Loading...
1. Architectural Design StandardsTri-City Planning Office 17 Second Street East — Suite 211 Kafise, Nfontana1 Phone: 6) 751-1850 Fax: (406) 751-1858 tricity@,)eenturytel.net May 20, 2005 ar .es H. Patrick, City Manager City of Kalispell P.O. Box 1997 Kal s e , MT 59903 Re: Kalispell Architectural ral Design. Standards DearJim: The Kalispell City Planning Board met on April 197 2005 and held a public heaiing to consider a, request by the City of Kalispell for the creation of Kalispell Architecturai Design . standards for new commercial and multi -family development. t. This project was part of the Kalispell Planning Board's work program and the planning board has been wormsg on this project for the last nine or ten months. .s. The draft document presented for pubEc hearing was the result o research and work sessions on the part of the Kahs e .... Planning Board, Kalispell Architectural Review Committee and City staff. Nara Wilson of the Tri-City Planning Office, presenters staff report KZA-05- evaluating the proposal and recommended approval of the amendments outlined U'a Exhibit A of the staff report. She explained this =end.ment was part of the ian g board work program and drafted by the plan=g board and architectural review cow. ttee, At the public hearing there were several people who spoke In favor of the proposed standard citing establishing standards that reflect the commr .ties Mterest and vision as well as providing developers with a cohesive document for new development. The board discussed the issixes the standards and the work they had done, including the on -going work that would ld.. e re . re l from the Kalispell Architectural review Committee. A motion was made and passed on a unan=ous vote to r-ecor=e .d. to the Kalispell City Council that the Kalispell Zoning Ordinance be amended to Mol de the Kalispell Architectural Design Standards as outlined in attached Exhibit -A. Please schedule this ratter for consideration by the XalispeH City Council at their earliest opportunity. You may contact this board. or Nara Wilson at the -City Planning Office if you have any questions regarding this matter. 'oidlg Community Planning Assistance To: e G:ty of Kalispell a City of Columbia Falls * City of Whitefish Kalispell Architectural Design Standards May 20, 2005 Page Sincerely, Kahspell City Pla ning Board C4K)r, George Taylor President GT/NW/ma Attachments: Exhibit - Dry Architectural Design Standards Sty report #KZTA-05-4 and application materials Minutes 95 planning board meeting w/ Att: Theresa White, Kalispell City Clerk ter/ t.. an-iH. Patrick, City Manager, City of Kalispell, P.O. Box 1997, Kam, MT S9901-1997 P.J. Sorensen, Zoning , City of Kalispell, P.O. Box 1997, Kam, M59903-1997 Meridian Road. Cuthbertson stated that he is in favor of this zone change but want he wanted and will be wanting c` am is a re or'g of his property t -2 especially due the location and size limitations of his current signage. He noted that with the office complex being proposed they will want a sign that lists the individiaal tenants names and under- they only get one sign and it cannot multiple tenant sign. 3]j]i 3 Taylor noted that the Board tries to be consistent. No one else wished to speak and the pubs earl was closer. MOTION Hinchey moved and Schutt seconded to adopt sty report KZC-o -2 as finding of fact and, based on these fmdings recommend to the Kalispell City Council that the request for a zone change from R- 5 to -1 be approved. BOA DISCUSSION Hull receded the Board of the need to deternaine ' c or .stent o� for the Meridian Roadarea to .t least draw some des in the sand so that the busm*ess area doesn't overlap too much � ito the residential area, instead r of doing it in a piecemead way. E Tarok` asked if another work session .o is scheduled for the Growth Policy update. Wilson said not yet. She added that if the Board wants to deal with Zonmg it would not be Groff Policy issue it would be a work item issue. A neighborhood meeting .ou 1 e held to tto some of the property owner's on whit they would envision for the area instead of the Board tag big blocks of land and zoning ` them without community input. Schutt asked if the zone changing would be accomplished in conjunction with the road reconstruction or before and Wilson said a strategy on how to approach this item should e developed by the Board at a work session. ROLL CALL The motion passed unanimously on a .roll oaE vote. CITY of ISPELL SPELL A request by the City of Kalispell for an amendment ent to the ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN KalispeU Zoning Ordinance to meor or to architectural ,,STANDARDS 1 design standards that would y to all new development AMENDMENT ENT REQUEST in the City of Kalispell except single family and two family s residences. i STAFF REPORT KZTA-05-4 Narda Wilson, with the ii-C t Flaming Office, gave a KZTA-05- , Presentation o Staff Report- request by the I% City of Kalispell for an amendment to the Kalispell Zoningf f Ordinance to incorporate architectural design standards. Kalispeil City Planning Board Minutes of the mecung of Apri 19, 2005 Wilson .noted that the Beard has been working on the Architectural Design. Standards for more than a year. They 3 have a document, although far from perfect, that provides the spit of what the Board is Ong to accomplish i developing Architectural Design Standards for the City of KalispeH that basically cover ecnamercia andmulti-ar,ily development. The standards would be an addendum to the Ka .s e . Zoning Ordinance. The Kalispell City Council has on a feu occasions already discussed these standards ire their current form, The x,i g board and Architectural Review Committee did a good job of putting together ideals of what the corr - nunity o efu� sees as important elements without ece ssarily putting restrictions or requirements on the building design. The Architectural Review Committee has volunteered to expand their duties to include the review of new con=ercial and multi -family development wl--tic . wiH require more meeting tirne. Wilson noted that they could use sorne assistance and asked for volunteers from the Board or to be recruited by the Board. Staff is recorunending that the Board adopt staff report KZTA-05-4 as findings of fact and recommend to the city council that the Architectural Design. Standards attached to the report as Exhibit A be included in the Kalispell Zoning Ordinance. Wilson added that these standards were posted on the City of Kalispell and, ` ii-City Planning office websites. It is hoped that there was some interest in access to those online documents on the part of the public. Some feedback was already received. QUESTIONS BY THE 130ARD Taylor asked. for comments by any members of the Architectural Review committee. f Bill Goodman, who served on the Committee and was part of the process, noted that the Kalispell city Planning Board and Architectural Review Committee worked Hard on the standards and. he hoped the Board would recommend that, s € they be adopted. 'there was discussion on =proving the quality or the document and Wilson noted that after a final draft has been adopted more professional touches can be added, with f the help of Gini ogle who served on the Committee, before the final document is printed. i U C HEARING The public hearing as opened to dose who wised o s eak o . the iss .e. IKL-Lfispell City Puri . w %ri Minutes of the meetina of Aph1 19. 200 U- BLIC COMMENT M ayre Flowers, Citizens for a Better Flathead applauded the board for taking on this project because it has been talked about with M' the community for quite a vie. It is a positive step forward and provides the kind of predictability that residents and developers need and welcome. Flowers added that she appreciates that these documents a-ve been made available owe and she encourages that kind of presentation for the public to be more actively: evolved. Flowers asked for clarificadon on how you defuie the boundaries daries for the entrance coriidors and why they were not extended further. In addition on page 24 under Greater Kalispell Area Development Standards, clarification needs to be provided regarding redevelopment of properties to ensure quality and mtegrit r. Taylor said that the board would rely on the Groff Policy which defies general areas and it would be the pohcy o the board to be as consistent as possible with the immediately surrounding area with regard to infer. They wouldn't dn't put a -story building M* the middle of a residential area. Flowers clarified and said the area was vague and thought there would be some simple wording that could be used to clarify it. Wilson said that they could look at this at the end of the public hearing as something to pass on to city council. To one else wished to speak and the public hean'ng was closed. MOTION HM'chey moved and Taylor seconded to adopt staff report KZTA-05-4 as findings of fact and recommend to the Kalispell City council that the Architectural Design F.-Standards .-be.. adopted... as-..-. a -...--adder umto --- the - - -Kalispell Zoning Ordinance. BOARD DISCUSSION Wilson asked to clarify the areas that were brought up in the public hearer . Wilson noted that the boundaries were selected based on the location of the city limits to Meridian r � on the merest - 7thAvenue on the east, Wvoming and 13th down to the city its and suggested that there may be a better way to Ford this pomon. Taylor suggested that when the Standards go to final print a. niap or diagram co ld be included. Wilson noted that the it-Y l it l t s will charge and the corridors were intended to be from hose points out to the city limits. FMdi.g some better wording . between now and city c o . c-U would prevent the -Minutes of the meeting aIl-April 19, 7005 boundaries from being stuck to an exhibit and would be ever -changing as the city limits change along those corridor areas. e Hi chey mentioried Ms.Flowers' comments regarding � . being consistent and cohesive which he thought was t already covered in the standards. The intent was if you are f going to redevelop a city block that has aH brick structures you might want to put a brick structure M* . Nilson said that the e n em is when you talk about infiH that you. might end �� a lset huts � door rater than a building that you would want t r ate. Wilson suggested adding a phrase s as "stn'vm'g for high quahty construction and architecture" may be better. ROLL CALL The motion passed iinanimously on a roll call vote. BOARD DISCUSSION Wilson suggested that perhaps the is rinboard and city council should .ave one more work session for the handoff of the Architectural r es ga Standards so that the standards do not end up languishing.e to lack of understdnding. Taylor r suggested that Wilson put sotnethm'g together-. EV PROPERTIES A request by .REV Properties for a change in zoning from R - C URTHOUS EAST ZONE 3 (Urban single Fanifly Residential) to R-5 s CHANGE REQUEST & PUD (Residential Professional Office) , and a request for awed. I use Planned Unit Development U which includes 2 € apartments, appro= . el y 20,000 square feet of office space, apprommately 1,600 square feet of retail and a 2,000 square foot community room, on approximately 2.06 acres. The property is located at the east side of Fifth Street .fast between Seventh street East and Eighth Street East also know. as Cruse East. STAFF .E . ' i KZC" r"3 & Nar a Wilson, with the ` ri-Cit ' Plarmmg Office, gave a ' - -3 presentation of Staff Reports KZC- 5-3 and KPU -05-3 for the Board.. Wilson described the location and history of use of the { property. The previous owner, Gel as IDevelopment care before the Board with another proposal on the property which was tabled because of some changes that were made e f at the last :Dilute and was Dever brought back to life. I the past couple 3f years the property has been fenced and. � s x the building has been allowed. to deteriorate, has been vandahzed, the pang lot torn up, and a maintenance i buflding was taken down. The neighborhood and mr . nrtv has been wo erm what is_aoing to happen to ; rNlalispeil Ci(y Pl=ingBeard CITY OF RIS E - ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STANDARDS TRI-CITY PLANNING OFFICE STAFF .REPORT #KZ A- 5-4 "RIL 12,2005 This is a report to the Kalispell City Planning Board and the Kalispell City Council re axdi .g a request est for a text amendment to the Kalispell Zoning rd.mar ce to develop architectural design standards. A public hearing has been scheduled before the planning board for April 19, 2005 beginning at :00 PM in the Kalispell. City Council Chambers. `he planning board will forward a recommendatiori to the Kalispell. City Council for final. action BACKGROUND INFORMATION The City of Kalispell is proposing an amendment to the Kalispell Zoning Ordinance that creates standards for a-rchitectural design and review that would apply to all new development in the city with the exception of the single family and duplexes. A. Petitioner. James H. Patrick, city Manager City of Kalispell P.O. Box 1997 Kalispell, MT 59903 (406) 7 B. Area Effected by the Proposed Changes: Any area within the Kalispell zoning jurisdictioncould be effected by these proposed. standards. C. Proposed Amendment: ent: The architectural design standards would be adopted as an adjunct to the Kalispell Zoning ordinance. The design standards would apply to all new development within the city of Kalispell, and is primarily geared toward new commercial development. t. The standards as proposed are outlined on attached Exhibit A, Architectural Design Standards. I . Staff on: These standards comprise several elements of the Kalispell Planning Board's work program to address commercial design standards, highway corridor standards, architectural design, signaage, site design and pang. The planning board. and. Kal.is ell's Axchitectiaral Review Committee met over several months s M* sessions to develop the standards that are being proposed. The resources used were ordinances from other cities, American Planning Association articles and other resources. During the several months of work and research on this project the Kalispell City Planning Board and Architectural Review Committee feels that they have come up with fairly reasonable and clear standards. The Architectural Review Committee, a citizen committee, has agreed to be available to provide the accessary review in order to ensure that the architectural design standards are applied uniformly. The additional step in the review process will be in addition to the Kalispell el.l. Site Development Review Committee process. EVALUATION BASED ON STATUTORY CRITERIA The statutory basis for reviewing g a change in zoning is set fob by 76-2.2 5, M. C A Findings of Fact for the zone change request are discussed relative to the it r=' . cnt ria described by 76-2-203, M.C.A. I. Does the requested zone comp with the owth policy? The growth policy generally anticipates use of development standards that will conserve and protect the quality of life of the citizens of its cor=unit r. The architectural design standards being proposed are intro.ded to further this goal and thus the proposed amendment wi1 generally promote the goals and objectives of the growth policy plate.. 2. is the re nested zone desiMedto lessen congestion . the streets The proposed amendment wi not typically have a significant impact on traffic congestion in the streets since architectural design is not related to lard use or level of traffic that would be generated. This amendment will not affect ov raU traffic Pattems, amount of traffic in an area, or contribute to traffic congestion. 3. Will the rc nested zone secure safely.from firs aic and other- dam rs The proposed amendment would not reduce any sec lity from fire or other halth and safety issues sm'ce the standards are intended to maintai.n a high level of integrity and quality m new development. There would no com ror ise with regard to public safety. Will the requested change -promote the health an en ralwelfare? The general health and welfare of the public will be promoted by creating standards for architectural design, that ensures a high quality of development, good architectural design and promotes quality of life as well as the general health and safety of the comet ity. . will the requested ne rovi e for adequate light and air? Light and air between and surrounding buildings wo .ld not be altered or impacted the proposed text a endm t_ . Will the reguested zone prevent the overcrowding of land or undue concentration of j2eoplO The proposed change would not increase the intensity of lases currently allowed xxuthin the zoning districts since the proposed change does not deal with land uses per se but rather architectural design standards. . Will the re nested zone facilitate the adeguate provision of transportation.,, grater ewerageschools arks a d of .er public 'e�.ents The amendment would not itnact the availability of public services. This text amendment wiH not have any adverse impact on the availability or provision o bhe services and uti ties . Does the requested zone_give consideration to the articular suita i i of the propertyfor artic laruses? The architectural design standards were crafted with. consideration being given to the speck applications of architectural design for specie uses and gives adequate consideration to the suitability of the standar ls. . Does the reguested zone gave reasonable consideration to the character of the district? The character of the area in which the architectural design standards are applied wiH be maintam*ed and promoted by architectural design that does not degrade, visua.y impact or devalue the overall quality of life wits those neighborhoods. By providing architectural design standards in the commercial as well as multi -family residential areas, reasonable consideration is given to protection of the character of a district. 10. Will the prgposed zone conserve the value of buildings--) The architectural design standards will not only conserve the value of buildings but wiU conserve the quality of lire within the community unity err both the residential and commercial area.. The building values iH e conserved y promoting and encouraging reasonable standards Within' these districts. These amendments will conserve the value of buildings. W1H the req ested zone encoura e the most a ro cute use of the land throe bout the ' ris ctlon The most appropriate land uses throughout the Jurisdiction are promoted by encouraging reasonable design standards that promote the general rely. -being of all cit�ens of the community. 'these changes will not only encourage appropriate land uses through the la .n g jurisdiction, but will also provide greater opportunities for the enjoyment of the visual elements of the community and promote a. safe and healthy environment. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Kalispell City Planning Board adopt the findings in staff`' report KZTA-05-4 and recommend to the Kahspell City Council that architectural design standards be included in the Kalispell Zoning Ordinance as shown on attached Exhibit A. EXHIBIT A DRAFT CITY OF KALISPELL, MONTANA ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STANDARDS ADOPTED: XXXX With editorial Changes 11l14/05 Table of Contents Vision Statement .1. Introduction 2. Application and Review Process 3. Parking 4. Lighting 5. Landscaping 6. Signage 7. Community Amenities and Public Spaces 8. Site Planning and Development 9. Building Design 10. Highway Corridor Standards 11, Historical Preservation VISION STATEMENT The city of Kalispell is the economic and government center of the Flathead valley and takes pride in its economic diversity, business opportunities and multiple amenities. Kalispell expects excellence in growth and development. Both public and private development should emphasize retaining Kalispell's historic character, cultural heritage and should complement the cit's unique and beautiful natural setting. Creativity that results in quality site design, architecture, landscaping and signage is encouraged so that new development makes a positive contribution to the community. Adopted by the Kalispell city council Drafted by: The Kalispell Planning Board and Zoning Commission The Kalispell Architectural Review committee KALISPELL ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STANDARDS 'CHAT... • I alispell's architectural review standards are a component of the Kalispell Zoning Ordinance and contain additional design standards for development. WHERE... All development within the city limits is subject to Kalispell's architectural review standards except single family residences and duplexes. • Anytime new development or redevelopment occurs, the architectural design standards shall apply except single family residences and duplexes. HOW... • A process has been developed for architectural review that occurs concurrently with the building permit review process. PARKING W "V%-Vt'fie ` ^f �cn"nit" large parking lots that front main arter ais or collectorsjQhnilbe are discouraged unless adequately screened or landscaped. The building, not the parking lot, should be the primary focus of the development. Landscaping should be incorporated ! 1 J Fi ►! " i f t !i !. J a --%-J P JIt to create green space and otten the visual impact of the parcing iot. ne use of earm berms, short decorative fencing, walkways, pavers or alternate paving materials are useful tools in parking lot design. Parking located along street frontages lessens the attractiveness for pedestrians and compromises safety. Pacing Lot Design Guidelines Developments requiring large parking lots should attempt to create smaller parking "pods" around the building or behind the building. tsA art Landscaping within parking lots should define the entrance and exit aisles of the parking lanes. Landscape islands shall be developed at parking lot entrances / exits where feasible. Parking lots should be located behind or between buildings when possible.YL : Adequate consideration should be given to areas for snow storage in parking lot design. Landscaped boulevards shall be between the project site and adjacent roadways. 7 • When _QiHP_Xn1A Cc nr nPr p�frinn nnfhcz nra narf of n rlovolnnmianf ra n fhaw chnif him V ■ a IwI a Wa%.Av r■ viw1;.%.r 7+I It n4Ai a NwlLi a L.41 L./ r%.41 L W1 %r4 %AV Y V1Vrf1 # 1%J1 [6 ViI.AE 1 161 1%.I Y %.,1 IW11 designed with curbs and sidewalks so as to maintain a minimum three foot clear pedestrian walkway. The design will prevent vehicles from encroaching into the three foot clear walkway space. J'11..V� Parking lots located next to residentially zoned properties shall have adequate screening using landscaping, fencing, berms or a combination of these. • It is the goal of the City to provide adequate parking within the commercial areas of the community while avoiding excess parking. Except in the downtown area, development of parking beyond the required standards in the Kalispell Zoning Ordinance is discouraged. Shared parking between adjacent properties with non -conflicting times of operation is encouraged, as is alternative modes of transportation. • Provision shall be made for public transportation drop-off and pick-up areas as needed. Light pollution obscures the night sky, a resource important to residents and visitors. Light trespass interferes with the quality of life. Architectural review standards for outdoor lighting are intended to control light from non -vehicular sources; and to reduce and eliminate nuisance glare and light trespass from poorly placed or shielded light sources. It is the further intent of these standards to curtail and reverse the degradation of the night time visual environment through regulation of the type and use of outdoor lighting; and to conserve energy and resources, while maintaining night-time safety, utility and security. General Lighting standards • bighting shall be designed, directed and shielded in such a manner that direct light does not leave the perimeter of the site. All outdoor lighting, including the fixture, pole, and other supporting elements, shall be designed to complement the overall architectural appearance of the site and prevent excessive glare. 9 • The height and level of lighting should be appropriate for the development. g-ht Pol shall net exceed 25 texr-ee.,n feet 0 Roof illumination is not allured. Timing mechanisms and photo cells are encourto be used to reduce light levels and conserve energy during non -operational hours, • bighting mounted on the building should be integrated as an architectural component. It shall be designed so the light is fully shielded and directed toward the building. 0 canopy lighting shall be recessed and shielded. 0 Love voltage landscape lighting will be allowed provided it is directed toward the object or building and does not leave the perimeter of the site or contribute to light trespass. ern -n rnininium n+ 2 13 rle, %0, t� All pole mounted lighting shall have a full cut-off lens that does not allow, light to shine above a 80 degree an le measured from a vertical line from the center of the lamp. 16 'Mercury vapor lights are...prohibited because of the poor color sp ctrurn, light intensity and inefficient energy use. • Low pre.ssure or high pressure sodium li hts metal halide florescent and compact florescent lihts are encoura ed A Kq 5 CakOAND ! r + .� i AI - a a a ^ i 1L +► • ! a +w r f w rM w ra MILW2�WALW a IM IM r rr rr wi rw re s ; + ■ iR ■ "� ■ + 1R - a + r wr rir LANDSCAPING Landscaping should be planned as an Integral part of the building design. This includes a combination of trees, shrubs, hedges, vines, ground cover and flowers suitable for the climate, exposure and site condition. Landscaping shall complement the architecture and _1' _ 1 1_ _'1 _1"_- aa acen11 bu iuings. Landscaping design may include earth berms, bark, mulch, edgers, pavers, rack and structural features such as fountains, benches, art sculptures and planters. The objects and plants shall be arranged in a harmonious manner compatible with the building and its surroundings. New development or redevelopment shall provide sufficient landscaping to assure a pleasant and aesthetic on -site environment and, when necessary, provide protective screening. Landscaping should be included in the front yard or any yard adjacent to any public right-of-way, along any lot adjacent to a residential zone, or in association with off-street parking areas. General Landscape Requirements • Landscape plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Kalispell Parks and Recreation Department as part of the site development review process prior to planting. Existing mature landscaping should be preserved during site development and removed only when necessary. 12 • To ensure a clear vision triangle shrubs at entrances and exits shall be less than two feet in height. Landscaping shall include a mix of seasonally attractive trees, shrubs and other green plants. Trees shall have a diameter (caliper) of at least 2 % inches measured 18 inches above ground level at the time of planting. Groundcover shall be planted in accordance with the tagged recommendation or as approved by the City. Not more than 20 percent of the ground cover area shall be comprised of rock or other hard materials unless otherwise reviewed and approved by the City. 1.3 • If fences, hedges or other architectural designs are used along street frontage, they shall be placed inward of the landscape strip. openings shall be provided to accommodate pedestrian circulation. • Landscaping along the perimeter of the parking lot that provides a visual relief between a public street and the parking lot shall be a minimum of five feet at maturity and shall be comprised primarily of planted materials. • The perimeter landscape buffer along a street shall consist of planted materials and man-made features to create, at a minimum, , a three foot high visual relief screen. This screen will be a hedge, fence, planter box, berm, dividers, shrubbery or trees, or a combination of the above. All visual relief landscaping shall create a two foot tall minimum screen at time of planting. Perimeter landscaping that adjoins a landscaped boulevard shall be designed in cooperation with the city parks director. • There shall be a three and a half to six and a half foot high vegetative visual barrier of mixed evergreens when bordering or adjacent to a residential zone unless the border fronts on a public alley or street. All landscaping shall be continually maintained including necessary watering, weeding, pruning and replacing when necessary. 14 Signage is intended to reflect the natural environment of the Flathead Valley. The Kalispell Zoning Ordinance has specific regulations regarding the number, size and location of signs according to the zoning district. It is the goal of the City to improve the quality of existing signage throughout its jurisdiction through standards that create signs that are clear in their messages and advertising and that are aesthetically compatible with the built and natural environment. To that end, the following are some basic guidelines that are intended to foster commerce and creative expression, significantly reduce sign clutter, enhance local architecture and community character, Design Guidelines • The location, size, as well as qualities of style and permanence of the sign, together with the materials, methods of illumination, and graphic standard shall reflect a favorable compatibility with the overall context of the building and of the neighborhood. 15 "T kr #trr►%r-%f ^I AW% ►Arlo+krNr fre%ram c+#+��r�irtir-� err-►inr%4*"i� f1i irk r"r%i i"+pA ;hr� � r-+�ns-t�tI i !� LyP� ui �IUI I M IU V1. lI c��-OLcxi lull lu, PI VJUkAll lU, ltu�1 t=i l €vul l«u vvcaii, Kcal ivVy, window, or directory shall create a visual pattern that can be easily interpreted by motorists and pedestrians, and utilized for the mutual benefit of merchants, tourists, and customers. The character of the sign shall be in context with the commercial activity and shall not overpower the building or its architecture nor obscure significant views. Legibility and visual interest are strongly encouraged. Signs that cause glare and/or spill light on surrounding properties shall be prohibited. Vibrant franchise and corporate colors shall be used as accent colors only. Architectural components of the building or development shall be integrated into the sign structure to create a unified theme. 16 Ground mounted monument signs are encouraged. Pole mounted signs are discouraged. Landscaping around ground mounted and monument signs are encouraged. The landscaping is intended to create an integrated development of the site 17 COMMUNITY AMENITIES AND PUBLIC SPACES Community amenities are design elements which add form, function and interest to a development. They create a safer vehicular and pedestrian environment, as well as encouraging and developing a well -maintained built environment. Community - - - - are — — __ — — - - .- — __ — -1 . - - d I -r. amenmes are encouragea in ine aesign ana aeveiopment OT a site anci are ouvinea below. Design Guidelines for Community Amenities • Benches and outdoor seating areas associated with or without a particular business or commercial enterprise are encouraged to be incorporated into the site design. 1.8 • Balconies, porches, rooftop seating areas and covered patios create a sense of space and provide an area for respite. • Landscape features that include works of art such as sculptures, fountains and seasonal planters add visual interest and are encouraged. • Pedestrian walkways that incorporate colored pavers, tiles, concrete or other features that meander or flow in a nonlinear fashion provide an alternative to concrete. 19 • Well -maintained landscaped areas and buildings add to the sense of quality development. Covered entrances of buildings foyers provide weather protection, security and a sense of place. 20 SITE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT CONSIDERATIONS There are several distinctive development areas in Kalispell where the architectural review standards apply. Each have special considerations. The downtown area is the historical and cultural center of Kalispell, while the greater Kalispell area provides areas for commercial growth, expansion and redevelopment. The highway corridor provides a gateway to the community and is addressed under a separate segment of this document. Downtown Area Development Guidelines Downtowns traditionally comprise an assortment of high intensity uses within a compact, walkable area including retail, office, housing, and entertainment. Kalispell's Downtown ,Area is generally from California Street on the north to Eight Street on the south and between Second Avenue East and Third Avenue Vilest. To make the heart of Kalispell a vibrant and friendly environment for residents, workers, merchants and visitors, the following policies will re -energize the area: 21 Make downtown a destination b attracting a variety of different uses that include retail, restaurants, offices and entertainment functions not found in a mail to ensure long terra viability. • There should be a focus on revitalizing existing buildings in the downtown area and utilize existing storefronts to create a sense of place and a positive setting for pedestrian activity not found elsewhere in the community. 2 ■ Uses on the ground floor street frontages should be non- residential uses within the UUVVI ILVVVI I ULMt: UjUd.r F j (ItIZe Inn construction and re -vitalization of high -quality and high -density nixed -use housing on upper floors of downtown buildings to maintain a vibrant area. • construction of office buildings with smaller footprints that offer historical design in and around the downtown core area on identified locations are encouraged to maintain the scale and character of the area. Re -vitalization of sites shall follow the downtown's historic character. They should include amenities such as balconies, terraces and galleries to take advantage of the city's mountain scenery. 23 Historically significant residential structures U ILIL are L;UI I U[ Led to a non residential use shall maintain the historical integrity of the structure to the greatest extent possible. 0 Screening of refuse areas and mechanical equipment is required. • changes to the exterior color of a building of more than 25 percent will be subject to architectural review. 2 Greater Kalispell Area Development Guidelines The city provides a variety of business opportunities on properties located in unique settings. These areas should be developed to reinforce the best qualities of the property. Develmment and redevelODment should strive for hinh nij;;Iitv win-11 infP-nrnfA-H rip-qinn . . - . .. I - - - - - -.-- - -- - .- -- — - — - — IT - - - — - - - — — . - — - — - - - -,U - - —1 —�-* � F I F w � 4 a 9* 0 %�Zj 2 components that enhance the site and surrounding areas. 25 • Redevelopment in areas suffering from adverse economic and physical conditions is encouraged by using available incentives. • Redevelopment projects must include upgraded amenities such as sidewalks, landscaping, lighting and applicable buffers from noise and/or dense traffic. • Buildings shall be located to take positive advantage of the site's natural topography and drainage, existing vegetation, and other natural features. 26 BUILDING DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS Quality building design is considered a primary element of the architectural standards for the City of Kalispell. Creativity is encouraged to avoid monotony while at the same time providing architectural design that is harmonious and complementary to other buildings in the area and community as a whole. Design Guidelines for Commercial and Multi -Family Development Architectural elements within a project shall be applied consistently on all sides of structures visible from public rights -of -way and/or adjacent residential zones. 27 • Exterior materials shall be sufficiently durable to ensure stability, maintainability, and long life. The use of natural and natural looking materials indigenous to the area signifying permanence, such as wood, stone, stucco and masonry are encouraged. These materials shall be integrated elements comprised of natural and muted colors that are complementary. Bright, vibrant, corporate or franchise colors shall be used only as accent colors, not as a primary base or theme. If natural materials or natural looking materials are not incorporated as a building component, special design details will be required to undergo a preliminary design review with the architectural review committee prior to a final submittal that demonstrates the merits of the design. Community amenities should be incorporated into projects with a site of 30,000 square feet or less. They are required on larger projects. This would include the use of beaches, planters, decorative banners, fountains clocks, kiosks,, pavers, curved sidewalks, plazas and sculptures. 28 • Massive structures such as box -like "warehouse„ buildings are aiscouragea unless designed with smaller architectural components such as articulated rooflines and entry designs, • Ground -level utilities, service equipment, trash, storage, loading, and other accessory facilities shall be screened by landscaping or placement where their visibility is limited. • Roof top mechanical equipment shall be screened from view with parapet galls, articulated roof designs or other architectural components. -)9 HIGHWAY ENTRANCE CE CORRIDOR STANDARDS Commercial properties adjacent to the highways entering the city of Kalispell are subject to these standards. Generally this would include the highway corridors of Hwy 2 and Hwy 93 from the city limits to Meridian Road on the west; 7th Avenue East to the east, Wyoming to the north and 13Ih Street to the south. The entrances to Kalispell are an important gateway to the community and as such should be developed in such a way that they create an inviting and positive first impression of the community. The goal is to reflect architectural integrity, a high quality of design and aesthetic presence in architecture, landscaping, signage and lighting. The highway corridors are generally the major arterials that service the community. Additional standards and attention are given to these important community entrances. Components is of the Highway corridor Elements Buildings design - Buildings, particularly large scale buildings, should strive to have interesting architectural components minimizing generic and corporate structures. Use of articulated roofs and entrances will be required, Multiple buildings within a single development should have similar architectural components that tie the development together. Materials - Use of natural materials and natural looking materials shall be incorporated into the building and site design. Bright colors shall be used as accent 30 colors rather than a primary building color which should be muted natural shades. Use of natural materials shall be incorporated into the building elements. Landscaping — Landscaping shall be an Integral part of the building design. it will include a mix of seasonally attractive trees, shrubs and other green planted materials with a consistent theme throughout the site. Boulevards shall be developed in the entrance / exits areas to the development. Once established the landscaping should be well -maintained and irrigated. Parking lots — The building, not the parking lot, should be the primary focus, particularly in shopping centers and large scale retail developments. Parking lots should be developed in pods within the site rather than one large lot. Landscaping should be Interspersed in the parking lot with trees, shrubs and other planted materials. Shared access to parking is encouraged rather than separate accesses to individual businesses. A landscape buffer shall be provided between the parking lot and highway. • ignage — Attractive signage along the roadways is very important to the corridor areas and shall be given careful consideration in the initial stages of the building site design. signs should be ground mounted monument signs integrated with the architectural components of the buildings with landscaping around the base of the sign. Shared signage for multiple tenants is required. Consistent lettering, coloring and sizing of signs on the buildings and monuments signs is encouraged. Use ��r-s,� . 31. • 1 inhfinn -- (,, rP-fi d nnnsirl�rnfinn Rh�ll he niven to n1anninn and nbadna linhtina for w ■ v.7 ■ 3 % 0 ■ a ;y rr vr� a ... . r* • rr w . .... ... r e wry ... �. . . _ • - I %W .. the site and shall adhere to the lighting standards outlined elsewhere in this document. • Pedestrian amenities -- Sidewalks, walkways and or bike and pedestrian trails shall be established with new development and redevelopment within and adjacent to the development. Bike and I or pedestrian paths shall be developed adjacent to the public right of way in areas where they do not exist in order to create a continuous trail network. • Maintenance - once quality elements of the highway corridor developments have been established, a regular maintenance schedule shall be followed to ensure that the quality is maintained. 32 HISTORIC PRESERVATION Kalispell has a rich historical heritage that is reflected in the buildings and architecture located primarily in the Downtown, East and West Side Historic Districts. Preservation for the purposes of this document is generally be limited to those historically significant buildings in these areas. It is the intent of these standards to maintain key characteristic details and elements of the exterior of these buildings. Design Guidelines and standards for Historic Preservation Original materials or details should not be removed from a building when they can be reasonably repaired. The distinctive historic and architectural character of the building should be maintained through proper regular maintenance and repair. 33 • The original shape of a roofline including the pitch eave lines and ridge should be retained or restored. • Visible roofs should retain or duplicate the appearance of the original roofing material when possible. • Roof mounted architectural features such as dormers, cupolas, cornices, chimney or other features and facades should be preserved or replaced. Window and door opening should be in original size and spacing while retaining the original style of window and door. 0 Use of bare aluminum for storm windows and doors is strongly discouraged. 34 New construction should be compatible with the historical character of the downtown area with particular attention being given to exterior features such as windows and doors. In order to prevent and protect the unnecessary demolition of historically significant buildings, prior approval from the architectural review committee is required. 35 Theresa White From. Erik Chri ian (titan 1776 @ h otmaiI. coml Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 8036 PM To: eityoil@kiell.o Subject; zoning mate! The zoning ordinance's that get passe. in Kalispell city are absolutely draconian. I had to walk out of a meeting ton-Ight, because I was sickened by a passage: of a motion for a i ee te a, 4 standards '. STANDARDS.' -whose standards?'.."?? This -is insane. If the state cannot honor and respect the right o -1 a e property use and disposal, then there is No real freedom, but rather a pack of wolves in the hen house reader to devour and enforce THEIR idea of what is good and right. Sounds to me like sociallst planning. Express o el instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE]. me e ge . - click.- .. om/ o c nm00 0 ve i- eo 0 1