08. Resolution 4219 - Boller AnnexationRESOLUTION NO. 4219
A RESOLUTION TO PROVIDE FOR THE ALTERATION OF THE BOUNDARIES OF THE
CITY OF KALISPELL BY INCLUDING THEREIN, AS AN ANNEXATION, A TRACT
OF LAND DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A", TO BE KNOWN AS BOLLER ADDITION
NO. 265; TO ZONE SAID PROPERTY LOW DENSITY MULTI -FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL, RA-1, TO AMEND THE CITY ZONING MAP ACCORDINGLY AND TO
DECLARE AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Kalispell has received a petition from
the City of Kalispell on behalf of Rex Boller, the owner of the
property described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and thereby made
a part hereof, requesting that the City of Kalispell annex the
territory into the City, and
WHEREAS, the Flathead Regional Development Office has made a
report on Boller Addition No. 265, City Zone Request, #KA-95-5,
dated June 1, 1995, and
WHEREAS, the Kalispell City -County Planning Board and Zoning
Commission recommended that the territory be annexed into the City
of Kalispell and be zoned Low Density Multi -Family Residential, RA-
1, and
WHEREAS, based upon the report of the Flathead Regional
Development Office and the recommendation of the Kalispell City -
County Planning Board and Zoning Commission, the City Council of
the City of Kalispell finds that the recommended zoning
classification for the territory is appropriate based upon the
following criterion:
Does the Requested Zone Comply with the Master Plan?
The subject property is within the jurisdiction of the
Kalispell City -County Master Plan. According to the map
of the master plan, the property is currently designated
as "High Density Residential". RA-1 is considered in
compliance with the Master Plan.
Does the Requested Zone Lessen Congestion in the Streets?
Congestion in the streets is caused by an overburden of
traffic on the street system. The zone in this case
would -not cause undue congestion because traffic
generation is a function of the number of dwelling units
that are allowed within a given area. Because the area
to be annexed is part of an existing single tract under
single ownership, they must be developed together. The
area to be annexed contains 18,300 sq. feet. Both
portions of the tract contain 36,600 sq. feet. If the
entire tract were rezoned RA-1, the site could
accommodate a maximum of 12 dwelling units. Under the
1
present split zoning the ownership could accommodate 10
dwelling units, 6 units on the RA-1 zone in the City and
4 units configured as two duplexes on the R-4 lot in
question. The net effect of increasing density from a
potential maximum of 10 units to 12 is considered
negligible in this location. If the property is
subdivided/developed it would be in a manner that is
consistent with the existing City RA-1 zone in the area.
In addition, the Master Plan for this area calls for this
property to be developed with RA-1 type development, and
5th Avenue East in this location is a through street.
Will the Requested Zone Secure Safety from Fire, Panic
and Other Dangers?
Development within this zone is subject to development
standards including: lot coverage, maximum building
height, and the provision of off-street parking. Any
development of the property is subject to review by the
City, and requires the issuance of building, plumbing,
and mechanical permits. These requirements and review
processes help ensure that development of the property
subsequent to the zone change is done in a safe manner.
In addition, 5th Avenue. East is a through street. No
significant negative impact is expected.
Will the Requested Change Promote the Health and General
Welfare?
The purpose of the City's zoning ordinance is to promote
the general health and welfare and does so by
implementing the City -County Master Plan.. The City -
County Master Plan would support the requested zone
change. Designation of this area as RA-1 would have
little or no impact. Any traffic generation that the
proposed change allows would be mitigated at the time of
development. Any impact to stormwater runoff, sewers,
and water would also be addressed at the time of
development proposals.
The zoning ordinance provides a mechanism for public
input and review for all zone change requests. This
process offers an opportunity to ensure that any changes
to the Official Zoning Map are done in the general public
interest. No significant negative impact is expected.
Will the Requested Zone Provide for Adequate Light and
Air?
The development standards of the zoning ordinance and
subdivision regulations (i.e.: parking, landscaping,
clear vision setback, roadway improvements, etc.) would
Pq
ensure that light and air are adequately provided. Any
development beyond a duplex would also require approval
of a Conditional Use Permit.
Will the Requested Zone Chancre Prevent the Overcrowding
of Land?
Overcrowding of land occurs when development out -paces or
exceeds the environmental or service limitations of the
property. A Special Improvements District is being
created to install sewer in 5th Avenue East. This sewer
would prevent the degradation of the environment by
septic system contamination and help limit any impacts
due to overcrowding of the land. The Subdivision,
Zoning, and Building regulations control the intensity
requirements that a property can be developed with.
Adequate infrastructure is in place or can be provided at
the time of development to accommodate the land uses
allowed in the requested zone. No significant negative
impact is expected.
will the Requested Zone Avoid Undue Concentration of
People?
Concentration of people relates to the land use permitted
by a particular zone. The proposed change would have
little -unexpected impact on residential density in the
area. Infrastructure exists or can be provided which
supports the proposed change. The zoning ordinance
covers the intensity of use that would be permitted in
this zone. An undue concentration of people would result
if the property is developed at a level which exceeds the
environmental or service carrying capacity of the land
which would not happen. The proposed zoning and its
regulations would ensure that the site is properly
developed. No significant negative impact is expected.
will the Requested Zone Facilitate the Adequate Provision
of Transportation, Water, Sewer, Schools, Parks and Other
Public Requirements?
The additional demands for transportation, water, and
sewer will be evaluated pursuant to individual
development proposals; existing infrastructure exists, or
can be provided, in the vicinity which should be able to
serve development/redevelopment of this property.
Schools and parks should not be any more impacted under
the existing County zone than would be under the proposed
City zone. No significant negative impact is expected.
3
Does the Requested Zone Give Consideration to the
Particular Suitability of the Property for Particular
Uses?
The subject property is well suited for uses permitted
within the RA-1 zone because of availability of services
and access. The property is of adequate size for the
type of uses permitted and conditionally allowed in the
proposed zone. No significant negative impact is
expected.
Does the Requested Zoning Give Reasonable Consideration
to the Character of this District?
The property in question is well suited for the type
development anticipated under the requested zone because
of the topography, access, regional location, access to
schools, access to urban services, and size of the
proposal. In addition the Master Plan for the area
anticipates this type of zone in this area. No
significant negative impact is expected.
Would the Proposed Zoning Conserve the Value of the
Buildings?
The subject request would not significantly impact
buildings. There are no known uses that would be
affected by this zone. A change from County R-4 to the
City RA-1 zone will not significantly impact, erode, or
devalue the neighborhood beyond the type of uses that are
currently allowed or that exist in the area as this is a
residential zone. No significant negative impact is
expected.
Will the Requested Zone Change Encourage the Most
Appropriate Use of the Land Throughout the Jurisdiction?
Appropriateness of a zone is determined by the Kalispell
City -County Master Plan. The Plan and the existing
zoning classifications in the area identify this area for
the uses permitted within the requested zone. Therefore,
the change would encourage the most appropriate use of
the land. No significant negative impact is expected.
WHEREAS, on the 3rd day of April, 1989 the City Council of the
City of Kalispell adopted, pursuant to Section 7-2-4610, Montana
Code Annotated, an Extension of Services Plan which anticipates
development of City services for approximately five years in the
future, and
WHEREAS, the City has caused to be developed a "mini -extension
of services plan", attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and thereby made
4
a part hereof, for the territory by this Resolution annexed to the
City of Kalispell, and
WHEREAS, said "mini -extension of services plan" provides for
the extension of municipal services or maintenance of existing
services within the area of Boller Addition No. 265, subject to
annexation, including water, sewer, storm drainage, streets,
garbage collection, police protection and fire protection, and
WHEREAS, said "mini -extension of services plan" provides for
financing the extension of municipal services or maintenance of
existing services by utilizing funds allocated and expended,
pursuant to the annual City budget without incurring additional
bonded indebtedness, and
WHEREAS, the City of Kalispell desires to annex said property
in accordance with Title 7, Chapter 2, Part 46, Montana Code
Annotated.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF KALISPELL AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. That all the real property as is more
particularly described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto
and thereby made a part hereof, shall be annexed to the
City of Kalispell and the boundary of the City is altered
to so provide.
SECTION II. Upon the effective date of this Resolution,
the City Clerk of Council is directed to make and
certify, under the seal of the City a copy of the record
of these proceedings as are entered on the minutes of the
City Council and file said documents with the Flathead
County Clerk and Recorder.
From and after the date of filing of said documents as
prepared by the City Clerk of Council, or on the
effective date hereof, whichever shall occur later, said
annexed territory is part of the City of Kalispell and
its citizens and property shall be subject to all debts,
laws and ordinances and regulations in force in the City
of Kalispell and shall be entitled to the same privileges
and benefits as are other parts of the City.
SECTION III. The territory annexed by this Resolution
shall be zoned Low Density Multi -Family Residential, RA-
1.
5
SECTION IV. This Resolution shall be effective 30 days
from and after its passage by the City Council.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND MAYOR OF THE CITY
OF KALISPELL THIS DAY OF , 1995.
ATTEST:
Debbie Gifford, CMC
Clerk of Council
N.
Douglas D. Rauthe, Mayor
EXHIBIT A
ROLLER ADDITION NO. 265
That portion of the SW1/4 of Section 17, Township 28 North, Range 21 West, P.M.M.,
Flathead County, Montana, described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest
corner of Block 248 of Kalispell Townsite Company's Addition Number Seven to
Kalispell, Montana, according to the map or plat thereof on file and of record in
the office of the County Clerk and Recorder of Flathead County Montana; thence
on a line which Is the southerly continuation of the westerly line of said Block 248,
South 13049' East a distance of 366.00 feet to a point; thence 76011' East and
parallel with the southerly boundary of said Block 248 a distance of 150 feet to the
point of beginning; thence continuing North 760 11' East a distance of 150 feet to
a point; thence South 13049' East and parallel with the westerly boundary of said
Block 248 a distance of 122.00 feet to a point; thence South 76011' West and parallel
with the southerly boundary of said Block 248 a distance of 150.00 feet to a point;
thence North 13049' West and parallel with the westerly line of said Block 248 a
distance of 122 feet to the point of beginning.
�. 6
EXHIBIT "B"
4 • ADDITION
..il: ! • ANNEXATION
SERVICESEXTENSION OF PLAN
ADDENDUM ! CITY RESOLUTION
13838
PREPARED
FLATHEADa
1995
The subject property is within the Service Area Boundary of the City of Kalispell as
described by the Extension of Services Plan adopted by the City of Kalispell on April
3, 1989 (Resolution 13838). This broad -based extension of services plan together
with this "mini -plan" comprise the Extension of Services Plan for the Boiler Addition
No. 265 annexation.
EXISTING SERVICES:
Water: The City has a 6 inch water line in 5th Avenue East. This main should have
sufficient capacity to serve this site.
Sewer: No sewer currently exists to serve this site.
F"
Storm Drainage: No storm drain system exists in the area.
Streets: 5th Avenue East is developed as a two lane local street with access to 18th
Street East and 14th Street East.
Garbage Collection: Available by contract from private companies.
Police Protection: Currently the Flathead County Sheriff's Department.
Fire Protection: South Kalispell Fire Department.
7
ANEEDS:
Water: Water supply exists to the property from the water line In 5th Avenue Fast.
if, upon redevelopment of this property, this main is not of sufflclent capacity to
serve the development, a water main must be extended to connect with a main
of sufficient capacity to serve this property or other alternative be Installed.
Capacity and any extensions would be evaluated at the review stage of any
development permit.
Sewer: Sewer does not exists to this site. Currently, septic systems are used In this
area. A Special improvements District is currently being formed to Install a sewer
main in 5th Avenue Fast. when sewer is installed It would allow the area to
develop with more Intensive land uses.
storm Drainage: Retention and/or disposal of storm water will be evaluated during
the review phase of any proposed development. Storm drainage would be
handled onsite at the time of development.
Streets: 5th Avenue East is a two lane road in a 60 foot right-of-way and of
sufficient size to accommodate any additional traffic loads development of this site
would produce. The site could accommodate 12 units which would generate
approximately 80 vehicle trips per day.
Garbage Collection: The City has the capacity and equipment to handle the needs
of this site at the time it becomes eligible for municipal service.
Police/Fire: City of Kalispell Police Department and Fire Department will be available
to serve the tract upon annexation. They will be able to provide *service" to this
property on substantially the same basis and In the same manner In which this
service Is currently provided to the rest of the municipality.
EXTENSION AND FINANCE STRATEGIES:
The cost of extending such public services as police and fire protection are
expected to be negligible. The general source of money to extend these types of
services is from the general tax revenues received from this property and other
properties inside the City limits. A Special Improvements District is proposed for
the Installation of a sewer main In 5th Avenue East. This SID Is paid for by the
property owners who would receive sewer service. Individual Improvements to
the property, including the extension of water lines, sewer lines, and stormwater
management improvements, will be the responsibility of the developerflandowner.
Any area -wide Improvements relative to a comprehensive storm drainage system
will be financed in part by the residents of the entire municipality and In part by
special assessments for that purpose.
F:\...\KA95-SES.BLR
N.
0
►A
Flatheads Regional Development Office
723 5th Avenue East - Room 414
Kalispell, Montana 59901
June 19, 1995
Phone: (406) 758-5780
Bruce Williams, City Manager
Fax: (406) 758-5781
City of Kalispell
P.O. Drawer 1997
Kalispell, MT 59901
Re: Recommendation of Zoning for Boller Addition No. 265
Dear Bruce:
The Kalispell City -County Planning Board and Zoning Commission met on June 13,
1995, and held a public hearing on the following agenda item:
A request by the City of Kalispell on behalf of Rex Boller for annexation to the
City of Kalispell with an initial zoning classification of RA-1 (Low Denisty
Multi -Family Residential). The parcel contains approximately 18,300 square feet
located approximately 150 feet east of 5th Avenue East and 400 feet south of
14th Street East. The site is the east 150 feet of Tract 4J in the S W4 of
Section 17, Township 28 North, Range 21 West, P.M.M., Flathead County,
Montana.
John Parsons reviewed the statutory criteria for a zone change and recommended the
zone classification of RA-1 upon annexation of the property be granted.
No one spoke either in favor or in opposition to the requested zone upon annexation.
After a brief discussion on the proper legal notification of adjacent property owners,
the Board acting as the Zoning Commission, voted unanimously to adopt the findings
of fact in report #KA-95-5, and recommend that the requested RA-1 zone be granted
upon annexation of the subject property.
This recommendation for zoning is forwarded to the City Council for final action.
Council needs to wait for the minutes of the Planning Board meeting prior to taking
final action on this matter. However, this does not preclude discussion at Council
workshop. Please contact the Commission or the FRDO if you have any questions.
Respectfully submitted,
KALI PELL CITCOU TY PLANNING BOARD AND ZONING COMMISSION
Therese Fox Hash
President
TFH/JPP/eo
Attachments: FRDO Report #KA-95-5 & Packet
Minutes of 6/13/95 meeting forwarded separately
c: Mayor Doug Rauthe
c w/o Att: Rex Boller
F:\...\TRANSMIT\KALISPEL\KA-95-6.266
Providing Community Planning Assistance To:
* Flathead County * City of Columbia Falls * City of Kalispell * City of Whitefish
pf
1
BOLLER ADDITION NO. 265 - CITY ZONE REQUEST
R-4 (COUNTY) TO RA-1 (CITY)
FRDO CITY ZONE REPORT #KA-95-5
JUNE 1, 1995
The City of Kalispell on behalf of Rex Boller has petitioned for annexation of a tract
of land into the city limits of Kalispell. This is a report to the Kalispell City -County
Zoning Commission and Kalispell City Council. This report evaluates the assignment
of a City zoning classification as it relates to annexation in accordance with Section
27.03.010(4) of the Kalispell Zoning Ordinance.
The applicant has petitioned for a zoning classification of RA-1 (Low density
Residential Apartment). Presently, the property is zoned County R-4, under the
Flathead County Zoning Regulations. The Kalispell Zoning Ordinance defines the
intent of the RA-1 Classification as follows:
A residential apartment district to provide areas for multi -family use
and compatible non-residential uses of medium land use intensity. it
should be served with all public utilities and be in close proximity to
.. municipal services and shopping districts.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
City of Kalispell, on behalf of
Rex Boller
33 - 2nd Street East
Kalispell, MT 59901
SIZE AND LOCATION:
The property is approximately 18,300 square feet located on the southeast side of
Kalispell, approximately 150 feet east of 5th Avenue East and 400 feet south of 14th
Street East. This site is the east 150 feet of Tract 41 in the SW 1/4, of Section 17,
Township 28 North, Range 21 West, P.M.M., Flathead County, Montana. The
property is more particularly described in Exhibit "A".
LAND USE AND ZONING:
The west half of the property is currently in the City, has a house on it and is zoned
RA-1; the east half of the property (the area to be annexed) is currently vacant and
zoned County R-4. North, south, and east (zoned County R-4) is developed with
residences, west is zoned City RA-1 and has a house on it. 5th Avenue East is a local
City road developed with two paved lanes and provides primary access to the
property.
AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVICES:
City services are available in and to the general area. A separately prepared
"Extension of Services Plan" discusses the provision of public services to this
property.
BACKGROUND:
When the city originally annexed the land area along 5th Avenue East and assigned
an RA-1 zoning classification, the city annexed a strip only 150 feet deep. In the
case of the applicants, this 150 foot depth severed their lot In half. That is, the
west half is in the city and zoned RA-1. The east half of the lot is zoned R-4 (Two
family residential) and still lies in the County. The applicant Is requesting
permission to bring the east half of the tract into the city with the same RA-1
zoning that already exists on the west half.
The statutory procedure for evaluating zone changes is set forth by 76-2-303, M.C.A.
Findings of Fact for the zone change request are discussed relative to the criteria
described by 76-2-304, M.C.A.
Does The Reauested Zone Comgiy With The Master Plan?
The subject property is within the jurisdiction of the Kalispell City -County Master
Plan. According to the map of the master plan, the property is currently
designated as "High Density Residential". RA-1 is considered in compliance with the
Master Plan.
Does The Requested Zone Lessen Congestion in the Streets?
Congestion in the streets is caused by an overburden of traffic on the street
system. The zone in this case would not cause undue congestion because traffic
generation is a function of the number of dwelling units that are allowed within
a given area. Because the area to be annexed is part of an existing single tract
under single ownership, they must be developed together. The area to be
annexed contains 18,300 sq. feet. Both portions of the tract contain 36,600 sq.
feet. If the entire tract were rezoned RA-1, the site could accommodate a
maximum of 12 dwelling units. Under the present splitzoning the ownership could
accommodate 10 dwelling units, 6 units on the RA-1 zone in the City and 4 units
configured as two duplexes on the R-4 lot in question. The net effect of increasing
density from a potential maximum of 10 units to 12 is considered negligible in this
location. If the property is subdivided/developed it would be in a manner that is
consistent with the existing City RA-1 zone in the area. In addition, the Master Plan
F,
` for this area calls for this property to be developed with RA-1 type development,
and 5th Avenue East in this location is a through street.
Will The Requested Zone Secure Safety From Fire, Panic And Other Dangers?
Development within this zone is subject to development standards including: lot
coverage, maximum building height, and the provision of off-street parking. Any
development of the property is subject to review by the City, and requires the
issuance of building, plumbing, and mechanical permits. These requirements and
review processes help ensure that development of the property subsequent to the
zone change is done in a safe manner. In addition, 5th Avenue East is a through
street. No significant negative impact is expected.
Will The Requested Change Promote The Health And General Welfare?
The purpose of the City's zoning ordinance is to promote the general health and
welfare and does so by implementing the City -County Master Plan. The City -County
Master Plan would support the requested zone change. Designation of this area as
RA-1 would have little or no impact. Any traffic generation that the proposed
change allows would be mitigated at the time of development. Any impact to
stormwater runoff, sewers, and water would also be addressed at the time of
development proposals.
The zoning ordinance provides a mechanism for public input and review for all
zone change requests. This process offers an opportunity to ensure that any
changes to the Official Zoning Map are done in the general public interest. No
significant negative impact is expected.
Will The Requested Zone Provide For Adequate Light And Air?
The development standards of the zoning ordinance and subdivision regulations
(Le.: parking, landscaping, clear vision setback, roadway improvements, etc.) would
ensure that light and air are adequately provided. Any development beyond a
duplex would also require approval of a Conditional Use Permit.
Will The Requested Zone Change Prevent The Overcrowding of Land?
Overcrowding of land occurs when development out -paces or exceeds the
environmental or service limitations of the property. A special Improvements
District is being created to install sewer in 5th Avenue East. This sewer would
prevent the degradation of the environment by septic system contamination and
help limit any impacts due to overcrowding of the land. The Subdivision, Zoning,
and Building regulations control the intensity requirements that a property can be
developed with. Adequate infrastructure is in place or can be provided at the time
of development to accommodate the land uses allowed in the requested zone. No
significant negative impact is expected.
3
Will The Requested Zone Avoid Undue Concentration Of People?
Concentration of people relates to the land use permitted by a particular zone.
The proposed change would have little unexpected impact on residential density
In the area. Infrastructure exists or can be provided which supports the proposed
change. The zoning ordinance covers the intensity of use that would be permitted
in this zone. An undue concentration of people would result If the property Is
developed at a level which exceeds the environmental or service carrying capacity
of the land which would not happen. The proposed zoning and its regulations
would ensure that the site is properly developed. No significant negative impact
is expected.
Will The Requested Zone Facilitate The Adequate Provision Of Transportation,
Water Sewer, Schools, Parks And Other Public Requirements?
The additional demands for transportation, water, and sewer will be evaluated
pursuant to Individual development proposals; existing infrastructure exists, or can
be provided, in the vicinity which should be able to serve
development/redevelopment of this property. Schools and parks should not be
any more impacted under the existing County zone than would be under the
proposed City zone. No significant negative impact is expected.
_Does The Requested Zone Give Consideration To The Particular Suitability Of The
Property For Particular Uses?
The subject property is well suited for uses permitted within the RA-1 zone because
of availability of services and access. The property is of adequate size for the type
of uses permitted and conditionally allowed in the proposed zone. No significant
negative impact is expected.
Does The Requested Zoning Give Reasonable Consideration To The Character Of This
District?
The property in question is well suited for the type development anticipated under
the requested zone because of the topography, access, regional location, access to
schools, access to urban services, and size of the proposal. in addition the Master
Plan for the area anticipates this type of zone in this area. No significant negative
impact is expected.
Would The Proposed Zoning Conserve The Value Of The Buildings?
The subject request would not significantly impact buildings. There are no known
uses that would be affected by this zone. A change from County R-4 to the City RA-
1 zone will not significantly impact, erode, or devalue the neighborhood beyond
the type of uses that are currently allowed or that exist in the area as this is a
residential zone. No significant negative impact is expected.
2
Will The Requested Zone Change Encourage The Most Appropriate Use Of The Land
Throughout The Jurisdiction?
Appropriateness of a zone is determined by the Kalispell City -County Master Plan.
The Plan and the existing zoning classifications in the area identify this area for the
uses permitted within the requested zone. Therefore, the change would
encourage the most appropriate use of the land. No significant negative impact
is expected.
SUMMARY
The request complies with the master plan, conforms to adjacent zoning, avoids
confusion and supports coordinated development by maintaining a single zoning
classification on a piece of land and would not unduly impact adjoining services or
facilities.
it is recommended that the Kalispell City -County Planning Board and Zoning
Commission adopt this FRDO staff report as findings of fact and forward a favorable
recommendation to City Council for the requested zone upon annexation.
F:\...\KA95-5ES.BLR
5
That portion of the SW1/4 of Section 17, Township 28 North, Range 21 West, P.M.M.,
Flathead County, Montana, described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest
corner of Block 248 of Kalispell Townsite Company's Addition Number Seven to
Kalispell, Montana, according to the map or plat thereof on file and of record In
the office of the County Clerk and Recorder of Flathead County Montana; thence
on a line which is the southerly continuation of the westerly line of said Block 248,
South 13049' East a distance of 366.00 feet to a point; thence 76011' East and
parallel with the southerly boundary of said Block 248 a distance of 150 feet to the
point of beginning; thence continuing North 760 11' East a distance of 150 feet to
a point; thence South 13049' East and parallel with the westerly boundary of said
Block 248 a distance of 122.00 feet to a point; thence South 76011' West and parallel
with the southerly boundary of said Block 248 a distance of 150.00 feet to a point;
thence North 13049' West and parallel with the westerly line of said Block 248 a
distance of 122 feet to the point of beginning.
6
BOLLER ♦ 1 • .46;;. 1
EXTENSION SERVICES PLAN
ADDENDUM TO CITY RESOLUTION #3838
PREPARED
BY
FLATHEAD
1 ! 1 DEVELOPMENT
. OFFICE
1995
The subject property is within the Service Area Boundary of the City of Kalispell as
described by the Extension of Services Plan adopted by the City of Kalispell on April
3, 1989 (Resolution #3838). This broad -based extension of services plan together
with this "mini -plan" comprise the Extension of Services Plan for the Boller Addition
No. 265 annexation.
EXISTING SERVICES:
Water: The City has a 6 inch water line in 5th Avenue East. This main should have
sufficient capacity to serve this site.
Sewer: No sewer currently exists to serve this site.
Storm Drainage: No storm drain system exists in the area.
Streets: 5th Avenue East is developed as a two lane local street with access to 18th
Street East and 14th Street East.
Garbage Collection: Available by contract from private companies.
Police Protection: Currently the Flathead County Sheriff's Department.
Fire Protection: South Kalispell Fire Department.
7
# r A
Water: Water supply exists to the property from the waterline in 5th Avenue East.
if, upon redevelopment of this property, this main is not of sufficient capacity to
serve the development, a water main must be extended to connect with a main
of sufficient capacity to serve this property or other alternative be Installed.
Capacity and any extensions would be evaluated at the review stage of any
development permit.
Sewer: Sewer does not exists to this site. Currently, septic systems are used in this
area. A Special improvements District is currently being formed to Install a sewer
main In Sth Avenue East. When sewer is installed It would allow the area to
develop with more intensive land uses.
Storm Drainage: Retention and/or disposal of storm water will be evaluated during
the review phase of any proposed development. Storm drainage would be
handled onsite at the time of development.
Streets: 5th Avenue East is a two lane road in a 60 foot right-of-way and of
sufficient size to accommodate any additional traffic loads development of this site
would produce. The site could accommodate 12 units which would generate
approximately 80 vehicle trips per day.
Garbage Collection: The City has the capacity and equipment to handle the needs
of this site at the time it becomes eligible for municipal service.
Police/Fire: City of Kalispell Police Department and Fire Department will be available
to serve the tract upon annexation. They will be able to provide "service" to this
property on substantially the same basis and in the same manner in which this
service is currently provided to the rest of the municipality.
EXTENSION AND FINANCE STRATEGIES:
The cost of extending such public services as police and fire protection are
expected to be negligible. The general source of money to extend these types of
services is from the general tax revenues received from this property and other
properties inside the City limits. A Special Improvements District Is proposed for
the installation of a sewer main in Sth Avenue East. This SID is paid for by the
property owners who would receive sewer service. Individual improvements to
the property, Including the extension of water lines, sewer lines, and stormwater
management improvements, will be the responsibility of the developer/landowner.
Any area -wide improvements relative to a comprehensive storm drainage system
will be financed in part by the residents of the entire municipality and in part by
special assessments for that purpose.
F:1... tKA95-SES.BLR
0
The City cf Kalispell
Incorporated 1892
Building Department
Brian Lwood
Zoning :administrator
April 20, 1995
John Parsons
Flathead Regional Developmen_ C==_ce
Courthouse East
723 5th Avenue East
Kalispell, MT 59901
Re. Annex>ation, Ass=:r`,t,en.. c_ Requests
Dear Mr. Parsons:
Telephone (406) 758-7730
248 3rd Avenue East
PO Box 1997
Zip 59903
Fax (406) 7_58-7739
At z
Enclosed are two Consent To ,_ _.e:. Ag-reements, each with legal
descri ration, vicin--y :n..ap .a._.. 1_ - of property owners within 150
feet.
Please schedule a public he-a__ng before the city -county planning
board/zoning commission on _ne z-_: g requests for June 13, 1995.
These annel.aticns are a reS___ of the city -initiated sewer S7D or_
the lower east side oz town.
I- you have any auest_ons, cr nee.. anything else let me know
Sincerely,
+ C) C 9
W
Brian J. Wood
Zoning Administrator
c: City Manager
Public Works (Zavodny)
��":�`•7 s,... ter � S.t :�' � �'+
V: