Loading...
Carter-Burgess SOQConsultants in Engineering, Architecture, Planning and the Environment April 16, 1997 Mr. Clarence Krepps City Manager P.O. Box 1997 Kalispell, MT 59903 Reference: Statement of Qualifications Kalispell City Airport Airport Planning Study The Carter & Burgess team is pleased to submit this proposal to provide the City of Kalispell with consulting services for this project. Joining Carter & Burgess for this project is the Airport Technology and Planning Group, Inc. (AirTech) who have completed numerous projects of this type. Also joining Carter & Burgess is Carpenter -Dunlap Associates, Inc., a Kalispell based graphics and computer aided -drafting firm. The entire project team has worked together successfully on other similar projects. This proposal presents our team's experience on comparable projects, team organization, information concerning key professionals, and qualifications. Carter & Burgess is a leader in airport planning and design, having begun our aviation practice in the early 1940's. As a result, our team of experts in Missoula and across the country have the capabilities and experience necessary to provide aviation planning, design, construction administration, and development services. Our project team has extensive experience in numerous states and numerous airports across the country. In addition, the Carter & Burgess team has several key advantages. Among these are: ❑ Commitment of Key Personnel. The Missoula office is staffed with full-time planners, engineers, technical personnel, and support staff. Carter & Burgess is committed to providing the City of Kalispell with the same personalized service it provides all of its Montana clients. ❑ Commitment to Quality. Our commitment to quality includes not only the production of accurate and high quality products, but also our commitment to project schedules and budgets. ❑ Reputation. Carter & Burgess has a proven record of delivering quality service and products on schedule and within budget. Our approach to projects has been well received by numerous Montana clients. We encourage you to contact our references in this regard. We look forward to discussing our qualifications and approach. We are very interested in this project, and are committed to its successful completion. If you need additional information, please call me at (406) 721-1471. Sincereiv, CAR URGESS, INC. Michael F. o all, P.E. Associate Carter & Burgess, Inc. 113 West Front St eet, Suite 103 Missoula, Montana 59802 (40e) 721-1471 Fax (406) 542-7651 Statement of Qualifications Kalispell City Airport Airport Planning Study Fable of Contents 1. Introduction 2. Recent Experience 3. Reputation and Quality 4. Key Personnel 5. Project Team Qualifications 6. Current Workload 7. Project Control Ss FAA Familiarity 9. Public Participation Program 10. Potential issues Example Airport Layout Plans - Carter = Burgess Statement of Qualifications Kalispell City Airport Airport Planning Study I . Introduction Carter & Burgess, Inc. is pleased to submit this Statement of Qualifications for the proposed projects in association with the Airport Technology and Planning Group, Inc., (AirTech), a DBE firm and Carpenter -Dunlap Associates, Inc., also a DBE firm. Carter & Burgess is a leader in airport planning and design, having begun our aviation practice in the early 1940's. Asa result, our team of experts in Missoula and across the country have the capabilities and experience necessary to provide the planning, public participation techniques, and environmental services required foryour project. Personnel in Carter & Burgess' Missoula office have first hand familiaritywith the many issues ofgrowth facing the State ofMontana and the Kalispell area, in particular. This experience and local familiarity with day to day issues will be particularly important in the development ofviable Airport Planning and Environmental studies. C-Z Carter - Burgess Statement of- Qualifications Kalispell City Airport Airport Planning Study Carter & Burgess has over 50 years ofexperience in the planning and design of general aviation facilities, commercial aviation facilities, and military aviation facilities. A brief summary ofairport planning projects completed within the past five years includes: ❑ Ravalli County Airport, Hamilton, Montana Airport Master Plan and Environmental Assessment. ❑ Alliance Airport, Fort Worth, Texas Airport layout plan update and land use plan. ❑ Angelina County Airport, Lufkin, Texas Master plan preparation and Environmental Assessment for airfield and runway improvements. ❑ Arlington Municipal Airport, Arlington, Texas Airport Master Plan and Environmental Assessment for runway extension. ❑ Chennault Airport, Lake Charles, Louisiana Master plan for industrial airpark and Airport Layout Plan. ❑ Grande Prairie Municipal Airport, Grande Prairie, Texas Airport master plan and Environmental Assessment. ❑ Grayson County Airport, Denison, Texas Airport Master Plan and industrial airpark planning. T Carter -- Burgess ❑ Killeen Municipal Airport, Killeen, Texas Preparation ofEnvironmental Assessment for runway extension. ❑ Meacham Airport, Fort Worth, Texas Master plan and Environmental Assessment for airfield improvements. ❑ Meridian Municipal Airport, Meridian, Mississippi Preparation ofAirport Master Plan Update. ❑ Midland Regional Airport, Midland, Texas Development ofzoning ordinance, UST mitigation. ❑ Mineral Wells Airport, Mineral Wells, Texas Master Plan update. Statement of Qualifications Kalispell City Airport Airport Planning Study N Carter - Burgess Statement of Qualifications Kalispell City Airport Airport Planning Studv Experience RavalliCounty, MT - Arlington, TX Fort Myers, Page Field, FL FortWorth;Alliance,TX ., •�: + ' !' Fort Worth, Spinks, TX Gainesville, �'X _ � Gilmer, TX Grauderaitie, TX Greenville, TX - Lufldn, TX i' Carter = Burgess Statement of Qualifications Kalispell City Airport Airport Planning Study Experience Austin, TX Dallas -Fort Worth, TX Fort Worth, Meacham, TX Hoastoti;$ofiliy;TX , . 11 ., .. Intercontinental, TX . , Memphis, TN Midland, TX Orlando,FL I I I 1 Skagway,AK I I I I 1 • Del Rio -Laughlin AFT, TX 1 NASCeedF%1d�FL, - ChennaultAFB, LA MesaWilliamsAF$AZ WurtsmithAFB,MI Plattsbu AFS,NY Goodfellow AFB, TX Carter = Burgess Statement of Qualifications Kalispell City Airport Airport Planning Study Reputation Alist ofclient references from our recent similar projects including client name, contact, and phone number ofthe contact is included below. We believe our client references and references from FAA personnel will provide the most compelling assessment ofthe reputation ofCarter& Burgess. Current and Recent Airport and Environmental Planning Studies Client Name Contact Name Telephone Number Federal Aviation Administration John Styba (406) 449-5271 RavalliCountyPlanningOffice Tim Schwecke (406) 375-6229 Montana Department of-fransportation Joel Marshik (406) 444-7632 ChennaultlndustrialAirpark Max Jones (318) 491-9661 Mineral Wells Airport RichDeOtte (817) 336-5773 Um Carter 3 Burgess PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL Mr. Pat Sullivan Harrisburg International FAA Airports District Office Capital City, Summit, Barbara Fritsche 2nd Floor, Terminal Building Grand Canyon State, and Andrew Daniluk Capital City Airport DuBois -Jefferson County Pamela Keidel New Cumberland, PA 17070 Airport Master Plans Monica Geygan (717)782-4549 Mr. Bob Shaffer Airport Manager Airport Master Plan, Barbara Fritsche DuBois -Jefferson County Airport Economic Impact, and Andrew Daniluk P.O. Box 299 Passenger Facility Charge Monica Geygan Falls Creek, PA (814) 328-3511 Mr. Gene Lakin Airport Manager Westmoreland County Airport Land Use / Master Plan Study Barbara sche Route 981 and Terminal Plan Geygan Monica Geyg Latrobe, PA 15650 (412)539-8100 Mr. Mark Ryan Metropolitan Airports Commission Barbara Fritsche 6040 28th Avenue S. MAC Reliever Airport Consultant, Andrew Daniluk P.O. Box 11700 Master Plans, Environmental Scott Sanders St. Paul, MN 55450 Analysis, General Consulting Monica Geygan (612)726-8129 Mr. Don Bottemiller Chairman, Airport Committee Airport Site Location Study Andrew Daniluk Box 350 Environmental Assessment Barbara Fritsche Wadena, MN 56482 Scott Sanders (218) 631-2609 Mr. Larry Beebe Gallia-Meigs Regional Airport Authority 1479 State Route 160 Gallipolis, OH 45631 (614) 533-9074 Site Evaluation Study Master Plan Scott Sanders Pamela Keidel Ken Page Monica Geygan Mr. Mike Weddle City of Alliance Barbara Fritsche 470 E. Market St. Site Evaluation Study Monica Geygan Alliance, OH 44601 Master Plan Scott Sanders (330)829-2235 Ken Page Mr. Charles Hostetter Director, Bureau of Aviation Statewide Aviation System Plans, ch e Andrew D Barbara Fritsitsch aniluk Pennsylvania Dept. of Transportation Economic Impact, Pamela Keidel 208 Airport Drive Air Service, Mike Maynard Middletown, PA 17057 Properties Directory Ken Page (717) 948-3915 Statement of Qualifications Kalispell City Airport Airport Planning Study 4. Key Personnel Our project organization is shown on the following organizational chart. This project organization depicts the key personnel assigned for the leadership of each major work task. It is our philosophy to assign key personnel with the experience and expertise in specific areas for which they are best suited. The organizational chart also designates the connection and communication between the consultant team and the City of Kalispell. Following the organizational chart is resumes of key personnel. = Carter - Burgess THOMAS LOUIS MERTENS, P.E. Associate, Project Manager Carter & Burgess, Inc. Years of Experience: 21.9 Years with C&B: .5 Education M.S., Engineering Management (Minor Environmental Engineering), 1971 University of Missouri at Rolla B.S., Civil Engineering, 1968 University of Missouri at Rolla Professional Registration Registered Professional Engineer CO FL IL IN MO NV TN Professional Experience Mr. Mertens has more than 21 years of experience in aviation as a project director, project manager and airport engineer. As National Director of Aviation for Carter and Burgess, Mr. Mertens is responsible for management and supervision of projects throughout the country, as well as the marketing of aviation services. He has worked at numerous airports, including Denver International Airport, Las Vegas McCarren International Airport, New Austin Bergstrom Airport, Fort Worth Alliance, Houston Hobby, Orlando International and Philadelphia International Airport. Relevant project experience includes: THOMAS LOUIS MERTENS, P.E. Page 2 ® AMR Combs General Aviation Facilities, Denver, CO; Project Director. Management of staff providing design of sitework. ® Alliance Maintenance Base, Fort Worth, TX; Project Manager. Directed joint venture to provide project management services for this American Airlines project. Responsible for developing master plan, final program report and design standards and procedures manuals utilized as a basis for the development of all facilities. Managed the work of 12 design subconsultants and established clear project limits to identify a clear interface between the 12 separate projects. ® Denver International Airport Apron and Terminal Taxiways, Denver, CO; Project Director. Responsible for design and construction administration of the apron and terminal taxiways at the new airport. Managed design staff and seven subconsultants. Project included engineering design/construction services for six airfield paving and lighting construction packages. Responsible for design schedule and budget. Worked closely with Design Consultants and Resident Engineers responsible for site grading, utilities, five runway/taxiway systems, airside concourse and air cargo buildings. ® Greater Orlando Airport Runway 18R-36L Rehabilitation, Orlando, FL; Project Manager. Prepared project scope, schedule, and management plan for the design team and five subconsultants. Coordinated efforts of subconsultants during final design process. Provided quality assurance for the final design documents. ® Houston Hobby Taxiway Modification, Houston, TX; Project Manager. Established the budget and schedule for the design of the $23 million Airfield Improvement Project. Also established the budget and staffing for construction management. Provided management for construction. ® Indianapolis Airport Authority, Indianapolis, IN; Director, Planning and Engineering. Responsible for planning, design and construction of all airport authority capital improvement projects including a $20-million airfield reconstruction program, new aircraft fueling system and two major terminal renovation projects. ® Lambert -St. Louis International Airport, St. Louis, MO; Airport Engineer. Coordinated design and construction of major airport improvements including construction of a second level on the airside concourse building, overlay of main air carrier runway, new sanitary sewer to serve terminal and concourses, new hydrant fueling system to serve all airline gates and a major aircraft parking apron expansion. ® Las Vegas McCarran International Airport Terminal "D", Las Vegas, NV; Project Director. Responsible for the technical management of the Terminal "D" sitework design team. Responsibilities included preparation of detailed task plans and design schedules for this THOMAS LOUIS MERTENS, P.E. Page 3 project. Also coordinated the efforts of subconsultants providing electrical design and aircraft fueling system design. Coordinated interface issues with the Terminal "D" building design team. ® Nashville Metropolitan Airport Authority, Nashville, TN; Project Manager. Responsible for all planning and engineering projects at Nashville Metropolitan Airport and three reliever airports. Typical responsibilities included design of 50 new terminal facilities (utilizing consultants) and preparation of project budget. Managed the planning, design and construction of a new general aviation airport and a new carrier runway. ® New Austin Bergstrom Airport, Austin, TX; Project Director. Developed detailed Work Plan and Design Schedule for accomplishing design of $20 million Midfield Cross Taxiways on an accelerated basis. Also responsible for coordination with the Terminal Building Design Team for the design of the Terminal Apron plus other landside and airside elements. ® Orlando International Airport Fourth Runway Program, Orlando, FL; Project Manager. Provided the Greater Orlando Aviation Authority (GOAA) with Task Plans and estimates of manhours required for both the preliminary and final design phases of this project which formed the basis for contract negotiations with GOAA and subconsultants. Also responsible for subconsultant contract administration. ® Philadelphia International Airport, Philadelphia, PA; Project Director. Directed this airfield master plan update project, with responsibilities for preparing detailed task plan, manhour budget, airport layout plan and environmental assessment report. Developed detailed work plan and management plan, and prepared for the preliminary design and land acquisition phase, and prepared a preliminary report for the development of Runway 8-26 design. • United Airlines Support Facilities at Denver International Airport, Denver, CO; Project Director. Managed the staff providing design and construction administration of the site work. { Michael F. Worrall Project Manager, Civil Engineer Carter & Burgess, Inc. Years of Experience: 13.5 Years with C & B: 3.5 Education B.S., Civil Engineering, University of Colorado, 1983 Professional Registration Registered Professional Engineer 1989, CO, 26436 1994, MT, 11501 Organizations American Public Works Association Computer Program Fluency Fortran AutoCAD R12 Softdesk Civil Design Software WordPerfect Microsoft Word Lotus 1-2-3 Professional Experience Intergraph Microstation (V.5.0) GEOPAK Civil Design Software HEC-1 HEC-2 Microsoft Excel As project manager, Mr. Worrall is responsible for agency and public coordination, project control, project tracking and quality control. He has been involved in numerous civil and transportation projects including municipal, highway, site and drainage designs. His experience includes both design and field engineering. Relevant project experience includes: Aviation Ravalli County Airport, Planning Study, Hamilton, MT; Project Manager. Carter & Burgess is performing a planning study to identify future aviation demand, to identify capacities and demand, to make recommendations for development, and to assist in reaching decisions at the airport for the next 20 years. As part of this planning study, Carter & Burgess is preparing an Airport Layout Plan. Carter & Burgess is also identifying potential funding sources for infrastructure and improvements. Due to differing interests surrounding the airport, the project is controversial and Carter & Burgess is providing an aggressive public coordination effort to address public issues and concerns. P.E. Page 2 Highway / Roadway North Reserve Street Preliminary Design, Missoula County, MT (Montana Department of Transportation); Project Engineer. This project involves the widening of the existing two-lane urban arterial to a four -lane urban arterial. Mike's involvement included the preparation of an Environmental Assessment, Traffic Analysis, an Interchange Alternatives Analysis for the 1-90/Reserve Street Interchange, Signal Design, and Signing & Striping Plans. California Street Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge, Missoula, MT (City of Missoula Redevelopment Agency), Project Manager. An old bridge torn down in the mid- 1980's provided a connection across the Clark Fork River for pedestrians and bicyclists. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the old existing piers for use with a new bridge (an evaluation of alternative bridge types). The project involved public involvement, completion of a NEPA environmental document, and preliminary design. As project manager, Mike was responsible for the project progress, public involvement, alternatives analysis, and preliminary design. US 93, Somers to Ashley Creek, Preliminary & Final Design, Flathead County, MT (Montana Department of Transportation). Mike performed as Project Manager for the final design of 9.45 kilometers of US 93. This project involves the widening of the existing two-lane highway to a divided four -lane highway with a depressed median. As project manager, Mike is responsible for design, scheduling, project tracking, coordination, and public involvement. US 93, Stillwater River - North, Preliminary & Final Design, Flathead County, MT (Montana Department of Transportation). As Project Manager, Mike performed the final design of 9.4 kilometers of US 93 north of Kalispell, Montana. This project is a major widening of the existing two-lane highway to a divided four -lane highway with a depressed median. Mike was responsible for design, scheduling, project tracking, coordination, and public involvement. US 93, Somers to Whitefish Preliminary Design, Flathead County, MT (Montana Department of Transportation). As Project Manager, Mike directed work on the preliminary design of two segments of US 93 based on recommendations made in the Somers to Whitefish EIS. This project involved a unique design of a four -lane limited access highway with a depressed center median. Included in the design was a scenic turnout and a separated bikepath. Mike was responsible for the coordination and direction of this project which also included roadway design; bridge design; identification of right-of-way needs; and coordination of utility relocation. ® SH-550 Ouray County Line to Chipeta Road, CO; Project Manager. Mike performed preliminary and final design of widening and safety improvements for eight miles of rural highway in western Colorado, South of Montrose. The project involved numerous irrigation crossings and the replacement of two bridges. Michael F. Worrall, P.E. Page 3 ® SH-30 (Havana) Florida to First Avenue, Aurora, CO; Project Manager. Provided preliminary design for widening and rehabilitation of Havana Street to achieve six through travel lanes including street design, storm sewer design, traffic signal replacement, street lighting and modification to concrete box culvert. ® Riverdale Road Realignment, Thornton, CO; Project Manager. Provided preliminary and final design for realignment of Riverdale Road at 104th Avenue including new concrete box culvert across Grange Hall Creek and new traffic signal. ® SH-92 West of Scottsbluff, Scottsbluff, NE; Project Manager. Mike performed preliminary and final design of widening and safety improvements for seven miles of rural highway which involved numerous irrigation crossings including several concrete box culverts. ® I-25/38th Avenue/Fox Street Interchange, Denver, CO; Project Engineer. Performed preliminary and final design on the interchange on 1-25 at 38th Ave. and Fox St. which included construction of HOV lanes, collector distributor ramps "braided" with entrance/exit terminals and "flyover" ramp connecting with new 23rd Ave. viaduct. ® Littleton 1992 Street Rehabilitation, Littleton, CO; Project Manager. Provided design services for pavement, curb, gutter and sidewalk rehabilitation project for designated asphalt streets within the city. ® Perry Street Rehabilitation, Denver, CO; Project Manager. Provided design services for pavement, curb, gutter and sidewalk rehabilitation project for two miles of urban roadway. ® Winter Park Drive, Winter Park, CO; Project Engineer. Winter Park Drive is a key connection for the resort community of Winter Park, Colorado. It provides direct access from SH-40 to the Winter Park Ski area. Mike provided survey, design and construction engineering for 6,000 feet of roadway which included main entrances into Winter Park Ski Area from SH-40 and a river crossing over the Fraser River. ® Vasquez Road, Winter Park, CO; Project Engineer. Vasquez Road was an aging facility in the ski resort community of Winter Park, Colorado. Mike performed design, survey, and construction engineering for a major re -alignment and reconstruction of this roadway for the Town of Winter Park. ® Fir Drive, Winter Park, CO; Project Engineer. Fir Drive was a narrow winding road that was difficult for snowplows to negotiate. Mike worked on a design to reconstruct the residential road to improve access and mobility for snow plows. The project included 230 feet of retaining walls due to the steep terrain of the area. This project was performed for the town of Winter Park, Colorado. Michael F. VWorrall, P.E. Page 4 Transportation Planning I Environmental US 93, Somers to West of Whitefish EIS, Flathead County, MT (Federal Highway Administration); Project Engineer. Mike provided engineering assistance to the EIS project team on this controversial project. This project included consideration of bypass corridors around the cities of Kalispell and Whitefish; alternative cross - sections; access consolidation and right-of-way issues. Mike also provided coordination with the Montana Department of Transportation, technical support and assistance with extensive public involvement programs including coordination with numerous land owners in the corridor. North Main Street Improvement Project, Helena, MT (Montana Department of Transportation); Carter & Burgess Project Manager. Mike performed a re-evaluation of a 1981 Environmental Impact Statement for improvements to a 0.8-mile section of North Main Street in Helena, Montana. Mike lead several project work tasks including analysis of automobile traffic; bicycle and pedestrian traffic; business and residential access; signal warrants; alternative evaluation; Environmental Assessment; and public involvement. Maclay Bridge Site Selection Study, Missoula County, MT (Missoula County); Project Manager. As project manager, Mike lead the evaluation of alternative bridge locations, performed an Environmental Assessment, and performed preliminary roadway and bridge design for the replacement of Maclay Bridge on the west side of Missoula. This controversial project included an intensive public participation plan that provided for the success of the project. ® MDT Environmental Documents, Missoula District, MT (Montana Department of Transportation); Project Engineer. This project is a term contract to perform environmental assessment and documentation on numerous MDT projects. Provided technical assistance on the following environmental documents: — Carl Rey - Categorical Exclusion — Trout Creek West - Categorical Exclusion — Perma Canyon North - Categorical Exclusion — Foys Canyon Road - Environmental Assessment — Thompson Lakes Rest Area - Categorical Exclusion — Maxville-Drummond - Categorical Exclusion — Drummond - East & West - Categorical Exclusion — Drummond - North - Categorical Exclusion — Batavia Wetland Mitigation - Categorical Exclusion ANDREW HERMAN, JR. Senior Aviation Consultant Carter & Burgess, Inc. Education B.A., Economics & Geography, 1971 Kent State University, Ohio Continuing Education Airport Master Planning, 1977, FAA Academy Airport System Planning, 1977, FAA Academy Airport System Planning, 1991, University of California, Berkeley Airport Noise and Land Use Planning, 1992, Georgia Institute of Technology SIMMOD, 1995, American Airlines - Sabre Decision Technologies Professional Experience Mr. Herman has more than 24 years experience in all aspects of airport master planning including inventory, forecasts, demand/capacity analysis, facility requirements, airport plans, economic/financial analysis, and environmental analysis. He has participated in planning studies for large, medium, small, and non -hub airports and general aviation airports at more than 60 facilities throughout the United States. His relevant project experience includes: ® Ravalli County Airport, Hamilton, MT. Project Manager. Principal planner for the Airport Master Plan Update at this general aviation airport in the Bitterroot Valley. Responsible for the inventory, demand capacity and facility requirements, site assessment, airport plans, schedules, noise analysis, and financing for this study. ® Grand Prairie Municipal Airport, Grand Prairie, TX. Senior Planner. Prepared forecasts, facility requirements, and noise contours for the master plan for this Reliever airport. ® Butler County Airport, Butler, PA. Prepared the Airport Layout Plan Report Update for this General Aviation Reliever Airport. ® College Station, Easterwood Field Airport, College Station, TX. Senior Planner. Prepared majority of the master plan update for this non -hub commercial service airport serving College Station, Bryan, and Texas A&M University. ® Everett -Paine Field, WA. Participated in the development of the Airport Master Plan Update and prepared the Airport Layout Plan Update for this General Aviation Airport. ® Ketchikan International Airport, AK. Prepared the Airport Layout Plan for this Commercial Service Airport. ® Kitsap County Airport, Bremerton, WA. Prepared the Airport Layout Plan for this General Aviation Airport. ® Norfolk International Airport (ORF), VA; Project Manager. Prepared an Environmental Assessment for a new parallel runway at this Medium Hub Airport, prepared alternative airfield layouts to maximize airfield facilities, developed detailed noise analyses to assess recovery of all or part of the displaced threshold on the primary Runway 5-23. ® Greater Cincinnati International, OH. Prepared alternative gate development scenarios for Delta Airlines eventual establishment of Greater Cincinnati International as a hub facility. ® Fort Lauderdale -Hollywood International (FILL), Fl. Prepared technical studies for this medium hub airport including: an assessment of runway length requirements, the financial feasibility of developing a cogeneration facility; an assessment of tower line -of -sight adequacy for the new terminal building; an evaluation of a new flight kitchen proposed by Marriott Corporation; and its potential impacts on the FAA's remote transmitter receiver. ® John Wayne -Orange County Airport, Orange County, CA. Prepared an evaluation of Airport pricing policies of this Large Hub Airport, which entailed identifying pricing policies of similar size airports in Southern California, with recommendations for pricing changes at John Wayne Airport. ® Cleveland Hopkins International, OH. Prepared the Inventory element of the Master Plan Update for this Large Hub Airport including inventory surveys of airport tenants and preparation of the Airport Layout Plans. ® Portland International Jetport, Portland, ME. Project Manager. Participated in evaluation and development of terminal facility requirements for USAir and United Airlines at this Commercial Service Airport. ® Roanoke Regional Airport, Roanoke, VA. Project Manager. Prepared the ten year General Aviation Development Plan for this commercial service airport. Principal planner in preparation of the FAR Part 150 Study for this airport. ® Chennault Industrial Airpark, Lake Charles, LA. Senior Planner. Prepared forecasts, facility requirements, O&M budgeting, and recommended plan for airfield development at this former Air Force Base. ® Killeen Municipal Airport, Killeen, TX. Senior Planner. Prepared majority of the Environmental Assessment for this regional airline service airport serving the Fort Hood area. JEREMY W. KEENE, EIT Civil Engineer Carter & Burgess, Inc. Years of Experience: 3.5 Years with C & B: 3.0 Education B.S., Civil Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, 1993 Professional Registration Engineer in Training, 1994, CO Organizations American Society of Civil Engineers Montana Society of Engineers Professional Experience Mr. Keene has been involved with numerous transportation projects in Montana and Colorado. His experience includes public involvement and coordination; roadway design; wetland delineation and mitigation design; NEPA documentation; hydraulic and hydrologic analysis; traffic and noise analysis; surveying; cost estimating; construction administration and inspection. Relevant project experience includes: Aviation Ravalli County Airport, Planning Study, Hamilton, MT; Project Engineer. Carter & Burgess is performing a planning study to identify future aviation demand, to identify capacities and demand, to make recommendations for development, and to assist in reaching decisions at the airport for the next 20 years. As part of this planning study, Carter & Burgess is preparing an Airport Layout Plan. Carter & Burgess is also identifying potential funding sources for infrastructure and improvements. Due to differing interests surrounding the airport, the project is controversial and Carter & Burgess is providing an aggressive public coordination effort to address public issues and concerns. Jeremy W. Keene, EIT Page 2 Highway / Roadway ® North Reserve Street, Missoula, MT (Montana Department of Transportation); Project Engineer. Preliminary and Final Design of improvements to 5 km of North Reserve Street. Work on this project included Traffic and Intersection Analysis, GEOPAK Modeling, Water Quality Analysis, Landscape Design, and preparation of the Environmental Assessment. US 93, Somers to Ashley Creek, Final Design, Flathead County, MT (Montana Department of Transportation); Project Engineer. Final design of 9.45 kilometers (6 miles) of US 93 south of Kalispell, Montana. Responsibilities included design of geometrics, bikepath, scenic turnout, park-n-ride, frontage road, bridge layout, GEOPAK modeling, English to Metric conversion, landowner coordination, and public involvement. ® US 93, Stillwater River - North, Final Design, Flathead County, MT (Montana Department of Transportation); Project Engineer. Final design of 9.4 kilometers (6 miles) of US 93 north of Kalispell, Montana. Responsibilities included hydraulic design; review of geometrics; GEOPAK modeling; English to Metric conversion; landowner coordination; and public involvement. ® US 93, Somers to Whitefish Preliminary Design, Flathead County, MT (Montana Department of Transportation); Project Engineer. Preliminary design of two segments of US 93 based on recommendations made in the Somers to West of Whitefish EIS. Work included roadway and bridge design; right-of-way needs assessment; coordination of utility relocation; and public involvement. ® Denver International Airport Boulevard, Denver, CO; Intern. Provided services for construction of 3-mile section of 12-mile link between 1-70 and Denver International Airport including review of grading plans and earthwork quantities, review of shop drawings and response to contractor Request -For -Information. ® 32nd Street, Durango, CO; Intern. Provided improvements design to rural section of 32nd Street including widening existing shoulders to make bicycle lanes, adding curb and gutter, consolidation of driveway access and resigning/striping. Provided quantity take -off and final cost estimates. ® Colorado Boulevard 88th to Welby Road, Thornton, CO; Intern. Provided design for 5-lane urban arterial with pedestrian bikeways and crossings. Assisted with grading plans, earthwork quantities and cost estimating. Jeremy W. Keene, EIT Page 3 Environmental Lawrence Park Wetland Mitigation Project, Kalispell, MT (Montana Department of Transportation), Project Engineer. Design of a 2-acre wetland site for mitigation of impacts associated with the US 93 highway construction between Somers and Whitefish. This project was jointly sponsored by MDT and the City of Kalispell. Work performed included topographic survey and field data collection, 3D computer modeling, preparation of plans and specifications, and assistance with bid letting and construction administration. ® MDT Environmental Documents, Missoula District, MT (Montana Department of Transportation); Project Engineer. This project is a term contract to perform environmental assessment and documentation on numerous MDT projects. Provided wetland delineation, impacts analysis, wetland mitigation site evaluation, review of alignments, and design on the following environmental documents: — Maxville-Drummond - Environmental Assessment — Drummond -East & West - Categorical Exclusion — Drummond -North - Categorical Exclusion — Carl Rey - Categorical Exclusion — Trout Creek West - Categorical Exclusion — Perma Canyon North - Categorical Exclusion — Foys Canyon Road - Environmental Assessment — Thompson Lakes Rest Area - Categorical Exclusion ® North Main Street, Helena, MT; (Montana Department of Transportation), Project Engineer. Performed re-evaluation of 1981 EIS for improvements to 0.8 mile section of North Main Street involving analysis of automobile traffic; bicycle and pedestrian traffic; business and residential access; signal warrants; alternative evaluation; and public involvement. ® US 93, Somers to West of Whitefish EIS, Flathead County, MT; (Montana Department of Transportation), Project Engineer. Provided technical assistance to the EIS project team. This highly controversial project included consideration of bypass corridors; alternative cross -sections; access consolidation; land -use and right-of-way issues. ® Maclay Bridge Site Selection Study, Missoula County, MT; Project Engineer. Provided preliminary roadway and bridge design for the replacement of Maclay Bridge on the west side of Missoula. This project involved an intensive public participation program, evaluation of alternative bridge locations, and an environmental assessment. JEANETTE LOSTRACCO, AICP Associate, Project Manager, Environmental Planner Carter & Burgess, Inc. Years of Experience: 17 Years with C&B: 3 Education M.B.A., Business Administration, 1981 University of South Florida B.A., Geography, 1975 University of South Florida Professional Registration American Institute of Certified Planners 1984, United States of America Organizations American Institute of Planners American Planning Association National Association of Environmental Professionals Professional Experience Ms. Lostracco has management expertise in environmental/land use planning and analysis. Her multi -disciplinary background has been applied in field work, analysis, report preparation, project management and public involvement/information efforts. Relevant project experience includes: ® High -Speed Rail Demonstration Project, Seattle to Vancouver, Seattle, WA; Environmental Planner. Project included research of environmental issues and preparation of environmental analysis for adding AMTRAK service to a Burlington -Northern freight rail corridor. JEANETTE LOSTRACCO, AICP Page 2 ® Denver Southwest Corridor Major Investment Study, Denver, CO; Environmental Planner. Project included analysis of various transit modes including LRT, heavy rail, busways and bus lanes. Analyzed wildlife, threatened and endangered species and wetlands for the draft environmental impact statement. Major issue addressed was impact to historic structures, air quality, noise and parks. ® Alameda Redevelopment, Mexico City, DF, Mexico; Project Coordinator. Provided traffic and circulation analysis report for a 2,000,000-square foot, mixed -use project in the historic district of Mexico City. ® C-470 Extension/Alameda Interchange, Golden, CO; Environmental Planner. Prepared Environmental Assessment for the extension of C-470 into Golden and construction of an interchange at C-470 and Alameda. Major issues were noise, land use and visual resources. ® Chapultepec Tower, Mexico City, DF, Mexico; Project Coordinator. Provided traffic and circulation report for 50-story, 750,000-square foot office building in downtown Mexico City. ® Mexico City Centro Oeste Santa Fe Transportation Planning, Mexico City, DF, Mexico; Project Coordinator. Provided traffic study for a 6,000,000-square foot, mixed -use project on the western edge of Mexico City. ® Southeast Corridor Major Investment Study, Denver, CO; Environmental Planner. Project included analysis of various transit modes including LRT, heavy rail, busways and bus lanes. Responsible for all phases of the MIS, which includes improvements to 1-25 and 1-225 in the southeast portion of the metro Denver area. ® IH 410 Major Investment Study, San Antonio, TX. Environmental Planner. Project involved analysis of various transportation modes. Responsible for environmental analysis portions of this MIS. ® Broadway Viaduct Replacement, Denver, CO; Environmental Planner. Prepared Environmental Assessment for replacement of Broadway Viaduct. Major issues were historic bridges, historic archaeological properties, air quality and relocation. ® Burgess Junction -Dayton EA, Cheyenne, WY; Assistant Project Manager. Project included widening of scenic byway in Bighorn National Forest in northern Wyoming. JEANETTE LOSTRACCO, AICP Page 3 ® California Street Pedestrian Bridge, Missoula, MT; Environmental Planner. Prepared an Environmental Assessment for a pedestrian bridge. Major issues included water quality, visual resources and pedestrian safety. ® Carl Rey Wetland Mitigation, Ravalli County, MT; Project Manager. Prepared a Categorical Exclusion for a wetland mitigation project. A major issue was wetland delineation. ® Cody to Yellowstone Environmental Impact Statement, WY; Environmental Planner. Minor widening and occasional road on new location work for 27 miles between Cody and east entrance to Yellowstone National Park. Major issues: effect to wildlife, stream encroachment, visual impact, Section 4(f) effect and archaeological site effect. ® Drummond East-West, Granite and Powell Counties, MT; Project Manager. Provided a Categorical Exclusion for 12.3 miles of safety enhancement and truck weigh station expansions. Issues included wetlands. ® Drummond North, Granite County, MT; Project Manager. Provided a Categorical Exclusion for 2.0 miles of reconstruction to Secondary Road 271. Major issues included wetlands, archaeological resources and coordination with the Bureau of Land Management. ® East 128th Avenue Realignment Environmental Overview, Thornton, CO; Project Manager. Provided EO for realignment of a roadway. Issues addressed included: noise, wetlands and visual resources. ® Foy's Canyon Environmental Assessment, Kalispell, MT; Project Manager. Prepared Environmental Assessment for improvements to Foy's Canyon Road. Major issues included wetlands, floodplains and property values. ® Glenwood Springs North/South Alternative Route Environmental Assessment, Glenwood Springs, CO; Environmental Planner. Provided assessment of two alternate routes to SH-82 confronting such issues as noise, neighborhood, visual, property value and economic impacts. ® Kalispell Bypass Study, Kalispell, MT; Environmental Planner. Provided feasibility analysis and identification of environmental issues such as bypass alternatives around Kalispell, river and wetland impacts, park and state wildlife refuge impacts, noise, property value and other residential impacts. JEANETTE LOSTRACCO, AICP Page 4 ® Killeen Airport Environmental Assessment; Killeen, TX; Environmental Planner. Project included expansion of existing airport in south central Texas. Issues included noise and visual impacts. ® Lake Lewisville Bridge Study, Denton County, TX; Environmental Planner. Project included research of environmental issues for a new bridge over Lake Lewisville north of Dallas. ® Maclay Bridge, Missoula County, MT; Environmental Planner. Provided analysis of alternatives for the relocation of an existing bridge. Major environmental issues were impact to recreation uses, effects to fish and wildlife and air quality. ® Maxville-Drummond Environmental Assessment, Drummond, MT; Project Manager. Prepared a re-evaluation of an existing Environmental Assessment for the widening of 14.3 miles of Montana Highway 1. Major issues included wetlands, historic structures and hazardous materials. ® Montana DOT North Main Street, Helena, MT; Environmental Planner. Provided analysis of improvements to a one -mile segment of key principal arterial through downtown Helena. Major issues included pedestrian and bicycle access, land use and socioeconomic impacts, impacts to parks and historic sites and visual impacts. ® Parker/Arapahoe Road Interchange, Arapahoe County, CO; Environmental Planner. Provided Environmental Assessment for new interchange at Parker and Arapahoe Roads. Major issues included noise, residential relocations and visual resources. ® Perma Canyon North, Sanders County, MT; Project Manager. Prepared Categorical Exclusion for the widening of Secondary Highway 382. Major issues were wetlands, wildlife and coordination with tribal representatives. ® Poison Highway US 93 Environmental Impact Statement, Poison, MT; Project Manager. Developed several bypass alternatives, conducted community involvement program and prepared draft and final EISs. Major issues were economic impacts, land use impacts, wetlands, wildlife, parks and coordination with tribal representatives. ® Reserve Street Environmental Assessment, Missoula, MT. Environmental Planner. Responsible for the widening of Reserve Street. Major issues included air quality and noise analysis. JEANETTE LOSTRACCO, AICP Page 5 ® Southwest Water Project, Colorado Springs, CO; Project Manager. Provided Threatened & Endangered evaluation for construction of 10-mile water pipeline for Brown and Caldwell. Major issues included impact to the endangered Ute Ladies' Tresses Orchid. ® Thompson Lakes Rest Area, Lincoln County, MT; Project Manager. Prepared a Categorical Exclusion for a 10-acre rest area. Issues included hazardous materials. ® U.S. 93 (Somers to Whitefish), Flathead County, MT; Assistant Project Manager. Provided highway improvements including widening work and analysis of bypass alternative around Kalispell and Whitefish. Major environmental issues included impact of land use, visual, wetlands and air quality. ® West of Trout Creek, Sanders County, MT; Project Manager. Prepared a Categorical Exclusion for an 8.2-mile safety enhancement and overlay project. Major issues included wetlands and coordination with the Forest Service. ® Airport Area Gateway Plan Case Study, Denver, CO; Project Planner. Developed land use plans illustrating how developments could be designed to be oriented to transit, pedestrian and bicycles. JOE MURPHY Transportation Engineer Carter & Burgess, Inc. Years of Experience: 3.5 Education B.S., Civil Engineering, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, 1991 Professional Registration Engineer -in -Training, 1991, Montana Professional Experience Carter & Burgess: 1.0 Washington State Department of Transportation, Seattle, WA: 2 Years Other: 1.5 Years Mr. Murphy has been involved with numerous transportation projects in Montana and Washington. His experience includes public involvement and coordination; roadway design; traffic analysis; traffic signal design; roadway lighting design; hydraulic analysis; surveying; construction cost estimating; construction administration and inspection. Relevant Project Experience Includes: Aviation Ravalli County Airport, Planning Study, Hamilton, MT; Project Engineer. Carter & Burgess is performing a planning study to identify future aviation demand, to identify capacities and demand, to make recommendations for development, and to assist in reaching decisions at the airport for the next 20 years. As part of this planning study, Carter & Burgess is preparing an Airport Layout Plan. Carter & Burgess is also identifying potential funding sources for infrastructure and improvements. Due to differing interests surrounding the airport, the project is controversial and Carter & Burgess is providing an aggressive public coordination effort to address public issues and concerns. Highway / Roadway ® North Reserve Street Preliminary and Final Design, Missoula County, MT (Montana Department of Transportation); Project Engineer. This project involves the widening of 5 kilometers of the existing two-lane urban arterial to a four -lane urban arterial. Work includes public involvement assisting in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment; traffic data collection; signal warrant and traffic analysis; 1-90 z O ' • • ■. T • age 2 Interchange Alternatives Analysis; preparing final signal plans, specifications, and construction cost estimates for six intersections within the project limits; preparation of final signing and striping plans; retaining wall design; and design of stormwater runoff treatment facilities. US 93, Somers to Ashley Creek, Final Design, Flathead County, MT (Montana Department of Transportation); Project Engineer. This project involves the widening of 9.5 kilometers of a two-lane highway to a divided four -lane highway with a depressed median. Work includes design of roadway sections, final drainage and hydraulic design, lighting design for intersection and park-n-ride facilities; and construction cost estimates. US 93, Stillwater River - North, Final Design, Flathead County, MT (Montana Department of Transportation); Project Engineer. This project involves the widening of 7.6 kilometers of two-lane highway to a divided four -lane highway with a depressed median. Responsibilities include design of geometrics; GEOPAK modeling; English to Metric conversion; landowner coordination; and public involvement. California Street Bicycle/Pedestrian Bridge Study, Missoula, MT (City of Missoula Redevelopment Agency), Project Engineer. This Congestion Mitigation Air Quality project involved an Environmental Assessment and Preliminary Design for a bicycle/pedestrian bridge crossing of the Clark Fork River. Work included public involvement, an alternative site evaluation, HEC-2 water surface profile modeling, and scour analysis. Traffic Signal Design Joe has extensive Traffic Signal Design experience. He is familiar with current state-of- the-art signal control and detection hardware. Joe has designed and prepared plans, specifications, and construction cost estimates for fully actuated, multiple phase spanwire and mast arm signal systems. Projects include: • SR-516, Witte Road, King County, Washington, New spanwire. • SR-167, South 208th, City of Renton, Washington, Reconstruction -mast arm. • SR-99, South Holden Street, City of Seattle, Washington, Reconstruction -mast arm. • SR-202/SR-203, King County, Washington, New -mast arm. • SR-99, South 145th, City of Sea Tac, Washington, Reconstruction -mast arm. JOE MURPHY Page Lighting and Illumination Design Joe has experience with both low level and high mast lighting designs with both single- phase and three-phase electrical systems. Projects include: ® SR-167, South 212th, City of Renton, Washington, Full interchange lighting. ® SR-167/SR-405, City of Renton, Washington, Full interchange lighting. ® SR-167, South 208th, City of Kent, Washington, Full interchange lighting. ® SR-5/SR-518, City of Renton, Washington, Full interchange lighting. ® SR-99, 1st Avenue South, Seattle, Washington, Bridge lighting. ® SR-99, Washington Bridge, City of Seattle, Washington, Bridge lighting. EXPERIENCE Ms. Fritsche is a founding principal of AirTech. Ms. Fritsche began her career as an aviation consultant in 1974. Her expertise lies in the areas of airport master planning, system planning, airport site selection, and feasibility analyses. She has also supervised and participated in many statewide and individual airport air service and economic impact analyses. She has been instrumental in developing airport land use plans which have focused on more effective use of airport property to enhance revenue streams. She is responsible for all technical, coordination, and management elements. Ms. Fritsche has conducted more than 40 airport master plans for a variety of airports including commercial service, commuter, reliever, and general aviation facilities. She has also directed military master planning assignments and has integrated military needs into civilian planning studies. . Ms. Fritsche's system planning experience has been at both the statewide and regional levels. Many of the system plans Ms. Fritsche has directed have focused on, complex capacity issues in major metropolitan areas. These plans have resulted in detailed implementation/action plans that have identified feasible demand management strategies, with emphasis on developing effective reliever systems. These system plans have also included related elements such as economic impact and air service analyses. These elements provide sponsors with information that can be used for discussions with airlines and communities to enhance an airport's position in terms of additional service, or to relate to the public the importance of, and benefits from, an airport. Demonstrating and quantifying the economic contribution of an individual airport or an airport system is often critical to securing public and political support and financial commitment. Ms. Fritsche has developed comprehensive economic impactstudies which have included statewide survey efforts to quantify the benefit of the state's airport system. She has also assisted a number of states and individual communities in developing plans to improve scheduled commercial air service. These plans have included detailed modeling and route analysis to identify economically viable air service improvements. In the area of site selection/feasibility studies, Ms. Fritsche has developed and directed projects for both general aviation and air carrier airports. These studies have analyzed the need for new airports, as well as determined the site for development of new airports. Her experience in site selection/feasibility analyses is nationwide. Ms. Fritsche has also managed and directed several land use management studies for airports. These studies assist an airport in identifying excess airport properties and have even involved developing marketing strategies for the development of these properties. Ms. Fritsche has been a presenter at a number of national and state aviation conferences. She was a workshop leader at the 1991 and 1993 NASAO/FAA National Airport System Planning Symposium. She also has served as an instructor for an aviation management course at Northern Kentucky University. She appeared as a speaker on protecting air service at the AAAE National Conference in B oston (1995). She served as a moderator for a workshop on forecasting at the National FAA Management Conference held in Washington D.C. in July (1995) and as a speaker on community air service needs at the FAA Central Region Management Conference held in Kansas City in October 1995. EDUCATION • Bachelor of Science (Geography/Urban Planning), Miami University REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS Commercial Service Airport Master Plans • Asheville Regional Airport (NC) • Cincinnati/No. Kentucky Int'1 Airport (KY) • Dayton International Airport (OH) • Devils Lake Municipal Airport (ND) • DuBois -Jefferson County Airport (PA) • Edwin A. Link Field (NY) • Eugene Airport (OR) • Grand Forks International Airport (ND) • Great Falls International Airport (MT) • Harrisburg International Airport (PA) • Lancaster Airport (PA) • Medford -Jackson County Airport (OR) • Naples Municipal Airport (FL) • Westmoreland County Airport (PA) General Aviation Airport Master Plans • Capital City Airport (PA) • Grand Canyon State Airport (PA) • Lawrence County Airpark (OH) • Leesburg Municipal Airport (FL) • North Perry Airport (FL) • Palm Beach County Airport (FL) • Pompano Beach Air Park (FL) • Port Meadville Airport (PA) • Portsmouth Regional Airport (OH) • Rostraver Airport (PA) • Summit Airport (DE) Land Use/Marketing Plans • Port Columbus International Airport (OH) • Richmond International Airport (VA) • St. Croix - Alexander Hamilton Airport (USVI) • Westmoreland County Airport (PA) Statewide System Plans • Florida Department of Transportation (FL) • Georgia Department of Transportation (GA) • Maine Department of Transportation (ME) • North Dakota Aeronautics Commission (ND) • Oregon Aeronautics Division (OR) • South Dakota Department of Transportation (SD) • West Virginia Governor's Office of Economic Development (WV) Regional/Metropolitan System Plans • Lehigh Valley (PA) • Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities, Reliever Airports (MN) • Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority (NY) • Northeastern Ohio Areawide Coord. Agency (OH) • Pima Association of Governments (AZ) • Richmond Regional Planning Commission (VA) • Southwestern Pennsylvania Regional Planning Commission (PA) Economic Impact Studies • Asheville Regional Airport (NC) • Armstrong County Airport (PA) • Capital City Airport (PA) • Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (PA) • Commonwealth of Virginia (VA) • DuBois -Jefferson County Airport (PA) • Harrisburg International Airport (PA) • Maine Department of Transportation (ME) • Medford -Jackson County Airport (OR) • New Jersey Department of Transportation (NJ) • Norfolk International Airport (VA) • North Dakota Aeronautics Commission (ND) Site Selection/Feasibility Studies • Atlanta Regional Commission (GA) • City of Alliance (OH) • City of Bellefontaine (OH) • Carroll County -Tolson Field (OH) • Gallia-Meigs Regional Airport (OH) • Lebanon County Planning Commission (PA) • Metropolitan Airports Commission (MN) • Multi -County Regional Airport Task Force (FL) • North Palm Beach County Airport (FL) Air Service Studies • Altoona -Blair County Airport (PA) • Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (PA) • Durango -La Plata County (CO) • Erie International (PA) • Great Falls International (MT) • Harrisburg International Airport (PA) • Maine Department of Transportation (ME) • Montana Airport Management Association (MT) • North Dakota Aeronautics Commission (ND) • Oregon Aeronautics Division (OR) • South Dakota Department of Transportation (SD) • Vermont Agency of Transportation (VT) EXPERIENCE Ms. Keidel has been with AirTech since its inception in 1991. Before joining AirTech, Ms. Keidel was previously employed as an airport planning consultant for two years. Her assignments have primarily been focused in the areas of system planning, air service analyses, master planning, and environmental analyses. She conducts managerial, technical, and analytical aspects of the studies, as well as public and client coordination efforts. Ms. Keidel's system planning experience has been both on the statewide and regional levels. These plans have involved extensive analysis of the needs of the systems, including determining the number of airports required to have an effective air transportation network. This analysis examines projected activity, geographic coverage needs, the economic benefits of airports, operational capacity, and the ability of the airports to expand to meet landside and airside needs. As part of her system planning projects, she has prepared analyses for more than 300 airports. Most notable in the statewide system plans, Ms. Keidel was responsible for the development of a priority model. Ms. Keidel's master planning clients have ranged from small general aviation airports to commercial service airports. These master plans were developed using the traditional elements including inventory, forecasts, capacity/facility requirements, alternatives analysis, environmental overview, and financial feasibility. Several survey and public coordination efforts were also used to develop accurate, client - specific data for each master plan. In the area of environmental planning, Ms. Keidel has been involved in several large-scale Part 150 studies and environmental assessments. Her development of baseline land use and socioeconomic data were integral to the conclusions of these studies. Ms. Keidel also participated in public coordination efforts for each of these studies, conducting workshops and public hearings, as required. Ms. Keidel has the primary responsibility for conducting air service analyses at AirTech. She has completed air service studies on both the statewide and airport -specific levels. Her working knowledge of airline industry trends has been integral to the development of sound recommendations that have resulted in service implementation. Ms. Keidel uses AirTech's computerized air service model to analyze the financial feasibility of implementing changes in air service. As part of a study to determine the commercial air service and airport needs of the State of Georgia, Ms. Keidel prepared analyses to determine the true origination point for Georgia air passengers. The Georgia assignment also included a comprehensive forecasting effort for the eight commercial service and over 90 general aviation airports. Ms. Keidel has been working with the Oregon Department of Transportation since 1991, completing various elements of their Continuous Aviation System Plan, including an analysis of potential new commercial air service points, developing a comprehensive database of capital improvement projects, updating the financial plan element, preparing activity forecasts, and analyzing the requirements and roles of all 100 airports in the state. Ms. Keidel was the lead consultant for the 1989 Maine Aviation Systems Plan. Since the completion of this comprehensive study, she has managed three continuous planning programs for the State's aviation system. These programs have contained elements such as an analysis of the State's dependence on Boston - Logan International Airport, land use compatibility guidelines, an update of the 1989 Systems Plan, and an analysis of the air service needs between Maine and Canada. EDUCATION • Bachelor of Urban Administration, University of Cincinnati REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS Air Service Studies • Altoona -Blair County Airport (PA) • Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (PA) - Altoona -Blair County - Bradford - Chess Lamberton - DuBois -Jefferson - Erie - Harrisburg - Johnstown - Lancaster - Lehigh Valley - Reading - University Park - Westmoreland - Wilkes-Barre/Scranton - Williamsport • Colorado Legislative Council (CO) - Alamosa - Aspen - Cortez - Durango - Ft. Collins - Grand Junction - Gunnison - Montrose - Pueblo - Steamboat Springs - Telluride • Durango -La Plata County Airport (CO) • Erie International Airport (PA) • Georgia Department of Transportation (GA) - Albany - Athens - Augusta - Brunswick - Columbus - Macon - Savannah - Valdosta • Great Falls International Airport (MT) • Harrisburg International Airport (PA) • Maine Department of Transportation (ME) - Augusta - Bangor - Bar Harbor - Frenchville - Portland - Presque Isle - Rockland • Minneapolis - St. Paul International Airport (MN) • Montana Airport Management Association (MT) - Billings - Bozeman - Butte - Great Falls - Helena - Kalispell - Missoula • North Dakota Aeronautics Commission (ND) - Bismarck - Devils Lake - Dickinson - Fargo - Grand Forks - Jamestown - Minot - Williston • Oregon Aeronautics Section (OR) - Eugene - Medford - North Bend - Pendleton - Redmond - Salem • Panama City - Bay County International (FL) • Vermont Agency of Transportation (VT) Airport Master Plans • Akron -Canton Regional Airport (OH) • Aspen-Pitkin County Airport (CO) • City of Bellefontaine (OH) • Capital City Airport (PA) • Cheyenne Airport (WY) • Grand Canyon State Airport (PA) • Highland County Airport (OH) • Rogue Valley International -Medford Airport (OR) • Pompano Beach Air Park (FL) • Union County Airport (OH) System Plans • Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (PA) • Georgia Department of Transportation (GA) • Maine Department of Transportation (ME) • Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities, Reliever Airports (MN) • North Dakota Aeronautics Commission (ND) • Pima Association of Governments (AZ) • Oregon Aeronautics Section (OR) Economic Impact Studies • Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (PA) • Maine Department of Transportation (ME) • Oregon Aeronautics Section (OR) Land Use Planning • Maine Department of Transportation (ME) • Oregon Aeronautics Section (OR) Environmental Studies • City of Bellefontaine (OH) • Cincinnati/Northem Kentucky Int'1 Airport (KY) • La Cholla Airpark (AZ) • Mansfield Lahm Municipal Airport (OH) • Nashville International Airport (TN) • Willmar Municipal Airport (MN) Site Selection/Feasibility Studies • City of Bellefontaine (OH) • Gallia and Meigs Counties (OH) EXPERIENCE Mr. Page joined AirTech in 1994. Prior to joining AirTech he was employed as a commercial pilot. Mr. Page was employed by Pan American Airlines prior to their dissolution. Mr. Page's flying experience includes airline, charter, flight instruction, and air tours. Mr. Page currently holds a commercial pilot license with instrument privileges for multi -engine land, single - engine land, and single -engine sea class aircraft. As a college instructor, Mr. Page has taught numerous courses in instrument flight, specializing in areas concerning instrument approaches, airspace, and instrument navigation. In addition, Mr. Page is qualified to provide flight instruction for all phases of flight training. Mr. Page has over 1,500 hours of flight time and is qualified to pilot a wide range of general aviation and commercial aircraft. Aside from his flying experience, Mr. Page also has experience managing a private general aviation airport. In this role, he reopened an airport located in a southern New Jersey resort area. Mr. Page developed the airport into a facility that supported over thirty based fixed wing aircraft, two helicopters, a sightseeing operation, and a flight school. The airport also supported numerous transient flights. While serving as Airport Manager, Mr. Page functioned as the airport's Fixed Base Operator (FBO). He was responsible for scheduling all airport maintenance activities and for insuring that the airport was in compliance with FAA standards. This position afforded him the opportunity to deal directly with Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requirements on fuel tanks. He also served as an interface between the airport, local politicians, and the general public related to noise issues. As an aviation consultant, Mr. Page has specialized in the design of instrument approaches. In addition, Mr. Page has developed a manager's handbook for the operation of small -to medium- sized airports. He has assisted in the development of environmental assessments, system plans, air carrier and general aviation master plans, and economic impact studies. Mr. Page was selected to the United States Air Force Officer Training Program, Blue Key National Honor Society, and is a member of Tau Kappa Epsilon (a national fraternity). For both the Colorado Legislative Council and the Lynchburg Regional Airport, Mr. Page has developed, administered, and analyzed passenger surveys. For the Colorado Legislative Council's Intrastate Air Service Study, surveys were administered at 11 airports throughout the State. The Lynchburg Regional Airport Market Study's survey was administered for two, one- weekperiods. The passenger surveys have been used to gather data necessary to form the basis of evaluation for these two studies. EDUCATION • Bachelor of Science in Aviation Management and Flight Technology, Florida Institute of Technology • Tulane University, 1984-86 REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS Air Carrier Airport Master Plans • Cheyenne Airport (WY) • Akron -Canton Regional Airport (OH) General Aviation Airport Master Plans • Greene County -Lewis A. Jackson Regional (OH) • City of Alliance (New) (OH) • City of Bellefontaine (New) (OH) • Gallia-Meigs Regional Airport (New) (OH) • Pompano Beach Airpark (FL) Environmental Studies • Brainerd -Crow Wing County (MN) • Greene County -Lewis A. Jackson Regional (OH) • City of Bellefontaine (New) (OH) • Akron -Canton Regionaf Airport (OH) Economic Impact Studies • Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Bureau of Aviation (PA) • New Jersey Dept. of Transportation (NJ) System Plans Special Studies • North Dakota Aeronautics Commission (ND) • North Dakota Airport Managers Handbook (ND) • Oregon Aeronautics Section (OR) • North Dakota Airspace and Land Use Analysis (ND) • Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Bureau of • New Jersey Industrial Properties Guide (NJ) Aviation (PA) • Lynchburg Regional Airport Market Study (VA) • New Jersey Dept. of Transportation (NJ) Air Service • Colorado Legislative Council (CO) Statement of Qualifications Kalispell City Airport Airport Planning Study S . Project Team Qualtions Qualifications and Experience Carter & Burgess is an established and recognized aviation planning and design firm, with a regional office in Denver, Colorado and a local office in Missoula, Montana. Our Missoula office is staffed with seven people, comprised ofengineers, technicians, and planners. Our Denver office consists ofapproximately 50 professionals and support personnel who have been serving the surrounding region, including the state ofMontana, for more than 15 years. This office is staffed with planners, engineers, and technical support personnel who have achieved a high degree of experience throughout the region. Thefirm provides professional aviation and environmental consulting servicesthrough our Denver office and a full range oftransportation, environmental, and design services. The firm is currently involved in airport planning and/or engineering services for airports throughout the western states and the Rocky Mountain area. T Carter x Burgess Statement of Qualifications Kalispell City Airport Airport Planning Study Carter& Burgess provides a complete range of airport expertise to its clients from the conceptual planning phase to the management ofactual project implementation. Carter & Burgess' experience includes: Airport Planning ❑ Master Planning: Pursuant to FAA Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5070-6A, and FAA Order 5100.3 8. A master plan depicting the long-term development ofan airport graphically with supporting narrative. ❑ Environmental Assessments: As required by FAA Order 5050.4A, the environmental feasibility ofproposed airport development. ❑ Economic Impact Assessments: These studies evaluate the economic benefit that an airport provides its community and are based on Report No. DOT/FAA/PP/87-1. ❑ Site Selection Studies: Studies are performed to refine the alternatives recommended during the master planning ofan existing airport, or that arise from needs identified in regional studies. Requirements are also specified in FAA Order 5050.4A. ❑ Part 150 Noise Studies: Plans for identifying and mitigating airport noise impacts as described in AC 150/5020-1 are developed. ❑ Industrial Airpark Development and Marketing Plans: Action plans for sponsors to use in attracting commercial tenants to their facilities are developed based on AC 150/5070-3 and other sources. ❑ Airspace Planning: Our aviation planners and designers are well -versed in the analytical techniques required for these specialized studies. Mapping ofairspace systems includes FAR Part 77 Surfaces, approach/departure routing, low and high airways, VFR corridors and reporting points, military training routes and restricted - use areas, NAVAIDS and intersections. Evaluation ofAir Traffic Demands on Airspace involves loading IFR and VFR demand volumes into the route segments to determine IFR and VFR peak demand characteristics, utilization characteristics, ARTCC and ATCT capabilities, and the relationship between Special -Use and Civil - Use airspace. Assessment of the capacity ofairspace systems determines airport - specific conditions for approach/departure control, vectoring, transitional airspace and VFR/IFRenroute segments. CTI Carter.. Burgess Statement of Qualifications Kalispell City Airport Airport Planning Study ❑ Airport Terminal Scope Studies: These studies consist ofexamining existing facilities, establishing a construction budget for making the necessary alterations, and creating the construction documents. — Transit planning — Landscape architecture — Site design — Community comprehensive transportation plans — Noise and air quality modeling — Traffic studies — Land use/transportation interface studies ❑ Project Types — Airports — City streets — Bridges — Highways — Light rail systems — Bus maintenance facilities — Major interstate interchanges — Beltways or bypasses — Land development (Chrysler Technology Project) NEPA Compliance Carter & Burgess staffhas extensive experience in preparation ofenvironmental assessments, impact statements and overviews for majorpublic works projects, as required by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Our NEPA documents cover abroad range ofimpacts, including visual, land use, socioeconomic, water quality, historic and archaeological resources, fish and wildlife resources, noise, air quality and wetlands. C Carter = Burgess Statement of Qualifications Kalispell City Airport Airport Planning Study We have expertise in the following areas: — Section 4(f)/16(f) which relates to impacts to recreation and historic properties. — Section 106 ofthe National Historic Preservation Act which relates to properties on or eligible for inclusion on the National register ofHistoric Places. — Section 404 and 401 ofthe Clean Water Act which relates to wetland and floodplain resources, including wetland delineation, mitigation design, and construction monitoring ofnew wetlands. — Noise analysis and modeling for airport and highway projects. — Air quality modeling for airport and highway/interchange projects. — Section 7 ofthe Threatened and Endangered Species Act. Environmental Permitting and Approvals C&B assisted many clients to secure permits and agency approvals for their development projects. We are skilled at agency negotiations and understand the technical requirements ofpermit processes. Our experience includes preparation of applications for permits and approvals such as: — Section 404 and 401 permits. We have provided wetland inventories, impact assessment and development ofmitigation plans to support applications for Section 404 and 401 permits. — 124 permits as required by the Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks in situations where fish and wildlife impacts may occur adjacent to rivers and streams. We provide information to assist clients in obtaining these permits. — Rezoning/Public Utility District applications have been prepared for highly controversial projects. Our staffis familiar with requirements oflocal jurisdictions and skilled at presenting the merits ofprojects so that rezoning applications get approved. Carter =Burgess Statement of Qualifications Kalispell City Airport Airport Planning Study Airport Design and Engineering Carter & Burgess' civil engineering group, using our Computer -Aided Design and Drafting (CADD) system, provides these services: ❑ Surveying: Combining the technology advantage of such sophisticated equipment as the Theomat Wild T-2000 thoedolite with our Intergraph VAX 11 /780 CADD system allows Carter & Burgess to provide services such as: — Boundary, topographic and route surveying — Platting and mapping — Land Acquisition — Title searches, legal descriptions — Engineering, design, and as -built surveying — Construction layout ❑ Site Development Engineering. Carter & Burgess performs a full range of site engineering services beginning with the site selection analysis and progressing through design to construction observation. Products include development feasibilities, cost estimates, zoning requirements, right-of-way needs, unique site requirements (drainage, topography, slope stability), and coordination with all appropriate permitting and funding agencies. These services include detailed plans for: ❑ Water storage and distribution ❑ Other Airport Engineering Services (Based on design criteria established in FAA - AC 150/5300-13): — Airfield design — Terminal design, renovation plans — Airfield and apron signing and lighting design — Hangarand maintenance facility design — Pavement design: aprons, runways, taxiways and parking lots — Drainage systems — Fuel farms and fueling systems Carter = Burgess Statement of Qualifications Kalispell City Airport Airport Planning Study — Sewer and water treatment systems — Hazardous waste disposal systems — Bridges and tunnels — Air and ground traffic control towers, including line -of -sight studies — Access road design — Parks and recreation planning and design — Industrial airpark design — Aircraft simulator design — Construction field representation — PavementDesign — Airfield Electrical Design — Navaid Installation/Relocation — Paving, drainage, utility coordination — Platting — Grading — Sanitary sewer — Floodplain reclamation CRZ Carter.. Burgess Statement of Qualifications Kalispell City Airport Airport Planning Study Computer Aided Drafting at Design (CADD) Carter & Burgess, Inc. was one ofthe first engineering, planning and surveying firms to install a CADD system. The firm uses CADD to optimize productivity, improve quality, respond rapidly to our client's needs and provide a more useful product for the client. Our primary system is a network ofPC-based workstations, using both AutoCADD and MicroStation. Engineers, planners, surveyors, designers and techni- cians, from each ofthefirm's engineering, planning and surveying disciplines, have been trained on the CADD system. The services offered through the use ofour CADD system include: — Original and as -built engineering design in all disciplines — Master planning design with rapid criteria adjustment — Mapping of improvements —underground, surface and above ground —by capacity, type, age, materials, usage, etc. for system analysis, improvements and/or expansion — Synthesis offield surveyed improvements and facility characteristics for total facility management programs — Subdivision design and mapping — Topographic mapping with direct interface to electronic data collection equipment — Property abstracts and boundary surveys Burgess FIRM HISTORY AND BACKGROUND The Airport Technology and Planning Group, Inc. (AirTech), was established in 1991. AirTech was founded to more fully implement the philosophy of its owners related to the importance of recognizing every client's individual needs. AirTech provides quality planning, environmental, and financial services to airports across the U.S. The combined experience of our staff exceeds 70 years. AirTech, with offices in Cincinnati and Miami, is a Certified Woman -Owned Business Enterprise (WBE/DBE). AirTech is staffed by experienced planners, pilots, environmentalists, and experts in airport finance. AirTech's staff also includes -experienced word processors and graphic designers. AirTech staff members have degrees in urban planning, transportation planning, geography, airport management, architecture, and finance. AirTech staff members are supported by 486- and Pentium -based personal computers, a HP ScanJet IIcx color scanner, HP LaserJet postscript printers, Epson color printers, and AutoCAD workstations with a CalComp plotter. In addition, the work of AirTech staff members is supported by a wide variety of software applications. Business applications include WordPerfect, Lotus 1-2- 3, Lotus Approach, and Microsoft FoxPro. Design applications include Adobe Photoshop, CorelDRAW!, and Aldus PageMaker. AirTech's technical analyses are supported by the FAA Integrated Noise Model (IIVM), CadOverlay GS, the FAA's capacity and runway length programs, the FAA runway exit design program, and AirNoise 4.0. AirTech subscribes to commercial airline databases which provide access to OAG and US DOT information. AirTech staff members have developed database management programs and air service, economic impact, financial, and priority funding models. AirTech's project management and accounting systems are automated using Wind II. Each airport is unique; and, therefore, the requirements of each airport sponsor are different. In working with its clients, AirTech's initial objective is to clearly identify sponsor expectations for each project the firm undertakes. By following this personalized approach, AirTech has established a reputation for producing studies that are responsive to each airport's individualized needs. The firm's commitment to timely and continual coordination during each project ensures that changing airport, tenant, and community issues are thoroughly addressed as each AirTech assignment progresses. When you choose AirTech, your project has the firm's commitment of quality. AirTech's approach is designed to build long-lasting relationships by providing every client with a product that is specifically tailored to meet each airport's individual needs. AirTech brings you experienced, professional, and enthusiastic staff ready to meet your airport's objectives. In addition to the textual descriptions of AirTech s services, the symbols shown below are used throughout the qualifications package to provide a graphic representaion of AirTech's experience. Air Carrier Master Plan Commercial Airport Planning General Aviation Master Plan Terminal Studies Noise Studies (Part 150) Environmental Assessment Feasibility /Site Selection Studies AIRPORT PLANNING AirTech staff members have prepared more than 50 recent Airport Master Plans. These plans have been prepared for large air carrier and commuter facilities, corporate/reliever facilities, and small general aviation airports. Having served a wide variety of airports from coast to coast, AirTech staff members have an excellent understanding of the most current issues facing airports, the factors influencing demand, and the most current Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) design parameters. AirTech'sTerminal andFacility Planning for air carrier airports provides an excellent complement to its master planning expertise. AirTech staff members have been innovative in the industry in developing hands-on Land Use Management and MarketingPlans lans for many airports; these plans help the airports to identify and market properties which are in excess of their long-term aviation needs. AirTech staff members have been involved in Feasibility and Site Selection Studies for many of the nation's largest metropolitan communities who are seeking to identify and address their aviation needs beyond the year 2020; AirTech staff members have also prepared feasibility/site selection studies for numerous general aviation facilities. Military Planning for units stationed on civilian airports and the preparation of B ase Comprehensive Plans are also provided by AirTech staff. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSES Effective sponsor, public, and community coordination efforts are critical to the success of both airport planning and environmental projects. AirTech's comprehensive approach to the coordination and public participation portion of each assignment through newsletters, workshops, advisory committees, news releases, and regular sponsor briefings ensures attention to this essential element of each successful project. Environmental Assessments for new and extended runways at both general aviation and air carrier airports are a specialty of the AirTech staff. The firm's environmental credentials are strengthened by its large number of Part 150 Noise Studies. Economic Impact Financial Studies Airport System Planning Air Space Studies Cargo Studies Helicopter Studies Land Use Management & Marketing Studies Military / Joint Use Assignments Air Service Studies AirTech staff members are unmatched in their credentials for preparing statewide, regional, and reliever airport system plans. AirTech staff have prepared more than 20 statewide and regional aviation system plans. AirTech system plans provide computerized databases, with emphasis on prioritizing system implementation needs. AirTech's regional system plans have focused on many of the nation's major metropolitan areas and have addressed complicated airspace issues of regions served by multiple air carrier, corporate, and general aviation airports. Many of AirTech's system plans have contained Air Service elements. AirTech staff members have addressed air service needs and demand potential of statewide airport systems and individual airports nationwide. These studies resulted in new or improved scheduled air service for many communities. Economic Impact Studies are also frequently undertaken in tandem with AirTech's system planning assignments. Economic impact studies, when prepared for individual airports or airport systems, provide data on employment, payroll, and total economic output on both a direct and an indirect basis. This data can be invaluable in gaining community support for projects that are critical to an airport's expansion needs. AirTech staff provide a wide variety of airport related financial services. These services include financial feasibility and accounting, rates and charges, lease preparation and negotiation, airline agreements, management studies, concession planning, and PFC development and implementation. AirTech's understanding of the ever changing aviation/airport financial environment helps our staff to develop studies that are within the sponsor's financial capability to implement. Among consultants, AirTech is unique. Its satisfied clients attest to the effectiveness of the firm's objective, experienced, and professional approach. This personalized approach can work for you. When you select AirTech, you select more than a company; you select the people behind the company. W 307 1 STAVE. E., STE. 22 KALISPELL, MT • 59901 PHONE 406-755-3143 FAX 406-755-0231 SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS INTRODUCTION Carpenter Dunlap Associates, Inc. delivers - COMPUTER GRAPHICS AND PUBLISHING SERVICES: CADD SUPPORT AND PLOTTING SERVICES• DATA CAPTURE FOR G.I.S. MAPPING AND DATA LINKAGE: DIGITAL MAP PUBLISHING AND COLOR SEPARATION; TECHNICAL PUBLICATIONS. These services are provided to government agencies and to the private sector, utilizing INTERGRAPH MICROSTATION, AND AUTOCAD. As a Service Bureau, Carpenter Dunlap Associates, Inc., (CDA) provides full service to include CADD conversion, plotting and consulting, and publishing services. Carpenter Dunlap Associates, Inc. works with AEI firms and government agencies, providing conversion or subconsulting services, including scanning, digitizing and data attachment, shop drawings; preliminary and final construction plans for airport design, road design, architectural design; graphics for master planning; topographic and boundary surveys, site plans and as -built drawings. Carpenter Dunlap Associates, Inc. is a SMALL BUSINESS CONCERN AND A WOMAN OWNED BUSINESS. Under the Grants Program CDA satisfies government set -aside requirements for DBE/WBE participation. The firm has been certified as a WBE by many civil government agencies and state D.O.T.'s. CDA is 100% woman owned. Carpenter Dunlap Associates, Inc., has earned a reputation for producing work on schedule with quick turnaround to keep projects within crucial deadlines. The firm's hallmarks are timely service, attention to quality control, and in-house software development for more efficient production time. CDA takes pride in maintaining a long, lasting relationship with the client, because only quality work is delivered, therefore ensuring client call back. BACKGROUND Originally based in Atlanta, Georgia in 1985, and now in Kalispell, Montana, CDA first served as a Service Bureau to provide architectural and engineering drafting services, plotting services, map design and publishing, brochure design and typesetting to the private sector and to civil government agencies. In 1987 the firm was awarded a one year contract with Federal Aviation Administration, Southern Region, Atlanta, Georgia, to provide manual and CADD Engineering Drafting Services to support the Engineering Division. The contract was extended for two additional years. Over 1,500 digital files were produced during this contract. In January, 1989,- CDA began to develop software for Intergraph Microstation with user data linkage for .G.I.S. applications and Cadastral Mapping. Since 1989, the firm served as subconsultant for major mapping companies, providing data capture and user data linkage for various county and city cadastral mapping projects. Carpenter Dunlap Associates, Inc., also provides desktop publishing, graphic design, and digital map publishing. Many maps have been published using this method which meet strict mapping specifications. The final product is comparable in quality to the traditional cartographic methods. The most recent map published is a 3 dimensional digital map of downtown Atlanta, Georgia. Over 300,000 copies of this map have been distributed. CDA has provided CADD Drafting Services since 1989 to various prime contractors for numerous road design and airport design projects. Please refer to page four for a list of these projects. Since relocating to Kalispell, Montana, Carpenter Dunlap Associates, Inc. has expanded services to include DBE Administration. Because of ten years experience working with prime contractors and the private sector, CDA was approached by Morrison-Maierle CSSA, Inc., Kalispell office, to be a team member for the Indefinite Quantity Contract, Glacier International Airport. The responsibilities include Assisting the contractor and Sponsor with the following: DESIGN Goal Determination ❑ Assist the Prime Contractor and Sponsor with identification of subcontracting opportunities. Communications ❑ Publicize the project to appropriate DBE firms. ❑ Develop and maintain list of regional DBE firms. ❑ Provide list of potential DBE's to prime bidders. Pre -Bid Conference ❑ Conduct DBE portion of Pre -Bid conference to include (a) project goal, (b)discussion of good faith effort, (c) Schedules A and B, and (d) Proposal Affidavit. CONSTRUCTION Monitoring - Commercially Useful Function. ❑ Amount of work subcontracted. ❑ Type of work, sub -contract DBE opportunities. ❑ DBE workforce. FOLLOW - UP Reports Required ❑ DBE Participation Statement. ❑ DOT form 4630. 2 The following represents work secured by Carpenter Dunlap Associates, Inc. The utmost concern of Carpenter Dunlap Associates, Inc. is to produce UALI WORK, COMPLETE PROJECTS WITHIN BUDGET, AND TO COMPLETE THEM ON SCHEDULE. 1985 National Park Service, Southern Region - Map publishing - Desoto Trail Study, Trail of Tears Study, Boone Heritage Trail Study. 1986 National Park Service, Southern Region - Map publishing - Tuskeegee Institute National Historic Site. 1988 National Park Service, Death Valley National Monument - Scanning services and data clean up - Death Valley Topo. 1988 National Park Service, Chattahoochee River NRA - Map publishing - Cochran Shoals, Sope Creek, Powers Island Trails. 1989 U.S. Forest Service, Southern Region - Map Publishing - Digital color separation and consulting on preparation of digitally produced maps to meet strict U.S. Forestry mapping specifications. 1989 National Park Service, Southern Region - Map design and color separation - Gulfport, Kingsbay, Mayport, Cecil Field and Meridian Navy Bases. 1987-1990 Federal Aviation Administration, Southern Region - Conversion and plotting services, creating or editing over 1,500 drawings. 1989-1990 Federal Aviation Administration, Southern Region - Conversion/Plotting services Subconsultant for Raytheon Service Company, Atlanta, Georgia. 1992 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Savannah District - CADD drawings - Construction Plans for demolition and design, Moody Air Force Base, 1992-1996 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Nashville District - CADD support services. • • • •-• • - 1989 City of Hiram, Georgia - Digital Land Use Map. 1989* City of Albemarle, North Carolina - Digitize roads from aerial photographs. 1989* Johnston County, North Carolina - Cadastral mapping services and data linkage for 4,000 parcels. 1990* City of White Plains, New York - Cadastral mapping services and data linkage for 12,000 parcels, 119 sheets. 1990* Granville County, North Carolina - Cadastral mapping services and data linkage for 21,000 parcels, 421 sheets. 1990* Harford County, Maryland - Clean up and add text for Plan imetric-Topographic Map Compilation, 523 sheets. 1990 City of Atlanta, Georgia - CADD drawings, Metro Service Facility, and Pennsylvania Power Company - Subconsultant for Ebasco Service Company, Atlanta, Georgia. 1994 Portage County, Wisconsin - Cadastral mapping services, presently underway. Subconsultant for Greenhorne & O'Mara, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia. * Projects undertaken as Subconsultant for Westinghouse Landmark G.I.S., Cary, North Carolina. 1989 Charleston County Aviation Authority, Charleston, SC - Preliminary and Final Construction Plans, Taxiway II Rehabilitation. Subconsultant for Howard Needles Tammen & Bergendoff, Atlanta, Georgia. 1991 Glynn County Aviation Authority, Brunswick, Georgia - Master Plans - Glynn County Airport, McKinnen Airport - Subconsultant for Howard Needles Tammen & Bergendoff, Atlanta, Georgia. 1992 Montana Department of Transportation, Camps Pass, East, Montana - CADD Support Services, Highway Reconstruction, Pre Iiminary.Construction Plans - Subconsultant for Robert Peccia & Associates, Inc., Helena, Montana. 1992 Huntsville Madison County Airport Authority, Huntsville Alabama - Construction Plans, Air Carrier Apron Repair, Subconsultant for Howard Needles Tammen & Bergendoff, Atlanta, Georgia. 1992 Charleston County Aviation Authority, Charleston SC - Old Terminal Demolition Plan Subconsultant for Howard Needles Tammen & Bergendoff, Atlanta, Georgia. 1993 Huntsville International Airport, Huntsville, Alabama - Modifications and Airfield Signage. Subconsultant for Howard Needles Tammen & Bergendoff, Atlanta, Georgia. 1993 Huntsville Madison County Airport Authority, Huntsville, Alabama - Runway 18L-36R and Related Taxiway Overlay. Subconsultant for Howard Needles Tammen & Bergendoff, Atlanta, Georgia. 1993 Glenco Airport Authority, Brunswick Georgia - Glynn County Master Plan. Subconsultant for Howard Needles Tammen & Bergendoff, Atlanta, Georgia. 1993 Charleston Aviation Authority, Charleston, SC - Construction Plans, Taxiway 5 Reconstruction. Subconsultant for Howard Needles Tammen & Bergendoff, Atlanta, Georgia. 1993 Glenco Airport Authority, Brunswick, Georgia - Glynn County Runway 7-25 Overlay & Grooving. Subconsultant for Howard Needles Tammen & Bergendoff, Atlanta, Georgia. 1993 Athens Airport Authority, Athens, Georgia - Athens Airfield Signage. Subconsultant for Howard Needles Tammen & Bergendoff, Atlanta, Georgia. 1994 Huntsville International Airport, Huntsville, Alabama - Construction Plans, Lighting and Rehab. Subconsultant for Howard Needles Tammen & Bergendoff, Atlanta, Georgia. 1995 Flathead Municipal Airport, Glacier International Airport, Kalispell, Montana - Indefinite Quantity Contract. Subconsultant for Morrison Maierle CSSA, Inc., Kalispell, Montana. 1996 Montana Department of Transportation, North Reserve Street Improvement Project, Missoula Montana - CADD Support Services - Subconsultant for WGM Group, Missoula, Montana. 1996 Montana Department of Transportation, Foy's Canyon Road Design, Kalispell, Montana - CADD Support Services - Subconsultant for Carter & Burgess, Inc., Denver, Colorado. 1996 Montana Department of Transportation, Plevna to Baker Road Design, Montana - CADD Support Services - Subconsultant for Carter & Burgess, Inc., Denver, Colorado. 1996 Montana Department of Transportation, Maxville to Drummond Road Design, Montana - CADD Support Services - Subconsultant for Carter & Burgess, Inc., Denver, Colorado. 1996 Montana Department of Transportation, Drummond North Road Design, Montana - CADD Support Services - Subconsultant for Carter & Burgess, Inc., Denver Colorado. 1996 Montana Department of Transportation, Drummond East/West Road Design, Montana - CADD Support Services - Subconsultant for Carter & Burgess, Inc., Denver Colorado. 51 1989-1991 Smalley & Risberg, Atlanta, Georgia - Shop Drawings, Custom Millwork. 1989-1991 Virginia Bowen Interiors, A.S.I.D., Atlanta, Georgia - Space Planning, CADD generated Floor Plans & Furniture Plans, various interior design projects. 1991 D.S.I., Atlanta, Georgia - Graphics for Electrical Technical Manuals. 1991-1993 Lanier Worldwide, Inc, Atlanta, Georgia - Copy and FAX Department Conversion and color separation services, Electrical Schematics and Technical Publications. 1990-1991 Westinghouse Environmental, Atlanta, Georgia - Consultant services - Engineering CADD drafting and plotting services. 1991 Aim Consultants, Atlanta, Georgia - Digitizing/Plotting services for various architectural and engineering projects. 1992 RenfroWs, Inc, Columbia Falls, Montana - Shop drawings - Philip Burton Federal Building, San Francisco, California. 1993 Delta, Cincinnati - CADD Support Services. Subconsultant for Howard Needles Tammen & Bergendoff, Structural Division. 1992-1993 Alabama Power Company, Birmingham Alabama - CADD Support Services. 1990-1993 Ebasco Service Company, Atlanta Georgia - CADD Support Services for various government and non -government projects. 1995-1996 Plum Creek Timber Company - CADD Support Services - Update existing digital base maps. National Park Service U.S. Forest Service Federal Aviation Administration U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Savannah District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Nashville District City of Hiram Westinghouse Landmark G.I.S. Howard Needles Tammen & Bergendoff Ebasco Service Company Raytheon Service Company Robert Peccia & Associates, Inc. Lanier Worldwide, Inc. Westinghouse Environmental (S&ME) Aim Consultants Renfrow's Inc. Alabama Power Company Greenhorne & O'Mara, Inc. Morrison-Maierle CSSA, Inc. WGM Group Plum Creek Timber Company Carter & Burgess, Inc. Statement of Qualifications Kalispell City Airport Airport Planning Study Carter & Burgess is currently involved in a number ofplanning studies and design projects in Montana. We expect a number ofthese efforts to be completed during the next 3-6 months. Your study schedule fits our current and projected workload which will enable our staffto commit the required comprehensive and thorough resources to this effort. In addition, Carter & Burgess has the resources ofa national firm with additional qualified professionals to meet the demands ofthis study, if and as needed. AirTech has the personnel and time availability to providethe support needed to complete their work effort in a responsive and timely manner. We believe that our current and past clients will attest to our capabilities. Ability and Availability of Key Personnel to be Assigned to this Project Ofimportance to the Kalispell City Airport is the fact that our team has qualified aviation professional, technical, and administrative personnel available to support your immediate and long-term needs in developing the Airport Planning and Environmental studies forthe Kalispell City Airport. The following is abriefdescription ofthe key personnel assigned to this project: Mr. Mike Worrall has 13 years of experience in the planning, design, and construction oftransportation projects. Mr. Worrall is overseeing the development ofthe current Airport Master Plan Update and Environmental Studies forthe Ravalli County Airport inHamilton, Montana. This project involves a high degree ofpublic involvement and community information efforts, similarto those that will be required for your study. He leads a staff of seven engineers and technicians in our Missoula office. He has also participated in the development ofnumerous environmental documents. Mr. Andrew Herman, senior aviation consultant, has more than 20 years ofexperience in all phases ofplanning at general aviation airports throughout the country. His experi- ence and familiarity with airports and ability to develop studies that incorporate the specific needs ofthe communities they serve will be particularly important to the City of Kalispell. Mr. Herman is the principal planner for the current Airport Master Plan Update at the Ravalli County Airport. He has worked on numerous planning studies within the Northwest Mountain Region ofthe FAA and is cognizant ofthe issues facing the community in Kalispell. During his career he has striven to develop planning documents that are consistent, concise, and reflect the specific issues and concerns of the local communities in which they are located. Mr. Herman would serve as project manager forthe AirporrtPlanning and Environmental studies. m RED Carter = Burgess Statement of Qualifications Kalispell City Airport Airport Planning Study Mr. Thomas Mertens, P.E. has more than 21 years of experience in aviation as a project director, project manager and airport engineer. As National Director of Aviation for Carter & Burgess, Mr. Mertens is responsible for management and supervision ofprojects throughout the country, as well as the marketing ofaviation services. Ms. Jeanette Lostracco, has participated in a variety of environmental studies and public involvement/information programs in western Montana and will be a valuable resource in any environmental studies for the Kalispell Airport. She has extensive experience with NEPAresulting from involvement innumerous Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements. Ms. Barbara Fritsche of AirTech is a well known and respected professional within the aviation community, both in Montana and throughout the country. Our firms are currently developing the Airport Master Plan Update for the Ravalli County Airport. In addition, AirTech has prepared additional studies for airports in the state at the request ofthe Montana Airport Managers Association and has participated in a number of additional airport master plans conducted in Montana. Ms. Ffit sche and other members ofAirTech's staffwill assist in the development ofthe studies for the Kalispell City Airport. Full resumes of these and other Carter & Burgess and AirTech staff members are included beginning on page 13. Quality of Other Similar Projects We believe that the number offollow-up projects the firm has received is a direct testament to the quality of Carter & Burgess' work, particularly in the state ofMontana. Carter& Burgess has been selected by the Montana Department ofTransportation to prepare a variety of studies over the past several years. We believe our selection for these studies is a result ofthe success we have had in implementing previous projects forthe state. This success is a result ofdeveloping a comprehensive public involvement process that has provided local citizens with the information needed to make valid decisions concerning the need for and importance ofthe proposed projects. Those same personnel that have contributed to that success will be directly involved in this study. In addition, our aviation staff strives to attain the same level of success on airport planning and development projects. Anumber of sample Airport Layout Plans have been included at the end ofthis submittal to signify the level ofdetail and completeness we will provide to the City ofKalispell for your proposed project. 2 Carter - Burgess CURRENT WORKLOAD/ PROJECTS UNDER CONTRACT March 1, 1997 AIRTECH .�� Greene County Regional Master Plan ° $150,000 65 /o September 1997 Xenia, Ohio Environmental Assessment Bellefontaine Airport Master Plan $139,750 65% September 1997 Bellefontaine, Ohio Environmental Assessment Akron -Canton Regional Airport Master Plan Update $175,000 ° 90 /o May 1997 North Canton, Ohio FAR Part 150 Update Grand Rapids -Itasca County Airport Passenger Facility Charge $12,500 20% June 1997 Grand Rapids, MN New York State Dept. of Transportation System Plan $158,000 15% November 1997 State of New York Maine Department of Transportation Passenger Transportation Study $23,470 10% July 1997 State of Maine Juneau International Airport Master Plan Update $65,430 25% September 1997 Juneau, AK Union County Airport ALP Update, $42,935 10% December 1997 Marysville, OH Land Use Study Highland County Airport ALP Update $31,410 5% October 1997 Hillsboro, OH Peachtree DeKalb Airport Atlanta, GA Economic Impact Analysis $79,900 15% September 1997 Idaho Department of Transportation State of Idaho System Plan $140,000 5% January 1998 Updated 3/97 CLT Statement of Qualifications Kalispell City Airport Airport Planning Study . Project Control Ability to Complete Projects on Schedule and Within Budget Carter & Burgess staffhave demonstrated a commitment to meeting schedules and budgets for projects undertaken by the firm. Prior to the start ofthe proposed studies, our staffwill develop a project schedule for review and approval by the City of Kalispell. This schedule will identify a project timeline and serve as the City's yardstick to provide that the work is completed in atimely manner. It is in the interests ofboth the City and Carter & Burgess to adhere to this schedule, since any major deviations could result in additional costs, both direct and indirect, to both parties. The proposed studies by the City ofKalispell are FAA funded projects, and therefore the budgets are lump sum amounts that cannot be changed. Since the vast majority of the aviation planning and environmental work undertaken by Carter & Burgess is FAA funded, we are adept at working within the allotted budgets and time frames. .. Carter = Burgess Statement of Qualifications Kalispell City Airport Airport Planning Study . FAA Familiarity Knowledge of FAA Regulations, Policies, and Procedures Carter & Burgess staffhave completed numerous airport planning and environmental studies, each of which have been accomplished using FAA regulations, policies, and procedures. Mr. Herman, a former FAA employee, is particularly aware ofthe criteria to be adhered to in the preparation ofFAA funded studies. We invite you to contact the FAA staffin Helena, to determine our abilityto adhere to their regulations, policies, and procedures. M Carter = Burgess Statement of Qualifications Kalispell City Airport Airport Planning Stu Ability to Develop and Implement a Public Participation Program We believe that one of Carter & Burgess' particular strengths has been the public participation programs we have developed forthe various studies we have undertaken throughout the state of Montana. Our local presence enables us to identify and under- stand the specific issues and develop a public participation program that speaks to the concerns of local residents. We will work with representatives ofthe City ofKalispell and personnel at the airport to develop apublic participation program tailored to your specific needs and concerns. By incorporating the on -going involvement ofthe local community we will have the needed insight to develop a plan that can be successfully implemented. Our public participation program includes liberal use ofcolor graphics, charts, and drawings, as well as computer visualization as needed. This enables us to highlight issues and relay information to the public in a clear and concise manner. We encourage you to contact our references to ascertain our ability and commitment to successfully develop and implement public participation programs. Community Involvement and Agency Coordination C&B has a long and successful track record in the area of community involvement and agency coordination which may playa significant role in this project. Our personnel have extensive experience in resolving public issues related to highly controversial and complex public works projects, specifically in Montana and in achieving a consensus that allows the project to go forward. Our approach to public involvement consists of identifying public issues and incorporating these issues into the development ofproject alternatives. Focusing on the responses to, and ultimate resolution of, these issues, developing alternatives that mitigate the impacts. Our approach has proven successful in projects throughout Montana and other locations, and has resulted in community acceptance and community and federal support ofprojects. -C Carter = Burgess Statement of Qualifications Kalispell City Airport Airport Planning Study Specific techniques we have used include: ❑ Informal public workshops conducted by project personnel which identify public issues about the project and ensure that the public is involved in the development and evaluation ofalternatives. ❑ Newsletters which keep the public informed about the process and progress ofthe project. ❑ Public hearings which allow the public to formally register input to the planning process. ❑ Graphics, workshop handouts that include project mailings and graphic information designed to inform and educate the public about a project's progress. ❑ Programming, which includes: — Identifying goals, objectives and facts about the study area. — Soliciting inputfromthe public at group meetings and workshops for their needs and concepts or ideas on improving the transportation system. Recording input graphically ❑ Developing evaluation criteria for alternatives based upon the information supplied by the public. ❑ Interacting with the public to evaluate the alternatives. ❑ Graphically illustrating the results ofthe public workshops to reflect the public input and to recommend preferred design alternatives. C Carter - Burgess Statement of Qualifications Kalispell City Airport Airport Planninq Studv 10. Potential Issues Understanding of the Projects Potential Issues This study is ofparticular importance to the City ofKalispell Airport since it will represent the FAA's initial participation in a project at the Airport. An airportmust be listed in the National Plan ofIntegrated Airport Systems (NPIAS) to be eligible to receive federal planning and construction funds. The Kalispell City Airport is not currently listed in the NPIAS. However, the FAA has agreed to participate in this study in order to determine the role ofthe Airport and establish the potential eligibility ofthe Kalispell City Airport for inclusion in the NPIAS. Inclusion in the NPIAS enables airports to obtain federal funding, which at current levels represents 90 percent of eligible planning and construction costs. The study will identify the role and function ofthe airport and establish eligibility for inclusion in the NPIAS, based on specific FAA criteria contained in FAA Advisory Circulars and internal FAA Orders. The Glacier Park International Airport, which is within one half hour drive ofthe City ofKalispell, is currently listed in the NPIAS, and that facility is eligible to receive federal funds. This study must establish the need for inclusion ofthe Kalispell City Airport within the NPIAS as well. Carter = Burgess Statement of Qualifications Kalispell City Airport Airport Planning Study Since the Airport is geographically located in the City ofKalispell, there will be potentially significant opposition to further developing the facility due to environmental considerations, particularly noise issues. The study must establish realistic and defensible noise projections using FAA approved methodologies, specifically the Integrated Noise Model (INM). These noise projections will be used in recommending noise abatement alternatives and identifying compatible land uses in the airport vicinity. There has been discussion of relocating the Airport to another site and developing the existing site for commercial uses. Radio transmission towers were constructed in the immediate Airport vicinity during a period when the airport was closed. These towers represent a potential obstruction to air navigation at the Kalispell City Airport. This study must therefore identify the constraints these towers place on aircraft operations at the Airport. Coordination with the responsible FAA Divisions (Airport Planning, Flight Standards, and Airway Procedures) and state representatives must be undertaken to assess the impact ofthe towers on the Airport. This study must therefore also assess the feasibility ofcontinuing airfield operations at the existing site or relocatingthe airport to a new site. During the course ofthe study, additional issues are likely to arise. All ofthese known and potential issues must be addressed in order to develop auseful planning study for the Kalispell City Airport. Carter -Burgess SOURM DEPARTMENT Of THE NAVY RUNWAY 9-27 9&31% 0 11 KNOTS RUNWAY 9-27 99.45% 0 iJ KNOTS RUNWAY I" 97M% 0 11 MOTS RUNWAY I" "AD% a KNOTS M 1 COMBINED "X5% 41) 11 KwNO!S TS COMBINED nw% a 13 �-5 PERIM 1974 20 10 0 20 SCALE IN KNOTS � _ �;,�T K &NR cz' k%2.,:,,; L V�;, 7 i�! �,,Lx Tr Wt +-4�4 TT 4-4 4 1 1 7-7 -RUNWAY I T _14 z J7 -24 A j M Avt� D w AVF t 4. -A •�.vo I! x 79 �_.l f, � tw; J �x -�o OR L z 131 niw �,rl -A p Q ; X !-;� M81—A :N vj N N� 7, 7'. E�57' 7- "i 4 4, tr' 9, E, ;0 "i qv� t RT DATA I SaSTING AIRPORT ELEVATION I w AIRPORT AM AIDS ITARIN b1n MEAN MAX MAP. f_9V AIRPORT RE195RENCE CODE 04V I WtND COVERAGE 11 & 3 KNOT 99.65%, 99.9% 1 DEIGN AIRCRAFT RUNWAY DATA RUNWAY �O9L - Of RUNWAY 2n RUNWAY Fic-26R hWAY-TO-A _- iU- —AM NG tafiW_ EMSTTHG "ROACH CATEGORY A DESIGN GROUP D4V ow RUNWAY WOTIVNIDTH) X 200' USAKE RUNWAY LENGTH a,ow 6.0w )2AW 4'000' APPROACH 94 VOIAL 9K INSTRUM" I&L VISUAL ISR MENT 271t INSTRUMENT 27-L —VtSUAL- VISUAL MAXMUM ELEVATIONABOVE MSL ____,ML PAVEMENT DESIGN STRENGTH RUNWAY LIGHnmG HIRL _MRL RUNWAY MARKING PRECISION PREMOSK")N PPRECISOON PRECMH MICTRONIC AM AISF-0 ALSF-41 VISUAL ADS __ Rat _G§N REL RK RUNWAY L4.PETY AREA WantWOTH) 10,000' x sw 10,000Y X 500' 14 AWI - - w-,X L 12,9WX4W O.ECT "J9 AM PNGnVMDTtQ 10 92RM ODD' — io- _x___ 6,AWX400- OWACU! On ZONE WGMWKnM 84400'X 4W L E Z M. WE � 1 , VA rn)1111 *.0 am A00 0 goo 6wn%wr%Mw—w11 SCALE IN FEET 0 EXISTING AIRFIELD LAYOUT STRUCTURES AVIATION STRUCTURES AMIED PAVEMENT DENSE WOODS WATER LEGEND EDGE OF PAVEMENT BASE PROPERTY UNE RUNWAY PROTECTION ZONE (RPZ) U.S. AND STATE HIGHWAYS UNIMPROVED EARTH ROADS FENCE tNDE( CONTOURS ALSF4 ILS CATEGORY [I APPROACH LIGHTS BASE REUSE PLAN NAS CECIL FIELD jacksonville, florida Arthur Andersen & Co. HOH Associates, Inc. The Haskell Company Carter & Burgess Post Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc. Hope & Hope, Certified Public Accountants Carter -Surge" M-nhV and 1h. &Mftwn"W s ®• f. uB f� ERMAr t ti u CIM _ � y 1 .�c • - ATHLETIC AHD 1 = CKM 'C' AYE lOR - r i a FAWNS _ as 7! I ' _ AVWTI [E5 mom , G MUL Y�R TS HANGAR 63221 67 - �.�- _.\ ,- a . FM M4 RT AM �E_-. _.. _. T3 _-ICE' •.. .... S.. . _.. _ .. � ,. ..... , _ ,. ...,...._.. >.,.,.. D• -. VALRI 147 T ".b ' aR l ;,) > iTORAG! .'r�JS FIRE �2 f ! SHE -- SI 9 3Z'P F.C3lf - i' MY '': C N � y �... Il: c, 3v 1 stir C \ 9e M IN BIGM MT CELL 3M iff Seam TEST ill low r RIT TFss ,�'-Y'?:... as TOM ENCLORM SIR ARE v I€S7 T -,:� lll/ `. ♦ -L ^f. .c� Y C- 7 -� it ,1 �•ysit . ....-. s §FS rx' i r >� R'R� - Tf75 as Rfll IUD HA M TTZ W75 : -7 4 ( .,-- > A TFss k c-. L r ` d? ®® iBE7 fTR FF REAP TTFAdR+IRsIla UZI ®. .� 1. t \Lim ✓ k FTAtIGATF Mig— MW r u iy 150 0 Mu t #iAW SHW 3#A I'lRE � AVE, TlIiS - F� l O IN SLUE INFffT AVIATION STRUCTURES KEY AVIATION SDR CMES AOIHBD MMOM DC-ISE WOGS Tg: a`{ WAM LEGEND EDGE Or PAVEMBa RASE PROPERTY UM RIREWAY PROTECTION ZONE IVA us AND STATE HKAMAYS U09WMVM EARTH ROADS — —x—=— FENCE --- .---- - 04M cotFITriw ALSFI4 US G7EGOR) VAM7OACH UGHTS BASE REUSE PLAN NAS CECIL FIELD jacksonv le, florida Arthur Andersen & Co. HOH Associates, Inc. The Haskell Company Carter & Burgess Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc. Hope & Hope, Certified Public Accountants C--A-b h FS,Riru 9. Ai h d 1% M=rd R and b 6�ireda� f4om #jot JJ* z— I YOZK AVE cot*;EcncLff ItDi F 2M Coutm 2 CI& AuAl c- am i, 2*411 2112D —4Z1271, —m ALL WEATHER VAND ROSE WIND ROSE SCALE I TO 20 SOLIRCE, ftA775111LI tLY.AF.11, CALMS 22315 04 M-PIL 13 M.PJt Ci WIND COVEPAGE 171S 949 15 M.FJ1L CROSS WIND Covat.ZE 17-15 941 % ow nil 7 M'3 $1. =xr: M11 Tw X2 BM04 OVENUUN OF"ir— 1413' ..... FAA ....... ..................... ... ......... 50-1 MAPMOACH k'-w '17'-.-q�s -26 N2-7 3 11,764Y -a 77 ................ P- ------ 15-- -------- ---..... AMtOAOi LIGHTS IDWXW17W o. 90TH ENDS) tpz III 2W 41 KWY 35 END EL 161 111 LOCALIZEt Ali RWY LOW FT. POWIR SITE )IT I 33" SANffAJtY LAkVFU KEY LEGEND AW.?OXT ItIEFERENCE POW + EDGE OF rAVEMEW LOCALI PROPEITY LINE f"OT SHOWN) KnLDM REST111i LINE MASI OBJECT FILM AREA JOFA) AIRPORT DATA ANOViliff-ELLVATION 21T ARP COOSID044M N LAT. "139`05-oov AMOU AND IRM]INAL MAY AIDS VORrAC Si aa MAX TES 91 I SAME NW-104 -- CODE tkto comho-man sua C-111 SAME WM COVII 13 Mf% 15 AV" RUNWAY END COORDINATES RLRrwAY EQSTM RAI 17 R LAT. 44*3r5&ZW W.LOHGw312vw.?w sum Sokw I LAT. "*3111 W IONG. onl2ras.674r SAME35 3W4 ssa AMMO 15'27'1 Sou its 600 300 0 600 U-'L GeOi 51.111 At*AM RATE OF CRA24M I-TWEST DAM XJi 1"4 SCALE IN I RUNWAY NDTECTION -H. THRESHOLD Li -- VINIWAY SAFETY AM (" li END 0&(i LIGHT (REIL) (16 I.L.S. AND STATE HIGHWAYS WATER STORAGE WTrH ROTATING BACON 0 ns CONTOURS INm CONTOURS CRITICAL AMA - - - - OBJECT ME ZONE (OM SM311L2ED SHOUl.DN 0 NOTE L RUNWAY i COO*Di AND AvyoftT ReFatINCE POINT 011111A1141i PROM GT-CALC V.4.0. 2 — — AM WNWAY — OVAINIM RCM — a tb. C-my ( � kb &--i. d 11� ..d. A4.KDW.,ttit" & Dt— M. "t d. C-lity .1 Cli -d 6- a —Ay -&a d- THE DeAVMi OF 11-ff All FORA MANS LftATED 08CEMJ& 30, 1"3, PLATTSBURGH AIR FORCE BASE 3. CONTOLlItS ARE FOR CONOWTIJAL FL1VOS9S ONLY. 4. THIS OUFT ONLY SHOWS EXIVIING DeWELONAII & UNMAY T7-15 Mftn C-8 C1111i PLATTSBURGH, NEW YORK_____ 6. REFIER TO EXHINIT NO. I FOR AM�Oiiff snmmu evii AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN im El"i I DGR No. "M47" ptojjECT 9311674M Carter :Burgess AIRPORT DATA CaSIING FUTURE AIRPORT ELEVATION 297' SAAA! AN? COORDINATES A,IU - RT AND JEWUNAL NAY. AIDS N LAT. W LONG, U'I9'S 7S7' OW 45'a4.16W MEAN MAX TEMP. RZ7' SAAAE HPIAS ROLE AIR CARRIER SAME AIRPORT Rl$EPINCE CODE mp l SMAE WIND COVERAGE 12- MPH 16 MM 97.9% 99.1% SAME DESIGN AIRCRAFT Q SAME vim COVERAGE 12 MPH IS MPH RUNWAY W9 964% 9L9% RUNWAY p 22 932% 90.0% RUNWAY END COORDINATES EOSIING FUTURE N. TAT. 32.19.13AW SAME W. LONG. AEB'4571AW' SAMEN.LAT. r1922 3V2" 202' SAAW RB W. LONG. O'4S`MVdW SAW N. RAT. 32,1931494' SMUR RR W. LONG. 0" 45'10.OdS' SAMEN.LAT. 3V2077.306' SAMR W. LONG 0Ne44'2R.M* SAME -22 FL TAT. 52" 20'23.877' LAME %AJFI.0 ORMUCTION DATA SHEET 254 LEY REM MEUDIAN,AYssmom surwoED Nommm 1991. R11H EDITION. M. + • - -,V - T "ItY „"�► NON PREf1510►L APPROACH SURFACE 10AW X TAW X 40W 3*1 SLOPE 1,70W X s00' x i,016' RPZ 4NEL 292�-- PkmlowJ TYNGiLX WM WMYAY ENDS SOURCE OBSTRUCTION DATA SHEET 254 1E1f RED MEEIDGIN,MISS557FP1. .� ' 54j - `&" ,1 % SURVEYED jl D SEYED NOVlMRER TESL 1TIH EDTItON. HEEL AIRPORT LAYOUT { r. .:�,±�n_� 20 is 10 5 O 10 20 SOURCE NATIONAL CLIMATE MUE1 i ♦' '� PERIOD 1949-4778 "� • �j��.� scAtt IN MPFL KEr Han Meww+, russasvel �� ao _ r i �m _ �sEc+AnN1ED c�eaF i� anu> u wRHD� Wmt WIND COENE .. POFt EL. 31B' f 'vp G, 8 6 RAllAOAD / 1xEc`a�; �..._.' 32 RPZaRt- �� .J$ �R: /'' n' S~ sS0•; `r' 'tot �- 4 1R2E i 34f �-" • F . _ , OF' \ 'A" EL 39. 1 i ��•" ritz TEES El- 379' . ~ �' r ..._ 1nRNwty 12 ='��'-.t k:0'tL'3�'�10r7?'E U_ ',AiPt. T tS;:: _ :.'- - RSh :� '`.. -' �s+z,A 7J'e� 4 • ' co TREE (1 ;STY' _ '�'iL RrOFZ-AFA)CR6 �� tOFZ • .:r TYPE S.:iT FENCE 0L30Y ��„• ��TF `�3. 90. AVIGAAON EASEMENT 1. THE RUELDING RESTRICTION UNE (014 ENCOMPASSES THE RUNWAY F, .S, „_ _ -t -.ems /.-'/..; - .-� ar-OSSRlACED 1101ESHOlD -_" ... S3 ' PROLKiION 7ANE, THE RUNWAY OBJECT FitEE AREA AM1 NAVAID - / OUTICAL ALTERS.: -��� - n 3 [., 4 - E:. 297' VISUAL APPROACH SURFACE `' co►DROE TOWEL --'- 4 �3' s,4Hw' x 500' X i,500' 2P.i riOR 2. E)ISTING' FEATURES SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING INDUCING CONTOURS, j / ��.., \�. _ BOOR EE 339' TYPICAL BOTH RUNWAY ENDS VEGETATION, WILDMGS AND ROADWAYS ARE COMPOSED FROM GROUND SURVEYS, 1 11 - < DIGfTIZID AS-6111LT5 AND A91AL PHOTCCRAAVAEIIC/. AIRUL RIOTOGRARFI' DATED R•5-91. ' � �� , � � _ W- �+� •tT � S - 3. IACATIONS AND ELEVATIONS FOR HAVAID EQUIPAI SNT OBTAINED FROM THE ORSTRUCHON WN _ ; T r �.. '.. -," '{_ `�'•_ -t' "F - �._,� DATA SHIFT 254 KEY FIELD MERIDIAN, MLIS 991. SURVEYED NOVEMBE� 1991 IITH EDmON.. ��j`-- " � - / - • �"`--'�"._ (\\� •�,TOUNAL MAIDNG 4. RUNWAY END 8EVA710N5 AND 015TRUCIIONS OBTAIN® FROM THE ORSTRICTION DATA SHEET 254 KEY FIELD AAMDIAN, MISSISSIPPL SURVEYED NOVENIER 1991 ITTH EDITION. �E — CM S" 'PARUNG I alti' / SLOPE _ EL LEST # ,. FtA Tji UATgIFLG. a GtUOE'3LOFt: ", \ €L 318• -..; .. i•� �`'� "'% ei OUiIGLL AREA \�- _- 2 soa x Loar x 175LY RPZ�� _ ? tU `P MAD, oEC. o•n•oo•E N EASEMENT n U.& GEO{OG" S1fRVEY ANNUAL RAIL OP CUbwOe O'9.7'W _ } DAM NOroom IW4 � O {l'RRT !!{NtCi uP➢[CE My . rKEY AR ,, " Y i bTr LEGEND 500 25rs6 P no •. r AIRPORT RD'E E NNCE POINT + EDGE OF PAVEMENT 14�� ���LOCA PROPEiIY LIN�� SfAli 44 FEET .��� - OBJECT ME [0f4-- ------ - - - - ti a,._.: - - VAS •• RUNWAY mowecHON ZONE (L-4 tt. puPtntla d Mk *m -P ddy a—d bU ft j APPROACH VJRFACE LF�Dq.,�dT., P.RQ,LA Ab:�, KEY Fi/�B.©�```,AIRPORT THRESHOLD LIGHTS '�'- .. . .......... RUNWAY SAFETY AREA RS4 � LFAAI..a* A. Rro,AJ..tdd. AYyen and AFrne) 1s, j MERIDIAN MISSIJJ1PPI - !^ l` �\ 1 . _. -.. _ AV]GA77uN c��E1,EiiT _:' `• - -Mm Ell 3u1' - PRECSION APPROACH SURFACE 10,000• %{ 1,O110' x I,oOD• 50.1 SLOPE x 40,000'tQl ADOm SLOPE RUNWAY END WE NTIHER LIGHT PM4 ,4 r SEGMENTED ORCU! WITH WM CONE O W@HD SOD( VI AVG ON EASEMENT SS,L CRITICAL AREA EXISTING SUI DRNOS E)WTING PAVEMENT• . WATER VEGETATION' r --_ MiTstSTIZE ROUTES pv�t Act d 11RLAV4h Ls 9,-2+ct Anap� dOY dacad by ft PAA da.ab•4.4 , U.S. AM STA111 HOGHWAYS a d. PPPdde U kd Sate, pu6dV.m b 4 dwaA} -� — UMMOVED EARTH ROADS o•+ d7" b..bk mt dar It-A--d-d.pmp- �� d.d�s it b � M asalfine..ht ? EXISFiNG O'JDBL CONTOURS PoLR¢Fa•7t-IL'R9F-24 nt/At AD�4S. — — OBJECT FM ZONE (OFA _ aM - MEr� { AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN RUIROAEf SSA1R SAIRIFIED S10RT APPROACH D.toa.r ----- RVR� _ - DATE MAACF7 t"A, UGHHNG SYSTEM WTI" RUNWAY �. 001UR F DON. Rio. M74UlW ._ --- - AUOFQKNT 11DWATOR UGWS [ FRWECI No. .._ .. 9412B90LF - r - . Na , - -- REVISIONS - --- APEE -, LANE ' M Carter •• '�tdilidi"•, �.. .; __ __ - _._.... mob.