Loading...
5. Kalispell Facility Plan 2000 Contract Awardof Kalispell Post Office Box 1997 • Kalispell, Montana 59903-1997 • Telephone (406) 758-7700 • FAX (406) 758-7758 REPORT TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Jim Hansz, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Award Contract, Kalispell Facility Plan 2000 MEETING DATE: May 15, 2000 BACKGROUND: The FY 1999/2000 budget includes appropriated funds in the Water, Sewer, Storm Drain, and Downtown, Westside and Airport Tax Increment Urban Renewal budgets for development of comprehensive facility plans and analyses of the City's water, sewer, storm drainage and wastewater treatment facilities. The amounts budgeted currently total $250,000.00. The current year budget for wastewater treatment does not include funds for this work because the need was unanticipated at the time the budget was originally developed. All these funds have been carried forward into the 2000/2001 budget and additional funds totaling $25,000.00 have been added to the WWTP budget for the proportionate cost of work in this area. A long and comprehensive process was followed, outlined in a detailed RFQ/RFP prepared by the City, to identify the best -qualified consultants capable of performing this work. Three qualified organizations were invited to propose a scope and methodology for the project. As previously reported to the City Council, the joint venture of HDR Engineers / Morrison Maierle was selected and a detailed scope of work and budget has been negotiated that includes all the items initially specified by the City and others identified through the RFQ/RFP and negotiating efforts. The total cost of this work is negotiated to not exceed $275,000.00, exclusive of additional work that may be identified and subsequently approved. As mentioned above, all but $25,000.00 of this amount, for the WWTP analysis portion of the work, is covered in the current budget. This deficiency is accounted for in the FY 2000/2001 budget. Therefore, it is the intent that work on this task be delayed until after the start of the 2000/2001 budget year, July 1, 2000, at which time the budget will reflect full accounting of all project costs. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend award of the Kalispell Facility Plan 2000 contract to the joint venture of HDR Engineers / Morrison Maierle based on the negotiated scope and budget. FISCAL EFFECTS: Expenditure of budgeted funds as indicated. ALTERNATIVES: As suggested by the City Council Respectfully mimes C. Hansz, P.E. Director of Public Works Attachment: Contract Engineer Chris A. Kukulski City Manager Report compiled May 11, 2000 AGREEMENT TO FURNISH ENGINEERING SERVICES to the CITY OF KALISPELL for the For the consideration hereinafter set forth HDR Engineering, Inc, a Nebraska corporation, with principal offices at 8404 Indian Hills Drive, Omaha, Nebraska, 68114 (hereinafter referred to as the ENGINEER), agrees to provide engineering and related services as described herein to THE CITY OF KALISPELL (hereinafter referred to as the OWNER) for a project generally described as the Kalispell Water, Sewer, and Storm Drainage Systems Facility Plan 2000. The project will involve preparation of the Kalispell Water, Sewer, and Storm Drainage Systems Facility Plan 2000 as described in Article 1 and Exhibit A. ARTICLE 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES The ENGINEER agrees to provide required planning and engineering related services for the OWNER's Project. The services to be provided, and the compensation for such services, shall be as mutually agreed to in this Agreement, executed by both parties and as described in the Scope of Services (Exhibit A). Unless otherwise indicated, execution of this Agreement by the OWNER shall constitute notice to and authorization for the ENGINEER to proceed with the services enumerated in the Agreement. ARTICLE 2. BASIS OF COMPENSATION A. BUDGET The budget for the Scope of Services of this Agreement has been agreed upon by the parties to this agreement. The Scope of Services, by this reference, is hereby made a part of this Agreement. B. COMPENSATION As consideration for providing the services described as: Tasks 100 through 1100 in Scope of Services (Exhibit A), the OWNER shall pay the ENGINEER a total fee not to exceed $275,000.00. Pay requests shall be submitted and payment shall be made as described in Article 3. C. CHANGE OF SCOPE OR PERSONNEL The Scope of Services and its related budget for this Agreement shall be limited to the scope and budget so contained herein (Exhibit A). Changes in the indicated Scope of Services shall be subject to renegotiation and shall be implemented by a formal amendment to this Agreement. ENGINEER shall notify OWNER of any changes in key personnel assigned to this project and shall obtain concurrence of OWNER prior to such changes. D. ADDITIONAL SERVICES Additional services not specified in Article 1, but subsequently requested by the OWNER, shall be described and the cost thereof outlined in a formal amendment to this Agreement E. LITIGATION ASSISTANCE The ENGINEER will not be obligated to provide expert witness or other litigation support related to its services, unless expressly agreed in writing. In the event the ENGINEER is required to respond to a subpoena, government inquiry or other legal process related to the services in connection with a proceeding to which it is not a party, the OWNER shall reimburse the ENGINEER for reasonable costs and compensate the ENGINEER at its then standard rates for reasonable time incurred in gathering information and documents and attending depositions, hearings, and the like. ARTICLE 3. PAYMENT FOR SERVICES Payment to the ENGINEER, as prescribed in Article 2, shall be made as follows: A. REQUEST FOR PAYMENT The ENGINEER shall submit monthly pay requests in a consistent detailed format. The submittal shall include a summary sheet to indicate total Professional Services, Reimbursable Expenses, Subcontracted Services and Total Payment Requested. Additional sheets shall be attached as necessary to describe hours worked and billable rates for each employee, itemized reimbursable expenses and itemized subcontracted services, including hours worked and billable rates for all subcontractors' employees. B. PAYMENT FOR SERVICES For all services described in Article 1 and subsequent amendments, payment is due within 30 days after the OWNER's receipt of the ENGINEER's pay request. Payment shall be for actual invoiced costs but shall not exceed the total amount shown in Article 2 and Scope of Services (Exhibit A). ARTICLE 4. OBLIGATIONS OF THE ENGINEER 2 A. AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED The ENGINEER will not begin work on any of the services listed in Article 1 until the OWNER directs him to proceed. Authorization to proceed on work elements not defined in this Agreement as to scope, cost, and time for completion shall be in the form of a formal amendment as previously described. The ENGINEER will perform the services described in this Agreement and in any work release documents or change orders which are issued under this Agreement and signed by both parties. In performing the services, the ENGINEER will exercise the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by reputable companies performing the same or similar services in the same geographic area. The ENGINEER is obligated to provide only those services which are described in this Agreement, in work release documents signed by the ENGINEER or in change orders signed by the ENGINEER C. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION Confidential information shall be designated as such by the OWNER. The ENGINEER and his subcontractors will not disclose confidential information provided by the OWNER or developed by the ENGINEER and his subcontractors in the course of its services without the OWNER's specific prior written consent. ARTICLE 5. OBLIGATIONS OF THE OWNER A. AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED The OWNER shall authorize the ENGINEER to proceed on Tasks 100 through 1100 in Scope of Services (Article A) by executing this Agreement. The OWNER shall provide to the ENGINEER all technical data in the OWNER's possession, including previous reports, maps, surveys, borings, and all other information required by the ENGINEER and relating to the ENGINEER's work on the project. Such information shall include, but not be limited to, the OWNER's requirements for the project, any design criteria or constraints, and copies of design and construction details or standards that OWNER requires to be included. The ENGINEER may rely upon the accuracy, timeliness, and completeness of the information provided by the OWNER in performing ENGINEER's services to the OWNER. C. ACCESS TO FACILITIES AND PROPERTY 3 The OWNER shall make its system facilities and properties available and accessible for inspection by the ENGINEER and provide labor and safety equipment as reasonably required by the ENGINEER and as authorized by OWNER. D. ACCESS TO PRIVATE PROPERTY The ENGINEER shall obtain permission for access from individual property owners as necessary to perform required services on private property. E. TIMELY REVIEW The OWNER shall examine all studies, reports, sketches, drawings, specifications, proposals, and other documents presented by the ENGINEER, obtain advice of an attorney, insurance counselor, accountant, auditor, and other consultants as the OWNER deems appropriate for such examination and render in writing decisions pertaining thereto in a timely manner so as to not delay the services of the ENGINEER. F. PROMPT NOTICE The OWNER shall give prompt written notice to the ENGINEER whenever the OWNER observes or otherwise becomes aware of any development that affects the scope or timing of the ENGINEER's services or any defect in the work of the ENGINEER or Contractors. ARTICLE 6. GENERAL LEGAL PROVISIONS A. FORCE MAJEURE The OWNER shall not be responsible for any delay or failure of performance caused by fire or other casualty, labor dispute, government or military action, transportation delay, inclement weather, Act of God, act or omission of OWNER or its contractors, failure of OWNER or any government authority to timely review or to approve the services or to grant permits or approvals, or any other cause beyond the OWNER'S reasonable control. B. INDEMNIFICATION Indemnification by OWNER: The OWNER agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend the ENGINEER from and against any and all liabilities, demands, claims, causes of actions and judgments (including costs and reasonable attorneys fees) which the ENGINEER may incur, become responsible for or pay out as a result of death or bodily injury or threat thereof to any person, destruction of or damage to any property, contamination of or adverse effect on natural resources or the environment, any violation of local, state, or federal laws, regulations or orders, or any other damages claimed by third parties, including without limitation any arising out of or related to hazardous materials or substances and including costs of response or remediation arising out of the application of 4 common law or laws imposing strict liability, to the extent arising from the negligent acts or omissions or willful misconduct of the OWNER, its employees, agents and subcontractors. Indemnification by ENGINEER: The ENGINEER agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend the OWNER from and against any and all liabilities, demands, claims, causes of actions and judgments (including costs and reasonable attorneys fees) which the OWNER may incur, become responsible for or pay out as a result of death or bodily injury or threat thereof to any person, destruction of or damage to any property, contamination of or adverse effect on natural resources or the environment, any violation of local, state, or federal laws, regulations or orders, or any other damages claimed by third parties, including without limitation any arising out of or related to hazardous materials or substances and including costs of response or remediation arising out of the application of common law or laws imposing strict liability, to the extent arising from the negligent acts or omissions or willful misconduct of the ENGINEER, its employees, agents and subcontractors. C. INSURANCE The ENGINEER shall acquire and maintain statutory workmen's compensation insurance coverage. ENGINEER shall acquire and maintain bodily injury and property damage insurance coverage in an amount not less than seven hundred fifty thousand ($750,000) dollars for each claim and one and one- half million ($1,500,000) dollars per occurrence. The ENGINEER shall acquire and maintain bodily injury liability automobile insurance coverage in an amount not less than seven hundred fifty thousand ($750,000) dollars for each claim and one and one- half million ($1,500,000) dollars per occurrence and property damage liability automobile insurance coverage in the amount of fifty thousand ($50,000) dollars for each occurrence. The ENGINEER shall acquire and maintain catastrophe or excess insurance coverage in the amount of one million (1,000,000) dollars for each occurrence and one million (1,000,000) dollars for each aggregate with ten thousand ($10,000) dollars deductible amount. The ENGINEER shall acquire and maintain professional liability insurance coverage in the amount of one million ($1,000,000) dollars with a one hundred thousand ($100,000) dollar deductible amount. D. TERMINATION This Agreement may be terminated by the OWNER for its convenience by giving 30 days written notice to the ENGINEER. This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon 30 days written notice should the other party fail substantially to perform in accordance with this Agreement through no fault of the other or if the project is stopped by conditions beyond the control of the OWNER. In the event of termination, the ENGINEER shall be paid in full for all work previously authorized and performed up to the termination date, plus termination expenses if termination is not caused by failure of the ENGINEER to perform. If no termination is implemented, relationships and obligations created by this Agreement shall 5 terminate upon completion of all applicable requirements of this Agreement. E. SUSPENSION, DELAY, OR INTERRUPTION OF WORK The OWNER may suspend, delay, or interrupt the work of the ENGINEER on the project for the convenience of the OWNER or for reasons beyond the control of the OWNER or ENGINEER. In the event of such suspension, delay, or interruption, an adjustment in compensation due the ENGINEER shall be made for all increases in cost of the ENGINEER's performance under this Agreement, including personnel relocation and/or replacement costs, and all other identifiable labor and expense costs. F. ASSIGNMENT This Agreement is to be binding on the heirs, successors, and assigns of the parties hereto and is not to be assigned by either party without first obtaining the written consent of the- other. No assignment of this Agreement shall be affective until the Assignee assumes in writing the obligations of the assigning party, and delivers such written assumption to the other original party to this Agreement. Use of subconsultants by the ENGINEER for technical or professional services shall not be considered an assignment of a portion of this Agreement. Nothing herein shall be construed to give any rights or benefits hereunder to anyone other than OWNER and ENGINEER. G. LITIGATION In the event either party to this Agreement shall be required to bring an action against the other party to enforce this Agreement, or any portion thereof, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and costs therefore in addition to any damages that may be awarded. In the event of litigation concerning this Agreement, venue shall be in the Eleventh Judicial District in and for the County of Flathead, Montana, and this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Montana both as to interpretation and performance. ARTICLE 7. GENERAL PROVISIONS A. ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS The ENGINEER shall provide access to any of the documents relating to this project to the OWNER, the City of Kalispell, or authorized representative of the above during normal working 0 hours. The ENGINEER shall maintain project and financial records for this project for at least three years after final payment and closure of the project. C. REPRODUCIBLE COPIES Reproducible copies of planning and design drawings and specifications shall be made available to the OWNER upon request. D. COVENANT AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES The ENGINEER warrants that he has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the ENGINEER, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that he has not paid or agreed to pay any company or persons, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the ENGINEER, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts, or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, the OWNER shall have the right to annul this Agreement without liability, or in its discretion to deduct from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee. E. SCHEDULE The final Kalispell Water, Sewer, and Storm Drainage Systems Facility Plan 2000 shall be submitted to the OWNER within 365 calendar days of the date of this agreement. See Exhibit B for detailed schedule. 7 ARTICLE 8 ATTACHMENTS SCHEDULES AND SIGNATURES A. AGREEMENT DESCRIPTION This Agreement (consisting of pages 1 through 8, inclusive) and attached Scope of Services (Exhibit a) and Schedule (Exhibit B) constitute the entire Agreement between the OWNER and the ENGINEER and supersedes all prior written or oral understandings. This Agreement may only be amended, supplemented, modified, or canceled by a duly executed written addendum. DATED this day of , 19_. CITY OF KALISPELL I0 Chris Kukulski, City Manager HDR ENGINEERING, INC. "ENGINEER" By Name: Dave Backer Title: Senior Vice President Address: 418 S. 9" St., Suite 301 Boise, Idaho 83702 Exhibit A Scope of Services 100 Project Management 200 Existing System Inventory 300 Basis of Planning Memorandum 400 Water System Analysis 500 Sewer System Analysis 600 Storm Drainage System Analysis 700 Sewage Treatment Plant Evaluation 800 System Recommendations and Capital Improvement Plan 900 Financial Management Evaluation 1000 Reports and Training 1100 Public Presentations TASK 100. PROJECT MANAGEMENT Objectives: Plan and execute the facility plan development in accordance with an established schedule and budget while exceeding quality expectations. HDR/MMI Subtasks: 101 Weekly Updates. Joe Steiner and Terry Richmond will conduct weekly telephone conference calls with the City's project manager to review project status and action items. Arrangements will be made to conduct the conference calls at the MMI Kalispell office or City office, at the discretion of the City. 102 Project Coordination Meetings. Attend twelve monthly meetings with the City to review status of the planning effort. To the extent possible, these will be coordinated with other meetings and workshops to minimize impact on City staff. 103 Project Management Plan. The Plan will set forth project procedures and will clearly define individual responsibilities, task schedules, milestones, deliverables and task budgets. The Project Management Plan will contain project objectives; organization and roles of the project team, contract work plan, management tools and techniques; subconsultant management; coordination with the City and other participating agencies; Quality Assurance and Quality Control Plan; monitoring; reporting and administrative procedures. At the onset of the project, a project team meeting will be conducted to develop communication channels and form the basis for a comprehensive Project Management Plan. 104 Monitoring. Monitor project progress including work completed, work remaining, budget expended, schedule and estimated cost of work remaining and estimated cost at completion. Manage activities within task budgets. Prepare and submit a brief monthly progress report and invoice using the project management tools prepared in Subtask 103. 105 Quality Control. Review all work activities and project deliverables for conformance with quality control requirements and project standards. Monitor project activities for potential changes, anticipate changes whenever possible, and with the City's approval, modify project tasks and approach to keep the overall project within budget and on schedule. Deliverables: Project Management Plan Memoranda and meeting notes as required Project status reports and invoices City Involvement: • Participate in telephone conference calls and meetings. • Participate in project management workshop. • Review project status reports and approve invoices. • Review and approve modifications to approach, schedule and deliverables as appropriate. • Report to City Manager and Council as appropriate. TASK 200. EXISTING SYSTEM INVENTORY Objectives: Gather accurate existing system information. The information gathered in this task will be the foundation for recommendations in the facility plan. HDR/MMI Subtasks: 201 Collect and Inventory Existing System Information. HDR/MMI will collect and review existing reports, records, logs, system maps and as -built drawings relating to the water, sewer and stormwater facilities. The focus of this task is to compile available physical system information, incorporate system information into the existing City mapping system (i.e. sewer inverts and pipe sizing) and evaluate existing system conditions to determine deficiencies. 202 Staff Interviews. HDR/MMI will interview key City staff concerning past and current water, sewer collection, storm drainage and wastewater plant issues. These interviews will be conducted in a manner to minimize impact to staff work schedules. 203 Field Observation and Examination. Where inconsistencies exist in the sources of information, field reconnaissance will be performed by HDR/MMI and the city staff to verify existing conditions. 204 System Database. A database for the water, sewer collection, storm drainage and wastewater treatment plant will be developed and will include information such as pipe diameters, materials, elevations, depths and other additional physical information describing the system components. This database can reduce the potential for human error when the hydraulic models are constructed by importing the databases directly into the models. This provides another level of quality control in model development. A copy of the database will be provided to the city as a hard copy appendix to the facility plan and in electronic form. Components determined to be field verified will be summarized in a memorandum to the City. Efforts will be made to use the existing Hansen database. 205 Design Standards Review. The purpose of this subtask is to review current City policy on basic design and planning requirements including: pipeline sizing, water storage, fire flow, maximum and minimum line velocities, maximum and minimum water main pressures and facility construction. Using HDR/MMI's relationships with other municipalities and agencies across the nation along with state and federal associations, the design standards will be reviewed and recommendations for improvements will be made, based on standard industry practices and tailored to the City's water, sewer collection and storm drainage needs. As the City grows, these criteria will provide a level of consistency in the planning, design and construction of future system components. Deliverables: System database " Memorandum of recommended improvements based on design standard review Updated City digital map and a log of changes based on system inventory information City Involvement: • Supply existing system records inclusive of existing database (Hansen software, documentation and permission to use). • Participate in brief and organized staff interviews. Review recommended design standards improvements and implement standards changes. TASK 300. BASIS OF PLANNING MEMORANDUM Objectives: The Basis of Planning Memorandum establishes the planning constraints, clarifies the issues that will impact planning decisions and provides a clear foundation for the development of the alternatives for the three key system plans. It is anticipated that the City has already developed much of this information and the task will be largely focused on the consolidation, completion, evaluation, and interpretation of existing information and data. The Basis of Planning Memorandum will be developed through the following subtasks and activities: HDR/MMI Subtasks: 301 Population, Economic and Land Use Baseline (Existing Conditions). The goal of this subtask is to develop a strong understanding of existing conditions. Socioeconomic and land use data will be gathered for the Kalispell area and developed into current population and economic (business and employment) characteristics. HDR/MMI will rely on the following information: • Land use mapping for the Kalispell area to be used as the base for population and employment overlays. The Resources and Analysis Section of the Kalispell City/County Master Plan (1997) will be used for land use designation. • Flathead County Regional Development Office economic/business characteristics and trends. • Flathead County yearly population estimates available from the Bureau of Census (1967-1999). • Even -year population estimates for the City of Kalispell from the US Bureau of Census through 1998. • National Policy Association (NPA) — Data Services population projections for Flathead County through year 2025. • County employment earnings estimates (1969 to 1998) from the US Bureau of Economic Analysis. • Flathead Regional Development Office general land use trends for Flathead County. Data and observations recruited from City public works and building department personnel, county health department, school districts and others knowledgeable about local land use characteristics. 302 Population and Economic Distribution. The baseline data will be integrated into a . summary Kalispell area GIS database. In conjunction with the corresponding GIS maps, the Montana Department of Revenue's GEOCODE database will be used to identify lot locations, housing, lot size, assessed value and other characteristics relevant to modeling service demand. To accommodate the infrastructure demand models, the demographic information will be handled by Analysis Zone to provide area -specific residential and employment service needs. The Montana Department of Labor and Industry's "202" database will also be used to identify the location and service needs of commercial/industrial and government land uses. Special generators of service demand (colleges, schools, special event facilities, etc.) will be identified and incorporated into the analysis. All baseline data will be provided in a database form associated with each Analysis Zone. 303 Establish Service Area Boundary. HDR/MMI will develop a preliminary service area boundary consistent with current City/County growth planning. A general assumption is City of Kalispell's city limits will expand over time. Using current land use planning, the Kalispell City/County Comprehensive Master Plan Update, geophysical boundaries, the City's extension of service plans and established stormwater basins, the boundary will be presented to the City Public Works Department for final confirmation. 304 Project Population and Distribution. Using data collected in the baseline evaluation, a mathematical model will be used to project future population and employment by Analysis Zone, tied to the Kalispell City/County Comprehensive Master Plan population projections. Economic impacts, such as recent introduction of a major new employer into the Kalispell economy, will be used to adjust projections. Population and distribution projections will be made for 20-year horizon and saturation (complete build -out) conditions. High, low and most -likely projections will be developed for each Analysis Zone. This task will include identification of future areas of expansion based upon past and projected patterns of community growth and development. The city will provide input and approve these projections. HDR/MMI has budgeted 1 meeting with city staff to discuss and resolve any issues regarding population projections. 305 Computer Models Development. HDR/MMI shall conduct a market survey of commercially available storm drainage, sanitary sewer collection, and water distribution computer model(s). HDR/MMI will review each model and make recommendations to the City in a memorandum, identifying the merits of each program in matrix form. Following the selection of the computer model(s) by the City, HDR/MMI will procure the models on behalf of the City. $12,000 has been allocated for model purchase ($4,000 per module). All models will be licensed to the City and become the property of the City, following completion of the work. The following are minimum requirements for the water, sewer and storm drainage computer models: • All model data shall be provided and accessible on a user friendly database format acceptable to the City. The model shall be compatible with existing and updated City mapping. • The water distribution model shall be able to plot any section of the water distribution network; and from the plotted sections, the user shall be able to obtain flow velocities, flow rates, flow directions, static and residual pressures, hydraulic grade lines, diameter of the line, material, and date of construction. • The sewer collection and storm drainage system models may be able to plot any section of the collection system; and, from the plotted section, the user should be able to obtain slope, total capacity, used capacity, diameter of the line and material. 306 Basis of Planning Workshop. A single workshop will be organized and facilitated to review the conclusions and information presented in the draft Basis of Planning Memorandum. The workshop will review the socioeconomic, land use information, ongoing trends and other relevant information used to develop the baseline and future population projections. Particular focus will be placed on how the information in the text of the planning report will impact the development and evaluation of facility improvement alternatives. Final decisions on the use of this information will be made at this workshop. 307 Finalize Basis of Planning Memorandum. The Draft Basis of Planning Memorandum developed as part of Subtasks 301 through 306 will be finalized after review and comment by the City. The report will include separate Basis of Planning subtask memorandums consolidated into a report, along with an executive summary. Deliverables: • Population and economic distribution summary database and mapping of entire study area using Kalispell -Flathead County GIS database and mapping • Service area boundary map • Population projections database • Basis of Planning workshop agenda and meeting notes • Computer model recommendation memorandum • Computer model(s) • Draft and final Basis of Planning Memoranda City Involvement: • Participate in workshops. • Review and approve Draft and Final Basis of Planning Memoranda. • Review computer model recommendation memorandum. • Participate in the selection of system models. TASK 400. WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS Objectives: HDR/MMI will evaluate the City's existing water storage and distribution facilities, with emphasis on the ability to continue to provide excellent water storage and delivery. Any capacity limited or inadequate facilities will be identified and recommendations made for necessary renovations or equipment replacement needs. HDR/MMI will develop and evaluate alternatives to expand water source, storage and distribution capability requirements to continue to meet increasing demand. HDR/MMI Subtasks: 401 Water Supply. The HDR/MMI team will review the City's municipal water -right certificates and permits to identify the total amount of 50-year water -demand forecasts. The amount of any water rights surplus or shortfall for each of these time increments will be identified. Shortfalls will indicate that the City needs to acquire additional groundwater rights/permits. A water rights memorandum will be prepared that summarizes the review. This review will include: 1) compilation and tabulation of historical water use from each water source (6 sources); 2) determine adequate water right appropriation and prepare and submit the pertinent change of use, notice of completion or application for beneficial water use permit forms to the MDNR; and 3) evaluation of 5 surface water rights through the development of a plan identifying use and quantity (inclusive of a re-evaluation of Noffsinger Spring — Stillwater River supplemental water right). 402 Develop and Calibrate Hydraulic Model. The selected computer model will be used to simulate the water system. Water lines with a diameter of six (6) inches and greater will be modeled. Pumps, pressure -reducing valves, and other appurtenances will also be entered into the database. Node elevations will be obtained from the existing system inventory developed in Task 200. Hydraulic model runs will consist of peak day, peak hour, and fire flow runs and will include a 24-hour extended period simulation. The existing condition model will be calibrated with existing system operation and maintenance data, including water production data, pumping records, and tank logs, and physical testing procedures. Existing data, hydraulic modeling and engineering judgement will be used to estimate average day, maximum day and maximum hour usage rates. 403 Deficiencies Identification: Existing System. Results from the existing condition model combined with information gathered from staff interviews will be used to identify the existing system problem areas. Potential problem areas that would be identified in the modeling process include system low pressures, high velocities, inadequate fire flows and deficient storage. Water storage facilities will be visually inspected for standard deficiencies and inadequacies. If any major problems or deficiencies are observed, recommendations for further study will be made. Further studies would be provided as additional service. The existing service zone boundaries will be evaluated and appropriate modifications will be recommended, including linking the two existing pressure zones with Pressure Reducing Valve Stations. Identification of system deficiencies will be based on the design criteria established in Task 300. 404 Future System Analysis and Deficiencies Identification. Using the population data and land use projections developed in Task 300, a future condition hydraulic model will be developed. This model will aid in the determination of water service area, fire flow and storage deficiencies in the existing and future systems. The model will look at: average day and peak day flows; fire demands; and peak hour demands. System requirements to serve future development will be evaluated for 20-year and saturation growth scenarios. Included in the problem deficiencies task will be issues relating to identification of capacity restrictions and other system inadequacies. As with the existing system, future system requirements and deficiencies will be based on the criteria established in Task 300. 405 Regulatory Analysis. The system will be evaluated while cognizant of the impact of existing and future regulatory requirements. HDR/MMI will conduct the analysis and evaluation at the state and federal levels. If deficiencies or inadequacies are identified, corrective actions will be assessed, and recommendations made for bringing the system into compliance. 406 Alternative Analysis. The alternative analysis task will investigate solutions to the existing and future system deficiency identified in Tasks 403 and 404. Because there is a potential for an existing system concern to be magnified with development, the alternative analysis looks at these items when investigating potential solutions. This approach provides long-term solutions that fix existing problems while addressing future growth. For the existing and future condition deficiencies identified in the distribution system, alternatives will be evaluated using the future condition hydraulic model. The computer model provides the opportunity to efficiently simulate numerous potential solutions to the deficiency areas identified, while looking at the impacts on overall system performance. No more than three (3) potential scenarios will be simulated as part of this project. 407 Water System Summary Memorandum. A summary technical memorandum will be prepared presenting existing and future deficiencies. Included in the summary memorandum will be conceptual level estimates of capital costs for the alternatives developed and exhibits to aid City staff in review. In addition, the goal of this memorandum is to provide City staff with a draft of the system alternatives and proposed improvements for their review prior to the development of system recommendations. A map showing water distribution system improvements and extensions will be prepared. All planning work shall be performed in accordance with the Montana State Department of Environmental Quality and the Environmental Protection Agency procedures. Deliverables: • Water rights and recommendations memorandum • Future system alternative evaluations • Water system summary memorandum • Water system improvements and extensions map • Regulatory compliance recommendation City Involvement: • Assist HDR/MMI in field verification of model by providing existing system operation and maintenance data and field tests. TASK 500. SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM ANALYSIS Objective: HDR/MMI will evaluate the existing sewer collection facilities, with an emphasis on the ability to provide excellence in wastewater conveyance. Any capacity limited section will be identified and recommendations will be made for necessary improvements and equipment replacement. HDR/MMI will also develop and evaluate alternatives to expand sewer collection facilities to meet additional needs of an expanded service area and additional capacity requirements. HDRIMMI Subtasks: 501 Develop and Calibrate Hydraulic Models. The sewer collection system model will be developed for sewers with a diameter of eight (8) gravity inches and greater. Hydraulic model runs will consist of a 24-hour extended period simulation that will evaluate system performance under wet weather conditions. A 10 year storm event will be used for the modeling of inflow volumes. The City will provide peak flow from the WWTP for the last 5 years. The existing condition model will be calibrated based on flow monitoring and operation and maintenance data. It is anticipated that flow data recorded at the sewage treatment plant influent flow meter will be the primary source for model calibration. 502 Deficiencies Identification: Existing System. Results from the existing condition model run along with information gathered from staff interviews will be used to identify the existing system problem areas. Potential deficiency areas that would be identified in the modeling process include surcharged pipe locations, storm water cross -connections and low and high pipeline velocities. Identifications of system capacity restrictions and deficiencies will be based on the design criteria established in Task 300. 503 Inflow and Infiltration (111) Reduction. Evaluate past and current efforts to reduce 1/I and recommend additional actions. Utilize the hydraulic model to analyze sewers with regard to the impact of infiltration and inflow. Transfer data from previous flow monitoring studies into the model calibration. HDR/MMI will recommend any additional field studies; ie. Smoke testing, flow monitoring, etc., needed to further define the I/I analysis. 504 Future System Analysis and Deficiency Identification. Using the population and employment projections developed in Task 300, a future condition hydraulic model will be developed that will also project future sewer flows. This model will aid in the determination of collection system requirements to serve future development and alleviate existing system deficiencies. Future system requirements will be developed for the 20-year and saturation growth (ultimate buildout) conditions. Like the existing system, future system capacity restrictions and deficiencies will be based on the criteria established in Task 300. 505 Lift Station Analysis. This task will include a physical inspection of all 16 lift stations within the collection system. HDR/MMI will collect station design information and interview City staff to assess station capacity and identify facility deficiencies. Recommended improvements will be identified in conjunction with system future expansion analysis conducted in Task 504. Focus will be placed on the feasibility for station elimination with station expansion alternatives. Force mains will be evaluated for capacity. 506 Regulatory Analysis. The system will be evaluated while cognizant of the impact of existing and future regulatory requirements. If deficiencies or inadequacies are identified, corrective actions will be assessed, and recommendations made for bringing the system into regulatory compliance. 507 Alternative Analysis. The alternative analysis task will investigate solutions to the existing and future system deficiencies identified in tasks 502, 503, 504, and 505. Because there is a potential for an existing system problem to be magnified with development, the alternative analysis looks at these problems when investigating potential solutions. This approach provides long-term solutions that correct existing concerns while accounting for future growth. For the existing and future condition deficiencies identified in the collection system, alternatives will be evaluated using the future condition hydraulic model. The computer model provides the opportunity to efficiently simulate numerous potential solutions to the problem areas identified while looking at the effect on overall system performance. No more than three (3) potential scenarios will be simulated as part of this project. 508 Wastewater Summary Memorandum. A summary memorandum will be prepared presenting the existing and future problems identified. Included in the summary memorandum will be conceptual level estimates of capital costs and O&M costs for the alternatives developed and exhibits to aid City staff in review. The goal of this memorandum is to provide City staff with a draft of the system alternatives and proposed improvements for their review prior to the development of system recommendations. A map showing sewer service areas and interceptor improvements will be prepared. All planning work shall be performed in accordance with the Montana State Department of Environmental Quality and the Environmental Protection Agency procedures. Deliverables: • Sewer system summary memorandum • Future system alternative evaluations • Sewer collection system improvements and extensions map. • Lift station and force main evaluation • Regulatory compliance recommendation Client Involvement: Assist HDR/MMI in field verification of model by providing existing system flow monitoring operation and maintenance data Participate in interviews and inspections to assess lift stations Provide WWTP flow data TASK 600. STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM ANALYSIS Objective: HDR/MMI will evaluate the existing storm drainage facilities, with emphasis on resolution of known storm drainage problems in the western portion of the service area. In addition, any capacity limited facilities will be identified and recommendations will be made for necessary improvements. Where appropriate, alternatives for facility improvements will be compared and recommendations made. HDR/MMI Subtasks: 601 Data Coordination. Coordinate with Task 300 to identify the base level of data needed for modeling purpose. 602 Basin Characterization. Determine basin areas from City topographical maps. Map the subcatchments to interface with the baseline mapping and database developed in Task 300. Create the hydrologic model from the maps. Develop subcatchment characteristics using available land use, soil, and slope information and existing electronic maps to be provided by the City and other agencies. 603 Model Development and Calibration. The selected computer model will be prepared for the existing and proposed drainage facilities. The model development will be extended from the closed piping systems to open drainage areas. Model calibration will be completed using operation and maintenance data as well as empirical and historical data such as rainfall records, high water marks, previous flow monitoring. An empirical model setup is planned at this time to output general information on facility capacity. A qualitative calibration step using known flooding conditions or surcharge data (i.e. intersection flooding after a storm event) will be used to verify model accuracy. Detailed model calibration including system flow monitoring during storm events is not anticipated for this subtask. 604 Alternative Analysis Modeling and Deficiency Area Identification. Using the computerized model developed in subtask 603, model runs for the existing, 20-year and saturation (ultimate buildout) growth scenarios will be conducted. Model runs will assume storms of a 25- and 100-year recurrence interval. Model output will be used to generate information on location and extent of all hydraulic or potential hydraulic surcharges within each basin. It is anticipated that the model will include pipes greater than or equal to 15 inches in diameter and major open channels. Precipitation can be simulated using existing SCS Type IA storm or the City's 5, 25- or 100-year design storms (not short - duration precipitation data). The method of precipitation simulated will be coordinated with the hydraulic model selected. The model information will be used to develop alternatives and to allow for comparative analysis of alternative relief measures for existing systems and future developed areas. A summary memorandum will be prepared presenting the existing and forecasted problems identified. Included in the summary memorandum will be conceptual level cost estimates of capital costs and O&M costs for the alternatives developed. The goal of this memorandum is to provide the City staff a draft of the system alternatives and proposed improvements for their review prior to the development of system recommendations. A map showing drainage basins and recommended stormwater system improvements will be prepared. No more than three (3) potential alternatives will be evaluated as part of this project. 605 Storm Water Management Program Development. Requirements necessary for the City to meet the recently adopted EPA Phase II stormwater regulations will be summarized in a stormwater management program memorandum. As part of this subtask, a citywide assessment will be conducted on the relative benefits of regional facilities versus construction of greater conveyance system capacity. Alternatives for stormwater retention/detention facilities will be included as part of the management program memorandum Deliverables: • Basin model • Storm drainage system summary memorandum • Storm drainage system improvement map • Storm drainage management plan memorandum City Involvement: • Assist HDR/MMI in field verification of model by providing existing system operation and maintenance information. • Review draft storm drainage system summary memorandum. • Review storm drainage management program memorandum. TASK 700. SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT EVALUATION Objective: Confirm existing flow and loading conditions at the sewage treatment facility, including volumetric flow, biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), total suspended solids (TSS), phosphorous and nitrogen. Projected flow and loading conditions will be compared to the existing design capacity of the treatment facilities and solids handling systems to determine the level of the existing infrastructure utilization. 701 Confirm Existing Sewage Flows and Loadings. Monthly treatment plant reports for the last three years will be compiled and reviewed. Data analyzed will include flow, influent and effluent constituents, consistency of BOD, suspended solids (SS), phosphorous and nitrogen (total kjeldahl nitrogen, ammonia, and nitrites/nitrates). Disinfection performance will also be analyzed where data is available. Recommendations for additional sampling (if any) will be identified. 702 Existing Plant Utilization. The existing sewer flow and loading analysis developed as part of subtask 701 will be compared with design "nameplate" capacity of each unit process within the sewage treatment plant (including liquid treatment and solid process units). The analysis will identify capacity restrictions in the unit process and will determine when they will occur. A treatment plant utilization schedule will be developed that will be used for projection of remaining capacity. The city will perform additional sampling and testing as mutually agreed. 703 Septic Tank Effluent Pump Systems Impact Evaluation. The outlying areas of the City sewage collection system utilize a significant number of new septic tank effluent pump systems (STEP). These systems discharge to a common lift station and then pump via a long force main to the City's wastewater system. The STEP systems result in different sewage characteristics that should be considered in assessing the validity of interlocal agreements and the cost sharing provisions. The loadings associated with the STEP systems will be documented and data will be used during evaluation of interlocal agreements in Subtask 705. 704 Future Plant Expansion Requirements. The population and economic projection data assembled in Task 300 will develop the future sewage flow projections detailed in subtask 504. This information will be used to determine future treatment plant capacity needs. Treatment plant process unit design capacities will be compared with future projections and presented in a schedule for treatment plant upgrades by individual unit process. Facility capacity needs will be evaluated for both liquid and solid treatment processes. An action plan will be developed that projects required treatment plant upgrades, tied to service growth. 705 Interlocal Agreements Evaluation. The City entered into interlocal agreements that reserved a portion of the plant's design capacity for the non -city flows and provided for compensation to the City for operating expenses and debt retirement on the proportionate share of the design capacity. These agreements were sanctioned by the Montana DHSS but were based solely on the contributing flow without consideration of sewage characteristics. The City collects raw sewage principally via an old clay tile gravity collection system, which is subject to infiltration and inflow. Additionally, flows received by the City system from outlying area are, in part, from STEP systems. This subtask involves reevaluation of these agreements in light of those issues and re -assessment of capacity use based upon loadings delivered to the City's wastewater treatment facility in addition to contributing flows. A memorandum summarizing this assessment will be prepared. Deliverables: • Sewage treatment plant utilization schedule and action plan • Review memorandum of interlocal agreements. City Involvement: • Provide plant limitations and design capacity. • Provide treatment plant flow and loading records for the past 5 years. TASK 800. SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Objective: The objective of this task is to select a recommended plan for the water, sewage and storm drainage systems from the alternatives developed in Task 400, 500 and 600. The recommended alternatives will be evaluated in a workshop format and a priority ranking system will be developed. A summary memorandum will be prepared noting the recommended system improvements, a capital improvement schedule and a plan for implementation of recommended improvements. 801 Develop Rating Criteria. Non -monetary criteria, including environmental impacts, will be established for evaluating the alternatives for the water, sewage and storm drainage systems. A list of evaluation criteria will be developed by HDR/MMI and approved by the City. These criteria will be summarized in a memorandum. 802 Alternative Evaluation Workshop. The focus of this workshop will be to jointly evaluate, rank and select the recommended alternatives for the water, sewage and storm drainage systems. Public impact will be included as part of this process. 803 Recommended Alternative Documentation. A technical memorandum will be developed that documents the recommended alternatives for each system. 804 Capital Improvement and Implementation Plan Development. A plan for implementation of the recommended alternatives for each system will be prepared. This plan will include a description of the recommended projects and their priorities. A capital improvements schedule spreadsheet will be developed that includes prioritization and capital costs. Deliverables: Rating criteria memorandum Recommend alternative memorandum • Capital improvement and implementation plan and capital improvements schedule City Involvement: • Participate in alternative evaluation workshop • Review rating criteria TASK 900. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT EVALUATION Objective: Obtain a working knowledge of the City's baseline financial condition for water, sewer and storm water utilities. Each utility rate structure including connection fees will be evaluated versus current and projected revenue requirements. Provide reconnaissance level growth impact fees for each utility and provide recommendations for modifications to fees and rate structures. Provide recommendations on possible external funding sources for of planned capital improvements. HDR/MMI Subtasks: 901 Capital Improvement Summary. Summarize recommended capital improvements made as part of the Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) developed in Subtask 804 for the water, sewer and stormwater utilities. Summarize on an annual basis and determine the probable funding source for the expenditures. Consider cash reserves, revenue bonds, State Revolving funds, grants and other likely sources. Allocate the planned capital improvements between expenditures for system expansion (growth) versus expenditures for enhancing the current system. Utilize previous work efforts performed by the City as a starting point for the analysis. Provide a summary as part of the project summary memorandum. 902 Current Fees Assessment. Develop spreadsheet -based financial models of the water, sewage and storm drainage utilities and specifically develop a simple revenue requirement model for each. This includes a summary of all system revenues and costs, plus projections of these parameters into the future. Consider at least two scenarios for each utility: 1) When all CIP expenditures are recovered through rates, and 2) When the rate impacts are partially mitigated by development impact fees that recover the system expansion costs determined above. Evaluation`of the existing revenue sources will include the user rates and connection fees. Based on expenditures and financing examined in Subtask 901, determine the increase in revenue necessary to meet the cash and debt service obligations of the CIP. 903 Growth Impact Fee. Assess the use and application of impact fees around the state and with other clients. Estimate reconnaissance -level growth impact fees associated with the water and sewer services, based on system expansion costs identified above and expected future growth in the number customers. Make recommendations for the application of the fees in the City, as part of a project financial summary memorandum. 904 Pumping Fee Evaluation. Conduct an analysis for a special impact fee for development area(s) that require pumping of sewage and establish recommended fees and approaches to implement. 905 Drainage Zone Fees Evaluation. Determine the feasibility and make recommendations on the desirability of establishing drainage zones or areas in which specific fees could be levied for needed improvements. 906 Funding Source Assistance. HDR/MMI will assist the City with identification of potential funding sources for both planning and contribution of needed facilities. The Montana State Department of Commerce funding database will form the foundation of the assistance effort. A Montana Uniform Application will be completed as part of the assistance effort. Deliverables: Capital improvement summary and cost allocation Project financial management summary Montana Uniform Application City Involvement: • Provide existing rate structures. • Review financing management summary. TASK 1000. REPORTS AND TRAINING Objective: The final technical memorandums will be assembled into one document that will form the Facilities Plan 2000. This document will be structured similar to the following outline: Executive Summary Section 1: Basis of Planning Memorandum Section 2: Water System • Summary Memorandum • Improvements and Extension Map • Summary of Water Rights and Recommendations Section 3: Sewer Collection System • Summary Memorandum • Sewer Collection System Improvements and Extension Map Section 4: Storm Drainage System Summary Memorandum • Basin Models • Storm Drainage System Improvements Section 5: Sewage Treatment Plant • Utilization and Action Plan • Review Report of Interlocal Agreements Section 6: Rating Criteria Memorandum Section 7: Recommended Alternatives Memorandum Section 8: Capital Improvement and Implementation Plan and Schedule Section 9: Capital Improvement Summary Section 10: Project Financial Management Summary Appendices: 1. System Inventory and Database 2. Design Standards Recommendations 1001 Model Delivery and Training. Provide one week (total) of technical training to City staff on the utilization and updating of models. Transfer the models to City staff. 1002 Prepare and Deliver Final Facility Plan to City of Kalispell. Based on review comments received, revisions to the draft report will be made and the final report will be assembled and 15 copies delivered to the City. Deliverables: • Draft Reports • Final Reports TASK 1100. PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS The estimated level of effort includes four public presentations of the findings and recommendations of the water, sewer and storm drainage facility plans. These presentations are planned for the City Council workshops. Prior to the presentations a preparation meeting will be held with the consultant team and City staff to discuss the format and information to be provided to the Council. Task Cost Summary City 01 Kalispell Water, Sewer, and Storm Drainage Systems Facility Plan 2000 Task Task Description Task Cost 100 Project Management $.':5; 83T 200 Existing System Inveritcry $16,837.e3 300 Basis, of Planning Mernorandurn $19,755.40 400 Water System ,Analysis $19.536.3,4 500 Sewer Collection System Analysis $38,090.74 600 Storm OrainagaSystern Analysis $26,257.04 700 Sewage Treatment Plant Evaluation $1 C1, 08 1. 8,4 $00 Development of System Recommendations $13,041,86 900 Financial Management FValLatlon $17r308,32 1000 Reports and Training $14,252,8.0 1100 Public Presentations $8,862.24 Total Labor Cost $219,894.33 Subconsultants $19,500,00 Telephone/Fax $1,160-00 Photocopies $95000 Printing $3,050,00 Film/Prints $450.00 Mileage/Travel $4,000.0() ShippinglPostage $920.00 Computer/CADL) $10,59-0-00 Model Purchase $112,0001,00 Expenses Subtotal $52,580.00 Mark-up on E.x22user. $2,h--29.00 Total Expenses $56,209.00 Total Pro pact Cost $276,103.$3 Page 1 Exhibit B Kalispell, Montana Facility Plan 2000 Project Schedule ID Task Name June 2000 July 2000 August 2000 September 2000 October 2000 November 2000 December 2000 January 2001 February2001 March 2001 April 2001 May 2001 June 2001 July 2001 August 2001 September 2001 JOctober2OOI November 2001 1 Task 100 - Project Management ' rr rr - .� ., 77777 _ ; I r' _ _ - 1 2 101-Weekty Updates 51 102-Project Coordination Meetings 58 103-Project Management Plan 59 104-Monitoring 71 105-Ouality Control 72 Task 200 - Existing System Inventory 73 201-Collect and Inventory Existing System Information 74 202-Staff Interviews (phone) 75 203-Field Observation and Examination 76 204-System Database 77 205-Design Standards Review 78 Task 300 - Basis of Planning Report 79 301-Population, Economic and Land Use Baseline 80 302-Population and Economic; Distribution: 81 303-Establbh Service Area 82 304-Project Population and Distribution 83 305-Computer Model Selection 84 306-Basis of Planning Workshop 85 307-Finalize Basis of Planning 86 Task 400 - Water System Analysis 87 401-Water Supply Evaluation 88 402-Develop and Calibrate Hydraulic Model 89 403-Problem Identification: Existing System 90 404-Future System Analysis and Problem Identification 97 405-Regulatory Analysis 92 406-Altemative AnalysisMEMBER 93 407-Water System Summary Memorandum 94 Task 500 - Sewer Collection System Analysis 95 501-Develop and Calibrate Hydraulic Model 96 502-Problem Identification: Existing System 97 503-inflow and Infiltration Reduction 98 504 - Future System Analysis and Problem Identification 99 505-Lift Station Analysis 100 506-Regulatory Analysis 101 507-Altemattve Analysis 102 508-Wastewater Summary Memorandum 103 Task600- Storm Drainage System Analysis 104 601-Data Coordination 105 602-Basin Characterization 106 603-Model Development and Calibration 107 604-Altemattve Analysis Modeling and Problem Identification 108 605-Stone Water Management Program Development 109 Task 700 - Sewage Treatment Plant Evaluation 110 701-Confine Existing Wastewater Flows and Loadings ill 702-Existing Plant Utilization 112 703-Septic Tank/Effluent Pump Systems Impact Eva lua0on Task Progress Summary ^ Rolled Up Split Roiled Up Progress Project Summary Split Milestone ♦ Roped Up Task Rolled Up Milestone O External Tasks May 11, 2000 Exhibit B Kalispell, Montana Facility plan 2000 Project Schedule ID Task Name June 2000 July 2000 August 2000 September 2000 October 2000 November 2000 December 2000 January2001 February 2001 March 2001 April 2001 May 2001 June 2001 July 2001 August 2001 September 2001 October 2001 November 2001 113 704-Future Plant Expansion Requirements . 114 7054ntedocal Agreements Evaluation 115 Task t100 -System Recommendations and C.I.P. 116 802-Alternatives Evaluation Workshop 117 803-Recommended Alternatives Documentation 118 804-Capital Improvement and Implementation Plan 119 Task 900- Financial Management Evaluation 120 901-Captial improvement Summary 121 9W-Current Fee Evaluation 122 903-GrowthAmpact Fee Evaluation 123 904-Pumping Fee Evaluation 124 905-Drainage Zone Fee Evaluation 125 Task 1000 - Reports and Training 126 1001-Model Delivery and Training 127 1002-Final Facility Plan Report 128 Task 1100- Public Presentations . 129 1101-City Council Workshop 1 130 1102-City Council Workshop 2 131 1103-City Council Workshop 3 132 1104-City Council Workshop 4