Loading...
08. Ordinance 1549 - Amendments - Spring Prairie PUD - 1st ReadingCity of Kalispell Planning Department 1 �- . street East, suite 211, Kalispell, Montana 59901 Telephone: 1-18 o Fax: 751-1858 W site: kalispellplanning.com REPORT o: Kalispell Mayor and City Gorki FROM: PJ Sorensen, Chairman, Site Development Review Committee James es t . Patrick, City Manager SUBJECT; Glacier High School/Proposed PUD amendments dments FETING A September 6, 2005 BACKGROUND: The proposed Glacier High School location is in the Spring ra re Plarmed Unit Development. As is standard practice with PU s, there is a development agreement that generally incorporates the zoning ordinance, but also modifies certain specific omng provisions as part of are overall plan. The submitted plans for the high school co.r twr two aspects that do not comply with the present .regulations applicable to the property. First, the plans show an overall building height of appro lmate y �5 feet at the entry gable, with other portions of the building varying between 40 and DO feet. The PUD limits the height to 40 feet in the mixed professional zone. Second, the plans provide for 874 parking spaces and the utilization of a parking control plan.. The present re lremer t under the om'ng ordinance ce is based primarily on enrollment and seating in assembly areas. Preliminary calculations led to a figure of approximately 1919 spaces. t was l�tlally suggested that modified ratio gene at g a preliminary f gt e space would be viewed favorably. The PUD adlows for a party to request are amen.dmen ' y submitting the request to the Site Development Review Committee_ Site Review then determines whether xer the amendment is minor or major. Minor ame dments may e approved adm' strat'vely. Ma or amen.dr. ents are forwarded to the Cowell. The School District formally requested two amendments relating to the building height and the number of parking spaces on August 9. On August I S. Site Review discussed the proposals and deemed both to be major amendments. In regard to the height, Site Review vocal recommend approval subject to substantial conformance with the submitted fitted plans. The additional height was viewed as having a limited impact due to the scale/scope of thebuilding, the relation of the building to the size of the property. and the approximately oo foot setback from the property limes. In regard to the parking spaces, Site review also recommended approval of the basic framework vor of the proposal. Site Review would support an initial construction of 874 parking spaces, with additional spaces to e added ranto a approved parking plan ota�g Berta n tugger provisions. The specific trig(ers were a ratter of some debate, and Site R view deferred that question to the PlanninQ Office, After a subsequent meeting betweea the Planning Office and the School District, a Parking Management Flan was created (see attached). RECOMMENDATION: A motion to approve the proposed amendments to the Sprang ra Pled Unit Development, as modified by the Site Development Review Committee, would be M order. FISCAL EFFECTS: None s suggested by Council. ATTACHMENTS: 1 Letter from CTA on behalf of the School District dated August , 2005, formally requesting the proposed amendments, and including a building elevation, overall site plan, and proposed parking plan (2) Site Review Committee minutes from August 18, 2005 (3) Parking Management plan dated August , 2005, drafted by the anm'ng Office in consultation with the School District Respectfully submitted, PJ Sorensenm, Chairman Site Development Review Committee F a es 1. Patrick City Manager ORDINANCE NO.I AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AND ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE SPRING PRAIRIE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT IN ASSOCIATION WITH THE CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF GLACIER HIGH SCHOOL. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KAIS EL , AS FOLLOWS. SECTION1. That the Spring Prairie Planned ''knit Development, approved on Deceniber3,2001, and amended on December 15, 2003, shall be,, upon execution by the landowner, amended as provided for in said agreement under Section 5, Amendment or Modification n of Agreement as follows: . 0 1 a: Buildings should not exceed 3 5 feet above the final grade in the Mixed Residential POD, 40 feet in the Mixed Professional POD and 45 feet in the Mixed Commercial POD. Such height limitation may he exceeded in the nixed commercial POD by issuance of a conditional use Permit. An exec tion to this hei ht limit is granted to Glacier Hi h School to be located in the Mixed Professional POD which will be allowed a maximum imam hey ht of 5 5jeet at its highest . 1 E g: Parking space requirements and general parking lot design shall be guided by the parking and loading provisions of City of Kalispell Zoning Ordinance, except as noted herein. Parkin lots in the Mixed Commercial and Mixed Professional PODS may be extended to within five feet of any lease lot boundary, provided a five foot wide exterior landscape buffer adjoins the extended parking lot. In locations where the parking adjoins a landscaped common area, no setback from the lease boundary is required. A s c al rovisi n has en ranted in this cement for the develo ment of a -Parkim4 plan for Glacier HiRh, School to address a hased development and ansion the school¢ t is here noted that a s eei e Parkimr, Management Ilan shall be developed between the Cijy o I alis ll and. School District 95 that will address the initial needs of the high school-, and as enrollment increases and the....gyip and auditorium are ex nded the number f required arkin2 spaces -shall e increased based upon a demonstrated need. The kin kinLy management ement Ian shall be ne otiated the i manager on behalf of the City of Kalispell and executed through `orrn.al a reemen.t between the City and the District. This W, eem nt shall include the initial number of required XgkLng s ayesparking ratios ands eerie provisions that will ei arl indicate when additional tmrking.will be re ' to be develoDed. SECTION 11. This Ordinance shall take effect from and after 30 days of its passage by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND SIGNED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF KALISPELL,, M N A.N ,, THIS 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER., 2005. Pamela a . Kennedy Mayor ATTEST: Theresa White City Clerk SCHOOL DISTRICT #5 TRAFFIC & PAREING CONTROL PLAN FOR GLACIER HIGH SCHOOL (4/22/05) BACKGROUND The new Glacier High School will be desigmed for 1 moo students M the initial years with expansion up to 1500 students in the out years, In the first few years there will be less than 1200 students assigned to this school. T'he school will have a gym designed to accommodate bleachers for 3500 spectators at some point In time but will only be outfitted with bleachers to accommodate around 2000 spectators for the first few years. The auditorium will have seating for 550 spectators and the Black Box Theater area will have a nominal seating requirement (60-100 seats s or minus) BASE NUMBERS School Day students only (1200) School Day staff only (140) Current budgeted gym seating (2000) Current budgeted auditorium seating (550) Current budgeted Black Box seating (100) GROUPINGS OF PARKING NEEDS School Day & no event School Day & full auditorium event School Day & fall y. event School Day & Ul Black Box event After school fullgym/Box/auditorium School Day & 0% auditorium event School Day & 50% gym event 1200 x 40% = 480 }along spaces 140 parking spaces o at 1 s ace 5 seats = 400 parkingspaces 550 at 1 space seats 184 parking spaces 100 at 1 space/3 seats =34 parking spaces 4 01 140 o = 620 parking spaces 4 + 14 184 = 804 parking spaces o + 140 � 400 = 020 parking spaces 4 + 14 + 34 = 654 parking spaces 400 4 +l - - 618 parking spaces 40 + 140 + 92 = 756 parking spaces 480 - 140 - 200 = 820 parking spaces" The initial review of building codes and based on early discussions and meetings with City Planning officials indicated that the combination of full student loading of 1200 students at a 4% car usage = 40 spaces), plus fall staff/visitor parking of 140 ding school i s a fall zm use during school of 2 at a 1 sparking space to person. ratio 50 aced together would probably drive the parking requirement for this new facility to be In the ball park of 1140 parking spaces or so. We have subsequently lowered the number of bleachers, due o budgetary requirements, that we will buy in the early years o just 2000 vs, 2600 we had initially hoped we could afford with the hope to grow to a 5 o seating capability In the out years. Our view of the use of the new high school in the early years based on the low likelihood of big events oec rr ng during full school clay occupancy periods and considering our ability to control and coordinate event timing for the first 5-7 years would drive us to calculate, a need for parking at 620student and staff/visitors and no event). There certainly are events that could drive a much higher spectator number such as once we reach a ill gyrn bleacher capacity of 3_500 that would drive a non-sc .00i day requirement forpar-king o 3500 = Too parking spaces for to mame .t level basketball games or gradation which are low frequency everts that will occur for less than 5) � of the year, perhaps even less than that. There also could be some less than 00% seating requirement type events in the g-vm or a d tor'um during a school. If we assumed a school day evert and a % full gym event that would give us a requirement of 820 parking spaces . Note we currently mitigate parking corcer. s for these type events at Flathead High School by seeking alternative parking locations to assemble people and then bus at our expense to the event location. We also have two dedicated school resource officers that advise us and coordinate special traffic issues as needed with city law enforcement staf. DISCUSSION t is our view that designing for the future is best but budgets often do not allow building all the needs for the future at one time, so phased approaches are often a reasonable compromise. Jn our case we are desigrung the new high school infiustructre to accommodate larger student bodies and larger event populations but we do not see in the rear terra (5-7 years) -reaching the larger numbers in either area. Thus our view is to allow room to grow and this includes the size of the paTking area also. We have 60 acres of land and all will not be developed for the foreseeable future. Thus we have designed a balanced facility with flexibility to grow in tie. To this end and specifically relating to the number of parking spaces we feel that our calculation of 820 spaces will more than satisfy the spirt and intent of the planning documents and meet the needs of the students and taxpayers that will patronize the new high school after hours for the majority of the calendar ar year, We feel that as the managers of this public institution we currently schedule everts in a prudent manner and will continue to do so in the fat re in order to maximize satisfaction bv parties involved and MIM* i e disruption to the commuru*ty to the maximum extent possible. We do not want to see anyone hurt or greatly inconvenienced as we too are members ers of this community. RECOMMENDATION Therefore we offer the following parking management plan for con lderation. 1 Build for the start of school year 2007-2008, 820 paved parking spaces including the appropriate spaces for ADA issues, parent drop off areas, bus drop of areas and paved access 360 degrees around the main school for easy access by all emergency vehicles. 2 Build the parking areas in accordance with PUD requirements (pavj_ng, curb, lighting, landscaping, etc.) 3) Allow room for ark.n� expansion based on future expansion o the facilities. 4) Implement are inter -local Parking Management ement rogram between. School District and the City of Kalispell to monitor, record and report r'o ca y at Sri# cost) the average and peak parking uses at this new high school. 5) Implement controlled parking areas with a pass, permit or some other measure to ens re that the available parking spaces are being utilized appropfiately. 6) Implement a parking enforcement system that has appropriate s gna e to warms vehicle masers of consequences and then actively enforce these rules and cite and tow violators. 7) Implement active, visible parking management staff for high parking events to direct traffic, allow vehicles with appropnate passes/permits to park and direct those without proper permits to alternative parking locations. 8) Issue a report at the conclusion of each high traffic evert on the lessors leamed and take corrective action to prevent reoccurrences of negative parking/traffic concerns (by better communication with parties that will participate in these events). 9) Work with the City to develop a phased trigger process that once the demand begins to exceed on some higher percentage basis) what is currently in place for parking, that vita some reasonable period of time (probably 5 years to allow for accrual of funds for construction) additional paved parking will be added. 1 Hold a periodic meeting of the parties to conununicate the status of successful or unsuccessful implementation of these parking management program items for paw.g of the next step with reports being offered to the Board of Trustees and the City Council by the appropriate o fici l of the other orgar . ation i.e. the SD#5 official will report to the City Council and the City Representative will report to the School Board). August 9, 200 PJ Sorensen Kalispell Planning Department 17 2nd Street East. Suite 211 Kalispell, Montana 59901. .e: New Glacier High School - Site Review On behalf of Flathead High School District No. 5, and at your urging, we submit this letter to formally request two amendments to the Spring Prairie PUD for the new Glacier High School project. The two amendments requested eo eer. s Sections 27.08.040 Building Height and. 2 7.2 6.0 5 o Parking of the Spring Prairie PUD, - Zone. Amendment No. .: The School District requests are amendment to the PUD to allow a proposed -Foot high two-story school facility. The zoninc,g currently allows 5 -feet, thus they are requesting an additional 2 -feet. The building entry gable, classroom wing gables, and aymnasium structure will all exceed the current allowable height In the propose. design. This 1 20-ste.t High School is optimally and most economically designed as a two-story structure. At one-story control and travel distances for the new high school would be sprawling and would take twice the footpfint as shown on the proposed site plan. We believe ieve that allowallowIng this requested height increase enhances the design and exterior imagery of the building. The gabled forns and materials reflect the mountain valley image and Glacier Park type structures. Due to the size of the - .ere lot and the location of the new building on the lot a minimum o -feet of open yard and setback .from the property line to the building will be maintained. The -foot total height at -the entry gable will essentially have no impact on the surrounding properties and adjacent communities. An image of the exterior design is attached to help convey the propped design a.d height request. Amendment en No. : The School District requests a second amendment to allow fever parking spaces than what is currently required in the zoning regulations. In early meetings with the City of Kalispell Plying Department we all realized that the zoning regulations requiring 1,919 spaces was much higher than what this development would reasonable require. The event regulation assumes the sum of the maximum evert capacities for all assembly spaces, plus all students and teachers while school is in .session.. From an educational logistics standpoint this certainly will not and cannot occur. J:\JOBS\F-HHSI—New\City_Kalispell\Subdivision ReviewTinal .pp i do -�.HS—Site-Riew.do Main Street 1, Suite 205 * Kalispell, Montana S9901 0 .2 . 1 * Fax; 406.257.8173 The School istr*ct conducted student parking polls and looked at activity attendance ce to cone up with a proposed parking space count of 820 spaces that would adequately handle the campus activities and public parking reeds of the high school development. .t. This court was backed by a Parking Control Plan, which offers ers a management system that will trigger additional spaces if needed and as the school expands in the future. A copy o the Parking Control Plan is enclosed for your review. The City Planm'ng Department reviewed the District's parking .proposal and conducted their own parking calculations. They indicated that the School District would receive positive feedback concerning this amendment if they planned for 1,140 parking spaces The School Distfict has proceeded with a design and bidding mechanism is to construct and pave either the School .district's or the Playing Department's proposed parking space calculations. The School District has identified a cost increase o $1 o,o o to asphalt the difference between t.he parking space calculations as this scope of work has already been bid. The School District recommends proceeding with paving 874 parking spaces, which exceeds their calculations. initiate a Parking r Control Par, monitor the lot and pave more spaces as needed in the future when it is warranted, and use the $170,000 to enhance right-of-way improvements surrounding the site. Thank you for your time conceming this great community development. We look forward to working with you and the rest of the city team in the planning meetings to follow. Sincer. . y, CT, Aircitects veers ey A. Jo son rod eet aaer Enc: Exterior Perspective, Site Pia., School District No. 5 Parking; Control Plan Cc: Tom Jentz. Kalispell Planning Stephen Lorch, DNRC ,avid Greer, DNRC Darlene Sc ott e, Flathead High School District No, Chuck Cassidy, Flathead High School District No. Candace Mastell C. Landworks Debra Rosa., CTA Landworks J: B\F s 1_I ewk ity—Kalisp ll� bdivisio . vi \Final Ap iicationi �I —Site- iew.do SITE DEVELOP.NMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE SUMMARY Thursday, August 18, 2005 Building Department Conference Room Mike Baker, Parks & Rec. Director Brent Christopherson, Fire Marshal `rank Garner, Police Chief Craig Ker r a , Building Official J. Sorensen, Zom'ng Administrator,, Chair Jennifer nifer Young, Recreation Supervisor Frank Castles, Asst. City Engineer Mark Crowley, City Planner Tom Jentz, Planning Director F. Ray Rffatto, Fire Inspector Na da Wilson, City Planner Kathy Kuhlin, Recording Secretary Guests: Don Counsell with ANW Architect; Tony Dawson, FHS Trustee; Darlene S ottle, S 5 S en'nte .de t; Shawn Baker, Swank Enterprises/Glacier HS Co st. Mgr.; Chuck Cassidy, School District 5; Corey A. Johnson, CT..CTA Architects/Engineers; and Don Murray, School Bo and Chairman an Hear the Public: None. Performance Bond Reminders: Same as last week. OLD BUSINESS Glacier High School ,---- West Reserve/Stillwater -- Material was received from CTA.eve have two requests for amendments: a the building height which should be 35but they are proposing 55'; and (b) the amount of parking spaces. The setback from the fight -of -way is oo " minimum on the east side of the property. The overall scale of the size of the building minimizes the height, and adds architectural embellishment to the building. It will need to be built according to the plans submitted. This is a mitigated situation. This would id e a major amendment .dment with a recommendation for approval with the o' setback. The committee deemed this proposal to be a major amendment, and would forward 1t to City Council with a recommendation of approval subject to substantial c nforna. ce with the proposed plans. The second amendment involves parking numbers. The it t al parking calculations in the zoning ordinance was tied to the number of seats in an assembly area and enrollment. We calculated over 1 900initially. Based on a survey at the present high school , the school district estimates that only 0% of these students is will drive to school. We looked at ratios for other types of assembly areas and carve up with a proposed minimum total of 1,140 reflecting enrollment and seating estimates provided this s nng (the total would e adjusted based on updated estimates we have recently received). The School Distfict is asking for approval for 820 parking spaces to be belt) at this time. This is also a major amendment. Staff will need to provide for Council a breakdown. of how the calculations were done. Focus on one assembly area.. 1,900 is too much, 20 is too few. 820 is for the .harking control plan. They are at 8 74 with base bid plans, The school wi 11 have ' , i "', and I th grade classes to begin with. Discussion was held. The school could monitor the first year's needs and then the next school year, create more parking if needed. We could require a Performance Bored or Letter of Credit with a Phasing Plan. Darlene Schottle spoke to a five-year building reserve bond. They could possibly use: some of those ids. Also, general ids are available if they chose to use them for this. Primary improvements will need to be made on Stillwater and at the intersection of Stillwater and Reserve. Stelling is doing a traffic study on this. Overflow traffic has to go on the site. They have 874 parking stalls proposed. Chuck Cassidy stated they also have are area with road base, gravel, and fill, to rake a total of l , 140 parking spaces. The cost for asphalt, striping, and curbing for this added area is $1771,000. The overflow issue reeds to be spelled out. Phase tr*ggers were discussed. They could be based on enrollment and installation of additional bleachers. Could possible have a Memorandum of Understanding. Analyze over time. Have school d str'ct monitor and record. PUD has heightened standards for parking lot desipt Planning office will develop a notice to form a committee to discuss the Phasing tr' gers. Committee deems this proposal to be a maj or amendment, and would recommend that the proposal be adopted subject to farther discussion related to phasing/triggers for fa re parking exp a .sion. KJHS — traffic/access issues only — Entrances, exits and sidewalk installation were discussed. The trade circulation letter that was previously distributed was also discussed. Key point from committee is to allow parent drop -off/pick-up in upper area off o ved.gewood, with a one way in and a sidewalk along the west side. If ved e vood Lane becomes a stacking area/droparea/drop off, then the school district would reed to put in a sideway.. We tview Park — potential request for revised conditions — Property owner may request changes to the requirements, particularly with the cross easements; Head Start — 7 th Avenue EN — Nothing has been received yet on the in orrration we requested. Glacier a k/C lies — 202 Main Street — Still waiting for MDOT. Wells Fay — new uidinSr'ng Praifie PUD — This will need to go through Architectural Review. No lighting plan in yet. Mike also noted that they reed more trees added to the landscaping plan. Also, Dave Greer will reed to sign off on the garbage area as it is it the 25" landscaped. area. Approved subject to receipt of the lighting plan, ARC approval, and landscaping charges. NEW BUSINESS: Vallev Glass — o -d Avenue East- addition (Preliminary Review) — They are going to connect the two buildings together. This `'new"' building will reed to be s r nklered. OTHERDISCUSSION: . Abbott — He didn't get a building pennit and built in the setback. The golf course fence was removed. He has offered the City 13 acres abutting Lawrence Park as a lard swap, PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN GLACIER HIGH SCHOOL AUGUST 23, 2005 The following shall serve as the parking management plan Jointly developed bv the City o Kalispell and School .istr'ct 5. The pose of the plan is to provide an appropriate mo .itori g process and develop thresholds that ill assure that the parking needs of the new Glacier High School are adequately addressed. The thresholds and r o .tor g plan outlined in this document are intended to establish thresholds that would then trigger the requirement for the development of additional parking that may be needed. It is the e t of the plan to relieve the school from. the burden of providing excessive and unwarranted parking while at the same time providing a predictable process to ensure that the parking needs of the school and its users are adequately a. appropriately addressed as the use of the school and its Facilities are expanded. Parking Demand The initial construction phase of the school will accommodate the following parting based o the ratios stated. below: • School enrollment will begin at 1,200 growing to 1,500 students in future gears. Zoo at I space per 5 students =,240 spaces • School staff will initially consist of a rna im= of 140 and increase as enrol ent increases. 140 at l space per faculty or employee = 14 spaces 000 seat gym will be constructed initially that will ultimately be expanded to accommodate a potential seating capacity of �,500. 2000 at l space per 5 seats = 400 spaces • An auditorium that will accommodate 55 spectators. 550 at I space per 3 seats == 183 spaces • The Black Box Theater that will accommodate up to 100 seats. o at l space per 3 seats = 3 3 spaces Students 240 Staff— 140 Gam. - W 400 Auditorium — 183 Theater 996 Given that it is unlikely that there will be fail gym event, theater evert and auditorium evert i addition to full staff and students simultaneously, it is hereby agreed upon that the school will construct a im'mum of 874 spaces. more detailed analysis of the parking needs based on students, staff and events can be found in the in.itlai proposal submitted by the school district dated 4/22/05 located in the Glacier High School preliminary plat file located in the Kalispell leg Department. Parking plan summate* The school will develop 874 paved parking spaces. If the school exceeds the available daily parking on site for 3 consecutive months, the district will construct more parking to address the deficit. If the school exceeds the special events parkng (evem'ng and weekends) more than times In a year, the district will construct additional parking to address the deficit, Parking Management Plan: 1. The school district will be responsible to mon'tor the daily parking usage and .eepinu Witten record of the number of parking spaces utilized. 2. The school district will forward a monthly report to the City of Kalispell 'lanr ng Department that provides a computation tation of parkin' usage. 11 arkin.g compliance standards shall be divided up into two sate ores: student/ teacher use during the :30 A.M. to : 3 o PN per'od and special events parking after 3:3 o p.m. and weekends. . Student/Teacher Parking S t and and s .. The time frame shall be from ' 30 A.M. to : o P.M. Monday duough Friday. . All parking that occurs on -site shall be accommodated WAMn a ,hard spaced parking lot meeting the City of Kalispell design standards. c. If the school parking needs exceed the available lard spaced parking over 5 0% o the days wit m' a month , It shall be on noted the number of deficient parking spaces and be on notice that It needs to implement improved n ana ;ernent plans. d. If the school exceeds this standard for three consecutive months ding a given school year, it will do the ollo ing. .. Construct additional hard surface parking that complies with. the City's design standards. 2. The minimum amount of new parking shall equal at least the average of the three consecutive parking deficits} 3. The parking shall be available at the beginning of next school year. 5. Special events parking standards: a. The time .game shall be after 3 -.3 o P.M. Monday through nday and weekends_ . All parking that occurson-site shall be accommodated within a hard surfaced Parking lot meeting the City of Kalispell design standards. c. if the school exceeds the available parking during a 2 4 hour period more than 5 tunes during a school year, the district shall do the following: . Construct additional al hard surface parking that eomplles with the City" s design standards. 2. The amount shall equal at least the average of the five event deficit. 3. The parking shall be available at the begin' rg of the next school year. . Pang provision for new construction or expansion of the school campus are as follows: 1. New construction or expansion is meant to include such things as the addition of fixed seating in the gym or auditofium,, construction of additioris to the Glacier School campus, the development of any related facilities on carpus including iron -school district facilities and the development o athletic fields with fixed seater g. . The required parking shall be based on the parking standards developed as part of this agreement provided they have proved adequate or, if inadequate, shall be based on the requirements of the Kalispell Zoning Ordinance at that time the new construction or expansion occurs 3. Parking shall be based on the additional increment of parking required for the new construction/expansion and shall acknowledge any existing capacity already on site. Pang Management .flan Review This parking plan .shall be subject to administrative review on an annual basis and may be terminated by mutual consent of both the Kalispell ClY Manager and an a thorl zed representative of District 5. If the agreement is mutually terminated., in lieu of a new agreement, the City will then rely on the adopted parking provision of the city zomng or a ..ce to address parking demands for new construction. action. :,. <.. � ..._ �, f_i:::'s F'n':::�; �•r s, :.#:a: ti'�: T:<.:'.:.,� .::._ ..; �...,: a:Z <:�::: ":•,;.0 '.'r:: :.:..a � .1:%. :.�� <; .x.;;¢ ,. ....... ..., .. .... ...... ,. . . r .. <� i n 1, , � , ., .... -------------- ........ ... ... . . .. .... ......... ........ ........ ..... 7-1!, 77" 1� M_1_11�14;1 .......... .. Future Flitilre Football 1 0 Softball F ITJ ...... ........................ 11 leiu ..... ..... Field ...... ....... title ......... . 14 Upt jj . . ........... V WHO f'U'lilro vent . .............. .. .... ...... Future Development i, Follire Wiest IsIT Roerve Se V6 e School Mug 9 rn Ev� Ftitute'RO'ad 7T, A dh ft, U nQ 4) IN Fub$Lje� 1110ad ..... ..... ..... Site Plait ---------- _VLUJUre City 'Street ..- -, - ­ Byposs