4. Resolution 5486 - Amend Latecomers Agreement - West View Estatesm
Tel 406.758.7709
Fax 406.758.7771
charball@kalispell.com
1117�I��IC�7�e �I\� 1]i1�5i
TOO Mayor Tammi :Fisher
and Kalispell City Council
FROM: Charles Ha.rball, City Attorney
Jane Howington, City Manager
S CTm Resolution No. 5486 -- a Resolution to Authorize the City
Manager to Execute an Amendment to the Owl Corporation.
Developer Agreement
MEETINGT . March. 7, 2011-- Regular Council Meeting
In 2005 the Owl Corporation extended the Kalispell City grater and
sewage conveyance systems through Section 36 from the old. DNRC campus to West view
Estates Subdivision abutting the northwest corner of section 36. The City required these
extensions to be oversized beyond the needs of the West view Estates subdivision so that
anticipated Future growth in the area of Section 35 and Section 36 could be served by the
new extensions. Owl Corporation and. the City of Kalispell entered into a. developer's
agreement so that landowners connecting to the new extensions would pay a latecomer
fee to owl Corporation representing their pro rates share of the cost of the oversized
portion of the lines. On February 7, 2011 the City Council approved an agreement with
Owl Corporation in which the City agreed to extend the term of the developer's
agreement to thirty (30) years. The City of Kalispell recently amended two other
developer agreements Frith, latecomer terms to extend to thirty years recognizing the
reality that the capacity of the utility lines may not be fully demanded before that time.
Eo .TIo : That City Council give consideration to and pass Resolution
No. 5486.
FISCAL IMPACTS.* The extension of the agreement to thirty (30) years allows for
adequate time for development to pay the costs of the improvement.
Respectfully submitted,
Charles a 1, City Attorney Jane Howington, City Mana er
.; RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OF THE CITY OF KALISPELL TO ENTER
INTO AN AMENDMENT OF THE DEVELOPER AGREEMENT EXECUTED WITH OWL
CORPORATION
WHEREAS, in 2005 the owl Corporation extended the Kalispell City water and sewage conveyance systems
through Section 36, in the City of Kalispell, from the old DNRC campus to Nest view Estates
Subdivision abutting the northwest corner of Section 36; and
WHEREAS, the City of Kalispell required the water and sewage conveyance extension to be oversized beyond
the needs of the West view Estates subdivision so that anticipated future growth in the area of
Section 35 and Section 36 could be served by these new extensions; and
WHEREAS, in 2005 owl Corporation and the City of Kalispell entered into a developer's agreement with a
term of 17 years so that landowners connecting to the new extensions would pay a latecomer fee to
Owl Corporation representing their pro rata share of the cost of oversized portion of these lines;
and
WHEREAS, on February 7, 2011 the City Council approved an agreement with owl Corporation in which the
City agreed to extend the term of the developer's agreement with owl Corporation to thirty (30)
years; and
WHEREAS, the City of Kalispell recently amended two other developer agreements with latecomer terms to
extend to thirty years with the purpose of recognizing the reality that the capacity of the utility lines
may not be fully demanded before that time; and
WHEREAS, a significant portion of the master plan for development of Section 36 as well as the Starling
Subdivision planned for Section 35, also annexed into the city, remain to be developed and will be
served by this water main extension; and
WHEREAS, the Kalispell City Council therefore finds that it is appropriate and in the best interests of the City
that the developer's agreement with owl Corporation executed on August 1.0, 2005 be extended to
a total term of thirty (30) years.
Now THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of THE CITY OF KALISPELL AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute an agreement with Cowl Corporation
extending the term of the developer's agreement executed between. the parties on August
10, 2005 to thirty (30) years.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND SIGNED BY THE MAYOR of THE CITY of
KALISPELL, THIS 7TH DAY of MARCH, 2011.
Tamrni Fisher
Mayor
Theresa white
City Clerk
'6oX �
Vi9a� ..
Y,OL t 6pe� I . 1yVa3
{ iL A u 'y..,f 8,1� F yy� `T 7 ; r� � e�_: _ ti x'i i 2'^.. i ?4 t ,^,.. g....` 4 S
�.j f e.�.6 4.dr -.✓:� !'a diva c� e fvi°.-if'4 T l i �!
LATECOMERS AGREEMENT FOR REIMBURSEMENT FOR
MU ICI WATER TAR I� EWER SYSTEM EXTENSIONS
AGREEMENT, made this 10th day of august, 2005, between Cowl Corporation, a
Montana corporation ("'Developer"') and the City of Kalispell, situated in Flathead County,
Montana C'City").
WITNES SETH ■
RVVTTAT,R
Q A. The City owns and operates municipal water and sewer systems within and
adjacent to its City limits; and
B. Developer has constructed, under agreement with the City, extensions to said
water and sewer systems (collectively the "Extensions'), as more particularly depicted on
Exhibit .A. attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which Extensions are
capable of serving parcels now owned by the Developer and others; and
C. The Extensions are located within, the City's existing municipal water and surer
service area, and shall be subject to the City's public works standards for performance; and
D. The total project cost for design and construction of the Extensions amounted to
$939,079.74 as more specifically itemized on Exhibit ` B," attached hereto and incorporated
herein by this reference; and
E. The City and Developer desire and intend by this Agreement to provide for
collection of the fair pro rata share of the total project costs of the Extension from the owners of
the properties which benefit from the Extensions, but who did not contribute to the original cost
thereof.
E. The City has determined and Developer has agreed that the fair pro rata share of
the total project costs of the Extensions, to be collected from the owners of properties who tap
onto, connect to or use the Extensions, shall be based upon the equivalent dwelling units
C'EDU") associated with the expected use of the subject properties at the rates set forth in
Section S below.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements hereafter
set forth, it is agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows:
1. All of the recitals set forth above are adopted by the parties as material elements
of this Agreement.
2. Developer shall transfer title, free and clear of all encumbrances, to the
LATECOMER.s AGREEMENT P. I
. 4'
14
Extensions, by a bill of sale to be executed and delivered by Developer to the City. Developer
shall assign easement deed for utilities from State of Montana to Developer (hereinafter referred
to as easement), to be executed and delivered by Developer to the City. In the event that any lien
or other claim against the Extensions are asserted after conveyance to the City, Developer shall
defend and save harmless the City from loss on account thereof. In the event the City shall be
put to any expense in defense of such claim or otherwise, then the City shall have a lien against
any funds then or thereafter deposited with it pursuant to this Agreement.
3. Developer warrants that it is the owner in title absolute of the Extensions, that it
has neither permitted nor suffered any person or other entity to tap onto, connect to or use the
Extensions prior to the date of this Agreement, except the real property owned by Developer as
identified on. Exhibit "C," and as described in Section, s below.
4. The City agrees to accept the Extensions for ownership and maintenance as part
of its facility by acceptance of the bill of sale and assignment of easement if the utilities are
constructed in accordance to City of Kalispell Standards for Design and Construction, .April
1996. Further, the City agrees to collect from owners of properties who have not heretofore
contributed to the project costs of the Extensions, and who subsequently tap onto, connect to or
use the Extensions, a fee equal to the fair pro rata share of the total project costs as set forth in
Section 5 below ("Assessment Fees"). Such Assessment Fees shall not be collected by the City
with respect to the property by the Developer, as more particularly set forth on Exhibit "C," and
as described in Section 8 below.
5. The total project costs for the Extensions including costs eligible for
reimbursement under this .Agreement are as itemized on Exhibit "B." Said eligible portion of the
total project costs includes costs for design engineering, surveying, construction, construction
inspection and construction contract administration incurred and paid by Developer. The
essrnent Fees for each of the properties who subsequently tap onto, connect to or use the
:extensions shall be based upon the estimated equivalent dwelling units ("EDUs") associated
with such properties in the amounts set forth in Section. 5(a) and (b). The amounts set forth in
Sections 5(a) and (b) are based upon total capacity of 2,467 EDUs for the municipal water
system extension and 1,136 EDUs for the sewer system extension, with 127 EDUs for the
municipal water system extension and 127 EDUs for the sewer system extension being allocated
to the property owned by Developer as described on Exhibit "C," for which no Assessment Fee
shall be charged and for which Developer shall not be entitled to reimbursement pursuant to this
Agreement.
(a) The Assessment Fee for owners of properties who subsequently tap onto,
connect to or use the municipal water system extension shall be $1 d4.28 per EDU,
adjusted annually in accordance with Section 5(c) below. The maximum number of
EDUs for which Developer shall be entitled to reimbursement for the municipal water
system extension shall be 2,340 EDUs.
(b) The Assessment Fee for owners of properties who subsequently tap onto,
connect to or use the sewer system extension shall be $469.89 per EDU, adjusted
annually in accordance with Section 5(c) below. The maximum number of EDUs for
LATECOMERs AGUEMENT P. 2
which Developer shall be entitled to reimbursement for the sever system extension shall
be 1,009 EDUs.
(c) The per EDU Assessment Fees set forth in Sections 5 (a) and (b) above
shall be increased annually, over the prior year's Assessment Fee, on the first day of
January each year, based upon the ten (10) year United States Treasury Dote rate as of
the last day of the immediately preceding November, plus 1.5 %.
6. The EDUs for purposes of computing the Assessment F'ees to be collected
pursuant to this Agreement shall be determined by in accordance with Exhibit "D," attached
hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
7. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, the Assessment Fees
to be collected pursuant to this .Agreement shall not be collected with respect to property owned
by Developer as described on Exhibit "C," attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference.
8. � The City agrees not to allow any tapping into, connecting to or using of the
Extensions without the owners of properties to be benefited from said tapping or connecting
having first paid to the City the Assessment Fees and such other charges as set forth in Sections 4
and 5 above. D n*ng the term of this Agreement, the City shall not have the authority to waive
the Assessment Fees for tapping into, connecting to or using the Extensions, without the prior
written consent of Developer. To the extent that the City does waive any Assessment pees, the
City shall be responsible for payment to Developer of the Assessment Fees. that would have
otherwise been payable by the owner of such properties benefiting from tapping onto, connecting
to or using the :extensions.
9. The City shall pay to Developer the sums agreed by it to be collected pursuant to
the provisions of this .,agreement within sixty (60) days after receipt thereof at the address of
Developer as set forth hereinafter or at such other addresses as Developer shall provide to the
city.
10. In the event of the assignment or transfer of the rights of Developer voluntarily,
involuntarily or by operation of lair, the City shall pay all benefits accruing hereunder, after
notice, to such successor of Developer as the City, in its sole judgment, deems entitled to such
benefits; and in the event conflicting demands are made upon the City for benefits accruing
under this Agreement, the City may, at its option, commence an action in interpleader Joining
any party claiming rights under this contract, or other parties which the City believes to be
necessary or proper, and the City shall be discharged from, further liability upon paying the
person or persons whom any court having jurisdiction of such interpleader action shall
determine, and in such action the City shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorneys' fees
and cost, which fees and costs shall constitute a lien upon all funds accrued or accruing pursuant
to this Agreement.
11. Nothing contained herein shall be construed to affect or impair in any manner the
right of the City to regulate the use of its municipal water system or surer system, of which the
LATECOMERs AGREEMENT P. 3
a ^'1•" ' meµ•
w '.
Extensions shall become a part under the terms of this Agreement, pursuant to the provisions of
any ordinance, resolution or policy now or hereafter in effect. The imposition by the City of any
such requirement shall not be deemed an impairment of this Agreement though it may be
imposed in such a manner as to refuse service to an owner or owners of a parcel in the benefited
area in order to secure compliance with any such requirement of the City.
12. This Agreement shall become operative as of the date first written above, and
shall remain in full force and effect for a period of seventeen (17) years after the date first written
above, or until Developer, or its successors or assigns, shall have been fully reimbursed as
aforesaid, whichever event occurs earlier; provided, that in the event the Extensions, or any
portions thereof, shall during the term of this Agreement, be rendered useless by the redesign or
reconstruction of a portion of the Extension, or of the City's municipal water or surer systems,
then the City's obligation to collect for Developer the Assessment Pees provided pursuant to this
Agreement shall cease.
13. An administrative fee in addition to the per EDU assessment Fees described
previously in this Agreement will be assessed by the City of Kalispell, Montana.
14. No waiver, alteration or modification of any of the provisions of this Agreement
shall be binding unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of the City and
Developer.
15. All communications regarding this Agreement shall be sent to the parties at the
addresses listed below, unless notified to the contrary.
Owl Corporation
Mr. Mark Owens
500 P alm. er Drive
Kalispell, Montana 59901
City of Kalispell
Mr. James Patrick, City Manager
Po Box 1997
Kalispell, Montana 59903
16. All of the provisions, conditions, regulations and requirements of this Agreement
shall be binding upon the successors and assigns of Developer, as if they were specifically
mentioned herein.
17. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of
Montana, and jurisdiction of any resulting dispute shall be in Flathead County, Montana. The
p- e vailing party in any legal action arising from. this Agreement shall be entitled to all costs and
expenses, including attorneys' fees, expert witness fees or other witness fees and any such fees
and expenses incurred on appeal.
18. .any invalidity, in whole or in part, of any of the provisions of this Agreement
shall not affect the validity of any other of its provisions.
19. No term or provision herein shall be deemed waived and no breach excused mess
such waiver or consent shall be in writing and signed by the party claimed to have waived or
consented.
LA.TEComF,Rs AGREEMENT P. 4
r
p .. wr:
,mm
r
20. This Agreement, including its exhibits and all documents referenced herein,
constitutes the entire agreement between the City and Developer, and supersedes all proposals,
oral or written, between the parties on the subject.
IN WITNESS S WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the day and year
above written.
State of
County,s
S i"-anes� crr
if e- p
Sig ate .
r
r
� � s
■ R
y• i �
B
NOTARY BLOCS
5�
OWL CORPORATION,
.A MONTANA CORPORATION
BY:
[NAME]
. 4 TTLE
DATE 12005
CITY of KA.LISPELL, MONTANA
Exhibit A. -- serer and grater system extension drawing
Exhibit B --- breakdown of reimbursable costs
Exhibit C — legal description of West Vier Estates Subdivision
E�hibit D — EDU determination
. . .:. .....
LATECOMERs AoREEM ENT P. 5
I A saw! 4 9
m - Water and Sewer Main Drawing
20OG:125 2006125 Dqcs4s
WEST VIEW -Essrins
NEW -WATER"XUN AND
sANITARY, sEwER' MAIN -
NEW WATER VAIN NEW WATER IWN
DRIVE, -
7, Z.,."
7-'
7.
vI 7 a
N -SANITARY SEVER MAIN EW
A
J,
It P
FUTURE HIGH 2 SCHOOL PARCEL,
F,
NEW WATER M
jl�
It
v
FF
C.4-Furum WxS'*r'7-
J,
DRfM
w.F -CONNEM•Jlr
411
r?
91
ik
tt
ki
OM-
9 ANIT Y-SEWER N AR
IV
i�- �4=
V44144 WAIM
W/s— 1
EXHIBIT B
LATE COMERS AGREEMENT FOR REIMBURSEMENT
FOR WATER AND
SEWER SYSTEM EXTENSIONS
ACTIVITY
::[ WATER----
SEWER
TOTAL
Design Engineering
. .. .... ... ..... .... .....
$51,905-81
$62,451.60
. .. ........
$1147357.41
Construction
$335,973.51
$4041233-82
$740,207.33
Easements Costs
$12,392-00
$60,412.00
$72,804.00
Easement Fees
$50.00
$50.00
$100.00
MD Q Review Fees
$25-00
$25-00
$50.00
SWPPP Fees
$900.00
$900.00
$17800.00
Eby Surveying
$675.00
$675.00
$1,350.00
Sands ,Surveying
$31364.00
$5,047-00
$8,411.00 j
TOTAL COST
$405y285'@32
5339794.42
$93910 =.74
rq. ..
µ..
y� r�
A TRACT OF LAND, SITUATED, LYING AND BEING IN THE 'BEST HALF OF
THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 29 NORTH, RANGE
22 WEST, P.M.M., FLATHEAD COUNTY, MONTANA, AND MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS
BEGINNING at the southwest corner of the Southwest Quarter of Section 25, Township
29 Forth, Range 22 West, P.M.M., Flathead County, Montana, which is a found pin on
the centerline of a 60 foot counter road known as Stillwater Road; Thence along the west
boundary of said SW % and along said centerline No0°06'40" l" 1982.69 feet; Thence
Ieaving said merest boundary and said centerline N89°59' 11 "B 1327.96 feet to a set iron
pin on the east boundary of the Nest Half of Southwest Quarter of said Section 25;
Thence along said east boundary SOO'00'23"W 1985.86 feet to the southeast corner
thereof and the centerline of a 60 foot county road known as West Reserve Drive;
Thence along said centerline and along the south boundary of SW 4 N89°53'02"W
1323.89 feet to the point ofbegiming and containing 60.396 .ACRES. Subject to and
together with all appurtenant easements of record.
EXHIBIT
):r
COST PER EQUIVAILENT DWELLING UNIT (EDU) DETERMINATION
The purpose of this exhibit is to document the methodology used to determine the cost
per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) for reimbursement to Owl Corporation as
referenced in the Late Corners Agreement for Reimbursement for Municipal water and
Sever System Extensions between the Cowl Corporation and the City of Kalispell.
An equivalent dwelling unit is defined as a single family home. The water demand of an
EDU is defined as the maximum daily demand of a residential single family home. This
demand is calculated as follows:
Total people per home (EDU) = 2.31 (Ref. 2000 Census Data)
Average Day water Demand = 145 gallons per person per day (0. 10 gallons per person
per minute) (Ref City of Kalispell water, Wastewater, and Storm Drainage Facility Plan.,
January, 2002, Page 3 -6)
Average Day/Maximum Day Pealing Factor = 2.7 (Ref City of Kalispell water,
Wastewater, and Storm Drainage Facility Plan, January, 2002, Page 3--6)
Maximum Day Demand per EDU = (2.31 people/EDU)x(0.10 GPM/person)x(2.7)= 0.62
GPM per EDU
The Owl Corporation water main has been oversized in accordance with the City of
Kalispell dater, wastewater, and Storm. Drainage Facility Plan, January, 2002 in order to
serve fature growth in the area. Since capacity of a water main varies with. pressure (and
elevation), and since use of capacity is how reimbursement will be based, it is necessary
to establish a point on which capacity for the Late Confers Agreement will be based.
This point will be the entrance to West view Estates. It is important to note this flow
establishes the base point for the reimbursement to Owl Corporation. However, this flow
does not necessarily define the actual capacity of the water main as capacity may change
depending on the location along the water main (e.g. capacity is greater at lower
elevations).
Based on the design report for the Section 36 Water and Seger Extensions, the capacity
at west view Estates is 2,530 gallons per minute (GPM) at a residual pressure of 26.5
psi . It is assumed west View Estates and other developments in the area will require a
minimum fire flow of 1,040 GPM. Wherefore, the leftover domestic capacity of the main
is 1,530 GPM. The maximum number of EDU's that can be serviced with this capacity is
figured by dividing this capacity by the Maximum Day Demand per EDU, which gives a
total number 2,467 EDU's that can be served by this main. It should be noted that all
development in the area will benefit from the 1,000 GPM fire flow required by west
View Estates. Subtracting the 127 EDU's for the west View Estates Subdivision leaves a
total of 2,340 EDU's of leftover capacity in the main that are eligible for reimbursement
to Owl Corporation.
The maximum daily demand for the 127 lots in west View Estates is (127 EDU's) x
(0.62 GPM/EDU) = 79 GPM. Subtracting the fire flow and domestic demands for west
View leaves 1,451 GPI of additional capacity in .the water main not being used by west
View Estates. Dividing the leftover capacity by the total domestic capacity gives (1,451
GPM/ 1530 GPI[) equals 95%, which is the maximum percentage of reimbursement Owl
Corporation is entitled to.
Dividing the total project cost by the maximum number of EDU's the main can supply
results in a cost per EDU reimbursable to Owl Corporation. With a total project cost of
$405,285.32 and the total EDU's served of 21,467, the cost per EDU is $164.28. with the
total leftover EDU's of 2,340, the maximum amount of reimbursement to awl
Corporation will be (2,340 EDU's x $164.281EDU) = 384,415.20. for the year 2005.
Per Section 5.0 in the Late Conger's Agreement, the annual reimbursement fee will be
increased annually based on the U.S. Treasury Note Rate plus 1.5 %. The following table
summarizes the yearly reimbursement costs per EDU based on a Treasury Dote Rate of
4.5%, giving an annual interest rate of 6.0%:
'dearly Reimbursement Costs/EDU - Water
Year
Reimbursement Factor
Reimbursement Amount per EDU
1
1.00
$164.23
2
1.06
$174.14
3
1.12
$184.00
4
1.19
$ 95.50
5
1.25
$207.00
5
1.34
$220. 1 4
7
1.42
$233.28
3
1.50
$246.42
9
1.59
$25 1 .21
0
1.69
$27.64
11
1.79
$294.07
12
1.90
$312.14
13
2.0'
$330.21
14
2.13
$349.92
15
2.26
$37 .23
15
2.54
$417.28
7
2.69
$441.92
If a project with a fire flow requirement higher than the base fire flow of 1,000 GPM
were to connect to the main, the future development would benefit from this extra
capacity due to the oversized pipe. Therefore, there would have to be a payment for the
additional fire flow above and beyond the 1,000 GPM already supplied. This fire flow
cost would be figured by converting the extra demand to an equivalent number of
dwelling units. For example, if a new development were to need a fire flow of 1,500
GPM, the cost will be figured by converting the extra 500 GPM to the number of
dwelling units that will use 500 GPM. In this ease, this would be 500 GPM/ 0.62 GPM
per dwelling unit, which equals 806 dwelling units.
In the future, if another main from the City of Kalispell system is extended to connect to
this main creating a "looping system," the reimbursable costs to Owl Corporation will be
figured by an engineering analysis of the system in order to estimate the amount of flog
provided from the water main extended by the Owl Corporation. The impact per EDU to
this 14-inch main will be determined and will be reimbursed appropriately.
Ark
An equivalent dwelling unit for wastewater is also defined as a single family home. The
maximum wastewater flow per EDU will be defined as the peals hourly flow from a
residential single family home. This demand is calculated as follows:
Total people per home (EDU) = 2.31 (Ref. 2000 Census Data)
Average -Day Wastewater Demand = 100 gallons per person per day (0.07 gallons per
person per minute) (Ref. Montana Department of Environmental Quality)
Average-Day/Maximum Day Peaking Factor = 4.1 (Ref. Montana Department of
Environmental Quality, equation for peak hourly flow based on population)
Maximum Peak Hour Flow per EDU = (2.31 -people/EDU)x(0.07 GPMlperson)x(4.1)=
0.66 GPM/EDU-
The sewer main has been oversized in accordance with the City of Kalispell water,
Wastewater, and Storm Drainage Facility Plan, January, 2002 in order to serve future
growth in the area. Sewer Main reimbursement costs are much easier to figure since the
capacity of the sewer main is dependent only on pipe diatneter and slope. Based on the
slope and pipe diameter, the capacity of the sewer main is 750 GPM. Using a Maximum
Peals Dour flow of 0.66 GPM per EDU, the total number of EDU's that can be served is
1,136. Subtracting the 127 EDU's for west view Estates leaves a total of 1,009 EDU's
of leftover capacity reimbursable to Cowl Corporation.
The maximum peak flow Nest view Estates will have in the sewer plain will be (0.66
GPM/EDU x 127 EDP = 83.8 GPM. This leftover capacity is (750GPM -- 83.8 GPM)
666.2 GPM. Dividing the leftover capacity by the total capacity of the sewer main gives
(666.2 GPM/ 750 GPM) equals 89%, which is the percentage of reimbursement Owl
Corporation is entitled to.
Dividing the total project cost by the maximum number of EDU's the sewer main can
supply results in a cost per EDU reimbursable to Owl Corporation. with a total project
cost of 533,794.42 and the total EDU's served of 1.,136, the cost per EDT l is $469.89.
With the total leftover EDU's of 11009, the maximum amount of reimbursement to Owl
Corporation will be (1,009 EDT.U's x $469.89/EDU) = $474,119.01 for the year 2005.
Per Section 5.0 in the Late Corner's Agreement, the annual reimbursement fee will be
increased annually based on the U.S. 'Treasury Note Date plus 1. 5 %. The following table
summarizes the yearly reimbursement costs per EDU based on a Treasury Dote Rate of
4. 5 %, giving an annual interest rate of 6. 0% -.
Yearly Reimbursement Costs/EDU - Sewer
Year
Reimbursement Factor
Reimbursement Amount per EDU
1
1.00
$469.89
2
1.05
$498.08
3
1.12
$526.28
4
1.19
$559.1 7
5
1.26
$592.06
5
1.34
$629.65
7
1,42
$587.24
8
1.50
$704.83
1.59
$747.12
. .................9
10
1.59
$794.11
11
1.79
$841.10
12
1.90
$892.79
13
2.01
$944. 8
14
2.18
$1,000.86
15
2.25
$1,081.95
10
2.54
$1,193.52
17
2.59
$1,264.00
As with the water, if a project such as a commercial or industrial development were to
connect to the sewer, the reimbursement costs would be figured by taking the wastewater
flog and converting to an equivalent dwelling unit. For example, if a new industry were
to connect with an estimated peak hourly flow of 250 GPM, the number of ED` .r's would
be figured by dividing the flow by the flow per dwelling unit. For this example, the
number of EDU's would be (250 GPM)l(0.66 GPM per dwelling unit) which would equal
379 dwelling units.