Loading...
Exhibit K - Letter from Hansz re: Follow-upmay, -vtA July 7,1998 Mr. Thor Jackola Jackola. Engineering 317 First Avenue East Kalispell, MT 59903 Reference: Southfield Park subdivision Dear Mr. Jackola: I want to follow up on our discussions of June 20h regarding the storm drainage design you have proposed for Southfield Park. As Dick Amerman and I mentioned, we are very concerned that the design as submitted will not function as intended because of the very high ground water conditions of the area In general, drain trenches are a frequent source of disappointment because their proper operation depends on so many variables; soil percolation rates, ambient ground water changes, overall size, rainfall intensities and changes in the originally assumed development plan must all be carefully managed to ensure functionality of the system. To date we have not received any further information from you regarding the items we discussed. So there is no misunderstanding let me review our concerns one more time. With respect to Southfield Park, the information you have provided clearly indicates that the present ground water elevation is well above the pipe and as a result the pipe will act as a collector of ground water rather than as a conduit for water to drain away. The system as designed will, in the opinion of this Department, be immediately non-functional. In order to work, a drain trench needs to have the drain pipe above the water table most of the time in order to provide the hydraulic gradient necessary to permit water flow into the surrounding permeable soil strata. As presently designed, we believe the system will flood above the surface throughout the developed portions of the project until sufficient head is achieved to permit proper flow into the water table. This assumes the capacity of the trench and pipe work are correctly sized for the anticipated storm intensity, which we are unable to determine from the data you have submitted. In addition, the submitted plan does not provide any elevation data to show the relationships of surrounding features to the proposed improvements. The relief pipe connecting to the City system is assumed to be properly located and sized but this is not verifiable. Further, the City's Extension of Services Plan stipulates that storm discharge from a development is limited in rate and quantity to the amount resulting from pre -development conditions. Excess amounts are to be dealt with onsite by the developer. I have enclosed a copy of this requirement for your Post Office Box 1997 - Kalispell, Montana 59903-1997 Telephone (406) 758-7700 - FAX (406) 758-7758 information. This design requirement is frequently difficult to accommodate hence our concern that the proposed solution for Southfield Park be carefully designed and constructed so as to ensure proper operation for the owners, and to avoid situations where the City may be called upon in the future to assist in correcting a problem. The intense thunderstorm of this past weekend and the many local flooding problems it generated should caution all of us to be extremely prudent in each aspect of storm drainage design. Your reference to the possibility of a future connection to a new storm drain, part of the US 93 improvements, may be feasible provided the improvements are installed as anticipated. But, you should be aware that the design of these facilities is based on the existing runoff conditions. The requirement for onsite retention of flows in excess of predevelopment quantities will remain. In any event, these improvements would not be available for use for at least two years or more. Other items of this development, the access points, roadway improvements, water and sewer extensions appear to be satisfactory and are as we previously discussed. From our discussions we understood that you would revise the storm drainage design for Southfield Park to provide a higher margin of operating safety, and to relocate the drain pipe above the water table to give it the best chance of working without problems. To date we have received no new information that reflects the changes we discussed. We are ready to work with you to resolve these concerns and look forward to receiving your latest plans. James C. Hansz, P.E. Director of Public W rks / C ty Engineer cc: City Attorney / Interim City Manager,