6. Resolution 5118 - Resolution of Intent & Call for PH - Growth Policy Amendment - Eisiinger & DavisCity of Kalispell
Planning Department
2"d Street .fast. Suite 211, Kalispell, Montana 59901
Telephone: (406) 751-1850
Fax: (406) 751-1858
We s.i.e: kalispellplanning.com
REPORT Kalispell Mayor and City Council
FROM: Sean Conrad, Senior Planner
James H. Patrick, City Manager
SUBJECT Notice of Intent to adopt, amend or deny a Growth Policy
Amendment t request for Elsl ger Properties, LLC and Lyle and
Joanne Davis and scheduling of said public hearing
MEETING DATE: June 5, 200
CK rR tIN: Eisinger Properties, LLC and Lyle and Joanne Davis have requested
a growth policy amendment ment on two properties totaling 15.4 acres. The property
owners are requesting to amend the growth policy designation on the properties from
Neighborhood Commercial and Suburban an Residential to Commercial. The properties
are located at 2545 and 2563 Highway 93 Now, at the northeast corner of the
intersection of Highway 93 and West Reserve Dave, located Within Section 30,
Township 29 Now, Range 21 west, Flathead. County, Montana.
The planning board held a public hearing on the requested groom policy amendment
on May 9, 2006. The information from that meeting .g including r *notes, staff report
and application materials ials will be forwarded ed. to you. However, State law requires the
City Council to pass a Resolution of Intent to Adopt, t, Revise or Reject a. Growth Policy
Amendment prior to actually taldng action on the proposed amendment. In addition,
it has been the policy of the city to hold a public hearing on any Growth Polley
Amendment. Therefore, In order to take action n the requested growth policy
amendment, the City Council will need to approve the Resolution of Inert at the June
5 meeting. This would then set the stage for the public hearing and council action at
the June 19 council meeting.
REC NOMMN: Approval of the Resolution of Intent to Adopt, Revise or Reject
ect
the Eisenginer Growth Policy Amendment request and setting the public hearing to act
on the amendment er t for June 19 would be in order.
ALTERNATIVES: As suggested by the City Council.
Respectfully submitted,
W
,r
Sean Conrad James H. Patrick
Senior Planner City Manager
Report compiled: May 30, 200
Theresa White, Kalispell City Clerk
RESOLUTION No. 5118
RESOLUTION of INTENTION To ADOPT, REVISE OR REJECT AN AMENDMENT
To THE KALISPE L GROWTH POLICY 2020 TO AMEND THE RESIGNATION OF
PROPERTIES LOCATED WITHIN SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 29 NORTH, RANGE 21.
WEST, FLATHEAD COUNTY Y AND MORE PARTICULARLY LOCATED AT 2545 AND
2563 HIGHWAY 93 NORTH, KALISPELL, MONT NA AND To CALL FOR A PUBLIC
HALING.
WHEREAS, the Kalispell Growth Policy 2020 was o gina.11y adopted by the Kalispell City
Council on February 18, 2003 by Resolution No. 4773 - and
WHEREAS,, Eisinger Properties L C and Lyle and Joanne Davis have requested a growth policy
amendment on two properties totaling 15.4 acres located within Section 30,
Township 29 North, Range 21 West, Flathead County and more Particularly located
at 2545 and 2563 Highway 93 North, Kalispell, Montana,; and
WHEREAS the Kalispell Growth Policy 2020 currently designates this property as Neighborhood
Commercial and Suburban Residential and the petitioners are requesting an
amendment to change this designation to Commercial; and
WHEREAS, commercial development in the Hwy 93 North area has continued to expand beyond
the boundary currently shown on the Kalispell Growth Policy Mafia; and.
WHEREAS, on May 95 2006, the Kalispell City Planning Board held a Public hearing, after due
and Proper notIc , received Public comment upon, and reviewed Kalispell Planning
RePartrn nt report KGP.A-0 -- 1, which evaluated the Proposal based upon the goals
and objectives of the Growth Policy, the purpose ose of zoning and current circumstances
in the Planning jurisdiction; and
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of said Public bearing and after consideration of the proposed
amendment, the Kalispell City Planning Board, on a tie vote,, failed to adopt report
KGPA-0 - l , as the Endings of fact and which recommended approval of the
proposed Growth Policy amendment, and
HIES, the City Council of the City of Kalispell considers it advisable that they consider the
proposed Growth Policy Amendment and the recommendations of the Kalispell City
Planning Board, and adopt a Resolution of Intention to Adopt, Revise or Reject the
Proposed Amendment to the Kalispell Growth Policy 2020.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVER BY THE CITY COUNCIL of THE CITY of
KALISPELL, AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That pursuant to Section 7 - - 0 , MCA, the City Council of the City o
Kalispell intends to consider a proposed amendment to the Kalispell Growth
Policy 2020, and the evidence considered by the Kalispell City Planning
Board, said amendment consisting of amending the designation o
Neighborhood Commercial and Suburban Residential to Commercial a
those properties located within Section 30, Township 29 North, Range 21
West, Flathead County and more particularly .located. at 2545 and 2563
Highway 93 North, Kalispell, Montana.
SECTION 11. At the next regular meeting of June 19, Zoo , the City Council will consider
Resolutions to Adopt, Revise, or Reject said proposed amendment.
SECTION 111. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to give notice of said meeting in
accordance with Section - I - 127, MCA.
PASSED ,AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND SIGNED BY THE MAYOR OF THE
CITY of KALISPELL, THIS 5TH DAY OF MAY, 2006.
....................
Pamela B..yenned
Mayor
Theresa White
City Clerk
SINGER AVIS
GROWTH POLICY AXEMENT
KALISPELL PLANNING DEPARTBMNT
STAFF REPORT KG--
APRIL 20,2006
A report to the Kalispell City Planning Board and the Ka spell City Council regarding
a request to amend the Kalispell Groff. Policy on property located on the northern
end of Ka.lispel. along Highway 93. A public hearing has been scheduled before the
Kalispell City Planning Board. for May 9, 2006 beginning at :00 PM in the Ka ispen
City Council Chambers. The planning board will forward a recommendation to the
Kahspell City Council for final action..
Petitioner and Owners* ismer Properties, ITC
1000 West Idaho
Kalispell, MT 59901
(406) 55-5555
Lyle and Joanne Davis
2563 Highway 93 North
Kalispell., MT 59901
(406)752-3356
Technical Assistance: Schwarz Architecture and Engineering, Inc.
1000 Financial Dfive, suite 120
Kalispell, MT 59901
(406) 755-1333
B. Nature of the Request: This is a proposal to amend the Kalispell Groff Policy
2020 by changing the land use designation on two properties located at the
northeast corer of the intersection of West Reserve Drive and. Highway 93. The
properties are currently outside of the City lets
The property owners have petitioned to annex into the City and have requested the
-2, General Commercial,zoning district. The properties are d.esigna.ted by the
Kalispell Groff Policy 2020 as Neighborhood Commercial and. Suburban
Residential for the 10.1 acre property described as Assessors 'bract 41, owned by
lsinger Properties, LLC, and Suburban Residential for the 5.3 acre property
described as .Assessors Tract 4C, ou.ed by Lyle and. Joanne Davis. In order to
obtain the proposed -2 zoning, the owners will need to amend the groom policy
map la nd use designations atior s to Commercial.
C. Location and Description of Property.* The properties proposing the trot.
Policy Amendment are situated on the northeast corner of the intersection of West
Reserve Drive and Highway 93. The property addresses are 2545 and 2563
Highway 93 North and can be described as Assessors Tracts 41 and 4C located in
the SWI/4 of Section 30, Township 29 North, Range 21 West, P.M.M. , Flathead.
County, Montana..
Assessors Tract 41 is a 10. 1 acre property located at the northeast intersection. o
West Reserve Drive and Highway 93. The propel address is 2545 Highway 93
however the property is currently vacant. It has approximately 730 hneal feet o
Highway 93 frontage e along its western bounder and Soo lineal feet of frontage along
West Reserve Drive, ve, .djacent to its so t xerr property boundary. The property one
mcluded a seasonal dry . e for lands to the southwest. The property conveyed
ester from lands to the southwest under the highway intersection through the
property and into the StiRw .ter River. over the past several years the property has
been fffled in and is now devoid of any major vegetation save for a strand of pine trees
along the eastern boundary adjacent to the StiRwater River. The majority of the site
s level with an escarpment r i g along a portion of the properties e .stem edge.
Assessors Tract
41 looking
northwest
.cross the
property -
Highway 93 is
m the
background.
Assessors Tract 4C is located approximately 750 feet north of the West reserve
Dave and Highway 93 intersection. The Property is developed with a single family
res'dence addressed as 25 3 H w y 3. Theproperty contains 5.3 acres and is
generally level throughout except along the eastem boundary where, like the
property immediately south, a steep bank leads down to the Stifles .ter River. In
addition to a residence on the property several outbuildings are located in the
western half of the property. Mature trees and with an under story of brass in fe
western portion of the property provide a park like setting.
2
The photo at
left sons the
Davis property
taken from
across
highway 93.
D. E Land Use and Zoning: As stated above, Assessors Tract 41 is vacant at
this time and. Assessors Tract 4C is developed with a single family residence and
several outbuildffigs. The properties are currently In the County om*n
jurisdiction with Assessors Tract 41 zoned. -2 and Assessors '`bract 4C zoned R-1.
The Co at -2 district is a business district intended to provide for those retail
sales and service functions and operations that are typically characterized by
outdoor display, storage, and/or sale of merchandise, by major repair of motor
vehicles, and by outdoor commercial amusement ent and recreational activities. This
district is very similar to the City -2 district.
The County R- 1, Suburban Residential, district is intended to provide estate -type
development. These areas would nonnallr be located in rural areas away from
concentrated urban development, typically not served by water or surer services,
or in areas where it is desirable to perrifit only lour -density development.
Evaluation of the Growth wt' Plan Amendment:
No specific c criteria have been outlined to address amendments to the growth policy,
but amendments e .ts generally follow public interest criteria.. Elements of those criteria
are basic to most comprehensive lard use plans, which are a common took. � are most
coararr x ties. .e �rowt policy, master plan or comprehensive la. are used to
provide a general and comprehensive outline of community goals and expectations
about here and homer a community should grove and develop.
In order to provide a. framework for analysis and evaluation of the proposal a. general
outline of public -interest criteria related to a proposed change in land use is used.
The following criten a for evaluation will be established as follows:
• Changes in circumstances that warrant theamendment;
Compliance with the overall goals and policies of the master plan and its various
3
elements:
groom management,
lard use,
• economy.,
environmental considerations,
parks and recreation,
transportation,
• infrastructure, utilities and public services;
annexation and the extension of services.
The proposed plan amendment wiH be considered in the context of the current
KahspeH Growth. Policy 2020 as well as current and future development treads for the
area.
Has there been a change of circumstancesder which the proposed plan
amen ent is being made that warrants its consideration
The growth policy for Kalispefl was adopted in February of 2002 which has been a.
useful tool in proving guidance to the community, developers, decision makers and
staff when anticipating acing growth trends and expansion of the city limits. However, the
groom and expansion of the city has occurred much faster than cold have been
anticipated on al sides of the community.
The adopted growth policy map designates the two properties included r . the Growth
Policy Amendment as Neighborhood Commercial and suburban Residential lard
uses. In the last five years the city has seen a. tremendous amount .t of commercial
growth M the area south of West Reserve Drive along Highway 93. The Target Home
Depot commercial center in addition to the oge's Co tco commercial center and,
more recently, the approval of the Hutton Ranch Plaza have turned the last half mile
along Highway 93 leading to West Reserve Dave mto a commercial corridor. Giver
the charge in land uses in the immediate area, a groom policy ma.p amendment to
Commercial should he given consideration as the nature of this end of the City has
changed.
In addition to the commerclad expansion in the immediate area of the proposed
amendment, the Kalispell City Planning Board has been reviewing the existing growth
policy ma.p for areas north of Nest Reserve Drive up to the intersection of Highway 93
and Church Drive. The Planrfing Board is considering changing the Neighborhood
Commercial and Suburban Residential anal use designations for properties located
north of West Reserve Drive to the Stillwater River, on the east side of Highway 93, to
Commercial. This would �r dude the two properties requesting the growth policy
amendment. Although a public hearing has not been held on the proposed charges
by the planning hoard, the planning board has recognized that the changing g land use
in the Immediate area warrants additional commercial expansion along Highway ay 3
north to the Stillwater River.
4
Does the proposed plan amenwe Sher the overall goals and
objectives of the groom poUcy when considering the specific elements
the plan?
Growth Management: Two primary mechanisms for mana.gmg growth in the City o
KallspeR exist which are to rely an redevelopment and infM within the current City
lets or annexation of outlying areas. A goal of the growth policy is to provide a
comprehensive, effective groom management t plan that provides for all the needs o
the community, is adaptable to changing trends and is attuned to the overall public
welfare.
Chapter 2,, Policy 6 of the Kalispell Growth Policy states,, `Design and locate
development to protect public health and s ty insure adequate ouision off ` se�ces;
e compatible nth the character of its surroundings an.d encourage the most
appropriate use of land.
The proposed map amendment t would allow commercial zoning and uses m an area
that is adjacent to em*sting waiter and sewer services. The property is located at the
northem end of a commercial corridor with nelgl bon'ng properties immediately north
proposing commercial zo ='g within the County. Highway 93 divides the existing
high density residential to the west. Immediately east of the Elsiner property is a
church,, and the Stillwater River.
Land Use: General goals and polices of the growth policy encourage the orderly
development in the groom policy area with space for future expansion while er s n'n
compatibility ility of adjacent land use. Standards for the designation or expansion o
commercial areas should e based on a compact development pattem designed to
meet the reeds of the intended service area.
s discussed earlier in this report, the planning board has been reviewing the existing
growth policy map for the areas north of West Reserve Drive and the planning
department is prepanng to hold are information meeting to discuss the planning
board's ideas and recommendations. The proposed growth policy map would place
commercial zoning on properties located north of West Reserve Drive, along Highway
3 up to the Stillwater Bridge. The properties requesting the reap amendment are
Mcl ud.ed in the planning boards growth p oli y map as having a commercial land use
designation.
..
In upda6ng the groom policy map, the plarring board is also considering policies
aimed at enhancing the gateway entrances to Kahspell through improved red design,.
These design policies include pro 'idmg for an impact area, between 00- 50 feet in
width, adjacent to Highway 93. Within this impact area, a comb ation of be=ing,
landscaping, a pedestrian trail system and frontage roads would be incorporated. The
policies would also place the pnmary buildings outside of this impact area, promote
four sided architecture and have new development incorporate monument signs
located it the rear portion of the impact area, while prohibiting other freestanding
signs. I the Groff Policy Amendment is approved, future commer6al construction
on the site should incorporate these policies into tier construction design*
5
Eck: The economic component of the growth policy recognizes a. diverse
economy and Kalispell as the economic center of the community. It also recognizes a
trend away from resource and a.gr' cultura . based economies to that of Service, tourist,
business and health care services. The plate encourages policies that wiH provide for
higher pang j obs b as ed on non-traditional econor * c b ases .
Chapter 6 of the KahspeH Groff Policy encourages new businesses to locate in areas
here sound infrastructure can be provided. In addition, one of the goals in the
economic chapter of the Growth Policy is to strengthen Kalispell as a regional retail
center that strives to capture more local and out of county dollars.
The proposed map amendment would create 15.4 additional acres of commercial land
use. The property owners have also petitioned for annexation and are requesting a
2 , General Commercial, om* ng district on their properties. This request stems from
the fact that one of the property owners, Eisinger Properties, LLC, is relocating their
current auto dealerships located on Idaho Street to this site. The proposed map
arnendmer t would allow the auto dealership to build Within the City limits. 'rior to
constructing within the City, the developers wiH be required to extend water and
surer service to the site.
Environmental Considerations: The properties proposix� g an amendment to the
growth policy map are, for the most part, level. A steep slope is located along the
eastern boundaries of the properties adjacent to the Stillwater River. Future
development would be located west of these slopes. The application rotes one
e virorYrr ental. constraint on the property which has already been addressed. The
issue was a storm drain o ncd. and maintained by the Montana Department of
Transportation at the southwest corer of Assessors Tract 41, the Eisinger property.
The e storn water dram rare northeast through the property dram' g runoff from the
highway into the Stillwater River. The application rotes that the drain has been
reconstructed, upgraded and extended per specifications from the Montana
Department of Transportation.
One other nvironmental consideration is the proximity of the Stillwater Diver and the
accompanying 1 oo-yeas flood.plain. FEMA f.00d.plai . map, Community panel No,
00023 1805D, shows portions of the 1 oo--yea.r .00dplam' along the eastern
boundaries of the two properties. However, the owners intend to develop the western
portions of their- respective properties which are higher in elevation and out of the
1. - year fl cd lam. The only exception to this is a possible overflow parking lot,
which Eisinger Properdes, LLC, is considering constructing on Assessors Tract 4C
down by the Stillwater River. if the owners pursue this, given the scope of the work
and extent of the f oodplain on the property, a. f .00d.pla.in permit may be required.
Communand Recreational Facilities. As development has been constructed
along Highway 93, between 4 Mile Drive and West Reserve Drive, the City has
required a. bike path be placed within the highway right-of-wayn4ght-of-way at the developer's
expense. The planning board has been reviewing an updated groom policy map for
areas north of West Reserve as mentioned previously in this report. The planning
board has also recommended policies pertaining to new development along Highway
3. One of these policies is to incorporate a bike trail system in conjunction unction with
landscaping along Highway 93 in order to provide an a Uxactive entrance into the city
31
and a. more pedestrian and bide friendly community. If the Growth. Policy
Amendment is approved, future commercial construction on the site should
incorporate these policies into their construction design.
Transportation: The proposed amendment to commercial l for the two properties
mci ded in this appheation has the potential to aRo v a multitude of uses however,
the owners are requesting the amendment to facilitate the construction ction of an auto
dealership on the Eisin er property and possible overflow parking on a. portion of the
Davis proper. The pro -posed auto dealership on the Elsinger property, Assessors
Tract 4L would have two accesses, one on Highway hway 3 and the other on West Reserve
Drive. The Davis property, Assessors 'bract 4C, already has a. highway approach for
the existing residence. The application notes however that the Montana Department
artment
of Transportation M ' will need to conduct a. traffic iM a.ct analysis prior to
issuing any approach permits and through the traffic impact analysis, MDOT wiJl
decide what mitigation measures may be required in order to facilitate an auto
dealership.
As this area grocers, increased impacts to the highway system can be anticipated. The
Montana Department of Transportation is M the process of upgrading the intersection
of west Reserve Drive and Highway 93. Included in this upgrading is the potential for
a frontage road to serge the Eisin er and Davis properties as well as two other
properties located north of the Davis property. A frontage road would lessen
congestion and the impact of are auto dealership or other commercial uses at this site
however, the ultimate decision on whether independent accesses or a frontage road
would be required will be up to the Montana Department of Transportation,
Commun Facilities Lufrastructure and Public Service.: Properties should be
annexed into the City of Kalispell, when City services are available to the proper and
the property is proposed for development in accordance with City policies, Ka .is ell's
Extension of Services Plan anticipates that the casts of the extension of services to
new development be borne by developer and associated impacts Will be mitigated..
The extension of services plan further anticipates that if upsizing is required to
accommodate future anticipated users that the City wiU pay the difference between
the capacity required by the developer and the capacity required for future users.
Potentially, a. development ent agreement with the City can be executed to ensure that the
"latecomers onto the system repay the development costs to the developer and, or
the City of Kalispell.
The owners of the Fish ger property have already held meetings with City staff to
discuss the feasibility of extending water and sewer hues to the site. Below is a brief
summary .mary of existing facilities able to serge the proposed commercial sites and any
extension of facilities that would be required.
Serer: There is are existing 12-inc . surer main located approxilmately 270 feet south
of the intersection of West Reserve Drive and Highway 93, on the east sine of the
highway. In order to develop the two properties within the City the owners will need
to extend the surer maim. The application rotes that the owner would be extending
the sewer service to the site per the Kalispell Public works Department specifications.
7
Water: 'here is an existing 12-i ch water mam. located at the southeast corner of the
intersection of Nest Reserve Drive and Highway 93. In order to develop the two
properties within the City the owners will reed to extend the water main. The
application notes that the owner would be extending the grater service to the site per
the Kalispell Public Works Department specifications.
Storm water manor. Kalispell. Public Works Department has design and
construction standards that relate to storm grater management which generally
require that any storm water generated from the site be managed and retained on site.
Storm grater flows from the site cannot exceed pre -development levels and the
developer wiH be required to prepare a comprehensive storm grater analysis and crust
identify the impacts of the proposed development. Mitigation measures must be
identified and implementation undertaken as needed..
Fire- Once annexed into the City of Kalispell, the Kalispell Fire Department will
provide protection to the area.. Fire station. no. 62 recently opened and will provide
fire services. The fire station is located approximately 1/2 mile south of the properties
proposing the growth policy map amendment. New development will need to meet the
requirements of the li ter atio al Fire Code and the required fire flogs for new
commercial construction.
Police; Demands on the Kalispell Police Department will not increase as the proposed
amendment will not contribute to .more housing, adding to Ka s ell's population.
Educational Services-, The proposed amendment would allow additional business t
locate within the City limits, Generally eommereial and industrial development will
eon t . ute significantly to eduea.tiona.l. faeffities.
SUAUdARY: This growth policy amendment reflects anticipated development along
the Highway 93 corridor and reeog yes that continued growth pressures in this area
will take place. The provision of public services and facilities ities to this area will
contribute to the management of growth loeaUy and regionally as well as providing an
area for commercial expansion within . the City.
R=OBEVIENDATION.
Based upon the above evaluation, planning staff would recommend that the Kalispell
City Planning Board adopt Staff Report KG A-06-2 as findings of fact and approve
Resolution KGP -o -2 amending the Kalispell Groff Policy 2020 for Assessors
Tracts 4C and 41. Staff also recommends that included in the recommendation of
approval the Highway Community Entrance overlay be designated on these properties
so that future construction would comply with the policies set forth for highway
corridor entrances including landscaping, setbacks, pathways and sign restrictions.
E
City of Kalispell
Planning Department
1 - 2n stet East, suite 211, Kalispell,, Mona 59901
Telephone: o6) 751-1850
Fax: o6) 751-1858
APPLICATION FAR GROWTH POLICY AMENDMENT (GPA)
1
.'
4
PROJECT NAME, L b"-Z'o S�
NAME OF APPLICANT: .1,91
2. MAIL ADDRESS: LvcfS'T-
3. CITY/STATE/ZIP: /��� 5��7-�- . "T 5�1� / PHONE:
NAME AND ADDRESS of OWNER/ s IF DIFFERENT THAN APPLICANT:
4. •
5. MAID
6
PHONE. . CITY/STATE/ZIP:
7SO
{ � a
' . TECHNICAL SSISTANC _ �� rt"' � � � 5 � �4,...�
. MAIL ADDRESS;
9
. CITY/STATE/ZIP: I� �� ��:
If there are others who should be notified duringthe review process, please list those.
A. Property Address:
B. Total. Area of Property:C. Legal descript-tonincludm*g section, ow.sh range: L
A)IQ, --_4
�F
1
D. Please provide the fol.o Mg information m a narrative format with supporting
drawings or other format as needed:
a. An overall descr*ption of the issues, goals and policies associated with
the proposed development.
. Project feasibility and a schedule showing the tir eframe in which each
phase will be completed.
C. A showing of the conformance of this amendment with the growth policy
overall.
. A convincing showing of need.
e. A showing of neighborhood compatibility. Were there are more
intensive uses or incompatible uses planned within the plan area or o
the boundaries, homer the impacts of those uses would be mitigated.
f.A showing of transportation impacts and general proposed mitigation
measures.
A listing f the environmental impacts associated with the plan
amendment.
,. A listing of all know site hazards and general mitigation strategies
i. . strategy for the adequate provision of local services
(1). Water
(2). Seger
(3) t Police
(4). Fire
(5). parks and open space, trails and pedestrian ways
(6). Storm water
(7). Schools
(8). Gas, electricity
A showing of the appropriateness of the proposed location of the project.
k. The extent to which the plan .eparts from the existing growth policy and
the reasons why such departures are or are not deemed e to be in the
public interest.
1. Include site plans, drawings and schematics atic with supporting narratives
where needed that includes the following Mforma.tion:
(1). Property boundary locations.
(2). Site hazards or environmental constraints including area of
steep slopes 1 % and 2 5 , f loodplain and flood way,
drayage or streams;
(3). Total acreage, current growth pollen designation and
present zoning classifications;
(4). Groff policy and zoning classification of all ad olnm'
properties;
(5), ssign ent of major land use categories. A showing of
density and intensity of major or arid. uses including, for
example, dwelling units per gross acre, square footages of
commercial/acre, square footage of �r d.ustrial uses/acre,
potential pubhc facilities and buildings, open space uses,
etc.
(6). Collector and arterial road systems. Any unusual road
features (bridges, frontage roads, etc.)
(7). oca.tion and type of significant open space, common areas
or substantial buffers, and major pedestrian trail systems-,
(8). Proposed schedule of completions and phasing f the
development, if applicable;
(9). Existing covenants, conditions ons and restrictions which
would significantly alter development Wit .�r� the area.;
(10). Special or unusual design features intended to mitigate
identified site hazards.
(11). Any ogler info=ation that may be deemed relevant and
a.ppropnate to allow for adequate review.
The si' ng of this application signifies that the aforementioned information is true
and correct and grants approval. for Kalispell Plan Department staff to be present
on the property for routine moniton*n and mspcction dun*ng review process.
(ApphLL Signature
(6ate)
�' t-fP*&' e- Aaj U-2 � 4 /'1 #'.) E, 4.-;, Z'Ul 6;,
3
ARC. H ITECFU R
April '114,2005 5CHWARZ
Mr. Thomas Jentz
City of Kalispell Planning Department
1 2n fre t East
Kalispell, MT 59901
Re: Growth Policy Amendment en for New Eisinger Dealership Site
Kalispelit Monfana
Dear 'or:
Schwarz Architecture & Engineering, Inc. is respectfully proposing an amendment to the
existing Kalispell growth policy on behalf of Eisinger Properties, L C and Lyle & Joanne Davis.
The area In question is Located immediately to the northeast of the Intersection of Reserve
Drive and is three Bracts described as Tracts 41 and 4C in Section 30, Township 29 North,
Range 21 lives. The properties are currently outside the city limits, but are anticipating
annexation. We are proposing charging the Eisinger property (currently Master planned as
Neighborhood Commercial and Suburban Residential by the city) and the Davis Property
(currently master planned a Suburban Residential by the city) to General Commercial. The
amendment would id e in anticipation of, and consistent with, the Planning Board's proposed
recommendation to extend the commercial designation to the area north and east of the
intersection at US Highway 93 and Reserve Drive, to the Stillwater River. The existing growth
policy shoves Neighborhood Commercial at the very corner of the intersection with the
remaining property being residential. The goal afterward, if the Growth Policy is approved, is
o petition for a B-2 zoning designation.
Goals and Policies
We believe that this Growth policy amendment ei furthers the existing policies of the Kalispell
Growth Policy y:
• ci co raging the development and growth of prosperous commercl'al and nd s riot
districts, each wifh a viable mix of businesses, suitable infrastructure, and a
coordinated development pattern that reduces business osl-s and increases small
business potential.
This new commercial development is occurring in areas where public water and
sever are available.
• This policy amendment provides for adequate areas within the community for
commercial reeds in order to be responsive to potential grout.
• This new amendment will implement standards that ensure a high quality function
and design in new development.
.
• Provides for and encourages an adequate supply of Jobs, higher median incor e and
a stable diversified economy.
5CH WARZ ARC H ITECTU R E AN D E N61 N E E RI N# I NC.
100I n a nc 1 al D r, 5 u i 3 20 - Ka I ispe 11, MT 5 9901 - T e 1: 4 0 6.755,1133 3 T Fax: 40 . .1 - www.sc h w r . om
M
Z
Z
rn
nz
Z
C\
Toro ;71-411412006
,fie: 151-naer Growth Policy Amendinent Pa-OV 2 of 3
• will strengthen Kalispell as c regional retail center that strives to capture more local
and out of county dollars.
# will be located in an area where sound infrastructure can be provided.
Uses public water and sewer available to this area that is in close proximity to 'These
services.
• Improves the drainage and storm wcter draincge facilities in this particular area.
Neighborhood Compatibility
The property for the proposed Growth Policy Amendment is located in an area that has
seen rapid commercial development en in the past 2 years. The subject property is located
just north of the Spring Prairie Addition that houses Target, Home Depot, l etco$ Famous
Footwear, lei=a Factory and TJ Max . To the southwest of this property is Lowe°s and
Costco and the future r e v Kalispell High School. To the north is 'The area proposed for a
regional mall. And directly west is a high density apartment complex. FurFurf her wesf of
these aparfments are various single fcmily subdivisions. We believe this Growth Policy
Amendment is very much in keeping with I area, and pafterns of development in this
p r is lar area.
Transportation Impacts
traffic impact study has been performed ed for the US Highway 93 and Reserve Drive
intersection and is attached for review. Level of service of this Intersection at this time i
Levels B and C as observed by the traffic study, A Traffic impact oral sis will need to be
performed ed y the M OT prior to Issuance of an approach permit. The site will have two
accesses; one off US Highway 93 and one off Reserve Drive. As pointed out, a detailed
fraffic Impact analysis will need to be performed for the MDOT to decide what types of
improvements ents will need to be constructed at the applicants expense to maintain ain she B
and C levels of service that are not occurring on the site.
Environmental Impacts/Site Hazards
Only one environmental impact/site hazard has been encountered on the site at this
time. Are MDOT storm drain is located from the south west corner of the site running north
east through g the property to the Stillwater. This drain has been constructed, upgraded
and extended per specifications of the M OT and is now in exceptional working order.
A hydraulic ra lic analysis for the drain extension is attached to this report. No other hazards ards or
envlron enfal impacts are known at this time. In conclusion, fhere are no known
environmental impacts or site hazards that would impact ct the development of the area.
Local Services
Local services are generally not impacted by comr erclal growth as they do not require
school or general local government services like a residential subdivision would require.
They also generally pay more taxes than residential developments. Public waterand
sewer are easily extendable to the site as they exist on the south side of Reserve Drive_ All
services will be extended by the applicant and installed to public works specifications.
Law enforcement n the site will be minimal compared to residential areas that require
intense 'law enforcement of fines. This site will require city of Kalispell fire emergency
m Jeni 0
services. The buildings will be sprinklered and built to UBC specifications, thus reducing
the intensity of potential fires. A new fire station has just been built approximately 1/4of a
mile of the site incorporating a reduction in travel 'lime to o fire in this area. Water and
sever are located just south of the site at the tile's convenience ce store. Discussions with
Public Works s for extension of those services have already been initiated. The discussion
to this point is that the applicant will extend services under Reserve Drive and then up the
east side of the right of way of US Highway 913. to the north. In conclusion, local services
are adequate or can be extended to serve this development.
Locaflon of the Project
The project area is locotec in an area of rapid commercial and residential growth. This
site is directly north of the Spring Prairie commercial center and northwest of the section
36 development area that will house various commercial structures, a new high school,
the new fire station and various single family residential structures as you move west. A
high density apartment complex is directly vest of the site bordering this commercial
development from the single family residential housing behind it. The site is located in an
area of intense retail development and fits in well with the concentric pattern of growth
that is occurring in the area. In conclusion, the site is appropriate for the commercial
designation proposed for the site.
Entrance Corridor
Entrance corridors will be maintained through careful consideration and construction o
buildings and the final site design. Blending architecturally pleasing structures and
landscaping to create the best visual corridor possible for the north end of Kalispell. All
improvements to the site will be reviewed and approved by the Kalispell site review
committee.
We feel that these properties with the intended use of Automobile Soles and Service will be
more appropriate and fit in with the goals and policies of the general commercial
designation of the Kalispell Growth Policy.
In closing, we feel this proposal substantial meets or exceeds the expectations of the goals
and policies of the Kalispell Growth Policy. We are in hopes that the Kalispell city Planning
Board and city council concur with our findings and vote to approve the Growth Policy
amendment for the future Elsinger Motors site.
Sincerely,
Schwarz Architecture & Engineering, Inc.
Kira Thomas Larson, Architect
Cc: Project File
Qener \documents\Project Fi es i5jngec Motors \ Tom Jens, Aprii 14, 2006,kc.doc
4G
94"x C NTY
2 S Gml 0 c
Go 4BB co c
2
f
4EA
-1 HA ti
i rr i
B��// 8
�' �' I � 1 _ COUNTY
/ � � � 6 —� j SAG-10
_7>
. .. . . ..................
. . . .. . ... ...... . ..... .... .. ... I I I I I I .. ......... .. .. I I I I I
I � I
.....................
VICINITY MAP SCALE 1 400'
EISINGER PROPERTIES, LLC/LYLE & JOANNE DAVIS
EQUEST FOR A GROWTH POLICY AMENDMENT TO GENERAL
BUSINESS FROM NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL &
SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL - FILED CONCURRENTLY WITH
AN ANNEXATION AND INITIAL ZONING APPLICATION
PLOT DATE 4/18/06
FILE# KGPA-06-01 H.\gis\aite\kgpaO6—iDl.dwg
31 w
CB
,
�v.
�r0 ...
J
M1
h
6 t
HA
ti
4
,6V
I
9 L
10
10
a
1
4G
VICINITY MAP SCALE 1 400'
EISINGER PROPERTIES, LLC LYLE & JOANNE DAVIS
GROWTH POLICY AMENDME T CURRENT LAND USE
Commercial Suburban Residenfial}:° ...:>..: Urban Residential
(retail, offices, services, mined use, residential) (single family residential) duplex, single fam ly and love dens ky mu ti-#`artily)
Neighborhood Commercial knot to exceed dweftgs per gross a e ty caR to 12 dwellings per gross a e)
(services. offices, limited retail to immediate neighborhood)
High Density Residential
Urban Mixed Use Area mutti fanOy, limited office)
- (maces, resid -A, tirr0ed commercial & j d st al) typically 8 to 40 dwellings per gross awe)
FILE# KGPA-06-01LAND USE ]Ht.\Ios\site\kaOO-03liLnduse-dwg
CERTIFICATION
APPLICANT: Eis tiger Motors
1. the undersigned certify that I did this date mail via First Class Mail a copy
attachedof the llowir, list
landowners djining the
property lanes of the property that is requesting annexation and a growth
policy amendment.
Date:
LotjTracts# 41 & 4C
Property Owner/Mail Address:
Elsinger Properties, LLC
1000 West Idaho
Kalispell, MT 59901
Schwarz Architecture & Eg, In.
100 Financial Drive, Ste IL20
Kalispell, MT 59,901
Lyle & Joanne Davis
2563 Highway 93 Forth
Kalispell, MT 59901
.AND ATTACHE _ ► S
Elsinger Properties, LLC Schwa Architecture & Eng, Inc, Lyle & Jose Davis
o West Idaho 100 Financial Drive, Ste 120 2563 Highway worth
Kalispell, MT 59901 Kalispell, MT 59901 Kalispell, MT 59901
InlandWestern Kalispell Mtn View
2901 Butterfield Road
Oak Brook 16o2
Stillwater Corporation
5 — 7 ffi Avenue West
Kalispell, M
Mark & Angela Rhodes
2490 US Highway 93 N
Kalispell, M' 59901
David & Ke Filler
P.O. Box 9305
Kahsp ell, M[T 5 9 9 04�23
HD Development of Maryland, Inc. MGS Partnership
A Home Depot USA, Inc. P.O. Box 3356
2455 Paces Ferry Road NiW Missoula, MT 59806
Atlanta, GA 30339
H Properties., LP
P.O. Box 6200
Coeur d'Alene, ID 8-3`816
David & Karie Filler
5 77 US Highway N
NRC
2250 US Highway 93 N
Kalispell, MT 59901
State of Montana Riverside Alliance Church Delores Stroh Comp. Specialist
Dept. of Hiay 859 W here Drive R, Liquor Licensing
7. Prospect Avenue Kalispell, M 51 P.O. Box 1712
Helena, M 5 Helena, MT 2
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
KALISPELL CITY PLANNING BOARD ANDZONING COMMISSION
May 9, 2006
The regular meetIng of the KalispeH City Planning Board. and Zanln Commission is
scheduled for Tuesday, May 9, 2006 beginning at 7:00M in the Kalispell City Council
Chambers,, KalispeH city gall, 312 First ,avenue East,, Kalispell. The planning board VAR hold
a public hearing and take public torments can the following agenda iterns. The Board will
make a recommendation to the Kalispell City Council who will take final action.
1. A request from The Trinity Lutheran Church for a conditional use permit to allow a
youth center to be placed on the church complex site. The property is zoned .w3
{Urban Single Famfly Residential) whick requires churches and accessory buildings to
obtain a. conditional use per. it prior to construction and operation, The property
proposed. for the youth center is located along Third Avenue WN apprwdmately 250
feet south of the intersection of Third Avenue WN and West California Street, The
property address is 452 Third Avenue WN. The site can be described as Assessor's
Tract -Y and -3 in Section 7, Township 28 North, range 21 West, Flathead County,,
Montana.
2. A request from Flathead High School District 5 for a. conditional use pennit to allow
final design and construction ction of a new 12,400 square foot student commons/food
court addition to the high school. Flathead High School is located at 644 4thAve.
West. The high school occupies four city blocks between 4th Ave. West and Sth Ave.
West. The property is 7.7 acres in size can be described as riots -12 Block 91, Lots " -
1 2 Block 92, Lots 7-12 Block 109 and Lots 1 -2 Block 1.10 of Kalispell Original
To nsite located within Section 1 ,'township 28 North,, Range 21 West, Flathead
County, Montana.
3. A request from KVC veto inert to lease a 2.9 acre parcel from the Department o
Natural. Resources and. Conversation in order to construct a Holiday Inn Express. The
proposed hotel would include three stories, accommodating 104 rooms, with a total
building footprint of 22,435 square Feet. The proposed lease site is northwest of the
e sting Lore's building located at 2360 Highway 93 in Section 36, Township 219
North., Range 22 West, Flathead County, Montana. The area of the lease site is zoned
(Industrial -Commercial/ Pan d. Unit Development),
. A request from Elsinr Properties, LLC and Lyle and Joanne Days for a growth policy
a rrendinent, petition for annexation and initial zoning on two properties totaling 15.
acres, The property owners are requesting to amend the growth policy designation on
the properties from Neighborhood Commercial and Suburban residential to
Commercial. The owners have also submitted a petition to annex into the City o
Kalispell and have requested. -2 (General Commercial) zoning for each of the
properties. The properties are located at 2545 and 2563 Highway 93 North, at the
northeast corner of the intersection of Highway 93 and West reserve Drive, located
within Section 30, Township 29 North, range 21 West, Flathead County, Montana.
Documents pertaining to the agenda items are on file for public inspection at the Kalispell
Planning Department, 17 Second Street East, Suite 211, Kalispell, MT 59901, and are
available for public review during regular office hours.
Interested persons are encouraged to attend the hearing and snake their views and concerns
known to the Board. Written comments may e submitted to the Kalispell Planning
Department at the above address, prior to the date of the heahng, or you may contact Sear
Conrad, Senior Planner at 4 1- 85 or -mail him at s ;o rad(i- -calls e',Loony for
additional it fb=atio .
ti
'Ilk
'norms R. Jentz
Planning Director
..... .............................
.... ...
PUBLISH: Legal Notice
Daily Inter Lake
Sunday, 23, 2006
BILL: Kalispell Planning Department
17 Second Street East, Suite 211
Kalispell MT 59901
Note: This office is acting as an agency of the Cif of Kalispell and should be billed at the
City's contract rate.
No. 10501
3. A request from KVC
Development to lease a
NOTICE F PUBLIC
2-9 acre parcel 'from the
H EA_r-�ING
Department of Natural
ALA �L1 [T
and Conver-
LA NING1 BOARD
{resources
;7 ko I in order to con -
AND ZONING
struct a Holiday InnEx-
COMMISSION
press. The proposed
May 9, 2006
hotel would include
three stories, accommo-
The regular meeting of
dating 104 rooms, with
the Kalispell City Plan-
a total building footprint
ning Board and Zo i
of 2?,435 square feet,
sion sohedg
The proposed lease site
� for Tuesday, ja
is northwest of the eist-
9, 3 beginning at
i �,,....,.jjEV��'r� building lo-
7: PM in the Kalispell-�
G�teL� at 30 l��gh#,�
€� Council barkers,
iSectionTown_
1'al�scell #ter Hall,1
��North, lane 22
First Avenue East, Ka-
1,et,ti ld oun,
lispell. The planni.ng
i�e*
Montana. e Caren of
board will hold a public
the lease site is zoned
hearing and take public
B- PD (Industrial -
comments on the follow-
Commercial/Planned
ing agenda items- The
UnitDevelopment),
Board will make a rec-
om endation to the Ka-
lispell City Council who
singer Properties, LL
will take final action.
and Lyle and Joanne
1, A request from The
Trinity Lutheran Church
for a conditional use
permit to allow a youth
center to be placed on
the church complex site.
The property is zoned
R- (Urban Single Fami-
ly
Residential) which re-
quires churches and ac-
cessory buildings to ob-
tain a conditional use
permit prior toconstruc-
tion and operation. The
property proposed for
the youth outer is lo-
cated along Third Ave-
nue WN approximately
25O.feet south of the in-
tersection of Third Ave-
nue WN and West Cali-
fornia Street. The prop-
erty address is 462
Third Avenue WN. The
site can be described as
Assessor's Tract -`
and 8-3 in Section 7,
Township 28 North,
Range 21 Most, Fiat -
head (aunty ontana
Davis for a growth poii-
cy amendment, petition
for annexation and initial
.zoning on two proper-
ties totaling 15.4 acres.
The property owners
are requesting to amend
the growth policy desig-
nation on the properties
from Neighborhood
Commercial and Subur,
ban Residential to Com-
mercial., The owners
have also submitted a
petition to annex into
the C4 of Kalispell and
have requested B}
(General Commercial)
zoning for each of the
properties. The proper-
ties are located at 2545
and 2563 Highway 93
North, at the northeast
corner of the intersec-
tion of Highway 93 and
West Reserve Drive, io-
ated within Section 30,
Township 29 North,'
Range 21 West, Flat-
head County, Montana.
' Documents pertaining
. A request from Fiat- to the agenda items are
head High School Dis- on file for public inspec-
trice 5 for a co ditionai tion at the Kalispell
ll
use permit to allow final Planning Department,
design and construction 17 Second Street East,
Suite 211, lalispellx
of a ;per 12,400 square1T
toot student 01, and are avaiia- cornrorrslfood court ad- hie for public review
ifio to the high school. during regular office
hours.
Flathead High School is
;oc t d at 644 4th Ave, interested persons are
West, The high schoc! encouraged to attend
occupies four city blocks
I-)etween 4th Ave. West she hear € g and rnais
z-�x th eve. West. The their views d c ,
.J510p rty .s 7.7 acres in terns known to ---he
size can described Roord. written corn -
be
as Lots 1-12 Bloch 91, ments may be submit -
Lots 7-12 Biotic 92, Lots ted to the Kail 'Dell Plan/-12 -
ning and Lots ning Department at the
1 - 1Block 110 of laii- above address, prior to
peiR Oriinal Townite the date of the hearing,
iocated withinsection or you rr�a contact
18, Township 8 Forth, Seanor�r �#, errior
. iµ t, l nn r wt (406.) 751-
f n = 3est1 or a -
mail (Iou��t�r. Montana. af mail him at
- scocrad 4 kalipell.corrr
ter additional iforr-naR
€f ;n.
STATE OF MONTANA
FLATHEAD COUNTY
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
CHRIS SCHULDHEISS BEING DULY
SWORN.) DEPOSES AND SAYS: THAT SHE IS THE
LEGAL CLERK OF THE DAILY INTER LAKE A
DAILY NEWSPAPER OF GENERAL CIRCULATION,
PdNE -AND PUBLISHED IN THE CITY OF
KALISPELL, IN THE COUNTY OF FLATHEAD.
r
STATE OF MONTANE., AND THAT N. 10501
LEGAL ADVERTISMENT WAS
PRINTED AND PUBLISHED IN THE REGULAR AND
ENTIRE ISSUE OF SAID PAPER,, AND IN EACH AND
EVERY COPY THEREOF ON THE .DATES OF
APR � 2006
AND THE RATE CHARGED FOR THE ABOVE
PRINTING DOES NOT EXCEED THE MINIMUM
GOING RATE CHARGED TO ANY OTHER
ADVERTISER FOR THE SAME PUBLICATION,
SET IN THE SAME SIZE TYPE AND PUBLISHED
FOR.,THE SAYIE NUMBER OF INSERTIONS.
kt
Subscribed and sworn t
Before me this APR 24,2006
LLB.
Nett Public for the State of Montana
Residing in Kalispell
Commission expires 9/11/09
R of
Pla rming. Dire-T.cr