The URL can be used to link to this page

2. Space Needs Studyy City of Kalispell Post Office Box 1997 - Kalispell, Montana 59903-1997 - Telephone (406)758-7700 Fax(406)758-7758 REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Chris A- Kukulski, City Manager SUBJECT: City Space Needs Study MEETING DATE: September 11, 2000 BACK GROUND: In July of 1999, the City Council directed the staff to develop a long range solution to the City's space needs issue. At the time, the Council planned on utilizing tax increment funds to pay for the changes and as a result felt a solution must be found prior to the sun setting of the Downtown Urban Renewal District. In this long range solution we were asked to maximize the efficiency of our operations by potentially bringing all departments back into one central location. From that meeting we retained Architects Design Group (ADG) of Kalispell to conduct a Space Needs Study. The study was broken down into three phases. Phase I was an evaluation of the actual square footage needed to efficiently perform City services today and ten years from now. This first phase was completed in January 2000. Phase two included two parts: 1) conduct an analysis of which departments are dependent, location wise, on each other. In other words, can the Police Department function efficiently if separated from the Parks Department or the Court etc (see attachment); and 2) provide the City with some alternatives that resolve the space need and group departments so we maximize departmental efficiency. Mike Absalonson will make a presentation to the Council regarding the outcomes of these first two phases. We can not move forward with this project until we get direction from the Council Monday evening. Attached is the executive summary and net space summary from phase I of the study. Also attached is a copy of the departmental relations review and two options that could be utilized along with their cost. RECOMMENDATION: The Council needs to determine the direction they want to pursue regarding the results of the space needs study. FISCAL EFFECTS: ALTERNATIVES: Respectfully submitted, Chris A- Kukulski City Manager Unknown. As suggested by the Council. Report compiled September 7, 2000 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CITY OF KALISPELL SPACE NEEDS STUDY: PHASE 1 KALISPELL, MONTANA January 5, 2000 Background: The City of Kalispell retained Architects Design Group of Kalispell in September, 1999 to assist with the evaluation of space needs within the City Hall Complex and the Planning Economic & Community Development Building. The Study is to be completed in three distinct phases. Phase 1 is a Space Analysis of the existing facilities based upon their actual and projected use. The analysis accounts for the number of staff, their responsibilities, and the supporting equipment required for them to efficiently and effectively perform their duties. The Space Analysis is divided into two parts. Part A examines existing spaces on the basis of gross and net square footage. The objective is to determine whether the space is appropriately sized for the current activity. Part B estimates the future space requirement based upon the Departments' best estimates out to the year 2010. An evaluation of each future space is completed by net and gross square footage figures. Phase 2 of the study is a Diagrammatic Drawing Analysis of possible remodeling or expansion options. It will be based upon the results of Phase 1 for the City Hall Complex and the Planning Economic & Community Development Building. Phase 3 of the study is a Site Analysis and Diagrammatic Drawing Analysis of potential expansion options for other sites. These would be potential locations, other than the City Hall Complex and Planning Economic & Community Development Building, which could require evaluation to determine their suitability for the City's use. Each phase of the study is an independent evaluation. At the conclusion of each Phase, the City of Kalispell may decide whether to proceed to the next level. The following information represents the results of Phase 1 of the study for the following Departments: City Hall Complex Manager / Administration / City Attorney Public Works Parks & Recreation Finance Water Office Court Police Fire Executive Summary Page 1 Planning Economic & Community Development Buildinq Building Community Development Phase I Methodology: Each department head completed a standard questionnaire to assemble information for the current and projected use of each space within the department. The requested data included: Department Type of use for the space Departmental relationships Estimated volume of City and public traffic Type of space required; i.e., secure, private, public, etc. Primary and secondary occupancy of the space Approximate net area of the space Current staff and equipment occupying the space, and the required staff and equipment for the space, if not the same. Additional staff or equipment expansion for the space out to the year 2010 This information was reviewed for accuracy and then combined to determine a number of basic space planning and analysis elements. Some of these are: Encumbered Need. The questionnaire information and the follow-up reviews with each Department head provided a basis for determining "encumbered need." This is the space required for the supporting furnishings and equipment that are essential for an efficient and effective working environment. For example, these may be a desk, working chair, visitor chair, table, computer, and printer. When this square footage is identified, the area is then adjusted to include the space necessary for interior room circulation. The final result of these calculations is a rationally developed net square footage requirement for the room. Net Area. Net area is the interior room or work area size from wall face to wall face. It does not include the common circulation space needed to move between the various rooms or work spaces. The specific net areas are a part of the Study and are itemized for each "group" of spaces to provide a "bottom line" net area need for each Department. They are summarized in the accompanying "Net Area Summary". Gross Area. The "gross area" for the purpose of the Phase 1 Study is defined as the "net area" multiplied by an appropriate factor to represent the total area under consideration, including interior and exterior walls, mechanical, and the required common circulation space to move between the various rooms. The net areas developed were adjusted to reflect an actual gross area. The specifics of this calculation are a part of the Study and are itemized for each "group" of spaces to provide a "bottom line" gross area need for each Department. They are summarized in the accompanying "Gross Area Summary" Under Part A of the evaluation, the calculated net areas could have been larger or smaller than the actual existing area. For this analysis, the actual existing work area and the calculated required area identified a clear deficiency of space. Under Part B of the evaluation, a net area was calculated for each identified future expansion space. The sum of these areas defines the future need, shown on the Summary tabulations. Executive Summary Page 2 Conclusions: It is important to recognize that a Study of this type is generally empirical in nature rather than intuitive. As such, the various working areas have not been subjected to "area creep" in one direction or another. In some instances, the department may note that the required size of a given space is actually smaller than that space currently occupied. However, in general many but not all of the working environments are cramped or have working areas that are inappropriately located. This appears largely due to past staff increases which have required double occupancy of work spaces that were formerly used by one person, the advent of computer or other technologies that encumber substantial amounts of space, and the need to store paper documents and other materials for extended periods. Space requirements for the areas studied are discussed at the beginning of each department's analysis. This information is further documented by building, and by total in the "Summary Net Space" section. Planning Economic & Community Development Building: The information developed in Part A for current space requirements indicate the Planning Economic & Community Development Building requires remodeling and expansion. This would involve increasing its size approximately 39.5-percent, or 1,087 net square feet. In terms of gross figures, the area would increase approximately 1,535 gross square feet. Part B figures for future needs indicate a small expansion to meet anticipated needs out to the year 2010. This expansion is over and above the Part A figures, and indicate an expansion of approximately 199 net square feet. In terms of gross figures, the area would increase approximately 283 gross square feet. City Hall Complex: The Part A analysis for current needs shows the City Hall Complex requires remodeling and expansion. This will involve increasing its size approximately 15.0-percent, or 3,938 net square feet. All departments within the City Hall Complex require more area, with ranges from 6.1-percent to 150-percent. In terms of gross figures, the area would increase approximately 5,458 gross square feet. On the basis of a percentage of net area increases required, the three most significant increases are identified for the Parks & Recreation at 150-percent, Public Works at 80.5-percent and the Court at 37.1- percent. On the basis of actual net area increases required, the three most significant increases are identified for the Public Works Department at 1,091 net square feet, Police at 775 net square feet and Fire at 581 net square feet. Part B figures for future space needs to the year 2010 show the future expansion requirement is quite significant at 8,415 net square feet. In terms of gross figures, the area would increase approximately 11,204 gross square feet. On the basis of actual net area increases required, the three most significant increases are identified for the Court at 2,238 net square feet, the Police Department at 2,004 net square feet, and the Finance & Water Department at 1,936 net square feet [mostly storage]. Executive Summary Page 3 Although no significant issues relating to health or safety were identified, several security issues were identified. This is to be expected in a facility that houses police and court operations. For the Police Department, additional study is necessary to fully address the security requirements for officers and the detainees. This is especially critical when moving prisoners from patrol cars to the booking area because the present facility has neither a vehicle sallyport nor an interior man sallyport prior to entering the booking area. These are considered essential security features. In addition, the study has identified a non -prioritized need to secure the patrol vehicles when they are not in service. The Court operation would benefit from a new configuration to significantly decrease the volume of public traffic through the building. It would also address the concern to separate the public from the court staff while increasing function and security. This would also minimize scheduling conflicts between the judicial side and the city administration side at the Council Chambers. The space provided for the Fire Department requires little remodeling, and is for the most part, tight but workable. The Fire Department identified a need for a separate Fire Training Center. This facility has been preliminarily programmed and is identified under Area 11 in the body of this study. This study provides the City with an initial planning tool through the identification of space requirements necessary to evaluate an orderly and efficient growth of Municipal operations. It will also provide a basis for evaluating and prioritizing capital expenditure decisions to ensure that City operations remain economical for the taxpayer. Respectfully Submitted, Michael A. Absalonson, A.I.A. Principal Architect Architects Design Group Executive Summary Page 4 CITY OF KALISPELL SPACE NEEDS STUDY PROGRAMMING ARCHITECTS DESIGN GROUP KALISPELL MONTANA 1 /5/00 SUMMARY NET SPACE DEPARTMENT CURRENT REQUIRED DIFFERENCE PERCENT EXPANSION NOTES EXISTING EXISTING INCREASE TO YEAR SPACE SPACE ABOVE 2010 N.S.F N.S.F. N.S.F. EXISTING N.S.F. PART "A" PART "A" PART "A" PART "A" PART "B" BUILDING 1 721 1,226 505 70.0% 199 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2 659 780 121 18.4% - COMMON SPACES BD & CD 3 1,374 1,835 461 33.6% - SUB -TOTAL [11 - [31 ABOVE "A" 199 2,754 3,841 1,087 39.5% PUBLIC WORKS PARKS & RECREATION FINANCE & WATER CITY ADMINISTRATION COURTS POLICE FIRE SUB -TOTAL [41 - [101 ABOVE TOTAL FIRE TRAINING CENTER SUB -TOTAL SECURE VEHICLE PARKING SUB -TOTAL 4 1,355 2,446 1,091 80.5% 329 5 338 845 507 150.0% 918 6 3,742 4,023 281 7.5% 1,936 7 3,852 4,333 481 12.5% 469 8 598 820 222 37.1 % 2,238 9 6,878 7,653 775 11.3% 2,004 Not Including Secure Parking 10 9,466 10,047 581 6.1% 521 "B" 26,229 30,167 3,938 15.0% 8,415 A+B 28,983 34,008 5,025 17.3% 8,614 11 2,039 Remote Study Area 2,039 9 7,475 Exterior Secure Space 7,475 CITY OF KALISPELL SPACE NEEDS STUDY SUMMARY NET SPACE 1 OF 1 CITY OF KALISPELL SPACE NEEDS STUDY PROGRAMMING ARCHITECTS DESIGN GROUP KALISPELL MONTANA 1 /5/00 SUMMARY GROSS SPACE DEPARTMENT CURRENT REQUIRED DIFFERENCE PERCENT EXPANSION NOTES EXISTING EXISTING INCREASE TO YEAR SPACE SPACE ABOVE 2010 G.S.F. G.S.F. G.S.F. EXISTING G.S.F. PART "A" PART "A" PART "A" PART "A" PART "B" BUILDING 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2 COMMON SPACES BD & CD 3 SUB -TOTAL [1] - [3] ABOVE 1,024 1,741 717 70.0% 283 919 1,090 171 18.6% - 1,825 2,472 647 35.5% - 3,768 5,303 1,535 40.7% 283 PUBLIC WORKS 4 1,707 3,253 1,546 90.6% 438 PARKS & RECREATION 5 426 1,124 698 163.8% 1,221 FINANCE & WATER 6 5,121 5,382 261 5.1% 2,467 CITY ADMINISTRATION 7 4,892 5,698 806 16.5% 624 COURTS 8 855 1,173 318 37.2% 2,977 POLICE 9 9,385 10,488 1,103 11.8% 2,784 Not Including Secure Parking FIRE 10 11,833 12,559 726 6.1% 693 SUB -TOTAL [4] - [10] ABOVE 16.0% 11,204 34,219 39,677 5,458 TOTAL 18.4% 11,487 37,987 44,980 6,993 FIRE TRAINING CENTER 11 SUB -TOTAL SECURE VEHICLE PARKING 9 SUB -TOTAL 2,737 Remote Study Area 2,737 7,475 Exterior Secure Space 7,475 CITY OF KALISPELL SPACE NEEDS STUDY SUMMARY GROSS SPACE 1 OF 1 CITY ADMINISTRATION CITY IN COUNCIL BUILDING COMM PUBLIC FINANCE CITY DEFT DEVELOP WORKS WATER TTORN 2BI=DING DEPARTNTENT BUILDING DEFT CITY ADMIN COUNCIL PUBLIG FIRE WORKS COMM FINANCE rlC.I�Z� DEVELOP WATERr7 [COU:pul ' POLICE 3COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMUNI;7VEL r"' -DIVIINCOUNCIL BUILDING PUBLIC FINANCE CITY DEPT WORKS WATER ORN �up-POLICE FIRE CITY OF KALISPELL SPACE NEEIDS STUDY DIAGRAM OF DEPART'NMNTAL RELATIONSBPS ADG 99-934B-6/20/2GOO 4PUBLIC W 5PARKS & RECREATION PARKS 4 REC� CITY AIDMINT COUNCIL FINANCE WATER BUILDING COMMI L___j L PUBLIC COURT POLICE F�l ATTORP DEPT DEVELOP, WORKS FINANCE & WATERDEPARTTVIENT FINANCE WATER CITY ADMIN COUNCIL COURT 11LDINGI I COMM 1 PUBLIC DEPT DEVELOP I WORKS P RK 4I I I( I I POLICE I( FIRE P,EC SPACECITY OF KALISPELL ISTUDY DIAGRAM OF D- 1 - i 1'` CITY �TTORN E` ADG 99-934B-6/20/2000 7CO'LaT COURT 0 CITY ADMIN I COUNCIL FINANCE WATER '!BUILDING EE7!DEVELOP WO LRK5 PARKS REC � iL-J L 8 POLICE DEPARTNIENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ADMIN COUNCIL PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING )i I COMM L___j DEVELOP 9 FIIIE DEPARTIviENT FIRE DEPARTMENT 1 FBUILDING DEPT FINANCE WATER PARKS 4 REC COURT CITY ADMIN I COUNCIL FINANCE WATER COMM PUBLIC t. PARKS l WORKS i � R COURT POLICE POLICE TTORN FIRE mi= .- SPACE N-EEDS STUDY DIAGRAM DEPARTMENTAL RELATI NS S mm ADG 99-934B-6/20J2000 10 CITY ATTORNEY Comm DEVELOP FINANCE z O J U &n, z Uz O PARKS PUBLIC C� REC WORK5 0 � : F CITY ATTNY PRIMARY RELATIONSHIPS: OPTION ADC 99-934B-6/20/2000 COMM DEVELOP FINANCE WATER Oz U k Uct� CITYPUBLIC O v UPARR5 ATTNYWORKS Q PIKE i t BUILDING CITY ATTNY 12PRIMARY RELATIONS11IPS: OPTION 2 ADG 99-934B-6/20/2000 Z17 ! I ilium .,..M El =BE cl U Ey El AT C40) 13 0 0 ❑ =—- 1100 Jaoy lh r if If FZ m m m m a m m C ED] u u lip cl Un . CITY OF K4LISPELL SPACE NEEDS STUDY pxosnAww/mu ARCHITECTS DESIGN GROUP "uuapeu wowr^wa amomo SUMMARY ��T�� /��T�% OPTION �� '�� COSTS DEPARTMENT usMo ncmooeume NEW pnoeAaLs pnoaxoLE wureu AREA AREA AREA ooxrp.o.p. oour DOLLARS ooL/Ana G.S.F. G.S.F. G.S.F. vcAnuovu ,sxneoou BUILDING DEPARTMENT I B.D. DEMO U $ - $ B.D.REMODEL|N8 8 * $ ' BUILDING DEPARTMENT NEW 2074 $ 127 $ 304.998 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2&3 C.D.DEMO 1082 $ 5 $ 5.410 C.D.REMODEL|NG 1082 $ 75 $ 81.150 COMMUN|TYDEVELOPMENT'NEVY O $ $ ' COMMON SPACES BID &CD 0 $ ' $ ' DISTRIBUTED PUBLIC WORKS 4 P.W. DEMO O P.VV.REM0DEL|NG 0 PUBLIC WORKS -NEW 3286 $ 127 $ 410.582 PARKS &RECREATION s P.R. DEMO P.R.REMODEUNG PARKS &RECREATION -NEW REMOTE LOCATION FINANCE &WATER 6 F.VY.DEMO 1307 $ 15 $ 20.505 F.YV.REk8ODEL|N8 0 * $ - F.VY.CENTRAL COLLECTION REMOD 847 $ 45 $ 38.115 FINANCE &WATER -NEW 3199 $ 127 $ 406.273 CITY ADMINISTRATION 7 C.A.DEM0 7281 $ 5 $ 30.455 C.A.REMODEL|NG 7291 $ 80 $ 583.280 C|TYADW1/N|GTRAT|0N'NEVV O $ $ - COURT 8 COURTDEMO 055 $ 5 $ 4.275 COURT REMODELING O $ $ ' COURT -NEW 4000 $ 145 * 580.000 DEMO REMODELING NEW PROBABLE PROBABLE NOTES AREA AREA AREA COST P.S.F. COST DOLLARS DOLLARS G.S.F. G.S.F. G.S.F. YEAR 2000 YEAR 2000 POLICE DEPARTMENT 9 POLICE DEMO 747 $ 20 $ 14,940 POLICE DEMO 9385 $ 12 $ 112,620 POLICE REMODELING 0 $ - $ - POLICE FLOOR 1-NEW 8215 $ 150 $1,232,250 POLICE BASEMENT -NEW 5805 $ 108 $ 626,940 FIRE DEPARTMENT 10 FIRE DEMO 987 $ 5 $ 4,935 FIRE REMODELING 987 $ 75 $ 74,025 FIRE -NEW 0 $ - $ - COMMON DEMO 0 $ $ COMMON REMODELING 0 $ $ - COMMON SPACES: MAIN -NEW 1609 $ 130 $ 209,170 COMMON SPACES: FLOOR 2-NEW 1401 $ 130 $ 182,130 COMMON SPACES: FLOOR 3-NEW 2430 $ 130 $ 315,900 COMMON SPACES: FLOOR B-NEW 608 $ 100 $ 60,800 CONSTRUCTION HARD COSTS $5,372,763 30% $1,611,829 ADMINISTRATION SOFT COSTS $1,611,829 TOTAL PROJECT COST $6,984,592 Design Contingency 10% Project Soft Costs 20% Inflation Past Y.O. 2000 4% Per Year Not Included ^ CITY OFKALKSPELL SPACE NEEDS STUDY pnoanAwm/we ARCHITECTS DESIGN GROUP x^uapsuwowTAw^ umnn SUMMARY OPTIO��T|��yJ �� /�� N .��/n "_^� ��o^� DEPARTMENT oewo nemoosumo NEW pnoaAaLE pnoaAsLe worsa AREA AREA AREA ooarp.as uoor oouAno oouxna BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1 B.D. DEMO B.D.REM0DEL|N6 BUILDING DEPARTMENT NEW COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 20 C.D.DEMO CD.REM0DELING C0MMUN|TYDEVELOPK4ENT'NEVV COMMON SPACES BD&CD PUBLIC WORKS 4 P.W. DEMO P.W. REMODELING PUBL|CVVORKO'NEVV PARKS &RECREAT|ON 5 P.R. DEMO P.R. REMODELING PARKS &RECREATION -NEW FINANCE &WATER 0 F.W. DEMO F.W. REMODELING F.YV.CENTRAL COLLECTION REMOD FINANCE &WATER -NEW CITY ADMINISTRATION 7 C.A. DEMO C.A. REMODELING C|TYADM|N|STRAT|0N'NEVY COURT 0 COURTDEMO COURT REMODELING COURT -NEW 0 $ $ ' O $ $ ' O $ ' $ O $ - $ ' 8 $ $ - 0 $ $ ' O $ ' $ ' Distributed O G $ ' O $ - $ O $ - $ ' O $ $ - O $ - $ ' 0 * - $ ' U $ $ - 2545 $ 2.50 $ 6,303 2545 $ 92 $ 234140 Remote Location DEMO REMODELING NEW PROBABLE PROBABLE NOTES AREA AREA AREA 000rp.aF. oonr oouxno oouxma G.S.F. G.S.F. G.S.F. veAnemm vcAncuu POLICE DEPARTMENT 8 POLICE DEMO 4970 $ 20 $ 89.400 POLICE REMODELING 4970 * 125 $ 621.250 POLICE FLOOR 1-NEW 3031 $ 150 $ 454.650 POL|CEBASEK4ENlFNEVV V $ - $ ' FIRE DEPARTMENT 10 FIRE DEMO 020 $ 5 $ 3.130 FIRE REMODELING 026 $ 75 $ 48.950 FIRE -NEW 8 $ - $ ' COMMON COMMVNDEMO 2832 $ 5 $ 14.160 COMMON REMODELING 2032 $ 92 $ 260.544 COMMON SPACES: MAIN -NEW O $ $ ' CONSTRUCTION HARD COSTS 30% $ 542.310 ADMINISTRATION SOFT COSTS TOTAL PROJECT COST Design Contingency 10% Project Soft Costs 20% Inflation Past Y.O. 2008 4% Per Year Not Included CITY OFKALISPLL SPACE NEEDS STUDY pnoenAww/wa ARCHITECTS DESIGN GROUP xxuapeu wowrxw* unmo SUMMARY "ORDER OFMAGNITUDE" OPTIO��-F|��yJ �� /��c%TC� N ��.� �� W�� °� ' �^/ //^+��^� DEPARTMENT osmo nswooeuwo NEW pnouAaLE PROBABLE worsn AREA AREA AREA cosrp.e.p. oonr oouAoo oouAna G.S.F. G.S.F. G.S.F. vsx00000 ,Exe0000 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1 B.D.DEMO O $ ' * - B.D.REK8ODEL|NG O $ - $ ' BUILDING DEPARTMENT NEW O $ $' Main Building COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 20 C.D.DEMO U $ - $ ' C.D.REMODEL|NG 1000 $ 74.35 $ 80.744 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT -NEW O $ - $ ' PUBLIC WORKS 4 P.W. DEMO U P.VV.REMODEL|NG 3120 $ 74.35 $ 232.418 PUBLIC WORKS -NEW O $ ' $ PARKS QRECREATION s P.R. DEMO O $ ' $ - P.R. REMODELING 0 $ $ PARKS &RECREATION -NEW U * - $ - Remote Location FINANCE &WATER s F.YV.DEK4O U $ ' $ F.VV.REMODEL|NG 2968 $ 74.35 $ 220.671 F.W. CENTRAL COLLECTION REMOD O $ ' $ - FINANCE &WATER -NEW 0 $ ' $ ' C|TYADM|N-COUNC|L'ATTORNEY 7 C.A. DEMO 0 $ $ - C.&REMODEL}NG 5399 $ 74.35 $ 401.416 QTYADM|N|GTRAT0N'NEVV 0 $ ' $ ' COURT 8 COURTDEWO O $ $ COURT REMODELING 0 $ ' $ ' COURT -NEW 0 $ $ ' Main Building DEMO REMODELING NEW PROBABLE PROBABLE NOTES AREA AREA AREA COST P.S.F. COST DOLLARS DOLLARS G.S.F. G.S.F. G.S.F. YEAR 2000 YEAR 2000 POLICE DEPARTMENT 9 POLICE DEMO 0 $ $ POLICE DEMO 0 $ $ POLICE REMODELING 0 $ $ POLICE FLOOR 1-NEW 0 $ $ POLICE BASEMENT -NEW 0 $ $ Main Building FIRE DEPARTMENT 10 FIRE DEMO 0 $ $ FIRE REMODELING 0 $ $ FIRE -NEW 0 $ $ Main Building COMMON STORAGE & EXPANSION STORAGE DEMO 0 $ $ STORAGE REMODELING 1371 $ 25.00 $ 34,275 Partial Finish Only STORAGE NEW 0 $ - $ - COMMON COMMON DEMO 1440 $ 3.35 $ 4,824 Intermidiate Floor COMMON MISC DEMO 19654 $ 1.00 $ 19,654 General Prep Work COMMON SPACES: MAIN 1733 $ 80.00 $ 138,640 COMMON SPACES: FLOOR 2 1968 $ 80.00 $ 157,440 COMMON SPACES: FLOOR B 2003 $ 80.00 $ 160,240 CONSTRUCTION HARD COSTS 19654 $1,450,322 ADMINISTRATION SOFT COSTS 30% 435,096 TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,885,418 Design Contingency 10% Project Soft Costs 20% Inflation Past Y.O. 2000 4% Per Year Not Included Division 1 General Conditions $ 4.43 Division 2 Sitework $ 1.00 Division 3 Concrete $ 2.00 Division 4 Masonry $ 4.00 Division 5 Metals $ 1.80 Division 6 Wood & Plastics $ 7.47 Division 7 Thermal & Moisture $ 1.00 Division 8 Doors & Windows $ 3.80 Division 9 Finishes $ 7.22 Division 10 Specialties $ 0.26 Division 11 Conveying System $ 3.20 Division 12 Mechanical $ 13.00 Division 13 Electrical $ 10.00 $ 59.18 Overhead & Profit 15% $ 8.36 Bond 1.5% $ 0.89 Pre -Design Costing Allowance 10.0% $ 5.92 $ 15.17 $ 74.35