Preliminary Airport Layout PlanPrepared for the
City of Kalispell
Kalispell, Montana
In cooperation with the
Federal Aviation Administration
and the
Montana Aeronautics Division
Prepared by
Robert Peccia & Associates
Helena, MT
September, 1996
I FORECASTS ......................................................... [
PRIVATELY OWNED PROPERTY (From Kalispell City Airport Redevelopment Plan) .. 17
iW, LISPELL
PRELIMINARY AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN
NARRATIVE REPORT
In order to show its commitment to aviation at the Kalispell City Airport, the City of Kalispell
has taken it upon themselves to produce a Preliminary Airport Layout Plan (ALP). An ALP is a
tool used to show existing airport facilities and the projected improvements in the future.
This Preliminary ALP was also created to demonstrate the feasibility of Kalispell City Airport to
meet Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) dimensional and safety requirements. Upon
demonstration of these, the City of Kalispell, also known as the Owner, may become eligible for
federal assistance for projects concerning this airport. This would include planning projects such
as master planning and ALP creation as well as actual construction projects.
Since this is a Preliminary ALP, some components of an ALP have been left out. This aided in
reducing the cost of creating the ALP while providing enough critical information to show
feasibility. The format has been set-up such that finalizing the ALP would be fairly efficient in
the future should the Owner decide to further pursue development.
Following are the components required for an ALP Narrative Report as specified by the FAA's
ALP Checklist dated 12/26/90.
FORECASTS
From the FAA's 5010 Forms for the Kalispell City Airport, there was no growth in based aircraft
from 1983 to 1993. The latest 5010 Form shows 64 based aircraft. This seems out of place
considering the City of Kalispell's population growth during this period is approximately 6% and
Flathead County growth is 15%.(') The nearby Glacier International Airport (GIA), with a larger,
cross -wind runway and well maintained facilities, has likely absorbed any increase in the based
aircraft fleet in the region.
Having an airport with many more based aircraft than most of Montana's general aviation (GA)
airports, Kalispell feels their airport deserves the same consideration as other airports, especially
considering their population growth trend and the airports status as a relief airport for GIA.
Following is a table predicted forecasts for Kalispell City Airport.
1. Kalispell Area Transportation Plan, p. 35, July 30, 1993.
Preliminary Airport Layout Plan - Narrative Report
City of Kalispell
Kalispell City Airport
pB fir
Fri e
Current
0-5 Years(')
6-10 Years(l)
11-20 Years(l)
Total Annual Operations
33,100
34,600
36,100
38,000
Annual Itinerant Operations
13,500*
14,100
14,700
15,500
Based Aircraft
64**
67
70
74
Annual Instrument
Approaches
0
0
0
40
Annual Itinerant Operations
by Critical Aircraft
Unknown
Enplaned Passengers
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
*Includes 1,000 Military Operations
**Includes: 1 Glider, 1 Helicopter, 3 Ultra -lights, 3 Multi -Engine, and 56 Single Engine
(t) Growth rates of 2%/ ear for the first ten years then I% for the next 10 years.
2. BASIS FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Since there are a large number of based aircraft and total annual operations compared to most
Montana GA airports, it stands to reason this is one of the busier airports in the State. The FAA
and Montana Aeronautics Division promote development of airports which make it safer to the
flying community. Supporting the Kalispell City Airport will provide benefits to many users as
compared to less frequented airports in the State that also receive support from the community
and governmental agencies.
The primary importance is to demonstrate that the airport can feasibly be made to conform to
recognized standards. The Preliminary ALP is an attempt to show this is indeed possible.
Kalispell has shown its commitment to safety and conformance to standards by taking this first
step in planning their Airport's future.
A number of alternatives for airport development were discussed, analyzed and ruled out for
further consideration because of unfavorable conclusions. The following are a brief summary of
those considered:
Preliminary Airport Layout Plan - Narrative Report 2
City of Kalispell
Kalispell City Airport
a. EXISTING - but not up to standards.
B-I (Small) Visual Runway - maintain existing length and separation standards.
This approach would require land acquisition to the south, east and west. (--4 Ac.
Total) Changes required to alleviate current Part 77 Airspace infringements.
b. STAGES I & II - proposed.
B-II (Small) Visual Runway - many increased dimensional criteria
More land required than above option (-4 Ac. Total). Reconstruction of airport
required. Can accommodate aircraft with larger wingspans. Wider runway
facilitates safer landing of all aircraft in crosswind landings.
STAGE III - proposed.
B-II (Small) NPI Runway - increased primary surface width.
Slightly more land required (-46 Ac. Total). Buildings required to be further
away from runway. Aircraft operations can occur in more marginal weather
conditions.
B-II (Large) Visual Runway - stronger pavement required. Larger RPZ required.
Slightly more land required than B-II (Small) visual option.
Heavier aircraft can be accommodated without damaging the pavement.
B-II (Large) NPI Runway - approach slope length doubles and becomes much
shallower than above option.
Heavier aircraft with fairly large wingspans can use the airport in marginal
weather and not damage the pavement.
NOT RECOMMENDED
Reorientation of runway centerline - changing the runway orientation can have
favorable results on the impact of the radio towers in the approach slope.
However, other penetrations at the north end would result (ie. power poles,
stadium lights, buildings). Closer in, and adjacent to the runway, are existing
developments that would be impacted by reorientation.
Preliminary Airport Layout Plan - Narrative Report 3
City of Kalispell
Kalispell City Airport
3. RATIONALE FOR UNUSUAL FEATURE AND/OR
MODIFICATIONS OF DESIGN STANDARDS
The most concerning features of the airport are radio towers located near the Runway 31 End
Approach. These towers have existed for many years. The current obstruction lighting consists
of a single red (steady burning) light mounted atop the 324 foot high towers.(2)
Intermediate - medium intensity strobe lighting should be installed to make the area safer for
visual flight rules (VFR) flying. VFR flying, by the way, can be performed at night provided
visibility and cloud clearance are maintained. Future instrument flight rule (IFR) flying /
approaches should not be encouraged, however, until these towers are relocated. This provides
the rational for the ALP indication of Non -Precision Instrument (NPI) approaches as an ultimate
condition.
The close proximity of the existing buildings to the runway centerline will require relocation if
the airport classification is to go to Approach Category B Design Group II with an Non Precision
Instrument Approach.
4. SUMMARY OF STAGE DEVELOPMENT
Development at the Kalispell City Airport is proposed to occur in the following stages.
Stage 1 - (0 - 5 years)
+ Reconstruct Runway 13/31 to its current length, but displace the Runway 13 landing end 500-
feet for better clearance and less objects in the runway protection zone (RPZ). The width
would also be increased from 60-feet to 75-feet wide to provide better cross wind coverage in
the absence of a cross -wind runway and be of adequate width for a transition into the B-II
category when it is justified.
+ Construct a parallel taxiway to connect a new GA apron / tiedown area with the new runway.
+ Purchase land south, east and west of the current airport property. This would protect the
airport from infringements of the object free area (OFA) and transitional surfaces running
along the length of the runway. It will also protect the approach slope and potential ultimate
extension of the runway.
+ Increase radio towers obstruction lighting.
+ Relocate the facilities that impact the dimensional standards of a B-II, visual runway.
(2) Radio tower height is published in the 1993 FAA's 5010 Form as 324 feet above the ground.
Preliminary Airport Layout Plan - Narrative Report 4
City of Kalispell
Kalispell City Airport
Stage 2 - (6 - 10 years)
+ Extend Runway 31, 700 feet to the south.
+ Remove the facilities that impact the dimensional standards of a B-II, visual runway that is
now 4,300-feet long.
+ Complete full parallel taxiway and system of taxilanes for hangar development. Possibly
expand apron to facilitate more tiedowns and/or larger aircraft tiedowns.
Stage 3 - (11 - 20 years)
+ Possibly designate the airport as NPI or whatever equivalent GPS technology brings.
Consequently relocate any objects that impact the dimensional standards of a B-II, NPI
runway.
+ Relocate radio towers.
5. COORDINATION WITH GOVERNMENT UNITS
Submission of this Preliminary ALP to the FAA and Montana Aeronautics Division will serve as
coordination with government agencies interested in this potential development.
The City of Kalispell being the Owner and instigator of this work will be constantly abreast of
the status of airport planning and development. Being a part of Flathead County, they will also
be responsible for coordination with the County.
6. OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
For planning purposes, a rough estimate of the costs associated with bring the airport to the
standards shown on the ALP is in the following table. Again this would be for an Approach
Category B, Design Group II airport with a Non -Precision Instrument approach and pavement
strength able to withstand loads from small aircraft only. The ultimate length would
accommodate 95% of the small aircraft fleet per FAA guidelines. Inclusion of the 500' paved
overrun for take -offs would include 100% of all small aircraft.
The following table is also broken down into stages to correspond with the Summary of Stage
Development proposed on page four. The airport reference code is included in the breakdown
for each corresponding stage.
Preliminary Airport Layout Plan - Narrative Report 5
City of Kalispell
Kalispell City Airport
7. AIRPORT CLASSIFICATIONS
As the number of operations of larger, faster, and heavier aircraft increase, airport standards must
be modified to accommodate these airplanes. Ideally, when improvements are done at an airport,
the improvements facilitate the current demand as well as expected requirements in the near
future.
Following the table are pages containing some of the dimensional criteria required for each
airport category outlined in the stage development. This will help the reader see which criteria
change from category to category. For detailed definitions of the terms listed in these pages,
refer to the FAA Advisory Circular 150/5300-13 Change 4.
Preliminary Airport Layout Plan - Narrative Report 6
City of Kalispell
Kalispell City Airport
Q ?T "R `
STAGE I: B-II, Small - Visual Estimated Estimated
Quantity Unit Price
Estimated
Total Cost
1
Reconstruct Runway 13/31 to 75' Wide x 3,600'
34,200
SY
$11.00 /SY
$376,200.00
2
Construct Parallel Taxiway and Apron Area
48,800
SY
$11.00 /SY
$536,800.00
3
Purchase Land (46 Ac.)
1
LS
$345,000.00 /LS
$345,000.00
4
Fencing
15,000
LF
$2.00 /LF
$30,000.001
5
Improve Radio Tower Lighting
3
EA
$10,000.00 /EA
$30,000.00
6
Install Medium Intensity Runway Lighting System
1
LS
$150,000.00 /LS
$150,000.00
7
Relocations - #2,3,5,6,14,16,17
1
LS
$95,000.00 /LS
$95,000.00
8
Administrative (--15%)
1
LS
$234,000.00 /LS
$234,000.00
Total:
STAGE II: B-II, Small - Visual
$1,797,000.00
1
Extend Runway 13/31 700'
9,500
SY
$12.00
$114,000.00
2
Construct Taxilanes
7,450
SY
$12.00
$89,400.00
3
Construct Large Aircraft Tiedown Area
4,400
SY
$12.00
$52,800.00
4
Install Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI)
1
LS
$15,000.00 /LS
$15,000.00
5
Relocations - #22,23,27
1
LS
$40,000.00 /LS
$40,000.00
6
Administrative (-15%)
1
LS
$46,800.00 /LS
$46,800.00
Total:
STAGE III: B-II, Small - Non -Precision
$358,000.00
1
Overlay Runway ans Apron
83,000
SY
$4.00 /SY
$332,000.00
2
Remove Obstructions
10
EA
$2,000.00 /EA
$20,000.00
3
Relocations - #18,19,20,21
1
LS
$35,000.00 /LS
$35,000.00
4
Relocations - #15,24,25,26
4
EA
UNKNOWN /EA
$0.00
5
Relocate Radio Towers
2
EA
$100,000.00 /EA
$200,000.00
6
Administrative (-15%)
1
LS
$88,000.00 /LS
$88,000.00
Total:
$675,000.20
5uo
Preliminary Airport Layout Plan - Narrative Report
City of Kalispell
Kalispell City Airport
KALISPELL CITY AIRPORT
AIRPORT DESIGN AIRPLANE AND AIRPORT DATA
Aircraft Approach Category........................................................... B
Airplane Design Group.......................................................... I Small
Airplane wingspan............................................................ 48.99 feet
Primary runway end approach visibility minimums are exclusively .......................... visual
Other runway end approach visibility minimums are exclusively ........................... visual
Airplane undercarriage width (1.15 x main gear track) ................................. 0.00 feet
RUNWAY AND TAXIWAY WIDTH AND CLEARANCE STANDARD DIMENSIONS
Runway centerline to parallel taxiway/taxilane centerline ................................
150 feet
Runway centerline to edge of aircraft parking .........................................
125 feet
Runway width..................................................................
60 feet
Runway shoulder width...........................................................
10 feet
Runway blast pad width...........................................................
80 feet
Runway blast pad length..........................................................
60 feet
Runway safety area width.........................................................
120 feet
Runway safety area length beyond each runway end
or stopway end, whichever is greater ...............................................
240 feet
Runway object free area width .....................................................
250 feet
Runway object free area length beyond each runway end
or stopway end, whichever is greater ...............................................
240 feet
Clearway width.................................................................
500 feet
Stopwaywidth..................................................................
60 feet
Obstacle free zone (OFZ):
Runway OFZ width............................................................ 250 feet
Runway OFZ length beyond each runway end ....................................... 200 feet
Inner -approach OFZ width ...................................................... 250 feet
Inner -approach OFZ length beyond approach light system .............................. 200 feet
Inner -approach OFZ slope from 200 feet beyond threshold ............................... 50:1
Inner -transitional OFZ slope......................................................... 0:1
Runway protection zone at the primary runway end:
Width 200 feet from runway end ................................................. 250 feet
Width 1200 feet from runway end ............. ................................... 450 feet
Length..................................................................... 1000 feet
Preliminary Airport Layout Plan - Narrative Report 8
City of Kalispell
Kalispell City Airport
Runway protection zone at other runway end:
Width 200 feet from runway end ................................................. 250 feet
Width 1200 feet from runway end ................................................ 450 feet
Length..................................................................... 1000 feet
Departure runway protection zone:
Width 200 feet from the far end of TORA.......................................... 250 feet
Width 1200 feet from the far end of TORA......................................... 450 feet
Length..................................................................... 1000 feet
Threshold surface at primary runway end:
Distance out from threshold to start of surface ......................................... 0 feet
Width of surface at start of trapezoidal section ....................................... 250 feet
Width of surface at end of trapezoidal section ........................................ 700 feet
Length of trapezoidal section ................................................... 2250 feet
Length of rectangular section ................................................... 2750 feet
Slope of surface.................................................................. 20:1
Threshold surface at other runway end:
Distance out from threshold to start of surface ......................................... 0 feet
Width of surface at start of trapezoidal section ....................................... 250 feet
Width of surface at end of trapezoidal section ........................................ 700 feet
Length of trapezoidal section ................................................... 2250 feet
Length of rectangular section ................................................... 2750 feet
Slopeof surface.................................................................. 20:1
Taxiway centerline to parallel taxiway/taxilane centerline ................................. 69 feet
Taxiway centerline to fixed or movable object ........................................ 44.5 feet
Taxilane centerline to parallel taxilane centerline ....................................... 64 feet
Taxilane centerline to fixed or movable object ........................................ 39.5 feet
Taxiway width.................................................................. 25 feet
Taxiway shoulder width........................................................... 10 feet
Taxiway safety area width ................................................ I ........ 49 feet
Taxiway object free area width ...................................................... 89 feet
Taxilane object free area width ..................................................... 79 feet
Taxiway edge safety margin......................................................... 5 feet
Taxiway wingtip clearance......................................................... 20 feet
Taxilane wingtip clearance......................................................... 15 feet
REFERENCE: AC 15015300-13, Airport Design, including Changes I through 4.
Preliminary Airport Layout Plan - Narrative Report 9
City of Kalispell
Kalispell City Airport
KALISPELL CITY AIRPORT
AIRPORT DESIGN AIRPLANE AND AIRPORT DATA
Aircraft Approach Category........................................................... B
Airplane Design Group ........................................................ II Small
Airplane wingspan........................................................... 78.99 feet
Primary runway end approach visibility minimums are exclusively ......................... visual
Other runway end approach visibility minimums are exclusively .......................... visual
Airplane undercarriage width (1.15 x main gear track) ................................ 0.00 feet
Airport elevation.............................................................. 2932 feet
RUNWAY AND TAXIWAY WIDTH AND CLEARANCE STANDARD DIMENSIONS
Runway centerline to parallel taxiway/taxilane centerline ................................ 240 feet
Runway centerline to edge of aircraft parking ......................................... 250 feet
Runwaywidth.................................................................. 75 feet
Runway shoulder width........................................................... 10 feet
Runway blast pad width ........................................................... 95 feet
Runway blast pad length......................................................... 150 feet
Runway safety area width......................................................... 150 feet
Runway safety area length beyond each runway end
or stopway end, whichever is greater .............................................. 300 feet
Runway object free area width ..................................................... 500 feet
Runway object free area length beyond each runway end
or stopway end, whichever is greater .............................................. 300 feet
Clearway width................................................................. 500 feet
Stopwaywidth.................................................................. 75 feet
Obstacle free zone (OFZ):
Runway OFZ width............................................................ 250 feet
Runway OFZ length beyond each runway end ....................................... 200 feet
Inner -approach OFZ width ...................................................... 250 feet
Inner -approach OFZ length beyond approach light system .............................. 200 feet
Inner -approach OFZ slope from 200 feet beyond threshold ................................ 50:1
Inner -transitional OFZ slope......................................................... 0:1
Runway protection zone at the primary runway end:
Width 200 feet from runway end ................................................. 250 feet
Width 1200 feet from runway end ................................................ 450 feet
Length..................................................................... 1000 feet
Preliminary Airport Layout Plan - Narrative Report 10
City of Kalispell
Kalispell City Airport
Runway protection zone at other runway end:
Width 200 feet from runway end ................................................. 250 feet
Width 1200 feet from runway end ................................................ 450 feet
Length..................................................................... 1000 feet
Departure runway protection zone:
Width 200 feet from the far end of TORA.......................................... 250 feet
Width 1200 feet from the far end of TORA......................................... 450 feet
Length..................................................................... 1000 feet
Threshold surface at primary runway end:
Distance out from threshold to start of surface ......................................... 0 feet
Width of surface at start of trapezoidal section ....................................... 400 feet
Width of surface at end of trapezoidal section ...................................... 1000 feet
Length of trapezoidal section ................................................... 1500 feet
Length of rectangular section ................................................... 8500 feet
Slope of surface.................................................................. 20:1
Threshold surface at other runway end:
Distance out from threshold to start of surface ......................................... 0 feet
Width of surface at start of trapezoidal section ....................................... 400 feet
Width of surface at end of trapezoidal section ....................................... 1000 feet
Length of trapezoidal section ................................................... 1500 feet
Length of rectangular section ................................................... 8500 feet
Slopeof surface.................................................................. 20:1
Taxiway centerline to parallel taxiway/taxilane centerline ................................
105 feet
Taxiway centerline to fixed or movable object .......................................
65.5 feet
Taxilane centerline to parallel taxilane centerline .......................................
97 feet
Taxilane centerline to fixed or movable object ........................................
57.5 feet
Taxiwaywidth..................................................................
35 feet
Taxiway shoulder width...........................................................
10 feet
Taxiway safety area width.........................................................
79 feet
Taxiway object free area width .....................................................
131 feet
Taxilane object free area width ....................................................
115 feet
Taxiway edge safety margin .......................................................
7.5 feet
Taxiway wingtip clearance.........................................................
26 feet
Taxilane wingtip clearance.........................................................
18 feet
REFERENCE: AC 15015300-13, Airport Design, including Changes 1 through 4.
Preliminary Airport Layout Plan - Narrative Report f i
City of Kalispell
Kalispell City Airport
AIRPORTKALISPELL CITY
Aircraft Approach Category........................................................... B
Airplane Design Group ........................................................ II Small
Airplane wingspan........................................................... 78.99 feet
Primary runway end approach visibility minimums are not lower than ...................... 1 Mile
Other runway end approach visibility minimums are not lower than ........................ 1 Mile
Airplane undercarriage width (1.15 x main gear track) ................................ 0.00 feet
Airport elevation.............................................................. 2932 feet
RUNWAY AND TAXIWAY WIDTH AND CLEARANCE STANDARD DIMENSIONS
Runway centerline to parallel taxiway/taxilane centerline ................................
240 feet
Runway centerline to edge of aircraft parking .........................................
250 feet
Runwaywidth..................................................................
75 feet
Runway shoulder width...........................................................
10 feet
Runway blast pad width...........................................................
95 feet
Runway blast pad length.........................................................
150 feet
Runway safety area width.........................................................
150 feet
Runway safety area length beyond each runway end
or stopway end, whichever is greater ..............................................
300 feet
Runway object free area width .....................................................
500 feet
Runway object free area length beyond each runway end
or stopway end, whichever is greater ..............................................
300 feet
Clearwaywidth.................................................................
500 feet
Stopway width..................................................................
75 feet
Obstacle free zone (OFZ):
Runway OFZ width............................................................ 250 feet
Runway OFZ length beyond each runway end ....................................... 200 feet
Inner -approach OFZ width ...................................................... 250 feet
Inner -approach OFZ length beyond approach light system .............................. 200 feet
Inner -approach OFZ slope from 200 feet beyond threshold ................................ 50:1
Inner -transitional OFZ slope......................................................... 0:1
Runway protection zone at the primary runway end:
Width 200 feet from runway end ................................................. 250 feet
Width 1200 feet from runway end ................................................ 450 feet
Length..................................................................... 1000 feet
Preliminary Airport Layout Plan - Narrative Report 12
City of Kalispell
Kalispell City Airport
Runway protection zone at other runway end:
Width 200 feet from runway end ................................................. 250 feet
Width 1200 feet from runway end ................................................ 450 feet
Length..................................................................... 1000 feet
Departure runway protection zone:
Width 200 feet from the far end of TORA.......................................... 250 feet
Width 1200 feet from the far end of TORA......................................... 450 feet
Length..................................................................... 1000 feet
Threshold surface at primary runway end:
Distance out from threshold to start of surface ......................................... 0 feet
Width of surface at start of trapezoidal section .......................................
400 feet
Width of surface at end of trapezoidal section ......................................
1000 feet
Length of trapezoidal section ...................................................
1500 feet
Length of rectangular section ...................................................
8500 feet
Slope of surface..................................................................
20:1
Threshold surface at other runway end:
Distance out from threshold to start of surface .........................................
0 feet
Width of surface at start of trapezoidal section .......................................
400 feet
Width of surface at end of trapezoidal section .......................................
1000 feet
Length of trapezoidal section ...................................................
1500 feet
Length of rectangular section ...................................................
8500 feet
Slopeof surface..................................................................
20:1
Taxiway centerline to parallel taxiway/taxilane centerline ................................
105 feet
Taxiway centerline to fixed or movable object .......................................
65.5 feet
Taxilane centerline to parallel taxilane centerline .......................................
97 feet
Taxilane centerline to fixed or movable object ........................................
57.5 feet
Taxiway width..................................................................
35 feet
Taxiway shoulder width...........................................................
10 feet
Taxiway safety area width.........................................................
79 feet
Taxiway object free area width .....................................................
131 feet
Taxilane object free area width ....................................................
115 feet
Taxiway edge safety margin .......................................................
7.5 feet
Taxiway wingtip clearance.........................................................
26 feet
Taxilane wingtip clearance.........................................................
18 feet
REFERENCE: AC 15015300-13, Airport Design, including Changes I through 4.
Preliminary Airport Layout Plan - Narrative Report 13
City of Kalispell
Kalispell City Airport
KALISPELL CITE' AIRPORT
AIRPORT AND RUNWAY DATA
Airport elevation............................................................... 2932 feet
Mean daily maximum temperature of the hottest month ................................. 82.50 F
Maximum difference in runway centerline elevation ...................................... 5 feet
Length of haul for airplanes of more than 60,000 pounds ............................... 500 miles
RUNWAY LENGTHS RECOMMENDED FOR AIRPORT DESIGN
Small airplanes with approach speeds of less than 30 knots ............................... 390 feet
Small airplanes with approach speeds of less than 50 knots .............................. 1030 feet
Small airplanes with less than 10 passenger seats
75 percent of these small airplanes ............................................... 3460 feet
95 percent of these small airplanes ............................................... 4270 feet
100 percent of these small airplanes .............................................. 4740 feet
Small airplanes with 10 or more passenger seats ...................................... 4770 feet
Large airplanes of 60,000 pounds or less
75 percent of these large airplanes at 60 percent useful load ........................... 5500 feet
75 percent of these large airplanes at 90 percent useful load .......................... 7570 feet
100 percent of these large airplanes at 60 percent useful load .......................... 6610 feet
100 percent of these large airplanes at 90 percent useful load .......................... 8850 feet
Airplanes of more than 60,000 pounds ................................. Approximately 6040 feet
REFERENCE: AC I50/5325-4A, RUNWAY LENGTH REQUIREMENTS FOR AIRPORT DESIGN.
Preliminary Airport Layout Plan - Narrative Report i4
0
0
Ln
<
O
L�
W
v
0
n
o
n
<1
l
u
>
u�
I'l
III
<
U�
C:)
z
-
0
1
U�
<
U�
::D
0
z
7;
LLJ
U
m
V)
Li
Li
0
n�
CD
0
ry
wE
0
>
LLJ
III z
III
m >
Z
ol'i
0
LLJ
>
71
LLJ
0
LLJ
�
�--
D
o
<
LL-
<
m
>
m
Li
<
0
x
U) <
0
cn
<
cr)
F--
0 <
z
U)
= =
00
0 rY
Lij
Un
1.1
F— I --
<
1
Li
Q-�
<
>
n
D
D
L-i
__j LLJ
no
LLJ
o
L-i Z:
cl� Z-
h,LLJ
0
:E
< 0
<
C)
<
ry
<
LL-
CD
u
U
D
LLJ
D
<
<
C5
m
0
1 1
(Y
Li
CL
0
D
cn
<
C/�
z
0
<ry
<
<
0
INI��JliN:13 �VMNn �I
�-
O
O
Ln
n
Q
O
-cN
n
O
w
v
�
—
77
O0
_O
i-I—
jUQ
U
:�i
U
W
III
Q
U/
U
Z
W
_
W
U�
n
Q
�
n-
W
-1
U
Q
m
z
ry
o�
0
�z
w�
w
0
O
m
_
W ~
W CD
>
z
wz
� w
w
r_
ry>
z
w
01.1
O
z
w�
F-
W W
z Q
z
U w
O �
>
QO
W
> J
m
'S W
-<
�O
w�
o
ry-I
zz0
x_
cry 4
w
Q
�
O
Imo-
U O
OW �
w
cn
w
W
J
Q Q
W
W
� m
wz
�O
W
o
W
w
z
0:�
3:
w�
CD
o
z
«�
w
o
Q
u
Q
n�
Q
O
F--
U
w
U
W
J
D
Q
(n
Q
U
m
O
w
w
J
Q
W
n
O
c
O
I
Q
cn
Q
Q
Q
cn
W
ry
Q:�
0
n
F—
INIT':IiNIO J,VMNn1 i
W
LL-
Q
m
D
Q
Q
V
>�
Q
--
�Q
z zw
z
::D D
ct� D,
Of
Q ll�Q
LL-
OW
o0
�LL-
LrlQ
Q
w
V)
cr-
If
Q
w
w
L.
U
W
D
m
0
Located within the suggested project area boundary are multiple private ownerships
that may be affected by the proposed project. In the event an urban renewal project
is created, all of the owners must be notified of the City's intention to declare the area
blighted and that it is necessary and in the public interest for the City to implement an
urban renewal plan. A complete list of private owners should be compiled, checked
and verified prior to the adoption of any plan for implementation.
TRACT
P.I.N.
OWNER
ACRES
6D
0949500
DOUG & JULIE WISE
20.00
5B, 5BB
0219880
DOUG & DONNA MILLER
4.79
5HA
0711701
R & R DEVELOPMENT
5.21
5H, 5J, 5CEB
0367750
ELMER SIELER
13.51
5G
CITY OF KALISPELL
2.50
5GAA, 5CCAA
0848978
RON & CLARA SWARTZENBERGER
0.90
5GB, 5CCB
0848078
RON & CLARA SWARTZENBERGER
0.93
5GC
0791472
ELMER JR & VIRGINIA SIELER
3.22
5C, 5CE
ELMER JR & VIRGINIA SIELER
3.00
5GA, 5CCA
0848976
RON & CLARA SWARTZENBERGER
1.37
5CCD
0259420
PHYLLIS BRIGGS
1.20
STEVEN & KATHLEEN BOOWER
5CC
0970295
AL SHEFFERD
0.37
2
0535340
ROBERT MONK
10.78
7C
0535340
ROBERT MONK
0.12
7CG
0975566
ERIN WILKEN
4.57
DOUG & DONNA MILLER
2D
0535342
SYDNEY TORGERSON
1.68
2E
0968004
MICHAEL BARRETT
0.81
2M
0980170
JERRY & KAREN SLACK
0.82
2G
0972764
RON TRIPPETT
1.67
3AA
FOREST SERVICE
2.00
3AB
0829450
LAWRENCE & BETTY STOCKHILL
1.51
MARGERY HEWSON TRUST
1 D
0835500
MYRON & MARILYN STRAND
3.16
STRAND AVIATION
is
NATIONAL GUARD ARMORY
3.44
1
0427901
KALISPELL ELKS
3.67
1 A
0112600
MEYERS FAMILY TRUST
1.47
GILBERT & SUSAN BISSELL
2AD
0971780
ROBERT & LADONA MONK
0.37
JOHN DITTMAN
KALISPELL OB/GYN ASSOC.
VAN KIRKE NELSON TRUST
2L
0974474
ORETANA
9.32
2ACA, 2K
0974200
WIGGIN & TORGERSON, PARTNERS
1.43
SRS BUILDING
2AC
0974473
DON TORGERSON
1.44
2C
0050405
DONALD & JUANITA BREVIK
1.40
7AAC, 7CD
0050405
DONALD & JUANITA BREVIK
1.08
7AAB
0368500
EDWARD HINES TRUST
1.55
DONALD HINES
7CEB
0976769
DONALD & VICTORIA BURTON
1.23
7CEA
0975364
LINDA STEVENS
0.34
0972913
FREDERICK WEBER
SKY HARBOR CONDOS
0976768
ALAN & MARY LERNER
7CF
0975555
DONALD & VICTORIA BURTON
1.29
KENNETH MAKLOSKI
2F
0969226
SYDNEY TORGERSON
4.67
2FA
0975843
LOUIS & CAROL SCHLEGEL
2.33
2J
0973040
HUGH LOUDEN
1.16
2JA
0973749
HUGH LOUDEN
1.03
2JB
0973755
HUGH LOUDEN
1.01
12BA.
E002400
CITY OF KALISPELL
5.80
12B
0791474
ELMER JR & VIRGINIA SIELER
10.43
DATE: January 23, 1996
10
12A, 12AA, 12 E013766 FLATHEAD COUNTY 24.71
12C E013750 FLATHEAD COUNTY 2.11
PART
771 OBSTRUCTION
DATA TABLE
NO.
DESCRIPTION
PART 77 SURFACE
PENETRATION
AMOUNT OF
PENETRATION
PROPOSED
REMEDY
DISTANCE FROM
RW CENTERLINE
APPROXIMATE
RW STATION
13:1 >
POLES/TREES
RW 13 APPROACH SURFACE
1
DISP. THRESHOLD
VARIES
VARIES
31:17
RADIO TOWER
RW 31 APPROACH SURFACE
2 112'
UGHTING/RELOCA110N
250' RT.
100+00
FHS.l>
RADIO TOWER
HORIZONTAL SURFACE
_35 176'
LIGHTING/RELOCATION
1250' RT.
101+00
CS:1 >
RADIO TOWER
CONICAL SURFACE
4 108'
UGHTING/RELOCATION
3900' LT.
111+00
FCS 2->7
TERRAIN
CONICAL SURFACE
5 544'
NONE
5500' RT.
10+00
1QEXISTING CONDITIONS MAY HAVE UTILITY POLES AND A TREES AS PENETRATIONS. THE FUTURE AND ULTIMATE
CONDITION OF A DISPLACED THRESHOLD SHOULD REMEDY THESE VARYING PENETRATIONS.
Q2 THIS OBSTRUCTION IS A CONICAL SURFACE PENETRATION IN THE EXISTING AND FUTURE CONDITIONS
(151' AND 176' PENETRATIONS RESPECTIVELY.)
Q3 THIS OBSTRUCTION IS A CONICAL SURFACE PENETRATICN IN THE EXISTING AND FUTURE CONDITIONS
(146' AND 171' PENETRATIONS RESPECTIVELY.)
®THIS OBSTRUCTION IS A 62' PENETRATION UNDER THE EXISTING CONDITIONS.
IN THE FUTURE CONDITION, IT IS A 82' PENETRATION.
OS SAME FOR EXISTING, FUTURE AND ULTIMATE CONDITIONS.
T28N ; R21W
2000 0 2000 4000
(Sf.]ALE IN FEET)
HORIZONTAL SCALE
600 0 600 1200
(SCALE IN FEET)
VERTICAL SCALE
100 0 100 200
(SCALE IN FEET)
--
200
1000
HS:1
3300
1000' 200' EXISTING
PRIMARY
EXISTING RUNWAY
PROTECTION ZONE
3300
31:1
3250
EXISTING RUNWAY EXISTING PRIMARY SURFACE SURFACE
PROTECTION ZONE
200' 1000'
3250
RUNWAYFUTURE FUTURE
3200
3200
1000' 200'
PRIMARY PROTECTIONZONE
SURFACE 200' 11000,
�pPE
ppE
SG
OpE
ON G?�
3150
UTURE/ULT. RN FUTURE/ULTIMATE
PROTECTION ZONE PRIMARY SURFACE
LTIMATE ULTIMATE RUNWAY
PROTECTION ZONE
g0••� Pp
ON S
ROP pP�
PppR
5� Gt1
ROP
Pp
LNG
15
�U
�� _ G
CpN 1E_
3150
fk/
3100
SrINC CONICAL-----
LEY _ _
? EXISTING_HORIZONTAL_SURFACE_ELE'V. 3 082---- ------
PRIMARY
SURF ACE
A-- ----------- - -----------------------
---- EX\S�N�
�NRE
20:�
--- 0`nMP
F NROGONGPI
3100
--
-� ---
--
3050
N�T1�-----=
FU I IATf
Tt R f C�Np
CAC
---------
-------
----- --
f
---------
FUTU(
ST//yC 2p.
--------- -
f OLT 20.
AP I
-------- -------- ------�----------- W
_o O— 0 3 0
z Of 0 o+
o o M
o W 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
rn 0+ rn o+ rn
N m N 3 N
3050
FUTURE
ULTIMATE
3000
3000
PROACH
AP o
SCOP OACN ^
W
D
HORIZONTAL
HORIZONTAL
SLOP p ¢
f f j j
w ¢ w ¢ w
SURFACE
SURFACE
2950
2950
X r J_ o r J W VI
W V 1 W W V) W
W 4 VV) w o In W
2900
13:1
2900
-80' LIGHT TOWERS
-25' TREES
13:1
2850
2850
-42+00 -36+00 -30+00 -24+00 -18+00 -12+00 -6+00 0+00 6+00 12+00 18+00 24+00 30+00 36+00 42+00 48+00 54+00 60+00 66+00 72+00 78+00 84+00 90+00 96+00 102+00 108+00
1 1 1 1 I
APPROACH TO RUNWAY 13 APPROACH TO RUNWAY 31
1
a
0
a!r
Q
}
m
0
N
5
W
lr
V)
3
o
i Wi
U
Q
W O ' d Z
z� oo j
p rn a Q
z
0
1n
�m zm
a o V)
Z W 0
� W
o2>< a L)i
Qr o o c .
♦3
r
w
V � W
�.
Way
jacc
F a
0a
W
O �
a
W
V
=N
J a.
a OC
~a
ui
W
2
to
SHEET
2
2 OF 2