06/05/00 City Council Minutes1613
A REGULAR MEETING OF THE KALISPELL CITY COUNCIL WAS HELD AT 7:00
P.M. MONDAY, JUNE 5, 2000, IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT CITY HALL IN
KALISPELL, MONTANA. MAYOR WILLIAM E. BOHARSKI PRESIDED. COUNCIL
MEMBERS JIM ATKINSON, DON COUNSELL, DALE HAARR, RANDY KENYON, DUANE
LARSON, FRED LEISTIKO, DOUG SCARFF, RON VAN NATTA AND CITY MANAGER
CHRIS KUKULSKI AND CITY ATTORNEY GLEN NEIER WERE PRESENT.
Mayor Boharski called the meeting to order and led the Pledge of
Allegiance.
AGENDA APPROVAL
Haarr moved approval of the Agenda with the addition of a
Proclamation to the Consent Agenda honoring United States Army
Week. The motion was seconded by Scarff.
There was no discussion.
The motion carried unanimously upon vote.
CONSENT AGENDA APPROVAL
1. Council Minutes -Regular Meeting May 15, 2000
2. Approval of Claims per Payables Register-$359,130.51
3. Proclamation -United States Army Week
Scarff moved approval of the Consent Agenda. The motion was
seconded by Van Natta.
There was no discussion.
The motion carried unanimously upon vote.
HEAR THE PUBLIC
Clare Hafferman, 1337 3rd Street West, criticized the Parks &
Recreation Department for its Senior Citizen walking program.
PUBLIC HEARING- URBAN FORESTRY DISTRICT
Boharski explained Council will receive comments concerning a
proposed Urban Forestry District to plant, protect, preserve and
care for public trees in the City.
Parks & Recreation Director Mike Baker explained in 1991, a total
of 5,149 trees were counted along Kalispell's streets and
boulevards with another 2,500 trees identified elsewhere within the
City. He said these trees amount to over $20,000,000 in assets to
the City. Baker said the proposed urban forestry district will
allow the City to properly maintain the current trees, and plant
additional trees, at an assessment to the average taxpayer of
approximately $10.12 annually. He said a cap of $300 will be placed
on those parcels that exceed five acres. Baker stated about
$120,000 will be raised through these assessments and will allow
the Parks Department to commit to a strict hazard reduction
program, a planting program that will see the addition of 75 to 100
new trees each year, and a pruning and disease control program.
Boharski opened the public hearing.
Kalispell City Council Minutes
June 5, 2000
1614
Proponents
Chris Moritz, Bigfork Landscape Architect, commended the City for
considering an urban forestry district commenting that trees are
"green air conditioners".
Ben Long, 920 6th Avenue East, said he's a board member of Citizens
for a Better Flathead and feels trees are a great investment.
Lex Blood, 844 3rd Avenue East, thanked the Council and Parks
Director Mike Baker for considering the district and said he'd like
even more attention to be paid to the urban areas.
Donald Hill, 362 College Avenue, said he's always been impressed
with the City' s thoroughfares under the arched trees and would like
to see them protected.
Peggy Casey, 614 llth Street East, commented she's 100% in favor of
the district, but suggested the Council use gambling money to
support it.
Jennifer Reese, 745 4th Street West, said the suggested assessment
of $10.00 to taxpayers is well worth it and suggested more trees be
planted on the west side of town.
Paula Rosenthal, DNRC State Program Manager for Urban Forestry,
stated urban forestry activities are hurting across the State
because forest service funding has diminished and grants have been
rescinded. She said more and more cities are looking toward urban
forestry districts to supplement these funds and added the benefits
to the community are well worth the investment.
Ted Mead, 1026 1st Avenue East, said he's a professional forester
and urged Council's support of the resolution.
Mark Lennon, DNRC Western Regional Community Forester, said he
works with Bozeman, Great Falls and Helena with their urban
forestry districts and all three cities agree the districts allow
them to address tree care and tree problems in a more timely and
cost effective fashion due to consistent funding.
Tracy Mayer, 645 6th Avenue East, urged Council to support the
district.
Opponents
Greg Stevens, 31 Lower Valley Road, said he' s speaking on behalf of
elderly friends and relatives who live on fixed incomes. He said
this assessment, along with proposed increases in the utility
rates, will have a negative impact on their lifestyles.
Fred Hammel, 505 7th Avenue West, said the City's never maintained
the trees around his house, he's always done it himself.
Bill Miles, 1311 7th Street West, stated "my taxes are high
enough." He said the Council needs to learn to pay the bills with
the current taxes.
Don Buckallew, 896 North Meridian, said he's on a fixed income and
can't afford an additional tax.
Kalispell City Council Minutes
June 5, 2000
Page 2 of 8
1615
Sharon Demeester, 415 Chestnut Drive, commented she owns commercial
property in the City and has seen a 5.8% increase in her property
taxes over the past two years.
Larry Barrow, 1220 6th Avenue West, said his taxes have increased
four times since he bought his home and asked the Council to work
with the money it has.
Lori Fisher, 1310 6th Avenue West, said she takes care of her own
trees and hasn't seen much maintenance from the City in the past.
She said if the Council is determined to create the district, then
assess everyone a flat rate.
Paul Ulberg, 204 Colomba Lane, said he lives in the Grandview
Townhouses and they maintains the trees now without City help.
Russell Crowder, Montanans for Property Rights, questioned where
the $120,000 raised through assessments will go and stated he's
concerned with the precedence this sets.
Pat Baker, 1739 Foys Lake Road, said she's continually being taxed
for services she doesn't get. She said there aren't any curbs or
sidewalks in her area and no place to even plant trees.
Lynda Altenburg, 723 2nd Street East, commented she feels taxpayers
are paying enough now to maintain the trees.
John Altenburg, 723 2nd Street East, stated one of his lots is all
asphalt which will never see trees.
Ed Marks, 1305 West Idaho Street, said assessment for his property
will be around $250.00. He said he doesn't have any City services
and planted the only trees he does have.
Kit Hunter, 454 1st Avenue East North, stated he loves the trees,
but he sees the district as just another bureaucracy. He urged the
Council to use the money the City already has.
Boharski closed the public hearing.
RESOLUTION 4557-RESOLUTION CREATING URBAN FORESTRY DISTRICT NO. 1
Larson moved Resolution 4557, a resolution relating to Urban
Forestry District No. 1, creating the district for the purpose of
undertaking certain local improvements and financing the cost
thereof and incidental thereto by assessing real property within
said district. The motion was seconded by Van Natta.
There was discussion.
Haarr stated everyone loves trees, but the urban forestry program
should be funded from what's already in the budget. He said the
City should set up the district, but fund it out of the General
Fund.
Leistiko commented Haarr must not have been at the same budget
sessions as he was. He said when Baker proposed the district as a
way to properly care for the trees, the Council agreed it was a
good solution. Leistiko said maybe other ways should be looked at
for funding, but he feels establishing the district is worthwhile.
Kalispell City Council Minutes
June 5, 2000
Page 3 of 8
1616
Atkinson spoke in favor of the Staff, stating they do a wonderful
job with the money they have. He said the funds for the district
have to come from somewhere, and the departments don't have any
extra.
Van Natta said this is a difficult decision, but feels the urban
forestry program needs to be established. He said Kalispell is
growing, additional services are needed, and the City is
struggling. Van Natta agreed, however, that the Council needs to
continue to look at other funding methods.
Larson said the trees are a form of infrastructure and they're just
as important as everything else. He said he received several phone
calls from people who were willing to pay something, but didn't
agree with the assessment as proposed. Larson said he supports the
concept of the district and agreed that all funding possibilities
should be explored.
Counsell said the district establishes a method for the City to
maintain the trees better. He said he doesn't want to pay more
taxes either, but held really hate for the City to lose a "huge
asset that draws people to the area".
Larson said maybe the issue should be tabled until other funding
options are researched.
Leistiko pointed out the resolution simply establishes the
district, and the decision on how to fund the program will be made
at budget time.
Van Natta agreed, stating there may be a way to come up with
additional monies during budget deliberations. He said at this
time, the Council is simply establishing the district.
Kenyon said he'll vote in favor of the resolution because he feels
it's a worthwhile project for long term beautification.
Scarff spoke against the motion, stating he will be assessed
approximately $500.00 a year. He said the issue should be put on
the ballot in November.
Boharski stated the Council has done a good job on holding the line
on spending. He said he constantly questions budget items in the
work sessions, including the purchase of new vehicles and a recent
increase in salaries. Boharski said the Council needs to continue
to hold the line on spending and he will vote against the motion.
The motion carried upon roll call vote with Atkinson, Counsell,
Kenyon, Larson, Leistiko and Van Natta voting in favor, and Haarr,
Scarff and Boharski voting against.
ORDINANCE 1354 - 2ND READING - ZONING REQUEST FROM GWENN LEE (LEE' S
MERIDIAN BUSINESS PARK) FOR B-2, GENERAL BUSINESS
Gwenn Lee has requested a B-2 zoning designation for Lee's Meridian
Business Park which is located on the west side of Meridian Road at
the terminus of West Center Street.
Van Natta moved second reading of Ordinance 1354, an ordinance to
amend Section 27.02.010, Official Zoning Map, City of Kalispell
Zoning Ordinance (Ordinance No. 1175), by zoning certain real
property described in Exhibit "A" (previously zoned County R-1,
Kalispell City Council Minutes
June 5, 2000
Page 4 of 8
1617
Suburban Residential) to B-2 (General Business), in accordance with
the City -County Master Plan and to provide an effective date. The
motion was seconded by Leistiko.
There was no discussion.
The motion carried unanimously upon roll call vote.
ORDINANCE 1355 - 2ND READING - ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 3
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, KALISPELL MUNICIPAL CODE
It's necessary to recodify Chapter 3, Alcoholic Beverages, in the
Municipal Codes to conform with State law regarding licensing and
enforcement. The recodification is also necessary to incorporate
changes made by Council members over the past few years.
Scarff moved second reading of Ordinance 1355, an ordinance
amending Chapter 3, Alcoholic Beverages, Kalispell Municipal Code
by amending R.O. 1947, §§ 774, 785, 789, 895, 897, 898; and
Ordinance No's 676 § 1, 813 § 1, 836 § 1, 840 §§ 2,5, 874 § 1, and
917 § 1, and 3; repealing R.O. 1947, §§ 773, 776 and 781 and
Ordinance No.'s 840 §§ 4, 6 and 7; 874 § 2, 917 §§ 2, and 4;
authorizing the City Attorney to recodify Chapter 3, Kalispell
Municipal Code in accordance with this ordinance; and declaring an
effective date. The motion was seconded by Atkinson.
There was discussion.
Haarr asked Neier if the City can legally restrict alcohol
consumption on leased property and whether the City can enforce the
condition that requires lessees to provide notice when planning an
event with alcohol.
Neier said he feels the City does have the authority to prohibit
the consumption of alcohol in any City owned building, but if the
Council wants to revisit the issue then they can do so. He asked
however, that members approve the recodification at this time and
go from there.
Boharski said the reason for the notice is to make sure the
different entities have insurance. He said otherwise, the City is
the one with the "deep pocket" if something would happen.
The motion carried unanimously upon roll call vote.
RESOLUTION 4558 - RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO ADOPT REJECT OR
REVISE THE PROPOSED GROWTH POLICY PLAN AND SET A PUBLIC HEARING
In accordance with State law, the Council must pass a "Resolution
of Intention" concerning the proposed Growth Policy Plan submitted
by the Planning Board. This resolution sets the public hearing
date to hear comments on the proposed plan.
Kukulski said he has a recommendation for the public hearing date,
but would like to know how the Council is planning on handling the
July 3rd meeting.
Boharski said it's his intention
call the meeting to order, not
special meeting for July loth.
to attend the meeting July 3rd,
have a quorum, and then call a
Kalispell City Council Minutes
June 5, 2000
Page 5 of 8
1618
Kukulski said if that's the case, then he would recommend the
Council schedule the public hearing for July loth.
Atkinson moved Resolution 4558, a resolution of intention to adopt,
revise or reject the recommended Kalispell City -Council Growth
Policy and set a public hearing for July loth starting at 7:00 p.m.
The motion was seconded by Larson.
There was no discussion.
The motion carried unanimously upon roll call vote.
RESOLUTION 4559 - RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A CDBG GRANT APPLICATION
This resolution allows the City to file an application to obtain
training dollars for Stream.
Haarr moved Resolution 4559, a resolution authorizing an
application to the Montana Department of Commerce for a Community
Development Block Grant to provide employee training dollars for
Stream International Services. The motion was seconded by Scarff.
There was no discussion.
The motion carried unanimously upon roll call vote.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - FAITH FREE LUTHERAN CHURCH
Faith Free Lutheran Church is requesting a conditional use permit
for the expansion of its existing church on property located at 405
Liberty Street.
Van Natta moved approval of the Conditional Use Permit for Faith
Free Lutheran Church with the attached conditions. The motion was
seconded by Scarff.
There was discussion.
Haarr asked if the Church owns the property planned for expansion.
Dan Breen, Church Council Member, said the Church does not own the
property but has a buy/sell agreement on the property if the
Council approves the conditional use permit.
The motion carried unanimously upon vote.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - NORTHWEST HEALTH CARE CORPORATION
Northwest Health Care is requesting a conditional use permit for
the expansion and remodel of the Kalispell Regional Hospital.
Haarr moved approval of the Conditional Use Permit for Northwest
Health Care with the attached conditions. The motion was seconded
by Larson.
There was discussion.
David Greer, NW Health Care Consultant, explained the main hospital
south will be extensively renovated and expanded. He said the
purpose is to upgrade the hospital and to recognize changing
technology and health care trends. Greer said in addition, the
proposal calls for the rerouting of Sunnyview Lane to the north to
create a campus setting for the hospital. He said there will also
Kalispell City Council Minutes
June 5, 2000
Page 6 of 8
1619
be a new connection between Sunnyview and Conway on the west side
as part of the requirements established by the Planning Board.
Atkinson said the hospital is planning to reconstruct a portion of
Sunnyview Lane during the rerouting and asked if there's a
possibility of an SID to continue the reconstruction to Highway 93.
Kukulski said that's the hope, however, the City can't guarantee it
will get the concurrence of the required 51% of landowners needed
to establish an SID.
Public works Director Jim Hansz said he would suggest working with
Peccia & Associates to at least get an engineering design for the
balance of the road so the City can determine what the costs would
be for an SID.
Ted ,258 Buffalo Hill Drive, criticized Northwest Health Care for
leaving porta potties near his property the last time construction
was done and asked that it not happen again. He said he would also
like to see landscaping between the hospital and the residential
area and stop signs at every exit from the hospital along with
right turn lanes into the hospital.
The motion carried unanimously upon vote.
FLATHEAD REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT OFFICE FISCAL YEAR 2000/2001 ANNUAL
WORK PROGRAM
The Planning Board has recommended a work program for the Kalispell
planning jurisdiction for the next fiscal year and is asking for
Council's approval.
Van Natta moved approval of the work program as presented. The
motion was seconded by Leistiko.
There was discussion.
Haarr asked if planning staff would look at changing the height
limits for construction.
Narda Wilson, FRDO, said staff likes to look at different problem
areas each year and include them all in one ordinance change. She
said she would be happy to look at the height limits.
Boharski said he'd also like staff to look at side yard setbacks
and how those are administered. He said possibly an administrative
variance could be an option for people who want minor changes to
the zoning ordinance.
The motion carried unanimously upon vote.
CITY MANAGER EVALUATION REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
At the last meeting, three Council members were appointed to review
the annual evaluations and report to the Council. Larson was
appointed Chairman.
Larson asked Kukulski if he would like to have the meeting closed.
Kukulski waived his right to close the meeting.
Atkinson moved adoption of the evaluation. The motion was seconded
by Van Natta.
Kalispell City Council Minutes
June 5, 2000
Page 7 of 8
1620
There was no discussion.
The motion carried unanimously upon vote.
Atkinson moved adoption of a 3% raise for the City Manager
retroactive to May 3rd, 2000, and extend his contract to May 3,
2002. The motion was seconded by Van Natta.
There was discussion.
The motion carried upon vote with Haarr and Boharski voting
against.
MAYOR/COUNCIL/CITY MANAGER'S REPORTS
Kukulski reminded Council that comments on the proposed growth
policy plan are due today.
Kukulski informed Council he is continuing to work on annexation
issues and has a meeting tomorrow with some people from the Village
Greens Sewer District.
ADJOURN
The meeting was adjourned at 11:10 p.m.
ATTEST:
Theresa White
City Clerk
Approved June 19, 2000
i
WM.E .50harSkI
Wm. E. Boharski
Mayor
1
Kalispell City Council Minutes
June 5, 2000
Page 8 of 8
JEUv10
1
1
1
E CROW
S ERVICES
305 Third Avenue Cast
P. O. Box 327
IKallspell, INT S9903-0327
(406) 257-8186 - Telephone
(406) 257-9S15 - FAX
May 1, 2000
City Council
City of Kalispell
P.O. Box 1997
Kalispell, MT 59903-1997
RE: Extension of Services
Fee Increases
Dear Council Members,
I am writting to protest the possible increase in fees & extension of services due to the
following:
Fee Increases
1... Fees are are not Voter approved & are only a method for you to tax without mandate.
2. An increase in Taxes or Fees would not be necessary if you & the previous Council's
would. have avoided the Frills of a Museum & other such projects which have drained
the City's income, and in the case of the Museum, were undertaken even under a
large degree of opposition.
3. 1 am sure that you want to hide the fact that a lower or higher Fire Insurance Rating
will only affect the Commercial Properties outside the one mile zone & have no effect
at. all on. Residential insurance costs.
Extension of Services
1. Further Extension of Services without Impact Fees, will further increase Taxes &
Fees to current tapayers within the City to cover additional Manpower & Capital
Equipment that you will want to cover the areas that you extend services to.
2. You have created an unfair business advantage for all of the recent additions to the
City, since they have not previously contributed taxes toward Captial expenditures.
-- In short, you are offering a free ride to those extended services.
We have seen very few of the "City Services", only the City Taxes and Water Bills for
watering the City Trees that have never been pruned in the last five years. Since you spend
the larger portion of the Parks Budget on ballfields, you then create another District to tax us,
again without Voter approval. to prune your trees.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
n ✓'
M on V. Boulden
MAY - 2 2000
1622
CARL
8N C 0 Q P** A 1r[ O
& SONS
CORPORATF OFFICES • 44 T141RD ST. SOUTH . PO BOX 109 • (1REAT FALLS. MONTANA59403-1609 0 PHONE (406)76` -4b46
May 11, 2000
City of Kalispell
P.O. Box 1997
Kalispell, MT 59903
Facsimile: 758-7758
Attention: Michael Baker
Director Parks and Recreation
M
Resolution 4549
(C:hErt%Kuk-Wski
ity Manager
Thank you for sending the announcement of the Public Hearing; on the Urban Porestry District 0 1
in Kalispell, Montana.
Three W's Inc., (75-0919900) would be opposed to this measure as it is circulated. We have
approximately 3.75 acres of commercial property, that is already hiss boulevard improvements that
we have paid for. From the formula propo5cd of $13.50 per year for 10,000 square feet would work
out to about $220.00 per year for our property. We do not see that we would benefit by any
additional improvement on the property, indeed additional trots would he a detriment to our being
able to conduct our business on this commercial property. Supporting additional trees in residential
areas should be handled by assessing those properties that receive benefit solely!
The measure ac proposed is another impediment to established busine„ in Kalispell, and mould be a
deterrent for haziness desiring to locate in Kalispell. There are, already, numerous business
ventures formerly domiciled in Kalispell, that have moved out of the City limits rn avnid this kind
of cost. As a commercial enterprise we are not in favor of this proposed ordinance.
Very truly yo `-
Jerrold A. Weissman
3-W's Corporation
FACSIMILE (406 ) 791 -6731
TOLL FREE 1 - 800 - 334 - 6964
1
1
L _I
1
1
May 10, 2000
City of Italispell
Post Office Box 19974,
0
Dear Kalispell Property Owner:
Kalispell, Montana 59903-1997Telephone (406) 758-7700
1623
FAX (406) 758-7758
Trees that grow along streets, in parks, cemeteries, school grounds, and green belts
and on other public and privately owned lands constitute a "communi , forest." �J&
We have forgotten that community forests of the west were created, not found and
that these forests, just like natural forests, must be renewed if we are to enjoy the benefits
they provide.y
Trees make a world of difference in Kalispell. Trees have long been recognized for s�
the beauty and value they lend to our homes, neighborhoods, parks, and business areas. At
the same time, those trees conserve energy, help clean air, protect our rivers and streams,
and provide a home for wildlife in our community. As stated previously pioneer settlers
and succeeding generations planted our community forest. However, they did not provide ✓
for a means of growth and removal. An effective community forestry program is an
ongoing process, a program of planting and care that continues through the years.
The enclosed resolution outlines a means of planning and preparation to provide V
longevity, renewal, and growth to Kalispell's community forestry program. The Kalispell
City Council intends to create an Urban Forestry District which will include all the
property located within the exterior boundaries of the City of Kalispell. The general
purpose of the district is to plant, protect, maintain, preserve, and care for public trees
located on Cts�-mnvned rights -of -way, public parks and open space land./f - % ..�
The estimated annual cost of the district is $120,000.00. A 10,000 square foot lol
will be assessed $13.50 per year. Your input is important, on June 5 a public hearing h
schedule for you to express your views. It will start at 7:00 p.m., Council Chambers.
Please review the enclosed Resolution at,,, -
concerns please give us a call at 758-7756 r"
Sincerely,
Michae Baker,
Director Parks & Recreation
O ONe
convenience. If
have questiot
a
f�
Chris Kukulski,
Kalispell City Manager
�I
1624
Jerry Hawley
77 4th Ave W.N.
Kalispell, Mt.
Dear Mr.Kukulski,
I received your letter about the resolution to create an Urban
Forest District. It sounds to me like the City Council has al-
ready decided on this resolution, like it or not. I just don't re-
call anyone asking me if I wanted to pay for it.
In this letter I would like to express my concerns with these
ideas to "beautify" Kalispell, and If possible to have it read
at the public hearing.
Twelve years ago I began buying my property and while my taxes
have continued to rise, benefits from social security do not.
I've watched as new "antique" street lights went up, and sitting
benches with flower boxes beautified our down town.
But am I the only one who noticed no one sits on the benches? But
there they sit, empty, completely useless and costly.
Now there is talk of Trees.
The last wind storm we had uprooted a Evergreen and it hit my
house, on top of causing a 60 footer to lean toward my neighbors
and costing me $150 to have it cut down.
Since I believe my lot to be less than the 10,000 square foot
I gather I will not be forced to pay the $13.50 per year.
My point is why should I be forced to pay for things I can't
afford nor do I want?
These ideas to beautify Kalispell lay a heavy load on those who
live on a fixed income and small at that.
Doesn't it seem unjust to someone on the City Council that some
have to sale their homes because they can't pay"their taxes,
and usually its the elderly.
I don't expect my letter to make a difference in how the City
Council spends my, money, but at lease someone knows how I feel.
Sincerely,
Jerry Hawley
�I�tt�!!�
1
MHY . 14: LbbU 4: 14Pt9 N.O. 8'L 1 F 2 5
May 14, 2000
TO: City of Kalispell
FROM Jon Heselwood
795 N. Main
Kalispell, NtT 59901
1-406-239-6361
R£: Creation of Urban Forestry District #1
I atn in full support of your attempts to maintain our city trees, and more than willing to
pay the associated assessment if, and only if, the assessment be earmarked for the urban
forestry program.
'thank you for your time and efforts.
1
(-�- - V� ��' CCC9
1626
RECEIVED
MAY 15 2000
11 May 2000
Mayor William Boharski
City of Kalispell
P.O. Box 1997
Kalispell, Montana 59903-1997
Dear Mayor Boharski:
As a property owner in the City of Kalispell, i congratulate Mr. Baker and staff, you and
the City Council for having the vision to enhance and protect the tree program in the city.
In addition to the environmental benefits and aesthetics, the trees have a way of reducing
the stress so prevalent in our daily lives these days.
Please record my wholehearted support for the proposed Urban Forestry District No. 1
(Resolution No. 4549).
Your truly,
William L. Breen
335 Mountain Meadow Road
Kalispell, Mt, 59901-8407
1
1
1
1627
May 25, 2000
Chris Kukulshi
Kalispell City Manager
PO Box 1997
Kalispell, MT 59903-1997
Dear Mr. Kukilshi,
I'm writing in response to a recent letter to property owners about the
creation of a city urban forest district.
1 have property at 1223 a Ave West and pay taxes for my fathers property at
422 Parkway Drive. Many of us on the west side of the city do not have
boulevards, sidewalks, adequate storm drainage or "city" trees.
1 am strongly opposed to the plan outlined in the letter and would encourage
the city to look at alternative options. Perhaps?
• Co-opted funds and staff with county parks and recreation
• Support of non-profit employment programs that could contract this
work
• Private contracted services on an as needed basis
• Shared governance with private homeowners
• Urban renewal grant or foundation funding
1 support the philosophy behind the plan and would like to have our community
be beautiful and ecologically healthy. I would like the city to look at
alternative ways to accomplish these goals.
Sincerely,
Charlene Herron
1
1628
RECEIVED
MAY 3 0 2000
May 24, 2000
Mayor and City Councilmembers
City of Kalispell
P.O. Box 1997
Kalispell, MO 59903-1997
RE: Urban Forestry District #1
Dear Mayor Bill Boharski:
Although I no longer live in Kalispell, I still own real estate that would be
assessed as part of the proposed Urban Forestry District #1.
This letter is submitted in protest of the proposed district. I am not opposed to the
city spending its resources on the community trees, parks, and playgrounds.
However, I do believe that a more appropriate approach is to ask the voters at
the polls for the additional money needed for this purpose, as well as any other
financial needs the organization may have.
Creating a special taxing district encompassing the entire community, it appears
to me, would be difficult to show equitable resident benefit. If I were to be
assessed, I would like to know what specific benefit accrues to me and my
neighbors, bosides paying for some one, else°s trees. A general property tax for
this purpose does not have to meet this same test; it simply needs voter
approval.
Thank you for taking the time to listen to my concerns.
Sincerely,
4 "4-
��CJ .
Bruce Williams
791 Churchill Bay
Lake Havasu City, AZ 86406
1
11
2 g
AV 12C- ry)
1
1
I
1630
aq , 0t000
kw,\cL,\.5 ti;
C-,'%A- )
. boy v�cvl
• `d_`C!v `qr
51 q0 -5
B
MAY 312000
01- Ck\f- �Av
\V\, cz- Y
wA kv kAkk- (yt3�O5QIA
kA
Ow VIN,
d O
a
S v�-cam\� �� �►.. e` p`�. cyv--6
ck v v DIY
V
\0\
V15.06 �� edr� o�� `a ���5 ► 55��
V."O 5
e43
L` 6 v.,Ak LO vv,, 1�vi,�, ` ��•� L Ott •s`C • \ W . \ � c�\� C, �
1631
F
1632
426 7 h Ave W
Kalispell, MT 59901
The Honorable Bill Boharski, Mayor
PO Box 1997
Kalispell, MT 59903
Dear Sir:
JUN U 12000
BY: --------------------
In reference to Resolution 4549, the intention to create an Urban Forestry District.
I, a taxpaying citizen of Kalispell, object strenuously to the city imposing another
tax. Tax by any other name is still a burden on we residents. And now the City Manager
is proposing an increase in the fees (another euphemism for tax) for sewer and water in
the proposed budget.
One of the features that attracted us to Kalispell was the beautiful, shaded streets.
And they have been that way for nearly a century without the need of an Urban Forestry
District. As the Director of Parks and Recreation and the City Manager stated in their
letter, the care and maintenance of the communal trees is an ongoing process, which the
Parks and Recreation Department has been doing very well. There is no need to add more
bureaucracy to the ones already in place.
It would seem the only purpose of the proposal is twofold. To increase the empire
of the Parks and Recreation Director and to add a line to the City Manager's resume for
his next job.
Sincerely,
A�2 R_4'1
Louis B. Gates
CC/ Michael Baker
Director, Parks & Recreation
Chris Kukulski
Kalispell City Manager
Clarice M. Gates
i x�
1
1
1633
JUN 0 21000
The Honorable Bill Boharski, Mayor
PO Box 1997
Kalispell, MT 59903
Dear Sir:
I am opposed to Resolution 4549, the intention to create an Urban Forestry
District.
We taxpaying citizens of Kalispell, object to the city imposing another tax.
Whether you it a fee or not it is still a burden on the low-income elderly and young
struggling families. Besides this proposed unnecessary resolution the City Manager is
proposing an increase in the fees (an euphism for tax) for sewer and water in the
proposed budget.
One of the features that attracted us to Kalispell was the beautiful, shaded streets.
And they have been that way for nearly a century without the need of an Urban Forestry
District. As the Director of Parks and Recreation and the City Manager stated in their
letter, the care and maintenance of the communal trees is an ongoing process, which the
Parks and Recreation Department has been doing very well. There is no need to add more
bureaucracy to the ones already in place.
This resolution seems to be in direct opposition of the city's policy when the
downtown businesses attempted to add beautification by placing flower boxes on the
sidewalks.
Sincerely,
Director; Parks & Recreation
Chris Kukulski
Kalispell City Manager
1
1634
RECEIVED
J U N - 2 2000
The Honorable Bill Boharski, Mayor
PO Box 1997
Kalispell, MT 59903
Dear Sir:
I am opposed to Resolution 4549, the intention to create an Urban Forestry
District.
We taxpaying citizens of Kalispell, object to the city imposing another tax.
Whether you it a fee or not it is still a burden on the low-income elderly and young
struggling families. Besides this proposed unnecessary resolution the City Manager is
proposing an increase in the fees (an euphism for tax) for sewer and water in the
proposed budget.
One of the features that attracted us to Kalispell was the beautiful, shaded streets.
And they have been that way for nearly a century without the need of an Urban Forestry
District. As the Director of Parks and Recreation and the City Manager stated in their
letter, the care and maintenance of the communal trees is an ongoing process, which the
Parks and Recreation Department has been doing very well. There is no need to add more
bureaucracy to the ones already in place.
This resolution seems to be in direct. opposition of the city's policy when the
downtown businesses attempted to add beautification by placing flower boxes on the
sidewalks.
Sincerely,
CC/ Michael Baker
Director, Parks & Recreation
Chris Kukulski
Kalispell City Manager
I
1
1635
The Honorable Bill Boharski, Mayor
PO Box 1997
Kalispell, MT 59903
Dear Sir:
I am opposed to Resolution 4549, the intention to create an Urban Forestry
District.
We taxpaying citizens of Kalispell, object to the city imposing another tax.
Whether you it a fee or not it is still a burden on the low-income elderly and young
struggling families. Besides this proposed unnecessary resolution the City Manager is
proposing an increase in the fees (an euphism for tax) for sewer and water in the
proposed budget.
One of the features that attracted us to Kalispell was the beautiful, shaded streets.
And they have been that way for nearly a century without the need of an Urban Forestry
District. As the Director of Parks and Recreation and the City Manager stated in their
letter, the care and maintenance of the communal trees is an ongoing process, which the
Parks and Recreation Department has been doing very well. There is no need to add more
bureaucracy to the ones already in place.
This resolution seems to be in direct opposition of the city's policy when the
downtown businesses attempted to add beautification by placing flower boxes on the
sidewalks.
Sincerely
CC/ Michael Baker
Director, Parks & Recreation
Chris Kukulski
Kalispell City Manager
1
1636
JUN 0 5 2000 ZUl
June 4, 2000
To: City Manager, Mayor, and Council
This is in response to your letter, dated May 10, 2000, regarding Resolution
No. 4549. I am writing this to speak against Resolution No. 4549, as a
resident and taxpayer of South Meadows, Kalispell, MT.
I believe this could be another waste of taxpayers' "hard earned" money.
Any trees that are planted in this area are already at the expense of the
residents (there are no sidewalks or curbs, which is fine with me).
Taxes in the City are already too high, it seems!
Thank you.
a12--)
Do ores Aadsen
1975 Bluestone Drive
Kalispell, MT 59901
1
1
1637
Gary W. Nystul
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT
PO BOX 366
KALISPELL, MONTANA 59903-0366
June 5, 2000
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Kalispell
City Hall
Kalispell, Montana
Gentlemen:
�pJE�GE�FC�7gj�
Jl� JUN 0 5 200
I am unable to attend the public hearing on the proposed creation of the street tree
maintenance district this evening. This letter is to advise you that I do NOT favor the
creation of this district for the following reasons.
The announced plan to create the street tree district along with raising water,
sewer, ambulance and garbage rates is unacceptable. The city should live within its
financial means. Certain rate adjustments may be necessary to maintain profitability in
the enterprise funds. However creating new sources of revenue or raising rates when not
needed is merely an act of increasing "taxes" to the citizens of Kalispell.
Once a special taxing district is created it will remain in perpetuity. While the
intentions of the present mayor and council are sincere in a minimal fee, there is no
certainty that future elected officials will maintain this view. Once created, it will
continue with little oversight.
The city apparently has sufficient funds to grant pay raises in excess of the actual
increase in the cost of living. The city apparently has funds to add management personnel
at experience levels that are not needed. The mayor takes credit for reducing the tax levy
a number of years ago so perhaps now is time to add that back. The bottom line is that I
believe there are sufficient funds, at present, to properly maintain the street trees.
Now is not the time to start a new tax. Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Gary W. Nystul
1
1638
Flathead County
Board of Commissioners
(406) 758-5503
Howard W. Gipe
Robert W. Watne
Dale W. Williams
June 5, 2000
Kalispell City Mayor Wm E. Boharski &
Council Members
P O Box 1997
Kalispell, MT 59903
Dear Mayor & Council Members:
RECEIVED
JUN - 6 2000
We are in receipt of your May 10, 2000 notification concerning the establishment of an Urban
Forestry District for the City of Kalispell. Because this is a Special Assessment, the lands that
Flathead County now owns within the city limits of Kalispell would be subject to the assessment.
We have reviewed the formation of the District in regards to one of the properties now owned by
Flathead County namely the Flathead County Fairgrounds. The assessment of $13.50 per year on
a 10,000 square foot lot if interpolated to the 57 acres encompassed by the Fairgrounds results in
an additional fee of $3308.85 to the taxpayers of Flathead County, which includes the residents of
the City of Kalispell.
This figure does not include Courthouse East, the Justice Center block, or the block immediately
south of the Justice Center, which if totaled would be assessed another $1458.00 to the Flathead
County taxpayers.
We must point out that by and large the planting, protecting, maintaining, and preservation of the
existing trees are now done by the private citizen. We believe there is no reason to assume that
the citizens would be any less caring in the future. Therefore, we respectively protest the
intention to create the Urban Forestry District and urge you to deny passage of Resolution 4549.
Sincerely,
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
FLATHEAD COUNTY, MONTANA
*E�t�
Dale W. Williams
District 1
County Board of Commissioners
DWW:njw
800 South Main ** Kalispell, Montana 59901 ** Fax (406) 758-5861
1