07. Resolution 4207 - McKee Annexation and Zone ChangeRESOLUTION NO. 4207
A RESOLUTION TO PROVIDE FOR THE ALTERATION OF THE BOUNDARIES OF THE
CITY OF KALISPELL BY INCLUDING THEREIN, AS AN ANNEXATION, A TRACT
OF LAND DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A", TO BE KNOWN AS McKEE ADDITION NO.
263; TO ZONE SAID PROPERTY URBAN SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, R-3, TO
AMEND THE CITY ZONING MAP ACCORDINGLY AND TO DECLARE AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Kalispell has received a petition from
Timothy McKee, the owner of the property described in Exhibit "A",
attached hereto and thereby made a part hereof, requesting that the
City of Kalispell annex the territory into the City, and
WHEREAS, the Flathead Regional Development Office has made a
report on McKee Addition No. 263, City Zone Request, KA-95-3, dated
March 31, 1995, and
WHEREAS, the Kalispell City -County Planning Board and Zoning
Commission recommended that the territory be annexed into the City
of Kalispell and be zoned Urban Single Family Residential, R-3, and
WHEREAS, based upon the report of the Flathead Regional
Development Office and the recommendation of the Kalispell City -
County Planning Board and Zoning Commission, the City Council of
the City of Kalispell finds that the recommended zoning
classification for the territory is appropriate based upon the
following criterion:
Does the Requested Zone Comply with the Master Plan?
The subject property is within the jurisdiction of the
Kalispell City -County Master Plan. According to the map
of the master plan, the property is currently designated
as a transition area between "High Density Residential
and Urban Residential". R-3 is considered in compliance
with the Master Plan.
Does the Requested Zone Lessen Congestion in the Streets?
Congestion in the streets is caused by an overburden of
traffic on the street system. The zone in this case
would not cause undue congestion because traffic
generation is a function of the number of dwelling units
that are allowed within a given area. The property is
subdivided in a manner which should preclude any further
subdivisions and the R-3 density of this property is
expected for this area. In addition, the County R-5
allows development at higher density than does the City
R-3. No significant additional traffic is expected as a
result of this zoning designation.
1
Will the Requested Zone Secure Safety from Fire, Panic
and Other Dangers?
Development within this zone is subject to development
standards including: lot coverage, maximum building
height, and the provision of off-street parking. Any
further development of the property is subject to review
by the City, and requires the issuance of building,
plumbing, and mechanical permits. These requirements and
review processes help ensure that development of the
property subsequent to the zone change is done in a safe
manner. No significant negative impact is expected.
Will the Requested Change Promote the Health and General
Welfare?
The general purpose of the City's zoning ordinance is to
promote the general health and welfare and does so by
implementing the City -County Master Plan. The City -
County Master Plan would support the requested zone
change. Designation of this area as R-3 would have
little or no impact. Any traffic generation that the
proposed change allows would be mitigated at the time of
redevelopment. Any impact to stormwater runoff, sewers,
and water would be addressed at the time of development
proposals.
OFF The zoning ordinance provides a mechanism for public
input and review for all zone change requests. This
process offers an opportunity to ensure that any changes
to the Official Zoning Map are done in the general public
interest. Additionally, other review mechanisms are in
place to ensure that development is in compliance with
all applicable safety codes. No significant negative
impact is expected.
Will the Requested Zone Provide for Adequate Light and
Air?
The development standards of the zoning ordinance and
subdivision regulations (i.e.: parking, landscaping,
clear vision setback, roadway -improvements, etc.) would
ensure that light and air are adequately provided.
Will the Requested Zone Change Prevent the Overcrowding
of Land?
Overcrowding of land occurs when development out -paces or
exceeds the environmental or service limitations of the
property. The Subdivision and Zoning Regulations control
the intensity requirements that a property can be
developed with. Adequate infrastructure is in place or
K
can be provided at the time of development to accommodate
the land uses allowed in the requested zone. No
significant negative impact is expected.
Will the Requested Zone Avoid Undue Concentration of
People?
Concentration of people relates to the land use permitted
by a particular zone. The proposed zone change would
decrease residential density in the area. infrastructure
exists or can be provided which supports the proposed
change. The zoning ordinance covers the intensity of use
that would be permitted in this zone. An undue
concentration of people would result if the property is
developed at a level which exceeds the environmental or
service carrying capacity of the land which would not
happen. The proposed zoning will insure that the site is
properly developed. No significant negative impact is
expected.
Will the Requested Zone Facilitate the Adequate Provision
of Transportation, Water, Sewer, Schools, Parks and other
Public Requirements?
The additional demands for transportation, water, and
sewer will be evaluated pursuant to individual
<<- development proposals; existing infrastructure exists in
the vicinity which should be able to serve redevelopment
of this property. Because of the size of the proposal
and existing development on the property, schools and
parks should not be significantly impacted. No
significant negative impact is expected.
Does the Requested Zone Give Consideration to the
Particular Suitability of the Property for Particular
Uses?
The subject property is well suited for uses permitted
within the R-3 zone. The property is of adequate size
and has adequate access to facilities for the type of
uses permitted in the proposed zone. No significant
negative impact is expected.
Does the Requested Zoning Give Reasonable Consideration
to the Character of this District?
The properties in question are well suited for the type
development anticipated under the requested zone because
of the topography, access, regional location, and size of
the proposal. No significant negative impact is
expected.
3
Would the Proposed Zoning Conserve the Value of the
Buildings?
The subject request would not significantly impact
buildings. There are no known uses that would be
affected by this zone. A change from County R-5 to the
City R-3 zone will not significantly impact, erode, or
devalue the neighborhood beyond the type of uses that are
currently allowed or that exist in the area. No
significant negative impact is expected.
Will the Requested Zone Change Encourage the Most
Appropriate Use of the Land Throughout the Jurisdiction?
The requested zoning classification would be consistent
with the Kalispell City -County Master Plan. The Plan and
the existing permitted uses under the zoning ordinance
generally identify this area for residential uses. The
change would encourage the most appropriate use of the
land. No significant negative impact is expected.
WHEREAS, on the 3rd day of April, 1989 the City Council of the
City of Kalispell adopted, pursuant to Section 7-2-4610, Montana
Code Annotated, an Extension of Services Plan which anticipates
development of City services for approximately five years in the
future, and
.. WHEREAS, the City has caused to be developed a "mini -extension
w of services plan", attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and thereby made
a part hereof, for the territory by this Resolution annexed to the
City of Kalispell, and
WHEREAS, said "mini -extension of services plan" provides for
the extension of municipal services or maintenance of existing
services with the area of McKee Addition No. 263, subject to
annexation, including water, sewer, storm drainage, streets,
garbage collection, police protection and fire protection, and
WHEREAS, said "mini -extension of services plan" provides for
financing the extension of municipal services or maintenance of
existing services by utilizing funds allocated and expended,
pursuant to the annual City budget without incurring additional
bonded indebtedness, and
WHEREAS, McKee Addition No. 263 is included within and
conforms to the Kalispell City -County Master Plan, and
WHEREAS, the City of Kalispell desires to annex said property
in accordance with Title 7, Chapter 2, Part 46, Montana Code
Annotated.
4
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF KALISPELL AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. That all the real property as is more
particularly described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto
and thereby made a part hereof, shall be annexed to the
City of Kalispell and the boundary of the City is altered
to so provide.
SECTION II. Upon the effective date of this Resolution,
the City Clerk of Council is directed to make and
certify, under the seal of the City a copy of the record
of these proceedings as are entered on the minutes of the
City Council and file said documents with the Flathead
County Clerk and Recorder.
From and after the date of filing of said documents as
prepared by the City Clerk of Council, or on the
effective date hereof whichever shall occur later, said
annexed territory is part of the City of Kalispell and
its citizens and property shall be subject to all debts,
laws and ordinances and regulations in force in the City
of Kalispell and shall be entitled to the same privileges
and benefits as are other parts of the City.
SECTION III. The territory annexed by this Resolution
shall be zoned Urban Single Family Residential, R-3.
SECTION IV. This Resolution shall be effective 30 days
from and after its passage by the City Council.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND MAYOR OF THE CITY
OF KALISPELL THIS DAY OF , 1995.
ATTEST:
Debbie Gifford, CMC
Clerk of Council
5
Douglas D. Rauthe, Mayor
Tract 1:
All that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 8,
Township 28 North, Range 21 West, M.P.M., Flathead County, Montana, particularly
described as follows:
Commencing at a point on the Easterly extension of the Northerly line of
Washington Street, which point is 289.8 feet Easterly from the Southeast corner of
Block B, Duncan's Addition to Kalispell, according to the recorded plat thereof;
thence containing
Easterly along the Easterly extension of the Northerly line of said Washington
Street, a distance of 199.5 feet; thence
North 0047' East, a distance of 90 feet; thence
North 31051' East, a distance of 90 feet to a point 150 feet North of and at right
angles to the Easterly extension of the North line of Washington Street, and the
Point of Beginning of the property to be herein described; thence continuing
North 31151' East, a distance of 208.4 feet to an intersection with the Easterly
extension of the Southerly boundary of Oregon Street; thence
South 76018' West along the Southerly boundary of the Easterly extension of said
Oregon Steet a distance of 149.8 feet to the Northeast corner of that certain Tract
of land described in Deed to Charles F. Hafer, recorded June 5, 1968 under
t Recorder's Fee No. 4082 in Book 498, Page 42, records of the County Clerk and
Recorder of Flathead County, Montana; thence
South 13042'East and along the East boundary thereof, a distance of 150 feet to the
Southeast corner thereof; thence
North 76018' East to the Point of Beginning.
Deed Exhibit Book 544, Page 429.
Tract 2:
A Tract of land in the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 8,
Township 28 North, Range 21 West, P.M.M., Flathead County, Montana, more
particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the point of intersection of the East boundary of 8th Avenue E.N. and
the Northerly boundary of Washington Street; thence
North 76011' East along the Northerly boundary of Washington Street a distance
of 261.5 feet; thence
North 0047' East a distance of 90 feet; thence
North 31051' East a distance of 80 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence
continuing
North 31051' East a distance of 210 feet, more or less, to the Southerly boundary
of Oregon Street; thence
North 76011' East to the center line of the County Road; thence following the
center line of said County Road
South 31051' West a distance of 220 feet, more or less; thence
South 76011'West to the -Point of Beginning.
EXHIBIT "B"
McKEE ADDITION NO. 263 ANNEXATION
EXTENSIONOF
ADDENDUM r RESOLUTION
PREPARED
FLATHEAD REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT
The subject property is within the Service Area Boundary of the City of Kalispell as
described by the Extension of Services Plan adopted by the City of Kalispell on April
3, 1989 (Resolution J3838). This broad -based extension of services plan, together
with this "mini -plan" comprise the Extension of Services Plan for the McKee
Addition No. 263, annexation.
EXISTING SERVICES:
Water: A 6 inch municipal water line exists in Oregon Street. The City has sufficient
capacity to serve this site when the extension is made.
Sewer: An 8 inch sanitary sewer line exists in Oregon Street. The City has sufficient
capacity to service this property when extensions are made.
Storm Drainage: Storm drainage is proposed to remain the same.
Streets: Oregon Street is a two lane paved street with sufficient capacity to serve
this site.
Garbage Collection: Available by contract from private companies.
Police Protection: Currently the Flathead County Sheriff's Department.
Fire Protection: Evergreen Volunteer Fire Department.
ANTICIPATED SERVICE NEEDS:
Water: Water supply would be able to be extended to the property from the
water line in Oregon Street. if not, a water main must be extended to connect
with a main of sufficient capacity to serve this property. Capacity and any
extensions would be evaluated at the review stage of any development permit.
Sewer: Sewer would be fed into the 8 inch main under Oregon Street and would
feed into the City's sewerage disposal plant. This disposal system would be
evaluated during the review phase of any development permit.
storm Drainage: On -site retention and/or disposal of storm water will be evaluated
during the review phase of any proposed development.
streets: Oregon Street is a two lane paved road with sufficient capacity to serve
this site.
Garbage Collection: The City has the capacity and equipment to handle the needs
of this site at the time it becomes eligible for municipal service.
Police/Fire: City of Kalispell Police Department and Fire Department will be available
to serve the tract upon annexation. They will be able to provide "service" to this
property on the substantially same basis and In the same manner in which this
service is currently provided to the rest of the municipality.
EXTENSION AND FINANCE STRATEGIES:
The cost of extending such public services as police and fire protection are
expected to be negligible. The general source of money to extend these type of
services is from the general tax revenues received from this property and other
properties inside the City limits. Individual improvements to the property
Including the extension of the water line, sewer line, and stormwater management
improvements will be the responsibility of the develope r/fandowner. Any area -
wide improvements relative to a comprehensive storm drainage system will be
financed in part by the residents of the entire municipality and in part by special
assessments for that purpose.
FA ..\KA95-3ES.MCK
4 _..__. ._.._
95i A H , d
Sot 112
! IQIC d $0114
io
e+ t{ at ag0 1 ,�
i 0 f too*
ia x;
� j
L ! J/
s � t.,:
Q� A
SUBEC9P
}
NROPER
a .
A t pR{
p s sas*
IL
s 1
a �{'
4 i i�pit
10. �
r 4o.% so• �/
-- rt sb•4 so•4 • A .
{on
a 4 ><
O R-2
!a!® Sol) too o°
0
.i00 i0t
1
i!
409 i w
. N
lotSOPS
..
y * t4 4
1 =300' KA 95-3
VIP
". 1 ,, 1 "
723 5th Avenue East - Room 414
Kalispell, Montana 59901
April 17, 1995
Phone: (406) 758-5780
Bruce Williams, City Manager
City of Kalispell
P.O. Drawer 1997
Kalispell, MT 59901
Re: Recommendation of Zoning for McKee Addition No. 263
Dear Bruce:
The Kalispell City -County Planning Board and Zoning Commission met on April 11,
1995, and held a public hearing on the following agenda item:
A request by Timothy McKee for annexation to the City of Kalispell with an
initial zoning classification of R-3 (Urban Single Family Residential). The
properties are located on the south side of Oregon Street approximately 400
feet east of 8th Avenue EN. The address is 1048 East Oregon, and is
further described as Assessor's Tracts 30X and 33 in Section 8, Township 28
North, Range 21 West, P.M.M., Flathead County, Montana.
During the public hearing, the applicant spoke in favor of the requested zoning
classification. No one spoke in opposition. By unanimous vote, the Commission
adopted FRDO Report #KA-95-3 as findings of fact, and recommend to the City
Council that the subject property be zoned R-3 upon annexation into the City of
Kalispell.
This recommendation for zoning is forwarded to the City Council for a subsequent
public hearing and final action. Council needs to wait for the minutes of the
Planning Board meeting prior to taking final action on this matter. However, this
does not preclude discussion at Council workshop. Please contact the Commission
or the FRDO if you have any questions.
Respectfully submitted,
cpELL CIjT�Y-/COUNTY PLANNING BOARD AND ZONING COMMISSION
Therese Fox Hash
President
TFH/JPP/eo
Attachments: FRDO Report #KA-95-3 & Packet
c: Mayor Doug Rauthe c w/o Att: Timothy McKee
F:\...\TRANSMIT\KALISPEL\KA-95-3.263
Providing Community Planning Assistance To:
• Flathead County • City of Columbia Falls • City of Kalispell • City of Whitefish •
McKEE ADDITION
R O TO
-
1. O CITY ZONE REPORT
MARCH
Timothy McKee has petitioned the City of Kalispell for annexation of a tract of land
Into the city limits of Kalispell. This is a report to the Kalispell City -County Zoning
Commission and Kalispell City Council. This report evaluates the annexation and the
assignment of a City zoning classification in accordance with Section 27.03.010(4)
of the Kalispell Zoning Ordinance.
The applicant has petitioned for a zoning classification of R-3 (Urban Single Family
Residential). Presently, the property is zoned County R-5, under the Flathead
County Zoning Regulations. The Kalispell Zoning Ordinance defines the intent of
the R-3 Classification as follows:
A residential district to provide lot areas for urban development. This
development must be served by all public utilities.
PETITIONER:
Timothy McKee
405 Valley View Drive
Kalispell, MT 59901
SIZE AND LOCATION:
The property is approximately 1/2 acre located on the northeast side of Kalispell,
on the south side of Oregon Street east of 9th Avenue East North. This site is
described as Assessors Tracts 30X and 33, in the NWE 1/4, of Section 8, T28N, R21W,
P.M.M., Flathead County, Montana. The properties are specifically described in
Exhibit A. The address of the property Is 1048 E. Oregon Street.
GENERAL LAND USE CHARACTER:
The property consists of two parcels of land; both are currently used for a
residence. South and east (zoned County R-5) is developed as a mobile home park,
west and north (zoned City R-3) is developed with residences. Oregon Street is a
paved two lane street which provides access to the site.
AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVICES:
City water and sewer services are available In the area. A separately prepared
"Extension of Services Plan" discusses the provision of public services to this
property.
EVALUATION EASED ON STATUTORY CRITERIA
The statutory procedure for evaluating zone changes Is set forth by 76-2-303, M.C.A.
Findings of Fact for the zone change request are discussed relative to the criteria
described by 76-2-304, M.C.A.
Does The Requested Zone Comply With The Master Plan?
The subject property is within the jurisdiction of the Kalispell City -County Master
Plan. According to the map of the master plan, the property Is currently
designated as a transition area between "High Density Residential and Urban
Residential". R-3 is considered in compliance with the Master Plan.
Does The Requested Zone Lessen Congestion in the Streets?
Congestion in the streets is caused by an overburden of traffic on the street
system. The zone in this case would not cause undue congestion because traffic
generation is a function of the number of dwelling units that are allowed within
a given area. The property is subdivided in a manner which should preclude any
further subdivisions and the R-3 density of this property is expected for this area.
in addition, the County R-5 allows development at higher density than does the City
R-3. No significant additional traffic is expected as a result of this zoning
designation.
Will The Requested Zone Secure Safety From Fire, Panic And _Other Dangers?
Development within this zone is subject to development standards including: lot
coverage, maximum building height, and the provision of off-street parking. Any
further development of the property is subject to review by the City, and requires
the issuance of building, plumbing, and mechanical permits. These requirements
and review processes help ensure that development of the property subsequent
to the zone change is done in a safe manner. No significant negative Impact is
expected.
Will The Requested Change Promote The Health And General Welfare?
The general purpose of the City's zoning ordinance is to promote the general
health and welfare and does so by implementing the City -County Master Plan. The
City -County Master Plan would support the requested zone change. Designation of
this area as R-3 would have little or no impact. Any traffic generation that the
proposed change allows would be mitigated at the time of redevelopment. Any
2
impact to stormwater runoff, sewers, and water would be addressed at the time
of development proposals.
The zoning ordinance provides a mechanism for public input and review for all
zone change requests. This process offers an opportunity to ensure that any
changes to the Official Zoning Map are done in the general public interest.
Additionally, other review mechanisms are in place to ensure that development is
in compliance with all applicable safety codes. No significant negative impact is
expected.
Will The Requested Zone Provide For Adequate Light And Air?
The development standards of the zoning ordinance and subdivision regulations
(Le.: parking, landscaping, clearvision setback, roadway improvements, etc.)would
ensure that light and air are adequately provided.
Will The Requested Zone Change Prevent The Overcrowding of Land?
Overcrowding of land occurs when development out -paces or exceeds the
environmental or service limitations of the property. The Subdivision and Zoning
Regulations control the intensity requirements that a property can be developed
with. Adequate infrastructure is in place or can be provided at the time of
development to accommodate the land uses allowed in the requested zone. No
significant negative impact is expected.
Will The Requested Zone Avoid Undue Concentration Of People?
Concentration of people relates to the land use permitted by a particular zone.
The proposed zone change would decrease residential density in the area. infra-
structure exists or can be provided which supports the proposed change. The
zoning ordinance covers the intensity of use that would be permitted in this zone.
An undue concentration of people would result if the property is developed at a
level which exceeds the environmental or service carrying capacity of the land
which would not happen. The proposed zoning will insure that the site is properly
developed. No significant negative impact is expected.
Will The Requested Zone Facilitate The Adequate Provision Of Transportation
Water Sewer Schools Parks And Other Public Requirements?
The additional demands for transportation, water, and sewer will be evaluated
pursuant to individual development proposals; existing infrastructure exists in the
vicinity which should be able to serve redevelopment of this property. Because of
the size of the proposal and existing development on the property, schools and
parks should not be significantly impacted. No significant negative impact is
expected.
3
Does The Requested Zone Give Consideration To The Particular Suitability_ Of The
Property or Particular Uses?
The subject property is well suited for uses permitted within the R-3 zone. The
property is of adequate size and has adequate access to facilities for the type of
uses permitted In the proposed zone. No significant negative Impact Is expected.
Does The Requested Zoning Give Reasonable Consideration To The Character Of This
[District?
The properties in question are well suited for the type development anticipated
under the requested zone because of the topography, access, regional location,
and size of the proposal. No significant negative impact is expected.
Would The Proposed Zoning Conserve The Value Of The Buildings?
The subject request would not significantly impact buildings. There are no known
uses that would be affected by this zone. A change from County R-5 to the City R-3
zone will not significantly impact, erode, or devalue the neighborhood beyond the
type of uses that are currently allowed or that exist in the area. No significant
negative impact Is expected.
Will The Requested Zone Change Encourage The Most Appropriate Use Of The Land
Throughout The Jurisdiction?
The requested zoning classification would be consistent with the Kalispell City -
County Master Plan. The Plan and the existing permitted uses under the zoning
ordinance generally identify this area for residential uses. The change would
encourage the most appropriate use of the land. No significant negative impact
is expected.
Existing residential development encompasses the area. This zone change would
facilitate an orderly development of related uses. it is staffs' opinion that the
proposed R-3 zone would serve the needs of the community by allowing residential
development to occur in a manner that Is commensurate with the services
available to the area.
it is recommended that the Kalispell City -County Planning Board and Zoning
Commission adopt this FRDO staff report as findings of fact and forward a favorable
recommendation to City Council for the requested zone change upon annexation.
FA ... \KA95-3ES.MCK
4
Tract 1:
All that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 8,
Township 28 North, Range 21 West, M.P.M., Flathead County, Montana, particularly
described as follows:
Commencing at a point on the Easterly extension of the Northerly line of
Washington Street, which point is 289.8 feet Easterly from the Southeast corner of
Block B, Duncan's Addition to Kalispell, according to the recorded plat thereof;
thence contuining
Easterly along the Easterly extension of the Northerly line of said Washington
Street, a distance of 199.5 feet; thence
North 0047' East, a distance of 90 feet; thence
North 31051' East, a distance of 90 feet to a point 150 feet North of and at right
angles to the Easterly extension of the North line of Washington Street, and the
Point of Beginning of the property to be herein described; thence continuing
North 31051' East, a distance of 208.4 feet to an intersection with the Easterly
extension of the Southerly boundary of Oregon Street; thence
South 76018' West along the Southerly boundary of the Easterly extension of said
Oregon Steet a distance of 149.8 feet to the Northeast corner of that certain Tract
of land described in Deed to Charles F. Hafer, recorded June 5, 1968 under
Recorder's Fee No. 4082 in Book 498, Page 42, records of the County Clerk and
Recorder of Flathead County, Montana; thence
South 13042'East and along the East boundary thereof, a distance of 150 feet to the
Southeast corner thereof; thence
North 76018' East to the Point of Beginning.
Deed Exhibit Book 544, Page 429.
Tract 2:
A Tract of land in the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 8,
Township 28 North, Range 21 West, P.M.M., Flathead County, Montana, more
particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the point of intersection of the East boundary of 8th Avenue E.N. and
the Northerly boundary of Washington Street; thence
North 76011' East along the Northerly boundary of Washington Street a distance
of 261.5 feet; thence
North 0047' East a distance of 90 feet; thence
North 31051' East a distance of 80 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence
continuing
North 31051' East a distance of 210 feet, more or less, to the Southerly boundary
of Oregon Street; thence
North 76011' East to the center line of the County Road; thence following the
center line of said County Road
5
South 31051' West a distance of 220 feet, more or less; thence
South 76011' West to the.Point of Beginning.
MCKEE ADDITION i
. 263 ANNEXATION
EXTENSION OF
ADDENDUM Ti CITY RESOLUTION +
PREPARED BY THE
FLATHEAD
`, REGIONAL
The subject property is within the Service Area Boundary of the City of Kalispell as
described by the Extension of Services Plan adopted by the City of Kalispell on April
3, 1989 (Resolution #3838). This broad -based extension of services plan, together
with this "mini -plan" comprise the Extension of Services Plan for the McKee
Addition No. 263, annexation.
EXISTING SERVICES:
Water: A 6 inch municipal water line exists in Oregon Street. The City has sufficient
capacity to serve this site when the extension is made.
Sewer: An 8 inch sanitary sewer line exists in Oregon Street. The City has sufficient
capacity to service this property when extensions are made.
Storm Drainage: Storm drainage is proposed to remain the same.
Streets: Oregon Street is a two lane paved street with sufficient capacity to serve
this site.
Garbage Collection: Available by contract from private companies.
Police Protection: Currently the Flathead County Sheriff's Department.
Fire Protection: Evergreen Volunteer Fire Department.
ANTICIPATED SERVICE NEEDS:
Water: Water supply would be able to be extended to the property from the
water line in Oregon Street. If not, a water main must be extended to connect
with a main of sufficient capacity to serve this property. Capacity and any
extensions would be evaluated at the review stage of any development permit.
Sewer: Sewer would be fed into the 8 inch main under Oregon Street and would
feed into the City's sewerage disposal plant. This disposal system would be
evaluated during the review phase of any development permit.
6
Storm Drainage: on -site retention and/or disposal of storm water will be evaluated
during the review phase of any proposed development.
Streets: Oregon Street Is a two lane paved road with sufficient capacity to serve
this site.
Garbage Collection: The City has the capacity and equipment to handle the needs
of this site at the time it becomes eligible for municipal service.
Police/Fire: City of Kalispell Police Department and Fire Department will be available
to serve the tract upon annexation. They will be able to provide "service" to this
property on the substantially same basis and in the same manner in which this
service is currently provided to the rest of the municipality.
I s 11 0MAd.11A
The cost of extending such public services as police and fire protection are
expected to be negligible. The general source of money to extend these type of
services is from the general tax revenues received from this property and other
properties inside the City limits. Individual improvements to the property
Including the extension of the water line, sewer line, and stormwater management
improvements will be the responsibility of the developer/landowner. Any area -
wide improvements relative to a comprehensive storm drainage system will be
financed in part by the residents of the entire municipality and in part by special
assessments for that purpose.
F:\...\KA95-3ES.MCK
E:3