Enterprise Fundsinvest.nent Income
Depreciation Expense
Interfund Transfers
Activities That Are Exclusively Business -Type Activities
Interest Expense
Investment Income
Depreciation Expense
Interfund Transfers
Activities That Support Predominantly Governmental
Funds
Differentiating between Governmental and
Business -Type Activities
Activities with External Parties
Activities with Fiduciary Funds
Zeporting Cash Flows of Proprietary Funds
Basic Requirement and Purpose
Focus of Statement
Cash Flow Amounts
Classification of Cash Flows
Operating Cash Flows
Noncapital Financing Cash Flows
Capital and Related'Financing Cash Flows
Investing Cash Flows
Capital Distinguished from Noncapital Financing
Formatting the Statement of Cash Flows
Noncash Investing, Capital, and Financing Activities
Cash Overdraft Position
Exhibit 7-1: Illustration: Enterprise Fund Statement
of Cash FIows
INTRODUCTION
7.24
7.25
7.25
7.25
7.27
7.27
7.27
7.28
7.28
7.31
7.31
7.33
7.34
7.35
7.36
7.38
7.39
7.40
7.42
7.42
7.45
7.45
7.47
7.49
7.50
7.51
proprietary fund is used to account for a state or local govern-
Lent's activities that are similar to activities that may be performed
i a commercial enterprise. For example, a hospital may be oper-
ed by a governmental unit, such as a city, or by a profit -oriented
corporation. The accounting and reporting standards used by a pro-
prietary fund and a business. enterprise are similar because the
activities performed are basically the same.
Although a proprietary fund is accounted for in much the same
manner as a commercial enterprise, a proprietary fund is nonethe-
less a fund used by governmental entities. NCGA-1 (Governmental
Accounting and Financial Reporting Principles) defines a "fund" as
A fiscal and accounting entity with a self -balancing set of
accounts recording cash and other financial resources,
together with all related liabilities and residual equities or
balances, and changes therein, which are segregated for the
purpose of carrying on specific activities or attaining certain
objectives in accordance with special regulations, restrictions,
or limitations.
The basic objective of a proprietary fund, as alluded to in the
NCGA's definition, is different from the fundamental purpose of
a commercial enterprise. The purpose of a proprietary fund is not to
maximize its return on invested capital. Generally, the purpose of a
proprietary fund is to provide a service or product to the public or
other governmental entities at a reasonable cost. The objective is
achieved by creating one of the following two types of proprietary
funds: an Enterprise Fund or Internal Service Fund.
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
An Enterprise Fund may be used to "report any activity for which a
fee is charged to external users for goods or services." GASB-34
states that an Enterprise Fund must be used to account for an activity
if any one of the following three criteria is satisfied (GASB-34, par. 67):
1. The activity is financed with debt that is secured solely by a
pledge of the net revenues from fees and charges of the activity.
2. Laws or regulations require that the activity's costs of
providing services, including capital costs (such as deprecia-
tion or capital debt service), be recovered with fees and
charges, rather than with taxes or similar revenues.
3. The pricing policies of the activity establish fees and charges
designed to recover its costs, including capital costs (such as
depreciation or debt service).
OBSERVATION: Some financial statement preparers raised
the question about whether the three criteria listed above
apply to activities that are currently accounted for in Internal
Service Funds. GASB-34 takes the position that an Enterprise
7.04 Fund Accounting
Fund, not an Internal Service Fund, must be used when
external users are the predominant participants in the fund.
GASB-37 reemphasizes this point by adding a footnote to
paragraph 67 that states, "the focus of these criteria is on
fees charged to external users" (GASB-37, par. 14).
The first criterion refers to debt secured solely by fees and
charges. If that debt is secured by a pledge of fees and charges
from the activity and the full faith and credit of the primary gov-
ernment or component unit, this arrangement does not satisfy the
"sole source of debt security" and the activity does not have to be
accounted for (assuming the other two criteria are not satisfied) in
an Enterprise Fund. This conclusion is not changed even if it is
anticipated that the primary government or component unit is
not expected to make debt payments under the arrangement. On
the other hand, debt that is secured partially by a portion of its own
proceeds does satisfy the "sole source of debt security' criterion.
The second and third criteria refer to the establishment of a pric-
ing policy that recovers costs, including depreciation expense or
debt service. In some situations the activity might be responsible
for little or no debt. The GASB Comprehensive Implementation Guide
states that in this circumstance, the criteria are still met when debt
service requirements (if any) are used to establish the pricing policy.
There is no assumption that there is equality between the depreca-
tion expense and the debt service on capital debt for a particular
activity.
The third criterion is similar to the previous standard for deter-
mining when an Enterprise Fund should be used to account for
an activity except that the new standard in GASB-34 is based on
"established policies" rather than management's intent.
OBSERVATION: The criteria established by GASB-34 are dif-
ferent from those established by NCGA-1. The GASB believes
that the establishment of the three criteria listed above will
reduce the degree of subjectivity that is now used by govern-
mental entities in determining when an Enterprise Fund should
be used.
The three criteria should be applied to a governmental entity's j
cipal revenue sources; however, the criteria do nothave tobeappli
"insignificant activities" of a governmental entity. If none of the cri
apply, the activity can be accounted for in a governmental fund.
OBSERVATION: The GASB Comprehensive Implementation
Guide points out that while professional judgment must be
used to determine what an activity's principal source of reve-
nue is, the focus should be on the relationship between a par-
ticular revenue source and an activity's total revenues. For
Proprietary Funds 7.05
example, when 75% of a fund's revenue is provided from
charges for services designed to cover the cost of the services,
the service charges would clearly be considered the "princi-
pal" revenue source for the fund.
PRACTICE POINT: It should be noted that GASB-34 (Basic
Financial Statements —and Management's Discussion and
Analysis —for State and Local Governments) states that a fee -
based activity can be accounted for in an Enterprise Fund even
if the three criteria described above do not exist. The three
criteria apply to fee -based activities that must be accounted
for in an Enterprise Fund.
Activities commonly reported as Enterprise Funds of state and
local governments include the following:
• Airport
• Electric, gas, water; wastewater, and sanitation/landfill
• Golf
• Hospital or other health care services
• Lotteries and gaming
• Parking and transit
• Unemployment insurance
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
GASB-34 (Basic Financial Statements —and Management's Discus-
sion and Analysis —for State and Local Governments) describes an
Internal Service Fund as a proprietary fund that may be used to
report "any activity that provides goods or services to other
funds, departments, or agencies of the primary government and
its component units, or to other governments, on a cost reimburse-
ment basis." An Internal Service Fund should be used only when
the reporting government itself is the predominant participant in
the fund. When the transactions with the other governmental enti-
ties represent the predominant portion of the activity, an Enterprise
Fund must be used.
There is no circumstance under which an Internal Service Fund
must be used. For example, an activity may be centralized by a
governmental entity whereby all departments, programs, and so
forth within the reporting entity must use the centralized activity
and be billed for the service provided. That activity could
be accounted for in an Internal Service Fund, but it could also be