Loading...
08. Abrahm's Offer to Purchase College Property...... ._ _-.....__. ..._r . i .. _..._... ..... . __ ..p__._ .. p ._.p.. _._�....__ . tch t41.4'J1' �tCr��t�lUr!<!L T 1 �tiZ£SiaU4E ��-'toPe'tib i A i PROFESSIONAL HANDLING am a OF YOUR U REAL ESTATE REALTY NEEDS BOX 460 LAKESIDE, MT 59922 (406) 844-3395 FAX (406) 844-2031 August 12, 1996 Kalispell City Council Kalispell, Montana 59901 Re: Tax Increment District City of Kalispell Mr. Mayor and Members of the City Council; HOMES ACREAGE LOTS RANCHES BUSINESS PROPERTIES This a formal request to secure $270,000.00 of tax increment financing to purchase and clear improvements located at the corner of Center Street and 3rd Ave E. and east of the Glacier Bank Drive-thru facility. This request is for the benefit of a proposed 24,500 sq. ft. building to house a major retailer. The funds will be used to clear on 24,000. sq. ft. masonry building and two metal buildings on the property. The $270,000.00 is applied to the following: Acquiring the existing improvements ............................. $210,000.00 (*At current Flathead County assessed valuation) Demolition and site clearance ........................................ $ 60,000.00 I, as an agent of Woods and Water Realty, represent the major retailer and the owner. We are finalizing lease negotiations between the two parties. It is the intent of the owner to have this new structure in place by June 1, 1997 and the retailer to be open for business by August 1, 1997. As we have mentioned to Mr. Gallagher, in a meeting last week, it is imperative that we receive a favorable vote from the City Council so that we may be able to proceed with final arrangements with our tenants. It is anticipated by all our preliminary figures that the cost of development of this building will run in the range of$1,200,000.00, with tenant improvements of $380,000.00, T d ZE:1-T 9661'ZS'80 1W 30IS3AU 1 AlIU38 N31W35000n W021d At this point I would like to finish by saying that a lot of effort was put in to identify this location and it would be a real shame to see a major retailer be force to relocate to a location outside the tax increment district and the city not benefiting from what could be a 30 year tenant. In addition to having a new retail tenant, a new and more attractive building will be incorporated into the downtown area. This always gives existing downtown tenants some security that more consumers will shop the downtown area and not opting to shop elsewhere. It is imparative that we receive the City's acceptance and acknowlegement of this project and tax increment funding during your meeting of August 19th, but no later than September 9th, 1996. Your prompt consideration of this matter is greatly appriciated Sine David C. Thomquist Broker Associate ***END***