Loading...
05. Resolution 4246 - Woods Annexation & Zone ChangeORDINANCE NO. 1234 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SECTION 27.02.010, OFFICIAL ZONING MAP, CITY OF KALISPELL ZONING ORDINANCE, (ORDINANCE NO. 1175), BY ZONING PROPERTY KNOWN AS LOT 1, INSTENESS SUBDIVISION IN THE NE1/4 OF SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 28 NORTH, RANGE 21 WEST, P.M.M., FLATHEAD COUNTY, MONTANA (PREVIOUSLY ZONED R-1, SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL), R-4, TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY -COUNTY MASTER PLAN, AND TO PROVIDE AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Chris and Libby Wallace, the owners of property known as Lot 1, Insteness Subdivision in the NE1/4 of Section 19, T28N, R21W, P.M.M., Flathead County, Montana, petitioned the City of Kalispell that the zoning classification attached to the above described tract of land be changed to R-4,Two Family Residential, and WHEREAS, the property as described above exists as property surrounded to the north, east and west by City R-1 classification, and to the south by County R-1 classification, and WHEREAS, the petition of Chris and Libby Wallace was the subject of a report compiled by the Flathead Regional Development Office, #KZC-95-06, dated November 5, 1995, in which the Flathead Regional Development Office evaluated the petition and recommended that the property as described above be rezoned R-4, Two Family Residential, as requested by the petition, and WHEREAS, the Kalispell City -County Planning Board and Zoning Commission issued a report recommending the property as described above be zoned R-4, Two Family Residential, and WHEREAS, after considering all the evidence submitted on the proposal to zone the property as described above R-4, Two Family Residential; the City Council makes the following based upon the criterion set forth in Section 76-3-608, M.C.A., and State, Etc. V. Board of Country Commissioners, Etc. 590 P2d 602: Does the Requested Zone Comply with the Master Plan? The subject property is within the jurisdiction of the Kalispell City -County Master Plan. According to the map of the Master Plan, the property is currently designated as "Urban Residential", with a maximum density of 8 dwelling units per acre. R-4 is considered in compliance with the Master Plan. Is the Requested Zone Designed to Lessen Congestion in the Streets and Facilitate the Adequate Provision of Transportation, Water, Sewer, Schools, Parks and Other Public Requirements? 0 Congestion in the street and the provision for adequate transportation is related to an overburden of the system by traffic. The zone in this case would not overburden the system because traffic generation is a function of the number of dwelling units and uses that are allowed within a given area; this density of development is anticipated under the Master Plan. In addition, Sunnyside Drive is considered a Collector street by the Master Plan and is expected to handle the increase in traffic. A change of zone will allow a greater density of development to occur. However, the area is being served or can be served by urban infrastructure including: municipal street, parks, fire and police departments, and sewer and water along with other utilities. Any development of this site will require further City review, whether in the form of a conditional use permit, subdivision review, building permits, and/or Site Plan Committee review. Impacts from specific development would be addressed at the time of that request. No significant negative impact is expected. Will the Requested Zone Secure Safety from Fire, Panic and Other Dangers? Development within the R-4 zone is subject to certain standards including maximum building height and the provision of off-street parking. Further, any development of the property is subject to review by the City's Site Plan Review Committee and requires the issuance of City building, plumbing, mechanical and State electrical permits. These requirements and review processes help ensure that development of the property subsequent to the zone change is done in a safe manner. In addition, this type of development activity is anticipated at this location per the Master Plan. The property is not known to be in any hazardous area. No significant negative impact is expected. Will the Requested Zone Change Promote the Health and General Welfare? The general purpose of the City's zoning ordinance is to promote the general health and welfare and does so by implementing the City's Master Plan. The City's Master Plan does support the requested zone change. The requested zone would not intrude on the health or general welfare of this particular neighborhood and in fact would promote the health and general welfare of the City by providing an area for urban density development to occur where services are available as provided for in the E Master Plan. The surrounding residential uses are compatible with the proposed zoning classification. No significant negative impact is expected. Will the Requested Zone Provide for Adequate Light and Air? The parking, landscaping, and clear vision setback requirements of the 'zoning ordinance, subdivision regulations, and review by the Site Review Committee would ensure that light and air are adequately provided. No significant negative impact is expected. Will the Requested Zone Change Prevent the Overcrowding of Land? Overcrowding of land can occur when development out -paces or exceeds the environmental or service limitations of the property. Adequate infrastructure is in place to accommodate the land uses allowed in the requested zone. No significant negative impact is expected. Will the Requested Zone Avoid Undue Concentration of People? Concentration of people is a function of land use. Residential redevelopment would certainly occur on this site if the zone change is approved. The uses associated with the R-4 zone are anticipated for the concentration of people expected and should not create an undue hardship on the neighborhood. No significant negative impact is expected. Does the Requested Zone Give Consideration to the Particular Suitability of the Property for Particular Uses? The subject site is well suited for uses permitted within the R-4 zone. The property is of adequate size and has adequate access to facilities for the type of uses permitted in the proposed zone. No significant negative impact is expected. Does the Requested Zoning Give Reasonable Consideration to the Character of this District? The property in question is well suited for the type of development anticipated under the requested zone because of the topography, access, regional location, and size of the proposal. No significant negative impact is expected. to Would the Proposed Zoning Conserve the Value of the Buildings? The subject request would not significantly impact buildings. There are no known uses that would be affected by this zone. A change to the R-4 zone will not significantly impact, erode or devalue the neighborhood beyond the type of uses that are currently allowed to exist. No significant negative impact is expected. Will the Requested Zone Change Encourage the Most Appropriate Use of the Land Throughout the Jurisdiction? The requested zoning classification is consistent with the Kalispell City -County Master Plan. The Plan specifically identifies this area for urban residential uses. The area consists of residential uses with the same zone north of Sunnyside Drive. The proposed zone change would be the most appropriate use of the land. No significant negative impact is expected. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KALISPELL AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Section 27.02.010, of the Official Zoning Map of the Kalispell Zoning Ordinance, (Ordinance #1175) is hereby amended by designating the property known as Lot 1, Insteness Subdivision in the NE1/4 of Section 19, T28N, R21W, P.M.M., Flathead County, Montana, as R-4, Two Family Residential. SECTION II. The balance of Section 27.02.010, Official Zoning Map, City of Kalispell Zoning Ordinance not amended hereby shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION III. This Ordinance shall be effective thirty (30) days from and after the date of its final passage and approval by the Mayor. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND MAYOR OF THE CITY OF KALISPELL THIS DAY OF , 1995. ATTEST: Debbie Gifford, CMC Clerk of Council 4 Douglas D. Rauthe, Mayor Flathead Regional Development Office 723 5th Avenue East - Room 414 Kalispell, Montana 59901 Phone: (406) 758-5980 November 22, 1995 Fax: (406) 758-5781 Bruce Williams, City Manager City of Kalispell P.O. Drawer 1997 Kalispell, MT 59903 Re: Wallace Zone Change - R-1 to R4 Dear Bruce: The Kalispell City -County Planning Board and Zoning Commission met on November 14, 1995 and held a public hearing on the following agenda item: A request by Chris and Libby Wallace for a rezoning of property from R-1, Suburban Residential to R-4, Two Family Residential. The property is known as Lot 1, Insteness Subdivision in the NEI/a of Section 19, Township 28 North, Range 21 West, P.M.M., Flathead County, Montana. The property is located on the south side of Sunnyside Drive where 6th Avenue West ends. The staff report was presented by John Parsons, Senior Planner of the Flathead Regional Development Office. The applicant spoke in favor of the requested zone change. There was no opposition. The Zoning Commission on a 5-3 vote adopted FRDO Report #KZC-95-06 as findings of fact and recommended that the zone change from R-1 to R-4 be approved. This recommendation is forwarded to City Council for final determination on the petition for a zone change. Council needs to wait for the minutes of the Planning Board meeting prior to taking final action, however this does not preclude discussion at the Council workshop. Please contact this Commission or the FRDO if you have any questions. Respectfully submitted, KAL PELL CITY -COUNTY PLANNING BOARD AND ZONING COMMISSION Therese Fox Hash President TFH/JJP/dh Attachments: FRDO Report #KZC-95-06 and Application Materials Minutes to follow under seperate cover c w/o Att: Chris and Libby Wallace, 602 Sunnyside Dr., Kalispell, MT 59901 Providing Community Planning Assistance To: * Flathead County * City of Columbia Falls * City of Kalispell * City of Whitefish WALLACE ZONE CHANGE REQUEST CITY OF KALISPELL FRDO STAFF REPORT #KZC-95-6 NOVEMBER 5, 1995 Chris and Libby Wallace have petitioned to amend the Official Zoning Map of the City of Kalispell. The property subject to the request is currently zoned R-1 (Suburban Residential). The request is to change the zoning to R-4 (Two Family Residential). The zone change request is subject to a public hearing before the Kalispell City -County Planning Board and Zoning Commission on November 14, 1995 at 7:00 pm, in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 312-1st Avenue East. A recommendation from that body will be forwarded to the Kalispell City Council for final action. PROPOSED ZONING CLASSIFICATION An R-4 Two Family zoning classification is defined by the Kalispell Zoning Ordinance as: A residential district with minimum lot areas. Development within this district will require all public utilities, and all community facilities. Two-family dwellings are permitted in this district. BACKGROUND INFORMATION PETITIONER/OWNER: Chris and Libby Wallace 602 Sunnyside Drive Kalispell, MT 59901 LOCATION: The subject property is located on the south side of Sunnyside Drive where 6th Avenue West ends. The property is approximately one acre and has access directly from Sunnyside Drive. The legal description of the property is Lot 1 of Insteness Addition. ZONING AND LAND USE: The subject property is currently zoned R-1 and developed with a house. To the north, east and west is zoned City R-1 and developed with residences. To the south is zoned County R-1 and is vacant (requested for annexation File #KA=95-10). EVALUATION BASED ON STATUTORY CRITERIA The statutory procedure for evaluating zone changes is set forth by 76-2-303, M.C.A. Findings of Fact for the zone change request are discussed relative to the criteria described by 76-2-304, M.C.A. Does The Requested Zone Comply With The Master Plan? The subject property is within the jurisdiction of the Kalispell City -County Master Plan. According to the map of the Master Plan, the property is currently designated as "Urban Residential", with a maximum density of 8 dwelling units per acre. R-4 is considered in compliance with the Master Plan. Is The Requested Zone Designed To Lesson Congestion In The Streets And Facilitate The Adeguate Provision Of Transportation, Water, Sewer, Schools, Parks And Other Public Requirements? Congestion in the street and the provision for adequate transportation is related to an overburden of the system by traffic. The zone in this case would not overburden the system because traffic generation is a function of the number of dwelling units and uses that are allowed within a given area; this density of development is anticipated under the Master Plan. In addition, Sunnyside Drive is considered a Collector street by the Master Plan and is expected to handle the increase in traffic. A change of zone will allow a greater density of development to occur. However, the area is being served or can be served by urban infrastructure including: municipal street, parks, fire and police departments, and sewer and water along with other utilities. Any development of this site will require further City review, whether in the form of a conditional use permit, subdivision review, building permits, and/or Site Plan Committee review. Impacts from specific development would be addressed at the time of that request. No significant negative impact is expected. Will The Requested Zone Secure Safety From Fire, Panic And Other Dangers? Development within the R-4 zone is subject to certain standards including maximum building height and the provision of off-street parking. Further, any development of the property is subject to review by the City's Site Plan Review Committee and requires the issuance of City building, plumbing, mechanical, and State electrical permits. These requirements and review processes help ensure that development of the property subsequent to the zone change is done in a safe manner. In addition, this type of development activity is anticipated at this location per the Master Plan. The property is not known to be in any hazardous area. No significant negative impact is expected. 2 Will The Requested Change Promote The Health And General Welfare? The general purpose of the City's zoning ordinance is to promote the general health and welfare and does so by implementing the City's Master Plan. The City's Master Plan does support the requested zone change. The requested zone would not intrude on the health or general welfare of this particular neighborhood and in fact would promote the health and general welfare of the City by providing an area for urban density development to occur where services are available as provided for in the Master Plan. The surrounding residential uses are compatible with the proposed zoning classification. No significant negative impact is expected. Will The Requested Zone Provide For Adequate Light And Air? The parking, landscaping and clear vision setback requirements of the zoning ordinance, subdivision regulations, and review by the Site Review Committee would ensure that light and air are adequately provided. No significant negative impact is expected. Will The Requested Zone Change Prevent The Overcrowdingof Land? Overcrowding of land can occur when development out -paces or exceeds the environmental or service limitations of the property. Adequate infrastructure is in place to accommodate the land uses allowed in the requested zone. No significant negative impact is expected. Will The Requested Zone Avoid Undue Concentration Of People? Concentration of people is a function of land use. Residential redevelopment would certainly occur on this site if the zone change is approved. The uses associated with the R-4 zone are anticipated for the concentration of people expected and should not create a undue hardship on the neighborhood. No significant negative impact is expected. Does The Requested Zone Give Consideration To The Particular Suitability Of The Property For Particular Uses? The subject site is well suited for uses permitted within the R-4 zone. The property is of adequate size and has adequate access to facilities for the type of uses permitted in the proposed zone. No significant negative impact is expected. Does The Requested Zoning Give Reasonable Consideration To The Character Of This District? The property in question is well suited for the type of development anticipated under the requested zone because of the topography, access, regional location, and size of the proposal. No significant negative impact is expected. 3 Would The Proposed Zoning Conserve The Value Of The Buildings? The subject request would not significantly impact buildings. There are no known uses that would be affected by this zone. A change to the R-4 zone will not significantly impact, erode or devalue the neighborhood beyond the type of uses that are currently allowed to exist. No significant negative impact is expected. Will The Requested Zone Change Encourage The Most Appropriate Use Of The Land Throughout The Jurisdiction? The requested zoning classification is consistent with the Kalispell City -County Master Plan. The Plan specifically identifies this area for urban residential uses. The area consists of residential uses with the same zone north of Sunnyside Drive. The proposed zone change would DISCOSION AND RECOMMENDATION The Kalispell City -County Master Plan designated this general area as Urban Residential. The Master Plan anticipates this density of development in this area. The infrastructure exists or can be provided to this property for the zoning designation. this staff report as findings of fact and forward a recommendation to the City Council to approve the requested zone change. FA ... \KZC95-05.R-4 4 .;7s' �' " _ iOL'! _ _ rs sir Erg :rr ' �11 dirt �l I Ap, rift rw rs ei■n t " i a •