Loading...
H2. Ord 1787 - Kalispell Regional Healthcare PUD OverlayMKilLI ILl PLANNING FOR THE FUTURE MONTANA REPORT TO: Doug Russell, City Manager FROM: Jarod Nygren, Senior Planner Planning Department 201 V Avenue East Kalispell, MT 59901 Phone: (406) 758-7940 Fax: (406) 758-7739 www.kalispell.com/planning SUBJECT: Ordinance 1787 — Kalispell Regional Healthcare (KRH) Planned Unit Development (PUD) Overlay Zone Request MEETING DATE: March 6, 2017 BACKGROUND: Kalispell Regional Healthcare (KRH) has submitted a request for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) overlay zoning district on approximately 97 acres of property. The application request has been evaluated in accordance with 76-2-303-M.C.A., 76-2-304-M.C.A. and Section 27.19.020(4) of the City of Kalispell Zoning Ordinance. The goals of the PUD application are to create a framework to organize growth and continued healthcare development of unknown timing and scope. As a regional medical center the property and facilities have grown into a campus, which creates difficulties when implementing the parking regulations, signage regulations, and existing H-1 Zone and PUD overlays currently on the 97 acres. The PUD application seeks to resolve these issues by doing the following: 1) Create a PUD overlay zone that better aligns with the KRH adopted master plan. This includes incorporating a larger approximately 97 acre area that generally follows the property owned by KRH; 2) Consolidate the existing PUD boundaries. The current campus is divided by two PUD's with the remainder of the properties being within the H-1 and RA-1 Zones. This creates confusion as development arises on the campus; 3) Accommodate guided yet flexible growth that addresses community needs with the necessary infrastructure for the rapidly expanding campus; 4) Adopt zoning and development standards that are more appropriate for the development of a modern urban campus for both inpatient and outpatient services; and 5) Make reasonable predications and assurances for an unpredictable future. The PUD overlay zoning district is generally bound by the centerline of U.S. 93 on the west boundary; the centerline of Heritage Way between U.S. 93 and Windward Way and the southern edge of Buffalo Commons Phase 1 Subdivision, Ridgeview Subdivision and Grandview Townhouse Subdivision on the northerly boundary; the centerline of Grandview Drive, Grand View Heights Subdivision, Buffalo Hill Townhouse Subdivision and City of Kalispell water tank site on the east boundary; and the Salvation Army and Bountiful Drive on the southern boundary. The Kalispell Planning Board held a duly noticed public hearing February 14, 2017, to consider the PUD application request. Staff reported that the proposed PUD was compatible with the zoning and the growth policy. Staff recommended that the Planning Board adopt staff report KPUD 16-01 as findings of fact, and recommend to the City Council that the PUD application request be approved, subject to conditions. During the public comment portion of the hearing, a representative of KRH spoke in support of the project. There being no further testimony, the public hearing was closed and a motion was presented to adopt staff report KPUD-16-01 as findings of fact and recommend to the Kalispell City Council that the PUD overlay zone for KRH be approved subject to the conditions listed in the staff report. There was lengthy board discussion regarding the proposed height, R.V. patient parking and construction staging area near residentially zoned properties. Following the discussion, the board did not feel there was any additional provisions that should be required for the R.V. patient parking and construction staging area; however they did feel that the height permitted adjacent to the residential properties needed amending. As drafted, the PUD standards required a 15' setback for structures adjacent to residentially zoned properties, which effectively would have permitted 100' tall buildings as long as they met the 15' setbackibuffer requirement. Accordingly, another motion was made to amend the development standards for permitted height adjacent to residentially zoned properties. The motion presented changed the development standards to provide for a building height envelope, created by a 1:1 slope starting at a height of 60' at the property line of any residentially zoned property. Using the 60' height as a starting point stems from the fact that it is the current permitted height in the zone. Effectively, the amendment means that a structure would be permitted at 75' tall when setback the required 15', and continue at a 1:1 building envelope to a point 40' away, at which point the structure could be 100' tall. This building envelope only applies when adjacent to a residentially zoned property. Following discussion, the motion to amend the development standards was approved unanimously upon roll call vote. There being no further discussion, the original motion to approve the PUD, with the amendment to the standards, passed unanimously on a roll call vote. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Kalispell City Council approve the first reading of Ordinance 1787, an ordinance to amend section 27.02.010, official zoning map of the city of Kalispell zoning ordinance 1677, by creating a planned unit development overlay zone over certain real property described as Kalispell Regional Medical Center, located in the southwest quarter of Section 6, Township 28 North, Range 21 West, Flathead County, Montana, and further described on exhibit A in accordance with the Kalispell Growth Policy 2020, and to provide an effective date. FISCAL EFFECTS: Approval of the request will allow the applicant to implement their master plan, which in turn will have positive fiscal impact. ALTERNATIVES: Deny the request. Report compiled: February 27, 2017 ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance 1787 February 14, 2017, Kalispell Planning Board Minutes Staff Report Application Materials & Maps c: Aimee Brunckhorst, Kalispell City Clerk Return to: Kalispell City Clerk PO Box 1997 Kalispell, MT 59903 ORDINANCE NO. 1787 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SECTION 27.02.010, OFFICIAL ZONING MAP, CITY OF KALISPELL ZONING ORDINANCE, (ORDINANCE NO. 1677), BY CREATING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY ZONE OVER CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS KALISPELL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 28 NORTH, RANGE 21 WEST, FLATHEAD COUNTY, MONTANA, AND FURTHER DESCRIBED ON EXHIBIT "A", IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE KALISPELL GROWTH POLICY 2020, AND TO PROVIDE AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Kalispell Regional Healthcare petitioned the City of Kalispell that a Planned Unit Development overlay be attached to the current zoning classifications on 97 acres of land; and WHEREAS, there are various zoning classifications and planned unit developments currently attached to this property, including H-1, Health Care, and RA-1, Residential Apartment; and WHEREAS, the property is generally bound by the centerline of U.S. 93 on the west boundary; the centerline of Heritage Way between U.S. 93 and Windward Way and the southern edge of Buffalo Commons Phase 1 Subdivision, Ridgeview Subdivision and Grandview Townhouse Subdivision on the northerly boundary; the centerline of Grandview Drive, Grand View Heights Subdivision, Buffalo Hill Townhouse Subdivision and City of Kalispell water tank site on the east boundary; and the Salvation Army and Bountiful Drive on the southern boundary; and WHEREAS, the petition of Kalispell Regional Healthcare was the subject of a report compiled by the Kalispell Planning Department, Amended Staff Report #KPUD-16-01, in which the Kalispell Planning Department evaluated the petition and recommended that a Planned Unit Development overlay be attached to the above described tract of land pursuant to Kalispell City Code 72.21.030(2)(b); and WHEREAS, the Kalispell City Planning Board held a Public Hearing on the matter on February 14, 2017, and recommended that a Planned Unit Development overlay be attached to approximately 97 acres of land, pursuant to Kalispell City Code 72.21.030(2)(b); and WHEREAS, after considering all the evidence submitted on the proposal to attach a Planned Unit Development overlay to the property, the City Council finds such zoning to be consistent with the Kalispell Growth Policy 2020 and adopts, based upon the criterion set forth in Section 76-3-608, M.C.A., and State, Etc. v. Board of County Commissioners, Etc. 590 P2d 602, the findings of fact of KPD as set forth in Amended Staff Report No. #KPUD-16-01. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KALISPELL, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Section 27.02.010, of the Official Zoning Map of the Kalispell Zoning Ordinance, (Ordinance No. 1677) is hereby amended by attaching the property described above with a Planned Unit Development overlay. SECTION 2. The Planned Unit Development overlay proposed by Kalispell Regional Healthcare upon the real property described above is hereby approved, as set forth below, subject to the conditions that follow. The Planned Unit Development overlay for the real property described herein shall be as follows: KRH PUD OVERLAY ZONE Intent: A zoning district intended to provide hospitals and medical facilities and supportive services for the care of the sick, elderly and distraught. This zone is not intended to serve the general retail or overnight accommodation needs of the general public. Permitted uses: 1. Aircraft hangers 2. Airports and heliports 3. Athletic club and Wellness Facilities 4. Assembly halls/stadiums/convention hall facilities 5. Automobile parking — surface and structure 6. Barber and beauty services 7. Bed and breakfast S. Church 9. Community center 10. Central Construction Staging Area 11. Day care - home (12 or fewer) - Center (13 or more) 12. Dwelling - Single family - Duplex - Townhouse (2 or more attached units) - Multi -family - Patient, Family, and Healthcare Support Housing — See definition below 13. Fairgrounds (public) 14. Funeral homes and crematoriums 15. Group home - 8 or fewer persons - 9 or more persons 16. Home occupations (refer to Section 27.20.060) 17. Homeless shelters 18. Hospital - Inpatient Hospital (including treatment centers and 24-hour care facilities) - Outpatient Ambulatory Care — Less than 24-hour stay 19. Jail Facilities (public) 20. Laboratories, tech research, development and testing 21. Office - Professional/government - Medical with limited overnight stay (less than 24 hours) 22. Parks 23. Patient RV Parking 24. Police and fire stations 25. Residential care home or facility 26. Restaurants 27. Retail, limited: - Book stores - Florist - Medical supplies and equipment - Opticians - Pharmacy - Gift shops - Coffee shops - Ancillary retail uses - Similar uses 28. Safe houses 29. Schools - K-12 (public or private) Post -secondary (public or private) - Commercial 30. Utilities (primary distribution site) Property Development Standards: 1. Minimum Lot Area (sq. ft.): N/A 2. Minimum Lot Width (ft.): N/A 3. Minimum Setbacks (ft.): - Front Yard — 0* - Side Yard — 0* - Rear Yard — 0* - Side Corner — 0* - Attached Garage (Front/Side Corner) — 20 - Accessory Structures — N/A *Provide 15-foot setback where adjacent to residentially zoned property and where adjacent to Highway 93 corridor. 4. Maximum Building Height (ft.):100 Feet; over 100 feet subject to CUP. Provide for a building height envelope, created by a 1:1 slope starting at a height of 60' at the property line of any residentially zoned property. 5. Permitted Lot Coverage (%): N/A 6. Off -Street Parking — Parking Ratios and design standards per City of Kalispell Zoning Ordinance. For sites located within the Parking Management Zone, see the Parking Management Plan. 7. Fences (refer to Section 27.20.040) - Maximum Heights (ft.): - Front — 4 (6.5 for construction staging area fence screening) - Side — 6.5 - Rear — 6.5 - Side Corner — 6.5 8. Signs — Signs 1.1-3.3 of Signage Development Guide 9. Outdoor lighting — Outdoor lighting shall comply with Chapter 27.26 in the City Zoning Ordinance. 10. Pedestrian Connectivity — Development projects should install missing right-of-way sidewalk along its property frontage as required by City requirements. If the developed sidewalk falls within 100 feet of an existing ROW sidewalk, located on the same side of the street, and the missing segment is located along the frontage of a parcel under common Ownership, the project should install sidewalk to connect the new and existing walkways. 11. Definitions - Patient, Family, and Healthcare Support Housing — Housing related to a hospital function with a limited term stay. This includes but is not limited to patients, families, doctors, staff, and students. An example could be a patient that needs to be close to the hospital for treatment but is not appropriate for being admitted. Conditions of Approval Parking shall be in compliance with the Parking Management Plan and Parking Management Zone as outlined in this report. 2. Signage types 1.1-2.2 as outlined in the Signage Development Guide of the application and their location shall be approved by the Kalispell Planning Director and Architectural Review Committee prior to installation. As these signs are directional in nature, they would not count towards the allowable signage of the property they are being placed on (host property). 3. Signage types 3.1-3.3 as outlined in the Signage Development Guide of the application shall be reviewed at a ratio of 2 square feet per lineal foot of building frontage. One (1) onsite freestanding sign is permitted, if more than one onsite freestanding sign is proposed, Section 27.22.090(1)(b) of the Kalispell Zoning Ordinance would apply. 4. The central construction staging area shall be in compliance the Central Construction Staging Area Management Plan as outlined in this report. 5. A north -south road connection between Windward Way and Conway Drive, as generally shown on Appendix G, shall be constructed at the time the existing Medical Arts Building is demolished and a new building is constructed in its place. The connection shall be open to the public for vehicular access and pedestrians. 6. The proposed east -west pedestrian connection south of Brandan House and Alert Building, as generally shown on Appendix G, shall be completed within one (1) year of final approval of this PUD overlay. 7. That a development agreement be drafted by the Kalispell City Attorney between the City of Kalispell and the developer outlining and formalizing the terms, conditions and provisions of approval. The final plan as approved, together with the conditions and restrictions imposed, shall constitute the Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning for the site. 8. For multi -family residential projects, a minimum of 500 square feet of land per unit which has recreational value as determined by the Kalispell Parks and Recreation Director, or recreational amenities equivalent to the fair market value of 500 square feet of land shall be provided. SECTION 3. The balance of Section 27.02.010, Official Zoning Map, City of Kalispell Zoning Ordinance not amended hereby shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4. This Ordinance shall take effect from and after 30 days of its passage by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND SIGNED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF KALISPELL, MONTANA, THIS 20TH DAY OF MARCH, 2017. Mark Johnson Mayor ATTEST: Aimee Brunckhorst, CMC City Clerk EXHIBIT "A" THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOTS 5, 6, 7, 8, 13 AND 14 IN SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 28 NORTH, RANGE 21 WEST, FLATHEAD COUNTY, MONTANA DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 3A OF THE AMENDED PLAT OF LOTS 3 & 4, HIGHLAND PARK SECOND ADDITION; THENCE N15°41'W ALONG THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF U.S. HIGHWAY NO. 93, A DISTANCE OF 1430 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT 1 OF CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY NO. 11287 AND BEING A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF HERITAGE WAY; THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY THE FOLLOWING FIVE (5) COURSES: S86°43'43"E, 119.30 FEET; ALONG A 434.63 FOOT RADIUS NON -TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH CENTER BEARING S03026'13"W, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 18009'24", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 137.73 FEET; S6802514811E, 160.42 FEET; ALONG A 442.91 FOOT RADIUS NON -TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH CENTER BEARING N24048'47"E, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 090 03'40"1 AN ARC DISTANCE OF 70.04 FEET; S8500614711E, 389.26 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1 OF HERITAGE PLACE, 1ST ADDITION AND BEING A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF WINDWARD WAY; THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF- WAY THE FOLLOWING FOUR (4) COURSES: N04031'52"E, 148.34 FEET; ALONG A 220.00 FOOT RADIUS NON -TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH CENTER BEARING S85039'33"E, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 44018'38", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 170.14 FEET; N4813910711E, 55.99 FEET; ALONG A 530.00 FOOT RADIUS TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 08008'29", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 75.31 FEET TO A POINT A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF BUFFALO COMMONS PHASE 1 AND BEING THE WESTERNMOST CORNER OF THE SOUTHERN PARK, COMMON AREA, UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT OF BUFFALO COMMONS PHASE 1; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY OF SAID BUFFALO COMMONS PHASE 1 THE FOLLOWING SIX (5) COURSES: S18°10144"E, 148.56 FEET; S5814610411E, 113.74 FEET; S7615612011E, 165.28 FEET; N71056'17"E, 219.17 FEET; N89001'35"E, 53.96 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF RIDGEVIEW SUBDIVISION; THENCE S03°52' 13"E ALONG SAID BOUNDARY, A DISTANCE OF 303.74 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF U.S. GOVERNMENT LOT 13; THENCE N89°05'56"E ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 770.22 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF GRANDVIEW DRIVE; THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY THE FOLLOWING FIVE (5) COURSES: S0003615611E, 229.46 FEET; S00135'00"E, 113.50 FEET; N77016148"W, 46.30 FEET; S02055124"W, 130.17 FEET; AND S03°04'26"W, 99.95 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 4 OF GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS; THENCE S8900510311W ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 4, A DISTANCE OF 90.15 FEET TO THE WEST BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT; THENCE S02051'33"W ALONG SAID WEST BOUNDARY, A DISTANCE OF 49.87 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THAT PARCEL SHOWN AND DESCRIBED ON CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY NO. 1852 ; THENCE S88050'26"W ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF SAID PARCEL, A DISTANCE OF 39.18 FEET TO THE WEST BOUNDARY OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST BOUNDARY S03°02'26"W, A DISTANCE OF 49.68 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT A OF AMENDED PLAT OF LOTS 2 & 3 OF GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS; THENCE ALONG THE WEST BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT S02059'41 "W, A DISTANCE OF 80.17 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT B OF AMENDED PLAT OF LOTS 2 & 3 OF GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS; THENCE ALONG THE WEST BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT S0205215711W, A DISTANCE OF 34.98 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH BOUNDARY GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS ADDITION NO. 2; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH BOUNDARY THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES: N86059'47"W, 89.74 FEET; N8710012911W, 129.37 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 3 OF GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS ADDITION NO. 2; THENCE ALONG THE WEST BOUNDARY OF SAID GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS ADDITION NO. 2 S03002'30"W, A DISTANCE OF 280.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1 OF GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS ADDITION NO. 2 ; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT S75031'22"E, A DISTANCE OF 57.03 FEET TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF GLACIER VIEW DRIVE; THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES: ALONG A 81.00 FOOT RADIUS NON -TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH CENTER BEARING S45001'38"E, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 38°55'40", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 55.03 FEET; S05007141"E, 25.63 FEET; AND S03103'19"W, A DISTANCE OF 89.91 FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF SUNNY VIEW LANE; THENCE ALONG SAIDAND S03003'19"W, A DISTANCE OF 89.91 FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY N89009'02"E, A DISTANCE OF 67.13 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S00150144"E AND LEAVING SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY, A DISTANCE OF 59.69 FEET THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ADDITION NO.64 BUFFALO HILL TOWNHOUSES; THENCE ALONG THE WEST BOUNDARY OF SAID ADDITION S02049'55"W, A DISTANCE OF 430.69 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF THAT PARCEL DESCRIBED IN BOOK 369 PAGE 423; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH AND WEST BOUNDARIES OF SAID PARCEL THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES: S8715612711W, 2.88 FEET AND S0215314711W, 399.94 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF PARCEL A OF CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY NO. 14535; THENCE S47032'2711W ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID PARCEL, A DISTANCE OF 84.47 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 2 OF HIGHLAND PARK FIRST ADDITION; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH AND WEST BOUNDARIES OF SAID LOT THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES: S89°24'37"W, 280.56 FEET AND S03001'37"W, 258.47 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1 OF HIGHLAND PARK FIRST ADDITION; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH AND WEST BOUNDARIES OF SAID LOT THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES; S8912410011W, 100.00 FEET AND S03000'59"W, 140.28 FEET; THENCE S8912413711W, A DISTANCE OF 202.72 FEET TO THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF CLAIRMONT STREET; THENCE NO3°01'00"E ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY, A DISTANCE OF 17.07 FEET; THENCE S89015' 12 "W AND LEAVING SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY, A DISTANCE OF 61.49 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1 OF HIGHLAND PARK NO. 5; THENCE S89°15'12"W ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT, A DISTANCE OF 575.24 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THIS AREA CONTAINS 96.3 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. KALISPELL CITY PLANNING BOARD & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING February 14, 2017 CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL The regular meeting of the Kalispell City Planning Board and CALL Zoning Commission was called to order at 6:00 p.m. Board members present were: Chad Graham, Ronalee Skees, Steve Lorch and Doug Kauffman, Christopher Yerkes, Rory Young & Charles Pesola were absent. Jarod Nygren and PJ Sorensen represented the Kalispell Planning Department, Tom Jentz was absent. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Lorch moved and Skees seconded a motion to approve the minutes of the January 10, 2017 meeting of the Kalispell City Planning Board and Zoning Commission. VOTE BY ACCLAMATION The motion passed unanimously on a vote of acclamation. PUBLIC COMMENT None. KALISPELL REGIONAL A report to the Kalispell City Planning Board and the Kalispell City HEALTHCARE PUD Council for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) overlay district request from Kalispell Regional Healthcare on approximately 97 acres. The PUD would allow for the implementation of the hospital's master plan and provide for the growth of the hospital campus for the next 25-30 years. STAFF REPORT Jarod Nygren, representing the Kalispell Planning Department reviewed Staff report #KPUD- 16-01 for the board. Nygren noted a correction to the staff report on page 2 that the RA-1 zoned portion of the property on the east should also be included in the staff report in sub -section D. Nygren reviewed the work sessions and meetings with the hospital that have been held thus far and described the boundaries and existing zoning of the PUD. Nygren went on to say that the hospital has worked with an architect to develop a master site plan which looks at where and how the KRH campus may grow and is the basis for this PUD request. Since the hospital has been continuing to grow, the request helps push the hospital into the next generation, as it was originally constructed as more of a suburban campus and this would allow it to develop into an urban campus setting. With this PUD we are looking at the uses that would be allowed within the PUD overlay, the standards that would be allowed within the PUD overlay, parking, circulation and signage. Nygren went into further detail regarding the allowable uses and Kalispell City Planning Board Minutes of the meeting of January 10, 2017 Pagel the standards in regards to height, setbacks and lot coverage. As well as the Parking Management Plan and the proposed way finding signage. Following the presentation, staff recommended that the Kalispell City Planning Board and Zoning Commission adopt staff report KPUD-16-01 as findings of fact and recommend to the Kalispell City Council that the PUD overlay zoning district for Kalispell Regional Healthcare be approved subject to the conditions listed in the staff report. BOARD DISCUSSION Graham expressed his concern in regards to the visual screening fabric that is to be used on the construction site and whether or not it will be secure and aesthetically pleasing. Nygren pointed out that in the staff report under construction staging management that the fences and screening be inspected regularly with repairs completed as necessary. Graham also inquired into how Grandview Dr. ties into the PUD as far as upgrades to the road are concerned and any traffic impacts. Nygren stated that as of now with the traffic impact studies that have been completed so far there are no foreseen impacts to Grandview Dr., however with the recent opening of the bypass it's difficult to predict exactly what will happen. This PUD sets the framework for the hospital to develop in the future and if at that time the traffic impacts require mitigation then the hospital will be required to do so at that time. Lorch asked if the landowners affected by the PUD around the RA-4 parcel have been notified. Nygren responded that yes they have been notified by both the city planning department as well as the hospital and at this time we have received positive feedback from the majority of them. PUBLIC HEARING Mo Stein — principal architect at HKS and representative for the applicant — noted that the visual screening Graham asked about in the board discussion will be more like a wind or fence screen similar to that used on sports fields. It will be tied down, very rigid and secure and can often times be decorated if you wanted it to be. He also addressed the Grandview Dr. impacts in the future and reiterated what Nygren had mentioned earlier about the traffic impact study and assured the board that changes will be made in the future if necessary. MOTION - ORIGINAL Kauffman moved and Lorch seconded a motion that the Kalispell City Planning Board and Zoning Commission adopt Staff Report #KPUD-16-01 as findings of fact and recommend to the Kalispell City Council that the PUD overlay zoning district for Kalispell Regional Healthcare be approved subject to the conditions listed in Kalispell City Planning Board Minutes of the meeting of January 10, 2017 Page12 the staff report. BOARD DISCUSSION Lorch inquired about the building heights and setbacks adjacent to the residential neighborhoods and proposed that the setbacks be increased since the height is increasing from what is currently allowed. He also noted his concern of the RV Parking sites and the central construction site staging area. He wants to make sure that the hospital will be closely managing both of these areas. MOTION - AMENDMENT Lorch moved and Kauffman seconded a motion to amend Staff Report #KPUD-16-01 to state that RV parking sites, central construction staging areas and buildings in excess of 60 feet adjacent to residentially zoned lands require a conditional use permit. BOARD DISCUSSION Graham asked for some clarity on this amendment from Lorch by viewing the areas on the vicinity maps. Lorch went on to say that on the north end of the property, specifically the RA-1 zoning, as well as the R-3 zoning on the east side of the property, he is concerned about the distance of the buildings to the property line. He went on to express his concern that the construction site staging area is temporary and may or may not be moved around. Graham noted that this site already existed and he feels confident that it will not be moved and that it will be the last place to develop out as the project gets closer to completion. Lorch finished by saying his overall concern is that these 3 items could potentially negatively impact the adjacent residential neighborhoods and he wants to make sure it's being managed properly. Sorenson explained that a conditional use permit would not apply here because the construction site is essentially grandfathered in since it was already there. He also noted that as far as the building heights are concerned the staff would recommend amending the specific condition in the staff report rather than requiring a conditional use permit. Lorch then decided to retract his previously amended motion and start over. Graham asked if Kauffman, who seconded, if he was ok with that and he said yes. MOTION — AMEND Lorch moved and Kauffman seconded a motion to amend Staff CONDITION #1.4 WITHIN Report #KPUD-16-01 to amend condition #1.4 within the Property THE PROPERTY Development Standards to provide for a building height envelope DEVELOPMENT created by a 1 to 1 slope starting at a height of 60 feet at the STANDARDS - BUILDING property line of any adjacent residentially zoned property. HEIGHT BOARD DISCUSSION A brief board discussion concluded that the amendment is appropriate to buffer adjacent residential areas. Kalispell City Planning Board Minutes of the meeting of January 10, 2017 Page 13 ROLL CALL - AMEND The motion passed unanimously on a roll call vote. CONDITION #1.4 WITHIN THE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - BUILDING HEIGHT ROLL CALL — ORIGINAL The motion, as amended, passed unanimously on a roll call vote. MOTION OLD BUSINESS Discussion has been ongoing regarding the Courthouse Couplet. RPA recently did a study and are recommending the 4 lane option. Nygren noted from a city standpoint they would like additional alternatives considered, such as downtown esthetics and pedestrian environment, not just traffic congestion. NEW BUSINESS Nygren mentioned the new application for Stillwater Bend for a growth policy amendment, annexation and PUD place holder for a 57 acre tracts of land located on the west side of US Hwy 93 at Rose Crossing. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at approximately 7:26 p.m. NEXT MEETING The next meeting of the Kalispell Planning Board will be held on Tuesday, March 14, 2017 at 6:00 p.m. and located in the Kalispell City Council Chambers, 201 1st Ave East. Chad Graham President APPROVED as submitted/amended: Kari Hernandez Recording Secretary Kalispell City Planning Board Minutes of the meeting of January 10, 2017 Page 14 Michelle Anderson From: blems@aol.com Sent: Friday, January 27, 2017 3:10 PM To: Jarod Nygren; Michelle Anderson Cc: bleecm@earthlink.com Subject: Fwd: Proposed KRH PUD Attachments: KRH PUD 2017 application.doc Oops. Here's the attachment. Finally! Maggie -----Original Message ----- From: blems <blemsCu?aol.com> To: jnygren <jnypren(a)_kalispell. com>; planning <planningfa)_kalispell.com> Sent: Fri, Jan 27, 2017 12:03 pm Subject: Proposed KRH PUD Comments on the KRH PUD are attached. Re -read the application available on-line and note some changes from the first iteration. I still believe the information available from KRH is not sufficient or specific enough to be considered appropriate for a complete PUD application. It is good that the Planning Board is being made aware of KRH's master planning efforts. The changes KRH wants can almost all be addressed by changes to H-1 zoning regs. If nothing else, KRH's first step is undoing or modifying its two existing PUDs. The application refers to this process. If this PUD does proceed, it will need some sophisticated conditions to accompany it. Monitoring and enforcement of PUD conditions is more difficult than administering zoning regs. The later are more readily understood and available to the public than PUD ordinances. Thank you, Maggie Davis, homeowner 160 Charlotte Ave, Kalispell 59901 cc: Mo Stein, HKS, KRH consultant Dear Editor 27 Jan 2017 A heart-y way to observe Valentine's Day will be at the City Planning Board's Feb 14 meeting, which includes a work session on Kalispell Regional Healthcare's proposed Planned Unit Development in the H-1 zone. To date only KRH's narrative version of the application has been posted on the City Planning Department's website. The complete, formal PUD application documents and staff report are not yet available. The proposed PUD is unique in that KRH is applying for it retroactively. The boundaries include almost 97 acres, including property it neither owns or controls and much of which has already been developed. KRH states clearly that anticipating future needs and projects within the PUD is difficult, if not impossible, due to fast -paced changes in the healthcare industry. With these uncertainties in mind, KRH cannot meet the prerequisites for a PUD as stated in state law (MCA 76-3-103 definitions) and Kalispell City Zoning, Chapter 27.19 Planned Unit Development. Planned Unit Developments on passage become City ordinances or laws. In the past KRH and its affiliated entities have had difficulty complying with the provisions, phases, and conditions associated with its existing PUDs in the H-1 zone. To add yet another, more extensive PUD would further obscure future development and city infrastructure needs in the zone from public knowledge and participation. KRMC is a not -for -profit community hospital, but it is affiliated with for -profit entities in a complex administrative structure. KRH shares the H-1 zone with other property owners including Immanuel Lutheran Home, Buffalo Hills Terrace, the Salvation Army, medical offices, and commercial uses. Given the permitted uses already approved in the H-1 zone, it would be appropriate for KRH to amend the existing H-1 zoning regulations to accommodate its master planning. The main features of the proposed January 2417 KRH PUD application are as follows: I. No site plan 2. No timelines 3. No setbacks from the property lines 4. No minimum lot size 5. No maximum lot coverage 6. An out of date traffic study done in May 2016 that relates only to the Women and Children's Pavilion currently under construction. This study omits Grandview Drive, Commons Way, Mission Street and the Grace Church access off of Highway 93. It only covers those streets with traffic lights on Highway 93. The study predates the opening of the Highway 93 by-pass and the Four Mile/Grandview connector to FVCC and the hospital via Grandview. It does not reference the City's Transportation Plan. 7. The most concrete element on the concept drawings is the re -alignment of Conway Drive to highlight hospital visibility. This street is the only approved truck route to the area south of KRMC, which includes the Emergency Department, Brendan House, Alert Helicopter, Immanuel Lutheran Home, Buffalo Hill Terrance, day care facilities, medical offices, and the residential neighborhood south of the H-I zone. Employee, patient, residential, and visitor vehicles and vans use Conway and its traffic light as the safest way to access Highway 93. Preservation of robust intersections at Conway Drive/Claremont Street and Conway Drive/Highway 93 are essential to public safety in south portion of the H-1 zone 8. A weak, subjective commitment to strengthening traffic connectivity and pedestrian/bicycle access to the H-1 zone. The zone has a mix of public and private streets, some of which do not meet City standards. 9. Specific reference is made to a future extension of Windward Way as a connector between Sunnyview Lane and Conway Drive. 10. No CC&Rs. Any present or future property owner would be free to take advantage of any or all of the provisions included in the PUD, whether their purposes were related to healthcare or not. For example, a suite -style hotel with convention and/or ballroom facilities. 11. Height limit of 100' or more with a Conditional Use Pen -nit (CUP) 12. An array of vastly larger signage, up to 128sf per sign and 16' high. 13. Proposed additional H-1 permitted uses include: a. Patient, Family, and Healthcare Support Housing [doctors, students] b. Assembly Hall/Stadiums/Convention Hall Facilities c. Central Construction Staging Area [a current non -conforming use] d. Patient RV Parking [existing RV park is a current non -conforming use] e. Retail — Gift Shops, Coffee Shop, Ancillary Retail use 14. Parking issues are discussed. At present surface parking lots do not meet City standards for proximity to structures. Three locations for multi -story garages are shown on the concept site plan. The retention or elimination of on -street parking is not mentioned. Margaret S Davis, homeowner 160 Charlotte, Kalispell 59901 Kari Hernandez From: Michelle Anderson Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 7:42 AM To: Jarod Nygren; Tom Jentz; PJ Sorensen Cc: Kari Hernandez Subject: FW: # KPUD-16-01, Kalispell Regional Healthcare PUD February 14th meeting From: steve martinez [mailto:martinezlact+ gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 6:17 PM To: Michelle Anderson Subject: # KPUD-16-01, Kalispell Regional Healthcare PUD February 14th meeting Members of the planning board, I am submitting comments as I can not attend the meeting. My primary concern in this planning revision is setbacks along residential property. Homes most directly affected do not have a road between their property and KRH property. This is primarily Glacier View Dr. A 15 foot set back may be adequate for a single story building, but a 100 foot building? A two or three story parking garage or a taller building would significantly destroy the values of these properties and decrease the quality of life of the residents. "Set backs along residential property should increase as structure height increases." We are now dealing with this with the constructions of the new addition. It is more then 15 feet set back from residential property but it is going to have a significant negative impact by blocking sunlight and view and by creating noise and 24 hour light. In the Narrative it was stated that impact to residential neighbors already exists, so the assumption is that new development would have no further impact. This is NOT true. A 100 foot building with a 15 foot set back would be a significant impact that does not exist. Also in the narrative it states that there is mature landscaping between the residents of Grand View Dr. and the KRH parking lots. This is NOT true. Current landscaping is immature and inadequate to act as a buffer from noise and light from the parking lots that come right up to the back of these properties. As a resident of Sunnyview lane I do not feel the hospital has been a good neighbor. I realize that they will grow. I hope you will make sure they do so without completely destroying our neighborhood. Sincerely, Steve Martinez Dr. Patrick Burns Burlin Properties, LLC 1297 Burns Way, Suite 2 Kalispell, Montana 59901 February S, 2017 City of Kalispell Planning Department 2011" Avenue fast Kalispell, Montana 59901 Dear Planning Staff, I understand that property I own is Included In Kalispell Regional Healthcare's PUD Application currently being reviewed by the City of Kalispell. The property is Suites 2 and 4,1297 Burns Way. This letter is in support of our property being Included in the PUD boundary. Sincerely, - L- = Dr. Patrick B rns Cc: Administration, Kalispell Regional Healthcare Kalispell Medical Offices 1280 Burns Way Kalispell, MT 59901 Feb. 13, 2017 Planning Division City of Kalispell Re: File #KPUD-16-01 To whom it may concern: I trained at a very large medical complex in Denver. In the beginning of its development, this campus had many trees and grassy areas. By the time I finished my residency, there were almost no grass or trees. The lack of planning for this sprawling campus resulted in a sterile appearance and an absence in the fabric necessary to promote social, mental, and emotional wellbeing of patients and their families. As our medical campus grows, it is important that we have a unifying plan and that everyone fail under the same rules. This will decrease misunderstandings and arguments, which detract from our goal of providing the best medical care for our patients. Without this over -reaching umbrella, limited resources could be wasted in resolving disputes or correcting mistakes. To that end,_ I support the PUD as an excellent way to address concerns ahead of tithe and to explicate ground rules for the variety of hospital -owned and privately owned properties on campus. Sincerely,_ Manse K..tohnsonV.Q Dr. Don Ericksen Flathead Orthopedics 111 Sunnyview Lane Kalispell, Montana 59901 February 8, 2017 City of Kalispell Planning Department 201 V Avenue East Kalispell, Montana 59901 Dear Planning Staff, understand that property owned by Flathead Orthopedics is included in Kalispell Regional Healthcare's PUD Application currently being reviewed by the City of Kalispell. The property is located at 111 Sunnyview Lane. This letter is in support of our property being included in the PUD boundary. Sincerely, Dr. 6on Eric sen Cc: Administration, Kalispell Regional Healthcare Anders Engdahl, MD Northwest Radiology, LP 320 Sunnyview Lane Kalispell, Montana 59901 February 8, 2017 City of Kalispell Planning Department 201 Vt Avenue East Kalispell, Montana 59901 Dear Planning Staff, I understand that property we own is included in Kalispell Regional Healthcare's PUD Application currently being reviewed by the City of Kalispell. The property is Lot 1 of the Amended Plat of Simmons No. 78 which is the parking lot property located at SE corner of the intersection of Highway 93 and Meridian Road. This letter is in support of our property being included in the PUD boundary. Sincerely, Anders Engdahl, MD Cc: Administration, Kalispell Regional Healthcare Douglas E. Jack Northern Care, Inc. Orthotics and Prosthetics 210 Windward Way Kalispell, Montana 59901 February 8, 2017 City of Kalispell Planning Department 201 1" Avenue East Kalispell, Montana 59901 Dear Planning Staff, DECEIVED FEB 2 1201 KALISPELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT I understand that property I own is included in Kalispell Regional Healthcare's PUD Application currently being reviewed by the City of Kalispell. The property is 210 Windward Way. This letter is in support of our property being included in the PUD boundary. Sincerely, QM Douglas J ck '11- Cc: Administration, Kalispell Regional Healthcare Frederick Weber Highland Park, Lot 13 Montana Sky Networks 1286 Burns Way Kalispell, Montana 59901 February 8, 2017 City of Kalispell Planning Department 201 1st Avenue East Kalispell, Montana 59901 Dear Planning Staff, I understand that property I own is included in Kalispell Regional Healthcare's PUD Application currently being reviewed by the City of Kalispell. The Property is Highland Park, Lot 13, 1286 Burns Way. This letter is in SUPPORT of our property being included in the PUD boundary. Sincerely, MontanaSky Networks, Inc. Frederick Weber President Founder1984 "Before Al Gore" Cc: Administration, Kalispell Regional Healthcare KALISPELL REGIONAL HEALTHCARE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REQUEST AMENDED STAFF REPORT #KPUD-16-01 KALISPELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT FEBRUARY 2, 2017 A report to the Kalispell City Planning Board and the Kalispell City Council for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) overlay district request from Kalispell Regional Healthcare on approximately 97 acres. The PUD would allow for the implementation of the hospital's master plan and provide for the growth of the hospital campus for the next 25-30 years. A public hearing is scheduled before the planning board on February 14, 2017, in the Kalispell City Council Chambers. The planning board will make a recommendation and forward a set of findings to the Kalispell City Council for final action. Amendments to the staff report between the Planning Board meeting and City Council meeting are shown in red. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Kalispell Regional Healthcare (KRH) has submitted a Planned Unit Development (PUD) application for approximately 97 acres dedicated to the healthcare needs of the Kalispell region. The campus currently has approximately 2,700 employees between the different facilities. The 97 acre boundary currently functions as a unified campus and contains primarily healthcare related uses. KRH was built at its current location on Buffalo Hill in 1976. Since that time the hospital has seen numerous expansions as it has grown with the community and its changing needs for healthcare services. The goals of the PUD application are to create a framework to organize growth within the hospital campus over the next 25-30 years. KRH has worked with HKS Architects to develop a master site plan which looks at where and how the KRH campus may grow and is the basis of the PUD request. As a regional medical center, the KRH campus is growing into an urban campus which often creates difficulties when administering the existing H-1 Zoning and PUD overlays currently on the properties. The PUD application seeks to resolve the campus issues by doing the following: 1) Create a PUD overlay that better aligns with the KRH adopted master plan. This includes incorporating a larger approximately 97 acre area that generally follows the property owned by KRH; 2) Consolidate the existing PUD boundaries. The current campus is divided by two PUD's with the remainder of the properties being within the H-1 Zone. This creates confusion as development arises on the campus; 3) Accommodate guided yet flexible growth that addresses community needs with the necessary infrastructure for rapidly expanding campus; 4) Adopt zoning and development standards that are more appropriate for the development of a modern urban campus for both inpatient and outpatient services; and 5) Make reasonable predications and assurances for an unpredictable future. A. Owner/Petitioner: Technical Assistance: Kalispell Regional Healthcare 310 Sunnyview Lane Kalispell, MT 59901 Jackola Engineering 2250 HWY 93 South Kalispell, MT 59901 B. Location and Legal Description of Property: The PUD overlay is generally bound by the centerline of U.S. 93 on the west boundary; the centerline of Heritage Way between U.S. 93 and Windward Way and the southern edge of Buffalo Commons Phase 1 Subdivision, Ridgeview Subdivision and Grandview Townhouses Subdivision on the northerly boundary; centerline of Grandview Drive, Grand View Heights Subdivision, Buffalo Hill Townhouses Subdivision and City of Kalispell water tank site on the east boundary; and the Salvation Army and Bountiful Drive on the southern boundary. For complete legal description see the attached Exhibit "A". C. Existing Land Use (within PUD boundary): The existing land uses within the PUD boundary include the hospital, hospital related/private office space, dental, day care, health club (The Summit), Grace church, multi -family apartments and surface parking facilities. 0 E. Existing Zoning (within PUD boundary): North: Buffalo Commons PUD/H-I Zone East: Northwest Healthcare PUD, RA-1 Zone South: Northwest Healthcare PUD/H-I Zone West: H-1 Zone Adjacent Land Uses: North: Common area open space, retail, restaurants and residential housing. East: Residential housing, golf course, city water storage/tank South: Residential housing, Salvation Army and Immanuel Lutheran Communities West: U.S. 93 highway F. Adjacent Zoning: North: Buffalo Commons PUD, H-1 and RA-1 Zones East: R-3 and P-1 Zones South: H-1 Zone West: B-2 and RA-1 Zone beyond U.S. 93 2 G. General Land Use Character: The area is generally made up of medical, dental and other professional offices with some multi -family residential. The hospital is the largest building and medical center in the immediate area. Other uses in the area support the medical nature of this neighborhood including pharmacies, a day care center, health club and assisted and independent living facilities for the elderly. East of the hospital includes a mix of residential homes, the city's water storage tanks and municipal golf course. The west edge of the PUD boundary is bordered by U.S. 93, which is topographically above the grade of the properties beyond the highway. H. Utilities and Public Services: Sewer: City of Kalispell Water: City of Kalispell Refuse: City of Kalispell Electricity: Flathead Electric Cooperative Gas: NorthWestern Energy Telephone: CenturyLink Schools: School District #5 Fire: City of Kalispell Fire Department Police: City of Kalispell I. EVALUATION BASED ON STATUTORY CRITERIA FOR THE PROPOSED PUD OVERLAY The statutory basis for reviewing a change in zoning is set forth by 76-2-303, M.C.A. Findings of fact for the PUD overlay request are discussed relative to the itemized criteria described by 76-2-304, M.C.A. and Section 27.19.020(4) of the City of Kalispell Zoning Ordinance. 1. Does the requested zone comply with the growth policy? The Kalispell Growth Policy 2020 designates the proposed PUD boundary as urban mixed use. The growth policy encourages development in the urban mixed use areas to be compact with centrally located services and employment centers that provide easy connections between existing commercial and residential neighborhoods. The urban mixed use area is also intended to allow a compatible mix of higher -intensity uses including office as well as some commercial development. The Kalispell Growth Policy 2020 has several goals that support the PUD request: Chapter 4, Business and Industry, states the following: GOAL #10 - Support the development and expansion of the Kalispell Regional Medical Center recognizing it as an important and desirable element in the economy that can be expanded on a regional basis and provide high-tech, high quality healthcare and services while providing an important and high paying employment base. 3 POLICIES (General Commercial, g.) - The Kalispell Regional Medical campus and associate Buffalo Commons area is anticipated to develop as a mixed use area that will accommodate wide range compatible residential, office, commercial and medical uses. POLICIES (Urban Mixed -Use Areas, e.) -Avoid encroachment into established, intact residential areas. Chapter 6, The Economy states the following: GOAL #5 - Strengthen Kalispell as a regional health care center that provides a broad spectrum of healthcare related services with diagnostic, therapeutic and varied medical services available. POLICIES #8 - Support the Kalispell area position as a regional commercial center and a location of major healthcare, government, industrial facilities and retail services. The proposed PUD overlay zoning would permit the expansion of the hospital which in turn meets the above cited goals and policies within the Kalispell Growth Policy 2020. Healthcare and social assistance jobs are growing at three times the state rate, creating economic development benefit for Kalispell and the region. KRH is leading employer within Flathead County with approximately 2,700 employees. Those positions being offered are generally high -paying positions, which is extremely beneficial in an economically distressed area. Because of the growing medical specialties, broad service area, unified medical system, high quality doctor pool, and proximity to Canada, Kalispell has the potential to further grow on its medical center services. The proposed PUD overlay zoning would permit higher -intensity development in a compact, urban setting to compliment the larger medical neighborhood which has been established in this part of the city while at the same time excluding the residential developments to the east. This compact, higher -intensity style development is compatible with the city's growth policy goals found within the urban mixed use land use designation. Therefore, the requested PUD overlay zoning is consistent with the city's growth policy. 2. The effect on motorized and nonmotorized transportation systems? It can be anticipated that the proposed PUD overlay zoning district will permit a higher -intensity use of the property in the immediate area creating more vehicle traffic on adjacent streets. The PUD includes construction of a 164,000 square foot Women's and Children's pavilion and the ultimate full PUD buildout which will increase traffic volumes by 10-15% on the medical campus according to the traffic study conducted by Abelin traffic services. With the full build -out of the KRH PUD it is expected that traffic volumes on the roadways within the development will increase by an additional 10%. While most of the roads and intersections within the KRH campus have sufficient reserve capacity to accommodate additional traffic, the traffic study indicates some road widening 51 may be desirable along the west end of Sunnyview Lane. Improvements to Sunnyview Lane would occur at the time KRH feels it necessary, or when a traffic study determines the improvements are necessary to move traffic appropriately. Efforts in the master site plan and the PUD design have been made to discourage use and connectivity to Grandview Drive which largely provides a divide between the hospital and the residential properties. KRH will work with their staff to discourage using Grandview Drive for vehicular access due to potential impacts on the residential properties to the north and east. Although the hospital will encourage its staff to use Grandview Drive, the traffic study indicates that Grandview Drive is currently operating well under carrying capacity, as traffic volumes are 400 vehicles per day (VPD) and only 3% of traffic from the hospital uses Grandview Drive. Although traffic increases can be expected along Grandview Drive, the increases are well within the limits of its carrying capacity. Concerns over north -south connectivity are addressed within the master site plan by making a new connection between Windward Way and Conway Drive as shown in Appendix G. Currently there is a north -south connection between the west wall of the hospital and the Medical Arts Building. This connection is not adequate, so many visitors to the hospital either don't know the connection exists or use either U.S. 93 or the Medical Arts Building parking lot to connect the north side of the campus from the south and north. This connection is supported by the Kalispell Growth Policy 2020, Chapter 4, Policies (Urban Mixed -Use Areas, c) which states the following: Expand the depth of urban highway commercial areas as mixed -use corridors, in order to provide an alternative to continued linear commercial development, concentrate more intensive uses along traffic arterials, improve business district circulation and transportation efficiency areas, by secondary street access, provide flexibility for larger development sites, and expand small business opportunities. The site lacks north -south circulation at this time. As the site develops into a more dense urban campus, this connection would improve circulation and keep visitors from entering onto U.S. 93 to traverse the campus. Therefore, staff recommends the new north -south street connection be constructed at the time the Medical Arts Building is demolished and a new building is constructed in its place. New construction in this area would be the appropriate time to make the connection. The new connection would generally connect at the intersection of Windward Way and Sunnyview Lane at the north and Conway Drive at the south. Pedestrian connectivity within the hospital campus has been a priority over the last decade, as the hospital was previously developed at a suburban scale with little thought of the pedestrian. As shown by Appendix G in the application, a majority of the area within the PUD boundary has developed with or installed pedestrian circulation. In order to ensure that pedestrian circulation gaps are completed, the proposed standards include a requirement that all development projects shall install missing right-of-way sidewalks along their property frontages. The standards also state that if the developed sidewalk falls within 100 feet of an existing right-of-way sidewalk, located on the same side of street, 5 and missing segment is located along the frontage of a parcel under common ownership, the project shall install a sidewalk to connect the new and existing pedestrian connection. Appendix G shows an east -west connection south of Brendan House and the ALERT Building. This connection was a requirement of the pedestrian plan approved by the Hospital PUD in 2010. The completion date for the connection is tied to the "final phase" of the E.R. addition/remodel. To date, there has not been a final phase because construction has been ongoing for a number of years. Staff recommends that completion of this section of pedestrian connectivity be completed within 1 year of final approval of this PUD overlay. Completion of this section would finish a major section of the pedestrian system, as it would connect to the north -south section that will be completed with the Women's and Children's addition around the east side of the hospital. As part of any future development of the site, any project creating more than 300 vehicle trips will require an additional traffic impact study report. The traffic impact study will analyze the traffic impacts associated with a development and recommend mitigation measures for the increase in traffic. Those recommendations will be implemented at the building permit stage of the development in order to mitigate the potential impacts of the associated development. Any development or redevelopment is reviewed by the city's Site Review Committee to ensure any impacts to the transportation system are adequately addressed. Therefore, although there will be a change in the amount of traffic in the area, the traffic study has concluded that there are no significant traffic impacts at this time and that the transportation system will continue to operate at a satisfactory level. Additional traffic studies required for projects generating 300 trips or more will determine what improvements, if any, will be required to the transportation system. 3. That historical uses and established use patterns and recent change in use trends will be weighed equally and consideration not be given to one to the exclusion of the other. The immediate neighborhood is primarily made up of medical and other professional offices with the hospital being the largest building in the area. The last several decades have seen an increase in upgraded and new medical buildings in the area, with the last few years seeing considerable expansion. The requested PUD overlay zoning would permit further expansion plans for the hospital campus over the next 25-30 years, creating a large benefit to the region both economically and through healthcare services. 4. Will the requested zone secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers? The requested PUD does not contain any features which would compromise the safety of the public in regards to safety from fire, panic, and other dangers. All new construction will be required to be in compliance with the safety codes of the city which relate to fire and building safety. All municipal services including police and fire protection, water and sewer service are available to the properties. no 5. Will the requested zone promote public health, public safety and the general welfare? The requested zoning classification will promote the health and general welfare by allowing the orderly expansion of the KRH campus. KRH is the largest employer and healthcare provider of the region, which are both major components to a regions public health, safety and general welfare. The requested PUD overlay zoning will allow KRH to expand their services within their campus, supporting their growth as a major economic and healthcare provider to the area, further expanding on the regions general well-being. Therefore, the requested PUD overlay promotes the health and general welfare of the community with increased medical services which would be offered to the residents of the region and high quality employment. 6. Promotion of compatible urban growth? This area has been anticipated for a mix of higher -intensity residential, commercial and office development based on the city's growth policy future land use map. All public services and facilities will be available to serve the proposed hospital expansion within the proposed PUD boundary. Incompatible urban growth would occur if infrastructure were inadequate to accommodate the development in the area. 7. Will the requested zone avoid undue concentration of people? An increase in the number and concentration of people in the area will likely result by allowing the PUD overlay zoning. However, the intensity of the uses of the hospital's property would be in direct relationship to the availability of public services, utilities and facilities as well as compliance with established design standards. The design standards and availability of utilities would provide the infrastructure needed to insure that there will not be an overcrowding of the land or undue concentration of people. 8. Will the requested zone provide for adequate light and air? The requested PUD standards are consistent with an urban environment and provide the most efficient use of limited space with existing infrastructure. There are also additional standards provided for within the zoning ordinance that will assure development provides for parks, landscaping, parking, etc. that provide reasonable provisions of adequate light and air. Currently, the existing lot coverage for the master plan is approximately 16%. Fully developed the master plan lot coverage would be approximately 25%. Additionally, a 15 foot setback is being proposed for all development next to residential zones and U.S. 93. 9. Will the requested zone facilitate the adequate provision of transportation water, sewerage, schools, parks, and other public requirements? 7 Public service, facilities and infrastructure would be made available as the hospital expands within the PUD boundary. New improvements to the hospital campus such as water, sewer and drainage would be installed in accordance with city policies and standards at the hospital's expense, thereby insuring that there is adequate provision of services to the site prior to development. Any development or redevelopment is reviewed by the city's Site Review Committee to ensure any impacts to the public infrastructure are adequately addressed. The proposed PUD overlay zoning district would not have any impacts to schools or parks in the immediate area, as the development is commercial in nature. The PUD overlay would permit the expansion of the exiting hospital to provide an increase in care and services to the residents of the community. The master site plan also indicated potential multi -family housing at the northeast corner of the PUD boundary within the Women's, Children, and Family land use area. Multi- family housing would be required to supply recreational amenities as stipulated by Section 27.34.060 if the Kalispell Zoning Ordinance. Section 27.34.060 of the Kalispell Zoning Ordinance requires 500 square feet of land which has recreational value or recreational amenities equivalent to the fair market value of 500 square feet of undeveloped land; or combination thereof. 10. Does the requested zone give consideration to the particular suitability of the property for particular uses? The 97 acre boundary currently functions as a unified campus and contains primarily healthcare related uses. KRH was built at its current location on Buffalo Hill in 1976. Since that time the hospital has seen numerous expansions as it has grown with the community and its changing needs for healthcare services. 11. Will the proposed zone conserve the value of property? Value of the property in the area will be conserved and likely increased because the proposed PUD overlay zoning will allow for the expansion of the hospital campus to an urban -scale medical neighborhood. It should be noted that most of the properties within the boundary are owned by KRH and therefore tax-exempt. Properties privately owned within the PUD boundary are primarily medical in nature and will likely see an increase in property values from any of the proposed hospital expansions. Additionally, any new construction will be required to meet the architectural guidelines for the city thus helping to conserve the property values in the area. 12. Will the requested zone encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout the municipality? The most appropriate land uses throughout the jurisdiction are promoted by encouraging complementary and compatible uses which promote the general well-being of all citizens of the community. As the site it currently developed primarily as medical, the most appropriate use of the area would be a medical campus as provided by with the proposed PUD overlay. The only areas of the municipality that will be affected directly by the proposed PUD overlay at this time are the properties within the PUD boundary. The requested PUD overlay provides for the most appropriate zoning for the hospital's master plan and provides the tools necessary to implement the goals and policies of the Kalispell Growth Policy 2020 as outlined earlier. II. EVALUATION OF THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL: Project Narrative: Nature of the Request: This is a request for a planned unit development (PUD) overlay zoning district on approximately 97 acres of land. The 97 acre boundary currently functions as a unified campus and contains primarily healthcare related uses; such as, hospital, hospital related/private office space, dental, day care, health club (The Summit), Grace church, multi -family apartments and surface parking facilities. The PUD overlay would allow for a multitude of deviations from the Kalispell Zoning Ordinance in regards to allowable uses and standards in order for KRH to implement its master site plan. As a regional medical center, the property and facilities are transitioning into urban campus which often creates difficulties when implementing the existing H-1 Zoning and PUD overlays currently on the properties. In order to rectify the difficulties being encountered by KRH, the application has requested a PUD overlay that uses the city H-1 Zone as a basis, while deviating from it in the following ways: Permitted Uses - The H-1 Zone is largely applicable to the uses currently found on the KRH Campus and provides a good starting point for the PUD overlay zone. A number of uses only allowed by a conditional use permit (CUP) within the H-1 Zone are common to healthcare uses as well. This includes: athletic clubs, heliports, and even hospitals. Therefore, the application is requesting that all "permitted" uses in the H-1 Zone and those uses allowed by "CUP" will be considered a "permitted" use in the PUD overlay. Accordingly, the application is requesting that there be no uses that require a CUP and that they all be permitted uses. The result of this request would mean that ultimate approval of all the uses within the proposed PUD overlay would not require public review, i.e. - Planning Board and Council approval. Although, the public hearing process would not be required, all development projects would still need approval from the city's Site Review Committee and Architectural Review Committee prior to construction. Both of these committees are public meetings and open to the public. In addition to the H-1 "permitted" uses being requested, the following uses have been included into the list of permitted uses: Patient, Family, and Healthcare Support Housing - This is a new use specific to the hospital and is defined as follows; Housing related to a hospital function with a limited term stay. This includes but is not limited to patients, families, doctors, staff, and students. An example could be a patient that needs to be close to the hospital for treatment but is not appropriate for being admitted. 2. Assembly Halls/Stadiums/Convention Hall Facilities - This use is currently within the Kalispell Zoning Ordinance but is reserved for Zones B-2 through I-2 and the P-1 Zone. Allowing this use could give KRH the 9 ability to construct a fieldhouse at the Summit. It is common for a large fieldhouse to have an associated indoor arena for spectator seating. Additionally, the hospital is a frequent location for large meetings within their conference rooms. Permitting this use would allow for the hospital to expand on their operations with the ability to hold larger medical conferences, meeting, etc. 3. Central Construction Staging Area - Construction staging areas are generally temporary in nature and removed when a construction project is completed. Whether it's maintaining existing facilities or building new projects, there has been a steady stream of projects on the KRH campus for more than the past decade. Accordingly, the temporary construction staging area has become a permanent component to the hospital. As a construction yard is not listed as an "allowed" use in the current zone, the reality is every construction project has a need for staging areas. Over the years, the main construction yard has largely stayed in the same location off of Heritage Way. It has fluctuated in size based on the project and construction needs and isolated staging areas have been located adjacent to each construction site. Within the PUD, temporary construction staging will be allowed adjacent to specific project as well as the central location. This is required based on limited space adjacent to many projects and the size/magnitude of construction projects exceeding those typical of the Flathead Valley. Allowance of a permanent construction staging area would include development standards as outlined in the management plan below: Central Construction Staging Area - Management Plan: Intent: Every construction project requires site specific staging areas to carry out the work and is typically located adjacent to the project. When the specific project is complete, these staging areas are removed and the facility is put into use. These project specific construction sites exist on many projects at KRH. The intent of the central construction staging area as an allowed use is to accommodate the larger scale growth experienced at KRH. This growth has created the need to provide a non -project specific staging areas which supports the nearly constant stream of projects ranging from small remodels of existing improvements to the construction of new facilities. The nature of healthcare construction often requires temporary storage of large building elements and equipment. Since a number of the projects are infilling developed property, there is often not enough space for staging adjacent to the individual project. The intent of the Central Construction Staging Area is to allow for non -project specific staging that will remain in place beyond individual project schedules as the demand for the use exists. Construction Staging Management: Fencing - Fencing with visual screening shall be utilized around the yard perimeter to screen adjacent properties and provide security. Vehicle access 10 shall be controlled with gates that do not obstruct the public Right -of -Way when open or closed. Screening along adjacent properties shall be of uniform solid color. Along Public ROW, signs may be allowed following the City of Kalispell Sign Regulations. Fences and screening shall be inspected regularly with repairs completed as necessary. Fences can be installed up to the property line when adjacent to the Public Right of Way and other non-residential properties within the PUD. When adjacent to a residential zone, fences shall be installed a minimum of 10 feet from the property line. Construction Storm water - The Contractor shall obtain and maintain appropriate Kalispell and State construction storm water permits which implement Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans. These permits include measures to control runoff, dust, off -site tracking of mud and gravels, storage of chemicals, and solid waste management. These plans shall include provisions to inspect and clean the ROW of off -site tracking as needed. As a construction use, impervious surfacing is not required. In the event new pavement surfacing is desired, compliance with the City of Kalispell Storm Water Regulations will be required. Driveway Approaches - A City of Kalispell Driveway permit shall be obtained for any new or relocated driveways from the Staging Area. The driveway shall be constructed to the City of Kalispell Standard Driveway detail. Right -of -Way Encroachment- When work is required within the adjacent right-of-way, an encroachment permit shall be obtained. 4. Patient RV Parking - An RV park is not listed as an allowed use in the current zone; however, an RV park is allowed by conditional use. As an allowed use in the PUD it is worth noting that the RV spaces provided at KRH do not constitute an RV Park in the traditional sense as they are not open to the public for rent or lease. The RV spaces are provided as an amenity limited to patients and their families' that are on campus for healthcare services. These are often out of town patients that are able to bring a familiar living space with them all while controlling their costs to be in the area for care. Based on this, the PUD will include patient RV parking spaces as an allowed use. The current location is in the northern part of the campus. Growth in the number of spaces may be required in the future and will largely be driven by the needs of patients. As the facility is truly not an RV park for camping, this is not perceived as a large impact to the public. Further, electric, water and sewer hookups are provided to eliminate the need for noisy generators and storing and hauling away of gray and black water. 5. Retail - Gift Shops, Coffee Shop, Ancillary Retail use - The uses mentioned here would be added to the uses already permitted as follows; Book Stores, Florist, Medical Supplies and Equipment, Opticians, Pharmacy and similar use. Although Gift Shop, Coffee Shop and Ancillary Retail use could be considered a "similar use", for clarity KRH 11 wishes to include the additional retail uses. The outline of the proposed PUD overlay zone for KRH has been designed to be easy to use and formatted similarly to the existing Kalispell Zoning Ordinance. The proposed PUD overlay for the permitted uses as explained above is outlined below: KRH PUD OVERLAY ZONE Intent: A zoning district intended to provide hospitals and medical facilities and supportive services for the care of the sick, elderly and distraught. This zone is not intended to serve the general retail or overnight accommodation needs of the general public. Permitted uses: 1. Aircraft hangers 2. Airports and heliports 3. Athletic club and Wellness Facilities 4. Assembly halls/stadiums/convention hall facilities 5. Automobile parking - surface and structure 6. Barber and beauty services 7. Bed and breakfast 8. Church 9. Community center 10. Central Construction Staging Area 11. Day care - home (12 or fewer) - Center (13 or more) 12. Dwelling - Single family - Duplex - Townhouse (2 or more attached units) - Multi -family - Patient, Family, and Healthcare Support Housing - See definition below 13. Fairgrounds (public) 14. Funeral homes and crematoriums 15. Group home - 8 or fewer persons - 9 or more persons 16. Home occupations (refer to Section 27.20.060) 17. Homeless shelters 18. Hospital 12 Inpatient Hospital (including treatment centers and 24- hour care facilities) Outpatient Ambulatory Care - Less than 24-hour stay 19. Jail Facilities (public) 20. Laboratories, tech research, development and testing 21. Office - Professional/government - Medical with limited overnight stay (less than 24 hours) 22. Parks 23. Patient RV Parking 24. Police and fire stations 25. Residential care home or facility 26. Restaurants 27. Retail, limited: - Book stores - Florist - Medical supplies and equipment - Opticians - Pharmacy - Gift shops - Coffee shops - Ancillary retail uses - Similar uses 28. Safe houses 29. Schools - K-12 (public or private) - Post -secondary (public or private) - Commercial 30. Utilities (primary distribution site) Development Standards The proposed PUD overlay for the development standards is outlined below with further explanation following: Property Development Standards: 1. Minimum Lot Area (sq. ft.): N/A 2. Minimum Lot Width (ft.): N/A 3. Minimum Setbacks (ft.): - Front Yard - 0* - Side Yard - 0* - Rear Yard - 0* - Side Corner - 0* 13 - Attached Garage (Front/Side Corner) - 20 - Accessory Structures - N/A *Provide 15-foot setback where adjacent to residentially zoned property and where adjacent to Highway 93 corridor. 4. Maximum Building Height (ft.):100 Feet; over 100 feet subject to CUP 5. Permitted Lot Coverage (%): N/A 6. Off -Street Parking - Parking Ratios and design standards per City of Kalispell Zoning Ordinance. For sites located within the Parking Management Zone, see the Parking Management Plan. 7. Fences (refer to Section 27.20.040) - Maximum Heights (ft.): Front - 4 (6.5 for construction staging area fence screening) Side - 6.5 - Rear - 6.5 - Side Corner - 6.5 8. Signs - See KRH Signage Development Guide 9. Outdoor lighting - Outdoor lighting shall comply with Chapter 27.26 in the City Zoning Ordinance. 10. Pedestrian Connectivity - Development projects should install missing right-of-way sidewalk along its property frontage as required by City requirements. If the developed sidewalk falls within 100 feet of an existing ROW sidewalk, located on the same side of the street, and the missing segment is located along the frontage of a parcel under common Ownership, the project should install sidewalk to connect the new and existing walkways. The deviation to the existing design standards largely focuses on setbacks, lot coverage, building height, parking and signage and is explained further below: 5etbacks%Lot Coverage - The table below outlines the current H-1 setbacks and the proposed PUD setbacks. It is worth noting that the existing hospital PUD modified setbacks however this change does not cover a majority of the proposed PUD boundary. As noted in the table below, the proposed setbacks are zero. The request would also reduce the required lot coverage from 45% to zero (0). Reduced setbacks allow for the campus to be developed holistically, as it should be looked as its own entity rather than a multitude of different uses. Where a site is adjacent to U.S. 93 or a residentially zoned property, a setback of 15 feet will be used in order to buffer the area. Since KRH operates as a campus, reducing the setbacks and lot coverage gives them the ability to be flexible in its design in order to use its space efficiently. Setbacks and lot coverage are generally required in order to create neighborhood compatibility and stability within commercial and residential neighborhoods where there are a multitude of property owners. Since the campus is primarily owned by KRH and most of the uses within the boundary are hospital related, compatibility with neighboring properties becomes less of an issue. The proposed overlay would also allow for a 6.5' high fence within the front 14 yard setback for the construction staging area. Currently, the maximum height is 4' which would not be tall enough to adequately screen the area. There are also additional standards provided for within the zoning ordinance that will mitigate potential negative impacts of reduced setbacks and lot coverage such as; landscaping and parking which create open/buffer areas between buildings, streets, etc. Setback Summary Setback Current H-1 PUD proposed* Front 15 feet 0 feet Side 5 feet 0 feet Rear 10 feet 0 feet Side Corner 15 feet 0 feet *Provide 15-foot setback where adjacent to Residentially zoned property and where adjacent to Highway 93 corridor Building Height - The current H-1 Zone allows for 60 feet by right with unlimited height allowed with a CUP. The existing PUD covering the main hospital building allowed for 80 feet building heights to accommodate for the Surgical Services project. The proposed PUD would allow for 100 feet building heights, over 100 feet would be subject to a CUP. Building vertically may be the best use of available land as KRH grows. Expanding vertically rather than horizontally, the hospital's infrastructure of services becomes more efficient allowing the hospital to provide better care to patients. Without the ability to expand vertically, growth of the hospital will be limited and there will be greater chance of the campus encroaching into adjacent properties not within the PUD boundary. The typical impacts associated with additional height include a possible shadow effect on neighboring properties and a scale of development which is uncharacteristic with the surrounding neighborhood. Surrounding development is mostly medical or professional offices, treatment centers or elderly care facilities which would not be impacted by the proposed height. As mentioned previously, the main hospital building is already permitted to be 80 feet in height. The properties that could be affected the most by increased height would be the residences to the east. A 15' setback is being proposed for any development within the proposed PUD boundary when it is adjacent a residential development or U.S. 93. This setback acts as a buffer that would reduce the perceived bulk and scale of buildings. Maximum height requirements are typically not a concern because of the increased building and fire code requirements when a structure increases in height. With the increased height the tallest structure in the area will continue to be the city's water tower, located east of the hospital at approximately 150 feet tall. Restrictions due to ALERT helicopter approaches would need to be considered with each specific building design and approved by appropriate regulatory agencies. Off -Street Parking - Parking demand at KRH varies significantly from day to day and even hour to hour. It is highly dynamic and the perception of sufficiency of existing facilities is dependent on these fluctuations. Development at KRH has 15 met the current ordinance in terms of the H-1 parking ratios; however, the parking counts rely on using offsite parking. This can become an issue in the fact that as parking has expanded to the north, the distance to the facilities served exceeds 300 feet and overlaps existing H-1 and PUD zones. The proposed PUD overlay deviates from the current ordinance with respect to off -site parking and a maximum 300-foot distance from the use to the parking facility. With a campus setting, the PUD overlay will allow parking to be located onsite or anywhere within the Parking Management Zone (shown below). The departure from the zoning ordinance to allow for parking to exceed 300 feet from the facilities they serve may be perceived as not being in the public's best interest. In reality, it's in KRH's best interest to provide adequate parking for patients, visitors, employees, and vendors. This means that as parking needs require being spread over a large area, a circulator shuttle and valet parking will be provided to effectively move people around campus within the Parking Management Zone. Staff has had discussion with KRH about the difficulty of implementing the hospital required parking ratio. Because the ratio is dependent upon number of physicians, beds, employment, etc, the parking requirement can change regularly. In order to implement the parking ratio appropriately, KRH will create a model/template that will be ongoing and submitted with every building permit application. This template will address the number of beds, employees and physicians. The template will also use a square footage comparison, as in the long-term it may be the easier method of calculating the parking requirement if it is determined to be adequate. Additionally, KRH will submit on an annual basis a maximum working shift that will be the baseline for the parking counts for that year. If at the time the annual study determines that additional parking is required, the hospital would install those parking spaces within a nine (9) month timeframe. The annual parking count should be submitted to the Planning Director by February 1st of each year, so that if it is determined that additional parking is required the hospital would have the construction season to do so. The Parking Management Plan is outlined below: Parking Management Plan Intent: Uses within the PUD boundary consist of the main Hospital and numerous stand-alone buildings and properties. As the hospital requires a large amount of parking for patients, visitors, and employees alike, the parking facilities can stretch across several properties within the PUD boundary. The following Parking Management Plan is being implemented for the "KRH Parking Management Zone" as shown in purple below. 16 KALISPELL REGIONAL mil- HEALTHCARE 46 PARKING MANAGIMENTWINE MAP Parking within the PUD shall comply with the Off -Street Parking Design Standards except as modified by this Parking Management Plan. 09 Location: The required parking for the Core Hospital Area (blue hatching in map above), can be located anywhere within the KRH Parking Management Zone (purple) as long as the total parking requirement is satisfied. Minimum Standards by Use: 1. The Minimum Standards by Use shall be determined by the City of Kalispell Zoning Ordinance and this Management Plan. The ratios listed in the table below shall govern over the City Zoning Ordinance for uses within the KRH Parking Management Zone. 2. The applicant shall provide with each building permit: a. Parking calculations in a standard format based on the uses listed below and those relevant from the City Zoning Ordinance. These ratios shall determine the required parking for the project and/or the KRH Parking Management Zone. For the Hospital use, the maximum staff per working shift shall be established on an annual basis during the parking review with the City Staff presented below. b. If the project involves the core hospital area as shown in the Parking Management Zone Map, the applicant shall provide for reference the square foot of building per parking space calculation. After two years of monitoring the square footage per space ratio for the Hospital use, the City and KRH agree to discuss a possible PUD amendment to the Hospital parking standard listed below. 17 3. The parking for existing stand-alone uses within the management area are not required to be presented unless impacted by the application. If a portion of the parking at an existing use is utilized by the application, then the parking for that existing use shall also be presented in the parking count requirements. 4. An annual review of parking in the KRH Parking Management Zone shall be conducted between the city staff and KRH. This meeting will provide an opportunity to review base compliance with parking in the Management Zone as well as establish the maximum working shift to be utilized for the following year. If it is determined that additional parking spaces are needed, KRH will have nine (9) months to install the required parking spaces. Extension of this timeframe can be given by the Planning Director if meeting the parking requirement is not feasible within a nine (9) month timeframe. This meeting should be conducted by February 1st of each year to allow for appropriate time to construct additional parking, if needed, during through construction season. This requirement would not delay building permits that are submitted during the same timeframe and meet their required parking requirements. Minimum Parking Standards by Use Athletic Clubs 1 space per 200 gross square feet of floor area Business and Professional Offices 1 space per 300 square feet of gross floor area Hospitals 1 per 2 beds, excluding bassinets, plus 1 per 5 employees on maximum working shift, plus 1 per each staff doctor Parking Management Strategies: Valet - A free Valet service will be implemented at intervals deemed appropriate by KRH. Efforts shall be taken to notify the public through the KRMC website and news outlets when the Valet service has been implemented. Shuttle Service - A free shuttle service will be implemented at intervals deemed appropriate by KRH to move people from the more distant parking areas to the major facility entrances. When provided for patients and visitors, efforts shall be taken to notify the public through the KRMC website and news outlets. Parking Garage - KRH may use parking structures to increase parking counts and improve parking proximity to existing and/or proposed facilities. Potential locations are provided for in Appendix H. Parking Signs - Signage to improve wayfinding to parking facilities shall be considered in the completion of the campus signage plan. IN As a practical matter the PUD overlay would allow for the main hospital (hatched in blue in diagram above) to use any of the parking spaces within the parking management zone (purple area in diagram above). All other uses within the parking management zone would still maintain parking onsite. Staff would review the parking requirements herein when a building permit is submitted. In this case, staff would also review the baseline parking at the beginning of each year in order to assure compliance with this plan. Signage - The signage development guide included in appendices discusses the need to create a uniform look for a medical campus signage, provide the visitor with the correct visible signage at the correct time and location. As the primary concern for medical campus signing is life safety, it is imperative to provide simple and clear direction for the first time visitor and patients needing care. For these reasons, the proposed changes are a benefit, not a detriment, to the community. The proposed guide is included in Appendix K (Signage Development Guide) and falls in line with accepted medical industry signage standards. The development guide addresses the types and quantities of signs allowed for the PUD and will allow for the development of a campus signage plan prior to implementing. Generally, the proposed guide modifies the number and size of signs allowed, but it also differentiates from the current City Ordinance in that it provides greater area for wayfmding signage. The following is a list of sign types as outlined in the Signage Development Guide for the campus with the design intent behind each sign type: 1.1 Primary Campus Monument Sign: 128 sq. ft. 16'-0" Max. Height Intent: To identify the main public entry points into the medical center campus. 1.2 Secondary Monument Sign: 60 Sq, ft. 12'-0" Max. Height Intent. To identify secondary entry points into the medical center campus. 2.1 Vehicular Directional Pole Sign: 23 sq. ft. 13'- 0" Max. Height Intent: To direct traffic to main destination points on campus. 2.2 Secondary Directional Pole Sign: 23 sq. ft. 6'- 0" Max. Height Intent: To direct pedestrian, bicycle, and shuttle traffic. 3.1 Building Identification Letters and or Logo: Allow 2 sq. ft. of sign for every 1 lineal foot of building. Intent: To identify main buildings on the campus. 3.2 Tenant Identification Sign: (Similar to sign type 2.2) Intent: To identify occupants of the buildings on the campus. 3.3 Building Identification Monument Sign: 48 sq. ft. 8'-0" Max. Height Intent: To identify individual building entrances on campus at street level. The proposed signs as outlined in 1.1-2.2 would be unique to the PUD overlay and are therefore a deviation. Signs 1.1-2.2 are intended to serve as wayfinding signage. 19 Currently, the H-1 Zone does permit not more than two off -premise signs on primary entrance roads. The signs are allowed to be a maximum of 54 square feet and 12 feet in height, which is considerably smaller than the signs being proposed. Although the heights and size of the signs being proposed are larger than currently permitted, they would be subject to the setback requirements and height requirements of Section 27.22.90(d) of the Kalispell Zoning Ordinance which would mitigate any potential impacts to the proposed signs size. As these signs are directional in nature, they would not count towards the allowable signage of the property they are being placed on (host property). At this time the location of these signs has not been determined; accordingly, when developed, the signage plan for these signs would be subject to review and approval of the Planning Director and the Architectural Review Committee. The proposed signs as outlined in 3.1-3.3 are onsite signage and provided for within the Kalispell Zoning Ordinance. Although, the sign type 3.3 does deviate from the allowable size of 24 s.f. and 6 feet in height to a size of 48 s.f. and 8 feet in height. For the PUD overlay, the ratio to be used for calculating the allowable sign area would be 2 s.f. for every 1 lineal foot of building frontage. This is the same ratio being used for zones R-5, RA-1, RA-2, 13-1 and P-1 and is the most appropriate ratio for this use. One (1) onsite freestanding sign would be permitted, if more than one onsite freestanding sign is proposed section 27.22.090(1)(b) would apply. Section 27.22.090(1)(b) permits a single freestanding sign on a lot having at least 30 feet of frontage along a public road except two signs may be permitted when the frontage of the lot along a single road exceeds 500 feet. The provision allows lots with multiple frontages to have signs along each frontage. Multiple frontage lots would still be subject to 2 s.f. per 1 lineal foot of building frontage. The permitted uses, development standards and management plans, are not perceived as a negative impact to the community. By allowing for growth and expansion of the KRH campus from a medical and operations standpoint, it improves the medical services provided to the community. Further, this growth helps strengthen and support the Flathead Economy. By providing a single PUD that closely resembles the existing H-1 Zone in regards to uses, a consistent planning document can be used by KRH and the city for determining compliance of future projects. Regarding the signage, life safety is the primary issue when designing a signage program for a medical facility. It is imperative to give the first time visitor to the campus simple and clear directions throughout the campus, especially to the emergency room. As a visitor approaches the new sign program will help them determine the best entry point into the campus to help them get to the emergency entrance, then to other building entrances. III. Criteria for the Creation of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) District The intent of the PUD district is to serve as an overlay zoning district. The Kalispell Zoning Ordinance describes the intent of a PUD district as follows: "The district shall function in concert with one or more of the underlying zones to provide a comprehensive, integrated development plan which will serve to modify the underlying zone and, where appropriate, subdivision standards with the intent of providing flexibility of architectural design and density as well as providing the option to mix land uses and densities while preserving and enhancing the integrity and environmental values of an area." 20 Sections 27.19.020(4) of the zoning regulations provide that the Kalispell City Planning Board and Kalispell City Council shall review the PUD application based on the following criteria: Review of Application Based Upon PUD Evaluation Criteria: The zoning regulations provide that the planning board and city council shall review the PUD application and plan based on the following criteria: A. The compliance of the proposed PUD with the city growth policy and in particular the density and use policies of the plan; The Kalispell Growth Policy Future Land Use Map designates the 97 acre area proposed for the PUD overlay as urban mixed use. Chapter 4, policy 7 of the Kalispell Growth Policy lists the following parameters around development in the urban mixed use land use designation: a. Encourage the development of compact, centrally located service and employment areas that provide easy connections between existing commercial and residential neighborhoods. b. Within these corridor areas, provide for higher -intensity, mixed -use areas roughly two blocks on both sides of urban highways. As distance from the highway increases, create a gradual transition into the residential neighborhoods by encouraging multifamily, offices and other compatible uses as a transition tool with sensitivity to compatible design. c. Avoid encroachment into established, intact residential areas. d. Allow a compatible mix of higher -intensity uses including office as well as some commercial and light industrial; medium and high -density residential and public facilities. As stated in Section I of this report the proposed PUD overlay zoning would permit higher -intensity development in a compact, urban setting to compliment the larger medical neighborhood which has been established in this part of the city. The proposed overlay includes 15 feet setback when adjacent residential neighborhoods, which provides a buffer avoiding encroachment into established residential areas. The application also cites the following goal in the Kalispell Growth Policy that supports the requested deviations in the PUD. Goal 5 of chapter 6, The Economy, states the following: Strengthen Kalispell as a regional healthcare center that provides a broad spectrum of health care related services with diagnostic, therapeutic and varied medical services available. In addition chapter 6, policy 8 of the Kalispell Growth Policy states the 21 following: Support the Kalispell area's position as a regional commercial center and a location of major healthcare, government, industrial facilities and retail services. The proposed expansion plans help the hospital achieve the above stated goal and policy by providing the area's physicians with the needed space and state- of-the-art facility to serve the growing community. B. The extent to which the PUD departs from the underlying zoning and the reasons why such departures are or are not deemed to be in the public interest, and the mitigating conditions that the PUD provides to address the deviations; As stated above the owners are requesting deviations in regards to the "permitted" uses within the H-1 Zone, adding five (5) additional permitted uses not currently within the H-1 Zone and modifying the development standards in regards to setbacks, lot coverage, height and parking requirements. Further clarification of these deviations area described in Section 2 of this report. C. The extent to which the PUD departs from the subdivision regulations (if subdivision is anticipated) and the public works standards for design and construction applicable to the subject property, the reasons why such departures are deemed to be in the public interest, and the mitigating conditions that the PUD provides to address the deviations; The requested PUD will not deviate from the subdivision regulations or public work's standards for design and construction. D. The overall internal integrity of the PUD including the appropriate use of internal design elements, the use of buffers between different land uses, the use of transitions between uses of greater and lesser intensity, the use of enhanced design features to provide connectedness for both vehicle and pedestrian traffic throughout the PUD and the use of innovative and traditional design to foster more livable neighborhoods; Currently, the existing zoning is creating barriers for the long-term development of KRH campus. As a regional medical center, the KRH campus is growing into an urban campus which often creates difficulties when administering the existing H-1 Zoning and PUD overlays currently on the properties. If permitted, the PUD application request will allow for a holistic view of the entire 97 acre site, creating a campus environment that allows the site to functions as one. Current zoning segregates the properties into different zones/standards creating barriers to a unified development approach. Vehicle and pedestrian connectedness was discussed with representatives from KRH and city staff. The main hospital within the PUD boundary is located between two streets, Sunnyview Lane on the north and Conway Drive on the south. Currently, there is a north -south connection between the west wall of the 22 hospital and the Medical Arts Building. This connection is not adequate, so many visitors to the hospital either don't know the connection exists or use either U.S. 93 or the Medical Arts Building parking lot to connect the north side of the campus from the south. The new connection would generally connect at the intersection of Windward Way and Sunnyview Lane on the north and Conway Drive on the south (see Appendix G). The new north -south street connection would be constructed at the time the Medical Arts Building is demolished and a new building is constructed in its place. Pedestrian connectivity within the hospital campus has been a priority over the last decade, as the hospital was previously developed at a suburban -scale with little thought of the pedestrian. As shown by Appendix G, a majority of the area within the PUD boundary has developed with or installed pedestrian circulation. In order to ensure that pedestrian circulation gaps are completed, the proposed standards include a requirement that all development projects shall install missing right-of-way sidewalks along their property frontages. The standards also state that if the developed sidewalk falls within 100 feet of an existing right-of-way sidewalk, located on the same side of street, and missing segment is located along the frontage of a parcel under common ownership, the project shall install a sidewalk to connect the new and existing pedestrian connection. The master plan includes the construction of one or more possible parking structures (Appendix H). If developed, these structures will require a traffic impact study to determine any necessary improvements to existing city streets or intersections to accommodate the increased traffic typically associated with a parking structure. By requiring a traffic impact study and subsequent street improvements, if necessary, adequate provisions will be made to address the potential impacts the PUD overlay zoning district may have on transportation in the area. As with any commercial development, any new development within the PUD boundary would require both Site Review Committee and Architectural Review Committee approval. The Site Review Committee will review the public infrastructure components of the proposed project for appropriateness. The Architectural Review Committee will review the designs/materials of new development for general aesthetics. E. The nature and extent of the public parks and common open space in the PUD, the reliability of the proposal for maintenance and conservation of these areas and the adequacy or inadequacy of the amount and function of the parks and open space in terms of the land use, densities and dwelling types proposed in the PUD; A majority of the PUD boundary is going to be hospital/hospital related uses and there is no subdivision; accordingly, there is not a public parks and open space requirement. However, the KRH master plan indicates an effort by the hospital to increase the amount of open/green space and increase the visibility of the main hospital building's key entries along U.S. 93. At the intersection of 23 U.S. 93 and Sunnyview Lane the master plan shows a new "Health Lawn" which provides that key entry feature as well as open space area. The master plan also shows additional consolidation of buildings and parking to allow for the addition of open/green space. Per the application, KRH and the healthcare industry acknowledge that an open, welcome, and aesthetically appealing environment can play a role in patient healing. The master site plan works to incorporate this approach throughout the campus. KRH has indicated that as development occurs, areas of the campus will continue to be improved from a landscape perspective. There are no proposed deviations from the city landscaped ordinance requirements. A landscaped plan for all required landscaped areas will be reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Director. The master site plan also indicated potential multi -family housing at the northeast corner of the PUD boundary within the Women's, Children, and Family land use area. Multi -family housing would be required to supply recreational amenities as stipulated by Section 27.34.060 if the Kalispell Zoning Ordinance. Section 27.34.060 of the Kalispell Zoning Ordinance requires 500 square feet of land which has recreational value or recreational amenities equivalent to the fair market value of 500 square feet of undeveloped land; or combination thereof. F. The manner in which the PUD plan makes adequate provision for public services, provides adequate control over vehicular traffic and furthers the amenities of recreation and visual enjoyment; 1. Public Services: Police and Fire Services The expansion plans for the hospital will be constructed on property which is tax-exempt from the city's general fund levy. The city currently provides police and fire services to the hospital property and will continue to do so during and after the expansion plans are completed. The city, through the police and fire services provided, will continue to experience the cost and impacts of providing these services to the hospital. The hospital does have security personnel in place that likely reduces the number of services calls for the police and fire department. Water and Sewer There are existing water and sewer mains located all throughout the proposed PUD boundary and the city has the ability to serve the property and any future expansions. Any new water and sewer mains/service lines will be required to be installed per the City of Kalispell Construction and Design Standards Storm water Storm water runoff from the site shall be managed and constructed per the 24 City of Kalispell Construction and Design Guidelines. Final design will be approved by Kalispell Public Works Department prior to building permit issuance. Prior to receiving a building permit the developer will need to submit a construction storm water management plan to the Public Works Department. This plan will need to show how storm water will be treated and where it will be directed during construction activities. 2. Control Over Vehicle Traffic: As part of any future development of the site, any project creating more than 300 vehicle trips will require an additional traffic impact study report. The traffic impact study will analyze the traffic impacts associated with a development and recommend mitigation measures for the increase in traffic. Those recommendations will be implemented at the building permit stage of the development in order to mitigate the potential impacts of the associated development. Any development or redevelopment is reviewed by the city's site review committee to ensure any impacts to the transportation system are adequately addressed. 3. Recreational Amenities: No recreational amenities are required as part of the proposed expansion plans for the hospital. Recreational amenities are needed in residential developments or mixed commercial/residential developments where the project includes a new resident population. The master site plan also indicated potential multi- family housing at the northeast corner of the PUD boundary within the Women's, Children, and Family land use area. Multi -family housing would be required to supply recreational amenities as stipulated by Section 27.34.060 if the Kalispell Zoning Ordinance. Section 27.34.060 of the Kalispell Zoning Ordinance requires 500 square feet of land which has recreational value or recreational amenities equivalent to the fair market value of 500 square feet of undeveloped land; or combination thereof. 4. Visual Enjoyment The application indicated that KRH has made and is continuing to make an aesthetically appealing environment. The KRH master plan indicates an effort by the hospital to increase the amount of open/green space and increase the visibility of the main hospital building's key entries along U.S. 93. At the intersection of U.S. 93 and Sunnyview Lane the master plan shows a new "Health Lawn" which provides that key entry feature as well as open space area. The master plan also shows additional consolidation of buildings and parking to allow for the addition of open/green space. In addition to the increased green space, all development within the PUD boundary will be reviewed by the city's Architectural Review Committee for aesthetics. The application also includes standards as outlined within Appendix M of the application for the construction staging area. Historically, staff has received 25 complaints regarding the construction staging area in regards to the visual impacts. Appendix M includes fencing for visual screening to be utilized around the yard perimeter. The fencing will be of uniform color and inspected regularly with repairs completed as necessary. G. The relationship, beneficial or adverse, of the PUD plan upon the neighborhood in which it is proposed to be established in concert with the underlying zone; The intent of the H-1 zone is to provide medical facilities and support services for the sick, elderly and distraught in the community. The H-1 zone is not found throughout the city, it is concentrated in and around the existing hospital campus. The requested PUD overlay provides additional options to increase the development density with regards to permitted uses, height increases, setback reductions and parking requirements. This will enable the hospital and future support services to increase the number of services offered within the campus and not require these services to be spread throughout the city. H. In the case of a plan which proposes development over a period of years, the sufficiency of the terms and conditions proposed to protect and maintain the integrity of the PUD; The continued growth of the KRH campus will not be phased like a typical land development PUD, which would typically include large undeveloped properties, subdivisions, etc. that are constructed over a number of years. As outlined in the application, the growth and sequencing of projects is driven by community needs, changes in healthcare practices, and maintaining and updating the facilities within the PUD boundary. That being said, the PUD overlay itself includes standards, triggers, etc. that assure the integrity of the PUD is maintained. I. Conformity with all applicable provisions of this chapter. No other specific deviations from the Kalispell Zoning Ordinance can be identified based upon the information submitted with the application other than those addressed in this report. 26 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Kalispell City Planning Board and Zoning Commission adopt staff report KPUD-16-01 as findings of fact and recommend to the Kalispell City Council the PUD overlay zoning district for Kalispell Regional Healthcare be approved subject to the conditions listed below: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The Planned Unit Development overlay for Kalispell Regional Healthcare shall be provided as follows: KRH PUD OVERLAY ZONE Intent: A zoning district intended to provide hospitals and medical facilities and supportive services for the care of the sick, elderly and distraught. This zone is not intended to serve the general retail or overnight accommodation needs of the general public. Permitted uses: 1. Aircraft hangers 2. Airports and heliports 3. Athletic club and Wellness Facilities 4. Assembly halls/stadiums/convention hall facilities 5. Automobile parking - surface and structure 6. Barber and beauty services 7. Bed and breakfast 8. Church 9. Community center 10. Central Construction Staging Area 11. Day care - home (12 or fewer) - Center (13 or more) 12. Dwelling - Single family - Duplex - Townhouse (2 or more attached units) - Multi -family - Patient, Family, and Healthcare Support Housing - See definition below 13. Fairgrounds (public) 14. Funeral homes and crematoriums 15. Group home 27 - 8 or fewer persons 9 or more persons 16. Home occupations (refer to Section 27.20.060) 17. Homeless shelters 18. Hospital - Inpatient Hospital (including treatment centers and 24- hour care facilities) - Outpatient Ambulatory Care - Less than 24-hour stay 19. Jail Facilities (public) 20. Laboratories, tech research, development and testing 21. Office - Professional/government - Medical with limited overnight stay (less than 24 hours) 22. Parks 23. Patient RV Parking 24. Police and fire stations 25. Residential care home or facility 26. Restaurants 27. Retail, limited: - Book stores - Florist - Medical supplies and equipment - Opticians - Pharmacy - Gift shops - Coffee shops - Ancillary retail uses - Similar uses 28. Safe houses 29. Schools - K-12 (public or private) - Post -secondary (public or private) - Commercial 30. Utilities (primary distribution site) Property Development Standards: 1. Minimum Lot Area (sq. ft.): N/A 2. Minimum Lot Width (ft.): N/A 3. Minimum Setbacks (ft.): - Front Yard - 0* - Side Yard - 0* - Rear Yard - 0* - Side Corner - 0* - Attached Garage (Front/Side Corner) - 20 01 - Accessory Structures - N/A *Provide 15-foot setback where adjacent to residentially zoned property and where adjacent to Highway 93 corridor. 4. Maximum Building Height (ft.):100 Feet; over 100 feet subject to CUP. Provide for a buildin height envelope, created by a 1: 1 slope starting at a height of 60' at the property line of any residentially zoned property. 5. Permitted Lot Coverage (%): N/A 6. Off -Street Parking - Parking Ratios and design standards per City of Kalispell Zoning Ordinance. For sites located within the Parking Management Zone, see the Parking Management Plan. 7. Fences (refer to Section 27.20.040) - Maximum Heights (ft.): - Front - 4 (6.5 for construction staging area fence screening) - Side - 6.5 - Rear - 6.5 - Side Corner - 6.5 8. Signs - Signs 1.1-3.3 of Signage Development Guide 9. Outdoor lighting - Outdoor lighting shall comply with Chapter 27.26 in the City Zoning Ordinance. 10. Pedestrian Connectivity - Development projects should install missing right-of-way sidewalk along its property frontage as required by City requirements. If the developed sidewalk falls within 100 feet of an existing ROW sidewalk, located on the same side of the street, and the missing segment is located along the frontage of a parcel under common Ownership, the project should install sidewalk to connect the new and existing walkways. Definitions: Patient, Family, and Healthcare Support Housing - Housing related to a hospital function with a limited term stay. This includes but is not limited to patients, families, doctors, staff, and students. An example could be a patient that needs to be close to the hospital for treatment but is not appropriate for being admitted. 2. Parking shall be in compliance with the Parking Management Plan and Parking Management Zone as outlined in this report. 3. Signage types 1.1-2.2 as outlined in the Signage Development Guide of the application and their location shall be approved by the Kalispell Planning Director and Architectural Review Committee prior to installation. As these signs are directional in nature, they would not count towards the allowable signage of the property they are being placed on (host properly). 4. Signage types 3.1-3.3 as outlined in the Signage Development Guide of the application shall be reviewed at a ratio of 2 square feet per lineal foot of building 29 frontage. One (1) onsite freestanding sign is permitted, if more than one onsite freestanding sign is proposed, Section 27.22.090(1)(b) of the Kalispell Zoning Ordinance would apply. 5. The central construction staging area shall be in compliance with the Central Construction Staging Area Management Plan as outlined in this report. 6. A north -south road connection between Windward Way and Conway Drive, as generally shown on Appendix G, shall be constructed at the time the existing Medical Arts Building is demolished and a new building is constructed in its place. The connection shall be open to the public for vehicular access and pedestrians. 7. The proposed east -west pedestrian connection south of Brandan House and Alert Building, as generally shown on Appendix G, shall be completed within one (1) year of final approval of this PUD overlay. 8. That a development agreement be drafted by the Kalispell City Attorney between the City of Kalispell and the developer outlining and formalizing the terms, conditions and provisions of approval. The final plan as approved, together with the conditions and restrictions imposed, shall constitute the Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning for the site. 9. For multi -family residential projects, a minimum of 500 square feet of land per unit which has recreational value as determined by the Kalispell Parks and Recreation Director, or recreational amenities equivalent to the fair market value of 500 square feet of land shall be provided. 30 PEANNING FOR THE FUTURE Planning Department 201 1-t Avenue East Kalispell, MT 59901 Phone: (406) 758-7940 Fax: (406) 758-7739 www.kalispell.com/ planning APPLICATION FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) PROJECT NAME Kalispell Regional Healthcare PUD 1 2 3 NAME OF APPLICANT: Kalispell Regional Healthcare MAIL ADDRESS: 310 Sunnyview Lane CITY/STATE/ZIP: Kalispell, MT 59901 PHONE: NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER IF DIFFERENT THAN APPLICANT: 4. NAME: F1 MAIL ADDRESS: CITY/STATE/ZIP: TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE: MAIL ADDRESS: CITY/ STATE/ZIP: PHONE: PHONE: If there are others who should be notified during the review process, please list those. Toby McIntosh - Jackola Engineering & Architecture PO Box 1134 Kalispell, MT 59903 tmcintosh@jackola.com Check One: x Initial PUD proposal Amendment to an existing PUD A. B. C. 0 Property Address: Contains numerous properties - generally 310 Sunnyview Lane, Kalispell Total Area of Property: Approx. 97 Legal description including section, township 8, range: Portion of Gov't Lots 5-8, 13, and 14, section 6, T28N, R21W, Flathead County, Montana The present zoning of the above property is: H-1, PUD Medical, H-1/PUD, RA-1 11 E. Please provide the following information in a narrative format with supporting drawings or other format as needed: a. An overall description of the goals and objectives for the development of the project. b. In cases where the development will be executed in increments, a schedule showing the time within phase will be completed. C. The extent to which the plan departs from zoning and subdivision regulations including but not limited to density, setbacks and use, and the reasons why such departures are or are not deemed to be in the public interest; d. The nature and extent of the common open space in the project and the provisions for maintenance and conservation of the common open space; and the adequacy of the amount and function of the open space in terms of the land use, densities and dwelling types proposed in the plan; e. The manner in which services will be provided such as water, sewer, storm water management, schools, roads, traffic management, pedestrian access, recreational facilities and other applicable services and utilities. f. The relationship, beneficial or adverse, of the planned development project upon the neighborhood in which it is proposed to be established g. How the plan provides reasonable consideration to the character of the neighborhood and the peculiar suitability of the property for the proposed use. h. Where there are more intensive uses or incompatible uses planned within the project or on the project boundaries, how with the impacts of those uses be mitigated. How the development plan will further the goals, policies and objectives of the Kalispell Growth Policy. j. Include site plans, drawings and schematics with supporting narratives where needed that includes the following information: (1). Total acreage and present zoning classifications; (2). Zoning classification of all adjoining properties; (3). Density in dwelling units per gross acre; (4). Location, size height and number of stories for buildings and uses proposed for buildings; (5). Layout and dimensions of streets, parking areas, pedestrian walkways and surfacing; 2 (6). Vehicle, emergency and pedestrian access, traffic circulation and control; (7). Location, size, height, color and materials of signs; (8). Location and height of fencing and/or screening; (9). Location and type of landscaping; (10). Location and type of open space and common areas; (11). Proposed maintenance of common areas and open space; (12). Property boundary locations and setback lines (13). Special design standards, materials and / or colors; (14). Proposed schedule of completions and phasing of the development, if applicable; (15). Covenants, conditions and restrictions; (16). Any other information that may be deemed relevant and appropriate to allow for adequate review. If the PUD involves the division of land for the purpose of conveyance, a preliminary plat shall be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the subdivision regulations. Please note that the approved final plan, together with the conditions and restrictions imposed, shall constitute the zoning for the district. No building permit shall be issued for any structure within the district unless such structure conforms to the provisions of the approved plan. The signing of this application signifies that the aforementioned information is true and correct and grants approval for Kalispell Planning staff to be present on the property for routine monitoring and inspection during review process. i� /Z (Applicant Signature) (Date) KALISPELL REGIONAL HEALTHCARE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION KALISPELL REGIJ00 ONAL HEALTHCARE HKS u i rr n n ag r ! FEBRUARY 2017 KRL�SPELL R,EGIONRL, HI<S TABLE OF CONTENTS COVER TABLE OF CONTENTS APPLICATION NARRATIVE EXHIBITS/APPENDICES A. KRH PUD ZONING STANDARDS B. VICINITY MAP C. EXISTING ZONING D. PROPOSED PUD BOUNDARY & LEGAL DESCRIPTION E. PROPOSED PUD BOUNDARY WITH OWNERSHIP F. LAND USE PLAN G. EXISTING & PROPOSED CIRCULATION PLAN H. PARKING PLAN I. CONCEPT MASTERPLAN DRAWINGS J. TRAFFIC STUDY K. SIGNAGE DEVELOPMENT GUIDE L. PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN M. CENTRAL CONSTRUCTION STAGING MANAGEMENT PLAN IApplication Narrative Please provide the following information in o narrative format with supporting drawings or other format os needed: o. An overall description of the goals and objectives for the development of the project. The goals and objectives of the Kalispell Regional Healthcare (KRH) PUD, is to create a framework to organize growth and population healthcare for continued planned development of unknown timing and scope. As a regional medical center, the property and facilities have grown into a campus which often conflicts with the current H-1 zoning and the City of Kalispell Zoning Ordinance. KRH has worked with HKS Architects to develop a master site plan which looked at where and how the KRH Campus may grow, considering high flexibility for current and future health delivery. This master plan provides the framework to guide the PUD content and is included as a reference for the benefit of Staff, Council, and the Community. As is common with master plans, they are a snapshot in time and therefore require regular review and update. Similar to a growth policy in that they are not the regulation or law, the master plan is not being used as the PUD plan, but rather to guide the content in the proposed PUD to allow for implementing growth for approximately the next 25-30 years. The goals of the PUD are as follows: 1. Create a PUD overlay that better aligns with KRH adopted master site plan which recognizes KRH as the prime regional healthcare facility for today and the future. This includes incorporating a larger land area that generally follows the property owned or affiliated with KRH. 2. Consolidate the existing PUD boundaries. The current KRH campus is divided by two PUD's and the remainder of the property lies in the standard H-1 zone. The PUD will eliminate multiple boundaries dividing the campus as well as provide a comprehensive boundary to help guide growth. 3. Accommodate guided yet flexible growth that allows for adapting to growing community needs as well as the determinants of the ever changing healthcare delivery model. 4. Adopt zoning and development standards that are more appropriate for development of a modern hospital campus for inpatient and outpatient services. KRH and Healthcare in general has evolved significantly from when the original H-1 zone was developed. 5. Make reasonable predictions and assurances for an unpredictable future. 1IPage IApplication Narrative b. In cases where the development will be executed in increments, a schedule showing the time within phase will be completed. The continued growth of the KRH Campus is not phased like the typical land development PUD. The growth and sequencing of projects is driven by community needs, changes in healthcare practices, and maintaining and updating the facilities owned and operated by KRH. c. The extent to which the plan departs from zoning and subdivision regulations including but not limited to density, setbacks and use, and the reasons why such departures are or are not deemed to be in the public interest: Included in Appendix A is a summary of the standards for the KRH PUD zone. It is adapted from the current City of Kalispell H-1 zone as described in the Zoning Ordinance. This appendix also describes how the proposed standards deviate from the current zone and their impacts on the public. d. The nature and extent of the common open space in the project and the provisions for maintenance and conservation of the common open space; and the adequacy of the amount and function of the open space in terms of the land use, densities, and dwelling types proposed in the plan; As briefly mentioned above, the KRH masterplan was a result of an effort undertaken by HKS and KRH. A goal of the master site effort was to increase the amount of open/green space and increase visibility of the main hospital building key entries along Hwy 93. This resulted in an open area coined the Health Lawn as well as open spaces oriented to patient care space. The Health Lawn has started to take shape with the demolition of the old Evenson residence south of the Summit along Sunnyview Lane. The master site plan shows additional consolidation of buildings and parking to allow for the addition of open/green space. Dedicated park land is not required as this PUD is non-residential and not associated with a subdivision. However, developing an appealing campus is important to KRH and surrounding neighbors. It is difficult to find other locations around Kalispell that receive the same level of landscape and maintenance as KRH. While moving around campus, especially the main hospital building, you note the amount of plant material and the vibrant color of blooming flowers and shrubs. The healthcare industry has acknowledged that an open, welcome, and 2 1 P a g e IApplication Narrative aesthetically appealing environment can play a role in patient healing. The site master plan works to incorporate this approach and is apparent throughout campus. As development occurs, areas of the campus will continue to be improved from a landscape perspective. e. The manner in which services will be provided such as water, sewer, storm water management, schools, roads, traffic management, pedestrian access, recreational facilities and other applicable services and utilities. i. Water — City of Kalispell infrastructure is largely in place. Extension and relocation of existing infrastructure will be completed as required for future projects. ii. Sewer — City of Kalispell infrastructure is largely in place. Extension and relocation of existing infrastructure will be completed as required for future projects. iii. Storm Water — Privately owned system(s) owned and maintained by KRH. As development occurs, compliance with the applicable City of Kalispell stormwater regulations will need to be maintained. iv. Schools — Not applicable. The campus is located within School District 5. v. Roads — Existing streets and access points exist in and out of the Campus. As development will largely rely on existing infrastructure, modifications to public and private roads/driveways may be required for development and would be considered on a case by case basis. An existing and proposed circulation plan is provided in appendix G. vi. Traffic Management — A traffic study was completed by Abelin Traffic Services out of Helena and is attached to this report in Appendix J. As the PUD relies on existing roads and signaled intersections, the study has found no impact to existing Levels of Service for roads and intersections. vii. Pedestrian Access — The existing ROW's typically include boulevard sidewalks. As deemed appropriate and as required by City Standards, extension and connectivity to the existing infrastructure will be implemented as projects are developed. A circulation plan is provided in the appendices. viii. Recreational Facilities — N/A ix. Other services — N/A f. The relationship, beneficial or adverse, of the planned development project upon the neighborhood in which it is proposed to be established. 3 1 P a g e IApplication Narrative The KRH Campus already exists and therefore already interfaces with the surrounding neighborhood. The campus will continue to grow regardless of the implementation of a comprehensive PUD under the existing zoning and PUD designations. The PUD is being requested as a tool to help guide KRH and provide reasonable assurances for the City and neighborhoods through this growth. The PUD and master planning process undertaken by KRH provides the City and neighborhood a clearer picture of how the hospital intends to grow. Quality health care in the Flathead Valley is a benefit to the community as care can be provided close to home. Growth through the years has presented some challenges with the neighborhood. Based on discussions with the City and comments from residential neighbors, concerns are often raised regarding pedestrian connectivity, vehicle circulation, and impacts to Grandview. Some other comments have been from an operational standpoint such as late night snow removal and pedestrian crossings. The PUD provides an opportunity to help mitigate these concerns through planning as well as maintain a line of communication between KRH, the City, and neighbors. A neighborhood meeting was held May 26t", 2016 at KRH where the masterplan and Women's and Children's Pavilion project were presented to meeting attendees. The outcome was overwhelmingly positive and a number of attendees expressed their thanks for holding the informational meeting. Concerns largely focused on known issues for impacts to Grandview as well as pedestrian circulation. Separate from the PUD, questions regarding the Women's and Children's Pavilion were asked with respect to building height, mechanical equipment and lighting. All of which are reviewed by the City during building permit review process. The PUD and site master plan make efforts to reduce negative impacts to the surrounding neighborhood. As shown in the Land Use plan in Appendix F, the master plan identifies different 'use' areas on campus. As discussed in detail below, this includes areas for Community Health and Wellness, Inpatient and Outpatient Care, and the Women, Children, and Family Area. The Inpatient/Outpatient facilities are located at the Campus core focused around the existing hospital. Community health and wellness is focused out towards Hwy 93 for ease of access and visibility. The Women, Children, and family area is focused adjacent to the existing residential uses to help soften the more intense hospital uses at the campus core. All three of 4 1 P a g e IApplication Narrative these zones overlap interior to the PUD Boundary with the idea that uses will overlap and the transition of uses will be gradual. This is necessitated by a finite land area in which the campus can grow as well as the ever changing healthcare needs. g. How the plan provides reasonable consideration to the character of the neighborhood and the peculiar suitability of the property for the proposed use. Character of the surrounding property was taken into account in the PUD and master planning processes. The master site plan looked at three different zones or areas for the campus. These areas consist of the Community Health and Wellness area, the Inpatient and Outpatient Care area, and the Women, Children, and Family area. These areas are generally shown in the land use map shown in Appendix F. The intent of these zones is to not specifically include or exclude a type of use but rather guide the types of uses expected in areas of the Campus. Inpatient and Outpatient Care Area — This area is focused over the main hospital building. This is where the more intense care occurs that is typical of a hospital facility and is representative of its current use. This area is the densest development and also the largest height. Community Health and Wellness Area — This area is intended to be mostly outpatient uses such as clinics, health and wellness, pharmacies, etc. This zone is largely set along the Highway 93 frontage as they require easy access, high visibility, and interface well with the existing Hwy 93 corridor in terms of use and adjacent zones. This area is representative of its current use and predicts the most significant demolition and new development. Women, Children, and Family Area — This area is located in the NE portion of the campus to soften the hospital uses to the surrounding residential neighborhoods. This area focuses on family. Closer to the Inpatient/Outpatient area, the use will consist of the Women's and Children's Pavilion which provides hospital care services focused on women's and children's healthcare. As development approaches the residential neighborhood, uses would be focused on family services and housing for work force and patient families. 5 1 P a g e IApplication Narrative h. Where there are more intensive uses or incompatible uses planned within the project or on the project boundaries, how will the impacts of those uses be mitigated. The KRH campus lies within an existing H-1 zone with two different PUD overlays, therefore the continued growth is in alignment with existing zoning. The proposed PUD will border existing H-1 zoned properties to the northwest and south, residential properties to the northeast and east, and public to the east. To the west, the properties are largely B-2, General Business, with a few RA-1, residential apartment parcels. The west edge of the PUD is bordered by Hwy 93, which is topographically above the grade of these western properties resulting in little impact to those existing parcels. Generally speaking, the PUD boundary borders compatible uses with adjacent H-1 and B-2 zones. As an existing use, the impacts to the residential neighbors largely already exists. Mitigation of impacts to the neighboring residential uses is achieved through the land use areas discussed above and as presented in the overall master plan concept provided in Appendix I. By trying to focus women, children, and family oriented uses in the portions of the campus that abut residential uses, better compatibility is maintained. Efforts in the site master plan and the PUD design have been made to discourage use and connectivity to Grandview Drive which largely provides the divide between the hospital and the residential properties. KRH will work with their staff to discourage using Grandview Drive for vehicle access. As development occurs along residential properties, landscaping to aide in softening the impact will be completed where it doesn't already exist. Mature landscaping exists along most of the interface between the hospital property and the homes along the west side of Glacier View Drive as well as along the Buffalo Hill Townhomes west property line. Further, the NE corner of the proposed PUD was an old gravel pit and fill dump site. Development of the property could impact the neighborhood; however, until recently, this property was weed infested and riddled with construction debris. Development of this property removes blight from this neighborhood as well as provides infill development on parcels that will be costly to develop based on past uses. i. How the development plan will further the goals, policies and objectives of the Kalispell Growth Policy. 6 1 P a g e IApplication Narrative Several areas of the Kalispell Growth Policy align with the continued growth of KRH. Chapters 4 and 6 specifically list goals that reference growth of Regional Healthcare. Below are excerpts from the Growth Policy. Chapter 4, Land Use: Business and Industry goal states: "support the development and expansion of the Kalispell Regional Medical Center recognizing it as an important and desirable element in the economy that can be expanded on a regional basis and provide high-tech, high -quality health care and services while providing an important and high paying employment base." Chapter 6, Economy states: "Strengthen Kalispell as a regional healthcare center that provides a broad spectrum of healthcare related services with diagnostic, therapeutic, and varied medical services available." Chapter 8, Urban Design, Historic and Cultural Conservation: "New Development should contribute to the community quality of life and its attractiveness as a retirement and tourism destination." The excellent health care available to the community contributes to the quality of life and it continues to attract world class healthcare providers that seek the lifestyle NW Montana offers. Implementation of a KRH Campus PUD enables planned growth, which aligns with the Kalispell Growth Policy as shown above. j. Include site plans, drawings and schematics with supporting narratives where needed that includes the following information: 1. Total acreage and present zoning classifications — An overall PUD boundary map is included in the appendices as well as a current zoning designation map. The proposed PUD boundary contains approximately 97 acres of land largely owned or affiliated with KRH. 2. Zoning classification of all adjoining properties — Included in Appendix C is a current zoning map showing the zoning of properties adjoining the PUD. 3. Density in dwelling units per gross acre — Not applicable as this is not a residential PUD. 4. Location, size, height and number of stories for buildings and uses proposed for buildings — The master site plan concept provided with the PUD application shows numerous buildings throughout the campus. The building specifics have not been identified at this stage; however, the 7 1 P a g e IApplication Narrative proposed PUD development standards dictate the design with respect to height, setbacks, and uses. This information is provided in Appendix A. 5. Layout and dimensions of streets, parking areas, pedestrian walkways and surfacing — Not applicable. The streets and adjacent pedestrian ways are largely existing infrastructure. Where improvements become necessary, the street and sidewalk dimensions will match the existing section or the City's Public Works standard in place where appropriate. 6. Vehicle, emergency and pedestrian access, traffic circulation and control — A site circulation plan is included in Appendix G. As shown, a large portion of the street and pedestrian infrastructure is already in place. This plan generally defines the circulation routes for vehicles and pedestrians. As buildings are developed, connectivity to the core circulation routes will be incorporated where appropriate. Concerns over internal north -south connectivity will be addressed with improvements between the west wall of the hospital and the Medical Arts Building. Although timing is not addressed, the masterplan identifies that this current fire lane gets improved to allow for better circulation between Sunnyview Lane and Windward Way down to Conway Drive. Connectivity of the east side pedestrian pathway will be completed as part of the Emergency Department and Women's and Children's Pavilion projects. 7. Location, size, height, color and materials of signs — Signage guidelines are included in Appendix K, which have been developed in cooperation with Healthcare Graphics Consulting out of Dallas, Texas. These sign guidelines, once adopted with the PUD, will be used to develop a campus signage plan prior to implementation. Individual property sign permits shall be applied for and shall comply with these proposed sign standards. 8. Location and height of fencing and/or screening — Not applicable as fencing and or screening is not anticipated as part of the overall PUD. Screening will be implemented as appropriate to buffer adjacent residential uses as development occurs. 9. Location and type of landscaping - Not applicable as landscaping is not anticipated as part of the overall PUD. Landscaping will be completed 8 1 P a g e IApplication Narrative on a project specific basis and included with the site and building permit design submittals. 10.Location and type of open space and common areas - Not applicable as dedicated open space and common areas is not provided as part of the overall PUD. Creation of open space will be completed on a project specific basis and included with the site and building permit design submittals. The master site plan indicates an increase of open space with continued development of the campus. 11.Proposed maintenance of common areas and open space — KRH employs personnel and/or contracts maintenance of their grounds for all of their existing landscaping and open areas. These efforts will be adjusted as needed to continue to provide a well -maintained campus. 12.Property boundary locations and setback lines — A PUD Boundary map is provided in Appendix D. The legal boundary definition is also provided in that appendix. The setbacks will be identified on a case by case basis for projects and their impacted parcels. Setback standards are identified in the PUD zoning guidelines provided in Appendix A. 13.Special design standards, materials and/or colors — No special design standards or materials are set forth with the PUD. Development in the PUD is largely anticipated to fall under common KRH Ownership and therefore special design standards are not necessary. As with any project within the City Limits, a building project is required to be approved by the Architectural Review Committee prior to being issued a building permit. 14. Proposed schedule of completions and phasing of the development, if applicable — As discussed in the narrative sections above, the master site plan included with the application for reference is a 25 to 30-year plan. Implementation of building improvements will be largely dictated by community and healthcare needs. 15.Covenants, conditions and restrictions — No CCR's are proposed for the PUD as the Campus will fall largely under common KRH Ownership. As shown in the appendices, the proposed PUD boundary overlaps a number of existing zones and PUD's. One such overlap is with a portion of the Buffalo Commons Medical/Professional Facilities PUD and therefore amendments will be required to the existing PUD covenants. 9 1 P a g e IApplication Narrative The Medical/Professional CCR's have been previously amended based on KRH maintaining at least 75% Ownership of the land included within the PUD boundary and a similar approach would be used for future amendments. As the proposed PUD process could impact the amendments to the Medical/Professional CCR's, these changes will be made prior to final adoption of the PUD. 16.Any other information that may be deemed relevant and appropriate to allow for adequate review — None. 101 Page Appendix A - PUD Zoning Standards I KRH PUD Zoning Standard KRH PUD — PROPOSED STANDARDS Intent: A zoning district intended to provide hospitals and medical facilities and supportive services for the care of the sick, elderly and distraught. This zone is not intended to serve the general retail or overnight accommodation needs of the general public. Permitted uses: 1. Aircraft hangers 2. Airports and heliports 3. Athletic club and Wellness Facilities 4. Assembly halls/stadiums/convention hall facilities 5. Automobile parking — surface and structure 6. Barber and beauty services 7. Bed and breakfast 8. Church 9. Community center 10.Central Construction Staging Area 11. Day care - home (12 or fewer) - Center (13 or more) 12. Dwelling - Single family - Duplex - Townhouse (2 or more attached units) - Multi -family - Patient, Family, and Healthcare Support Housing — See definition below 13. Fairgrounds (public) 14. Funeral homes and crematoriums 15.Group home - 8 or fewer persons - 9 or more persons 16. Home occupations (refer to Section 27.20.060) 17. Homeless shelters 18. Hospital - Inpatient Hospital (including treatment centers and 24-hour care facilities) - Outpatient Ambulatory Care — Less than 24-hour stay 19.Jail Facilities (public) 20. Laboratories, tech research, development and testing 21. Office - Professional/government 1IPage I KRH PUD Zoning Standard - Medical with limited overnight stay (less than 24 hours) 22. Parks 23. Patient RV Parking 24. Police and fire stations 25. Residential care home or facility 26. Restaurants 27. Retail, limited: - Book stores - Florist - Medical supplies and equipment - Opticians - Pharmacy - Gift shops - Coffee shops - Ancillary retail uses - Similar uses 28. Safe houses 29. Schools - K-12 (public or private) - Post -secondary (public or private) - Commercial 30. Utilities (primary distribution site) Property Development Standards: 1. Minimum Lot Area (sq. ft.): N/A 2. Minimum Lot Width (ft.): N/A 3. Minimum Setbacks (ft.): - Front Yard — 0* - Side Yard — 0* - Rear Yard — 0* - Side Corner — 0* - Attached Garage (Front/Side Corner) — 20 - Accessory Structures — N/A *Provide 15-foot setback where adjacent to Residentially zoned property and where adjacent to Highway 93 corridor. 4. Maximum Building Height (ft.): 100 Feet; over 100 feet subject to CUP 5. Permitted Lot Coverage (%): N/A 6. Off -Street Parking — Parking Ratios and design standards per City of Kalispell Zoning Ordinance. For sites located within the Parking Management Zone, see the Parking Management Plan. 2 1 P a g e I KRH PUD Zoning Standard 7. Fences (refer to Section 27.20.040) - Maximum Heights (ft.): - Front — 4 (6.5 for construction staging area fence screening) - Side — 6.5 - Rear — 6.5 - Side Corner — 6.5 8. Signs — See KRH Signage Development Guide 9. Outdoor lighting — Outdoor lighting shall comply with Chapter 27.26 in the City Zoning Ordinance. 10. Pedestrian Connectivity — Development projects should install missing right-of- way sidewalk along its property frontage as required by City requirements. If the developed sidewalk falls within 100 feet of an existing ROW sidewalk, located on the same side of the street, and the missing segment is located along the frontage of a parcel under common Ownership, the project should install sidewalk to connect the new and existing walkways. Definitions: Patient, Family, and Healthcare Support Housing — Housing related to a hospital function with a limited term stay. This includes but is not limited to patients, families, doctors, staff, and students. An example could be a patient that needs to be close to the hospital for treatment but is not appropriate for being admitted. 3 1 P a g e IExisting H-1 Zoning Deviation Summary EXISTING H-1 ZONING DEVIATION SUMMARY Permitted Uses — The uses allowed in the H-1 zone are largely applicable to the uses currently found on the KRH Campus. A number of uses only allowed by a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) are common to healthcare uses as well. This includes: athletic clubs, heliports, and even hospitals. Therefore, all permitted uses in the H-1 zone and those only allowed by CUP will be considered a permitted use in the PUD. In addition to the H-1 allowed and CUP allowed uses, the following uses have been allowed: i. Patient, Family, and Healthcare Support Housing ii. Assembly Halls/Stadiums/Convention Hall Facilities iii. Central Construction Staging Area iv. Patient RV Parking v. Retail — Gift Shops, Coffee Shop, Ancillary Retail use Based on discussions with the City, two existing uses on campus have been problematic under the existing zoning. They are Construction Staging and the RV parking spaces. A brief discussion on each of these uses is provided. As a construction yard is not listed as an "allowed" use in the current zone, the reality is every construction project has a need for staging areas. Whether it's maintaining existing facilities or expanding into new, there has been a steady stream of projects on the KRH campus for more than the past decade. Construction activities shall comply with City Ordinances including but not limited to noise, dust, and construction storm water. Over the years, the main yard has largely stayed in the same location off of Heritage Way. It has fluctuated in size based on the project and construction needs and isolated laydown areas have been located adjacent to each construction site. The construction yard may need to be moved and ultimately will be removed when no longer necessary. Within the PUD, construction staging will be allowed adjacent to the specific project as well as a central location. This is required based on limited space adjacent to many projects and the size/magnitude of construction projects exceeding those typical of the Flathead Valley. See the enclosed Central Construction Staging Management Plan. An RV park is not listed as an allowed use in the current zone; however, an RV park is allowed by conditional use. As an allowed use in the PUD it is worth noting that the RV spaces provided at KRH do not constitute an RV Park in the traditional sense as they are not open to the public for rent or lease. The RV spaces are provided as an amenity limited to patients and their families' that are on campus for healthcare services. These are often out of town patients that are able to bring a familiar living space with them all while controlling their costs to be in the area for care. Based on this, the PUD will include Patient RV parking spaces as an allowed use. The current location is in the northern part of the campus. Growth in the number of spaces may be required in the 4 1 P a g e IExisting H-1 Zoning Deviation Summary future and will largely be driven by the needs of Patients. As the facility is truly not an RV park for camping, this is not perceived as a large impact to the public. Further, hookups are provided to eliminate the need for noisy generators and storing and hauling away of gray and black water. The permitted uses, including those added as part of the PUD, are not perceived as a negative impact to the community. By allowing for growth and expansion of the KRH campus from a medical and operations standpoint, it improves the medical services provided to the community. Further, this growth helps strengthen and support the Flathead Economy. By providing a single PUD, a consistent planning document can be used by KRH and the City for determining compliance of future projects. Development Standards — See the proposed development standards provided at the beginning of this appendix. The deviation to the existing design standards largely focuses on setbacks, building height, and parking. Deviation from these standards will be a benefit to the community in that is allows for concentrating building development to allow for an increase in open area and therefore anticipates little impact above existing improvements. The concept master plan included in the PUD for reference shows a general improvement to the "front" of the campus and provides for more green space. Upon review of the existing campus from aerial photography, it becomes readily apparent that there exists a lot of hard surface. Through the work of the master plan, consolidation of building and site improvements actually results in larger amounts of green space as shown in the concept drawing. i. Setbacks — The table below outlines the current H-1 setbacks and the proposed PUD setbacks. It is worth noting that the existing hospital PUD modified setbacks however this change does not cover a majority of the proposed PUD boundary. Setback Summary Setback Current H-1 PUD proposed* Front 15 ft 0 ft Side 5 ft 0 ft Rear 10 ft 0 ft Side Corner 15 ft 0 ft *Provide 15-foot setback where adjacent to Residentially zoned property and where adjacent to Highway 93 corridor 5 1 P a g e IExisting H-1 Zoning Deviation Summary ii. Building Height — The current H-1 zone allows for 60 feet with unlimited allowed with a Conditional Use Permit. The existing PUD covering the main hospital building allowed for 80 feet building heights to accommodate for the Surgical Services project. The proposed PUD would allow for 100-foot building heights. Building vertically may be the best use of available land as KRH continues to grow. Restrictions due to ALERT helicopter approaches would need to be considered with each specific building design and approved by appropriate regulatory agencies. iii. Off -Street Parking — Parking demand at KRH varies significantly from day to day and even hour to hour. It is highly dynamic and the perception of sufficiency of existing facilities is dependent on these fluctuations. Development at KRH has met the current ordinance in terms of the H-1 parking ratios; however, the parking counts rely on using offsite parking. This can become an issue in the fact that as parking has expanded to the north, the distance to the facilities served exceeds 300 feet and overlaps existing H-1 and PUD zones. The PUD deviates from the current ordinance with respect to off -site parking and a maximum 300-foot distance from the use to the parking facility. With a campus setting, the PUD will allow parking to be anywhere within the PUD boundary and proposes to meet or exceed the current zoning ordinance with respect to the number of spaces provided. The departure from the zoning ordinance to allow for parking to exceed 300 feet from the facilities they serve may be perceived as not being in the public's best interest. In reality, it's in KRH's best interest to provide adequate parking for patients, visitors, employees, and vendors. This means that as parking needs require being spread over a large area, a circulator shuttle and valet parking may be provided to effectively move people around campus. This also means as parking demands dictate, a parking structure will be provided. The parking map enclosed in Appendix H shows that KRH has a sufficient number of parking spaces throughout campus to accommodate the Women's and Children's Pavilion Project. As growth continues, the available land for surface parking will be reduced and will likely require parking structure(s). The future parking requirements will be calculated using the City of Kalispell Parking Ratios and as presented in the parking management plan. Based on a review of existing parking and areas available for surface parking development, it is projected that a garage may be required once the parking demand reaches the counts presented in the Post Women's and Children's Parking map included in appendix H. The proposed Full PUD Build -out Parking Structure plan included in Appendix H identifies possible locations for (3) three parking garages. The exact number of spaces, garages, or final locations are unknown at this time. Efforts to locate parking adjacent to the use will be made for stand-alone uses that are less 6 1 P a g e IExisting H-1 Zoning Deviation Summary connected to the main hospital functions. This could include housing or clinics for example. iv. Signs —The signage development guide included in appendices discusses the need to create a uniform look for a medical campus signage, provide the visitor with the correct visible signage at the correct time and location, and all while keeping it simple, affordable, and maintainable. As the primary concern for medical campus signing is life safety, it is imperative to provide simple and clear direction for the first time visitor and patients needing care. For these reasons, the proposed changes are a benefit, not a detriment, to the community. The proposed guide is included in appendix K and was developed in cooperation with Healthcare Graphics Consulting from Dallas, Texas and falls in line with accepted medical industry signage standards. The development guide addresses the types and quantities of signs allowed for the PUD and will allow for the development of a campus signage plan prior to implementing. Generally, the proposed guide modifies the number and size of signs allowed, but it also differentiates from the current City Ordinance in that it provides greater area for building freestanding, marquee (canopy) and wall signs from a quantity and size perspective. 7 1 P a g e Appendix B - Vicinity Map i ,t Appendix C - Existing Zoning Map a Q z z 0 N (D z H X w Appendix D - Proposed PUD Boundary & Legal Description Q 0 z D 0 m 0 D a Y LU W N 0 d 0 d THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOTS 5, 6, 7, 8, 13 AND 14 IN SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 28 NORTH, RANGE 21 WEST, FLATHEAD COUNTY, MONTANA DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING ATTHE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 3A OF THE AMENDED PLAT OF LOTS 3 & 4, HIGHLAND PARK SECOND ADDITION; THENCE N15°41'W ALONG THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF U.S. HIGHWAY No. 93, A DISTANCE OF 1430 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT 1 OF CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY No. 11287 AND BEING A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF HERITAGE WAY; THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY THE FOLLOWING FIVE (5) COURSES: S86°43'43"E, 119.30 FEET; ALONG A 434.63 FOOT RADIUS NON -TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH CENTER BEARING S03°2611311W, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 18o09'24", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 137.73 FEET; S68°25'48"E, 160.42 FEET; ALONG A 442.91 FOOT RADIUS NON -TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH CENTER BEARING N24°48'47"E, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09° 03'40", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 70.04 FEET; S85°06'47"E, 389.26 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1 OF HERITAGE PLACE, 1ST ADDITION AND BEING A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF WINDWARD WAY; THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY THE FOLLOWING FOUR (4) COURSES: 1\104°31'52"E, 148.34 FEET; ALONG A 220.00 FOOT RADIUS NON -TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH CENTER BEARING S85°39'33"E, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 44°18'38", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 170.14 FEET; N48°39'07"E, 55.99 FEET; ALONG A 530.00 FOOT RADIUS TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 08°08'29", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 75.31 FEET TO A POINT A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF BUFFALO COMMONS PHASE 1 AND BEING THE WESTERNMOST CORNER OF THE SOUTHERN PARK, COMMON AREA, UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT OF BUFFALO COMMONS PHASE 1; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY OF SAID BUFFALO COMMONS PHASE 1 THE FOLLOWING SIX (5) COURSES: S18°10'44"E, 148.56 FEET; S58°46'04"E, 113.74 FEET; S76°56'20"E, 165.28 FEET; N71°56'17"E, 219.17 FEET; N89°01'35"E, 53.96 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF RIDGEVIEW SUBDIVISION; THENCE S03°52'13"E ALONG SAID BOUNDARY, A DISTANCE OF 303.74 FEETTO THE NORTH LINE OF U.S. GOVERNMENT LOT 13; THENCE N89°05'56"E ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 770.22 FEETTO THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF GRANDVIEW DRIVE; THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY THE FOLLOWING FIVE (5) COURSES: S00°36'56"E, 229.46 FEET; S00°35'00"E, 113.50 FEET; N77°16'48"W, 46.30 FEET; S02°55'24"W, 130.17 FEET; AND S03°04'26"W, 99.95 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 4 OF GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS; THENCE S89°05'03"W ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 4, A DISTANCE OF 90.15 FEET TO THE WEST BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT; THENCE S02°51'33"W ALONG SAID WEST BOUNDARY, A DISTANCE OF 49.87 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THAT PARCEL SHOWN AND DESCRIBED ON CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY NO. 1852 ; THENCE S88o50'26"W ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF SAID PARCEL, A DISTANCE OF 39.18 FEETTO THE WEST BOUNDARY OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST BOUNDARY S03°02'2611W, A DISTANCE OF 49.68 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT A OF AMENDED PLAT OF LOTS 2 & 3 OF GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS; THENCE ALONG THE WEST BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT S02o59'41"W, A DISTANCE OF 80.17 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT B OF AMENDED PLAT OF LOTS 2 & 3 OF GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS; THENCE ALONG THE WEST BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT S02o52'57"W, A DISTANCE OF 34.98 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH BOUNDARY GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS ADDITION No. 2; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH BOUNDARY THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES: N86°59'47"W, 89.74 FEET; N87°00'29"W, 129.37 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 3 OF GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS ADDITION No. 2; THENCE ALONG THE WEST BOUNDARY OF SAID GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS ADDITION No. 2 S03°02'30"W, A DISTANCE OF 280.09 FEETTO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1 OF GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS ADDITION NO. 2; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT S75°31'22"E, A DISTANCE OF 57.03 FEET TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF GLACIER VIEW DRIVE; THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES: ALONG A 81.00 FOOT RADIUS NON -TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH CENTER BEARING S45°01'3811E, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 38°55'40", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 55.03 FEET; S05°07'41"E, 25.63 FEET; AND S03oO3'19"W, A DISTANCE OF 89.91 FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF SUNNY VIEW LANE; THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY N89°09'02"E, A DISTANCE OF 67.13 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S00°50'44"E AND LEAVING SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY, A DISTANCE OF 59.69 FEETTHE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ADDITION NO. 64 BUFFALO HILL TOWNHOUSES; THENCE ALONG THE WEST BOUNDARY OF SAID ADDITION S02o49'55"W, A DISTANCE OF 430.69 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF THAT PARCEL DESCRIBED IN BOOK 369 PAGE 423; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH AND WEST BOUNDARIES OF SAID PARCEL THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES: S87°56'27"W, 2.88 FEET AND S02o53'47"W, 399.94 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF PARCEL A OF CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY NO. 14535; THENCE S47°32'27"W ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID PARCEL, A DISTANCE OF 84.47 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 2 OF HIGHLAND PARK FIRST ADDITION; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH AND WEST BOUNDARIES OF SAID LOT THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES: S89°24'37"W, 280.56 FEET AND S03°01'37"W, 258.47 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1 OF HIGHLAND PARK FIRST ADDITION; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH AND WEST BOUNDARIES OF SAID LOT THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES; S89°24'00"W, 100.00 FEET AND S03°00'59"W, 140.28 FEET; THENCE S89°24'37"W, A DISTANCE OF 202.72 FEET TO THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF CLAIRMONT STREET; THENCE NO3°01'00"E ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY, A DISTANCE OF 17.07 FEET; THENCE S89°15'12"W AND LEAVING SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY, A DISTANCE OF 61.49 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1 OF HIGHLAND PARK No. 5; THENCE S89°15'12"W ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT, A DISTANCE OF 575.24 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THIS AREA CONTAINS 96.3 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. Appendix E - Proposed PUD Boundary with Parcel Ownership Appendix F - Land Use Plan z Q J d W N D 0 z Q J Appendix G - Existing & Proposed Circulation Plan z Q J d z 0 Q J D U U (7 z H V) X w z Q J d z O Q J D U U 0 w V) O a O a Appendix H - Parking Plans «M, �§ \ \\ \\\,,,, 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2§ o2 0 / : ! - : - !- - Z)))) &&&;\§z � � � " Appendix I - Concept Master Plan Drawings Aij .- IAIOA INA, -AN I .VFTF llioti owlw COW. LU = LU Ap 'Al lood -cc Nr- CD LU LU ik .04 All L IWO L U 1*4 A Ll to Fir 4 -J don 7!1 OW � tl A Amps ps wim oWIN Z d W h Elm . �1 W Q LQL 2 Q U 2 � J J Q W J Q z O O O W O 2 2 J 2 Y J O � W = d d f7 h W -i Z Q Y #MP of hd LU now � cm i d' m , m, � Z �1 • LU �� o J LU \�11 2 Z Appendix J - Traffic Study • • abelin traffic services Prepared For: Kalispell Regional Healthcare PUD Traffic Impact Study Kalispell Regional Healthcare Corporation 310 Sunnyview Lane Kalispell, MT 59901 July, 2016 Kalispell, Montana 130 South Howie Street Helena Montana 59601 Kalispell Regional Healthcare PUD Traffic Impact Study Kalispell, Montana Table of Contents A. Executive Summary...................................................................................... I B. Project Description........................................................................................ I C. Existing Conditions........................................................................................ I Adjacent Roadways..............................................................................2 TrafficCounts........................................................................................3 HistoricTraffic Data...............................................................................3 Levelof Service.....................................................................................4 D. Proposed Development..............................................................................4 E. Trip Generation and Assignment................................................................5 F. Trip Distribution..........................................................................................6 G. Traffic Impacts Outside of the Development...............................................8 H. Impact Summary & Recommendations......................................................9 List of Figures Figure 1 — Proposed Development Site...................................................................2 Figure 2 — Proposed Development..........................................................................5 Figure 3 — Hourly Trip Generation & Vehicle Accumulation....................................7 Figure4 —Trip Distribution....................................................................................... 7 List of Tables Table 1 — Historic Traffic Data.................................................................................4 Table 2 — Existing 2016 Level of Service Summary................................................4 Table 3 — Trip Generation Rates............................................................................. 6 Table 4 — Level of Service Summary With Development........................................8 Kalispell Regional Healthcare PUD Traffic Impact Study Kalispell, Montana Kalispell Regional Healthcare PUD Traffic Impact Study Kalispell, Montana A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The proposed Kalispell Regional Healthcare PUD includes the construction of a 164,000 S.F. Women's & Children's Pavilion and the ultimate full PUD buildout which will increase traffic volumes by 10-15% on the medical campus. As proposed the addition of the Women's and Children's Pavilion to the KRH facilities will not have a major impact on the traffic conditions in this area. Most roads and intersections will continue to function at an acceptable LOS with the new addition. The intersection of Heritage Way with Highway 93 will continue to have a poor LOS for left -turn traffic, but will not warrant additional intersection control. The expansion will not have an effect on the overall LOS at this intersection and it is unlikely that MDT would approve any additional traffic signals along this portion of U.S. Highway 93 between the existing signals. No new road or intersection improvement would be necessary with the completion of the Women's & Children's project. With the full build -out of the KRH PUD it is expected that traffic volumes on the roadways within the development will increase by an additional 10%. While most of the roads and intersections within the KRH campus have sufficient reserve capacity to accommodate additional traffic, some road widening may be desirable along the west end of Sunnyview Lane. The hospital will also need to address pedestrian crossing needs as additional parking is constructed north of Sunnyview Lane. B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION This document studies the possible effect on the surrounding road system from the proposed expansion of the Kalispell Regional Healthcare (KRH) facility. The document provides specific impacts projections and improvement recommendations for the Women's & Children's Pavilion and general information about the full build -out of the PUD. The document identifies traffic mitigation efforts that the facility may require. C. EXISTING CONDITIONS The KRH facility consists of approximately 100-acres of property dedicated to the healthcare needs of the Kalispell region. The healthcare facility provides a wide range of medical services from the central hospital facility and the surrounding campus. The campus currently has over 2,400 employees and 300 hospital beds between the different facilities. See Figure 1 for a location map of the KRH facility. Abelin Traffic Services 1 July, 2016 Kalispell Regional Healthcare PUD Traffic Impact Study Kalispell, Montana Adjacent Roadways U.S. Highway 93 is a five -lane north/south principal arterial route that extends through the City of Kalispell. The road has a posted speed limit of 45 MPH and carries 26,400 VPD south of Conway Drive and 27,900 VPD south of Four Mile Drive. In this area, Highway 93 is signalized at Northridge Drive, Meridian Road, Sunnyview Lane, and Conway Drive. Meridian Road is an arterial route that connects to U.S. Highway 93 from the west. The road crosses U.S. Highway 93 and becomes a one-way street into the KRH campus and provides access to a variety of medical outbuildings and properties outside of the PUD. The road has a paved width of 36 feet and currently carries 16,400 VPD west of 93 and 1,400 VPD east of 93. Heritage Way is an east/west route that connects to the northern portion of the KRH campus. The road has a paved width of 36 feet and provides access to the medical campus and the commercial and residential area to the north. Traffic data collected by ATS in 2016 indicates that the road currently carries 3,800 VPD. Sunnyview Lane is a two-lane east/west route that passes through the KRH site and is the primary access route for KRH facilities. Sunnyview lane has an existing pedestrian crossing located east of Windward Way and has a four way STOP at Heritage Way. The road has a paved width of 30 feet. Traffic data collected by ATS in 2016 indicates that the road currently carries 7,100 VPD. Conway Drive is an east/west route that extends east from Highway 93 into the KRH site. The intersection with 93 is currently signalized. The road has a paved width of 36 feet. Traffic data collected by ATS in 2016 indicates that the road currently carries 2,100 VPD. Windward Way extends into the residential areas north of the KRH campus. The road has a paved width of 30 feet. Traffic data collected by ATS in 2016 indicates that the road currently carries 900 VPD. Claremont Street extends south from the KRH facilities. The road has a paved width of 34 feet. Traffic data collected by ATS in 2016 indicates that the road currently carries 1,900 VPD. The road provides access to a variety of care facilities and a residential area south of the KRH campus. Grandview Drive extends east form the KRH facilities and turns to the north through the rural residential areas east of the medical center. The road ultimately connects with Four Mile drive to the north. The road has a posted speed limit of 25 MPH and a paved width of 22-30 feet with a rural cross-section. Traffic data collected by ATS in 2016 indicates that the road currently carries 400 VPD. Abelin Traffic Services 2 July, 2016 Kalispell Regional Healthcare PUD Traffic Impact Study Kalispell, Montana Traffic Counts In May 2016 Abelin Traffic Services (ATS) collected vehicle use information at locations around the KRH campus. The data collection included peak -hour turning movement counts at the intersections along Highway 93 including Heritage Way, Meridian Road, Sunnyview Lane, and Conway Drive. ATS also collected 24-hour directional traffic counts at all entrances to the medical center and week-long counts on Sunnyview Lane and Grandview Drive. The raw traffic data is included in Appendix A of this report. The raw data collected for this project was adjusted for seasonal variation in accordance with the data collected from MDT's annual count station located on US Highway 2, 1.3 miles west of Kalispell (Station A-24). This count station data indicated that data collected in May is approximately 105% of the AADT (Average Annual Daily Traffic) volume in this area. Historic Traffic Data Abelin Traffic Services collected historic traffic data for the surrounding road system to help develop historic background growth rates for the area. The information indicates that traffic volumes along this section of U.S. Highway 93 have increased at a rate of 2% annually over the past ten years. Abelin Traffic Services 3 July, 2016 Kalispell Regional Healthcare PUD Traffic Impact Study Kalispell, Montana Table 1 - Historic Average Daily Traffic Data Station Location ID 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Hwy 93 S. of 15-7B- Conway Dr. 014 23,930 24,000 25,460 25,150 26,080 24,690 27,020 26,060 24,600 26,399 Meridian Rd. 15-7B- N. of 93 038 11,220 10,850 12,300 12,550 13,380 13,700 14,280 13,500 14,550 16,379 Hwy 93 S. of 15-7B- 4-Mile Dr. 016 25,620 25,700 31,890 31,790 35,660 32,590 34,850 35,520 33,510 27,935 Level of Service Using the data collected for this project, ATS conducted a Level of Service (LOS) analysis at area intersections. This evaluation was conducted in accordance with the procedures outlined in the Transportation Research Board's Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) - Special Report 209 and the Highway Capacity Software (HCS) version 6.7. Intersections are graded from A to F representing the average delay that a vehicle entering an intersection can expect. Typically, a LOS of C or better is considered acceptable for peak -hour conditions. Table 2-Existing 2016 Level of Service Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Highway 93 Intersection I Delay (Sec.) LOS Delay (Sec.) LOS Heritage Way 24.1 C 49.6 E Meridian Road 18.1 B 18.3 B Sunny View Lane 7.3 A 15.3 B Conway Drive 4.9 A 11.6 B Table 1 shows the existing 2016 LOS for the AM and PM peak hours without the traffic from the medical center expansion. The LOS calculations are included in Appendix C. The analysis shows that most of the intersections in this area are operating at an acceptable level of service except for the Highway 93/Heritage way which is currently experiencing excessive delay for traffic turning left onto Highway 93 under peak -traffic conditions. Although the number of vehicles attempting to make this maneuver is very low (<10 VPH), the delay for these vehicles is high. The intersection does not currently have sufficient traffic volumes to meet any signalization warrants. D. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The current expansion proposal for the KRH facilities includes the addition of a Women's & Children's Pavilion. The new facility would be added onto the east side of the main hospital complex. The Women's & Children's Pavilion would have 164,691 S.F. of floor space on three Abelin Traffic Services 4 July, 2016 Kalispell Regional Healthcare PUD Traffic Impact Study Kalispell, Montana floors. The first floor would include 36 beds and the second floor would house medical offices which would be moved from existing areas of the campus. The third floor would be built as shell space to house additional hospital services as the medical campus continues to develop. The Women's and Children's Pavilion will be opened the spring of 2018. In is not expected that full development of the PUD would occur before 2040. The current Women's & Children's Pavilion expansion plan is shown in Figure 2. E. TRIP GENERATION AND ASSIGNMENT ATS performed a trip generation analysis to determine the anticipated future traffic volumes using the trip generation rates contained in Trip Generation (Institute of Transportation Engineers, Ninth Edition). These rates are the national standard and are based on the most current information available to planners. A vehicle "trip" is defined as any trip that either begins or ends at the development site. ATS determined that the critical traffic impacts on the Abelin Traffic Services 5 July, 2016 Kalispell Regional Healthcare PUD Traffic Impact Study Kalispell, Montana intersections and roadways would occur during the weekday morning and evening peak hours. According to the ITE trip generation rates the Women's & Children's Pavilion would produce 148 AM peak hour trips, 149 PM peak hour trips, and 1,867 daily trips. The trip generation rates and totals are shown in Table 3. Table 3 - Trip Generation Rates AM Peak Total AM PM Peak Total PM Hour Trip Peak Hour Trip Peak Weekday Total Ends per Hour Trip Ends per Hour Trip Trip Ends Weekday Land Use Units Unit Ends Unit Ends per Unit Trip Ends Floor 1 W 36 & C Center Beds 1.32 48 1.42 51 12.94 466 Floor 2 W 52K & C Center S.F. 0.95 49 0.93 48 13.22 687 Floor 3 W 54K & C Center S.F. 0.95 51 0.93 50 13.22 714 TOTAL 1 148 149 1,867 The traffic data collected at the entrances to the KRH was analyzed to develop a total trip generation and parking accumulation for the campus based on the hourly vehicle entering and exiting data collected in May 2016. The data suggests that the total daily trip generation from KRH is 20,360 trips/day and the maximum vehicle accumulation observed was 1,980 vehicles. Taking into account the trip distribution proportions, the campus currently accounts for 25% to 29% of the traffic on U.S. Highway 93 in this area. The hourly trip generation and vehicle accumulation is shown in Figure 3. It is expected that traffic from the Woman's & Children's Pavilion would account for a 8% increase in traffic at the KRH facilities. As the KRH campus continues to expand to the full buildout of the PUD it is expected that employment and services will increase by an additional 10%. Total trip generation will likely increase by a similar amount (approximately 2,000 VPD). F. TRIP DISTRIBUTION The traffic distribution and assignment for the proposed expansion was based upon the existing ADT volumes along the adjacent roadways and the peak -hour turning volumes. Traffic is expected to distribute onto the surrounding road network as shown on Figure 4. Abelin Traffic Services 6 July, 2016 Kalispell Regional Healthcare PUD Traffic Impact Study Kalispell, Montana Figure 3 - Hourly Trip Generation and Vehicle Accumulation 2500 4919191 1500 1000 500 00 .60 .00 .00 00 00 00 00 00 0 00 00 .00 .00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 .00 .00 O• ti. L• �' �• 4 b. A 4i' �i' y0 yti' titi ,y'�' tiD ti tip' tit' ■ IN ■ OUT ■ Accumulation Based on data collected May 27 to June 1, 2016. 36% Figure 4 - Trip Distribution 5% 1 Windward Way Heritage Way Meridian Rd. 8% Sunnyview Ln. M d7 A cU 3 0) so Conway Dr. 38% KRH Campus Claremont St. 10% e 3% Grandview Dr. Abelin Traffic Services 7 July, 2016 Kalispell Regional Healthcare PUD Traffic Impact Study Kalispell, Montana G. TRAFFIC IMPACTS OUTSIDE THE DEVELOPMENT Using the trip generation and trip distribution numbers, ATS determined the future Level of Service for the area intersections. The anticipated intersection LOS with the Women's & Children's Pavilion is shown in Table 4. These calculations are based on the projected model volumes included in Appendix B of this report. Table 4 - Level of Service Summary with W & C Center AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Highway 93 intersection I Delay Sec. LOS Delay Sec. LOS Heritage Way 24.5 C 57.6 F Meridian Road 18.2 B 18.7 B Sunny View Lane 7.8 A 16.1 B Conway Drive 5.3 A 12.2 B Table 3 indicates that most of the intersections in this area will continue to function adequately with the additional traffic from the Women's & Children's Pavilion. Total delay at the signalized approaches on Highway 93 will increase by less than one second during the peak hours. The Heritage Way intersection is currently experiencing higher levels of delay, but does not warrant additional traffic control. The Women's & Children's Pavilion expansion will not have a significant effect on the overall LOS at this intersection and it is unlikely that MDT would approve any additional traffic signals along this portion of U.S. Highway 93 between the existing signals. It is expected that the KRH campus will expand by an additional 10% with the full buildout of the PUD. The existing approaches along Highway 93 are expected to function adequately with the Women's & Children's Pavilion and have significant reserve capacity, but could experience additional delay in the future with the current road configuration. It is expected that the completion of the Kalispell bypass will change traffic patterns within the Kalispell community and will likely decrease through -traffic volumes on Highway 93 adjacent to KRH center. This decrease will improve the operations of the existing intersections and should allow KRH to fully expand without causing any traffic disruptions along Highway 93. Traffic volumes on the internal road system within the KRH campus will range from 2,000 to 8,000 and will increase by only 8% with the addition of Women's & Children's Pavilion. The existing four-way STOP controls at Sunnyview Lane/Heritage Way and Windward Way/Heritage Way are an effective way to control traffic through the campus and are appropriate for encouraging lower vehicle speeds. Traffic volumes on Sunnyview Lane will reach 7,500 VPD with the construction of the Women's & Children's Pavilion. Typically any road carrying more than 8,000 VPD should be considered for a three -lane cross section to improve capacity. However, adding additional lanes and road width can increase vehicle speeds, which is not desirable on the campus. Abelin Traffic Services 8 July, 2016 Kalispell Regional Healthcare PUD Traffic Impact Study Kalispell, Montana The addition of the Women's & Children's Pavilion will have a limited impact on Grandview Drive. Currently only 3% of the traffic from the hospital uses Grandview Drive to access the campus. The addition of the Woman's & Children's Pavilion will add approximately 30 daily vehicle trips to Grandview Drive (3 vehicles per hour). Total traffic volumes on Grandview Drive will be less than 450 VPD. If vehicle speeds become a concern it may be of value to perform a speed study on Grandview Drive to determine if drivers are adhering to the 25 MPH speed limit and if speed mitigation may be warranted. This is a general recommendation and is not specifically tied to the KRH PUD. The KRH facility will need to address pedestrian crossing needs as the campus continues to expand. A pedestrian crossing study performed by ATS in December 2015 suggested that an additional pedestrian crossing may be warranted along the eastern portion of Sunnyview Lane with the development of the Women's & Children's Pavilion, depending on the location of any new entrances to the Women's & Children's Pavilion. It is expected that 803 additional parking spots will be constructed north of Sunnyview Lane and 211 existing parking spaces will be eliminated south of Sunnyview Lane, increasing the number of pedestrians crossing Sunnyview Lane and Heritage Way at a variety of locations as the KRH facilities expands. It would be desirable to construct any future parking areas to funnel pedestrians to specific locations and provide designated pedestrian crossings as needed. H. IMPACT SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS As proposed the addition of the Women's and Children's Pavilion to the KRH facilities will not have a major impact on the traffic conditions in this area. Most roads and intersections will continue to function at an acceptable LOS with the new addition. The intersection of Heritage Way with Highway 93 will continue to have a poor LOS for left -turn traffic, but will not warrant additional intersection control. The expansion will not have an effect on the overall LOS at this intersection and it is unlikely that MDT would approve any additional traffic signals along this portion of U.S. Highway 93 between the existing signals. No new road or intersection improvement would be necessary with the completion of the Women's & Children's project. With the full build -out of the KRH PUD it is expected that traffic volumes on the roadways within the development will increase by an additional 10%. While most of the roads and intersections within the KRH campus have sufficient reserve capacity to accommodate additional traffic, some road widening may be desirable along the west end of Sunnyview Lane. The hospital will also need to address pedestrian crossing needs as additional parking is constructed north of Sunnyview Lane. Abelin Traffic Services 9 July, 2016 APPENDIX A Traffic Data agaILIA .1ugp Sewice6 130 S. Howie Street Helena, MT 59601 File Name : HeritageAMtmc Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 5/26/2016 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Unshifted - Bank 1 93 Heritage 93 Heritage Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound StartTlme Right Thru Left Peds App. Tow Right Thru Left Peds App.Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 07:30 AM 0 272 22 0 294 14 0 1 0 15 15 249 0 0 264 0 0 1 0 1 574 07:45 AM 0 343 28 0 371 18 0 2 0 20 19 288 0 0 307 0 0 1 0 1 699 Total 0 615 50 0 665 32 0 3 0 35 34 537 0 0 571 0 0 2 0 2 1273 08:00 AM 0 284 29 0 313 10 0 2 0 12 17 250 0 0 267 0 0 0 0 0 592 08:15 AM 0 254 18 0 272 12 0 3 0 15 10 232 0 0 242 0 0 0 0 0 529 Grand Total 0 1153 97 0 1250 54 0 8 0 62 61 1019 0 0 1080 0 0 2 0 2 2394 Apprch % 0 92.2 7.8 0 87.1 0 12.9 0 5.6 94.4 0 0 0 0 100 0 Total % 0 48.2 4.1 0 52.2 2.3 0 0.3 0 2.6 2.5 42.6 0 0 45.1 0 0 0.1 0 0.1 Unshifted 0 1151 97 0 1248 54 0 8 0 62 61 1016 0 0 1077 0 0 0 0 0 2387 % Unshifted 0 99.8 100 0 99.8 100 0 100 0 100 100 99.7 0 0 99.7 0 0 0 0 0 99.7 Bank 1 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 2 7 % Bank 1 0 0.2 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.3 0 0 0.3 0 0 100 0 100 0.3 N O N N O N (N y� o F J 000 ONN L� C ♦- 0 0 0 LOO7��l O O � O r 0000 a)a Out In Total 2318 M2325 1075 1250 0 1151 97 0 0 2 0 0 0 1153 97 0 Right Thru Left Peds North 5/26/2016 0730 AM 5/26/2016 08:15 AM Unshifted Bank 1 F+ Left Thru Ri ht Peds 0 1016 61 0 0 3 0 0 01 1 01 91 61 0 1161 1080 2241 Out In Total A O A U co U C 000 C O O 0 _ � r m N m O N mom N N N OU a N N N N 000 0 0 0— agaILIA .1ugp Sewice6 130 S. Howie Street Helena, MT 59601 File Name : HeritagePMtmc Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 5/25/2016 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Unshifted - Bank 1 93 Heritage 93 Heritage Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound StartTlme Right Thru Left Peds App. Tow Right Thru Left Peds App.Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 04:30 PM 0 354 2 0 356 22 0 1 0 23 9 390 0 0 399 0 0 0 0 0 778 04:45 PM 0 364 7 0 371 27 0 2 0 29 11 409 0 0 420 0 0 1 0 1 821 Total 0 718 9 0 727 49 0 3 0 52 20 799 0 0 819 0 0 1 0 1 1599 05:00 PM 0 435 4 0 439 32 0 1 0 33 12 483 0 0 495 0 0 0 0 0 967 05:15 PM 1 401 3 0 405 20 0 4 0 24 7 454 0 0 461 0 0 0 0 0 890 Grand Total 1 1554 16 0 1571 101 0 8 0 109 39 1736 0 0 1775 0 0 1 0 1 3456 Apprch % 0.1 98.9 1 0 92.7 0 7.3 0 2.2 97.8 0 0 0 0 100 0 Total % 0 45 0.5 0 45.5 2.9 0 0.2 0 3.2 1.1 50.2 0 0 51.4 0 0 0 0 0 Unshifted 0 1553 16 0 1569 101 0 8 0 109 39 1732 0 0 1771 0 0 0 0 0 3449 % Unshifted 0 99.9 100 0 99.9 100 0 100 0 100 100 99.8 0 0 99.8 0 0 0 0 0 99.8 Bank 1 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 1 7 % Bank 1 100 0.1 0 0 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0.2 0 0 100 0 100 0.2 N ONN 0-- 0 F J 000 C ♦- 0 0 0 V L � O 000� a Out In Total 3402 1838 1571 1:34029 0 1553 16 0 1 1 0 0 1 1554 16 0 Right Thru Le� Peds North 5/25/2016 0430 PM 5/25/2016 05:15 PM Unshifted Bank 1 F+ Left Thru Ri ht Peds 0 1732 39 0 0 4 0 0 01 17361 39 0 1562 1775 3 5 Out In Total O U U U O O U �000 0 _ 0� r m o m �5 mom a m o j8U O OOO age& .1ugp Sewice6 130 S. Howie Street Helena, MT 59601 21Ca►FT MMLVACa'i o - Moo Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 5/26/2016 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Unshifted - Bank 1 93 MERIDIAN 93 MERIDIAN Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound StartTlme Right Thru Left Peds App. Tow Right Thru Left Peds App.Total Right Thru Left Peds App.T.1 Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 07:30 AM 99 173 1 0 273 0 0 0 0 0 20 184 31 3 238 15 14 81 3 113 624 07:45 AM 102 232 11 0 345 0 0 0 0 0 18 176 26 0 220 37 21 132 0 190 755 Total 201 405 12 0 618 0 0 0 0 0 38 360 57 3 458 52 35 213 3 303 1379 08:00 AM 93 190 3 0 286 0 0 0 0 0 17 175 9 0 201 23 19 92 0 134 621 08:15 AM 80 172 5 0 257 0 0 0 0 0 22 157 16 0 195 19 20 85 1 125 577 Grand Total 374 767 20 0 1161 0 0 0 0 0 77 692 82 3 854 94 74 390 4 562 2577 Apprch % 32.2 66.1 1.7 0 0 0 0 0 9 81 9.6 0.4 16.7 13.2 69.4 0.7 Total % 14.5 29.8 0.8 0 45.1 0 0 0 0 0 3 26.9 3.2 0.1 33.1 3.6 2.9 15.1 0.2 21.8 Unshifted 374 765 20 0 1159 0 0 0 0 0 77 689 82 3 851 94 74 388 4 560 2570 % Unshifted 100 99.7 100 0 99.8 0 0 0 0 0 100 99.6 100 100 99.6 100 100 99.5 100 99.6 99.7 Bank 1 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 2 7 % Bank 1 0 0.3 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 0.4 0 0 0.5 0 0.4 0.3 O N N OD N 0) r O O (h NJ F J V 0 V r` L� V O D) V D) L Ov v vov� aa) a Out In Total 2236 122243 1082 1161 374 765 20 0 01 2 0 0 374 767 20 0 Right Thru Left Peds North 5/26/2016 0730 AM 5/26/2016 08:15 AM Unshifted Bank 1 F+ Left Thru Ri ht Peds 82 689 77 3 0 3 0 0 821 6921 77 3 861 854 1715 Out In Total 0 0 0 O O ~C 00 0 r o00 000 � a 0 y N_ �o No00 age& .1ugp Sewice6 130 S. Howie Street Helena, MT 59601 21Ca►FTm NLVACa'iC•IF WLVAI Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 5/25/2016 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Unshifted - Bank 1 93 MERIDIAN 93 MERIDIAN Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound StartTlme Right Thru Left Peds App. Tow Right Thru Left Peds App.Total Right Thru Left Peds App.T.1 Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 04:30 PM 111 237 7 0 355 0 0 0 1 1 8 262 38 0 308 8 16 137 0 161 825 04:45 PM 121 234 11 0 366 0 0 0 1 1 10 270 42 1 323 12 15 151 1 179 869 Total 232 471 18 0 721 0 0 0 2 2 18 532 80 1 631 20 31 288 1 340 1694 05:00 PM 140 291 5 0 436 0 0 0 0 0 11 348 46 0 405 5 13 147 1 166 1007 05:15 PM 137 260 9 0 406 0 0 0 2 2 6 308 40 0 354 7 20 153 1 181 943 Grand Total 509 1022 32 0 1563 0 0 0 4 4 35 1188 166 1 1390 32 64 588 3 687 3644 Apprch % 32.6 65.4 2 0 0 0 0 100 2.5 85.5 11.9 0.1 4.7 9.3 85.6 0.4 Total % 14 28 0.9 0 42.9 0 0 0 0.1 0.1 1 32.6 4.6 0 38.1 0.9 1.8 16.1 0.1 18.9 Unshifted 508 1021 32 0 1561 0 0 0 4 4 35 1184 166 1 1386 32 64 587 3 686 3637 % Unshifted 99.8 99.9 100 0 99.9 0 0 0 100 100 100 99.7 100 100 99.7 100 100 99.8 100 99.9 99.8 Bank 1 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 1 7 % Bank 1 0.2 0.1 0 0 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.3 0 0 0.3 0 0 0.2 0 0.1 0.2 a7 (O0N(0 OHOD O r h F h U, U, NJ J V 0 V C (O (O ~ (N O ch N c) LO l r` Or` m m o0 o m aa) a Out In Total 3332 133239 1776 1563 508 1021 32 0 11 1 0 0 509 1022 32 0 Right Thru Left Peds North 5/25/2016 0430 PM 5/25/2016 05:15 PM Unshifted Bank 1 F+ Left Thru Ri ht Peds 166 1184 35 1 0 4 0 0 1661 11 881 35 1 1054 1390 2444 Out In Total O 0 0 0 O ~C 00 0 000 a w -0 o aU U- N A o A agaILIA .1ugp Sewice6 130 S. Howie Street Helena, MT 59601 File Name : SunnyAM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 5/26/2016 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Unshifted - Bank 1 93 SUNNY VIEW 93 SUNNY VIEW Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound StartTlme Right Thru Left Peds App. Tow Right Thru Left Peds App.Total Right Thru Left Peds App.Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 07:30 AM 0 143 28 0 171 11 0 14 1 26 46 193 0 0 239 0 0 0 0 0 436 07:45 AM 0 241 37 0 278 14 0 31 0 45 43 246 0 1 290 0 0 0 0 0 613 Total 0 384 65 0 449 25 0 45 1 71 89 439 0 1 529 0 0 0 0 0 1049 08:00 AM 0 199 43 0 242 8 0 19 0 27 45 184 0 0 229 0 0 0 0 0 498 08:15 AM 0 177 42 0 219 9 0 23 0 32 52 214 0 0 266 0 0 0 0 0 517 Grand Total 0 760 150 0 910 42 0 87 1 130 186 837 0 1 1024 0 0 0 0 0 2064 Apprch % 0 83.5 16.5 0 32.3 0 66.9 0.8 18.2 81.7 0 0.1 0 0 0 0 Total % 0 36.8 7.3 0 44.1 2 0 4.2 0 6.3 9 40.6 0 0 49.6 0 0 0 0 0 Unshifted 0 760 150 0 910 42 0 87 1 130 186 837 0 1 1024 0 0 0 0 0 2064 % Unshifted 0 100 100 0 100 100 0 100 100 100 100 100 0 100 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 Bank 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Bank 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -mu000 000 o F J 000 000 L� C ♦- 0 0 0 L°� 000 O 0000 aa) a Out In Total 879 910 1789 0 760 150 0 0 0 0 0 0 760 150 0 Right Thru Left Peds North 5/26/2016 0730 AM 5/26/2016 08:15 AM Unshifted Bank 1 F+ Left Thru Ri ht Peds 0 837 186 1 0 0 0 0 01 8371 186 1 847 1024 18701 Out In Total S N N W W O O D) O D) C O O 0 W W r 000 m 40-4 N p p O a D) mom D) N — m . o agaILIA .1ugp Sewice6 130 S. Howie Street Helena, MT 59601 File Name : SunnyPM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 5/26/2016 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Unshifted - Bank 1 93 SUNNY VIEW 93 SUNNY VIEW Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound StartTlme Right Thru Left Peds App. Tow Right Thru Left Peds App.Total Right Thru Left Peds App.Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 04:30 PM 0 211 6 0 217 49 0 69 0 118 13 292 0 0 305 0 0 0 0 0 640 04:45 PM 0 242 18 0 260 37 0 49 0 86 13 293 0 0 306 0 0 0 0 0 652 Total 0 453 24 0 477 86 0 118 0 204 26 585 0 0 611 0 0 0 0 0 1292 05:00 PM 0 264 13 0 277 60 0 71 0 131 16 298 0 0 314 0 0 0 0 0 722 05:15 PM 0 269 9 0 278 33 0 52 0 85 17 332 0 0 349 0 0 0 0 0 712 Grand Total 0 986 46 0 1032 179 0 241 0 420 59 1215 0 0 1274 0 0 0 0 0 2726 Apprch % 0 95.5 4.5 0 42.6 0 57.4 0 4.6 95.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total % 0 36.2 1.7 0 37.9 6.6 0 8.8 0 15.4 2.2 44.6 0 0 46.7 0 0 0 0 0 Unshifted 0 986 46 0 1032 179 0 241 0 420 59 1215 0 0 1274 0 0 0 0 0 2726 % Unshifted 0 100 100 0 100 100 0 100 0 100 100 100 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 Bank 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Bank 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M000 000 o F J 000 000 L� C ♦- 0 0 0 L°� 000 O 0000 aa) a Out In Total 1394 1032 2426 0 986 46 0 0 0 0 0 0 986 46 0 Right Thru Left Peds North 5/26/2016 0430 PM 5/26/2016 05:15 PM Unshifted Bank 1 F+ Left Thru Ri ht Peds 0 1215 59 0 0 0 0 0 01 1 21 51 59 0 12207 1274 25001 Out In Total =MOM o U o� 0 U C O O 0 N _ N r 000 �(p N N A A O m o 0 0 a N cn N N 00 N o00 ClA- a da .1uccric S e wic e 6 130 S. Howie Street Helena, MT 59601 File Name : ConwayAM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 5/31/2016 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Unshifted - Bank 1 93 CONWAY 93 CONWAY Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Tow Right Thru Left Peds App.Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Tow Int. Total 07:30 AM 0 141 40 0 181 6 0 7 0 13 24 260 0 0 284 0 0 0 0 0 478 07:45 AM 0 213 53 0 266 5 0 8 0 13 42 336 0 0 378 0 0 0 0 0 657 Total 0 354 93 0 447 11 0 15 0 26 66 596 0 0 662 0 0 0 0 0 1135 08:00 AM 0 178 56 1 235 5 0 14 0 19 43 240 0 1 284 0 0 0 0 0 538 08:15 AM 0 163 34 0 197 12 0 13 0 25 27 224 0 0 251 0 0 0 0 0 473 Grand Total 0 695 183 1 879 28 0 42 0 70 136 1060 0 1 1197 0 0 0 0 0 2146 Apprch % 0 79.1 20.8 0.1 40 0 60 0 11.4 88.6 0 0.1 0 0 0 0 Total % 0 32.4 8.5 0 41 1.3 0 2 0 3.3 6.3 49.4 0 0 55.8 0 0 0 0 0 Unshifted 0 695 183 1 879 28 0 42 0 70 136 1060 0 1 1197 0 0 0 0 0 2146 % Unshifted 0 100 100 100 100 100 0 100 0 100 100 100 0 100 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 Bank 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Bank 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000�,� �0 O 7 a) F 000, C ♦— O O 0 L 000 � O 0000 o a Out In Total 1088 879 1967 0 695 183 1 0 0 0 0 0 695 183 1 7ht Thr Left Peds North 5/31/2016 0730 AM 5/31/2016 08:15 AM Unshifted Bank 1 +-1 T F+ Left Thru Ri ht Peds 0 1060 136 1 0 0 0 0 0 01 1060 136 1 737 1197 1934 Out In Total =mom a (0 a� 0 (0 ~C 00 0 _ (D O O O �; N O N a m mo ° m 0 000 ClA- a da .1uccric S e wic e 6 130 S. Howie Street Helena, MT 59601 File Name : ConwayPM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 6/1/2016 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Unshifted - Bank 1 93 CONWAY 93 CONWAY Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App.Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Tow Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Tow Int. Total 04:30 PM 0 323 11 0 334 44 0 56 0 100 8 267 0 0 275 0 0 0 0 0 709 04:45 PM 0 319 5 0 324 33 0 44 0 77 9 291 0 0 300 0 0 0 0 0 701 Total 0 642 16 0 658 77 0 100 0 177 17 558 0 0 575 0 0 0 0 0 1410 05:00 PM 0 345 14 0 359 55 0 77 0 132 6 262 0 0 268 0 0 0 0 0 759 05:15 PM 0 354 9 0 363 42 0 44 0 86 7 328 0 0 335 0 0 0 0 0 784 Grand Total 0 1341 39 0 1380 174 0 221 0 395 30 1148 0 0 1178 0 0 0 0 0 2953 Apprch % 0 97.2 2.8 0 44.1 0 55.9 0 2.5 97.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total % 0 45.4 1.3 0 46.7 5.9 0 7.5 0 13.4 1 38.9 0 0 39.9 0 0 0 0 0 Unshifted 0 1341 39 0 1380 174 0 221 0 395 30 1148 0 0 1178 0 0 0 0 0 2953 % Unshifted 0 100 100 0 100 100 0 100 0 100 100 100 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 Bank 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Bank 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000�,� M0 O 7 a) F 000, C ♦- O O 0 LO l O O O � O 0000 o a Out In Total 1322 1380 2702 0 1341 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 1341 39 0 Thr Left Peds 7ht North 6/1/2016 0430 PM 6/1/2016 05:15 PM Unshifted Bank 1 +-1 T F+ Left Thru Ri ht Peds 0 1148 30 0 0 0 0 0 01 1148 30 0 1562 1178 2740 Out In Total '-' A O A (o O O (o ~C 00 0 co _ c � N N 0c0cn 0 a poA� m000 PiwtTable Data 1 am R-d Name I Oat. Claremont Street Canw Orv. Gmntl m Lane Herd . Wa N.Nh Meal.. Wa Sunn iew Lane Wh,dw-J Wa Total Sam -I Total Sam -C Oat. Oa Time Sam -In Sam - ON Sam - In Sam - Out Sam -In Sam - Out Sam -In Sam - ON Sam -In Sam - ON Sam -In Sam - ON Sam -In Sam - ON 0525116 Wetl 15.30 6 ] 6 ] 1545 10 6 10 6 16.00 2 8 16 15 18 23 16.15 6 ] 15 10 21 17 16 W 2 8 9 12 11 20 16.45 2 1 9 8 11 9 1]00 4 8 13 13 17 21 1]_15 2 10 6 13 8 23 1]30 1 10 8 9 9 19 1]45 3 4 4 5 ] 9 1800 1 2 23 41 5 5 29 M18.15 3 6 12 19 30 3] 3 2 4fi M18 30 2 1 15 33 36 fi3 2 6 55 103 1845 2 0 31 21 29 41 1 3 0]2 1900 15 2 10 21 0 6 18 20 18 33 1 1 62 89 19.15 5 6 12 21 3 2 10 16 11 50 1 6 a101 19 30 13 5 9 18 2 0 5 34 1] 49 0 2 aIN1945 4 1 6 14 0 3 11 10 17 35 1 1 39 64 2800 5 3 ] 1] 2 3 3 14 9 30 2 3 2fi 70 20.15 3 0 5 17 1 1 6 20 18 30 2 2 35 10 2830 2 0 6 13 1 2 9 25 11 20 0 1 29 61 2845 0 2 3 2 0 1 6 9 13 20 1 2 23 36 21 M 0 3 3 3 3 2 1 6 8 21 1 0 ifi J5 21.15 4 0 4 5 0 0 3 14 13 22 2 1 2fi 42 2130 0 1 1 2 4 3 2 3 9 12 0 4 ifi 25 2145 3 1 1 4 0 0 1 5 7 19 0 2 12 31 ,m 0 2 1 2 1 0 3 12 3 16 0 0 8 12 22.15 0 2 4 8 1 0 2 5 3 7 2 1 12 23 2230 3 2 2 9 1 1 6 7 6 6 0 1 18 26 2245 3 2 4 6 0 0 3 13 8 14 0 2 18 J] 23M 0 1 5 5 0 1 0 11 1 ] 1 0 ] 25 23.15 1 0 1 6 1 1 0 7 1 6 0 1 4 21 2330 3 0 4 4 0 0 3 6 0 4 1 0 11 14 2345 0 0 3 4 0 III 0 5 2 1 0 0 51 10 0526/16 Th. 0800 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 5 0 0 3 7 00.15 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 3 2 0 1 5 5 0030 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 4 4 0845 1 0 3 10 0 0 2 1 1 2 0 1 1 14 0100 2 0 0 3 0 0 1 5 1 1 0 1 4 10 .1 15 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 3 2 1 0 8 3 0130 0 0 0 2 0 1 4 0 1 2 0 0 5 5 0145 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 4 4 0200 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 0215 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 02 30 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 1 0245 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 6 0 0 1 6 0300 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 03.15 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 2 4 0330 1 2 2 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 4 6 0345 0 2 3 0 2 0 1 1 0 3 0 1 fi ] 04m 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 1 2 oa_15 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 5 3 0430 1 0 2 4 0 0 ] 1 ] 4 0 0 1] 9 04.45 1 1 2 0 0 0 12 4 7 0 0 0 22 5 0500 0 0 2 0 0 0 6 2 11 1 3 0 M3 05.15 3 1 3 1 1 0 11 2 11 1 1 0 306 0530 1 5 4 0 0 0 13 6 1] 1 2 1 37 13 0545 1 8 1] 2 3 0 23 4 30 10 0 1 74 25 O6w 2 6 17 6 1 1 15 14 27 12 3 2 fi5 41 0515 3 18 2111 1 0 22 15 31 10 0 3 13 4] 0630 7 19 29 5 3 0 27 13 52 19 0 1 118 51 w 5 10 27 65 10 4 0 50 18 74 17 0 0 203 72 0]00 5 24 25 20 4 0 30 13 52 33 1 1 117 91 0]_15 10 14 49 19 1 3 30 14 68 26 4 10 ifi2 Bfi 0730 10 28 6] 1] 2 5 38 24 66 39 9 8 192 121 0745 23 38 103 22 11 0 72 12 103 47 7 15 319 134 08w 22 4fi 71 26 2 4 5fi 25 16 29 4 10 229 138 08.15 20 18 65 27 4 4 47 15 90 33 2 5 228 102 0830 9 30 4fi 33 5 1 3] 1] 84 Sfi 6 20 185 13] 08.45 10 17 % 32 6 0 43 37 95 46 12 11 222 143 09w 13 211 4fi 37 11 5 23 21 30 50 4 8 125 14] 09.15 8 15 35 20 2 3 31 33 45 42 11 16 132 129 0930 2 Z1 42 25 2 4 36 31 51 51 10 12 151 151 09.45 7 20 41 38 7 3 W 38 5] fi5 10 8 158 152 1800 4 13 42 33 4 1 30 31 45 ]1 13 4 138 153 10.15 6 16 38 39 6 3 24 36 5fi 63 18 0 150 157 1830 6 29 55 49 4 0 24 27 63 ]] 18 3 110 185 1845 10 19 45 5fi 2 2 2] 31 64 12 18 2 ififi 180 11 00 10 16 39 % 4 4 42 36 5] 69 9 12 ififi 193 11.15 10 16 38 62 3 1 37 % 42 91 6 17 13' TA3 11 307 23 35 5fi 1 2 211 29 48 89 13 12 13. 213 11 45 15 25 39 63 2 5 15 38 59 72 9 5 139 208 1200 7 19 28 5fi 1 9 W 41 49 91 11 7 126 MI 12.15 12 22 42 57 4 7 37W 59 ]3 8 13 162 208 12 30 15 19 41 53 1 4 37 32 fit 81 8 5 163 194 1245 11 29 66 51 4 3 40 33 ]2 66 18 5 211 187 1300 12 32 43 55 4 5 38 32 68 67 5 13 170 204 1315 22 30 48 % 7 3 34 36 62 79 16 11 189 215 1330 20 19 52 46 1 2 37 42 40 69 9 11 159 189 1345 10 19 43 60 3 4 3737 5fi 11 8 10 159 201 1400 11 18 43 40 6 3 40 46 % 84 12 6 ififi 191 14.15 10 20 34 %8 6 30 38 41 82 10 13 139 215 14 30 12 18 42 55 3 4 21151 50 87 12 14 M229 1445 8 29 37 51 5 1 34 38 53 82 6 12 143 21J 1500 16 24 3] 55 5 10 28 49 4fi Ill 11 6 141 255 15.15 10 23 25 69 2 6 33 36 51 79 8 9 129 222 15 30 29 24 35 66 2 6 36 50 56 109 9 11 167 2fifi 1545 16 18 28 60 6 6 32 28 fit 84 9 13 153 209 1 fi 00 25 26 27 72 1 5 23 5fi 41 93 14 15 131 2fi5 16.15 14 24 28 65 6 2 10 38 41 92 8 10 107 211 1fi 30 31 33 24 94 4 10 38 46 42 112 12 14 151 309 16.45 19 26 18 84 6 5 28 37 44 88 8 7 123 247 1]00 23 27 18 131 5 1 19 48 43 123 10 14 118 3" 17_15 16 28 1] ]0 5 5 2] 55 4fi 86 ] ] 11fi 251 1] 30 15 40 13 86 4 6 15 61 47 86 8 ] 102 2fi6 1745 ] 19 1] fi3 3 8 1] 33 49 5fi 9 5 1. ififi 1800 11 13 1] 42 2 3 6 W 40 58 6 7 82 159 18.15 10 9 16 41 4 3 11 26 30 49 5 4 lfi 132 18 30 9 6 14 16 7 3 18 23 50 4' 3 6 101 112 1845 711 21 24 4 3 24 38 35 37 5 2 % "51900 13 11 12 29 1 3 14 25 16 31 2 2 5fi 101 19.15 11 5 8 24 1 3 5 40 15 42 0 2 40 11fi 1930 6 7 5 20 0 7 3 18 13 41 0 2 v 95 1945 9 6 8 1] 2 2 5 21 1737 1 2 42 fi5 2DW 5 5 5 14 3 0 5 27 22 29 0 3 40 18 20.15 2 4 6 13 4 3 4 18 1723 1 4 34 fi5 2830 2 3 5 13 3 ] 5 14 17 24 2 4 34 65 2845 2 2 9 8 2 3 4 14 11 20 1 2 29 49 21 M 6 3 5 12 3 3 6 11 1733 1 3 38 fi5 21.15 3 1 5 2 2 3 6 11 15 20 2 2 JJ 39 2130 1 3 3 3 1 0 0 5 6 20 1 1 12 32 2145 0 1 4 21 2 21 2 61 13 161 0 11 211 2.1 Page 1 Pivot Table Data 1 22.00 2215 22M 2245 23M 23.15 2330 2345 3 3 1 0 3 6 2 4 0 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 3 8 3 5 2 8 6 5 0 4 1 3 1 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 3 0 1 ] 1 5 4 6 4 9 0 12 2 8 4 8 0 2 6 10 6 6 4 ] 10 13 4 15 2 3 4 12 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 13 11 13 2211 6 7 11 6 28 1] 21 31 16 28 a 05W116 F. 0000 1 0 3 3 0 0 1 1 1 7 2 1 8 12 00:15 0 0 0 4 1 1 1 2 0 3 0 0 2 10 00:30 2 2 1 3 0 1 0 1 5 4 0 0 8 11 0041 2 0 2 8 0 0 1 3 1 2 0 1 6 1a 0100 0 1 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 1 9 01 15 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 4 a 01 30 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 1 2 1 1 1 5 5 0145 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 4 2 0200 1 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 3 a 0215 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 6 0 0 2 10 02 30 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0245 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0300 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 03.15 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 2 5 0330 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 3 5 0345 0 0 1 1 0 0 4 0 1 1 0 2 6 a 0400 1 1 2 0 0 1 5 0 5 0 1 0 14 2 0415 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 5 2 0430 3 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 6 0 0 0 12 1 0445 0 1 2 1 0 0 7 1 9 0 0 0 18 3 0500 0 2 3 0 0 0 1 0 10 3 1 0 15 5 0515 3 4 5 0 1 0 11 6 8 3 1 0 29 13 0530 2 0 4 3 2 0 7 1 9 5 2 1 26 10 0545 0 4 15 2 1 0 21 2 25 3 1 1 fi3 12 0600 2 8 10 5 0 0 23 4 22 11 2 2 59 30 0015 0 20 26 4 0 0 13 14 20 9 1 1 60 48 0630 2 Z1 28 4 2 1 34 1] 44 23 2 4 112 12 06.45 6 27 38 8 5 1 41 16 74 22 1 0 16, ]4 0]00 25 14 4 2 28 12 36 35 4 1 91 64 0]_15 41 16 1 4 48 27 90 4] 0730 55 14 4 2 65 44 iTA fi0 0]_45 5 5 31 85 58 121 fi3 0800 7 0 31 6] 31 105 3fi 08.15 4 2 30 11 28 105 30 0830 3 1 22 57 30 82 31 08.45 3 3 32 83 27 118 30 0900 2 1 22 55 44 19 45 09.15 3 2 15 43 41 61 43 0930 4 2 23 52 fib ]9 fi8 09.45 7 1 29 60 64 96 fi5 1000 4 4 25 50 44 19 48 10.15 ] 4 31 48 BID8fi 84 10 30 3 6 32 53 64 88 10 1045 5 5 39 47 6] 91 12 11 00 2 4 24 56 67 82 11 11.15 6 3 14 51 64 71 fit 11 30 5 ] 17 55 84 ]] 91 11 45 4 6 28 41 83 73 89 1200 1 2 12 46 8] 59 89 12.15 3 9 21 5()fib 74 71 12 30 5 2 20 55 fi] 80 fig 1245 3 8 19 55 ]fi ]] 84 1300 3 8 22 61 72 86 80 13.15 3 2 1] 52 49 12 51 1330 5 6 15 59 13 19 fi9 1345 3 3 26 64 fifi 93 fi9 1400 2 5 16 53 48 71 53 14.15 2 3 22 40 ]] fi4 80 14 30 3 8 24 43 fig 10 71 1445 8 2 21 41 ]9 10 81 1500 1 7 19 38 89 58 9fi 15.15 ] 3 27 31 64 fi5 fit 15 30 3 9 34 44 82 81 91 1545 3 6 18 34 ]8 55 84 1000 6 6 1] 31 88 54 94 16.15 3 3 12 28 fig 43 12 1030 3 1 25 1] 85 45 86 16.45 0 3 20 27 83 4] 86 1700 2 2 16 22 110 40 112 1]_15 5 ] 19 25 69 49 16 1]30 4 ] 14 29 57 4] 64 1]45 0 3 11 27 53 38 56 IBM3 4 13 30 41 4fi 45 18.15 3 2 11 16 24 30 2fi 18 30 0 4 13 31 35 44 39 1845 1 2 13 30 19 44 21 1900 4 ] 9 19 2] 32 34 19.15 3 2 4 16 28 23 30 1930 4 3 6 14 3()a 33 1945 1 4 7 10 23 18 21 2000 3 1 8 16 23 21 24 20.15 4 4 3 15 2' 22 30 20 30 1 3 4 11 12 ifi 15 2045 1 2 3 23 25 2] 27 2100 1 2 3 9 18 13 20 21.15 1 2 4 13 22 18 24 21 30 4 5 6 12 1] 22 22 2145 2 0 5 3 13 10 13 2200 3 3 0 9 8 12 11 22.15 0 1 2 ] 9 9 10 22M 0 1 3 4 8 1 9 2245 2 2 0 11 10 13 12 2300 0 0 0 5 11 5 11 23.15 0 1 0 3 5 3 6 2330 0 2 1 5 5 6 ] 2345 0 0 0 3 3 3 3 052816 Sal 00:00 0 1 0 3 2 3 3 00:15 0 0 0 1 2 1 2 00 30 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 00 15 0 0 0 1 6 1 6 01 00 0 0 0 3 1 3 1 0115 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0130 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0145 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0200 1 0 0 2 0 3 0 0215 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 02 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0245 0 0 0 0 4 6 a 03 00 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0315 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 033 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0345 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0400 2 0 o z 2 a 2 0415 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0430 1 1 0 3 1 a 2 04a5 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0500 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 05.15 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0530 1 0 0 8 2 9l 2 Pae Pivot Table Data L Pivot Table Data L 1330 1345 1400 14.15 14 30 1445 1500 15.15 15 30 1545 1 fi 00 16.15 1630 16.45 1]00 1]_15 1730 1745 1800 18.15 18 30 1845 1900 1915. 19 30 1945 200 20.15 2830 2845 21 W 21.15 2130 2145 22.00 22.15 2230 2245 23M 23.15 2330 2345 2 2 5 0 0 0 4 4 2 5 2 2 2 0 0 3 3 0 2 3 1 3 1 1 3 4 0 3 6 1 2 1 0 4 2 1 1 5 1 2 2 4 4 1 2 4 1 3 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 4 0 1 1 0 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 6 4 10 9 1 9 5 3 5 6 8 5 8 5 5 5 3 4 5 3 7 2 1 3 3 4 1 0 0 1 5 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 19 9 11 24 11 13 13 13 13 21 19 14 14 19 18 19 9 14 11 12 15 22 16 13 16 25 13 22 21 18 14 15 21 14 14 22 14 15 11 13 21 11 23 24 20 20 9 11 12 18 10 15 8 1 1 11 6 11 6 8 9 1 3 9 3 fi 3 9 3 3 4 1 0 3 2 4 3 ] 1 2 1 2 2 6 24 28 23 21 25 30 23 2] 11 21 2' 21 18 35 21 26 21 18 16 28 30 29 12 13 1J 11 12 8 ] 10 4 9 5 4 5 0 4 J 1 1 2 11 24 13 11 26 16 19 22 14 15 25 14 29 25 19 16 18 23 20 15 20 25 24 20 19 16 ] 13 12 9 11 10 6 11 4 6 3 4 8 2 2 6 05W16 Mon 0800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0815 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0030 1 1 0 3 4 4 5 0845 1 1 0 1 1 2 2 01 00 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0t15 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0130 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0145 0 1 1 1 0 2 1 0200 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0215 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 02 30 a a 0 a o 9 0 0245 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0300 0 0 1 2 2 3 2 03.15 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0330 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0345 0 1 1 2 1 3 2 04w 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 oa_15 3 0 0 1 0 4 0 0430 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 04.45 0 0 0 5 1 5 1 0500 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 05.15 0 0 2 2 2 4 2 0530 0 0 0 2 1 2 1 0545 1 0 0 8 1 9 1 ,w 0 0 0 ] 5 1 5 afi_15 0 1 0 11 5 11 6 0630 0 0 1 20 4 21 4 O6_a5 0 0 0 26 3 2fi 3 0]00 0 1 2 9 5 11 6 0715 0 0 4 ] 11 11 1] 0730 0 0 3 12 12 15 12 0745 1 1 9 13 8 23 9 08w 3 0 16 18 9 31 9 08.15 3 1 9 9 11 21 12 0830 0 1 ] 13 8 20 9 08.45 5 2 14 20 11 39 13 09w 1 1 15 10 11 2fi 12 09.15 3 2 13 20 13 3fi 15 0930 1 3 14 15 18 30 21 09.45 1 1 12 15 1fi 28 17 1800 0 1 12 15 29 21 JO 10.15 3 0 14 1] 13 34 13 1830 2 4 12 14 21 28 31 1845 7 3 16 14 23 31 26 11 00 1 4 8 26 25 35 29 11.15 3 2 10 22 21 35 29 11 30 3 2 4 20 32 2] 34 11 45 3 2 4 18 28 25 30 1200 0 2 1 14 43 21 45 12.15 2 2 6 14 18 22 20 12 30 2 2 3 16 10 21 12 1245 5 3 3 12 24 20 27 1300 2 2 4 14 11 20 19 13.15 2 2 2 14 18 18 20 1330 3 2 1 13 10 23 12 1345 3 1 4 19 15 2fi 16 1400 0 3 6 11 18 1] 21 14.15 1 7 3 19 19 23 26 1415 1 1 3 12 11 ifi 18 1445 2 3 3 11 10 ifi 13 1500 4 1 1 19 11 a 18 15.15 5 3 2 9 15 18 15 30 3 3 3 11 11 11 20 1545 1 4 2 10 14 13 18 1fi 00 2 1 0 11 13 13 14 16.15 2 3 2 12 16 ifi 19 "30 3 1 0 13 11 ifi 12 16.45 1 2 4 12 1fi 11 18 1]00 1 3 3 15 13 19 16 1]_15 2 2 1 9 14 12 16 1730 5 3 3 13 15 21 18 1]45 3 3 4 13 12 20 15 1800 1 6 2 15 11 18 23 18.15 0 1 2 21 13 23 14 18 30 3 4 1 26 15 30 19 1845 3 3 3 26 9 32 12 1900 1 3 1 9 13 11 16 19.15 3 0 2 13 15 18 15 19 30 2 1 3 10 24 15 25 1945 4 0 0 10 15 14 15 200 1 8 0 13 8 14 16 20.15 2 2 5 10 11 11 13 2830 2 2 2 12 ] ifi 9 2845 1 0 1 1 6 9 6 21W 2 0 2 10 ] 14 ] P.- 4 Pivot Table Data L 2115 21 30 2145 22.00 zz_15 2230 2245 23M 23.15 2330 2345 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 9 3 10 8 9 3 6 5 4 3 4 2 4 3 8 5 6 3 5 1 1 11 a 8 a 6 3 3 3 5 3 1 10 10 9 ] a 5 a 8 6 6 1 Os/31/16 Tue 00.00 0 0 0 2 4 2 a 00:15 0 1 0 1 4 1 5 00:30 1 1 0 1 2 2 3 0845 2 0 0 3 2 5 2 01 00 0 0 0 1 2 1 2 0115 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 01 30 0 1 1 1 0 2 1 01 45 2 1 0 1 2 3 3 0200 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0215 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 02 30 0 0 1 0 2 1 2 0245 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0300 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 03.15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0330 2 0 0 1 0 3 0 0345 0 0 0 2 1 2 1 0400 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0415 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0430 0 0 2 6 0 8 0 0445 0 0 15 6 0 21 0 0500 0 0 13 9 0 22 0 05.15 0 0 20 8 0 28 0 0530 1 0 10 10 1 21 1 0545 0 0 13 31 5 as 5 0fi00 1 1 8 31 1fi a0 1] O6.15 1 0 9 35 8 a5 8 0fi30 3 1 10 15 18 68 19 w45 2 0 20 82 18 10a 18 0]00 3 2 12 43 20 58 22 0]_15 1 1 11 % 22 68 23 0730 5 4 18 70 33 93 3] 0745 6 1 35 98 41 1. 42 08 00 7 0 32 74 31 113 31 08:15 8 2 22 fifi 30 96 32 08 30 8 6 26 74 33 108 39 0845 4 3 4] 81 53 132 56 0900 4 3 21 62 39 8] 42 0915 4 5 18 5] 72 19 ]] 0930 6 3 26 65 fifi 9] 69 0945 5 4 22 fifi fi4 93 68 1800 6 3 26 % 72 88 ]5 10]5 ] 4 11 fifi 74 Ba ]8 1830 3 0 20 68 54 91 5a 1845 4 ] 2] 62 79 93 86 11 00 2 5 26 50 fig ]8 ]a 11.15 0 1 20 55 90 ]5 91 11 30 5 6 28 45 81 ]8 8] 11 45 9 3 34 62 8] 105 90 1200 3 4 24 45 88 12 92 12.15 9 2 22 59 73 90 ]5 12 30 5 7 19 70 9fi 94 103 1245 8 6 26 76 fit 110 68 1300 8 9 26 63 9] 97 106 1315 6 3 26 52 67 84 70 1330 2 3 26 fi4 59 92 62 1345 1 1 19 36 82 56 83 1400 5 5 24 42 fifi 71 ]1 14.15 1 8 21 fi4 fib 86 76 14 30 2 5 18 46 Sfi fifi 91 1445 5 6 32 53 82 90 88 1500 5 2 2] 46 11fi ]8 118 15.15 4 3 28 41 75 73 78 15 30 5 3 33 50 108 88 111 1545 3 ] 35 10 84 108 91 1600 6 7 27 55 108 88 115 16.15 6 2 22 50 91 78 93 16 30 6 7 37 36 119 79 126 1645 7 6 32 43 130 82 136 1]00 1 8 31 31 168 63 1l6 1]_15 4 8 30 30 134 fi4 1a2 1730 3 9 18 42 111 63 126 1]45 6 3 35 29 fib 70 71 1800 4 2 29 16 63 49 65 18.15 3 4 22 23 35 48 39 18 30 3 4 16 38 fib 5] 72 1845 5 3 23 37 4fi 65 49 1900 2 2 8 16 42 26 as 19.15 3 1 15 28 31 46 3] 19 30 4 3 13 26 51 43 5a 1945 2 4 8 16 25 26 29 2DM 2 2 10 19 28 31 30 20.15 1 6 5 171] 23 23 2830 1 0 6 15 20 22 20 z845 1 1 7 17 2] 25 28 21 00 0 4 3 10 29 13 33 21.15 2 1 2 5 1fi 9 17 2130 2 1 3 9 1fi 14 1] 2145 0 1 1 10 ] 11 8 2200 0 3 2 9 5 11 8 zz_15 0 1 0 5 18 5 19 2230 1 0 0 4 11 5 11 22_a5 0 2 1 3 ] a 9 2300 1 0 0 4 13 5 13 23.15 0 0 1 2 5 3 5 2330 0 0 0 2 5 2 5 2345 0 0 3 2 4 5 a WM1116 We 0000 0 0 0 1 4 1 a 0015 1 0 0 2 1 3 1 0030 0 0 0 3 4 3 a 0845 0 0 1 2 3 3 3 01 00 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0t15 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 01 30 0 0 0 2 1 2 1 0145 0 1 1 2 1 3 2 0200 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0215 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 30 0 0 1 0 3 1 3 0245 0 1 1 2 2 3 3 03 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0315 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 033 0 0 1 1 2 2 2 0345 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0400 2 0 1 8 4 11 a 0415 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0430 1 1 4 6 2 11 3 0445 0 0 23 6 0 29 0 Pae Pivot Table Data 1 Page 6 APPENDIX B Traffic Model Kalispell Regional Healthcare Traffic Study 2016 Traffic Model Existing Peak Hour (15min x 4) AM Peak Season Factor 1303 l L 68 0.95 106 8 1098 72 388 4: 882 l 42 y 502 1 h 99 80 t 669 141 Z 68 916 l L 53 141 118 t 935 163 676 l L 19 213 53 t 912 163 Heritage Meridian Sunnv V. Conwa WEVAN Windward Way Hwy 93 1 IClaremont Grandview Kalispell Regional Healthcare Traffic Study 2016 Traffic Model Existing Peak Hour (15min x 4) PM Peak Season Factor 1653 1 L 122 0.95 15 4 1835 46 532 4: 1106 1 19 y 559 1 h 175 49 t 1322 19 Z 42 1003 1 L 228 49 270 t 1132 61 1345 1 L 160 34 167 t 1246 27 Heritage Meridian Sunnv V. Conwa WEVA 7 Windward Way Hwy 93 1 IClaremont Grandview Kalispell Regional Healthcare Traffic Study 2016 Traffic Model 35 19 MODEL 5 3 AM Peak Windward Way W & C Center 20 l L 10 Heritage 5% 5% 16 0 10 20% 9 17 17% 1 0 4: 17 l Meridian 3 3 y 0 0% 8 1 1 3 15 15% 5 t 9 KRMC 2 Z 7 IN 98 OUT 50 8 l L 6 Sunny V. Grandview 10 12 19 37% %IN 100% 3% t 12 29 30% %OUT 100% 3% 19 12 l L 6 Conway 8 7 13 25% t 26 20 20% 12 10% 10% Hwy 93 IN 98 Claremont 19 37 OUT 50 5 10 check 3 2 Kalispell Regional Healthcare Traffic Study 2016 Traffic Model 19 36 MODEL 3 5 PM Peak Windward Way W & C Center 11 l L 19 Heritage 5% 5% 9 0 19 20% 17 9 17% 0 0 4: 9 l Meridian 6 2 y 0 0% 4 0 1 6 8 15% 3 t 17 KRMC 1 Z 4 IN 54 OUT 95 4 l L 12 Sunny V. Grandview 6 23 35 37% %IN 100% 3% t 14 16 30% %OUT 100% 3% 11 23 l L 11 Conway 4 13 24 25% t 14 11 20% 6 10% 10% Hwy 93 IN 54 Claremont 36 21 OUT 95 10 5 check 2 3 Kalispell Regional Healthcare Traffic Study 2016 Traffic Model Projected W&C Total Traffic AM Peak 1323 j L 78 122 8 Heritage t 1107 73 388 «i 898 1 45 �► 502 1 h 102 Meridian 85 -0 t 678 KRMC 142 Z 10 75 924 j L 60 151 130 Sunny V. t 947 183 688 j L 25 221 60 t 938 175 Windward Way Hwy 93 1 IClaremont Grandview Kalispell Regional Healthcare Traffic Study 2016 Traffic Model Projected W&C Total Traffic PM Peak 1664 1 L 140 24 14 r 4 Heritage t 1853 46 559 1 «1 181 Meridian 52 t 1340 KRMC 20 Z 45 1008 1 L 240 55 14 r 293 Sunny V. t 1147 71 1368 1 L 170 39 14 r 180 t 1261 33 Windward Way Hwy 93 1 IClaremont Grandview APPENDIX C LOS Calculations General Information Analyst HCS 2010 RLA • •• Control Sum ma ry Report Site Information Intersection 93 & Heritage Agency/Co. ATS Jurisdiction MDT Date Performed 6/3/2016 East/West Street Heritage Way Analysis Year 2016 North/South Street Highway 93 Time Analyzed AM Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 1.00 Intersection Orientation North -South Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description KRH Traffic Study Lanes Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Movement U L T .� 4 1L if E# Major Street: North -South Westbound R U L T R U Northbound L T R U Southbound L T R Priority 10 11 12 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 2 0 Configuration LR T TR L T Volume (veh/h) 8 68 1098 72 106 1303 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked 0.100 0.100 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type Undivided Median Storage Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service 76 106 Flow Rate (veh/h) Capacity 264 587 v/c Ratio 0.29 0.18 95% Queue Length 1.2 0.7 Control Delay (s/veh) 24.1 12.5 Level of Service (LOS) C B Approach Delay (s/veh) 24.1 0.9 Approach LOS C A Copyright © 2016 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010- TWSC Version 6.70 Generated: 7/6/2016 3:15:30 PM HeritageAM.xtw HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency ATS Duration, h 0.25 Analyst RLA Analysis Date Jun 3, 2016 Area Type Other Jurisdiction MDT Time Period AM Peak Hour PHF 1.00 Urban Street U.S. Highway 93 Analysis Year 2016 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Intersection IMeridianRoad File Name 93AM2016.xus Project Description 1KRH Traffic Study Demand Information Approach Movement Demand ( v ), veh/h Signal Information Cycle, s 120.0 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Timer Results Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability i x Out Probability Movement Group Results Approach Movement Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g ), s Green Ratio ( g/C ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X ) Available Capacity ( c a ), veh/h Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 50 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 50 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d i ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS Multimodal Results Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS Bicycle LOS Score / LOS EB WB LITR::i 1 1 L T R 502 1 80 1 141 `5 I `MY, I "N' NB SB L I T I R L T R 99 669 68 42 1 882 1 388 Green 4.5 1.3 78.0 21.2 0.0 0.0 Yellow 4.0 0.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 Red 1.0 10.0 1.0 11.0 0.0 10.0 000 0� 000 _- EB 2.9 C 1.7 A WB 3.0 1 C NBT Me 6 ■ SBL 1 1.1 9.5 5.0 3.1 3.0 0.1 0.75 WIN 3 4 � 7 81 SBT NB SB R L T R L T R 5 2 12 1 6 16 100 379 367 42 882 388 1650 1733 1676 1650 1650 1468 2.3 10.1 9.8 1.0 15.3 7.5 2.3 10.1 9.8 1.0 15.3 7.5 0.70 0.66 0.66 0.69 0.65 0.83 470 1144 1107 525 2144 1214 0.213 0.331 0.332 0.080 0.411 0.320 1446 1144 1107 927 2144 1214 0.8 3.6 3.3 0.3 5.3 1.6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.3 7.5 7.2 6.5 10.0 2.4 0.1 0.7 0.8 0.0 1 0.6 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.4 8.2 8.0 6.6 10.6 3.1 A A A A B A 8.0 1 A 8.3 A NB 1.9 A 1.2 A B SB 2.5 B 1.6 A Copyright © 2016 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010TM Streets Version 6.70 Generated: 7/6/2016 3:16:32 PM HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency ATS Duration, h 0.25 Analyst RLA Analysis Date Jun 3, 2016 Area Type Other Jurisdiction MDT Time Period AM Peak Hour PHF 1.00 Urban Street U.S. Highway 93 Analysis Year 2016 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Intersection ISunnv View Drive File Name 93AM2016.xus Project Description 1KRH Traffic Study Demand Information Approach Movement Demand ( v ), veh/h Signal Information Cycle, s 120.0 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Timer Results Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability i x Out Probability Movement Group Results Approach Movement Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g ), s Green Ratio ( g/C ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X ) Available Capacity ( c a ), veh/h Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 50 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 50 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d i ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS Multimodal Results Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS Bicycle LOS Score / LOS EB WB NB SB L T R L I T R L T I JR L TR 118 53 935 1141 1 916 t? 3 4 � �00 000 000 000 EB 2.9 C WB 2.9C PF NB 2.2 B 1.4 A SB 0.6 A 1.4 A Copyright © 2016 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010TM Streets Version 6.70 Generated: 7/6/2016 3:16:32 PM HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information -4d.4-1 4, L a ' ` r Agency ATS Duration, h 0.25 Analyst RLA Analysis Date Jun 3, 2016 Area Type Other Jurisdiction MDT Time Period AM Peak Hour PHF 1.00 Urban Street U.S. Highway 93 Analysis Year 2016 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Intersection Conway Drive File Name 93AM2016.xus Project Description 1KRH Traffic Study Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T RA L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h 53 19 912 163, 213 676 Signal Information Cycle, s 120.0 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Timer Results Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability Max Out Probability Movement Group Results Approach Movement Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g ), s Green Ratio ( g/C ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X ) Available Capacity ( c a ), veh/h Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 50 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 50 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d i ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS Multimodal Results Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS Bicycle LOS Score / LOS �00 000 000 000 EB 2.5 1 B WB 2.8 C F NB 2.2 B 1.4 A SB 0.6 A 2.0 A Copyright © 2016 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010TM Streets Version 6.70 Generated: 7/6/2016 3:16:32 PN General Information Analyst HCS 2010 RLA • •• Control Sum ma ry Report Site Information Intersection 93 & Heritage Agency/Co. ATS Jurisdiction MDT Date Performed 6/3/2016 East/West Street Heritage Way Analysis Year 2016 North/South Street Highway 93 Time Analyzed PM Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 1.00 Intersection Orientation North -South Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description KRH Traffic Study Lanes Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Movement U L T .� 4 1L if E# Major Street: North -South Westbound R U L T R U Northbound L T R U Southbound L T R Priority 10 11 12 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 2 0 Configuration LR T TR L T Volume (veh/h) 4 122 1835 46 15 1653 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked 0.100 0.100 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type Undivided Median Storage Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service 126 15 Flow Rate (veh/h) Capacity 200 311 v/c Ratio 0.63 0.05 95% Queue Length 3.7 0.2 Control Delay (s/veh) 49.6 17.2 Level of Service (LOS) E C Approach Delay (s/veh) 49.6 0.2 Approach LOS E A Copyright © 2016 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010- TWSC Version 6.70 Generated: 7/6/2016 3:16:00 PM HeritagePMxtw HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency ATS Duration, h 0.25 Analyst RLA Analysis Date Jun 3, 2016 Area Type Other Jurisdiction MDT Time Period PM Peak Hour PHF 1.00 Urban Street U.S. Highway 93 Analysis Year 2016 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Intersection IMeridianRoad File Name 93PM2016.xus Project Description 1KRH Traffic Study Demand Information Approach Movement Demand ( v ), veh/h Signal Information Cycle, s 120.0 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Timer Results Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability i x Out Probability Movement Group Results Approach Movement Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g ), s Green Ratio ( g/C ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X ) Available Capacity ( c a ), veh/h Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 50 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 50 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d i ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS Multimodal Results Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS Bicycle LOS Score / LOS EB L T R 559 49 19 WB L I T R `5 I `MY, I "N' NB SB L I T R L T I R 175 1 1322 42 1 19 1106 1 532 Green 2.8 4.1 75.0 23.1 0.0 0.0 Yellow 11.0 4.0 0.0 4.0 4.0 11.0 0.0 0.0 Red 10.0 11.0 0.0 10.0 000 0� 000 _- EB 2.9 C 1.5 A WB 3.0 1 C NBT Me 6 ■ SBL 1 1.1 7.8 5.0 3.1 2.5 0.0 0.47 WIN 3 4 � 7 81 SBT NB SB R L T R L T R 5 2 12 1 6 16 187 732 726 19 1106 532 1650 1733 1714 1650 1650 1468 4.6 32.1 31.9 0.5 22.7 12.5 4.6 32.1 31.9 0.5 22.7 12.5 0.69 0.66 0.66 0.65 0.62 0.82 379 1142 1130 236 2061 1200 0.494 0.641 0.643 0.080 0.537 0.443 1231 1142 1130 1118 2061 1200 1.6 12.6 12.3 0.2 8.1 2.9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.4 13.9 13.7 11.5 12.7 3.2 0.3 2.2 2.2kB 1.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.7Ll6.1 15.9 13.7 4.3 B B B B15.4 B B NB 1.9 A 1.8 A B SB 2.5 B 1.9 A Copyright © 2016 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010TM Streets Version 6.70 Generated: 7/6/2016 3:18:59 PM HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information -4d.4-1 4, a ' ` r Agency ATS Duration, h 0.25 Analyst RLA Analysis Date Jun 3, 2016 Area Type Other Jurisdiction MDT Time Period PM Peak Hour PHF 1.00 Urban Street U.S. Highway 93 Analysis Year 2016 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Intersection Sunny View Drive File Name 93PM2016.xus Project Description 1KRH Traffic Study Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T RA L T R L T R#49 T R Demand ( v ), veh/h 270 228 1132 611003 Signal Information Cycle, s 120.0 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Timer Results Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability Max Out Probability Movement Group Results Approach Movement Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g ), s Green Ratio ( g/C ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X ) Available Capacity ( c a ), veh/h Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 50 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 50 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d i ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS Multimodal Results Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS Bicycle LOS Score / LOS �00 000 000 000 EB 2.9 1 C WB 2.9 C F NB 2.2 B 1.5 A SB 0.7 A 1.4 A Copyright © 2016 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010TM Streets Version 6.70 Generated: 7/6/2016 3:18:59 PN HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information -4d.4-1 4, a ' ` r Agency ATS Duration, h 0.25 Analyst RLA Analysis Date Jun 3, 2016 Area Type Other Jurisdiction MDT Time Period PM Peak Hour PHF 1.00 Urban Street U.S. Highway 93 Analysis Year 2016 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Intersection Conway Drive File Name 93PM2016.xus Project Description 1KRH Traffic Study Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T RA L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h 167 160 1246 27 34 1345 Signal Information Cycle, s 120.0 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Timer Results Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability Max Out Probability Movement Group Results Approach Movement Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g ), s Green Ratio ( g/C ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X ) Available Capacity ( c a ), veh/h Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 50 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 50 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d i ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS Multimodal Results Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS Bicycle LOS Score / LOS �00 000 000 000 EB 2.9 1 C WB 2.9 C F NB 2.2 B 1.5 A SB 0.6 A 1.6 A Copyright © 2016 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010TM Streets Version 6.70 Generated: 7/6/2016 3:18:59 PN General Information Analyst HCS 2010 RLA • •• Control Sum ma ry Report Site Information Intersection 93 & Heritage Agency/Co. ATS Jurisdiction MDT Date Performed 6/3/2016 East/West Street Heritage Way Analysis Year 2016 North/South Street Highway 93 Time Analyzed AM Peak Hour - With WC Peak Hour Factor 1.00 Intersection Orientation North -South Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description KRH Traffic Study Lanes Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Movement U L T .� 4 1L if Major Street: North -South Westbound R U L T R U Northbound L T R U Southbound L T R Priority 10 11 12 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 2 0 Configuration LR T TR L T Volume (veh/h) 8 78 1107 73 122 1323 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked 0.110 0.110 0.000 0.000 0.110 0.000 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type Undivided Median Storage Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service 86 122 Flow Rate (veh/h) Capacity 270 631 v/c Ratio 0.32 0.19 95% Queue Length 1.3 0.7 Control Delay (s/veh) 24.5 12.1 Level of Service (LOS) C B Approach Delay (s/veh) 24.5 1.0 Approach LOS C A Copyright © 2016 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010- TWSC Version 6.70 Generated: 7/13/2016 8:41:23 AM HeritageAMwc.> tw HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency ATS Duration, h 0.25 Analyst RLA Analysis Date Jun 3, 2016 Area Type Other Jurisdiction MDT Time Period AM Peak Hour PHF 1.00 Urban Street U.S. Highway 93 Analysis Year 2016 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Intersection lMeridianRoad File Name 93AMwithWC.xus Project Description 1KRH Traffic Study - With WC Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L I T R L T I R Demand ( v ), veh/h 502 85 142 102 1 678 75 45 898 1 388 Signal Information ,��, .y R;� Cycle, s 120.0 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT Assigned Phase 4 5 2 Case Number 9.0 1.1 4.0 Phase Duration, s 26.2 10.8 84.1 Change Period, ( Y+R ), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s 3.2 3.1 0.0 Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s 19.5 4.4 Green Extension Time ( g e ), s 1.7 0.2 0.0 Phase Call Probability 1.00 0.97 x Out Probability i 0.00 0.00 Green 4.7 1.1 78.0 21.2 0.0 0.0 Yellow 4.0 0.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 Red 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 3 4 � 6 7 8 SBL SBT 1 6 1.1 3.0 9.7 83.0 5.0 5.0 3.1 0.0 3.0 0.1 0.0 0.78 WIN Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 7 4 14 5 2 12 1 6 16 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h 502 85 142 103 388 375 45 898 388 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In 1666 1793 1519 1650 1733 1672 1650 1650 1468 Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 17.5 4.9 10.2 2.4 10.9 10.5 1.0 15.7 7.5 Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g ), s 17.5 4.9 10.2 2.4 10.9 10.5 1.0 15.7 7.5 Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.70 0.66 0.66 0.69 0.65 0.83 Capacity ( c ), veh/h 590 317 269 463 1142 1102 514 2143 1214 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) 0.851 0.268 0.528 0.223 0.340 0.341 0.088 0.419 0.320 Available Capacity ( c a ), veh/h 1305 702 595 1439 1142 1102 914 2143 1214 Back of Queue (Q ), veh/In (50 th percentile) 7.3 0.8 3.9 3.6 0.3 5.5 1.6 Queue Storage Ratio (RQ) (50 th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay ( d i ), s/veh 47.8 7.4 8.0 7.6 6.6 10.1 2.5 Incremental Delay ( d2 ), s/veh 1.4 0.1 0.8 0.8 0.0 0.6 0.7 Initial Queue Delay ( ds ), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay ( d ), s/veh 49.2 7.5 8.8 8.5 6.6 10.7 3.1 Level of Service (LOS) D A A A A B A Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 47.7X0. 8.5 A 8.4 A Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 18.2 B Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.9 C 3.0 C 1.9 A 2.5 B Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.7 A 1.2 A 1.6 A Copyright © 2016 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010TM Streets Version 6.70 Generated: 7/13/2016 8:41:50 AM HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency ATS Duration, h 0.25 Analyst RLA Analysis Date Jun 3, 2016 Area Type Other Jurisdiction MDT Time Period AM Peak Hour PHF 1.00 Urban Street U.S. Highway 93 Analysis Year 2016 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Intersection lSunny View Drive File Name 93AMwithWC.xus Project Description 1KRH Traffic Study - With WC Demand Information EB WB NB I SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T I R L I T R Demand ( v ), veh/h 130 60 947 1 183 1 151 1 924 Signal Information Cycle, s 120.0 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point Endl, Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT Assigned Phase 8 2 Case Number 9.0 7.3 Phase Duration, s 16.6 92.4 Change Period, ( Y+R � ), s 5.0 5.0 Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s 3.2 0.0 Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s 11.3 Green Extension Time ( g e ), s 0.4 0.0 Phase Call Probability 1.00 x Out Probability i 0.00 3 4 6 7 8 SBL SBT 1 6 1.0 4.0 11.0 103.4 5.0 5.0 3.1 0.0 4.3 0.3 0.0 0.99 WIN Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 3 18 2 12 1 6 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h 130 60 807 156 146 894 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In 1650 1468 1650 1468 1650 1650 Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 1 9.3 4.6 7.9 2.5 2.3 6.2 Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g ), s 9.3 4.6 7.9 2.5 2.3 6.2 Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.10 0.10 0.73 0.73 0.79 0.82 Capacity ( c ), veh/h 160 142 2404 1070 592 2705 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) 0.814 0.422 0.336 0.146 0.2471 0.331 Available Capacity ( c a ), veh/h 880 783 2404 1070 1670 2705 Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 50 th percentile) 4.0 1.7 2.2 0.7 0.6 1.4 Queue Storage Ratio (RQ) (50 th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d ), s/veh 53.1 51.0 4.0 3.0 3.4 1.9 Incremental Delay ( d2 ), s/veh 3.8 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.3 Initial Queue Delay ( ds ), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay ( d ), s/veh 56.9 51.8 4.4 3.3 3.5 2.2 Level of Service (LOS) E D A A A A Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 0.0 55.3 E 4.2 A 2.4 F A Intersection Delay s/veh / LOS 7.8 A Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.9 C 2.9 C 2.2 B 0.6 A Bicycle LOS Score / LOS F 1.4 A 1.4 A Copyright © 2016 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010TM Streets Version 6.70 Generated: 7/13/2016 8:41:50 AM HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency ATS Duration, h 0.25 Analyst RLA Analysis Date Jun 3, 2016 Area Type Other Jurisdiction MDT Time Period AM Peak Hour PHF 1.00 Urban Street U.S. Highway 93 Analysis Year 2016 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Intersection lConway Drive File Name 93AMwithWC.xus Project Description 1KRH Traffic Study - With WC Demand Information EB WB NB I SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h 60 25 938 175 1 221 688 Signal Information .y Cycle, s 120.0 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point Endl, Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT Assigned Phase 8 2 Case Number 9.0 7.3 Phase Duration, s 11.0 98.0 Change Period, ( Y+R � ), s 5.0 5.0 Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s 3.1 0.0 Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s 6.3 Green Extension Time ( g e ), s 0.0 0.0 Phase Call Probability 0.94 Out Probability Maxii" 0.43 3 4 � 6 7 8 SBL SBT 1 6 1.0 4.0 11.0 109.0 5.0 5.0 3.0 0.0 5.1 0.4 0.0 1.00 WIN Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 3 18 2 12 1 6 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h 60 25 938 175 249 775 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In 1650 1468 1650 1468 1650 1650 Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 1 4.3 2.0 10.7 3.6 3.1 3.8 Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g ), s 4.3 2.0 10.7 3.6 3.1 3.8 Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.05 0.05 0.78 0.78 0.84 0.87 Capacity ( c ), veh/h 82 73 2558 1138 554 2860 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) 0.732 0.343 0.367 0.154 0.449 0.271 Available Capacity ( c a ), veh/h 138 122 2558 1138 1174 2860 Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 50 th percentile) 1.9 0.7 2.7 0.9 0.5 0.4 Queue Storage Ratio (RQ) (50 th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d ), s/veh 56.2 55.1 4.2 3.4 3.0 1.0 Incremental Delay ( d2 ), s/veh 4.6 1.0 0.4 0.3MA Initial Queue Delay ( ds ), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay ( d ), s/veh 60.9 56.2 4.6 3.7 Level of Service (LOS) E E A AApproach Delay, s/veh / LOS 0.0 59.5 E 4.5 AA Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 5.3 A Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.9 C 2.9 I C 2.2 B 0.6 1 A Bicycle LOS Score / LOS F 1.4 A 1.2 A Copyright © 2016 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010TM Streets Version 6.70 Generated: 7/13/2016 8:41:50 AM General Information Analyst HCS 2010 RLA • •• Control Sum ma ry Report Site Information Intersection 93 & Heritage Agency/Co. ATS Jurisdiction MDT Date Performed 6/3/2016 East/West Street Heritage Way Analysis Year 2016 North/South Street Highway 93 Time Analyzed PM Peak Hour - With WC Peak Hour Factor 1.00 Intersection Orientation North -South Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description KRH Traffic Study Lanes Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Movement U L T .� 4 1L if E# Major Street: North -South Westbound R U L T R U Northbound L T R U Southbound L T R Priority 10 11 12 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 2 0 Configuration LR T TR L T Volume (veh/h) 4 140 1853 46 24 1664 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked 0.110 0.110 0.000 0.000 0.110 0.000 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type Undivided Median Storage Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service 144 24 Flow Rate (veh/h) Capacity 202 308 v/c Ratio 0.71 0.08 95% Queue Length 4.6 0.3 Control Delay (s/veh) 57.6 17.7 Level of Service (LOS) F C Approach Delay (s/veh) 57.6 0.3 Approach LOS F A Copyright © 2016 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010- TWSC Version 6.70 Generated: 7/13/2016 8:40:09 AM HeritagePMwc.xtw HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency ATS Duration, h 0.25 Analyst RLA Analysis Date Jun 3, 2016 Area Type Other Jurisdiction MDT Time Period PM Peak Hour PHF 1.00 Urban Street U.S. Highway 93 Analysis Year 2016 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Intersection lMeridianRoad File Name 93PMwithWC.xus Project Description 1KRH Traffic Study - With WC Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L I T I R L T I R Demand ( v ), veh/h 559 52 20 181 11340 1 45 21 1115 1 532 Signal Information ,��, .y R;� Cycle, s 120.0 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT Assigned Phase 4 5 2 Case Number 9.0 1.1 4.0 Phase Duration, s 28.1 12.1 83.9 Change Period, ( Y+R ), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s 3.1 3.1 0.0 Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s 21.5 6.8 Green Extension Time ( g e ), s 1.5 0.4 0.0 Phase Call Probability 1.00 1.00 Max Out Probability 0.00 0.00 Green 3.0 4.1 74.8 23.1 0.0 0.0 Yellow 4.0 0.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 Red 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 3 4 � 6 7 8 SBL SBT 1 6 1.1 3.0 8.0 79.8 5.0 5.0 3.1 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.50 WIN Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 7 4 14 5 2 12 1 6 16 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h 559 52 20 193 742 736 21 1115 532 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In 1666 1793 1519 1650 1733 1713 1650 1650 1468 Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 19.5 2.9 1.3 4.8 32.9 32.8 0.5 23.1 12.6 Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g ), s 19.5 2.9 1.3 4.8 32.9 32.8 0.5 23.1 12.6 Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.69 0.66 0.66 0.65 0.62 0.82 Capacity ( c ), veh/h 641 345 292 377 1139 1126 233 2056 1197 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) 0.872 0.151 0.068 0.512 0.651 0.653 0.090 0.542 0.444 Available Capacity ( c a ), veh/h 2250 1210 1026 1227 1139 1126 1112 2056 1197 Back of Queue (Q ), veh/In (50 th percentile) 8.1 1.3 0.5 1.6 12.9 12.7 0.2 8.3 2.9 Queue Storage Ratio (RQ) (50 th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay ( d i ), s/veh 47.0 40.3 39.7 10.6 14.2 13.9 11.7 12.9 3.2 Incremental Delay ( d2 ), s/veh 1.5 0.1 0.0 0.3 2.2 2.3 0.1 1.0 1.2 Initial Queue Delay ( ds ), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay ( d ), s/veh 48.5 40.4 39.7 11.0 16.4 16.2 11.8 13.9 4.4 Level of Service (LOS) D D D B B B B B A Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 47.6 D 0.0 15.7 B 10.8 B Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 18.7 B Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.9 C 3.0 C 1.9 A 2.5 B Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.5 A 1.8 A 1.9 A Copyright © 2016 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010TM Streets Version 6.70 Generated: 7/13/2016 8:44:25 AM HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency Duration, h Analyst Analysis Date Area Type Jurisdiction Time Period PHF Urban Street Analysis Year Analvsis Period Intersection Project Description Demand Information Approach Movement Demand ( v ), veh/h Signal Information Cycle, s Reference Phase Offset, s Reference Point Uncoordinated Simult. Gap E/W Force Mode Simult. Gap N/S Timer Results Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability i x Out Probability Movement Group Results Approach Movement Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g ), s Green Ratio ( g/C ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X ) Available Capacity ( c a ), veh/h Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 50 th percentile Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 50 th percentile Uniform Delay ( d i ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( dz ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( ds ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS Multimodal Results Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS Bicycle LOS Score / LOS File Name EB I WB I NB I SB L I T I R I L I T I R I L T I R I L I T I R tF 3 4 � �00 000 000 000 SO ME one men in EB WB NB SB Copyright © 2016 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010TM Streets Version 6.70 Generated: 7/13/2016 8:37:10 AM HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency ATS Duration, h 0.25 Analyst RLA Analysis Date Jun 3, 2016 Area Type Other Jurisdiction MDT Time Period PM Peak Hour PHF 1.00 Urban Street U.S. Highway 93 Analysis Year 2016 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Intersection lConway Drive File Name 93PMwithWC.xus Project Description 1KRH Traffic Study - With WC Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h 180 170 1261 33 39 1368 Signal Information Cycle, s 120.0 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT Assigned Phase 8 2 Case Number 9.0 7.3 Phase Duration, s 21.2 89.5 Change Period, ( Y+R ), s 5.0 5.0 Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s 3.2 0.0 Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s 15.6 Green Extension Time ( g e ), s 0.6 0.0 Phase Call Probability 1.00 x Out Probability i 0.00 3 4 6 7 8 �0 W 06 Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 3 18 2 12 1 6 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h 180 170 1261 33 38 1326 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In 1650 1468 1650 1468 1650 1650 Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 1 12.7 13.6 22.0 0.8 0.7 14.7 Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g ), s 12.7 13.6 22.0 0.8 0.7 14.7 Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.14 0.14 0.70 0.70 0.76 0.78 Capacity ( c ), veh/h 223 198 2323 1034 350 2578 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) 0.807 0.857 0.543 0.032 0.108 0.514 Available Capacity ( c a ), veh/h 481 428 2323 1034 673 2578 Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 50 th percentile) 5.3 5.1 6.7 0.2 0.2 3.1 Queue Storage Ratio (RQ) (50 th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d ), s/veh 50.4 50.8 8.5 5.4 6.4 3.6 Incremental Delay ( d2 ), s/veh 2.6 4.1 0.9 0.1M6.54.2 Initial Queue Delay ( ds ), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay ( d ), s/veh 53.0 54.9 9.4 5.4Level of Service (LOS) D D A AApproach Delay, s/veh / LOS 0.0 53.9 D 9.3 AA Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 12.2 B Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.9 C 2.9 I C 2.2 B 1 0.6 A Bicycle LOS Score / LOS F 1.6 A 1.6 A Copyright © 2016 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010TM Streets Version 6.70 Generated: 7/13/2016 8:37:10 AM Appendix K - Signage Development Guide Kalispell Regional Healthcare Signage Development for new H-1 PUD December 28, 2016 HEALTHCARE GRAPHICS C O N S U L T I N G The concept for the sign program is to create a "sense of place"for patients, visitors, residents and staff. This is accomplished by in several ways. First, by creating a uniform look for the sign family. Second by using what is called "progressive disclosure, giving the visitor the right amount of information at the right time in the right space. Third, by creating a design that is maintainable, affordable, simple, and thoughtful. The program will "fit the space"creating a sense of comfort and safety. Below is a progressive disclosure image to illustrate the hierarchy of information applied to the design of the signage program. CITY CAMPUS PARKING ENTRANCE ELEVATOR ROOM Life safety is the primary issue when designing a signage program for a medical facility. It is imperative to give the first time visitor to the campus simple and clear directions to the Emergency Department.The new sign program is based on the"Patient /Visitor Journey" As a visitor approaches the campus, the new sign program will help them determine the best entry point to the campus to help get them to the Emergency entrance. Once on the campus the directional signs are intended to point them, first to the Emergency entrance, then to other building entrances. Designing a signage program for a medical facility is different than for any other type facility. People looking for a medical center in an emergency situation are under considerable stress. This creates a situation much different than looking for a retail store or office building. The signage must be simple to read and large enough to see from a distance. ©HEALTHCARE GRAPHICS 01 CONS U LT I N G 1504 Surrey Ct., Dallas, TX 75043 972.249.6833 December 28, 2016 The following is a list of sign types for the campus with the design intent behind each sign type. 1.1 Primary Campus Monument Sign: 128 sq. ft. 16'-0" Max. Height Intent: To identify the main public entry points into the medical center campus. 1.2 Secondary Monument Sign: 60 Sq. ft. 12'-0" Max. Height Intent: To identify secondary entry points into the medical center campus. 2.1 Vehicular Directional Pole Sign: 23 sq. ft. 13'- 0" Max. Height Intent: To direct traffic to main destination points on campus. 2.2 Secondary Directional Pole Sign: 23 sq. ft. 6'- 0" Max. Height Intent: To direct pedestrian, bicycle, and shuttle traffic. 3.1 Building Identification Letters and or Logo: Allow 2 sq. ft. of sign for every 1 lineal foot of building. Intent: To identify main buildings on the campus. 3.2 Tenant Identification Sign: (Similar to sign type 2.2) Intent: To identify occupants of the buildings on the campus. 3.3 Building Identification Monument Sign: 48 sq. ft. 8'-0"Max. Height Intent: To identify individual building entrances on campus at street level. ©HEALTHCARE GRAPHICS 02 CONS U LT ING 1504 Surrey Ct., Dallas, TX 75043 972.249.6833 December 28, 2016 27.22.050: Signs Not Requiring Permits H-1 Crala• 1 /)"— V-0" (3) Directional Signs. A sign, other than a government sign, not more than four (8) Nameplates. One per dwelling or tenant square feet which provides directions for traffic flow to places of business. name(s) at a main entrance, not exceeding one square foot per nameplate. 1 (4) Identification Signs. One sign per street front, setting forth or denoting the name of any public, charitable, or religious institution when located on the premises of such institution, provided such sign or bulletin board shall not exceed 24 square feet in sign area per face, subject to the height for the given zoning district. (6) Subdivision Identification Signs. One sign not to exceed 24 square feet in area or two signs not to exceed 12 square feet each per exclusive entrance to a subdivision or tract. Such signs shall be restricted to the subdivision or development name and shall not exceed six feet in height. ©HEALTHCARE GRAPHICS 03 CONS U LT I N G 1504 Surrey Ct., Dallas, TX 75043 972.249.6833 December 28, 2016 Permitted Signs in Zone H-1 PUD Scale: 1/4"= 1'-0" New Code H-1 PUD 1 Sign Type 1.1 Sign Type 1.2 Primary Campus Monument Sign: 128 sq. ft. 16'-0"Max. Height Intent: To identify the main public entry points into the medical center campus. Secondary Campus Monument Sign: 60 sq. ft. 12'-0"Max. Height Intent: To identify secondary entry points into the medical center campus. ©HEALTHCARE GRAPHICS 04 CONS U LT ING 1504 Surrey Ct., Dallas, TX 75043 972.249.6833 December 28, 2016 Permitted Signs in Zone H-1 PUD Scale: 1 /4" = V-0" New Code H-1 PUD Side View Side View Sign Type 2.1 Vehicular Directional Pole Sign: 23 sq. ft. 13'- 0" Max. Height Intent: To direct traffic to main destination points on campus. Sign Type 2.2 and 3.2 Secondary Directional Pole Sign: 23 sq. ft. 6'- 0"Max. Height Intent: To direct pedestrian, bicycle, and shuttle traffic. ©HEALTHCARE GRAPHICS 05 CONS U LT ING 1504 Surrey Ct., Dallas, TX 75043 972.249.6833 December 28, 2016 Signage Description IL - Permitted Signs in Zone H-1 PUD Scale: NITS ZWOMEN'S & CHILDREN'S Sign Type 3.1 Allow 2 sq. ft. of sign for every 1 lineal foot of building. T- 0"Max. Height Intent: To identify main buildings on the campus. Logo Sign Type 1.3 Building Identification Monument Sign:48 sq. ft. 8'-0"Max. Height Intent: To identify individual building entrances on campus at street level. ©HEALTHCARE GRAPHICS 06 CONS U LT ING 1504 Surrey Ct., Dallas, TX 75043 972.249.6833 December 28, 2016 27.22.120: Permitted Signs in Zone H-1 PUD (Off -Premise Signs) Scale: 1 /2" = V-0" Existing Code for H-1 to remain for H-1 PUD 6-9" (5) Not more than two off -premise signs may be permitted at primary hospital entrance roads to provide direction to a hospital facility from a major arterial. One sign shall be permitted per intersection entrance. Each sign shall not exceed 54 square feet per face nor 12 feet in height. Off -premise hospital signs will be allowed on developed or undeveloped property and will not be counted as part of the sign type or allowance permitted for that parcel. ©HEALTHCARE GRAPHICS 07 CONS U LT ING 1504 Surrey Ct., Dallas, TX 75043 972.249.6833 December 28, 2016 Identification Identify where the visitor is at within a space by creating a boundary at the entrance and exit. Campus entry identification Campus monument identification Building monument identification Building letters identification Parking identification Shuttle identification Campus Entry 7'-7"h x 12'-o"w Identify the two main entry and exit points on the campus from the main roads. Building Monument Parking Identify the buildings on the campus. 6'-0" h x 3'-0"w 9'-0"h x 5'-0"w with 2'dia number n�gmm Russell Hwpifal for Chi ldmn 12'-0" h x 4'-6" w I� 12'-6" h x 3'-8" w These signs would mark secondary entry points & create the "edge" of the campus. Building Letters Names or logos on building walls to indicate their function. Logo: 17'-0"x 17'-0" Lette rs: 3'-6" h i g h ©HEALTHCARE GRAPHICS 08 CONS U LT ING 1504 Surrey Ct., Dallas, TX 75043 972.249.6833 December 28, 2016 Signage Examples Directional Direct visitors to their destination once they enter a space. Vehicular directionals Pedestrian directional 16-0" h x 5'-0" w Vehicular Direct vehicular traffic to parking areas and main buildings. 1 T-0" h pole 5'-9" h x 4'-0"w sign panel Pedestrian Direct visitors to main buildings and feature distance. ©HEALTHCARE GRAPHICS 09 CONS U LT I N G 1504 Surrey Ct., Dallas, TX 75043 972.249.6833 December 28, 2016 Emergency Directional Sign ®PHOENIX CHILDREN'$ Hospital N Thomas Main Entrance Cambridge Entrance b Side A Side B 16-0" h x 5'-0" w Side A Side B 12'-0" h x 4'-4" w ©HEALTHCARE GRAPHICS 10 CONS U LT I N G 1504 Surrey Ct., Dallas, TX 75043 972.249.6833 December 28, 2016 Signage Examples Regulatory The necessary signage for codes and regulations. Traffic regulations Parking regulations Entrance regulations o4 a No Smoking No Weapons Allowed IF�= O Entrance Placed at building entrances and often required by code or client. T-6" h x 2'-6" w ©HEALTHCARE GRAPHICS 1 1 CONS U LT ING 1504 Surrey Ct., Dallas, TX 75043 972.249.6833 December 28, 2016 Appendix L - Parking Management Plan Parking Management Plan Intent: Uses within the PUD boundary consist of the main Hospital and numerous stand-alone buildings and properties. As the hospital requires a large amount of parking for patients, visitors, and employees alike, the parking facilities can stretch across several properties within the PUD boundary. The following Parking Management Plan is being implemented for the "KRH Parking Management Zone" as presented in the attached map. Amendments to the areas included in the Parking Management Zone shall be reviewed by the City Site Review Committee as a minor amendment to the PUD. Parking within the PUD shall comply with the Off -Street Parking Design Standards except as modified by this Parking Management Plan. Location: The location of the Required parking for a use located within the KRH Parking Management Zone is allowed anywhere within the Zone as long as the total parking requirement is satisfied. Minimum Standards by Use: 1. The Minimum Standards by Use shall be determined by the City of Kalispell Zoning Ordinance and this Management Plan. The ratios listed in the table below shall govern over the City Zoning Ordinance for uses within the KRH Parking Management Zone. 2. The applicant shall provide with each building permit: a. Parking calculations in a standard format based on the uses listed below and those relevant from the City Zoning Ordinance. These ratios shall determine the required parking for the project and/or the KRH Parking Management Zone. For the Hospital use, the maximum staff per working shift shall be established on an annual basis during the parking review with the City Staff presented below. b. If the project involves the core hospital area as shown in the Parking Management Zone Map, the applicant shall provide for reference the square foot of building per parking space calculation. After two years of monitoring the square footage per space ratio for the Hospital use, the City and KRH agree to discuss a possible PUD amendment to the Hospital parking standard listed below. 3. The parking counts for existing stand-alone uses within the management area are not required to be presented unless impacted by the application. If a portion of the parking at an existing use is utilized by the application, then the parking for that existing use shall also be presented in the parking count requirements. 4. An annual review of parking in the KRH Parking Management Zone shall be conducted between the City Staff and KRH. This meeting will provide an opportunity to review base compliance with parking in the Management Zone as well as establish the maximum working shift to be utilized for the following year. If it is determined that additional parking spaces are needed, KRH will have nine (9) months to install the required parking spaces. Extension of this timeframe can be given by the Planning Director if meeting the parking requirement is not feasible within a nine (9) month timeframe. This meeting should be conducted by February 1st of each year to allow for appropriate time to construct additional parking, if needed, during through construction season. This requirement would not delay building permits that are submitted during the same timeframe and meet their required parking requirements. Minimum Parking Standards by Use Athletic Clubs 1 space per 200 gross square feet of floor area Business and Professional Offices 1 space per 300 square feet of gross floor area Hospitals 1 per 2 beds, excluding bassinets, plus 1 per 5 employees on maximum working shift, plus 1 per each staff doctor Parking Management Strategies: Valet — A free Valet service will be implemented at intervals deemed appropriate by KRH. Efforts shall be taken to notify the public through the KRMC website and news outlets when the Valet service has been implemented. Shuttle Service — A free shuttle service will be implemented at intervals deemed appropriate by KRH to move people from the more distant parking areas to the major facility entrances. When provided for patients and visitors, efforts shall be taken to notify the public through the KRMC website and news outlets. Parking Garage — KRH may use parking structures to increase parking counts and improve parking proximity to existing and/or proposed facilities. Potential locations are provided for in the PUD documents. Signage — Signage to improve wayfinding to parking facilities shall be considered in the completion of the campus signage plan. Appendix M - Central Construction Staging Management Plan Central Construction Staging Area — Management Plan Intent: Every construction project requires site specific staging areas to carry out the work and is typically located adjacent to the project. When the specific project is complete, these staging areas are removed and the facility is put into use. These project specific construction sites exist on many projects at KRH. The intent of the central construction staging area as an allowed use is to accommodate the larger scale growth experienced at KRH. This growth has created the need to provide a non - project specific staging areas which supports the nearly constant stream of projects ranging from small remodels of existing improvements to the construction of new facilities. The nature of healthcare construction often requires temporary storage of large building elements and equipment. Since a number of the projects are infilling developed property, there is often not enough space for staging adjacent to the individual project. The intent of the Central Construction Staging Area is to allow for non -project specific staging that will remain in place beyond individual project schedules as the demand for the use exists. Construction Staging Management: Fencing — Fencing with visual screening shall be utilized around the yard perimeter to screen adjacent properties and provide security. Vehicle access shall be controlled with gates that do not obstruct the public Right -of -Way when open or closed. Screening along adjacent properties shall be of uniform solid color. Along Public ROW, signs may be allowed following the City of Kalispell Sign Regulations. Fences and screening shall be inspected regularly with repairs completed as necessary. Fences can be installed up to the property line when adjacent to the Public Right of Way and other non-residential properties within the PUD. When adjacent to a residential zone, fences shall be installed a minimum of 10 feet from the property line. Construction Storm water — The Contractor shall obtain and maintain appropriate Kalispell and State construction storm water permits which implement Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans. These permits include measures to control runoff, dust, off -site tracking of mud and gravels, storage of chemicals, and solid waste management. These plans shall include provisions to inspect and clean the ROW of off -site tracking as needed. As a construction use, impervious surfacing is not required. In the event new pavement surfacing is desired, compliance with the City of Kalispell Storm Water Regulations will be required. Driveway Approaches — A City of Kalispell Driveway permit shall be obtained for any new or relocated driveways from the Staging Area. The driveway shall be constructed to the City of Kalispell Standard Driveway detail. Right -of -Way Encroachment — When work is required within the adjacent right-of-way, an encroachment permit shall be obtained.