CorrespondenceAugust 16, 1999
Glen Neier
City Attorney
P.O. Box 1997
Kalispell, MT 59903
City Council of Kalispell
City Hall
Kalispell, MT 59901
Re: Ron Pack's sewer line in vicinity of Greenbriar Subdivision
Dear Glen and Council Members:
In confirmation of the conversation between you, me and my attorney this afternoon, enclosed
please find a brief explanation with a rough map dealing with my proposed sewer development.
I am submitting this information to you in view of the fact that it was indefinite when the work
session would commence and today, Monday the 16th day of August, I am not feeling well and
thus cannot sit and wait at the City Council meeting for the work session meeting.
MAP ORIENTA'nON - The map I am presenting to you is a blow-up of the State of Montana
right-of-way map showing the bypass west of town, through my properties west of Corporate
Avenue and North of Highway 2. 1 have attached a very rough drawing of the properties that I
own which lie adjacent to but north of the highway map. As you are aware, although this
highway map reflects the approximate course of the highway, since this map was done the actual
highway course has changed. We are not sure when the final highway layout will be "etched in
stone." The property on the map marked in yellow starting at the bottom of the page reflects my
properties as they existed. The square parcel lying to the west through which the highway cuts
directly through the middle, was a I 0-acre parcel acquired by me some time ago, and which I had
planned to develop. In addition, the other properties shown in yellow are properties Wmik-uh
belong to me. The property with the yellow lines marked through it is the property I have
recently sold and is the property subject to the sewer dispute between myself and the City.
Originally, before the bypass became an issue, I had contemplated and had building permits to
build a sewer line commencing at U.S. Highway 2, that is at the very bottom right-hand comer of
the map, across that area now marked in pink which the highway is taking, up the boundary as
appears through the dotted blue lines, to and through the I 0-acre parcel, half -way across the 10-
acre parcel to its northernmost boundary, back to my boundary line as reflected by the dash lines,
and then north to connect with the sewer main servicing the pump station. The actual sewer
main and pump station that I installed several years ago which is sub ect to the agreement, is
marked with a solid blue line and the letters P.S. at the top of this exhibit. Due to the bypass we
abandoned the sewer line as marked with the dash lines. Now, as a result of the highway bypass,
what use I am going to make of the remainder of the I 0-acre parcel lying north of the highway,
and how I am going to provide that with services, and also service some of those properties
adjacent to the Greenbriar Subdivision is unknown at the current time. I do not know whether I
will be able to obtain commercial zoning, multiple -family zoning, business zoning, or what kind
of zoning will be allowed after the highway is complete, or after it is specifically delineated so
that I know exactly what my remainders are. I do know, however, that any city sewer and other
services due to the effects of gravity from those properties, will have to course in either a
northerly direction, or directly easterly through a pumping set-up. When I first built the existing
pump station and sewer system, it was my concept that this area would be developed and that I
would utilize the pump station to do so. That is why I built the pump station with such
tremendous capacity -- much more than was needed for the Greenbriar subdivision, in order that
these areas which need be served by gravitational service could utilize that capacity. That was
the whole basis behind the agreement.
As indicated above, I am not sure what I am going to do with the balance of the I 0-acre parcel,
but if the City allows me to put in the sewer line from the property marked with the dash lines
along the lines that I have proposed, and running north to that sewer line, then in that case I can
use gravitational flow to service those two small triangles that the highway has left for me to
fin-ther develop. If I cannot service in that fashion, i.e., if the City insists that the parcel marked
with the dash lines must be serviced directly easterly, then the only way I can service my two
parcels is to either put in additional pump stations to pump to the line I place on that parcel
(which means I will have to cross the property of the new owner and at least one other place), or
two, I will then also have to develop either a very complex puraping system or an additional line
down the dotted line on the property I own north of the properties. This more than doubles the
expense I am facing in developing a very small remainder of property. This was not the plan.
I have proposed and you have seen a "wish book", a plan of what might be done with the parcels
left as a result of the highway condemnation. Obviously this is not final. Obviously I am not
inclined to have this at a public meeting where it can be subject to public scrutiny, until 1) we are
assured that the highway right-of-way is fully established and locked in stone, and 2) 1 have any
concept fully engineered and in such fashion that I can present same for subdivision review or
other environmental considerations whatever they might be. The fact remains, however, that the
only way to develop these parcels in an economically reasonable sense for me the landowner, is
to set up a service line to my sole properties with all the characteristics of a main line, in order
that it is feasible for me to hook these properties to that line and serve the same with that line.
To do otherwise will cost tremendous amounts of money.
I own all the land involved. We are not running sewer lines across properties I do not own. I
own more than sufficient capacity in the pump station to service those lines. In short the City, by
taking the step they are taking, is costing me tremendous money, is adopting a plan which is
questionnable engineering -wise, and is forcing me the landowner to abandon my use of my rights
under the contract. The City is not following their own regulations and looking at the general
overall development. They are looking only at the development of this one lot which I have
recently sold, and are not looking to a comprehensive plan for development of the whole area.
As to development of the whole area, I can assure you I did not buy the original 10 acres and the
rest of the land just north of that, to stand on my porch, look at same and admire the sun rising
and setting over this property. I bought this property for the purposes of commercial
development of some sort, whether it be apartments, corporate headquarters, or other such uses.
I have an idea to develop my properties. It is my desire to develop these properties. I have
shown you a "wish book" plan for possible future development. The properties would be
developed now but for ihe bypass. The City, by insisting that the sewer on the lined parcel be
put in under existing water lines directly to Corporate Avenue and rejecting my plan, will force
me to utilize a pumping station or additional sewer mains at tremendous expense, making much
of my property undevelopable, and precludes a reasonable, progressive, economic and careful
development of my properties.
I request that the City Council authorize me to place the sewer line on my property to service this
property in accord with my plan. If you have any questions, either I or my attorney, Lee
Kaufman, can most probably answer them.
Best regards,
Ron Pack
11-
ME-
MEMORANDUM
August 16, 1999
0
To: Chris Kukulski, City Manager
From: Jim Hansz, Director of Public W rks
Subject: Sewer in Corporate Drive
For quite some time we have been working with the developer of the Westgate Senior project on
Corporate Drive. For several weeks now there has been some misunderstanding regarding the ready
availability of sewer to the parcel, and the possible need for a new sewer to serve the development. Mr.
Amerman prepared the attached memo outlining the situation.
When the parcels on Corporate were platted for development a sewer was installed in Corporate
Drive to serve them. The Westgate Senior project is on the west side of the road, and a sewer main runs the
entire length of the property. A sewer service wye was installed on the main for this parcel. Mr. Amerman's
photographs show these relationships. As this information clearly shows there is no need for a new sewer to
serve this parcel or any other parcel on Corporate Drive to the extent that it is presently developed.
The point at issue is the claimed need for a new sewer extending from the south side of the parcel,
then west a distance, then north to eventually tie into the sewer system that serves Greenbriar and from
there to the lift station. Th.is lift station then pumps the sewage back up the hill to discharge into a manhole
directly in front of the Westgate Senior property where it then flows by gravity to the City WWTP, past the
existing sewer wye installed to serve the Westgate parcel.
After reviewing the proposal for the new sewer, it was apparent that the sewer was not needed for
the stated purpose. To the contrary, the sewer's primary function would be to serve a large area of property
to the north for which there is no development plan, as required by MDEQ regulations and a number of
Kalispell regulations and ordinances.
In summary, an existing sewer can serve the Westgate Senior project, and any new sewer to an
undeveloped area would need to be preceded by a comprehensive development plan, engineered design and
review and approval by the State and the City. Mr. Pack and the engineer have been informed of these
requirements.
Post Office Box 1997 - Kalispell, Montana 59903-1997
-- Telephone (406) 758-7700 - FAX (406) 758-7758-
FAPR%lIq=�F
UN
MEMORANDUM
To: Jim Hansz
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
From: Dick Amerman
Assistant City Engineer
Date: Auguii 16,1999
Re: Westgate Seniors Development, Sewer Main in Corporate Drive
Bret Birk, Consulting Engineer for Koa Development has submitted an Engineering Report and plans
for the referenced project. The proposed development is on the west side of Corporate Drive and
at the north end. There is an existing sewer main in Corporate Drive that runs in fi7ont of the subject
property and then flows by gravity to our treatment facility. The sewer main can serve the entire
piece of proper
.ty by gravity flow, even though the service piping will be fairly shallow at the
noi-thwesterly.comer. The development will consist of twelve (12) duplex units and a community
building. Mr. Birk's design has two of the duplexes connected to the sewer in Corporate Drive, and
the sewer for the rest of the project flows 740 ft. north to an existing gravity sewer which flows to
a fift station. The force main for the lift station empties into a manhole at the northeasterly comer
of the Westgate property. The sewer system, as designed by Mr. Birk, is intended to serve not only
this property, but the property to the north and west. There is no development plan for these
properties, and hence, no engineering data to support a design. Our design standards require a
development plan and an engineering report that supports a design. The State's Design Standards
for Wastewater Facilities also requires a development plan and an engineering report.
(CONT.)
Post Office Box 1997 - Kalispell, Montana 59903-1997
-Felephone (406) 758-7700 - FAX (406)758-7758
The following photograph was taken looking southwesterly at the manhole at the northeast comer
of the property:
I have reviewed Mr. Birk's design and determined that all of the property can be served by the sewer
main in Corporate Drive. It makes no sense to have the sewer from this project flow north several
hundred feet and then pump it right back to the fi7ont of the property. I have asked Br. Birk to re-
design the sewer so that all flows are to the main in Corporate Drive. The flagged stake in the photo
below marks the sewer service for the property.
RST
NATIONAL BANK
March 13, 2001
City of Kalispell
RE: Irrevocable Letter of Credit No. 01-0313
Ronnie Pack/Westgate Subdivision
Expiration Date August 15, 2001
Gentlemen:
We hereby establish in your favor our Irrevocable Letter of Credit No. 01-0313 in the
amount of "THREE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY SEVEN AND 501100**
U. S. Dollars ($3,187.50). This Letter of Credit shall remain in force and available by
your drafts in part or whole, at our office, Montana First National Bank, 85 North Main
Street, Kalispell, MT. 59901, until expiring at close of business on August 15, 2001, and
certifying the following:
a. That the creditor guarantees funds in the sum of $3,187.50, which represents
125% of the estimated cost of completing the required improvements in Westgate.
b. That if the Developer fails to complete the specified improvements within the
required period, the creditor will pay to the City immec��Y- and without further
action, such funds as are necessary to finance the completion- dsb
improvements up to the limit of credit stated in the L&f6ri-�&f Credit.
ffiA
t National Bank
o'W
F. p
0.
BY:
Tom Weaver, President
TW/sk
85 North Main - RO. Box 1996 - Kalispell, MT 59903 - (406) 755-9999 - Fax (406) 755-1534
CD
- k1)
�6
CD
't
X
CN
Lf
r�
CD
ON
ON
I
41 40
carver Engineering, Inc.,
Consulting Engineers
Civil
Structural
Environmental
May 10, 2001
Chris Kukulski, Manager
City of Kalispell
PO Box 1997
Kalispell, MT 59903-1997
Re: Westgate Subdivision - Subdivision Improvement Agreement
Release of Security
Dear Mr. Kukulski:
We are submitting an updated version of Exhibit "B" of the Subdivision
Improvement Agreement for Westgate Subdivision that shows all work has now
been completed. On behalf of the owner (Ronnie Pack), we are requesting the
release of security ($3,187.50) being held for the completion of remaining
improvements.
The remaining improvements consisted of planting of trees along the
boulevards, and although 17 trees were included in the Subdivision
Improvement Agreement, the owner planted 20 trees along the Westgate
Subdivision boulevards and another 11 trees along the Westgatq,, S'�Pior
> C---
Apartment boulevards. All trees are 1-1/2" caliper Norway Maples. r-
Please feel free to call if you have any questions. M M
M
Sincerely, < M
E, CD
X-
CARVER ENGINEERING, INC.
e---rao (;1�11
Tom Cowan, P.E.
EXHIBIT "B"
CERTIFICATION OF WORK TO BE COMPLETED
WESTGATE SUBDIVISION
PRIVATE ROAD NORTH OF LOT 4
COMPLETED TO DATE
3-May-01
Item No.
Description
Unit
Measure
Estimated
Quantity
Unit Price
Total Price
QUANTITY
OMPLETE
TOTAL COST
COMPLETED
101
Unclassified Excavation
C.Y.
720
$ 3.25
$ 2,340.00
720
$ 2,340.6-0-
102
Select Sub -Base, 3" (-) Pit Run Gravel
C.Y.
535
$ 8.00
$ 4,280.00
535
$ 4,280.00
103
Crushed Base, 3/4" Crushed Gravel
S. F.
9,680
$ 0.20
$ 1,936.00
9,680
$ 1,936.00
104
Hot Plant Mix Asphalt
S. F.
8,572
$ 0.75
$ 6,429.00
81572
$ 6,429.00
105
Curb and Gutter
L.F.
586
$ 7.00
$ 4,102.00
586
$ 4,102.00
106
Sidew Ik (5' Wide) - North Side of Road
S. F.
$ 3.00
$ 3,975.00
1,325
$ 3,975.00
iSUBTOTAL ITEMS 101 - 106 1
-��1,32�5
1
$ 23,062.00
1 $ 23,062.00
MISCELLANEOUS WORK
Item No.
Description
Unit
Measure
Estimated
Quantity
Unit Price
Total Price
QUANTITY
OMPLETE
TOTAL COST
COMPLETED
201
5' Sidewalk (West Side Corporate Way)
S. F.
2,590
$ 3.00
$ 7,770.00
2590
$ 7,770.00
202
Boulevard Trees
EACH
17
$ 150.00
$ 2,550.00
17
$ 2,550.00
SUBTOTAL 201 - 202
$ 10,320.00
$ 10,320.00
ITOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST 1 $ 33,382.00 1 1 $ 33,382.001
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST OF CONSTRUCTION
$
33,382.00
AMOUNT COMPLETED PRIOR TO BONDING
$
33,382.00
AMOUNT OF REMAINING WORK
AMOUNT OF BOND (125% OF REMAINING WORK)
AMOUNT OF WORK COMPLETED TO DATE
33,382.00
PERCENTAGE OF WORK COMPLETED TO DATE
100%
AMOUNT OF WORK REMAINING
ORIGINAL BOND AMOUNT
3,187.50
AMOUNT OF BOND TO BE RETAINED (125% OF REMAINING WORK)
$
-
BOND AMOUNT TO BE RELEASED
$
3,187.50
AMOUNT PREVIOUSLY RELEASED
$
-
AMOUNT TO BE RELEASED AT THIS TIME 3,1877i7O
AS ENGINEER OF RECORD FOR WESTGATE SUBDIVISION, I CERTIFY THAT THE WORK
LISTED HEREIN IS CORRECT. IN ADDITION, I CERTIFY THAT THE ASSOCIATED COSTS ARE
REASONABLY ACCURATE ESTIMATES OF THE RESPECTIVE COSTS OF THE WORK. THE
VALUE OF CONSTRUCTION & OTHER WORK COMPLETED TO DATE IS ESTIMATED TO BE: $ 33,382.00
THE TOTAL VALUE OF THE REMAINING WORK, SERVICES & FEES IS ESTIMATED TO BE: $ -
SECURITY HELD AT 125% OF THE REMAINING COSTS SHOULD BE IN THE AMOUNT OF: $
THEREFORE, IT IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT
TO REDUCE THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF THE SECURITY HELD BY: $3,187.50
THOMAS )k,>17,Ny,�F
*ALL IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE COMPLETED BY JUNE 15, 2001
THOMAS 101.
EXHIBIT "B"
-A GOWAN
WESTGATE SUBDIVISION
1032 RE. 2`7 1"
LETTER OF CREDIT CERTIFICATION
5/3/01
1 OF I PAGES
rE'
City of Kalispell
Post Office Box 1997 - Kalispell, Montana 59903-1997 - Telephone (406)758-7700 Fax(406)758-7758
June 1, 2001
Tom Cowan, P.E.
1995 Third Avenue East
Kalispell, MT 59901
Dear Mr. Cowan:
Enclosed is the Letter of Credit, No. 01-0313, submitted for the
Westgate Subdivision. I apologize for the delay in returning it
to you.
If you need any additional information, please don't hesitate to
contact me.
Sincerely,
Theresa White
City Clerk
enclosure
BANK'
March 13, 2001
City of Kalispell
RE: Irrevocable Letter of Credit No. 01-0313
Ronnie PackfWestgate Subdivision
Expiration Date August 15, 2001
Gentlemen:
We hereby establish in your favor our Irrevocable Letter of Credit No. 01-0313 in the
amount of "THREE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY SEVEN AND, 501100**
U. S. Dollars ($3,187.50). This Letter of Credit shall remain in force and available by
your drafts in part or whole,, at our office, Montana First National Bank, 85 North Main
Street, Kalispell, MT. 59901, until expiring at close of business on August 15, 2001, and
certifying the following:
a. That the creditor guarantees funds in the sum of $3,187.50, which represents
125% of the estimated cost of completing the required improvements in Westgate.
b. That if the Developer fails to complete the specified improvements within the
required period, the creditor will pay to the City imme A�jy
cA and without further
action, such funds as are necessary to finance the compj
improvements up to the limit of credit stated in the LM I
t National Bank
BY:
Tom Weaver, President
TW/sk
MA R
2001
IU'
V
F. it 1> 0.
85 North Main e RO. Box 1996 e Kalispell, MT 59903 - (406) 755-9999 - Fax (406) 755-1534