Traffic Impact Study January 2010Febi-uary 16 2010
traffic Hubert Turner
SCMCC5 3300 Hwy 2 West
Kalispell, MT 59901
RE: Willow CreekTIS Meridian Road Supplement
Dear Hubert,
it is my understanding that the City of Kalispell has requested some additional
information in regards to the possible traffic impacts along Meridian Road from the
proposed Willow Creek residential development. Due to the unknown impacts to the
overall traffic patterns within this area from the construction of the Highway 93 Bypass,
no evaluation of the projected traffic volumes on Meridian Road were included in the
November 2009 update to the traffic impact study prepared for this project.
There is currently limited information regarding the overall traffic impacts from the
Highway 93 Bypass. Therefore, there is no method to accurately determine the future
volumes along Meridian Road with or without the Willow Creek development project.
Based on information available from the Kalispell Transportation Plan Update it is clear
that the Highway 93 Bypass project will decrease traffic volumes along Meridian Road
once the bypass is in operation. The magnitude of this decrease will likely be between
LOOO and Z000 trips per day.
The September 2008 Traffic Impact Study prepared for the Willow Creek development
projected that approximately 40% of the traffic from the development would use
Meridian Road to reach destinations around Kalispell. With the inclusion of the Highway
93 bypass it is likely that the total amount of traffic from Willow Creek will using
Meridian Road will decrease by half to approximately 20% of the overall vehicle trips
from this site. Based on Willow Creek"s current estimated total trip generation of 4.,280
VPD it is estimated that the approximately 856 vehicles per day from the Willow Creek
development would use portions of Meridian Road. However, most of this traffic will
likely turn off of Meridian Road relatively quickly using 7 th Street and Second Street.
The amount of traffic from the Willow Creek Project using Meridian Road north of
Second Street will likely be very low (less than 200 VPD)
The net result is that traffic volumes along Meridian Road will decrease overall by
approximately 1,000 VPD over existing traffic volumes with the Highway 93 Bypass and
the Willow Creek development. It is also clear that the southern portions of Meridian
Road which are currently operating reasonably well will see the largest portion of traffic
from the Willow Creek project. With the expected traffic decreases along Meridian Road
from the Highway 93 Byp as s proi e ct, the traffic operati ons at thes e inters ecti ons shoul d
be improved from their current operations even with the trafFic from Willow Creek. The
intersections along the northern portions of Meridian Road which currently have
operational problems should also see a significant decrease in traffic volumes due to the
130 SOLIth Howie Street
H-el—e.n.a- M.o—ntana 59601
Highway 93 bypass project. The Willow Creek development will only add a small
amount of additional traffic along Meridian Road in this area.
It is possible that the redistribution of traffic through this area caused by the Highway 93
Bypass project could cause some local traffic problems along Meridian Road which may
need to be addressed once the bypass is in operation. ATS would like to reiterate the
need to do additional trafflic monitoring in this area atter the bypass and several phases of
the Willow Creek project have been completed to accurately identify any necessary
improvements which may be needed to ensure efficient traffic operations in this area
throughout the construction of the Willow Creek development.
If you have any additional comments or questions please feel free to contact me at 406-
459-1443.
Sincerely,
Bob Abelin., P.E.
Abelin Traffic Services, Inc.
Ir fwi
trarric
Febiuary 10, 20 10
Hubert Turner
3300 Hwy 2 West
Kalispell, MT 59901
RE: Willow CreekTIS Evolution., 2006-2009
Dear Hubert,
As requested I am providing a brief summary of the evolution for the traffic impact
studies prepared for the Willow Creek subdivision in Kalispell. The original traffic
impact study prepared for this project by Robert Peccia & Associates in March of 2006
analyzed the construction of 753 single -single family residential homes on the Willow
Creek site. The development plans provided access only onto Foys Lake Road. No
access onto U.S. Highway 2 to the north was proposed. This traffic study predicted
signi icant impacts onto Merid'an Road and recommended a var'ety of major
improvements to mitigate these impacts. This study recommended several new traffic
signals and turning lanes on Meridian Road.
The next traffic study prepared for this project was completed in January of 2007 by
Abelin Traffic Services (ATS). This study analyzed the construction of 709 residential
units on the property and included a recommendation to provide an additional access onto
U.S. Highway 2 to lielp decrease the traffic inipacts on Mcridian Road. This traffic study
recommended one new traffic signal, two new turning lanes, and additional STOP signs
along Meridian Road.
The third traffic study completed in December of 2007 by ATS analyzed the construction
of 5 3 1 residential units on the property and included the access onto U. S. Highway 2.
The report also contained a discussion of the possible impacts from the Kalispell bypass
proi e ct, but ultimately dis c ounte d the effe ct of the byp as s be c ause it was not known if or
when the bypass would be constructed. This traffic study recommended the same traffic
signal, turning lanes, and STOP signs on Meridian Road.
The fourth version of the Willow Creek traffic study was prepared by ATS in September
2008 and assumed the construction of the same 531 residential homes on the property but
also included more information from the Kalispell Transportation Plan Update. Data
obtained from the in the Transportation Plan indicated asignificant decrease in traffic
volumes along Meridian Road with the construction of the bypass and the new
north/south road through the Willow Creek property. The traffic study tried to account
for these effects and recommended only additional STOP signs on Meridian Road.
The most recent version of the traffic study was prepared by ATS in November 2009 and
analyzed the construction of 455 residential units on the Willow Creek property. This
new traffic study was prepared due to the decrease in the overall density in the
development and the decision by MDT to begin construction on the Kalispell bypass.
130 South Howie Street
Helena, Montana 59601
406-459-1443
However, the current bypass consti-uction plans also include a change from grade -
separated interchanges to at -grade intersections at major street crossings. Due to the fact
that this scenario of constructing of at -grade intersections was not analyzed in detail
during preparation of the Kalispell Transportation Plan Update, no accurate data exists as
to the precise traffic volumes that will be expected on roadways within this area once the
bypass is in operation. Due to this fact., MDT recommended that the developer only look
at the trafflic -imp acts we st ofthe byp as s and c onclude d that the bypas s proj- e ct would
likely resolve any major traffic problems to the east of this area.
At this time it is not possible to accurately create recommended roadway improvements
for areas east of the Kalispell bypass due to the unknown nature of the overall traffic
impacts from the bypass prql'ect. ATS has recommended performing some additional
traffic counts in this area to help determine if additional mitigation measures are needed
along Foys Lake Road after construction of the bypass. It is not anticipated that the
Willow Creek project will have any significant impacts along Meridian Road, but
additional traffic counts could be performed on Meridian Road after the bypass is
constructed to confirm these conclusions.
ATS also performed an analysis to determine exactly when the northern access onto U.S.
Highway 2 will be needed. This analysis indicates that 200 homes could be constructed
on the Willow Creek site before a northern approach onto U.S. Highway 2 is necessary.
If you have any questions please feel free to call me at 406-459-1443.
since.rely,
Bob Abelin., P.E.
Abelin Traffic Services, Inc.
abel*in
traffic Traff*lc Impact Study Update
5ervices
W'I'llow Creek Subdeivision
Res*ldent*lal Development
Kalispell, Montana
a
Prepared For.
Hubert Turner
3300 Hwy 2 West
Kalispell,, MT 59901
November, 2009
130 South Howie Street
Helena, Montana 59601
406-459-1443
Willuw Cruck Subdivibiurt Kulibpull, Munturat
Table of Contents
A.
Executive Summary ....................................................................................
I
B.
Project Description .....................................................................................
1
C.
Existing Conditions .....................................................................................
2
Traffic Data Collection ...........................................................................
3
Levelof Service .....................................................................................
3
D.
Proposed Development ..............................................................................
4
E.
Trip Generation and Assignment ................................................................
6
Additional Developments .......................................................................
6
F.
Trip Distribution ..........................................................................................
7
G.
Traffic Impacts Outside of the Development ...............................................
7
H.
Mitigation Schedule ..................................................................................
10
1.
Impact Summary & Recommendations ....................................................
10
List of Tables
Ta ble I — U. S. High way 2 Historic A vera ge Daily Tra ffic Da ta ................................ 3
Table 2 — 2006 Existing Traffic Level of Service Summary ..................................... 4
Table 3 — Willow Creek Phasing Plan ..................................................................... 4
Table 4 — Trip Generation Rates ............................................................................. 6
Table 5 — Tfip Generation Rates (Lonepine & Stonefidge Subdivisions) ---------------- 6
Table 6 — 2013 Level of Service Summary With the Willow Creek Subdivision ....... 8
List of Figures
FigureI — Vicinity Map ............................................................................................ 2
Figure 2 — Proposed Development .......................................................................... 5
Figure 3 — Trip Distribiffion -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8
Willucu Cruck Subdivibiurt Kuhbpull, Munturat
Traffic Impact Study
Willow Creek Subdivision
Kalispell, Montana
A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The construction of the Willow Creek Subdivision may require some improvements at area
intersections. nese improvements may include the installation of a traffic signal at the
development's eastern approach onto Foys Lake Road and the installation of a left -turn deceleration
lane on U. S. Highway 2. Traffic counts should be performed along Foys Lake Road after Phase 2 of
construction to help determine when the traffic signal may be warranted or if any additional
mitigation measures are needed within this area.
B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This document studies the possible effect on the surrounding road system from a proposed 139-acre
residential development located north of Foys Lake Road in Kalispell, Montana. The document also
identifies any traffic mitigation efforts that the development may require. The property would be
developed to include up to 455 residential units. These residential units would include a variety of
single-family homes, condominiums, and townhouses.
nis, updated traffic report is, intended to provide new information about the possible effects, to
Willow Creek development based on the current plans to begin construction of the Kalispell Bypass
in 20 10. The existence of the Kalispell Bypass was not included in any ofthe previous traffic studies
produced for this project because it was not Imown when or if the bypass would be constructed. The
bypass project will have a significant impact on traffic volumes throughout this area.
Based on the results from the Kalispell Area Transportation Plan, it is expected that the bypass will
resolve most of the current and future traffic problems along Meridian Road. However, the exact
traffic volumes expected along roadways within this area once the bypass is completed are not
currently known. For this reason the Montana Department of Transportation requested an update of
the TIS for the Willow Creek project which focuses only on the intersections located west of the
proposed by I I
pass. It is expected that the bypass w'll be constructed w'th sufficient capacity to handle
most of the expected growth in this area over the next 20 years. The impacts from the Willow Creek
project east of the bypass should be minimal.
This update builds upon the previous traffic impact study prepared by Abelin Traffic Services (ATS)
in 2008 and by Robert Peccia & Associates in March 2006. The Peccia report identified
considerable mitigation efforts that would be required along Meridian Road based on the original
development layout. With the construction of the Kalispell bypass, these improvements should be
Abc1irt Tra c Scrvicc5 I Novcinbcr 2009 Updatc
Willucu Cruck Subdivibiurt Kuhbpull, Munturat
unnecessary. The traffic data and existing site conditions information was taken from the original
traffic report and is included in this document with permission from Robert Peccia & Associates.
C. EXISTING CONDITIONS
ixture o collector., and
The existing transportation system that would serve this site is a m' f local.,
arterial roadways. The project site is located north of Foys Lake Road, outside the Kalispell City
limits. See Figure 1 for a location map of the proposed development. Roadways that may be
affected by the proposed development include Valley View Drive, Foys Lake Road, and U.S.
Highway 2. These facilities are described in further detail below:
Abc1irt Tra c Scrvicc5 2 Novcinbcr 2009 Updatc
Willucu Cruck Subdiv-ibiurt Kul-ibpull, Munturat
Foys Lake Road is an east -west, secondary two-lane highway. It is located directly south of the
proposed project and will provide direct access for traffic entering and exiting the proposed
subdivi s ion. It has a 5 0 mph sp ee d I imit and s erve s re s idents to the s outhwe st of Kal isp el 1. Foys
Lake Road becomes Meridian Road near Ashley Creek. The ADT is 3,400 vpd.
VaHey View Drive is a north -south, two-lane roadway classified as a local roadway that
intersects with Foys Lake Road. The roadway has a 25 mph speed limit and an estimated ADT
of 1,600 vpd.
U.S. Highway 2 is the principal east -west route through northern Montana. The route also
serves as a principal arterial route through the City of Kalispell. The road has a 45 mph speed
hinit noilli of the developinent site which dec-reases to 3 5 nipli ente-ring Kalispell. Acco-rding to
MDT the roadway carries 8,800 vpd 1.3 mile west of the Kalispell city limits.
Traffic Data Collection
Rob ert P e cc ia & As s oc iate s c o 11 ecte d turning movement c ount data and 24-hour ho se count data
in January 2006 at the intersection of Foys Lake Road and Valley View Drive. This data is
included in Appendix A of this report.
The raw turning count movement data was adjusted for seasonal variation in accordance with the
data collected from MDT"s annual count station located on US Highway 2, 1.3 miles west of
Kalispell (Station A-24). This count station data indicated that data collected in January is
approximately 81% of the AADT (Average Annual Daily Traffic) volume. Automatic hose
counters were placed on both Foys Lake Road (in the vicinity of the project location) and on
Meridian Road (between 3rd Strect and 4th Street).
Abelin Traffic Services gathered historic Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volumes for the area from
the M ontana Department ot"I'ransp ortation (MDT). 'Ih -is evaluat -ion -is base d on MD'Ypermanent
count station A-24. The data indicates an annual average traffic growth rate in this area of 2.6%.
Table I - U.S. Highway 2 H isto ric Average Daily Traffic Data
Location
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
I
U.S. Highwuy 2*
L_
7)624
I
7)604
I
7)909
I
8)364
I
8)611
I
8749
I
8741
I
9)000
I
9)220
I
8643
I
*Based on MDT permanent count station A-24 located on U.S. Highway 2, 1.3 miles west of Kalispell
Level of Service
Us ing the data co 11 e cted for thi s proi e ct, AT S c onducte d a Leve I of S ervice (LO S) analysis at
the existing intersections within the area of impact. This evaluation was conducted in
Abclirt Tra c Scrvicc5 Novcinbcr 2009 Updatc
Willucu Cruck Subdiv-ibiurt Kuhbpull, Munturat
accordance with the procedures outlined in the Transportation Research Board"s Highway
Ca aci ty Manu al (HCM) - Speci al R eport 2 09 and the Highway Cap ac ity S oftware (HC S)
vers ion 5.2. Intersections are graded from A to F representing the average delay that a vehicle
entering an intersection can expect. Typically, a LOS of C or better is considered acceptable
for peak -hour conditions.
Tahle 2 — 2006 Fxisfinn Traffir- Level of Service (LOSI Summary
INTERSECTION
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour
Delay
LOS
V/c
Delay
LOS
V/
Foys Lake Road & Val I ey View
13.9
B
N/A
12.1
B
N/A
-Drive
Westbound LeftlThru
8.5
A
0.06
7.7
A
0.06
Northbound LeftlRight
13.9
B
0.26
12.1
B
0.15
T a ble 2 shows, the e xisting 2 0 06 LO S for the AM and P M p eak hoii rs, - The LO S c a lcii I at ions
are included in Appendix C. The table indicates that the intersection of Foys Lake Road and
Valley View Drive is currently operating with minimal delay.
D. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
The development currently under consideration for this site includes 139 acres of land north of Foys
Lake Road which would be developed into a residential subdivision. The development would have
455 residential units, 20 of which would be townhouses. Initially the development would connect
only with Foys Lake Road. An additional access onto U. S. Highway 2 would also be developed, but
would be for emergency use only for the first three phases. The northern approach onto U.S.
Highway 2 would be formalized and open to the public with Phase 4 of construction. The City of
Kalispell has requested that Willow Creek Parkway be constructed to a major collector standard.
The devel op er p lans to c onstruct two ac ce s s e s onto Foys Lake Road, one of which woul d be lo cate d
approximately 700 feet west of Valley View Drive and the other would be located mile to the
west of Valley View Drive. The layout of the proposed subdivision is shown in Figure 2. The
project would be constructed in five phases as shown in Table 3. Full build -out of the property
would likely occur by 2015.
Table 3 - Willow Creek Phasina Plan
Single Family
TownhoUses
Total
Phase 1
85
0
85
Phase 2
129
0
129
Phase 3
91
0
91
Phase 4
58
20
78
Phase 5
72
0
72
436
18
466
Abc1irt Tra c Scrvicc5 4 Novcinbcr 2009 Updatc
Willucu Cruck Subdivibiurt Kul-ibpull, Munturat
Flaure 2 - ProDosed DeveloDment
Al
%
Ab
-Z
i
Ft
y,' J1
4,
V
41L
L7
rb q> z Q)
LO 6-5 (n U) C6 It
QL
A
Al
F
"I.
W4
rr 0
.2
tk
Abclirt Tra c5crvicc5 Novcinbcr 2009 Updatc
ff i f
Willucu Cruck Subdivibiurt Kuhbpull, Munturat
E. TRIP GENERATION AND ASSIGNMENT
ATS performed a trip generation analysis to determine anticipated future traffic volumes from the
proposed development. ATS used the trip generation rates contained in Trip Generation (Institute of
Transportation Engineers., Seventh Edition). These rates are the national standard and are based on
the most current information available to planners. A vehicle "trip"' is defined as any trip that either
begins or ends at the development site. Judging from field observations and the typical nature of
residential developments, ATS determined that the critical traffic impacts on the intersections and
roadways would occur during the weekday morning and evening peak hours. At full build -out in
2 015 the propo s e d deve lopment would pro duc e 3 3 5 AM pe ak hour trip s, 449 PM p eak hour trips.,
and 4.,280 daily trips. The trip generation rates and totals are shown in Table 4.
Table 4 - Trip Generation Rates
AM Peak
Total AM
PM Peak
Total PM
Hour Trip
Peak
Hour Trip
Peak
Weekday
Total
Ends per
Hour Trip
Ends per
Hour Trip
Trip Ends
Weekday
Land Use
Units
Unit
Ends
Unit
Ends
per Unit
Trip Ends
Single Family
435
0.75
326
1.01
459
9.57
4)163
Residential
Townhouse
20
0.44
9
0.52
10
5.86
117
Total
455
1 335
1
449
1
1 41280
Additional Developments
Two additional subdivisions are currently under construction in the vicinity of the proposed
development which will increase traffic on the surrounding road system. The Lonepine Meadows
subdivision currently has all 77 lots available for development. The second, Stoneridge, is a 3 8-lot
subdivision that currently has 32 lots available for development. The trip generation characteristics
of both subdivisions are shown in Table 5.
Table 5 - Trip Generation Rates (Lonepine & Stoneridge Subdivisions)
AM Peak
PM Peak
Hour -
AM Peak
Hour -
PM Peak
Weekday -
Avg. Trip
Hour
Avg. Trip
Hour
Avg. Trip
Weekday
Land Use
Ends per
Trip
Ends per
Trip
Ends per
Trip
ITE Code) Units
Unit
Ends
unit
Ends
Unit
Ends
LONEPINE 77
0.75
58
1.01
78
9.57
737
STONERIDGE 32
0.75
24
1.01
33
9.57
307
Total
82
111
11044
Abc1irt Tra c Scrvicc5 6 Novcinbcr 2009 Updatc
W'Ilo%v Creek Subdivision - Kalispell. Montana CMG Fnp erino
-ine
25 ind 10 pet -cent, respectively.
No frozen., organic. or other deleterious
materi a] s sho uld be Present i n the St ructura I
Fill-
') -1
_L.3 Fill placement should be observed and tested by our geotechnical site representative- Any
areas of rurfing, excessive deformation, or other non-unifoimi perfbmiancc should be
moisture conditioned and recompacted,, or removed and replaced, as recommended by our
geotechnical engineer.
0
2.4 Utility trcnch backfill material should be approved bv our geotechnical engineer and be
placed in uniform lifts of inaxinium 8-inch loose thickness and be compacted to 95 percent
of The maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D698. On -site silt, rsilty swid� silty
clay. and silty gravel soils are acceptable for backfill purposes, provided the soils =
compacted within 3 percent of the optimum moisture content and they are free of
construction debris. and frozen or dcictcrious material. Cobbles and boulders 9rciater than
6 inc h maxi m uni size sho ul d not be used as back fil I material. Backfil I shou Id not be p] aced
on frozen subgrade material or previously placed backfill that bas frozen.
2.5 Unclassified rill or Structural Fill constructed on slopes steeper than 5H:1V should be
benched into the exisLing grade as sbown on Detail 1. Since it is difficult to compact the
surlbee of fi I I s lopes, we reco mmend that tbC 31opes be overbui It by a m irdmuni o f 2 fMt Wid
tfinimed back using an excavator with a smoodi lippcd bucket after construction to providc
a surface that is more resistant to localized sloughing. In addition, cuts on slopes steeper
than 514: 1 V shall'be accomplished with an excavator equippcd with a smooth lipped bucket
to redu ce the ri sk of di sturbing the native soj I s when fine grad ing. Fin i shed slopes .9hal I be
no steeper than 2H: IV. Appropriate topsoil, vegetation and erosion protection shall be
implemented on all slopes to reduce the risk of surface erosion.
3.0 Seismic Design
3.1 Seismic design following the static procedures outlined in the Intemational Building Code
may be conducted usino a Site Class D (2003 IBC) across the ma o6ty of the site with Site
0 j
Class C conditions where Glacial Till soils are emountemd at the ground fmi-face. A 34c
specific seismic hazard study will bc necessary if dynamic procedures are to be followed.
4.0 Site Drainage
M Finished site grades should be positively sloped away from foundation and backfill zones.
Grading should be designed and maintained to route runoff away fi-om the bui Iding amas.
15.0
Roadways and Pavement Areas
5.1 In preparation for base course placemeDl. the subgrade should be scaTified, MOiStUre
Page 10
Willucu Cruck Subdivibiurt Kuhbpull, Munturat
Figure 3 -Trip Distributions
25%
U.S. H ig hway 2
30%
Proposed
Development
Site
45%
25%
5 % 65%
Foys Lake Road
Table 6 - 2013 Level of Service Summary
With The Willow Creek Subdivision
INTERSECTION
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour
Delay
LOS
V/c
DelavT
LOS
V/c
Foys Lake Road & Valley View
Drive
29.3
D
NIA
22.3
C
NIA
Westbound ThrulLeft
9.8
A
0.11
8.2
A
0.10
Northbound LeftlRight
29.3
D
0.56
22.3
C
0.36
Foys Lake Road & Southeastern
Access
25.8
D
NIA
19.2
C
NIA
Eastbound LeftlThru
7.8
A
0.01
8.8
A
0.04
Southbound Left
27.5
D
0.46
20.0
C
0.26
Southbound Right
9.7
A
0.02
12.0
B
0.02
Foys Lake Road & Southwestern
Access
17.3
C
NIA
15.5
C
NIA
Eastbound LeftlThru
7.7
A
0.00
5.4
A
0.01
Southbound RightlLeft
17.3
C
0.23
15.5
C
0.15
U.S. H ig hway 2 & Wi I low Creek
Drive
23.0
C
N/A
17.9
C
N/A
Westbound ThrulLeft
9.8
A
0.03
8.6
A
0.08
Northbound RightlLeft
23.0
C
0.32
17.9
C
0.18
Table 6 indicates that the Willow Creek Subdivision would affect the LOS at intersections along
Foys Lake Road and U. S. Highway 2. In order to mitigate these effects the developer should provide
improN7ements at these intersections. The intersection of Foys Lake Road and the site"s eastern
approach may need a different method of traffic control to operate effectively with the anticipated
Abc1irt Tra c Scrvicc5 Novcinbcr 2009 Updatc
Willucu Cruck Subdivibiurt Kuhbpull, Munturat
traffi-cvolumes. 'fhe possible traffic controls appropriate for this location include atraffic signal or a
modem roundabout. Either of these two types of traffic controls would function adequately for the
projected traffic volumes.
It is possible that the intersection of Foys Lake Road and Valley View Drive will require the addition
of a separated left -turn lane for northbound traffic in order to operate effectively at full build -out
based on existing traffic volumes on this road. However, the construction of the Kalispell bypass
will significantly affect the traffic on Valley View Drive. As part of the construction of the bypass,
Valley View Drive will become a dead-end road and will have no direct connection east to Kalispell.
This should significantly decrease the overall traffic on this roadway. Rather than attempting to
guess if any mitigation will be required at the intersection of Valley View Drive and Foys Lake
Road it is recommended that a traffic count be performed at this intersection after the bypass is
completed to determine if any intersection modifications will be warranted.
It would also be desirable to install separated right- and left-tum lanes for northbound traffic at the
development's new approach onto U.S. Highway 2. Although current traffic projections show that
this intersection may function adequately through full build -out with only one lane, the possible
effects from the bypass and the likelihood that Willow Creek Drive will draw some cut -through
traffic could increase the overall traffic volumes and delay at the intersection and may warrant the
separated turn lanes. These lanes will likely be necessary in the future as this area of Kalispell
continues to grow.
ATS reviewed the proposed location of the project's eastern access onto Foys Lake Road to
determ ine if a mo dern roundab out c ould b e instal le d at thi s lo c ation without negative ly affecting the
nearby residential driveways. There are currently six separate residential driveways within 500 feet
of the proposed access location. With this density of residential driveways it will be extremely
difficult to install a modem roundabout without negatively affecting many of these driveways. For
this reason it is not recommended that a modem roundabout be constructed at this location.
If a traffic signal were installed along Foys Lake Road at the development?s eastern approach the
intersection would function at LOS B in the AM and PM peak hours. This intersection should also
be equipped with separated left- and right -turn lanes to help maximize the capacity of the
intersection before the traffic signal is installed.
ATS also reviewed the left- and ri ght-tum lane warrants for the approach onto U. S. Highway 2 based
on the requirement from the MDT Road Design Manual. The analysis showed that this intersection
would warrant a left-tum deceleration lane for westbound traffic but would not need a right -turn
deceleration lane. The turn lane warrant calculations are shown in Appendix D.
Abclirt Tra c Scrvicc5 9 Novcinbcr 2009 Updatc
Willucu Cruck Subdivibiurt Kuhbpull, Munturat
H. MITIGATION SCHEDULE
ATS reviewed the build -out schedule to predict when the various mitigation measures would be
required. Based on the projected traffic volumes it is likely that the left -turn deceleration lane on
U.S. Highway 2 will be required as soon as the road is opened to the public. The required traffic
signal at the development"s eastern approach onto Foys Lake Road will likely be needed with Phase
5 of construction but should not be installed until traffic counts indicate that the traffic signal is
warranted. The developer should perform traffic counts in this area after construction of Phase 2 of
the development to determine Nvhen the traffic signal installation may be required and if any
additional lanes on Valley View Drive are necessary.
1. IMPACT SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS
'fhe construction of the Willow Creek Subdivision may require some improvements at area
intersections. These improvements may include the installation of a traffic signal at the
development's eastern approach onto Foys Lake Road and the installation of a left -turn deceleration
lane on U. S. Highway 2. Traffic counts should be performed along Foys Lake Road after Phase 2 of
construction to help determine when the traffic signal may be warranted or if any additional
mitigation measures are needed within this area.
Abc1irt Tra c Scrvicc5 10 Novcinbcr 2009 Updatc
APPEN IX A
Traffic Data
Robert Peccia & Associates
825 Custer Avenue
Hubert Turner TIS
Helena, Mt 59601
File Name
kalispel[5
rcirs and Trucks
406-447-5000
Site Code
00000000
Start Date
01/1 1/200E
Page No
I
5 nnte-q- unariv,
Grou s NjnteNd- Un hifted - Bank 1
VALLEY VIEW
FOYS
LAKE
KE
VALLEY VIEW
FOYS LAKE
Start Tirne
South
bound
Westau-nd
Nonhbound
Ea-stbound.
Matt
Thru-
Left'
Peds
Right
Thri j
I eft
Peds
Right
Thru
Left
Peds
Right
Thru
Loft
Peds
I nt.
Total
Factor 189
1.189 1.189
1.189 1,189
1-189
1.189
1.189'
1-189 1 .18g
tigg
07.00 AM 0
0715 AM 0
0
a
2 0
1 0
8 0
11 a
a
2
0
0
a
6
31 0
31 0
0
47
59
07-.30 AM 0
0
10
0- 0
15 0
4
0
5
73 0
0
1-16
07,45 AM D
0
0
0
0
12
5 0
23 0
5
0
6
115 0
0
168
Total 0
G
0
01
0
38
15 0
58 0
12
0
17
250 0
0
ago
08-00 AM n
0
0
01
0
IG
1� 0�
3�� 0
2
01
:5
G7 0
0
169
08:15AM 0
0
0
0
0
32
14 0
15 0
a
0
14
54 0
0
137
08'30 AM 0
0
0
0
0
29
0 D
14 0
5
0
5
35 0
0
95
084A5 AM 0
0
ID
0
0
20
6 01
11 a
4
0
0
29 0
0
70
Total 0 0
BREAK **Pr
04.00 PM
0
0
(�4: 15 PM
a
0
04:30 PM
0
0
04,45 PM
0
0
Total
0
0
05:00 PM
0
0
05:15 PM
a
0
05:30 PM
0
0
05,45 PM
a
Total
0
Grand Tot@l
0
Apprch 1%
0-0
0.0
Total %
0.0
0.0
0 0 0 100 �g 01 73 0 19 0 24 216 r� '- 171
0
0
0
:5 1
7
0
10
0
5
0
5
19
0
0
U
0
48
17
0
14
0
2
0
8
25
0
0
0
0
45
17
0
13
0
2
0
7
25
0
0
0
0
54
15
0
15
0
6
0
7
32
0
0
a
198
56
0 ---52
0
15
0
27
101
0
0
0
57
18
0
7
0
4
0
2
32
0
0
0
0
74
19
0
4
0
10
0
11
31
0
0
0
a
58
24
0
10
0
12
0
7
33
0
n
0
0
so
21
-0
6
0
.5
0
10
31
0
0
0
0
239
82
0
27
0
31
0
30
127
0
0
0
0
575
192
0
210
0
77
0
98
694
0
0.0
OLO
0.0
75,0
25.0
0.0
71.2
0 n
9R A
0.0
12.4
87.6
010
().a
0.0
0.0
31.1
10.4
0,0
11.4
0.0
4.2
0,0
5.3
37,6
0.0
a 97
0 114
0 109
0 129
0 449
0 120
a 149
0 144
0 1 536
0 1846
0.0
0.0
VALLEY VIEW
61)"thwuna
FOYS LAKE
VALLEY VIEW
I
FOYS LAKE
Westbound
Manhbound
Eastbound
Start Tme
Rig Thr Pad
T
r _�pp-
13�9
I
Thr
Left Ped
App.
Rig
Thr
Left
Ped
App,
Rig
Thr
Pedl
App.
-Int.
ht UL S I
Tow I
ht
U._.-.-
-5
Total
ht.
U
S
TQtal
ht
U1
Left 1 5
Total
Total
Peak Hour From 07:00 AM to 11 A5 AM - Peak 10 of I
Intorsectio
07"30 AM
n
Volume
0 0 0 0
0
0
73
39 0
112
89
0
20
0
109
30
339
0 0
369
590
Percent
0,0 0.0 0,0 0.0
0 - 0
65.2
34� B 0.0
81,7
0.0
18.3
0.0
8.1
Oto
0.0 0.0
vclume
0 0 a 0
01
0
19
13 0
32
33
0
2
0
35
5
97
0 0
102
169
Peak
Factor
High Int.
6:45:00 AM
08:15
AM
OB-00
AM
07:45 AM
0.873
Volume
0 0 0 0
0�
0
S2
14 0
46
33
0
2
0
351
6
115
0 0
121
Pqak
Factor
0.609
0,779
0.762
1
I
qd w e
oj 4C4
t, 0 W4 V)
1;
4mP
N
w
0
ca
42
:w gem
c
4.%16F
IL
.0
06.
M CM CM
C5
C)
r-- m m
m
ni6 n i-,,
al
Lo cn
I--
M
C'i
M
ci U., cri
M M CD
r
r,
CD
00 cu
-r-- -r-- 0
c.,i
0
CD LO
0 M
e, .,a
612"
c6
4
ui
M
-V
-Rr
N
llqr
M
co
W,
w
�r
t3
v
w
M
U-�
t*
0
M
[--
CD
M
cc
to
r-,
0
T-
C�
�r--
V--
-r-
U15
UD
r—
r4
w
4
Ir—
qt
cr'�
�—
0
T-
6 00 t7
a;
a;
CT,
0�
a;
cr;
C6
0;
.x
N
Lo
M -
V
9T
;r
Co
(D
Nr
(1)
an
M
10
C�
M
C)
N
'rf
rk
M
cc
M
co
06
6
ai
ci
co,
co,
rl-,
oi
LLI
n CD
Crj
(M co
ce>
r4
qt
OD
M
C%l to
rt
Wo
-r--MM
Mtn
"RT
kr)
r�-
r�-
n W
�D
N
�-
c6
cd
r-,�
r�-�
cd
rz
Lo
cr) (D C) q�r cn N Lf) M Lr3 1 LO CO C�
to M N W 03 C� N N 0 r�- 0
n T.-- V-- cn �D M M M 0 0 �t
CO
(D
0)
CD C�
tD
10
0
0
0
cn
CO
CD
LL
CO
t-
M
Kt
1'--
0
Ln
-t
-d
t2l
LO
a)
PL- 4
W)
0)
M
�D
M
ID
co
LD
P-L,
00 LC3
M
N
gcJ-
LO
r)
cs
Go,
00,
co, Cb'
C-mb,
M"
M"
M"
0 0'
r-
0;,
am a.
UMJ
qV
Cb C%j
C%4
Lc�
"t
C;�
M
f.0
C%j
co
cm
on it
v)
p
m
Lo
eb
Le)
2
M
r6_
r-_ J�r
W
V
Lo
M
C�j
M
E
as
6
ad
cc- M-
a)-
CD-
CD-
Cb-
Cb-
cn-
co-
7
a)-
00
U-)
Lo
LD
w
CM
M
Cc
CD
CO
CD
Lo
Ln
CO
03
Co
Mo
N Nt
N
Cq
(D
N
Cr)
(4)
P-7
06
cd
05 0;
0;
C;
d
c�
d
C6
C6
LEL
C-)
C� -
CIO) q5 to
CrA Rt
Lim) cn CD
CD
CD
ca
At,
W (D P—
T-- 'r-
W cn cm
0
C
C6. 6
d 6
C6, C6 C�
C6 -Cd
.0
rob
CD N N In M M, M 0 0 w
r") 0 - 0 0 0 M w M OD n N-
UD M -r- M 'rr 0 M M -* r-- t-
L6 L6 Lzi 6 6 tz (6 1.6 40' �6
z M x M z
< w .4c M D
--a LL --3
C2
IN
CIL,
.2
L4
P
9
13)
APPENDIX
Traffic Model
Li
eN
�1-- —M
6n
0
LL
Lj M-
6-
I >-
0
LL
LA
E
CL
73 k^
m
c
+1
E
r,, 6
CU -L-4
Ln
tc
LL
,A
4-
C
CD
P
CL
0
4-J
Ln
6n
M
u
.2
4-- 11
E
CL
0
r-L
ra
I q*
�.o
ch
LA Ln m
6n IV L.
-Ad E z;
—0
>
aj
CL
LP)
:I-
0
LL
LA
-r4
.t I
LM
m
Lin. -C
CL
4p-9
C—
Ln
CL
3:
m
Pp-
4r m
t
9T
Lrl
bLD
LL.
4m t.
t A*
N
C%l
Ln
*m IL
t &
Ln
Ln
C: to
4-J
Air
16-
>
w
4-0
It
.Ln
4qt cc
r�6% r%6%
14
to
eN
13
m
0
Ln UM)
00 In .00
Itm
4r
4t e
r1i
lw* " or
C* C%4
m
4r
P4
L.L
*m IL
P'4
APPEN IX C
LOS Calculations
Two -Way Stop Control
Page I of t
I TWOMAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY I
neral Information
Is'
LA
Unayst
ena/Go.
befin Traffic Services
Date Performed
1/24/2007
I-IM
jAnalysis Time . Period
Peak Hour
ite Information
Intersection
Foys Lake Rd, & Valley View
r
unschchon
Analysis Year
015 With Wrilow Creek PH
i
I
Project Description Hubert T-umer TIS
EasttWest Straet: Foys Lake Road North/South Street: Valley View Road
I
Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25
MEMEMEN
ehicle Volurnes and Adiustments I
Aajar Street
Eastbound
Westbound
Kvemeni
1
2
4
L
T
R
L
T
R
To�lume (yeh/h)
584
43
61
149
�eak-Hour Factor, PHF
0.76
0.79
0,79
0.65
0.65
0.61
Acurly Flow Rate. HrR
.vehlh)
0
739
54
93
229
0
Percent Heavy Vehicles
0
0
Median Ty[2
Undividecf
RT Channellized
0
0
Lanes
0
1
0
0
1
0
sonfiguration
TR
LT
Jpstream Signal
0
Minor Stmet
Noahbound
Southbound
0overnent
7
9
10
11
12
L
T
R
L
T
R
Uplume (yah/h)
32
110
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.79
0.78
0.79
0.78
0.76
0-78
Houdy Flow RaLe, HFR
(yehth)
40
0
139
0
0
0
Percent Heavy Vehicles
0
0
0
0
0
D
Percent Grade (%)
0
0
Flared Approach
N
N
Storage
0
0
RT Channelized
0
I I
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
iLanes
Ponfiguration
LR
Lu&wegaJLUU6U9 Leopm, ana
LeV81 OT �ervice
kpprosch
Eastbound
Westbound
Northbound
Southbound
Aovement
1
4
7
8
9
10 11
12
.ane Conflguration
LT
LP
F (veh1h)
93
179
(m) (veh1h)
837
322
35% queue length
0-37
3.19
.fontroll Delay (slveh)
9.8
29,3
LOS
kpproach Delay (slveh)
A
ED
29.3
kIpproach LOS
D
C opy right 0 20 (37 U n i ve rslity o f Flod da, Al I Rig hts Re served
HCS+TM Version 5.3 Generated: 11118/2009 1C.-32AM
file: //C ADocuments and Settings\Rob Abelin\Local Setting s\Temp\u2k4B B.tmp I I /t 8/2009
Two -Way Stop Control
Page I of I
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Ve—neral Information ISIte Inform—a-tio-n I
nalyst
RIA
Oj i Trdffpc Service-s
Date Performed
12A
1IF2412007
Analysis Time Period
Mj
M Peak Hour
Project Desoription Hubert Turner TIS
EasMest Streeto Foys Lake Road
Intersection Orientation;
East-West
ehicle Volumes and.
A!�ustments
ajor Stmet
Eaatbound
Movement
1
2
L
T
olurne �jeh/h)
273
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.92
0.92
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0
296
veh/h
Percent Hem Vehicles
0
--
Median Type
RT Channelized
Lanes
0
1
onfi uration
pstream Signal
0
inor Stmet
Nolhbound
ovement
7
L
T
olurne �vehlh)
43
eak-Hour Factor, PHFT
0, 77
0.77
Hourly Flow Rate, HFP1
55
0
eh/h
I
Percent I Heavy Vehicles
0
0
Percent Grade (%)
0
lared Approach
N
Storage
0
Channelized
nes
0
0
onfiguration
LR
aLay, Quoua Larigth, and
Level of Service
pproach
Eastbound
Westbound
Movement
1
4
.qnp. Cnnfiaimafinn
I T
(veh/h)
122
(m) (vehlh)
1230
5% queue length
0.33
Control Delay (slveh)
8.2
06
A
pproach Delay (slveh)
pproach LOS
Qcpyr1!;1M1 0 Zuu I U n !VeMly of fflotide, All Rig NTS ReserVCO
Intersection
Foys Lake Rd. & Valley View:
Rd
Jurisdiction
Analysis Year
2015 With— W-001ow Creek PH
5
1
1
orth/South �t'reet- Valley View Road
tudy Period. (hrs)- 0-25
Westbound
4
6
6
R
L
T
R
41
105
505
0,92
0.66
O'B6
0.86
44
122
587
0
0
7
Undivided
0
0
0
0
TP
L T
0
Southbound
10
11
12
R
L
T
R
48
0.7-7
0,77
0.77
O� 77
62
0
0
0
0
0
1 10
0
N
0
0
0
0
0
7
Noithbound
LR
pq �
117
324
0.36
1.60
22.3
C
22.3
C
HCS+TM Vcrsion,5.,3
Southbound
9 10 1 11 1 12
Uenerated: 11ijUjZQUq 10,32AM
file ://C:�D ocuments and Settings\Bob Abelin\Local SettingsUemp�u2WBRtimp 11/18/2009
Two -Way Stop Control Plage I of I
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
eneral Information
ite Inf . ormation
te ' n
nalyst
LA
Intersection
terse�
oys Lake Rd,- & Second Ent
g-ency/Co.
befin Traft Services
Jurisdiction
risd ic
Date Per -formed
1/24/2007
["M
lysi
Analysis Year
011.5 With Wilow Greek PH
-Analysis Time Fe�riod
Peak Hour
Project Description Hubert Turner TIS
EastWest Street Foys Lake Road
North/South Street: Southeast Entrance
IStudy
Intersection Orientation,
Easi-West
Period (hrs): 0. 25
hicle Volumes and Adjustments
2jor Street
Eastbound
Westbound
ovement
2
-3
4
5
6
L
T
R
L
T
R
ulume (veh1h)
4
522
147
34
Pe2k-Hour Factor, PHIF
0.76
0.76
0.76
0.61
0.64 0-64
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
eh/h
5
686
0
0
229
53
Percent Heaq Vehicles
0
0
—
—
Median Type
Undivided
RT Channelized
0
nes
0
1
0
0
1
0 =Now
onfigLination
LT
TR
ream Signal
0
0
1
or Street
Nodhbound.
Southbound
ovement
7
a
9
10
11
12
L
T
R
L
T
R
olume (yetifni
102
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.78
0.78
0.78
0.77
0.78 0.77
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0
0
0
132
0
. 14
veh/h)
Peroent Heavy Vehicles
0
0
0
0
0�1
0
Percent Grade (%)
0
0
Flared Approach
N
N
Storage
0
0
RT Channelized
0
0
anes
0
0
0
onfiguration
L J
'_R
elay, Queue ength, and
Level of Service
_j
Dproach
Eastbound Westbound
Northbound
Southhound
Movement
1
4
7
a
9
10
12
ane Configuration
LT
L
R
(vah1h)
.9
132
14
(m) (veh/h�
1292
289
788
C
0.00
0.46
O�02
queue lengffi
0.01
2.20
0,05
ntrol Delay (sJveh)
7-,9
27.5
9.7
0S
A
D
A
pproach Delay (5Neh)
Vpproach LOS
D
Copyright & 2007 U niversity of Florida, A I -R ig Me, Reserved
HCS+Tm Versior 5.2
Generated. 1VIW2909 10:33AM
file: //C ADocuments and Settings\Bob Abelin\Local Setting s�Te rnp\u2 k4C C. tmp 1118/2009
Two -Way Stop Control Page I of 1
TWO-WAY STOP CDNTROL SUMMARY
enerall Information
ISite Information
nalyst
RLA
intersection
Foys Lake Rd. & Second Ent
gency/Co.
Kbefin Traffic Services
1 Jurisdiction
12015
Date Performed
IlAnalysis
1/24/2007 I
nalysis Year
P
With Willow Creek PH
5
Time Period
VmpeakHour
PTiect Dnscripfian Htibaif Tamer TPS�
L
...
astANest Street Foys Lake Road
North/South St 7eemt*- Southeast Entrance
Ptudy
tersection Odentation- East-West
Pe6od (hr:s): 0.25
ehicle Volumes an Muustments
or Stmet Eastbound
Westbound
ovement
2
3
4
6
L
T
R
L
T
R
olume (veh/h) 13
242
431 117
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0-92
0.92
0.92
q%Aft
0-01?
0.86 0.86
Houdy Flow Rate, HFR
h/h 14
263
0
0
501 136
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 r_7
—
--
10
—
Median Type
Undivided
RT Channelized
0
0
Lanes 0
1
0
0
onfiguration L T
TR
tream Signal
0
or Street Nodhibound
Southbound
ovement 7
8
9
10
11
12
L
T
R
L
R
olume (yeh1h)
66
7
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.77
0.77
0-77
0.77
0.77 0-77
ourly Flow Rate, HFR
vehih) 0
0
0 I
85
0
9
Percent eavy Vehicles 0
0
0
0
0
0
Peroent Grade (%)
0
0
Flared Approanh
N
Storage
0
0
RT Channelized
0
0
0
0
0
nfiguration
L
R
Della Queue Length, and Level of Servi;e
_j
ppra2ch
Eastbound
Wastbound
Nodhbound
Southbound
Movement
4
7 8
10 11
12
Lane Configuration
LT
L
R
(vehlh)
14
9
(m) (veh1h)
956
324
525
Ic
0.01
0,26
0,02
5% queue length
0.04
1.03
0.05
ontrol Delay (slveh)
8.8
20.0
12,o
LOS
A
C
B
pproach Delay (silveh)
pproach LOS
C
Copyright C 2007 University af Florida. Al� Rights Reserved
HC34TM Vergior 6_3
Gen era te d 1111812 009 10 -.34 AM
file:XADocuments and Setfings\Bob AbelinTocal Setfings�Temp\u2MDO.tmp 11/18/2009
Two -Way Stop Control Page I of I
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
ral Information ite Intormation
F—en e Pr. 11 1- 11
nal st
RLA
Intersection
oys LaKe Hd.. & SWLnt
ency/Go.
Date Performed
I
belin Traffic Services
Jurisdiction
IY2412007
Analysis Year
20 7 5 With willow Creek PH
15
A JYS6
na is Time Period
M Peak Hour
I
Project Description Hubert Tumar TIS
EasMest Street' Lms Lake Road
E�
NorthIsputh Street: Southwest Entranco
Intersection Orientation, East-West
Stu gy Period rs): 0. 25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound
Westbound
Movement 1
2
3
4
5
6
L
T
R
T
R
Volume Ltehfh) 4
475
135
24
Pe ak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.77
0.77
0.76
0.61
0.67
0-67
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
=4
h �Ih 5
616
0
0
201
35
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0
--
edian Type
Undivided
... =
T Channelized
0
nes 0
1
0
0
0
onfigur2tion LT
TR
�nal
streaT Si
0
0
nor Street - Northbound
Southbound
ovement 7
10
12
L
T_
R
L
T
R
clume (yehlh)
54
13
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.78
0.78
0.78
0.78
0.76
O� 78
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
veh/W 0
0
0
69
0
16
Percent Hea�j Vehicles 0
0
0
0
0
0,
Percent Grade
0
0
Flared Appmach
Pi
N
Storage
0
0
RT Channelized
0
0
Lanas
E
0
onfiguration
L R
Delay,. Queue Length, and Level of Service
roach
Fasthound
wesihound
Nofthbound
Southbound
ement
1
4
7
a
9
10
11
12
ane Configuration
LT
LR
(vohJh)
5
86
(m) (vehih)
1343
%777
0.00
0.23
a queue length
0-of
0.65
ntrol Delay (slveh)
7.7
17-3
LOS
A
C
pproaGn Uelay (siven)
17-3
p-proach LOS
C
G opy Ig ht 0 2 007 u mive rs Ity of RoOdia, All Rights Reserved
HCS+Tk4 Versica 5.3
Generated: 11OW2009 10:34AM
file:8CADomnents and Settings\Bob Abelin\Local SettI'ngs\Temp\u2k4D4.tmp 11/18/2009
Two -Way Stop Control Page I of I
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Feneral-Infoffnation ite information
nallyst
' s
RLA I
I ntersealon
Voys Lake Hd- & SW Ent
a
eng Co.
0 L_
Nbelin Traffic Services
Jurisdiction
a P
ate Performed
1 rnalysis
1/24/2007
Analysis Year
20 1 b With VVfflo w Creek PH
05
I S Time Pedod
IPM Peak Hour
I
Project Deseriplian 14uhart Tumer TIS
EastANesl Street: Foys Lake Road orth/South Street: Southwest Eph�anae
Intersection Orientation: East-West Ptudy Period ftrAs 0.25
ehicle Volumes and Adjustments
ajar Street
Eastbound
Westbound
Movement
1
2
3
3
4
6
6
L
T
R
R
L
_T
R
R
olume Lveh/h)
14
223
376
63
63
Peak -Hour Factor, PHP
0.92
0.92
0.92!
0.92
0.86
0-86
0.86
0.86
ourly Flow Rate, HFR
vah1h)
15
242
0
0
437
73
ercent Heavy Vehicles
edian Type
0:=j — —
Undivided
Channelize7�
es
nfiguration
tream Signal
0
0 1 E 0
LT I
1 0 _F
Northbound
0
0 1 0
I I TR
I 1 0
So7th7ound
or Street
Movement
7
L
B 9
T R
10 11
L T
12
R
olume (veh/h)
39
8
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(ye-h1h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles
0.77
0
0
0. 77 0.77
0 0
I I
0 0
0-77 0.77
50 0
0 0
0.77
10
ercent Grade ("A)
0
0
lared Approach
N
N
Storage
0
0
RT Channelized
o
1
0
0
onfiguration
LR
elm Queue Length, and
Level of Service
pproach
Pagthound
WA-Affinund
Nolhbound
Southbound
Movement
1
4 I
7
8
9
10 11
12
Lane Configuration
LT
I
JE]
E] LR
(vahlh)
15
60
(m) (veh/h)
1065
403
0.01
0.15
5% queue leniath
0.04
0.52
antroll Delay (alveh)
. - ..
8.4
15,5
LOS
A
pproach Delay (siveh)
15-5
pproach LOS
C
C opy rig ht 0 20 07 U n i-ve rs� ty n f Flo-ri da AJ I Rig hts Re served HGS+7M V@Fsjorl 5_3 Generated: 11/1&2009 10:34AM
file: 11C ADocuments and Settings\Bob Abelin%Local SettI"ngs\Temp\u2k4D8Amp 11/18/2009
Two -Way Stop Control
Page I of I
eneral Information
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
[site Information
nalxst
LA
gency/Co.
befin Traffic Services
Date Performed
1/25/2007
Analysis Time Period
M Peak Hour
rojed Description Hubert Tumer TIS
EasMest Street: US. d�Lhway 2
rntersection On'entafion:
East-Wast
Vehicle Volumes and
Adjustments
Wor Street
Eastbooind
Moverneni MEN="
2
�((vehlh)
T
70mlmunWme
�L
810
Peak -Hour Faclor, PHF4
0.90
0.92
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
vp.hih
0
880
Peroeni Heavy Vehicles
0
Median Type
RT Channelized
I
Lanes
0
I
n
onfiguration
0 U'
�
t re
-S rearn Signal
arS
0
0 r
or Street
Northbound
ovement
:p
8
L
T
o ol u m I
lume (veh1h)
13�
Peak -Hour Factor, PH
0.80
0.90
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
18
0
Iveh1h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles
0
0
Percent Grade M
0
Flared Approach
N
Storage
0
RT Channelized
Lanes
0
ion
LR
Bnfigurat
lay, Queue Length, and
Level of Service
kpproach
Eastbou nd
Westhound
4ovement
1
4
.a-ne Configuration
L
(vahJh)
25
0 ( I MIP) (veh1h)
772
Ic
T.O T
15% queue length
0� 10
Pontrol Delay (slveh)
9.8
LOS
A
kpproach Delay (SPveh)
Epproach LOS I I
00p yd g ht C 2 D07 U n ly ersity of ric ride, A I I R i g hts R es a rved
Intersection
W& 2 & NW Ent
Jurisdiction
Analysis Year
L
015 With Willow Ureek PH
orth/South Street: No-rthwest Entrance
tudy Period (hrs).- 0.25
11'estbound
R M11111111111111
OEM
Southbound
Northbound
7 8 9
LR
03
292
0.32
1.33
23.0
C
23.0
C
HCS4T" V�rsian 5.3
Southbound
10 1 11
Generated, 11M812009 10:33AM
file:HCADocuments and Setfings\Bob AbefinTocal Settings\Temp\u2k4C3.tmp 11/18/2009
Two -Way Stop Control Page I of I
TWOmWAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
enerall information
Site Information
nalyst
RLA
'j
Intersection
igh=a 2 & NW Ent
gency/Co.
befin Traffir. Rnwir.ps
Jurisdiction
Date Per -Formed
1/25/2007
[b
Analysis Year
015 With Willow Creek PH
lAnalysis Time. Period
M Peak Hour
Projact Description Huborf Turner TIS
EasVWest Street: U.S. Highya
X 2
North/South Street, Northwest Entrance
Intersection Orientation:
East-West
I I
]Study Period (hral- O� 25
ehicle Volumes and Adjustments
ajorStreet
Eastbou nd
Westbound
ovement
1
2
3 4
5
6
L
T
R L
T
R
01me (yeh1h)
412
19 78
745
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.90
0.90
0.90 0-90
0.90 0.90
Hourly Flow kale, HFR
Veh/h
0
457
21 86
627
0
Percent Heavy Vehicles
0
0
Median Type-
Undivided
RT Channelized
0
0
Lanes
0
0 1
0
off uration
TR L
7
pstream Signal
0
0
inor Str"t
Northbound
Southbound
ovement
7
a
9 10
11
12
L
T
R L
T
R
olurne (vehih)
11
44
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0. so
0.90
0.90 0� 90
0.90 0.87
Hourly Flow Rate, HFIR
ch/h
13
0
46 0
n
0
Percent Heavy Vehicles
0
0
0 L
0
0
Percent Grade (%)
0
0
Flarad Approach
MENNEN
IV
Storage
0
0�
RT Channelized
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
Configuration
LR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
-
ppro2ch
Eastbound Westbound
Nolbbound
Southbound
ovement
1
4
7 8 9
10 11
12
Lane Configuration
L
LR
(vehlh)
86
61
(m) (veh/h)
1095
340
I
0.08
5% queue iength
0.20
0.64
Control Delay (slveh)
8.6
I
17.9
LOS
I C
pproach Delay (slveh)
17.9
pproach LOS
C
Cop y H g ht 0 200 7 U NY ersity of Flo We, A I I R 19 hts R eserved
HCS4TM 'Version 5.3
Generated, 1111812009 1C:33AM
file://C;\Documents and Settings\Bob AbelinTocal SettIngs\Temp\u2k4C7.tmp 11/18/2009
APPENDIX
TurnmLane Warrants
28.4(8)
INTERSECTIONS AT -GRADE
November 2000
U) z 0
LL. z
1�- 0
LL. j
LLI
Q
(n
Be
Jd6 LL.
RMJ LU LLI
X
I--
.j
.j cmi
LL.
z
I.J
Lli 0
ui
Lai
Lij 0
Pot I.-
L61 CC j
LLI LLI
2 :5 1;
sit
tJ
LLJ
CL (n LL;
�j
L61
ka Z
x
Lli x z
LL.
r4 5
L6
LLI gn
LLI
IAJ
LLJ
Li
w
L a
uj
cc ci
US W
0
lz
w 1
10
X W
4. w 9
Pm I
uj
N
W
Z
> LLI LLI
U2 1�
LL.
6�
X
= > P-
CPA La
LLI
z d,
V. L
LLI
I"
00
W
z
M
M
0
0
U)
z
9
>P
LU 4c
z
0
0
0
cn
LLI
0
z
LL
w
Z
co
04
t6
Oro%
.L
CL
c%l
z
cn
um
0
>
U)
LLJ
LL. z
w 0
C)
Z
>
MJ LU
LU to
a M
Z
M LU
z
<
LLI z
>
2
0
0 0 0 0 a a 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
OD I@-- LD 0 qw rn IrL
HnOH NOIS30 ONNnO (Hc[A) 3yqnlOA ONISO.1.10 —OA
%0
MA
January 2 7, 20 10
traffic Hubert Turner
wrvice5 3300 Hwy 2 West
Kalispell, MT 59901
RE: Willow CreekTIS Addendum
Dear Hubert,
At the request of the Montana Department of Transportation Abelin Traffic Services
(ATS) has assembled additional information regarding the phasing of the proposed
Willow Creek project. Due to uncertainties in anticipated traffic volumes caused by the
proposed Kalispell Bypass construction plans, ATS did not provide specific details about
the individual traffic impacts by phase for this project in the November 2009 Traffic
Impact Study (TIS). ATS recommended that additional traffic counts be performed after
the bypass is operating so that the mitigation schedule can be more accurately evaluated.
Upon review of the TIS, MDT requested some additional phasing information and traffic
volume data for the project which was not included in the TIS. This information has
been provided below. The end results of the Traffic Impact Study have not been changed
in any way.
The proposed phasing plan for the Willow Creek development is shown in Table 1.
Table 1 -Willow Creek Phasing Plan
Single Family
Townhouses
Total
Phase 1
85
0
85
Phase 2
129
0
129
Phase 3
91
0
91
Phase 4
58
20
78
Phase 5
72
0
72
435
18
455
Table 2 includes the projected trip generation by phase for the Willow Creek project.
This data supplements the information included in Section E of the TIS.
Tables 3-7 contain the Level of Service data for each phase of the development. This
information supplements the data contained in Section G of the TIS. This analysis
ass -Limes that the northern access onto Highway 2 is not opened until Phase 2 of
construction.
130 South Howie Street
Helena, Montana 59601
406-459-1443
Table 2 - Trip Generation Rates
Land Use
Units
AM Peak
Hour Trip
Ends per
Unit
Total AM
Peak
Hour Trip
I Ends
PM Peak
Hour Trip
Ends per
I Unit
Total PM
Peak
Hour Trip
I Ends
Weekday
Trip Ends
per Unit
Total
Weekday
Trip Ends
Phase 1
Single Family
Residential
85
0.75
64
1.01
86
9.57
813
Phase 2
Single Family
Residential
129
0.75
97
1.01
130
9.57
1)235
Tntal Phases 1-9
914
161
916
9, n48
Phase 3
Single Family
Residential
91
1
0.75
1
68
1
1.01
1
92
1
9.57
871
1
Total Phases 1-3
305
229
3081
2)919
Phase 4
Single Family
Residential
58
0.75
44
1.01
59
9.57
555
Townhouse
20
0.44
9
0.52
10
5.86
117
Subtotal
78
53
69
672
Total Phases 1-4
383
282
377
3)591
Phase 5
Single Family
Residential
72
0.75
54
1.01
73
9.57
689
Total Phases 1-5
455
336
450
47280
Table 3 - 2011 Level of Service Summary
With The Willow Creek Subdivision - Phase 1
INTERSECTION
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour
Delay
T LOS
V/c
Delay
T- LOS
V/c j
Foys La ke Road & Va I I ey Vi ew D ri ve
18.1
C
NIA
15.3
C
NIA
Westbound ThrulLeft
9.0
A
0.09
7.9
A
0.08
Northbound LeftlRight
18.1
C
0.37
15.3
C
0.24
Foys Lake Rd. & Southeastern Access
15.3
C
N/A
13.3
B
N/A
Eastbound LeftlThru
7.6
A
0.00
8.2
A
0.01
Southbound Left
15.9
C
0.09
13.8
B
0.04
Southbound Right
9.3
A
0.00
10.8
B
0.00
Foys Lake Rd. & Southwestern Access
14.1
B
N/A
13.2
B
N/A
Eastbound LeftlThru
7.6
A
0.00
8.2
A
0.01
Southbound RightlLeft
14.1
B
0.07
13.2
B
0.04
Table 4 - 2012 Level of Service Summary
With The Willow Creek Subdivision - Phase 2
INTERSECTION
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour
Delay -F
LOS
V/c A
-Delay
T-LOS
V/c a
Foys La ke Road & Va I I ey Vi ow D ri ve
20.3
C
N/A
16.9
C
N/A
Westbound ThrulLeft
9.2
A
0.09
8.0
A
0.09
Northbound LeftlRight
20.3
C
0.42
16.9
C
0.27
Foys Lake Rd. & Southeastern Access
17.1
C
N/A
14.6
B
N/A
Eastbound LeftlThru
7.7
A
0.00
8.4
A
0.01
Southbound Left
17.9
C
0.18
15.1
C
0.10
Southbound Right
9.4
A
0.01
11.1
B
0.01
Foys Lake Rd. & Southwestern Access
14.7
B
NIA
13.7
B
NIA
Eastbound LeftlThru
7.6
A
0.00
8.2
A
0.01
Southbound RightlLeft
14.7
B
0.10
13.7
B
0.08
U.S. Highway 2 & Willow Creek Drive
18.7
C
NIA
15.7
C
NIA
Westbound ThrulLeft
9.5
A
0.01
8.3
A
0.04
Northbound RightlLeft
18.7
C
0.16
15.7
C
0.09
Table 5 - 2013 Level of Service Summary
With The Willow Creek Subdivision - Phase 3
INTERSECTION
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour
Del
LOS
V/c
Delay
T LOS
V/c
Foys La Ke Road &Valley View Drive
22.7
C
N/A
18.5
C
N/A
Westbound ThrulLeft
9.4
A
0.10
8.1
A
0.09
Northbound LeftlRight
22.7
C
0.46
18.5
C
0.30
Foys Lake Rd. & Southeastern Access
19.4
C
NIA
16.0
B
NIA
Eastbound LeftlThru
7.7
A
0.00
8.5
A
0.01
Southbound Left
20.5
C
0.28
16.5
C
0.16
Southbound Right
9.5
A
0.01
11.4
B
0.01
Foys Lake Rd. & Southwestern Access
15.5
C
N/A
14.3
B
N/A
Eastbound LeftlThru
7.6
A
0.00
8.3
A
0.01
Southbound RightlLeft
15.5
C
0.14
14.3
B
0.10
U.S. Highway 2 & Willow Creek Drive
19.6
C
NIA
16.4
C
NIA
Westbound ThrulLeft
9.6
A
0.02
8.4
A
0.05
Northbound RightlLeft
19.6
C
0.21
16.4
C
0.12
Table 6 - 2014 Level of Service Summary
With The Willow Creek Subdivision - Phase 4
INTERSECTION
AM Peak Hour
PM
Peak Hour
Del
LOS
V/c
De
LOS
V/c
Foys La ke Road & Va I I ey Vi ew Dri ve
25.6
D
N/A
20.0
C
N/A
Westbound ThrulLeft
9.6
A
0.11
8.2
A
0.09
Northbound LettlHlght
2b.b
U
U.bl
2U. U
C;
U.33
Foys Lake Rd. & Southeastern Access
21.9
C
NIA
17.5
B
NIA
Eastbound LeftlThru
7.8
A
0.00
8.7
A
0.01
Southbound Left
23.2
C
0.36
18.0
C
0.20
Southbound Right
9.6
A
0.01
11.7
B
0.01
Foys Lake Rd. & Southwestern Access
16.2
C
NIA
14.8
B
NIA
Eastbound LeftlThru
7.7
A
0.00
8.4
A
0.01
Southbound RightlLeft
16.2
C
0.18
14.8
B
0.13
U.S. Highway 2 & Willow Creek Drive
21.1
C
N/A
17.0
C
N/A
Westbound ThrulLeft
9.7
A
0.03
8.5
A
0.06
Northbound RightlLeft
21.1
C
0.26
17.0
C
0.15
Table 7 - 2016 Level of Service Summary
With The Willow Creek Subdivision - Phase 5
INTERSECTION
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour
Del
LOS
F V/c
Delay
LOS
V/c
Foys La ke R02d & V2 I I Gy Vi ow D ri ve
29.3
D
N/A
22.3
C
N/A
Westbound ThrulLeft
9.8
A
0.11
8.2
A
0.10
Northbound LeftlRight
29.3
D
0.56
22.3
C
0.36
Foys Lake Rd. & Southeastern Access
25.8
D
N/A
19.2
C
N/A
Eastbound LeftlThru
7.8
A
0.01
8.8
A
0.04
Southbound Left
27.5
D
0.46
20.0
C
0.26
Southbound Right
9.7
A
0.02
12.0
B
0.02
Foys Lake Rd. & Southwestern Access
17.3
C
N/A
15.5
C
N/A
Eastbound LeftlThru
7.7
A
0.00
8.4
A
0.01
Southbound RightlLeft
17.3
C
0.23
15.5
C
0.15
U.S. Highway 2 & Willow Creek Drive
23.0
C
N/A
17.9
C
N/A
Westbound ThrulLeft
9-8
A
0-03
8-6
A
0-08
Northbound RightlLeft
23.0
C
0.32
17.9
C
0.18
Included with this addendum please also find the projected traffic volumes for each phase
of the project and the individual LOS data sheets for each intersection. If you have any
additional comments or questions please feel free to contact me at 406-459-1443.
Sincerely,
Bob Abelin, P.E.
Abelin Traffic Services., Inc.
LL.
M "
FD
LA
CA
tin
r LL.
eD
r4
m
CL
INA
ru
0
r LL
LF
LL,
E
7E
m cn
C CL
E
CL
0
QJ
Ln
CL
4-J
FD
CL
CL,
I e
T-1
tkD
:E
M r-4 C%l
�Lp C>
14
L
LL.
-10
Ln
Ln
I
Ln
CU
CL
�p
Ln F:
7FV )e M :3
0
6-
> -he
W M
cu
-V
-4
_q tz rn �cu
>1
73
CLD
t e
v ro
00 wt
Ln
ON t
t e
rq
C%4
Ln
#a IL
1 9*
Ln
r6%
9:t
I I
CL
LL
Two -Way Stop Control Pagc I of I
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
eneral Information
ite Information
nalyst
L A
r
I n t ers ect ion
Foys Lake Rd. & vailey View
Rd
gency/co.
belin Traffic Services
ui ibdirtiqn
ate Performed
1/24/2007
. Analysis Year
2011 With Willow Creek PH
nalysis Time Period
X
M Peak Hour
Project Description Hubert Tumor TIS
EasMest Street'. Foys Lake Road
NorthlSouth Street: Valley View Road
Ptudy
tersection Odentation:
East-West
Period (hrs): 0.25
ehicle Volumes and Adjustments
ajor Street
Eastbound
Westbound
ovement
1
2
3
4
5
6
L
T
R
L
T
R
clume (vehfh)
434
40
57
104
Peak-Hauf Factor, PHF
0,76
0.79
0, 79
0.65
0.65
0.61
Hourly Flow Rqt;&-, HFR
eh/h
0
549
50
87
160
0
Percent Heavy Vehicles
0
0
4
Median Type
Undivided
RT Channelized
0
Lanes
0
1
0
0
1
0
onfiguralion
TR
L T
.-arn Signal
0,M
0
r Street
Niorthbound
Southbound
ment
7
8
9
10
1
11
12
L
T
R
L
T
R
olume (vehih)
30
100,_
T
171
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.79
O� 78
0-79
0,78
3� 78
0.'78
ourly Flow Ptate, HFR
37
0
126
0
0
0
h/h
Percent Heavy Vehicles
0
0
o
0
0
0
Percent Grade M
0
0
Flared Approach
N
N
Storage
0
0
RT Chanrielized
0
0
Lanes
0
0
0
0
0
0
Config ration
LR
Dellay,, Queue Length. and
Level of Service
�pproach
Eastbound
Westbound
Northbound
Southbound
Movement
1
1
1
4
7 8
9
10 11 12
Lane Configuration
LT
LR
v (veh/b)
87
163
1 C (rn) (vehN
98AS
437
VIC
0.0-9
0.37
.5% queue length
q
0.29
1.70
ontrol Delay (slveh)
nt ro,,
9.0
18.1
LOS
A
C
proach Delay (s/veh)
p pproa
p roach LOS
p ppro.�
copyngnt* 2U07university Of 1`10ri0a. All Rkghft ReWrVed
HCS*TrO Version 5.3
Generated: 112712010 B-47 AM
file://C -.\Documents and Settings\Bob Abelin\Local Setting s\Temp\u2k2FD. tmp 1/27/2010
Two -Way Stop Coritrol
Pagc 1 of I
renerai information
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
S tte Information
ff nalyst
RLA
enScqy/co.
be;ij? Ti-affic stol vi'vezi
D ate P e rformed EEEEEME�
1/24/25'07
j4nalysis Time.Period
IPM Peak Hour
Intersection
oys Lake Rd. & Valley View
Rd
u i is d i rvA ion
Analysis Year
2011 With Willow Cmek PH
1
Pr 'ect Description Hubert Turnar TIS
EastlWest Street, Foys Lakig Road
Street: Va&t View Road
EorthlSouth
tersedion Orientation- East-West tudy Period (hrs)-, 0,25
tu�
ohicle Volumes and Adjustments
or Street Eastbound Westbound
ovement 2 3 4 5 6
lume (yeh/h)
eak-Hour Factor, PHF
ourly Flow Ratc, HFR
eh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles
than Type
L T R
187 38
0.92 0.92 0.92
0 203 41
0
Undivided
L T R
96 750
0. 86 0.88 0.86
406 0
0 --
T Channelized
Lanes
onfluuration
0
0
0
TR
0
LT
0
0
stream Signal
nor Stmet
0
NoNhbound
0
South =ound
overnent
7
8
9
10
11 12
olurne (veh/h)
Peak -Hour Factor. PHF
L
40
0.77
T
0.77
R
44
0.77
L
0-77
T R
0.77 0.77
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
veh/h
51
I 0
57
0
0 0
Percent Heavy Vehicles
0
0
jP77
0
0
0
0 0
ercent Grade (%)
0
0
lared Approach
N
N
Storage
0
0
RT Channelized
19
0
es
0
0
0
0
0
0
nfiguration
4, LR
alay, Quoue Langth,,2ndl
Laval of Sarvice
pproach
Eastbound
Westbound
North ba u n d
Southbound
Movement
1
4
7
8 9
10
11 12
..anp- ConfigUration
LT
LP
(vehih)
111
108
(m) (veh/h)
1334
456
1
0,09
0.24
5% queue length
0.27
0.91
Control Delay (siveh)
7,9
15.3
A
C
proach Delay (stveh)
15.3
ppToach LOS
C
Cc pyr ig h t C 2007 U n i vers4 of F I odd a, Al I Rig h t5 Rmerved
H CS+ I h, Ve r's I on :5-:3
Generebed: 112712010 8:48 AM
file :VC:\Documents and Settings\Bob AbelinTocal Settings\Temp\u2k304.tmp 1/27/2010
Two -Way Stop Control Page I of I
TWOnWAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Feneiral. Information ite Information
M mmm� PC - . I. -
nalyst
Intersection
�-OyS Lake ME & Second Ent
gency/co.
befin Traft Services
Jurisdiction
Date Performed
IlAnalysis
f1//2 4/2 00 7
Analysis Year
201 f With Wiflow Creek PH
Time Pe!riad
M I
M PeaA Hour
Project Dese-ription Nybo)f Tumor TI,9
asMest Streel: Foys Lake Road North/South Street, Southeast Entrance
Iludy
tersection Odentation: East-West Period (hrs): 0.25
ehicle Volumes and Admustments
ajor Stneet Eastbou nd Westbound
ovement 2 3 5 6
— - L T R L T R
olume (yeh1h)
1
447
126
6
r
Pe2k-Hour Factor, PHF
0.76
0.76
0.76
0.61
0.64
0.64
ourly Flow Rate. HFR
vp.hih
1
568
0
0
196
9
Peroenl Heavy Vehicles
0
0
Median Type
Undivided
RT Channefized
0
Lanes
0
0
0
0
--nfiguration
L T
tream Signal
0
Northbound
or Street
Snuthlbound
IVID nt
I 7 8 9
10 11
12
. L T R
L T
R
olume (yeh1h)
24
3
Peak -Hour Factor, PR�F
0.78 0,78 0.78
Or 77 0.78
0.77
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 0 0
31 0
3
h/h
ercent Heavy Vehicles
0 0 0
0 0
0
ercent Grade (%)
0
Flared ApprOWII
N
Storage
0
0
RT Channelized
0
Lanes
onfiguration
L
R
Della Queue Length, and Level of Service
pproach
Eastbound
We-stbound
Northbound
Southbound
Vement
1
4
7
a
9
10 11
12
ne onflgluration
LT
L
R
(vehlh)
1
31
3
(m) (veh1h)
13to
362
846
1
0.00
0.09
0.00
5'3/o queue lerigill
0.00
0.28
0.01
ontrol Delay (slveh)
7.6
15-9
9,3
0S
A
C
A
pproach Del2y (s/veh)
pproach LOS
C
Copyright* 2007 University of Florida. AH Rights Reserved HCS+TM VefS10r, 5.3 Generated: V2712010 8:49 AM
file: //C :Wocuments and Setfings\Bob AbelinTocal Settings\Temp\u2k30B.trnp 1/27/2010
Two -Way Stop Control
Page I of I
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
ener=allnfiormatlon Site Inform 1. ition
Analyst
RLA
Agen2y/Cc.
belin Traffic Services
Date Pefformed
IY241200 7
Analysis Time Period
P
PM Peak Hour
intersection
Jurisdiction
Malysis Year
oys Lake Rd. Second Ent
0 11 With Willow Greek PH
Pro-ect Description i4uborf Tumi;r PS
EasYWest Street'. E2Ls Lake Road NorthlSouth Street: Southeast Entrance
Intersection Orientation: East-West IStu dy Period (h rs) 0, 25
ehicle Volumes and
Adjustment!;
21W Stmet
Movement
Eastbound
1 2 3
2
Westbound
4 5 6
L
T
T
R
L
1
T
R
olume (veh1h)
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
v=dt,.Lh�
3-ermnt Heavy Vehicles
3
0.92
3
0
203
03
0.192
P2
0
220
—
0.92
0
—
0.86
0
0
362
0.86
420
27
0. 816
31
Aledian I j1pe
RT Channelized
La n e s
Undivided
0
0 0 0 0
I
N
.,ponfiguration
Jpstrearn Signal
LT
I
TR
Enor Street
Northbound
Southbound
Oovement
7
10 11
12
L T R
L T
R
/olume (veh/h)
15
2
:leak -Hour Factor, PHF
O� 77 0.77 0.77
0.77 0.77
0.77
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(veh/h)
0 0 0
1
19 0
0
2
�err..ent Heavy Vehicles
0 0 0
0 0
:Iercent Grade
0
0
F12red Approach
N
N
Sto rag a
0
0
RT Channelized
0
Lanes
0
0
0
1
0
1
,onfiguralion
L
R
FE
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
kpproaoh
Castbound
WestbFound
Nofthbound
Southbound
M
Movement
1
4
7
8
9
10 11
12
Lane Configuration
LT
L
R
v (veh+)
3
19
2
(m) (veh/h)
1120
429
625
Ic
0.00
0-04
0.00
5,0/o queue length
0.01
0.14
0.01
ontrol Delay (sIveh)
6.2
13.8
10.8
LOS
A
pproaCh Delay (s/veh)
11
pproach LOS
Copyrig ht 0 2 007 U nive rs ity of r lor i da. All R ig hl s R e se ry ed
HCSJM Version S.3
G enerated: 1 f2712D 10 0 -50 AM
file://C:Tocuments and Settings\Bob AbelinTocal Settings\Temp\u2k3 I O.tmp 1/27/2010
Two -Way Stop Control
?age I of I
I TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY I
nerai information
nalyst
gency/Co.
I
�*fin Traffic Services
Date Performed
FLA
1/24/2007
Analysis Time Period
M j
M Peak Hour
Site Information
I n t ers ect ion
Jurisdiction
Lake Rd. & SIN Ent
nalysis Year r, 0 11 VVflh Milow Creek PH I
r Pm '
r art Dnscriphan Hubart Tumar TIS
East/West SIreet: Foys Lake Road North/South Street: Soulhm?st Entrance
I tersection Orientation: East-West P5tudy Pedod (hrs): 0.25
e
nt
a
ahicete Volumes and Adiustmenift
ajor Street
a 0 r
Eastbound Westbound
m
Rovement
0 V e
1
2
3 4
5
6
L
T
R L
T
R
olurne
lume (yeh/h)
1
430
116
13
eak-Hc
eak-Hour Factor, PHF
0.77
0.77
0.76 0.81
0.67
0.67
ourly low Rate, HFR
a urly F
Yoh/h)
Yoh/h)
1
558
0 0
173
1.9
V
Percent Heavy Vehicles
e icles
0
Median T pe
Undivided
RT Channelized
Lanes
0
1
0
0
1
0
E7on�figguralio-n
LT
TR
Upstream Signal
0
0
R'n'777Street
Narthhound
Scuthbound
Movement
7
a
9
10
11 12
L
T
R
L
T R
Volume (yeh/�)..
20
4
7�eak-Hour Factor, PHIF
0.78
0-78
O� 78
0.78
0.78 0.78
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(v.&h/h)
0
0
0
25
0 5
Percent Heavy Vehicles
0
0
0
0
0 0
Percent Grade
'0
0
0
e d
lared Approach
r
N
N
rl
S Storage
to
a
RT Channelized
0
0
L ;i n P..q
onfiguration
LR
uslay, wusue Langin, ana
LeVel Of berVICe
%pproach
Fastbound
Westhound
Northbound
Southbound
Oovement
1
4
7 8 9
10
11
12
Lane Configuration
LT
LR
1 (vehih)
30
777=7
(m) (veh/h)
1394
425
I/C
0.00
0.07
)�5% queue length
0.00
0.23
77 �77
woonlrol Delay (siveh)
7.6
14.1
.0s
A
71p�DprO:a@ch [Delay (siveh)
1;
A
1
14.1
1
kpproach LOS
—
13 1
Copyd ght 0 200 7 J nilvers4 of F I o rid a, A I I R I gbts Re-s erved
HC.S+TM Version 5_3 Generated, 1127/2010 8:51 AM
file://C: \Documents and Seltings\Bob AbeliMLocal Settings\Temp\u2k3I5.Imp 1/27/2010
Two -Way Stop Control Page I of I
ovement 1
ove"
2
3 4
5
6
T
R L
T
R
olurne (yeh/h) 5
C)Iurni
195
339
25
Pre a k_
Peak -Hour Faclor, PHF 0.92
0� 92
0.92 0.86
0.86
0.86
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5
(yeh/h)
211
0
394
29
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0
IMedian Type I Undivided I
RT C-hannallized
Lanes 0
0
1
0
ft onfl uration LT
TR
jpstrearn Signal
0
iinor Stmet Nor1filbound
Southbourid
ftv.ement 7
a
9
10
11
12
L
T
R
L
T
R
Joliume (yehih)
is
3
:leak -Hour Factor. PHF 0.77
0.77
0.77
0.77
0,77
�Iourly Flow Rate, HFR
F 0
Lveh/h)
0
0
23
0
3
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0
0
0
0
0
0
Percent Grade (%) 0
0
Flared Approach
N
N
Storage
0
0
T Channelized
0
0
Lanes
onfiguration
L
LR
uoisy, uueueLikpqin,. ana
LQVQI Of berVICe
pproach
Eaalbound
Westbound
Northbound
Southbound
Movement
1
4
7 9
10 11
12
Lane Configuralion
LT
LR
(veh/h)
5
28
(m) (ve h/h)
1147
464
/r.
0.00
0.06
50h queue lengtn
0.01
0.18
ontroll Delay (s/veh)
8.2
13� 2
LOS
A
B
'CIO
pproach Delay (stveh)
P ch LOS
P P 7ro a
I
B
Co pyrig ht C 2 007 U n iv " Ity of Floida, A I R 1 g ht a R ese rved
HGS+TM Vmiion 5.3 Genefaled-. 1 a712 010 6 � 67 AM
file://C:\Documents and Settings\Bob AbelinTocal Settings\Temp\00 ID,tmp 1/27/2010
Two -Way Stop Control
Page I of I
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information [Site Information
n nalyst
a ' St
pDate
befin TraMe Sorvices,
Performed
1/24/2007
�nalysis Time Period
M Peak Hour
Project Description Hubert Tumor TIS
EasMest Street: Foys Lake Road
MENNEN
Intersection Orientation:
East-West
eph 1 c
EWe Volurnes and Adjustments
a.or
a o r Street
-Eastbound
Movement
2
L
T
Volume (yeh1h)
475
Peak -Hour Factor, PHIF
0.76
0.79
Hourly Flow RAtP., HFR
(yeh/h)
0
501
Percent Heavy Vehicles
0
Median Type
RT Channelized
Lanes
0
onfiguration—
,upstream 5ignal
0
i
inor fteet
or S'
North bo u n id
Fn
Moverne
overnent
7
8
L
I
T
Volume (veh1h)
31
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.79
0.76
Hourly Flow Rate. HFR
39
0
veh/fibh
Percent Heavy Vehicles
0
Percent Grade (%)
0
Flared Approach
N
Storage
0
Channelized
nes
PCT
0
onfiguration
LR
Delay, Queue Length, and
re I =a,
Level of Servic
e
pproa
pproach
EastbDund
Westbound
Moverneni
1
4
Lane Configuration
LT
(veh1h)
89
(M) (Veh/h)
945
5% queue length
0.31
ontrol Delay (siveh)
9.2
LOS
A
pproach Delay (s/veh)
pproach LOS
C Q Py rig h t 0 20 07 U n j vcF *-Ity c4 F I orild o. All R -119 h t5 Re5crvc�-d
htersection
oys Lake Rd. & VaRey View
d
Jurisdiction
Analysis Year
012 Arith WFIlow Creek PH
orthiSouth Street: Valley View Road
tudy Period (hrs): 0.25
3 4
R L
40 58
0.79 F �65
50 89
1 0
undivided
0
0 0
TR LT
9
R
102
0.79
129
0
�6
Northbound
7 8 9
LR
401
-42
2.02
20.3
20.3
C
mcs+"�' versian&s
Westbound
5
T
116
178
Southbound
11
T
0.78
0
IV
0
0
K, pi
I
on
Southbound
10 1 11 12
Generated.- UM2CtO 9.16AM
fi le: //C: \Documents and Settings\Bob Abe I i n\L ocal S ettings\Temp\u2k 10 E. trnp 1/2612010
Two -Way Stop Control
Page I of I
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
eneral Information
mmb� ite Information
PIF
n-alys! LA
intersection
Jurlsdiction
Analysis Year
%Jj
Rd r%j A.Am"Zo rk". %A v-%4#rwr lrF%7VV
012 With Wiflow Cmek PH
f
gency/Co. befin Ti-afric SeuvF'Ves-
rnalysis
a p 1) -
te Performed 112412007
I sis 0 1
Time Period PM Peak How-
hProject Description Hubett Turner TIS
ot
EastJWest Str - eet. Foys Lake Road North/South Street- Valley View Road
terseOkon Orientation:. East-West IStudy Period (hrs), 0-25
e h ic
Old; Volumes and
Ag'ustments
*r
ajor Street
Ea stbou n d
Westbound
overr
ovement
2
3
4
5
6
MEN—"
R
0ju me
olume (yehAh)
211
39
98
39,3
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.86
0.66 66
Hourly Flow Rate, HPP
.
Veh/h
0
42
113
4 56
0
Percent Heavy Vehicles
0
:=0
—
F
Median Type
Undivi
ed
RT Channelized
0
0
Lanes
0
0
0
0
onfiguration
TR
LT
�!pstream Signal
0
0
Minor Stmet
Northbound
Southbound
Movement
7
8
9
10
11
12
L
T
R
L
T
R
7o�lumie (veh1h)
41
I
45
I
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0-77
0.77
0.77
0.77
O� 77 0.77
Hourty Flow Rate, HFR
53
0
58
0
0
0
veh/h
Lt�
lPerce-nt Heavy Vehicles
0
0
0
—
0
0
Percent Grade (%)
0
0
Flared Approach
N
IV
Storage
0
0
RT Channelized
0
Lanes
0
0
0
0
0
0
onfiguration
LR
Telay, Queue Lenigth, and
Level of Service
kpproach
Eastbound
Westbound
Northbound
Southbound
64avernent
1
4
7
8
9
10
11
12
Lane Configuration
LT
L R
f (veh/h)
113
I
E4
(m) (veh/h)
1304
14
fir.
0-09
0-27
)5% queue length
0.28
1.0
Control Delay (slveh)
8.0
16.9
_0S
A
C
kPproach Delay (siveh)
16.9
kpproach LOS
C
Cvpyi 19 tit 0 2 007 U r i1vui W Ly uT Fluddti. Al I Rig I iu� Rt!WFVtPd
HC'S +T 11 versicn!i.a
Generatea: 1 rzaizc) i c) 016 AM
file:HC: Tocuments and SettingsTob AbelinTocal Se,"ingsUemp\u2ki 12.tmp t /26/20 10
Two -Way Stop Control Page I of I
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Eeneral Informatio"_" ite Information
nalyst
LA
mi-ersection
Lake Rd. & Second Ent
encylGo.
I belin Traffic Services I
Jurisdiclion
ate Performed
1/24/2007
Analysis Year
012 With Willow GreeK PH
nalysis Time Period
IM Peak Ho ur
Project Description Hubert Tumar TIS
EasMest Street: E2Ls Lake Road
North/Soulh Street: Southeast Entrance
Itudy
Inlersection Orientationi East-West
Period
(hrs),- 0.25
ehicle Volumes and Adjustments
ajar Street Eastbound
Westbound
ovement
2
3
4
6
L
T
R
L
R
olurne (veh/h) 2
464
130
16
ealk-Hour Factor, PHF 0.76
O� 76
O� 76
0-61
0.64
0.64
ourly Flow Rate, HFR
-
veh1h) 2
610
0
0
203
25
Tcent Heavy Vehicles 0
0
ed Gn7y pe
Undivided
T Channelized
0
nes 0
0
0
0
onfi uration LT
TR
pstream Signal
0
0
Inor Stireet Nolhbound
Southbound
ovement 7
8
10
...
11
12
L
T
R
L
T
olume (Veh1h)
49
5
ealk-Hour Factor, PHF 0. 78
0.78
0. 78
0,77
0.78
0. . 77
ourly Flow Rate, HFR
veh/h 0
0
0
63
0
6
erc.ent Heavy Vehicles 0
0
0
0
ercent Grade (%)
0
0
Flared ch
N
Storage
0
0
RT Channelized
0
0
Lanes
0
0
onfiguration
L
R
slay, Queue �ength, and Level of Service
pproach
Eastbound
Westbound
NnIhhnund
Southbound
Movement
1
4
7
9
10 11 12
ane Configuration
LT
L
R
(veh1h;
2
63
6
(m) (veh1h)
1352
342
829
0.00
0,18
0,01
queue length
0.00
0.615
0.02
ntrol Delay (s/veh)
7.7
17.9
9.4
LOS
A
G
A
pproach Delay (sfveh)
17.1
pp roa ch LOS
C
Cop y � g hi 0 200 7 U niv eusity of Flo ride.. A I I R i 9 hts R as-e nied
HC-S+TM
Version 5.3
Generatad, V2612010 918 AM
file -a//C 4 Wocurnents and S ettingsT ob Abe 11"n\L ocal Setting s\Temp\u2k I I F.tmp 1/26/2010
Two -Way Stop Control Page I of I
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
eneral information
ite Information
te ' n
nalyst
RLA
I r.
Intersedon
t a %e�
oys Lake Rd. & Second Ent
ency/Co.
be 7nTraff'lc Servicos
,
ri sdic
Jurisfttion
rna
Date Performed
1/.24,/2()07
A I y s Year
Si
.'ysi
012 With Willow Crook PH
Analysis Time Period
PM Pgak Ho-ur
2
Projeact Descrietion i4ohert Tiim--ar TIS
East/West Street, Foys Lake Road
NorthlSouth Street: Southeast Entrance
]Study
Intersection Orientation,
East-West
Period (hrs)-
0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street
Eastbound
Westbound
ovement
2
3
4
5
6
L
T
R
L
T
R
clume Leh1h)
6
212
37i9
56
eak-Hour Factor. PHF
IL OA92
0.92
0.92 1,0786
0.86
0.86
ourly Flow Rate, HFR
vehlh
6
230
0
0
439
65
ercent Heavy Vehicles
0
edian Type
Undivided
T Channelized
0
0
nes
0
1
0
0
onfiguration
LT
TR
stream Signal
0
nor Street
Northbound
Southbound
Move nt
7
B
9
10
11
12
L
T
R
L
T
R
olume Lveh/h)
32
4
eak-Hour Factor, PHF
0.77
0.77
0.77
0.77
O� 77
0.77
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
I
vch/h
0
0
0
41
0
5
Percent Heavy Vehicles
1
=MEW
0
I
0
0
0
0
0
Percent Grade N
0
0
Flared Approach
N
N
Storage
0
0
Channelized
0
nos
0
0
0
1
0
onfiguration
L
R
... lay� Queue Length, and
Level of Service
pproach
Fastbound
Weetbound
Northbound
Southbound
Movement
1
4
7
8
9
10
11
12
Lane ConfiguratiDn
LT
L
R
(veh1h)
6
41
5
(m) (veh/h)
1071
39,9
596
0.10
0.01
I* queue length
02
0-02
0.34
0.03
ntrol Delay (s/veh)
W8.4
9 .4
1
15.1
11. f
LO-S
A
G
1
B
pproach Delay (Wven)
14.6
pproach LOS
8
CopyightO =07universny of Florida, All Rights Reserved
HCS+TV Version 5-3
Generated: 1126001C) 9:18AM
fi le: 11C: �Docwnents and Se ttings\Bob AbelinT ocal S etfings\Temp\u2k 12 3. trnp 1/2612010
Two -Way Stop Control Page I of 1
ovement
ove
1 2 3 4
6
6
L T R L
T
R
olum
olume (veh/h)
2 441
121
15
eak-Hour Factor, PHF
Peak-l
0. 77� 0.77 0.76 U 671
0.67
Or 67
ourly Flow Rate, HFR
0 Urly
veh1h)
veh1h)
2 572 0 0
180
22
Percent Hem Vehicles
Median Type
0 —
UndividiRd
ZT Channeflzed
0
0
,anes
0
1
0
0
0
uration
�2M
LT
TR
Jpstream Signal
0
L
Ainor Stmet
Northbound
Southbound
Movement
7
8 9
10 11
12
L
T R
L T
R
/olume �vehlh)
1
1
27
6
Peak -Hour Factor-, PHF
0-78
0.78 0.78
0.78 0.78
0.78
Hourly Flow Rate, HFIR
. Vehill)
0
0 0
34 0
0
7
Dercent Heau"Veblctes
0
0 0
0 0
0
;ercent Grade
0
0
Flared Approach
N
IV
Storage
0
0
RT Channelized
0
0
Lane*
0
0
0
0
0 0
onfiguration
A.
LR
1.101W UUOU 9 Le ngm an
a Levei or ae
ry ice
Appr-oach
Eastl)ound
Westbound
Hodhtiound
Southbound
Movernent
1
4
7
8
9
10
11 12
Lane Configuration
LT
LR
v (vehfh)
2
41
C (m) (veh/h)
1382
412
We
0.00
0.10
M% queue lenEgth
OM
0.33
Control Delay (sIveh)
7.6
14.7
LOS
A
I
L
8
Approach Delay (,Wve;7)
14.7
Approach LOS
C apy 19 ht 0 2 007 U nive rs I ty of F: lod dia. All R ig hts Re se rved
HOS.OTM Vqrslon 5.3 Gerierate�d'. V26=10 9:143 AM
file :XADocuments and Settings\Bob Abelin\Locat Setting s\Temp�u2k 12 7, tmp 1/26/2010
Two -Way Stop Control
Page t of I
I TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY I
enerall information
nalyst
RLA
gency/Co.
I 50111
belin
Tb Traffic Services
Date Performed
11241�200 7
'e
jAnalysis Time Period
M Pt
M Peak Hour
Hto Information
ntersection
lurisdiction
6vs Lake Rd. & SW Ent
2012 With Willow Cmck PH
knalysis Year 113 1
Pr"' c
r '4R�& Description Huhart Tomer TIS
ast/West Street, Floys Lake Road Nortb/South Street- Southwest Entrunce
IStudy Period (hrs)- 0-25
Intliersection Odentation-E East-West
ahir-In Voinmas and Adiustmenft
ftor Street
Eastbound
Westbound
Aovement
2
3
4
6
L
T
R
L
T R
lolume (yeh/hy
7
203
33
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.92
0.97
0.92
0.86
0.86 0.86
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
veh/h)
7
220
0
0
405 38
erGent Heavy Vehicles
0
0
—
�edian Tyee
Undivided
RT Channefizad
0
Lanes
0
1
0
0
0
Configuration
LT
TR
& "veam Signal
0
0
Minor Street
Northbound
SauthbDund
70%vement
7 8
9
10 11
12
L T
I
R
L T
R
0 olume (veh1h)
'Um'
23
1
4
Peak -Hour Factor-, PHF
F
0-77 0.77
0.77
77
0.77 0-77
0.77
ourly Flow Rate, HFR
H r
o
p.h h
0 0
0
29 0
0
1]
5
rc ri
Percent Heavy Vehicles
0 0
0
0 0
0
e r
ercent Grade (%)
r'
0
0
I re
lared Approach
a d
N
F
N
S t( r4
Storage
0
0
RT Ch' nnelized
oa-
0
0
L . anes .
0
0
0
0
0
0
onfiguratio-n
0 f
I I
LR
welay I U UOUG Le n gin a
na LGYOI OT b9rVIC
0
Appma-ch
Eastbound
Wesibnund
NnMhbound
Southbinund
Movement
1
4
7
a
9
10 11
12
Lane Configuration
LT
LR
v (veh1h)
7
.94
E (m) (veh/h)
1328
450
VIC
0.01
0.08
95% queue length
0.02
OWN
0.24
Control Delay (siveh)
8.2
13.7
LOS
A
=MEMO
70proach Delay (S(veh)
ppro
13.7
Approach LOS
Copyri ght 0 200 7 U niver-51ty of F �u r1da, A I I R i OW, R es erved
HCS+T�A Version 5.3 Generated: 112W2010 9-11SAM
file://C ADocuments and Settings\Bob AbelinTocal Setfings\Temp\u2k I 2B.tmp 1/26/2010
Two -Way Stop Control
Page I of I
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
e "n"
neral Information ite Information
Intersection way 2 & 1VW Ent
r na ysl rk
l I Jurisdiction
qencyiCo. belin Truffic SaMaoc
ja5 2012 With Mlow Creek PH
t
rKDate Performed 1/2WO07 �knalysis Year
nalysis Time Pen'od WM Peak Hour
Projeut DewrlpliorT Hubuil Turriou TIS
gastlWe-st Street: U. Sr Hfghway 2
Intersection Orientation- East-West
Vahialle Volumes and Adiustments
orthiSouth Street: Northwest Entrance
tudv Period ffirs): 0,25
ftor Street
Eastbound
Westbound
Zvement
1
2
3
4
5
6
L
T
R
L
T
R
/olurne (yehlh)_
751
5
if
301
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0,90
0.92
0.92
0.97"
.90
0.90
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
veh/h
0
816
5
12
334
0
"ercent Heavy Vehicles
0
0
Median Type
Undivided
RT Channelized
Lanes
0
1
0
1
1
0
..,oinfiguration
TR
L
T
M
Jpstream Signal
0
0
Eno�rstreet
N_o_"r'_'t_hbo_und_
Southbound
ovement
7 8
9
10
11
12
L T
R
L
T
R
Volume (vehlh�
I 1
33
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0�80 0.90
0.90
0.90
0.87
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
1.13 1)
115
0
0
0
Percent Heavy Vehicles
0
0
0
0
Percent Grade
0
0
r1ared Approach
N
N
Storage
0
RT Channelized
Lanea
0
0
0
0
Eonfiguration
LR
pei4
L '� , vueUe LenqUj, aria
LeV01 OT:beirvice
Approach
Eastbound
Wastbound
Northbound
Southbound
Movement
Lane Configuration
1
4
L
7
8
Lt?
9
10
11
12
v (veh/h)
49
C (m) (veh1h)
817
312
Vic
0.01
0,16
95% queue length
0-04
19�55
C ontrol Delay (siveh)
9.5
E
18.7
TOS
A
C
ApproacMe"lay (stveh)
�pproach LOS
18.71
Go pyr ig h t C 2007 U n 1 versity of F I ald a, A I Rig h ts Reserved
HCS+TM Version 5.3 Gerereted: 1126/2010 9-18AM
file -AIIC :\Documents and Scttings�Bob Abelin\Local Settings\Temp\u2k1 17.tmp 1/26/2010
Two -Way Stop Control Page I of I
RT Channelized
0
0
.anes 0
0
1
0
Zonfiguration
R
L
T
Ji3strearn Signal
0
Enar Street Northbound
Southbound
Movemeni 7
8 9
10
11
12
L
T R
L 1
T
R
1
Volume (yeh/h) 7
8
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.80
0-90 0,90
0,90
I 0.90
0.87
Hourly Flow Rale, HFR
(yeh1h) 8
0 8
0
0
- — ------
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0
0 0
0
0
0
Percent Grade (%) 0
0
riared Approach
N
N
Storage
0
0
RT Channelized
0
0
Lanes 0
0
0
0
0 0
onfiguration
LR
welay, uueue Lengun, anO
Levei or tarvice
I
Wroach
Ea5tbound
Westbound
Nuahbound
Southbound
Movement
1
4
7
a
9
10
11 12
I ane Configuration
L
LR
(veh1h)
10
115
d.- - Z I
J. h/h)
1144
309
IC
0.01
0.05
15% queue length
0.04
0.16
antral Delay (slveh)
6.2
IT3
A
C .. .... .
r
kppl h Delay (sIveh)
17.3
�pproach LOS
Copyrig ht 0 2 007 U nive rs i ty of F lor i da. All R ig hts R e se ry ad HCS4-T" Version 5-3 Generated, 112612010 :5:32 AM
fileWCADocuments and Settings\Bob Abelin\Local Setfings\Ternp\u2kFO,tmp 1/26/2010
Two -Way Stop Control
Page I of I
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
e eneral Information
L r
ne
ite Information
PE
Intersection
oys Lake Rd. & Valley View
Rd
rR
na lyst RLA
ell ICU, befin Ttaffic Servicez
Jurisdiction
ate Performed 1/24J2007
at
D e r�4
Analysis Year
013 With WWow Cmek PH
nalysis Time Period M Pook Houi,
Project Description Hubart Tumor TIS
92stmest Street: Foys Lake Road
Intersection Orientation: East-West
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
/South Street, Vailey View Road
ppr�
Period (hrs)- 0.25
Aajor Street
Eastbound
Westbound
�ovement
1
2
3
4
5 6
L
T
R
L
T R
/olume �vehih)
516
41
59
129
eak-Hour Factor, PHF
0.76
0.79
0.79
0,65
0.65 0-61
lourly Flow Rate, HFR
veh/�).
0 I
653 _T
51
90
198 0
Percent Heavy Vehicles
0
Median Type
Undivided
RT Channelized
0
0
Lanes
0
I
0
I
0 1
0
aonfiguration
LT
ipsir eam Signal
I
0
0
Monwoomr Stmet
Nofthbound
Southbound
ftvement
7 8 9
10
11
12
L R
L
T
R
olume �vehlh)
olum�
EPeak-4Hour
31 105
Factor, PHF
0.79 0.78 0.79
0.78
0.78
0-78
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
veh/h
39 0 132
0
I 0
0
eroent Heavy Vehicles
0 0 0
0
0
0
Peroent Grade (%)
0
0
Flared Approach
N
/V
Storage
0
0
RT Channelized
0
0
Lanes
0
0
0
0
0
0
onfiguraton
LR
.eiay, ijueue Lenon, anO
Levell oTzervice
Approach
Eastbound
Westbound
Nafthbound
Southbound
5overnent
1
4
7
8
9
10
11
12
Lane Conflauration
LT
LR
v (veh1h)
90
171
C (m) (ve h1h)
903
371
We
0.46
95% queue length
0.33
2.35
Control Delay (s/veh)
94
22.7
LOS
A
C
Approach Deiay (siveh)
22.7
Approach LOS
I
I
C
Oop y n g nt 0 ;20C 7 U niversity ot �- ic nae, A I I K I g MS R e!9 elVed
HCS+Tm Version 5,3 G e nerat ad: I f2 612 010 9: 5 0 AM
file://C: Tocuments and Setfings\Bob AbelinTocal Settings�Temp\uR131F.trnp 1/26/2010
Two -Way Stop Control
Page I of I
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
eneral Information
nalysl
;A
gency/Co-
)e1in Tharfic Services
fif�.
Date Performed
1/24�2007
�Analysis Time Period
IPM Peak Hour
ite Information
Intersection Foys Lake Rd. & Valley View
Rd
i Mimi I ctlo n
Analysis Year 2013 With Willow Creek PH
13
PrID ' c
r 'eat Description Hubert Tumer TIS
EastMest Street: Foys Lako Road N o rt=h/Sou th Street: Vailey Via w Road
V rio
FS=tudy Period (hrs). 0,26
11naltersection Odentation: East-West
t
e ic
hicle Volumes and Adjustments
ajor stmet
Eastbound Westbound
ovemeril
1
2 3 4
5
6
L
T R L
T
R
1
olume (yeh/h)
[Hourly
235 40 100
436
P1
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.92
O�92 0�92 OM
0.86
0.86
Flow Ratc, HFR
veh1h)
0
255 43 116
506
0
Percent Heavy Vehicles
0
0
Median Type
Undividect
RT Channelized
0
0
-anes
0
0
0
1 0
a9n��uration
TR
LT
lis-tream Signal
0
0
Nnor Street
Northbound
Southbound
Vlovement
7
6
9
1 G
11
12
L
T
R
L
T
R
701�ume (yeh1h)
42
46
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.77
0.77
0.77
0.77
0.77
0.77
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
veh1h)
54
0
59
0
0
0
Dercent Heavy Vehicles
0
0
0
0
0
0
rce
Percent Grade
n
0
0
,d
Flared Approach
a re
N
T-=
Storang
S to ro
0
RT Channelized
0
0
Lanes
0 0
0
0 0
0
o 0 nfiguration
LR
wislay. wueue Lenain. anG
LeVel OT ZerVIC8
\pproach
Eastbound
Westbound
Northbound
Southbound
Jovernent
1
4
7 8
9
10
11
12
-ane Configuration
M
LT
LR
r (veh1h)
I
116
113
(m) (veh/h)
1275
378
;1r_
0.0-0
0.30
)5% queue length =MW
0.30
1.23
M
.tontrol Delay (s/veh)
& 1
18.5
LOS
A
C
kpproac,h Delay (s/veh)
18.5
7pppDrozach LOS'
C
C 0 Py righ t 0 20 07 U n 1 ver s1ty of F Iar[0 a, All R Igh ts R eserve a
Hr,SI-Tm Verslur:5.3 Uenerated: V26QCID W50AM
file: X:0ocuments and Settings\Bob Abefin\Local Settings\Temp\u2k1 43.tmp 1/26/2010
Two -Way Stop Control
Page I of I
neral Information
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
:Pite InEoffnation
IF ILVI ticuLi U"
nalyst A
urisdiction
gen 22 Lo. Desin uamcbervices
Date Performed r/2 4412 00 7
M
JAnalysis Time Period M Peak Ho7r
Lake Rd� & Second Ent
knalysis Year 2013 WR17 Milaw Crook PH
I '> I
Pro
r eck Description 14ubert Tum.&r TIS
EasMest Street: Es: Lake Road Northl5outh Slreel: Southeast
te ' rFsection 0�entafion: East-West =ftudy Period (hTj, 0.25
a$
Inte
%hi&
_h -I&- Vnilieman anti Arfluntimants
ajar Street
astbound
Westbound
ovement
1
2
3
4
5 6
L 1
T
R
L
T R
olume �veNh)
3
485
137 23
eak-Hour Factor, PHF
0.76
0.76
0.76
0-61 1...-
0.64 0-64
ourly Flow Rate, HFR
eh1h)
3
638
0
0
214 35
Percent Heavy Vehicles
0
-
—
0
Median Type
Undivided
RT Channelized
0
anes
0
0
0
1
0
onfiguration
LT
TR
rearn Sigqp�..
0
or Street
Northb7und
Southbound
ovement
8 9
10
11
12
L T R
1
L
T
R
olume (veh/h)
70
6
Peak -Hour Fartor, PHF
0.78 0.78 0, 7i9
0.77
0.76
0.77
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
h/h
0 0 0
90
0
10
ercent Heavy Vehicles
0 0 0
0
0
0
ercent Grade (%)
0
0
Flared Approach
/V
Sto ran, -a
0
0
RT Channelized
0
0
Lanes
0
0
0
1
0
1
onfiguration
L
R
�LLMO�Iaq t4ueue Lengm, ana
LeVOL OT bOrVIC0
Approach
Pagthound
Wpgtbound
Nodhbound
F7
Southbound
Movernent
1
4
7
a
9
10
11 12
Lane Configuration
LT
L
V (Veh1h)
3
00
10
(m) (veh/h)
1328
3
321
612
V/G
0,00
25
0.01
75-=1kUqtuuue length
0.01
0
1� 13
0.04
Control Delay (slveh)
7.7
20.5
9.5
W
A
C
A
Approach Delay (s/veh)
19.4
�pproach LOS
C
Copyrig ht * 2 007 U nive rs ity of F [or I da. All R ig hts R e se ry ed
HCSJM Vei-*Iov 5,3 Generated: V26=10 9:51 AM
fi le: //C -ADocuments and Setting s\B ob Abelin�Local S ett1"_ngs\Te m&2 k 15 1. tmp 1/26/2010
Two -Way Stop Control
Page, 1 of I
eneral Information
nalyst
RLA
gencylCc.
haiin Tmffir qarviro;.�q
ate Performed
r1/124 / 2 0 0 7
nalysis Time Period
M Peak Hour
TWOnWAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Site In
Intersection
urisdiction
ovs Lake Rd. & Second Ent
knalysis Year F 013 With Willow Crook PH I
roject Description Hubert 7umer TIS
EasMest Sireet: Foys Lake Road North/South Street- Southeast Entrance
InItersection Orientation: East-West pstudy PerlDd. 0.25
ahicle Volumea and Adiushnants
L AM4
!jor Stm*16
Eastbound
Westbound
ovement
1
2
3
4
5 6
L
T
R
L
T R
olume (yeh1h)
9
223
398 80
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0,92
0.92
0.92
0.86
0.66 0.86
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
eh/h
9
242
0
0
462 93
rce nt Heavy Vehicles
0
0
edian Type
Undivided
RT Ch nnelized
0
0
1,anes
0
1
0
0
0
onfiguration
LT
TR
am Signal
0
r St*et
Northbound
Southbound
ovement
7 8 9
10
11
12
L T R
L
T
R
olume (veh/h)
45
5
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
IF
0.77 0.77 0.77
0.77
0.77
0.77
Hourly Flow Rate, HFRJ
h/h
0 0 0
I
58
0
6
ercent Heavy Vehicles.,.
0 0 0
0
0
0
ercent Grade (%)
0
0
Flared Approach
N
N
Storage
0
0
RT Chan-nelized
I
0
0
Lanee
0
0
0
1
0
onfiguration
I L
I R
M eia tAueus LengEn, anU
LIL
LOV61 OT *81rVJC8
%pproach
Eastbound
Westbound
Northbound
Southbound
Movement
1
4
7
8
9
10
11 12
Lane Configuration
LT
L
R
(vcWh)
9
56
6
(m) (veh/h)
1026
370
569
11C
0.01
0.16
.01
)SIA queue length
0.03
0.55
0.03
P%
aontrol Delay (slveh)
8� 5
16.5
11A
LOS
A
C
�pproach Delay (s/veh)
Mu
Npproach LOS
C
C"fig ht * 2 007 U niN a rS ity of F 10f ida. Al Rig hts R ese ry ad
HCS+TM VerS1011 6-3 Generated, 112EJ2010 9:51 AM
file: I/C:\Do cuments and S etting s\Bob AbelinToc al S etting s\Temp\u2k 15 5. trnp 1/26/2010
Two -Way Stop Control
Page I of I
I TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY I
enerai intormation
naly�l._
'A
gency/Go.
belin Traft Services I
Date Performed
112412007
Analysis Time Period
M Peak Hour
4 1
ate information
ntersection
lurisdiction
Lake Rd- & S W Ent
�nalysis Year 2D 13 With Willow Cfre k P1 I
1-1 1
Pro'ect Descripflon Hubail Tumor TIS
EastlWast Street, Foys Lake Road North/South Street, Southwest Entrance
ro'E
ZL$t IStudy Period (hrs)m 0.25
Intersection Odentation: East-West
RIP-hir-la Vnl"may. anel Ar1i"%tmPnt!r. I
Stmet
Eastbound
Wealbound
10jor
overnent
1
2 3
4
42
5
6
L
T R
L
T
R
ol u rn e (yehfb
3
453
126
is
eak-Hour Factor, PHIF
0.77
0-77 0-76
0.61
0.67
0.67
Hourly Flow Rate, HIFIR
(yehAh)
3
588 0
0
188
26
Percent Heavy Vehicles
0
0
ledian Type
Undivided
T Channelized
0
0
anes
0
1
0
0
1
0
onfiquiration
LT
TR
g.s.t.ream Signal
0
linor Street
Northbound
Southbound
%rioverrient
7
8
9
10 11
12
L
T
R
L T
R
Uolume (yah/h)
37
9
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.78
0.78
0.78
0.78 0.78
0.78
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(yeh/h)
0
0
0
47 0
11
Percent Heavy Vehicles
0
0
0
0 0
0
Percent Grade
0
0
Flared Approach
N
N
Storage
0
0
RT Channelized
0
0
Lanes
0
0
0
0
0
0
Configuralion
LR
May u ueue Le n gin a
n 0 Leyei OT berMe
Approach
Easthound
Wesibnund
Northbound
Southbound
Movement
1
4
7
a
9
10 11
12
Lane Configuration
LT
LR
v (veh1h)
3
58
(m) (ve h1h)
1300
402
Vic
0-00
0.14
95% c4ueue length
0.01
0.50
7on7rol Delay (slveh)
7.6
15.5
LOS
A
C
Approach Delay (siveh)
A pp roa ch LOS
C
Cop y 6 g ht 0 200 7 U niveraity cyf Flo rida, A I I R i g hts R eserved
HCS+-Tm Version 5.3 GOrlftated: V2612DID 9:51 Am
file://C: Tocuments and Settings\Bob AbetinTocal Setfing:s\Temp\u2k159.tmp 1/26/2010
Two -Way Stop Control
Page I of I
I TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY I
eneral Infoffnation
nallyst
LA
gQneylCo.
. befin Traffic Servkc�s
Date Performed
1/24/2007
d
kalysis Tirne Period
M Peak Hour
Site Information
FnteZrsection oys Lake Rd. & SW Ent
urisdiction
Analysis Year 2013 With Willow Creek PH
3
Project De:a"iption "ubert Tumor TiS
EastlWest Street: Foy-s Lake Road North[South Street: Southwest Entranw
intersection Orientation: East-West Itudy Pen'ad (hrs)- 0.25
[Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments I
gajor Stmet
Eastbound
Westbound
00vernent
1
2
3
4
6
L
T
R
L
T R
lolume (veh/h)
10
2fO
358 44
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.86
0.86 0,66
iourly Flow Rate, HFR
� veh/h
2�
10
228
-
0
0
416 51
Percent Hem Vehicles
0
0
I
MFe�dian Type
Undivided
FZT Channelizad
0
0
Lanes
0
0
0
0
,onfiguration
LT
TR
5pstreW Signal,
0
0
Enor Stmet
Northbound
Southbound
Movement
7 8 9
10
11
12
L T R
L
T
R
Volume (veh1h)
29
6
Pe2k-Hour FOIctor, PHF
0.77 0.77 0.77
0.77
O� 77
0.77
Hourly Flow Rate, HFIR
vel III I
0 0 0
37
0
7
Percent Hem Vehicles
0 0 0
0
0
Fercent Grade (%)
0
0
Flared Approach
N
N
Storage
0
0
iRT Channelizer�_
0
0
Lanes
0
0
0
0
0
0
Eonfiguraton
LR
U018 UUeU e Le n g in a
nO LeVOI OT ZOMC
e
kpproach
Eastbound
Weetbound
I
Northbound
Southbound
4ovement
1
4
I
7
9
I
10
11
12
-ane Configuration
LT
I
LP
(yeh1h)
10
44
(m) (ve h1h)
1105
433
Fie
0.01
0.10
)5"A queve length =MR
�5
0-0.3
0.34
z . .
.ontroll Delay (stveh)
8.3
NNINMENOMMMM"
14.3
LOS
A
B
Npproacn Uelay (siven)
14.3
%pproach. -LOS
B
Cop y d g ht 0 200 7 U niversity of Flo rida, A I I R i g hts R es erved
Hcs*'" Version 5.3 Generated- V2612DIO 9.51 Am
file://C:\Documents and Sctfings�Bob AbelinTocal Setfings\Temp\u2k I 5D.trnp 1126/2010
Two -Way Stop Control
Page 1 of 1
I TWOmWAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY I
[General Information ISite Information I
't
Pbelin
Pnalyst
enq,lCo.
Traffic Services
ate Performed
112512007
14nalysis Time Pen*od
1AM Peak Hour
Intersection
2 & NW Ent
iuri�d'IG'tion
Eihway
nalysis Year
2013 Wi(h Vfiffuw Creuk PH
3
r 'ect Description Hubert Turnar TIS
astMest Street, U.S. t�Lhway 2 NorthiSouth Str ' eet: Notthwest Entrance
Intersection Odentatio-n.; East-West $tu dy Period (h rs), 0- 25
chicle Volumes and Adjustmente;
allor Street
Eastbound Westbound
ovement
2 3 4
5
6
L T R L
T
1
R
olume (veh1h).
771 6 15
310
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
I
0-190 0.92 0.90
0.90
0.90
Hourly Rate, HFR
(veh/h
__-0.92
0 838 6 16
344
0
Percent Heavy Vehicles
0 0
ed ian ly pe
Undivided
Channelized
0
anes
0
1
0
f
1
0
onfiguration
TR
L
T
ream Signal
0
0
or Street
Nodhbound
Southbound
ovemerit
7
8
10
1
12
L
T
R
L
T
R
olurne (veh1h)
12
46
Peak -Hour Factor, PHIF
0.80
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.87
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
(yehAh)
14
0
51
0
0
0
Percent Hep�� Vehiules
0
0
19
0
0
0
Percent Grade (%)
0
0
Flared Approach
N
N
Storage
0
RT Channelized
0
0
as
0
0
0
D 0
0
figuration
I LR
L
we lay , ;4ue UO LeflgUl,. a
na LeVel OT �e
rV I Ce
Approach
Easthound
Wostbound
Northbound
Sovihbound
Movement
1
4
7
8
9
10
11
12
Lane Configuration
L
LR
v (veh/h)
16
65
F(f'm)) ((vehPh)
801
311
V1 r,
Or 02
0.21
9:5*/o queue length
0.00
0.77
Control Delay (s/veh)
9-6
19.6
LOS
A
C
Approach Delay (slveh)
Approach LOS
C
C o py righ t 0 20 07 LJ n i ver s4 of F I o6d a, All R igh ts R eserve d
HCS+T'O Versior 5.3 Generab&d: V2W010 9:50AM
a I
file: flC \Documents and S ettings\Bob Abel * nTocal S ettings\Temp\u2k 14 9. tmp 1/2W201 0
Two -Way Stop Control
Page I of I
I TYVO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY I
enerall Information
a' 3'
RLA
gencyfCo.
befin Traffic SeMces 1
Knalyst
ate Performed
at
D e P�
1/2WO07
nalysis Time Period
I SIS
IPM Poak Hour
tite I n form ati o n
ite
Intersection ighway 2 & NW Ent
:s(!
urisdiction
Analysis Year 2013 Willi Wdluw Creek pt,
Pr 'ect Descniption Hubert Tumor TIS
east)West Street U.S. Highway 2 Nortti/South Street'. Northwest Entran-ce
[Intersection Orientation, East-West Ntudy Pedod (hrs): 0,25
[Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments I
0
I a r Street
a r
Eastbound Westbound
M 'T
Mo e
ovement
V
1 2 3 4
5
6
L T R L
T
R
olume (veh1h)
0 lum
392 16 53
TOR
oak -Hour Factor, PHF
Peak_�
0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
0.90
0,90
curly Flow Rate, HFR
curly
veh/h
.h/h)
ve
0 435 17 58
787
0
e
Percent Heavy Vehicles
en
0 0
c
M e: d ar
Median 7ype
r
Undivided
T C ,
RT Channellized
R N
0
0
0
1
0
1
1 0
Dontguration
TR
L
T
412—stream Signal
0
0
Winor Street
Northbound
Southbound
Movement
7
a
9
10
11
12
L
T
R
L
T
R
Volume (yehAh)
9
30
:leak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.80
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.87
-lourly Flow Rate, HFR
'vehih)
I 1
0
33
0
0
0
Percenl Heavy Vehicle4
0
0
0
0
1 0
1 0
I
Peroent Grade
0
Flared Approach
N
N
Storage
0
0
Channelized
0
0
r
s
D
K,neRT
0
0 0
0
0
0
onfi ration
I I
f
LR
L igahk tjueue Langm,, anO
IL
Levei OT ZIBINICe
kPproach
Eastbound
Wastbound
I Northbound
Southbound
Movement
1
4
7
a
9
10 11
12
.ane Configuration
L
LP
(vehlh)
58
44
(m) (ve h1h)
1119
359
0.05
-0.12
)5% queue length
O.f6
0.41
,xntrol Delay (slveh)
8.4
16.4
_0S
A
C
ckpproach Delay (slveh)
10.4
�pproach LOS
Cop yrig ht C 2 007 U n iv a rs ity of Flor Ida, A I R 1 g ht a R ese ry act
HCS+Tm Version 5.3 Generated: V2512010 a'50AM
file:8CADocumenis and Settings\Bob AbelinTocal SeUings\Temp\u2k14D.tmp 1/26/2010
Two -Way Stop Control
Page I of I
I TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY I
lGeneral Information [Site Information I
nalyst
RLA
gencylGo.
besin I raft �;ervices
I'M
Date Performed
1/24/2007
Rnalysis Time Period
Peak Hour
Intersection
oys Lake Rd. & Valley View
Junscliction
Analysis Year
2014 With Wiflow Cmek PH
4
roject Description Hubert Tamer TIS
astMest Street: LoLs Lake Road North/South Street, Valley View Road
intersection Orientation: East-West rstudy Period (hrs), 0.25
ahicle Volum'es and Adiustments
ajor Street
Eastbound
Westbound
overnent
1
2
3
4
5
(3
L
T
R
I,
T
R
olume (yehJh)
549
42
60
138
Peak -Hour Factor, PHIF
0.76
0.79
O� 79
I
0,65
0. 65
0,61
1 lourly Flow Rate, HFR
h/h
0
694
53
92
212
0
Percent Heavy_Vehicles
—
0
ledian Type
Undivided
T Channelized
0
0
anes
0
1
0
0
1
0
o r nfiguration
TR
4-T
pstream Signal
0
0
11nor Street
Northbound
Southbound
w1lovement
7
8 9
10
11
12
L
T R
L
T
R
�ol ume Lveh1h)
32
107
Deak-Hour Factor-, PHF
0-79
0.7,9 0.79
0.78
0-78
D. 78
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
eh/h
40
0 135
0
0
0
Ve'i':Ied
Percent Heavy Vehicles
0
0 0
0
0
0
(0
Dernent Grade (%)
0
0
=Iared Approach
'h
N
N
Storage
0
0
RT Ch2nnelize-Ed
0
0
Lanes
0
0
0
0
0 0
lConfiguration
I
LR
T_
F6�12w_ fluoua Lanath- and Laval of Sarviep I
Approach
Eastbound
Westbound
Northbound
Southbound
Movement
1
4
7
a 9
10
11 12
Lane Configuration
LT
LR
v (veh/h)
92
175
7((�M)) ((vehllh�
670
346
VIC
0.11
0.51
95% queue length
0.35
2.72
Control Delay (s/veh)
9.6
6
P2�
LOS
A
D
Approach Delay (sIveh)
25.6
�pproach Fos
D
C upy rig hi 40 20 07' U n ive rsi ty o f Flo d da . A] I R ig hts Re served
HC,S+"' VerSINI 5-3 Generated-. 1i26Q010 10:14 AM
file: //C:\D ocuments and S ettings\Bob AbelinTo cal S etting s\Temp\u2k 162 1 tMP 1/26/2010
Two -Way Stop Control
Page I of I
Fenerall Information
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
ISIte information
nalxst
RLA
Rbolin
,genzir-co.
Traffic Sorvicos
Date Performed
112412007
Analysis Time Period
IPM Peak Hour
*ect Desaiption Hubert Turner TIS
*Pr
Eaost/Wdast Street: Foys Lake— Road
te al
Intersection Orientation:
East-West
1cle Volumes Adjustments
-and
r Street
Eastbound
ovement
2
L
T
olume �vehlh)
254
Peak -Hour Factor, PHIF
0.92
0, 92
Hourly Flow Rale. HFR
0
276
veh/h)
Peroent Heavy Vehicles
Median Type
�0
RT Channelized
Lanes
0
1
onforation
tria-am 519nal
0
or Stmet
Northbound
ovement
7
8
L
T
olume (vehlhL_
42
Peak -Hour Factor, PHIF
0.77
0.
Hourly Flow Rale. HFIR
54
0
veh/h
Percent Heavy Vehicles
0
0
Percent Grade (%)
0
Flared Approach
N
Storage
0
T Chan7eri`zed
Lanes
0
onfiguration
LR
lay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
pproach
Eastbound
Westbound
Movement
1
4
Lane Configuration
LT
(veh1h)
118
(m) (ve h/h)
1251
/C
0.09
50
A
5% queue length
q
0�31
o ntr
ontrol Delay (s/veh)
8.2
LOS
A
proaGh Delay (sJveh)
p ppro
pproach LOS
Co py ri!g h t 0 20 07 U n i ver sity of F I orid a, AN R ilgh ta R ceideyt-d
Inlersection
bys Lake Rd. & Valley View
Rd
Jurh3diction
Analysis Year
2014 With Willow Creek PH
4
rth/South Street Valley View Roac(
idy Period Mrs): 0.25
Westbound
ro M��
Undivided
Southbound
Noahbound
7 8 9
LR
115
353
0-33
20.0
20.o
C
HGS.0 T-M -version *.;3
Southbound
10 1 1" 1- 1 12
Gener.akvd. 1120f2-010 1015AW.
file://C:\Documents and Settings�Bob AbelinTocal Setdngs\Temp�u2k166.trnp 1/26/2010
Two -Way Stop Control
Page I of I
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
eneral Information
ite Information
� 'n
tersel
I ntersection
0 s Lako Rd. & Second Ent
nalat
RLA
Jurisdiction
rii sd
ic
ency/Co. belin Traffic Sef-vices
ate Performed
1/24/2007
IM
nalysi
Analysis Year
01
014 With Wiflow
Greek PH
nallysis Time Period
Peak Hour
P rp
jqr..1_ D-opeription Hubort Turnar TIS
Mest Street: Foys Lake Road
===;tudy
NorthiSouth Street: Southeast Entrance
rs�ection Ofientation:
East-West
Period (h�4): 0. 2!5
J
hicle. Volumes and
A 'ustmenbs
jor Stmet
Eastbound
Westbound
overnent
1
2
3
4
5
L
T
R
L MEEEEMEMEEM�
T
R
oluma (vehlh�
3
503.
142
28
Peak -Hour Factor, P1HF
0.76
0-76
0,76
0.61
O� 64
0.64
Hourly Flow Rate, HFk
vah/h
3
661
0
0
221
43
Percent Heavy Vehic I e :s
0
—
0
Median Type
Undivided
RT Channelized
0
0
Lanes
onfl2uration
0
L T
1
0
0
0
TR
ream Signal
0
0
or Street
Nofthbound
Southbound
Movement
7
8
9
10
11
12
L
T
R
L
T
R
I urn e (yehih)
eak-Hour Factor, PHF
c)urly Flow Rate, HFR
vah/h)
0.78
E�
0
�
0-78 M
0
O�78
0
86
0,77
0.78
0
0.,77
EEEEEE�
12
Peroent Heavy Vehicles
0
0
0
0
0
0
Peroent Grade (%)
1712red Approach
0
N
0
N
Storage
0
0
RT Channelized
Lanes
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
Configuration
L
R
Delay, Queue Length, and
Approach
Level of Service
Eastbound Weetbound
Nolhbound
Southbound
Movement
1
4
7
a
lo 11
12
Lane Configuration
(vchlh)
LT
3
L
11.1
R
f2
(m) (veh/h)
1312
307
802
/C
0-00
0,36
0.01
VA queue length
0.01
1- 00
0.05
ontrol Delay (slveh)
7.8
23.2
9.6
LOS
A
C
A
pproach L)elay (Wveh)
21.9
pproach LOS
Copyriigbt 0 2007 University of Ficrida, All Rights Reserved
HCS+T" Version 5_5 Gerierated: VW2010 10:15 AM
file://C: \Documents and Settings\Bob AbelinTocad Settings4emp\u2 k I 72.trnp 1/26/2010
Two -Way Stop Control
Page I of I
eneral Information
Enalyst
L'q
gencylCo-
behn Traffic Services
Date PerformeT
EV24/200 7
6nallysis Time Period
M Peak Hour
M
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Site Information
Intersection
Jurisdiction
ov-5 Lake Rd. & Second Ent
2014 With Willow Creek PH
�nallysis Year 1A I
Pr"' c
r 'act Doscription Hubert Tumor VS
Ea2sgWest Street: Foys Lake Road orthiSouth Street: Southeast Entrance
t
Intersection Cri-entatiom. East-West tudy Period (hrs): 0.25
e e
a a
hiccia Volluman and Aditistmenta,
ajor Street
or
Eastbound
Westbound
Ma'
ove'
ovement
1
2
3
4
5
6
L
T
R
L
T
R
olume (yeh1h)
11
232
414
C
98
P011jmo
eak_l_
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.86
0.86
0.86
ourly Flow Rate, HFR
(vehih)
11
252
0
0
461
113
�erce nt Heavy Vehicles
0
0
7edian Type
Undivided
RT Channalized
1)
Lanes
0
1 0
0
1
0
aonfiguration
LT
Upstream Signal
0
0
Ifliner Stmet
Wo7th bound
Southbound
�ovemenl
7
8
10
11
12
L
T R
L
T
R
Jollume (yehfih)
55
6
�Iealk-Hour Factor, PHF
0.77
I 0.77 0.77
I O� 77
0.77
0.77
qourly Flow Rate, HFR
F
,vch1h)
0
0 0
71
0
7
Percent Heavy Vehicles
0 0
0
-0
0
Percent Grade
0
0
Flared Approach
A/
IV
Storage
0
RT Channelized
0
0
9
anes
0
0
I
1
0 1
onfigvatian
L
I R A
Inalay. Ounue Lonath. and Level of Service I
kppro:ach
Eastbound
Westbound
Nomhbound
Southbound
Vlovement
1
4
7 8 9
10
11 12
-ane Configuratlofi
LT
L
R
i (veh1h)
if
71
7
(m) (vehih)
992
347
547
0.01
0.20
0.01
)59/o queue lengm
0.03
Td
0.04
..ontrol Delay (slveh)
8.7
1&
11.7
LOS
A
C
;�pppproaach Delay (Vveh)
17.5
kpproach LOS
C
I
Co pyr ig h t 4; 20n 7 U n I versity of F I o ld a, Al I R ig h ts RegerviLld
HCS-*TM VerSior 5.3 Generated, VMMO 10,15AM
file://C: \Documents and Settings\Bob Abelin\Local Set1ings\Temp\u2k176.tmp 1/26/2010
Two -Way Stop Control
Page I of I
lGeneral Information
Analysl
LA
7gta_nr.-y1r.0
I befin Traffic Services
Dale Pe rformed
112412007
.-nalysis Time Period
M Peak Hour
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Iite Informiation
intersection
Jurisdiction
�A
nalysis Year
- oys Lake Rd. & SWEnt
0 14 With Kri Ow Cre 61 k PH
act Description Hubert Tumor TIS
E!ast:fW: est Street: Foys Lake Road
PIntersection
North/South Street: Southwe''s' ... f En tra n ce
18tudy
te Orientation, East-West
Period (hrs)'. 0.25
hilielle Volumes and A Monte
ajor Street
Eastbound
Westbound
Movernent
2
3
4
6
L
T
R
L
T
R
olume (yeh/h)
4
463
130
2f
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.77
0.77
0.76
0.61
0.67
0.67
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
hfh
5
601
0
0
194
31
Percent Hean Vehicles
Median Type
0
Undivided
RT Channellized
0
0
Lanes
0
0
0
0
onfiguration
ream Signal
LT
TR
0
Southbound
10 11 12
L T R
or Street
Movement
Northboundl
7 9
L T R
olume (yeh/h)
-eak-Hour Factor. PHF
ourly Flow Rate, HFR
veh)h
0.78
0
0.78
0-78
45
0,78 0.78
57 0
11
0.78
14
aroent Heavy Vehicles
ercent Grade (%)
0 0 0
0
0 0 0
0
Flared Approach
Storage
N
0
0
RT Channelized
figuration
0
0
0
LR
0
F7
Della Queue Length,. and
Level of SGrvice
J
pproach
Movemeni
Lane Configuration
r=astbound
1
LT
Westbound
4
Nofthbound
7 8 9
Southbound
10 11 12
LR
(veh1h)
C (m) (vehfh)
.5
1356
7f
391
0.00
0-118
:51/6 queue length
0.01
045
ontrol Belay (atveh)
T7
16.2
0S
A
pproacn Delay (siven)
161
pproach LOS
C
C 0 py ri!gh t 05 20 07 U A I vCLr-&dy 0 f F 10ri d a, All R Igh ts Reserve d
HCS+T�4 Version 5.3
Generated, 112W2010 10:15AM
file:8CADocuments and Settings\Bob Abefin\Local Settings\Temp�u2k] 7A.tmp 1/26/2010
Two -Way Stop Control Page I of I
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Feneirall Information its Information
®r.
nalyst
LA
intersection
P�
OYS Lake Rd, a SW Ent
gency/Co-
I befin Traffic SeMces
Jurisdiction
Dale Pertormed
IlAnalysis
j
112412007
1
Analysis Year
2014 With Willow Creek PH
4
Time Period —
M Poak Hour
-
c'
r
r 0
oject Description Hubert Turner TIS
a
astMest Street: Fays Lako Road
North/South Street: Southwest Entrance
EStudy
t
Intersection Odentation: East-West
Pe Hod (h rs)
0. 25
ee �ic
hicle Volumes and Adjustments
orl
gjor Street Eastbound
Westbound
6- 8 rr
ovement 1
2
3
4
5
6
L
reak-l-
T
R
L
T
R
olume
lume (veh/hI 12
216
367
53
eak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92
0.9.7
0. 00>
wrdr,
0.8.6
0.86
Or 815
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
v h1h) 13
234
0
0
426
61
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0
0
edian TjPe
U17divided
Channelized
0
0
anes
0
1
0
0
0
onfj uration
LT
TR
pstream._Signal
0
0
in a r Street
Northbound
Southbound
ovement
7
8
10
1
12
L
T
R
L
T
R
clume (veh1h)
34
7
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
Dd 77
0.77
0.77
0.77
O� 77
0.77
Hourly'Pimow Rate, HFR
0
veh/h
0
0
44
0
9
Percent Hean Vehicles
0
0
0
0
0
0
Percent Grade (%)
0
0
Flared pproach
N
N
Storage
0
Channelized
0
0
nes
0
I
0
0
0
0
0
nfiguration
L
LR
lay, Queue L =ngth, and
Mel of Service
pproach
Eastbound
Westbound
Northbound
Southbound
Movement
1
4
7 8
9
10
1
12
Lane Configuration
LT
LR
(veh/h)
f3
53
(m) (vehAn)
1006
420
/C
0.01
0.13
574 queue length
0,04
0.43
ontroll Delay (siveh)
8.4
14.8
LOS
A
19
pproaCh Delay (sNeti)
pproach LOS
Co py Hg h t 0 2 007 U n 1 yers4 of F i crid a, A I Wig h ts Reserved
HCS+TM Version 5�3
Generated: 112EV2010 10'.15 AM
file:HCADocuments and Settings\Bob AbelinTocal Settings\"remp\u2k17E.trnp 1/26/2010
Two -Way Stop Control
Page I of I
eneral Information
TWO -,WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
'r§ite Information
nalyst
RLA
Intersection
I
hwax 2 & NW Ent
poncylCn.
Nheiin Traffic SeMoes-
Jurisdiction
Date Peff&med �m
V252007
Analysis Year
2014 With Willow Creek PH
4
Analysis Time Period
1AM Peak Hour
71.
P 'ect Description Hubert Tumor TIS
East(West Street'. U.S. qi]ghway 2
NorthfSouth Street: Northwest Entrance
IStu
J�ntersection..Orientation: East-West
dy Period (h rs):
0. 25
h ic
Phicle Volumo!g and Adjustments
a 0
Nor Street
r '
Ea stbou n d
Westbound
ove M
ovement 1
I :::F
2
3
I
4
5
6
L
T
R
j
L
T
R
clume
lurne (yeh1h)
790
6
19
317
eak.H
eak-Hour Factor. PHF 0.90
0.92
0-92
0.90
0.90
0-90
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
veh/h 0
h h
858
6
21
352
0
e r c e n
ercent Heavy Vehicles 0
—
0
d 3 n
jq
edian Tjpe
Undividod
h
T Channelized
C
0
0
anes 0
0
1
1
0
n f
I L
AuratioR
TR
L
T
Stre
pstream Signa[
1
0
Noftbound
0
a r Street
or'
Southbound
Finin -
Movement
7
10
11
12
L
T
R
L
T
R
clume (yeh/h)
13
57
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.80
0.90
0.90
0.90
0. go
0.87
Hourly Ffow Rate, HFR
(yeh/h)
16
0
63
0
0
0
Percent±!2;�yy Vehicles
0
0
0
0
0
0
Percent Grade (%)
0
0
Flared Approach
IV
N
Storage
EEE
0
0
RT Channelized
0
0
nee
0
0
0
0
0
0
onfiguration
LR
Delay:, Queue Len!pth, and
Level of Service
Approach
Gaetbound
W-9stbound
North bo u n d
Southbound
Movement
1
4
7
10
11 12
Lane Configuration
L
LR
v (vchfh)
21
79
C (m) (vehih)
787
302
ic
0.03
0.26
5% queue length
0. 08
1.03
ontrol Delay (s/veh)
9-7
21.1
LOS
A
cr
pproach Delay (sJveh)
Z1.1
pproar.h LOS
C
Co py ig h 10 2C 07 Lj n i ver sity of F I crid a, A I Rig h ts Reserved
HCS-t-rm Version 5.3
Generated: V2612010 10:15 AM
:5 1e:J/C: Mocuments and Senings\Bob Abelin\Local Settings\Temp\u2k16A.tmp 1/26/2010
Two -Way Stop Control
Page I of I
lGeneral Information
nallyst
RLA
qenqy/.00-
Traffic Sermes
Date Performed
rbeiin
V25�2007
6nallysis Time Pen'od
M Peak Hour
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Site Informatlon
I ntersect !on
Jurisdiction--
jAnalysis Year
fighway 2 & NW Ent
014 With Wffluw Ovek PH
roject Description Hubert Tumar TIS
ast/West Street, U. S-, Highway 2
North/South Street, Northwest Entrance
itersection Odentations
East-West
tudy Period
n __(Ors)l
0.25
'ehicle Volumes and
Adjustmenft
or Stmet
F-astbou nd
Westbound
lovernent
1
2
3
4
5
6
L
T
R
L
T
R
olume Leh/h�
401
17
65
726
-ealk-Hour Factor, PHF
0.90
0-90
0,90
0.90
0.90
0.90
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
Yoh/h)
0
445
18
72
806
0 0
Percent Heavy Vehicles
0
F
0
Median Type
Undivided
RT Channellized
0
Lanes
0
1
0
1
0
r1k onfi uration
�2=
TR
L
I
�pstream Signal
0
mmm�
0
-_
6111nor Stmet
NDrthbound
'�§outhbound
Wovement
7
8
9
10
11
12
7olume (Yenm)
�eak-Hour Factor, PHF
qourly Flow Rate, HFR
f
Lvp.h/h)
L
10
0.80
12
T
0. ;0'
0
R
37
0-90
41
L
0�90
0
T
0.90
0
R
0.87
0
Percent Heavy Vehicles
0
0
0
0
0
0
Percent Grade (%)
0
0
Flared Approach
N
Storage
0
RT Channellized
0
0
anes
0
0
0
0
0
0
aonfiguration
LR
May, Queue Length, and
Level of Service
kppir<>ach
Eastbound
Westbound
Nodhbound
Southbound
Movement
1
4
7
8
9
10
11 12
Lane Configuration
L
LR
i (vch1h)
72
53
(m) (veh/h)
1109
35.3
;/C
0-06
0-15
95% qutaje It!n9th
0-21
0�52
7
.,Oontrol Delay (slveh)
8.5
170
S
LOS
A
C
r 15
P pproacti Delay (slveh)
r
17.0
a& LOS
ppprooa
C
Copyrig ht * 2 007 U nive rs ity of F lor ida, All R iq hts R e se ry ed
HCS+Tm Ver.5ian 5.3
Generated- 11261:2010 10:15 AM
file: //C ADocuments and Setfings\Bob Abelin\Local Sett1ngs\Ternp\u2k16E.tMp 1/26/2010
Two -Way Stop Control
Page 1 of I
eneral Information
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
[Site Information
Enalyst
RLA
Nbefin
g en cr,5;y" I C o.
Ttuffic Services
Date Performed
112412007
�knalysls Time Period
[AM Peak Hour
Intersection
Foys Lake Rd. & Valley View
Rd
Analysis Year
2015 With Willow Creek PH
15
0
Pr 'ect Description Hubert T-urner TIS
w"
East/West Street: Foys Lak e Road orth/South Street: VC9116y View Road
L s
Mters ection Orientation: East-West tudy Period (hrs).- 0.25
ehi cle Volumes and Adjustments
ajor Street Eastbound Wes1bound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
olume (veh1h) 584 43 61 149
13TIPeak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.76 0.79 0,79 0.65 0.65 0.61
HOUrly Flow Rate�r HFR 0 739 54 93 229 0
vehlh�
ercent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- 0 —
ad ian Type Undivided
Channelized
es
nfiguration
0
0
0
TR
0
L T
0
0
rsam Signal
or Stmet
overnent
7
0
Narthbound
8
9
0
Southbound
0
10 11 12
L
T
L
HL
T
R
olume (yeh/h)
32
110
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.79
0.78
0.79
I
O� 78
0-78
0.78
Hourly Flow Rato, HFR
eh/h
40
0
139
0
0
0
Percent Heavy Vehicles..
0
0
0
0
0,
0
ercent Grade (%)
0
0
lared Approach
Pr 0
N
N
Storage
ge
0
0
RT GhatEnnefizedd�'
0
ail=
0
Lanes
0
0
0
0
0 0
onfiouration
LR
elay, Queue Length, and
Level of Service
pproach
Eastbound
Westbound
Northbound
Southbound
Movement
4
7
8 9
10
11 12
Lane Configuration
LT
LR
(vehih)
93
179
i
(m) (vehih)
837
322
C
0-11
5% queue length
0.37
3.19
ontrol Delay (stveh)
9,8
29.3
LOS
A
pproar, Delay (sheh)
29.3
pproach LOS
D
Go pyr ig h 10 2 007 U nii vief sity of F; I and a, A I Rig h 15 ReSe Ned
HC-S+Trld Version S. 3
Generated: lliM2009 IT-32AM
file-.//C:�Documents and Settings\3ob Abefin\Local Settings\Temp\U2k4BB.tMp 11/18/2009
Two -Way Stop Control
Page 1 of 1
I TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY I
Peneral Information ISIte Information I
hr nalyst RLA
a St L'
' ' F
gency/Go. belin Traffic Services
ate Performed 112,412007
nalysis M
nalysis Time Pedod Peak Hour
Intersection
Foys Lake Rd. & Valley View
I Rd
Juriscliction
Analysis Year
�015 With Willow Crook PH
jProject Descdption Hubert Tumor TIS I
EasMest Street: LoLs Lake Road
North/South Sireet- Valley View Road
Ptudy
Intersection Orientation: East-West Period (hr 0.25
Vehicle Wilumes and A0justments
Major Street
Ea stbou n d
Westbound
Movement
1
2
3
4
5
6
L
T
R
L
T
R
Volume (veh/*
273
41
105
505
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.86
0.86
0.86
Hourly Flow Rate, HIFR
eh/h
0
296
44
122
587
0
Percent Heavy Vehicles
0
0
Median Type
Undivided
IRT Channelized
0
0
Lanes
0
1
0
0
1
0
onfi uration
LT
strearn Signal
0
61 ii nor Street
Northbound
Southbound
Aovement
7 8 9
10
11
12
L T R
L
L
T
R
iolurne �veh/h)
43 48
�0.
Peak -Hour Factor, PHIF
:)r' P
0,77 0.77 0. 77E
7 77
0,77
0.77
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
R
yeh1h)
55 0 62
0
0
0
0
�ercent Hem Vehicles
0 0 0
0
0
0
3ercent Grade
=MR
0
0
�Iared Approach
E
N
N
Storage
0
0
PT V.h;qnnP.[i7P.f1
f)
E
...
0
Lanes
0
0
0
0 I
0 E
0
Configuration
LR
11MY, t4U4?UO Longun, anaLOV01
OT ftOrVICO
\pproach
Eastbound
Westbound
Northbound
Southbound
Zovement
1
4
7
8 9
10
11 12
-a-ne CnnflgUration
IT
IP
i (veh/h)
122
117
1% (m) (vehih)
1230
324
)5% queue length
0-33
1-60
6.ontral Delay (siveh)
8.2
22.3
LOS
A
C
Tpoprwach Delay (sfveh)
22.3
mow
kpproach LOS
C
r., opy Nght C 2007 University of Flon-da, Al I Rights Reaerved
HCS+TrO Vefaion 5.3 uenera�ea: 1iiiwzuuq iu:3zAm
fi le:HC: \Documents and Settings\Bob Abefin�Local Settings\Temp\-u2k4BF.tmp 11/18/2009
Two -Way Stop Control Page I of I
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
eneral Information __rSite Information
nalyst
RLA
Inlerseclion
0 Lake Rd. & Second En.t
enG 0.
Nbeffn Traffic; Services
Jurisdiction
Date Performed
1/24J200?
Analysis Year
2015 With Willow Gr�9iqk PH
[Analysis Time Period
M Peak Hour
roject Description Hubert Tumor TIS
asMest Street: E2Ls Lake Road
North/South Street-, South east Entrance
ntersection Odentation: East-West
-]Study Pedod (hrs)-. 0,25
ehicle Volume5 and Adiustments
ajor Street Eastbound
WesFbound
ovement
2
3
4
5
6
L
T
R
L
T
R
olume (yeh/h) 4
522
147
34
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Or 76
0.76
0.76
0.51
0.64
0-64
Hourly Flo'w Rate, HFR
1 1
veh/h 5
686
0
0
229
53
Percent Hem Vehicles 0
1
0
—
Median Type
Undividecf
RT Channellized
0
Lanes 0
0
0
0
onfiguration LT
TR
stream Signal
0
0
nor Street Northbound
Southbound
Movemeni 7
8
9
10
1
12
L
T
R
L
T
R
olume (Veh1h) =Mom
I
ID2
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0-78
0. 78
0.78
0.77
OL 78
0.77
HourlyFlow' Rate, HFR
(vehAh)
I 0
0
0
132
0
14
Percent Heavy Vehicles
0
0
0
0
0
Percent Grade (9/6)
0
0
Rared Approach
N
N
Storage
hhw�
0
0
RT Channelized
0
0
Lanes
�nfi
0
0
0
1
n
Fo (gluration
L
L
R
May, queue Length, and
Level of Service
Amroach
Eastbound
Westbound
Northbound
Southhound
Movement
1
4
7
8
9
E, 0 11
12
Lane Con1guration
LT
L
R
v (via h1h)
S
132
14
(ni) (veh/h)
1292'
289
788
VIC
0.00
0.46
0.02
OQ
5% queue length
0.01
Z26
0.05
ontroll Delay (s/veh)
nt'qro
7,8
27.5
9.7
LOS
A
D
A
proach Delay (sfveh)
p pprc)a
25.49
pproach LOS
�Proa
D
Copyr i ght 0 200 7 U niversity of F I o rid a, A I I R 1 gbts Res erved
HCS+TM Version 5.3
Generated. 11MV2UGS 10:33AM
file://C:\Documents and Setfings\Bob Abelin\Local Settings\Temp\u2k4CC.tmp t 1/18/2009
Two -Way Stop Control Page I of I
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
-eneral Information lite Information
®r
nalyst
Intersection
OYS Lake Rd. Second Ent
gencyLCq.
befin Traffic Services 1
Jurisdiction
I
f-I
ARLA
Date Performed
JF�nalysis
112.4,12007
Analysis Year
2014") Wfth Wiffow Greek PH
05
Time Peegrriod
Xf Peak Hour
Projent Descrietion Hubert Tumor TIS
Eastfflest Streel: Foys Lake Road
North/South Street: Southeast Entrance
Intersection Odent2tiori: East-West
Study Period (hrs): 0.255
;7elhide Volumes and Adjustments
M'or Street
Eastbound
Westbound
Movement 1
2
3
4
5
6
L
T
R
L
T
R
Volurne L%�ehlh) 13
242
431
117
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.92
0-92
0.192
0.86
0.86
0,86
Pourly Flow Rate, HFIR
(vah/h) 14
263
0
0
501
136
rcent Heavy Vehicles 0
0
d ian Type
Undivided
hannelized
0
0
Lanes 0
0
0
0
onfi uration LT
TR
pstream Signal
0
0
!nor Stmet
Northbound
Southbound
ove 7
10
11
12
IL
T
R
L
T
R
olume (Vehfh)
66
7
eak-Hour Factor, PHF
0. 77
0,77
0.77
0.77
0.77
O� 77
ourly Flow Rate, HIFIR
vp-h/h)
0
0
0
85
0
9
eroefit Heavy Vehicles
0
0
0
0
0
0
Percent Grade (OA)
0
0
Flared Approach
N
Storage
0
0
RT Channelized
0
0
0
uration
L
R
Della , Queue Length, and
Level of Service
pproach
E29%0und
Westbound
Nolhbound
Southbound
Movement
1
4
7
8
9
10 11
12
ana figuration
LT
L
R
(veh/h)
14
85
10
(m) (veh1h)
956
324
525
1
0.01
0,26
0.02
5"A queue iength
0.04
1-0.3
0.05
Control Delay (s/veh)
8.8
20.0
12.0
LOS
A
C
S
pproach Delay (siveh)
19.2
pproach LOS
C
Cop yri g ht 0 2 D07 U n iv arsity of Flo dda, A I I R 1 g ht-s R ew rved
HCS-tTM Ver3I<)p e,3
Gone rated, I I � I V2009 10:34 AM
file : //C: \Documents and Settings\Bob Abelin\Local Setting s\Temp\-U2k4D0.Imp 11/18/2009
Two -Way Stop Control Flage I of I
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information
ite Information
Intersection
oys Lake Rd- $ S W Ent
gnalyst
gencylCo,
Traffic Services
Jurisdi7ion
Date Performed
Vb9fin
112412007
Analysis Year
07b With Wiflow Crook PH
Analysis Time Period
M I
M Peak Hour
Project Descriotion Hubert Tumer TIS
East)West Street: Foys Lake Road
North/South Street: Southwest Entrance
Ptudy
Intersection Orientation'.
East-West
Period Lhrs)-. 0725
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Fwaj or Street
Eastbound
---
Westbound
Movement
1
2
3
4
5
6
MEMEMENEEMENEEMb �
L
T
R
L
T
R
yolurne (verlill)
4
475
135
24
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.77
0.77
0.76
0-61
0.67
0.67
ourly FFow Rate, HFR
rvehlh
5
616
0
0
201
35
") M
ercent Heavy Vehicles
0
--
0
ed iar
Median Type
Undivided
RT Channelized
Ch4-
[
0
es
LaEnT
Lanes
0
0
0
OnIgi
onfiguration.
L T
TR
st
.Stream Signal
a
0
00
r
nor Street
in 0 S
Northbound
Southbound
0 ve M4
Move nt
7 1
a
9
110
11
12
L
T
R
L
T
R
olume
olume �vehih)
54
13
Peak -Hour Factor. PHF
Peak_Hc
0.76
0.78
0.78
0.78
0.76
0.78
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
I 0
I
ve h1h)
0
0
69
0
16
Percent Heavy Vehicles
0
0
1 0
0
0
0
Percent Grade
0
0
Flared Approach
N
IV
Storage
0
0
RT Channelized
0
0
=n 7
0
1
0
0
n
0
0
Configuration
0
LR
Nisy, Queue Length, and
Level of Service
Approach
Eastbound
7estbound
Northbound
Southbound
Movement
1
4
7
a
-9
10
11
12
Lane Configuration
LT
LR
v (vehfh)
3
(rn) (veh1h)
1343
377
Ic
0.00
0.23
5% queue length
0.01
0.435
ontrol Delay (slveh)
7.7
17-3
LOS
A
C ... -,
- -1
pproach Delay (sJveh)
77-3
pproa& LOS
C
I
Copyright* 2007 LI niversity of Florida, All Rights Reserved
HCS+TM Version 5-3
Generated'. 11OW2009 10.34 AM
file:HC:�Documenls and Setfings\Bob Abelin\Local Settings\Temp\u2k4D4.tmp 11/18/2009
Two -Way Stop Control Page I of I
TWOMAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
eneral Information
Ite Informatio'n
naly:51
LA
Intersection
0 Lake Rd- & SWEnt
gencyfCo.
belin Traffic Services
Jurisdiction
V5
D ate P e r1ormed
112412007
Analysis Year
016
015 With Willow Crook PH
6nalysis Time Period
M
M Peak Hour
I
I
Projad Description Htibort 7urner TIS
EasMest Street: Foys Lake Road
North/Soulh Street: Southwest Entrance
Itudy
Intersection Orientation-,
East-West
Period (hrs)-- 0,25
ehicle Volumeg2ndl Agiustmenbs
a or Street.
Eastbound
Westbound
movement
2
3
4
EEEEEEEEM�
L
T
R
L
T
R
olume (Veh1h)
14
223
376
63
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0,92
O�92
0,92
0-66
0.86
0. 66
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
veh/h
15
242
0
0
437
73
eroent Heavy Vehicles
0
edian Type
Undivided
Channelized
es
0
0
0
1
0
nfiguration
L T
TR
eam Signal
0
0
MMMMENEENEW
--------
r Stmet
Northbound
Southbound
overnent
7
8
9
10
11
12
plume (yehfh)
39
6
eak-Hour Factor, PHF
0. 77
0. 77
0.77
0.77
0.77
0.77
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
veh1h)
0
0
0
50
0
10
ement Heavy Vehicles
0
0
0
0
0
0
ercent Grade (%)
0
0
Flared Approach
N
N
Sto rag e
0
0
RT Channelized
0
0
Lane&
0
0
0
0
0
0
onfiguration
LR
ellay, Queue.�ength, and Level of Service
proath
Eastbound
Westbound
Nodhbound
Southbound
ovement
1
4
7
8
9
10
11
12
Lane Configuration
LT
LR
(vahllh)
is
60
(rn) (ve h1h)
1065
403
5% queue length
0.04
0.152
ontrol Delay (slveh)
B-4
15.5
LOS
A
C
ppro.ach Delay (slveh)
pproa& LOS
C
Copy -right * 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved
HCS+T Ve FS j a n 5.3
Generated, 1111S#2009 10-34AM
file:XMocuments and Setfings\Bob Abelin\Local Settings\Temp\u2k4D8.tmp 11/18/2009
Two -Way Stop Control Page I of I
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
FG=eneiralll Information ite Fnformagon-
nal st __
LA
IntersecilDn
hway 2 & NW Ent
en ICO,
ej
IN91in Traffic Services
Jurisdiclion
a P�rt
ate Pertarmed
Malysis
r112 5v 2 0 0 7
5
nalysis Year
2015 Wilh Mflow Crook PH
n I sis Time Pe6od
M
M Peak Hour
. . ......
05
1— 1 1
P[oj'ect Description Hubert Tumer TIS
EastMest Street- U_ S. L�Zhway 2
North/South Street: Noithwest Entrance
nlersection Orientation: East-West
Stugy Period (hrs):
0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Ytajor Street
Eastbound
Westboijnd
Vlovernent
2
3
4
5
6
L
T
R
L
T
Volume (yehAh)
810
7
23
325
eak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90
0.92
0.92
0.90
0.90
0. 90
iourly Flow Rate, HFR
��_h �/h 0
860
7
25
361
0
Perce nt- H eavy Veh i cl es 0
—
0
--
Median Type
Undivided
RT Channelized
0
0
FLanes 0
1
0
0
onfi I
onfigurabon
Tf ?
L
T
!Lstream Signal
0
0
Minor Stmet
Northbound
Southbound
Movement 7
9
10—
11
12
L
T
R
L
T
R
volume (vehih) 15
68
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0-80
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.87
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 18
0
75
0
0
0
(yehAhj
Percent Heav
y Vehicles 0
0
0
0
0
0
Percent Grade (%)
0
Flared Approach
N
IV
Storage
0
0
FT�Channellzed
0
0
Lanes
0
0
0
0
n
onfiguration
LR
Way, Queue Length, and Level of Service
kppro;ach
Eastbound
Westbound
Northhnund
Southbound
Movement
1
4
7
5
9
10 11 12
Lane Configuration
L
LR
(veh1h)
25
193
(m) (veh1h)
772
292
0.03
0.32
)5% queue length
0� to
1.33
Control Delay (s/veh)
9.6
23.0
_0S
A
C
kpproach Detay (:slvehT
TopDroaach LOS
C
Copyrig 1ht 0 2007 U n ive sity of Florida, All Rig hts Reserved
HCS4-Tm Version 5.3
Generated 1V18Q009 10:33AM
file:HCADocuments and Settings\Bob Abefin\Local SettingsUemp�u2k4CItmp 11118/2009
Two -Way Stop Control Page I of I
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
enerall Information
ite Infoffnation
nalyst
RLA
Interseclian
hway 2 & NW Ent
gency/co.
Rbefin TraNIC sarvir.p..Cz
Judsdiction
f
Date Performed
1/2M007
Analysis Year
2015 With Willow Crook PH
jAnalysis Time Period
Peak Hour
5
rnject Dasc%ription Hubart Tumor TIS
astmest streal: U.S. Highway 2
North/South Street: Northwest Ent-r-ance
Jntersection Orientation:
East-West
ludy Peniod (hrs):
jig
0.....5
Vehicle Volume's and Adjustments
major Street
Eastbound
Westbound
movement
2
4
'((veh/hi
T
R
L
T
R
7olume
412
19
78
745
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
10.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
ave h I h
0
457
21
86
827
0
Percent Heavy Vehicles
0 I
:L
01
:7
Median Tyrpe
Undivided
RT Channelized
0
0
Lanes
0
1
0
1
I
0
L onfi uration
,ul 1
MMP,7
TR
L
T
U strearn Signal
0 mm�
I
0
inGr Street
Northbound
Southbound
Movement
7
10
11
12
L
T
R
L
T
R
olurne (yeh/h)
11
44
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.80
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.87
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
veWh)
13
0
48
0
0
n
e r C ,e n
Percent Heavy Veh1cl
I ;7s
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
r e n
Percent Grade
e G
0
0
I a d
Flared Approach
re
IV
IV
IV
S t 0 r
Storage
0
RT Channalized
0
0
Lanes
0
0
0
0
0
C Co fial
onfiguration
LR.
J
Delay, Queue Length, and
Level of Seryk;e
A-ppronch
P4qtbound
Westbound
Northt�ounclli
F7--,
Southbound
Movement
1
4
7 8
8
19
10
11 12
Lane Configuration
L
EL�,
LR
v (voh�h)
86
61
C (m) (veh/h)
1095
340
V/C
0.08
0.18
95% queue lenSth
0.20
0.64
Control Delay (siveh)
8,6
17.9
LOS
A
C
Approach Delay (stveti)
17.9
�pproach LOS
I
C
I
Copyrigllmt 0 207 univerNty of Floida, All Rights Reserved
HCS+Tm Versior 5-3
Generated, 11110120C9 10,33AM
file:J/C ADocuments and Setlings\Bob Abefin\Local Settings\Temp\u2k4C7.trnp I t/I 8/2009