Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
KRH PUD Overlay Application
PLANNING FOR THE FUTURE Planning Department 201 1-t Avenue East Kalispell, MT 59901 Phone: (406) 758-7940 Fax: (406) 758-7739 www.kalispell.com/ planning APPLICATION FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) PROJECT NAME Kalispell Regional Healthcare PUD 1 2 3 NAME OF APPLICANT: Kalispell Regional Healthcare MAIL ADDRESS: 310 Sunnyview Lane CITY/STATE/ZIP: Kalispell, MT 59901 PHONE: NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER IF DIFFERENT THAN APPLICANT: 4. NAME: 5. MAIL ADDRESS: 6. CITY/STATE/ZIP: PHONE: 7. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE: 8. MAIL ADDRESS: 9. CITY/STATE/ZIP: PHONE: If there are others who should be notified during the review process, please list those. Toby McIntosh - Jackola Engineering & Architecture PO Box 1134 Kalispell, MT 59903 tmcintosh@jackola.com Check One: x Initial PUD proposal Amendment to an existing PUD C Property Address: Contains numerous properties - generally 310 Sunnyview Lane, Kalispell Total Area of Property: Approx. 97 Legal description including section, township 8, range: and 14, section 6, T28N, R21W, Flathead County, Montana Portion of Gov't Lots 5-8, 13, The present zoning of the above property is: H-1, PUD Medical, H-1/PUD, RA-1 0 E. Please provide the following information in a narrative format with supporting drawings or other format as needed: a. An overall description of the goals and objectives for the development of the project. b. In cases where the development will be executed in increments, a schedule showing the time within phase will be completed. C. The extent to which the plan departs from zoning and subdivision regulations including but not limited to density, setbacks and use, and the reasons why such departures are or are not deemed to be in the public interest; d. The nature and extent of the common open space in the project and the provisions for maintenance and conservation of the common open space; and the adequacy of the amount and function of the open space in terms of the land use, densities and dwelling types proposed in the plan; e. The manner in which services will be provided such as water, sewer, storm water management, schools, roads, traffic management, pedestrian access, recreational facilities and other applicable services and utilities. f. The relationship, beneficial or adverse, of the planned development project upon the neighborhood in which it is proposed to be established g. How the plan provides reasonable consideration to the character of the neighborhood and the peculiar suitability of the property for the proposed use. h. Where there are more intensive uses or incompatible uses planned within the project or on the project boundaries, how with the impacts of those uses be mitigated. How the development plan will further the goals, policies and objectives of the Kalispell Growth Policy. j. Include site plans, drawings and schematics with supporting narratives where needed that includes the following information: (1). Total acreage and present zoning classifications; (2). Zoning classification of all adjoining properties; (3). Density in dwelling units per gross acre; (4). Location, size height and number of stories for buildings and uses proposed for buildings; (5). Layout and dimensions of streets, parking areas, pedestrian walkways and surfacing; 2 (6). Vehicle, emergency and pedestrian access, traffic circulation and control; (7). Location, size, height, color and materials of signs; (8). Location and height of fencing and/or screening; (9). Location and type of landscaping; (10). Location and type of open space and common areas; (11). Proposed maintenance of common areas and open space; (12). Property boundary locations and setback lines (13). Special design standards, materials and / or colors; (14). Proposed schedule of completions and phasing of the development, if applicable; (15). Covenants, conditions and restrictions; (16). .Any other information that may be deemed relevant and appropriate to allow for adequate review. If the PUD involves the division of land for the purpose of conveyance, a preliminary plat shall be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the subdivision regulations. Please note that the approved final plan, together with the conditions and restrictions imposed, shall constitute the zoning for the district. No building permit shall be issued for any structure within the district unless such structure conforms to the provisions of the approved plan. The signing of this application signifies that the aforementioned information is true and correct and grants approval for Kalispell Planning staff to be present on the property for routine monitoring and inspection during review process. (Applicant Signature) (Date) KALISPELL REGIONAL HEALTHCARE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION KALISPELL REGIONAL HEALTHCARE HKSR „XSEALIXRCAGRENRL, a •`�Sii��L'. 511fYV'� FEBRUARY 2017 H I<S TABLE OF CONTENTS COVER TABLE OF CONTENTS APPLICATION NARRATIVE EXHIBITS/APPENDICES A. KRH PUD ZONING STANDARDS B. VICINITY MAP C. EXISTING ZONING D. PROPOSED PUD BOUNDARY & LEGAL DESCRIPTION E. PROPOSED PUD BOUNDARY WITH OWNERSHIP F. LAND USE PLAN G. EXISTING & PROPOSED CIRCULATION PLAN H. PARKING PLAN I. CONCEPT MASTERPLAN DRAWINGS J. TRAFFIC STUDY K. SIGNAGE DEVELOPMENT GUIDE L. PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN M. CENTRAL CONSTRUCTION STAGING MANAGEMENT PLAN IApplication Narrative Please provide the following information in o narrative format with supporting drawings or other format os needed: o. An overall description of the goals and objectives for the development of the project. The goals and objectives of the Kalispell Regional Healthcare (KRH) PUD, is to create a framework to organize growth and population healthcare for continued planned development of unknown timing and scope. As a regional medical center, the property and facilities have grown into a campus which often conflicts with the current H-1 zoning and the City of Kalispell Zoning Ordinance. KRH has worked with HKS Architects to develop a master site plan which looked at where and how the KRH Campus may grow, considering high flexibility for current and future health delivery. This master plan provides the framework to guide the PUD content and is included as a reference for the benefit of Staff, Council, and the Community. As is common with master plans, they are a snapshot in time and therefore require regular review and update. Similar to a growth policy in that they are not the regulation or law, the master plan is not being used as the PUD plan, but rather to guide the content in the proposed PUD to allow for implementing growth for approximately the next 25-30 years. The goals of the PUD are as follows: 1. Create a PUD overlay that better aligns with KRH adopted master site plan which recognizes KRH as the prime regional healthcare facility for today and the future. This includes incorporating a larger land area that generally follows the property owned or affiliated with KRH. 2. Consolidate the existing PUD boundaries. The current KRH campus is divided by two PUD's and the remainder of the property lies in the standard H-1 zone. The PUD will eliminate multiple boundaries dividing the campus as well as provide a comprehensive boundary to help guide growth. 3. Accommodate guided yet flexible growth that allows for adapting to growing community needs as well as the determinants of the ever changing healthcare delivery model. 4. Adopt zoning and development standards that are more appropriate for development of a modern hospital campus for inpatient and outpatient services. KRH and Healthcare in general has evolved significantly from when the original H-1 zone was developed. 5. Make reasonable predictions and assurances for an unpredictable future. 1IPage IApplication Narrative b. In cases where the development will be executed in increments, a schedule showing the time within phase will be completed. The continued growth of the KRH Campus is not phased like the typical land development PUD. The growth and sequencing of projects is driven by community needs, changes in healthcare practices, and maintaining and updating the facilities owned and operated by KRH. c. The extent to which the plan departs from zoning and subdivision regulations including but not limited to density, setbacks and use, and the reasons why such departures are or are not deemed to be in the public interest: Included in Appendix A is a summary of the standards for the KRH PUD zone. It is adapted from the current City of Kalispell H-1 zone as described in the Zoning Ordinance. This appendix also describes how the proposed standards deviate from the current zone and their impacts on the public. d. The nature and extent of the common open space in the project and the provisions for maintenance and conservation of the common open space; and the adequacy of the amount and function of the open space in terms of the land use, densities, and dwelling types proposed in the plan; As briefly mentioned above, the KRH masterplan was a result of an effort undertaken by HKS and KRH. A goal of the master site effort was to increase the amount of open/green space and increase visibility of the main hospital building key entries along Hwy 93. This resulted in an open area coined the Health Lawn as well as open spaces oriented to patient care space. The Health Lawn has started to take shape with the demolition of the old Evenson residence south of the Summit along Sunnyview Lane. The master site plan shows additional consolidation of buildings and parking to allow for the addition of open/green space. Dedicated park land is not required as this PUD is non-residential and not associated with a subdivision. However, developing an appealing campus is important to KRH and surrounding neighbors. It is difficult to find other locations around Kalispell that receive the same level of landscape and maintenance as KRH. While moving around campus, especially the main hospital building, you note the amount of plant material and the vibrant color of blooming flowers and shrubs. The healthcare industry has acknowledged that an open, welcome, and 2 1 P a g e IApplication Narrative aesthetically appealing environment can play a role in patient healing. The site master plan works to incorporate this approach and is apparent throughout campus. As development occurs, areas of the campus will continue to be improved from a landscape perspective. e. The manner in which services will be provided such as water, sewer, storm water management, schools, roads, traffic management, pedestrian access, recreational facilities and other applicable services and utilities. i. Water — City of Kalispell infrastructure is largely in place. Extension and relocation of existing infrastructure will be completed as required for future projects. ii. Sewer — City of Kalispell infrastructure is largely in place. Extension and relocation of existing infrastructure will be completed as required for future projects. iii. Storm Water — Privately owned system(s) owned and maintained by KRH. As development occurs, compliance with the applicable City of Kalispell stormwater regulations will need to be maintained. iv. Schools — Not applicable. The campus is located within School District 5. v. Roads — Existing streets and access points exist in and out of the Campus. As development will largely rely on existing infrastructure, modifications to public and private roads/driveways may be required for development and would be considered on a case by case basis. An existing and proposed circulation plan is provided in appendix G. vi. Traffic Management — A traffic study was completed by Abelin Traffic Services out of Helena and is attached to this report in Appendix J. As the PUD relies on existing roads and signaled intersections, the study has found no impact to existing Levels of Service for roads and intersections. vii. Pedestrian Access — The existing ROW's typically include boulevard sidewalks. As deemed appropriate and as required by City Standards, extension and connectivity to the existing infrastructure will be implemented as projects are developed. A circulation plan is provided in the appendices. viii. Recreational Facilities — N/A ix. Other services — N/A f. The relationship, beneficial or adverse, of the planned development project upon the neighborhood in which it is proposed to be established. 3 1 P a g e IApplication Narrative The KRH Campus already exists and therefore already interfaces with the surrounding neighborhood. The campus will continue to grow regardless of the implementation of a comprehensive PUD under the existing zoning and PUD designations. The PUD is being requested as a tool to help guide KRH and provide reasonable assurances for the City and neighborhoods through this growth. The PUD and master planning process undertaken by KRH provides the City and neighborhood a clearer picture of how the hospital intends to grow. Quality health care in the Flathead Valley is a benefit to the community as care can be provided close to home. Growth through the years has presented some challenges with the neighborhood. Based on discussions with the City and comments from residential neighbors, concerns are often raised regarding pedestrian connectivity, vehicle circulation, and impacts to Grandview. Some other comments have been from an operational standpoint such as late night snow removal and pedestrian crossings. The PUD provides an opportunity to help mitigate these concerns through planning as well as maintain a line of communication between KRH, the City, and neighbors. A neighborhood meeting was held May 26t", 2016 at KRH where the masterplan and Women's and Children's Pavilion project were presented to meeting attendees. The outcome was overwhelmingly positive and a number of attendees expressed their thanks for holding the informational meeting. Concerns largely focused on known issues for impacts to Grandview as well as pedestrian circulation. Separate from the PUD, questions regarding the Women's and Children's Pavilion were asked with respect to building height, mechanical equipment and lighting. All of which are reviewed by the City during building permit review process. The PUD and site master plan make efforts to reduce negative impacts to the surrounding neighborhood. As shown in the Land Use plan in Appendix F, the master plan identifies different 'use' areas on campus. As discussed in detail below, this includes areas for Community Health and Wellness, Inpatient and Outpatient Care, and the Women, Children, and Family Area. The Inpatient/Outpatient facilities are located at the Campus core focused around the existing hospital. Community health and wellness is focused out towards Hwy 93 for ease of access and visibility. The Women, Children, and family area is focused adjacent to the existing residential uses to help soften the more intense hospital uses at the campus core. All three of 4 1 P a g e IApplication Narrative these zones overlap interior to the PUD Boundary with the idea that uses will overlap and the transition of uses will be gradual. This is necessitated by a finite land area in which the campus can grow as well as the ever changing healthcare needs. g. How the plan provides reasonable consideration to the character of the neighborhood and the peculiar suitability of the property for the proposed use. Character of the surrounding property was taken into account in the PUD and master planning processes. The master site plan looked at three different zones or areas for the campus. These areas consist of the Community Health and Wellness area, the Inpatient and Outpatient Care area, and the Women, Children, and Family area. These areas are generally shown in the land use map shown in Appendix F. The intent of these zones is to not specifically include or exclude a type of use but rather guide the types of uses expected in areas of the Campus. Inpatient and Outpatient Care Area — This area is focused over the main hospital building. This is where the more intense care occurs that is typical of a hospital facility and is representative of its current use. This area is the densest development and also the largest height. Community Health and Wellness Area — This area is intended to be mostly outpatient uses such as clinics, health and wellness, pharmacies, etc. This zone is largely set along the Highway 93 frontage as they require easy access, high visibility, and interface well with the existing Hwy 93 corridor in terms of use and adjacent zones. This area is representative of its current use and predicts the most significant demolition and new development. Women, Children, and Family Area — This area is located in the NE portion of the campus to soften the hospital uses to the surrounding residential neighborhoods. This area focuses on family. Closer to the Inpatient/Outpatient area, the use will consist of the Women's and Children's Pavilion which provides hospital care services focused on women's and children's healthcare. As development approaches the residential neighborhood, uses would be focused on family services and housing for work force and patient families. 5 1 P a g e IApplication Narrative h. Where there are more intensive uses or incompatible uses planned within the project or on the project boundaries, how will the impacts of those uses be mitigated. The KRH campus lies within an existing H-1 zone with two different PUD overlays, therefore the continued growth is in alignment with existing zoning. The proposed PUD will border existing H-1 zoned properties to the northwest and south, residential properties to the northeast and east, and public to the east. To the west, the properties are largely B-2, General Business, with a few RA-1, residential apartment parcels. The west edge of the PUD is bordered by Hwy 93, which is topographically above the grade of these western properties resulting in little impact to those existing parcels. Generally speaking, the PUD boundary borders compatible uses with adjacent H-1 and B-2 zones. As an existing use, the impacts to the residential neighbors largely already exists. Mitigation of impacts to the neighboring residential uses is achieved through the land use areas discussed above and as presented in the overall master plan concept provided in Appendix I. By trying to focus women, children, and family oriented uses in the portions of the campus that abut residential uses, better compatibility is maintained. Efforts in the site master plan and the PUD design have been made to discourage use and connectivity to Grandview Drive which largely provides the divide between the hospital and the residential properties. KRH will work with their staff to discourage using Grandview Drive for vehicle access. As development occurs along residential properties, landscaping to aide in softening the impact will be completed where it doesn't already exist. Mature landscaping exists along most of the interface between the hospital property and the homes along the west side of Glacier View Drive as well as along the Buffalo Hill Townhomes west property line. Further, the NE corner of the proposed PUD was an old gravel pit and fill dump site. Development of the property could impact the neighborhood; however, until recently, this property was weed infested and riddled with construction debris. Development of this property removes blight from this neighborhood as well as provides infill development on parcels that will be costly to develop based on past uses. i. How the development plan will further the goals, policies and objectives of the Kalispell Growth Policy. 6 1 P a g e IApplication Narrative Several areas of the Kalispell Growth Policy align with the continued growth of KRH. Chapters 4 and 6 specifically list goals that reference growth of Regional Healthcare. Below are excerpts from the Growth Policy. Chapter 4, Land Use: Business and Industry goal states: "support the development and expansion of the Kalispell Regional Medical Center recognizing it as an important and desirable element in the economy that can be expanded on a regional basis and provide high-tech, high -quality health care and services while providing an important and high paying employment base." Chapter 6, Economy states: "Strengthen Kalispell as a regional healthcare center that provides a broad spectrum of healthcare related services with diagnostic, therapeutic, and varied medical services available." Chapter 8, Urban Design, Historic and Cultural Conservation: "New Development should contribute to the community quality of life and its attractiveness as a retirement and tourism destination." The excellent health care available to the community contributes to the quality of life and it continues to attract world class healthcare providers that seek the lifestyle NW Montana offers. Implementation of a KRH Campus PUD enables planned growth, which aligns with the Kalispell Growth Policy as shown above. j. Include site plans, drawings and schematics with supporting narratives where needed that includes the following information: 1. Total acreage and present zoning classifications — An overall PUD boundary map is included in the appendices as well as a current zoning designation map. The proposed PUD boundary contains approximately 97 acres of land largely owned or affiliated with KRH. 2. Zoning classification of all adjoining properties — Included in Appendix C is a current zoning map showing the zoning of properties adjoining the PUD. 3. Density in dwelling units per gross acre — Not applicable as this is not a residential PUD. 4. Location, size, height and number of stories for buildings and uses proposed for buildings — The master site plan concept provided with the PUD application shows numerous buildings throughout the campus. The building specifics have not been identified at this stage; however, the 7 1 P a g e IApplication Narrative proposed PUD development standards dictate the design with respect to height, setbacks, and uses. This information is provided in Appendix A. 5. Layout and dimensions of streets, parking areas, pedestrian walkways and surfacing — Not applicable. The streets and adjacent pedestrian ways are largely existing infrastructure. Where improvements become necessary, the street and sidewalk dimensions will match the existing section or the City's Public Works standard in place where appropriate. 6. Vehicle, emergency and pedestrian access, traffic circulation and control — A site circulation plan is included in Appendix G. As shown, a large portion of the street and pedestrian infrastructure is already in place. This plan generally defines the circulation routes for vehicles and pedestrians. As buildings are developed, connectivity to the core circulation routes will be incorporated where appropriate. Concerns over internal north -south connectivity will be addressed with improvements between the west wall of the hospital and the Medical Arts Building. Although timing is not addressed, the masterplan identifies that this current fire lane gets improved to allow for better circulation between Sunnyview Lane and Windward Way down to Conway Drive. Connectivity of the east side pedestrian pathway will be completed as part of the Emergency Department and Women's and Children's Pavilion projects. 7. Location, size, height, color and materials of signs — Signage guidelines are included in Appendix K, which have been developed in cooperation with Healthcare Graphics Consulting out of Dallas, Texas. These sign guidelines, once adopted with the PUD, will be used to develop a campus signage plan prior to implementation. Individual property sign permits shall be applied for and shall comply with these proposed sign standards. 8. Location and height of fencing and/or screening — Not applicable as fencing and or screening is not anticipated as part of the overall PUD. Screening will be implemented as appropriate to buffer adjacent residential uses as development occurs. 9. Location and type of landscaping - Not applicable as landscaping is not anticipated as part of the overall PUD. Landscaping will be completed 8 1 P a g e IApplication Narrative on a project specific basis and included with the site and building permit design submittals. 10.Location and type of open space and common areas - Not applicable as dedicated open space and common areas is not provided as part of the overall PUD. Creation of open space will be completed on a project specific basis and included with the site and building permit design submittals. The master site plan indicates an increase of open space with continued development of the campus. 11.Proposed maintenance of common areas and open space — KRH employs personnel and/or contracts maintenance of their grounds for all of their existing landscaping and open areas. These efforts will be adjusted as needed to continue to provide a well -maintained campus. 12.Property boundary locations and setback lines — A PUD Boundary map is provided in Appendix D. The legal boundary definition is also provided in that appendix. The setbacks will be identified on a case by case basis for projects and their impacted parcels. Setback standards are identified in the PUD zoning guidelines provided in Appendix A. 13.Special design standards, materials and/or colors — No special design standards or materials are set forth with the PUD. Development in the PUD is largely anticipated to fall under common KRH Ownership and therefore special design standards are not necessary. As with any project within the City Limits, a building project is required to be approved by the Architectural Review Committee prior to being issued a building permit. 14. Proposed schedule of completions and phasing of the development, if applicable — As discussed in the narrative sections above, the master site plan included with the application for reference is a 25 to 30-year plan. Implementation of building improvements will be largely dictated by community and healthcare needs. 15.Covenants, conditions and restrictions — No CCR's are proposed for the PUD as the Campus will fall largely under common KRH Ownership. As shown in the appendices, the proposed PUD boundary overlaps a number of existing zones and PUD's. One such overlap is with a portion of the Buffalo Commons Medical/Professional Facilities PUD and therefore amendments will be required to the existing PUD covenants. 9 1 P a g e IApplication Narrative The Medical/Professional CCR's have been previously amended based on KRH maintaining at least 75% Ownership of the land included within the PUD boundary and a similar approach would be used for future amendments. As the proposed PUD process could impact the amendments to the Medical/Professional CCR's, these changes will be made prior to final adoption of the PUD. 16.Any other information that may be deemed relevant and appropriate to allow for adequate review — None. 101 Page Appendix A - PUD Zoning Standards I KRH PUD Zoning Standard KRH PUD — PROPOSED STANDARDS Intent: A zoning district intended to provide hospitals and medical facilities and supportive services for the care of the sick, elderly and distraught. This zone is not intended to serve the general retail or overnight accommodation needs of the general public. Permitted uses: 1. Aircraft hangers 2. Airports and heliports 3. Athletic club and Wellness Facilities 4. Assembly halls/stadiums/convention hall facilities 5. Automobile parking — surface and structure 6. Barber and beauty services 7. Bed and breakfast 8. Church 9. Community center 10.Central Construction Staging Area 11. Day care - home (12 or fewer) - Center (13 or more) 12. Dwelling - Single family - Duplex - Townhouse (2 or more attached units) - Multi -family - Patient, Family, and Healthcare Support Housing — See definition below 13. Fairgrounds (public) 14. Funeral homes and crematoriums 15.Group home - 8 or fewer persons - 9 or more persons 16. Home occupations (refer to Section 27.20.060) 17. Homeless shelters 18. Hospital - Inpatient Hospital (including treatment centers and 24-hour care facilities) - Outpatient Ambulatory Care — Less than 24-hour stay 19.Jail Facilities (public) 20. Laboratories, tech research, development and testing 21. Office - Professional/government 1IPage I KRH PUD Zoning Standard - Medical with limited overnight stay (less than 24 hours) 22. Parks 23. Patient RV Parking 24. Police and fire stations 25. Residential care home or facility 26. Restaurants 27. Retail, limited: - Book stores - Florist - Medical supplies and equipment - Opticians - Pharmacy - Gift shops - Coffee shops - Ancillary retail uses - Similar uses 28. Safe houses 29. Schools - K-12 (public or private) - Post -secondary (public or private) - Commercial 30. Utilities (primary distribution site) Property Development Standards: 1. Minimum Lot Area (sq. ft.): N/A 2. Minimum Lot Width (ft.): N/A 3. Minimum Setbacks (ft.): - Front Yard — 0* - Side Yard — 0* - Rear Yard — 0* - Side Corner — 0* - Attached Garage (Front/Side Corner) — 20 - Accessory Structures — N/A *Provide 15-foot setback where adjacent to Residentially zoned property and where adjacent to Highway 93 corridor. 4. Maximum Building Height (ft.): 100 Feet; over 100 feet subject to CUP 5. Permitted Lot Coverage (%): N/A 6. Off -Street Parking — Parking Ratios and design standards per City of Kalispell Zoning Ordinance. For sites located within the Parking Management Zone, see the Parking Management Plan. 2 1 P a g e I KRH PUD Zoning Standard 7. Fences (refer to Section 27.20.040) - Maximum Heights (ft.): - Front — 4 (6.5 for construction staging area fence screening) - Side — 6.5 - Rear — 6.5 - Side Corner — 6.5 8. Signs — See KRH Signage Development Guide 9. Outdoor lighting — Outdoor lighting shall comply with Chapter 27.26 in the City Zoning Ordinance. 10. Pedestrian Connectivity — Development projects should install missing right-of- way sidewalk along its property frontage as required by City requirements. If the developed sidewalk falls within 100 feet of an existing ROW sidewalk, located on the same side of the street, and the missing segment is located along the frontage of a parcel under common Ownership, the project should install sidewalk to connect the new and existing walkways. Definitions: Patient, Family, and Healthcare Support Housing — Housing related to a hospital function with a limited term stay. This includes but is not limited to patients, families, doctors, staff, and students. An example could be a patient that needs to be close to the hospital for treatment but is not appropriate for being admitted. 3 1 P a g e IExisting H-1 Zoning Deviation Summary EXISTING H-1 ZONING DEVIATION SUMMARY Permitted Uses — The uses allowed in the H-1 zone are largely applicable to the uses currently found on the KRH Campus. A number of uses only allowed by a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) are common to healthcare uses as well. This includes: athletic clubs, heliports, and even hospitals. Therefore, all permitted uses in the H-1 zone and those only allowed by CUP will be considered a permitted use in the PUD. In addition to the H-1 allowed and CUP allowed uses, the following uses have been allowed: i. Patient, Family, and Healthcare Support Housing ii. Assembly Halls/Stadiums/Convention Hall Facilities iii. Central Construction Staging Area iv. Patient RV Parking v. Retail — Gift Shops, Coffee Shop, Ancillary Retail use Based on discussions with the City, two existing uses on campus have been problematic under the existing zoning. They are Construction Staging and the RV parking spaces. A brief discussion on each of these uses is provided. As a construction yard is not listed as an "allowed" use in the current zone, the reality is every construction project has a need for staging areas. Whether it's maintaining existing facilities or expanding into new, there has been a steady stream of projects on the KRH campus for more than the past decade. Construction activities shall comply with City Ordinances including but not limited to noise, dust, and construction storm water. Over the years, the main yard has largely stayed in the same location off of Heritage Way. It has fluctuated in size based on the project and construction needs and isolated laydown areas have been located adjacent to each construction site. The construction yard may need to be moved and ultimately will be removed when no longer necessary. Within the PUD, construction staging will be allowed adjacent to the specific project as well as a central location. This is required based on limited space adjacent to many projects and the size/magnitude of construction projects exceeding those typical of the Flathead Valley. See the enclosed Central Construction Staging Management Plan. An RV park is not listed as an allowed use in the current zone; however, an RV park is allowed by conditional use. As an allowed use in the PUD it is worth noting that the RV spaces provided at KRH do not constitute an RV Park in the traditional sense as they are not open to the public for rent or lease. The RV spaces are provided as an amenity limited to patients and their families' that are on campus for healthcare services. These are often out of town patients that are able to bring a familiar living space with them all while controlling their costs to be in the area for care. Based on this, the PUD will include Patient RV parking spaces as an allowed use. The current location is in the northern part of the campus. Growth in the number of spaces may be required in the 4 1 P a g e IExisting H-1 Zoning Deviation Summary future and will largely be driven by the needs of Patients. As the facility is truly not an RV park for camping, this is not perceived as a large impact to the public. Further, hookups are provided to eliminate the need for noisy generators and storing and hauling away of gray and black water. The permitted uses, including those added as part of the PUD, are not perceived as a negative impact to the community. By allowing for growth and expansion of the KRH campus from a medical and operations standpoint, it improves the medical services provided to the community. Further, this growth helps strengthen and support the Flathead Economy. By providing a single PUD, a consistent planning document can be used by KRH and the City for determining compliance of future projects. Development Standards — See the proposed development standards provided at the beginning of this appendix. The deviation to the existing design standards largely focuses on setbacks, building height, and parking. Deviation from these standards will be a benefit to the community in that is allows for concentrating building development to allow for an increase in open area and therefore anticipates little impact above existing improvements. The concept master plan included in the PUD for reference shows a general improvement to the "front" of the campus and provides for more green space. Upon review of the existing campus from aerial photography, it becomes readily apparent that there exists a lot of hard surface. Through the work of the master plan, consolidation of building and site improvements actually results in larger amounts of green space as shown in the concept drawing. i. Setbacks — The table below outlines the current H-1 setbacks and the proposed PUD setbacks. It is worth noting that the existing hospital PUD modified setbacks however this change does not cover a majority of the proposed PUD boundary. Setback Summary Setback Current H-1 PUD proposed* Front 15 ft 0 ft Side 5 ft 0 ft Rear 10 ft 0 ft Side Corner 15 ft 0 ft *Provide 15-foot setback where adjacent to Residentially zoned property and where adjacent to Highway 93 corridor 5 1 P a g e IExisting H-1 Zoning Deviation Summary ii. Building Height — The current H-1 zone allows for 60 feet with unlimited allowed with a Conditional Use Permit. The existing PUD covering the main hospital building allowed for 80 feet building heights to accommodate for the Surgical Services project. The proposed PUD would allow for 100-foot building heights. Building vertically may be the best use of available land as KRH continues to grow. Restrictions due to ALERT helicopter approaches would need to be considered with each specific building design and approved by appropriate regulatory agencies. iii. Off -Street Parking — Parking demand at KRH varies significantly from day to day and even hour to hour. It is highly dynamic and the perception of sufficiency of existing facilities is dependent on these fluctuations. Development at KRH has met the current ordinance in terms of the H-1 parking ratios; however, the parking counts rely on using offsite parking. This can become an issue in the fact that as parking has expanded to the north, the distance to the facilities served exceeds 300 feet and overlaps existing H-1 and PUD zones. The PUD deviates from the current ordinance with respect to off -site parking and a maximum 300-foot distance from the use to the parking facility. With a campus setting, the PUD will allow parking to be anywhere within the PUD boundary and proposes to meet or exceed the current zoning ordinance with respect to the number of spaces provided. The departure from the zoning ordinance to allow for parking to exceed 300 feet from the facilities they serve may be perceived as not being in the public's best interest. In reality, it's in KRH's best interest to provide adequate parking for patients, visitors, employees, and vendors. This means that as parking needs require being spread over a large area, a circulator shuttle and valet parking may be provided to effectively move people around campus. This also means as parking demands dictate, a parking structure will be provided. The parking map enclosed in Appendix H shows that KRH has a sufficient number of parking spaces throughout campus to accommodate the Women's and Children's Pavilion Project. As growth continues, the available land for surface parking will be reduced and will likely require parking structure(s). The future parking requirements will be calculated using the City of Kalispell Parking Ratios and as presented in the parking management plan. Based on a review of existing parking and areas available for surface parking development, it is projected that a garage may be required once the parking demand reaches the counts presented in the Post Women's and Children's Parking map included in appendix H. The proposed Full PUD Build -out Parking Structure plan included in Appendix H identifies possible locations for (3) three parking garages. The exact number of spaces, garages, or final locations are unknown at this time. Efforts to locate parking adjacent to the use will be made for stand-alone uses that are less 6 1 P a g e IExisting H-1 Zoning Deviation Summary connected to the main hospital functions. This could include housing or clinics for example. iv. Signs —The signage development guide included in appendices discusses the need to create a uniform look for a medical campus signage, provide the visitor with the correct visible signage at the correct time and location, and all while keeping it simple, affordable, and maintainable. As the primary concern for medical campus signing is life safety, it is imperative to provide simple and clear direction for the first time visitor and patients needing care. For these reasons, the proposed changes are a benefit, not a detriment, to the community. The proposed guide is included in appendix K and was developed in cooperation with Healthcare Graphics Consulting from Dallas, Texas and falls in line with accepted medical industry signage standards. The development guide addresses the types and quantities of signs allowed for the PUD and will allow for the development of a campus signage plan prior to implementing. Generally, the proposed guide modifies the number and size of signs allowed, but it also differentiates from the current City Ordinance in that it provides greater area for building freestanding, marquee (canopy) and wall signs from a quantity and size perspective. 7 1 P a g e Appendix B - Vicinity Map Appendix C - Existing Zoning Map a Q z z 0 N (D z H X w Appendix D - Proposed PUD Boundary & Legal Description Q 0 z D 0 m 0 D a Y LU W N 0 d 0 d F F* THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOTS 5, 6, 7, 8, 13 AND 14 IN SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 28 NORTH, RANGE 21 WEST, FLATHEAD COUNTY, MONTANA DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING ATTHE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 3A OF THE AMENDED PLAT OF LOTS 3 & 4, HIGHLAND PARK SECOND ADDITION; THENCE N15°41'W ALONG THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF U.S. HIGHWAY No. 93, A DISTANCE OF 1430 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT 1 OF CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY No. 11287 AND BEING A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF HERITAGE WAY; THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY THE FOLLOWING FIVE (5) COURSES: S86°43'43"E, 119.30 FEET; ALONG A 434.63 FOOT RADIUS NON -TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH CENTER BEARING S03°2611311W, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 18o09'24", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 137.73 FEET; S68°25'48"E, 160.42 FEET; ALONG A 442.91 FOOT RADIUS NON -TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH CENTER BEARING N24°48'47"E, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09° 03'40", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 70.04 FEET; S85°06'47"E, 389.26 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1 OF HERITAGE PLACE, 1ST ADDITION AND BEING A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF WINDWARD WAY; THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY THE FOLLOWING FOUR (4) COURSES: 1\104°31'52"E, 148.34 FEET; ALONG A 220.00 FOOT RADIUS NON -TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH CENTER BEARING S85°39'33"E, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 44°18'38", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 170.14 FEET; N48°39'07"E, 55.99 FEET; ALONG A 530.00 FOOT RADIUS TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 08°08'29", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 75.31 FEET TO A POINT A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF BUFFALO COMMONS PHASE 1 AND BEING THE WESTERNMOST CORNER OF THE SOUTHERN PARK, COMMON AREA, UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT OF BUFFALO COMMONS PHASE 1; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY OF SAID BUFFALO COMMONS PHASE 1 THE FOLLOWING SIX (5) COURSES: S18°10'44"E, 148.56 FEET; S58°46'04"E, 113.74 FEET; S76°56'20"E, 165.28 FEET; N71°56'17"E, 219.17 FEET; N89°01'35"E, 53.96 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF RIDGEVIEW SUBDIVISION; THENCE S03°52'13"E ALONG SAID BOUNDARY, A DISTANCE OF 303.74 FEETTO THE NORTH LINE OF U.S. GOVERNMENT LOT 13; THENCE N89°05'56"E ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 770.22 FEETTO THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF GRANDVIEW DRIVE; THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY THE FOLLOWING FIVE (5) COURSES: S00°36'56"E, 229.46 FEET; S00°35'00"E, 113.50 FEET; N77°16'48"W, 46.30 FEET; S02°55'24"W, 130.17 FEET; AND S03°04'26"W, 99.95 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 4 OF GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS; THENCE S89°05'03"W ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 4, A DISTANCE OF 90.15 FEET TO THE WEST BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT; THENCE S02°51'33"W ALONG SAID WEST BOUNDARY, A DISTANCE OF 49.87 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THAT PARCEL SHOWN AND DESCRIBED ON CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY NO. 1852 ; THENCE S88o50'26"W ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF SAID PARCEL, A DISTANCE OF 39.18 FEETTO THE WEST BOUNDARY OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST BOUNDARY S03°02'2611W, A DISTANCE OF 49.68 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT A OF AMENDED PLAT OF LOTS 2 & 3 OF GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS; THENCE ALONG THE WEST BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT S02o59'41"W, A DISTANCE OF 80.17 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT B OF AMENDED PLAT OF LOTS 2 & 3 OF GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS; THENCE ALONG THE WEST BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT S02o52'57"W, A DISTANCE OF 34.98 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH BOUNDARY GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS ADDITION No. 2; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH BOUNDARY THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES: N86°59'47"W, 89.74 FEET; N87°00'29"W, 129.37 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 3 OF GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS ADDITION No. 2; THENCE ALONG THE WEST BOUNDARY OF SAID GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS ADDITION No. 2 S03°02'30"W, A DISTANCE OF 280.09 FEETTO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1 OF GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS ADDITION NO. 2; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT S75°31'22"E, A DISTANCE OF 57.03 FEET TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF GLACIER VIEW DRIVE; THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES: ALONG A 81.00 FOOT RADIUS NON -TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH CENTER BEARING S45°01'3811E, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 38°55'40", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 55.03 FEET; S05°07'41"E, 25.63 FEET; AND S03oO3'19"W, A DISTANCE OF 89.91 FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF SUNNY VIEW LANE; THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY N89°09'02"E, A DISTANCE OF 67.13 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S00°50'44"E AND LEAVING SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY, A DISTANCE OF 59.69 FEETTHE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ADDITION NO. 64 BUFFALO HILL TOWNHOUSES; THENCE ALONG THE WEST BOUNDARY OF SAID ADDITION S02o49'55"W, A DISTANCE OF 430.69 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF THAT PARCEL DESCRIBED IN BOOK 369 PAGE 423; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH AND WEST BOUNDARIES OF SAID PARCEL THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES: S87°56'27"W, 2.88 FEET AND S02o53'47"W, 399.94 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF PARCEL A OF CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY NO. 14535; THENCE S47°32'27"W ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID PARCEL, A DISTANCE OF 84.47 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 2 OF HIGHLAND PARK FIRST ADDITION; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH AND WEST BOUNDARIES OF SAID LOT THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES: S89°24'37"W, 280.56 FEET AND S03°01'37"W, 258.47 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1 OF HIGHLAND PARK FIRST ADDITION; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH AND WEST BOUNDARIES OF SAID LOT THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES; S89°24'00"W, 100.00 FEET AND S03°00'59"W, 140.28 FEET; THENCE S89°24'37"W, A DISTANCE OF 202.72 FEET TO THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF CLAIRMONT STREET; THENCE NO3°01'00"E ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY, A DISTANCE OF 17.07 FEET; THENCE S89°15'12"W AND LEAVING SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY, A DISTANCE OF 61.49 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1 OF HIGHLAND PARK No. 5; THENCE S89°15'12"W ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT, A DISTANCE OF 575.24 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THIS AREA CONTAINS 96.3 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. Appendix E - Proposed PUD Boundary with Parcel Ownership N Z / - J loop LU LL W Q o z o J x w z o oCL LU LA 97s,al - , Appendix F - Land Use Plan z Q J d W N D 0 z Q J Appendix G - Existing & Proposed Circulation Plan z 0 Q LU kn Appendix H - Parking Plans J w Q u z O z O z �a a "U�' �= z <w J H a z a a a Y 0 J a W F O u o w °^ � z F g Z Q o x e o y a U Q w w w w 0 0 0 w w w w w W a Q Z 0 0 0 0 o o F oo N i', p U o z j � — 3 - z W o o --- z 0 z s s s E .E ? Q c 3 -= i a N 22 E E E o 0 - '6^ E E E O z 2 E E E E E - 3 E E E i r RAND\ IEW Dpl\, . i \\X \X, N� N qi WINDWARD WAY q N IT, a a a� q q . q a q 0q a q �q r a� HVJV a3 ��imr m h o _ 1. a cQ C W z O N H Z w 2 w Q z cQ G z Y Q d -- ilo In Ab, �U 'eqia Appendix I - Concept Master Plan Drawings x -A- Ae//f "�', •yl` �'S,Y Imo, y / - 4 'l Ci t` ♦r9 i g Ali �s LL 4 L 40' 10, 010 44 Ati Ah LU a7l. LU AA CD pi LU -j LU 4� co —j 10*1 il 46 -A;r tIL 5.1 �16 jLU pX-g -4 Ar I P FJ 4(( w U 2 H Q w 2 J Q Z O C7 w OC J w IL h J Q Y 1 IAO#w 7t*t MR I Appendix J - Traffic Study • • abelin traffic services Prepared For: Kalispell Regional Healthcare PUD Traffic Impact Study Kalispell Regional Healthcare Corporation 310 Sunnyview Lane Kalispell, MT 59901 July, 2016 Kalispell, Montana 130 South Howie Street Helena Montana 59601 Kalispell Regional Healthcare PUD Traffic Impact Study Kalispell, Montana Table of Contents A. Executive Summary...................................................................................... I B. Project Description........................................................................................ I C. Existing Conditions........................................................................................ I Adjacent Roadways..............................................................................2 TrafficCounts........................................................................................3 HistoricTraffic Data...............................................................................3 Levelof Service.....................................................................................4 D. Proposed Development..............................................................................4 E. Trip Generation and Assignment................................................................5 F. Trip Distribution..........................................................................................6 G. Traffic Impacts Outside of the Development...............................................8 H. Impact Summary & Recommendations......................................................9 List of Figures Figure 1 — Proposed Development Site...................................................................2 Figure 2 — Proposed Development..........................................................................5 Figure 3 — Hourly Trip Generation & Vehicle Accumulation....................................7 Figure4 —Trip Distribution....................................................................................... 7 List of Tables Table 1 — Historic Traffic Data.................................................................................4 Table 2 — Existing 2016 Level of Service Summary................................................4 Table 3 — Trip Generation Rates............................................................................. 6 Table 4 — Level of Service Summary With Development........................................8 Kalispell Regional Healthcare PUD Traffic Impact Study Kalispell, Montana Kalispell Regional Healthcare PUD Traffic Impact Study Kalispell, Montana A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The proposed Kalispell Regional Healthcare PUD includes the construction of a 164,000 S.F. Women's & Children's Pavilion and the ultimate full PUD buildout which will increase traffic volumes by 10-15% on the medical campus. As proposed the addition of the Women's and Children's Pavilion to the KRH facilities will not have a major impact on the traffic conditions in this area. Most roads and intersections will continue to function at an acceptable LOS with the new addition. The intersection of Heritage Way with Highway 93 will continue to have a poor LOS for left -turn traffic, but will not warrant additional intersection control. The expansion will not have an effect on the overall LOS at this intersection and it is unlikely that MDT would approve any additional traffic signals along this portion of U.S. Highway 93 between the existing signals. No new road or intersection improvement would be necessary with the completion of the Women's & Children's project. With the full build -out of the KRH PUD it is expected that traffic volumes on the roadways within the development will increase by an additional 10%. While most of the roads and intersections within the KRH campus have sufficient reserve capacity to accommodate additional traffic, some road widening may be desirable along the west end of Sunnyview Lane. The hospital will also need to address pedestrian crossing needs as additional parking is constructed north of Sunnyview Lane. B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION This document studies the possible effect on the surrounding road system from the proposed expansion of the Kalispell Regional Healthcare (KRH) facility. The document provides specific impacts projections and improvement recommendations for the Women's & Children's Pavilion and general information about the full build -out of the PUD. The document identifies traffic mitigation efforts that the facility may require. C. EXISTING CONDITIONS The KRH facility consists of approximately 100-acres of property dedicated to the healthcare needs of the Kalispell region. The healthcare facility provides a wide range of medical services from the central hospital facility and the surrounding campus. The campus currently has over 2,400 employees and 300 hospital beds between the different facilities. See Figure 1 for a location map of the KRH facility. Abelin Traffic Services 1 July, 2016 Kalispell Regional Healthcare PUD Traffic Impact Study Kalispell, Montana Adjacent Roadways U.S. Highway 93 is a five -lane north/south principal arterial route that extends through the City of Kalispell. The road has a posted speed limit of 45 MPH and carries 26,400 VPD south of Conway Drive and 27,900 VPD south of Four Mile Drive. In this area, Highway 93 is signalized at Northridge Drive, Meridian Road, Sunnyview Lane, and Conway Drive. Meridian Road is an arterial route that connects to U.S. Highway 93 from the west. The road crosses U.S. Highway 93 and becomes a one-way street into the KRH campus and provides access to a variety of medical outbuildings and properties outside of the PUD. The road has a paved width of 36 feet and currently carries 16,400 VPD west of 93 and 1,400 VPD east of 93. Heritage Way is an east/west route that connects to the northern portion of the KRH campus. The road has a paved width of 36 feet and provides access to the medical campus and the commercial and residential area to the north. Traffic data collected by ATS in 2016 indicates that the road currently carries 3,800 VPD. Sunnyview Lane is a two-lane east/west route that passes through the KRH site and is the primary access route for KRH facilities. Sunnyview lane has an existing pedestrian crossing located east of Windward Way and has a four way STOP at Heritage Way. The road has a paved width of 30 feet. Traffic data collected by ATS in 2016 indicates that the road currently carries 7,100 VPD. Conway Drive is an east/west route that extends east from Highway 93 into the KRH site. The intersection with 93 is currently signalized. The road has a paved width of 36 feet. Traffic data collected by ATS in 2016 indicates that the road currently carries 2,100 VPD. Windward Way extends into the residential areas north of the KRH campus. The road has a paved width of 30 feet. Traffic data collected by ATS in 2016 indicates that the road currently carries 900 VPD. Claremont Street extends south from the KRH facilities. The road has a paved width of 34 feet. Traffic data collected by ATS in 2016 indicates that the road currently carries 1,900 VPD. The road provides access to a variety of care facilities and a residential area south of the KRH campus. Grandview Drive extends east form the KRH facilities and turns to the north through the rural residential areas east of the medical center. The road ultimately connects with Four Mile drive to the north. The road has a posted speed limit of 25 MPH and a paved width of 22-30 feet with a rural cross-section. Traffic data collected by ATS in 2016 indicates that the road currently carries 400 VPD. Abelin Traffic Services 2 July, 2016 Kalispell Regional Healthcare PUD Traffic Impact Study Kalispell, Montana Traffic Counts In May 2016 Abelin Traffic Services (ATS) collected vehicle use information at locations around the KRH campus. The data collection included peak -hour turning movement counts at the intersections along Highway 93 including Heritage Way, Meridian Road, Sunnyview Lane, and Conway Drive. ATS also collected 24-hour directional traffic counts at all entrances to the medical center and week-long counts on Sunnyview Lane and Grandview Drive. The raw traffic data is included in Appendix A of this report. The raw data collected for this project was adjusted for seasonal variation in accordance with the data collected from MDT's annual count station located on US Highway 2, 1.3 miles west of Kalispell (Station A-24). This count station data indicated that data collected in May is approximately 105% of the AADT (Average Annual Daily Traffic) volume in this area. Historic Traffic Data Abelin Traffic Services collected historic traffic data for the surrounding road system to help develop historic background growth rates for the area. The information indicates that traffic volumes along this section of U.S. Highway 93 have increased at a rate of 2% annually over the past ten years. Abelin Traffic Services 3 July, 2016 Kalispell Regional Healthcare PUD Traffic Impact Study Kalispell, Montana Table 1 - Historic Average Daily Traffic Data Station Location ID 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Hwy 93 S. of 15-7B- Conway Dr. 014 23,930 24,000 25,460 25,150 26,080 24,690 27,020 26,060 24,600 26,399 Meridian Rd. 15-7B- N. of 93 038 11,220 10,850 12,300 12,550 13,380 13,700 14,280 13,500 14,550 16,379 Hwy 93 S. of 15-7B- 4-Mile Dr. 016 25,620 25,700 31,890 31,790 35,660 32,590 34,850 35,520 33,510 27,935 Level of Service Using the data collected for this project, ATS conducted a Level of Service (LOS) analysis at area intersections. This evaluation was conducted in accordance with the procedures outlined in the Transportation Research Board's Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) - Special Report 209 and the Highway Capacity Software (HCS) version 6.7. Intersections are graded from A to F representing the average delay that a vehicle entering an intersection can expect. Typically, a LOS of C or better is considered acceptable for peak -hour conditions. Table 2-Existing 2016 Level of Service Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Highway 93 Intersection I Delay (Sec.) LOS Delay (Sec.) LOS Heritage Way 24.1 C 49.6 E Meridian Road 18.1 B 18.3 B Sunny View Lane 7.3 A 15.3 B Conway Drive 4.9 A 11.6 B Table 1 shows the existing 2016 LOS for the AM and PM peak hours without the traffic from the medical center expansion. The LOS calculations are included in Appendix C. The analysis shows that most of the intersections in this area are operating at an acceptable level of service except for the Highway 93/Heritage way which is currently experiencing excessive delay for traffic turning left onto Highway 93 under peak -traffic conditions. Although the number of vehicles attempting to make this maneuver is very low (<10 VPH), the delay for these vehicles is high. The intersection does not currently have sufficient traffic volumes to meet any signalization warrants. D. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The current expansion proposal for the KRH facilities includes the addition of a Women's & Children's Pavilion. The new facility would be added onto the east side of the main hospital complex. The Women's & Children's Pavilion would have 164,691 S.F. of floor space on three Abelin Traffic Services 4 July, 2016 Kalispell Regional Healthcare PUD Traffic Impact Study Kalispell, Montana floors. The first floor would include 36 beds and the second floor would house medical offices which would be moved from existing areas of the campus. The third floor would be built as shell space to house additional hospital services as the medical campus continues to develop. The Women's and Children's Pavilion will be opened the spring of 2018. In is not expected that full development of the PUD would occur before 2040. The current Women's & Children's Pavilion expansion plan is shown in Figure 2. E. TRIP GENERATION AND ASSIGNMENT ATS performed a trip generation analysis to determine the anticipated future traffic volumes using the trip generation rates contained in Trip Generation (Institute of Transportation Engineers, Ninth Edition). These rates are the national standard and are based on the most current information available to planners. A vehicle "trip" is defined as any trip that either begins or ends at the development site. ATS determined that the critical traffic impacts on the Abelin Traffic Services 5 July, 2016 Kalispell Regional Healthcare PUD Traffic Impact Study Kalispell, Montana intersections and roadways would occur during the weekday morning and evening peak hours. According to the ITE trip generation rates the Women's & Children's Pavilion would produce 148 AM peak hour trips, 149 PM peak hour trips, and 1,867 daily trips. The trip generation rates and totals are shown in Table 3. Table 3 - Trip Generation Rates AM Peak Total AM PM Peak Total PM Hour Trip Peak Hour Trip Peak Weekday Total Ends per Hour Trip Ends per Hour Trip Trip Ends Weekday Land Use Units Unit Ends Unit Ends per Unit Trip Ends Floor 1 W 36 & C Center Beds 1.32 48 1.42 51 12.94 466 Floor 2 W 52K & C Center S.F. 0.95 49 0.93 48 13.22 687 Floor 3 W 54K & C Center S.F. 0.95 51 0.93 50 13.22 714 TOTAL 1 148 149 1,867 The traffic data collected at the entrances to the KRH was analyzed to develop a total trip generation and parking accumulation for the campus based on the hourly vehicle entering and exiting data collected in May 2016. The data suggests that the total daily trip generation from KRH is 20,360 trips/day and the maximum vehicle accumulation observed was 1,980 vehicles. Taking into account the trip distribution proportions, the campus currently accounts for 25% to 29% of the traffic on U.S. Highway 93 in this area. The hourly trip generation and vehicle accumulation is shown in Figure 3. It is expected that traffic from the Woman's & Children's Pavilion would account for a 8% increase in traffic at the KRH facilities. As the KRH campus continues to expand to the full buildout of the PUD it is expected that employment and services will increase by an additional 10%. Total trip generation will likely increase by a similar amount (approximately 2,000 VPD). F. TRIP DISTRIBUTION The traffic distribution and assignment for the proposed expansion was based upon the existing ADT volumes along the adjacent roadways and the peak -hour turning volumes. Traffic is expected to distribute onto the surrounding road network as shown on Figure 4. Abelin Traffic Services 6 July, 2016 Kalispell Regional Healthcare PUD Traffic Impact Study Kalispell, Montana Figure 3 - Hourly Trip Generation and Vehicle Accumulation 2500 4919191 1500 1000 500 00 .60 .00 .00 00 00 00 00 00 0 00 00 .00 .00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 .00 .00 O• ti. L• �' �• 4 b. A 4i' �i' y0 yti' titi ,y'�' tiD ti tip' tit' ■ IN ■ OUT ■ Accumulation Based on data collected May 27 to June 1, 2016. 36% Figure 4 - Trip Distribution 5% 1 Windward Way Heritage Way Meridian Rd. 8% Sunnyview Ln. M d7 A cU 3 0) so Conway Dr. 38% KRH Campus Claremont St. 10% e 3% Grandview Dr. Abelin Traffic Services 7 July, 2016 Kalispell Regional Healthcare PUD Traffic Impact Study Kalispell, Montana G. TRAFFIC IMPACTS OUTSIDE THE DEVELOPMENT Using the trip generation and trip distribution numbers, ATS determined the future Level of Service for the area intersections. The anticipated intersection LOS with the Women's & Children's Pavilion is shown in Table 4. These calculations are based on the projected model volumes included in Appendix B of this report. Table 4 - Level of Service Summary with W & C Center AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Highway 93 intersection I Delay Sec. LOS Delay Sec. LOS Heritage Way 24.5 C 57.6 F Meridian Road 18.2 B 18.7 B Sunny View Lane 7.8 A 16.1 B Conway Drive 5.3 A 12.2 B Table 3 indicates that most of the intersections in this area will continue to function adequately with the additional traffic from the Women's & Children's Pavilion. Total delay at the signalized approaches on Highway 93 will increase by less than one second during the peak hours. The Heritage Way intersection is currently experiencing higher levels of delay, but does not warrant additional traffic control. The Women's & Children's Pavilion expansion will not have a significant effect on the overall LOS at this intersection and it is unlikely that MDT would approve any additional traffic signals along this portion of U.S. Highway 93 between the existing signals. It is expected that the KRH campus will expand by an additional 10% with the full buildout of the PUD. The existing approaches along Highway 93 are expected to function adequately with the Women's & Children's Pavilion and have significant reserve capacity, but could experience additional delay in the future with the current road configuration. It is expected that the completion of the Kalispell bypass will change traffic patterns within the Kalispell community and will likely decrease through -traffic volumes on Highway 93 adjacent to KRH center. This decrease will improve the operations of the existing intersections and should allow KRH to fully expand without causing any traffic disruptions along Highway 93. Traffic volumes on the internal road system within the KRH campus will range from 2,000 to 8,000 and will increase by only 8% with the addition of Women's & Children's Pavilion. The existing four-way STOP controls at Sunnyview Lane/Heritage Way and Windward Way/Heritage Way are an effective way to control traffic through the campus and are appropriate for encouraging lower vehicle speeds. Traffic volumes on Sunnyview Lane will reach 7,500 VPD with the construction of the Women's & Children's Pavilion. Typically any road carrying more than 8,000 VPD should be considered for a three -lane cross section to improve capacity. However, adding additional lanes and road width can increase vehicle speeds, which is not desirable on the campus. Abelin Traffic Services 8 July, 2016 Kalispell Regional Healthcare PUD Traffic Impact Study Kalispell, Montana The addition of the Women's & Children's Pavilion will have a limited impact on Grandview Drive. Currently only 3% of the traffic from the hospital uses Grandview Drive to access the campus. The addition of the Woman's & Children's Pavilion will add approximately 30 daily vehicle trips to Grandview Drive (3 vehicles per hour). Total traffic volumes on Grandview Drive will be less than 450 VPD. If vehicle speeds become a concern it may be of value to perform a speed study on Grandview Drive to determine if drivers are adhering to the 25 MPH speed limit and if speed mitigation may be warranted. This is a general recommendation and is not specifically tied to the KRH PUD. The KRH facility will need to address pedestrian crossing needs as the campus continues to expand. A pedestrian crossing study performed by ATS in December 2015 suggested that an additional pedestrian crossing may be warranted along the eastern portion of Sunnyview Lane with the development of the Women's & Children's Pavilion, depending on the location of any new entrances to the Women's & Children's Pavilion. It is expected that 803 additional parking spots will be constructed north of Sunnyview Lane and 211 existing parking spaces will be eliminated south of Sunnyview Lane, increasing the number of pedestrians crossing Sunnyview Lane and Heritage Way at a variety of locations as the KRH facilities expands. It would be desirable to construct any future parking areas to funnel pedestrians to specific locations and provide designated pedestrian crossings as needed. H. IMPACT SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS As proposed the addition of the Women's and Children's Pavilion to the KRH facilities will not have a major impact on the traffic conditions in this area. Most roads and intersections will continue to function at an acceptable LOS with the new addition. The intersection of Heritage Way with Highway 93 will continue to have a poor LOS for left -turn traffic, but will not warrant additional intersection control. The expansion will not have an effect on the overall LOS at this intersection and it is unlikely that MDT would approve any additional traffic signals along this portion of U.S. Highway 93 between the existing signals. No new road or intersection improvement would be necessary with the completion of the Women's & Children's project. With the full build -out of the KRH PUD it is expected that traffic volumes on the roadways within the development will increase by an additional 10%. While most of the roads and intersections within the KRH campus have sufficient reserve capacity to accommodate additional traffic, some road widening may be desirable along the west end of Sunnyview Lane. The hospital will also need to address pedestrian crossing needs as additional parking is constructed north of Sunnyview Lane. Abelin Traffic Services 9 July, 2016 APPENDIX A Traffic Data agaILIA .1ugp Sewice6 130 S. Howie Street Helena, MT 59601 File Name : HeritageAMtmc Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 5/26/2016 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Unshifted - Bank 1 93 Heritage 93 Heritage Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound StartTlme Right Thru Left Peds App. Tow Right Thru Left Peds App.Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 07:30 AM 0 272 22 0 294 14 0 1 0 15 15 249 0 0 264 0 0 1 0 1 574 07:45 AM 0 343 28 0 371 18 0 2 0 20 19 288 0 0 307 0 0 1 0 1 699 Total 0 615 50 0 665 32 0 3 0 35 34 537 0 0 571 0 0 2 0 2 1273 08:00 AM 0 284 29 0 313 10 0 2 0 12 17 250 0 0 267 0 0 0 0 0 592 08:15 AM 0 254 18 0 272 12 0 3 0 15 10 232 0 0 242 0 0 0 0 0 529 Grand Total 0 1153 97 0 1250 54 0 8 0 62 61 1019 0 0 1080 0 0 2 0 2 2394 Apprch % 0 92.2 7.8 0 87.1 0 12.9 0 5.6 94.4 0 0 0 0 100 0 Total % 0 48.2 4.1 0 52.2 2.3 0 0.3 0 2.6 2.5 42.6 0 0 45.1 0 0 0.1 0 0.1 Unshifted 0 1151 97 0 1248 54 0 8 0 62 61 1016 0 0 1077 0 0 0 0 0 2387 % Unshifted 0 99.8 100 0 99.8 100 0 100 0 100 100 99.7 0 0 99.7 0 0 0 0 0 99.7 Bank 1 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 2 7 % Bank 1 0 0.2 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.3 0 0 0.3 0 0 100 0 100 0.3 N O N N O N (N y� o F J 000 ONN L� C ♦- 0 0 0 LOO7��l O O � O r 0000 a)a Out In Total 2318 M2325 1075 1250 0 1151 97 0 0 2 0 0 0 1153 97 0 Right Thru Left Peds North 5/26/2016 0730 AM 5/26/2016 08:15 AM Unshifted Bank 1 F+ Left Thru Ri ht Peds 0 1016 61 0 0 3 0 0 01 1 01 91 61 0 1161 1080 2241 Out In Total A O A U co U C 000 C O O 0 _ � r m N m O N mom N N N OU a N N N N 000 0 0 0— agaILIA .1ugp Sewice6 130 S. Howie Street Helena, MT 59601 File Name : HeritagePMtmc Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 5/25/2016 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Unshifted - Bank 1 93 Heritage 93 Heritage Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound StartTlme Right Thru Left Peds App. Tow Right Thru Left Peds App.Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 04:30 PM 0 354 2 0 356 22 0 1 0 23 9 390 0 0 399 0 0 0 0 0 778 04:45 PM 0 364 7 0 371 27 0 2 0 29 11 409 0 0 420 0 0 1 0 1 821 Total 0 718 9 0 727 49 0 3 0 52 20 799 0 0 819 0 0 1 0 1 1599 05:00 PM 0 435 4 0 439 32 0 1 0 33 12 483 0 0 495 0 0 0 0 0 967 05:15 PM 1 401 3 0 405 20 0 4 0 24 7 454 0 0 461 0 0 0 0 0 890 Grand Total 1 1554 16 0 1571 101 0 8 0 109 39 1736 0 0 1775 0 0 1 0 1 3456 Apprch % 0.1 98.9 1 0 92.7 0 7.3 0 2.2 97.8 0 0 0 0 100 0 Total % 0 45 0.5 0 45.5 2.9 0 0.2 0 3.2 1.1 50.2 0 0 51.4 0 0 0 0 0 Unshifted 0 1553 16 0 1569 101 0 8 0 109 39 1732 0 0 1771 0 0 0 0 0 3449 % Unshifted 0 99.9 100 0 99.9 100 0 100 0 100 100 99.8 0 0 99.8 0 0 0 0 0 99.8 Bank 1 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 1 7 % Bank 1 100 0.1 0 0 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0.2 0 0 100 0 100 0.2 N ONN 0-- 0 F J 000 C ♦- 0 0 0 V L � O 000� a Out In Total 3402 1838 1571 1:34029 0 1553 16 0 1 1 0 0 1 1554 16 0 Right Thru Le� Peds North 5/25/2016 0430 PM 5/25/2016 05:15 PM Unshifted Bank 1 F+ Left Thru Ri ht Peds 0 1732 39 0 0 4 0 0 01 17361 39 0 1562 1775 3 5 Out In Total O U U U O O U �000 0 _ 0� r m o m �5 mom a m o j8U O OOO age& .1ugp Sewice6 130 S. Howie Street Helena, MT 59601 21Ca►FT MMLVACa'i o - Moo Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 5/26/2016 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Unshifted - Bank 1 93 MERIDIAN 93 MERIDIAN Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound StartTlme Right Thru Left Peds App. Tow Right Thru Left Peds App.Total Right Thru Left Peds App.T.1 Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 07:30 AM 99 173 1 0 273 0 0 0 0 0 20 184 31 3 238 15 14 81 3 113 624 07:45 AM 102 232 11 0 345 0 0 0 0 0 18 176 26 0 220 37 21 132 0 190 755 Total 201 405 12 0 618 0 0 0 0 0 38 360 57 3 458 52 35 213 3 303 1379 08:00 AM 93 190 3 0 286 0 0 0 0 0 17 175 9 0 201 23 19 92 0 134 621 08:15 AM 80 172 5 0 257 0 0 0 0 0 22 157 16 0 195 19 20 85 1 125 577 Grand Total 374 767 20 0 1161 0 0 0 0 0 77 692 82 3 854 94 74 390 4 562 2577 Apprch % 32.2 66.1 1.7 0 0 0 0 0 9 81 9.6 0.4 16.7 13.2 69.4 0.7 Total % 14.5 29.8 0.8 0 45.1 0 0 0 0 0 3 26.9 3.2 0.1 33.1 3.6 2.9 15.1 0.2 21.8 Unshifted 374 765 20 0 1159 0 0 0 0 0 77 689 82 3 851 94 74 388 4 560 2570 % Unshifted 100 99.7 100 0 99.8 0 0 0 0 0 100 99.6 100 100 99.6 100 100 99.5 100 99.6 99.7 Bank 1 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 2 7 % Bank 1 0 0.3 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 0.4 0 0 0.5 0 0.4 0.3 O N N OD N 0) r O O (h NJ F J V 0 V r` L� V O D) V D) L Ov v vov� aa) a Out In Total 2236 122243 1082 1161 374 765 20 0 01 2 0 0 374 767 20 0 Right Thru Left Peds North 5/26/2016 0730 AM 5/26/2016 08:15 AM Unshifted Bank 1 F+ Left Thru Ri ht Peds 82 689 77 3 0 3 0 0 821 6921 77 3 861 854 1715 Out In Total 0 0 0 O O ~C 00 0 r o00 000 � a 0 y N_ �o No00 age& .1ugp Sewice6 130 S. Howie Street Helena, MT 59601 21Ca►FTm NLVACa'iC•IF WLVAI Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 5/25/2016 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Unshifted - Bank 1 93 MERIDIAN 93 MERIDIAN Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound StartTlme Right Thru Left Peds App. Tow Right Thru Left Peds App.Total Right Thru Left Peds App.T.1 Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 04:30 PM 111 237 7 0 355 0 0 0 1 1 8 262 38 0 308 8 16 137 0 161 825 04:45 PM 121 234 11 0 366 0 0 0 1 1 10 270 42 1 323 12 15 151 1 179 869 Total 232 471 18 0 721 0 0 0 2 2 18 532 80 1 631 20 31 288 1 340 1694 05:00 PM 140 291 5 0 436 0 0 0 0 0 11 348 46 0 405 5 13 147 1 166 1007 05:15 PM 137 260 9 0 406 0 0 0 2 2 6 308 40 0 354 7 20 153 1 181 943 Grand Total 509 1022 32 0 1563 0 0 0 4 4 35 1188 166 1 1390 32 64 588 3 687 3644 Apprch % 32.6 65.4 2 0 0 0 0 100 2.5 85.5 11.9 0.1 4.7 9.3 85.6 0.4 Total % 14 28 0.9 0 42.9 0 0 0 0.1 0.1 1 32.6 4.6 0 38.1 0.9 1.8 16.1 0.1 18.9 Unshifted 508 1021 32 0 1561 0 0 0 4 4 35 1184 166 1 1386 32 64 587 3 686 3637 % Unshifted 99.8 99.9 100 0 99.9 0 0 0 100 100 100 99.7 100 100 99.7 100 100 99.8 100 99.9 99.8 Bank 1 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 1 7 % Bank 1 0.2 0.1 0 0 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.3 0 0 0.3 0 0 0.2 0 0.1 0.2 a7 (O0N(0 OHOD O r h F h U, U, NJ J V 0 V C (O (O ~ (N O ch N c) LO l r` Or` m m o0 o m aa) a Out In Total 3332 133239 1776 1563 508 1021 32 0 11 1 0 0 509 1022 32 0 Right Thru Left Peds North 5/25/2016 0430 PM 5/25/2016 05:15 PM Unshifted Bank 1 F+ Left Thru Ri ht Peds 166 1184 35 1 0 4 0 0 1661 11 881 35 1 1054 1390 2444 Out In Total O 0 0 0 O ~C 00 0 000 a w -0 o aU U- N A o A agaILIA .1ugp Sewice6 130 S. Howie Street Helena, MT 59601 File Name : SunnyAM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 5/26/2016 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Unshifted - Bank 1 93 SUNNY VIEW 93 SUNNY VIEW Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound StartTlme Right Thru Left Peds App. Tow Right Thru Left Peds App.Total Right Thru Left Peds App.Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 07:30 AM 0 143 28 0 171 11 0 14 1 26 46 193 0 0 239 0 0 0 0 0 436 07:45 AM 0 241 37 0 278 14 0 31 0 45 43 246 0 1 290 0 0 0 0 0 613 Total 0 384 65 0 449 25 0 45 1 71 89 439 0 1 529 0 0 0 0 0 1049 08:00 AM 0 199 43 0 242 8 0 19 0 27 45 184 0 0 229 0 0 0 0 0 498 08:15 AM 0 177 42 0 219 9 0 23 0 32 52 214 0 0 266 0 0 0 0 0 517 Grand Total 0 760 150 0 910 42 0 87 1 130 186 837 0 1 1024 0 0 0 0 0 2064 Apprch % 0 83.5 16.5 0 32.3 0 66.9 0.8 18.2 81.7 0 0.1 0 0 0 0 Total % 0 36.8 7.3 0 44.1 2 0 4.2 0 6.3 9 40.6 0 0 49.6 0 0 0 0 0 Unshifted 0 760 150 0 910 42 0 87 1 130 186 837 0 1 1024 0 0 0 0 0 2064 % Unshifted 0 100 100 0 100 100 0 100 100 100 100 100 0 100 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 Bank 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Bank 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -mu000 000 o F J 000 000 L� C ♦- 0 0 0 L°� 000 O 0000 aa) a Out In Total 879 910 1789 0 760 150 0 0 0 0 0 0 760 150 0 Right Thru Left Peds North 5/26/2016 0730 AM 5/26/2016 08:15 AM Unshifted Bank 1 F+ Left Thru Ri ht Peds 0 837 186 1 0 0 0 0 01 8371 186 1 847 1024 18701 Out In Total S N N W W O O D) O D) C O O 0 W W r 000 m 40-4 N p p O a D) mom D) N — m . o agaILIA .1ugp Sewice6 130 S. Howie Street Helena, MT 59601 File Name : SunnyPM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 5/26/2016 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Unshifted - Bank 1 93 SUNNY VIEW 93 SUNNY VIEW Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound StartTlme Right Thru Left Peds App. Tow Right Thru Left Peds App.Total Right Thru Left Peds App.Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 04:30 PM 0 211 6 0 217 49 0 69 0 118 13 292 0 0 305 0 0 0 0 0 640 04:45 PM 0 242 18 0 260 37 0 49 0 86 13 293 0 0 306 0 0 0 0 0 652 Total 0 453 24 0 477 86 0 118 0 204 26 585 0 0 611 0 0 0 0 0 1292 05:00 PM 0 264 13 0 277 60 0 71 0 131 16 298 0 0 314 0 0 0 0 0 722 05:15 PM 0 269 9 0 278 33 0 52 0 85 17 332 0 0 349 0 0 0 0 0 712 Grand Total 0 986 46 0 1032 179 0 241 0 420 59 1215 0 0 1274 0 0 0 0 0 2726 Apprch % 0 95.5 4.5 0 42.6 0 57.4 0 4.6 95.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total % 0 36.2 1.7 0 37.9 6.6 0 8.8 0 15.4 2.2 44.6 0 0 46.7 0 0 0 0 0 Unshifted 0 986 46 0 1032 179 0 241 0 420 59 1215 0 0 1274 0 0 0 0 0 2726 % Unshifted 0 100 100 0 100 100 0 100 0 100 100 100 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 Bank 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Bank 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M000 000 o F J 000 000 L� C ♦- 0 0 0 L°� 000 O 0000 aa) a Out In Total 1394 1032 2426 0 986 46 0 0 0 0 0 0 986 46 0 Right Thru Left Peds North 5/26/2016 0430 PM 5/26/2016 05:15 PM Unshifted Bank 1 F+ Left Thru Ri ht Peds 0 1215 59 0 0 0 0 0 01 1 21 51 59 0 12207 1274 25001 Out In Total =MOM o U o� 0 U C O O 0 N _ N r 000 �(p N N A A O m o 0 0 a N cn N N 00 N o00 ClA- a da .1uccric S e wic e 6 130 S. Howie Street Helena, MT 59601 File Name : ConwayAM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 5/31/2016 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Unshifted - Bank 1 93 CONWAY 93 CONWAY Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Tow Right Thru Left Peds App.Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Tow Int. Total 07:30 AM 0 141 40 0 181 6 0 7 0 13 24 260 0 0 284 0 0 0 0 0 478 07:45 AM 0 213 53 0 266 5 0 8 0 13 42 336 0 0 378 0 0 0 0 0 657 Total 0 354 93 0 447 11 0 15 0 26 66 596 0 0 662 0 0 0 0 0 1135 08:00 AM 0 178 56 1 235 5 0 14 0 19 43 240 0 1 284 0 0 0 0 0 538 08:15 AM 0 163 34 0 197 12 0 13 0 25 27 224 0 0 251 0 0 0 0 0 473 Grand Total 0 695 183 1 879 28 0 42 0 70 136 1060 0 1 1197 0 0 0 0 0 2146 Apprch % 0 79.1 20.8 0.1 40 0 60 0 11.4 88.6 0 0.1 0 0 0 0 Total % 0 32.4 8.5 0 41 1.3 0 2 0 3.3 6.3 49.4 0 0 55.8 0 0 0 0 0 Unshifted 0 695 183 1 879 28 0 42 0 70 136 1060 0 1 1197 0 0 0 0 0 2146 % Unshifted 0 100 100 100 100 100 0 100 0 100 100 100 0 100 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 Bank 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Bank 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000�,� �0 O 7 a) F 000, C ♦— O O 0 L 000 � O 0000 o a Out In Total 1088 879 1967 0 695 183 1 0 0 0 0 0 695 183 1 7ht Thr Left Peds North 5/31/2016 0730 AM 5/31/2016 08:15 AM Unshifted Bank 1 +-1 T F+ Left Thru Ri ht Peds 0 1060 136 1 0 0 0 0 0 01 1060 136 1 737 1197 1934 Out In Total =mom a (0 a� 0 (0 ~C 00 0 _ (D O O O �; N O N a m mo ° m 0 000 ClA- a da .1uccric S e wic e 6 130 S. Howie Street Helena, MT 59601 File Name : ConwayPM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 6/1/2016 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Unshifted - Bank 1 93 CONWAY 93 CONWAY Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App.Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Tow Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Tow Int. Total 04:30 PM 0 323 11 0 334 44 0 56 0 100 8 267 0 0 275 0 0 0 0 0 709 04:45 PM 0 319 5 0 324 33 0 44 0 77 9 291 0 0 300 0 0 0 0 0 701 Total 0 642 16 0 658 77 0 100 0 177 17 558 0 0 575 0 0 0 0 0 1410 05:00 PM 0 345 14 0 359 55 0 77 0 132 6 262 0 0 268 0 0 0 0 0 759 05:15 PM 0 354 9 0 363 42 0 44 0 86 7 328 0 0 335 0 0 0 0 0 784 Grand Total 0 1341 39 0 1380 174 0 221 0 395 30 1148 0 0 1178 0 0 0 0 0 2953 Apprch % 0 97.2 2.8 0 44.1 0 55.9 0 2.5 97.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total % 0 45.4 1.3 0 46.7 5.9 0 7.5 0 13.4 1 38.9 0 0 39.9 0 0 0 0 0 Unshifted 0 1341 39 0 1380 174 0 221 0 395 30 1148 0 0 1178 0 0 0 0 0 2953 % Unshifted 0 100 100 0 100 100 0 100 0 100 100 100 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 Bank 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Bank 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000�,� M0 O 7 a) F 000, C ♦- O O 0 LO l O O O � O 0000 o a Out In Total 1322 1380 2702 0 1341 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 1341 39 0 Thr Left Peds 7ht North 6/1/2016 0430 PM 6/1/2016 05:15 PM Unshifted Bank 1 +-1 T F+ Left Thru Ri ht Peds 0 1148 30 0 0 0 0 0 01 1148 30 0 1562 1178 2740 Out In Total '-' A O A (o O O (o ~C 00 0 co _ c � N N 0c0cn 0 a poA� m000 PiwtTable Data 1 am Raatl_N— I Oat. Claremont Street CenwW D— Gra.tl — Lane Herila9e Way Ne h Meal.. Way S... W ew Lane Wh,d. J Way Total Som -I Total Som -C Dd.Oa Tme Sam -In Sam - Out Sam -In Sam - Out Sam -In Sam - Out Sam -In Sam - Out Sam -In Sam - Out Sam -In Sam - Out Sam -In Sam -Out 0525116 Wetl 15.30 6 7 6 7 1545 10 6 10 6 1fi00 2 8 16 15 18 23 16.15 6 ] 15 10 21 17 16 M 2 8 9 12 11 20 16.45 2 1 9 8 11 9 1700 4 8 13 13 17 21 17_15 2 10 6 13 8 23 1730 1 10 8 9 9 19 1745 3 4 4 5 ] 9 1800 1 2 23 41 5 5 29 4fi 18.15 3 6 12 19 30 37 3 2 4fi 64 IBM 2 1 15 33 36 63 2 6 55 103 1845 2 0 31 21 29 48 1 3 0 72 19M 15 2 10 27 0 6 18 20 18 33 1 1 62 89 1915. 5 6 12 21 3 2 10 16 17 50 1 6 4fi 101 19 30 13 5 9 18 2 0 5 34 17 49 0 2 46 108 1945 4 1 6 14 0 3 11 10 17 35 1 1 39 64 2DW 5 3 ] 17 2 3 3 14 9 30 2 3 28 70 20.15 3 0 5 17 1 1 6 20 18 30 2 2 35 10 2D W 2 0 6 13 1 2 9 25 11 20 0 1 29 61 245 0 2 3 2 0 1 6 9 13 20 1 2 23 36 21 W 0 3 3 3 3 2 1 6 8 21 1 0 ifi 35 21.15 4 0 4 5 0 0 3 14 13 22 2 1 26 42 2130 0 1 1 2 4 3 2 3 9 12 0 4 ifi 25 2145 3 1 1 4 0 0 1 5 7 19 0 2 12 31 2 w 0 2 1 2 1 0 3 12 3 1fi 0 0 8 32 22.15 0 2 4 8 1 0 2 5 3 7 2 1 12 23 22M 3 2 2 9 1 1 6 ] 6 fi 0 1 18 26 2245 3 2 4 6 0 0 3 13 8 14 0 2 18 3] 23M 0 1 5 5 0 1 0 11 1 ] 1 0 ] 25 23.15 1 0 1 6 1 1 0 7 1 6 0 1 4 21 2330 3 0 4 4 0 0 3 6 0 4 1 0 11 14 2345 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 51 2 1 0 0 51 10 0526/16 Th. 0800 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 5 0 0 3 1 00.15 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 3 2 0 1 5 5 0030 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 4 4 0845 1 0 3 10 0 0 2 1 1 2 0 1 1 14 0100 2 0 0 3 0 0 1 5 1 1 0 1 4 10 01 15 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 3 2 1 0 8 3 0130 0 0 0 2 0 1 4 0 1 2 0 0 5 5 0145 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 4 4 0200 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 0215 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 02 30 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 1 0245 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 fi 0 0 1 6 03W 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 03.15 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 2 4 0330 1 2 2 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 4 6 0345 0 2 3 0 2 0 1 1 0 3 0 1 6 ] 04w 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 1 2 oa_15 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 5 3 0430 1 0 2 4 0 0 ] 1 ] 4 0 0 1] 9 04.45 1 1 2 0 0 0 12 4 7 0 0 0 22 5 0500 0 0 2 0 0 0 6 2 11 1 3 0 22 3 05.15 3 1 3 1 1 0 11 2 11 1 1 0 30 5 0530 1 5 4 0 0 0 13 6 1] 1 2 1 37 13 0545 1 8 17 2 3 0 23 4 30 10 0 1 74 25 O6w 2 6 17 6 1 1 15 14 27 12 3 2 fi5 41 0515 3 18 26 1 1 0 22 15 31 10 0 3 13 4] 0630 ] 19 29 5 3 0 2] 13 52 19 0 1 118 51 o6_a5 10 27 65 10 4 0 50 18 74 17 0 0 203 72 0]00 5 24 25 20 4 0 30 13 52 33 1 1 117 91 0]_15 10 14 49 19 1 3 30 14 68 26 4 10 i62 Bfi 0730 10 28 6] 1] 2 5 38 24 fib 39 9 8 192 121 0]45 23 38 103 22 11 0 72 12 103 47 7 15 319 134 O800 22 4fi 71 26 2 4 54 25 76 29 4 10 229 138 08.15 20 18 65 27 4 4 47 15 90 33 2 5 228 102 0830 9 30 4fi 33 5 1 3] 1] 84 36 6 20 185 13] 08.45 10 17 56 32 6 0 43 37 95 46 12 11 222 143 09w 13 26 4fi 37 11 5 23 21 30 50 4 8 125 14] 09.15 8 15 35 20 2 3 31 33 45 42 11 16 132 129 0930 2 Z1 42 25 2 4 36 31 58 51 10 12 151 151 09.45 7 20 41 38 7 3 36 38 5] fi5 10 8 158 152 ID 4 13 42 33 4 1 30 31 45 71 13 4 138 153 10.15 6 16 38 39 6 3 24 36 58 63 18 0 150 157 1830 6 29 55 49 4 0 24 27 63 ]] 18 3 110 185 1845 10 19 45 54 2 2 2] 31 64 72 18 2 ififi 180 11 00 10 16 39 56 4 4 42 36 57 69 9 12 ififi 193 11.15 10 16 38 62 3 1 37 56 42 91 6 17 136 243 11 30 7 23 35 58 1 2 26 29 48 89 13 12 130 213 11 45 15 25 39 63 2 5 15 38 59 72 9 5 139 208 12W 7 19 28 54 1 9 30 41 49 91 11 7 126 221 12.15 12 22 42 57 4 7 37W 59 ]3 8 13 162 208 12 30 15 19 41 53 1 4 37 32 fit 81 8 5 163 194 1245 11 29 fib 51 4 3 40 33 ]2 fib 18 5 211 187 13W 12 32 43 55 4 5 38 32 68 67 5 13 170 204 1315 22 30 48 56 7 3 34 36 62 79 16 11 189 215 13 W 20 19 52 46 1 2 37 42 40 69 9 11 159 189 1345 10 19 43 60 3 4 3737 58 71 8 10 159 201 1400 11 18 43 40 6 3 40 46 56 84 12 6 ififi 191 14.15 10 20 34 56 8 6 30 38 4] 82 10 13 139 215 14 30 12 18 42 55 3 4 26 51 50 87 12 14 12229 1445 8 29 37 51 5 1 34 38 53 82 6 12 143 213 1500 16 24 3] 55 5 10 28 49 4fi Ill 11 6 141 255 15.15 10 23 25 69 2 6 33 36 51 ]9 8 9 In222 15 30 29 24 35 66 2 6 36 5() 56109 9 11 167 2fifi 1545 16 18 28 60 6 6 32 28 fit 84 9 13 153 209 1 fi 00 25 26 27 72 1 5 23 54 41 93 14 15 131 2fi5 16.15 14 24 28 65 6 2 10 38 41 92 8 10 107 211 1fi 30 31 33 24 94 4 10 38 46 42 112 12 14 151 309 16.45 19 26 18 84 6 5 28 3] 44 88 8 7 123 247 1]00 23 2] 18 131 5 1 19 48 43 123 10 14 118 3" 17_15 16 28 1] ]0 5 5 2] 55 4fi 86 ] ] 11fi 251 1] 30 15 40 13 86 4 6 15 61 47Sfi 8 ] 102 2fi6 1745 ] 19 1] fi3 3 8 1] 33 49 56 9 5 1. ififi 1800 11 13 1] 42 2 3 6 36 40 58 6 7 82 159 18.15 10 9 16 41 4 3 11 26 30 49 5 4 lfi 132 18 30 9 6 14 16 7 3 18 23 50 4' 3 6 101 112 1845 711 21 24 4 3 24 38 35 37 5 2 Sfi "51900 13 11 12 29 1 3 14 25 16 31 2 2 58 101 19.15 11 5 8 24 1 3 5 40 15 42 0 2 40 11fi 1930 6 7 5 20 0 7 3 18 13 41 0 2 v 95 1945 9 6 8 1] 2 2 5 21 1737 1 2 42 fi5 2DW 5 5 5 14 3 0 5 27 22 29 0 3 40 18 20.15 2 4 6 13 4 3 4 18 1723 1 4 34 fi5 2830 2 3 5 13 3 ] 5 14 17 24 2 4 34 65 2845 2 2 9 8 2 3 4 14 11 20 1 2 29 49 21 W 6 3 5 12 3 3 6 11 1733 1 3 38 fi5 21.15 3 1 5 2 2 3 6 11 15 20 2 2 m 39 21 W 1 3 3 3 1 0 0 5 6 20 1 1 12 32 2145 0 1 4 21 2 21 2 61 13 161 0 11 211 2.1 Page 1 Pivot Table Data 1 22.00 2215 22M 2245 23M 23.15 2330 2345 3 3 1 0 3 6 2 4 0 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 3 8 3 5 2 8 6 5 0 4 1 3 1 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 3 0 1 ] 1 5 4 6 4 9 0 12 2 8 4 8 0 2 6 10 6 6 4 ] 10 13 4 15 2 3 4 12 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 13 11 13 2211 6 7 11 6 28 1] 21 31 16 28 a 05W116 F. 0000 1 0 3 3 0 0 1 1 1 7 2 1 8 12 00:15 0 0 0 4 1 1 1 2 0 3 0 0 2 10 00:30 2 2 1 3 0 1 0 1 5 4 0 0 8 11 0041 2 0 2 8 0 0 1 3 1 2 0 1 6 1a 0100 0 1 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 1 9 01 15 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 4 a 01 30 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 1 2 1 1 1 5 5 0145 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 4 2 0200 1 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 3 a 0215 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 6 0 0 2 10 02 30 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0245 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0300 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 03.15 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 2 5 0330 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 3 5 0345 0 0 1 1 0 0 4 0 1 1 0 2 6 a 0400 1 1 2 0 0 1 5 0 5 0 1 0 14 2 0415 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 5 2 0430 3 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 6 0 0 0 12 1 0445 0 1 2 1 0 0 7 1 9 0 0 0 18 3 0500 0 2 3 0 0 0 1 0 10 3 1 0 15 5 0515 3 4 5 0 1 0 11 6 8 3 1 0 29 13 0530 2 0 4 3 2 0 7 1 9 5 2 1 26 10 0545 0 4 15 2 1 0 21 2 25 3 1 1 fi3 12 0600 2 8 10 5 0 0 23 4 22 11 2 2 59 30 0015 0 20 26 4 0 0 13 14 20 9 1 1 60 48 0630 2 Z1 28 4 2 1 34 1] 44 23 2 4 112 12 06.45 6 27 38 8 5 1 41 16 74 22 1 0 16, ]4 0]00 25 14 4 2 28 12 36 35 4 1 91 64 0]_15 41 16 1 4 48 27 90 4] 0730 55 14 4 2 65 44 iTA fi0 0]_45 5 5 31 85 58 121 fi3 0800 7 0 31 6] 31 105 3fi 08.15 4 2 30 11 28 105 30 0830 3 1 22 57 30 82 31 08.45 3 3 32 83 27 118 30 0900 2 1 22 55 44 19 45 09.15 3 2 15 43 41 61 43 0930 4 2 23 52 fib ]9 fi8 09.45 7 1 29 60 64 96 fi5 1000 4 4 25 50 44 19 48 10.15 ] 4 31 48 BID8fi 84 10 30 3 6 32 53 64 88 10 1045 5 5 39 47 6] 91 12 11 00 2 4 24 56 67 82 11 11.15 6 3 14 51 64 71 fit 11 30 5 ] 17 55 84 ]] 91 11 45 4 6 28 41 83 73 89 1200 1 2 12 46 8] 59 89 12.15 3 9 21 5()fib 74 71 12 30 5 2 20 55 fi] 80 fig 1245 3 8 19 55 ]fi ]] 84 1300 3 8 22 61 72 86 80 13.15 3 2 1] 52 49 12 51 1330 5 6 15 59 13 19 fi9 1345 3 3 26 64 fifi 93 fi9 1400 2 5 16 53 48 71 53 14.15 2 3 22 40 ]] fi4 80 14 30 3 8 24 43 fig 10 71 1445 8 2 21 41 ]9 10 81 1500 1 7 19 38 89 58 9fi 15.15 ] 3 27 31 64 fi5 fit 15 30 3 9 34 44 82 81 91 1545 3 6 18 34 ]8 55 84 1000 6 6 1] 31 88 54 94 16.15 3 3 12 28 fig 43 12 1030 3 1 25 1] 85 45 86 16.45 0 3 20 27 83 4] 86 1700 2 2 16 22 110 40 112 1]_15 5 ] 19 25 69 49 16 1]30 4 ] 14 29 57 4] 64 1]45 0 3 11 27 53 38 56 IBM3 4 13 30 41 4fi 45 18.15 3 2 11 16 24 30 2fi 18 30 0 4 13 31 35 44 39 1845 1 2 13 30 19 44 21 1900 4 ] 9 19 2] 32 34 19.15 3 2 4 16 28 23 30 1930 4 3 6 14 3()a 33 1945 1 4 7 10 23 18 21 2000 3 1 8 16 23 21 24 20.15 4 4 3 15 2' 22 30 20 30 1 3 4 11 12 ifi 15 2045 1 2 3 23 25 2] 27 2100 1 2 3 9 18 13 20 21.15 1 2 4 13 22 18 24 21 30 4 5 6 12 1] 22 22 2145 2 0 5 3 13 10 13 2200 3 3 0 9 8 12 11 22.15 0 1 2 ] 9 9 10 22M 0 1 3 4 8 1 9 2245 2 2 0 11 10 13 12 2300 0 0 0 5 11 5 11 23.15 0 1 0 3 5 3 6 2330 0 2 1 5 5 6 ] 2345 0 0 0 3 3 3 3 052816 Sal 00:00 0 1 0 3 2 3 3 00:15 0 0 0 1 2 1 2 00 30 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 00 15 0 0 0 1 6 1 6 01 00 0 0 0 3 1 3 1 0115 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0130 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0145 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0200 1 0 0 2 0 3 0 0215 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 02 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0245 0 0 0 0 4 6 a 03 00 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0315 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 033 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0345 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0400 2 0 o z 2 a 2 0415 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0430 1 1 0 3 1 a 2 04a5 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0500 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 05.15 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0530 1 0 0 8 2 9l 2 Pae Pivot Table Data L Pivot Table Data L 1330 1345 1400 14.15 14 30 1445 1500 15.15 15 30 1545 1 fi 00 16.15 1630 16.45 1]00 1]_15 1730 1745 1800 18.15 18 30 1845 1900 1915. 19 30 1945 200 20.15 2830 2845 21 W 21.15 2130 2145 22.00 22.15 2230 2245 23M 23.15 2330 2345 2 2 5 0 0 0 4 4 2 5 2 2 2 0 0 3 3 0 2 3 1 3 1 1 3 4 0 3 6 1 2 1 0 4 2 1 1 5 1 2 2 4 4 1 2 4 1 3 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 4 0 1 1 0 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 6 4 10 9 1 9 5 3 5 6 8 5 8 5 5 5 3 4 5 3 7 2 1 3 3 4 1 0 0 1 5 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 19 9 11 24 11 13 13 13 13 21 19 14 14 19 18 19 9 14 11 12 15 22 16 13 16 25 13 22 21 18 14 15 21 14 14 22 14 15 11 13 21 11 23 24 20 20 9 11 12 18 10 15 8 1 1 11 6 11 6 8 9 1 3 9 3 fi 3 9 3 3 4 1 0 3 2 4 3 ] 1 2 1 2 2 6 24 28 23 21 25 30 23 2] 11 21 2' 21 18 35 21 26 21 18 16 28 30 29 12 13 1J 11 12 8 ] 10 4 9 5 4 5 0 4 J 1 1 2 11 24 13 11 26 16 19 22 14 15 25 14 29 25 19 16 18 23 20 15 20 25 24 20 19 16 ] 13 12 9 11 10 6 11 4 6 3 4 8 2 2 6 05W16 Mon 0800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0815 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0030 1 1 0 3 4 4 5 0845 1 1 0 1 1 2 2 01 00 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0t15 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0130 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0145 0 1 1 1 0 2 1 0200 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0215 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 02 30 a a 0 a o 9 0 0245 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0300 0 0 1 2 2 3 2 03.15 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0330 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0345 0 1 1 2 1 3 2 04w 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 oa_15 3 0 0 1 0 4 0 0430 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 04.45 0 0 0 5 1 5 1 0500 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 05.15 0 0 2 2 2 4 2 0530 0 0 0 2 1 2 1 0545 1 0 0 8 1 9 1 ,w 0 0 0 ] 5 1 5 afi_15 0 1 0 11 5 11 6 0630 0 0 1 20 4 21 4 O6_a5 0 0 0 26 3 2fi 3 0]00 0 1 2 9 5 11 6 0715 0 0 4 ] 11 11 1] 0730 0 0 3 12 12 15 12 0745 1 1 9 13 8 23 9 08w 3 0 16 18 9 31 9 08.15 3 1 9 9 11 21 12 0830 0 1 ] 13 8 20 9 08.45 5 2 14 20 11 39 13 09w 1 1 15 10 11 2fi 12 09.15 3 2 13 20 13 3fi 15 0930 1 3 14 15 18 30 21 09.45 1 1 12 15 1fi 28 17 1800 0 1 12 15 29 21 JO 10.15 3 0 14 1] 13 34 13 1830 2 4 12 14 21 28 31 1845 7 3 16 14 23 31 26 11 00 1 4 8 26 25 35 29 11.15 3 2 10 22 21 35 29 11 30 3 2 4 20 32 2] 34 11 45 3 2 4 18 28 25 30 1200 0 2 1 14 43 21 45 12.15 2 2 6 14 18 22 20 12 30 2 2 3 16 10 21 12 1245 5 3 3 12 24 20 27 1300 2 2 4 14 11 20 19 13.15 2 2 2 14 18 18 20 1330 3 2 1 13 10 23 12 1345 3 1 4 19 15 2fi 16 1400 0 3 6 11 18 1] 21 14.15 1 7 3 19 19 23 26 1415 1 1 3 12 11 ifi 18 1445 2 3 3 11 10 ifi 13 1500 4 1 1 19 11 a 18 15.15 5 3 2 9 15 18 15 30 3 3 3 11 11 11 20 1545 1 4 2 10 14 13 18 1fi 00 2 1 0 11 13 13 14 16.15 2 3 2 12 16 ifi 19 "30 3 1 0 13 11 ifi 12 16.45 1 2 4 12 1fi 11 18 1]00 1 3 3 15 13 19 16 1]_15 2 2 1 9 14 12 16 1730 5 3 3 13 15 21 18 1]45 3 3 4 13 12 20 15 1800 1 6 2 15 11 18 23 18.15 0 1 2 21 13 23 14 18 30 3 4 1 26 15 30 19 1845 3 3 3 26 9 32 12 1900 1 3 1 9 13 11 16 19.15 3 0 2 13 15 18 15 19 30 2 1 3 10 24 15 25 1945 4 0 0 10 15 14 15 200 1 8 0 13 8 14 16 20.15 2 2 5 10 11 11 13 2830 2 2 2 12 ] ifi 9 2845 1 0 1 1 6 9 6 21W 2 0 2 10 ] 14 ] P.- 4 Pivot Table Data L 2115 21 30 2145 22.00 zz_15 2230 2245 23M 23.15 2330 2345 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 9 3 10 8 9 3 6 5 4 3 4 2 4 3 8 5 6 3 5 1 1 11 a 8 a 6 3 3 3 5 3 1 10 10 9 ] a 5 a 8 6 6 1 Os/31/16 Tue 00.00 0 0 0 2 4 2 a 00:15 0 1 0 1 4 1 5 00:30 1 1 0 1 2 2 3 0845 2 0 0 3 2 5 2 01 00 0 0 0 1 2 1 2 0115 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 01 30 0 1 1 1 0 2 1 01 45 2 1 0 1 2 3 3 0200 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0215 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 02 30 0 0 1 0 2 1 2 0245 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0300 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 03.15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0330 2 0 0 1 0 3 0 0345 0 0 0 2 1 2 1 0400 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0415 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0430 0 0 2 6 0 8 0 0445 0 0 15 6 0 21 0 0500 0 0 13 9 0 22 0 05.15 0 0 20 8 0 28 0 0530 1 0 10 10 1 21 1 0545 0 0 13 31 5 as 5 0fi00 1 1 8 31 1fi a0 1] O6.15 1 0 9 35 8 a5 8 0fi30 3 1 10 15 18 68 19 w45 2 0 20 82 18 10a 18 0]00 3 2 12 43 20 58 22 0]_15 1 1 11 % 22 68 23 0730 5 4 18 70 33 93 3] 0745 6 1 35 98 41 1. 42 08 00 7 0 32 74 31 113 31 08:15 8 2 22 fifi 30 96 32 08 30 8 6 26 74 33 108 39 0845 4 3 4] 81 53 132 56 0900 4 3 21 62 39 8] 42 0915 4 5 18 5] 72 19 ]] 0930 6 3 26 65 fifi 9] 69 0945 5 4 22 fifi fi4 93 68 1800 6 3 26 % 72 88 ]5 10]5 ] 4 11 fifi 74 Ba ]8 1830 3 0 20 68 54 91 5a 1845 4 ] 2] 62 79 93 86 11 00 2 5 26 50 fig ]8 ]a 11.15 0 1 20 55 90 ]5 91 11 30 5 6 28 45 81 ]8 8] 11 45 9 3 34 62 8] 105 90 1200 3 4 24 45 88 12 92 12.15 9 2 22 59 73 90 ]5 12 30 5 7 19 70 9fi 94 103 1245 8 6 26 76 fit 110 68 1300 8 9 26 63 9] 97 106 1315 6 3 26 52 67 84 70 1330 2 3 26 fi4 59 92 62 1345 1 1 19 36 82 56 83 1400 5 5 24 42 fifi 71 ]1 14.15 1 8 21 fi4 fib 86 76 14 30 2 5 18 46 Sfi fifi 91 1445 5 6 32 53 82 90 88 1500 5 2 2] 46 11fi ]8 118 15.15 4 3 28 41 75 73 78 15 30 5 3 33 50 108 88 111 1545 3 ] 35 10 84 108 91 1600 6 7 27 55 108 88 115 16.15 6 2 22 50 91 78 93 16 30 6 7 37 36 119 79 126 1645 7 6 32 43 130 82 136 1]00 1 8 31 31 168 63 1l6 1]_15 4 8 30 30 134 fi4 1a2 1730 3 9 18 42 111 63 126 1]45 6 3 35 29 fib 70 71 1800 4 2 29 16 63 49 65 18.15 3 4 22 23 35 48 39 18 30 3 4 16 38 fib 5] 72 1845 5 3 23 37 4fi 65 49 1900 2 2 8 16 42 26 as 19.15 3 1 15 28 31 46 3] 19 30 4 3 13 26 51 43 5a 1945 2 4 8 16 25 26 29 2DM 2 2 10 19 28 31 30 20.15 1 6 5 171] 23 23 2830 1 0 6 15 20 22 20 z845 1 1 7 17 2] 25 28 21 00 0 4 3 10 29 13 33 21.15 2 1 2 5 1fi 9 17 2130 2 1 3 9 1fi 14 1] 2145 0 1 1 10 ] 11 8 2200 0 3 2 9 5 11 8 zz_15 0 1 0 5 18 5 19 2230 1 0 0 4 11 5 11 22_a5 0 2 1 3 ] a 9 2300 1 0 0 4 13 5 13 23.15 0 0 1 2 5 3 5 2330 0 0 0 2 5 2 5 2345 0 0 3 2 4 5 a WM1116 We 0000 0 0 0 1 4 1 a 0015 1 0 0 2 1 3 1 0030 0 0 0 3 4 3 a 0845 0 0 1 2 3 3 3 01 00 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0t15 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 01 30 0 0 0 2 1 2 1 0145 0 1 1 2 1 3 2 0200 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0215 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 30 0 0 1 0 3 1 3 0245 0 1 1 2 2 3 3 03 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0315 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 033 0 0 1 1 2 2 2 0345 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0400 2 0 1 8 4 11 a 0415 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0430 1 1 4 6 2 11 3 0445 0 0 23 6 0 29 0 Pae Pivot Table Data 1 Page 6 APPENDIX B Traffic Model Kalispell Regional Healthcare Traffic Study 2016 Traffic Model Existing Peak Hour (15min x 4) AM Peak Season Factor 1303 j L 68 0.95 106 8 1098 72 388 4: 882 j 42 y 502 1 h 99 80 t 669 141 Z 68 916 j L 53 141 118 t 935 163 676 j L 19 213 53 t 912 163 Heritage Meridian Sunnv V. Conwa WEVAN Windward Way Hwy 93 1 IClaremont Grandview Kalispell Regional Healthcare Traffic Study 2016 Traffic Model Existing Peak Hour (15min x 4) PM Peak Season Factor 1653 1 L 122 0.95 15 4 1835 46 532 4: 1106 1 19 y 559 1 h 175 49 t 1322 19 Z 42 1003 1 L 228 49 270 t 1132 61 1345 1 L 160 34 167 t 1246 27 Heritage Meridian Sunnv V. Conwa WEVA 7 Windward Way Hwy 93 1 IClaremont Grandview Kalispell Regional Healthcare Traffic Study 2016 Traffic Model 35 19 MODEL 5 3 AM Peak Windward Way W & C Center 20 j L 10 Heritage 5% 5% 16 0 10 20% 9 17 17% 1 0 4: 17 j Meridian 3 3 y 0 0% 8 1 1 3 15 15% 5 t 9 KRMC 2 Z 7 IN 98 OUT 50 8 j L 6 Sunny V. Grandview 10 12 19 37% %IN 100% 3% t 12 29 30% %OUT 100% 3% 19 12 j L 6 Conway 8 7 13 25% t 26 20 20% 12 10% 10% Hwy 93 IN 98 Claremont 19 37 OUT 50 5 10 check 3 2 Kalispell Regional Healthcare Traffic Study 2016 Traffic Model 19 36 MODEL 3 5 PM Peak Windward Way W & C Center 11 j L 19 Heritage 5% 5% 9 0 19 20% 17 9 17% 0 0 4: 9 j Meridian 6 2 y 0 0% 4 0 1 6 8 15% 3 t 17 KRMC 1 Z 4 IN 54 OUT 95 4 j L 12 Sunny V. Grandview 6 23 35 37% %IN 100% 3% t 14 16 30% %OUT 100% 3% 11 23 j L 11 Conway 4 13 24 25% t 14 11 20% 6 10% 10% Hwy 93 IN 54 Claremont 36 21 OUT 95 10 5 check 2 3 Kalispell Regional Healthcare Traffic Study 2016 Traffic Model Projected W&C Total Traffic AM Peak 1323 j L 78 122 8 Heritage t 1107 f* 73 388 «i 898 1 45 �► 502 1 h 102 Meridian 85 -0 t 678 KRMC 142 Z 10 75 924 j L 60 151 130 Sunny V. t 947 183 688 j L 25 221 60 t 938 175 Windward Way Hwy 93 1 IClaremont Grandview Kalispell Regional Healthcare Traffic Study 2016 Traffic Model Projected W&C Total Traffic PM Peak 1664 1 L 140 24 to r 4 Heritage t 1853 46 559 1 «1 181 Meridian 52 t 1340 KRMC 20 Z 45 1008 1 L 240 55 to r 293 Sunny V. t 1147 71 1368 1 L 170 39 to r 180 t 1261 33 Windward Way Hwy 93 1 IClaremont Grandview APPENDIX C LOS Calculations General Information Analyst HCS 2010 RLA • •• Control Sum ma ry Report Site Information Intersection 93 & Heritage Agency/Co. ATS Jurisdiction MDT Date Performed 6/3/2016 East/West Street Heritage Way Analysis Year 2016 North/South Street Highway 93 Time Analyzed AM Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 1.00 Intersection Orientation North -South Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description KRH Traffic Study Lanes Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Movement U L T .� 4 141� L if Major Street: North -South Westbound R U L T R U Northbound L T R U Southbound L T R Priority 10 11 12 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 2 0 Configuration LR T TR L T Volume (veh/h) 8 68 1098 72 106 1303 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked 0.100 0.100 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type Undivided Median Storage Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service 76 106 Flow Rate (veh/h) Capacity 264 587 v/c Ratio 0.29 0.18 95% Queue Length 1.2 0.7 Control Delay (s/veh) 24.1 12.5 Level of Service (LOS) C B Approach Delay (s/veh) 24.1 0.9 Approach LOS C A Copyright © 2016 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010- TWSC Version 6.70 Generated: 7/6/2016 3:15:30 PM HeritageAM.xtw HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency ATS Duration, h 0.25 Analyst RLA Analysis Date Jun 3, 2016 Area Type Other Jurisdiction MDT Time Period AM Peak Hour PHF 1.00 Urban Street U.S. Highway 93 Analysis Year 2016 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Intersection IlMeridianRoad File Name 93AM2016.xus Project Description 1KRH Traffic Study Demand Information Approach Movement Demand ( v ), veh/h Signal Information Cycle, s 120.0 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Timer Results Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability Max Out Probability Movement Group Results Approach Movement Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g ), s Green Ratio ( g/C ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X ) Available Capacity ( c a ), veh/h Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 50 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 50 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d i ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS Multimodal Results Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS Bicycle LOS Score / LOS EB WB LITR::i 1 1 L T R 502 1 80 1 141 `5 I ')V, I "N' NB SB L I T I R L T R 99 669 68 42 1 882 1 388 Green 4.5 1.3 78.0 21.2 0.0 0.0 Yellow 4.0 0.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 Red 1.0 10.0 1.0 11.0 0.0 10.0 000 0� 000 _- EB 2.9 C 1.7 A WB 3.0 1 C NBT Me 6 ■ SBL 1 1.1 9.5 5.0 3.1 3.0 0.1 0.75 WIN 3 41 7 3 1 SBT NB SB R L T R L T R 5 2 12 1 6 16 100 379 367 42 882 388 1650 1733 1676 1650 1650 1468 2.3 10.1 9.8 1.0 15.3 7.5 2.3 10.1 9.8 1.0 15.3 7.5 0.70 0.66 0.66 0.69 0.65 0.83 470 1144 1107 525 2144 1214 0.213 0.331 0.332 0.080 0.411 0.320 1446 1144 1107 927 2144 1214 0.8 3.6 3.3 0.3 5.3 1.6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.3 7.5 7.2 6.5 10.0 2.4 0.1 0.7 0.8 0.0 1 0.6 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.4 8.2 8.0 6.6 10.6 3.1 A A A A B A 8.0 1 A 8.3 A NB 1.9 A 1.2 A B SB 2.5 B 1.6 A Copyright © 2016 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010TM Streets Version 6.70 Generated: 7/6/2016 3:16:32 PM HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency ATS Duration, h 0.25 Analyst RLA Analysis Date Jun 3, 2016 Area Type Other Jurisdiction MDT Time Period AM Peak Hour PHF 1.00 Urban Street U.S. Highway 93 Analysis Year 2016 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Intersection ISunnv View Drive File Name 93AM2016.xus Project Description 1KRH Traffic Study Demand Information Approach Movement Demand ( v ), veh/h Signal Information Cycle, s 120.0 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Timer Results Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability Max Out Probability Movement Group Results Approach Movement Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g ), s Green Ratio ( g/C ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X ) Available Capacity ( c a ), veh/h Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 50 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 50 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d i ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS Multimodal Results Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS Bicycle LOS Score / LOS EB WB NB SB L T R L I T R L T I JR L TR 118 53 935 1141 1 916 IN, 3 4 �00 000 000 000 EB 2.9 C WB 2.9C PF NB 2.2 B 1.4 A SB 0.6 A 1.4 A Copyright © 2016 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010TM Streets Version 6.70 Generated: 7/6/2016 3:16:32 PM HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information a ' ` r 7 -; T Agency ATS Duration, h 0.25 Analyst RLA Analysis Date Jun 3, 2016 Area Type Other Jurisdiction MDT Time Period AM Peak Hour PHF 1.00 Urban Street U.S. Highway 93 Analysis Year 2016 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Intersection Conway Drive File Name 93AM2016.xus Project Description 1KRH Traffic Study Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T RA L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h 53 19 912 163, 213 676 Signal Information Cycle, s 120.0 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Timer Results Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability Max Out Probability Movement Group Results Approach Movement Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g ), s Green Ratio ( g/C ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X ) Available Capacity ( c a ), veh/h Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 50 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 50 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d i ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS Multimodal Results Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS Bicycle LOS Score / LOS �00 000 000 000 EB 2.5 1 B WB 2.8 C F NB 2.2 B 1.4 A SB 0.6 A 2.0 A Copyright © 2016 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010TM Streets Version 6.70 Generated: 7/6/2016 3:16:32 PN General Information Analyst HCS 2010 RLA • •• Control Sum ma ry Report Site Information Intersection 93 & Heritage Agency/Co. ATS Jurisdiction MDT Date Performed 6/3/2016 East/West Street Heritage Way Analysis Year 2016 North/South Street Highway 93 Time Analyzed PM Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 1.00 Intersection Orientation North -South Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description KRH Traffic Study Lanes Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Movement U L T .� 4 141� L if Major Street: North -South Westbound R U L T R U Northbound L T R U Southbound L T R Priority 10 11 12 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 2 0 Configuration LR T TR L T Volume (veh/h) 4 122 1835 46 15 1653 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked 0.100 0.100 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type Undivided Median Storage Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service 126 15 Flow Rate (veh/h) Capacity 200 311 v/c Ratio 0.63 0.05 95% Queue Length 3.7 0.2 Control Delay (s/veh) 49.6 17.2 Level of Service (LOS) E C Approach Delay (s/veh) 49.6 0.2 Approach LOS E A Copyright © 2016 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010- TWSC Version 6.70 Generated: 7/6/2016 3:16:00 PM HeritagePMxtw HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency ATS Duration, h 0.25 Analyst RLA Analysis Date Jun 3, 2016 Area Type Other Jurisdiction MDT Time Period PM Peak Hour PHF 1.00 Urban Street U.S. Highway 93 Analysis Year 2016 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Intersection IlMeridianRoad File Name 93PM2016.xus Project Description 1KRH Traffic Study Demand Information Approach Movement Demand ( v ), veh/h Signal Information Cycle, s 120.0 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Timer Results Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability Max Out Probability Movement Group Results Approach Movement Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g ), s Green Ratio ( g/C ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X ) Available Capacity ( c a ), veh/h Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 50 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 50 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d i ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS Multimodal Results Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS Bicycle LOS Score / LOS EB L T R 559 49 19 WB L I T R `5 I ')V, I "N' NB SB L I T R L T I R 175 1 1322 42 1 19 1106 1 532 Green 2.8 4.1 75.0 23.1 0.0 0.0 Yellow 11.0 4.0 0.0 4.0 4.0 11.0 0.0 0.0 Red 10.0 11.0 0.0 10.0 000 0� 000 _- EB 2.9 C 1.5 A WB 3.0 1 C NBT Me 6 ■ SBL 1 1.1 7.8 5.0 3.1 2.5 0.0 0.47 WIN 3 41 7 3 1 SBT NB SB R L T R L T R 5 2 12 1 6 16 187 732 726 19 1106 532 1650 1733 1714 1650 1650 1468 4.6 32.1 31.9 0.5 22.7 12.5 4.6 32.1 31.9 0.5 22.7 12.5 0.69 0.66 0.66 0.65 0.62 0.82 379 1142 1130 236 2061 1200 0.494 0.641 0.643 0.080 0.537 0.443 1231 1142 1130 1118 2061 1200 1.6 12.6 12.3 0.2 8.1 2.9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.4 13.9 13.7 11.5 12.7 3.2 0.3 2.2 2.2kB 1.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.7Ll6.1 15.9 13.7 4.3 B B B B15.4 B B NB 1.9 A 1.8 A B SB 2.5 B 1.9 A Copyright © 2016 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010TM Streets Version 6.70 Generated: 7/6/2016 3:18:59 PM HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information -4d.4-1 4, a ' ` r T Agency ATS Duration, h 0.25 Analyst RLA Analysis Date Jun 3, 2016 Area Type Other Jurisdiction MDT Time Period PM Peak Hour PHF 1.00 Urban Street U.S. Highway 93 Analysis Year 2016 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Intersection Sunny View Drive File Name 93PM2016.xus Project Description 1KRH Traffic Study Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T i R L I 1 T I R L I T I R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h I I 270 1 1 228 1 1132 1 61 49 1003 Signal Information Cycle, s 120.0 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Timer Results Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability Max Out Probability Movement Group Results Approach Movement Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g ), s Green Ratio ( g/C ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X ) Available Capacity ( c a ), veh/h Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 50 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 50 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d i ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS Multimodal Results Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS Bicycle LOS Score / LOS �00 000 000 000 EB 2.9 1 C WB 2.9 C F NB 2.2 B 1.5 A SB 0.7 A 1.4 A Copyright © 2016 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010TM Streets Version 6.70 Generated: 7/6/2016 3:18:59 PN HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information -4d.4-1 4, a ' ` r 7 -; T Agency ATS Duration, h 0.25 Analyst RLA Analysis Date Jun 3, 2016 Area Type Other Jurisdiction MDT Time Period PM Peak Hour PHF 1.00 Urban Street U.S. Highway 93 Analysis Year 2016 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Intersection Conway Drive File Name 93PM2016.xus Project Description 1KRH Traffic Study Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T RA L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h 167 160 1246 27 34 1345 Signal Information Cycle, s 120.0 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Timer Results Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability Max Out Probability Movement Group Results Approach Movement Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g ), s Green Ratio ( g/C ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X ) Available Capacity ( c a ), veh/h Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 50 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 50 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d i ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS Multimodal Results Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS Bicycle LOS Score / LOS �00 000 000 000 EB 2.9 1 C WB 2.9 C F NB 2.2 B 1.5 A SB 0.6 A 1.6 A Copyright © 2016 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010TM Streets Version 6.70 Generated: 7/6/2016 3:18:59 PN General Information Analyst HCS 2010 RLA • •• Control Sum ma ry Report Site Information Intersection 93 & Heritage Agency/Co. ATS Jurisdiction MDT Date Performed 6/3/2016 East/West Street Heritage Way Analysis Year 2016 North/South Street Highway 93 Time Analyzed AM Peak Hour - With WC Peak Hour Factor 1.00 Intersection Orientation North -South Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description KRH Traffic Study Lanes Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Movement U L T .� 4 141� L if Major Street: North -South Westbound R U L T R U Northbound L T R U Southbound L T R Priority 10 11 12 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 2 0 Configuration LR T TR L T Volume (veh/h) 8 78 1107 73 122 1323 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked 0.110 0.110 0.000 0.000 0.110 0.000 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type Undivided Median Storage Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service 86 122 Flow Rate (veh/h) Capacity 270 631 v/c Ratio 0.32 0.19 95% Queue Length 1.3 0.7 Control Delay (s/veh) 24.5 12.1 Level of Service (LOS) C B Approach Delay (s/veh) 24.5 1.0 Approach LOS C A Copyright © 2016 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010- TWSC Version 6.70 Generated: 7/13/2016 8:41:23 AM HeritageAMwc.> tw HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency ATS Duration, h 0.25 Analyst RLA Analysis Date Jun 3, 2016 Area Type Other Jurisdiction MDT Time Period AM Peak Hour PHF 1.00 Urban Street U.S. Highway 93 Analysis Year 2016 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Intersection lMeridianRoad File Name 93AMwithWC.xus Project Description 1KRH Traffic Study - With WC Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L I T R L T I R Demand ( v ), veh/h 502 85 142 102 1 678 75 45 898 1 388 Signal Information ,���, .y Cycle, s 120.0 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT Assigned Phase 4 5 2 Case Number 9.0 1.1 4.0 Phase Duration, s 26.2 10.8 84.1 Change Period, ( Y+R ), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s 3.2 3.1 0.0 Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s 19.5 4.4 Green Extension Time ( g e ), s 1.7 0.2 0.0 Phase Call Probability 1.00 0.97 Max Out Probability 0.00 0.00 Green 4.7 1.1 78.0 21.2 0.0 0.0 Yellow 4.0 0.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 Red 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 3 41 6 7 3 SBL SBT 1 6 1.1 3.0 9.7 83.0 5.0 5.0 3.1 0.0 3.0 0.1 0.0 0.78 WIN Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 7 4 14 5 2 12 1 6 16 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h 502 85 142 103 388 375 45 898 388 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In 1666 1793 1519 1650 1733 1672 1650 1650 1468 Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 17.5 4.9 10.2 2.4 10.9 10.5 1.0 15.7 7.5 Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g ), s 17.5 4.9 10.2 2.4 10.9 10.5 1.0 15.7 7.5 Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.70 0.66 0.66 0.69 0.65 0.83 Capacity ( c ), veh/h 590 317 269 463 1142 1102 514 2143 1214 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) 0.851 0.268 0.528 0.223 0.340 0.341 0.088 0.419 0.320 Available Capacity ( c a ), veh/h 1305 702 595 1439 1142 1102 914 2143 1214 Back of Queue (Q ), veh/In (50 th percentile) 7.3 0.8 3.9 3.6 0.3 5.5 1.6 Queue Storage Ratio (RQ) (50 th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay ( d i ), s/veh 47.8 7.4 8.0 7.6 6.6 10.1 2.5 Incremental Delay ( d2 ), s/veh 1.4 0.1 0.8 0.8 0.0 0.6 0.7 Initial Queue Delay ( ds ), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay ( d ), s/veh 49.2 7.5 8.8 8.5 6.6 10.7 3.1 Level of Service (LOS) D A A A A B A Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 47.7X0. 8.5 A 8.4 A Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 18.2 B Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.9 C 3.0 C 1.9 A 2.5 B Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.7 A 1.2 A 1.6 A Copyright © 2016 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010TM Streets Version 6.70 Generated: 7/13/2016 8:41:50 AM HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency ATS Duration, h 0.25 Analyst RLA Analysis Date Jun 3, 2016 Area Type Other Jurisdiction MDT Time Period AM Peak Hour PHF 1.00 Urban Street U.S. Highway 93 Analysis Year 2016 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Intersection lSunny View Drive File Name 93AMwithWC.xus Project Description 1KRH Traffic Study - With WC Demand Information EB WB NB I SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T I R L I T R Demand ( v ), veh/h 130 60 947 1 183 1 151 1 924 Signal Information M Cycle, s 120.0 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT Assigned Phase 8 2 Case Number 9.0 7.3 Phase Duration, s 16.6 92.4 Change Period, ( Y+R ), s 5.0 5.0 Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s 3.2 0.0 Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s 11.3 Green Extension Time ( g e ), s 0.4 0.0 Phase Call Probability 1.00 Max Out Probability 0.00 3 4 6 7 3 SBL SBT 1 6 1.0 4.0 11.0 103.4 5.0 5.0 3.1 0.0 4.3 0.3 0.0 0.99 WIN Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 3 18 2 12 1 6 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h 130 60 807 156 146 894 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In 1650 1468 1650 1468 1650 1650 Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 1 9.3 4.6 7.9 2.5 2.3 6.2 Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g ), s 9.3 4.6 7.9 2.5 2.3 6.2 Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.10 0.10 0.73 0.73 0.79 0.82 Capacity ( c ), veh/h 160 142 2404 1070 592 2705 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) 0.814 0.422 0.336 0.146 0.2471 0.331 Available Capacity ( c a ), veh/h 880 783 2404 1070 1670 2705 Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 50 th percentile) 4.0 1.7 2.2 0.7 0.6 1.4 Queue Storage Ratio (RQ) (50 th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d ), s/veh 53.1 51.0 4.0 3.0 3.4 1.9 Incremental Delay ( d2 ), s/veh 3.8 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.3 Initial Queue Delay ( ds ), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay ( d ), s/veh 56.9 51.8 4.4 3.3 3.5 2.2 Level of Service (LOS) E D A A A A Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 0.0 55.3 E 4.2 A 2.4 F A Intersection Delay s/veh / LOS 7.8 A Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.9 C 2.9 C 2.2 B 0.6 A Bicycle LOS Score / LOS F 1.4 A 1.4 A Copyright © 2016 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010TM Streets Version 6.70 Generated: 7/13/2016 8:41:50 AM HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency ATS Duration, h 0.25 Analyst RLA Analysis Date Jun 3, 2016 Area Type Other Jurisdiction MDT Time Period AM Peak Hour PHF 1.00 Urban Street U.S. Highway 93 Analysis Year 2016 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Intersection lConway Drive File Name 93AMwithWC.xus Project Description 1KRH Traffic Study - With WC Demand Information EB WB NB I SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h 60 25 938 175 1 221 688 Signal Information .y Cycle, s 120.0 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT Assigned Phase 8 2 Case Number 9.0 7.3 Phase Duration, s 11.0 98.0 Change Period, ( Y+R ), s 5.0 5.0 Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s 3.1 0.0 Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s 6.3 Green Extension Time ( g e ), s 0.0 0.0 Phase Call Probability 0.94 Max Out Probability 0.43 3 4 6 7 3 SBL SBT 1 6 1.0 4.0 11.0 109.0 5.0 5.0 3.0 0.0 5.1 0.4 0.0 1.00 WIN Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 3 18 2 12 1 6 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h 60 25 938 175 249 775 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In 1650 1468 1650 1468 1650 1650 Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 1 4.3 2.0 10.7 3.6 3.1 3.8 Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g ), s 4.3 2.0 10.7 3.6 3.1 3.8 Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.05 0.05 0.78 0.78 0.84 0.87 Capacity ( c ), veh/h 82 73 2558 1138 554 2860 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) 0.732 0.343 0.367 0.154 0.449 0.271 Available Capacity ( c a ), veh/h 138 122 2558 1138 1174 2860 Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 50 th percentile) 1.9 0.7 2.7 0.9 0.5 0.4 Queue Storage Ratio (RQ) (50 th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d ), s/veh 56.2 55.1 4.2 3.4 3.0 1.0 Incremental Delay ( d2 ), s/veh 4.6 1.0 0.4 0.3MA Initial Queue Delay ( ds ), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay ( d ), s/veh 60.9 56.2 4.6 3.7 Level of Service (LOS) E E A AApproach Delay, s/veh / LOS 0.0 59.5 E 4.5 AA Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 5.3 A Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.9 C 2.9 I C 2.2 B 0.6 1 A Bicycle LOS Score / LOS F 1.4 A 1.2 A Copyright © 2016 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010TM Streets Version 6.70 Generated: 7/13/2016 8:41:50 AM General Information Analyst HCS 2010 RLA • •• Control Sum ma ry Report Site Information Intersection 93 & Heritage Agency/Co. ATS Jurisdiction MDT Date Performed 6/3/2016 East/West Street Heritage Way Analysis Year 2016 North/South Street Highway 93 Time Analyzed PM Peak Hour - With WC Peak Hour Factor 1.00 Intersection Orientation North -South Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description KRH Traffic Study Lanes Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Movement U L T .� 4 141� L if Major Street: North -South Westbound R U L T R U Northbound L T R U Southbound L T R Priority 10 11 12 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 2 0 Configuration LR T TR L T Volume (veh/h) 4 140 1853 46 24 1664 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked 0.110 0.110 0.000 0.000 0.110 0.000 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type Undivided Median Storage Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service 144 24 Flow Rate (veh/h) Capacity 202 308 v/c Ratio 0.71 0.08 95% Queue Length 4.6 0.3 Control Delay (s/veh) 57.6 17.7 Level of Service (LOS) F C Approach Delay (s/veh) 57.6 0.3 Approach LOS F A Copyright © 2016 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010- TWSC Version 6.70 Generated: 7/13/2016 8:40:09 AM HeritagePMwc.xtw HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency ATS Duration, h 0.25 Analyst RLA Analysis Date Jun 3, 2016 Area Type Other Jurisdiction MDT Time Period PM Peak Hour PHF 1.00 Urban Street U.S. Highway 93 Analysis Year 2016 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Intersection lMeridianRoad File Name 93PMwithWC.xus Project Description 1KRH Traffic Study - With WC Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L I T I R L T I R Demand ( v ), veh/h 559 52 20 181 11340 1 45 21 1115 1 532 Signal Information ,���, .y Cycle, s 120.0 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT Assigned Phase 4 5 2 Case Number 9.0 1.1 4.0 Phase Duration, s 28.1 12.1 83.9 Change Period, ( Y+R ), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s 3.1 3.1 0.0 Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s 21.5 6.8 Green Extension Time ( g e ), s 1.5 0.4 0.0 Phase Call Probability 1.00 1.00 Max Out Probability 0.00 0.00 Green 3.0 4.1 74.8 23.1 0.0 0.0 Yellow 4.0 0.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 Red 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 3 41 6 7 3 SBL SBT 1 6 1.1 3.0 8.0 79.8 5.0 5.0 3.1 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.50 WIN Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 7 4 14 5 2 12 1 6 16 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h 559 52 20 193 742 736 21 1115 532 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In 1666 1793 1519 1650 1733 1713 1650 1650 1468 Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 19.5 2.9 1.3 4.8 32.9 32.8 0.5 23.1 12.6 Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g ), s 19.5 2.9 1.3 4.8 32.9 32.8 0.5 23.1 12.6 Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.69 0.66 0.66 0.65 0.62 0.82 Capacity ( c ), veh/h 641 345 292 377 1139 1126 233 2056 1197 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) 0.872 0.151 0.068 0.512 0.651 0.653 0.090 0.542 0.444 Available Capacity ( c a ), veh/h 2250 1210 1026 1227 1139 1126 1112 2056 1197 Back of Queue (Q ), veh/In (50 th percentile) 8.1 1.3 0.5 1.6 12.9 12.7 0.2 8.3 2.9 Queue Storage Ratio (RQ) (50 th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay ( d i ), s/veh 47.0 40.3 39.7 10.6 14.2 13.9 11.7 12.9 3.2 Incremental Delay ( d2 ), s/veh 1.5 0.1 0.0 0.3 2.2 2.3 0.1 1.0 1.2 Initial Queue Delay ( ds ), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay ( d ), s/veh 48.5 40.4 39.7 11.0 16.4 16.2 11.8 13.9 4.4 Level of Service (LOS) D D D B B B B B A Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 47.6 D 0.0 15.7 B 10.8 B Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 18.7 B Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.9 C 3.0 C 1.9 A 2.5 B Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.5 A 1.8 A 1.9 A Copyright © 2016 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010TM Streets Version 6.70 Generated: 7/13/2016 8:44:25 AM HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency Duration, h Analyst Analysis Date Area Type Jurisdiction Time Period PHF Urban Street Analysis Year Analvsis Period Intersection Project Description Demand Information Approach Movement Demand ( v ), veh/h Signal Information Cycle, s Reference Phase Offset, s Reference Point Uncoordinated Simult. Gap E/W Force Mode Simult. Gap N/S Timer Results Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability Max Out Probability Movement Group Results Approach Movement Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g ), s Green Ratio ( g/C ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X ) Available Capacity ( c a ), veh/h Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 50 th percentile Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 50 th percentile Uniform Delay ( d i ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( dz ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS Multimodal Results Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS Bicycle LOS Score / LOS File Name EB I WB I NB I SB L I T I R I L I T I R I L T I R I L I T I R t? 3 4 �00 000 000 000 Timm ME one men in EB WB NB SB Copyright © 2016 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010TM Streets Version 6.70 Generated: 7/13/2016 8:37:10 AM HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency ATS Duration, h 0.25 Analyst RLA Analysis Date Jun 3, 2016 Area Type Other Jurisdiction MDT Time Period PM Peak Hour PHF 1.00 Urban Street U.S. Highway 93 Analysis Year 2016 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Intersection lConway Drive File Name 93PMwithWC.xus Project Description 1KRH Traffic Study - With WC Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h 180 170 1261 33 39 1368 Signal Information M Cycle, s 120.0 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT Assigned Phase 8 2 Case Number 9.0 7.3 Phase Duration, s 21.2 89.5 Change Period, ( Y+R ), s 5.0 5.0 Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s 3.2 0.0 Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s 15.6 Green Extension Time ( g e ), s 0.6 0.0 Phase Call Probability 1.00 Max Out Probability 0.00 3 4 6 7 3 �0 W 06 Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 3 18 2 12 1 6 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h 180 170 1261 33 38 1326 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In 1650 1468 1650 1468 1650 1650 Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 1 12.7 13.6 22.0 0.8 0.7 14.7 Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g ), s 12.7 13.6 22.0 0.8 0.7 14.7 Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.14 0.14 0.70 0.70 0.76 0.78 Capacity ( c ), veh/h 223 198 2323 1034 350 2578 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) 0.807 0.857 0.543 0.032 0.108 0.514 Available Capacity ( c a ), veh/h 481 428 2323 1034 673 2578 Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 50 th percentile) 5.3 5.1 6.7 0.2 0.2 3.1 Queue Storage Ratio (RQ) (50 th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d ), s/veh 50.4 50.8 8.5 5.4 6.4 3.6 Incremental Delay ( d2 ), s/veh 2.6 4.1 0.9 0.1M6.54.2 Initial Queue Delay ( ds ), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay ( d ), s/veh 53.0 54.9 9.4 5.4Level of Service (LOS) D D A AApproach Delay, s/veh / LOS 0.0 53.9 D 9.3 AA Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 12.2 B Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.9 C 2.9 I C 2.2 B 1 0.6 A Bicycle LOS Score / LOS F 1.6 A 1.6 A Copyright © 2016 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010TM Streets Version 6.70 Generated: 7/13/2016 8:37:10 AM Appendix K - Signage Development Guide Kalispell Regional Healthcare Signage Development for new H-1 PUD December 28, 2016 HEALTHCARE GRAPHICS C O N S U L T I N G The concept for the sign program is to create a "sense of place"for patients, visitors, residents and staff. This is accomplished by in several ways. First, by creating a uniform look for the sign family. Second by using what is called "progressive disclosure, giving the visitor the right amount of information at the right time in the right space. Third, by creating a design that is maintainable, affordable, simple, and thoughtful. The program will "fit the space"creating a sense of comfort and safety. Below is a progressive disclosure image to illustrate the hierarchy of information applied to the design of the signage program. CITY CAMPUS PARKING ENTRANCE ELEVATOR ROOM Life safety is the primary issue when designing a signage program for a medical facility. It is imperative to give the first time visitor to the campus simple and clear directions to the Emergency Department.The new sign program is based on the"Patient /Visitor Journey" As a visitor approaches the campus, the new sign program will help them determine the best entry point to the campus to help get them to the Emergency entrance. Once on the campus the directional signs are intended to point them, first to the Emergency entrance, then to other building entrances. Designing a signage program for a medical facility is different than for any other type facility. People looking for a medical center in an emergency situation are under considerable stress. This creates a situation much different than looking for a retail store or office building. The signage must be simple to read and large enough to see from a distance. ©HEALTHCARE GRAPHICS 01 CONS U LT I N G 1504 Surrey Ct., Dallas, TX 75043 972.249.6833 December 28, 2016 The following is a list of sign types for the campus with the design intent behind each sign type. 1.1 Primary Campus Monument Sign: 128 sq. ft. 16'-0" Max. Height Intent: To identify the main public entry points into the medical center campus. 1.2 Secondary Monument Sign: 60 Sq. ft. 12'-0" Max. Height Intent: To identify secondary entry points into the medical center campus. 2.1 Vehicular Directional Pole Sign: 23 sq. ft. 13'- 0" Max. Height Intent: To direct traffic to main destination points on campus. 2.2 Secondary Directional Pole Sign: 23 sq. ft. 6'- 0" Max. Height Intent: To direct pedestrian, bicycle, and shuttle traffic. 3.1 Building Identification Letters and or Logo: Allow 2 sq. ft. of sign for every 1 lineal foot of building. Intent: To identify main buildings on the campus. 3.2 Tenant Identification Sign: (Similar to sign type 2.2) Intent: To identify occupants of the buildings on the campus. 3.3 Building Identification Monument Sign: 48 sq. ft. 8'-0"Max. Height Intent: To identify individual building entrances on campus at street level. ©HEALTHCARE GRAPHICS 02 CONS U LT ING 1504 Surrey Ct., Dallas, TX 75043 972.249.6833 December 28, 2016 27.22.050: Signs Not Requiring Permits H-1 Crala• 1 /)"— V-0" (3) Directional Signs. A sign, other than a government sign, not more than four (8) Nameplates. One per dwelling or tenant square feet which provides directions for traffic flow to places of business. name(s) at a main entrance, not exceeding one square foot per nameplate. 1 (4) Identification Signs. One sign per street front, setting forth or denoting the name of any public, charitable, or religious institution when located on the premises of such institution, provided such sign or bulletin board shall not exceed 24 square feet in sign area per face, subject to the height for the given zoning district. (6) Subdivision Identification Signs. One sign not to exceed 24 square feet in area or two signs not to exceed 12 square feet each per exclusive entrance to a subdivision or tract. Such signs shall be restricted to the subdivision or development name and shall not exceed six feet in height. ©HEALTHCARE GRAPHICS 03 CONS U LT I N G 1504 Surrey Ct., Dallas, TX 75043 972.249.6833 December 28, 2016 Permitted Signs in Zone H-1 PUD Scale: 1/4"= 1'-0" New Code H-1 PUD 1 Sign Type 1.1 Sign Type 1.2 Primary Campus Monument Sign: 128 sq. ft. 16'-0"Max. Height Intent: To identify the main public entry points into the medical center campus. Secondary Campus Monument Sign: 60 sq. ft. 12'-0"Max. Height Intent: To identify secondary entry points into the medical center campus. ©HEALTHCARE GRAPHICS 04 CONS U LT ING 1504 Surrey Ct., Dallas, TX 75043 972.249.6833 December 28, 2016 Permitted Signs in Zone H-1 PUD Scale: 1 /4" = V-0" New Code H-1 PUD Side View Side View Sign Type 2.1 Vehicular Directional Pole Sign: 23 sq. ft. 13'- 0" Max. Height Intent: To direct traffic to main destination points on campus. Sign Type 2.2 and 3.2 Secondary Directional Pole Sign: 23 sq. ft. 6'- 0"Max. Height Intent: To direct pedestrian, bicycle, and shuttle traffic. ©HEALTHCARE GRAPHICS 05 CONS U LT ING 1504 Surrey Ct., Dallas, TX 75043 972.249.6833 December 28, 2016 Signage Description IL - Permitted Signs in Zone H-1 PUD Scale: NITS ZWOMEN'S & CHILDREN'S Sign Type 3.1 Allow 2 sq. ft. of sign for every 1 lineal foot of building. T- 0"Max. Height Intent: To identify main buildings on the campus. Logo Sign Type 1.3 Building Identification Monument Sign:48 sq. ft. 8'-0"Max. Height Intent: To identify individual building entrances on campus at street level. ©HEALTHCARE GRAPHICS 06 CONS U LT ING 1504 Surrey Ct., Dallas, TX 75043 972.249.6833 December 28, 2016 27.22.120: Permitted Signs in Zone H-1 PUD (Off -Premise Signs) Scale: 1 /2" = V-0" Existing Code for H-1 to remain for H-1 PUD 6-9" (5) Not more than two off -premise signs may be permitted at primary hospital entrance roads to provide direction to a hospital facility from a major arterial. One sign shall be permitted per intersection entrance. Each sign shall not exceed 54 square feet per face nor 12 feet in height. Off -premise hospital signs will be allowed on developed or undeveloped property and will not be counted as part of the sign type or allowance permitted for that parcel. ©HEALTHCARE GRAPHICS 07 CONS U LT ING 1504 Surrey Ct., Dallas, TX 75043 972.249.6833 December 28, 2016 Identification Identify where the visitor is at within a space by creating a boundary at the entrance and exit. Campus entry identification Campus monument identification Building monument identification Building letters identification Parking identification Shuttle identification Campus Entry 7'-7"h x 12'-o"w Identify the two main entry and exit points on the campus from the main roads. Building Monument Parking Identify the buildings on the campus. 6'-0" h x 3'-0"w 9'-0"h x 5'-0"w with 2'dia number njq— Russell Hwpifal for Chi ldmn 12'-0" h x 4'-6" w I� 12'-6" h x 3'-8" w These signs would mark secondary entry points & create the "edge" of the campus. Building Letters Names or logos on building walls to indicate their function. Logo: 17'-0"x 17'-0" Lette rs: 3'-6" h i g h ©HEALTHCARE GRAPHICS 08 CONS U LT ING 1504 Surrey Ct., Dallas, TX 75043 972.249.6833 December 28, 2016 Directional Direct visitors to their destination once they enter a space. Vehicular directionals Pedestrian directional 16-0" h x 5'-0" w Vehicular Direct vehicular traffic to parking areas and main buildings. 8'-6" h x 4'-4" w Pedestrian Direct visitors to main buildings and feature distance. I ©HEALTHCARE GRAPHICS 09 C O N S U L T I N G 1504 Surrey Ct., Dallas, TX 75043 972.249.6833 December 28, 2016 Emergency Directional Sign ®PHOENIX CHILDREN'$ Hospital N Thomas Main Entrance Cambridge Entrance b Side A Side B 16-0" h x 5'-0" w Side A Side B 12'-0" h x 4'-4" w ©HEALTHCARE GRAPHICS 10 CONS U LT I N G 1504 Surrey Ct., Dallas, TX 75043 972.249.6833 December 28, 2016 Signage Examples MW Regulatory The necessary signage for codes and regulations. Traffic regulations Parking regulations Entrance regulations o4 a No Smoking No Weapons Allowed 2 1 Entrance Placed at building entrances and often required by code or client. T-6" h x 2'-6" w ©HEALTHCARE GRAPHICS 1 1 CONS U LT ING 1504 Surrey Ct., Dallas, TX 75043 972.249.6833 December 28, 2016 Appendix L - Parking Management Plan Parking Management Plan Intent: Uses within the PUD boundary consist of the main Hospital and numerous stand-alone buildings and properties. As the hospital requires a large amount of parking for patients, visitors, and employees alike, the parking facilities can stretch across several properties within the PUD boundary. The following Parking Management Plan is being implemented for the "KRH Parking Management Zone" as presented in the attached map. Amendments to the areas included in the Parking Management Zone shall be reviewed by the City Site Review Committee as a minor amendment to the PUD. Parking within the PUD shall comply with the Off -Street Parking Design Standards except as modified by this Parking Management Plan. Location: The location of the Required parking for a use located within the KRH Parking Management Zone is allowed anywhere within the Zone as long as the total parking requirement is satisfied. Minimum Standards by Use: 1. The Minimum Standards by Use shall be determined by the City of Kalispell Zoning Ordinance and this Management Plan. The ratios listed in the table below shall govern over the City Zoning Ordinance for uses within the KRH Parking Management Zone. 2. The applicant shall provide with each building permit: a. Parking calculations in a standard format based on the uses listed below and those relevant from the City Zoning Ordinance. These ratios shall determine the required parking for the project and/or the KRH Parking Management Zone. For the Hospital use, the maximum staff per working shift shall be established on an annual basis during the parking review with the City Staff presented below. b. If the project involves the core hospital area as shown in the Parking Management Zone Map, the applicant shall provide for reference the square foot of building per parking space calculation. After two years of monitoring the square footage per space ratio for the Hospital use, the City and KRH agree to discuss a possible PUD amendment to the Hospital parking standard listed below. 3. The parking counts for existing stand-alone uses within the management area are not required to be presented unless impacted by the application. If a portion of the parking at an existing use is utilized by the application, then the parking for that existing use shall also be presented in the parking count requirements. 4. An annual review of parking in the KRH Parking Management Zone shall be conducted between the City Staff and KRH. This meeting will provide an opportunity to review base compliance with parking in the Management Zone as well as establish the maximum working shift to be utilized for the following year. If it is determined that additional parking spaces are needed, KRH will have nine (9) months to install the required parking spaces. Extension of this timeframe can be given by the Planning Director if meeting the parking requirement is not feasible within a nine (9) month timeframe. This meeting should be conducted by February 1st of each year to allow for appropriate time to construct additional parking, if needed, during through construction season. This requirement would not delay building permits that are submitted during the same timeframe and meet their required parking requirements. Minimum Parking Standards by Use Athletic Clubs 1 space per 200 gross square feet of floor area Business and Professional Offices 1 space per 300 square feet of gross floor area Hospitals 1 per 2 beds, excluding bassinets, plus 1 per 5 employees on maximum working shift, plus 1 per each staff doctor Parking Management Strategies: Valet — A free Valet service will be implemented at intervals deemed appropriate by KRH. Efforts shall be taken to notify the public through the KRMC website and news outlets when the Valet service has been implemented. Shuttle Service — A free shuttle service will be implemented at intervals deemed appropriate by KRH to move people from the more distant parking areas to the major facility entrances. When provided for patients and visitors, efforts shall be taken to notify the public through the KRMC website and news outlets. Parking Garage — KRH may use parking structures to increase parking counts and improve parking proximity to existing and/or proposed facilities. Potential locations are provided for in the PUD documents. Signage — Signage to improve wayfinding to parking facilities shall be considered in the completion of the campus signage plan. Appendix M - Central Construction Staging Management Plan Central Construction Staging Area — Management Plan Intent: Every construction project requires site specific staging areas to carry out the work and is typically located adjacent to the project. When the specific project is complete, these staging areas are removed and the facility is put into use. These project specific construction sites exist on many projects at KRH. The intent of the central construction staging area as an allowed use is to accommodate the larger scale growth experienced at KRH. This growth has created the need to provide a non - project specific staging areas which supports the nearly constant stream of projects ranging from small remodels of existing improvements to the construction of new facilities. The nature of healthcare construction often requires temporary storage of large building elements and equipment. Since a number of the projects are infilling developed property, there is often not enough space for staging adjacent to the individual project. The intent of the Central Construction Staging Area is to allow for non -project specific staging that will remain in place beyond individual project schedules as the demand for the use exists. Construction Staging Management: Fencing — Fencing with visual screening shall be utilized around the yard perimeter to screen adjacent properties and provide security. Vehicle access shall be controlled with gates that do not obstruct the public Right -of -Way when open or closed. Screening along adjacent properties shall be of uniform solid color. Along Public ROW, signs may be allowed following the City of Kalispell Sign Regulations. Fences and screening shall be inspected regularly with repairs completed as necessary. Fences can be installed up to the property line when adjacent to the Public Right of Way and other non-residential properties within the PUD. When adjacent to a residential zone, fences shall be installed a minimum of 10 feet from the property line. Construction Storm water — The Contractor shall obtain and maintain appropriate Kalispell and State construction storm water permits which implement Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans. These permits include measures to control runoff, dust, off -site tracking of mud and gravels, storage of chemicals, and solid waste management. These plans shall include provisions to inspect and clean the ROW of off -site tracking as needed. As a construction use, impervious surfacing is not required. In the event new pavement surfacing is desired, compliance with the City of Kalispell Storm Water Regulations will be required. Driveway Approaches — A City of Kalispell Driveway permit shall be obtained for any new or relocated driveways from the Staging Area. The driveway shall be constructed to the City of Kalispell Standard Driveway detail. Right -of -Way Encroachment — When work is required within the adjacent right-of-way, an encroachment permit shall be obtained.