Loading...
01. Resolution 4679 - Annexation - Gaylon OwensTri-City Planning Office 17 Second Street East — Suite 211 Kalispell, Montana 59901 Phone: (406) 751-1850 Fax: (406) 751-1858 tricity@centurytel.net REPORT TO: Kalispell Mayor and City Council FROM: Narda A. Wilson, Senior Planner Chris A. Kukulski, City Manager SUBJECT Annexation and Initial Zoning of RA-1 — South of Sunnyside Drive MEETING DATE: February 4, 2002 BACKGROUND: This is a request by Gaylon Owens / Owl Corporation for annexation and initial zoning on property located south of Sunnyside Drive and west of Ashley Creek for approximately 11 acres. The applicants are proposing City R-4, a Residential zoning district, which has a minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet and allows duplexes and single-family homes as permitted uses. Currently there are no development plans for the property. The property is currently under the County zoning jurisdiction and is zoned R-1, Suburban Residential, which has a minimum lot size requirement of one acre. At the public hearing a couple from the area to the west noted that when the Kalispell Bypass is constructed there will be more traffic in the area. After the public hearing, a motion was made and passed unanimously to forward a recommendation that initial zoning for this property should be R-4, Two Family Residential, upon annexation. The land use in the area is primarily single-family residential and duplexes to the east where City services are available and large tract residential to the west which transitions to a more rural area of the county. The Kalispell City Planning Board held a public hearing at their first regular meeting of January 15, 2002. A motion was made and passed unanimously to forward a recommendation to the Kalispell City Council that initial zoning for this property should be R-4, Residential, upon annexation. RECOMMENDATION: A motion to adopt the first reading of the ordinance for R-4, Two -Family Residential, zoning upon annexation would be in order. FISCAL EFFECTS: Minor positive impacts once developed. ALTERNATIVES: As suggested by the city council. Providing Community Planning Assistance To: • City of Kalispell • City of Columbia Falls • City of Whitefish Gaylon Owens and R-4 Zoning January 25, 2002 Page 2 Respectfully submitted, Narda A. Wilson Senior Planner Report compiled: January 25, 2002 c: Theresa White, Kalispell City Clerk Attachments: Transmittal letter C'_ j'42L� Chris A. Kukulski City Manager Legal description (Exhibit A) Staff report KA-01-8 and application materials Draft minutes from 1/ 15/02 planning board meeting H: \FRDO \TRANSMIT\ KALISPEL\2001 \KA01-8MEMO.DOC RESOLUTION NO. 4679 A RESOLUTION TO PROVIDE FOR THE ALTERATION OF THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY OF KALISPELL BY INCLUDING THEREIN AS AN ANNEXATION CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN "EXHIBIT A", TO BE KNOWN AS OWENS ADDITION NO. 310; TO ZONE SAID PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE KALISPELL ZONING ORDINANCE, AND TO DECLARE AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Kalispell has received a petition from Gaylon Owens/Owl Corporation, the owner of property located west of Lone Pine View Estates, south of Sunnyside Drive and east of the Burlington Northern right-of-way and further described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and thereby made a part hereof, requesting that the City of Kalispell annex the territory into the City, and WHEREAS, the Tri-City Planning Office has made a report on Gaylon Owens' Annexation Request, 4KA-01-8, dated January 8, 2002, and WHEREAS, the Kalispell City Planning Board and Zoning Commission recommended that the territory be annexed into the City of Kalispell, and WHEREAS, said territory is included within and conforms to the Kalispell City -County Master Plan, and WHEREAS, the City of Kalispell desires to annex said property in accordance with Title 7, Chapter 2, Part 46, Montana Code Annotated. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KALISPELL AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. That all the real property as described in Exhibit A, be annexed to the City of Kalispell and the boundary of the City is altered to so provide, and shall be known as Owens Addition No. 310. SECTION II. Upon the effective date of this Resolution, the City Clerk is directed to make and certify under the seal of the City, a copy of the record of these proceedings as are entered on the minutes of the City Council and file said documents with the Flathead County Clerk and Recorder. From and after the date of filing of said documents as prepared by the City Clerk, or on the effective date hereof, whichever shall occur later, said annexed territory is part of the City of Kalispell and its citizens and property shall be subject to all debts, laws and ordinances and regulations in force in the City of Kalispell and shall be entitled to the same privileges and benefits as are other parts of the City. SECTION III. The territory annexed by this Resolution shall be zoned in accordance with the Kalispell Zoning Ordinance. SECTION IV. This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon passage by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND SIGNED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF KALISPELL, THIS 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2002. Pamela B. Kennedy Mayor ATTEST: Theresa White City Clerk EXHIBIT A A TRACT OF LAND, SITUATED, LYING, AND BEING IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 28 NORTH, RANGE 21 WEST, P.M.,M., FLATHEAD COUNTY, MONTANA, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS TO WIT: BEGINNING at the northwest corner of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 19, Township 28 North, Range 21 West, P.M.,M., Flathead County, Montana, which is on the southerly R/W of a 60 foot county road known as Sunnyside Drive; thence along said R/W N88°11118"E 595.46 feet; thence leaving said R/W S0303510011E 118.43 feet; thence S8801111811W 263.40 feet; thence S0000912011E 198.70 feet; thence S7704412611W 4.09 feet, thence S0000912011E 983.16 feet to the south boundary of said NE1/4 NW1/4; thence along said south boundary S8802512011W 335.10 feet to the southwest corner thereof; thence N0000912011W and along the west boundary of said NE1/4 NW1/4 1299.66 feet to the point of beginning and containing 10.736 acres, all as shown as Tract 1 of Certificate of Survey No. 12924, records of Flathead County, Montana. Tri-City Planning Office 17 Second Street East -Suite 211 Kalispell, Montana 59901 January 25, 2002 Phone:(406) 751-1850 Fax: (406) 751-1858 tricity@centu rytel.net Chris Kukulski, City Manager City of Kalispell P.O. Box 1997 Kalispell, MT 59903 Re: Annexation and Initial Zoning of RA-1 - South of Sunnyside Drive The Kalispell City Planning Board met on January 15, 2002, and held a public hearing to consider a request by Gaylon Owens / Owl Corporation for annexation and initial zoning on property located south of Sunnyside Drive and west of Ashley Creek for approximately 11 acres. The applicants are proposing City R-4, a Residential zoning district, which has a minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet and allows duplexes and single-family homes as permitted uses. Currently there are no development plans for the property. Narda Wilson, of the Tri-City Planning Office, presented staff report KA-01-8, evaluating the appropriate zoning designation upon annexation. Staff recommended that the initial zoning of City R-4, Two Family Residential, be assigned to the property upon annexation to the city. At the public hearing a couple from the area to the west noted that when the Kalispell Bypass is constructed, there will be more traffic in the area. After the public hearing, a motion was made and passed unanimously to forward a recommendation that initial zoning for this property should be R-4, Two Family Residential, upon annexation. Please schedule this matter for the February 4, 2002 regular city council meeting. You may contact this board or Narda Wilson at the Tri-City Planning Office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Sincerely Kalis City Planning Board Ron Van Natta President Providing Community Planning Assistance To: • City of Kalispell • City of Columbia Falls • City of Whitefish Owl Corporation Annexation and R-4 Zoning January 25, 2002 Page 2 RVN/NW Attachments: Exhibit A (legal description) Staff report KA-01-8 and application materials Draft minutes 1/ 15/02 planning board meeting c w/ Att: Theresa White, Kalispell City Clerk c w/o Att: Gaylon Owens, / Owl Corp., P.O. Box 5290, Kalispell, MT 59903-5290 Sands Surveying, 2 Village Loop, Kalispell, MT 59901 H: \FRD0\TRANSMIT\KALISPEL\2001 \KA01-9.DOC AFT Public Comment - Opponents John Garfield, 2026 Mission Way South, said he was directly across from where the main entrance to the development will be and he had concerns about the new plan because it calls for a short concrete wall and fence. It still looks like it will be nine feet tall, with three feet of berm, three feet of wall, and three feet of iron work and he still considers it to look like a compound area. Garfield said one other concern was the new bike path that ran in front of the project on Whitefish Stage Road and what the impact would be on the path if a nine -foot wall and berm was built. Garfield asked who would address the problem of snow building up on the berm and falling onto the trail and the road. Garfield said these issues needed to be addressed tonight. Atkinson moved that the Kalispell City Planning Board and Zoning Commission adopt staff report KCU-01-7 as findings of fact and forward a recommendation to the Kalispell City Council to grant the conditional use permit for Whitefish Stage Condominiums subject to the 21 conditions as listed. Rice seconded the motion. Jay Billmayer explained that the fencing would comply with the zoning requirements and was just under six feet tall. The fence would not be located next to the property boundary but rather setback substantially from the property boundary and that it should not pose a problem for access to the trail. The board discussed the redesign of the project and the zoning requirements for fencing, fence height and the location of the fence near the corners of the property. The motion to approve the project subject to conditions passed unanimously upon a roll call vote. Gavlon Owens Annexation and Initial R-4 Zonine Narda Wilson of the Tri-City Planning Office presented staff report KA-01-8 saying staff was recommending an initial zoning classification of R-4, a Two Family Residential district with a minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet, upon annexation to the city limits. Currently the developer does not have specific plans for subdividing the property but intends to do so in the near future. Public Comment- Proponent No one spoke in favor of the proposal. Public Comment - Opponents Lila Crookenburg, 1204 Sunnyside Drive, said she was neither for nor against the request, but did express concern regarding the additional traffic that would be generated from the development. Crookenburg said they sold had some of their property to the State for the future by-pass which would result in a lot more traffic on Sunnyside Drive because it would be a feeder road into Kalispell. Crookenburg said most of the surrounding area was five and ten -acre tracts and this zoning classification wouldn't enhance their property or life style any. Kalispell City Planning Board Minutes January 15, 2002 Page 4 DRAFT Norman Crookenberg, 1116 Sunnyside Drive, said the road is narrow now, and when the by-pass does get constructed the traffic on Sunnyside would be more than the road can handle. Consideration needs to be given to improvements to Sunnyside Drive. Brechel moved that the Kalispell City Planning Board and Zoning Commission adopt Staff Report KA-01-8 as findings of fact and recommend to the Kalispell City Council that the initial zoning for this property upon annexation be R-4, Two Family Residential. Anderson seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously upon vote. Flathead Government Employees Credit Union Conditional Use Permit Narda Wilson of the Tri-City Planning Office presented staff report KCU-01-9 saying this was request for a conditional use permit by Flathead Government Employees Credit Union to allow the expansion of a non -conforming use, the existing bank, by constructing an addition to the north and adding drive -through lanes. The property is located at 660 Sunset Boulevard on property zoned B-1, Neighborhood Buffer District. Two existing buildings on property adjoining the credit union would be removed to made way for the improvements. Wilson said a letter had been received from Dick Amerman, Assistant City Engineer, recommending that the Highway 93 access be limited to ingress only, and she recommended that the board amend Condition 3 and replace it with that language. Wilson said staff was recommending approval of the conditional use permit subject to the conditions as amended, specifically Condition 3. Public Comment - Proponents Dave Meredith, representing the applicant, said they were in agreement with the staff report and the amendment to Condition 3. He noted they had been working with the Montana Department of Transportation on the relocation of the access as was proposed on the site plan. Dave Stenberg, manager of the Flathead Credit Union, spoke in favor saying they had experienced considerable growth in the recent past, and the facility was now too small. He did not anticipate the expansion to have significant impacts on the neighborhood as traffic would be limited and their staff is small. Public Comment - Opponents There was no one to speak in opposition to the proposal. Anderson moved to adopt staff report KCU-01-9 as findings of fact and recommend to the Kalispell City Council that the conditional use permit be granted subject to the four conditions, amending Condition 3 to read "That the access proposed for relocation along Highway 93 be limited to ingress only." Atkinson seconded the motion. Kalispell City Planning Board Minutes January 15, 2002 Page 5 GAYLON OWENS / OWL CORPORATION REQUEST FOR INITIAL ZONING OF R-4 UPON ANNEXATION TRI-CITY PLANNING OFFICE STAFF REPORT #KA-01-8 JANUARY 8, 2002 A report to the Kalispell City Planning Board and the Kalispell City Council regarding the initial zoning of R-4 upon annexation to the city on property in southwest Kalispell. A public hearing has been scheduled before the planning board for January 15, 2002 beginning at 7:00 PM in the Kalispell City Council Chambers. The planning board will forward a recommendation to the Kalispell City Council for final action. This report evaluates the appropriate assignment of a City zoning classification in accordance with Section 27.03.010(4) of the Kalispell Zoning Ordinance. The developer has petitioned annexation and initial zoning classification of R-4, a Two Family Residential district. The property is in the County zoning jurisdiction and is zoned County R-1, a Suburban Residential district. This property will be annexed under the provisions of Sections 7-2-4601 through 7-2-4610, M.C.A., Annexation by Petition. No development proposal for this property has been presented at this time. A. Petitioner and Owners: Gaylon Owens / Owl Corporation P.O. Box 5290 Kalispell, MT 59901 (406) 752-4438 Technical Assistance: Sands Surveying, Inc. 2 Village Loop Kalispell, MT 59901 (406) 755-6481 B. Location and Legal Description of Property: The property proposed for annexation lies west of Lone Pine View Estates, south of Sunnyside Drive and east of the Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way. The property proposed for annexation can be described as Assessor's Tract 8 located in Section 19, Township 28 North, Range 21 West, P.M.M., Flathead County, Montana. C. Existing zoning: The property is currently in the County zoning jurisdiction and is zoned R-1, Suburban Residential. The suburban residential district is intended to serve as an area where limited density would be encouraged such as in the 100- year floodplain or on steep slopes or in areas where estate type development is anticipated. D. Proposed Zoning: City R-4, Two Family Residential, has been proposed for the property. The R-4 zoning district allows duplexes and single-family dwellings as permitted uses. The minimum lot size for the district is 6,000 square feet and a minimum lot width of 50 feet with setbacks of 15 feet in the front, ten feet in the rear and five feet on the sides. 1 E. Size: The area proposed for annexation and zoning contains approximately 10.71 acres. F. Existing Land Use: Currently this property is being used for agricultural purposes such as the raising of hay and grading. There is a single-family residence located on the property near the northeast corner. There is also a barn located near the northeast boundary of the property. G. Adjacent Land Uses and Zoning: The immediate area is characterized by single- family homes on urban sized lots in the area to the east and single-family homes on the larger lots to the lots to the west and north. North: Large lot subdivision with single-family homes, County R-1 zoning East: Single-family homes; City R-4 and County R-1 zoning South: Undeveloped Stratford Subdivision, City R-4 zoning. West: Low density residential, grazing lands, railroad tracks, proposed Kalispell Bypass; County R-1 zoning H. General Land Use Character. The area can be described as a transitional area between the urban areas of Kalispell to the east and the more rural undeveloped area of the county to the west. The immediate area is characterized by single- family homes on urban sized lots in the area to the east and single-family homes on the larger lots to the lots to the west and north. An urban density residential subdivision, the Stratford Subdivision, is currently under development on approximately 30 acres to the south of this property. I. Availability, of Public Services and Extension of Services: Public services, including City water and sewer, can be provided to this site and will be done in accordance with the City of Kalispell's Extension of Services Plan and in accordance with Kalispell's Design and Construction Standards. EVALUATION BASED ON STATUTORY CRITERIA The statutory basis for reviewing a change in zoning is set forth by 76-2-205, M.C.A. Findings of fact for the zone change request are discussed relative to the itemized criteria described by 76-2-203, M.C.A. Does the requested zone comply with the Master Plan? The property is designated by the Kalispell City -County Master Plan as "Suburban Residential" which is defined as allowing two dwellings per acres. The master plan also encourages the redesignation of the suburban residential area to a higher density once public services are available. The Urban Residential land use designation anticipates two to eight dwelling units per acre. Because of the plans for the provision of public water and sewer to the site, the proposed R-4 zoning designation is in general compliance with the master plan designation provided some of the lots are used for single family homes. The R-4 zoning has a minimum lot size requirement of 6,000 square feet with each lot allowing a duplex or a base density of one dwelling per 3,000 square feet. A full build -out at the maximum density would exceed the urban residential limits of eight units per 2 acre and be closer to about 14 units per acre. With one dwelling per 6,000 square feet the density would be 7.26 dwellings per acre. It is unlikely the maximum density would be realized considering the present real estate market. This trend is reflected in the R-4 zoned subdivision to the east, South Meadows where most of the lots are single family with some duplex and townhouse units. The proposed zoning is in substantial compliance with the master plan which anticipates a mix of single family and duplex dwellings in urban residential areas. 2. Is the requested zone designed to lessen congestion in the streets? Once the property is developed, all of the improvements and infrastructure will be constructed to city standards. Traffic in the area will increase. The requested zoning designation and subsequent development of the site will not lessen congestion in the streets in the area, but is anticipated to occur as development of the area continues. 3. Will the requested zone secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers? Adequate access and public facilities are available to the site in the case of an emergency. There are no features related to the property which would compromise the safety of the public. New construction will be required to be in compliance with the building safety codes of the City which relate to fire and building safety. All municipal services including police and fire protection, water and sewer service is available to the area and will be extended as part of the development of this property at some point in the future. 4. Will the requested zone promote the health and general welfare? The requested zoning classification will promote the health and general welfare by restricting land uses to those that would be compatible with the adjoining properties and providing a place for new housing in the community. 5. Will the requested zone provide for adequate light and air? Setback, height, and coverage standards for development occurring on this site are established in the Kalispell Zoning Ordinance to insure adequate light and air is provided. 6. Will the requested zone prevent the overcrowding of land? As previously noted this area has been anticipated for residential development and now that public water and sewer are in close proximity and urban land use designation is appropriate. The anticipated density generally falls within the proposed R-4 zoning designation. All public services and facilities will be available to serve this subdivision. An overcrowding of land would occur if infrastructure were inadequate to accommodate the development in the area. This is unlikely to occur. 3 7. Will the requested zone avoid undue concentration of people? Minimum lot standards and use standards as well as subdivision development standards will avoid the undue concentration of people at the time the property is developed. 8. Will the requested zone facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks, and other public requirements? All public services and facilities are currently available or can be provided to the property. Development should be encouraged in areas where these services are available. 9. Does the requested zone give consideration to the particular suitability of the property for particular uses? The proposed R-4 zoning district is consistent with the surrounding zoning and land uses in the area and gives due consideration of the suitability of this property for the permitted uses in the district. 10. Does the requested zone give reasonable consideration to the character of the district? The general character of the area to the east is urban sized lots for residential development. The same type of development can be anticipated to occur on this property and will be consistent with the character of the district. 11. Will the proposed zone conserve the value of buildings? Value of the buildings in the area will be conserved because the R-4 zoning will promote compatible and like uses on this property as are found on other properties in the area. 12, Will the requested zone encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout the municipality? Urban scale residential development should be encouraged in areas were services and facilities are available such as is being proposed on this parcel. The proposed zoning is consistent with the master plan and surrounding zoning in the area. SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION The proposed City R-4 zoning is similar to the existing to the east and to the south of the site and is a continuation of the same pattern of development. There may be some concerns about too many duplexes being developed in the subdivision. However, past experience has demonstrated that the duplex development in these subdivisions is generally 25 percent or less of the total number of lots. Access is available to serve the property and any future development will be consistent and compatible with existing M development in the area. Public services and the facilities serving this subdivision will be extended and constructed in accordance with the City of Kalispell Extension of Services Plan and the Kalispell Design and Construction Standards. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Kalispell City Planning Board and Zoning Commission adopt Staff Report #KA-01-8 as findings of fact and recommend to the Kalispell City Council that the initial zoning for this property upon annexation be R-4, Two Family Residential. REPORTS\KA\01\KA01-8.DOC NW 5 Tri-City Planning Office 17 Second St East, Suite 211 Kalispell, MT 59901 Phone: (406) 751-1850 Fax: (406) 751-1858 RECEIVED PETITION FOR ANNEXATION AND INITIAL ZONING CITY OF KALISPELL DEC 11 2001 TRI-CITY PLANNING OFFICE NAME OF APPLICANT: PgAgn Owens/ Owl Corooration MAIL ADDRESS: P.O. Box 5290 CITY/STATE/ZIP: Kalispell, MT. 59903-5290 PHONE: 406-752-4438 INTEREST IN PROPERTY: Owner - Other Parties of Interest to be Notified: PARTIES OF INTEREST: Sands Surveyine. Inc. MAIL ADDRESS: 2 Village Loop CITY/STATE/ZIP: Kalispell. MT. 59901 PHONE: 406-755-6481 INTEREST IN PROPERTY: Surveyor PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING: Address of the Legal Description: See Attached T-1 of COS 12924 (Lot and Block of Subdivision; Tract # ) Sec 19- T28N- R21W See exibit A (Section, Township, Range) (Attach metes and bounds as Exhibit A) The present zoning of the above property is: R-1 The proposed zoning of the above property is: CkyR_ State the changed or changing conditions that make the proposed amendment necessary: Annexation to city requires zone change 3'NJJO 9NINNV1d Alq-I8, DEC 17 2001 �ff�*T TRKV1AVftiWcn signifies that the foregoing information is true and accurate based upon the best information available and further grants approval for Tri-City Planning staff to be present on the property for routine inspection during the annexation process. Applicant) ate APPLICATION PROCESS APPLICABLE TO ALL ANNEXATION AND INITIAL ZONING APPLICATIONS Pre -Application Meeting: A discussion with the planning director or designated member of staff must precede filing of this application. Among topics to be discussed are: compliance with the master plan, compatibility of proposed zoning with surrounding zoning classifications and the application procedure. 2. Completed application form. Completed Petition to Annex form including an Exhibit A, legal description of the property. 4. Annexation and Initial Zoning Fee made payable to the Tri-City Planning Office. 5. Fee Schedule None 6. A bona fide legal description of the property from a recent survey, title report or deed which accurately describes the property to be annexed. H:\FRDO\FORMS\APPFORMSW-ANNXDOC A TRACT OF LAND, SITUATED, LYING, AND BEING IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 28 NORTH, RANGE 21 WEST, P.M.,M., FLATHEAD COUNTY, MONTANA, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS TO WIT: BEGINNNING at the northwest corner of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 19, Township 28 North, Range 21 West, P.M.,M., Flathead County, Montana, which is on the southerly R/W of a 60 foot county road known as Sunnyside Drive; Thence along said R/W N88° 11' 18"E 595.46 feet; Thence leaving said R/W S03035'00"E 118.43 feet; Thence S88°11'18"W 263.40 feet; Thence S00°09'20"E 198.70 feet; Thence S77044'26"W 4.09 feet; Thence S00°09'20"E 983.16 feet to the south boundary of said NEl/4NW1/4; Thence along said south boundary S88°25'20"W 335.10 feet to the southwest corner thereof, Thence N00009'20"W and along the west boundary of said NE1/4NW1/4 1299.66 feet to the point of beginning and containing 10.736 acres, all as shown as Tract 1 of Certificate of Survey no. 12924, records of Flathead County, Montana. 4 LOT 4 1,A „C GP ,U 11 0 e 9AA A PARK ME MAW 5L°"E" CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY NE/4 NW114 SEC./9 ,T.28N, R2/W., PM,M., FLATHEAD o azm arEmra. SU—TINNYSM OWVE eu .ax a vas Imuvn nwr.e a*u emamr rmar TRACT 2 ,I E& 1.001 AC TRACT / 10. 736 AC. m m ffi €i (COS ]6291 � a e,w ui°as.�me ..P•-.. �.�.e ,.a.. m.. w.. nn .,� Isemn .®ems. �$1�.9h. l ���� e. � . ee.n nw.. z6.c •.ETC •� 4�mA �_�__ �_1y e �\ vw ":'i` Allwp, 4�. 9'rOSYVpW ��, nm wm 4&f �s99rrmw yyn. '�F., �i•o I y�EEi OF I SMEEIS .._ cannon orwevErxc laa Tri-City Planning Office 17 Second Street East — Suite 211 Kalispell, Montana 59901 Phone: (406) 751-1850 Fax: (406) 751-1858 tricity@centurytel.net MEMORANDUM TO: Kalispell City Staff and Other Interested Parties FROM: Narda A. Wilson, Senior Planner DATE: December 18, 2001 RE: January 15, 2002 Kalispell City Planning Board Meeting Attached with this memo is a copy of the legal ad, vicinity map, site plan or plat and application for items that will go before the planning board on the above referenced date for your information, review and comment. • Preliminary Plat Gateway West Addn #34 Eight Lot Commercial Subdivision • Revised Whitefish Stage Condos 214 Units Conditional Use Permit • Flathead Credit Union Expansion Conditional Use Permit • Four-Plex at East California St. and Eight Ave. E-N. • Initial R-4 Zoning Upon Annexation South of Sunnyside Drive • Westbrook Square Casino Conditional Use Permit These items will go before the Site Development Review Committee in the Conference Room of the Kalispell Building Dept. on: December 27, 2001 January 3, 2002 Comments By: • January 7, 2002 so that they can be incorporated into the staff report These matters will go before the Kalispell City Planning Board on January 15, 2002 for public hearing. Please bring your comments to the above referenced site review committee meeting(s) or submit your comments in writing or by phone, prior to January 7, 2002 so that they can be incorporated into the staff report to the planning board. You can reach me at 751-1852. If you need additional information regarding any of these items, please call me. Thank you for taking the time to review and comment on these items. Providing Community Planning Assistance To: • City of Kalispell • City of Columbia Falls • City of Whitefish Referrals KPB 0 1 / 15/02 December 18, 2001 Page 2 c: w/attachments: Dick Seddon / Randy Brodehl, Fire Dept. Mike Baker, Parks and Rec Chris Kukulski, City Manager PJ. Sorenson, Zoning Administrator Jim Brown, Police Dept. Dick Amerman, City Engineer Jim Hansz, Director Public Works Susan Moyer, Community Development Director Craig Kerzman, Chief Building Inspector Charles Harball, Interim City Attorney Steve Herzog, MDOT Roberta Struck, Evergreen Water District H: \... \AGREF\KALISPELL\KPB0115REF.DOC SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE SUMMARY Thursday, December 27, 2001 Building Department Conference Room ATTENDING: Dick Amerman, Asst. City Engineer Mike Baker, Parks & Rec. Director Tim Brown, Assistant Police Chief Craig Kerzman, Building Official Chris Kukulski, City Manager Dick Seddon, Fire Marshall P. J. Sorensen, Zoning Administrator, Chair Kathy Kuhlin, Recording Secretary OLD BUSINESS: NEW BUSINESS: Planning Board Items: Preliminary Plat, Gateway West - Dick A. asked ifanyondhad spoken with Tim Thompson yet about giving the City 20 feet. Narda indicated last week that it looks promising. Dick feels the success of the project is contingent upon the 20 feet in question. Revised Whitefish Stage Condos CUP - Nothing new. Flathead Credit Union expansion - Dick A. said two-way traffic in alley won't work. Not enough room Cars on Hwy. 93 can't be waiting to get in. Also, the plans will need to be further refined and developed. Dick will write a memo to Narda regarding these points. ' Four -Plea at East California and 81 Avenue E. N. - No major concerns at this point; will need to adjust parking. Initial zoning upon annexation of area south of Sunnyside - Will develop in the future but doesn't have a plat yet. A developers extension agreement exists in the area and expires in 2006. Westbrook Square Casino CUP - P.J. is concerned about the parking issue. Need a current plan for their parking. May be short on spaces. [oil I 71 Di A 1161611&" Ma Chris said the County Commissioners' approved Phase 11 of the Stillwater Estates final plat, scratching the language requiring sewer. Contiguous to the City - we need Page 14 - Kalispell Zoning Ordinance CIIAPTER 27.07 R4 RESIDENTIAL Sections: 27.07.010 Intent 27.07.020 Permitted Uses 27.07.030 Uses Which May Be Permitted By Conditional Use Permit 27.07.040 Property Development Standards 27.07.010: Intent. A residential district with minimum lot areas. Development within the district will require all public utilities, and all community facilities. Two- family dwellings are permitted in this district. 27.07.020: Permitted Uses. (1). Boarding house, incidental (see definition). (2). Day care (family or group day-care homes). (3). Dwelling, duplex. (4). Dwelling; single family. (5). Parks. r 27.07.030: Uses Which May Be Permitted By Conditional Use Permit. (1). Bed and breakfast. (2). Church/worship/parish/Sunday school buildings. (3). Community center/gym/swim pools -operated by public/quasi-public. (4). Community residential facility for eight (8) or fewer persons. (5). Day care center. (6). Dwelling, Accessory Single -Family. (7). Dwellings, cluster development. (8). Electrical distribution station. (9). Foster or group homes serving eight (8) or fewer persons. (10). Golf courses. (11). Law enforcement/fire stations. (12). Railroad rights -of -way. (13). Recreational area, non-commercial. (14). Schools, public/private, grades 1-12. (15). Temporary building/structure. (16). Water storage facilities. R- 4 Residential- Page 15 I27.07.040: Property Development Standards. I (1). Minimum Lot Area: 6000 square feet (2). Minimum Lot Width (FT): 50 (3). Minimum Yards (FT): I Front Yard - 15 Side Yard - 5 Rear Yazd - 10 I Side Comer - 15 (4). Maximum Building Height (FT): 35 (5). Permitted Lot Coverage (%): 40 (6). Off -Street Parking: Refer to Section 27.26. (7). Maximum Fence Heights (FT): IAs per 27.22.090. I' I' I' 1 1 1 1 11 I IYSIDE-DR F9 1 P S YSIDE WNHOUSES _ 1 10C 10D 7Rs �3 a 1 Is,�� 14D 14DA 1C 10 7AB 0 14F MIN R SUBD - u 10A 10E # 7 /Sj�sii 28 29 30 32 33 14CA LO N EP _ 1 37AAAA 1 _1 1 GA SANTE FE ST . EST �-f2M6125I24123 - � 7 e 9 107 n F 5 12 1 K \\ y PHOENIX 57 - 4 22 23 13 ` -- m 18 19 20 21 22 3 24 25 14 \\` LO 0 7ABA + p 26 27 z 15 �\ 1716151413 14C 1'4CAA z gg 1 ` EST BISMARK ST c3 , 14C o 16 \ I 7 8 9 10 11 12 21 20 19 18 43 45 46 47 48 49 Ann 52 53 54 55 56 57 5B 59 60 61 62 fi3 64 MEN 66 41 42 44 67 `\ 6L1F f 40 D VIAr RESUE 2 `\ }9 BLUESTONE �\ 3eB OF 8 /37 IN IA 141 1!1 140 UB 1!e 137 1!e 135 IN 133 13x 1]1 11e 21 1 Ix] \w� 6L + 35 145 147 Ib 14 i 151 152 19 1N tes 1S0 tAM 1 11 12T Ix tx4 e9 BEGG PARK OF 35 1�e DARDNGTON tle Ixe C/7� Izs 7a ns SOUTH MEADOWSI C/q� 1 q � 34 1m 1 Z'� tt1 IxY f 71 33 1 S 1 17e 157 le6 1e5 194 1N lei 1e1 t50 1B1 11] 1]11 efli 6+ 32 z� 7y 17 m n vs ne nt na t>s 1 W 181 0z "YY nx m 72 PARK CR \�\\ 31 Ite7 20 20 GARDENWAY 100 01 2 n 5 99 \\\ 30 �te5 204 xol� 0 88 89 90 91 d 6LA 97 98 iD4 103 102 74 \ 2p5 xm 'P 8 y g} A B6 10106 GREEN C75 OVE 1 N+ polel y B 9� 29 le! z0e zm zlB 211 8 94 95 107 108 109 11 Te OW5 Da 6+ `\ Yya 1s 19 teo 1e 1 I6 is 1 19 84 83 82 81 80 79 78 77 SOU{N M j 27 GREATVIEW SOUTH MEADOWS DR 1N y AM PLA 2s 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 18 15 1 1 S 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 4 ------------ \ 8 5 4 3 1 I 5 3 2 1 7 8 5 3 2 6 I ` 12BA TEAL DRIVE U 6+ \\` 2 27 23 7 21 29 22 yw 7 B w 23 24 8 24 8 20 8 23 W 8 9 25 26 22 I � 20 9 25 9 19] 27 24 I? 9 1 27 28 21 19 10 18 28 Y5 0 10 1 Z 29 30 20 J0 26