Loading...
Resolution 5129B - Revising Amendment to Growth Policy 2020 - Highway 93 NorthReturn to Theresa White Kalispell City Clerk P.O. Box : 99 Kalispell., MT 5990 20062230t7�� RESOLUTION NO. A. RESOLUTION REVISING AN AMENDMENT TO THE KALISPELL GROWTH POLICY 2020, To BE KNOWN AS THE HIGHWAY 93 NORTH GROWTH POLICY AMENDMENT. WHEREAS, the Kalispell Growth Policy 2020 was originally adopted by the Kalispell City Council o February 1.8, 2003, and WHEREAS, the Kalispell Planning Board has been reviewing land use information, traffic; patterns, environmental constraints, and growth trends in the area north of Kalispell , and WHEREAS, the Planning Board has determined that it would be appropriate to expand the Growth Policy boundaries northerly to address increased development pressure and the need to promote order.y growth and development in this area, and WHEREAS, the area to be included in the amendment utilizes the Stillwater 'River as the western boundary, Church and Birch Grove Drives as the northern boundary, LaSalle to Rose Crossing over to the Flathead River as the eastern boundary, and Reserve Drive as the southern boundary, and generally includes Sections 13, 24, and 2 Township 29 North, Range 22 West, and Sections 15, 1.6, ,,1-8, 19, 20, 21 27, 28 2 , and 30 in Township ip 2 North, Range 21. West, P.M.M., Flathead County, Montana, and WHEREAS, on June 13, 2006, the Kalispell City planning Board held a public hearing, after due and proper notice, received public comment upon., and re 'i wed Kalispell Planning Department report KG -o -2, which evaluated the proposal based upon the goals and objectives of the Growth policy, the purpose of zoning and current circumstances in the planning j urisdiction, and WHEREAS, at the conclusion of said public hearing and after consideration of the proposed amen dr ent, the Kalispell City, planning Board adopted report KGPA-o - , as the findings of fact and recommended approval of the proposed Growth Policy amendment, and W. ERA # the City Council of the City of Kalispell, on July 3, 2006, passed Resolution 51.27, a Resolution of Intention to Adopt, Revise or .ject a Proposed Amendment to the Kalispell Growth Policy 2020 and called for a public hearing to be held on July 17, 2006, and WHEREAS, the City Council of the C1t of Kalispell, after due and proper notice, held a public hearing o July 17, 2006, and received public comment on the recommendations of the City planning 2006223 0'6- v .hoard and the Kalispell Planning Department report KGp -o -2, which evaluated the pro . proposal based upon the goals and objectives of the Growth Policy, the purpose of zoning and current circumstances in the planning jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, .S, the City Council of the City of Kalispell finds that it is in the best interest of the City to amend the Kalispell Growth policy 2020, and revise the recommendations of the City Planning Board by adopting as its findings the following: i based upon evidence and testimony provided, the current inventory of commercial use property within the growth policy area is inadequate to meet the demand for such property over the next fifteen years. Therefore, the area designated as KN-I should allow for up to % general commercial use to meet this demand. ii based upon evidence and testimony provided, the area designated as KN-I .is appropriately located for such general commercial uses as it is situated within close proximity to other existing general commercial uses, thereby meeting the purpose of focusing these commercial uses to a spec 'if area, and is also located in close proximity to the essential transportation routes that support such commercial uses. iii based upon evidence and testimony provided, because the area designated as KN-I is located along the gateway entrance of the H.igway 93 corridor, it should be developed as planned unit developments consistent with city ordinances so that the City may maintain the maximum ur amount of oversight of the land uses and the landowners may have some degree of flexibility to address the particularities of their projects. WHEREAS, in all other respects, not inconsistent with the above, the Council adopts the Kalispell .Manning Department report KGPA-05-2 as its findings of fact, and further Finds that it is in the best interests of the City to adopt said revised amendment to the Kalispell G row-th Policy 2020 as set forth in the attached Exhibit it "A"' consisting of text and map and including approximately 8,227 acres in the Potential Utility Service Area. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED Y THE CITY COUNCIL of THE CITY of KALISPELL, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That pursuant to Section -1- o ,SIC , the City Council of the City of Kalispell .erel y adopts the revised amendment t to the Kalispell Growth Policy 2020, said amendment more particularly set forth in attached Exhibit "A" consisting of text and map and including approximately y ,22 acres in the potential Utility Service Area and assigning an appropriate land use upon annexation to the city. SECTION U. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL IGNE BY THE MAYOR of THE CITY . oK ISPELL, THIS TI DAY of AUGUST, Zoo r, 'afn-ela B. Kenn ATTEST: Mayor Theresa White City Clerk REVISED ATTACHMENT B HIGHWAY 93 NORTH GROWTH POLICY AMENDMENT GOAL - 1: Gateway entrances to Kalispell that enhance the community through improved design. POLICIES: . Gateway Entrance Corridors(areas of special concern) would extend up to 150 feet of either side of the existing W for primary highways and up to 50 feet for secondary highways. 2. The following roadway corrfd ors are identified as gateway entrances to Kalispell. a. Highway North corridor north of Four Mile to the County Landfill. . US Highway 2 (LaSalle) from. Reserve Drive to Birch Grove c. Whitefish Stage from Reserve Drive to Birch Grove. (minor entrance way) 3. The following design standards are intended to enhance the gateway entrances to Kalispell a. Access control is important along the gateway entrance roads. . Access should be coordinated so as to allow only collector or arterial streets to intersect. The judicious use of right -in right -out approaches, frontage roads and good internal development street design should be the rule to reduce or eliminate the need for direct access onto major gateway roads. c. with the construction ction. of the Church Drive overpass on US 93, every effort must be taken to fully utilize this interchange and conversely limit direct access onto US 93 for at least % mile along areas north and south of this facility to avoid congestion points and the need for future traffic signals. The Judicious use of right -in right -out approaches, frontage roads and good internal development street design will mitigate the need for direct access out. d. Extra setbacks, buffering and landscaping along US Highway 93 North and US Highway 2 and to a lesser degree along Whitefish Stage Road are the norm. e. In those areas planned for general commercial development ent on a gateway entrance, it should occur as an integrated development utilizing and enhancing the property back from the gateway as opposed to occurring as a shallow linear strip. Significant individual business highway exposure, individual access points, and pole signage would not be the norm. out parcels of commercial businesses would e anticipated within the improved design of a PUD along the corridors. f. Additional design standards should be developed to ensure that signage enhances development, not detracts from it. Wall signage integrated into the overall building design is preferred over free standing signage. Monument signs are preferred over other types of free standing signage. Where development entrance signage or monument signage is proposed, it should be done so as past of a unified planned unit development concept. 200G223CI"W'�0 g. Where the adjacent gateway road speed is posted at 3 mph or lover: L A minimum 20 foot landscape buffer should be provided abutting the gateway road. 11 Street trees should be incorporated into the landscape buffer. HL A pedestrian trail or sidewalk should be incorporated into the landscapedbuffer area. iv. Four sided architecture would be the norm adjacent to gateway entrances. . where the adjacent gateway road speed is posted from 3 -- 45 mph: L A minimum of 40 feet of landscaped buffer area should be provided. ii. Street trees and terming should be incorporated into the landscaping. iii. A pedestrian trail or sidewalk should be incorporated into the landscaped buffer area. iv. Four sided architecture would be the norm adjacent to gateway entrances i. where the adjacent gateway road speed is posted above 45 r is i. A minimum too - 150 foot impact area should be provided for major entrances and a 50 foot entrance for minor entrances. ii, Within this impact area, a combination of berming, landscaping using live materials and trees as well as grass, a pedestrian trail system, limited parking and frontage roads should be incorporated. iii. Primary buildings should not be located in this impact area, unless specifically approved mn a PUD. iv. Four sided architecture should be the norm for development adjacent to the impacted area. V. Monument signs would be anticipated to occur in the rear portion o the impacted area, other free standing signs would not. vi. Whenever parking or s g .age is proposed in the impact area, it shall only be done under a PUD process where the impacts of these actions are anticipated and provided. for. Where smaller parcels can not meet the setback areas., a PUD will be utilized. 4. Neighborhood commercial should be used as a means to buffer key intersections and to meet immediate local reeds, not to servo as a destination shopping area.. . Neighborhood commercial areas would in turn be buffered from lover density and intensity residential areas through the use of higher density residential uses and office uses. . Pedestrian and trail systems should be incorporated into terming, landscaping, greenbelts, park areas and setback standards along gateway entrances to enhance or maintain the scenic value of the entrance corridor from public facilities, neighborhoods, schools and commercial services. GOAL - 2: The development of are integrated residential/ commercial neighborhood (Designated KN-1 on Growth Policy Map) between US 3 -Reserve Drive and 'whitefish Stage. ZOOG2230"6��O POLICIES 1, Development will be mixed use in mature creating an overall integrated neighborhood as opposed to a linear strip commercial development fronting the Gateway entrances. 2. Access onto the rna,or Gateway roads would be limited. 3. Development in this 600 acre site would typically e: a. Up to % general commercial, . Up to 25% urban mixed use area. c. Lip to 20% in various residential configurations. d . 1 % open space uses . Commercial activity would be generally distributed throughout the development designed to serve both the adjacent neighborhood as well as the greater community. . Development within the KN- I area will be required to be Presented to the Planning Board and the City Council in the form of a Planned Unit Development so that the impacts of this development can be planned for and if necessary mitigated through improved design.. GOAL - 3: Cooperate with Flathead county in the development of a transfer of development rights program. The emphasis should be to provide opportunities to conserve and protect important farmlands, sensitive lands (high ground water, flood plain, wetlands, and critical wildlifehabitat) and rural open. space. ADDITIONAL AMENDMENT li THE KALISPELL GROWTH POLICY MAP That the definition of the Urban Mixed Use Area. Category on the Kalispell Growth Policy Map be amended to remove the terms. "limited" in reference to commercial while keeping it in reference to industrial uses so that it reads, "Urban Mixed Use Area - Office, Residential, Commercial and Limited Industrial". ,dote: This amendment was to address the entire planning jurisdiction reap and not just the Highway 93 North Amendments, 1 1 1 WERE pillp pm - `::III►\�►ii � WE = ■1 a .�R- _wi : lull � 'nll�,. ' .�/.'►o!i!i+_a "ice ■ �I , � 11111111■11�1■■��a � � - IRE! I I I S _mom -- : INS ME ■N■ - • `�• MEN —dd MEEN W, ■ ilk, so .. :.ME, r