Loading...
6. TPT Property PurchaseM.. .... ..ji • • L • ' < ..,1,.. Mr. David B. Routzahn, Tax Accountant 445 Main Street Kalispell, Mt. 59901 Re: "TPT" Office Buildings and Vacant Land Kalispell, Mt. Dear Mr. Routzahn: November 17, 199 As requested, I have personally inspected the site and performed a summan appraisal for the above referenced improved property located at 420 and 416 % First Avenue East and vacant lots 7, 8 and N-20' lot 9, Block 76, Kalispell, Mt.. The purpose of this summary appraisal was to estimate the market value of the fee simple estate of the property described herein, based on market conditions prevailing on November 6, 1997. (Date of site inspection). Based on the results of my work and analysis, as summarized in this report, and other information contained in the office files, in conjunction with my professional experience. It is my opinion and conclusion that the estimated market value of the fee simple estate as of date of site inspection - as is: r "TPT" Improved Property One Hundred Ninety-five Thousand Dollars (S 195,000.00 ) Vacant Lots Eighty-five Thousand Dollars ($ 85,000.00 ) This summary appraisal report is based, in part, on the facts and data included in this report. Respec fully, Rex Bo er, I Certifie Appraiser #442 Mt. Broker/Consultant 2) � d `PT" November 17, 1997 Executive Summary Property Type: Improvements - Commercial Buildings and Vacant City Lots Property Location: 416 % and 420 First Avenue East, and Lots 7, 8 and N-20' 9,all m Block 76, Kalispell, Mt. Owner of Record: David E. Thompson Revocable Trust Date of Valuation: November 6, 1997 (Date of site inspection) Property Rights Appraised: Fee simple estate Site Data: Rectangular shaped city lots, 25'x 140'. Improved property considered on lots 3, 4, 5 and 6, with interior parking between and in front of the buildings. Buildings sf appx. 2,520 and 2,940 for total of 5,460 sf, site sf appx. 14,000 sf. Vacant lots 7, 8 and N - 20' 9, asphalt paved parking, appx. 9,800 sf. Improvement Data: Two separate one story commercial buildings. Building at 420 1" Avenue fronts on First Avenue and has appx. 2,520 sf. the other building at 416 % - 424 First Avenue fronts on the alley and has appx. 2,940 sf. Zoning: City Zoning - B-4 Central Business Highest and Best Use: As though vacant and as improved - commercial use. Value Indications: "TPT" improved property: Site value Cost Approach Income Capitalization Approach Sales Comparison Approach Vacant city lots Final Value Estimate: "TPT" improved property Vacant city lots $ 110,000 $ 195,000 $ 190,000 $ 195,000 $ 85,000 S 195,000 - " As is " S 85,000 2 'PT" November 17, 1997 Consideration was given to " time trending " of sales, because of the lack of and time of sales, however in the final analysis land sales and values are estimated to have been relatively stable and no appreciation adjustment was estimated. Further support is contained in the office files. Smaller properties typically reflect higher unit values as the results of the principals of economics of scale. However, there is a threshold where smaller properties become less desirable because of poor utility. For the subjects, property size was considered by each value parcel as separate, (TPT - improved parcel lots 3, 4, 5 and 6 as one parcel and vacant lots 7, 8 & N 20' lot 9 as another parcel; as specifically requested) In other words, the smallest parcel for highest value was the standard of value estimate for this appraisal. Final Reconciliation No land sales were exactly similar to the subjects. The above comparisons indicate a range of 6.65 per sf to 9.14. The low range of 6.65 (1) was the most recent, however, this situation was viewed as somewhat unusual in the fact that it was a sale by a government entity, City of Kalispell, and was primarily induced by adding other development, upcoming City elections, etc.. Accordingly, this sale was considered low in relation to the market. The other recent sale, KM, (7) was a larger, %2 city block, size parcel, which generally command a lower per unit value. The sales considered most comparable were (5) and (6) and because of size a somewhat higher unit value. Accordingly the larger parcel with the improvements of 14,000 sf was deemed to have a representative per unit value of 8.00 per sf. The vacant lots were considered of higher value as they are unimproved and would be readily available for development, accordingly they were deemed to have a per sf value of 8.75. Site Value ( Land): TPT Improved Site - Lots 3, 4,5 & 6 14,000 sf at 8.00 = 112,500 (rounded) 110,000 Vacant Site - Lots 7, 8, & N 20' 9 9,800 sf at 8.75 = 85,750 (rounded) 85,000