02-09-211
AGENDA
KALISPELL CITY PLANNING BOARD AND ZONING COMMISSION TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 2021 The Kalispell City Planning Board and Zoning Commission will hold a WORK
SESSION beginning at 6:00 p.m. at the Kalispell City Council Chambers, 201 1st Avenue East, Kalispell.
WORK SESSION AGENDA
The Agenda for the work session will be:
A. Call to Order and Roll Call
B. Hear the Public – The public may comment on any matter not on the agenda.
(Comments are typically held to 3 minutes or less.)
C. Work Session:
1. Downtown Historic District Standards
2. Growth Policy Map Amendments
Next Meeting: March 9, 2021
Development Services Department 201 1st Avenue East Kalispell, MT 59901 Phone: (406) 758-7940 Fax: (406) 758-7739 www.kalispell.com/planning
REPORT TO: Kalispell City Planning Board
FROM: Rachel Ezell, Kalispell Planning Department SUBJECT: Downtown Historic District Design Standards DATE: January 9, 2020 (Work session)
BACKGROUND: The Downtown Business Improvement District (BID) received a grant from the Montana Main Street Program in 2020 to hire a consultant to develop design standards for the historic downtown Kalispell, an effort supported by the Downtown Plan. A&E Architects
was awarded the contract in September 2020 and since then staff has been working with A&E to determine the boundaries and develop design standards for Kalispell’s historic commercial area. Initial public input was sought via a public survey that was sent via mail to 148 property owners within the boundary of the proposed Downtown Historic District Overlay with online access
made available to the general public via the City website, social media accounts, and distributed
by the BID and Chamber of Commerce. The survey was open between October 22nd to November 19th and we received 58 total responses, 30 of which were from property owners within the Downtown Historic District Overlay boundaries. While the survey results showed a strong consensus that historic buildings are an asset to the city; responses varied as to what
direction the city should take to preserving the character of historic buildings, ranging from doing nothing to providing tax incentives and grants to support building owners, and establishing architectural design standards. With the survey results and the professional assistance of A&E, a set of draft design standards
was developed which follows historic preservation principles and includes standards found in
ordinances across Montana and the nation. While all new construction and major remodeling of commercial buildings is currently subject to Architectural Review Committee review and approval, these design standards established as part of the Zoning Ordinance would provide specific standards that commercial buildings in the proposed Downtown Historic District would
have to adhere to or demonstrate alternative compliance that meets the intent of the regulations. The design standards were developed with the understanding that the majority of the contributing historic buildings, buildings that were built at least 50 years ago and maintain a high degree of historic integrity, are found within the Main Street Historic District. The Main Street Historic
District was listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1994 at the direction of City
Council and expanded in 2010 after re-evaluation indicated, “of the district’s 77 buildings, nearly
75 percent (56) are contributing elements and therefore make a positive contribution to the district’s historic character.” While the surrounding commercial area has fewer “contributing
buildings”, the area exhibits common themes found in historic settlement patterns, such as street-
facing buildings with minimal or zero setbacks that focus on the pedestrian experience as much as automobile access. In order to preserve the unique characteristics of downtown without over-regulating buildings in an inappropriate way, the design standards are broken into two subsections: one set of standards that applies to all properties within the Downtown Historic District Overlay and focuses on pedestrian-friendly urban site design and an additional set of
standards that would apply to buildings within the Main Street Historic District that focus on historic architectural form, material and colors reflective of Kalispell’s period of significance (1891-1960).
A first draft of the proposed design standards was reviewed by the BID on February 2nd and the
draft is scheduled for review by the Architectural Review Committee on February 9th for their feedback. Questions for the Planning Board: 1. Do the proposed design standards achieve the goal of preserving the historic character of
downtown Kalispell while allowing sufficient flexibility for innovative design and creativity. 2. Is the application of color and material standards for buildings in the Main Street Historic District appropriate and should review by ARC of aesthetic changes not requiring a
building permit (e.g. paint, replacement of windows, awnings, siding, wall murals, etc.)
be required in this subdistrict? 3. Is there any information or amendments needed in order to be able to make a recommendation to the City Council on this proposal? RECOMMENDATION: Direct staff to proceed with a formal text amendment process to
consider design standards for the historic commercial downtown. Attachments: Proposed zoning text amendment Survey results
Historic Downtown Kalispell Design Standards
1 / 41
100.00%55
0.00%0
100.00%55
0.00%0
0.00%0
0.00%0
0.00%0
0.00%0
100.00%55
90.91%50
Q1 Contact Information
Answered: 55 Skipped: 4
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Contact Person
Company
Property Address
Address 2
City/Town
State/Province
ZIP/Postal Code
Country
Email Address
Phone Number
Historic Downtown Kalispell Design Standards
2 / 41
#CONTACT PERSON DATE
1 Jaimie Day 11/19/2020 3:36 PM
2 Ellery Luikens 11/19/2020 2:27 PM
3 Kenneth Yarus 11/19/2020 1:59 PM
4 Diane Yarus 11/19/2020 1:45 PM
5 Kim Love - mailed 11/19/2020 9:59 AM
6 Susanne Wigginton 11/19/2020 12:27 AM
7 Deborah Brown - mailed 11/16/2020 4:10 PM
8 Mont Peters - mailed 11/16/2020 4:05 PM
9 Hans Axelsen - mailed 11/16/2020 3:56 PM
10 Pamela James - mailed 11/16/2020 3:12 PM
11 Rosella Mosteller - mailed 11/16/2020 3:04 PM
12 Fran Tabor - mailed 11/16/2020 2:41 PM
13 Lisa Anderson - mailed 11/16/2020 2:25 PM
14 Ken Yachechak - mailed 11/16/2020 2:15 PM
15 Marc Weinberg - mailed 11/16/2020 2:01 PM
16 Mark Bratz - mailed 11/16/2020 1:45 PM
17 Sean Hinchey - mailed 11/16/2020 1:30 PM
18 Lynn Wallace - mailed 11/16/2020 1:26 PM
19 John Hinchey - mailed 11/16/2020 1:23 PM
20 Lori Bryden - mailed 11/16/2020 1:07 PM
21 Tamara Williams - mailed 11/16/2020 10:51 AM
22 Judy Eichhorn/Michael Blend - Mailed 11/16/2020 10:39 AM
23 Sarah or Larry - mailed 11/16/2020 10:33 AM
24 Ben White 11/15/2020 12:40 PM
25 Cindy Doll 11/8/2020 8:31 PM
26 Anastasia Grasma 11/4/2020 12:28 PM
27 Bryce Baker 11/2/2020 2:38 PM
28 Kisa Davison 11/1/2020 8:18 AM
29 Noelle Barr 10/30/2020 10:37 PM
30 Britta Joy 10/30/2020 12:15 PM
31 Diane Medler 10/30/2020 12:05 PM
32 McKenna Flannigan 10/28/2020 6:27 PM
33 Carol Mitch 10/28/2020 6:11 PM
34 Carol Mitch 10/28/2020 5:34 PM
35 Ronald Cebulla 10/28/2020 10:22 AM
36 Tessa Heck 10/28/2020 10:19 AM
37 Terri Cebulla 10/28/2020 10:10 AM
Historic Downtown Kalispell Design Standards
3 / 41
38 judith Pressmar 10/28/2020 9:48 AM
39 Darcy Thomas 10/28/2020 8:43 AM
40 Jemina Watstein 10/27/2020 9:08 AM
41 Shane Jacobs 10/26/2020 3:51 PM
42 Colleen McGuire 10/24/2020 8:38 AM
43 John Barr 10/24/2020 8:31 AM
44 Amber Roper 10/23/2020 10:13 PM
45 Zach George 10/23/2020 4:49 PM
46 Jennifer Roche 10/23/2020 4:35 PM
47 Dustin Leftridge 10/23/2020 3:33 PM
48 Jacob Thomas 10/23/2020 1:32 PM
49 Matt Banks 10/23/2020 12:45 PM
50 Katie Banks 10/23/2020 12:37 PM
51 George Giavasis 10/22/2020 4:39 PM
52 Susan Miller 10/22/2020 4:16 PM
53 Connie Behe, Director 10/22/2020 4:00 PM
54 Jana roach 10/22/2020 3:55 PM
55 Susan Munsinger 10/22/2020 3:33 PM
#COMPANY DATE
There are no responses.
Historic Downtown Kalispell Design Standards
4 / 41
#PROPERTY ADDRESS DATE
1 528 3rd Ave. W 11/19/2020 3:36 PM
2 716 2nd Avenue West 11/19/2020 2:27 PM
3 425 Ponderosa Lane 11/19/2020 1:59 PM
4 294 2nd Ave WN 11/19/2020 1:45 PM
5 237 Main St 11/19/2020 9:59 AM
6 502 3rd Ave E 11/19/2020 12:27 AM
7 340 S Main St 11/16/2020 4:10 PM
8 337 1st Ave E 11/16/2020 4:05 PM
9 214 1st Ave W 11/16/2020 3:56 PM
10 124 Main St 11/16/2020 3:12 PM
11 46 3rd Ave E 11/16/2020 3:04 PM
12 15 2nd Ave W/140 W Center St 11/16/2020 2:41 PM
13 139 Main St 11/16/2020 2:25 PM
14 35 Main St/38 1st Ave E 11/16/2020 2:15 PM
15 111 1st Ave E 11/16/2020 2:01 PM
16 426/428/430 1st Ave W 11/16/2020 1:45 PM
17 705 Main St 11/16/2020 1:30 PM
18 344 2nd Ave East 11/16/2020 1:26 PM
19 118/120/136/140 Main St 11/16/2020 1:23 PM
20 330 1st Ave W 11/16/2020 1:07 PM
21 131 Main St 11/16/2020 10:51 AM
22 424 Main St 11/16/2020 10:39 AM
23 310 Main St 11/16/2020 10:33 AM
24 305 Salish Court 11/15/2020 12:40 PM
25 32059 Ridge View Circle 11/8/2020 8:31 PM
26 Destiny lane, Kalispell 11/4/2020 12:28 PM
27 755 Treeline Rd 11/2/2020 2:38 PM
28 30 Fourth St. East 11/1/2020 8:18 AM
29 100 Main Street 10/30/2020 10:37 PM
30 250 Old Reserve Drive, Kalispell, MT 59901 10/30/2020 12:15 PM
31 15 Depot Park, Kalispell 10/30/2020 12:05 PM
32 143 Blasdel Lane, Kalispell MT 59901 10/28/2020 6:27 PM
33 143 Blasdel Lane 10/28/2020 6:11 PM
34 143 Blasdel Lane 10/28/2020 5:34 PM
35 440 6th Avenue East 10/28/2020 10:22 AM
36 612 3rd Ave E 10/28/2020 10:19 AM
37 440 6th Avenue East 10/28/2020 10:10 AM
Historic Downtown Kalispell Design Standards
5 / 41
38 POB 2063 10/28/2020 9:48 AM
39 612 Sylvan Ct 10/28/2020 8:43 AM
40 149 Main St, Kalispell 10/27/2020 9:08 AM
41 36 2nd St E 10/26/2020 3:51 PM
42 405 3rd Ave E 10/24/2020 8:38 AM
43 100 Main Street 10/24/2020 8:31 AM
44 35 S Main Street 10/23/2020 10:13 PM
45 136 2nd St W 10/23/2020 4:49 PM
46 116 Columbia Ave Whitefish MT 10/23/2020 4:35 PM
47 345 1st Ave E 10/23/2020 3:33 PM
48 124 2nd Avenue East 10/23/2020 1:32 PM
49 725 2nd Ave W 10/23/2020 12:45 PM
50 725 2nd Ave W 10/23/2020 12:37 PM
51 136 2nd st west 10/22/2020 4:39 PM
52 120 Main St 10/22/2020 4:16 PM
53 247 1st Ave E 10/22/2020 4:00 PM
54 136 S Main St 10/22/2020 3:55 PM
55 48 MAIN ST 10/22/2020 3:33 PM
#ADDRESS 2 DATE
There are no responses.
#CITY/TOWN DATE
There are no responses.
#STATE/PROVINCE DATE
There are no responses.
#ZIP/POSTAL CODE DATE
There are no responses.
#COUNTRY DATE
There are no responses.
Historic Downtown Kalispell Design Standards
6 / 41
#EMAIL ADDRESS DATE
1 jaimiemday@gmail.com 11/19/2020 3:36 PM
2 elletetrault@gmail.com 11/19/2020 2:27 PM
3 kennethyarus@gmail.com 11/19/2020 1:59 PM
4 diane@airworksmt.com 11/19/2020 1:45 PM
5 coinscarats@gmail.com 11/19/2020 9:59 AM
6 susanneday@gmail.com 11/19/2020 12:27 AM
7 d@tournesolmt.com 11/16/2020 4:10 PM
8 montpeters@hotmail.com 11/16/2020 4:05 PM
9 salesandinfo@wheatoncycle.com 11/16/2020 3:56 PM
10 pamjames2@gmail.com 11/16/2020 3:12 PM
11 mostellerphotos@gmail.com 11/16/2020 3:04 PM
12 frantabor@gmail.com 11/16/2020 2:41 PM
13 lisapoler@gmail.com 11/16/2020 2:25 PM
14 j22racr@hotmail.com 11/16/2020 2:15 PM
15 marc@weinberg.us 11/16/2020 2:01 PM
16 south-frk@yahoo.com 11/16/2020 1:45 PM
17 s.hinchey@hincheyandhinchey.com 11/16/2020 1:30 PM
18 lwallace444@gmail.com 11/16/2020 1:26 PM
19 hinchey@montanasky.net 11/16/2020 1:23 PM
20 vfw2007@bresnan.net 11/16/2020 1:07 PM
21 tam@instyprintsmt.com 11/16/2020 10:51 AM
22 judymayf@hotmail.com 11/16/2020 10:39 AM
23 music1workshop@gmail.com 11/16/2020 10:33 AM
24 benwhite22@gmail.com 11/15/2020 12:40 PM
25 ccmthome@gmail.com 11/8/2020 8:31 PM
26 stacygrasma@hotmail.com 11/4/2020 12:28 PM
27 kalispell@myplacehotels.com 11/2/2020 2:38 PM
28 kisadavison@gmail.com 11/1/2020 8:18 AM
29 Kalispellgrandhotel@gmail.com 10/30/2020 10:37 PM
30 britta.joy@marriott.com 10/30/2020 12:15 PM
31 diane@discoverkalispell.com 10/30/2020 12:05 PM
32 kennaroseflannigan@gmail.com 10/28/2020 6:27 PM
33 mitch59914@gmail.com 10/28/2020 6:11 PM
34 mitch59914@gmail.com 10/28/2020 5:34 PM
35 rjcaudio@gmail.com 10/28/2020 10:22 AM
36 tessa@lcstaffing.com 10/28/2020 10:19 AM
37 terric250@gmail.com 10/28/2020 10:10 AM
Historic Downtown Kalispell Design Standards
7 / 41
38 jpress@centurytel.net 10/28/2020 9:48 AM
39 darcy424@gmail.com 10/28/2020 8:43 AM
40 execdirector@kalicoartcenter.com 10/27/2020 9:08 AM
41 sjacobs@ae.design 10/26/2020 3:51 PM
42 montanaorphans@aol.com 10/24/2020 8:38 AM
43 johnhbarrjr@gmail.com 10/24/2020 8:31 AM
44 amber@naturebabyoutfitter.com 10/23/2020 10:13 PM
45 zach@workadaydesign.com 10/23/2020 4:49 PM
46 jrochewfish@hotmail.com 10/23/2020 4:35 PM
47 dleftridge@mcgarveylaw.com 10/23/2020 3:33 PM
48 museum@nwmthistory.org 10/23/2020 1:32 PM
49 banksfamilymt@gmail.com 10/23/2020 12:45 PM
50 katiebanks555@gmail.com 10/23/2020 12:37 PM
51 george@highlinemt.com 10/22/2020 4:39 PM
52 smiller@bigsky.net 10/22/2020 4:16 PM
53 cbehe@imagineiflibraries.org 10/22/2020 4:00 PM
54 janalynnroach@gmail.com 10/22/2020 3:55 PM
55 spmunsinger@outlook.com 10/22/2020 3:33 PM
Historic Downtown Kalispell Design Standards
8 / 41
#PHONE NUMBER DATE
1 (949)350-6300 11/19/2020 3:36 PM
2 4062610343 11/19/2020 2:27 PM
3 4062490165 11/19/2020 1:59 PM
4 406-751-2175 11/19/2020 1:45 PM
5 406-752-2646 11/19/2020 9:59 AM
6 406-249-9944 11/16/2020 4:10 PM
7 406-257-5808 11/16/2020 3:56 PM
8 808-633-6203 11/16/2020 3:12 PM
9 406-212-6545 11/16/2020 3:04 PM
10 406-212-9491 11/16/2020 2:41 PM
11 406-250-5994 11/16/2020 2:25 PM
12 972-505-3138 11/16/2020 2:01 PM
13 406-253-3036 11/16/2020 1:45 PM
14 406-756-7004 11/16/2020 1:30 PM
15 406-755-6477 11/16/2020 1:26 PM
16 406-261-9494 11/16/2020 1:23 PM
17 406-752-2611 11/16/2020 1:07 PM
18 406-752-8812 11/16/2020 10:51 AM
19 831-214-2251 11/16/2020 10:39 AM
20 406-890-3366 11/16/2020 10:33 AM
21 8177076625 11/15/2020 12:40 PM
22 4062495312 11/8/2020 8:31 PM
23 5055069027 11/4/2020 12:28 PM
24 4068686586 11/2/2020 2:38 PM
25 406-471-1232 11/1/2020 8:18 AM
26 7132025949 10/30/2020 10:37 PM
27 406-314-6600 10/30/2020 12:15 PM
28 406-758-2808 10/30/2020 12:05 PM
29 4064076551 10/28/2020 6:27 PM
30 4062491847 10/28/2020 6:11 PM
31 4062491847 10/28/2020 5:34 PM
32 4068711712 10/28/2020 10:22 AM
33 4068717993 10/28/2020 10:10 AM
34 4064078263 10/28/2020 8:43 AM
35 609-591-7455 10/27/2020 9:08 AM
36 4063007528 10/26/2020 3:51 PM
37 4064070078 10/24/2020 8:38 AM
Historic Downtown Kalispell Design Standards
9 / 41
38 832-868-1693 10/24/2020 8:31 AM
39 4063146464 10/23/2020 10:13 PM
40 4062122105 10/23/2020 4:49 PM
41 406-871-6963 10/23/2020 4:35 PM
42 752-5566 10/23/2020 3:33 PM
43 4067568381 10/23/2020 1:32 PM
44 4063800686 10/23/2020 12:45 PM
45 4062395572 10/23/2020 12:37 PM
46 4068386498 10/22/2020 4:39 PM
47 406-471-2634 10/22/2020 4:16 PM
48 406-758-5824 10/22/2020 4:00 PM
49 2089404823 10/22/2020 3:55 PM
50 14067565818 10/22/2020 3:33 PM
Historic Downtown Kalispell Design Standards
10 / 41
Q2 Business Name (Downtown Kalispell business owners)
Answered: 36 Skipped: 23
Historic Downtown Kalispell Design Standards
11 / 41
#RESPONSES DATE
1 Kalispell 11/19/2020 2:27 PM
2 AirWorks, Inc 11/19/2020 1:45 PM
3 Coins and Carats 11/19/2020 9:59 AM
4 AM Main LLC 11/16/2020 4:10 PM
5 Best Insurance 11/16/2020 4:05 PM
6 Wheatons Cycle 11/16/2020 3:56 PM
7 Rental 11/16/2020 3:12 PM
8 Mosteller Photos 11/16/2020 3:04 PM
9 A-1 Vacuum 11/16/2020 2:41 PM
10 Depot Park Partners LLC 11/16/2020 2:15 PM
11 Weinberg LLC 11/16/2020 2:01 PM
12 Bratz CPA & Residential Rental 11/16/2020 1:45 PM
13 Hinchey & Hinchey PC 11/16/2020 1:30 PM
14 Glacier Park VFW Post #2252 and Lounge 11/16/2020 1:07 PM
15 Insty Prints 11/16/2020 10:51 AM
16 Colter Coffee 11/16/2020 10:39 AM
17 Music One Workshop 11/16/2020 10:33 AM
18 Polson 11/8/2020 8:31 PM
19 Straight Blast Gym 11/1/2020 8:18 AM
20 Kalispell Grand Hotel 10/30/2020 10:37 PM
21 Kalispell Chamber/Convention & Visitor Bureau 10/30/2020 12:05 PM
22 Kalispell 10/28/2020 10:22 AM
23 Kalispell 10/28/2020 9:48 AM
24 Kalico 10/27/2020 9:08 AM
25 A&E Architects 10/26/2020 3:51 PM
26 Kalispell Grand Hotel 10/24/2020 8:31 AM
27 Nature Baby Outfitter 10/23/2020 10:13 PM
28 Workaday Design LLP 10/23/2020 4:49 PM
29 McGarvey Law 10/23/2020 3:33 PM
30 Northwest Montana Historical Society 10/23/2020 1:32 PM
31 Kalispell 10/23/2020 12:45 PM
32 Highline Brand Studio 10/22/2020 4:39 PM
33 Sassafras 10/22/2020 4:16 PM
34 Kalispell 10/22/2020 4:00 PM
35 Honey Home 10/22/2020 3:55 PM
36 Western Outdoor 10/22/2020 3:33 PM
Historic Downtown Kalispell Design Standards
12 / 41
35.29%12
26.47%9
0.00%0
0.00%0
38.24%13
Q3 Type of business
Answered: 34 Skipped: 25
TOTAL 34
Office
Retail
Financial
Manufacturing
Other (please
specify)
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Office
Retail
Financial
Manufacturing
Other (please specify)
Historic Downtown Kalispell Design Standards
13 / 41
#OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)DATE
1 Office /HVAC shop 11/19/2020 1:45 PM
2 fine art photography 11/16/2020 3:04 PM
3 Fraternal Organization/Lounge 11/16/2020 1:07 PM
4 Coffee Shop 11/16/2020 10:39 AM
5 Martial Arts, Yoga, Fitness 11/1/2020 8:18 AM
6 Hotel 10/30/2020 10:37 PM
7 NY 10/28/2020 10:22 AM
8 non-profit community art center 10/27/2020 9:08 AM
9 Hospitality/office/retail 10/24/2020 8:31 AM
10 Architectural Design and Interior Design 10/23/2020 4:49 PM
11 Non-profit Museum/ Education 10/23/2020 1:32 PM
12 n/a 10/23/2020 12:45 PM
13 Public Library 10/22/2020 4:00 PM
Historic Downtown Kalispell Design Standards
14 / 41
76.92%30
23.08%9
Q4 Do you OWN the property at this address or do you RENT the space?
Answered: 39 Skipped: 20
TOTAL 39
Own
Rent
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Own
Rent
Historic Downtown Kalispell Design Standards
15 / 41
Q5 What makes Downtown Kalispell unique to you and worth preserving?
Answered: 50 Skipped: 9
Historic Downtown Kalispell Design Standards
16 / 41
#RESPONSES DATE
1 Go anywhere in the world where there is an historic town square or, in our case, a circle, and
tell me if the people don't cherish their connection to their town. Flags hanging, holiday
decorations gleaming, 4th of July parades rousing the citizens down Main Street, this all brings
pride of belonging to the "neighborhood" that can't be duplicated with new planned
communities.
11/19/2020 3:36 PM
2 Old brick buildings once gone can never come back with the original character. The shape and
style of them are pleasing to the eye and timeless.
11/19/2020 1:59 PM
3 The older brick buildings, walkable continuous sidewalks 11/19/2020 1:45 PM
4 Unique in its shopping and is the heart of Kalispell 11/19/2020 9:59 AM
5 The incredible architecture, enduring charm of Main St., the quaint small town feeling and
notable historic significance.
11/19/2020 12:27 AM
6 historic buildings 11/16/2020 4:10 PM
7 Kalispell is beautiful and it's important to make sure it maintains it's historic value 11/16/2020 4:05 PM
8 beautiful architecture, history, unique mix of retail, breweries, restaurants, etc.11/16/2020 3:56 PM
9 geographic location 11/16/2020 3:12 PM
10 The history and community Kalispell exemplifies 11/16/2020 3:04 PM
11 sidewalks to DT area not maintained and in many places non-existent, sidewalks to an area
increases pedestrian traffic
11/16/2020 2:41 PM
12 natural assets, inventory of historical buildings, county seat, DT is heart and soul of
community
11/16/2020 2:25 PM
13 Traffic flows/parking w/ locally owned businesses 11/16/2020 2:15 PM
14 Beyond DT's architecture and historic significance, the fact is that the DT area creates (or can
create) a critical mass of activities are concentrated. This concentration facilitates business,
learning and cultural exchange.
11/16/2020 2:01 PM
15 Historical character 11/16/2020 1:30 PM
16 Historic Buildings 11/16/2020 1:23 PM
17 Lots of different trades represented which encourages walking and browsing. Newer
businesses located in Hutton Ranch are convenient but lack in character.
11/16/2020 1:07 PM
18 The rich history and legacy it provides, as the beginning of notable commerce in Kalispell 11/16/2020 10:51 AM
19 Historic vibe, hometown feel 11/16/2020 10:39 AM
20 Being from Phoenix originally I love the history and vintage buildings. Makes me sad when I
find out what's already gone.
11/8/2020 8:31 PM
21 The old Historic Beautiful buildings.11/4/2020 12:28 PM
22 Walkability of shopping/restaurants and a small town local "flair"11/2/2020 2:38 PM
23 The lives we live today is built on the work, enjoyment, and love of generations past. Seeing
the eras of times past built alongside each other shows the respect we have for different
perspectives and motivations for living.
11/1/2020 8:18 AM
24 The Character of most of the buildings fall into the period when Kalispell and Glacier was
booming with new development. It is almost like a time capsule.
10/30/2020 10:37 PM
25 The historic ambiance of our downtown area.10/30/2020 12:15 PM
26 Well preserved historic buildings that house current types of businesses that provide services
and amenities for both residents and visitors.
10/30/2020 12:05 PM
27 It's history, architecture, talent, and proximity to some of the most beautiful places on earth.10/28/2020 6:27 PM
28 The brick storefronts, the sculptures on RMO, Valley Bank, Western Outfitters, locally owned 10/28/2020 6:11 PM
Historic Downtown Kalispell Design Standards
17 / 41
businesses, interiors with tin ceilings, original woodwork.
29 The brick storefronts, the sculptures on RMO, Valley Bank, Western Outfitters, locally owned
businesses, interiors with tin ceilings, original woodwork.
10/28/2020 5:34 PM
30 As always its proven that grid style layouts are timeless and provide endless variety to a
business core. The traditional layout is unique with storefronts creating warmth and unique
business marketing displays with window displays. Also the surrounding residential
neighborhoods are convenient for pedestrians to walk to their favorite businesses. Kalispell's
core has so much potential for density and
10/28/2020 10:22 AM
31 I love Main Street and all the businesses who reside down there.10/28/2020 10:19 AM
32 There is so much history in downtown Kalispell. I grew up in Kalispell and it's sad to me to see
so many buildings empty. It should be the core of downtown and it should be protected.
10/28/2020 10:10 AM
33 Kalispell has a number of historic buildings in the downtown which give it character. Studies
have found that places that have maintained their historic character are more attractive to
resident shoppers and tourists. They tend to have higher property values which adds to the tax
base. I would not want to live in a city that could be Anywhere USA.
10/28/2020 9:48 AM
34 Downtown Kalispell is not that different from when I was a kid here in the 60s. Great old-
fashioned downtown that is very walkable. Some wonderful businesses that have been around
forever such as Norms News. It looks cohesive and has great appeal with the courthouse at
the end. It feels like a bit of history that is worth caring for especially in a world where there is
so much modern that is less interesting.
10/28/2020 8:43 AM
35 The fantastic histories of each building.10/27/2020 9:08 AM
36 Love the density, the history, the center of commerce, the potential for the future.10/26/2020 3:51 PM
37 Each building front has individual style; it is walkable; and I can't imagine how it could be
improved/
10/24/2020 8:38 AM
38 The historic architecture, the walkability, and the combination of unique local (non-chain)
businesses are critical to Kalispell preserving its unique character as a town and developing
into a tourist destination in its own right and not merely a pass-through to Whitefish and the
parks and a commercial center.
10/24/2020 8:31 AM
39 Great walking and shopping district. Unique stores you won't find up in north Kalispell big box
zone.
10/23/2020 10:13 PM
40 I want to see downtown Kalispell succeed because it is seemingly the downtown of much of
the working class of the Flathead Valley who actually live here full time.
10/23/2020 4:49 PM
41 what I love about Kalispell is its HISTORIC downtown. The brick work, the architecture, etc.10/23/2020 4:35 PM
42 With the prevalence of big box retail stores, it is imperative to maintain a walkable downtown
where people can live, shop, work and recreate without having to drive. Many of us live around
downtown Kalispell so we can walk to work.
10/23/2020 3:33 PM
43 Love the architecture, the benches, garbage receptacles, flowers, etc.10/23/2020 2:26 PM
44 Kalispell's historic downtown tells the story of the growth of the town and the region. The
historic depot, grain elevators, and other warehouse buildings along the railroad tracks
preserve a time that is left to history books but tells an important story about the human spirit
and innovation. The historic downtown buildings (the ones remaining, that is) have been the
products of adaptive reuse throughout the years and have new been converted to new uses
while retaining their character.
10/23/2020 1:32 PM
45 I have lived in a number of small towns in Montana, Seeley Lake, Lewistown, and Victor to be
precise. Of those towns, Lewistown and Kalispell are my favorite. The downtown atmosphere,
aesthetic, and feel are a huge reason for that. The other two towns, while nice towns on the
whole, really lack in "feel". There is not a "center" or "hub" to the towns. Both Lewistown and
Kalispell have both. The old buildings, the store fronts, and the small local businesses in them
are the heart beat of the two towns and every effort should be put forth to maintain that.
10/23/2020 12:45 PM
46 I grew up here and have always appreciated the look and welcoming feel of the downtown
businesses. Our historical buildings are part of what give that welcoming feeling and are unique
to our town.
10/23/2020 12:37 PM
Historic Downtown Kalispell Design Standards
18 / 41
47 Downtown is the only part of our valley built for dense, mixed commercial and residential use.10/22/2020 4:39 PM
48 Kalispell has a lot of history and I feel blessed to have Sassafras in a beautifully restored
building. It has character and is a great showcase to represent 60 artisans.
10/22/2020 4:16 PM
49 The character! You cannot recreate that brick and wood floor with a new build 😍10/22/2020 3:55 PM
50 Uniqueness, walkable, variety, small town feel and FRIENDLY!10/22/2020 3:33 PM
Historic Downtown Kalispell Design Standards
19 / 41
96.43%54
3.57%2
Q6 Do you think historic buildings are an important asset of the City?
Answered: 56 Skipped: 3
TOTAL 56
Yes
No
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Yes
No
Historic Downtown Kalispell Design Standards
20 / 41
#WHY?DATE
1 Having been in the design business most of my life, I know first hand that you can't duplicate
the emotional depth and charm of age. If designed well to begin with - historic buildings
become treasures that link us to a past worth recalling and worth building lives around today.
11/19/2020 3:36 PM
2 They tell a story which helps build an identity for the town and its people. The aesthetics are
also valuable and in my opinion are more beautiful than newer buildings. Check out the
documentary called "why beauty matters" by Roger Scruton
11/19/2020 1:59 PM
3 They represent our history and provide charm and character that is not available in new
construction.
11/19/2020 1:45 PM
4 They are unique and make downtown special 11/19/2020 9:59 AM
5 The quality of craftsmanship is unmatched, and the legacy of the early residents and business
owners is vital to a varied and thriving community. It also attracts people from all over who
seek old world charm and a unique departure from average communities throughout the USA.
11/19/2020 12:27 AM
6 generates interest to those that visit, keeps the community alive through time 11/16/2020 3:04 PM
7 Neutral - sometimes all historic sasy is "cute, tourist trap, nice for gifts and over priced, or for
dining (upper class) but nothing practical or family friendly
11/16/2020 2:41 PM
8 GOOD FOR PEOPLE STICKING AROUND, SOMETHING INTERESTING TO DO AND
LEARN
11/16/2020 2:25 PM
9 new and updated bring in new businesses rather than trying to retrofit older outdated facilities 11/16/2020 2:15 PM
10 timeless in character, important function in history and are not necessarily functionally
obsolete, should be charming yet economically functional
11/16/2020 2:01 PM
11 There is little value, people go DT to shop, live or do business because of the services offered
there, not because of cool old looking buildings
11/16/2020 1:45 PM
12 I like the courthouse and the look of the historic buildings but don't necessarily want all
buildings to look (be) historic.
11/16/2020 1:26 PM
13 Draws tourists, unique, historical 11/16/2020 1:23 PM
14 Visitors love walking and browsing, great special features on some of our buildings, people
remember fondly
11/16/2020 1:07 PM
15 They are reference to the culture and climate of our city and draw people to view, visit and
reflect upon... in contrast to new box entities
11/16/2020 10:51 AM
16 Gives it character 11/16/2020 10:39 AM
17 History is important, gives a sense of place. Buildings tell a story that shouldn't be lost.11/8/2020 8:31 PM
18 Adds to the uniqueness of Montana 11/2/2020 2:38 PM
19 Historic buildings represent that our community is responsible and respectful. We don't simply
throw out what is out of fashion. We use and reuse. We restore, respect, and honor what we
have.
11/1/2020 8:18 AM
20 Kalispell is Charming , not only the historic downtown but the historic neighborhood
surrounding downtown. They are both walking and biking friendly. The homes and buildings
have a variety of craftsmen details not found in modern building techniques. I also love the low
building lines that allow the view of the surrounding mountains.
10/30/2020 10:37 PM
21 Historic buildings provide a unique feel and attitude for locals and visitors alike.10/30/2020 12:15 PM
22 It gives character, sets us apart from other towns in the Flathead Valley. Historic buildings
enable downtown to display and pay homage to the past while providing present day
experiences and amenities.
10/30/2020 12:05 PM
23 Aesthetic and cultural/historical preservation.10/28/2020 6:27 PM
24 They provide texture that can only be developed over a long period of time. A historic building
can actually exude wisdom that comes with age.
10/28/2020 10:22 AM
Historic Downtown Kalispell Design Standards
21 / 41
25 Historic Buildings are an important asset to the City because they tell the story of Kalispell.
The history of Kalispell needs to be celebrated - not abandoned.
10/28/2020 10:10 AM
26 See above.10/28/2020 9:48 AM
27 It is fun to enjoy architecture from different eras and Kalispell shows this. It allows you to
dream a little of the past and value what came before you.
10/28/2020 8:43 AM
28 I think they are the root of any place- they have character and are specific to the time,
technology, and needs of their location. The older buildings tell a story from another time.
10/26/2020 3:51 PM
29 I've lived all over the world. The places I loved preserved their historical character--lets not
make the design and architectural mistakes we made in the 1960s. I'm proud of the historical
relevance of this area and of the buildings it represents.
10/24/2020 8:38 AM
30 Our company recently purchased the Kalispell Grand Hotel. The wonderful building and the
colorful and mostly intact historical Main Street commercial center was an important driver to
our decision to purchase the building and to make a significant financial investment in
Kalispell. Kalispell has all of the necessary elements to become a destination for visitors and
for new residents. As American cities become more and more homogeneous, offering all of the
same stores and restaurant chains, unique, historic, and walkable downtown commercial
districts like Kalispell's are a tremendous asset and a selling point for people looking for
something real and with a sense of place and time. Witness how towns such as Aspen,
Colorado capitalize on their historic architectural heritage and use it to attract visitors and
businesses. Many cities are now trying to create the kind of downtown district that Kalispell
already has--it is critical that Kalispell continues to promote and improve its historic downtown
buildings as feasible locations for new business growth.
10/24/2020 8:31 AM
31 They pull in tourists and preserve history 10/23/2020 10:13 PM
32 The ones that are done well and are in good condition provide a varied urban experience to the
downtown building fabric.
10/23/2020 4:49 PM
33 Because instead of feeling cookie-cutter-ish----every building is unique and has its own stories
through the century.
10/23/2020 4:35 PM
34 They add character and history.10/23/2020 3:33 PM
35 The unique architecture of the Main Street historical buildings provides an atmosphere of
endurance and elegance. The brick facades and decorative touches are rarely found in modern
buildings. It is vital to preserve this atmosphere for the enjoyment of citizens and visitors.
10/23/2020 2:26 PM
36 Historic buildings provide character and are attractive places that people want to visit. No one
travels out of their way to go to Walmart or a mall; they do so for the convivence.
10/23/2020 1:32 PM
37 They are the history of the town, they show where the town has come from and what we have
gone through to get where we are today.
10/23/2020 12:45 PM
38 They are part of our history and in my opinion we should value it.10/23/2020 12:37 PM
39 They add character to our town. More importantly, though, they are built for use that
unfortunately, very little modern construction matches. Most historic downtown buildings have
commercial spaces on the ground level with residential or small office space above. Most
historic buildings in town have little to no setbacks with parking hidden in the rear of the
building. Most historic buildings downtown have inherent character and design detail that much
of our lowest-bidder-built modern construction lacks.
10/22/2020 4:39 PM
40 The Historic buildings are each one of a kind. They have history and character.10/22/2020 4:16 PM
41 Gorgeous architecture makes walking to businesses fun and inspiring. It brings people
together.
10/22/2020 4:00 PM
42 Besides the character, I think they attract artisans and makers and unique businesses that
Kalispell desperately needs
10/22/2020 3:55 PM
43 Structurally STRONGER and more character!10/22/2020 3:33 PM
Historic Downtown Kalispell Design Standards
22 / 41
Q7 What role do non-historic buildings play in the fabric of Downtown
Kalispell? Do you think these buildings contribute to or detract from the
historic character?
Answered: 55 Skipped: 4
Historic Downtown Kalispell Design Standards
23 / 41
#RESPONSES DATE
1 Absolutely detract. If an oral surgeon replaced a chipped but beautiful front tooth with a silver
tooth, it may chew well, but it will never enhance the overall smile!
11/19/2020 3:36 PM
2 I think newer buildings can have a distracting and unappealing look. Cheap building materials
and overly modern design detracts from the overall beauty of the downtown. An aim for some
harmony like whitefish has would be a good idea long term.
11/19/2020 1:59 PM
3 It depends how they are built. Without a standard it becomes a hodgepodge. Some do detract
from the historic Western feel.
11/19/2020 1:45 PM
4 detract and should be restored or made to look historic 11/19/2020 9:59 AM
5 When properly developed, designed and constructed with with consideration to the area in
which it is sited, newer buildings can enhance the existing historic buildings. Poorly planned
buildings detract.
11/19/2020 12:27 AM
6 newer buildings today are historic buildings in the future, time is moving 11/16/2020 4:10 PM
7 They detract, new buildings should look like they have been there 100 years or go to 93 North 11/16/2020 4:05 PM
8 our historical buildings are important to the fabric of downtown 11/16/2020 3:56 PM
9 both display the evolution of independent business development 11/16/2020 3:12 PM
10 weave a tapestry of diversity and functionality that is important in the balance of Kalispell 11/16/2020 3:04 PM
11 They add to the ability to pay taxes 11/16/2020 2:41 PM
12 should be addressed before renovations 11/16/2020 2:25 PM
13 newer facilities lend to the image of a progressive business environment for the 21st century -
high speed business and interaction are the future
11/16/2020 2:15 PM
14 they can be designed to be architecturally harmonious with the historic buildings and DT
character and charm
11/16/2020 2:01 PM
15 The non-historic buildings are fine 11/16/2020 1:45 PM
16 If done appropriately they can contribute 11/16/2020 1:30 PM
17 Contribute 11/16/2020 1:26 PM
18 They fill in space that was opened when historic buildings were removed.11/16/2020 1:23 PM
19 Building contractors should consider making them look like they've been around for centuries.11/16/2020 1:07 PM
20 I don't feel they detract if they reflect a plan for design and development that coordinates with
existing structures. Bozeman has done a great job of doing this.
11/16/2020 10:51 AM
21 Add practicality, don't retract 11/16/2020 10:39 AM
22 Keep non-historic and historic, they each are signs of their period in history.11/16/2020 10:33 AM
23 Definitely detract. Example is the First Interstate (I believe it is) where the Conrad bank used
to be. Shameful.
11/8/2020 8:31 PM
24 They detract from the Historic 11/4/2020 12:28 PM
25 Detract - stricter architectural designs that adhere to a common feel should be implemented.
Additionally, more green space and trees should be required.
11/4/2020 12:20 PM
26 Contribute 11/2/2020 2:38 PM
27 Non-historic buildings today will be historic someday. We should think twice about tearing down
a historic building only to replace it with something new. But, we should view our downtown
community as a whole. Built through decades and generations, the buildings should show ALL
of the history of our community.
11/1/2020 8:18 AM
28 The new and modern buildings can blend in well with the old as long as they are not
overpowering the main historic theme. Historic buildings with some modern modifications can
also fit into the overall historic street. I have to add that there have been a few buildings added
10/30/2020 10:37 PM
Historic Downtown Kalispell Design Standards
24 / 41
to downtown that really detract from the aesthetics. They do not blend in well with the
neighboring buildings and do not have the high level craftsmanship of the older buildings.
Overall I believe there is balance that should be achieved between preserving the old while
allowing some well thought out modern designs blend in. I love to see an old building that can
be preserved yet bring in a few modern influences.
29 They can absolutely be an asset depending on their placement. The beauty of many Montana
communities is finding the balance between modern and historic architecture.
10/30/2020 12:15 PM
30 non-historic buildings can compliment the historic by using similar elements such as red brick,
tasteful facades, good design that doesn't distract from the historic elements.
10/30/2020 12:05 PM
31 They contribute hugely!! Our historic buildings are what keep Kalispell from becoming Anytown
USA.
10/28/2020 6:27 PM
32 I think they distract. Glacier Banks building for example doesn’t give any sense of its western
Montana location.
10/28/2020 6:11 PM
33 I think they distract. Glacier Banks building for example doesn’t give any sense of its western
Montana location.
10/28/2020 5:34 PM
34 If a modern building is constructed right it can provide important time contrast to historic
buildings. Th hey will compliment each other.
10/28/2020 10:22 AM
35 I think they contribute in their own ways and are important. We would run out of space if we
only utilized historic buildings.
10/28/2020 10:19 AM
36 The non-historic buildings can definitely detract from the historic character of the Kalispell if
not done right. Non-Historic Buildings need to fit into downtown, they should have character.
10/28/2020 10:10 AM
37 Detract. Whitefish (and many other communities throughout the country) has done an excellent
job of maintaining its historic character and draws thousands of tourists each year. While not
everyone may see that as a benefit, it has kept their downtown vibrant and added to the tax
base.
10/28/2020 9:48 AM
38 They can show how ideas and values change over time. The mix can be good if done with
taste but I like historic downtowns to mostly the same as it looks quaint. Kalispell should have
a look that says Montana.
10/28/2020 8:43 AM
39 They do in the sense that they keep Kalispell contemporary...Kalispell is unique in the way that
it is currently combining the old and the new.
10/27/2020 9:08 AM
40 I certainly think they can and do. I feel like a city needs to keep evolving, otherwise it's likely
stagnant or dying. That's not to say "out with the old and in with the new." I feel we should
harmonize the new with the past.
10/26/2020 3:51 PM
41 some of the buildings downtown look like they were victims of that 1960s "modern" attempt. I
wouldn't call them "historical"--they definitely detract from the more classy, historic buildings
10/24/2020 8:38 AM
42 If possible, the owners of non-historic buildings should be encouraged to renovate them in
such a way that they contribute to the district. That does not mean that we need to try to make
the First Interstate Bank building look historic--new buildings can contribute if they maintain
context, but when non-historic buildings are redeveloped or renovated, there should be
incentives offered and perhaps carefully considered and sensible ordinances to preserve the
character of the district. Kalispell does not have to be like colonial Williamsburg--just because
a building is old, does not mean that it is worthy of restoration--there was bad architecture in
the 1890's as there is today. However, the historic district should be developed and preserved
with consistency and in a manner to encourage commercial use of the district.
10/24/2020 8:31 AM
43 If they are renovated and upgraded to be able to function properly and safely you have unique
architecture with gear stories and modern functionality
10/23/2020 10:13 PM
44 These buildings greatly contribute as well. It is not beneficial to create new buildings that try to
emulate older buildings. This is not the way we build today, and replicating a style tends to
create a fake disney like atmosphere.
10/23/2020 4:49 PM
45 Dislike them----however, they will get old someday too!10/23/2020 4:35 PM
46 Contribute. They have history, they have cool architecture, and they provide something unique
(as opposed to cheap development).
10/23/2020 3:33 PM
Historic Downtown Kalispell Design Standards
25 / 41
47 Non-historic buildings can contribute if they are built in a manner that emulates or
complements the historic buildings.
10/23/2020 2:26 PM
48 Non-historic buildings detract form the overall character of our downtown. Contrast downtown
Kalispell with other (and older) cities in the state. While places like downtown Missoula or
Whitefish look complete and maintain a large degree historic integrity, and the much, much
older Last Chance Gulch in Helena has been revitalized with a mixture of preservation,
architectural standards, and pedestrian-friendly planning, Kalispell is a hodgepodge of old
structures, generic new buildings, and empty lots. I am thinking of Main Street as I write this,
although it applies even more to 1st Avenue East and West. Historic photos prove that these
were also once bustling acvenues lined with historic buildings.
10/23/2020 1:32 PM
49 I think that the "modern" buildings do detract from the overall vibe of the town. Especially when
you put a new(er) industrial type building right in the middle of a historical area with no though
given to trying to design the build to fit in with the historical aspect of the surrounding
neighborhood or business district. UNLESS, they are built to a specific standard, with specific
designs and aesthetics, much like Whitefish has done.
10/23/2020 12:45 PM
50 The non historic buildings show our growth over the years which is also part of our history. I do
think they contribute however I also prefer the buildings that blend well with the look of the old
buildings.
10/23/2020 12:37 PM
51 Do we mean "old" or "historic" here? Non-historic buildings play the same role as historic
buildings. Typically in our town, they contribute less character, but they don't need to. There
are many old buildings and new buildings downtown and around the city that detract from the
area's character. Maybe a new building was made to "look" historic, creating a cheap look.
Maybe an old building sits behind a large parking lot. Often they are made for a single-use.
10/22/2020 4:39 PM
52 I think they are still valid, and provide services to the public.10/22/2020 4:16 PM
53 If done well with quality materials they have the ability to also attract foot traffic and build
community.
10/22/2020 4:00 PM
54 I think as long as they compliment the aesthetic, they work great 10/22/2020 3:55 PM
55 Contribute.... more businesses downtown bring more people! No more parking lots or churches
which only function a few days a week!
10/22/2020 3:33 PM
Historic Downtown Kalispell Design Standards
26 / 41
74.51%38
25.49%13
Q8 Do you think the community has done a good job of preserving and
maintaining the historic character of Downtown Kalispell?
Answered: 51 Skipped: 8
TOTAL 51
Yes
No
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Yes
No
Historic Downtown Kalispell Design Standards
27 / 41
Q9 What direction should the City take to encourage preservation of our
historic buildings?
Answered: 52 Skipped: 7
Historic Downtown Kalispell Design Standards
28 / 41
#RESPONSES DATE
1 It's too bad there wasn't more consideration given to the government buildings near the circle,
and the new commercial building being built by Martel adjacent to it. With just a few tweaks,
they could have designed something that would offer a "bridge" from the old to the new - still
functional and yet historically connected. An opportunity lost.
11/19/2020 3:36 PM
2 Well I don't understand the legal ways this stuff happens but having some type of architecture
oversight could help. Maybe a tax incentive? I'm not sure what techniques other towns use but
maybe consult them.
11/19/2020 1:59 PM
3 New building standards and guidelines that provide a consistent aesthetic.11/19/2020 1:45 PM
4 Access to grants, funds and development/renovation support for owners of historic buildings
and residences in a single location or source would be great. There should be restrictions to
owners butchering or altering buildings beyond a certain point.
11/19/2020 12:27 AM
5 rail area be made into a walking park with lots of trees 11/16/2020 4:05 PM
6 improvement grants with low interest has been great, minimum requirements for the look and
care of property
11/16/2020 3:56 PM
7 provide tax relief to offset cost of sustaining 100 year old buildings 11/16/2020 3:12 PM
8 tax breaks and aiding homeowners in actually putting their homes or businesses on the historic
register
11/16/2020 3:04 PM
9 make low cost loans available to all businesses, avoids empty storefronts 11/16/2020 2:41 PM
10 develop places like an opera house w/ outside funds, archway type structure at beginning and
end of historic district
11/16/2020 2:25 PM
11 The city should not be for or against preservation of old buildings 11/16/2020 2:15 PM
12 existing programs have proven effective, a new or different direction could turn into
government overreach and create burdens on owners
11/16/2020 2:01 PM
13 It should be optional not required 11/16/2020 1:45 PM
14 no more medians and more parking 11/16/2020 1:30 PM
15 enact and enforce tighter standards, tax credits for rehabilitation 11/16/2020 1:23 PM
16 ?11/16/2020 1:07 PM
17 Provide incentive to engage in preservation practices through monetary means and educational
opportunities
11/16/2020 10:51 AM
18 Provide resources for owners like the facade grant in the past.11/16/2020 10:39 AM
19 Offer incentives 11/16/2020 10:33 AM
20 None 11/15/2020 12:40 PM
21 Do whatever is necessary to preserve them.11/8/2020 8:31 PM
22 ?11/4/2020 12:28 PM
23 practical steps, allowing renovations and usability of the buildings is key 11/2/2020 2:38 PM
24 Tax credits, grants, low cost loans, allocations for code variances to preserve historic integrity.11/1/2020 8:18 AM
25 I would aggressive protect the historic buildings. They can not be replicated for a reasonable
cost. They reflect the history and culture of the town.
10/30/2020 10:37 PM
26 The city should protect historic buildings from demolition or renovation outside of the scope of
a "historic appearance". Perhaps defining a specific "historic district" in which architectural
review and approval are required on all exterior projects.
10/30/2020 12:15 PM
27 Provide grants and guidelines to building owners to maintain and enhance the historic buildings
and implement strict guidelines on how facades are treated. i.e. paint colors, design
treatments, signage.
10/30/2020 12:05 PM
Historic Downtown Kalispell Design Standards
29 / 41
28 More strict guidelines for the aesthetics of remodels, storefronts, and new construction.
Cohesive design elements throughout the city.
10/28/2020 6:27 PM
29 Encourage building/preserving red brick store fronts with 3 dimensional art on their fronts.10/28/2020 6:11 PM
30 Encourage building/preserving red brick store fronts with 3 dimensional art on their fronts.10/28/2020 5:34 PM
31 The buildings themselves are already architecturally correct. The city has not succeeded at all
in providing the proper surroundings they need. Like lighting, pedestrian access and
vegetation. A great example is downtown Courdelene.
10/28/2020 10:22 AM
32 Encourage business owners with empty store fronts to sell their property.10/28/2020 10:19 AM
33 The City needs to help business owners preserve them. Money is normally the reason why -
there needs to be incentives for business owners to be downtown, grants given to upgrade the
historic buildings. Small Business Loan low interest rates. Preserving the buildings needs to be
an incentive for business owners. Tax credits, etc.
10/28/2020 10:10 AM
34 Better design review for renovation or construction projects downtown. Grants to assist owners
in restoring historic buildings.
10/28/2020 9:48 AM
35 Kalispell. Keep to the character of what is there now and continue to restore buildings.10/28/2020 8:43 AM
36 Identifying the history of each building and emphasizing that in writing and artworks.10/27/2020 9:08 AM
37 I think there have been both successes and challenges with regard to historic buildings in
Downtown Kalispell. We have a historic district and several individually registered buildings-
that's a great thing! To date though, I think the city has had a lack of guidance for architects,
developers, and building owners to direct thoughtful and meaningful growth and change or in
some cases that City needs some teeth for enforcement so we can keep the architecture that
makes Kalispell Kalispell.
10/26/2020 3:51 PM
38 somehow make it financially attractive to building owners...10/24/2020 8:38 AM
39 See 7 above. Historic character in exterior facades should be encouraged and preserved,
however, in accordance with the guidelines of the National Parks Service for historic tax
credits, the City must keep in mind that the objective is profitable re-use of historic buildings,
not preservation of empty shells. Restoration of facades can be accomplished, while allowing
flexibility in re-development of interiors so that feasible commercial re-use is possible. Our
hotel guests would not be happy with 1912 style hotel rooms, bathrooms down the hall, and no
HVAC, but redevelopment of the rooms and public spaces in the hotel to maintain historic
context while providing modern amenities and attractive interior design will make the hotel
profitable and ensure its future. Tax incentives and grants are very important to encourage re-
use and can help offset the cost required to preserve and re-use historic buildings, which is
often higher than tearing down and building new. Financial incentives are often preferable to
over-regulation which can stifle development.
10/24/2020 8:31 AM
40 Grants for upgrades and help relocate service businesses and encourage retail and restaurant
to be primary on main.
10/23/2020 10:13 PM
41 Grants and tax incentives 10/23/2020 4:49 PM
42 make laws that forbid builders to come in and change the structure, charm, etc. of these
historic buildings.
10/23/2020 4:35 PM
43 Provide incentives to building owners to make improvements and restorations cost effective.10/23/2020 3:33 PM
44 I wish the previous question had a response of somewhat available. I think the city is going in
the right direction creating guidelines.
10/23/2020 2:26 PM
45 There are many things to consider. Tax incentives for business owners/ businesses downtown
may be possible, maybe something like an incentive district. My larger opinions are in the
answer below. For my part, the Museum is set to take a larger role in highlighting the historic
buildings. We are currently developing two downtown waling tours ( one for main street, one for
the East Side) and I am committed to getting the title "Montana Main Streets: A Guide to
Historic Kalispell" into more businesses this summer.
10/23/2020 1:32 PM
46 Adopt a standard for future building/renovation that will require the property owners to make
sure their property is maintained to historical visual parameters and aesthetic.
10/23/2020 12:45 PM
Historic Downtown Kalispell Design Standards
30 / 41
47 Having only moved back to the area somewhat recently it would be difficult for me to say as I
am not sure what is already being done.
10/23/2020 12:37 PM
48 A historic preservation district should probably be created. Any new design standards should
avoid mandating that new construction "look" historic even if it isn't. More important than
preserving a historic design standard is establishing a quality standard, even if new materials
and construction are used. New construction should have mixed-use, with commercial on the
street residential above. Downtown landscaping standards should be enforced.
10/22/2020 4:39 PM
49 Provide an incentive to the owners, possibly a very low interest loan?10/22/2020 4:16 PM
50 I think more sidewalk space and less traffic would encourage people to spend more time and
Main St so they can enjoy the historic spaces would make people feel more invested.
10/22/2020 4:00 PM
51 I so wish we could remove the awnings or make them more cohesive throughout downtown.
Take the storefronts back to the original character would elevate how downtown looks!
10/22/2020 3:55 PM
52 Encourage more small businesses. Stress Walkability!10/22/2020 3:33 PM
Historic Downtown Kalispell Design Standards
31 / 41
Q10 What obstacles or concerns do you think might impede historic
preservation in the City?
Answered: 53 Skipped: 6
Historic Downtown Kalispell Design Standards
32 / 41
#RESPONSES DATE
1 You tell me. I'm only offering an aesthetic opinion.11/19/2020 3:36 PM
2 Finances 11/19/2020 2:27 PM
3 The cost involved with preserving older buildings and the cost of building new ones in a more
beautiful fashion.
11/19/2020 1:59 PM
4 Resistance to following rules and standards. No enforcement or financial incentives.11/19/2020 1:45 PM
5 offering grants to help people keep the history 11/19/2020 9:59 AM
6 Lack of owner support, lack of public support. And bad taste. Lack of qualified
craftsman/contractors who are knowledgeable enough and brave enough to tackle the
renovation needs of older buildings.
11/19/2020 12:27 AM
7 Hwy 93 and parking 11/16/2020 4:10 PM
8 people moving in from out of state wanting to change what we the local people want 11/16/2020 4:05 PM
9 trying to change and grow too quickly, trying to force 4 lanes of traffic around the courthouse 11/16/2020 3:56 PM
10 lack of zoning or specific perimeters 11/16/2020 3:04 PM
11 allow any type of business that believes in can operate and not just seasonal type businesses
that don't stay open year round
11/16/2020 2:41 PM
12 independent businesses w/ independent thinking 11/16/2020 2:25 PM
13 differences within the community to change 11/16/2020 2:15 PM
14 What happens when the historical buildings are no longer viable economically or structurally.11/16/2020 2:01 PM
15 Cost, ultimately business owners bear the cost to make it look pretty 11/16/2020 1:45 PM
16 growth 11/16/2020 1:30 PM
17 Too expensive 11/16/2020 1:26 PM
18 Dirty streets and sidewalks, snow not removed w/ no enforcement, no nightlife in DT Kalispell -
needs more bar/restaurants and liquor licenses.
11/16/2020 1:23 PM
19 Lack of business for DT shops resulting in selling. New owners are not interested in keeping
the integrity of the existing building design
11/16/2020 1:07 PM
20 Too many regulations and mandates that would make it difficult or unaffordable 11/16/2020 10:51 AM
21 We are in favor of less government controls on private property.11/16/2020 10:39 AM
22 Cost and weather 11/16/2020 10:33 AM
23 Private property rights 11/15/2020 12:40 PM
24 Probably money. Do fund raisers or something!11/8/2020 8:31 PM
25 ?11/4/2020 12:28 PM
26 space of older buildings is always tough to make use of for new tenants, also cost of
renovations along with cost of maintaining the current structure
11/2/2020 2:38 PM
27 Cost, creativity.11/1/2020 8:18 AM
28 There are many impediments with preservation and reality of operating a modern business.
Land owners want to be able to develop property for maximum profit. However, I feel like if the
old is not preserved then Kalispell could end up looking like any other town in America.
Covered with shopping malls with large parking lots and all having the same chain stores. I
have noticed often how the towns across the country are beginning to look the same.
10/30/2020 10:37 PM
29 Costs of restoration/preservation. Individual property owners may not appreciate additional
regulation on their investments.
10/30/2020 12:15 PM
30 Some buildings such as the MacIntosh Opera House have become very run down. That
building in particular is an important focal point for downtown. I would like to see the City work
10/30/2020 12:05 PM
Historic Downtown Kalispell Design Standards
33 / 41
with the Pierre's to identify funding to refurbish the exterior and the interior space so it can be
an active and positive asset for downtown.
31 Lack of building codes 10/28/2020 6:27 PM
32 Expense of renovating historic buildings.10/28/2020 6:11 PM
33 Expense of renovating historic buildings.10/28/2020 5:34 PM
34 The continued access of HWY 93 through mainstreet. It cripples the ability for the community
to implement architectural and pedestrian design to the area.
10/28/2020 10:22 AM
35 Business owners unwilling or unable to use their spaces. I think the empty storefronts on Main
Street are a major bummer. Why aren't these spaces being utilized? It seems like it brings
down Main St.
10/28/2020 10:19 AM
36 If the city is not willing to work with Small Business owners then it's not going to happen. If
permit costs are too high, if the city isn't open minded to changes. Progress needs to happen
but at the same time maintaining the historic integrity of our downtown.
10/28/2020 10:10 AM
37 Lack of money and/or community support for historic preservation. Lack of adequate design
review.
10/28/2020 9:48 AM
38 Kalispell Money probably and maybe personal opinion 10/28/2020 8:43 AM
39 Design guidelines need to be adopted by ordinance in order for them to have meaning- they
can't be optional. Optional guidelines are pointless. That might not sit well with some people
that see private property development as a private right. Our city leadership needs to realize
that even private buildings contribute to the public good and environment. There still needs to
be codes, zoning, and guidelines to channel these projects and those come from state and city
ordinance.
10/26/2020 3:51 PM
40 the lure of big money 10/24/2020 8:38 AM
41 The City should look at what has worked and what has not worked in other communities with
similar objectives. Some preservation ordinances may be helpful, but over-regulation can
discourage development and preservation by making it too expensive or not flexible enough to
allow for creative re-use.
10/24/2020 8:31 AM
42 Parking for additional visitors if we are able to have more retail and restaurants. Upgrading with
old wiring, plumbing or asbestos.
10/23/2020 10:13 PM
43 Cost to repair buildings. A lot of the materials and detailing of historical buildings are
prohibitively cost expensive to do today.
10/23/2020 4:49 PM
44 growth! mentality that newer is better.10/23/2020 4:35 PM
45 Cost.10/23/2020 3:33 PM
46 The cost of upgrading a historic building can be prohibitive. It is hard to balance making
preservation affordable with regulating historic preservation. Good luck!
10/23/2020 2:26 PM
47 The lack of parking downtown is a huge problem. I did not think this was the case until I was
presented with a proposal that would have converted a good number of spaces on 2nd Avenue
East in front of the Museum to permitted parking that would be sold to building owners to
attract/ retain tenets. It was then that I realized that parking is not an issue for anybody visiting
or stopping in Kalispell, but it is a larger issue for all of us who have to live in the city on a
daily basis. The other huge issue is the growth of Kalispell, particularly to the north.
Businesses can own their own buildings and have as big of a parking lot as they choose. This
has drawn a lot of traffic away from downtown Kalispell over the years, both in terms of
services and goods for the population and the businesses themselves. I understand that the
city wants to be diverse and all-encompassing, but if businesses continue to move to the new
development north of town, nothing will be left in downtown but tourism. And that alone cannot
support the downtown, at least at this stage.
10/23/2020 1:32 PM
48 Price, necessary rate of expansion/renovation, individuals who don't prioritize historical
preservation
10/23/2020 12:45 PM
49 Money and cost are the first to come to mind. And the individual tastes of potential new
business that may not agree with keeping a historic look and feel to downtown could potentially
10/23/2020 12:37 PM
Historic Downtown Kalispell Design Standards
34 / 41
prevent new businesses from wanting to come into our town.
50 Fear/confusion of standards equating restrictions.10/22/2020 4:39 PM
51 Costs that the average person could not afford.10/22/2020 4:16 PM
52 Too many cars, community division, lack of engaged citizens.10/22/2020 4:00 PM
53 Parking.... but we all need more exercise! So business owners/employees need to quit parking
on and around their front doors! More food and later hours. Street seating?
10/22/2020 3:33 PM
Historic Downtown Kalispell Design Standards
35 / 41
Q11 What are your top three priorities to ensure preservation of Downtown
Kalispell's historic buildings?
Answered: 48 Skipped: 11
Historic Downtown Kalispell Design Standards
36 / 41
#RESPONSES DATE
1 Maintenance, preservation, and enhancement as needed.11/19/2020 3:36 PM
2 Maintaining the brick and tall faced buildings. Encourage apartments so that people may more
easily live and shop downtown. Divert more traffic through the bypass and encourage walking
downtown.
11/19/2020 1:59 PM
3 Encouraging a consistent standard (like Whitefih) for remodeling and new construction.
Encourage new development along the railway tracks to mimic historic structures Tax
structures that encourage preservation and reinvestment.
11/19/2020 1:45 PM
4 Clear guidelines that are easily accessed by the public. Clear vision and goals. Access to
skilled and knowledgable renovation specialists.
11/19/2020 12:27 AM
5 architecture, additional green spaces 11/16/2020 4:05 PM
6 keep your property tight, have standards or codes in place for new construction 11/16/2020 3:56 PM
7 native plants, historical paint palettes, educational output for visitors 11/16/2020 3:04 PM
8 Owner lives in his business location would bring back the social atmosphere that bet created
our historical buildings
11/16/2020 2:41 PM
9 controlling signage 11/16/2020 2:25 PM
10 Do not feel it should be a priority to preserve 11/16/2020 2:15 PM
11 Keep DT charming and inviting, encourage and assist in the enhanced requirements of
historical buildings, programs which encourage the above w/o becoming a disincentive to to
invest in DT
11/16/2020 2:01 PM
12 Do not force or require compliance with new regulations 11/16/2020 1:45 PM
13 DOn't hinder businesses from opening, leave convenient space for fast food business 11/16/2020 1:26 PM
14 Trucks off main street, larger trees and more of them, make it look like a DT not a state hwy 11/16/2020 1:23 PM
15 Parking 11/16/2020 1:07 PM
16 Incentive to want to engage in preservation, promote visiting these structures, recognition to
building owner for preservation efforts
11/16/2020 10:51 AM
17 ?11/16/2020 10:39 AM
18 Allocate funds as a priority 11/16/2020 10:33 AM
19 1-3: for the city to not impose any further hindrance to private property owners 11/15/2020 12:40 PM
20 Don't tear down any more buildings. Preserve what's there. New building should be in line with
historical architecture.
11/8/2020 8:31 PM
21 ?11/4/2020 12:28 PM
22 1. usability of space 2. cost of renovations and cost of maintenance of existing facilities 3.
look and feel of the buildings (don't want any dilapidated buildings), a newer building would be
of more use than a broken down building
11/2/2020 2:38 PM
23 1. The Historic Design team should help building owners creatively address preservation and
restoration. 2. Grants, loans, and tax credits to assist building owners. 3. Community
awareness and publicity of the history, and community value of the downtown buildings.
11/1/2020 8:18 AM
24 Making main street an enjoyable place to walk, dine , shop and join in entertainment. The
larger sidewalks combined with a restricted traffic flow would provide a place for tourist and
locals to mix and enjoy a close community space.
10/30/2020 10:37 PM
25 Define a "historic district. Regulate renovation and new builds in the historic district. Source
funding to continue to restore our historic buildings.
10/30/2020 12:15 PM
26 Architectural and signage standards including approval of exterior modifications, grants for
building owners such as façade improvements, financial incentives/less burdensome impact
fees and hook ups to services to encourage new businesses to select downtown Kalispell.
10/30/2020 12:05 PM
Historic Downtown Kalispell Design Standards
37 / 41
27 See above.10/28/2020 6:11 PM
28 See above.10/28/2020 5:34 PM
29 Zoning. Tax breaks for new businesses to choose downtown instead outlying areas. Encourage
businesses to improve existing buildings with permit fee exemptions. It will be made up in
community spending. Maybe impose a local sales tax fof public improvements. Make Big Box
stores pay for improvements to the downtown area since they pull so much business away
from the core of the city.
10/28/2020 10:22 AM
30 1. Stop having empty storefronts 2. Encourage new businesses to start downtown 3.
community events (such as monthly artworks) to start up again on Main st.
10/28/2020 10:19 AM
31 1. Incentives for Business owners - tax credits, grants 2. Clear and doable and reasonable city
rules for the preservation of buildings 3. The city needs to communicate what the buildings are
that are vacant so the public is aware - market it better.
10/28/2020 10:10 AM
32 Adequate funding to assist owners in maintaining or renovating historic buildings, good design
review standards, grant writing to secure government assistance.
10/28/2020 9:48 AM
33 Safety. History. Montana charm.10/28/2020 8:43 AM
34 1. Identify the aspects of downtown that need to be preserved and honored. What is cherished
and what shouldn't be repeated. 2. Create design guidelines specific for downtown. 3. Develop
a process where ARC is able to review compliance wit those guidelines.
10/26/2020 3:51 PM
35 ?10/24/2020 8:38 AM
36 1. Re-route truck and heavy automobile traffic off of Main Street and execute the District's
excellent plan to promote walkability. 2. Address the liquor license problem. Affordability of
licenses to sell at least wine and beer is critical to the growth of dining and live music venues
that are required for Kalispell become a viable tourist destination. 3. Encouraging new and
unique businesses to locate in downtown Kalispell. We need to get the vacant buildings filled
to encourage visitors and foot traffic. Occupied buildings and profitable businesses ensure
economic viability and the preservation, maintenance and improvement of downtown Kalispell.
10/24/2020 8:31 AM
37 Safety Usability for retail and restaurant Cost to operate 10/23/2020 10:13 PM
38 -New Builds next to them must be of a high quality to raise the worth of the existing buildings. -
New Builds must not be allowed to be of a more low end residential type quality -Clear criteria
as to what is historical and what is not -Not hampering new, modern construction (forcing it to
look like an old building)
10/23/2020 4:49 PM
39 1. restrictive laws 2. more historic plaques 3. more awareness 10/23/2020 4:35 PM
40 Fix up buildings and provide space for businesses to thrive. For example, there are not enough
restaurants (especially easy lunch spots) in downtown. I'd LOVE to see something similar to
the Stumptown Marketplace (from Whitefish)
10/23/2020 3:33 PM
41 1. Passage of preservation policies and guidelines. 2. Infrastructure support for restoring 2nd
floor spaces. 3. Grants to help business owners preserve their historic buildings.
10/23/2020 2:26 PM
42 1. As alluded to above, a major issue is parking. I would like to see the city address this need
for local businesses with a more permanent solution, such as a garage a couple blocks off
Main Street, perhaps with businesses on the ground floor. I know that the question of angled
parking and a median on Main Street has been discussed, which would be beneficial not only
for additional parking, but also for... 2. The layout and walkability of Main Street. Angled
parking gives the appearance that we are a dynamic, bustling little city, and would lead to more
pedestrians (so would the bike path when it comes). This should be met with more greenery,
better benches and places to sit, ecc. I'm not sure if the improvements attract a different type
of business, or if a more customer-centered business needs these improvements, but wither
way, the cycle completes itself. As goods and services have all but moved out of downtown,
Kalispell should consider doubling-down on making the city a destination in its own right. More
restaurants, bars, boutique shops, galleries, coffee shops, places to do and things to see.
Really embrace the changes and better the town because of them. These are the kind of
business that have an active interest in driving tourism into downtown, and thus good
advocates for historic preservation. If Kalispell embraces the changes as a place to shop, eat,
and drink rather than a place for business (again, those changes are already happening), these
business should easily comply and be in favor of historic architectural standards. It would
10/23/2020 1:32 PM
Historic Downtown Kalispell Design Standards
38 / 41
improve their business and profits. This especcially feasible with our great historic preservation
and facade grant programs.
43 Identify/implement of a building/renovation standard ordinance that applies to the historic
downtown area. Procurement of funding to assist property owners that want to renovate their
property to bring it into line with the desired look/feel, i.e. resort tax Limit these changes to the
BUSINESS district, DO NOT include the residential areas.
10/23/2020 12:45 PM
44 I am not sure how to answer this question. In regards to question 12, I am in favor within
reason. If the choices are too restrictive it could become a detriment.
10/23/2020 12:37 PM
45 Mixed-use and downtown residential is crucial. Signage, both the cities and buildings need
stricter standards. Up the game of the landscaping. Fill ALL the spaces missing trees, and
enforce a landscaping standard. Narrowing Main street, and making downtown more family and
pedestrian-friendly is the most important thing we can do to ensure the value of our historic
downtown. A pedestrian-only street maybe? Or turn a parking lot into a community square?
10/22/2020 4:39 PM
46 Maintain the buildings that are already preserved. Provide information on such buildings Be
educated to inform the public
10/22/2020 4:16 PM
47 I am not sure.10/22/2020 4:00 PM
48 FILLED STORE FRONTS!10/22/2020 3:33 PM
Historic Downtown Kalispell Design Standards
39 / 41
77.19%44
22.81%13
Q12 Would you be in favor of requiring aesthetic and contextual review of
exterior changes (paint, exterior materials, windows, awnings, etc.) for
commercial buildings in Downtown Kalispell that may not otherwise require
a building permit?
Answered: 57 Skipped: 2
TOTAL 57
Yes
No
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Yes
No
Historic Downtown Kalispell Design Standards
40 / 41
7.50%3
62.50%25
30.00%12
Q13 If you own a historic property in Downtown Kalispell, have you ever
applied for a historic preservation grant?
Answered: 40 Skipped: 19
TOTAL 40
Yes
No
I don't own a
historic...
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Yes
No
I don't own a historic property.
Historic Downtown Kalispell Design Standards
41 / 41
22.50%9
47.50%19
30.00%12
Q14 If you own a historic property in Downtown Kalispell, have you taken
advantage of the Kalispell Business Improvement District Façade Grant?
Answered: 40 Skipped: 19
TOTAL 40
Yes
No
I don't own a
historic...
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Yes
No
I don't own a historic property.
Highlighted and italicized language represents amendments or additions, including the addition
of Chapter 27.21A
CHAPTER 27.21
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
Sections:
27.21.010 Findings and Objectives.
27.21.020 Architectural Review Committee.
27.21.030 Jurisdiction and Powers of the Architectural Review Committee.
27.21.040 Criteria and Standards.
27.21.050 Procedure.
27.21.010: Findings and Objectives.
(1) Excessive uniformity, dissimilarity, inappropriateness or poor quality of
design on the exterior appearance of structures and signs and the lack of
proper attention to site development and landscaping in Kalispell hinders
the harmonious development of the city, impairs the desirability of
residences, investment or occupation in the city, limits the opportunity to
attain the optimum use and value of land and improvement, adversely
affects the stability and value of the property, produces degeneration of
property in such areas with attendant deterioration of condition affecting the
peace, health and welfare of the city, and destroys a proper relationship
between the taxable value of property and the cost of municipal services.
(2) The purposes and objectives of architectural site design review procedure
are to:
(a) Encourage originality, flexibility and innovation in site planning and
development, including the architecture, landscaping and graphic
design of said development;
(b) Discourage monotonous, drab, unsightly, dreary and inharmonious
development;
(c) Conserve the city’s natural beauty and visual character and charm
by insuring that structures, signs and other improvements are
properly related to their sites, and to surrounding sites and
structures, with due regard to the aesthetic qualities of the natural
terrain and landscaping, and that proper attention is given to exterior
appearances of structures, signs, and other improvements;
(d) Protect and enhance the city’s appeal to tourists and visitors and thus
support and stimulate business and industry and promote the
desirability of investment and occupancy in business, commercial
and industrial properties;
(e) Stabilize and improve property values and prevent blighted areas
and, thus, increase tax revenues;
(f) Achieve the beneficial influence of pleasant environments for living
and working on behavioral patterns, and thus decrease the cost of
governmental services;
(g) Foster civil pride and community spirit so as to improve the quality
and quantity or citizen participation in local government and in
community growth, change and improvement;
(h) Sustain the comfort, health, tranquility and contentment of residents
by reason of the city’s favorable environment, and thus to promote
and protect the peace, health and welfare of the city; and
(i) Protect and enhance the historic character of downtown Kalispell
for the educational, cultural, and economic benefit and enjoyment
of the traveling public and citizens of Kalispell.
27.21.020: Architectural Review Committee.
(1) The mayor, with the approval of the council, shall appoint an Architectural
Review Committee (ARC) of at least five persons, each with one or more
of the following qualifications: special education, training or experience in
the financing of commercial real property, architecture, historic
preservation or landscape architecture; active engagement in business,
commerce or industry; and/or education, training or experience in the area
of graphic or allied arts. Whenever possible, the mayor shall appoint
individuals who are either property owners, residents, historic preservation
specialist, or actively engaged in business or employment in the city.
(2) The members shall serve four year terms. The specific terms shall be
initially established so that up to two four-year appointments are made each
year until all positions have been appointed. The mayor, with approval of
the council, may remove any member of the ARC after hearing, for
misconduct or non-performance of duty. Any vacancies of the ARC shall
be appointees of the mayor with the approval of the council.
(3) The ARC may adopt and amend rules to govern the conduct of its business
including, but not limited to: Officers, quorum, voting, schedule of meetings
and records.
27.21.030: Jurisdiction and Powers of the ARC.
(1) Except for single family and duplex dwellings, no building permit shall be
issued for a new building or major remodeling of an existing building, and
no sign permit shall be issued for the construction or alteration of a sign,
until the plans, drawings, sketches and other documents required under
Section 27.21.050 have been reviewed and approved by the ARC in
conformity with the criteria specified in Section 27.21.040. Wall signs and
groupings of wall signs less than 50 square feet in area are exempt from
ARC review. For purposes of this ordinance, the term “major remodeling”
shall mean any remodeling that substantially changes the exterior
appearance of the building. The facade improvements outlined in Section
27.21A.020 may not require a building permit but require ARC review and
approval prior to commencing work.
(2) Construction, site development and landscaping, signing and graphics shall
be carried out in the substantial accord with the plans, drawings, sketches
and other documents approved by the ARC, unless altered with the ARC’s
approval. Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent ordinary
repair, maintenance and replacement of any part of the building or
landscaping which does not involve a substantial change from the goals and
objectives of section 27.21.010.
27.21.040: Criteria and Standards.
(1) The following standards shall be utilized by the ARC in reviewing the plans,
drawings, sketches and other documents required under section 27.21.050.
These standards are intended to provide a frame of reference for the
applicant in the development of site and building plans as well as a method
of review for the ARC. These standards shall not be regarded as inflexible
requirements. They are not intended to discourage creativity, invention and
innovation. The specifications on one or more particular architectural style
are not included in these standards.
(a) City of Kalispell, Montana, Architectural Design Standards: The
project should be designed to follow the architectural design
standards.
(b) Relation of proposed buildings to environment: Proposed structures
shall be related harmoniously to the terrain and to existing buildings
in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed
buildings. The achievement of such relationship may include the
enclosure of space in conjunction with other existing buildings or
other proposed buildings and the creation of focal points with
respect to avenues of approach, terrain features or other buildings.
(c) Advertising features: The size, location, design, color, texture,
lighting and materials of all exterior signs and outdoor advertising
structures or features shall not detract from the design of proposed
buildings and structures and the surrounding properties.
(d) Special features: Exposed storage areas, exposed machinery
installations, service areas, truck loading areas, utility buildings and
structures and similar accessory areas and structures shall be subject
to such setback, screen plantings or other screening methods as shall
reasonably be required to prevent their being incongruous with the
existing or contemplated environment and the surrounding
properties.
(e) Application of design standards: The standards of review outlined
in this section also apply to all accessory buildings, structures,
exterior signs and other site features, however related to the major
buildings or structures.
(2) The ARC shall also be guided by the objectives of section 27.21.010, and
such objectives shall serve as additional criteria and standards.
27.21.050: Procedure.
(1) Submission of documents. A prospective applicant for a building or other
permit, who is subject to site design review, shall submit to the planning
department the following:
(a) A site plan, drawn to scale, showing the proposed layout of all
structures and other improvements including, where appropriate,
driveways, pedestrian walks, landscaped areas, fences, walls, off-
street parking and loading areas, and railroad tracks. The site plan
shall indicate the location of entrances and exits and the direction of
traffic flow into and out of off-street parking and loading areas, the
location of each parking space and each loading berth and areas of
turning and maneuvering vehicles.
(b) A landscape plan, drawn to scale, showing the location of existing
trees proposed to be removed and to be retained on the site, the
location and design of landscaped areas, the varieties and sizes of
trees and plant materials to be planted on the site, other pertinent
landscape features, and irrigation systems required to maintain trees
and plant materials.
(c) Architectural drawings or sketches, drawn to scale, including floor
plans, in sufficient detail to permit computation of yard
requirements and showing all elevations of the proposed structures
and other improvements as they will appear on completion of
construction.
(d) Specifications as to type, color and texture of exterior surfaces of
proposed structures or alterations.
(e) Specifications for each exterior light fixture.
(f) A sign plan, drawn to scale, showing the location, size, design,
material, color and methods of illumination of all exterior signs.
(2) The ARC shall make a decision in a timely manner pursuant to their rules
and schedule. An applicant may appeal a decision to the City Council. The
appeal shall be filed in writing to the city manager within 30 days after the
ARC has rendered its decision at the scheduled meeting.
CHAPTER 27.21A
DOWTOWN KALISPELL HISTORIC DESIGN STANDARDS
Sections:
27.21A.010 Intent
27.21A.020 Applicability
27.21A.030: Design Standards applicable to all properties within the Downtown Historic
District Overlay
27.21A.040: Additional Design Standards applicable to properties within the Main Street
Historic District.
27.21A.010: Intent. The purpose of this section is to establish design standards that guide
individuals, businesses, architects, designers as well as the Architectural Review
Committee in making consistent and objective decisions involving development
within historic downtown Kalispell. The standards will protect and enhance the
development of buildings and sites within downtown Kalispell, an area of
significant architectural and historic character, for educational, cultural and
economic benefit and enjoyment of the citizens of Kalispell and the traveling
public. The Downtown Historic District Overlay (Figure 2.2) consists of the
Kalispell Main Street Historic District and the surrounding area that embodies the
historic commercial site development patterns of early Kalispell. The design
standards will preserve historic architectural design and integrity, while promoting
compatible urban growth and redevelopment. The standards will protect the
investment and property values of local businesses, promote tourism, and
encourage pedestrian-oriented development. Contemporary, non-period and
innovative design of new structures and additions is encouraged when such design
is compatible with and/or compliments surrounding structures. These standards are
not intended to necessarily preclude significant alteration or demolition of existing
buildings but are designed to provide consistency and predictability to property
development standards and the permit review process.
27.21A.020: Applicability. The following design standards are applicable to all buildings except
for single family and duplex dwellings within the Downtown Historic District
Overlay (Figure 2.2). Standards in Section 27.21A.030 apply to all properties
within the boundary of the Downtown Historic District Overlay, which emphasizes
pedestrian-friendly urban site design congruent with historic Kalispell. In addition
to Section 27.21A.030, Section 27.21A.040 applies to properties within the Main
Street Historic District and focuses on historic architectural form, material, and
color reflective of the established historic built environment.
Figure 2.2: Downtown Historic District Overlay
In addition to ARC review and approval for all new building or major
remodeling as defined in Section 27.21.030, façade improvements
including but not limited to the application of paint, replacement of
windows, awnings, siding, wall murals, or substantial alteration of
historically significant elements (Section 27.21A.040(2)(c)(5)) on
contributing buildings require ARC approval within the Main Street
Historic District. Ordinary repair or maintenance which does not affect the
historic character of the building are exempt from ARC review.
(2) Alternative Compliance to Design Standards. ARC may modify the
design standards to allow for alternative compliance when the proposal
demonstrates alignment with the spirit and intent of the design standards.
(4) Definitions. As used in this section, the following definitions apply:
(a) Contributing building: A building constructed during Kalispell’s
period of significance (1891-1960) and which retains a high degree
of integrity. The building is intact and few alterations have
occurred. If additions have been made more than 50 years ago, the
additions may be seen as part of the evolution of the building and
provide historical significance.
(b) Downtown Main Street District: A historic district listed on the
National Register of Historic places and a subdistrict of the
Downtown Historic District Overlay.
(c) Individually listed building: A building or structure that has been
listed on the National Register of Historic Places based on the
significance in American history, architecture, archaeology,
engineering or culture. Information on individually listed buildings
can be found on the Montana State Historic Preservation Office
website and the National Park Service's National Register of
Historic Places website.
(d) Noncontributing building: A building whose date of construction
is outside the period of significance or is within the period of
significance but has been altered to the degree in which the
integrity and historical character has been compromised.
(e) Period of significance: A period between 1891 and 1960 during
which time Kalispell gained its most architectural and historical
importance.
27.21A.030: Design Standards applicable to all properties within the Downtown Historic
District Overlay. The following standards apply to all properties within the
Downtown Historic District Overlay (Figure 2.2) which consists of the Kalispell
Main Street Historic District and the surrounding area.
1) Site Design and Architectural Character
(a) All new buildings shall be placed and designed to present the front
and primary façade to the block frontage that is highest in order of
precedence and should convey a sense of human scale and visual
interest along the street front.
(b) New buildings on a corner at the intersection of two streets shall be
placed to present a front and primary façade on both street block
frontages.
(c) New buildings shall be scaled to the pedestrian, with a variety of
ways to engage activity at the street and sidewalk by incorporating
at least three of the following elements:
1. Recessed bays
2. Protruding or recessed entries.
3. Awnings, entry roofing and trellises.
4. Architectural elements integrated into the design such as
dormers, roof cornices, columns, piers, lintels.
5. Change in plane to distinguish different businesses and to
avoid large plain building masses.
6. Change in building material or siding style.
7. Windows (except storefront windows) shall include trim or
other design treatment, or alternately be recessed at least
two inches from the façade. Use of mirrored or tinted glass
for commercial uses is prohibited on street level windows.
2) Parking Facilities
(a) New surface parking along a street shall be placed to the side, rear,
the building and accessed via the alley.
(b) Parking structures shall incorporate ground floor features that
promote a pedestrian environment.
1. At street level, the parking structure shall include retail,
commercial space, or architectural features that engage the
pedestrian experience. The use of awnings, shading
devices, public art and landscaping are a means to provide
visual interest to areas otherwise not engaging the
pedestrian at street level.
2. Streel level shall, to the greatest extent possible, mimic
storefront of adjacent commercial buildings.
(c) Upper parking levels facing the street shall minimize the visual
impact of parked cars.
1. Openings shall have a rhythm and scale similar to buildings
in the area.
2. Screens and decorative materials along with railings shall
be included to provide visual interest to upper level
openings in the structure to help minimize headlight glare
onto adjacent buildings.
(d) The overall design of the parking structure shall be compatible
within the area or neighborhood especially in terms of scale,
massing, and rhythm.
1. Vertical and horizontal articulation shall divide the
structure to conform with the area or neighborhood.
2. Vertical pedestrian circulation can be a change of material
or offset from the façade or elevation in a design similar to
buildings in the area or neighborhood.
3. Angled ramps within shall be screened from view from
streets or sidewalks.
3) Service, loading, outdoor storage and mechanical areas. Trash, utility,
communications, power and gas meters and equivalent elements shall be
thoroughly screened from view from both the public right-of-way and
adjacent properties by using parapets, walls, roof elements, and/or
evergreen landscaping. Architectural screening elements shall be
compatible with the proposed or existing building materials.
27.21A.040: Additional Design Standards applicable to properties within the Main Street
Historic District. In addition to the standards outlined in Section 27.21A.030, the
following standards apply to properties within the boundaries of the Main Street
Historic District (Figure 2.2).
1) Building Materials and Color
(a) Exterior finishes shall include natural finishes such as wood, brick,
concrete, or stone as the primary finish material. Synthetic
materials may be used but shall be avoided as a primary finish
material.
(b) Historic elements, materials and details shall not be covered, clad
over, or boarded up with modern, non-historic, non-era materials.
(c) Street shades and awnings shall be based on materials consistent
with the historic period.
(d) All exterior building colors shall be based on a reputable paint
manufacturer designated historic period color palettes. These paint
palettes do not preclude the use of one or more colors that can be
justified to the ARC through historic paint analysis or historic
photo documentation.
(e) Any color not listed within a historic palette or justified by historic
paint analysis or photo documentation is referred to as a “limited
color”. Limited Colors may only be used up to 5-15% of the
building façade, depending on the building size, and are subject to
approval by the ARC.
(f) Color guidelines apply to all exterior materials, including, but not
limited to, paint, metals, masonry, concrete masonry units, and
storefronts.
(g) Noncontributing buildings are not subject to manufacturer
designated paint color palettes but shall take cues from colors and
materials used on the block or generally found in the district.
2) Standards for new construction:
(a) New construction shall maintain a uniform street wall with the
historic building alignment.
(b) All new buildings shall incorporate tripartite construction with a
base, middle, and a top that complements the building style of
adjacent structures.
Figure 2.3: Tripartite Building Form
(c) Height, mass, and form of new construction shall be compatible
with the historic context, area, and neighborhood. This may result
in in a reduction in permitted height otherwise allowed in the
property development standards for the zone.
Large projects shall have a massing and form rhythms and
variety compatible with the historic pattern of the block or
intersection. Massing shall be articulated to avoid a row of
a similarly massed building of a scale larger than others in
the area or neighborhood.
Figure 2.4: Building Massing
1. Buildings shall be at the same grade, elevation, or floor
height of surrounding historic buildings of the area or
neighborhood.
2. Floor to floor heights shall be similar to the surrounding
properties in the area or neighborhood including properties
at an intersection.
3. Buildings shall have horizontal and vertical articulation of
street facing wall planes and differentiate materials
between floors consistent with properties in the area or
neighborhood.
4. Façade or street facing elevations shall reflect the
proportions of height to width in the area or neighborhood.
5. Buildings shall include historically significant architectural
elements such as water tables, bulkhead, belt courses,
dormers, transom, window sills and lintels, roof cornices,
etc. Contemporary interpretations of these historical
elements may be appropriate.
Figure 2.5: Historic Commercial Building Elements
(d) Windows, doors, and other features shall be compatible with those
in the area or neighborhood.
1. Use simplified configuration of historic doors. Storefront
entrances shall have a recessed entry in order to avoid
conflict with pedestrian circulation within the right-of-way.
2. Door height, width, and materials shall be similar to those
in the area or neighborhood.
3. Window headers, sills, and sash design shall be similar to
those in the area or neighborhood and hold similar
relationship to cornices and belt courses.
4. Contemporary window patterns and designs shall respect
the character and proportion of those in the area or
neighborhood.
(e) Roof forms shall be compatible to those in the area or
neighborhood. Flat roof forms shall not be used in areas of pitched
roofs and pitched roof forms shall not be used in an area of flat
roofs.
(f) When a contributing property is demolished the reconstruction of
the property shall include elements in the design that respect and
harken back to the history of the site as it existed during Kalispell’s
period of significance.
3) Standards for minor additions and façade improvements to
contributing and individually listed buildings:
(a) Minor building additions and exterior façade improvements to
contributing properties shall preserve the historical character,
proportion, scale, and rhythm of the existing historic building.
When possible, historical reference including photographs shall be
used to verify appropriate design.
(b) If architecturally significant features such as cornices, lintels,
historically appropriate windows and doors are replaced, they shall
be replaced with reproductions of the original, where economically
and functionally possible. If this is not possible, they shall be
replaced with features similar in size and scale to the original.
Development Services Department 201 1st Avenue East Kalispell, MT 59901 Phone: (406) 758-7940 Fax: (406) 758-7739 www.kalispell.com/planning
TO: Kalispell Planning Board FROM: PJ Sorensen, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: Growth Policy Future Land Use Map Amendments Work Session DATE: February 9, 2021
BACKGROUND: Over the last several years, a number of significant changes have happened in and
around the city, including the completion of the northern portion of the bypass and the beginnings of
the Parkline Trail in the Core Area. Accordingly, staff is proposing a number of changes to the Growth Policy Future Land Use Map to keep up with the changes and prepare for future growth. These proposals were discussed previously at a work session in 2017.
At the meeting, staff will go over the proposed map amendments individually so that the Board can discuss them. If the Board feels that the proposed amendments are appropriate, staff will present the map amendments to the Board at a subsequent public hearing.
The work session is intended for information purposes only to inform both the public and the Board
about the various aspects of the proposed map amendments. It is not intended to be a public hearing
and the Planning Board will not take any formal action.