07. Resolution 5440 - Annexation - EverettREPORT TO: Kalispell Mayor and City Council
FROM: Sean Conrad, Senior Planner
Jane Howington, City Manager
SUBJECT Everett - Annexation and Initial Zoning of R-3 (Urban Single Family
Residential)
MEETING DATE: August 2, 2010
BACKGROUND: The Kalispell City Planning Board met on July 13, 2010 and held a public
hearing to consider a request by Loren and Patti Everett to annex approximately 0.37 of an acre into
the City of Kalispell. The owners have requested R-3 (Urban Single Family Residential) zoning on
the property. The 0.37 acre project site is located on east side of South Woodland Drive
approximately 200 feet north of the intersection of South Woodland Drive and Haven Drive. The
property address is 1721 South Woodland Drive. The property can be described as a portion of Lot
22 of B 10 ck 1 of Greenacres subdivision located within Section 20, Township 28 North, Range 21
West, P.M.M., Flathead County, Montana.
Kalispell Planning Department staff presented report #KA-10-01 providing details o f the proposal
and the evaluation. Staff reported that the proposed R-3 zoning district was compatible with
surrounding land uses and also consistent with the Kalispell Growth Policy which designated the area
as urban residential. Staff recommended the board consider recommending the council approve the
annexation request and initial zoning of R-3 based on findings in the staff report.
At the public hearing Loren George Everett spoke in favor of his proposed annexation and initial
zoning request. No other persons made public comments and the public hearing was closed.
The board briefly discussed the annexation request and recommended the city council consider
approving the request to annex and assign the R-3 zoning district on the property upon annexation.
The vote was unanimous.
A motion was then made and seconded to recommend that the city council move forward with the
annexation of the entire wholly surrounded island referred to as Greenacres. Discussion by the
planning board included the need to get as many septic tanks and leach fields out of the area as they
can and on to the public sewer system. One board member wanted to make sure that everything is
done to address the concerns of the people who live in this area should the council consider annexing
the entire area. Another board member had issues with the city limits property down Willow Glen
Drive and noted that the city limits in some areas are only the road. In view of that he felt that calling
the Greenacres area wholly surrounded property is, in his opinion, a stretch and was opposed to the
motion. The motion passed on a vote of 6 to 1.
RECOMMENDATION: A motion to approve the resolution annexing the property and a motion to
approve the first reading of the ordinance for initial zoning of R.-3 (Urban Single Family Residential)
would be in order.
FISCAL EFFECTS: The cost of services analysis indicates the annexation will cost the city
to serve the property. However, with wholly surrounded properties, the costs to our streets, parks,
etc. are already being experienced with no tax compensation. Annexing the property and the
accompanying city taxes would help to pay for the services and impacts to city infrastructure.
Report compiled: July 27, 2010
c: Theresa Mite, Kalispell City Clerk
Return to:
Kalispell City Clerk
PO Box 1997
Kalispell, MT 59903
WHEREAS, the City of Kalispell has received a petition from. Loren and Patti Everett, the owner
of property located on the east side of South Woodland Drive approximately 200 feet
north of the intersection of South Woodland Drive and Haven Drive, requesting that
the City of Kalispell annex the territory into the City, and
WHEREAS, the Kalispell Planning Department has made a report on the petitioner's Annexation
Request, ##KA-10-01, dated July 7, 2010, and
WHEREAS, the Kalispell City Planning Board and Zoning Comnussion recommended that the
territory be zoned City R--3, Urban Single Family Residential, on approximately 0.37
acres upon annexation into the City of Kalispell, and
WHEREAS, the City of Kalispell desires to annex said property in accordance with Title 7,
Chapter Z, Part 46, Montana Code Annotated.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED VED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIME CITY OF
KALIS PELL AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. That all the real property as described above be annexed to the City of
Kalispell and the boundary of the City is altered to so provide, and shall be
known as Everett Addition No. 409.
SECTION H. Upon the effective date of this Resolution, the City Clerk is directed to make
and certify under the seal of the City, a copy of the record of these
proceedings as are entered on the minutes of the City Council and file said
documents with the Flathead County Clerk and Recorder.
From and after the date of filing of said documents as prepared by the City
Clerk, or on the effective date hereof, whichever shall occur later, said
annexed territory is part of the City of Kalispell and its citizens and property
shall be subject to all debts, laws and ordinances and regulations in force in
the City of Kalispell and shall be entitled to the same privileges and benefits
as are other parts of the City.
SECTION III. The territory annexed by this Resolution shall be zoned in accordance with
the Kalispell Zoning Ordinance.
SECTION Iy. This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon passage by the City
Council.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND SIGNED FD BY THE MAYOR of THE
CITY OF KALISPELL, THIS 2ND DAY OF AUG2010.
ATTEST:
Theresa white
City Clerk
Tannrni Fisher
Mayor
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
EOREN AND PA.TTI EVERETT
A. tract of land, situate, lying and being in the NE 114 of Section 20, Township 28 North, Range
21 west, P.M.M., Flathead County, Montana and more particularly described as follows.
Beginning at the Northwest corner of Lot 22, Block 1, Greenacres Subdivision, a map or plat on
file in the office of the Flathead County Clerk and Recorder; thence S 89° 17' 09" E, 91.80 feet
along the North boundary of said Lot 22; thence leaving said North boundary, S 00° 37' 25" E,
97.06 feet; thence N 89°22' 35" E, 23.55 feet; thence S 02°30' S3" E, 61.74 feet; thence S
89°40' 34" w, 118.81 feet to the west boundary of said Lot 22; thence N 00°06' 27" w, 160.30
feet to the point of beginning. Containing 0.37 acres of land.
PLANNING FOR- THE FUTURE MOIffANA.L.J
July 27, 2010
Jane Howington, City Manager
City of Kalispell
201 First Avenue East
Kalispell, MT 59901
Planning Department
201 1 St Avenue East
Kalispell, MT 59901
Phone: (406) 758-7940
Fax: (406) 758-7739
www.kalis 11.com/planning
Re: Everett -Annexation and Initial Zoning of R-3 (Urban Single Family Residential)
Dear Jane:
The Kalispell City Planning Board met on July 13, 2010 and held a public hearing to consider a
request by Loren and Patti Everett to annex approximately 0.37 of an acre into the City of Kalispell.
The owners have requested R-3 (Urban Single Family Residential) zoning on the property. The 0.37
acre project site is located on east side of South Woodland Drive approximately 200 feet north of the
intersection of South Woodland Drive and Haven Drive. The property address is 1721 South
Woodland Drive. The property can be described as a portion of Lot 22 of Block 1 of Greenacres
subdivision located within Section 201, Township 28 North, Range 21 West, P.M.M., Flathead
County, Montana.
Sean Conrad, of the Kalispell Planning Department, presented staff report #KA-10-01 providing
details of the proposal and the evaluation. He reported that the proposed R-3 zoning district was
compatible with surrounding land uses and also consistent with the Kalispell Growth Policy which
designated the area as urban residential. Staff recommended the board consider recommending the
council approve the annexation request and initial zoning of R-3 based on findings in the staff report.
At the public hearing Loren George Everett spoke in favor of his proposed annexation and initial
zoning request. No other persons made public comments and the public hearing was closed.
The board briefly discussed the annexation request and recommended the city council consider
approving the request to annex and assign the R-3 zoning district on the property upon annexation.
The vote was unanimous.
A motion was then made and seconded to recommend that the city council move forward with the
annexation of the entire wholly surrounded island referred to as Greenacres. Discussion by the
planning board included the need to get as many septic tanks and leach fields out of the area as they
can and onto the public sewer system. One board member wanted to make sure that everything is
done to address the concerns of the people who live in this area should the council consider annexing
the entire area. Another board member had issues with the city limits property down Willow Glen
Drive and noted that the city limits in some areas are only the road. In view of that he felt that calling
the Greenacres area wholly surrounded property is, in his opinion, a stretch and was opposed to the
motion. The motion passed on a vote of 6 to 1.
Please schedule this matter for the August 2, 2010 regular city council meeting. You may contact
this board or Sean Conrad at the Kalispell Planning Department if you have any questions regarding
this matter.
Sincerely,
Kalispell City Planning Board
4
17 /�g
�.
John Plinchey
President
Attachments: Letter of transmittal
Staff Report #KA.-10-01 and supporting documents
Draft nvnutes from. the 7/ 13 / 10 planning board meeting
Petition to Withdrawal from Rural Fire District
Cost of Services Analysis
c w1 Att: Theresa White, Kalispell City Clerk
c w/o A.tt : Loren and Patti Everett
1344 Helena Flats Road
Kalispell, MT 59901
Larsen Engineering and Surveying
PO Box 2071
Kalispell, MT 59903
ESTIMATED COST OF SERVICES ANALYSIS (Residential land over 112 acre capped)
Project Name: Everett
Date: 2010
Calculated By: Kalispell Planning Department
Number of dwelling units proposed to be annexed: 2
Estimated increase in population: 2.20 4.4
Expected number of people per acre: 43560 0.37
Average square foot per lot: .� 16,000
Taxable market value per property: $150,000 0.37 $55,50U
..:........
-..>.005T::OF, : RVICE,:.......:.......:......:.::::..:...:.
Per capita costs based on increase in a ulation:
4
SERVICE
POPULATION
COST (2009)
TOTAL
Fire
4.4
76.19
$335
Police
4.4
122.59
$539
Administration
0.37
135.07
$50
Solid Waste none for 5 years
4A
0
$0
Casts per dwelling unit or Equivalent Residential Unit
ERU :
2
SERVICE
NO. OF UNITS
COST 2009)
TOTAL
Roads
2
609.00
$1,218
Water
0
222.00
$0
Sewer
0
138.00
$0
Wastewater Treatment
0
163.00
$0
Stormwater
2
87.00
$174
Parks
2
71.00
$142
TOTAL ANTICIPATED COST OF SERVICE
$2,458
2 : ANTIC PATEI3..REVE E:G ENERATED
Assessments based on average square foot per lot:
16.000
ASSESSMENT
NO. OF
DWELLING UNITS
AVE SQ FT
2009 ASSESSMENT
TOTAL
Storm sewer assessment(cap 21,780 sq ft :
2
16,000
0.005569
$178
Street maintenance assessment ca 21780 sq ft :
2
16,000
0.01222
$391
Urban forest assessment ca $150 :
2
16.000
0.00171
$55
Light maintenance assessment(cap $150 :
2
16,000
0.003
$95
Special assessment:
2
16,000
$0
AVERAGE SILL 2009
Avera a water and sewer bill
0
447.40
$0
TOTAL ANTICIPATE] REVENUE FROM ASSESSMENTS
=
$T20
3.: N TAX..REVE UE .....
Taxable market value Per orogerty:
NO. OF UNITS PROPERTY VALUE TOTAL
Total assessed value: 1 1 2 $55700 $111,000
09 REAL ESTATE TAX
Total taxable value:
TOTAL TAXABLE 2009 MILL L
Total additional revenue based on 169.81 mill le $3,252 0.16981
TOTAL TAX REVENUE
4:: P :FEES
Equivalent Residential Unit ERU) Determination Schedule
TYPE OF BUILDING AND SEWER USE
#OF
FIXTURES
ERU
UNITS
TOTAL
1. 1 Single Family Residence 0
1.00
each
0.000
TOTAL ERU
0.000
ITotal5wer ImpaFt Me
2499.UU
$Ieru
$0.00
total a er Impact Fee
2213
1 $0.00
[Mal orm Impact Fee
0
70.0{l
Trotal Police impact Fee
0
su 0
tTotal Fire Impact Fee
0
$0.00
Total ra is Impact Fee
0
$0.00
Total Proiect ImiPact Fee ($) :
$0
5.. TflTAL ANTICIPATEt) REVENilE.:GENERAT la. TO THE: CITY JITEMS AN
...:..:. ......
..C]NE.TfME.IMPACT..FEE.P..YMENT.T'O T Y. ITEM
- . ..:
7... NET :..REVENUE..TO..THi~CITY :;PER :YEAR. tTEM2...3.:.:1. m:::..::....:...........,..:........,.;...:...:..:....:............:.....-........._....... ....................,..........-$9,185.00
IJIOREN D
REQUEST FOR INITIAL ZONING OF R-3.
DEPARTMENT
A report to the Kalispell city Planning Board and the Kalispell City council regarding a
request to annex into the city limits with the initial zoning designation of R--3 upon
annexation. A public hearing has been scheduled before the Kalispell city Planning
Board for July 13, 2010 beginning at 6:00 PM, to consider the annexation request and
the appropriate zoning for the property to be annexed.. The planning board will
forward a recommendation to the Kalispell City Council for consideration.
The applicant has petitioned for annexation and an initial zoning designation of R-3, a
Single Family Residential district, on a portion of an existing lot approximately 16,000
square feet in. size. The owner is requesting annexation in the event the septic drain
field on the property fails. If the drain field fails, the owners will be required to
connect to the city's sewer main which is located immediately west of the property. To
connect to the city's sewer main the council's policy has been that the property must
first annex into the city.
This report evaluates the annexation request and the appropriate assignment of a City
zoning classification in accordance with section 27.03.010 (4) of the Kalispell zoning
Ordinance. This property will be annexed under the provisions of sections 7-2-4601
through 7--2-4610, M.C.A., Annexation by Petition.
A. petitioner JOwner: Loren and Patti Everett
1344 Helena Flats Load
Kalispell, MT 59901
Technical Advisor. Larsen Engineering and Surveying
PO Box 2071
Kalispell, MT 59903
B. Location and Legal Description. of Property: The property proposed for
annexation and initial zoning is located on east side of south. woodland Drive
approximately 200 feet north of the intersection of south. woodland Drive and
Haven. Drive. The property address is 1721 south. woodland. Drive. The property
can be described as a portion of Lot 22 of Block 1 of Green.acres subdivision
located within Section. 20, Township 23 North, Range 21 West, P.M.M. , Flathea.d.
County, Montana.
C. E ating Land Use and Zoning.* The property proposed for annexation is located
within the Greenacres subdivision, a 32-lot subdivision platted in the County in
1903. The annexation and initial zoning request is for an approximately 16,000
square foot western quarter of lot 22. This portion of lot 22 is currently developed
with one site built house, one mobile home and one detached garage. The
remaining portion of lot 22 outside of the land proposed for annexation is
developed as a mobile home park.
The current county zoning on the property is R-2, one Family Limited
Residential. This district is defined as "A district to provide for large -tract
resid.en.tial development. These areas will typically be found in suburban areas,
generally served by either sewer or water lines." Permitted uses in this district
are generally limited to residential uses. The conditionally permitted uses allow
some non-residential uses but those are limited to churches, daycare centers,
bed and breakfasts, schools and golf courses. The minimum lot size requirement
of the County R-2 zoning district is 20,000 square feet.
D. Proposed. Zoning: The proposed R-3, Urban Single Family Residential, zone
allows single-family residences and has a minimum lot size requirement of 77000
square feet and a width of 60 feet. The proposed City R.-3 district more closely
reflects the existing single family residential nature of the area and intended uses
for the property.
E. size: The area proposed for annexation and zoning contains approximately
16,000 square feet.
F. Adjacent Land Uses and ing: The South Woodland area is primarily
developed with single- family residences. However, the area proposed for
annexation is located on the western edge of an existing mobile home parr.
North: Residential, County R-S (Two -Family Residential)
West: Residential, County R-2
South: Residential, County R- 2
East: Residential, County R.-2
G. General Land UseCharacter: The general land use character of this area can be
described as primarily single family residential.. There is an existing mobile home
park located to the north, south and east of the property requesting annexation..
However, the mobile home parr is the anomaly in an area otherwise built with
detached single-family homes.
I. Utilities and PublicServices: All available public services and facilities are
available to the property owner. water and sewer main lines are located directly
in front of the property requesting annexation within. the South woodland Drive
right --of way. if annexed, the owner would have to pay water and sewer impact
fees prior to connecting one or both homes on the property to the city's water and
sewer lines.
Sewer: Septic system (currently) with the potential to connect to a
city sewer main if annexed.
Water: Private well (currently) with the potential to connect to a
city water main if annexed
Refuse: Contract hauler
Electricity: Flathead Electric Cooperative
Telephone: CenturyLink
Schools: School District #5, Kalispell
Fire: South Kalispell Fire Department (currently) Kalispell Fire
Department if annexed
Police: Flathead County Sherriff Department (currently) Kalispell
Police Department if annexed
2
ANNEXATION EVALUATION
1. Compliance with thegrowth- polia.
Chapter 2 of the Kalispell Grrowth. Policy discusses the issues with cyclical
growth the city has seen over the gears. The chapter focuses on affordable
housing, delivery of services, location of new development, redevelopment of the
existing urban core and quality of life issues. As part of the review of the
annexation request the following goals contained in chapter 2 are relevant to
this particular annexation request. The goals are:
Implement a comprehensive, effective growth management program that
recognizes and upholds the general welfare of the community as well as
individual rights.
® New urban and suburban development occurs in areas where public
water and sewer are available.
The city is currently drafting a growth management program in the form of an
annexation policy document. The purpose of the annexation policy is to give
the planning board, the council and the development community direction
when outlying property owners are requesting municipal services and
annexation. The draft document includes a potential annexation boundary
map around the current city limits. The property requesting annexation falls
inside the proposed boundary.
Public water and sewer main lines are located immediately west of the property
requesting annexation. The main lines are within the right-of-way for South.
Woodland Drive. If annexed, the property would have access to connect with
the water and sewer main lines provided the appropriate impact fees and
necessary permits are obtained from the city first.
2. Municipal services:
As stated above water and sewer main lines are located west of the property.
These main lines are adequate to serve the existing homes on the property
requesting annexation. Fire hydrants are located on the west side of South
Woodland Drive. One hydrant is approximately 200 feet south of the project
site at the in.t.ersection of south woodland Drive and Maven Court. The other
hydrant is approximately 200 feet north at the intersection of South. Woodland
Drive and Bison Drive. Given the close proximity to existing services,
annexation of the property will not overburden the municipal services currently
in place.
If annexed the adjacent portion of south. woodland Drive would also be
annexed. In situations such as this the city public works department makes an
agreement with the county to have the county continue to do the routine
maintenance of the road. In return, the city also provides maintenance to roads
that are primarily in city limits but have portions of the road outside of the city.
9
Figure l: Existing city utilities in the area.
Everett Proposed Annexation &City Utilities Location
Greenacres Subdivisions & Vicinity
(Imagery from June of 2009)
3. Distance from current city limits:
The property requesting annexation lies within an area which is wholly
surrounded by the City of Kalispell. Current city limits are approximately 1/8
11
of a mile north of the property and '/4 of a mile east and south of the property.
The reap in figure 2 provides an illustration of how close the city limits
currently are to the property.
If the property is annexed it will be surrounded by areas outside of the city
limits, albeit just several hundred feet to the north.. This could create problems
for police and fire personnel when responding to an emergency at this site since
properties along south woodland Drive fluctuate from being inside and outside
of city limits depending on what stretch of the road you are on. Consideration
should be given to exploring the feasibility of annexing the entire south
Woodland area that is currently surrounded by the city as shown in figure 2.
Figure 2: The property requesting annexation is with an area, shown in
grey, which is already wholly surrounded by city limits.
.............................................. . ................... ......................
...........................
210
211
BLKS
.;
4
4. Cost of services:
Once annexed to the city, full city services will be made available to the property owner.
Any necessary infrastructure associated with this development will be required to be
constructed in accordance with the City of Kalispell's Design and Construction
5
standards and any other development policies, regulations or ordinances that may
apply. If annexed, the property owner will not be connecting to city water or sewer
services. However, if the on -site septic system should fail the owner's only option is to
connect to the city's sewer main which lies immediately west of the property.
The attached cost of services analysis prepared for this property is used for all
residential annexations for residential land up to one-half acre. The analysis is only
an estimate based on a variety of assumptions. The analysis does not take into
consideration changes in methods of assessment and estimated costs associated with
services. The information can only be used as a general estimate of the anticipated
cost of services and revenue. A complete and accurate calculation will be completed at
the time a connection to water and sewer is requested and/or a building permit is
applied for as the necessary information would be available at that time.
The attached cost of services analysis for this annexation shows approximately $1,272
will be generated from assessments and taxes. To serve the property with police and
fire services will total approximately $2,458. Based on these estimated figures the
annexation will cost the city approximately $1,186. Please refer to Exhibit A for more
specific details on the calculations.
To summarize, the cost of services analysis indicates the annexation will cost the city
to serve the property. However, with wholly surrounded properties, the costs to our
streets, parrs, etc. are already being experienced with no tax compensation. Annexing
the property and the accompanying city taxes would help to pay for the services and
impacts to city infrastructure.
rio
INITLAL ZONING EVALUATION BASED
STATUTORY
The statutory basis for reviewing a change in zoning is set forth by 76-2-303,
I.C.A. Findings of fact for the zone change request are discussed relative to the
itemized criteria described by 76-2-304, M.C.A. and Section. 27.30.020, Kalispell
Zoning Ordinance.
1. Does the requested zone complycoMply with the ffQwth poh?
The property is designated by the Kalispell. Growth Policy future land use map as
"Urban. Residential" which anticipates residential development with a density of
between 3 to 12 dwelling units per acre. The proposed R-3 zoning designation
permits density within the range listed in the urban residential land use
designation. The property owner should be aware however that the R-3 zoning
district only permits one dwelling per property. with two dwellings currently on
the property, one of the units would be considered non --conforming and
expansion of that dwelling unit is limited to up to 50% . Alternatively, the owner
could pursue a lot split, creating two separate lots out of the 16,000 square foot
property and have a dwelling on each lot. If this was to occur then both
dwellings would be conforming to the R-3 zoning districts permitted uses.
2. Will the requested zone have an effect on motorized and n.onmotorized
transportation systems?
The property currently has two dwelling units on it. Once annexed and zoned R-
3 no noticilbe impacts to motorized or nonmotorized transportation systems will
occur. The requested R-3 zoning will not increase the density presently on the
property or allow additional development to occur that would add to the impacts
on the transporation system..
3. will the requested zone secure safely from fire anic and other dangers?
Adequate access and public facilities are available to the site in the case of an
emergency. There are no features related to the property which would
compromise the safety of the public. All municipal services including police and
fire protection, grater and sewer service are available to the area. There is an
existing city hydrant.
4. will the re uested zone romote the public health safety and general welfare?
The requested zoning classification will promote the health and general welfare
by restricting land uses to those that would be compatible with the adjoining
properties.
5. will the requested zone -provide for ade uate light and air?
Setback, height, and lot coverage standards for development occurring on this
site are established in the Kalispell Zoning; Ordinance to insure adequate light
and air is provided.
6. will the requested zone promote compatible urban owth?
The requested. R--3 zoning district limits the property uses to primarily single
family homes. This zoning district maintains and is compatible with the
established land use pattern in this area which is primarily single family
residential.
7. Will the requested zone facilitate the ade uate provision of transportation -,-water,
sewerage, schools arks and other public requirements?
All public services and facilities are currently available or can be provided to the
property. Development should be encouraged in areas where these services are
available.
3. Does the reguested zone give consideration to the particular suitabiliof the
—properly for articular uses?
The proposed. R-3 zoning district is consistent with the surrounding residential
zoning and land uses in the area. The R.-3 zone also gives due consideration of
the suitability of this property for the permitted uses in the zoning district.
N
9. Does the requested zone give reasonable consideration to the character of the
district?
The general character of the area is suburban scale residential development with
existing a higher density mobile borne park currently developed to the north,
south and east of the property requesting the R-3 zoning district. By assigning
the property with the R.--3 zoning district the development of this property will be
consistent with the residential character of the neighborhood.
10. Will the ro osed zone conserve the value of buildin s?
Value of the buildings in the area will be conserved because the R-3 zoning will
promote compatible and like uses on this property as are found on other
properties in the area.
11. will the requested zone encourage the most appropriate use of the land
throughout the munici ali ?
Urban scale residential development should be encouraged in areas where
services and facilities are available. In this case water and sewer lines are
located immediately west of the property. The proposed zoning is consistent with
the growth policy future land use designation and is compatible with current
county zoning M the immediate area.
It is recommended that the Kalispell City Planning Board and Zoning Commission adopt
Staff Report #KA-10-1 as findings of fact and recommend to the Kalispell City Council
that the property be annexed and the initial zoning for this property upon annexation be
R-3, Urban Single Family Residential.
Planning Department
201 1S` Avenue East
Kalispell, MT 59901
� Phone: (406) 758-7940
11 ISO I Plal 11 M P IP dam MMMMM=M Raw, JWFax: (406) 758-7739
' - www.kalispell.com/Plannin£
t*INNG EtORTHEFU'I'tIRE, „�U�.T.�.NA
PETITION FOR ANNEXATION AND INITIAL ZONING
NAME OF APPLICANT: /'0 cc(-)
AIL ADDRESS:- � �`�-1�--� HCIrOCA,a-4-
CITY/STATE/ZIP: i J�P � t , (YlT �I (� I PHONE: 7g5Z-0 1 OL
INTEREST 1N PROPERTY. -
Other Parties of Interest to be Notified:
PARTIES OF INTEREST: La�-ser1 En(s,,, �-- �
MAIL ADDRESS:_Pa box c:� D�)
CITY/STATE/ZIP: C�C�� 1`��}Pj I , y'YL`� Sq 9 Ot) PHONE:
INTEREST IN PROPERTY: �in G
PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING:
Address of the property: 1 �Zj �,� �j CCrA �CI.YI c� � i� . �GL� 1SDP
Legal Description: ni' 2-) p C- Of-1 �-� ✓���'1G�C��'S �yY�t �,�' IS I U►�
(Lot and Black of Subdivision; Tract #)
zv-z� o2i
(Section, Township, Range) (Attach metes and bounds as Exhibit A)
Land in project (ac): 0 , 3 1
Current estimated market value at S 0 /o build out
at l 00% build out
The present zoning of the above property is:
The proposed zoning of the above property is:
1�114
State the changed or changing conditions that make the proposed amendment necessary:
4��
The signing of this application signifies that the foregoing information is true and accurate based upon the
best information available and further grants approval for Kalispell Planning staff to be present on the
property for routine inspection during the annexation process.
(Applicant)
(Date)
FOUND 1/9 REBAR
�- AND CAP Bl' 7J18-S
\�
J I S O