Loading...
06-10-14KALISPELL CITY PLANNING BOARD & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING JUNE 10, 2014 CALL TO ORDER AND The regular meeting of the Kalispell City Planning Board and ROLL CALL Zoning Commission was called to order at 6:00 p.m. Board members present were: Chad Graham, Charles Pesola, Rory Young, Matt Regier, Karlene Osorio-Khor and Steve Lorch. Tom Jentz; Kevin LeClair and P.J. Sorensen represented the Kalispell Planning Department. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Osorio-Khor moved and Lorch seconded a motion to approve the minutes of the May 13, 2014 meeting of the Kalispell City Planning Board and Zoning Commission. VOTE BY ACCLAMATION I The motion passed unanimously on a vote by acclamation. PUBLIC COMMENT Rod Kuntz, 611 3' Avenue West, Kalispell stated he is representing the Flathead High School neighborhood parking district which is a group of residents that have been working with the school and the staff at the city planning department for the last 1-1/2 years trying to get a four decades old problem solved. They have been diligently working this spring to contact neighbors to see if they would be supportive of a residential parking district in their neighborhood. Kuntz provided a copy of the signatures they have collected. This issue is important because it protects the safety of their children and residents of the neighborhood and the students and others who go to the high school; causes disruption of services both with the city as well as private contracting services; diminishes their quality of life with noise, litter, parking confrontations, etc., as well as more rental turnovers, higher crime and decreased property values. Their committee tackled these issues by looking at residential parking as other cominunities have done with remarkable success. Hopefully they can move into a new direction. Kuntz noted they canvassed 207 people in the proposed district and they have made 182 contacts and of the 182 people, 176 have said they would support a residential parking district — that is 97%. They have only 5 not interested, 7 people not contacted and he added there are a lot of vacancies in the neighborhood. Kuntz is asking the planning board to officially direct the planning department to start working on this solution. He thinks the residents and the city would be well -served by a parking district in their neighborhood. Kalispell City Planning Board Minutes of the meeting of June 10, 2014 Page 1 of 14 The board decided they would prefer a have a work session prior to the public hearing and it was scheduled for July 8, 2014. MONTANA ACADEMY A request from Montana Academy for a conditional use permit to GROUP HOME use an existing single-family residence as a group home for 8 or CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT fewer transitional high school -aged students. The property is located at 1045 3rd Avenue East, in an R-4 (Residential) zoning district. STAFF REPORT KCU-14-02 Kevin LeClair, representing the Kalispell Planning Office reviewed Staff report KCU-14-02 for the board. LeClair said the proposal is from Montana Academy for a group home for 8 or fewer residents providing transitional education programs for teens from 16 — 19 years of age. The students living at the group home would be attending either Flathead High School or Flathead Valley Community College (FVCC). LeClair reviewed a vicinity map; an aerial view indicating the access points on the property; photographs of the home and surrounding homes noting the neighborhood is primarily single- family residential with a mixture of multi -family and home occupation type uses such as a day care operation nearby. LeClair provided the location of the other four Montana Academy group homes currently in operation. He also described the traffic volumes on 3rd Avenue East and 1 ld' Street East. Staff recommends that the Kalispell City Planning Board adopt staff report KCU-14-02 as findings of fact and recommend to the Kalispell City Council that the conditional use permit be approved subject to the three conditions listed in the staff report. BOARD DISCUSSION Lorch asked staff to review the State statute that allows for these types of group homes in a residential area and LeClair said the Montana Code Annotated (M.C.A.) defines group and youth foster homes as a protected use that can be located in residential neighborhoods. With a conditional use they must be treated as residential with no additional conditions applied to the group home that would be above and beyond what would typically be applied to a residential use in a neighborhood. Osorio-Khor asked if this applicant has group homes in either Whitefish or Columbia Falls. She also noted that the staff report indicates the residents will not have vehicles but they will be going to Flathead High School and FVCC and she asked how the students would get to the schools. LeClair said he did not know if they have homes in those cities and it was his understanding that the residents of the home would not have cars. He suggested she ask the Kalispell City Planning Board Minutes of the meeting of June 10, 2014 Page 2 of 14 applicant those questions during the public hearing. Osorio-Khor noted the staff report states that the applicant does not intend to install any signage that would identify the property as a Montana Academy group home and she suggested it should read "will not". LeClair said his understanding is they do not want to have any signs for the group home, however if they want a sign in the future they can apply for one. Osorio-Khor questioned why the staff report would state there will be no effect on property values when no one knows if there will or will not be. Graham said he also has the same concern and he asked how staff arrived at that conclusion. LeClair said the applicant provided property transaction information from the NW Montana Association of Realtors to show that properties are still selling in the vicinity of their group homes and that the values are on par with the balance of the neighborhood. LeClair added the statement is simply to say that staff doesn't anticipate that there would be any diminishment of property values because the property has been maintained and an unknowing observer cannot tell that a group home is operating at this location. Graham asked why group homes are not treated as a business in a residential zone and LeClair said he can't comment on the intent behind the law in the M.C.A. but the law states that we are to treat them as a residential use. Young asked if the use and conditions stay with the property and LeClair said yes and added, however if the use ceases it reverts back to a single-family residence. Then if a buyer wants to operate a group home at this location in the future they would have to go through the conditional use process again. There was discussion regarding the parking requirements which staff noted were adequate for the residence. Lorch asked if the board could condition the permit regarding parking spaces to allow for additional parking. LeClair and Jentz said no and Jentz added group homes and day care centers were continually being denied across the State so the State Legislature acted and said group homes of 8 or fewer residents are a protected class and they will be dealt with as if they are a single-family home. They can't be denied and no conditions can be placed on the group home that would not be placed on a single-family home. Jentz said although it creates angst and frustration for the planning board and at tunes for the neighborhood the State Legislature made it clear this use will be treated as a single-family home. Graham noted the city council opted to keep the public hearing process in place in order to provide the neighborhood with a Kalispell City Planning Board Minutes of the meeting of June 10, 2014 Page 3 of 14 chance to comment on this use in their neighborhood. Osorio-Khor said this also allows the applicant to hear the concerns of their neighbors and maybe those concerns can then be addressed. Graham added that has happened in the past with Montana Academy. They heard the concerns of the neighbors and then moved their third proposed group home to another location so it does work. PUBLIC HEARING John Santa, 990 McGregor Lane, Kalispell stated he is the owner of the property and co-owner of the Montana Academy. The academy has been in existence for 17 years with the main facility located near Lost Prairie. They have a total of 95 students, 70 on their ranch campus and 20 — 25 students in the transitional program. They have found that the transitioning portion of the program is so important they have had an increasing burden on sending kids into town for the last part of their program. The four houses almost work but with the limit of 8 students per house, and not wanting to mix the sexes, at times, they run into the problems. Santa continued they have had group homes in Kalispell for 10 years. They want to be good neighbors and listen to the community's concerns. That's why they spread their houses out as best they can especially when it became clear that the neighbors felt that more than 2 houses adjacent to each other was too much. The kids do not have cars and will never be allowed to have cars. They have no interest in placing signs on the homes and the kids are more closely supervised than some kids in traditional homes. They come from all over the country and when finished with the program almost 100% go on to colleges throughout the United States. Santa said none of the kids are adjudicated, sex offenders, or hard core criminals. The school is a boarding school environment where kids get a chance to slow down and get a chance to look at themselves and grow up. By the time they get to a group home in town they have been on campus for at least a year and most of them finish high school and then go on into the world. They are great kids and they volunteer all over the community. Osorio-Khor noted there were letters in the application in support of the Montana Academy but there were no letters from a tax- paying neighbor. She asked if the city could have a copy of their handbook and policies for the public to review if they have questions. Santa said they had an open house a few weeks ago and a number of the close neighbors did come and they had concerns because they are fearful of the kind of kids that the home might house. Santa said the neighbors need to know who these kids are and he added that isn't covered in a handbook but they have Kalispell City Planning Board Minutes of the meeting of June 10, 2014 Page 4 of 14 nothing to hide. Regier asked if there have been any major issues with neighbors and Santa said no and added with the newest home on the west side there were concerns about the house and one of the neighbors who objected to the home has now admitted that he was wrong and said the residents have been terrific neighbors. These homes do not have a negative impact on the neighborhood. No one else wished to speak and the public hearing was closed. MOTION Pesola moved and Regier seconded a motion to adopt staff report KCU-14-02 as findings of fact and recommend to the Kalispell City Council that the conditional use permit be approved subject to the three conditions listed in the staff report. BOARD DISCUSSION Pesola said as a board he doesn't feel that they have the ability to deny this application. A conditional use permit is a courtesy to the community to enable them to comment on the proposal. There may be concerns about parking and driving and the kids but the reality is this is considered a single-family residence according to law. Pesola supports the Montana Academy program and the CUP. Lorch said he is somewhat familiar with the Montana Academy and recently learned he actually lives across the street from one of these houses and has for 7-8 months and they are great neighbors. Lorch said he wants to commend Montana Academy for reaching out to the neighbors and suggested the Montana Academy reach out to the people who have written letters of concern, if they haven't already. Osorio-Khor said also asked the Montana Academy staff to address the letters of concern. Most people have that gut —wrenching, knee- jerk reaction to the term "group home" and there is a lot of neighborhood work still to do. Graham has been on the planning board since 2009 and this is the 3rd time Montana Academy has come before the board to request a group home. At the beginning he was skeptical and he now supports the Montana Academy program. Graham added he wanted to congratulate the students in attendance this evening for their achievement and he wished them good luck in the future. ROLL CALL The motion passed unanimously on a roll call vote. BEEHIVE HOMES A request from Josh Burlage of Beehive Homes of Kalispell, RESIDENTIAL CARE I working with the property owners Mike Fraser and FSEN, LLC to Kalispell City Planning Board Minutes of the meeting of June 10, 2014 Page 5 of 14 FACILITY CONDITIONAL develop a multi -structure residential care facility on a portion of an USE PERMIT undeveloped, 8.5-acre tract of land located at 242 Stillwater Road. The proposal includes two 19-bed homes for memory care, two 16- bed homes for assisted living, and four independent -living duplexes. STAFF REPORT KCU-14-03 Kevin LeClair, representing the Kalispell Planning Office reviewed Staff report KCU-14-03 for the board. LeClair reviewed the vicinity map of the subject property and noted the property is a remainder tract of the Fox Trotter Subdivision and is currently undeveloped. He reviewed the county zoning on three sides of the property and the proposed site plan. The applicant is proposing a phased approach. They plan to start with a single 19-bed memory care facility at the southeast corner of the property, following up with additional phases which includes a 16-bed assisted living facility, a 19-bed memory care facility, another 16-bed assisted living facility and then 4 independent living units on the north side. LeClair reviewed an aerial photo of the surrounding properties and described their uses and photographs of the property. Staff recommends that the Kalispell Planning Board adopt staff report KCU-14-03 as findings of fact and recommend to the Kalispell City Council that the conditional use permit be approved subject to the 11 conditions listed in the staff report. BOARD DISCUSSION Osorio-Khor asked if this facility is under the same statute as the Montana Academy group home and LeClair said no but the proposed facility will be governed by other statutes in the M.C.A. She asked if there are other conditions that the board could apply to the CUP and LeClair said yes. Osorio-Khor noted the Growth Policy states that high density housing developments and senior housing should be located in close proximity to other necessary services and bus stops and shelters should be incorporated in their designs. She noted her concerns are the isolation factor and security especially since memory care units are being proposed. She asked if video cameras were being considered and LeClair noted they didn't discuss the facilities in that detail but he knows they will have supervision and alarms on the doors to know if someone leaves the facility. LeClair noted the fencing would prevent thein from wandering too far away. Osorio-Khor added since this does not fall under the licensing of nursing homes could the board consider a condition that would require them to provide a copy of their handbook and/or policies to Kalispell City Planning Board Minutes of the meeting of June 10, 2014 Page 6 of 14 the City of Kalispell for review by the general public. LeClair noted that condition #5 on page 9 of the staff report requires all State licensing, inspections and approvals shall be obtained from the Montana Department of Health and Human Services. Copies of the current operational licenses and operating procedures for the facilities shall be submitted to the City of Kalispell prior to the Certificate of Occupancy for the structures. Osorio-Khor didn't think that covered their policies and that should be stated in the conditions. PUBLIC HEARING Josh Burlage stated he lives at 1190 Clayton Lane in Columbia Falls and he is the current owner of Beehive Homes in Columbia Falls. Burlage said their facilities are different than your typical nursing home and are set up more like a home where residents have rooms off of the common area. They provide three dietician approved meals per day plus snacks, daily housekeeping, laundry services, activities — whatever the residents need to live comfortably within the hoines. There are currently two Beehive assisted living homes in Columbia Falls, a 13-unit and 16-unit facility and they have noticed the increased need for memory care so that is why it is a part of this proposal for Kalispell. Burlage said he appreciates the concern regarding the safety and well-being of the residents and he noted all of the entrances are key -coded, the exterior fencing will not provide access to the outside, and there will be security cameras at all the exits and in the common areas. Osorio-Khor asked for the- qualifications of the staff for the memory care unit and Burlage said it is similar to assisted living where they use personal care attendants (PCA's) and do not require CNA's. They are State licensed and periodic checks are required. Osorio-Khor noted she feels it is important that their policies and procedures be available to the public and copies are provided to the city. Osorio-Khor said if most of the residents do not drive, how do they find outside stimulation like shopping? Burlage said they have a bus that transports residents to different locations. He noted this location is closer to the hospital and other services than their facilities in Columbia Falls. They do not currently transport residents to medical appointments so they will rely on families to assist them or have Eagle Transit pick them up. They also plan to have on -site physician care. Burlage said they have no problem with providing the city with a copy of their policies and procedures and he added they are approved by the State. Mike Fraser, 385 East View Drive stated he prepared the application and is assisting Mr. Burlage through this process. Fraser was originally involved with the Fox Trotter project and the remainder 8.5 acres that were originally planned for a 23 lot Kalispell City Planning Board Minutes of the meeting of June 10, 2014 Page 7 of 14 subdivision which was approved in 2008. They allowed that preliminary plat to expire in 2011 because they did not see the economy recovering to the extent that they could market those lots and have a return on their investment. The property has been sitting there looking for a user. It has been hayed on a regular basis and they have been maintaining it in order to be good neighbors. Fraser continued Mr. Burlage was looking for property for his project and this piece was the closest to the city's core area that had enough acreage. The property has good accessibility to shopping and medical facilities. Fraser noted condition 6 asks them to rebuild a portion of Stillwater Road. He said this site is halfway between Three Mile and Four Mile Drive where there are three subdivisions that access Stillwater Road and none of those subdivisions were required to make a dedication or improve Stillwater Road. They are being asked to rebuild 550 feet of Stillwater Road to include street widening; curb, gutter, street lights and landscaping between the curb & bike path. Fraser said they don't see any logic behind that request as there would then be rural sections of road to the north and south of the improvements. Fraser said they would, however, be willing to dedicate 10 feet of their property for the further widening of Stillwater Road as referenced in condition #9 and provide the 20-foot wide pedestrian and bicycle easement as referenced in condition #10. Fraser also noted that condition 11 is included within the overall concept of condition 3 and they feel it is redundant and not necessary. Jon Olson — 100 1 Quarter Horse Lane stated his property is directly south of this proposed project and his first major concern would be Stillwater Road which is not a rural road but is a very busy road. Another concern is the entrance to the proposed project as there are 5 or 6 access roads clustered together onto Stillwater Road. Parkridge will be closed eventually once the bypass is complete but still is a concentrated area and some improvements need to be made. Olson continued in terms of the bike path it is already on the other side of the road and how will that be connected to the one proposed with this development. In addition he has concerns about how the drainage faom this property will impact his property since his property is below this one. When Stillwater Estates was developed there was an issue of flooding in his area and the city installed a drainage system that has alleviated this problem. His neighbor is also concerned because there is a valley and all the runoff goes Kalispell City Planning Board Minutes of the meeting of June 10, 2014 Page 8 of 14 right between our properties. Olson added he is also concerned about fire trucks, ambulances and lighting in a residential area. Debbie Street, 1400 Rose Crossing stated she is a project manager on the Starling project which is the 640 acre master planned community that is directly north of this development. She is also a real estate broker and she speaks in support of the project because the community desperately needs assisted living. Frank Strickland stated he lives at 272 Stillwater Road, the 10 acres north of this proposed development. His concern is condition 6. The construction of the bypass will take a tremendous amount of traffic from Stillwater Road. Strickland said if you go west of Kalispell on Three Mile Drive there isn't a curb or gutter in site period. It does not make sense to require curb and gutter on a 550 foot section of Stillwater when the surrounding roads are built to rural standards. It could create more problems rather than solve them. Jane Crawford, 1201 Quarter Horse Lane stated if she knew there was going to be commercial property near her home she would not have purchased it. They have put a lot of investment in their property and although they may build a high quality facility they still are a commercial facility in a rural setting. When she looks out from her back porch she will see large buildings with paving, lighting and lighted signage. That will be the only thing that is not rural or agricultural in the area. Crawford said the property is rolling and that drainage will come across a corner of her property. This is a 24/7 operation where people can be coming and going at all hours. She objects to the project and if they do end up with an approval the developer should pay for the costs of improving the roads. Ron Cebulla, 250 Stillwater Road noted his property is Phase 1,of Fox Trotter Estates, the flag lot immediately north of this proposed development. Cebulla said he is concerned about his property values with a commercial project next to an urban setting. He knows they can't hang on to the rural setting forever and knowing that the previous subdivision was denser and they should be thankful. However, this will be a 24 hour operation with lighting on 24 hours a day, ambulances coming and going all hours of the day, parking lots and the number of entrances off of Stillwater Road. That is a steep hill and in the winter cars crash into their driveway. Cebulla said he agrees that the road should not be widened if this project is approved. He is not against senior care facilities but this is the wrong setting. Kalispell City Planning Board Minutes of the meeting of June 10, 2014 Page 9 of 14 MOTION Lorch moved and Young seconded a motion to adopt staff report KCU-14-03 as findings of fact and recommend to the Kalispell City Council that the conditional use permit be approved subject to the 11 conditions listed in the staff report. BOARD DISCUSSION Osorio-Khor said she is torn when she hears the neighbors' talk about their rural environment and as previously mentioned her concern about the location of this facility. She asked how the board will mitigate the neighbors concerns regarding runoff, Stillwater Road, the five access roads already in place onto Stillwater Road, and the impacts on their lifestyle. The setting seems wrong for this facility. Graham said he doesn't think there will be runoff because the development will have its own stormwater retention pond and that will help alleviate the current runoff problems. In addition the lighting ordinance requires that the lights be pointed downward to reduce light pollution onto to other properties. Graham said it appears to be a piece of land that is totally surrounded by county and Osorio-Khor said she is troubled by the fact that it is an island surrounded by agricultural land. LeClair noted the property is almost surrounded by other existing and proposed subdivisions and it just so happens that this is the western boundary of the city at this point. LeClair added this property is well within the growth policy's annexation boundary and the city will likely be annexing more lands further to the west of this property in the future. Lorch asked if the existing zoning and use is consistent with the growth policy and LeClair said the R-2 zoning is consistent with the growth policy designation and the zoning ordinance states that assisted living can go in an R-2 zone with a conditional use permit. Lorch said there is no question that there is a lot of growth going on in the west side of Kalispell and as a planner for the city and county a few years ago it was anticipated then. With the infrastructure working its way out to this area it is making these properties more attractive to people for development. Lorch said there are always going to be conflicts with changes to different areas and the best that the board can do is help mitigate some of the issues. Lorch said he has concerns with the incremental development of the property and the road. Typically with a subdivision there is a traffic impact study (TIS) and you can take the quantitative analysis and determine that safety would be greatly increased if there was a turn lane or some other mitigating measure. In the absence of a TIS Lorch said he doesn't know what the city uses to determine what improvements should be required. LeClair said Kalispell City Planning Board Minutes of the meeting of June 10, 2014 Page 10 of 14 traffic impacts. are discussed with the applicant early on. The threshold for requiring a traffic impact study is 300 vehicle trips per day and it is not expected that the first phase of this facility would meet that threshold. Those questions will get asked again by the site review committee before the building permits are issued. Then the Public Works engineers will look at the responses from the applicant and if the thresholds are met then the city looks at those improvements. LeClair said for this project the request was that Stillwater Road be approved at this time. Looking south there were no required improvements but those are examples of opportunities lost. Public Works felt that a compromise would be instead of putting in the improvements now they could pay a cash in lieu payment and that way at the time the entire roadway is designed to be improved the cash has been deposited with the city to make those improvements. Knowing that Four Mile Drive will be extended over to Stillwater Road with the completion of the bypass and with the potential development of the Starling subdivision to the north it is expected that Stillwater Road will become a collector street and the development of those improvements would be considered standard for those types of roads. LeClair noted the board could opt to recommend that the cash in lieu be changed to a waiver of SID that would put the cost off to a future date for the developer. Regier asked if that is the recommendation in condition #7 and LeClair said that is for the West Side Interceptor which is a project that is being designed at this time. With Stillwater Road we don't know when the traffic warrants will reach the point that the improvements should be made. Graham asked why would they need to have the SID for the interceptor and why wouldn't it be covered by the impact fees when they hook up. LeClair said after the interceptor is designed the impact fees may not cover the entire cost. Regier said if they pay cash in lieu for improvements to Stillwater Road, condition #6, and an SID comes later won't they be paying double and LeClair said they would have the right to protest the SID and if they had already paid the cash in lieu they would be in good standing to protest. Osorio asked why staff does not believe conditions #3 & #11 are redundant and LeClair stated condition #11 was included to specifically address the requirement that the 14" water main be under the roadway of Stillwater Road because the site plan shows it near the pedestrian/bike path running adjacent to the property. Public Works wanted it to be clear that what was shown on the site plan was not an approved location of the water main. LeClair noted Kalispell City Planning Board Minutes of the meeting of June 10, 2014 Page 11 of 14 an alternative would be to roll condition #11 into #3. MOTION — COMBINE Osorio-Khor moved and Lorch seconded a motion to roll condition CONDITIONS 3 & 11 #11 into condition #3. ROLL CALL The motion passed unanimously on a roll call vote. BOARD DISCUSSION There was lengthy discussion regarding cash in lieu v. completing the improvements to Stillwater Road at the time of development; SID's for the West Side Interceptor and for improvements to Stillwater Road; and impact fees. MOTION — DELETE Graham moved and Regier seconded a motion to delete condition CONDITION #7 #7. BOARD DISCUSSION Graham noted the impact fees were increased in order to pay for the West Side Interceptor and to also be required to sign a waiver of right to protest an SID for the same project didn't make sense to him. Further discussion was held. ROLL CALL The motion passed on a roll call vote of 4 in favor and 2 opposed. MOTION — AMEND Pesola moved and Regier seconded a motion to amend condition CONDTION #6 #6 to read, "The property owner shall submit a signed and recorded Special Improvement District (SID) Protest Waiver for their contributing capacity to the Stillwater Road improvements." BOARD DISCUSSION Lorch stated he would appreciate knowing that when it comes time to improve Stillwater Road that the general taxpayers will not get stuck with the costs to fill the gaps. There will be a need for a good city standard road as it is already being used beyond its rural standards. Lorch would like to keep the motion as written and allow the developer the option to either build it now or pay cash in lieu or require the developer to pay cash in lieu and not even allow the option to construct the improvements at the time of development. Osorio-Khor agreed with Lorch. Further discussion was held. ROLL CALL The motion passed on a roll call vote of 4 in favor and 2 opposed. BOARD DISCUSSION Osorio-Khor said we should keep in mind that we are building a neighborhood and it may not happen tomorrow but it is going to happen and it is important that the board try to solve some of these problems. Kalispell City Planning Board Minutes of the meeting of June 10, 2014 Page 12 of 14 Lorch said he is concerned about the need for improvements to Stillwater Road related to the increase in traffic from this development and he asked if the city is in the position to require any improvements such as a left -turn lane or some other traffic mitigation. LeClair these type of assisted living facilities are a very light impact on the transportation systems they are adjacent to. Staff will come and go but because of shift work it won't be during peak travel periods. There will also be the bus taking residents to different locations however, nothing that would require major road improvements. Lorch described the current traffic on Stillwater Road and how you don't get to address these issues without subdivision review. Lorch asked if there were any discussions of the impacts when the western portion of the property is developed. LeClair said there were lengthy discussions about that and the development was shifted to the north to include a full -width roadway that could be extended west on the southern portion of the property. Lorch asked if additional development would be considered an expansion of this conditional use permit and LeClair said another review would take place for additional facilities. Jentz reminded the board that the city council had approved a 23 lot subdivision in this location that would have generated about 230 vehicle trips per day. He noted that this project will probably have 1/1 Oth of that amount of traffic because this is a low impact project. ROLL CALL — ORIGINAL The original motion, as amended, passed unanimously on a roll call MOTION vote. OLD BUSINESS: Growth Policy Update. Lengthy discussion was held on changes to the draft Growth Policy Update and the board decided a work session should be held to work through the document prior to holding a public hearing. The update will be discussed at the work session on July 8, 2014. NEW BUSINESS: None. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at approximately 9:20 p.m. NEXT MEETING The next regular planning board meeting is cancelled due to a lack of applications however a work session will be held on July 8, 2014 bednnim at 6:00 p.m. in the Kalispell City Council Chambers, 201 1" Avenue East. The board will discuss the following items: Kalispell City Planning Board Minutes of the meeting of June 10, 2014 Page 13 of 14 1. Growth Policy Update 2. Flathead High School Parking District 4/7 Chad rahain Michelle Anderson President Recording Secretary APPROVED as submitted/corrected: � / 1'7- /14 Kalispell City Planning Board Minutes of the meeting of June 10, 2014 Page 14 of 14