H7. Reso 5818 - Growth PolicyPLANNING FOR THE FUTURE
REPORT TO:
FROM:
MONT"A
Doug Russell, City Manager
Jarod Nygren, Senior Planner
Planning Department
201 V Avenue East
Kalispell, MT 59901
Phone: (406) 758-7940
Fax: (406) 758-7739
www.kalispell.com/planning
SUBJECT: Resolution 5818, KGPA-14-01 — DRAFT Growth Policy — Plan It 2035
resolution of intention to adopt, revise, or reject the proposed updated
growth policy and call for a public hearing
MEETING DATE: June 5, 2017
BACKGROUND: The updated DRAFT Growth Policy — Plan It 2035 addresses a number of key
topics that affect the future growth and development of the City of Kalispell. Each chapter presents a
brief introduction of a particular topic, lists a number of issues surrounding the topic, establishes
goals and priorities, lays out the policies that will guide the city, and finishes with a number of
recommended actions. The proposed Growth Policy update would guide growth within the city over
the next 20 years.
Section 76-1-604, M.C.A. requires that the council adopt a resolution of intention to adopt, adopt
with revisions or reject the proposed DRAFT Growth Policy — Plan It 2035 update and call for a
public hearing. At the subsequent Kalispell City Council meeting on June 19th, the Council will hold
the public hearing and take public comment on the proposed update.
The Kalispell Planning Board held a duly noticed public hearing April 11, 2017, to consider the
Growth Policy — Plan It 2035 update. Staff presented the history of the DRAFT Growth Policy and
summarized the changes to the document since they had last reviewed it. Staff recommended that the
Planning Board recommend to the Kalispell City Council that the DRAFT Growth Policy — Plan It
2035 update be adopted, replacing the current Growth Policy 2020.
There being no public comment, the public hearing was closed and a motion was presented
recommending to the Kalispell City Council that the DRAFT Kalispell Growth Policy — Plan It 2035
be adopted, replacing the current Growth Policy 2020. Board discussion concluded that the DRAFT
Growth Policy — Plan It 2035 was appropriate, and the motion passed unanimously on roll call vote.
Subsequently, the Council held a work session on May 22, 2017 where they discussed the DRAFT
Growth Policy update. During the work session staff was directed to bring the DRAFT Growth
Policy to public hearing for their consideration.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Kalispell City Council approve Resolution
5818, a resolution setting a public hearing date of June 19 2017.
FISCAL EFFECTS: There are no anticipated fiscal impacts at this time.
ALTERNATIVES: Deny the request.
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 5818
DRAFT Growth Policy — Plan It 2035
DRAFT Growth Policy — Plan It 2035 (with edits)
Growth Policy Maps
April 11, 2017, Kalispell Planning Board Minutes
c: Aimee Brunckhorst, Kalispell City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 5818
A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO ADOPT, REVISE OR REJECT AN AMENDMENT
TO THE KALISPELL GROWTH POLICY 2020 BY ADOPTING THE UPDATED
GROWTH POLICY — PLAN IT 2035 DOCUMENT FOR THE CITY OF KALISPELL AND
CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING.
WHEREAS, the Kalispell Growth Policy 2020 was originally adopted by the Kalispell City
Council on February 18, 2003 by Resolution No. 4773; and
WHEREAS, the Kalispell City Council requested that the Growth Policy 2020 document be
updated to guide the next 20 years of growth in the City of Kalispell; and
WHEREAS, on April 11, 2017, the Kalispell City Planning Board held a public hearing, after due
and proper notice, received public comment upon, and reviewed Kalispell Planning
Department report #KGPA-14-01, which evaluated the proposal based upon the goals
and objectives of the Growth Policy, the purpose of zoning and current circumstances
in the planning jurisdiction; and
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of said public hearing and after consideration of the proposed
amendment, the Kalispell City Planning Board adopted report #KGPA-14-01 as the
findings of fact and recommended approval of the proposed Growth Policy
amendment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Kalispell considers it advisable that they consider the
proposed Growth Policy Amendment and the recommendations of the Kalispell City
Planning Board, and adopt a Resolution of Intention to Adopt, Revise or Reject the
Proposed Amendment to the Kalispell Growth Policy 2020.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
KALISPELL, AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That pursuant to Section 76-1-604, MCA, the City Council of the City of
Kalispell intends to consider a proposed amendment to the Kalispell Growth
Policy 2020, and the evidence considered by the Kalispell City Planning
Board, said amendment consisting of the updated Growth Policy — Plan It
2035 document for the City of Kalispell, attached hereto as Exhibit "A".
SECTION 2. The City Council will hold a public hearing on the proposed growth policy
amendment on June 19, 2017, at 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers
located at 201 First Avenue East, Kalispell.
SECTION 3. At the next regular meeting of July 3, 2017, the City Council will consider
Resolutions to Adopt, Revise, or Reject said proposed amendment.
SECTION 4. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to give notice of said meeting in
accordance with Section 7-1-4127, MCA.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND SIGNED BY THE MAYOR OF THE
CITY OF KALISPELL, THIS 5TH DAY OF JUNE, 2017.
ATTEST:
Aimee Brunckhorst, CMC
City Clerk
Mark Johnson
Mayor
EXHIBIT "A"
A copy of the Draft Growth Policy Plan -It 2035 can be found at
Final Growth Policy DRAFT.pdf
or a printed copy may be obtained from the Planning Department.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Kalispell is considering an
amendment to the Kalispell Growth Policy 2020 to adopt the updated Growth Policy — Plan It 2035
document for the City of Kalispell.
The Kalispell City Planning Board has considered the amendment, held a public hearing on
April 11, 2017, adopted report #KGPA-14-01 as the findings of fact and recommended approval of
the proposed Growth Policy — Plan It 2035 amendment to the Kalispell City Council. The City
Council, on June 5, 2017, passed a Resolution of Intention to Adopt, Revise or Reject a
Recommended Amendment to the Kalispell Growth Policy 2020.
On June 19, 2017, at 7:00 pm in the City Hall Council Chambers, 201 First Avenue East,
Kalispell, the City Council of the City of Kalispell will hold a public hearing regarding the proposed
amendment. Council may consider Resolutions to Adopt, Revise, or Reject said amendment at the
July 3, 2017 regular meeting. Further information is available on-line at
https://www.time.ci.kalispell.mt.us/weblink/O/doc/80439/Pa eg l aWx or contact the City Clerk at
(406) 758-7756.
Aimee Brunckhorst, CMC
City Clerk
Publish: June 11, 2017
June 18, 2017
7111,1TES 11oF AEG11LAA MEET111
April 11, 2017 1
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL
The regular meeting of the Kalispell City Planning Board and Zoning
CALL
Commission was called to order at 6:00 p.m. Board members present
were Chad Graham, Ronalee Skees, Steve Lorch, Doug Kauffman,
Christopher Yerkes, Rory Young & Charles Pesola. Tom Jentz, Jarod
Nygren and PJ Sorensen represented the Kalispell Planning Department.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Skees moved and Lorch seconded a motion to approve the minutes of
the March 14, 2017 meeting of the Kalispell City Planning Board and
Zoning Commission.
VOTE BY ACCLAMATION
The motion passed unanimously on a vote of acclamation.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Ryan Hunter — 911 3 rd Ave E — moved into his home I year ago.
Commented on city ordinance that does not allow for planting shrubs or
other vegetation on the boulevards between trees. He feels the ordinance
should be amendable, as a permit is required from Parks and Recreation,
which would allow for review of the proposed materials. He feels the
change would be a positive because vegetation absorbs pollution, cleans
the air, acts as a noise barrier and creates landscaping diversity.
KALISPELL MEETING
A request from Kalispell Meeting Halls, INC for a text amendment to
HALLS, INC
the Kalispell Zoning Ordinance to allow "private" schools within the
commercial zoning districts (B-1, B-2, B-3, B-4 and B-5), provided a
conditional use permit is obtained.
STAFF REPORT
Jarod Nygren, representing the Kalispell Planning Department reviewed
Staff report #KZTA- 17-01 for the board.
Nygren explained that currently "public" schools are provided for within
the commercial zoning districts, but "private" schools are not. This
amendment would allow for "private" schools in the specified
commercial zoning districts.
Staff recommends that the Kalispell City Planning, Board adopt the
t,
findings in staff report KZTA-17-01 and recommend to the Kalispell
4:1
City Council that the proposed text amendment be adopted as provided
herein.
BOARD DISCUSSION
Graham inquired as to why this was not already a part of the ordinance.
Sorenson responded that the last major update to the zoning ordinance
was in 2009/2010 and the distinction was made that since the public
schools claim agency exemption under state law they were permitted in
all zones. Although exempt, they would still be required to go through
architectural and site review committees. Private schools do not claim
agency exemption so they were not included in all the zones at that time.
However, since the uses seem to be similar in impact, staff feels that
they should be provided for within the commercial zones, as public
schools are.
Lorch inquired about required setbacks for casinos in regards to public
Kalispell City Planning Board
Minutes of the meeting of January 10, 2017
Page I I
and private schools. Sorenson advised there is no distinction between
public and private. Nygren added that as a city we have taken a stance
that in the downtown area in the B3 and B4 zones that the setback would
not apply to liquor licenses/accessory casinos. Therefore, in B1, B2 and
B5 the casinos would need to follow the setbacks required by the
ordinance. Lorch asked then if that is inherent with the regulations as
proposed or is that something that would have to be changed to avoid
that if it is an unintended consequence. Jentz advised that casinos (full
standing) shall be a minimum of 600 feet from churches, schools, parks
and city residential zones. Accessory casinos may be within 600 feet.
Nygren added that this is not a limitation on a school going in near a
casino; it is a limitation on a casino going in near a school, so it would
not have any impact on a public or private school looking for a place to
locate. Where it would have potential impacts is on a full casino looking
to locate within 600' of a school.
PUBLIC HEARING
None.
MOTION
Yerkes moved and Kauffman seconded a motion that the Kalispell City
Planning Board and Zoning Commission adopt staff report KZTA-17-01
and recommend to the Kalispell City Council that the proposed text
amendment be adopted as provided herein.
BOARD DISCUSSION
Graham asked Lorch if he is still concerned with the 600ft setback and
an unintended consequence. Lorch responded his concern is that
bringing schools into downtown may prevent restaurant/casinos that
serve alcohol from locating downtown. Jentz reminded Lorch that the
ordinance applies to full casinos not accessory casinos.
ROLL CALL
The motion passed unanimously on a roll call vote.
NORTHWEST AUTOMOTIVE
A request from Northwest Automotive for a conditional use permit for
an auto repair business within the B-4 Zoning District.
STAFF REPORT
Jarod Nygren, representing the Kalispell Planning Department reviewed
Staff report #KCU-17-01 for the board.
Nygren noted there is a potential new driveway access that may facilitate
after hour customer drop off, as well as parking with a gate on the south
end of the building, which would allow for off street customer parking in
a gated, secure location.
The staff recommends that the planning board adopt staff report #KCU-17-
01 as findings of fact and recommend to the Kalispell City Council that the
conditional use permit be approved subject to the conditions in the staff
report.
BOARD DISCUSSION
None.
PUBLIC HEARING
None.
MOTION
Kauffman moved and Pesola seconded a motion that the Kalispell City
Planning Board and Zoning Commission a staff report #KCU-17-01 as
Kalispell City Planning Board
Minutes of the meeting of January 10. 2017
Page12
findings of fact and recommend to the Kalispell City Council that the
conditional use permit be approved subject to the conditions listed in the
staff report.
BOARD DISCUSSION
None.
ROLL CALL
The motion passed unanimously on a roll call vote.
CASA MEXICO
A request from LV Enterprises, INC. for a conditional use permit for an
accessory casino within the B-2 Zoning District.
STAFF REPORT
Jarod Nygren, representing the Kalispell Planning, Department reviewed
Staff report #KCU- 17-02 for the board.
The staff recommends that the planning board adopt staff report #KCU- 17-
02 as findings of fact and recommend to the Kalispell City Council that the
conditional use permit be approved subject to the conditions listed in the
staff report.
BOARD DISCUSSION
None.
PUBLIC HEARING
Eric Mulcahy — Sands Surveying — 2 Village Loop — representative for
the applicant, advised he and the applicant are happy to answering any
questions the board may have.
MOTION
Larch moved and Yerkes seconded a motion that the Kalispell City
Planning Board and Zoning Commission adopt staff report #KCU-17-02
as findings of fact and recommend to the Kalispell City Council that the
conditional use permit be approved subject to the conditions listed in the
staff report.
BOARD DISCUSSION
Young inquired about any approvals that may be needed from Public
Works. Nygren advised that if the conditional use permit were approved,
the next step would be applying for a building permit, at which time the
Site Review Committee would review the project and requires all
departments' approvals,
ROLL CALL
The motion passed unanimously on a roll call vote.
BOARD MEMBERS SEATED
Kauffman and Lorch recused themselves from the discussion and vote
on item #4 Treeline Center due to a conflict of interest.
TREELINE CENTER
A request from AMI Development and DNRC for a for a major
subdivision of a 6.8 acre tract of land located within DNRC Section 36
into 7 commercial lots ranging from approximately .35 acres to 2.3 acres
in size.
STAFF REPORT
Jarod Nygren, representing the Kalispell Planning Department reviewed
Staff report #KPP-17-01 for the board.
Staff recommends that the Kalispell City Planning Board and Zoning
Commission adopt staff report KPP-17-01 as findings of fact and
recommend to the Kalispell City Council that the preliminary plat of
Kalispell City Planning Board
Minutes of the meeting of January 10, 2017
Page 13
Treeline Center be approved, subject to the conditions listed in the staff
report.
BOARD DISCUSSION
Graham inquired about driveway approaches and whether there were any
currently available to the site. Nygren explained that currently there are
no driveway cuts, however, Nygren showed on the site plan where the
driveway cuts would be located for access into the proposed subdivision.
Nygren also briefly discussed the water and sewer extensions into the
site.
PUBLIC HEARING
None.
MOTION
Yerkes moved and Skees seconded a motion that the Kalispell City
Planning Board and Zoning Commission adopt staff report KPP- 17-01 as
findings of fact and recommend to the Kalispell City Council that the
preliminary plat of Treeline Center be approved, subject to the
conditions listed in the staff report.
BOARD DISCUSSION
None.
ROLL CALL
The motion passed unanimously on a roll call vote.
BOARD MEMBER SEATED
Kauffman and Lorch returned to their seats.
STILLWATER BEND —
Spartan Holdings, LLC is requesting permission to annex an
ANNEXATION, PUD AND
approximately 56-acre property into the city and a growth policy map
GROWTH POLICY
amendment from Suburban Residential to Urban Mixed Use. Upon
AMENDMENT
annexation, the applicant is requesting the B-2 and RA-2 Zones with a
Planned Unit Development (PUD) Placeholder Overlay.
STAFF REPORT
Jarod Nygren, representing the Kalispell Planning Department reviewed
Staff reports #KGPA-17-01, #KA-17-01 and #KPUD-17-01 for the
board.
Staff recommends that the Kalispell City Planning Board and Zoning
Commission adopt staff report #KGPA-17-01 and recommend that the
growth policy land use designation for the entire 56-acre site be "Urban
Mixed Use" on the Kalispell Growth Policy Future Land Use Map.
Nygren also noted that a motion of approval needed to authorize the
planning board president to sign Resolution KGPA-17-01, a resolution
amending the Kalispell Growth Policy Map. Nygren clarified that this
was a state requirement for growth policy amendments.
Staff recommends that the Kalispell City Planning Board and Zoning
Commission adopt Staff Report #KA-17-01 as findings of fact and
recommend to the Kalispell City Council that the property be annexed
and the initial zoning for this property upon annexation be B-2 (General
Business) on 19 acres and RA-2 (Residential Apartment/Office) on 36.9
acres.
Staff recommends that the Kalispell City Planning Board and Zoning
Commission adopt staff report #KPUD-17-01 as findings of fact and
recommend to the Kalispell City Council that a PUD Placeholder for the
Kalispell City Planning Board
Minutes of the meeting of January 10, 2017
Page 14
entire 56-acre site be approved subject to the conditions listed in the staff
report.
BOARD DISCUSSION
Graham inquired about the 100% buffer of the surrounding land uses and
the proposed trail. Nygren responded that the proposed land use
designation of Urban Mixed Use would allow the flexibility needed in
order to properly integrate with and buffer the adjacent land uses. The
trail will happen as development proceeds an initially will serve
primarily this development.
PUBLIC HEARING
BJ Grieve — WGM Group, 151 Business Center Loop — representative
for the applicant requested that the language in regards to the PUD
placeholder under condition #2 be changed to read that "all new and
existing owners shall be required to coordinate on the development of a
phased PUD" rather than a Joint PUD. He went on to say that, they feel it
will prevent the PUD from becoming disjointed if the property were to
later be sold off to different owners. Nygren advised the board that staff
has no objections with the proposed change to the condition.
MOTION (KGPA-17-01)
Young moved and Pesola seconded a motion that the Kalispell City
Planning Board and Zoning Commission adopt staff report #KGPA-17-01
and recommend to the Kalispell City Council that the growth policy land
use designation for the entire 56-acre site be "Urban Mixed Use" on the
Kalispell Growth Policy Future Land Use Map and authorize the
planning board president to sign Resolution KGPA-17-01, a resolution
amending the Kalispell Growth Policy Map.
BOARD DISCUSSION
None.
ROLL CALL
The motion passed unanimously on a roll call vote.
MOTION (KA-17-01)
Skees moved and Young seconded a motion that the Kalispell City
Planning Board and Zoning Commission adopt Staff Report #KA-17-01
as findings of fact and recommend to the Kalispell City Council that the
property be annexed and the initial zoning for this property upon
annexation be B-2 (General Business) on 19 acres and RA-2 (Residential
Apartment/Office) on 36.9 acres.
BOARD DISCUSSION
None.
ROLL CALL
The motion passed unanimously on a roll call vote.
MOTION (KPUD-17-01)
Lorch moved and Pesola seconded a motion that the Kalispell City
Planning Board and Zoning Commission adopt staff report #KPUD- 17-01
as findings of fact and recommend to the Kalispell City Council that a
PUD Placeholder for the entire 56-acre site be approved subject to the
three conditions listed in the staff report, including the amended
condition #2 as requested by the applicant.
BOARD DISCUSSION
None.
ROLL CALL
The motion passed unanimously on a roll call vote.
Kalispell City Planning Board
Minutes of the meeting of January 10, 2017
Page 15
GROWTH POLICY UPDATE
Kalispell Growth Policy Update — PLAN -IT 2035. The Kalispell City
Council Growth Policy sub -committee has spent the past year reviewing
and updating the text of the Kalispell Growth Policy. The updated draft
addresses a number of key topics that affect the future growth and
development of the City of Kalispell.
STAFF REPORT
Jarod Nygren, representing the Kalispell Planning Department reviewed
Staff report #KGPA-14-01 for the board.
Nygren went over the timeline from when the Growth Policy was first
adopted in 2003. It is a document that is adopted as a vision for future
growth in and around the city for the next 15+ years. In 2012, the city
planning staff began a process of updating the Kalispell Growth Policy.
The staff attended more than 40 community meetings w/ community
groups, local agencies and service providers within the City of Kalispell.
During this time, the staff was drafting the 2030 Growth Policy update.
Beginning fall 2013 through summer 2014 the planning board conducted
a series of 12 meetings where the board individually went through the
document page by page updating the issues, goals and policies and
recommendations contained in the draft Growth Policy Update 2030.
Following those 12 meetings, the planning board recommended approval
of the draft on August 12, 2014 sending the recommendation of approval
for the draft on to City Council. At which time the City Council held two
work sessions on the draft in the fall of 2014. Following the work
sessions, the draft was placed on hold until November 2015 when the
City Council held another work session on the draft and established a
growth policy sub -committee. That sub -committee, over the entire
course of 2016, met a total of 8 more times going through the draft page
by page. These meetings were open to the public as well. Overall, the
focus was to make the draft more concise and more user friendly. The
only new content that was added to the growth policy was a healthcare
chapter.
Staff recommends that the Kalispell City Planning Board recommend to
the Kalispell City Council that the draft Kalispell Growth Policy Update
Plan it 2035 be adopted to replace the current Kalispell Growth Policy
2020 and authorize the planning board president to sign Resolution
KGPA-14-01, a resolution replacing the current Growth Policy 2020
with Growth Policy 2035.
BOARD DISCUSSION
Lorch noted that in the Business and Industry section of the Growth
Policy there is a statement regarding DNRC Trust Lands that says "the
development of the DNRC section 36 land is difficult for small business
due to lack of infrastructure improvements despite high demand" and he
understands the sentiment but believes it is stated in a way that sounds a
bit negative in regards to trust lands. He asked for some context for from
staff. Nygren responded it was put in place because that area of trust
lands has been in high demand in regards to healthcare development and
due to the lack of infrastructure, they have turned away from it. The sub-
committee felt it was necessary to be included as it is important to have a
satellite area for healthcare development.
Kalispell City Planning Board
Minutes of the meeting of January 10, 2017
Page 16
PUBLIC HEARING
None.
MOTION
Pesola moved and Yerkes seconded a motion that the Kalispell City
Planning Board and Zoning Commission recommend to the Kalispell City
Council the draft Kalispell Growth Policy Update Plan it 2035 be
adopted replacing the current Kalispell Growth Policy 2020 and
authorize the board president to sign resolution KGPA-14-01, a
resolution replacing the current Growth Policy 2020.
BOARD DISCUSSION
Lorch noted that the new DRAFT was easier to read and the changes
made to the document were good.
ROLL CALL
The motion passed unanimously on a roll call vote.
OLD BUSINESS
Jentz mentioned that the Is' reading of the B-3 Core Area Rezone Phase
3 passed and will go to a 2 d reading at City Council on 4/17/2017.
NEW BUSINESS
Nygren mentioned the agenda items scheduled for the May 9`h Planning
Board meeting.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at approximately 7:25 p.m.
NEXT MEETING
The next meeting of the Kalispell Planning Board will be held on
Tuesday, May 9, 2017 at 6:00 p.m. and located in the Kalispell City
Council Chambers, 201 1 s'Avenue East.
/s/ Chad Graham
Chad Graham
President
APPROVED as sub rnitted/amen ded: 5/9/2017
/s/ Kari Hernandez
Kari Hernandez
Recording Secretary
Kalispell City Planning Board
Minutes of the meeting of January 10, 2017
Page 17