The URL can be used to link to this page

05. Resolution 5065 - Preliminary Plat - Autumn Creek SubdivisionCity of Kalispell Planning Department l - 2nd Street East, Suite 211 Kalispell, Montana 59901 Telephone: (406) 751-1850 Fax: o 5 --. 5 REPORT Kalispell Mayor and City Courier. FROM: Narda A. Wilson, senior Planner James H. Patrick, City Manager SUBJECT Preliminary flat for Autunm Creek Subdivision MEETING DATE: October 3, 2005 BACKGROUND: This is a request for prelfimirrary plat approval of Autumn Creek Subdivision, a 21 lot residential subdivision on approximately acres. of the 2 lots, 17 are proposed for single family and four are proposed for townhouses. The property is also proposed for annexation and an frxltial zoning designation of - 2, Suburban Residential. A conditional use permit was filed. concurrently with the annexation and. preh.rr .nary plat to allow the creation of the four townhouse lots. The property is located north of Huy 2 Vest on the east side of Hathaway Larne. public hearing on this proposal was held before the Kalispell aw ing Board. on Jame 14, 2005 were it was continued ed to alloy the developer an pport .r ty for revision of the plan. Previously the property was proposed for are initial zoning designation of R- 3 and proposed a. total of 27 .lots with 15 single family .lots and 12 townhouse lots. The proposal was continued in order to al low the developer an opportunity to address issues related to density, parkland, access and the safety concerns at the intersection of Hwy 2 West and Hathaway Lane. '`leis revised proposal was brought back before the planning board at their September 13, 2005 meeting i to reconsider the request for preliminary plat approval. The adjoining land owners who were of record and noticed of the public hearing were also notified of the September 13, 2005 meeting approximately two weeks prior to the meeting. The planning staff reviewed the revised subdivision plans for the property and noted the developers had attempted to address the planning board and neighborhood eorreems to the fullest extent possible. The staff recommended approval of the preliminary plat subject to conditions. t the public hearing on dune 14, 2005 and the meeting field on September 13, 2005 there were several neighbors who expressed their opposition to the revised proposal citing concerns with density, neighborhood character and primarily the safety of the access at the intersection of Hi&y 2 West and Hathaway Lane. Their primary eorreem utum Creek S bdi . , r lamina r Flat September 22, 2005 Page 2 had to do with access and the traffic going eastbound conflicting with other eastbound traffic coming 'r•on r artt Hill. The board discussed the proposal and agreed the developers had made a sincere effort to address the issues related to the development. However, they were still concerned about the density and safety of the eastbound traffic along Hwy 2 West. A motion was made with amendments to address specific safety improvements related to the rods and to recommend approval of the preliminary plat subject to conditions. The motion failed on a vote of two in favor and two opposed with Norton and gull voting M favor and Taylor and r r c ey voting in opposition. An Exhibit A is attached to the transmittal letter that outlines the conditions considered by the board. RECOMMENDATION: Consideration should be VVen to the action taken by the planning board which was a. vote of two in favor and two opposed.. FISCAL EFFECTS: Minor positive impacts once fully developed. AL ` RNATr ES As suggested by the city council. Respectfully submitted, Na.rda A. Wilson, ames H. Patrick Senor Planner City Manager Report compiled: September ber 22, 2005 Attachments: Transmittal letter Exhibit Staff report lP -o5- A and apphcation materials Minutes from the 05 planning board reed. Draft minutes from the 9 / 13 05 planning board meeting c w/ Att: Teresa. White, Kalispell Cit r Clerk Applicants RESOLUTION NO.5065 (A) A RESOLUTION CONDITIONALLY APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT of AUTUMN CREEK SUBDIVISION, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS ASSESSORS TRACTS 6AAK, 6DI AND 6AB LOCATEDIN SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP NORTH, RANGE 22 WEST, P.M.M., FLATHEAD COUNTY, MONTANA. WHEREAS, Lee and Linda Hershberger, the owners of the certain real property described above, have petitioned for approval of the Subdivision Plat of said property, and WHERF, S, the Kalispell City Planning Board and ,honing Commission held a public hean'ng on June 14, 2005 and action was taken on September 13, 2005 when they reviewed Amended Subdivision Report #KPP-05-9A issued by the Kalispell Plying Department, and WHEREAS, the Kalispell City Planning Board and. Zoning Commission did not recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat of Autumn Creek Subdivision due to a vote of two in favor and two opposed, and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Kalispell at its regular Council Meeting of October 3, 2005, reviewed the Kalispell Planning Department Report #KPP-05-9A, reviewed the reeommendations oft e Kalispell City planning Board and Zoning Commission, and found from the Preliminary plat, and evidence, that the subdivision is in the public interest. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KALISPELL, MONTANA AS FOLLOWS SECTION I. That the Findings of Fact contained in Kalispell Planning Department Report #KPP-05-9A are hereby adopted as the Findings of Fact of the City Council. SECTION 11. That the application of Lee and Linda Hersh ear er for approval of the Preliminary Plat of A t nm Creek Subdivision, Kalispell, Flathead County, Montana is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That the development of the site shall be in substantial compliance with the application submitted, the site plan, materials and other specifications as well as any additional conditions associated with the preliminary plat as approved by the city council. (Kalispell Subdivision Regulations, Appendix C --- Final flat) 2, That the plans and specifications for all public Infrastructure be designed and in accordance with Kalispell's Standards for Design and Construction Standards and a letter shall be obtained stating that they have been reviewed and approved by the Kalispell public Worts Department. (Kalispell Subdivision Regulations, Chapter 3, Design Standards, Section 3.01). 3. A letter shall be submitted with the final plat from an engineer licensed in the state of Montana. certifying the improvements have been constructed. In accordance with the approved plans and specifications. As built drawings shall be submitted to the Kalispell Public Worts Department prior to final plat submittal for the completed infrastructure. A letter from the public works department shall accompany the engineer's certification stating that this condition has been met or otherwise adequately addressed (Kalispell Subdivision Regulations Chapter 3, Desip Standards, Section 3.01 . That an easement shall be obtained from the adjoining property owner to the northeast granting the right to cross those properties for utility extension purposes. (Kalispell Subdivision Regulations, Section 3.08 (A). . The following requirements shall be met per the Kalispell Fire Department: (Kalispell Subdivision Regulations, Section 3.20). a, water mains designed to provide minimum fire Tows shall be installed per City specifications at approved locations. Minimum fire flows shall be in accordance with Intematio al Fire Code 20 3) Appendix B. b. Fire hydrants shall be provided per City specifications at locations approved by this department, prior to combustible construction. C. Fire Department access shall be provided in accordance with International Fire Code (2003) Chapter 5. d. It should be noted that hazardous weed abatement shall be provided in accordance with City of Kalispell ordinance 10- . e. Street naming shall be approved by the fire department, . That a letter be obtained from. the Kalispell parks and Recreation Director approving landscape plan for the placement of trees and landscaping materials within the five foot landscape boulevard developed between the curb and the sidewalk. (Kalispell Subdivision Regulations, Section 3.11). . The area designated on the plat as "park"' along with the open area will meet the parkland dedication requirements provided that it be developed to create a recreational amenity within the subdivision. Those park improvements shall be addressed in accordance with a plan approved by the Kalispell parks and Recreation Director so as to provide a recreational component within the development. A letter from the Kalispell Parks Department shall be provided at the time of final plat that outlines the improvements and confirms those improvements have been .made. Kalispell Subdivision Regulations, Section 3.19). . That a detailed floodplain study be completed and accepted by FEN determining the base flood elevation for the floodplain area within the subdivision. No lots that are within 100 feet of the 100 year floodplain as currently indicated on the FIRM panels shall be platted prior to the completion and acceptance of the study area. The base flood elevation as determined as accepted by FEMA shall be indicated on the final plat. . Lots shall not be pre -sold until such time as a floodplain study has been reviewed and approved by F MA which determines the location of the 100 year floodplain and the base flood elevation. 10. A note shall be placed on the face of the final plat that waives protest to the creation of a special improvement district for the upgrade of Hathaway Lane to urban standards. 11. Townhouse lots within the subdivision shall he identified by a lot number and letter A or B. 12. The Kalispell Bypass eor*dor shall be indicated on the final plat as a separate parcel along with .rote that states "re er red for future n'ght-of-way acquisition", or if the State has acquired the property as the "Proposed Kalispell Bypass" and not he made part of the proposed lots. 1. eempleted. That a letter be obtained from Flathead CouM Road artment staliU that the ro osed accesses onto Hathaway Lane have been reviewed and a roved with the following improvements: The developer is re aired to widen Hatha va Lane - a ro 4 ate 1 feet ron �i west to the north to a minimum of 24 feet along with any gporooriate widening of HathqWayLane and shoulder work ad' aeent to the ro ert . 14. + a + r rt : ghat a letter is obtained from the Montana e agent o Transportation reviewing the Hathaw Lane roach onto Hi h La West and the impacts associated with this subdivision. With the approval from MDOT the developer is re uired to install a deceleration lane for westbound traffic on HWhway 2 West. The i ro ements shall he completed. pri o to final plat submittal and a letter from MD O ' shall be submitted shin the required improvements have been sates 'actoril eo leted. 1,, The roads within the subdivision shall he named and signed in accordance with the policies o the Kalispell Public Works ,department and the Uniform Traffic Control Devices Manual and he su eet to review and approval of the Kalispell Fire Department. A letter shall he obtained from the Kalispell Public Works Department stating the naming and addressing on the final plat have been reviewed and approved Kalispell Subdivision Regulations, Section 3.09). 16, All existing .nd proposed easements shall be indicated on the face of the final plat. Utility easements for City water and sewer shall he provided to allow for the logical extension of utilities from this subdivision to adjoining properties. A letter from the Kalispell Public Works Department shall he obtained stating that the required easements is are being shown on the final plat.. 17. The developer shall provide a letter from the U.S. Postal Service approving the plan for mail service. (Kalispell Subdivision Regulations, Section 3.22). 1 . Street lighting shall he located within the subdivision and shall have a. fall cutoff leas so that it does not intrude unnecessarily onto adjoining properties. (Kalispell. Subdivision Regulations Section . ). 19. All utilities shall be installed underground.(Kalispell Subdivision Regulations, Section 3.17). tort That a minimum of two-thirds of the necessary infrastructure for this subdivision shall be completed p or to final plat submittal. 2 1, All areas disturbed during development of the } ivi io shall be re -vegetated with weed - free mix immediately after development. 2. That preliminary plat approval for the first phase of the planned unit development shall be valid for a period or three years from the date or approval with an automatic two year extension a each phase of the subdivision plat has been completed and filed. (Kalispell Subdivision Regulations, Section 2.04). SECTION 111. Upon proper review and filing of the Final Flat or said subdivision in the office or the Flathead County Clerk and Recorder, said premises shall be a subdivision of the City of Kalispell. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND SIGNED BY THE MAYOR. OF THE CITY OF KALISPELL, THIS 3RD DAY OF OCTOBER, 2005. Pamela B.Kennedy Mayor ATTEST: Theresa White City Clerk RESOLUTION No. 5065 B A. RESOLUTION DENYING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT of AUTUMN CREEK SUBDIVISION, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS ASSESSORS TRACTS .AAK., 6DI AND 6AB LOCATED IN SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 28 NORTH, RANGE 22 WEST, P.M.M., FLATHEAD COUNTY, MONTANA. WHEREAS, Lee and Linda Hershl er er, the owners of the certain real property described above, have petitioned for approval of the Subdivision Plat of said property, and WHEREAS, the Kalispell City Planning Board and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on June 14, 2005 and action was taken on September 13, 2005 when they reviewed Amended Subdivision Report # PP-o - A issued by the Kalispell Planning Department, and WHEREAS, the Kalispell City Planning Board and Zoning Commission did not recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat of Autumn Creek Subdivision due to a vote of two in favor and two opposed, and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Kalispell at its regular Council Meeting of October 3, 2005, reviewed the Kalispell Planning epartment Report KPP-o - A, reviewed the recommendations of the Kalispell City Planning Board and Zoning Commission, and found from the Preliminary Plat, and evidence, that the subdivision is not in the public interest. W THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF TEE CITY OF KALISPELL, MONTANA AS FOLLOWS - SECTION I. That the Findings of Fact listed below are hereby adopted as the Findings ofPaet of the City o.cil: 1. The density exceeds that which is appropriate for the neighborhood and subdivision. 2, Townhouses are inconsistent with the character of the neighborhood. , Elimination of the townhouse lots will reduce the overall density of the subdivision. . The reduction of density in the subdivision will reduce the traffic and associated safety Issues. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND SIGNED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF KALISPELL, THIS 3RD DAY OF OCTOBER, 2005. Pamela B. Kennedy Mayor ATTEST; Theresa White City Clerk City of Kalispell Planning Department 2d Sued East, Suite 211, Kalispell, Montana 59901 Telephone: o 5 I -1 5 Fax: )751-1858 We ite: kalis el pla ningwe m September 22, 2005 James H. Patrick, City Manager City of Kalispell P.O. Box 1997 Kalispell, MT 59903 Re: Autumn Creek subdivision. Preliminary Plat - Hathaway Lane and Hwy 2 West Dear Jirn: The Kalispell City Planning Board met on September 13, 2005 to reconsider a request for preliminary plat approval of a 21 lot residential subdivision on appro rnately 8.69 acres. Of the 21 Lots, 17 are proposed for single fa.r ily and four are proposed for townhouses. The property is also proposed for annexation and an im'fial zoning designation of R--2, Suburban Residential. 'he property Is Located north of Hwy 2 West on the east side of Hathaway Lane. public hearing on this proposal was held before the planning board on dune 14, 2005 when It was continued to allow the developer an opportunity for revision of plan. Previously the property was proposed for an it a.l. zoning designation of R-3 and proposed a total of 27 lots with 15 single family lots and 12 townhouse lots. The proposal was continued in order to alloy the developer an opportunity to address issues related to density, parkland, access and the safety eoneems at the intersection of Hwy 2 West and Hathaway Lane, This revised proposal was brought back before the planning board at their September meeting. Narda Wilson of the Kalispell Planning Department, presented staff' report KP- 5-A (amended) and evaluated the proposal, She noted the revised subdivision plans for the property attempted to address the planning board and neighborhood concerns. The staff recommended approval of the preliminary plat subject to conditions and felt the developers had done tier best to address the concerns expressed by the hoard. At the public hearing onJune 14, 2005 and the meeting held on September 13, 2005 here were several neighbors who expressed their opposition to the revised proposal citing concerns with density, neighborhood character and pn'marily the safety of the access at the inter eetion of Hwy 2 West and Hathaway fie. Their primary concern had to do with access and the traffic going eastbound confficting with other eastbound traffic coming from Hartt Hill. Autumn Creek Preliminary Flat September , 2005 Page The board discussed the proposal and agreed the developers had made , sincere effort to address the issues related to the development. However, they were still concerned about the density and safety of the eastbound traffic along Hwy 2 west. A motion was made nth amendments to address specific safety improvements related to the roads and to recommend approval of the preliminary plat subject to conditions. The motion failed on a vote of two in favor and two opposed with Norton and Hull voting in favor and Taylor and Hinchey voting m opposition. An Exhibit A is attached that out nes the conditions considered by the board. Please schedule this matter for the October 3, 2005 regular Ka, ispeU City Council meeting. You may contact this board or Narda Wilson at the Ka .s ell Planning Department if you have any questions regarding this matter. GT/NW/ma Attachments: Exhibit , Conditions of approval Staff report 1 . -o5- and application rnat r'als Minutes from the 6/14/05 planning board meeting Draft minutes from the / l 3 / 05 planning board r eetffig w/ Att.- Theresa White, Kalispell City Clerk w/o Att: Lee & Linda H rs berg r, 24212 SE 384thSt,Enumclaw, WA 98022 TD 8& H, 31 Three Mile n'vo, Kalispell, MT 59901 EXHIBIT A AUTUMN ` CREEK SUBDBSI N PRELIMINARY PLAT KASEL CITY PLANNING BOARD The Kalispell city Planning Board held a public hearm'g was held on this matter at the regular meeting of the lanr .i boar, of June 14, 2005. The project was continued until September 13, 2005 where the planning board took action, The ollowm' conditions were considered. That the development of the site shall be i substantial compharrce with the application submitted, the site plan, materials and other specifications as wen as any additional conditions associated with the preliminaxy plait as approved by the city council. (Kalispell Subdivision Regulations, Append c - Final Plat) 2. That the plains and specifications for afl public infrastructure be designed and in accordance with Kal..a.s e 's Standards for Design and Construction Standards and a letter shall be obtained stating that they have been reviewed and approved by the Kalispell Pubhc Works Department. (Kalispell Subdivision. Regulations, Chapter 3, Design Standards, section. 3.0 f) � 3. A letter shall be submitted with the final plait from anengineer licensed in the state of Montana certifying the improvements have been constructed i accordance with the approved plans and specifications. As built drawings shall be submitted to the Kalispell. Public works Department prior to fmal plat submittal ittal. for the completed infrastructure. A letter from the public works department shall accompany the engineer's certification stating that this condition has been reset or otherwise adequately addressed (Kalispell Subdivision e uiations, Chapter 3, Design Standards, Section 3 .o 1. . T.lar.at an easement shall be obtained from the adjom*ing property owner to the northeast granting the right to cross those properties for utility extension purposes. (Kalispell Subdivision Regulations, section 3.0(A). The following requirements shall be met per the Kalispell Fire Department: (Kalispell Subdivision Regulations, Section. 3.20) . a.. Water ma ns designed to provide minimum fire flows shall be ix stalled. per City specifications at approved locations. Minimum Fire flows shall be i accordance with International Fire Code 2003 Append B. b. Fire hydrants shall be provided per City specifications at locations approved by this department, prior to combustible construction. c. Fire Department access shall be provided i accordance with Inte-mational Fire code 003 Chapter 5. d. It should be noted that hazardous weed abatement shall be provided in accordance with City of Kalispell Ordinance lo-. e. Street naming shall. be approved by the fire department. That a letter- be obtained from the Kalispell Parks and Recreation. Director approving a. landscape plan for the placement of trees and landscaping materials within the five foot landscape boulevard developed between the curb are.d the sidewalk. Kalis eU Subdivision. Regulations, Section 3.11). Autumn Creek Preliminary Plat Page . The area designated on the plat as "park" along with the open area will meet the parkland dedication re i-rements provided that it be developed to create a. recreational amenity within the subdivision, Those park improvements shall be addressed it accordance with a plan approved y the Kalis eH Parks and Recreation Director so as to provide a recreational component within the development. A letter from. the Kalispell Parks Department s a.H be provided at the time of 1"ma.l pit that outEnes the improvements ents and confirms those improvements have been made. (Kalispell Subdivision e ulations, Section 3.19). . That a detailed flood. lain study be completed and accepted by FEMA determining the base flood elevation for the flood. lain area within the subdivision. No lots that are 144t in. 100 feet of the 100 year floodplain as currently indicated on the FIRM panels shall be platted prior to the completion and acceptance of the study area. The base flood elevation as dcterruir�ed as accepted by FEMA shall be indicated on the final plat. . Lots shall not be pre -sold until such time as a floodplain study has been reviewed and approved by FEMA which determines the location of the 100 year flood lain and the base flood elevation. lo. A note shall be placed on the face of the final plat that waives protest to the creation of a special i� rovement district for the upgrade of Hathaway Lane to urban standards. 1.1. Townhouse lets within the subdivision shall be identified by a lot number and letter- A or B. 12. The Kalispell Bypass corridor shall e indicated on the fma . plat as a separate to parcel along with a rote that states `reserved for future right-of-way acquisition", or if the State has acquired the property as the "Proposed Kalispell Bypass"' and not be made part of the proposed .lots. 13. • That a letter be obtained from Flathead Coun Road Department stating that the ro used accesses onto atlas Lamle have been reviewed and approved with the following....irrr rover .eats: The de elo er is required to Crider . Hathaway Lane for a roxia.tel 50 feet from Hi wa 2 West to the northt a. minimum of 2 feet along�t� a ro riate wider n r- of at av a Lane and shoulder work adjacent ...overtv. YR ;. ... # # # # I!. # 11111# # f R i .s. # dh 1111101111 s� Mh 111 ■ i Wi i w � t fw ..... ! # fF 7 y! iF ♦db W # ■ it wr �l awj ri'2 �aoi►�R *1�i +F kP AlOt ky.9111rs wr r ■ f M 1R rw r r ■ i } That a. letter is obtained from the Montana Department of Transportation reviewing the HathaWay.Lane approach onto Highwa 2 West and the � aots associ.a.ted with this subdivision. With the approval from. MDOT the d.ev to er is required to install a. deceleration lane for westbound traffic on High3ya..2 West. The roven er is shall be eons leterl ri.or to final plat submittal and a. letter from MDOT shall be submitted stating_the.......Mquired iMprovements have been satisfactorily..completed. 1.5., The roads within the subdivision shall be named and signed in accordance with the policies of the Kalispell Public Works Department and the Uniform Traffic Control Devices Manual and be subject to review and approval of the Kalispell Fire Department. A letter shall be obtained from the Kalispell Public Works Department stating the narning and addressing on the fmal plat have been reviewed and approved (Kalispell subdivision Regulations, Section 3.09). 16. All existing and proposed easements s ail be indicated on the face of the final. plat. Utility easements for City water and sewer shall be provided to allow for the logical extension of utilities from this subdivision to adjoining pro ernes. A letter from. the Kalispell Pu he Works Department shall be obtained stating that the required easements are being shown on the final. plait. 17, The developer shall provide a letter from the U.S. Postal Service appronngthe plan for mail service. (KalispeR Subdivision Regulations, Section 3.22). 18. Street lighting shall he located within the subdivision and shall have a full cutoff lens so that it does not intrude unnecessarily onto adjoining properties. (Kalispell Subdivision Regulations Section . . 19. All utilities shall be installed underground. (Kalispell Subdivision Regulations, Section. 3.17). 20, That a. minimum of two-thirds of the necessary infrastructure for this s l d.i -isi n shy be completed prior to final Plat submittal. 21, All areas disturbed during development of the subdivision shall be re -vegetated with a. weed -free � immediately atel after development. 2. That preliminary plait approval for the first phase of the planned unit development shall be valid for a. period of three years from the date of approval with an automatic two year extension as each phase of the subdivision ivi.sion l at has been completed and filed. (Kalispell. Subdivision Regulations, Section 2.04). AUTUMN CREEK S"BDIVVISION KALISPELL PINNING DEPARTAMNT STAFF REPORT KPP- 5- (AMENDED) SEPTEMBER 7, 2005 report to the Kalispell City Planning Board and the Kalispell City council regarding a request for prehminary prat approval of a 2 1 lot residential subdivision on property proposed for current annexation and i itial town . A public hearing on this proposal was held before the planning board for June 14, 2005 in the Kalispell City council Chambers where it was continued to allow the developer an opportunity `or revision of plan. The planning board wi. forward a recommendation to the city council for final action. BACKGROUND KGROUND INFORMATION: A. Petitioner and owners: Lee & Linda Hershcrer 24212 SE 384thStreet Enumclaw, WAS 98022 Technical Assistance. Thomas Dean & Hoskins. 31 wee Mile Drive Kalispell, MT 59901 (406) 5 - 52 B. Location and Legal Description of Property: The property proposed for subdivision dies north of Hwy 2 West, on the cast side of Hathaway Lane. The property can be described. as Assessors Tracts 6AAK, 6 l and 6AB located iLn Section 2, Township 28 North, Range 22 West, , M t M. , Flat -head County, Montana. C. Nature of the Request: This is a request for preliminary plat approval of a 21 lot subdivision consisting of 17 single family lots and two two unit townhouse lots o approximately nine acres. The developer has revised their request for initial zoning from. -3, Urban Single Family Residential, to -2, suburban Residential. The etiti Dn to annex has been filed concurrently with the preliminary plat along with an application for a conditional use permit that would allow the creation of the two two .nit townhouses lots Currently this property is M the County zoning jurisdiction and has a ors g designation of R- 1, Suburban Residential, that has a one acre minirnum lot size requirement and is typically in areas where water and sewer are not available. Access to this subdivision wo ld be from Hathaway Drive which is located merest o Kalispell on the north side of US Hwy 2 Nest. An inter. ai road would be developed that would have two short cul-de-sacs that would serve the lots. There is a small drainage that runs through the site that appears to be connected to Ashley Creek that hes to the south of Hwy 2 West. As a. result of this drainage there is a. wetland area that lies near the southwest comer- of the site and has been set aside as a "open. area." The overall development plan has been reduced in density from 27 lots to 21 lots and the minimum lot size requirements of 7,000 square feet have been increased to 9,600 square Feet. A small park area has been created next to the wetland floodplam' located on the site. It is noteworthy that there is significant area of 100 year floodplain on the site some of which is clearly a wetland area as is demonstrated by standing water, reeds, grasses and cattails and is the open area mentioned above. This portion of the flood.pla.in is in a non -detailed study area and the base flood elevation has not been established. No dwellings .a. e been located i the area identified on the FIRM (flood insurance rate maps) prepared by FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) as being in the 100 year floodplain, and the area is under study. The developers are aware they will have to perform a detailed flood study to determine the flood elevation for this site. There are several lots in the subdivision that are currently located in the floodp .am* that would not be suitable for platting or development until such a. food study is completed. It is also noteworthy that the northeast corner of this site consisting of approximately on third of an acre is in the Kalispell Bypass right-of-way corridor. The applicants have been in contact with MDOT regarding the acquisition of this property. City utilities wiH be taken from this northeast corner of the site from Greenbriar Subdivision and through the bypass corridor. D. Size: Total Area: 8.69 acres Single FamilyLots: 3.15 acres Townhouse Lots: 2.09 acres Open. Area: 1. 8 5 acres Roads: 1..0 acres E. fisting Land Use and Zoning: The property proposed for subdivision is currently undeveloped with the exception of a pole baim and has been used for pasture in the past. Currently this property is in the County zoning jurisdiction and is zoned R -1, Suburban Residential, which. has a one acre ` um lot see requirement ex t and is typically in areas not served by public water and or sewer. As previously mentioned, a petition for annexation to the city of Kaiispell and an initial zonir�g designation of R-2 has been filed concurrently with the request for pre u'm'nary plat approval. The R -2 zoning district has a minimum lot size requirement of 9600 square feet and a. minimum lot width of 70 Feet. F. Adjacent Land Uses and. Zoning: This property is located in are area that could be considered to be on the urban fringes of Kaiispell with the city limits within one guar ter mile of this area. Development pressures have not been as intense in this area as they are in other fringe areas around the city. All of the zomffig surrounding this site is County -1, Suburban Residential, a district with a one acre minimum lot size requirement for newly created lots. The property is currently in the West Side Zoning District, but upon annexation would become part of the City o Kalispell with a. City zoning assignment. North: Single family residential, County R - l zoning South: Single family residential, County R-1 zoning East: Undeveloped pasture lard, City RA- i zoning West: Single family residential, County RM 1 zoning G. General Lang. Use Character: The general land use character of the area is suburban an residential with. parcels ranging in same from one half acre to over five acres. The property is on the urban fringes of Kalispell with the city omits immediately to the east, of this site. The proposed Kalispell Bypass corridor is east of the property and crosses the northeast corner. H. Zoning: Currently this property is located in the counter zoning jurisdiction and has a zoning designation of -1, Suburban Residential. This property is being annexed concurrently with review of the prelin-Anary plat and the developers are re uestffig an assignment of R- , Suburban Residential. ,Ak conditional use permit has also been filed to allow the creation of the 4 townhouse units by the shifting of density within the site. The R-2 zoning district allows the creation of -two u It townhouses nth a conditional use pernut. As proposed the subdivision has apprwdmately 2.33 dwelhng units per acre. 1. Unties: This subdivision would receive full City services upon annexation and development. Water: City of KalispeH Sewer: City of Kalispell Solid Waste. City of Kalispell Gas: Northwest Energy Electricity: Flathead Electric Coop (underground) Telephone: .e: Ce .turyTel (underground) `ire; City of Kalispell Schools. West Valley School District, School District 5 o1 fie. City of Kalispell. CObUdENTS FROM THE SITE DEVELOPMENT R.EVIIEW C NMTTEE This matter came before the site development review committee on May 26, 2005 and June 2, 2005 and again on September 1, 2005. One of the primary issues identified was the und.elineated fl,00dpl.an that comprises appro,'matel y one third of the site. The loodplain was not indicated on the preliminary plat as currently indicated on the . EMA map, but rater a. floodpla.in boundary that has been deterl ed by the engineer, but not yet gore through FEMA approval. Ad d itio aRy, there was some concern that the lets would be pre -sold prior to the determm'ation of the 100 year flood la . It was suggested that a. condition be placed on the plait that no lots be sold until the 100 year floodplain has been determined along with a. base flood elevation. The other issue that care before the committee was acceptance of the wetland area as fulfiffing the parkland dedication requirement. The parks department would like to work with the developer in detemhu'ng appr pr. ate park development that is indicated on the plat that includes a pedestrian walking trail and some limited amenities in the approximately one quarter acre park area. 3 REVEEW AND FLINGS of FACT This application is reviewed as a. major subdivision in accordance with statutory criteria and the Kalispe . City Subdivision Regulations. A. Effects on Health and Safety: Fire; This subdivision would be in the service area of the Kalispell Fire Department once annexed to the city. The property would be considered to be at low n'sk of fire because the subdivision and. homes within the subdivision would e constructed in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code and have access which meets City standards. AE of the lots will abut a street that has been constructed to City standards. Hydrants wiU be required to be placed in compliance with the requirements of the Uniform Fire Code and approved by the fire chief. The fire access and suppression system should e installed and approved by the fire department prior to final plat approval because of potential problems with combustible construction taking place prior to adequate fire access to the site being developed. Secondary access will not be required since the roadways do not exceed the maximum standards. loodir : Accordi to 1 M , anel. 1 5o there is ate. area. of si.g ificar�t floc plain on the site as a result of a. tributary to Ashley Creek that runs through the site and also creates a substantial wetland area. This area is in a non -detailed non-detailedstudy area and will reed to undergo a. detailed study that will then be reviewed and accepted by FEMA. .at that time a base flood elevation will be established. The property owner has been working on a. flood.plain study with the local engmeerin firm Thomas, Dean and Hoskins and an analysis will be submitted to FEMA for revs.. Prior to the Ming of a fma.l plat a detailed study of the area will need to be approved by FEMA in order to establish the lase flood elevation. The Kalispe Subdivision Regulations section 3 . o 5, Floodpla n Provisions, prohibit the creation of Lots in the 100 year floodplain or the floodway. Should. the results of the study reflect what has been srittel as the assumed floodplain it does not appear that lots or structures are proposed to be located in the floodpl.ain area, but until a detailed study has been accepted by FEMA establishment of the base flood elevation is inconclusive ive here is currently tly a culvert that is located wider Hathaway Drive that channels the creek and discharges at the northwest corner of this property. Any work within the 100 year floodpl.ain that would occur after annexation such as for road building purposes would have to be obtained from the City of Kalispell Floodplain Administrator. strator. Access., access to the subdivision will be from Hathaway Lane, a. County road in fair condition. a new internal roadway will provide access to the lots and be constructed to City standards. No secondary access would be required. There is lack of pedestrian access along Hathaway Lane which has a pavement width of between 22 and 24 feet, but no sidewalks, curbing or landscaping. It is designated as a local street in the Kalispefl Groff Policy and is a two way roadway with approximately 60 feet of right-of-way. Hathaway Lane accesses onto US Hwy 2 West in a section where there is two-way traffic. There could be potential traffic conflicts with traffic entering and exiting from Hathaway onto Hwy 2. The existing approach appears to be in rather poor condition and will probably require some improveme ,ts. Those improvements would be based on an 4 assessment by the Flathead County Road Department and the Montana Department of Transportation, Referral letters were sent to both of these agencies soliciting comments, but none were received to date. Additionally, Hathaway Care is a County Road that does not meet urban standards and a roxu'nateiy 1000 feet of the roadway will be used to access this subdivision. At a. um a wwver to protest the creation of a special improvement district for upgrading the road to City standards should be required as a plat condition. The Flathead County Road Department may want additional improvements to the roadway beyond the antic'1P ated improvements to the intersection.. Hathaway Lane currently experiences light volumes of traffic which does not significantly impact the condition of the road# One of the primary issues identified by the planmng hoard at their June meeting was the intersection of Hathaway and Hwy 2 West and potential improvements. Since that time the staff and developer have coordinated with the Flathead County Road Department artment and the Montana Department of Transportation to discuss potential improvements. it was determined and agreed that a right turn lane will e added to the westbound highway and that Hathaway Lane will be widened at the intersection. Additionally some shoulder work wiH be done in front of the project property as appropriate and approved by the Flathead County Road l epartinent. Effects Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat: This property has some significant topography related to an Ashley Creek tributary which, runs through the site and appears to provide habitat for a variety of grasses, cattails and birds. There may e some migratory birds and occasional deer may visit the site, however, this area does not appear to provide significant habitat for wildlife. The developer has attempted to i.=' 't impacts to the riparian area within the site that provides habitant to wildlife on this site by creating an open area of approximately 1.. 5 acres that would be owned, maintained and conserved by the homeowners within the subdivision. The riparian area would not be disturbed, filled or otherwise developed, but rather would he left in a. natural state. C. Effects on the Natural Environment: Surface and oundwater: This subdivision will be served by public gaiter and sewer thereby mininfizm' g any otential impacts to the groundwater. An Ashley Creek tributary runs dough this property and could potentially be impacted by construction and development M the area.. Best management practices should be taken when working along this drainage and the developer should clearly stake and protect the wetland area.. rane.• This site has some limited topographical constraints related to the floodplam and wetland area but should not pose unusual . challenges to site drainage. Curbs and gutters will he Mstalled with the subdivision and a engineered, storm drain management plain will have to be developed to address the runoff from the site. There is no storm drain system in the immediate area and storm waiter will have to be managed usm g ors -site reten.ti.on methods as part of are engineered storm water management plan. The drainage plan will have to comply with the City of K lis ell's standards and. State standards and will be required to be reviewed and approved by the Kalispell Public Works Department. D. Effects on Local Sakes: Water. Water service to the subdivision would be provided by the City of Kalispell and extended from a water man that lies to the northeast of this subdivision in Gree briar Subdivision, a City subdivision. The ma'n would be extended from its current location through a. City park, through Montana Department artment of Transportation property and through the bypass corridor to the subdivision. It is uncertain at this junctiare when the water loop connection for the subdivision may be required since it wiH depend on the fire flows that can be obtaLm*ed and whether they III meet the requirements of the Urilform Fire Code. Most likely the water system will be completed prior to fmal plat submittal. The water system for the subdivision will be reviewed and approved by the Kalispell Public Works Department and the Kalispell Fire Department as part of the development of the subdivision. There is adequate capacity within the clt is water system to accommodate this development. Sewer; Sewer service will be provided by the City of Kalispell with are extension of emsting sewer mains infrom heir current location in Greenbriar Subdivision to the northeast. Again, the rx a' would be extended through State owned property are the developers will be required to obtain an casement from. the State for the utihty extension. Design and construction of the rams will be reviewed and approved by the Kalispell Public Works Department, Where is adequate capacity within the sewage treatment plan to accommodate this development. Roads: Traffic projections for this subdivision ivision are estimated to be approximately o to 220 additional M*dividual vehicle trips per day based on the estate of to 10 vehicle trips per residence per day in the area onto Hathaway Lane and US Hwy 2. The internal subdivision roads will be constructed to City standards and would ar clue curb, gutter, sidewalks and landscape boulevards within the subdivision. Hathaway bane is a. rural roadway with a pavement width of between 22 to 24 feet with drainage swa.les and no pedestrian access. The impacts of this subdivision to Hathaway Lane will generally double its current use. The roadway appears to be in fair condition and may re -e some improvements based on the requirements of the Flathead County Road Department. A referral was sent to that department ,for comments but at the writing of this report none have been received. Access onto Hwy 2 Vest from Hathaway Lane appears to be in marginal condition and will likely require some improvements such as widening and re avm* g. The access from. Hathaway Lane onto Hwy 2 Vest is at the bottom of "F a.r-t Hi. and there is potential for delays accessing the highway during peak traffic hours such as mor=' g and evening commuter traffic. The developer WIll need to contact the Montana Department of Transportation and the, Flathead County Road Department regarding potentia . grades to the intersection o as well as Hathaway Lane. AdditionaRy, a note should be placed on the fmal plat which waives protest to the creation of a special improvement district for the upgrade of Hathaway Lane to urban standards. Overall here will be some moderate impacts to Hathaway Lane and insignificant impacts to Hwy 2 Vest as a result of this subdivision which already e.pen'ences large traffic volumes. As previously mentioned some improvements will be donne to the westbound lane along Hwy 2 that will create a turn lane as well as some shoulder work at the C intersection of Hathaway and Hwy 2 West. The Kalispell Bass cor id.or crosses the northeast corner of the subdivision rision and should e indicated on the ff a . plat as being reserved for future acquisition by the State. The preliminary plat has indicated the bypass corridor with shading but it is not labeled as such.. This corner of the property that is m the bypass corridor appears to contain approximately one third of an acre. The area within the future highway corridor should not be Mciuded ire the lot area but rather platted as a separate parcel for future acquisition. Schools; This development ent is within the boundaries of the Kalispell School District 5. The school district could anticipate that an additional 10 to 12 school aged chiJdren might be generated into the district at full build. out. This number is used because it takes into account pre-school I aged children, home school education options and private school education option.. Not all of the children who live in the subdivision will be attending public schools. This would have a potentially significant impact on the district, particularly on a. cumulative level with other developments pending within the district - both urban and rural particularly with high school -aged students. Parks and Open Space: The state and local subdivision regulations have parkland open space requirements for major subdivisions in the a.raount of I 1 percent or one -ninth of the area proposed for the development. The area in lots is 5.24 acres generating a. requirement for a r ' irrr x m of 0.58 of are acre park area.. The developer would like to use the "open area' Mdicated on the preliminary plat as satisfying the parkland dedication requirements under the Section 3.1. subsection f "Exceptions To .Park Dedication" which states "Park dedication shall not e required where a subdivision provides for long term protection of cri.tica.1, wildhfe habitat; cultural, historical or natural resources; a.g cult ra. interests or aesthetic values and said area equals or exceeds . the dedication requirements of Subsection . above. Although this area is a natural amer .ty for the subdivision, it is generally in are unbuildable and unusable area. The area indicated on the plat as are opera area is approximately 1. 5 acres. Comments from the Parks and Recreation Director are as follows: " utur m Creek Subdivision does not meet the standards set for fulfilling the Park requirement for subdivisions. Open Space by itself cues not adequately supply Park and Recreation opportunities to the neighborhood. 1 would recommend the developer set up are appointment to discuss this proposal with myself and my staff. We can discuss the issues and work towards are agreement with our Department and the developer." Should the developer choose to pay cash in lieu of parkland dedication rather than developing a park area, it can be generaRy esd a.ted that the value of the property is approximately $25,000 per acre. The cash in lieu of parkland dedication amount would be approximately $14,500. Subsequent to the initial submittal the developer has created an approximately 0.2 acre park between proposed. Lots 15 and 16 with a pedestrian tra . along the east side of the wetland area. This park is not large enough in size to warrant the City taking over maintenance of the site, but will provide a rice neighborhood amen y for the subdivision.. The developer will work with the parks department 7 to further refine the needed, improvements to the park so that it can function as and provide a recreational ameru'ty for the subdivision. Police: This subdivision would be in the urisdlcti.on of the city of Kalispell Police Department once annexed to the city. The department can adequately provide service to this subdivision, however the cumulative impacts of growth within the city further strains the department's ability to continue to provide the high level of service the department is committed to. Fire Protection: Fire protection services wiH be provided by the Kalispell Fire Department once annexed to the city, and the subdivision wiU be required t comply With the Uniform Fire Code. The fire department will review and approve the secondary access to the site if required duri..n.g inten*m phasing, the number and location of hydrants within the subdivision as well as fire flows for compliance with applicable fLre codes. Although fire risk is lour because of good access and fairly level terrain, the fire department is recommending that access to the subdivision and the hydrants are in place prior to final plat approval and or use of combustible r aterIals in construction. At the previous dune 2005 planningboard meeting here were some concerns expressed about the Kalispell FireDepartment's ability to adequately access the subdivision. Since that time the developer has met Frith a.n,d, discussed access vnth the fire department and a letter- addressing the concerns have been included with this resubr kta.l. Solid Waste: Solid. waste WIR be handled by a. private hauler m accordance with state statues and taken to the Flathead County Landfifl. Where is sufficient capacity within the landfill to accommodate this additional solid waste generated from this subdivision. Medical Services: Ambulance service is available from the fire department and ALERT helicopter service. Kalis e . Re ion.al Hospital is close, less than three miles from the site. E* Effects on Agriculture and agricultural water user facilities; The site has been traditionally .xsed for very limited agricultural purposes, primandy grazing and is more efficiently and effectively used for urban residential development. Its location and its proximity to urban services rakes this property sited for urban scale development. There will he relatively little impact on agricultural uses within the Valley and no unpact on agricultural water user facilities since this property will he served by a public water system. Fv Relation to the KalizpeH Growth cy This propel is in the Kalispell Groff Policy's potential utility service area and is anticipated for this type of urban scale development at the time of connection. to City utilities. The future .and use map for the area indicates this area is anticipated to be developed as Suburban. Residential. Areas designated as Suburban Residential are anticipated to be served by community grater and sewer and have good access to services and public facilities. This land use designation anticipates a density of up to four dwelling units per acre. The subdivision has a. density of approx.Tliately 2.33 dwelling units per acre. This subdivision is in compliance with the Kalispell. Growth Policy and its goals and policies. G. Compliance nth Zoning: This propel" has been proposed to be zoned -2 an Suburban. Residential district with a ' um lot size requirement of 9,600 square feet and a rnh i m lot width of 70 feet. Two .rt townhouses are a. conditionally permitted use provided they comply with the density istations of the subdivision. A complete report on the conditional use permit for the townhouses is fully deta .ed in the companion report KCU-05-6A. CompHance with the Kalispell Subdivision, Regulations: his subdivision complies with the Kalispell Subdivision Regulations and no variances have been requested. RECoUMN ANION Staff recommends that the Kalispell City lanru'ng Board adopt staff report KP-5- . as fm' di .gs of fact and recommend to the Kalispell City Council that preliminary plat for the subdivision be approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That the development of the site sha , be in substantial compliance with the a.ppli.ca.tion submitted., the site plan, materials and other specifications as well a any additional conditions associated with the preliminary plat as approved by the city council. (Kalispell Subdivision Regulations, ,appendix C - Final Plat) 2. That the plans and specifications for all public infrastructure be designed and in accordance with Kalisp ll.'s Standards for Design and Construction Standards and a letter shall be obtained stating that they have been reviewed and approved by the Kalispell public Works Department. (Kalispell Subdivision, Regulations, Chapter 3, Design Standards, Section , 01). 3. A letter shall be submitted with the final plat from anengmeer licensed in the state of Montana certifying the improvements have been constructed in accordance with the approved pans and specifications. As built drawings shall be submitted to the Kalispell Public Works Department prior to final plat submittal for the completed infrastructure., A letter from the public works department shall accompany the engineer's certification stating that this condition has been met or otherwise adequately addressed Kalisp R Subdivision Regulations, Chapter 3, Design Standards, Section 3.01 . That an easement shaft be obtained from the adjoining propel owner to the northeast granting the right to cross those properties for utility extension purposes. (Kalispell Subdivision Regulations, Section 3. . . The following requirements shall be met per the Kalispell FireDepartment: Kalispell Subdivision Regulations, Section 3.20). a. "water mains designed to provide mirilrnu u fire flows shall be installed per City specifications at approved locations. Mm' imum fire flows rs shall be in accordance with. International Fire Code 2003 Appendix B. b_ Fire hydrants shall be provided per City specifications at locations approved by this department, prior to combustible construction. 9 c. Fire Department access shall be provided in accordance with International Fire Cods (2003) Chapter 5. d. It should be noted that hazardous weed abatement shall be provided are accordance with City of Kalispell Ordnance - . . Street naming shaE be approved by the fire department. . That a. letter be obtained from the Kalispell larks and Recreation Director approving a landscape plan for the placement of trees and landscaping materials within the five Foot landscape boulevard developed between the curb and the sidewalk. (KalispeE Subdivision Regulations, Section 3.11). . The area designated on the plat as "park" along with the open area will meet the parkland dedication requirements provided that it be developed to create a recreational amenity within the subdivision. Those hark improvements shall be addressed In accordance with a plan approved by the Kalispell Parks and Recreation Director so as to provide a recreational component within the development. A letter from the Kalispell Parks Department shall be provided at the time of finial plat that outlines the improvements and confirms those improvements have been made. (Kalispell Subdivision Regulations, Section 3.19). . That a detailed. floodplain study be completed and accepted by FEMA determnung the base flood elevation for the flood lain area within the subdivision. No lots that are within 100 feet of the 100 year .00d. lam' as currently nd.icated on the FIRM panels shall be platted prior to the completion and acceptance of the study area.. The base flood elevation as determined as accepted by FEMA shall be indicated on the fma . plait. . Lots shall not be pre -sold until such time as a .00d lain study has been reviewed and approved by FEMA which deter M' es the location of the .boo year flood. lain and the base food elevation. M A note shall be placed on the face of the lirial plat that waves protest to the creation of a. special improvement district for the upgrade of Hathaway Lane to urban standards. 11. Townhouse lots within the subdivision shall be identified by a lot number and letter . or B. 12. The Kalispell Bypass corridor shall be indicated on the final plat as a separate parcel along with a. note that states `reserved for future right-of-way acquisition", or if the State has acquired the property as the "Proposed Kalispell Bypass' and not be made part of the proposed lots. 13. That a letter be obtained from Flathead County Road Department stating that the proposed accesses onto Hathaway Lane have been reviewed and approved and any associated and necessary improvements have been satisfactorily completed. 14. That a letter be of to -fined from the Montana Department ofTransportation reviewing the Hathaway Lane approach onto Hwy 2 West and the impacts associated with this subdivision. any improvements required by the MDOT shy" be completed prior to 10 final plat submittal and a. letter from MDOT shall be submitted stating the required improvements ..ts have been satisfactorily completed.. 15. The roads within the subdivision shall be named and signed in accordance with the policies of the KahspeH Public Works Department and the Urffo= Traffic fic Control Devices Manual and be subject to review and approval of the Kalispell Fire Department. A letter shall be obtained from the Kalispell Pubhe Works Department stating the nar frog and addressing on the fmal plat have been reviewed and approved. Kalispell Subdivision. Regulations, Section 3.09). 16. AR e'..V'sting and proposed easements shall be Mdicated or the face of the fmal plat. Utility easements for City water and sever shall be provided to alloy for the to cal extension of x tildes from this subdivision to and om'm'g proper .es. A letter from the Kalispell Public Works Department shank be obtained stating that the required easements are being shown on the final plat. 17. The developer shall provide a. letter from the U.S. Postal Sernce approving the plan for mail service. (Kalispell Subdivision Regulations, Section 3.22), 18. Street lighting shall be located within the �;u.bdivision and shall have a. full cutoff leans so that It sloes not intrude unnecessarily onto adjoining properties. Kalispell Subdivision Regulations Section 3.09(L)). 19, All utilities shah be installed underground. (Kalispell Subdivision Regulations, Section 3.17). 20. That a m of two-thirds of the necessary infrastructure for this subdivision shall be completed prior to final plat submittal.. 2 1. All areas disturbed during development of the subdivision shall be re -vegetated with a weed -free mix immediately after development. t. 22. That preliminary plat approval for the first phase of the planned writ development shall be va i.d for a period of three years from the date of approval with are automatic two year extension as each phase of the subdivision plat has been completed and filed. Kalispell Subdivision Regulations, Section 2.04). NW II City of Kalispell P.O. Box 1997 312 1 st Avenue East Kalispell, MT 59901 RECEIVED 17:: t-PP 1 = � _5 N - x �A"ASG1 o Mayor Pang Kennedy and Kalispell city Council Members, Ike; Autumn Creek Subdivision September 15, 200 I hope I'm not too late to share some input on the proposed Autumn Creek Subdivision on Hathaway Lane crest of Kalispell. I attended the first meeting but had to work on the evening of the 2nd meeting on this natter and got to the meeting just as the discussion on this item ended. I was advised that the ruling was for annexing the property into the city but that the decision on the subdivision itself was split and was being sent to the Kalispell city council. My name is Carol Collins and I have lived at 19 Hathaway Lane for the past 3 years. I would like to express my concern regarding Hathaway lane as the only access for a 21 lot subdivision. Hathaway Lane is a narrow dead end road, approximately 1200 feet in length. It currently serves as the only access to Highway 2 Nest for 10 residences and one business located at the corner of Hathaway and Hwy 2 West. The residences along the road are predominately situated on 1 acre or more. I think it's safe to say that most people of the Flathead Valley, myself Included, are not happy to see a subdivision coning to their neighborhood that was previously a rural area. However, with the growth that Kalispell is experiencing, subdivisions are bound to come and be approved. The Autumn creek sudivsion would be no exception to that if it were not for the dangerous access to Highway 2 West. Unfortunately Hathaway Lane intersects the Highway in a very bad spot for access. It lies just at the boftom of Hart Hill. vehicles coming down Hart Hill towards the city have not yet slowed down when they reach the bottom of the hill. vehicles traveling west, out of town, are in the process of speeding up for the hill and the highway. This makes for a very bad situation for vehicles trying to gain access to the Highway from Hathaway Lane. Most of the vehicles leaving Hathaway Lane would be turning left to go into Kalispell. l myself have gaited over 5 minutes to get out on the highway, summer is particularly bad with the increased traffic, and Winter is really no better with the sometimes es icy or slushy road conditions. Right ht now we have only 10 households using the access and l find It hard to imagine adding 21 more households trying to gain highway access from Hathaway Lane. The combination of vehicles from the west coming down the hill at high speeds and vehicles from the east gaining momentum for the highway and the bill just place Hathaway Lane in a very bad position for that many more vehicles trying to get out. Also I would like to mention that there have been accidents involving vehicles waiting to turn onto Hathaway Lane coming from the west. In these cases the vehicles waiting to turn left were rear -ended by traffic coring down the hill, at least one involved a. logging truck rear ending a vehicle. There is not enough room on Highway 2 West at that point for the vehicles .coming down the hill to pass on the right side to go around the vehicle waiting to turn. There was recently another rear -end accident there. Vehicles coming west out of Kalispell and turning right on Hathaway Lane also have to get way over to the right on the narrow strip that's available before they make the turn because the cars coring behind you are gearing up for the open road at a pretty fast pace. I've been in the position of Haling that right hard turn way faster than I'm comfortable with just to got out of the way and making the left hand turn going out spraying gravel behind rye to take advantage of a short-lived break In traffic. Envision younger, less experienced, drivers having to make that call . From what I understand, I DOT doesn't see a problem with the access* Maybe because they and their families aren't the ones trying to use the access. Maybe they looked at the road during a period when therewasn't much traffic. Maybe they won't see access for 40 more vehicles, with I don't know the average number of vehcle trips per day, as a problem. I do see it as a problem and more than that, an accident, possibly fatal, waiting to happen. It would be interesting to position a Highway Patrol car out of sight and using radar, take an average speed of vehicles traveling both ways at the point where Hathaway Lane intersects the Highway. ay. I would be willing to bet that average would core way above the posted 45 mph. Opposed or not to subdivisions in the Flathead, I realize they are a reality. If the proposed Autumn Creek subdivision had another access, I would have to just accept it as part of growth, like it or not. But where lives are at stake versus developer dollars I would like to ask you to please look over this situation carefully. Another resident on Hathaway r who is trying to sell their property also has mentioned the possibility of selling it to a developer and I'm sure there might be others on the road who would consider doing the same, but what of the access then? How many cars can funnel in and out of what is already a poor access before someone Is billed? Access is already a problem with the density we have now and I think to change the zoning to allow any more than I house per acre would be a mistake. There is quite a bit of open lard down Hathaway Lane and if It was all developed at one house per acre that would place a tremendous overload on the already poor access. I thank you in advance for your time and consideration on this ratter: I would hope that you rake your decision based on the safety factor as If you and your family lived on Hathaway Lane. Sincerely: Carol Collins 9 Hathaway Lane Kalispell, MT. 59901 ThomBe as, Inc,Engineering Consultants. T" TD& ► ug st 23, 2005 Narda Wilson Senior Planner City of Kalispell Plying Office Ford Bldg., -2nd St, E., Ste. 211 Kalispell, MT 59901 RE; ,autumn Creek Subdivision Dear Narda: s you are aware, Autumn Creek Subdivision has been purchased by Le & Linda Hersh erger. They are anxious to proceed with the project. The new owners have been briefed on the proceedings at the Planning Board Meeting. They have agreed to accommodate the recommendations presented. n response to the questions and recommendations raised during the June Planning Board Meeting, the ,coning has been changed. from R-3 to 2. There are proposed 17 single-family lots and 2 rn lti -Emily lots. A small park area has -been established with a pathway along the wetland area. NID' has been contacted regarding the acquisition of property Mn the northeast corer of the site and their memo in response is attached, MDT has also met with project representatives In the field to discuss the intersection of Hathaway Lane and Highway .2. It has been agreed that a right- tum.lane will be added to the we stbound highway and that Hathaway Lane will be widened at the intersection. We have met with you and Charlie Johnson, Flathead County Road Department, to discuss the inrovements to Hathaway Large. It was determined in that meeting that - widening Hathaway Lane at the intersection with Highway 2 and shoulder work in front of the project property was appropriate. We have also attached a letter from the City of Kalispell Fire Chief regarding the availability of the Department to provide emergency service to the subdivision. Finally, FEMA is nearing'completion of their review and approval of the proposed food lai . The existing and proposed floodplain areas are shown on the preliminary plat map. Per your request, we are also ecosg 10 full-sized copies and I half seed copy of the preliminary plat drawing with the modifications indicated above. Your assistance in this project is greatly appreciated. Please contact us if you have any questions. 31 Three Mile Drive, Suite.101 Kai , , MT5990 R FAX(40) 52- 0 Narda Wilson Page 2 of 2 3/2-31/05 Sincerely, ` HOMAS, DEAN & HOSES, INC. Z-1? 'Oti William D. Boger, P.E. WII):b K05-016-003 : Above Referenced c: Lee & Linda. Hershberger 0.\ r eti gTropos ' 0 5 Prop osals\H ers chb erger Autumn Creek,\O _2.05_ it on.su mi .1tr.do KAILISPELL FIR-E DEPARTMENT 3 12 First A -venue East ip, won 1 Raudy rode. - Fire Chief 6) 75-77 60 Dann Diehl - Assistant Chief/Operations - Brent L Christopherson — Assistant Chief/Pr ntio , " 4 June 23, 2005 New West Properties, LLC TTN: Michael Javorka, President 35 4 Ave Kalispell, MT 59901 : Autumn Creek Subdivision — Hathaway Lane Dear Mr. J rk : This letter is in response to your request for addftional input from the Kalispell Fire Department regarding the above -referenced project. Provided you meet the requifements of the Autumn Creek Subdivision preliminary plat review memo frorrtthis-office-to NardaWilsori dated June 2, 2� -Kalispell- Fire. Department - will be capable of providing adequate fire suppression and emergency medical response to the residents of the Autumn Creek Subdivision, regardless of the current dead-end status of Hathaway Lane. Please contact me ifyou have any questions or if I may be of further assistance. Sincerely, Randy Brodehl Fire Chief Kalispell Fire Department ca Narda Wilson, ri -City Planning "Assisting our communfty fn reducing, preventing, and mitigating emergencies_ �� s Montana Department of Transportation Jim Lynch, Director -Warvyw go U *vfrh pri'fe 8dan Schweftzer, Govemor Missoula District Office 100 W Broadway PO Box 7039 Missoula, MT,59807-7039 June 27, 2005 NEchael SavoTka Fourth Ave. East K�Ji, MT 59901 S et. �.�� Dear Mr. Ja orrka: This letter is to follow up with you regarding the on -site meeting I had with you o Friday, June 24TH. This meeting was to look at the intersection of US 2 and Hathaway Laos on the west side of Kalispell and discussyour proposals to upgade the approach o Hathaway Lane. You were e =g about safety upgrades for ingress and egress movements at the approach of Hathaway Lane to US 2 so as to facilitate access to your proposed subdivision located on Hathaway- IVie, Since safety is , 'ority for the Montana t I? epartm&nt of Transportation' QvIDT),, we are -always willing''to review proposals . that may increase to safety of traffic on the bg w .y . The discussion included the possibility o slope flatten and add a right-tum-lane. Please subrm't a plan to the MDR' detailing your proposed imp ro emen and MDT will revIw the submittal to e ermmc i they are acceptable. Should you have any Sher questions, please give me a call o523-5900. S-ncey, l 2 IL �q fames A Freyholtz, P.E. (Acting) Mis o. i tric Traffic Engineer copies: File.,} _ -Stepheii Herzog, P.E. KalieU AxMa to .�rce, h.e f - . Phone: (off S -580 3 n Equol Opportunity Employer 7Y: � 00) '13S-7592 ON -free; () 23 T-S7 9 Web Page-* www.mdt.mt.gov right of way iiir: Kalispell Bypass; 238-6- Parcel N rk Mike I have discussed the Bypass location with the department contract designer, Jason Gerard of S ellings Engineers. Jason said he -would be sending me the co - ordinance for the points where the bypass enters and leaves your property. He will also send me the cross -sections for the area where you propose to Gross under the road surface with your sewer line. Jason also said he would have the Right of Way corners staked for your tract sometime in the future. I hope this will confirm that our intentions are to work with you as closely as possible for this project. If you have any more questions or concerns, feel free to contact us. Dan Walls MDOT Field Right of Way Rep -5-23 ► UTUMN CREEK SUBDIVISION EN"RONMEN TAL ASSESSMENT T NRCoN The proposed Autumn Creek Subdivision is located west of Kalispell on Hathaway Lane i 1500 feet north of Highway 2. The subdivision will include 21 lots, approximately 0.2 acres each. The legal description of the subdivision is Tracts 6 I, 6AAK are A , Section 12, T28N, R22W. I -GEOLOGY The subject property is primarily level farmland. Due to the flat nature of the site, hazards that may cause property damage or personal injury are not present. 11. SURFACE WATER tributary to Ashley Creek is located on the, west and southwest portion of the property. The tributary enters the propel tough a culvert under Hathaway Lwie and exits south of the property via two culverts. The tributary widens as it flows two gh the subject property, where an island is fonned. The tributary tar then continues es south to Ashley Creek. At ultimate flow, the tributary is expected to flow at 24-039 e 's, based on analysis using HEC-HMS modeling software developed by the Anny Corp of Eng*meers. The EC - HMS model is enclosed n appendix 1, An open/conservation area will be created to ensure preservation of the tributary and surrounding area. The s j ect propel is currently delineated as zone 'A" f.00 p ain with an undetermined base flood elevation. Currently, a floodplain study is being perfonned and it is anticipated that subdivision lots will not be located within the I oo-gear floo pain.. 111, VEGETATION The subject property, previously `arrr lan , is not currently being used for agricultural pmToses. Trees and reeds exist on the property in the open/conservation area and will be protected during construction activities. 'n e proper, excluding the open/conservation area, is pr'marily composed of native grasses. It will be necessary to remove vegetation for co .sttuet on of road and home sites. Disturbance to areas other than road are.d home sites will be kept to a minimum. Areas that are disturbed will be seeded to native grasses r based on an approved plan from the Weed and Parks Department. The layout for proposed roads and lot configuration has been included in Appendix A. V, WT-LLIE The subject property may e associated with, or include the following species; ground squirrel, whitetm'l deer, red squirrel, snowshoe hare, porcupine, fox, coyote, hummingbird, raven, crow, finch, chickadee robin, bluebird, pheasant and grosbeak.. 4. r _O.ENvoNMENTA sss SMEN7 -1� The open/conservation is being l eft natural and disturbance to wildlife should e .mai. Tie Montana Department a.rtment of Fish, Wildlife and larks were not able to respond with a letter regarding this subdivision prior to submittal. V. AGRICTJLTURE AND TIMBER PRODUCTION The property is 8.694 acres in size and was previously used as grazing and farmland. The soil on site can be classified, according to The Soil Survey: Upper Flathead valley Area Montana, .a, n'mari y as Kalispell silt loam (Ku). The open/conservation area is classified as alluvial land .a , which is typical of creek beds. Laformation from the Upper Flathead Valley Area Soil Surrey has also been included in Appendix E. The property is not currently being used for fanning or gra mg purposes. Histor'cal records show that 7.58 acres of the property is classified as tillable non -irrigated land/continuously cropped. Crop production was approximately 28-29 bushels or wheat per year per acre. The rer aimng property is classified as grazing land. General property i . onnation is enclosed in Appendix C. activities immediately surrounding the property include i or agricultural producer, horse owners and residences. ces. Several home structures are located to the south of the property and Greenbrier Subdivision is located to the northeast. The proposed subdivision is expected to be compatible with the surrounding area. VL HISTORICAL, ARCHAEOLOGICAL OR CULTURAL FEATURES There are no known historical, archaeological or cultural features onsite. The landowner ner is unaware of any past histon*eal importance of the site. A letter from the Montana Historical Society has been attached in Appendix F. )/1. SEWAGE TREATMENT A t nm Creek Subdivision will be connecting to municipal sewer. Given wastewater flow of 87 gallons per day per capita and 2.5 residents per household when fly developed (Kalispell Standards for Design and Construction), an estimated 5,,,873 gallons per day of wastewater will be generated. Wastewater vx11 be conveyed to a pump station y moray o -inch gravity mains. Wastewater will correct to, and become part of, mumcipal sewer in the Gree . riar Subdivision. various wells in the area indicate groundwater approximately 42 feet deep with no indication of bedrock. above 130 feet. Well logs are enclosed in Appendix D. The developer will bear the costs for placement of the sewer system.. The City of Kalispell will be responsible for operation and maintenance of the sewer system upon completion and acceptance. Connection to municipal sewer is expected, approximately, in August of 2005. verbal permission to connect with municipal sewers has been granted by the City of Kalispell. The sewer system layout has been enclosed on a site map located in Appendix A. VIH. IVATER SUPPLY Water supply will be provided to A t = Creek Subdivision, through mumcl al water mains. .An -in water main will extend from Gree riar Subdivision to A. tum Creek 4.12.05.EN-VIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Subdivision. The developer will bear the costs of extending and connecting to municipal water. When connected, the water main will become part of the Municipal water supply. The City of Kalispell will be responsible for operation and maintenance upon completion and acceptance. verbal permission to extend municipal water mains has been granted by the City of Kalispell. Water mains have been located on a site map enclosed in Appendix A. xw SOLID WASTE The collection of solid wastes will fail under ffie City of Ka is e l's Jurisdiction. Jhdividual garbage units are proposed for each lot in the subdivision. X. DRAINAGE Drainage Patterns associated with the subdivision are not expected to impact adjoining properties, A store drainage plan will 'be developed for the property, and post Construction water will be retained o .s te. Internal road surfaces and driveways will be paved. Garb, gutter and grass ,wales are proposed to direct and accommodate increased storm water runoff. Each lot will retain its own runoff through use or individual swales. X1. ROARS The transportation network servicing Autumn Creek Subdivision is sown on the r hnu*nary plat. -Access to the property will come from Hathaway Lane 1, 5 00 feet north of Highway 2. All lots will have driveway access from the internal subdivision roads. Road right of way will be 60 feet and minimum pavement widths of 28 feet will be maintained throughout the subdivision. The roads, within the subdivision, will he desiped to Kalispell City Standards. All intemal subdivision roads will be paved and constructed cted y the subdivider. Mzdntenance of the rows will he in the Jun*sdiction of the City of Kalispell. i The northwest corner of the property is anticipated to be dedicated to The Montana Department ent of Transportation as highway right of way. This right of way is In anticipation of a future truck bypass route. There will he no access, to or from the property, through this highway right of way. At fall build -out, the subdivision may generate a maximum of 20 vehicle trips per day. Trip direction from the subdivision will most likely be a left turn, from the subdivision, onto Hathaway Lane towards Highway 2. Traffic is then expected to tum left on Highway 2 and head east, into Kalispell. The County, State, and City transportation networks in the region can adequately accommodate the anticipated vehicle trips from this subdivision. Letters from The Montana Department of Transportation and The Flathead County Road Department, regarding the subdivision, have been enclosed in Appendix F. 4.1 . .ENIv ONME TAL ASSESSMENT X11. EMERGENCY SERVICES The subdivision is petitioning for a ..exatio . into the Kalispell Fire Dist ct. Four fire hydrants are proposed for the subdivision. The road network has been designed to provide oneingress/ `egress � s with a gentle grade and cul de sacs at the end of each. goad. Police protection will be provided by the Kalispell Police Department. A tunm Creek Subdivision is not expected ected to dera d many police related services. Kalispell has a higbly trained ambulance and Quick Response Unit that can respond to medical emergencies in the area. Personnel include various grades of EMT-"s, including a paramedic EN4`, The ALERT helicopter of Kalispell Regional Hospital is also available for air tray -is o t of medical emergencies. This subdivision is .not expected to over burden these emergency services. The subdivision is not expected to generate an undue demand for emergency services. Design features of the s bdivisio -, such as fire hydrant locations, have been discussed with the Kalispell Fire Department and are Intended to minimize threats to public safety. A letter from the Kalispell Fire Department has been enclosed . Appendix F. X111. SCHOOLS The proposed subdivision is located in Kalispell School District 5 of the Flathead County School District. An estimated 1.5 students per house are expected to attend Peterson Elementary School K- . Flathead Junior High School and Flathead Him, School. A letter from Flathead County Schools, regarding the subdivision, has been included in Appendix D. Kalispell School District 5 was not able to respond with a letter regarding fis subdivision oar to submittal. YJV. ECONOMIC BENEFITS The propel is currently being assessed a "farmstead r a ". Total taxable market value was $5,026 in 200, and taxable value was $165.85. Taxes from the tract are divided between general county fictions, whicb include the sheriff s office, schools., and other de w eats. The following is a breakdown of the amounts received by each presently: County/General $11.40 Sheriff $4.84 Kalispell Elemental 5 $24.43 Flathead High. School $1. 2. I General S drools $ 1 . I State- School Aid $6.63 Smith Valley Fiore $ .2 4.1 .0 .ENIv o IMEN°AL Ass ESs " 4 m �e single-family lots are comparable to lots in tree b ar Sib -vision. Houses constructed on the lots will also be approximately the same in value. The project is planned as one phase. The following M onnafio . was based on tag. records M Greenbr'ar Subdivision. Estimated Values # Lots Market Taxable Phase 1 21 $1fi23fi57 $537580.45 Below are the taxed amounts projected at fall build out to the specific departments4 Count General 3,686.90 Sheriff $,52.9 Kalispell Elementary entary $75 92.85 Flathead High S&ool $ ,1 9. l General Schools $5,398.82 State — School Aid $27143.19 Kalispell City Functions $1401.97 The subject property tax notice has been enclosed in Appendix C. XV. LAND USE The property was previously used for grazing and farmland, but is currently inactive at ffis time. .A pole barn is located on the so them portion of the propel and will be removed before construction. The proposed subdivision, Kalispell zone R- , is similar and compatible to surrounding land uses. Residential subdivisions in the area it elude Greenbrlar Subdivision and several housing units surrounding the property. The subdivision will provide safe and eon ement access to the individual lots without adversely affecting the access to any ad offing properties. There are no perceived risks to the subdivision originating from ad offing land uses. The subdivision will not create any on --site nuisances. All access roads will be paved t eliminate dust hazards. Landscaping and the retention of substantial naturaJ areas should 4 mminu, e any land use transltlo . difficulties. XVI. PAJWS AND RECREATION FACILITIES The subdivision proposes approximately 2 acres of open/conservation area. This area will allow for wildlife and see k Viewing. This subdivision's close proximity to Kalispell gives it access to all of Kalls ell's recreational and park facilities. Lone Pine State Park, Ashley Creek and o 's Lake are all located within a five to ten minute drive. 4.1 .05.ENVIRENTA ASSESSMENT -5- �e ParUand requirement is .956 acres based on I I% dedication. Based on a per acre value of S '8. 10, the resulting fee in lieu of parklanddedication would e 2.8 . It i proposed that, per City of Kalispell Subdivision Regulations .1 . .1.., are area be set aside to protect the natal habitat existing in the r anan environment in the southwest comer of the property. XV1. UTILITIES The subdivision will be serviced by a fall range of public utilities. Flathead Electric Co- op will provide electricity, CenturyTel will provide telephone service and Northwe tem energy will provide gas. Gas and electric lines currently exist along Hathaway Lane, fronting the property. Cable television is also available in the area and mould be provided to the subdivision by Bresnan Communications. All utility services will be extended ed following approval of the preliminary plat. -- Prepared y: William D. Boger, 1�ylc L. Scarr, E.I. Owner: 1 '. or New Wes ' rorts, L.L.C. 4.12.05.ENNMONMENTAL ASSESSMENT -7- USGS TopograpMc Map TR 6AAK, 6D1,, 6A13 Section 1Z Township 28N, Range 22W ter � ir'• - P C�q 4 41 "J V Subject property is located on Hathaway Lane 1 500 feet north of Highway 2. 11 GAT wl ADD -k4� ': SPOKANE WANtiNU I UN . . ... . ......... ......................... 1. - - -- :LEWISTON IDAHO DRAWN BYr 0JK DATE, 5,2-05 ZONING & VICINITY MAP DESIGNED BY, JOB NO- K05-CIO SHEET QUAUTY CHECK: CAD NOMCINITY-ZON XWG FL ATH EAD COUNTY G S Montana CAMA Information (CompAiler Assisted Mass AppraisalSystem) General Information Definitions Geocode 07396 12305110000 Ownende I lnknntvn County Assessor Code 0000174851 Section Number 12 Township & Range T28NR22W Legal Description TR 6AAK IN S l4, TR CDI & 6AB IN SW4 Property Address TWO MILE DR 59901 Addition Subdivision n/a Levy District 071310 County Levy District 05 Levy district Name KALISPELL RURAL.. Total Final Land Value $4,173,00 Total Final Building Value $1,780.00 2003 Full Reappraisal 5,953.00 Value 2€ 03 Taxable Market $5,06,4€ Value Deed; Book, Page, Date n/a, n/a, n/a Owner Name 1 CROWE DONA .D A Owner Name 2 N/A Taxpayer Mailing Address ACC% JERRI AND RSON STILi.WATER, NON 55082-1074 Site Information Definitions Oeocode 07396512305110000 Neighborhood 1500 Neighborhood Trend 2, (stable) Residential Indicator other Access I" (paved road) 0, (landlocked/none) Fronting 0, (none) Location 0, (rural lard) Topography 8, (agltimber land) Utilities 0, (none) 0, (none) U, i«cil-i Acreage Type Classification Valuation Definitions Grade Irrigation information Property Agricultural Land Classification Acres Description Water Class potation Type Assessed Type Type (Cost/Acre) Value farmstead continuously tillable non -irrigated land - continuously 7.580 28_ 9 bushels wheat per - w other $3f 797.00 rural cropped cropped acre each year farmstead 3-5 acres for 10 month rural grazing grazing land 1,000 grazing season per 1000 _ - ether $376.00 1b steer or equiv TOTAL: 8.58 TOTAL. $4, .73,00 Improvements Definitions Dwelling Type N/A Style of Dwelling NIA Year Built N/A Physical Condition NIA Grade (Workmanship & NIA Material Condition, Desirability, N/A Usefulness Story Height N/A Exterior Wall Construction NIA Exterior Wall Finish N/A Roof Type N/A Roof Material NIA Heating System N/A Heating System Type NIA Heating Fuel Type N/A Prefab Fireplaces/Stores N/A Foundation N/A Basement N/A Finished Basement (sq ft) NIA Basement Quality N/A Total Rooms (EXC malls N/A and Baths) Bedrooms N/A Family Rooms N/A Full Bathrooms iij', Half Bathrooms N/A Additional Plumbing N/A Fixtures Attic N/A Other B111ldln Yard hmprow meats Type Quantity Year of Measurement Grade Condition Modifications Construction pole frame Unknown at this Bldg, 4 sides 1 1980 24X60 low cost average Time Time T open, rnetal pole frame hldg, 4 sides 1 1965 00996 average poor Unknown at this dosed, Time wood I -story learn -to, pole 1 1980 8 X 4 low cost average Unknown at this frame Time s 1 '^3 �j`�``3 *"�` f. ETM i �7I ^ � •-..L �-+` ]"" k a # .. -, D- Al.! :+. l 1" \....fFF J 5 -} J J .,et'ar this portion 1i th FIRS �? ..LLMZ_%CT payment y i � T45 N o 0 3. 7483I S r, h. D 19t i 05 Tax Bill No. 004 0426: 004 Mailing address as of 0 9 0 04 ax 43.74 t�e�.t, SAL+it NALCER-10WE ADS JRI PERSON Total..._ .. . . 6,921 NVAL XVS STILLWATER M7 508 Return this portion �-dt SECOND INISTALLIMENT pay -went by 05 31/05. 87 5 Assessor- T R 0174851 Schx Dist- 05 Tax Bill No. 200404266 2004- Prop=_rty Description nelow Real a-t-ate Mailing a-rof 09 0 € 4 'fax .71 - i. ,. . . . . . . . R CROWS 4921 A .= R T V T A X E 9 D U E 46 04 R:1-1AL 9STATE TS Adele Krantz, Flathead County Treasurer pax Bill 200404266 �4jai1 . gr 1300 S Main St, Kalispell 1147 3 901 School District 05 Location: 935 Int Aire W, Kalispell MT Aosasaor Number 0174851 Parties ith Ownership r_i�_,a - AS OF 1 1/ 4- -- SEE R1,!VZRSZ FOIR, ADDILNPMIAIO a wrer o F Recard CROWS, ]DONAL Addre s s ,. .,.. .__.. .AD- L RP - PERSON 1 MEAL STILLWATER MN 5508 Sn T P ert r De a 'i. �i Lot ,dock 1 8 CAA IN SW4 6DI& 6AB IN SWA Pe of oer- .art Value Taxable Value eal torte 3,805 1251.56 Totals S1026 ,SUMMARY OF FAXES, LEVIES � FEES Items marked with * are paid in the First Installment cal ) COUNTY _0 880 2-1.40 EMDI M .001425 . 4 SHERIFF .029170 4.84 TY ,� " INS .002711 i4 {�� WEEDS NOXIOUS Y iF. EIFS �+y� J.y[ a O a iA 3 3 � �J ROAD .30 i��y}YO iiM �{yj J�'{R �yl�{�} _ 4+ 8.4 V 3,01 CO .�� G Q 01 .22 BOARD OF 14E .005000 '83 , VB^ TOTAL - Takes For County Functi nor . . i .128380 21,29 TAT - UNIVERSITY .006000 1.00 0 .100760 26.71 STFILWATE i� - SCHOOLAID ;�y] ey�� jj�y�j r 0 4 V 0 y}��yj� �{�� jj �+ }�+��+�}�OOLS fyj COLLEGE .6{f 3}{ ,lL �f'J..[.7E# A i.. Y /�L C 4 i��F'Y��%y1�t�jrO +j�R.Rj� ii r3 +� E FLAT +7 kyC'y1i `�1R! . 0 1 q M y�yj [^�� w +1.�{F �/0 {/�' �}] j�'y[� r IT HEAD HIGH H H 4- h... �..f . V 7 8 Y A RURAL E LE JL RJ 5 R 147310 /� [♦L} +wy{.. 4 . 2 24.42 '�y1 ��`V'�}#�'Tj�' - W. AL �1 �- yti}`Mi�. '}.+�`.�.., � y /W - Taxes For � �.i �rt� � 1� l� w f • r * R r a s 3 8 3 0 0 }2 �''iy V 3 i :5 MOSQUITO KSMITH .000520 .09 SOIL& WATER.00273D .29 y�].�,'�IySPEL�`�+ i ' A I A. �. +-wJiiE J. RE � - 1 3 5 9 �} f/��+� 2 a iM�5 2.25 {0 iV� S M - �+ L.7 TAL ( ¢� a� �y�- �y And - V G. fore at aXe .�'` d L" e a s . .. . . . + _ .. . "� �] {� r 1 8 4 0 �'} �.R� 2 . 'w' 3 Total Mills Levied ie .527240 To t .-LI Taxes andf e lr f { ♦ i t � / a a 87,45 First installment due 11 30 04. a t ze43 ��'jy' �} 4 Second 3 zi tali. .� �due . 5 31/0 . . . . . . r . w t ti i y 3 , t i r ,.F„ one nuill in Flathead County equals �5 �� . Raceivt returnedonly ubon request. +�T'��x�! yy�� }}`' {o�7t{{��++yy aid DK due datIm 0czua {interest t 5+0� ;y of 1 o' per k , . + , penalty, Tl,,, C�4tiio 4 n t 4+ue must e V ri f ed b o L aQt the Zeasii . v t office P 10 t aymeli 4- r Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Ground -Water Information Center Site Deport DP,EW MAXINE Location Information WI Id: 82871 Location RS): 28N 22W 12 CD County (MT); FLATHEAD DNRC Water Right: PW d: Block: Lot: Addition: Well Construction and Performance Data Total Depth (ft): 165.00 Static Water Level ft: 42.00 PUMDing Water Level (ft): �0 Yield gp: 15.00 Test Type: BAILER Test Duration., 4.00 Drill Stem Setting ft: Recovery overy Water Level f : Recover Time (firs): Well Notes: Hole Diameter Information o Hole Diameter Records currently in GENIC. Annular Seal Information No Seal Records rd currently in GWIC. Lit olo y Information From To Description 0.01 .o SAND .o 64.0 GLACIAL MUD . ro YELLOW CLAY N N 92.01159.0 D CLAY ANDSTONE 1.0 1.0 WATER SAND All diameters reported are Onside diameter of the casing, Plot this site i€a Source of Data Latitude dd r 48.1984 Longitude dd . -114-3435 orethod: 1-SEC Datum: NAD27 Altitude (feet): 2934.00 Certificate of Survey* Type of Site: WELL How Drilled: DrIL,L. Driller' Name: HENDRICKSON Driller License:. WWC153 Completion Date 5/24/1972 1 Special Conditions; Is Well Flowing: Shut -In Pressure: olo y A uifer, 112ALVM Well/Water Use: DOMESTIC r rn To Dia Wald Thickness Pressure Rating faint Type 0.0 165,0! t STEEL Completion Information' - fro Completion Records currently in GWIC. These data represent the contents of the GWIC databases at the Montana Sureau of Mires and Geology at the time and date of the retrieval. The information is considered unpublished and is subject to correction and review on a daily basis. The Bureau warrants the accurate transmission of the data to the original end user. Retransmission of the data to other users is discouraged and the Bureau claims no responsibility if the material is retransmitted. Note: non -reported casing, completion,, and lithologic records may exist in paper files at GWIC. Montana Bureau of Mires and Geology Ground -Water Information Center Site Report CLOSE CECIL Location Information GWI Id: 82873 Location TRS): 28N 22W 12 CD County MT: FLATHEAD DNRC Water Right: PWS Id: Block: Lot: Addition: Well Construction and Performance Data Total Depth - 1.00 Static Water Level t: 42-00 Pumping pin Water Level l"t : ° ,00 Test Type. BAILER Test Duration: 4.00 Drill Stem Setting ft4 Recovery Water Level t : Recovery Time hrs: Well Notes'. Hole Diameter Information No Hole Diameter Records currently in GWIC. Annular Sea] Information No Seal Records currently in GWIC. Lithology Information To Description . SAID '. GLI AL MUD R 84R YELLOW CLAY AND STOICE 21. RED CLAY AND STONE w WATER SAND I - All diameters reported are inside diameter of the casing, _graphic. Source of Data: LOG Latitude dd : 48.1984 Longitude dd : -114-3435 Georn th d: TRS-SEC Datum: MAD' Altitude (feet: 2934.00 Certificate of Surrey: Type of Site: WELL. How Drilled: DRILL Driller's Name: HENDRICKSON Driller License: WW Completion Dater d y : 5/5/1972 SpecialConditions: s Well Flowing? - Shut -In Pressure: Geology/Aquifer: 11 ALV Well/Water Use: DOMESTIC r ncinn T fnr =t'11 From To H Wald Thickness: Pressure Ratin Joint Type 0.0 130.0 7.0 7 -------------------- ......................... From To Dia f Openings Size of Openings ]OPEN Description 30. k w BOTTOM. These data represent the contents of the GWIC databases at the Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology at the time and date of the retrieval. The information is considered unpublished and is subject to correction and review on a daily basis. The Bureau warrants the accurate transmission of the data to the original end user, Retransmission of the data to other users is discouraged and the Bureau claims no responsibility if the material is retransmitted. * Dote: non -reputed casing.. completion, and lithologic records may exist in paper files at GWIC. Montana Bureau Mines and Geology Ground -Water n r ion Center Site Report L Location Information GWI Id: 82872 Location TS: 28N 22W 12 CD County T: FLATHEAD DNRC Water Right: PWS Id Block: Let: Addition: Well Construction and Performance data Total Depth : 143.00 Static Water Level : 42.00 Purnping Water Level t: 70.00 `field g: 15.00 Test Type: BAILER Test Duration: 4.00 Drill Stern Setting ft= Recovery Water Level Recovery ry Time hr Well Notes: Hole Diameter Information No Hole Diameter Records urren ly in GWI . Annular Seal Information o Seal Records currently in GWIC. Litholo y Information From To Description 0 n n 19.0 SAID VEMM 19.0 0.0 GLACIAL MUD 0.0 83. 0 YELLOW CLAD AND STONE F 1.0 RED CLAY AND STONE 125.0 143.0.IWATER SAND I W All diameters reported are inside diameter of the casing. Plot _._this site on a topocai map Source of Data: LOG Latitude 48-1984 .1 Longitude d : -114.3435 e,ethod : TS-SEC Datum: N Altitude (feet):2934-00 Certificate of Survey: Type of Site: WELL How Drilled: DRILL Drill is Name: HENDRICKSON Driller License: WWC153 Completion Date d y : 5/13/1972 SpecialConditions: Is Well Flowing? - Shut -In Pressure.- Geology/Aquifer: 11 ALV Well/Water Use: DOMES -EC rncinn Tn r ti n1 From: To D a Wall Thickness Pressure: Rating Joint Type . . € STEEL From To Dia #of openings Size o Openings Description 10PEN �J 1r d r4J 1 . BOTTOM These data represent the contents of the GWIC databases at the Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology at the time and date; of the retrieval. The information is considered unpublished and is subject to correction and review on a dairy basis. The Bureau warrants the accurate- transmission of the data to the original end user. Retransmission of the data to other users is discouraged and the Bureau claims no responsibility if the material is retransmitted. Note: non -reported casing, completion,. and iithologic records may exist in paper flies at GWI. fib SOIL SURVEY SERIES 1 ) GUIDE TO MAPPING NI AND CAPABILITY U1 o flnued Map symbol Soil rums b Habspell graveRy, loam., moder- ately deep over gravel, 3 to 7 perce ,t slopes --------------- Kc Kalispell gravelly loam, moder- ately sleep over gravel, 7 to 1 percea; slope --------------- Kd Kalispell gravelly loam,, moder- ately deep over gravel, 12 to 40 pexcent slopes - -- - -y - - - - -- - - Ke Kalispell loam, 0 to3percent slopesY� --- ------------- Kf I llspell loam, to 3 percent slopes, wind eroded- - - - _ _ - - - - Kg aspell loan, 3 to 7 percent Slop es --- Kh Kalispell loam, 3 to 7 percent slopes f wind, ezoded- - - - - - - k Kalispell loam-,'7 to 12 percent slopes ---------------------- Km Kalill loam, 12 to p er cen t slopes-- ----------------- -- Kn Kalispell loam, moderately deep over gravel, 0 to 7 percent slopes, ------------------- o Kalispell loam, moderately deep over gravel, 7 to 12 percent slopes ----;------------.- p Kali -spell loam, moderately deep over sand, 0 to 3 percent lope---------------------- Kr Ralispeh loam,, moderately deep over sarLd, 3 to 7 percent slopes ---------------------- Ks Kalispell loam, moderately deep over sand, 7 to 12 percent slopes ---------------------- Kt Kalispell loam, moderately deep over sand, 12 to 40 percent lope---------- -_---------- Ku KafispeH silt loam, heavy sub- soil, 0 to 3 Percent slopes- .- - - - v Kalispell silt loam, moderately deep over sand, 9 to 7 percent slopes ----m------__---_------ w Kalispell -Demers. silt loaras, 0 to 3 percent slopes--- -------- x Kalispell-Iners silt loa.s, 3 to 12 percent slopes---.�.�--� z Kalispell-. &Ut l.oaxn, to 3 percent slopes --------------- Kzb Kalispell-Tuffit ailt loa # 3 to 7 percent slopes------------_-- Kalispell-Tuffitsilt loans, 7 to 20 percent slopes --------------- Klals fine saidswidy loam, 0 to -Kzd percent- Kze Ki anIs barn, 0 to 3 percent lope- -- -- ---.----------.- f alai loam,3 to 9 percent slopes. --------------- _- = Kzg i anis-lr ch one sandy l oa a.s, to 5 ereent slope - - - - - - - - - Kzh 'a l -� h 1. a:r . , 0 to I per- cen lopes ------------------ Kzk Xra.se gravelly loam, 0 to 3 per- cent ------------------ ------ Kzm Krause gra-velly l.oar a, 3 to 7 per -- cent slopes----------------- zn Krause gravelly loam, 7 to 1 percent slopes-----__---_,---- zo Krause gravelly loam, 12 to 35 percent slopes --------------- Ma lade land-------- ---------- M b AfcCajffary coarse sand, 0 to percent slopes --------------- De- sbed De- an Capability scribed page unit on page 40 -;TVs-1. 1 10 1 VS-1 1 10 12 1 12 1 13 15 1 IIIs-1 l 1 VIe-1 115 1 He-2 1 1 He-2 1 41 Jjje 13 42 Ie-1 1 42 IIe-2 1 42 JIG-2 42 IIIs-4 42 Ms- 2 ls- 3 Ms- 3 Ie-1 3 II-1 3 I-1 3 IIle-1 3 I s-1 3 I-1 44 Is-4 41 s-4 44 le-1 44 lc-1 44 -------- 44 12 1 1 1 1 1 13 13 13 1 5 1 1 1 10 1 l Map symbol 'MC Md e Mf Mg Mh Mk MM M it M p Mr M P Pb PC Pa Pe P� 5 P P P P Pn Ra Rc a Sb Sc Sd Se Sf S S S S S S Sp Soil xiam MeCaffery loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes ------------- McCaffery loamy fine sand, 3 to percent slopes------------ TkIeC�. al ery loamy -fine sand, to 12 percent slopes ------------ Mc a er y loamy one sand, 12 to 30 percent slopes _ - _ _ -. ------- Mires gravelly loam, 0 to 3 per- cezrt slopes ------------------ Mires gravelly loam, 3 to 7 per- cent slopes ------------------ Mires gravelly loarn, 7 to 12 per- cent ,dopes__��._ Mires gravelly loan., 12 to 30 per- cent slopes .---- ------------ Mires loam? 0 to 3 percent slopes - Mires loam, 3 to 7 percent slopes - Mires leaM, 7 ito 12 er ent slopc-s_ ` 1,o untainous land- Muck and Peat- - Prospect loan , 0 to 3 percent slopes ---------------------- Prospect loam, 3 to 7 percent slopes- ---- ..�.. � . ------- ---- -prospectlaa , to 12 percent slopes--------------------- Prospe t loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes ----------------------- Prospect stony loam, 3 to 7 per- cent slo es-_- Prospect stony ,loam., 7 to 12 per- cent slopes, W �. - - Prospect stony loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes ---------------- Prospect stormy hoar, 20 to 45 percent slope--------------- rospec -Tuft silt hams, 0 to percent Slope's --------------- Prospect-Tuffit silt loarns, 3 to 7 pert nt slopes-- - - - - - W Prospect-Tuffit sit loaxns, 7 to 20 Percent Sjopes --------------- Radnor silt loam, 0 - o 3 pereaut slopes ---------------------- Radnor silty clay loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, - - - - - - - - -- - - Riverwas - w - - - - -- - - - - - -- aline-aali land. elle fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 per- cent elle one sarrdy loam, 3 to 8 per- cent Some", silt loan., 0 to~3 percent slopes -m---------- .-------- rn r8 silt loamy 3 to 7 percent slopes---------------------- Somer silty clay, 0 to 4 percent slopes----- ---------------- orner sty clay loam., 0 to 3 per- cent o iners silty clay .l.o am, 3 t o - per- cent slopes -- -------------- try eT silt hoar,, 0 to 3 percent slopes ---------------------- Stryker silt loam, sandy subsoil, 9 to 3 Pei -cent slopes --------- Stryker silty clay loan, 0 to 3 percent slopes --------------- Swims silt loa in, 0 t percent .slopes- ---- --------------� Swims silt l.oarrn, 3 to 7 perceat slopes---------------------- De- scribed - OIL apbit'k Sibiad page unit on page 5 IVS-3 1. 5 Is-3 10 5 I Sys-3 16. 5 les-1 17 45 l r -1 1 5 Is-1 1 5 le-1 10 40 le-1 115 46 IIIs-1 13 0 IV-1 15 46 M—i � 40 Its-1 17 0 ' r-1 1 7 Ile-2 1. 7 Ile-2 1 7 Ille-1 13 7 I e-1 1 47 s-1 1 7 le-1 1 7 VIe-1 i C) 7 Ie-1 1 48 Ills-4- 14 48 IlIs-1 1 49 Vls-2 1 48 --1 1 8 --1 1 9 ' IIIsT-I 17 49 VIs-2 1 9 HIs-2 Ill. 49 II - 1 '1 ll Ike-1 11 5 -1 1 50 w -1 13 50 W -1 l3 1 III--1. l 5 III-1 1 52 IIw-1 1 2 II-1 13 UPPER T '` D VALLEY AREA, M .ki cent of the farms are classified as commercial in the 1951 census. The rem are classed as residential or pa - time farms. In 1964the use of farm power was reported a's follows: "'Jumbel- of .; tar-m8 No tractor, horses, or inules --.--------.-------------- 231 No tractor and only I horse or mule --------------- 3 No tractor and 2 or more horses or mules � �� .94 'tractor and horses €�r mules -.�.��.-r...�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.��.,�.�.--- 399 Tractor and no horses or mule-------------------- 661 Most farms ha-ve electricity, elepho .es, piped running water, and automobiles and trucks. 65 Irrigation According o the census, farms ice. Flathead Countyhad irrigation. Most of the water iised is ob- tained from streams, wens, small lakes, or pits that are d deep enough o reach the water table. Only the more nearly level so-Ils that will produce good yields are irrigated. One small, orgamized irrigation enterprise —the Ashl Irrigation Project —is in operation.. It has been operat- ing a per of years is not satisfactory because the source of water, Ashley r Lake, is not reliable. In some years the supply of water is limited and in other years there is no water. GUIDE TO MAPPING UNITS AND CAPABILITY UNITS De- D e- ,.] j zcribed De� ,� on Capability scribedMap an apa ffity scribed symbol I Soil name -page wait on pal-e s mbol Sad name page t it on page Aa __ - Alluvial land, poorlyr drained-_- iv-1 � 1 D h � Demers-D ll�+sil looms# o {'y +{}"�{L *r�y pined V i G: l land , .-. - - - 1�y 11 28 Is- 1 1 ^ p�•s p percent i-J�yS_y�+3�*+l�ent 4�-�k.f�ypy L��.i - ,, - ,..[�.. - - - - - -..,, - {'€� 3 ^gyp^ �� s- 1-7 + 6. a ^'}yr^�{lY�lu 3JCYnlc loamy ne and, 0 to `� per- fine sand, y� DSO �y ��-i e1rJ""Kaff spell silt I4� am , t to '+}} o [� cent}-� Slopes ?9 IS- i 11 }J percent 4 relit slopes - - ,. - ,.,.... - .,... - - - y�y 3 t y ['� ! q- �2 17 Bb Banks ne, loarii, o Dd pew siltylay, D to percent �+very [pan �'} e �J S.n slope3_ �-� � � percent [{}, 29 [� *t Is-4 Yi _/ Li �e s,[7�---ti 4 4�y---..-}��---„p.-.- �{y 36 �{� y3 r� �T -2 15 B Birch fine-` sandy loam, 0 o 5 per-- p :...J e pslo D epem siltyclayl loam, to e r- cent C{} {� nt may[ Bd Birch gravelly loam, 0 tto 3 per- f epe siltyclay loam, to 7 per- cent i-] 4J i.r ... +.....�,ewp... ....-. ,.., ,-. .,. �. .... ,-. ... - �} yy}/y �x-y3 Y I s i y3 _/ 1 F cent slopes - .� ,� �y�.'�- - - .,. ,��'.`.�,'�- - - - - - -- �}{ f 3 1 mm Be l n haFrd .e sand, to f per- F j y- Flathead fang sandy loam, 0 to 3 ;�-.j+en R�.�f�...y,'.-y. �..,..... ,.. ,� � � ,.� �..�yr-,. �7�a 1 I � �-1 1 percent�3,.. ,-..�.�y��.{,}.-.�..�.y.�J......�{}.. Y.. �{� �f 36 Ic y--1 1 }j��^''''y(�y Bf jsy yr.��}�� .}� Blanchard flue sand, 0 to 7 L- Fb {� � �' Flatheadfine TJau loam, fine 3 to L cent slopes, wind. eroded------ 31 l e 1 percent slopes-- - r - - - - - - - - - - - 36 Ides-1 1 Bg Blanchard fine sand, 7 to 12 per- Fc Flathead one sandy loam, 7 to 20 cent 31 e m1 17 percent slope --------------- 36 l 1 Bit Blanchard fine sand, 7 to 12 per- Fd Flathead sandy loam, 0 to 7 per- cent slopes, winderoded-_ 31 Vies-1 17 cent slopes---- ------------- 37 Iles-.1 Bk Bla.nchard fine sand, 12 to 35 per- Fe Flathead very fine sandy loam, 0 cent 31 Vies-1 17 to 3 percent slopes---- --- - - - - 37 1-1 11 Bm Blanchard fine sand, 12 to 3 55 per- f Flathead very fine sandy loam, 3 cent slopes, wind eroded-_ 31 es-1 17 to 7 percent 3 -. 11 B n Blanchard loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 Fg Flathead -Creston loa n# 0 to 3 percent s o es-- - 1 -1 15 percent slopes--------------- 37 Hes-1 1 e Blanchard loamy fine sand, 3 to 7 Fit Flathead -moires o.s, 3 per - percent slopes - - 31 Ives-1 1 � cent � es � w W � � � � � � � �..� �. � � � � Ills-1 13 Bp lan hard loamy ane�sand, 7 to Ha Half Moon silt l amp 0 to 3 er- 0 percent slopes 32 Vies-1 17 cent Hs-1 12 Br Blanchard loamy fane sand, 20 to Hb Half Moog, silt loam., 3 to 8 per- 45 percent slopes -----mm ----- 3 2 VIes-1 17 cent slopes --------------- 38 Me-2 13 B lanchaard very fine sandy barn, He Half Moon very fine sandy loa*rn, o 7 percent slopes------- - 32 H -1 12 0 to 3 percent slopes ------- - 38 Hs -1 1 Bt Blanchara very fine sandy loan, Hd Half Moon very fine sandy loan, 7 to 12 percent slopes- - - - - - - - 32 We- 15 3 to 7 percent slopes -_ - - - - m - - 38 Ille-21 Bu Blanchard very fine sandy loan, He Half Moon very fine sandy,loam, 12 to 20 percent slope - - -- - - - 32 VIe-1 16 7 to 12 percent slopes. - -- - - - - 38 Vle-I1 Bv l nch rd . very fine sandy loam, Hf Half Moon soils, 12 to 405 percent 0 to 45 percent slopes--- --- 32 Vle-116 slopes ----------------------- 38 Vle-I 1 Ca Chamokane soils, 0 to 3 percent Hg Half Moon - bill complex, 0 t slopes---- -------------- 4 - 3 3 He-2 12 3 ere.. s�� s � �� III - 1 b h mo , e soils, o '7 percent h Half Moon -Raskin comple , o slopes---------------------- � 3 e- 12 7 percent slopes------------- 39 Hls�21 Cc Chamokane and Banks soils, 0 to H k Haskillone sand, 0 to 7 percent percent slopes. � ------ 3 s�-1 1 slopes ------�..�------------ 3 Vs- 1 d raalll silty clay € szlo es----- 3 � �-1 1 s fine oared, 7 o 1 percent Ce percent - -- ------ Creston silt loam., o percent -�1 11 � slopes , --------------------- l�l one sated 1 o Pere nt , smm-1 17 f slopes-- - CrestonsiltWlo o�' }percent slopes.-------------------T 39 VIes-1 1 , slopes ------ 34 He- 1 1 o axsk loamy fine sand} to '7 Cg Creston silt loam, 7 o 1 percent percent slopes-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 s�-3 16 per e slopes - - - - - - - - , - 3 II e-�1 13 Hp Hsi loamy .a sand, o 20 Ch Creston silt loam, 12 to 45 per- percent slopes-- - - - - - - - - - - 171 40 Vies-1 1 cent 34 VIe-1 16 Ka Kalispell fine sandy loam, mod -'- . Da erners-Kalispell silt looms, 0 to era ely deep over sand, 0 to percent slopes.-- -------- 35 Vls-2 17 percent slopes------.-.--------- 40 HIs-1 1 UPPER FLATHEAD VALLEY AREA, MONTANA - SHEET NUMBER 21 R_ 22 W. [ P �)1 W Montano Det3artment of Transportation i;orvi gyou with Prix Mr. Kyle L. Scarr 6 9 0 North Meridian, Suite Kalispell, MT 59901 Subject: Autumn Creek Subdivision N/fr. S Carr ti.ea11 Area? O Box 731,18 If'F1f J Jiro Lynch, it L'-- for Brion Schweitzerr, Governor his will not have a i cy1 ant impact theexisting systems.. However � t� increased traffic, will provide inr rnto impa-ets that will reduce the productive service life of US 2west o Kalispell. S liL. Herzog, P.E. Kalispell Area Maintenance Engineer lh: SLH copies: Area File 1 � }}:��. �yy+{� , p� {� An Equal Opportunity Employer 4:ff1. 5 l,{, /l 2-F- 6 �"�Y Gl-.� ,�{,.t�v_ FLATHEAD COUNTY ROAD AND BRIDGE DEPARTMENTS 1 # , J r - 800 SOUTH MAIN KALISPELL, MT 59901 Phone: -o Fax: -5 4k April 26, 2005 ATTN. Kyle Scarr Thomas, Dean & Hoskins 690 N. Meridian, Suite 101 Kalispell, MT 59901 RE: Autumn Creek Subdivision Dear Kyle: The Flathead County Road Dept. would like a traffic study completed at the intersection of Hathaway Lane and Highway 2. The addztzona127Q trips per day are definitely going to have an impact on this intersection. In addition, the condition of Hathaway Lane is also a concern to the Fathead County Road Dept. In order for this road to handle an additional 270 drips per day, the road should be reconstructed to urban standards in order to handle traffic safely. Since.TY., ,a Char . E. Johnson Superintendent CEJ; pdv ML April , Zoo MONTANA HISTORICAL SOCIETY 225 N rrh Roberts 4. P.O. Box 201201 + Helena, MT 59620-1201 6 - 4 � FAX 406 4-- 6 6 w-�vr . o .tams o rica o ci ty * ora o. Kyle L. Scary &H o Norte Meridian, Suite 10 1 Kalispell MT 59901 R: AUTUMN CREEK SUBDIVISION. SHPO Project : oo o42oo .dear Mr. Scarr: have conducted a cultural resource file search for the above -cited project located in Section 12, T28N R22W. According to our records there have been no previously recorded histo c or archaeological sites within the designated search locales. The absence of cultural properties in the area does not .mean that they do not exist but rather may reflect the absence of any previous cultural resource inventory in the area, as our records indicated none. Based on the lack of previous inventory and the ground disturbance required by N undertaking we feel that this' project has the potential to impact cultural properties. We, therefore,, recommend that a cultural resource inventory conducted in order t d terr lne whether or not sites exist and if they will be impacted. Thank you for consulting with us. you have any fUft.er questions or comments you may contact one at ) 444-7767 or y e-mail t dmurd fit. o . Sincerely, Damon Mrdo Cultural Records Manager File; OCAUSUv S oNS 005- 1 Y STATE HisToRic PRESERVATI ON 0FFI CEo.14 10 P Ave � ? 0. Box 201202+ Helena, MT 5 9 6 -1202 —- — - - -- K le Scary - AUtUmn Creek Subdi lslon �...... -... :.......................................... :....-. From: It F. Ray I u at o" frru at o@l alispell.00m kyle. a@ dh kaIispell.com Date* / oo : : o PM Subject: Autumn Creek Subdivision Lyle Thank you for the opportunity to provide input regards the Autumn Creek Subdivision, located on Hath2Way Lane in Kalispell. Fire hydrants shall be located as follows - At the Intersection of Hathaway Lane and the subdivision entrance At the entrance to the south cul-de-sac on the northeast corner o Lot 1 At the entrance of the east cukde-sac on the south side of the street betvven Lot 10 and Lot -11 VVe also approve your requesi to keep the proposed hydrant bmeen Lots 1 and 17 in the south cul-de-sac. If you have questions or need additional information, please contact re. Thank you. Y��k��k��le�k��e-k�F�k�r�'r�r�r�c�c�c�sir9cM�c��c�cxar7r�k F. Ray Rao, Acting Deputy Fire Marshal Prevention Division ision Kalispell Fire Department st Ave Imo Box 1997 Kalispell, MT 59901 o-5-3 F --2 rratto@lalispell . co C: "'Frank Castles(E-mail)III tc sties@l all pell,com 111KEOC-Ems Project: Javorka Basin Model: Basin I Creek HMS Surmy of Results Project c ` avo Run Name Run Start of Run t OlJanO51200 BasinModel. Basin I End of Run OlFebO5 1200 Met. Model Rainfall Data Execution i MayO5 1100 Control Specs Control Hydrologic Discharge Timeof volume Drainage Element Peak Peak c Area c ) ( g Creek 24.039 02 Jan 05 0125 10.981 1.000 Island Area 11.010 2 Jan 05 0430 10.911 1.000 Creek Down 11.010 Jam. 05 0430 1 . 11 1.000 A . TU vfiN CREEK SUBDIVISION SITE PICTURES Fire Looking north from middle of property. Figure 2 Looking east from middle of property Figure 3 Looking south from middle of pfopUrty. Figure 4 Looking west from middle o ƒ prop erty- Hathaway Lane is in front of the yellow house, Figure Looking southwest from middle of property. Fide Adjacent property to the southeast, Figure Adjacent property to the south. Figure .hooking southwest at existing bam on the right and adjacent property, south of the subdivision, on the left. Figure This pole barn is the only existing structure on the property and will be removed. Figure 10 Adjacent property to the north. Figure 1 Tributary to Ashley Creek leaving the property to the south. j gure 12. Tributes to Ashley Creek on property .� t. � YY WWI it }�c':-��,:'�rc.4r�:..��<�.`�.'< J f :?i`- _ } �.( .. i�10�rr L ik-4-5�"�.'_ ,C'�..r..r -1 +; �5,,, y'�IY•T � `a> �<Y' `fYt '`t 'i`.'.� _ .i3'4=f .-2y"`:.w om •.3M1"^. < .N. �z.-~��' - � xE - e .. •� y ' - ��'3r: -.l. .:r„T.'_'' # y =i , � / 12 '+et ' ., �s.'. ram_ 4' :.:�. �? x;' :,. �.f. ,."'•S` _ '�.' ;�_..' �. - . :_., ��..-"5_.Y'�`'" . Figure 1 Proposed open/conservation area located on property. Hathaway away Lane is located just beyond ary on the right. Figure 16 Looking south. Open/ cons ervaiion area located to the right and front. Figure . Open/conservation area. Hathaway Lane is located by the trees on the r'gh. ;rc 18 Tn'butary as it passes under Hathaway Lane and eaters property. Figure 19 Proposed ingress/egress for subdivision. Figure 2 Looking east at property from Hathaway Lane. Figure 21 Looking east at property from Hathaway Large. 1.j' _... BROOK DRIVE .; ,,: .{.�.: =.: G' dry:. •:�!R,^F'iM�.-- IWT OF' 12 TEAT E❑ .3'MA Culvert SSri, •r RAJ 1. ....•s is ID 02 R 9' y�4w.a''• 'yam jK�, 0061HgpIN r TON _ -- me.µ may..,, .r`:i' .r i'�...: (."t. �;�'��• �cl':::." S• c��' -'':r 77 oatbridge LIMIT OF STUDY APPROXIMA1E SCALE IN I=EP FNATIONALLGOD INSURANCI PROGRAM FLOODWAY FLOOD BOUNDARY AND FLOODWAY MAP FLA"l-HEAD COUN-fY, M ON'TA A (t_1N1NCORPORATFU AREAS) 0 PANEL 1805 OF 3425 (SEE MAP €NbSX FOR PANELS NOT PRINTED) COMMUNITY -PANEL NUMBER 300023 1805 i MAP REVISED: SEPTEMBER 30, 1992 6 V Federal Emergency klanagenivnt Agency . This is an off fcial copy of a portion of the above referenced flood map. It was extracted using F-MIS' Version 1.0, This reap does not reflect changes or amendments which may have been made subsequent to the date on the title black. Futher information about National Flood Insurance P€ugram flood hazard maps is available at vvww-feM8. Oovint itf is d. pd0 Dat@: 6rUM5 (prii{t®d at 604[e Whd type Aj 90 6CDBA fu ►G E D cu 6EE in fuco co Li w L-7 � 6CA 6CIB 6EF 0 ru rmn 2CE E fr') 2CC PARK "r m GD DJ 6AC 71, .1 %, 1 Ab. .. &---- .- &b ..7...7 ... - .— -- -L . ... . . • EataFkw . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I ............. .............. &— ...... .......... ...... ........... & ...... 6DHA ........... A�b� ....... b4 ...... ........ ....... . . . . . . . . . .toe ............ m..'',-.m-mm . . . . . . . .......... 6KA 6DHBC 6AAL 6DF 6DH 6DHBB ...... ....... 6AAM 6DC 6AA 6AA 6L GDHBA im 6J 6 g=1 M u < 6DF a < < < < 6DHB A <4 < < < 6AAF < 6 6DF 6AAH COUN u u m R�l 13DB 13 u 13C 0 13D co 5 16B VICINITY MAP SCM.E 1 350 LEE & LINDA HERSBERGER PRELIMINARY PLAT AUTUMN CREEK SUBDIVISION A 21 LOT (15 SINGLE FAMILY & 6 TOWNHOUSE LOTS FOR A TOTAL OF 27 UNITS) SUBDIVISION ON 8.694 ACRES FILED CONCURRENTLY WITH AN ANNEXATION &INITIAL ZONING AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FWT DAM 5/9/05 FTT,F4 KPP-05-09 H-- \gis\site\kpp05-9. dwg . ............... - 2CCA L 7AD 4 7-7 T—i r- T B T-2 A T-1 16D fuumcro voXIum1 I'fism C✓mom l\n ~ —299a- y - Cd ?LIN LfME {S' rlTow) / pI4Tfw F11AGM6 x » x IM FliflC€ Pmwos ii STam W/mm Y O Mlfi ...... _.. FOSTM 6ULYm )00 W-0 FOOD PLm -.... -... —• -- — sus Lrn u►+�C PVAIM PW GW WAC 9X6W OLWAIA 7004aa foam Y Dal" AFL LL1t1' ; TZ VJD:TNIOM, WE SUBDIVISION SUMMARY PAOPOS��3_uSFS iOPIFn+pl�[ uzs 46) VArRAM (F.Et} M rs *am Ow or kmispw PIQriMT£ RLMlTS 5E"m (CV CP KY, P=) 24' PAYDAINT LRNFr'1 ug iicr..G..E..Ji.AT c". V WALKK PM]ii ZOOM (9-3 >SM. PM0 "DwWoogm Anocklimm PRELIMINARY PLAT OF F%W I %JIVIIN vr-1"ten %;�VLaLJI v 1%71W114 ut u m n PORTION OF SOUTH HALF, SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 28 NORTH, RANGE 22 WEST. P.M.M., FLATHEAD COUNTY, MONTANA. EXISTING CONDITIONS & GENERAL LAYOUT w12V k_ n.+^...^.. xx—Rom» N 88"98+08� .9 5W.88' %...•-ram X— A.......... x X— x.-,—_ X— tt— X— x— x— x— k«,....�.... >e SCAL.E i[ x 0.4D--kC, ' rr �' F 1S 2 3 4 5 '� z ; 0.21 AC. 0..21 AC. 0.21 AC. 0.21 AC. 0.18 AC. � �r' , "r • � r r R p PASTURE TURE �n i fry `f� �• � " t h , '41� � H B9/'.5+� E 35i1.0i r' �OAD rr i1 ` j SUMMER PLA6E- 1 ...1 0.41 AC. 1 Y w , Y jjj Q, I C �1•� j F � S It �ti -F' 1� sir P S! 12 _ 4k� � � Fwlx }i jjjjj k l fi ti 20 I 19 l 0.4 AC, � 11 10 ~ 8 f ! Y 13 0.45 AC, 0.21 AC.-'% 18 4 1 C 0.20 AC. ! I y S S• 1. 1 t 4t _� L�c. T, }4Y ` e •'� ! IN 1�'8"�� j � 1lS}}! r 1� �` w\_ Ll F 1 Y.F-/ SI L! } T 1 �A-.LJ j3 ~1 �-• 57 0.32 AC. ! t \ 1 Y� x tir�ll}u •t} AREA ;,��•na-ro.' ii RESIDENTIAL N Ri27�y-'�`{9y./�7`f',�i►4y {y'y)G J7i'7 r1'rTTG, `{34.85 RESIDENTIAL KN- 5Ga 4 6�w� (A � �`�$yA 61cC + 7p6 F b �iasfau E 1 b D4 5�1fyW T-1 ab 6KA : -- p 54s ' 6}eA bsR go,rFlFi ii-S. HWY 2 W i6C LAI VICINITY MAP H 0 SCAF.E SHEET 1OF S 3'"Eit: 1.M & UNDA HI$MUMER PRELIMINARY PLAT OF BY'. 'FHOUA9, BEAR AND HOMN3, INC. 31 THREE L1i,E DRIVE SU17Z 101 iiAi6) M 24 599t31 AUTUMN CREEK SUBDIVISION DAM At,ov . W05 PORTION OF SOUTH HALF, SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP Autumn. 28 NORTH, RANGE 22 WEST, P.M,M., FLATHEAD COUNTY, MONTANA. re�: I UTILITIES, STREETS & DRAINAGE .� s-oz,W Ico, I+.a' 2,4• 5.0' — 5-0' 2'j z` 4 E � �• rr,�.nocrc � � +.�,r rn.r .� � � � X ik Ss©EWAEaf il'P. $/ASYl,LT [SRNE OVER i S1 EtI LEES CLtREi c:�x : Ji#t]:CR.!' xs ,. •��. ...': SLOPE SUBBASE 3a - - - ' ,i'•I::: P.' er3uPACF�p �- ASPIi+!1,3' � 3/4- MINUS CRUSmW 951i co PACTION i OF 3%4` MMUT, BASE CpL;l3tSE PER ASTM 0-155% 9- S LECf 5t3B-k371aE tRlS5MEU 9RAVEL utrOER eum3s F'XJS�fVG f I�•€:I: ,. .t" !.ifkilS 357L FffHE)}Llt.4 COMPACTiL7H (�sx �4 } s• OF �f PER nAsrlab r-sa stx AASKCOMPAnONT-g FL QJ7�'tAJN c#ee15faEb GS2+LVEL PETi u,5h+71} 7-aa 97'% 40A,IPACtiom f ' PER AtiSkiTO F-99 ! �%r /F 1M;'ii±f! Q iV TYPICAL ROAD SECTION � , • :� LEGENDH4 5iw4. - _ �.T.L i t C. �.' L r.,' 3 k - ;� .5 . � ! L i.✓ 41.---" f1 = N 89'54'41" KR€1YE7ER B6LMMkf ti` : � 1 - ��"""'"'�" `• fi - r r � •� 4ti5 ........,,....,r.- £X6MQ PROS'CM PIN ~~tip .ti w � l s/r�Tri CORKR w'♦ f.!'1 If+ co1�lEsr 1 ; � I t ix�.'4"p CS V'I�^-F� PR0F0SEk WATER €AANi WY Vh1,4E '""' E ill y L;. PROPOS�ij FiYiHiFNT € SA �I 1 ,�• 4,: 1'.. 4 F PROPOSES UFr STATION SITE- � P i It 1� .,t, �,r .� •. � PROPOSED 5COWA SAAN �G1 %MTY} nc _ 1 } `., ��• v.`:t , PitOPRSfO S;EN MAlli (FORCE } I :, is ily4k� �ti rr ayp * PROP05EQ SE'A'£R MAN310iE CONTOUR LINE 0' € eNAL} _�__,_ p • k;1y 2�-� '" C07iiDUR Lim { INFE7i7AL Rx' t ti l GRA5 l 1' t y p 4 �i .5t ,' r/ ti_._ ♦ SWALE N 89"38'4.r'1" R SWALE ■ , L '.a '. ` 1 ,,■ `' �+ •,� `ti SWALE j'�+ n + �- �,'� l rr7� d �.� 61Lt1wc AR[7Ohy ti XI91' \ "l1 �'..■ 4 'ti. ' dLi i L�..+V 1 .� i.C� I k tt }4 l ir, l�y`+5 •.- iti''� iY \ � 3 �,+r•..«"--•. PM)POSED W-4W WFALL PAD MPQ'Ei7 SfOkWALK 1' I i `i ti ' 1 '` ■ V..\ O 1 � 4 9Qap` ' 12q` tr \\\ ",a ... ,+w. „�... .,�..,,�. t08 +rFJ32 FLO613 i�L/1R't N r?9*46J2 �• 5.. )!+P'J i i ti14 ti��: �:y L \ YkyY' ' C k �. i I ti� y L Sua LOT UNI •: F n {, t! rTt i . k ! 1 ! 'G x •, `.. 1 . FRAFFtC ROV! g •,.� PMWER PI LE CLre WIRE cu; - OaERrw POW R 1 11 fXIS 14 QtiY#'+SLrr 4' l . i }} y1, � N $9'45•08" is 170.98' ]4 FEL£PNONE RaR REVISE? E%tSTENG WELL FLC}U1)P AiN w 1' tfI EXISPNG A LIWa POLE Ff_OODPi AIN 1 aELECTRieAL SOX ti h -.. - - - E+t5Ek(ENT LIkE .. L.♦_.W._...:.��-.�.�"W.��.:y'rr µ +-,--T...------,...r gyp„ WATER iwE N 89'46'0.9' E 2s4._a5' SHEET OF S asr M: = �k U=A H$aS38MGM PRELIMINARY FLAT OF ar_ 'Autumn. m THREE )411FAN nO Htk�ilCii�S. �xc• AUTUMN CREEK SUBDIVISION K TSiitE 1 MT, c 5990 5113YE S Ol K08) ?51 24 59901 PHONE: (a�dj 751-5�48 DA'18: ,,UGUV. 00015 PORTION OF SOUTH HALF, SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP AflF;j� 28 NORTH, RANGE 22 WEST, P.M.M., FLATHEAD COUNTY, MONTANA. SINQU FAMILY LO'1'S 4.13 AC. LOT DIMENSIONS &. AREAS TOWNHOUS8 LOTS 6Z3 AC. OPEN AREA 1.66 AC. L4 tJ L10 Ltd L15 PARK AREAQ.29 AC. ROADS 1.60 AC. ii a' 'IQ'29' RESERVED FOR u1zT 9W O.xa AC. � 1 2 3 4 = 5A ;if ;:; ::�•; :.; :. TOTAL AC. ? 0,26 AC. � 0,26 AC. � 0.26 AC. w 0.23 AC. 5B t f { f .S.ii; Ili: r ♦ •1 ;�1: r' 8A Lit ROAD fo 1.60 AC. 6B Tl crg Y 7 Q 132 AC. 10 9 8 0.25 AC. 0.24 AC. �'w 0.28 AC, s �LA N 89'38'45" E :327.85' ❑ 0 AC, ❑ y K 1344 s.FI. CIt u $ 1344 3.F. ry V t Kl N DETAIL - TOWNHOUSE SCALE ; t VY SHEET 3 OF 3 X-MG-ENDA KALISPELL CITY PLANNING BOARD AND ZONING COMMSSION September 13, 2005 A regula-r meetLag of the Kalispell scheduled for Taesday, Septernber City C o cil Chambers, Kalispell Montana. The Agenda for the meeting will be . - A. . Calll to order and roll cal. City Planning Board and Zoning Co s;sion is 3, 2005 beginning at 7:00 PM in the Ka .s e. City- HaH, 312 First Avenue East, Kalispell, B. Approval of the Minutes - August 9, 2005 C. Hear the Public - The public may comment on any matte~ on the agenda or not o the agenda, except the public hea =*g items listed media e r below. . Public Hearings: The Kalispell City Ping Board and Zoning Con=i&sion will hold a pubiic hearing on the followm'g agenda items. Following the hearing and boa-rd discussion, the board may make its recommendation to the Kalispeli City Council for fmal action: 1. A request -by Flathead Health Center, Inc. for a conditional use pest to mow the relocation of a temporary modular office building southwest of the e sting Alert Buildingat 3 10 Sunn 'ew Lane, on the southeast corner of Claremont and Conway Drive.*the propel is zoned - 1, Health Care. 2. A request by Big Sky Properties on behalf of American Capitol aka ACG Kalispell. Investors, ,PLC, for an amendinent to the Kalispell Zo . ; Ordinance to allow fight assembly m the -3, Community Business, zoning district, This amendment could potentially meet al.. properties in the KaHs e . zorling jurisdiction, i.e. the Kalispell city limits, that are zoned red -3. E. Old Business 1. Continued from the June 14, 2005 meeting- Autumn Creek Subdivision. he propel is located north of Hwy 2 West, on the east side of Hatha ray- a .e: • Annexation with an U*U'ttal o=g designation of -2, Suburbaa Residential, on approximately .6 - acres. A request for preLiminary plat approval and a conditional use pest have been dled concurrently with the a ne.xation request. A request for preliminary plat approval of Autumn Creek Subdivision, a. 21 lot residential subdivision on appro�ately 8.694 acres consisting of 17 single fanifly lets and 4 townhouse lots. Kalispell City Planning Board Agenda Page • A request for a conditional use pest to allow the creation. of 2--two unit townhouse lots for a total of 4 townhouses within the proposed Auto= Creek Subdivision, a preliminary plat for a 21 lot residential sijbdivision. F. New Business . Creation of the BNSF 'fax Increment Finance District generally located on the north and south sides, but not including, the Kalispell Center Mai and west of Main street. G. Adj o mm t_ Next regular meeting: October 11, 2005 - Tuesday, 7:00 PM Growth Policy Fork Session: To Be fanged CERTIFICATION APPLICANT: Lee & Linda Hrsrgr TCPO FILE NO: KP-5- KA-5- KCU-5- 1. the undersigned certify that T did this date mail via First Class mail a copy of the attached notice following ice. list landowners i i .z the property limes of the property that is requesting annexation, a preliminary plat and a conditional use permit* _ rF } Date s--R: 12-2-22 Lot/ Tracts# Tracts A]B, 6DI, 6AAK, Property Owner/MailOwner/Mail Address, Lee 8ti Linda Hershberger S EF Lv4 5' FO da &H 31 Three Mile Drive, Ste. 101 Kaiis a fl, MT 59901 AND ATTACHED LIST I & H NEULL EDWIN KP H LEE & LEA HERS HBRG R I -� MILE DRIVE S T KALI SPELL MT 59901 3 HAT AWAY LANE KA IS , M 9901 T HNSON, LARRY & SUSAN RISE, MT 59901 R S S, STANLEY & DORA 275-31 NW TAYLOR AVE � RVALLIS, OR 9 3 VIAL. IN LTVING TRUST, DARREL R 29 US HIGHWAY 2 W KALISPELL, MT 59901 BLS, WILLIAM E 9 US HIGHWAY E W KALISPELL, MT 59901 '.1%4C ALLISTER, K. `HERINE HATHAWAY LN KALIS EL , MT 59901 CITY OF KALISPELL PO BOX 1997 KALISPELL,M 99 BARTLETT,, LYLE HA"HAWAY LANE KALISPELL, MT 59901 PARSONS, LAWRENCE VA ERIE 92 HA HAWAY DR KALISPELL, MT 59901 .DOSE, NANCY ALEN KA ISPELL, SIT 59901 CAMPBELL-ARSON, KI"Y ARSON, RON L '305 N HILL RD KALISPELL, MT 59901 POPE III, D ANIE POPE, RCHEE 130 GREEN BAR DR KALISPELL,, MT 59901 100 HA HAWAY LN N LA , NIARK & KA 'HEM KALISPELL, TVIT 59901 COLLINS, CAROL 19 �zlly KALISPELL, MT 59901 TUNGSTEN HOLDINGS INC PO BOX 2I ERAS S , STEVEN I HAHAWAY LN STATE OF M N AN.A DOT PO BOX 201001 Tr -City Planning Office 17 Second St fit, Suite 211 �pefl, MT 59901 Phone* 406) 751-1850 Fax: (406) 751-1858 KAJR SUBMSION PRELIMINARY PLAT "PLICATION KALISPELLX III SH C LUMU FALL FEE SCHEDULE: FEE ATTACFIED x Major Subdivision {6 or more lots) Mobile I-iorne Parks &, Campgrounds (6 or more spaces) Amended Preliminary Plat Subdivision Variance Commercial and IndustriaiSubdivision SUBDMSION MAKE: Autumn Cr` } owxER(s) of RECORD: $730 + $40/lot $750 + $40/space $250 T)1.Q0 (per variance) Add $200 to base preliminary play fee Name New West Prey er 1e , L.L.C. Phone406-261-5685 Maili. Address 435 4th Avenue Easy - City Kalispell Stat onta a zip 01 ' ECHNICAL PR FMSI N. L PARTICEPANTS See ewer rug neer, etc) Name&Addresq Thomas, Dean& Hoskins y- 31 3 Mile Dr., Ste 101, Kalispell, MT59901 Name & Address Name & Address LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PRR'* Property Address Not Assi ned Assessor's Tact No(s) 0000174851 Lot No(s) TR 6AAK, 6DI, SAS I/4 Sec SWI/4 Section. _ Township �� Range 22W Number of Lots or Rentai Spaces Total Acreage in Subdivision 8.694 Total l .crea. e in Lots 5.324 ,A Minimum . Size of Lots or Spaces 0 Total Acreage Streets orRoads- i c� maximum Size of Lots or Spaces 0.40 Ac Total Acreage in Parks, opera Spaces and/or Common Areas 1.85 Ac I PROPOSED USE(S) AND NUMBER OF ASSOCIATED LOTS/SPACES: Single Family Townhouse Mobile Home Park a Duplex Apartment Recreationai Vehicle Park Commercial I .al Planned Unit Development Condominium � � Multi -Family Other APPLICABLE ZONING DESIGNATION & DISTR.[CT R-3 Kalispef� ESTATE OF MAPI= VALUE: BEFORE IMPROVEMENTS- $5,026M IMPROVEMENTS TO BE PROVIDED: Roads: Gravel -Paved X Curb X Gutter X Sidewalks X Alleys Other Water System: Individual Multiple User Neighborhood Public X Other Sewer Systems: Individual � I lti le User Neighborhood Public X Other Other i .i i : Cable TV X 'telephone X Electric X Gas X Other Solid Waste: Home Pick Up -Central Storage -Contract Hauler Owner Haul Mail Delivery: Central r � IndividualX School. District: Kalispell f ool District Fixe Protection: Hydrants XTanker Recharge Fire District: City f KafiI!� Damage System: -Site PROPOSED EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL: Curb & Gutter's Grass Lawns Conservation. . A. ..........rea .-. . .. ................... . . . . . .... . .. ................. ..... '' CES: AJW ANY VAJUANCES REQUESTED? N ye no yes, please complete the i-norm. i SECTION OF RFXxULATIONS CREAT G E11P: F"LAIN THE SHM THAT WOULD HE CREATED WITH STRICT CONIPLLqLNCE WITH REGULATIONS PROPOSED ALTERNATIVE(S) TO STRICT COMPLIANCES WITH ABOVE 1;MTJ'J[ATNS: 2 PLEASE ANSWER THE FOLOWIWG QUESTIONS IN THE SPACES PROVIDED BELOW: .. Will the granting of the variance be even al to the public health, safety or general welfare or injurious to other adjoining properties 2. Will the variance cause a substantial increase in public costs? . Will the variance affect, in any manner, the provisions of any t nin regulations, Master Plan or Growth Policy. -. Are there special circumstances related to the physical characteristics of the site (topography, shape, etc.) that create the hardship . What other conditions are unique to this property that create the need for a anan e 3 APPLICATION CONTENTS: The subdivider shaH submit a. complete application addressing tems below to the Tri- City Planning office at least thirty five 3 days for Kalispell, and 45 days for Whitefish and Columbia Falls prior to the date of the Planning Board meeting at which it will be heard.. I. Preliminary plat application. 2. 20 copies of the preliminary plat. 3. One reproducible set of supplemental information. (See Appendix A of Subdivision Regulations for the city where the subdivision is proposed.) . One reduced copy o f the prelimin er plat not to e cee d 11" x 1 " in size. S. Application `ee. . Adjoining property Owners List (see example below and attached notice from County Plat Room) Assessor# Sec -Try.- LotZTract No Proverty Owner & Mailing Address I hereby certify under penalty of perjury and the laws of the State of Montana that the in o=a.tion -submitted herein, on all other submitted o=s, documents, plans or any other information submitted as a part of this application, to be true, complete, and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Sho d any information or representation submitted in connection with this application e untrue, l understand that any approval al based thereon may be rescinded, and other appropriate action taker. The signing of this application sigrii ies approval for the 'ri-City Planning staff to be present on the property for routine monitoring and inspection during the approval and development process. , q As approved by the TCPB, Effective o 1 /04 /y/s / (IYate)