1. Architectural Design StandardsTri-City Planning Office
17 Second Street East — Suite 211
Kafise, Nfontana1
Phone: 6) 751-1850
Fax: (406) 751-1858
tricity@,)eenturytel.net
May 20, 2005
ar .es H. Patrick, City Manager
City of Kalispell
P.O. Box 1997
Kal s e , MT 59903
Re: Kalispell Architectural ral Design. Standards
DearJim:
The Kalispell City Planning Board met on April 197 2005 and held a public heaiing to
consider a, request by the City of Kalispell for the creation of Kalispell Architecturai
Design . standards for new commercial and multi -family development. t. This project was
part of the Kalispell Planning Board's work program and the planning board has been
wormsg on this project for the last nine or ten months. .s. The draft document presented
for pubEc hearing was the result o research and work sessions on the part of the
Kahs e .... Planning Board, Kalispell Architectural Review Committee and City staff.
Nara Wilson of the Tri-City Planning Office, presenters staff report KZA-05-
evaluating the proposal and recommended approval of the amendments outlined U'a
Exhibit A of the staff report. She explained this =end.ment was part of the ian g
board work program and drafted by the plan=g board and architectural review
cow. ttee, At the public hearing there were several people who spoke In favor of the
proposed standard citing establishing standards that reflect the commr .ties Mterest
and vision as well as providing developers with a cohesive document for new
development.
The board discussed the issixes the standards and the work they had done, including
the on -going work that would ld.. e re . re l from the Kalispell Architectural review
Committee. A motion was made and passed on a unan=ous vote to r-ecor=e .d. to
the Kalispell City Council that the Kalispell Zoning Ordinance be amended to Mol de
the Kalispell Architectural Design Standards as outlined in attached Exhibit -A.
Please schedule this ratter for consideration by the XalispeH City Council at their
earliest opportunity. You may contact this board. or Nara Wilson at the -City
Planning Office if you have any questions regarding this matter.
'oidlg Community Planning Assistance To:
e G:ty of Kalispell a City of Columbia Falls * City of Whitefish
Kalispell Architectural Design Standards
May 20, 2005
Page
Sincerely,
Kahspell City Pla ning Board
C4K)r,
George Taylor
President
GT/NW/ma
Attachments: Exhibit - Dry Architectural Design Standards
Sty report #KZTA-05-4 and application materials
Minutes 95 planning board meeting
w/ Att: Theresa White, Kalispell City Clerk
ter/ t.. an-iH. Patrick, City Manager, City of Kalispell, P.O. Box 1997,
Kam, MT S9901-1997 P.J. Sorensen, Zoning , City of Kalispell, P.O. Box 1997,
Kam, M59903-1997
Meridian Road. Cuthbertson stated that he is in favor of
this zone change but want he wanted and will be wanting
c` am is a re or'g of his property t -2 especially due
the location and size limitations of his current signage. He
noted that with the office complex being proposed they will
want a sign that lists the individiaal tenants names and
under- they only get one sign and it cannot
multiple tenant sign.
3]j]i
3
Taylor noted that the Board tries to be consistent.
No one else wished to speak and the pubs earl was
closer.
MOTION
Hinchey moved and Schutt seconded to adopt sty report
KZC-o -2 as finding of fact and, based on these fmdings
recommend to the Kalispell City Council that the request
for a zone change from R- 5 to -1 be approved.
BOA DISCUSSION
Hull receded the Board of the need to deternaine
' c
or .stent o� for the Meridian Roadarea to .t least
draw some des in the sand so that the busm*ess area
doesn't overlap too much � ito the residential area, instead
r
of doing it in a piecemead way.
E
Tarok` asked if another work session .o is scheduled for the
Growth Policy update. Wilson said not yet. She added that
if the Board wants to deal with Zonmg it would not be
Groff Policy issue it would be a work item issue. A
neighborhood meeting .ou 1 e held to tto some of the
property owner's on whit they would envision for the area
instead of the Board tag big blocks of land and zoning
`
them without community input.
Schutt asked if the zone changing would be accomplished
in conjunction with the road reconstruction or before and
Wilson said a strategy on how to approach this item should
e developed by the Board at a work session.
ROLL CALL
The motion passed unanimously on a .roll oaE vote.
CITY of ISPELL SPELL
A request by the City of Kalispell for an amendment ent to the
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
KalispeU Zoning Ordinance to meor or to architectural
,,STANDARDS
1 design standards that would y to all new development
AMENDMENT ENT REQUEST
in the City of Kalispell except single family and two family
s
residences.
i STAFF REPORT KZTA-05-4
Narda Wilson, with the ii-C t Flaming Office, gave a
KZTA-05- ,
Presentation o Staff Report- request by the
I%
City of Kalispell for an amendment to the Kalispell Zoningf
f
Ordinance to incorporate architectural design standards.
Kalispeil City Planning Board
Minutes of the mecung of Apri 19, 2005
Wilson .noted that the Beard has been working on the
Architectural Design. Standards for more than a year. They
3 have a document, although far from perfect, that provides
the spit of what the Board is Ong to accomplish i
developing Architectural Design Standards for the City of
KalispeH that basically cover ecnamercia andmulti-ar,ily
development. The standards would be an addendum to the
Ka .s e . Zoning Ordinance.
The Kalispell City Council has on a feu occasions already
discussed these standards ire their current form, The
x,i g board and Architectural Review Committee did a
good job of putting together ideals of what the corr - nunity
o efu� sees as important elements without ece
ssarily
putting restrictions or requirements on the building design.
The Architectural Review Committee has volunteered to
expand their duties to include the review of new
con=ercial and multi -family development wl--tic . wiH
require more meeting tirne. Wilson noted that they could
use sorne assistance and asked for volunteers from the
Board or to be recruited by the Board.
Staff is recorunending that the Board adopt staff report
KZTA-05-4 as findings of fact and recommend to the city
council that the Architectural Design. Standards attached
to the report as Exhibit A be included in the Kalispell
Zoning Ordinance.
Wilson added that these standards were posted on the City
of Kalispell and, ` ii-City Planning office websites. It is
hoped that there was some interest in access to those
online documents on the part of the public. Some feedback
was already received.
QUESTIONS BY THE 130ARD Taylor asked. for comments by any members of the
Architectural Review committee.
f
Bill
Goodman, who served on the Committee and was part
of the process, noted that the Kalispell city Planning Board
and Architectural Review Committee worked Hard on the
standards and. he hoped the Board would recommend that,
s € they be adopted.
'there was discussion on =proving the quality or the
document and Wilson noted that after a final draft has
been adopted more professional touches can be added, with
f
the help of Gini ogle who served on the Committee, before
the final document is printed.
i
U C HEARING The public hearing as opened to dose who wised o
s eak o . the iss .e.
IKL-Lfispell City Puri . w %ri
Minutes of the meetina of Aph1 19. 200
U- BLIC COMMENT M ayre Flowers, Citizens for a Better Flathead applauded
the board for taking on this project because it has been
talked about with M' the community for quite a vie. It is a
positive step forward and provides the kind of predictability
that residents and developers need and welcome. Flowers
added that she appreciates that these documents a-ve
been made available owe and she encourages that kind
of presentation for the public to be more actively: evolved.
Flowers asked for clarificadon on how you defuie the
boundaries daries for the entrance coriidors and why they were
not extended further. In addition on page 24 under Greater
Kalispell Area Development Standards, clarification needs
to be provided regarding redevelopment of properties to
ensure quality and mtegrit r.
Taylor said that the board would rely on the Groff Policy
which defies general areas and it would be the pohcy o
the board to be as consistent as possible with the
immediately surrounding area with regard to infer. They
wouldn't dn't put a -story building M* the middle of a
residential area.
Flowers clarified and said the area was vague and thought
there would be some simple wording that could be used to
clarify it.
Wilson said that they could look at this at the end of the
public hearing as something to pass on to city council.
To one else wished to speak and the public hean'ng was
closed.
MOTION HM'chey moved and Taylor seconded to adopt staff report
KZTA-05-4 as findings of fact and recommend to the
Kalispell City council that the Architectural Design
F.-Standards .-be.. adopted... as-..-. a -...--adder umto --- the - - -Kalispell
Zoning Ordinance.
BOARD DISCUSSION Wilson asked to clarify the areas that were brought up in
the public hearer . Wilson noted that the boundaries were
selected based on the location of the city limits to Meridian
r �
on the merest - 7thAvenue on the east, Wvoming and 13th
down to the city its and suggested that there may be a
better way to Ford this pomon.
Taylor suggested that when the Standards go to final print
a. niap or diagram co ld be included. Wilson noted that the
it-Y l it l t s will charge and the corridors were intended to be
from hose points out to the city limits. FMdi.g some better
wording . between now and city c o . c-U would prevent the
-Minutes of the meeting aIl-April 19, 7005
boundaries from being stuck to an exhibit and would be
ever -changing as the city limits change along those corridor
areas.
e
Hi chey mentioried Ms.Flowers' comments regarding � .
being consistent and cohesive which he thought was
t
already covered in the standards. The intent was if you are
f
going to redevelop a city block that has aH brick structures
you might want to put a brick structure M* .
Nilson said that the e n em is when you talk about infiH
that you. might end �� a lset huts �
door rater than a building that you would want t
r ate. Wilson suggested adding a phrase s as
"stn'vm'g for high quahty construction and architecture"
may be better.
ROLL CALL
The motion passed iinanimously on a roll call vote.
BOARD DISCUSSION
Wilson suggested that perhaps the is rinboard and city
council should .ave one more work session for the handoff
of the Architectural r es ga Standards so that the
standards do not end up languishing.e to lack of
understdnding.
Taylor r suggested that Wilson put sotnethm'g together-.
EV PROPERTIES
A request by .REV Properties for a change in zoning from R -
C URTHOUS EAST ZONE
3 (Urban single Fanifly Residential) to R-5
s CHANGE REQUEST & PUD
(Residential Professional Office) , and a request for awed. I
use Planned Unit Development U which includes 2
€ apartments, appro= . el y 20,000 square feet of office
space, apprommately 1,600 square feet of retail and a
2,000 square foot community room, on approximately 2.06
acres. The property is located at the east side of Fifth Street
.fast between Seventh street East and Eighth Street East
also know. as Cruse East.
STAFF .E . ' i KZC" r"3 &
Nar a Wilson, with the ` ri-Cit ' Plarmmg Office, gave a '
- -3
presentation of Staff Reports KZC- 5-3 and KPU -05-3 for
the Board..
Wilson described the location and history of use of the {
property. The previous owner, Gel as IDevelopment care
before the Board with another proposal on the property
which was tabled because of some changes that were made
e
f
at the last :Dilute and was Dever brought back to life. I
the past couple 3f years the property has been fenced and. �
s
x
the building has been allowed. to deteriorate, has been
vandahzed, the pang lot torn up, and a maintenance
i
buflding was taken down. The neighborhood and
mr . nrtv has been wo erm what is_aoing to happen to ;
rNlalispeil Ci(y Pl=ingBeard
CITY OF RIS E - ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STANDARDS
TRI-CITY PLANNING OFFICE
STAFF .REPORT #KZ A- 5-4
"RIL 12,2005
This is a report to the Kalispell City Planning Board and the Kalispell City Council
re axdi .g a request est for a text amendment to the Kalispell Zoning rd.mar ce to
develop architectural design standards. A public hearing has been scheduled before
the planning board for April 19, 2005 beginning at :00 PM in the Kalispell. City
Council Chambers. `he planning board will forward a recommendatiori to the
Kalispell. City Council for final. action
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The City of Kalispell is proposing an amendment to the Kalispell Zoning Ordinance
that creates standards for a-rchitectural design and review that would apply to all
new development in the city with the exception of the single family and duplexes.
A. Petitioner. James H. Patrick, city Manager
City of Kalispell
P.O. Box 1997
Kalispell, MT 59903
(406) 7
B. Area Effected by the Proposed Changes: Any area within the Kalispell zoning
jurisdictioncould be effected by these proposed. standards.
C. Proposed Amendment: ent: The architectural design standards would be adopted
as an adjunct to the Kalispell Zoning ordinance. The design standards would
apply to all new development within the city of Kalispell, and is primarily
geared toward new commercial development. t. The standards as proposed are
outlined on attached Exhibit A, Architectural Design Standards.
I . Staff on: These standards comprise several elements of the Kalispell
Planning Board's work program to address commercial design standards,
highway corridor standards, architectural design, signaage, site design and
pang. The planning board. and. Kal.is ell's Axchitectiaral Review Committee
met over several months s M* sessions to develop the standards that are being
proposed. The resources used were ordinances from other cities, American
Planning Association articles and other resources.
During the several months of work and research on this project the Kalispell
City Planning Board and Architectural Review Committee feels that they have
come up with fairly reasonable and clear standards. The Architectural Review
Committee, a citizen committee, has agreed to be available to provide the
accessary review in order to ensure that the architectural design standards are
applied uniformly. The additional step in the review process will be in addition
to the Kalispell el.l. Site Development Review Committee process.
EVALUATION BASED ON STATUTORY CRITERIA
The statutory basis for reviewing g a change in zoning is set fob by 76-2.2 5, M. C A
Findings of Fact for the zone change request are discussed relative to the it r=' .
cnt ria described by 76-2-203, M.C.A.
I. Does the requested zone comp with the owth policy?
The growth policy generally anticipates use of development standards that will
conserve and protect the quality of life of the citizens of its cor=unit r. The
architectural design standards being proposed are intro.ded to further this goal
and thus the proposed amendment wi1 generally promote the goals and
objectives of the growth policy plate..
2. is the re nested zone desiMedto lessen congestion . the streets
The proposed amendment wi not typically have a significant impact on traffic
congestion in the streets since architectural design is not related to lard use or
level of traffic that would be generated. This amendment will not affect ov raU
traffic Pattems, amount of traffic in an area, or contribute to traffic congestion.
3. Will the rc nested zone secure safely.from firs aic and other- dam rs
The proposed amendment would not reduce any sec lity from fire or other
halth and safety issues sm'ce the standards are intended to maintai.n a high
level of integrity and quality m new development. There would no
com ror ise with regard to public safety.
Will the requested change -promote the health an en ralwelfare?
The general health and welfare of the public will be promoted by creating
standards for architectural design, that ensures a high quality of development,
good architectural design and promotes quality of life as well as the general
health and safety of the comet ity.
. will the requested ne rovi e for adequate light and air?
Light and air between and surrounding buildings wo .ld not be altered or
impacted the proposed text a endm t_
. Will the reguested zone prevent the overcrowding of land or undue
concentration of j2eoplO
The proposed change would not increase the intensity of lases currently allowed
xxuthin the zoning districts since the proposed change does not deal with land
uses per se but rather architectural design standards.
. Will the re nested zone facilitate the adeguate provision of transportation.,,
grater ewerageschools arks a d of .er public 'e�.ents
The amendment would not itnact the availability of public services. This text
amendment wiH not have any adverse impact on the availability or provision o
bhe services and uti ties .
Does the requested zone_give consideration to the articular suita i i of the
propertyfor artic laruses?
The architectural design standards were crafted with. consideration being given
to the speck applications of architectural design for specie uses and gives
adequate consideration to the suitability of the standar ls.
. Does the reguested zone gave reasonable consideration to the character of the
district?
The character of the area in which the architectural design standards are
applied wiH be maintam*ed and promoted by architectural design that does not
degrade, visua.y impact or devalue the overall quality of life wits those
neighborhoods. By providing architectural design standards in the commercial
as well as multi -family residential areas, reasonable consideration is given to
protection of the character of a district.
10. Will the prgposed zone conserve the value of buildings--)
The architectural design standards will not only conserve the value of buildings
but wiU conserve the quality of lire within the community unity err both the
residential and commercial area.. The building values iH e conserved y
promoting and encouraging reasonable standards Within' these districts. These
amendments will conserve the value of buildings.
W1H the req ested zone encoura e the most a ro cute use of the land
throe bout the ' ris ctlon
The most appropriate land uses throughout the Jurisdiction are promoted by
encouraging reasonable design standards that promote the general rely. -being
of all cit�ens of the community. 'these changes will not only encourage
appropriate land uses through the la .n g jurisdiction, but will also provide
greater opportunities for the enjoyment of the visual elements of the
community and promote a. safe and healthy environment.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Kalispell City Planning Board adopt the findings in staff`'
report KZTA-05-4 and recommend to the Kahspell City Council that architectural
design standards be included in the Kalispell Zoning Ordinance as shown on attached
Exhibit A.
EXHIBIT A
DRAFT CITY OF KALISPELL, MONTANA
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STANDARDS
ADOPTED: XXXX
With editorial Changes 11l14/05
Table of Contents
Vision Statement
.1. Introduction
2. Application and Review Process
3. Parking
4. Lighting
5. Landscaping
6. Signage
7. Community Amenities and Public Spaces
8. Site Planning and Development
9. Building Design
10. Highway Corridor Standards
11, Historical Preservation
VISION STATEMENT
The city of Kalispell is the economic and government center of the
Flathead valley and takes pride in its economic diversity, business
opportunities and multiple amenities. Kalispell expects excellence in
growth and development. Both public and private development should
emphasize retaining Kalispell's historic character, cultural heritage and
should complement the cit's unique and beautiful natural setting.
Creativity that results in quality site design, architecture, landscaping
and signage is encouraged so that new development makes a positive
contribution to the community.
Adopted by the Kalispell city council
Drafted by: The Kalispell Planning Board and Zoning Commission
The Kalispell Architectural Review committee
KALISPELL ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STANDARDS
'CHAT...
• I alispell's architectural review standards are a component of the Kalispell Zoning
Ordinance and contain additional design standards for development.
WHERE...
All development within the city limits is subject to Kalispell's architectural review
standards except single family residences and duplexes.
• Anytime new development or redevelopment occurs, the architectural design
standards shall apply except single family residences and duplexes.
HOW...
• A process has been developed for architectural review that occurs concurrently with
the building permit review process.
PARKING
W "V%-Vt'fie ` ^f �cn"nit" large parking lots that front main arter ais or collectorsjQhnilbe
are discouraged unless adequately screened or landscaped. The building, not the parking
lot, should be the primary focus of the development. Landscaping should be incorporated
! 1 J Fi ►! " i f t !i !. J a --%-J P JIt
to create green space and otten the visual impact of the parcing iot. ne use of earm
berms, short decorative fencing, walkways, pavers or alternate paving materials are useful
tools in parking lot design. Parking located along street frontages lessens the
attractiveness for pedestrians and compromises safety.
Pacing Lot Design Guidelines
Developments requiring large parking lots
should attempt to create smaller parking
"pods" around the building or behind the
building.
tsA art
Landscaping within parking lots should define the entrance and exit aisles of the
parking lanes. Landscape islands shall be developed at parking lot entrances / exits
where feasible.
Parking lots should be located behind or
between buildings when possible.YL
:
Adequate consideration should be given to areas for snow storage in parking lot
design.
Landscaped boulevards shall be
between the project site and
adjacent roadways.
7
• When _QiHP_Xn1A Cc nr nPr p�frinn nnfhcz nra narf of n rlovolnnmianf ra n fhaw chnif him
V ■ a IwI a Wa%.Av r■ viw1;.%.r 7+I It n4Ai a NwlLi a L.41 L./ r%.41 L W1 %r4 %AV Y V1Vrf1 # 1%J1 [6 ViI.AE 1 161 1%.I Y %.,1 IW11
designed with curbs and sidewalks so as to maintain a minimum three foot clear
pedestrian walkway. The design will prevent vehicles from encroaching into the
three foot clear walkway space.
J'11..V�
Parking lots located next to
residentially zoned properties shall
have adequate screening using
landscaping, fencing, berms or a
combination of these.
• It is the goal of the City to provide adequate parking within the commercial areas of
the community while avoiding excess parking. Except in the downtown area,
development of parking beyond the required standards in the Kalispell Zoning
Ordinance is discouraged.
Shared parking between adjacent properties with non -conflicting times of operation
is encouraged, as is alternative modes of transportation.
• Provision shall be made for public transportation drop-off and pick-up areas as
needed.
Light pollution obscures the night sky, a resource important to residents and visitors. Light
trespass interferes with the quality of life. Architectural review standards for outdoor
lighting are intended to control light from non -vehicular sources; and to reduce and
eliminate nuisance glare and light trespass from poorly placed or shielded light sources. It
is the further intent of these standards to curtail and reverse the degradation of the night
time visual environment through regulation of the type and use of outdoor lighting; and to
conserve energy and resources, while maintaining night-time safety, utility and security.
General Lighting standards
• bighting shall be designed, directed
and shielded in such a manner that
direct light does not leave the
perimeter of the site.
All outdoor lighting, including the fixture, pole, and other supporting elements, shall
be designed to complement the overall architectural appearance of the site and
prevent excessive glare.
9
• The height and level of lighting should be appropriate for the development. g-ht
Pol shall net exceed 25
texr-ee.,n feet
0 Roof illumination is not allured.
Timing mechanisms and photo cells are encourto be used to reduce light
levels and conserve energy during non -operational hours,
• bighting mounted on the building
should be integrated as an
architectural component. It shall
be designed so the light is fully
shielded and directed toward the
building.
0 canopy lighting shall be recessed and shielded.
0
Love voltage landscape lighting will be allowed provided it is directed toward the
object or building and does not leave the perimeter of the site or contribute to light
trespass.
ern -n
rnininium n+ 2 13 rle, %0,
t� All pole mounted lighting
shall have a full cut-off lens that does not
allow, light to shine above a 80 degree
an le measured from a vertical line from
the center of the lamp.
16 'Mercury vapor lights are...prohibited
because of the poor color sp ctrurn, light
intensity and inefficient energy use.
• Low pre.ssure or high pressure sodium
li hts metal halide florescent and compact
florescent lihts are encoura ed A
Kq
5
CakOAND
! r + .� i AI - a a a ^ i 1L +► • ! a
+w r f w rM w ra MILW2�WALW a IM IM r rr rr wi rw re s ;
+ ■ iR ■ "� ■ + 1R - a +
r wr rir
LANDSCAPING
Landscaping should be planned as an Integral part of the building design. This includes a
combination of trees, shrubs, hedges, vines, ground cover and flowers suitable for the
climate, exposure and site condition. Landscaping shall complement the architecture and
_1' _ 1 1_ _'1 _1"_-
aa acen11 bu iuings.
Landscaping design may include earth berms, bark, mulch, edgers, pavers, rack and
structural features such as fountains, benches, art sculptures and planters. The objects
and plants shall be arranged in a harmonious manner compatible with the building and its
surroundings. New development or redevelopment shall provide sufficient landscaping to
assure a pleasant and aesthetic on -site environment and, when necessary, provide
protective screening. Landscaping should be included in the front yard or any yard
adjacent to any public right-of-way, along any lot adjacent to a residential zone, or in
association with off-street parking areas.
General Landscape Requirements
• Landscape plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Kalispell Parks and
Recreation Department as part of the site development review process prior to
planting.
Existing mature landscaping should be preserved during site development and
removed only when necessary.
12
• To ensure a clear vision triangle shrubs at entrances and exits shall be less than
two feet in height.
Landscaping shall include a mix of
seasonally attractive trees, shrubs
and other green plants.
Trees shall have a diameter (caliper) of at least 2 % inches measured 18 inches
above ground level at the time of planting.
Groundcover shall be planted in accordance with the tagged recommendation or as
approved by the City. Not more than 20 percent of the ground cover area shall be
comprised of rock or other hard materials unless otherwise reviewed and approved
by the City.
1.3
• If fences, hedges or other architectural designs are used along street frontage, they
shall be placed inward of the landscape strip. openings shall be provided to
accommodate pedestrian circulation.
• Landscaping along the perimeter of the parking lot that provides a visual relief
between a public street and the parking lot shall be a minimum of five feet at
maturity and shall be comprised primarily of planted materials.
• The perimeter landscape buffer along a street shall consist of planted materials and
man-made features to create, at a minimum, , a three foot high visual relief screen.
This screen will be a hedge, fence, planter box, berm, dividers, shrubbery or trees,
or a combination of the above. All visual relief landscaping shall create a two foot tall
minimum screen at time of planting. Perimeter landscaping that adjoins a
landscaped boulevard shall be designed in cooperation with the city parks director.
• There shall be a three and a half to six and a half foot high vegetative visual barrier
of mixed evergreens when bordering or adjacent to a residential zone unless the
border fronts on a public alley or street.
All landscaping shall be continually maintained including necessary watering,
weeding, pruning and replacing when necessary.
14
Signage is intended to reflect the natural environment of the Flathead Valley. The Kalispell
Zoning Ordinance has specific regulations regarding the number, size and location of signs
according to the zoning district. It is the goal of the City to improve the quality of existing
signage throughout its jurisdiction through standards that create signs that are clear in their
messages and advertising and that are aesthetically compatible with the built and natural
environment. To that end, the following are some basic guidelines that are intended to
foster commerce and creative expression, significantly reduce sign clutter, enhance local
architecture and community character,
Design Guidelines
• The location, size, as well as
qualities of style and permanence of
the sign, together with the materials,
methods of illumination, and graphic
standard shall reflect a favorable
compatibility with the overall context
of the building and of the
neighborhood.
15
"T kr #trr►%r-%f ^I AW% ►Arlo+krNr fre%ram c+#+��r�irtir-� err-►inr%4*"i� f1i irk r"r%i i"+pA ;hr� � r-+�ns-t�tI
i !� LyP� ui �IUI I M IU V1. lI c��-OLcxi lull lu, PI VJUkAll lU, ltu�1 t=i l €vul l«u vvcaii, Kcal ivVy,
window, or directory shall create a visual pattern that can be easily interpreted by
motorists and pedestrians, and utilized for the mutual benefit of merchants, tourists,
and customers.
The character of the sign shall be in context with the commercial activity and shall
not overpower the building or its architecture nor obscure significant views.
Legibility and visual interest are
strongly encouraged. Signs that
cause glare and/or spill light on
surrounding properties shall be
prohibited. Vibrant franchise and
corporate colors shall be used as
accent colors only.
Architectural components of the building or development shall be integrated into the
sign structure to create a unified theme.
16
Ground mounted monument signs are encouraged. Pole mounted signs are
discouraged.
Landscaping around ground
mounted and monument signs are
encouraged. The landscaping is
intended to create an integrated
development of the site
17
COMMUNITY AMENITIES AND PUBLIC SPACES
Community amenities are design elements which add form, function and interest to a
development. They create a safer vehicular and pedestrian environment, as well as
encouraging and developing a well -maintained built environment. Community
- - - - are
— — __ — — - - .- — __ — -1 . - - d I -r.
amenmes are encouragea in ine aesign ana aeveiopment OT a site anci are ouvinea
below.
Design Guidelines for Community Amenities
• Benches and outdoor
seating areas
associated with or
without a particular
business or
commercial enterprise
are encouraged to be
incorporated into the
site design.
1.8
• Balconies, porches, rooftop seating areas and covered patios create a sense of
space and provide an area for respite.
• Landscape features that include works of art such as sculptures, fountains and
seasonal planters add visual interest and are encouraged.
• Pedestrian walkways that incorporate colored pavers, tiles, concrete or other
features that meander or flow in a nonlinear fashion provide an alternative to
concrete.
19
• Well -maintained landscaped areas and buildings add to the sense of quality
development.
Covered entrances of
buildings foyers
provide weather
protection, security
and a sense of place.
20
SITE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT CONSIDERATIONS
There are several distinctive development areas in Kalispell where the architectural review
standards apply. Each have special considerations. The downtown area is the historical
and cultural center of Kalispell, while the greater Kalispell area provides areas for
commercial growth, expansion and redevelopment. The highway corridor provides a
gateway to the community and is addressed under a separate segment of this document.
Downtown Area Development Guidelines
Downtowns traditionally comprise an assortment of high intensity uses within a compact,
walkable area including retail, office, housing, and entertainment. Kalispell's Downtown
,Area is generally from California Street on the north to Eight Street on the south and
between Second Avenue East and Third Avenue Vilest. To make the heart of Kalispell a
vibrant and friendly environment for residents, workers, merchants and visitors, the
following policies will re -energize the area:
21
Make downtown a destination b
attracting a variety of different
uses that include retail,
restaurants, offices and
entertainment functions not found
in a mail to ensure long terra
viability.
• There should be a focus on revitalizing existing buildings in the downtown area and
utilize existing storefronts to create a sense of place and a positive setting for
pedestrian activity not found elsewhere in the community.
2
■ Uses on the ground floor street
frontages should be non-
residential uses within the
UUVVI ILVVVI I ULMt: UjUd.r F j (ItIZe Inn
construction and re -vitalization of
high -quality and high -density
nixed -use housing on upper floors
of downtown buildings to maintain
a vibrant area.
• construction of office buildings with smaller footprints that offer historical design in
and around the downtown core area on identified locations are encouraged to
maintain the scale and character of the area.
Re -vitalization of sites shall follow the downtown's historic character. They should
include amenities such as balconies, terraces and galleries to take advantage of the
city's mountain scenery.
23
Historically significant
residential structures
U ILIL are L;UI I U[ Led to a
non residential use
shall maintain the
historical integrity of
the structure to the
greatest extent
possible.
0 Screening of refuse areas and mechanical equipment is required.
• changes to the exterior color of a building of more than 25 percent will be subject to
architectural review.
2
Greater Kalispell Area Development Guidelines
The city provides a variety of business opportunities on properties located in unique
settings. These areas should be developed to reinforce the best qualities of the property.
Develmment and redevelODment should strive for hinh nij;;Iitv win-11 infP-nrnfA-H rip-qinn
. . - . .. I - - - - - -.-- - -- - .- -- — - — - — IT - - - — - - - — — . - — - — - - - -,U - - —1 —�-* � F I F w � 4 a 9* 0 %�Zj 2
components that enhance the site and surrounding areas.
25
• Redevelopment in areas
suffering from adverse
economic and physical
conditions is encouraged
by using available
incentives.
• Redevelopment projects
must include upgraded
amenities such as
sidewalks, landscaping,
lighting and applicable
buffers from noise and/or
dense traffic.
• Buildings shall be located to take positive advantage of the site's natural topography
and drainage, existing vegetation, and other natural features.
26
BUILDING DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
Quality building design is considered a primary element of the architectural standards for
the City of Kalispell. Creativity is encouraged to avoid monotony while at the same time
providing architectural design that is harmonious and complementary to other buildings in
the area and community as a whole.
Design Guidelines for Commercial and Multi -Family Development
Architectural elements within a
project shall be applied
consistently on all sides of
structures visible from public
rights -of -way and/or adjacent
residential zones.
27
• Exterior materials shall be sufficiently durable to ensure stability, maintainability, and
long life. The use of natural and natural looking materials indigenous to the area
signifying permanence, such as wood, stone, stucco and masonry are encouraged.
These materials shall be integrated elements comprised of natural and muted colors
that are complementary. Bright, vibrant, corporate or franchise colors shall be used
only as accent colors, not as a primary base or theme.
If natural materials or natural looking materials are not incorporated as a building
component, special design details will be required to undergo a preliminary design
review with the architectural review committee prior to a final submittal that
demonstrates the merits of the design.
Community amenities should be incorporated into projects with a site of 30,000
square feet or less. They are required on larger projects. This would include the
use of beaches, planters, decorative banners, fountains clocks, kiosks,, pavers,
curved sidewalks, plazas and sculptures.
28
•
Massive structures such as
box -like "warehouse„ buildings
are aiscouragea unless
designed with smaller
architectural components such
as articulated rooflines and
entry designs,
• Ground -level utilities, service equipment, trash, storage, loading, and other
accessory facilities shall be screened by landscaping or placement where their
visibility is limited.
• Roof top mechanical equipment shall be screened from view with parapet galls,
articulated roof designs or other architectural components.
-)9
HIGHWAY ENTRANCE CE CORRIDOR STANDARDS
Commercial properties adjacent to the highways entering the city of Kalispell are subject to
these standards. Generally this would include the highway corridors of Hwy 2 and Hwy 93
from the city limits to Meridian Road on the west; 7th Avenue East to the east, Wyoming to
the north and 13Ih Street to the south. The entrances to Kalispell are an important gateway
to the community and as such should be developed in such a way that they create an
inviting and positive first impression of the community. The goal is to reflect architectural
integrity, a high quality of design and aesthetic presence in architecture, landscaping,
signage and lighting. The highway corridors are generally the major arterials that service
the community. Additional standards and attention are given to these important community
entrances.
Components is of the Highway corridor Elements
Buildings design - Buildings, particularly large scale buildings, should strive to have
interesting architectural components minimizing generic and corporate structures.
Use of articulated roofs and entrances will be required, Multiple buildings within a
single development should have similar architectural components that tie the
development together.
Materials - Use of natural materials and natural looking materials shall be
incorporated into the building and site design. Bright colors shall be used as accent
30
colors rather than a primary building color which should be muted natural shades.
Use of natural materials shall be incorporated into the building elements.
Landscaping — Landscaping shall be an Integral part of the building design. it will
include a mix of seasonally attractive trees, shrubs and other green planted
materials with a consistent theme throughout the site. Boulevards shall be
developed in the entrance / exits areas to the development. Once established the
landscaping should be well -maintained and irrigated.
Parking lots — The building, not the parking lot, should be the primary focus,
particularly in shopping centers and large scale retail developments. Parking lots
should be developed in pods within the site rather than one large lot. Landscaping
should be Interspersed in the parking lot with trees, shrubs and other planted
materials. Shared access to parking is encouraged rather than separate accesses
to individual businesses. A landscape buffer shall be provided between the parking
lot and highway.
• ignage — Attractive signage along the roadways is very important to the corridor
areas and shall be given careful consideration in the initial stages of the building site
design. signs should be ground mounted monument signs integrated with the
architectural components of the buildings with landscaping around the base of the
sign. Shared signage for multiple tenants is required. Consistent lettering, coloring
and sizing of signs on the buildings and monuments signs is encouraged. Use
��r-s,� .
31.
• 1 inhfinn -- (,, rP-fi d nnnsirl�rnfinn Rh�ll he niven to n1anninn and nbadna linhtina for
w ■ v.7 ■ 3 % 0 ■ a ;y rr vr� a ... . r* • rr w . .... ... r e wry ... �. . . _ • - I %W
..
the site and shall adhere to the lighting standards outlined elsewhere in this
document.
• Pedestrian amenities -- Sidewalks, walkways and or bike and pedestrian trails shall
be established with new development and redevelopment within and adjacent to the
development. Bike and I or pedestrian paths shall be developed adjacent to the
public right of way in areas where they do not exist in order to create a continuous
trail network.
• Maintenance - once quality elements of the highway corridor developments have
been established, a regular maintenance schedule shall be followed to ensure that
the quality is maintained.
32
HISTORIC PRESERVATION
Kalispell has a rich historical heritage that is reflected in the buildings and architecture
located primarily in the Downtown, East and West Side Historic Districts. Preservation for
the purposes of this document is generally be limited to those historically significant
buildings in these areas. It is the intent of these standards to maintain key characteristic
details and elements of the exterior of these buildings.
Design Guidelines and standards for Historic Preservation
Original materials or details should not be removed from a building when they can
be reasonably repaired.
The distinctive historic and
architectural character of the building
should be maintained through proper
regular maintenance and repair.
33
• The original shape of a roofline including the pitch eave lines and ridge should be
retained or restored.
• Visible roofs should retain or duplicate the appearance of the original roofing
material when possible.
• Roof mounted architectural features such as dormers, cupolas, cornices, chimney or
other features and facades should be preserved or replaced.
Window and door opening should be in original size and spacing while retaining the
original style of window and door.
0 Use of bare aluminum for storm windows and doors is strongly discouraged.
34
New construction should be compatible
with the historical character of the
downtown area with particular attention
being given to exterior features such as
windows and doors.
In order to prevent and protect the unnecessary demolition of historically significant
buildings, prior approval from the architectural review committee is required.
35
Theresa White
From. Erik Chri ian (titan 1776 @ h otmaiI. coml
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 8036 PM
To: eityoil@kiell.o
Subject; zoning mate!
The zoning ordinance's that get passe. in Kalispell city are absolutely
draconian. I had to walk out of a meeting ton-Ight, because I was sickened by
a passage: of a motion for a i ee te a, 4 standards '. STANDARDS.' -whose
standards?'.."?? This -is insane. If the state cannot honor and respect the
right o -1 a e property use and disposal, then there is No real freedom,
but rather a pack of wolves in the hen house reader to devour and enforce
THEIR idea of what is good and right. Sounds to me like sociallst planning.
Express o el instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE].
me e ge . - click.- .. om/ o c nm00 0 ve i- eo 0 1