Loading...
Staff Report/Treeline Center PPPLANNING FOR THE FUTURE REPORT TO: Doug Russell, City ManageqZ FROM: Jarod Nygren, Senior Planner Planning Department 201 V Avenue East Kalispell, MT 59901 Phone: (406) 758-7940 Fax: (406) 758-7739 www.kalispell.com/planning SUBJECT: KPP-17-01 — Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat Request MEETING DATE: May 1, 2017 BACKGROUND: A request from AMI Development and Montana Department of Natural Resources & Conservation (DNRC) for a major subdivision of a 6.8-acre tract of land into 6 commercial lots and 1 utility lot ranging from approximately .35 acres to 2.3 acres in size. The tract proposed to be subdivided is part of Section 36, which is primarily owned and managed by the DNRC for the benefit of Montana's school trust. The proposed subdivision site is zoned B-5/PUD, a mixed commercial zoning district originally adopted in 2001 and amended in 2003 (DNRC — Spring Prairie KPUD-03-01). The tract being subdivided was identified as part of the "mixed commercial" pod in the PUD, which anticipates commercial development. This land use theme was intended to provide a suitable location for commercial uses at an urban -scale density without creating a strip commercial appearance. The subject property is located at the southwest and southeast intersection of Treeline Road and Old Reserve Drive. The property can be legally described as portions of Tract 5 located in the SW4 of the NE4 and SE4 of the NW4 of Section 36, Township 29 North, Range 23 West, P.M.M., Flathead County, Montana. The Kalispell Planning Board held a duly noticed public hearing April 11, 2017, to consider the application request. Staff presented staff report KPP-17-01 providing details of the proposal and evaluation. Staff reported that the proposed preliminary plat was compatible with the zoning, the growth policy, and the applicant has met the burden of proof requirements. Staff recommended that the Planning Board adopt the staff report as findings of fact, and recommend to the Kalispell City Council that the preliminary plat be approved, subject to thirteen (13) conditions. There being no public comment, the public hearing was closed and a motion was presented to adopt staff report KPP-17-01 as findings of fact, and recommend to the Kalispell City Council that the preliminary plat be approved, subject to thirteen (13) conditions. Board discussion concluded that the preliminary plat was appropriate, and the motion passed unanimously on roll call vote. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Kalispell City Council approve Resolution 5812, a resolution approving a request from DNRC and AMI Development for Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat KPP-17-01, a major subdivision preliminary plat with thirteen (13) conditions of approval. The subject property is located within portions of Tract 5 located in the SW4 of the NE4 and SE4 of the NW4 of Section 36, Township 29 North, Range 23 West, P.M.M., Flathead County, Montana. FISCAL EFFECTS: Approval of the request will allow the applicant to proceed with development of the site, which in turn will have positive fiscal impact. ALTERNATIVES: Deny the request. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 5812 Preliminary Plat Staff Report KPP-17-01 Minutes of the April 11, 2017, Kalispell Planning Board Application Materials c: Aimee Brunckhorst, Kalispell City Clerk REQUEST FOR MAJOR SUBDIVISION APPROVAL STAFF REPORT #KPP-17-01 KALISPELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT March 23, 2017 A report to the Kalispell City Planning Board and the Kalispell City Council regarding a preliminary plat to create seven lots within DNRC Section 36. A public hearing has been scheduled before the planning board for April 11, 2017, beginning at 6:00 PM in the Kalispell City Council Chambers. The planning board will forward a recommendation to the Kalispell City Council for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: A request from AMI Development and DNRC for a for a major subdivision of a 6.8 acre tract of land located within DNRC Section 36 into 6 commercial lots and 1 utility lot ranging from approximately .35 acres to 2.3 acres in size. The lot proposed to be subdivided is part of section 36, which is primarily owned and managed by the Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation for the benefit of Montana's school trust. The proposed subdivision site is zoned B-5/PUD, a mixed commercial zoning district originally adopted in 2001 and amended in 2003 (DNRC - Spring Prairie KPUD- 03-01). The tract being subdivided was identified as part of the "mixed commercial" pod in the PUD. This land use theme was intended to provide a suitable location for commercial uses at an urban -scale density without creating a strip commercial appearance. LEGAL DESCRIPTION x =: TREELINE CENTER �T29H LOCATEC IN THE THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER AND azzw THE SO,J—HEAST OUARTER O: THE NO.ZTHS;VEST QUARTER OF SECTION 36, TO'Id\SHIP 2'' h0<TH. RANGE 22 WEST, P_Pd.IN., FLATHEAD COUNTY, MONTANA_ AREAS & DIMENSIONS Figure 1: Preliminary Plat Map 1 A. Petitioner and Owners: Montana Dept. of Natural Resources and Conservation 655 Timberwolf Parkway, Suite 3 Kalispell, MT 59901 AMI Development 53 4th Avenue EN Kalispell, MT 59901 Technical Assistance: TDH Engineering 450 Corporate Drive, Suite 101 Kalispell, MT 59901 B. Location and Legal Description of Property: The subject property is located at the southwest and southeast intersection of Treeline Road and Old Reserve Drive. The property can be legally described as portions of Tract 5 located in the SW4 of the NE4 and SE4 of the NW4 of Section 36, Township 29 North, Range 23 West, P.M.,M., Flathead County, Montana. C. Size: Total area: 6.8 acres Lots: 6.45 acres Utility Lot: .35 acres D. Existing Land Use and Zoning: The lot to be subdivided is currently undeveloped grasslands. The property is zoned B-5, (Industrial Business) with PUD (Planned Unit Development) overlay zoning. The result is a commercial zoning with some additional development standards incorporated into the zoning that limit strip commercial appearance. E. Adjacent Land Uses: North: Kalispell Bypass/U.S.93, high school and vacant land East: Vacant land, Kalispell City fire station 62, Marriot hotel and retail South: Single-family, multi -family residential (Bloomstone), Kidsports and vacant land West: Kalispell Bypass/U.S.93, vacant land F. Adjacent Zoning: North: B-5/PUD East: B-5 PUD South: R-4/PUD, P-1 West: R-5 PUD G. General Land Use Character: The subdivision is proposed within the mixed commercial POD of the DNRC Neighborhood Plan which provides for commercial development as would be expected within this subdivision. Over the last 15 years there has been a number of developments consisting of the Kalispell Bypass, E Glacier High School, the US Forest Service and Montana DNRC Offices to the north and west. The land to south located within the Bloomstone PUD has started to develop with both single-family and multi -family developments. Kidsports is also in the process of expanding its boundaries near the southern boundary of the proposed subdivision. Finally, fire station 62 and a Marriot hotel have been constructed to the immediate east. H. Utilities and Public Services: Sewer: City of Kalispell Water: City of Kalispell Refuse: City of Kalispell Electricity: Flathead Electric Cooperative Gas: NorthWestern Energy Telephone: Centurylink Schools: West Valley School District # 1 (K-8) and School District #5 (High School) Fire: City of Kalispell Police: City of Kalispell REVIEW AND FINDINGS OF FACT FOR THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF BRIGHT VIEW SUBDIVISION A. Effects on Health and Safety: Fire: The property is considered to be at low risk of fire because the subdivision and commercial structures within the subdivision will be constructed in accordance with the International Fire Code and have access which meets city standards. All of the lots within the subdivision will abut a street that has been constructed to city standards. Fire station 62 is located on Old Reserve Drive, less than 0.25 miles to the east of the subdivision. Flooding: Flood Insurance Rate Map, panel number 30029C 1805J, November 4, 2015, shows the entire subdivision to be outside of the 100-year floodplain. Access: Access to the subdivision is provided by Treeline Road, an improved city street. There is also a private drive that loops through the subdivision serving as access to those lots not getting direct access off of Treeline Road. There is an existing pathway located within the bypass right-of-way adjacent the proposed subdivision to the west and there are existing sidewalks along the right-of-ways fronting the subdivision. B. Effects on Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat: The subdivision is not located in known big game habitat and the property is not considered suitable habitat for other significant wildlife. C. Effects on the Natural Environment: Surface and groundwater: The nearest surface water is the Stillwater River, 3 approximately 5,000 feet east of the subdivision. Groundwater is relatively deep in the area, with depths greater than 50 feet at the subdivision site. Drainage: The applicant is proposing to develop a subdivision level storm drainage system with a detention pond located at the southeast portion of the proposed subdivision (Lot 6). A final storm water design will be reviewed and approved by Kalispell Public Works prior to construction and final plat submittal. D. Effects on Local Services: Water and Sewer: Water and sewer service to the subdivision will be provided by existing water and sewer mains located in Treeline Road public right-of-way. Roads: According to the traffic study completed by Abelin Traffic Services, traffic projections for the proposed subdivision are estimated to be 1,846 daily vehicle trips. All of the intersections within the study are currently functioning at a good level of service and have high levels of reserve capacity. As proposed, the Treeline Center development will not create any roadway capacity problems in this area. The impact from the proposed subdivision would be minimal. No traffic control or roadway geometric changes are recommended with this subdivision. Schools: The build out of the subdivision is anticipated to be primarily commercial, and therefore is not anticipated to generate any additional school - aged children utilizing the school district's services. Parks and Open Space: The Kalispell Subdivision Regulations do not require parkland dedication for non-residential lots. The intention of the subdivision is to create commercial lots; therefore, no parkland dedication is required. Police: This subdivision is in the jurisdiction of the City of Kalispell Police Department. The department can adequately provide service to this subdivision. Fire Protection: Fire protection services will be provided by the City of Kalispell Fire Department. Old Reserve Drive and Treeline Road provide adequate access and there are three (3) fire hydrants in proximity in case of emergency. Fire station 62 is approximately 0.25 miles away from the subdivision providing excellent response time. Solid Waste: Solid waste will be handled by the city. There is sufficient capacity within the landfill to accommodate this additional solid waste generated from this subdivision. Medical Services: Ambulance service is available from the fire department and ALERT helicopter service. Kalispell Regional Medical Center is approximately 2 miles from the site. E. Effects on Agriculture and agricultural water user facilities: The proposed subdivision site was previously used for agricultural purposes. The location and proximity to urban services and surrounding urban development make this property suited for commercial development as recommended in the Kalispell Growth Policy Future Land Use map. Therefore, development of this property will El have relatively little impact on agricultural uses within the valley and no impact on agricultural water user facilities since this property will be served by a public water system. F. Relation to the Kalispell Growth Policy: The Kalispell Growth Policy Future Land Use map for the area indicates this area is anticipated to be developed as a commercial area. Additionally, the DNRC neighborhood Plan designates the tract of land as "mixed commercial," which anticipates commercial development. Therefore, the proposed commercial subdivision is in compliance with the Kalispell Growth Policy. G. Compliance with Zoning: The proposed subdivision site is zoned B-5/PUD, a commercial zoning district originally adopted in 2001 and amended in 2003 (DNRC - Spring Prairie KPUD-03-01). The site being subdivided is identified as part of the "mixed commercial" pod in the PUD, which provides for commercial development. Therefore, the proposed commercial subdivision is in compliance with the zoning of the subject property. H. Compliance with the Kalispell Subdivision Regulations: This subdivision complies with the Kalispell Subdivision Regulations and no variances have been requested. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Kalispell City Planning Board and Zoning Commission adopt staff report KPP-17-01 as findings of fact and recommend to the Kalispell City Council that the preliminary plat of Treeline Center be approved, subject to the conditions listed below: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL General Conditions: 1. The development of the site shall be in substantial compliance with the application submitted, the site plan, materials and other specifications as well as any additional conditions associated with the preliminary plat as approved by the city council. 2. The preliminary plat approval shall be valid for a period of three years from the date of approval. 3. The developer shall submit to the Kalispell Public Works Department for review and approval a stormwater report and an engineered drainage plan that meets the requirements of the current city standards for design and construction. Prior to final plat, a certification shall be submitted to the public works department stating that the drainage plan for the subdivision has been installed as designed and approved. 4. The developer shall submit to the Kalispell Public Works Department prior to construction an erosion/sediment control plan for review and approval and a 5 copy of all documents submitted to Montana Department of Environmental Quality for the General Permit for Stormwater Discharge Associated with Construction Activities. 5. The developer shall submit water and sanitary sewer plans, applicable specifications, and design reports to the Kalispell Public Works Department and the Montana Department of Environmental Quality for concurrent review, with approval of both required prior to construction. 6. A letter from the Kalispell Public Works Department shall be submitted stating that all new infrastructure has been accepted by the City of Kalispell or a proper bond has been accepted for unfinished work. 7. All existing and proposed easements shall be indicated on the face of the final plat. Utility easements for city water and sewer shall be provided to allow for the logical extension of utilities from this subdivision to adjoining properties. A letter from the Kalispell Public Works Department shall be obtained stating that the required easements are being shown on the final plat. 8. A letter shall be obtained from the Kalispell Parks and Recreation Director approving a landscape plan for the placement of trees and landscaping materials within the landscape boulevards of the streets serving the subdivision. The approved landscape plan shall be implemented or a cash in lieu payment for installation of the street trees and groundcover be provided to the Kalispell Parks and Recreation Department. 9. The following statement shall appear on the final plat: "The undersigned hereby grants unto each and every person, firm or corporation, whether public or private, providing or offering to provide telephone, telegraph, electric power, gas, cable television, water or sewer service to the public, the right to the joint use of an easement for the construction, maintenance, repair, and removal of their lines and other facilities, in, over, under, and across each area designated on this plat as "Utility Easement" to have and to hold forever." Developer's Signature 10. Prior to filing the final plat, a letter from the US Postal Service shall be included stating the Service has reviewed and approved of the design and location of the mail delivery site. The mail delivery site shall be installed or bonded for prior to final plat. In addition, the mail delivery site and improvements shall also be included in the preliminary and final engineering plans to be reviewed by the Public Works Department. The mail delivery site shall not impact a sidewalk or proposed boulevard area. 11. A minimum of two-thirds of the necessary infrastructure for the subdivision shall be completed prior to final plat submittal. 12. All utilities shall be installed underground. me 13. All areas disturbed during development shall be re -vegetated with a weed -free mix immediately after development. PLANNING FOR THE FUTURE Planning Department 201 1st Avenue East Kalispell, MT 59901 Phone: (406) 758-7940 Fax: (406) 758-7739 www.kalispell.com/planning MAJOR SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION FEE SCHEDULE: FEE ATTACHED $1875 Major Subdivision (6 or more lots) $1,000 + $125/lot Major Subdivision Resubmittal $1,000 For each original lot unchanged add $10/lot For each lot redesigned/added add $125/lot Mobile Home Parks 8v Campgrounds (6 or more spaces) $1,000 + $250/space (5 or fewer spaces) $400 + $125/space Amended Preliminary Plat Amendment to Conditions Only Re -configured Proposed Lots Add Additional Lots or Sublots Subdivision Variance Commercial and Industrial Subdivision SUBDIVISION NAME: TREELINE CENTER OWNER(S) OF RECORD: Name STATE OF MONTANA - DNRC Mailing Address City KALISPELL 655 TIMBERWOLF PARKWAY, STE #3 $400 base fee Base fee + $40/lot Base fee + $125/lot $100 (per variance) $1,000 + $125/lot Phone 406-755-8985 State MT Zip 59901 TECHNICAL/PROFESSIONAL PARTICIPANTS (Surveyor/Designer/Engineer, etc): Name 8v Address Doug Peppmeier, PE - TDH Engineering, 450 Corporate Drive STE #101, Kalispell, MT Name 8v Address Richard Swan, PLS, TDH Engineering, 450 Corporate Drive STE #101, Kalispell, MT Name 8v Address LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: Property Address TREELINE ROAD, KALISPELL, MT 59901 Assessor's Tract No(s) 5-800 & 5-802 (#E000703) 1/4 Sec NE & NW Section Lot No(s) 36 Township 29N N/A Range 22W GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBDIVISION: Number of Lots or Rental Spaces 7 Total Acreage in Subdivision 6.785 I Total Acreage in Lots 6.785 Minimum Size of Lots or Spaces Total Acreage in Streets or Roads N/A Maximum Size of Lots or Spaces Total Acreage in Parks, Open Spaces and/or Common Areas PROPOSED USE(S) AND NUMBER OF ASSOCIATED LOTS/SPACES: Single Family Duplex Commercial Condominium Townhouse Apartment 6 Industrial Multi -Family Mobile Home Park Recreational Vehicle Park _ Planned Unit Development. Other APPLICABLE ZONING DESIGNATION & DISTRICT KALISPELL B-5/PUD ESTIMATE OF MARKET VALUE BEFORE IMPROVEMENTS $700,000 IMPROVEMENTS TO BE PROVIDED: WI T-T� Roads: Gravel Paved X Curb X Gutter Sidewalks X Alleys Other Water System: Individual Multiple User Neighborhood Public X Other Sewer System: Individual Multiple User Neighborhood Public X Other Other Utilities: Cable TV X Telephone X Electric X Gas Other Solid Waste: Home Pick Up Central Storage Contract Hauler X Owner Haul _ Mail Delivery: Central X Individual School District: Fire Protection: Hydrants X Tanker Recharge Fire District: Drainage System: IN & OVER GROUND COLLECTION SYSTEM TO CHAMBERS WITH OUTLET STRUCTURE PROPOSED EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL: BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES VARIANCES: ARE ANY VARIANCES REQUESTED? NO (yes/no) If yes, please complete the information below: SECTION OF REGULATIONS CREATING HARDSHIP: N/A EXPLAIN THE HARDSHIP THAT WOULD BE CREATED WITH STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATIONS PROPOSED ALTERNATIVES) TO STRICT COMPLIANCES WITH ABOVE REGULATIONS: 2 PLEASE ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS IN THE SPACES PROVIDED BELOW: 1. Will the granting of the variance be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare or injurious to other adjoining properties? 2. Will the variance cause a substantial increase in public costs? 3. Will the variance affect, in any manner, the provisions of any adopted zoning regulations, Master Plan or Growth Policy? 4. Are there special circumstances related to the physical characteristics of the site (topography, shape, etc.) that create the hardship? 5. What other conditions are unique to this property that create the need for a variance? 3 APPLICATION CONTENTS: The subdivider shall submit a complete application addressing items below to the Kalispell Planning Department at least thirty five (35) days prior to the date of the Planning Board meeting at which it will be heard. 1. Completed preliminary plat application. 2. 4 copies of the preliminary plat. 3. One reproducible set of supplemental information. (See Appendix A of Subdivision Regulations for the city where the subdivision is proposed.) 4. One reduced copy of the preliminary plat not to exceed 11" x 17" in size. 5. Electronic copy of the application materials, including the preliminary plat, either copied onto a disk or emailed to planning2kalispell.com (Please note the maximum file size to email is 20mg) 6. A bona fide legal description of the subject property and a map showing the location and boundaries of the property. 7. Application fee based on the schedule on page 1 of this application and made payable to the City of Kalispell. I hereby certify under penalty of perjury and the laws of the State of Montana that the information submitted herein, on all other submitted forms, documents, plans or any other information submitted as a part of this application, to be true, complete, and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Should any information or representation submitted in connection with this application be untrue, I understand that any approval based thereon may be rescinded, and other appropriate action taken. The signing of this application signifies approval for the Kalispell Planning staff to be present on the property for routine monitoring and inspection during the approval and development process. (Applicant) (Date) M LL _ o a e LLl �� �� u 3 5 ff G Ei G G G G G & G (n W W I I I w ,i \ a• o w® z wl z J c¢i w oa gi - awl O =_ - z "spas zz / Z W5 . 2 -z i z i ia'S io J 13-_ o�� a N a a� oo < q§ 5N H �oz' Sw / LLl Wom p p� waa$3a �/ wr ws=- sa <s3 o i r) Q / Q z � Q �;,� ntLU H W H U Z U W ¢ r T V N LLI�� I W a �± H0 Lr O Q W / y` ry �aSAq P = O rT, _ Q i/ s op `H \ LU ¢ HUH of co C1=w U,\ p UQ LLIH ��LL N C� O . IM- v> > z wC)� W z ry- b co 0 = W 0 mega cf) CO 61 O� F \ F LLJ VA' \„i -W Q I U� U z -o_- Hill tim 0`5 m„ Z�� o LL oo - oo = � aQ Z O1 (h � LL 0 N 3 F W W g Z --aigEO-� N s ,62- - Was3aa /// 01-0 w N Q co z fr c� Q ID O o i Q Wfr0 I W a 6 bQ L'M'Q ti d °�� °4 LL W Q 0\ a 4 0� eE oa L LL! o Hw W�.. a g U O 5 LL I x } LU z fr Q 0 _ J p Z jw� oz d H LLj LLI fn W O fr Q w I�fr O Q � � � VAs o�o n \ \ \\ J U)DI W U' H � I Hfr W W Q O \\' �t CN O = > W z V� �w U T- O O r o= o= s o a o o 0 0 z t ou - o s s g \ \ 0 A 0-&ao =o s- �p�p \ z z ¢ c7� j w mG WW a m pG �a �� �¢ o > d d os 3�€.,� a �wyoQ�z LU ;� om o �W - 7 sw \ \ Foy m" �s� Ws xoo..o wP Q 0 co m o co W Cfl N W = K / U) Z / O / 3 - / H M NA o � Q M Z �Q�/GS� ,O dS5bd W Z O Z O U do� off' s a as H M W M 1 H LL Z Q O 0 / G �°a' "- F W W /� O W Z Q C ♦Q �'15� �'°S .] O O Q Z D = � ~ O H co £� 0 co 51gg U co Q wu W_ ~ LL O ,p119 $ o co c U O U W W _ O�� J t Q IIZI �s W~ 2 �O " G J ,��y H o� a°� 0 CO m Q N H �C) Z Q O F W W cP� P,, 5yi M 8 g s °° > 7� ,er>u m.00,sc.ts $ LLI u !� H fn LL N J d j�W ��/� >= W Zr Q/ L LI Obi PLO ��p I�1 f Q f' O 0 < Q oFo 39 a W (J' F- Q �� r n o ti_ o c� W rn P J N ! H = N Z D W Q Q p0z`. ` O H W Z J UFO w O of W o Q z - P Q z�> �Q� Q - J DESCRIPTION — TREELINE CENTER (SOUTH PIECE) A parcel of land located in the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 36, Township 29 North, Range 22 West, P.M.M., Flathead County, Montana, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Center quarter corner of Section 36, Township 29 North, Range 22 West, P.M.M., Flathead County, Montana, said point being on the southerly boundary of Parcel A of Certificate of Survey No. 20476, records of Flathead County, thence S89°58'06"E along said boundary, 189.98 feet to the POINT -OF BEGINNING; thence northeasterly along said boundary the following five (5) courses; thence N75°28'21"E 70.83 feet; thence northeasterly along a tangent curve to the left having a radius of 479.11 feet and a central angle of 25°42'35", an arc length of 214.99 feet; thence northeasterly along a radial reverse curve to the right having a radius of 175.00 feet and a central angle of 11'59'51", an arc length of 36.64 feet; thence northeasterly along a radial reverse curve to the left having a radius of 226.37 feet and a central angle of 9'48' 12", an arc length of 38.73 feet; thence N47°25'08"E 43.82 feet to the intersection of said boundary with the southwesterly right of way of Old Reserve Drive, as shown on Kalispell Bypass right of way plans (R/W ID. MT-NH-NCPD 15(76)) and recorded as Doc. No. 200700032118, records of Flathead County; thence southeasterly along said right of way on a non -tangent curve to the left having a radius of 951.44 feet, a central angle of 7° 19' 52", a chord bearing of S49°42'44"E and a chord distance of 121.66 feet, an arc length of 121.74 feet; thence S68°35'35"E along said right of way, 73.34 feet; thence southeasterly along said right of way on a non -tangent curve to the left having a radius of 935.04 feet, a central angle of 11°14'20", a chord bearing of S63°21'01"E and a chord distance of 183.12 feet, an arc length of 183.41 feet to the intersection of said right of way with South line of the Northeast quarter of said Section 36; thence N89°58'06"W along said line, 677.51 feet to the POINT -OF -BEGINNING, containing 1.193 acres. Treeline Center Parking Agreement/ Storm water Management Plan Treeline Center grants to Lot 1, Lot 2, Lot 3, Lot 4, Lot 5, and Lot 6 and Lots 1-6 grant to Treeline Center and Lots 1-6, a non-exclusive access easement over and across any and all driveways, parking areas, and drive aisles (whether now existing or In the future to exist) located on that party's respective Lot. and as they may exist from time to time and parking easements over and across any and all parking areas on that party's respective Lot as may be established and/or designated from time to time (whether now existing or In the future to exist) by the party on whose property the easement Is located. The locations of the easements granted in this Section may be changed or modified, from time to time, by the party on whose property the easement is located and said parties will have parking subject to the provisions hereof. The purpose and intent of the parties are to establish non-exclusive cross -access easements across any and all drive aisles whether now existing or In the future to exist on all lots of their respective Lots. Accordingly, Treeline Center and Lots 1-6 hereby establish non-exclusive access agreement for access through and over any and all drive isles whether now existing or in the future to exist on any end all lots of the property defined in this Agreement for the benefit of all of each party's respective Lots, Except as otherwise provided herein, each party may designate areas on such party's respective Lot for building areas, parking, Ingress, egress and landscaping and other uses beneficial to such party's use and occupation of its respective lot. 1. Each party agrees to keep the drive aisles on their Lot free and clear from obstacles or obstructions which would prevent or hinder the free passage of vehicular traffic except temporarily, for reasonable times and in a reasonable manner, for purposes of performing work permitted by this Agreement. 2. Each party shall, at all times, maintain that portion of the easements (and any Improvements to such easements) located on that party's respective Lot in good repair. clean and clear of snow, ice, rubbish, and debris, properly drained, and adequately lighted, at that party's sole cost and expense, which shall include the incidental rights of maintenance and repair Including, but not limited to, repair of pot holes, deterioration or damages, cleaning and weed control and repaving, If necessary. 3. In the event of a default of any of the provisions hereof by either party I the non -defaulting party shall have the right the cure the default at the other party's sale expense If the defaulting party has not commenced curing said default within thirty (30) days after receipt of a written default notice from the non -defaulting party Notwithstanding the above, either party may cure a default immediately In an emergency situation. The defaulting party agrees to reimburse the non -defaulting party for any amount so paid by the non -defaulting party to cure any default within ten (10) days after receipt of a written invoice from the non -defaulting party. The non -defaulting party may take such other proceedings at law or in equity as the non -defaulting party deems necessary. 4. Treeline Center grants to Lots 1-5 perpetual non-exclusive easement to drain its surface water runoff into the retention system to be located on Lot 6. In order that Lot 6 and any improvements thereon will continue to be an attractive and viable addition to Treeline Center, it is necessary to establish herein a Storm Water Management Plan. There are no physical improvements proposed upon Lot 6, other than the storm water management basins or other underground utilities and associated manholes, transformers, or similar aboveground appurtenances to service underground facilities. 5. Treeline Center, (or their respective successors, tenants and assigns) at its sole expense, shall maintain Lot 6, in attractive condition, for the duration of the lease, ninety nine (99) years. Treeline Center, shall be responsible for maintaining the storm water management facilities located on Lot 6 in good, clean, unobstructed and proper operating condition. The aforesaid maintenance obligations shall include normal and routine surface maintenance, mowing of grass, and removal of debris, as well as any structural maintenance which may be required for proper operation and performance of the storm water management facilities. 6. Treeline Center shall, at its cost and expense, erect a monument sign on Lot 6 for the use of Lots 1-5. Lots 1-5 shall have the right, at their cost and expense, to place a sign thereon. Lots 1-5 shall, at their expense, maintain their sign in good condition and repair. Treeline Center shall maintain the monument sign and Lots 1-5 shall reimburse Treeline Center Its pro-rata share (based on the square footage of Lots1-5 sign panel to the total of all sign panels on the monument sign) of such maintenance cost. 7. Each party (and their respective successors, tenants and assigns) shall maintain commercial general liability Insurance against claims for personal Injury, death and property damage occurring in, on or about the easement areas with limits In the amount of Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000). All such policies shall name the other party as an additional insured, and each party, upon written request of the other party, shall deliver a certificate of insurance to such requesting party. 8. Each party (and their respective successors and assigns) shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the other, Its respective successors and assigns, from and against, any and all liability, demands, claims, causes of action, judgments and costs and expenses Incurred In the Investigation of the same (Including, without limitation. court costs and reasonable attorney's fee. 10. Communication may be given shall each have the right to specify. From time to time, as its address for purposes of this Agreement, any address In the 48 contiguous States of the United States of America upon giving fifteen (15) days' notice thereof to each other person then entitled to receive notices, instruments or communications hereunder. 11. As used In this Agreement, unless the context clearly otherwise requires, Treeline Center and Lots 1-6 shall mean, with respect to each Lot, the record Lessee(s) from time to time of an interest in fee simple In all or any part of Lot 1-6 whether such Lessee be one or more personal or entity. 12. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to be a gift or dedication of any portion of any property to the general public. This Agreement shall not be construed as conferring upon any third party any right or benefit and any and all claims which may arise hereunder may be enforced solely by the parties and their respective successors and assigns. 13. Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, each party reserves the right to eject any person or persons not authorized hereby. Each party hereby reserves any and all rights which are not directly Incompatible with the easements granted hereunder, including, without limitation, the right to grant easements to third parties over, under and through the granting party respective Lot. 14. The agreements and restrictions described in this Agreement shall run with the land and shall be binding upon and Inure to the benefit of Treeline Center, Lots 1-6 and their respective successors. lessees, and assigns and shall be perpetual, except that all use restrictions In Section 1 above shall be for a period of ninety-nine (99) years commencing on the date this Agreement is recorded in the recorded Office of the County of Flathead, Montana and said restrictions shall automatically terminate upon expiration of said ninety-nine (99) year period. Except as provided herein, all easements granted herein may be used for the purpose designated herein by Treeline Center, Lots 1-6 and their respective successor, designees, tenants, employees, agents, customers, and Invitees free from charge. Except as specifically set forth herein, no other easements are granted herein, nor shall any other easements be implied 15. It is further understood and agreed to by Treeline Center and Lots 1-6, that the easements and other rights may be mortgaged to any mortgagee taking a mortgage on Lots 1-6, but any mortgagee taking a mortgage on any easement herein shall take said mortgage subject to the other rights, benefits, duties, and obligations created and established herein. 16. If any legal action or other proceeding is brought for the enforcement hereof, or because of an alleged dispute, breach, default or misrepresentation in connection with any provisions hereof, the successful or prevailing party or parties shall be entitled to recover attorneys' fees, court costs, and all expenses even If not taxable as court costs (including, without limitation, all such fees, costs and expenses Incident to appeals), incurred In that action or proceeding, In addition to any other relief to which such party or parties may be entitled. 17. Any amendment to this Agreement shall require the prior written consent of all owners of Lots 1-6. Notwithstanding the above, any amendment to the use restriction in Section 1(a) shall at all times require the prior written consent of Treeline Center. In the event there are easements of record prior to this Agreement providing for any matters stated herein, then this Agreement shall amend any prior documents with respect to all property mentioned herein. • • abelin traffic services Prepared For: AMI Development 53 4th Avenue EN Kalispell, MT 59901 February, 2017 Traffic Impact Study Treeline Center Commercial Development Kalispell, Montana 130 South Howie Street Helena, Montana 596oi 4o6-459-1443 Treeline Center Traffic Impact Study Kalispell, Montana Table of Contents A. Executive Summary--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1 B. Project Description----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1 C. Existing Conditions ........................................................................................ 1 Adjacent Roadways------------------------------------------------------------------------------1 TrafficCounts ........................................................................................ 2 Historic Traffic Data ............................................................................... 3 Levelof Service ..................................................................................... 3 Planned Road Improvements & Developments.....................................4 D. Proposed Development .............................................................................. 4 E. Trip Generation and Assignment................................................................4 F. Trip Distribution------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------6 G. Traffic Impacts Outside of the Development...............................................6 H. Impact Summary & Recommendations......................................................7 List of Figures Figure 1 — Proposed Development Site...................................................................2 Figure 2 — Proposed Development .......................................................................... 5 Figure 3— Trip Distribution ...................................................................................... 6 List of Tables Table 1 — Historic Traffic Data ................................................................................. 3 Table 2 — 2017 Level of Service Summary ..............................................................4 Table 3 — Trip Generation Rates-----------------------------------------------------------------------------6 Table 4 — Future Level of Service Summary With Development .............................7 Treeline Center Traffic Impact Study Kalispell, Montana Treeline Center Development Traffic Impact Study Kalispell, Montana A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Treeline Center is a 6.5-acre mixed -use commercial development located south of Old Reserve Drive in Kalispell, MT. At full build -out in 2018 the project would produce 1,846 daily vehicle trips. All intersections within the study area are currently functioning at a good level of service and have high levels of reserve capacity. As proposed, the Treeline Center development will not create any roadway capacity problems in this area. The impact from the proposed development at these intersections would be minimal. No traffic control or roadway geometric changes are recommended with the Treeline Center development. B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION This document studies the possible effect on the surrounding road system from a proposed mixed - use commercial development project located south of Old Reserve Drive on Treeline Road in Kalispell, Montana. The development includes a variety of office, retail, and commercial properties. This document identifies any traffic mitigation efforts that the development may require. The site is located south of Old Reserve Drive and east of the new Highway 93 Bypass. C. EXISTING CONDITIONS The proposed development property currently consists of a 6.5-acre parcel of undeveloped land located south of Old Reserve Drive between the Highway 93 Bypass and Treeline Road. The topography in this area is mostly flat. The Bloomstone subdivision was recently completed at the southern end of Treeline Road. See Figure 1 for a location map of the proposed development. Adjacent Roadways Old Reserve Drive is a minor arterial roadway which has been developed as part of the Highway 93 Bypass improvements. The road extends northwest from Highway 93, and connects with Stillwater Road at a modern roundabout. Old Reserve Drive connects with the Highway 93 Bypass at a grade -separated intersection with off -ramps for northbound and southbound traffic. Glacier High School is located along Old Reserve Drive west of the Highway 93 Bypass. The road currently has a four -lane urban cross-section with left - turn bays at all intersections, corridor lighting, and sidewalks on both sides. The posted speed limit is 35 MPH. The intersections of Old Reserve Drive with Wolfpack Way and both ramps of the 93 Bypass are currently signalized. According to traffic counts conducted by MDT is 2015, Old Reserve Drive carried 5,345 Vehicles per Day (VPD). Abelin Traffic Services 1 February 2017 Treeline Center Traffic Impact Study Kalispell, Montana U.S. Highway 93 Bypass is a newly constructed four -lane principal arterial route that passes along the west side of the City of Kalispell. The route was opened to the public in the fall of 2016. The road has a posted speed limit of 55 MPH and grade -separated interchanges at Four Mile Drive, Three Mile Drive, and U.S. Highway 2. Treeline Road is a newly constructed two-lane collector route that extends south from Old Reserve Drive. The road provides access to the recently completed Bloomstone residential development. The intersection of Treeline Road with Old Reserve Drive currently has separated left- and right -turn lanes for northbound traffic and a left -turn lane on Old Reserve Drive. Current traffic volumes on Treeline Road are relatively low (approximately 700 VPD) Traffic Counts In February 2017 Abelin Traffic Services (ATS) collected turning movement count data at adjacent intersections along Old Reserve Drive. Due to the weather conditions, no 24-hour traffic data could be collected on the subject roadways. The raw traffic data is included in Appendix A of this report. Abelin Traffic Services 2 February 2017 Treeline Center Traffic Impact Study Kalispell, Montana The raw data collected for this project was adjusted for seasonal variations in accordance with data collected from MDT's annual count station located on Highway 2 west of Kalispell (Station A-024). This permanent count station indicated that data collected in February is approximately 89% of the AADT (Average Annual Daily Traffic) volume in this area. Historic Traffic Data Abelin Traffic Services obtained historic traffic data for Old Reserve Drive from the Montana DOT. This data is presented in Table 1. The traffic data history for this area indicates that traffic volumes have increased along this road segment since it was completed in 2009. No traffic counts have been performed along this section of road since the Highway 93 Bypass was completed in the fall of 2016 and the full impacts of the bypass on area traffic volumes have not yet been identified. Based on peak -hour data collected for this project it is estimated that the current 2017 ADT volumes on this road segment are now near 8,000 VPD with the completion of the Highway 93 Bypass. Table 1 - Historic Traffic Data Old Reserve Drive 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 East of HWY 93 Bypass 1 3,240 1 3,100 3,070 2,900 3,100 5,345 Level of Service Using the data collected for this project, ATS conducted a Level of Service (LOS) analysis at area intersections. This evaluation was conducted in accordance with the procedures outlined in the Transportation Research Board's Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) - Special Report 209 and the Highway Capacity Software (HCS) version 6.9. Intersections are graded from A to F representing the average delay that a vehicle entering an intersection can expect. Typically, a LOS of C or better is considered acceptable for peak -hour conditions. Table 2 shows the existing 2017 LOS for the AM and PM peak hours without the traffic from the proposed development. The LOS calculations are included in Appendix C. The table shows that all of the intersections within the study area are functioning at good levels of service. The new signalized intersections along this corridor allow for efficient flow of traffic through the area and the intersections have considerable reserve capacity. It should be noted that field observers recorded left -turning vehicles backing up between Wolfpack Way and the Highway 93 Bypass southbound ramps during the AM peak period due to traffic going into Glacier High School. The backup of traffic was short in duration, but did effect the operations of the adjacent intersections. It would be desirable for MDT to review the peak period signal timing and phasing at these intersections to improve overall traffic flow during peak operation (7:45 AM to 8:15 AM). Abelin Traffic Services 3 February 2017 Treeline Center Traffic Impact Study Kalispell, Montana Table 2 - 2017 Level of Service Summary Old Reserve Drive Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Delay (Sec.) LOS Delay (Sec.) LOS Wolfpack Way 18.0 B 14.3 B 93 Bypass SB 19.3 B 7.1 A 93 Bypass NB 15.1 B 15.5 B Treeline Road* 10.9 B 11.5 B *Northbound Side Street LOS and Delay Planned Road Improvements & Developments With the completion of the Highway 93 bypass it is likely that this area will experience high levels of development pressure. The Bloomstone residential development was recently completed along Treeline Road. Future phases of this project will ultimately connect Treeline Road to Four Mile Drive to the south. Additional commercial development proposals are in the planning phase which will connect Treeline Road north to Highway 93. The Kalispell IV development is also underway south of Reserve Loop to the east of Treeline Road. These developments and continued modifications to the overall road network will impact traffic volumes throughout the area. The ultimate impact of these road network changes will be hard to predict until more data is available about the current traffic impacts of the Highway 93 bypass operations. D. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The development currently under consideration for this site includes 6.5 acres of land located southwest of Old Reserve Drive which would be developed into a mixed -use commercial development. The site is located between the new Highway 93 Bypass and Treeline Road. The development would consist of several offices, mixed -retail, a restaurant and an 88 unit hotel. Access to the site would be obtained through an approach onto Treeline Road to the southeast. The developers plan to begin construction at the site in 2017 with full buildout by 2018. The Treeline Center Development site plan is shown in Figure 2. E. TRIP GENERATION AND ASSIGNMENT ATS performed a trip generation analysis to determine the anticipated future traffic volumes from the proposed developments using the trip generation rates contained in Trip Generation (Institute of Transportation Engineers, Ninth Edition). These rates are the national standard and are based on the most current information available to planners. A vehicle "trip" is defined as any trip that either begins or ends at the development site. ATS determined that the critical traffic impacts on the intersections and roadways would occur during the weekday morning and evening peak hours. According to the ITE trip generation rates, at full build -out the development would produce 168 AM peak hour trips, 141 PM peak hour trips, and 1,846 daily trips. See Table 3 for detailed trip generation information. Abelin Traffic Services 4 February 2017 TeleineCenter Traffic Impact Stu/y Kalispell, Montana Figure 3 — Proposed Treeline Center Development oL.o RESERVE DRIVE ab§#Traffic Srics 5 February 2O72 Treeline Center Traffic Impact Study Kalispell, Montana Table 3 - Trip Generation Rates - Treeline Center Land Use Units AM Peak Hour Trip Ends per Unit Total AM Peak Hour Trip Ends PM Peak Hour Trip Ends per Unit Total PM Peak Hour Trip Ends Weekday Trip Ends per Unit Total Weekday Trip Ends Office Park 8.6 KSF 1.71 15 1.48 13 11.42 98 Specialty Retail 6 KSF 6.84 41 2.71 16 44.32 266 Hotel 88 Rooms 0.53 47 0.6 53 8.17 719 Restaurant 6 KSF 10.81 65 9.85 59 127.15 763 TOTAL I 1 168 1 141 1 1,846 F. TRIP DISTRIBUTION The traffic distribution and assignment for the proposed subdivisions was based upon the existing ADT volumes along the adjacent roadways and the peak -hour turning volumes. Traffic is expected to distribute onto the surrounding road network as shown on Figure 3. a 4- 0 Figure 3 — Trip Distribution Old Reserve Drive G. TRAFFIC IMPACTS OUTSIDE OF THE DEVELOPMENT 45% Using the trip generation and trip distribution numbers, ATS determined the future Level of Service for the area intersections. The anticipated intersection LOS with the Treeline Center commercial development is shown in Table 4. These calculations are included in Appendix B of this report. The table indicates that the construction of the Treeline Center will not have a significant impact on the traffic operations at any adjacent intersection. The overall intersection delay will increase by less than one second per vehicle at the study intersections. No intersection Abelin Traffic Services 6 February 2017 Treeline Center Traffic Impact Study Kalispell, Montana traffic control or geometric changes are recommended with the Treeline Center. It is possible that future development and future road connections my ultimately necessitate the installation of a traffic signal at Treeline Road. However, traffic volumes at the intersection will need to double from the currently projected traffic with the Treeline Center before a higher level of traffic control would be necessary. Table 4 -Future Level of Service Summary With Development Old Reserve Drive Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Delay (Sec.) LOS Delay (Sec.) LOS Wolfpack Way 18.8 B 14.4 B 93 Bypass SB 19.2 B 7.1 A 93 Bypass NB 15.1 B 15.7 B Treeline Road* 12.0 B 12.7 B *Northbound Side Street LOS and Delay H. IMPACT SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS All intersections within the study area are currently functioning at a good level of service and have high levels of reserve capacity. As proposed, the Treeline Center development will not create any roadway capacity problems in this area. The impact from the proposed development at these intersections would be minimal. No traffic control or roadway geometric changes are recommended with the Treeline Center development. Abelin Traffic Services 7 February 2017 APPENDIX A Traffic Data (M a firt .J a is S e wic e,5 13C S. wie Stwet Helena, MT 59601 File Name : wolfamtmc Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 2/15/2017 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Bank 2 Wolfpack RESERVE Wolfpack RESERVE Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Int. Total 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 11 16 66 0 22 1 0 0 3 65 1 0 185 07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 14 30 117 0 38 1 0 0 3 99 1 0 303 07:45 AM 0 0 1 0 11 31 129 0 59 2 0 0 6 96 1 0 336 Total 0 0 1 0 36 77 312 0 119 4 0 0 12 260 3 0 824 08:00 AM 0 0 1 0 7 19 52 0 43 1 0 0 1 94 0 0 218 08:15 AM 0 0 5 0 12 16 10 0 7 1 0 0 0 64 1 0 116 Grand Total 0 0 7 0 55 112 374 0 169 6 0 0 13 418 4 0 1158 Apprch % 0 0 100 0 10.2 20.7 69.1 0 96.6 3.4 0 0 3 96.1 0.9 0 Total % 0 0 0.6 0 4.7 9.7 32.3 0 14.6 0.5 0 0 1.1 36.1 0.3 0 (M a firt .J a is S e wic e,5 13C S. wie Stwet Helena, MT 59601 File Name : WolfPMtmc Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 2/14/2017 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Bank 2 Wolfpack RESERVE Wolfpack RESERVE Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Int. Total 04:30 PM 0 0 9 0 2 44 14 0 15 0 0 0 0 53 0 0 137 04:45 PM 3 0 16 0 2 53 15 0 13 0 0 0 0 58 0 0 160 Total 3 0 25 0 4 97 29 0 28 0 0 0 0 111 0 0 297 05:00 PM 2 0 10 0 2 41 22 0 9 0 0 0 0 59 0 0 145 05:15 PM 0 0 8 0 1 58 33 0 32 0 1 0 2 75 0 0 210 05:30 PM 1 0 8 0 1 58 22 0 37 0 2 0 0 85 0 0 214 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 68 11 0 11 0 1 0 1 48 0 0 140 Total 3 0 26 0 4 225 88 0 89 0 4 0 3 267 0 0 709 Grand Total 6 0 51 0 8 322 117 0 117 0 4 0 3 378 0 0 1006 Apprch % 10.5 0 89.5 0 1.8 72 26.2 0 96.7 0 3.3 0 0.8 99.2 0 0 Total % 0.6 0 5.1 0 0.8 32 11.6 0 11.6 0 0.4 0 0.3 37.6 0 0 (M a firt .J a is S e wic e,5 13C S. wie Stwet Helena, MT 59601 File Name : 93sbrampsAM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 2/15/2017 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Unshifted - Bank 1 93 SB RESERVE 93 SB RESERVE Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left FPeds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Int. Total 07:15 AM 40 0 4 0 0 53 8 0 0 0 0 0 15 72 0 0 192 07:30 AM 68 0 5 0 0 93 4 0 0 0 0 0 21 116 0 0 307 07:45 AM 77 0 7 0 8 94 11 0 0 0 0 0 32 124 0 0 353 Total 185 0 16 0 8 240 23 0 0 0 0 0 68 312 0 0 852 08:00 AM 33 0 3 0 0 45 7 0 0 0 0 0 19 119 0 0 226 08:15 AM 17 0 5 0 0 21 8 0 0 0 0 0 5 71 0 0 127 08:30 AM 9 0 6 0 0 32 8 0 0 0 0 0 11 73 0 0 139 Grand Total 244 0 30 0 8 338 46 0 0 0 0 0 103 575 0 0 1344 Apprch % 89.1 0 10.9 0 2 86.2 11.7 0 0 0 0 0 15.2 84.8 0 0 Total % 18.2 0 2.2 0 0.6 25.1 3.4 0 0 0 0 0 7.7 42.8 0 0 Unshifted 243 0 30 0 8 338 46 0 0 0 0 0 103 572 0 0 1340 % Unshifted 99.6 0 100 0 100 100 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 99.5 0 0 99.7 Bank 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 4 % Bank 1 0.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0.3 (M a firt .J a is S e wic e,5 13U S. wk Stwet Helena, MT 59601 File Name : 93sbrampsPM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 2/14/2017 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Unshifted - Bank 1 93 SB RESERVE 93 SB RESERVE Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left FPeds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Int. Total 04:30 PM 6 0 5 0 0 54 48 0 0 0 0 0 9 68 0 0 190 04:45 PM 9 0 3 0 0 61 72 0 0 0 0 0 15 72 0 0 232 Total 15 0 8 0 0 115 120 0 0 0 0 0 24 140 0 0 422 05:00 PM 5 0 6 0 0 60 64 0 0 0 0 0 12 66 0 0 213 05:15 PM 24 0 3 0 0 68 67 0 0 0 0 0 19 96 0 0 277 05:30 PM 14 0 3 0 0 67 86 0 0 0 0 0 35 95 0 0 300 05:45 PM 13 0 10 0 0 66 48 0 0 0 0 0 7 52 0 0 196 Total 56 0 22 0 0 261 265 0 0 0 0 0 73 309 0 0 986 Grand Total 71 0 30 0 0 376 385 0 0 0 0 0 97 449 0 0 1408 Apprch % 70.3 0 29.7 0 0 49.4 50.6 0 0 0 0 0 17.8 82.2 0 0 Total % 5 0 2.1 0 0 26.7 27.3 0 0 0 0 0 6.9 31.9 0 0 Unshifted 70 0 30 0 0 375 384 0 0 0 0 0 97 448 0 0 1404 % Unshifted 98.6 0 100 0 0 99.7 99.7 0 0 0 0 0 100 99.8 0 0 99.7 Bank 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 % Bank 1 1.4 0 0 0 0 0.3 0.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0.3 (M a firt .J a is S e wic e,5 13U S. wk Stwet Helena, MT 59601 File Name : 93nbrampsam Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 2/15/2017 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Unshifted - Bank 1 93 NB Ramps RESERVE 93 NB Ramps RESERVE Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left FPeds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Int. Total 07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 2 44 0 0 13 0 33 1 0 47 44 0 184 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 54 0 0 20 0 50 0 0 67 61 0 252 Total 0 0 0 0 2 98 0 0 33 0 83 1 0 114 105 0 436 08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 2 54 0 0 13 0 40 0 0 78 57 0 244 08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 15 0 10 0 0 50 52 0 153 08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 21 0 6 0 0 49 28 0 124 08:45 AM 0 0 0 0 2 43 0 0 27 0 19 0 0 53 23 0 167 Total 0 0 0 0 4 143 0 0 76 0 75 0 0 230 160 0 688 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 6 241 0 0 109 0 158 1 0 344 265 0 1124 Apprch % 0 0 0 0 2.4 97.6 0 0 40.7 0 59 0.4 0 56.5 43.5 0 Total % 0 0 0 0 0.5 21.4 0 0 9.7 0 14.1 0.1 0 30.6 23.6 0 Unshifted 0 0 0 0 6 239 0 0 109 0 158 1 0 339 264 0 1116 % Unshifted 0 0 0 0 100 99.2 0 0 100 0 100 100 0 98.5 99.6 0 99.3 Bank 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 8 % Bank 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.5 0.4 0 0.7 (M a firt .J a is S e wic e,5 13C S. wie Stwet Helena, MT 59601 File Name : 93nbrampspm Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 2/14/2017 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Unshifted - Bank 1 93 NB Ramps RESERVE 93 NB Ramps RESERVE Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left FPeds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Int. Total 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 4 98 0 0 28 0 20 0 0 45 25 0 220 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 4 85 0 0 39 0 13 0 0 48 28 0 217 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 1 127 0 0 34 0 11 0 0 38 35 0 246 Total 0 0 0 0 9 310 0 0 101 0 44 0 0 131 88 0 683 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 4 107 0 0 50 0 28 0 0 50 30 0 269 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 3 112 0 0 47 0 26 0 0 52 51 0 291 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 3 109 0 0 40 0 15 0 0 48 33 0 248 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 19 638 0 0 238 0 113 0 0 281 202 0 1491 Apprch % 0 0 0 0 2.9 97.1 0 0 67.8 0 32.2 0 0 58.2 41.8 0 Total % 0 0 0 0 1.3 42.8 0 0 16 0 7.6 0 0 18.8 13.5 0 Unshifted 0 0 0 0 19 636 0 0 237 0 113 0 0 281 201 0 1487 % Unshifted 0 0 0 0 100 99.7 0 0 99.6 0 100 0 0 100 99.5 0 99.7 Bank 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 % Bank 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.3 0 0 0.4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0.3 (M a firt .J a is S e wic e,5 13C S. wie Stwet Helena, MT 59601 File Name : TreeAMtmc Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 2/15/2017 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Bank 2 Treeline RESERVE Treeline RESERVE Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left FPeds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Int. Total 07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 41 0 0 7 0 5 0 1 59 0 0 113 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 46 0 0 6 0 8 0 3 84 0 0 147 Total 0 0 0 0 0 87 0 0 13 0 13 0 4 143 0 0 260 08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 0 5 0 6 0 1 90 0 0 152 08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 26 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 65 0 0 95 08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 69 0 0 91 08:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 41 2 0 2 0 4 0 1 79 0 0 129 Total 0 0 0 0 0 137 3 0 11 0 10 0 3 303 0 0 467 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 224 3 0 24 0 23 0 7 446 0 0 727 Apprch % 0 0 0 0 0 98.7 1.3 0 51.1 0 48.9 0 1.5 98.5 0 0 Total % 0 0 0 0 0 30.8 0.4 0 3.3 0 3.2 0 1 61.3 0 0 (M a firt .J a is S e wic e,5 13C S. wie Stwet Helena, MT 59601 File Name : TreePMtmc Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 2/14/2017 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Bank 2 Treeline RESERVE Treeline RESERVE Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left FPeds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Int. Total 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 99 4 0 0 0 3 0 2 71 0 0 179 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 88 7 0 4 0 1 0 0 87 0 0 187 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 127 5 0 1 0 1 0 0 72 0 0 206 Total 0 0 0 0 0 314 16 0 5 0 5 0 2 230 0 0 572 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 110 4 0 5 0 1 0 3 97 0 0 220 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 113 9 0 2 0 2 0 3 96 0 0 225 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 109 4 0 6 0 3 0 6 82 0 0 210 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 646 33 0 18 0 11 0 14 505 0 0 1227 Apprch % 0 0 0 0 0 95.1 4.9 0 62.1 0 37.9 0 2.7 97.3 0 0 Total % 0 0 0 0 0 52.6 2.7 0 1.5 0 0.9 0 1.1 41.2 0 0 APPENDIX B Traffic Model Co Z CL co rrf 0, r1 rn N c-I c-1 N Ol �t �t U) O r1 � M rrf (.0 r- rr) N rt t r' U) 00 rrf N O N O Ol r4ot ♦1 t ry) O � o N rrf t r' l0 rrf Ln U) c-1 m 00 Izi- m M I,, L.0 zl- 1--1 Ln M O N «rrot Z'1t1" M N Izi- O O Ln N M O c-1 Ln «1 It O Ln O 00 M M It Z♦J M O M L.0 c-1 O L.0 m Z♦J M L L L O L O O N -00 N m 0 N U 0 2 i L.L 2 i N 2i A X X Ln U N N O N C N Cr- a-r, E � m N D_ E n ON c-I -0 Q c-I Ln -iOCV Ln t r' O M M -i «1 t 00 M N M N N t r' N Ln zj- -i 61 O c-I raIL U) m 00 N 1l c-1 c-I c-I co N m ♦J m -1 U) rrf N rt U) m t r' N rrf l0 (.0 c-I U) c-I H Z D O N rat ♦1 t 00 m t r' U) rrf c I O l0 N c-I c-I l>0 «�i�►r�t CL L V% � L N c v = E v -0 = =5 U O 0 v 2 > U N 4J d v o o Z ♦ J'1 t to C L E 0 = o > N CL -0 0 a � N rrf 44 Z♦J N C 1l c-1 rrf rrf 00 rt tOl rrf t r' N N 00 ry) O co N CL co rrf 1l N (.0 U) rt t r' U)(.0 00 l0 rrf �t �t N c-1 N O ci rat It rr) 00 1- (Yf N rrf t r► r-1 (Yf CF) �t U)r-I CF) �t >- O �t 00 n >� U) c-1 U) pl O N CL «�i�►r�t Z ♦ J'1 t r' O o �o � r1 � U U) N V- �t M L L O u N U O 2 N i N 1 O (� L � U N d N cu Zi= lB 4-1 O N Ln 1- i4 -i 00 N Ol rrf rrf It Z♦J rrf O Ln M l0 1� o Ln N -i «�lLO Z♦J U M (0 L L E O u N L 1 O N ra L d CL lB cr- O -0 CL 0 t r' O N M U) «1 t 00 1- N U) N N t r' 00 1- �tU) zj--1 pl O 1-1 r4mt «11 f♦ o rn o rrf APPENDIX C LOS Calculations HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information d k4- I. Agency ATS Duration, h 0.25 Analyst RLA Analysis Date Feb 17, 2017 Area Type Other A_ Jurisdiction MDT Time Period AM Peak PHF 1.00 Urban Street Old Reserve Drive Analysis Year 2017 1 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 r ti Intersection lWolfpack Way File Name OldReserveAM.xus Project Description Treeline Center ti f Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h 4 1 430 1 27 578 1 139 1 49 1 9 1 264 4 1 1 Signal Information 51 6 7 Cycle, s 90.0 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Green 0.6 20.1 30.7 18.7 0.0 To - Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On 1 Red 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 10.0 10.0 IL Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase 5 2 1 6 8 4 Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 6.0 6.0 Phase Duration, s 5.6 35.7 30.6 60.7 23.7 23.7 Change Period, ( Y+R � ), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s 3.1 0.0 3.1 0.0 3.4 3.4 Queue Clearance Time( g s ), s 2.1 24.4 17.7 18.1 Green Extension Time ( g e ), s 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.6 0.6 Phase Call Probability 0.10 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 Max Out Probability 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h 4 230 227 575 95 92 9 265 4 2 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In 1650 1733 1696 1650 1733 1582 1423 1469 1121 1590 Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 0.1 9.1 1 9.2 22.4 2.6 2.0 0.5 15.7 0.3 0.1 Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g ), s 0.1 9.1 9.2 22.4 2.6 2.0 0.6 15.7 16.1 0.1 Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.35 0.34 0.34 0.65 0.62 0.62 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 Capacity ( c ), veh/h 501 590 578 780 1073 980 373 305 116 330 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) 0.008 0.390 0.392 0.738 0.089 0.094 0.024 0.869 0.034 0.006 Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/In ( 50 th percentile) 1.3 97.4 95.6 63 23.1 15.6 3.8 142.5 2.2 0.8 Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 50 th percentile) 0.1 3.9 3.8 2.5 0.9 0.6 0.2 5.7 0.1 0.0 Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 50 th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay ( d i ), s/veh 19.2 22.6 22.6 6.1 9.3 6.4 28.5 34.5 42.3 28.3 Incremental Delay ( d2 ), s/veh 0.0 1.9 2.0 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 Initial Queue Delay ( d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay ( d ), s/veh 19.2 24.5 24.6 6.6 9.4 6.5 28.6 37.5 42.3 28.3 Level of Service (LOS) B C C A A A C D D C Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 24.5 C 7.0 A 37.2 D 37.6 D Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 18.0 B Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.3 B 2.2 B 2.8 C 2.8 C Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 0.9 A 1.1 A 0.9 A 0.5 A Copyright © 2017 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010TM Streets Version 6.90 Generated: 2/20/2017 9:03:58 AM HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information d k4- I. Agency ATS Duration, h 0.25 Analyst RLA Analysis Date Feb 17, 2017 Area Type Other A_ Jurisdiction MDT Time Period PM Peak PHF 1.00 Urban Street Old Reserve Drive Analysis Year 2017 1 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 r ti Intersection lWolfpack Way File Name OldReservePM.xus Project Description Treeline Center ti f Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h 1 1 381 1 1 99 260 1 4 1 9 1 0 166 36 0 4 Signal Information 51 6 7 Cycle, s 90.0 1 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Green 0.1 0.2 55.1 14.6 0.0 0.0 Uncoordinated No I Simult. Gap E/W On Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 Force Mode Fixed I Simult. Gap N/S On 1 Red 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 10.0 10.0 IL Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase 5 2 1 6 8 4 Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 6.0 6.0 Phase Duration, s 5.1 60.1 10.4 65.3 19.6 19.6 Change Period, ( Y+R � ), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s 3.1 0.0 3.1 0.0 3.4 3.4 Queue Clearance Time( g s ), s 2.0 3.6 11.6 14.1 Green Extension Time ( g e ), s 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.5 0.4 Phase Call Probability 0.02 1 0.90 1 1.00 1 1.00 Max Out Probability 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h 1 191 191 91 121 121 9 166 36 4 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In 1650 1733 1731 1650 1733 1723 1421 1468 1227 1468 Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 0.0 4.3 1 4.3 1.6 3.0 3.0 0.5 9.6 2.6 0.2 Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g ), s 0.0 4.3 4.3 1.6 3.0 3.0 0.6 9.6 12.1 0.2 Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.69 0.67 0.67 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 Capacity ( c ), veh/h 781 1058 1057 744 1159 1153 309 239 150 239 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) 0.001 0.181 0.181 0.122 0.105 0.105 0.029 0.695 0.241 0.017 Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/In ( 50 th percentile) 0.2 38.6 38.3 10.2 25.2 24.7 4.1 86.3 19.5 1.8 Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 50 th percentile) 0.0 1.5 1.5 0.4 1.0 1.0 0.2 3.4 0.8 0.1 Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 50 th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay ( d i ), s/veh 6.8 7.7 7.7 4.4 7.4 7.3 31.9 35.6 41.3 31.6 Incremental Delay ( d2 ), s/veh 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 1.4 0.3 0.0 Initial Queue Delay ( d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay ( d ), s/veh 6.8 8.0 8.0 4.4 7.6 7.5 31.9 36.9 41.6 31.6 Level of Service (LOS) A A A A A A C D D C Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 8.0 A 6.7 A 36.7 D 40.6 D Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 14.3 B Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.2 B 2.2 B 2.8 C 2.8 C Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 0.8 A 0.8 A 0.8 A 0.6 A Copyright © 2017 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010TM Streets Version 6.90 Generated: 2/20/2017 9:06:31 AM HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information d 4 4 Agency ATS Duration, h 0.25 Analyst RLA Analysis Date Feb 17, 2017 Area Type Other Jurisdiction MDT Time Period AM Peak PHF 1.00 $ Urban Street Old Reserve Drive Analysis Year 2017 1 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 p ti Intersection 193 Bypass SB Ramps File Name OldReserveAM.xus Project Description Treeline Center Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h 556 143 1 49 1 421 31 1 345 Signal Information if 3 4 Vp 6 Cycle, s 90.0 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Green 4.2 47.5 23.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On 1 Red 11.0 11.0 11.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase 2 1 6 4 Case Number 8.3 1.0 4.0 11.0 Phase Duration, s 52.5 9.2 61.7 28.3 Change Period, ( Y+R ), s 5.0 5.0 1 5.0 1 5.0 Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s 0.0 3.1 0.0 3.4 Queue Clearance Time( g s ), s 3.1 22.5 Green Extension Time ( g e ), s 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.8 Phase Call Probability 0.70 1.00 Max Out Probability 0.00 0.00 Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 2 12 1 6 7 4 14 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h 361 337 49 417 32 345 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In 1733 1610 1650 1650 1653 1468 Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 18.0 1 10.2 1.1 8.6 1.3 20.5 Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g ), s 18.0 10.2 1.1 8.6 1.3 20.5 Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.53 0.53 0.60 0.63 0.26 0.26 Capacity ( c ), veh/h 914 849 403 2078 428 1 380 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) 0.395 0.397 0.120 0.201 0.075 0.907 Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/In ( 50 th percentile) 123.31 85.3 9.2 84.1 12.7 184.9 Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 50 th percentile) 4.9 3.4 0.4 3.3 0.5 7.3 Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 50 th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay ( d i ), s/veh 14.6 10.9 10.4 15.0 25.2 32.3 Incremental Delay ( d2 ), s/veh 1.0 1.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 3.7 Initial Queue Delay ( d3), s/veh 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay ( d ), s/veh 15.6 12.0 10.4 15.2 1 1 25.2 36.0 Level of Service (LOS) B B B B C D Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 13.9 B 14.7 B 0.0-F-L-1 35.1 1 D Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 19.3 B Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 1.9 A 1.6 A 2.9 C 2.7 B Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.1 A 0.9 A 1.1 A Copyright © 2017 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010TM Streets Version 6.90 Generated: 2/20/2017 9:03:58 AM HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information d 4 4 Agency ATS Duration, h 0.25 Analyst RLA Analysis Date Feb 17, 2017 Area Type Other Jurisdiction MDT Time Period PM Peak PHF 1.00 $ Urban Street Old Reserve Drive Analysis Year 2017 1 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 p ti Intersection 193 Bypass SB Ramps File Name OldReservePM.xus Project Description Treeline Center Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h 426 1 157 385 1 300 13 1 63 Signal Information F =1r A■ 3 4 6 7 8 Cycle, s 90.0 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Green 7.5 62.4 5.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On 1 Red 11.0 11.0 11.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase 2 1 6 4 Case Number 8.3 1.0 4.0 11.0 Phase Duration, s 67.4 12.5 79.9 10.1 Change Period, ( Y+R � ), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s 0.0 3.1 0.0 3.3 Queue Clearance Time( g s ), s 7.0 5.8 Green Extension Time ( g e ), s 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 Phase Call Probability 1.00 1 0.85 Max Out Probability 0.03 1.00 Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 2 12 1 6 7 4 14 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h 303 280 347 271 14 63 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In 1733 1574 1650 1650 1656 1468 Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 7.3 1 6.2 5.0 1.0 0.7 3.8 Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g ), s 7.3 6.2 5.0 1.0 0.7 3.8 Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.69 0.69 0.80 0.83 0.06 0.06 Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1201 1091 729 2745 94 1 84 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) 0.253 0.256 0.476 0.099 0.148 0.753 Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/In ( 50 th percentile) 70.3 45.1 21.4 3.7 7.5 36.9 Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 50 th percentile) 2.8 1.8 0.8 0.1 0.3 1.5 Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 50 th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay ( d i ), s/veh 7.8 5.4 3.1 1.0 40.4 41.8 Incremental Delay ( d2 ), s/veh 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.3 5.0 Initial Queue Delay ( d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay ( d ), s/veh 8.3 6.0 3.3 1.1 40.6 46.9 Level of Service (LOS) A A A A D D Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 7.2 A 2.3 A 0.0 45.7 D Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 7.1 A Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 1.9 A 1.6 A 2.9 C 2.7 B Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.0 A 1.1 A 0.6 A Copyright © 2017 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010TM Streets Version 6.90 Generated: 2/20/2017 9:06:31 AM HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information J d k4. 4 4 Agency ATS Duration, h 0.25 Analyst RLA Analysis Date Feb 17, 2017 Area Type Other A_ Jurisdiction MDT Time Period AM Peak PHF 1.00 Urban Street Old Reserve Drive Analysis Year 2017 1 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 r ti Intersection 193 Bypass NB Ramps File Name OldReserveAM.xus Project Description Treeline Center ti . f it. Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h 273 1 300 242 1 4 224 1 1 90 Signal Information 4 742 3 4 p 51 6 7 Cycle, s 90.0 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Green 7.6 52.8 14.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On 1 Red 11.0 11.0 11.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 IL Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase 5 2 6 8 Case Number 1.0 4.0 8.3 11.0 Phase Duration, s 12.6 70.5 57.8 19.5 Change Period, ( Y+R � ), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s 3.1 0.0 0.0 3.2 Queue Clearance Time( g s ), s 7.1 13.9 Green Extension Time ( g e ), s 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.6 Phase Call Probability 1.00 1 1.00 Max Out Probability 0.00 0.00 Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 5 2 6 16 3 8 18 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h 279 307 123 123 225 90 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In 1650 1650 1733 1723 1651 1322 Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 5.1 3.2 1 6.4 2.9 11.9 5.5 Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g ), s 5.1 3.2 6.4 2.9 11.9 5.5 Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.69 0.73 0.59 0.59 0.16 0.16 Capacity ( c ), veh/h 809 2400 1017 1011 266 213 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) 0.345 0.128 0.121 0.121 0.844 0.422 Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/In ( 50 th percentile) 42.7 21.7 25.8 25.5 122.5 44.1 Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 50 th percentile) 1.7 0.9 1.0 1.0 4.9 1.8 Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 50 th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay ( d i ), s/veh 6.0 4.8 8.3 8.3 36.6 34.0 Incremental Delay ( d2 ), s/veh 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 2.8 0.5 Initial Queue Delay ( d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay ( d ), s/veh 6.1 4.9 8.5 8.5 39.5 34.4 Level of Service (LOS) A A A A D C Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 5.5 A 8.5 A 38.0 D 0.0 Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 15.1 B Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 1.6 A 1.9 A 2.7 B 2.9 C Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.0 A 0.7 A 1.0 A Copyright © 2017 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010TM Streets Version 6.90 Generated: 2/20/2017 9:03:58 AM HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information J d k4. 4 4 Agency ATS Duration, h 0.25 Analyst RLA Analysis Date Feb 17, 2017 Area Type Other A_ Jurisdiction MDT Time Period PM Peak PHF 1.00 Urban Street Old Reserve Drive Analysis Year 2017 1 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 r ti Intersection 193 Bypass NB Ramps File Name OldReservePM.xus Project Description Treeline Center ti . f it. Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h 228 1 233 502 1 13 116 0 211 Signal Information 4 742 3 4 p 51 6 7 Cycle, s 90.0 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Green 6.6 51.8 16.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On 1 Red 11.0 11.0 11.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 IL Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase 5 2 6 8 Case Number 1.0 4.0 8.3 11.0 Phase Duration, s 11.6 68.4 56.8 21.6 Change Period, ( Y+R � ), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s 3.1 0.0 0.0 3.3 Queue Clearance Time( g s ), s 6.2 15.9 Green Extension Time ( g e ), s 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.7 Phase Call Probability 1.00 1 1.00 Max Out Probability 0.00 0.00 Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 5 2 6 16 3 8 18 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h 217 222 258 257 116 211 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In 1650 1650 1733 1717 1650 1322 Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 4.2 1.9 1 11.4 6.7 5.5 13.9 Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g ), s 4.2 1.9 11.4 6.7 5.5 13.9 Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.67 0.70 0.58 0.58 0.18 0.18 Capacity ( c ), veh/h 600 2324 998 989 304 244 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) 0.362 0.095 0.259 0.259 0.381 0.866 Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/In ( 50 th percentile) 35.5 13.6 61.7 60.9 55 115.6 Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 50 th percentile) 1.4 0.5 2.4 2.4 2.2 4.6 Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 50 th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay ( d i ), s/veh 7.5 4.3 9.5 9.5 32.2 35.6 Incremental Delay ( d2 ), s/veh 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.6 0.3 3.6 Initial Queue Delay ( d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay ( d ), s/veh 7.6 4.3 10.1 10.2 32.5 39.2 Level of Service (LOS) A A B B C D Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 5.9 A 10.1 B 36.8 D 0.0 Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 15.5 B Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 1.6 A 1.9 A 2.7 B 2.9 C Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 0.9 A 0.9 A 1.0 A Copyright © 2017 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010TM Streets Version 6.90 Generated: 2/20/2017 9:06:31 AM HCS 2010 General Information •-Way Stop -Control Report Site Information Analyst RLA Intersection Treeline & Reserve Loop Agency/Co. ATS Jurisdiction City of Kalispell Date Performed 2/9/2017 East/West Street Reserve Loop Analysis Year 2017 North/South Street Treeline Drive Time Analyzed AM Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 1.00 Intersection Orientation East-West Project Description Treeline Development Lanes Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 � r G IItYt Ir Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1 U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 0 2 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration T TR L T L R Volume, V (veh/h) 385 4 13 211 36 27 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 1 1 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Left Only 1 Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) Follow -Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 13 36 27 Capacity, c (veh/h) 1173 552 818 v/c Ratio 0.01 0.07 0.03 95% Queue Length, Q95 (veh) 0.0 0.2 0.1 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.1 12.0 9.6 Level of Service, LOS A B A Approach Delay (s/veh) 0.5 10.9 Approach LOS B Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010M TWSC Version 6.90 Generated: 2/20/2017 9:08:01 AM TreeAM.xtw HCS 2010 General Information •-Way Stop -Control Report Site Information Analyst RLA Intersection Treeline & Reserve Loop Agency/Co. ATS Jurisdiction City of Kalispell Date Performed 2/9/2017 East/West Street Reserve Loop Analysis Year 2017 North/South Street Treeline Drive Time Analyzed PM Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 1.00 Intersection Orientation East-West Project Description Treeline Development Lanes Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 � r G IItYt Ir Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1 U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 0 2 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration T TR L T L R Volume, V (veh/h) 430 13 40 506 9 9 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 1 1 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Left Only 1 Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) Follow -Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 40 9 9 Capacity, c (veh/h) 1121 445 785 v/c Ratio 0.04 0.02 0.01 95% Queue Length, Q95 (veh) 0.1 0.1 0.0 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.3 13.3 9.6 Level of Service, LOS A B A Approach Delay (s/veh) 0.6 11.5 Approach LOS B Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010M TWSC Version 6.90 Generated: 2/20/2017 9:08:35 AM TreePM.xtw HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information d k4- I. Agency ATS Duration, h 0.25 Analyst RLA Analysis Date Feb 17, 2017 Area Type Other A_ Jurisdiction MDT Time Period AM Peak PHF 1.00 Urban Street Old Reserve Drive Analysis Year With Dev. 1 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 r ti Intersection lWolfpack Way File Name OldReserveAMwith.xus Project Description Treeline Center ti f Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h 4 1 451 1 27 584 1 149 1 50 1 9 1 276 6 1 1 Signal Information 51 6 7 Cycle, s 90.0 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Green 0.6 20.8 29.1 19.6 0.0 To - Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On 1 Red 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 10.0 10.0 IL Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase 5 2 1 6 8 4 Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 6.0 6.0 Phase Duration, s 5.6 34.1 31.3 59.8 24.6 24.6 Change Period, ( Y+R � ), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s 3.1 0.0 3.1 0.0 3.4 3.4 Queue Clearance Time( g s ), s 2.1 25.0 18.4 18.9 Green Extension Time ( g e ), s 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.7 0.7 Phase Call Probability 0.10 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 Max Out Probability 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h 4 241 237 581 101 97 9 277 6 2 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In 1650 1733 1698 1650 1733 1587 1423 1469 1109 1590 Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 0.1 9.9 1 9.9 23.0 2.9 2.2 0.4 16.4 0.5 0.1 Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g ), s 0.1 9.9 9.9 23.0 2.9 2.2 0.6 16.4 16.9 0.1 Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.33 0.32 0.32 0.64 0.61 0.61 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 Capacity ( c ), veh/h 474 558 546 766 1056 967 388 320 119 346 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) 0.008 0.432 0.434 0.759 0.095 0.101 0.023 0.866 0.050 0.006 Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/In ( 50 th percentile) 1.4 107.1 105 65.4 26.1 17.9 3.8 147.8 3.2 0.8 Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 50 th percentile) 0.1 4.2 4.2 2.6 1.0 0.7 0.2 5.9 0.1 0.0 Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 50 th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay ( d i ), s/veh 20.4 24.0 24.1 6.4 10.1 7.0 27.8 33.9 42.1 27.6 Incremental Delay ( d2 ), s/veh 0.0 2.4 2.5 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.0 2.8 0.1 0.0 Initial Queue Delay ( d3), s/veh 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay ( d ), s/veh 20.4 26.5 26.6 7.0 10.2 7.2 27.8 36.7 42.2 27.6 Level of Service (LOS) C C C A B A C D D C Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 26.5 C 7.5 A 36.4 D 38.5 D Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 18.8 B Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.3 B 2.2 B 2.8 C 2.8 C Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 0.9 A 1.1 A 1.0 A 0.5 A Copyright © 2017 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010TM Streets Version 6.90 Generated: 2/20/2017 9:23:42 AM HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information d k4- I. Agency ATS Duration, h 0.25 Analyst RLA Analysis Date Feb 17, 2017 Area Type Other A_ Jurisdiction MDT Time Period PM Peak PHF 1.00 Urban Street Old Reserve Drive Analysis Year With Dev. 1 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 r ti Intersection lWolfpack Way File Name OldReservePMwith.xus Project Description Treeline Center ti f Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h 1 1 394 1 1 106 1 273 1 5 1 9 0 174 37 0 4 Signal Information 51 6 7 Cycle, s 90.0 1 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Green 0.1 0.3 54.4 15.1 0.0 0.0 Uncoordinated No I Simult. Gap E/W On Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 Force Mode Fixed I Simult. Gap N/S On 1 Red 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 10.0 10.0 IL Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase 5 2 1 6 8 4 Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 6.0 6.0 Phase Duration, s 5.1 59.4 10.5 64.7 20.1 20.1 Change Period, ( Y+R � ), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s 3.1 0.0 3.1 0.0 3.4 3.4 Queue Clearance Time( g s ), s 2.0 3.8 12.1 14.6 Green Extension Time ( g e ), s 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.5 0.5 Phase Call Probability 0.02 1 0.91 1 1.00 1.00 Max Out Probability 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h 1 198 197 98 128 128 9 174 37 4 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In 1650 1733 1731 1650 1733 1722 1421 1468 1218 1468 Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 0.0 4.6 1 4.6 1.8 3.1 3.1 0.5 10.1 2.7 0.2 Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g ), s 0.0 4.6 4.6 1.8 3.1 3.1 0.6 10.1 12.6 0.2 Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.61 0.60 0.60 0.69 0.66 0.66 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 Capacity ( c ), veh/h 764 1046 1045 729 1148 1141 318 248 151 248 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) 0.001 0.189 0.189 0.134 0.112 0.112 0.028 0.702 0.246 0.016 Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/In ( 50 th percentile) 0.2 41.1 40.8 11.2 26.5 26 4.1 90.3 20 1.8 Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 50 th percentile) 0.0 1.6 1.6 0.4 1.1 1.0 0.2 3.6 0.8 0.1 Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 50 th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay ( d i ), s/veh 7.0 8.0 8.0 4.5 7.4 7.3 31.4 35.3 41.2 31.2 Incremental Delay ( d2 ), s/veh 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 1.4 0.3 0.0 Initial Queue Delay ( d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay ( d ), s/veh 7.0 8.4 8.4 4.6 7.6 7.5 31.4 36.6 41.5 31.2 Level of Service (LOS) A A A A A A C D D C Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 8.4 A 6.7 A 36.4 D 40.5 D Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 14.4 B Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.2 B 2.2 B 2.8 C 2.8 C Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 0.8 A 0.8 A 0.8 A 0.6 A Copyright © 2017 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010TM Streets Version 6.90 Generated: 2/20/2017 9:24:55 AM HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information d 4 4 Agency ATS Duration, h 0.25 Analyst RLA Analysis Date Feb 17, 2017 Area Type Other Jurisdiction MDT Time Period AM Peak PHF 1.00 $ Urban Street Old Reserve Drive Analysis Year With Dev. 1 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 p ti Intersection 193 Bypass SB Ramps File Name OldReserveAMwith.xus Project Description Treeline Center Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h 591 143 60 438 34 1 345 Signal Information if 3 4 Vp 6 Cycle, s 90.0 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Green 4.6 47.0 23.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On 1 Red 11.0 11.0 11.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase 2 1 6 4 Case Number 8.3 1.0 4.0 11.0 Phase Duration, s 52.0 9.6 61.7 28.3 Change Period, ( Y+R ), s 5.0 5.0 1 5.0 1 5.0 Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s 0.0 3.1 0.0 3.4 Queue Clearance Time( g s ), s 3.4 22.5 Green Extension Time ( g e ), s 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.8 Phase Call Probability 0.77 1.00 Max Out Probability 0.00 0.00 Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 2 12 1 6 7 4 14 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h 379 354 60 434 35 345 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In 1733 1616 1650 1650 1652 1468 Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 19.1 1 10.9 1.4 8.9 1.4 20.5 Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g ), s 19.1 10.9 1.4 8.9 1.4 20.5 Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.52 0.52 0.60 0.63 0.26 0.26 Capacity ( c ), veh/h 906 844 391 2078 428 1 380 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) 0.418 0.420 0.152 0.209 0.082 0.907 Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/In ( 50 th percentile) 130 91.9 11.5 86.3 14 184.9 Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 50 th percentile) 5.2 3.7 0.5 3.4 0.6 7.3 Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 50 th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay ( d i ), s/veh 14.8 11.3 10.8 14.8 25.2 32.3 Incremental Delay ( d2 ), s/veh 1.1 1.2 0.1 0.2 0.0 3.7 Initial Queue Delay ( d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay ( d ), s/veh 15.9 12.5 10.9 15.0 1 1 25.3 36.0 Level of Service (LOS) B B B B C D Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 14.2 B 14.5 B 0.0-F-L-1 35.0 1 C Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 19.2 B Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 1.9 A 1.6 A 2.9 C 2.7 B Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.1 A 0.9 A 1.1 A Copyright © 2017 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010TM Streets Version 6.90 Generated: 2/20/2017 9:23:42 AM HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information d 4 4 Agency ATS Duration, h 0.25 Analyst RLA Analysis Date Feb 17, 2017 Area Type Other Jurisdiction MDT Time Period PM Peak PHF 1.00 $ Urban Street Old Reserve Drive Analysis Year With Dev. 1 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 p ti Intersection 193 Bypass SB Ramps File Name OldReservePMwith.xus Project Description Treeline Center Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h 448 1 157 398 1 321 15 1 63 Signal Information F =1r A■ 3 4 6 7 8 Cycle, s 90.0 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Green 7.6 62.2 5.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On 1 Red 11.0 11.0 11.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase 2 1 6 4 Case Number 8.3 1.0 4.0 11.0 Phase Duration, s 67.2 12.6 79.8 10.2 Change Period, ( Y+R � ), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s 0.0 3.1 0.0 3.3 Queue Clearance Time( g s ), s 7.1 5.8 Green Extension Time ( g e ), s 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 Phase Call Probability 1.00 1 0.86 Max Out Probability 0.04 1.00 Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 2 12 1 6 7 4 14 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h 315 290 361 291 16 63 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In 1733 1579 1650 1650 1655 1468 Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 7.7 1 6.4 5.1 1.2 0.8 3.8 Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g ), s 7.7 6.4 5.1 1.2 0.8 3.8 Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.69 0.69 0.80 0.83 0.06 0.06 Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1198 1092 716 2743 95 1 84 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) 0.263 0.266 0.504 0.106 0.168 0.747 Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/In ( 50 th percentile) 71.2 46.7 22.6 4.4 8.5 36.8 Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 50 th percentile) 2.8 1.9 0.9 0.2 0.3 1.5 Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 50 th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay ( d i ), s/veh 7.6 5.4 3.3 1.2 40.4 41.8 Incremental Delay ( d2 ), s/veh 0.5 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.3 4.9 Initial Queue Delay ( d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay ( d ), s/veh 8.1 6.0 3.5 1.2 40.7 46.6 Level of Service (LOS) A A A A D D Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 7.1 A 2.5 A 0.0 45.4 D Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 7.1 A Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 1.9 A 1.6 A 2.9 C 2.7 B Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.0 A 1.1 A 0.6 A Copyright © 2017 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010TM Streets Version 6.90 Generated: 2/20/2017 9:24:55 AM HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information J d k4. 4 4 Agency ATS Duration, h 0.25 Analyst RLA Analysis Date Feb 17, 2017 Area Type Other A_ Jurisdiction MDT Time Period AM Peak PHF 1.00 Urban Street Old Reserve Drive Analysis Year With Dev. 1 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 r ti Intersection 193 Bypass NB Ramps File Name OldReserveAMwith.xus Project Description Treeline Center ti f Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h 273 1 338 270 1 7 224 1 1 114 Signal Information 4 3 4 742 p 51 6 7 Cycle, s 90.0 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Green 7.6 52.8 14.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On 1 Red 11.0 11.0 11.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 IL Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase 5 2 6 8 Case Number 1.0 4.0 8.3 11.0 Phase Duration, s 12.6 70.4 57.8 19.6 Change Period, ( Y+R ), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s 3.1 0.0 0.0 3.2 Queue Clearance Time( g s ), s 7.1 13.9 Green Extension Time ( g e ), s 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.7 Phase Call Probability 1.00 1 1.00 Max Out Probability 0.00 0.00 Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 5 2 6 16 3 8 18 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h 279 345 139 138 225 114 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In 1650 1650 1733 1717 1651 1322 Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 5.1 3.5 1 7.2 3.3 11.9 7.1 Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g ), s 5.1 3.5 7.2 3.3 11.9 7.1 Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.69 0.73 0.59 0.59 0.16 0.16 Capacity ( c ), veh/h 781 2398 1016 1007 267 214 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) 0.357 0.144 0.137 0.137 0.842 0.533 Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/In ( 50 th percentile) 42.8 24.2 29.5 29.1 122.4 57.2 Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 50 th percentile) 1.7 1.0 1.2 1.2 4.9 2.3 Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 50 th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay ( d i ), s/veh 6.2 4.8 8.4 8.4 36.6 34.6 Incremental Delay ( d2 ), s/veh 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 2.8 0.8 Initial Queue Delay ( d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay ( d ), s/veh 6.3 4.9 8.6 8.7 39.4 35.4 Level of Service (LOS) A A A A D D Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 5.5 A 8.6 A 38.0 D 0.0 Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 15.1 B Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 1.6 A 1.9 A 2.7 B 2.9 C Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.0 A 0.7 A 1.0 A Copyright © 2017 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010TM Streets Version 6.90 Generated: 2/20/2017 9:23:42 AM HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information J d k4. 4 4 Agency ATS Duration, h 0.25 Analyst RLA Analysis Date Feb 17, 2017 Area Type Other A_ Jurisdiction MDT Time Period PM Peak PHF 1.00 Urban Street Old Reserve Drive Analysis Year With Dev. 1 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 r ti Intersection 193 Bypass NB Ramps File Name OldReservePMwith.xus Project Description Treeline Center ti f Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h 228 1 257 536 1 16 116 0 226 Signal Information 4 3 4 742 p 51 6 7 Cycle, s 90.0 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Green 6.7 50.7 17.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On 1 Red 11.0 11.0 11.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 IL Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase 5 2 6 8 Case Number 1.0 4.0 8.3 11.0 Phase Duration, s 11.7 67.4 55.7 22.6 Change Period, ( Y+R ), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s 3.1 0.0 0.0 3.3 Queue Clearance Time( g s ), s 6.4 16.9 Green Extension Time ( g e ), s 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.7 Phase Call Probability 1.00 1 1.00 Max Out Probability 0.00 0.00 Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 5 2 6 16 3 8 18 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h 218 245 277 275 116 226 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In 1650 1650 1733 1715 1650 1322 Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 4.4 2.1 1 12.4 7.5 5.5 14.9 Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g ), s 4.4 2.1 12.4 7.5 5.5 14.9 Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.66 0.69 0.56 0.56 0.20 0.20 Capacity ( c ), veh/h 569 2287 975 965 323 259 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) 0.382 0.107 0.284 0.285 0.359 0.874 Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/In ( 50 th percentile) 37.7 15.2 70 68.9 54 123.3 Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 50 th percentile) 1.5 0.6 2.8 2.8 2.1 4.9 Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 50 th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay ( d i ), s/veh 8.1 4.3 10.2 10.2 31.3 35.1 Incremental Delay ( d2 ), s/veh 0.2 0.1 0.7 0.7 0.3 3.6 Initial Queue Delay ( d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay ( d ), s/veh 8.3 4.4 11.0 11.0 31.6 38.7 Level of Service (LOS) A A B B C D Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 6.2 A 11.0 B 36.3 D 0.0 Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 15.7 B Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 1.6 A 1.9 A 2.7 B 2.9 C Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 0.9 A 0.9 A 1.1 A Copyright © 2017 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010TM Streets Version 6.90 Generated: 2/20/2017 9:24:55 AM HCS 2010 General Information •-Way Stop -Control Report Site Information Analyst RLA Intersection Treeline & Reserve Loop Agency/Co. ATS Jurisdiction City of Kalispell Date Performed 2/9/2017 East/West Street Reserve Loop Analysis Year 2017 North/South Street Treeline Drive Time Analyzed AM Peak - With Dev. Peak Hour Factor 1.00 Intersection Orientation East-West Project Description Treeline Development Lanes Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 � r G IItYt Ir Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1 U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 0 2 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration T TR L T L R Volume, V (veh/h) 385 66 64 211 67 52 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 1 1 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Left Only 1 Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) Follow -Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 64 67 52 Capacity, c (veh/h) 1113 483 780 v/c Ratio 0.06 0.14 0.07 95% Queue Length, Q95 (veh) 0.2 0.5 0.2 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.4 13.6 9.9 Level of Service, LOS A B A Approach Delay (s/veh) 2.0 12.0 Approach LOS B Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010M TWSC Version 6.90 Generated: 2/20/2017 9:26:39 AM TreeAMwithxtw HCS 2010 General Information •-Way Stop -Control Report Site Information Analyst RLA Intersection Treeline & Reserve Loop Agency/Co. ATS Jurisdiction City of Kalispell Date Performed 2/9/2017 East/West Street Reserve Loop Analysis Year 2017 North/South Street Treeline Drive Time Analyzed PM Peak - With Dev. Peak Hour Factor 1.00 Intersection Orientation East-West Project Description Treeline Development Lanes Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 � r G IItYt Ir Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1 U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 0 2 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration T TR L T L R Volume, V (veh/h) 430 52 72 506 46 40 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 1 1 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Left Only 1 Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) Follow -Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 72 46 40 Capacity, c (veh/h) 1084 405 763 v/c Ratio 0.07 0.11 0.05 95% Queue Length, Q95 (veh) 0.2 0.4 0.2 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.6 15.0 10.0 Level of Service, LOS A C A Approach Delay (s/veh) 1.1 12.7 Approach LOS B Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010M TWSC Version 6.90 Generated: 2/20/2017 9:27:10 AM TreePMwith.xtw 1 r � i r r � r 1 ' , 1 I d r � K�c nR r _ f--- -- -- t I - � I ❑ ❑a ❑ 1 ❑ ❑ 1 , ❑ ❑ ❑ r� Li YW JQ I*�cJ I JGOpie- - -- -- -- - — E - ILJ 4 - + - - tU ypuea O � \ 4 I � ¢ I I � Q � K7 .n-taOLA ------- I I m .� - � m U) l+ Svr I 51 � r m I I -o 9 �_-r--if \ f � E I M f O M N 0 O 0 N O O O U 0 o C > > w C T M C O a O N - a a) V/ C C Q� o G � C L a) ) 'E) CO in M a) C M N Y Z �°'? C a M C U °o�oo Eao O O C M T. a ? ID M C L a O d IID C C w M 'O M O O > U C M -O C ID T O O L O a ( O n m Q - O- O m(D zEU O 9 (D L M y Ma.>_m� O a7 C O $ O T (D C O - M is U U O a � O 9 m O a (D (OD L a ME rn��o ow 15 O M U ? to rn OMa m o O (D L O (D (D TM U N y � Y � E c 'w o O ' a C O O N OU - U U M s M EO ME ( M t a Qrn (1 (vriwo M S M a (D O - N O- a) o o `m M ? N n (D a 0 N~ O 9 O O 1 C O o O Q a) a O M>. -.Q E wo E M o O (D r o E O L C 2 O C E N O a (n (DO oO Oa (D M N a N a•L•Y Ma O M n cu > O rL n Mo Q0W (D O a T L a M C a 0 M L Z C ❑ 'O �/) O M� W 2 X /W Z ZI Lo �E > > w C T (6 2 C C N O - �o8a O U T Q C'S N t/1 N C O) Z a Q > O aL• C � O C E O 9 N E (,D m C L N Q (D CO U) C y6 .T D N 76 N C (5 N Y N - = U Q N E OC t/1 U f6 C 0 OU Eao°a a) C 0 C C ) a O d C 6 a (D U (6 a C C O T O 0- O (�� O 0 U f w OE N 2-M > M O 6 N` Q E U a 9 0 o L L C a > (6 � O N C O O T O C 0 0 C O O - � - (6 O N � O 9 m O N a(Di(Da`maco L N C O U Q W (n �a m p o o a ` L O N W E Y T � E o Lo o - a C C a O OD U U E s E O E D E � E a QW n a a n 0 m 0 9 m ` a N O> (MDO O O p � j Q W N N U N O 9 O O 1 C O W o (D E �.Q E w E m o oo oEE�oL C 0 O .0 0 a C N E Oo tea° (� .-> o o 0 a m a o o �na�`on L - C > N I L m W m 6 C N 0 M 6 L Z � ❑atn O