Loading...
05/07/04 Memo Airport Overlay ZoneCity of Kalispell Zoning Administrator 248 3'� Avenue East —Kalispell, MT 59901— Telephone (406) 758-7732 — Fax (406) 758-7739 J)_I__ U l ' • 1 TO: NARDA WI SON, TRI-CITY PLANNING OFFICE FROM: Pi SORENSEN, ZONING ADMINISTRATOR DATE: MAY 7, 2004 RE: AIRPORT OVERLAY ZONE Attached are a transmittal letter, a map containing 3 options for Airport Influence Zone boundaries, and a disk containing the text for the airport overlay zone, all of which were recently sent by Phil Porrini of Peccia & Associates. The disk does not include the maps which attach to the text, but I believe you should already have a copy of those. Knot, let me know and I will get some for you. At this point, I think that most of the issues have been resolved. We may want to look closely at the language related to the county, particularly where the City Board of Adjustment would handle variances in the county. While that provides some cohesion throughout the zone and provides some measure of control to the City in the county areas around the airport, I'm not sure that we could extend the Board's authority outside of our jurisdictional area even if the County signed off on it. Politically, I think we may be asking for trouble. The bottom line for me is that it may be better to have the County handle its jurisdictional area and for us to handle ours. The other area which may need to be addressed is the Real Estate Disclosure Statement. The transmittal letter discusses various options. It is my feeling that requiring the disclosure for properties directly affected by height limitations due to various protective surfaces (i.e. those properties where the maximum allowable height under the airport regulations is less than the allowable height under zoning, typically 40 feet) would be a good balance. As we discussed earlier, public notice requirements as the proposal is moved through the planning process may be significant, and may include hiring a title company to put together a property owners list. Chris stated that the airport budget should pay for it. If we promptly move it through, there is some grant money available to us that we will become eligible for. There is a possibility that some of those funds could be used to reimburse those expenses. At some point, probably before the public hearing at the Planning Board, it would be helpful to have a joint work session for the Board and the Council with Phil Porrini so that everyone can better understand the complexities involved. I know you are busy over there right now, but it would be great if we could move this through the process as soon as we reasonably can. Is the July or August planning board meeting possible? Please let me know what you anticipate for a timetable and whether there is anything else you need. Thanks! Cc: Chris Kukulski; Patti Heath