NSP1 Closeout Attachment CNeighborhood Stabilization Program I
Closeout Checklist
Attachment C
For the purposes of expediting the grant closeout process, Commerce has attached NSP tracking information
from Commerce files and asks that the grantees compare their internal records to the attached for confirmation
of activities undertaken, funds spent, properties impacted and individuals benef tied with NSP funding. Please
review the attached against your records and then submit the following checklist with applicable responses and
answers:
Jurisdiction Name: City of Kalispell Grant Number: MT-NSP-007-01-001
Official Contact Name: Katharine King Telephone Number: 406-758-7713
Email Address: kking@kalispell.com Fax Number: 406-758-7758
I . NSP Activities
(i) Describe all activities completed under the HERA, Recovery Act or Dodd -Frank Act (s)
or published Federal Register Notices?
List addresses and type of activity undertaken for each address benefitted by NSP funds.:
166 Barron Way
36%
10/26/2012
10/26/2032
906 Ashley Drive
110%
10/5/2012
10/5/2032
152 Barron Way
91%
11/2/2012
11/2/2032
316 Buttercup Loop
54%
8/29/2012
8/29/2032
713 Ashley Drive
90%
6/18/2012
6/18/2032
1896 Teal Drive
119%
9/27/2012
9/27/2032
2231 Widgeon Court
61%
8/20/2012
8/20/2032
2200 Ruddy Duck
76%
3/26/2012
3/26/2032
156 Quincy Loop
105%
9/27/2012
9/27/2032
2304 Merganser
56%
9/28/2012
9/28/2032
2154 Merganser
47%
7/1/2013
7/1/2033
119 Quincy Loop
49%
6/7/2013
6/7/2033
160 Lupine Drive
49%
5/21/2013
5/21/2033
49 Stratford
P 97%
2/1/2013
2/1/2033
262 Empire Loop
f 106%
3/8/2013
3/8/2033
**Sold as of 05/31/14, Final Contract
Draw Date
128 Empire Loop
i 116%
7/23/2014
7/23/2034
2218 S Woodland
1 62%
7/9/2014
7/9/2034
f 1958 Teal
68%
9/5/2014
9/5/2034
813 Ashley
95%
11/17/2014
11/17/2034
2183 Golden Eye
96%
11/20/2014
11/20/2034
118 Barron Way
86% 1/29/2015
1/29/2035
1 of 8
Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) Closeout Certification
Montana Departmenc of Commerce 2016
113 Meadow Court
56%
3/27/2015
3/27/2035
906 Ashley Drive
44%
4/29/2015
4/29/2035
116 Barron Way
43%
8/10/2015
8/10/2035
2160 Ruddy Duck
74%
7/15/2014
7/15/2034
1958 Teal - Repurchase
76%
6/15/2015
6/15/2035
1928 Camelot
60%
8/27/2015
8/27/2035
29 Honeysuckle
93%
11/12/2015
11/12/2035
42 Vanderbilt
55%
12/21/201S
12/21/2035
1942 Bluestone
43%
9/27/2016
9/27/2036
372 6th Ave W N
70%
6/3/2016
6/3/2036
1915 Darlington
48%
5/17/2016
5/17/2036
725 Ashley
86%
6/10/2016
6/10/2036
161 Hawthorn Ave
78%
6/28/2016
6/28/2036
122 Bing Court
80%
7/8/2016
7/8/2036
39 Rockefeller Drive
88%
7/28/2016
7/28/2036
**Sold as of 11/04/16
_
1934 Gardenway
363 Ponderosa ST.
1422 7th Ave. W 2B
111 Meadow Court
**Currently Available as of 11/04/16
2. Expenditures
(i) How much of the total 1) grant amount and 2) program income (to date) has been
expended on administration?
Was more than 5 percent of the grant amount and program income earned spent on
administration and planning?
Yes 0 No ❑ If no, explain:
(ii) How much of the total grant award benefitted individuals earning less than 50% area
median income to meet the 25% set aside requirement? 26%
Is there evidence that 25 percent set aside requirement has been met?
Yes ■ No ❑ If no, explain:
2of8
Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) Closeout Certification
Montana Department of Commerce 2016
i. 1)$131,786.00 2)$1 18,160.75
3. Activities eligible and meet a national objective
(i) Is there evidence that 100 percent of the grant amount principally benefitted persons of
low, moderate and middle income (individuals or families whose incomes do not exceed
120 ercent of AMI)?
Yes No ❑
(ii) List each address and associated income group served:
3of8
Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) Closeout Certification
Montana Department of Commerce 2016
(iii) Did tee use more than 10 percent of its NSP3 grant for demolition activities?
Yes f7i
No n N/A n If yes, dates) of waiver:
(iv) Are all NSP-assisted homes occupied by income -eligible residents?
Yes ■ No n If no, explain:
(v) Did all NSP-assisted rental units meet the "affordable rents" standards?
Yes 0 No 0 N/A ■ If no, explain:
(vi) Do all NSP-assisted units have appropriate mechanisms in place to ensure compliance
with the required minimum affordability period?
Yes ■ No
(vii) Do all rental projects meet the NSP proportional requirements of units occupied by
income -eligible households or the CDBG criteria in 24 CFR 570.208(a)(3)?
Yes No n N/A ■ If no, explain:
(xi) Does the grantee still have unused funds held in a Loan Loss Reserve?
Yes No N/A ■ If yes, explain:
(xii) NSP3 only — Did all gut rehabilitation or new construction of residential buildings up to
three stories meet or exceed the Energy Star Qualified New Homes Standard?
Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A If no, explain:
(iii) NSP3 only
(v) No rental units
(vii) No rental units
(xi) No Loan Loss Reserve
(xii) NSP3 only
4. Program Income
(i) Is there any program income on hand at the time the close out agreement is signed?
Yes ■ No
(ii) If yes, does the grantee understand that all rules and regulations that currently govern
NSP Program Income will continue to apply to the funds on hand at the time of
closeout?
■ 5of8
Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) Closeout Certification
Montana Department of Commerce 2016
(iii) Did E
tee use more than rcent of its NSP3 grant for demolition activities?
Yes No ❑ N/AIf yes, date(s) of waiver:
(iv) Are all NSP-assisted ho s occupied by income -eligible residents?
Yes 0 No ❑ if no, explain:
(v) Did all NSP-assisted rental units meet the "affordable rents" standards?
Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A M If no, explain:
(vi) Do all NSP-assisted units have appropriate mechanisms in place to ensure compliance
with the required minimum affordability period?
Yes E No ❑
(vii) Do all rental projects meet the NSP proportional requirements of units occupied by
income -eligible households or the CDSG criteria in 24 CFR 570.208(a)(3)?
Yes ❑ No 0 NIA 0 if no, explain:
(xi) Does the grantee still have unused funds held in a Loan Loss Reserve?
Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A alf yes, explain:
(xii) NSP3 only— Did all gut rehabilitation or new construction of residential buildings up to
threeones t or exc the Energy Star Qualified New Homes Standard?
Yes No NIA If no, explain:
(iii) NSP3 only��
(v) No rental units
(vii) No rental units
(xi) No Loan Loss Reserve
(xii) NSP3 only
4, Program Income
W Is there any pro am income on hand at the time the close out agreement is signed?
Yes N No
(ii) If yes, does the grantee understand that all rules and regulations that currently govern
NSP Program Income will continue to apply to the funds on hand at the time of
closeout?
® 0 5of8
Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) Closeout Ceruficat,on
Montana Department of Commerce 2016
Yes No
(iii) Is the program income plan executed and being carried out per NSP guidelines to
further activities in the grantees area?
Yes ■ No ❑
S. Monitoring and Audits
(i) Does the grantee currently have an audit being performed on its grant funds?
Yes ■ No ❑ If yes, explain:
(ii) Are there any o en Audit Findings?
Yes ❑ No If yes, explain:
(iii) Did Commerce monitor, review and or audit the grant sub recipient?
Yes No ❑ If yes, list date: per MDOC If no, explain:
(iv) Are Pere any o en Commerce monitoring findings?
Yes ❑ No If no, explain:
6. Reporting
(i) Was the final a final quarterly performance report (QPR) submitted to Commerce
current and accurate for overall activity of the grant?
Yes . No ❑ If no, explain:
(ii) Did the grantee report on the name, location, and contact information for each
property that an activity was carried out?
Yes ■ No ❑ If no, explain:
(iii) Does the grantee files, as a licable, indicate that the environmental review is complete?
Yes a No ❑ N/A If no, explain:
(iv) Did the grantee maintain sufficient documentation about the purchase and sale amounts
of each propert to ensure compliance with applicable NSP regulations?
Yes ■ No If no, explain:
(v) Does the grantee agree to comply with program income reporting on a bi-annual basis
to the Department of Commerce, per the approved program income plan?
Yes E No ❑
6of8
Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) Closeout Certification
Montana Department of Commerce 2016
7. Certifications
W Did the grantee adhere to all of the following certifications included in their NSP
application and contract?
Yes ■ No ❑ If no, explain:
7 of 8
Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) Closeout Certification
Montana Department of Commerce 2016
Local Governments or Nonprofit, Consortium (please check boxes)
Affirmative Furthering Fair Housing
IN
Anti -Displacement and Relocation Plan
FA
Anti -Lobbying
FA
Authority of Jurisdiction
FA
Consistency with Plan
FA
Acquisition and Relocation
rA
Section 3
Citizen Participation
FA
Following a Plan
IN
Use of Funds
Excessive Force
Compliance with Anti -Discrimination Laws
Compliance with Lead -Based Paint Procedures
Compliance with Laws
rN
Continued Affordability
Grantee
�--- ��
By: c7 i
Type a and ntee Authorized Representative's Signature Date
Doug Russell, Kalispell City Manager
8of8
Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) Closeout Certification
Montana Department of Commerce 2016