2. Resolution 5504 - Annexation Request - Todd and Theresa CardinREPORT TO: Kalispell Mayor and City Council
FROM: Sean Conrad, Senior Planner
Jane Howington, City Manager
SUBJECT: Cardin - Annexation and Initial zoning of R-2 Residential
MEETING DATE: July S, 2011
BACKGROUND: The Kalispell City Planning Board met on June 14, 2011 and held a public
hearing to consider a request by Todd and Theresa Cardin to annex approximately 0.26 of an acre
into the City of Kalispell. The owners have requested R-2 Residential zoning on the property. The
0.26 acre project site is located on west side of South woodland Drive at the intersection of South
Woodland Drive and Quincy Loop. The property is currently vacant and can be described as Lot 4 of
Block 3, Greenacres Northwest as shown on Certificate of Survey #18774 located in the SE4 of
Section 17, Township 28 North, Range 21 west, P.M.M., Flathead County, Montana.
Kalispell Planning Department staff presented staff report #A-11-02 providing details of the
proposal and the evaluation. Staff reported that the proposed R-2 zoning district was compatible with
surrounding land uses and also consistent with the Kalispell Growth Policy which designated the area
as urban residential. Staff recommended the board consider recommending the council approve the
annexation request and initial zoning of R-2 based on findings in the staff report.
At the public hearing there was no public comment and the public hearing was closed. The board
briefly discussed the annexation request and recommended the city council consider approving the
request to annex and assign the R-2 zoning district on the property upon annexation. The vote was
unanimous.
RECOMMENDATION: A motion to approve the resolution annexing the property and a motion to
approve the first reading of the ordinance for initial zoning of R-2 Residential would be in order.
FISCAL EFFECTS: The cost of services analysis indicates that the annexation will generally be
revenue neutral or possibly slightly beneficial for the city. The standard cost of services figures are
based on an average residential piece of property on the outskirts of the city which will receive new
city services. However, it should be noted that the property to be annexed is already wholly
surrounded by the city. The property already has access to city parks, city police cars drive past the
front of the property and the property abuts South Woodland Drive a developed city street. The cost
of streets, parks and police have been removed from the cost of services analysis as these services are
already available to the site whether the property is annexed or not.
Report compiled: June 27, 2011
c: Theresa White, Kalispell City Clerk
Return to:
Kalispell City Clergy.
PO Box 1997
Kalispell, MT 59903
WHEREAS, the City of Kalispell has received a petition from Todd and Theresa Cardin, the
owners of property located on the merest side of South Woodland Drive at the
intersection of South 'woodland Drive and the southern lane of Quincy Loop,
requesting that the City of Kalispell annex the territory into the City; and
WHEREAS, the Kalispell Planning Department has made a report on the petitioner's Annexation
Request, #KA-11-02, dated June 7, 2011; and
WHEREAS, the Kalispell City Planning Board and Zoning Commission recommended that the
territory be zoned City R.-2, Residential, on approximately 11,325 square feet upon
annexation into the City of Kalispell; and
WHEREAS, the City of Kalispell desires to annex said property in accordance with Title 7,
Chapter 2, Part 46, Montana Code Annotated.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITE" COUNCIL OF THE CITY of
KALISPELL .AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. That all the real property as described on Exhibit "A" below be annexed to
the City of Kalispell and the boundary of the City is altered to so provide, and
shall be known as Cardin Addition No. 414.
SECTION I. Upon the effective date of this Resolution, the City Clerk is directed to make
and certify under the seal of the City, a copy of the record of these
proceedings as are entered on the minutes of the City Council and file said
documents with the Flathead County Clerk and Recorder.
From and after the date of filing of said documents as prepared by the City
Clerk, or on the effective date hereof, whichever shall occur later, said
annexed territory is part of the City of Kalispell and its citizens and property
shall be subject to all debts, lags and ordinances and regulations in force in
the City of Kalispell and shall be entitled to the sane privileges and benefits
as are other parts of the City.
SECTION III. The territory annexed by this Resolution shall be zoned in accordance with
the Kalispell zoning Ordinance.
SECTION Iy. This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon passage by the City
Council.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND SIGNED BY THE MAYOR OF THE
CITY OF KA.LISPELL, THIS STH DAY OF JULY, 2011.
ATTEST:
Theresa white
City Clerk
Ta mi Fisher
Mayor
EXHIBIT
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
The property is described as Lot 4 of Certificate of Survey No. 18774 in Section 17, Township 28
North, Range 21 west, P.M.M., Flathead County, Montana.
Cardin e a:
COST OF SERVICES ANALYSII
PROJECT DETAILS
Number : of dwelling units proposed to be annexed:
Estimated increase in population:
Average square foot per lot:
Assessed value per property:
1. COST OF SERVICES
Per capita costs based on increase in population:
2.2
Fire:
$158
Police:
$0
Administration:
$34
Solid Waste:
$0
Costs per dwelling unit or Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU):
I
Roads:
$0
Water:
$222
Sewer:
$138
Wastewater Treatment
$163
Stormwater:
$87
Parks:
$0
TOTAL ANTICIPATED COST OF SERVICE =
$812
2. ANTICIPATE® REVENUE GENERATED
Assessments based on average square foot per lot: 111000
Storm sewer assessment: $61
Street maintenance assessment: $ 134
Urban forestry assessment: $19
Light maintenance assessment: $33
Sewer and water hill: $44 7
3. TAX REVENUE
Taxable Market Value $200,000
Assessed value per property: $74, 000
Total assessed value: $74,000
Total taxable value: $2,087
Total additional revenue based on 170 mill levy: $355
TOTAL ESTIMATED TAX REVENUE = $355
4. IMPACT FETES
Sewer impact fee:
$21499
Water system impact fee:
$23213
Storrnwater impact fee
$111 2 1
Police impact fee
$41
Transportation impact fee
$352
Fire impact fee
$483
TOTAL ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE = $6,709
1
2.2
11,000
7, 000
5. TOTAL ANTICIPATED REVENUE GENERATED TO THE CITY (ITEMS 2 AND 3) $1,050
6. ONE TIME IMPACT FEE PAYMENT TO THE CITE' (ITEM 4) $6,709
7. NET REVENUE TO THE CITE' PER YEAR (ITEM 2 + ITEM 3 - ITEM 1) $239
PLANNING FOR THE FUTURE MO�T1M
June 27, 2011
Jane Howington, City Manager
City of Kalispell
201 First Avenue East
Kalispell, MT 59901
Re: Cardin - Annexation and Initial zoning of R-2 Residential
Dear Jane:
Planning Department
2011" Avenue East
Kalispell, MT 59901
Phone: (405) 758-7940
Fax: (406) 758-7739
www.katispell.com/planni*pg
The Kalispell City Planning Board met on June 14, 2011 and held a public hearing to consider a
request by Todd and Theresa Cardin to annex approximately 0.26 of an acre into the City of
Kalispell. The owners have requested R-2 Residential zoning on the property. The 0.26 acre project
site is located on west side of South woodland Drive at the intersection of South woodland Drive
and Quincy Loop. The property is currently vacant and can be described as Lot 4 of Block 3,
Greenacres Northwest as shown on Certificate of Survey #18774 located in the SE4 of Section 17,
Township 28 North, Range 21 west, P.M.M., Flathead County, Montana.
Sean Conrad, of the Kalispell Planning Department, presented staff report #A-11-02 providing
details of the proposal and the evaluation. He reported that the proposed R-2 zoning district was
compatible with surrounding land uses and also consistent with the Kalispell Growth Policy which
designated the area as urban residential. Staff recommended the board consider recommending the
council approve the annexation request and initial zoning of R-2 based on findings in the staff report.
At the public hearing there was no public comment and the public hearing was closed. The board
briefly discussed the annexation request and recommended the city council consider approving the
request to annex and assign the R-2 zoning district on the property upon annexation. The vote was
unanimous.
Please schedule this matter for the July 5, 2011 regular city council meeting. You may contact this
board or Sean Conrad at the Kalispell Planning Department if you have questions regarding this
matter.
Sincerely,
Kalispell City Planning Board
John Hinchey
President
Attachments.- Letter of transmittal
Staff Report #KA-11-02 and supporting documents
Draft minutes from the 611412011 planning board meeting
Petition to withdrawal from. Rural Fire District
Cost of Services Analysis
c wl Att: Theresa white, Kalispell City Clerk
c w/o Att: Todd and Theresa Cardin
8121 Highway 2 West
Kilas MT 59920
r kk-0 ' I Vz+:7 • • Z'
TFC12II11[l?4L0ONINi'' 01FR 2, UPON ANNEXAWN
STAFF- - #K411-2
A report to the Kalispell. a City Planning n i ri g Board and the Kalispell City Council regarding a
request to annex into the city limits with the initial zoning designation of R--2 upon
annexation. A public hearing has been scheduled before the Kalispell City Planning
Board for June 14, 2011 be ' g at 6:00 PM, to consider the annexation request
and the appropriate zoning for the property to be annexed. The planning board will
forward a recommendation to the Kalispell City Council for consideration.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
In April the planning board considered an annexation and initial zoning request for an
existing lot, lot 5 of Block 3, Greenacres Northwest. Lot 5 is approximately 11,325
square feet in size, is owned by Todd and Theresa Cardin and is located adjacent to
South woodland Drive. The Cardin's also owned several lots to the rear (rest) of Lot 5
but did not include them in the annexation request. The planning board recommended
annexation of lot 5 with the initial zoning of R-2 to the city council. The city council
annexed the property at their May meeting and zoned the property R-2 upon
annexation. The Cardins then began designing the home they intended to build on
the lot.
Upon submitting building plans to the city, the Cardins realized that the house design
was larger than just lot 5 would accommodate. Therefore, they are now requesting to
annex and consolidate Lot 4 which they also own with Lot 5 to mare one larger
building lot. The Cardin's are therefore now requesting annexation of lot 4 to permit
the consolidation of lots 4 and 5 and accommodate the location of their future home
on the property. Please note that the Cardins also own additional lots immediately
abutting and to the west of lots 4 and 5. They plan to develop an orchard with fruit
trees on the property and have no plans to annex this land into the city at this time.
This report evaluates the annexation request and the appropriate assignment of a City
zoning classification in accordance with Section 27.03.010(4) of the Kalispell zoning
Ordinance. This property will be annexed under the provisions of sections 7-2-4601
through 7-2-4610, M.C.A., Annexation by Petition.
A. Petitioner / Owner: Todd and Theresa Cardin
8121 Highway 2 west
Lila, MT 59920
B. Location and Legal Description of Property: The lot is located on the west side
of South woodland Drive at the intersection of South woodland Drive and the
southern lane of Quincy Loop. The 11,325 square foot lot can be legally
described as Lot 4 of Block 3, Greenacres Northwest, as shown on Certificate of
Survey 15774 located in the SE 1/4 of Section 17, Township 28 North, Range 21
]Vest P.M. M. , Flathead County, Montana.
Figure 1: View looking west at the property requesting annexation..
C. Existing Land Use and Zoning: The property proposed for annexation is located
within the Greenacres Northwest subdivision, a 29--lot subdivision platted in the
County in 1941. The annexation and initial zoning request is for an existing lot
approximately 11,325 square feet. The lot is currently undeveloped and the
property owners intend to consolidate this lot with Lot 5 to the east which was
previously annexed last month. They then plan to build one single family home
on the consolidated lots.
The current county zoning on the property is R-2, one Family Limited
Residential. This district is defined as "A district to provide for large -tract
residential development. These areas will typically be found in suburban areas,
generally served by either surer or crater lines." Permitted uses in this district
are generally limited to residential uses. The conditionally permitted uses allover
some non-residential uses but those are limited to churches, daycare centers,
bed and breakfasts, schools and golf courses. The minimum lot size requirement
of the County R-2 zoning district is 20,000 square feet.
D. Proposed Zoning: The proposed R-2, Residential, zone allows single-family
residences and has a minimum lot size requirement of 10,000 square feet and a
width of 70 feet. The proposed City R-2 district more closely reflects the existing
single family residential nature of the area and intended uses for the property.
E. Size: The area proposed for annexation and zoning contains approximately
11,325 square feet.
2
Adjacent Land Uses and Zoning: The South woodland area is primarily
developed with single --family residences.
North: Residential, County R-2
Nest: Residential, County R-2
South: Residential, City R-2
East: Residential, City R-2
G. General Land UseCharacter: The general land use character of this area can be
described as primarily single family residential. There is an existing mobile home
parr located approximately 1/4 mile southof the project site. However, the mobile
home park is the anomaly in an area otherwise built with detached single-family
homes.
H. Utilities and Public services: All available public services and facilities are
available to the property owner. water and surer main lines are located directly
in front of the property requesting annexation within the South. woodland Drive
right-of-way. If annexed, the owner would have to pay water and sewer impact
fees prior to connecting to the city's water and serer lines.
Seger: City surer main if annexed
water: City water main if annexed
Refuse: Contract Mauler
Electricity: Flathead Electric Cooperative
Telephone: CenturyL.ink
Schools: School District ##5, Kalispell
Fire: South. Kalispell Fire Department (currently) Kalispell Fire
Department if annexed
Police: Flathead County Sh.erriff Department (currently) Kalispell
Police Department if annexed
1.. Compliance with the growth polio :
Chapter 2 of the Kalispell Growth Policy discusses the issues with cyclical
growth the city has seen over the years. The chapter focuses on affordable
dousing, delivery of services, location of new development, redevelopment of the
existing urban core and quality of life issues. As part of the review of the
annexation request the following goals contained in chapter 2 are relevant to
this particular annexation. request. The goals are:
Implement a comprehensive, effective growth management program that
recognizes and upholds the general welfare of the community as well as
individual rights.
New urban and suburban development occurs in areas where public
water and sewer are available.
In addition to the two cited goals, the city council has recently adopted an
annexation policy with a corresponding reap as an addendum to the city's
growth policy document. The purpose of the annexation policy is to give the
planning board, the council and the development community direction when
property owners outside of the city limits are requesting municipal services and
3
annexation.. The property requesting annexation falls inside the annexation
boundaries for property owners to request direct annexation into the city.
Public grater and sewer main lines are located immediately east of the property
requesting annexation. The main lines are within the right-of-way for South
Woodland Drive. If annexed, the property would have access to connect with
the water and surer main lines provided the appropriate impact fees and
necessary permits are obtained from the city first.
2. Municipal Services:
As stated above water and sewer main lines are located east of the property.
These main lines are adequate to serve the future home on the property
requesting annexation. Fire hydrants are located on the west side of South
Woodland Drive. One hydrant is approximately 300 feet south of the project
site; the other hydrant is approximately 100 feet north. Given the close
proximity to existing services, annexation of the property will not overburden
the municipal services currently in. place.
11
Figure 2: Current city limits and existing city utilities in the area.
Cardin Proposed Annexation & City Utilities Location
Greenacres Subdivisions & Vicinity
(imagery from Flathead Basin Commission., September of 2009)
0
. Distance from current cif limits.
The property requesting annexation lies within an area which is wholly
surrounded by the city of Kalispell. . current city limits are abutting the south
and east sides of the property requesting annexation. The map in figure 2 also
provides an illustration of the current city limits in relation to the property
requesting annexation.
4, Cost of services;
Drake annexed to the city, full city services wiH be made available to the property
owner. Any necessary infrastructure associated with this development will be
required to be constructed in accordance with the City of Kalispell as Design and
Construction standards and any other development policies, regulations or
ordinances that may apply. when annexed, ed, the property owner wig. be
connecting to city water and sever serve ces prior to completing the home on the
property.
The attached cost of services analysis prepared for this property is based on a.
form that is used for all residential annexations for residential land up to one-
half acre. This form however has been modified specifically for those
annexations which involve wholly surrounded properties. The assumption here
is that because of the unique location of the property surrounded by the city,
many services are already being provided to or available to this property by the
city without the benefit of the wholly surrounded properties paying for then
Examples would be the abutting city street, South Woodland, which is already
maintained by the city, police protection from city police which already patrols
past this property as officers drive by in route to other areas in the city, access
to city parks which are developed for city residents in the area, etc,
Administration costs, fire protection, surer, storm suer and grater service were
included as these are considered new services. As always, please note that the
information can only be used as a general estimate of the anticipated cost of
services and revenue.
This cost of services analysis was re -done to reflect both Lot 5, which was
annexed last month, and lot 4 which is the basis of this report as both lots and
the proposed single family house make a single development unit. The attached
cost of services analysis for the combined lots and house shows that
approximately 1,050 will be generated per year from assessments and property
taxes.
To serge the property with water, sewer, and storm water as well as fire services
and general city administration the cost is estimated at approximately $812 per
year. Based on the estimated revenue paid to assessments and property taxes
this annexation will generate a net increase of 59 per year. This is only an
estimate. The 9 amount would help to pay for the services and impacts to
city infrastructure already being e penence by the city due to the wholly
surrounded location of this property.
In addition to the per year revenue generated by this annexation, there
will be a onetime payment of $6,709 for �i npact fees,
W,
TT
s INITLkL ZONING EVALUATION BASED ON STATUTORY CRITERIA
The statutory basis for reviewing a. change in zomn.g is set forth by 76 - - o ,
M.C.A. findings of fact for the zone change request are discussed relative to the
itemized cn'ter'a described by 7 -- 04, M.C.A. and Section . 9.0 0, Kalispell
Zoning ordinance.
1. Does the re nested zone coin 1 with the gEowth olio '�
The property is designated by the Kalispell Growth Policy future land use neap as
"Urban Residential" which anticipates residential development with a density of
between 3 to 12 dwelling units per acre. The proposed R-2 zoning designation
pernuts density within the range listed in the urban residential land use
designation.
. will the re nested zone have an effect on motorized and nonmotorized
transportation systems?,
The property is currently undeveloped. once annexed and zoned l - 3 one single
family home could be constructed on the property. This home could generate on
average 10 vehicle trips per day. The anticipated vehicle trips and construction
of a home associated with the requested R-2 zoning will not negatively imp act, the
road system in this area.
The KaEsp ell area Transportation Plan 006 Update) indicates that South
Woodland Drive is under capacity for the current volume of traffic that uses the
roadway. Additional traffic generated from the future single famidy hone will not
negatively impact South woodland Drive.
. Will the requested zone secure safe from fire panic, and other dan ers'?
Adequate access and pudic facilities are available to the site in the case of an
emergency. There are no features related to the property which would
cornprormse the safety of the pudic. All municipal services including police and
fire protection, water and suer service are available to the area..
4. will the requested zone romote the public health, safety and gtneral welfare?
The requested zoning classification will promote the Health and general welfare
by restricting land uses to those that would be compatible with the adjoin ' n.g
properties.
. will the reguested zonerovide for a.de ua.te light and ai.rP
Setback, height, and lot coverage standards for development occurring on this
site are established in the Kalispell Zoning Ordinance to insure adequate light
and air is provided.
6. will the requested zone prornote compatible urban growth?
The requested R-2 zoning district limits the property uses to primarily single
family homes. This zoning district maintains and is compatible with the
established land use pattern in this area which is primarily single family
residential.
V1
7. Will the reguested zone facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water,
s ewera e schools arks and other public requirements*.?
All public services and facilities are currently available or can be provided to the
property. Development should be encouraged in areas where these services are
avail able .
8. Does the re uested zone ave consideration to the articular suitability of the
property for, particular uses?
The proposed. -2 zoning district is consistent with the surrounding residential
zoning and land uses in the area. The R-2 zone also gives due consideration of
the suitability of this property for the permitted uses in the zoning district.
9. Does the re nested zone �ve reasonable con.sidearati.on to the character of the
district*.;)
The general character of the area is suburban scale residential development By
assigning the property with the R-2 zoning district the development of this
property will be consistent with the residential character of the neighborhood.
10. Will the reguested zone avoid undue concentration of pe"I-)
No significant increase in the number and concentration of people in the area will
likely result alter this land has been converted from a county residential zone to a
city residential zone. Beth the current county zoning and the proposed city
zoning of R-2 would pe=t a single family home on the property. Minimum lot
standards and use standards within the proposed. R-2 zomffig district avoid the
undue concentration of people at the time the property is further developed.
11. Will the proposed zone conserve the value of buildings?
Value of the buildings in the area will be conserved because the R-2 zoning will
promote compatible and like uses on this property as are faund on other
properties in the area.
12. Will the requested zone encourage the most a ro ria.te use of the land
throughout the municipality
Urban scale residential development should he encouraged In areas where
services and facilities are available. In this case water and suer lines are
located immediately vest of the property. The proposed zoning is consistent with
the groom policy future land use designation and is compatible with current
county zoning in the immediate area.
RECOMMNDATION
It is recornmended that the Kalispell city Pla=ng Board and Zoning Commission adopt
Staff Report #KA- 11-2 as findings of fact and reconunend to the Kalispell City Council
that the property be annexed. and the initial zoning for this property upon annexation be
- , Residential.
6
Planning Department
201 V Avenue Fast
Kalispell, MT 59901
Phone: (406) 758-7940
Fax: (406) 75 -7739
VV"%halts a 11.com/plApning
PETITION FOR A-NNEXATION AND MITIAL ZONWG
NAME OF APPLICANT:
MAIL ADDRESS : L) -2, e f;;2 +-
ITT/STA` E/ZIP: l� PHONE -
I TERES T IN PROPERTY: -7 �
Other Parties of Interest to he Notified:
PARTIES of INTEREST:
MAIL ADDRESS :
CITY/STATE/ZIP:
INTEREST ITS PROPERTY:
PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING,
Address of the property:
Legal Description: �
5, h7nnd" �r
9C-
PHONE:
(Lot and Bloch of Subdivision; Tract #
err It
(Section,. Township, Range) (Attach metes and hounds as Exhibit A)
Land in project (ac) ,
Current estimated market value D 0 at 50% build out
at 100% build out
Is there a Rural: Fire Department RSID or Bond on this property Yes
If yes remaining balance is
The present zoning of the above propel is:
The proposed zoning of the above property is. -
No
State the changed or changing conditions that make the proposed amendment necessary:
S�knf-'A A K�N-'
The signing of this application signifies that the foregoing information is true and accurate based upon the
best information available and further grants approval for Kalispell Planning staff to be present on the
property for routine inspection during the annexation process.
- t -- /5
-�
4
(Applicant) (Tate)
fq'�-rt;-
I eUMI tn:
Theresa White
Kalispell City Clerk
P.D. Box 1997
Kalispell, MT 59903)
PETITION TO ANNEX
AND
NOTICE OF WITHDR AVYVAL FROM RURAL FIRE DISTRICT
The undersigned hercinafter- referred to as Petitioners) respectfully petition the City Council of
the City of Kalispell T 01- annexatio rR of the real proper: y described below into the Chf of
Kalispell.
The Petition) er(s) requesting City of Ida l i sp el l annexation of the property{ described herein and
f uither described in Exhibit A hereby mutually agree with the City of Kalispell that i mm ed i ately
upon aruiexati on of the, land all City of Kalispell municipal services will b c provided to the
property described harein on substantially the same basis and in the same manner as such services
are prov Ided or made available to other properties within the rest of the m a ni ip al iq, .
Petitioner(s) hereby state that there is no need to prepare a Munie ipal Annexation Service Nall for
this annexation pursuant to Section 7-2-4610, M.C.A. since the parties are in agreement as to the
p -o zs i oz of municipal services to the proper�r requested to be annexed
The Petitioner(s) further here expres � an intent to have the property as herein described
withdrawn from the r r4�21� � f I lr �al ire I ist�-i ct u d er the provisions of Section
7-333-217, Montana Code Annot9tedx and that incorporated into this Petition to Annex is the
Notice req u.i rem ent pursuant to said ecti o n; and that upon proper adopti ors of an ordinance or
resolution of annexation by the City Council of the City{ of Kalispell, the property shall be
detracted from, said district.
In the event the, property is not immediately annexed. the Petitiolier(s) further agree(s) that this
covenant shall run to, with, and be binding upon the title of tk said real property, and shall be
binding upon our heirs, assigns, successors in interest, purchasers, and any and all subsequent
holders or owners of the above described property,
This City hereby agrees to allow Petitioners to connect and receive the utilities from the City of
I�.allspcll,
This City hereby agrees to al to r Petitioner(s) to connect and receive all available utilities from
the City of Kalispell excluding solid waste services. MCA 7- --47 6 prohibits the city frorn
providing solid waste services to this property for a minimum of 5 years from plate of annexation.
RCTI ac re l er Date
Peltiorre�•7er Date
NOTE You m u t attach Im Exhibl't A that provides q bonea fide legal desci-1 t~ion of
the pro er't3, to he a.n nexed.
STATE OF MONTANA
ss
Count/ of F l athcad Couny
On this f'* day of � } �before me. the wadersigned. a otan� Public for.
the" State, of Montana, l y orsmia a eared
l� � IMP
to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foreuo1 ict instrument and acknox4xledc;ed
to me that he/she executed th c same..
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have h ereL1a 1to set MV h alld a ad affixed m v N otary cal th e d ay aiid
ycai' in this certificate first above written, �
o ary - ublic, State of Mwitana
Printed Name
R(:,,-siding a
Mkt Comm
STATE OF MONTANA
S5
County of Flathead ou nt i
Fla
rt�
r-jo�,jb�nn at Montana
Oil this day of -� '� _._.... �a ,�_ _�.} before ine. the undersigned, a otar�� Puhiic for
the State of Montana, personally} appeared "� � _ �� knm� rn
to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and aGkno tledged
to me that lie/she executed the sane c.
IN WITNE WHEREOF,
I havel�e�•eu�xto set my hand a�� af�xed my Notary kcal the day and
year in this certificate first about writion.
btary Piab c� Stales of Montana
Printed Name
My Corrim is J Y � =1��`�� �� No f A RY Puy' I fo: the
SEAS Res' n-1 at 4 'I2f , �1� 3rti r l c"'.
}
2
Exhibit A
Todd &Theresa Cardin Annexation
Legal Description
The property is described as Lot 4 of Certificate of Survey No. 1877A in Section 17, Township ZS North,
Range 21 West, . I.K, Flathead County, Montana.
.�
7£$Ii' frl.fiQtrE�iR75
t 1
t
rJ N
ti I75
� j
s n
ry �f J ry
zrz.
z.
€ri
III{ .n
S.
a E6E6
539E Cb'r5 !fool LIP 5I'
•I��$ fA.C�i.9daEi�}•5
IR
Ni..•ril�,iliMl J'! W i 1214J
.n
]is
F
{JF
f
LE_
L4 rJ{iF N
4` i' 1�33i7:k
7S ~ rJ
7 ti
-N,
y
�f
ne � uti
2
N
1
�;
L
14
{�
1} �
Sj
i f ,M1�� 41 i� Fri-,• L�'1 'ti C�J
� K Elf v
� "�
j
4 }} � iyt� ,y ,
� � �
n
R
.!{n
p�.�rF
� .E••ti..
� �,
�
� 1
y
,rAyr
j x r �-
jti 4~i
;FEl
L
q
1 F~ •� ti ,� }
u
ekl a' y'
1 i
FO ;a ?4
re
�
V]
m h
crt � y
a LU �-• L CIS
4. �: LL
U rjfl w
�LU
V
AM
VAil
kimti n r f
APPLICANT: od Theresa Cardin
FILE N - I . - 02
- - : - - 1
Tract/Lot: Southerly 73.5 feet of Lot 4, Blk 3 GreenacresNorthwest
Property Owners/OwnerOwners/Owner Representative:
Todd & Theresa Cardin
1 Highway 2 West
Kiln, MT 59920
AND ATTACHED LIST
Todd & Theresa Cardin Kathryn Stevenson
8121 Highway 2 West 106 Quincy loop
ila, MT 59920 Kalispell, MT 59901.
LisaCarpenter-Jones
Heidi Jones eidi � Christopher v�'iegenstein
163 Quincy Loop �. �� Quincy Loop
5�
Kalispell} 59901
Kalispell, `� 59901
MT
Jeffrey l eer atz Daniel & Brandy White
1650 South Woodland Dr 110 Quincy Loop
Kalispell, MT 59901 Kalispell, MT 59901
Clinton Shirley Spurgeon William & Lois Mc laser
1602 Woodland Drive 1.09 River Glen Court
Kalispell, MT 59901 Kalispell, MT 59901
Janice Carter City of Kalispell
Bobby Parker Attn: City Clerk
18366 Bear Dane Lane P.O. Box 1997
Bigforka MT 5ID912 Kalispell, MT 5990
J ae Tithey
1231 South Main Street
Kalispell, MT 59901
hauna Cassity
Nadine Holt
Devra Kostelecky
168 u in cy loop
Kalispell, MT 59901
Jay Danielle Mooney
105 River Glen Court
Kalispell, MT 59901
F. Meer atz Rev Inter -Viva s Trust
1604 South Woodland Drive
Kalispell, MT 59901
PLANNING FOR THE FUTURE MOAT"A
Planning Department
201 1"Avenue East
Kalispell, MT 59901
Phone: (406) 758- 940
Fax: (406) 758-7739
'wWw.kalispe'll.com/planning
You are being sent this notice because you are a property owner within 150 feet of the proposed project noted below
and will be most directly affected by its development. You have an opportunity to present your comments and
concerns at the meeting noted below. You may contact this office at (406) 758-7940 for additional information or
visit our website at ww.kabspell.eomlplanning under "Planning Board Proiects". Written eon-unents may be
submitted to the Kalispell Planning Department at the above address prior to the date of the hearing, or email us at
pl annini� pia l ispl 1. 0111.
NOTICE of PUBLIC HEARING
I ALI P LL CITY PLANNING BOARD AND ZONING COMMISSION
TUNE 149 2011
The regular meeting of the Kalispell City Planning Board and Zoning Commission is scheduled
for Tuesday, June 14, 2011 beginnm" a at 6:00 PM M* the Kalispell City Council h.ambers,
Kalispell City Ball, 201 First Avenue Easy Kalispell. The plannm' g board will hold a public
hearing and take public comments on the following agenda item, The Board will make a
recommendation to the Kalispell City Council who will take final action.
1. A request from Todd and Thcresa Cardin to annex a 0.26 of an acre (11,325 square Feet)
lot and zone the land R-(Residential) upon annexation, The lot is located on the wcst
side of South Woodland Drive at the intersection of South woodland Drive and the
southern lane of Quincy Loop, The property is currently undeveloped. The 0.26 of an
acre site can be legally described as Lot 4 of B to ck 3, Green Acres Northwest, as shown
on Certificate of Survey 18774 located in the SE %4 of Section 17, Township 28 Nortk
Range 21 west.
:!NOTIOE PUBLIC"HEA, RING
;A-NNING
.K.rALISP�ELL.-.---"I C;,T��;Y-- -PiL
'ING
-ANE
BOARDI'."
ic-OMMISSION
.
.Th r,::...�,,;meetJng'z0f the
.
B 0 -city Pjanntp.9',, ard
andJ'-_-,,26'
U
qY1 n
uon
Lies.
2 b 661h.g fa g
h K ei I is p 6 11 City ty --i� Hall,
2Q1
`Xafispell.
,; nu
First�Ave e'East,.�
T -h
-:PWIiq'g
UMM .c.�hear
-a the., b to H O-W i n -9
n 6
e' " ha�.d All
i4'gea T'-" 0
0make Ja -�r.eopmmendafion':W:the
:,
ou -Mill
Malls 0 1 t.y :.Council ,
M.,
Jak i�
oj� tion�;'
Todd': an
M ues ro m rand an x -T, a;�, 6
TW6§a`,'Cardin" to,, n eO
!e 01 32 5 -,=;s q u a re i.e
6§ldantial) upon '-iannexation.
"T-tio-slot !:is �located -on.,Ahe!�west
'SDiAth--,�Woodland;-Drive'.-.Izit
:thy --intersection 'SoUth
_
-Moodland -Drive'., -.,-and- - 1he
CIP,
he..prop=:,currently
de
tt'
T
,up eve .0p, :_T e .
ie 6 f
legally
;�acre
S,
L6t 4
�Cq
'described,,--'
f:a ack r
"G re . e n �Ac res N o rt h West --.,,as
"S u r
-o -1,0 fti f i qaf6 ivey
zhown'�6 n-, - e
Y4 e SE 1. 'th, of
1�'87474 d coat ',in"
't i b n 17- T o w 2 8 --fl 6 il h
Sn - nship--`�
L
��the
'li ocurnen ts 119
,agen are: on
i p'e6fi t -Ahe.-.-Kalispell
ns on-- �a
,Rii nnino-.,,D,epattm.ent;-::,�201 "First
-Av6hoe. .,East, KAI i s p e I MT
_0
,a 1- and -a
d" re va flable .for
-;....d L]rin -:-'' :r L_- -. led'
g ular
c)ff ice' 'h 0 addition'
.iriformation' ,,,on _,".the',,apan da;Jter
on _,,opr,---,nwiebsite� at
ils
'WWW,kdfls -bom/pianning
.
iunder"Plannjr)g. - a
F"
3. tad
6, 6 -
_do
d'�l Wi- ".a
Ur''a, g'e
F,
�man i=4ma --:.views
hearin . g k' 11161 eir
-
I ,and _concerns--:� --known '4o 1he
-�qm Vrjttqn�.� Mant§ .7 rn ay
Board.".;.'i�
. I k :_.. _!_ -lispell
-t -e sKa
.be .'Subrnitted,-_Jd'.-.,,-,. .
lanning Depai�rnd.nt._-_ -at. , the
-above zddr'ess i o �-,-t e -date'
Of1he -hearing, -or -you .may call
-7940 br, �emall'
.Us,.aV (406) 68
..us at -planning- alispbl L-0,0M10?
-additional.;,
'..,Isl Thom as'R.-Jentz
5.
Thomas; R., Jentz
q
Plahningz."& BuildIR-g-lb4ve ior.
ay, 29,201
e. k
/'�FFf1__)AV1rT'(1')F
N 1")
I C) F '17 1-1L 'D A. f LV INIT Fi R. 11 i%. tl" F1' A
..j f, L L J
DA.1.L,Y' N;EVVSPAPER
PRIN"T"El") NO KJB 11,�� 11 f. N1.
I
COUNT'Y OF FLA r1l ... LE D� 'C.A Ll S PE'LL, I N-1 I .1 . 1. �"l
A I) VF'R k
7 T
Nj Ir .11 T� j y, py
rrn r
Of (vfiav `�9, 201 1. � I ER F 0 F 0 Ni 1' f-1 E I'D A T171
C`-1-1AR(_J'.PL._J) FOR, "11-11H
N N OT EX (_'E_'_� L*% 'i", FI E M I
(,j I �\j e� APr-r,N Y C(-, I "[L� I-1 k IJ RTE 1:A i .)A) E
A jr .E�' V1 fj T-1 Y TL' I()
F(AZ T FIE S A.[\/ A �, �r �Nl 6 6
SET 11N 7111H LSAfvf'.F. SIZE rT_'YPr_1_' A.,NFD PU'BL_-1SJ"E1)'
I �IME N(_IMBER OF lf�!SERTJUNS,
stlhscribeep and sworn to
Before n-tc this Nlay _3 1, 20 11
L, C,
� ,q (-) t <,1ryL V"uhlic fol. Olt-.. Suatc, of"Mont-i-L (I
N4V Co III III Is"Slion expircs 9/1 L!20C-1
CL
DOROTHY 1. GLENCROSS
N 0 1 A HY F1 J B L-1 % f o r It n e
S E_ A L
gate o Mon,err-
Residing a, Ka�jspoll, MonianL-
My Commission Expres
11. 292