Loading...
Citizens for a Better Flathead Handoutnrr V " IQ N N N T T �: f Q -0 $ �2 - pp 01 .07 N w 0 ' m N - N�- q O v 16 O O r H O t4i) v v aj 'C3 O O 1_-a O by .y ,.O !L bl) a 0 cct O n . �Hy G O U i r r ✓ Density Page 1 of 7 Office of Planning & Grants Agenda Fees FloodPlain Administration i Farms & Permits i Interlocal Agreement j Legal Notices Maps ;Meeting Calendar Minutes Planning & Property Links f Plans & Regulations l . ProgressReportj (If you can not view the buttons above, make sure you have Java. Click here for a free download.) IA Density Comparisons `- --' Please be patient while this page loads. Rural Initiatives 14 Missoula Online Statistical System MOSS Z —W--S Compliance approvals for building permit applications - view this week's approvals Check the status of your permits online through Velodty Hall Neighborhood Sampler I Sanborn Maps I Missoula in Motion ADA Notice Density Comparison - <2 DU/AC a c c U- Zintek Place House Spacing: 300' House Setback from Sidewalk Terrain: Flat Constructed: 1971-Present Council: None Fivnn Lane - Area 18 Density Current: 0.3 Net: 0.3 Comp. Plan: 2 Max. Zoning: 1 Specifications Number of Dwellings: 3 Zoning: C-RR1 Street Width: 25' Sidewalk Setback: N/A Sidewalk Width: NA' 103' Sidewalk Width:N/A House Spacing: 150' House Setback from Sidewalk: 40' Terrain: Flat Constructed: 1951-1970 Council: Upper Rattlesnake Upper Rattlesnake - Area 16 Density Current: 0.6 Net: 0.8 Comp Plan: 1 Max. Zoning: 1 Specifications Number of Dwellings: 6 Zoning: C-RR1 Street Width: 21' Sidewalk Setback: N/A Frev Lane - Area 14 Density Current: 1 Net: 1.3 Comp. Plan: 2 Max. Zonin4: 1 Specifications Number of Dwellings: 10 Zoning: C-RR1 What's New in OPG: City Subdivision Regulation Amendments. Phase 2 - PAZ to begin review May 30 Increased Countv Land Use Fees adopted by BCC. New fees go into effect Sept. 1 2007 City Council Ward Map - approved by City Council 2006 Analysis of Impediments to Affordable Housing Choice - final document 2008 Long Range Transportation Plan Update- update process to begin Draft Seeley Lake Regional and Use Plan available for review Northside/Westside Neighborhood Plan Review - sent back to PAZ for further discussion City and County Subdivision Applications now on web Missoula County Growth Policy Update - adopted by http://www.co.missoula.mt.us/opgweb/Admin/NeighborhoodSampler/density.htm 6/4/2007 Density Street Width: 24' Sidewalk Page 2 of 7 BCC and City Council Setback: NIA Sidewalk Width: NA' House Spacing: 100' House Setback from Sidewalk: 83' Terrain: Flat Constructed: 1971-Present Council: None Hawthorne - Area 11 Density Current: 1.2 Net: 1.3 Comp. Plan: 2 Max. Zoning: 2 Specifications Number of Dwellings: 12 Zoning: ZD-13 Street Width: 24' Sidewalk Setback: N/A Sidewalk Width: N/A House Spacing: 28' House Setback from Sidewalk: 42' Terrain: Hillside Constructed: 1971-Present Council: None Applehouse Lane - Area 15 Density Current: 1.3 Net: 1.4 Comp. Plan: 2 Max. Zoning: 2 Specifications Number of Dwellings: 13 Zoning: RLD-II/PUD Street Wdth: 32' Sidewalk Setback: N/A Sidewalk Width: 4' House Spacing: 44' House Setback from Sidewalk: 31' Terrain: Flat Constructed: 1971-Present Council: Upper Rattlesnake Canyon Gate - Area 6 Density Current: 1.8 Net: 1.7 Comp. Plan: 6 Max. Zoning: 1 Specifications Number of Dwellings: 18 Zoning: RLD-1 Street Wdth: 30' Sidewalk Setback: N/A Sidewalk Width: 5' House Spacing: 22' House Setback from Sidewalk: 63' Terrain: Flat Constructed: 1951-1970 Council: Farviews/Pattee Canyon Density Comparison - 2<3 DU/AC Farviews - Area 5 Density Current: 2.2 Net: 3.2 Comp. Plan: 6 Max. Zoning: 4-8 West Broadway Corridor Survey Downtown Historic District Nomination Town Lot Development Standards out for agency review Gravel Zoning Resolution . approved by BCC OPG Organizational Chart Public Notice Matrix - a guide to activity that triggers public notice from OPG Growth Management Phase 2 City Regulatory Revision Updated 1111104 -4� Chapter 19.74 M lu ti-Dwelling Site Plan Standards Adopted (Amended 12131103) Chapter 19.77 Landscaping and Buffering Adopted Chapter 19.78 ff-Street Parkin Adopted http://www.co.missoula.mt.us/opgweb/Admin/NeighborhoodSampler/density.htm 6/4/2007 Density Page 3 of 7 . Specifications Number of Dwellings: 22 Zoning: A Street Width: 22' Sidewalk Setback: N/A Sidewalk Width: 4' House Spacing: 15' House Setback from Sidewalk: 46' Terrain: Hillside Constructed: 1951-1970 Council: Farviews/Pattee Canyon Lewis & Clark - Area _4 Density Current: 2.8 Net: 4.1 Comp. Plan: 6 Max. Zoning: 4-8 Specifications Number of Dwellings: 28 Zoning: R-1 Street Width: 40' Sidewalk Setback: N/A Sidewalk Width: 5' House Spacing: 12' House Setback from Sidewalk: 41' Terrain: Flat Constructed: 1971-Present Council: Lewis & Clark Belleview - Area 7 Density Current: 2.9 Net: 4.4 Comp. Plan: 6 Max. Zoning: 4-5 Specifications Number of Dwellinqs: 29 Zoning: RR-1 Street Width: 40' Sidewalk Setback: N/A Sidewalk Width: 5' House Spacing: 21' House Setback from Sidewalk: 26' Terrain: Flat Constructed: <1950 Council: Lewis & Clark Density Comparison - 3<4 DU/AC Carline Addition - Area 3 Density Current: 3.1 Net: 4.4 Comp. Plan: 6 Max. Zoning: 4-8 Specifications Number of Dwellings: 31 Zoning: R-1 Street Width: 40' Sidewalk Setback: N/A Sidewalk Width: 5' House Spacing: 17' House Setback from Sidewalk: 28' Terrain: Flat Constructed: 1951-1970 Council: Southgate Triangle s 9 South Hills - Area 1 Densi http://www. co. missoula.mt.us/opgweb/Admin/NeighborhoodSampler/density.htm 6/4/2007 Density Current: 3.1 Net: 4.4 Page 4 of 7 Comp. Plan: 6 Max. Zoning: 8 Specifications Number of Dwellings: 31 Zoning: R-1 Street Width: 38' Sidewalk Setback: N/A Sidewalk Width: 4' House Spacing: 43' House Setback from Sidewalk: 32' Terrain: Hillside Constructed: 1971-Present Council: Moose Can Gully m 3 C � � 3 d �C Central Avenue r �THM � Sidewalk Width: 5' House Spacing: 15' House Setback from Sidewalk: 42' Terrain: Flat Constructed: <1950 Council: University District Setback: N/A Sidewalk Width: 5' House Spacing: 25' House Setback from Sidewalk: 40' Terrain: Flat Constructed: 1951-1970 Council: Emma Dickinson/Orchard Homes Sidewalk Width: 5' House S ap cing: 29' House Setback from Sidewalk: 23' Terrain: Hillside Constructed: <1950 Council: Lower Rattlesnake Universitv (Arthur - Maurice) - Area 22 Density Current: 3.2 Net: 5.6 Comp. Plan: 6 Max. Zoning: 4-8 Specifications Number of Dwellinas: 32 Zoning: R-1 Street Width: 40' Sidewalk Setback: N/A Orchard Homes/Riverfront - Area 12 Densijy Current: 3.3 Net: 4.3 Comp. Plan: 4 Max. Zoning: 4 Specifications Number of Dwellinas: 33 Zoning: RLD-4 Street Width: 31' Sidewalk Lower Rattlesnake - Area 13 Density Current: 3.4 Net: 5.3 Comp. Plan: 6-8 Max. Zoning: 4-8 Specifications Number of Dwellings: 34 Zoning: R-1 Street Width: 29' Sidewalk Setback: 8' Elk Hills - Area 2 http://www.co.missoula.mt.us/opgweb/Admin/NeighborhoodSampler/density.htm 6/4/2007 Density Page 5 of 7 Density Current: 3.6 Net: 7.0 Comp. Plan: 2 Max. Zoning: 12-20 Specifications Number of Dwellings: 36 Zoning: R-III/PUD Street Width: 49' Sidewalk Setback: N/A Sidewalk Width: 5' House Spacing: 161,58' House Setback from Sidewalk: 22' Terrain: Hillside Constructed: 1971-Present Council: Moose Can Gully Density Comparison - 4<5 DU/AC Slant Street - Area 21 Density Current: 4.6 Net: 8.3 Comp. Plan: 6 Max. Zoning: 4-8 Specifications Number of Dwellings: 46 Zoning: R-1 Street Wdth: 39' Sidewalk Setback: 22' Sidewalk Width: 5' House Spacing: 17' House Setback from Sidewalk: 20' Terrain: Hillside Constructed: <1950 Council: Rose Park Density Comparison - 5<6 DU/AC House Spacing: 32' House Setback from Sidewalk: 38' Terrain: Flat Constructed: <1950 Council: Franklin to the Fort House Spacing: 27' House Setback from Sidewalk: 34' Terrain: Hillside Constructed: 1951-1970 Franklin - Area 9 Density Current: 5.2 Net: 8.5 Comp. Plan: 16 Max. Zoning: 12-20 Specifications Number of Dwellings: 52 Zoning: B Street Width: 40' Sidewalk Setback: N/A Sidewalk Width: N/A Northside - Area 19 Density Current: 5.3 Net: 8.7 Comp. Plan: 16 Max. Zoning: 12-20 Specifications Number of Dwellings: 53 Zoning: B Street Width: 40' Sidewalk Setback: N/A Sidewalk Width: N/A http://www.co.missoula.mt.us/opgweb/Admin/NeighborhoodSampler/density.htm 6/4/2007 Density Council: Northside Page 6 of 7 Westside - Area 20 Density Current: 5.3 Net: 7.4 Comp. Plan: 16 Max. Zoning: 8-16 Specifications Number of Dwellings: 53 Zoning: R-II Street Width: 40' Sidewalk Setback: 12' Sidewalk Width: 5' House Spacing: 22' House Setback from Sidewalk: 30' Terrain: Hillside Constructed: 1951-1970 Council: Westside Density Comparison - 6<7 DU/AC Sidewalk Width: 6' House Spacing: 27' House Setback from Sidewalk: 29' Terrain: Flat Constructed: <1950 Council: University District C�South 4th Street Sidewalk Width: 5' House Spacing: 23' House Setback from Sidewalk: 32' Terrain: Flat Constructed: <1950 Council: Riverfront University (Hilda - Helen) - Area 8 Density Current: 6.1 Net: 11.4 Comp. Plan: 6 Max. Zoning: 4-8 Specifications Number of Dwellings: 61 Zoning: R-1 Street Width: 40' Sidewalk Setback: 11' Southside/Riverfront - Area 10 Densitt Current: 6.9 Net: 11.6 Comp. Plan: 16 Max. Zoning: 12-20 Specifications Number of Dwellings: 69 Zoning: B Street Width: 40' Sidewalk Setback: 13' Density Comparison - 10+ DU/AC Historic Eastside - Area 17 Front Street Density Current: 11.5 Net: 21.3 - Comp. Plan: City http://www.co.missoula.mt.us/opgweb/Admin/NeighborhoodSampler/density.htm 6/4/2007 Density Center Max. Zoning: 12-20 Page 7 of 7 Specifications Number of Dwellings: 115 Zoning: R-IV Street Width: 381 Sidewalk Setback: 181 Sidewalk Width: 51 Hiouse-Spacirtg.: 15',House Setback from Sidewalk: 231 Terrain: Flat Constructed: <1950 Council: Heart of Missoula Site Map http://www.co.missoula.mt.us/opgweb/Admin/NeighborhoodSampler/density.htm 6/4/2007 Street Vim Spacing PaLye 1 of 1 -e ek, 5 T)Tical House S etb ack hllh://WWW.CO.misSoul,1.ml.uS/Opgweb/Aclmin/Neil,hborhoodSampler/images/area-5d-jP9 6/4/2007 Typical House Setback Spacutr, Street View — 6--c CIV �) � hll�r://www_c��.misti��ulu.ml.us/<����,wch/nclmii�/Nci�,hhurh�uxl�am��lur/inui�cti/aru�i_ �'I�.Jh�; 014/2007 LEED for Neighborhood Development I.r,m.4ii`f,il II a i��,l, :! lilnI;r,iiijj ni Ilu; L n�; ���. loi I`lcvd Ihli:uii, Rating System PI ,iuril hc:uun �; Ih I�u,i Cninb,iliu�l Iln. IL'; I,�faen I'uildiny, C�nuu:il Disclaimer and Notices The U.S. Green Building Council autlIorizes you to view the LEED for Neighborhood Development Rating System for your individual use and to copy as -is, or in part if you reference the original document. No content may be altered. In exchange for this authorization, you agree to retain all copyright and other proprietary notices contained in the original LEED for Neighborhood Development Rating System. You also agree not to sell or modify the LEED for Neighborhood Development Rating System or to reproduce, display or distribute the LEED for Neighborhood Development Rating System in any way for any public or commercial purpose, including display on a website or in a networked environment. Unauthorized use of the LEED for Neighborhood Development Rating System violates copyright, trademark and other laws and is prohibited. All text, graphics, layout and other elements of content contained in the LEED for Neighborhood Development Rating System are owned by the U.S. Green Building Council and are protected by copyright under both United States and foreign laws. Also, please note that none of the parties involved in the funding or creation of the LEED for Neighborhood Development Rating System, including the U.S. Green Building Council or its members, make any warranty (express or implied) or assume any liability or responsibility, to you or any third parties for the accuracy, completeness, or use of, or reliance on, any information contained in the LEED or Neighborhood Development Rating System, or for any injuries, losses or damages (including, without limitation, equitable relief) arising out of such use or reliance. As a condition of use, you covenant not to sue, and agree to waive and release the U.S. Green Building Council and its members from any and all claims, demands and causes of action for any injuries, losses or damages (including, without limitation, equitable relief) that you may now or hereafter have a right to assert against such parties as a result of Your use of or reliance on, the LEED for Neighborhood Development Raising System. Copyright Copyright C 2007 by the U.S. Green Building Council. All rights reserved. Trademark LEED"' is a registered trademark of the U.S. Green Building Council. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................... 1 PROJECT CHECKLIST............................................................................. 4 SMART LOCATION It LINKAGE.................................................................. 6 SLL Prerequisite 1: Smart Location..........................................................................6 SLL Prerequisite 2: Proximity to Water and Wastewater Infrastructure ..............................9 SLL Prerequisite 3: Imperiled Species and Ecological Communities .................................. 11 SLL Prerequisite 4: Wetland and Water Body Conservation .......................................... 14 SLL Prerequisite 5: Agricultural Land Conservation.................................................... 17 SLL Prerequisite 6: Floodplain Avoidance............................................................... 20 SLL Credit 1: Brownfields Redevelopment............................................................... 23 SLL Credit 2: High Priority Brownfields Redevelopment ............................................... 25 SLL Credit 3: Preferred Locations......................................................................... 27 SLL Credit 4: Reduced Automobile Dependence........................................................ 29 SLL Credit 5: Bicycle Network............................................................................. 32 SLL Credit 6: Housing and Jobs Proximity................................................................ 34 SLL Credit 7: School Proximity............................................................................. 36 SLL Credit 8: Steep Slope Protection..................................................................... 40 SLL Credit 9: Site Design for Habitat or Wetland Conservation ...................................... 41 SLL Credit 10: Restoration of Habitat or Wetlands .................................................... 44 SLL Credit 11: Conservation Management of Habitat or Wetlands .................................. 46 NEIGHBORHOOD PATTERN 8t DESIGN........................................................48 NPD Prerequisite 1: Open Community................................................................... 48 NPD Prerequisite 2: Compact Development.............................................................. 50 NPD Credit 1: Compact Development.................................................................... 52 NPD Credit 2: Diversity of Uses............................................................................ 54 <•luItItIvni R;ilin^ `;�siem , NPD Credit 3: Diversity of Housing Types................................................................ 56 NPD Credit 4: Affordable Rental Housing................................................................. 59 NPD .................... Credit 5: Affordable For -Sate Housing .............................................................. 61 NPD Credit 6: Reduced Parking Footprint................................................................ 63 NPD Credit 7: Walkable Streets............................................................................ 65 NPD Credit 8: Street Network.............................................................................. 69 NPD Credit 9: Transit Facilities........................................................................... 71 NPD Credit 10: Transportation Demand Management ................................................. 73 NPD Credit 11: Access to Surrounding Vicinity.......................................................... 76 NPD Credit 12: Access to Public Spaces.................................................................. 78 NPD Credit 13: Access to Active Spaces.................................................................. 80 NPD Credit 14: Universal Accessibility.................................................................... 83 NPD Credit 15: Community Outreach and Involvement ................................................ 86 NPD Credit 16: Local Food Production.................................................................... 89 GREEN CONSTRUCTION at TECHNOLOGY.....................................................92 GCT Prerequisite 1: Construction Activity Pollution Prevention ...................................... 92 GCT Credit 1: Certified Green Buildings.................................................................. 94 GCT Credit 2: Energy Efficiency in Buildings............................................................. 96 GCT Credit 3: Reduced Water Use........................................................................101 GCT Credit 4: Building Reuse and Adaptive Reuse.....................................................105 GCT Credit 5: Reuse of Historic Buildings...............................................................107 GCT Credit 6: Minimize Site Disturbance through Site Design.......................................109 GCT Credit 7: Minimize Site Disturbance during Construction.......................................111 GCT Credit 8: Contaminant Reduction in Brownfietds Remediation................................114 GCT Credit 9: Stormwater Management.................................................................116 GCT Credit 10: Heat Island Reduction...................................................................119 GCT Credit 11: Solar Orientation.........................................................................122 GCT Credit 12: On -Site Energy Generation..............................................................124 E'iru( �t•:��intt: B.ffiSE`;(f Cur `�rs�t,itltnt'lin�ril IGc�C'clu�rrut�ul IZalirt,� .`-��'r,t��rtt ..',Ol17 GCT Credit 13: On -Site Renewable Energy Sources....................................................127 GCT Credit 14: District Heating Et Cooling..............................................................129 GCT Credit 15: Infrastructure Energy Efficiency ..................................................131 GCT Credit 16: Wastewater Management .............................................. .................133 GCT Credit 17: Recycled Content in Infrastructure....................................................135 GCT Credit 18: Construction Waste Management......................................................137 GCT Credit 19: Comprehensive Waste Management...................................................139 GCT Credit 20: Light Pollution Reduction...............................................................141 INNOVATION Et DESIGN PROCESS............................................................ 144 ID Credit 1: Innovation and Exemplary Performance..................................................144 ID Credit 2: LEED Accredited Professional..............................................................146 DEFINITIONS..................................................................................... 148 APPENDIX A: List of Diverse Uses........................................................... 152 ,!,iIItI \ ,,e.v+)n: C,1"i�!t i`chtrp:�r� LOtY7 Introduction Overview The U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC), the Congress for the New Urbanism (CNU), and the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC)—three organizations that represent some of the nation's leaders among progressive design professionals, builders, developers, and the environmental community —have come together to develop a national set of standards for neighborhood location and design based on the combined principles of smart growth, new urbanism, and green building. The goal of this partnership is to establish these standards for assessing and rewarding environmentally superior development practices within the rating framework of the LEED") (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) Green Building Rating System"rM Unlike other LEED products that focus primarily on green building practices, with relatively few credits regarding site selection and design, LEED for Neighborhood Development places emphasis on the design and construction elements that bring buildings together into a neighborhood, and relate the neighborhood to its larger region and landscape. The work of the committee is guided by sources such as the Smart Growth Network's ten principles of smart growth, the Charter of the New Urbanism, and other LEED rating systems. LEED for Neighborhood Development creates a label, as well as guidelines for design and decision -making, to serve as an incentive for better location, design, and construction of new residential, commercial, and mixed use developments. The existing LEED for New Construction Rating System has a proven tract: record of encouraging builders to utilize green building practices, such as increasing energy and water efficiency and improving indoor air quality in buildings. It is the hope of the partnership that LEED for Neighborhood Development: will have a similarly positive effect in encouraging developers to revitalize existing urban areas, reduce land consumption, reduce automobile dependence, promote pedestrian activity, improve air quality, decrease polluted stormwater runoff; and build more livable, sustainable, communities for people of al l income levels. I -low LEED Rating Systems Work LINED provides rating systems that arc voluntary, consensus -based, market -driven, grounded in accepted energy and environmental principles, and that strike a balance between established practices and emerging concepts. LEI3D rating systems are developed by committees, in adherence with USGBC policies and procedures guiding the development and maintenance of rating systems. LEED for Neighborhood Development is one of a growing portfolio of rating systems serving specific market sectors. Ll"I D rating systems typically consist of a few prerequisites and many credits. In order to be certified, a project must meet each prerequisite. Mach credit is optional, but achievement of each credit confribules to the project's point total. n minimum point total is required firr certification, and higher point scores are required for silver, gold, or platinum LI_:ED certification. What is a "Neighborhood Development"? The rating system is designed to certify exemplary development projects that perf��rm well in terms of smm-t growth, new urbanism, and green building. Projects may Constitute whole neighborhoods, lracl.ions of neighborhoods, or multiple neighborhoods. Smaller, inlill prOJCOs Ihat arc single use but complunenl Pilot: VI.1-sion: t._t l_) for Noigllborhood Dc--V lol.rrria:nt. Ratirlrt iy5aisrtr l oht-lmry 2007 existing neighboring uses should be able to earn certification as well as larger and mixed use developments. The LEED for Neighborhood Development Pilot Program Up to 120 projects in total will be selected to be a part of the pilot program. The objective of the pilot program is to ensure that the rating system is practical for application and is an effective tool for recognizing projects that incorporate smart growth, new urbanist, and green building practices. The LCCD for Neighborhood Development Core Committee will assess the experience gained from the pilot program in order to revise the rating system for public comment and ballot. LLLD for Neighborhood Development's principal ainl is to improve land -use patterns, neighborhood design, and technology in the United States. However, on a very limited basis, the pilot program may test the applicability of the rating system in non -United States settings as well. In terms of eligibility for the pilot program, there is no nlininlunl or maxirllurll for project size and no strict definition for what would comprise a neighborhood. The only requirement is that projects must be able to meet all prerequisites and anticipate that the minimum number of points through credits to achieve certification can be earned. Certification Process LCHD for Neighborhood Development will certify prpjects that may have significantly longer construction periods than single buildings, and as I result the standard LLLD certification process needed to be modified. The core committee wanted to be able to provide developers of certiliable projects with some form of approval even at the early, pre -entitlement stage. They also wanted to ensure that great plans became great real -life projects. With these goals in mind, the core committee created the following three -stage certification process: Optional Pre -review (Stage 1) This stage is available but not required for projects at any point before the entitlement process begins. 11' pre -review approval o'l'the plan is achieved, USGBC will issue a letter stating that if the project is built as proposed, it will be able to achieve LEAD for Neighborhood Development certification. "I"he purpose ol'this letter is to assist the developer in building a case for entitlement a.illOilg land LIW planning atlthoritles, as well as a case fOl' financing and OCCLIpant COI1111111111entS. Certification of an Approved Plan (Stage 2) 'Phis stage is available after the project has been granted any necessary approvals and entitlements to be boil( to plan. Any changes 10 the pre-revieweCI plan that could potentially affect prcrcquisite or credit achievement would be communicated to USGBC as part of this submission. If certification of the approved plan is achieved, USG BC will issue a certificate stating that file approved plan is a LFAA) li)r Neighborhood Development Certified flan and will list it as such on the USCHIC website. Certification ol'a Conipleted Neighbor -hood Development (Stage 3) This slop lakes place when construction is complete or nearly complete. Any changes to file certified approved plan that could polentially afluct prcrcquisite or credit achievement would be Coln III Lill icated to USCit3C as punt 01' this submission. If certification of the completed neighborhood development is achieved, U(CGBC will issue plaques Or similar awards for public display at the project Site and will list it as such on the USG13C website. Pilo(, Vor"'.icw l_LF_1l for tfci<tilt}orlt<xxf Devtri<.,Iltnu-ni PI-fiintt System Fohruaty 2007 Similar to other LEED certification processes, projects will be provided with a more thorough explanation of credit topics and calculations in a reference guide. Project teams will be required to submit documentation for each credit as described in the "submittal" sections of the rating system. Pilot participants will be given submittal templates to fill out as part of documentation after they register their project. The templates will assist projects in providing the requested calculations. The submittal section included with each credit in the rating system is subject to modification during the course of the pilot program. During the pilot program, project teams are encouraged to suggest replacement documentation that clearly verifies that the requirements have been met but may be easier to access or produce than the items listed below. The certification reviewers will evaluate the adequacy of the potential replacement documentation on a case -by -case basis. Acknowledgements The partnership would like to thank the following fenders for their support of the creation of LEED for Neighborhood Development (listed alphabetically): The Blue Moon Fund Centers for Disease Control EDA W U.S. EPA Office of F3rowntields Cleanup and Redevelopment U.S. EPA Development, Community, and Environment Division The .Io11nSOn Foundation National Endowment for the Arts The pilot version of the LEED for Neighborhood Development Rating System has been made possible because ofthe efforts of many dedicated volunteers, staff members, consultants, and others in the USGBC, CNU, and NRDC communities. The partnership extends its deepest gratitude to all of these individuals, a.nd especially to the LEED for Neighborhood Development Core Committee members selected by the partners, for their tireless volunteer efforts in developing this rating system. They are: Doug Darr (Chair), Farr Associates Kaid Benfield (Vice -Chair), Natural RCSOurces Delbnse Council Bill Browning, Browning + Bannon LLC Victor Dover, Dover, Kohl & Partners Town Planning Sharon Feigon, Censer for Neighborhood Technology Rebecca Flora, Green Building Alliance Berl Gregory, Milhun Architects + Designers + Planners Daniel I lernander, Topology, LLC. Melissa Knott, Forest City Stapleton, Inc. Jessica Cogan Millman, Coalition Ibr Smarter Growth SuSan Mudd, Congress liar Ifie New Urbanism Board of Directors John Norquist, Congress Im the. New Urbanism MICllael PIIWILIkiCWIGG, Urban Land Institute Shelley Pol.ieha, Reconnecling America Tom Richman, Tom Richman klir.ibelh Schilling, Urban Associates Lama Watchnian, Dclbnders of Wildlife, Sandy Wiggins, Consilience, LLC ir,ri: I._ ' iHCi ir,r N("ii.tI�hor, ti L)cv<tir I?atin(t .Sy:stc:rri I- )ni.try 2007 Smart Location & Linkage 30 Possible Points Prereq I Smart Location Required Prereq 2 Proximity to Water and Wastewater Infrastructure Required Prereq 3 Imperiled Species and Ecological Communities Required Prereq 4 Wetland and Water Body Conservation Required Prereq 5 Agricultural Land Conservation Required Prereq G Floodplain Avoidance Ruluired Credit I Brownfield Redevelopment Credit I-ligh Priority Brownfields Redevelopment I Credit 3 Preferred Locations 2-1(1 Credit Reduced Automobile Dependence 1-9 Credit 5 Bicycle Network I Credit G housing and .lobs Proximity 3 Credit 7 School Proximity Credit s Steep Slope Protection I Credit 9 Site Design for Habitat or Wetlands Conservation I Credit 10 Restoration of llabitat or Wetlands I Credit I I Conservation Management of Habitat or Wetlands I Neighborhood Pattern & Design 39 Possible Points Prereq I open Community Required Prereq 2 Compact: Development Rcquircd Credit. I Compact Development 1-7 Credit 2 Diversity of Uses I Credit 3 Diversity of llousing'Iypes 1-3 Credil4 Affordable Rental Housing 1-2 Credit 5 Affordable For -Sale I -lousing 1-2 Credit 6 Reduced Parking Footprint 2 Credit 7 Walkable Streets 4-9 Credit 9 Street Nciworlc 1-2 Credit 9 Transit Facilities I Credil In Transportatiou Demand Management 2 Credit I I Access to Surrounding! 'Vicinity I Credit 12 Access to Public Spaces I Credil 13 Ace"N to Active Public Spaces I Credil 14 Universal Accessibility I Credit 15 Cornurrnrity Outreach and Involvement I Crodil 16 Local Food Production I Green Construction & Technology 31 Possible Points Prereq I Construction Activity Pollution Prevention Rapnn+d C7cdit I Certified Green Buildings I -a Credil 2 Fnergy Lff eieucy in Buildings I=3 Credit 3 Reduced Water Use I-3 Credit 4 Building, Reuse and Adaptive Reuse 1.2 Credit 5 Reuse of Ilistorie Buildings I Pilot vort �-ioll: LI_l__D tar Dow4olmwnt P atinrl �;ystr;trt F ohntat'y 200Y 4 Credit 6 Minimize Site Disturbance through Site Design Credit 7 Minimize Site Disturbance during Construction 1 Credit 9 Contaminant Reduction in Brownfields Remediation Credit 9 Stormwater Management I-5 Credit to Heat Island Reduction Credit I I Solar Orientation I Credit 12 On -Site Energy Generation I Credit 13 On -Site Renewable Energy Sources I Credit 14 District Heating and Cooling 1 Credit 15 Infrastructure Energy Efficiency Credit lip Wastewater Management I Credit 17 Recycled Content in Infrastructure 1 Credit Ih Construction Waste Management I Credit 19 Comprehensive Waste Management I Credit 20 Light Pollution Reduction I Innovation & Design Process 6 Possible Points Credit I Innovation in Design I-5 Credit2 LEER Accredited Professional I Project Totals 106 Possible Points Certification Levels: Certified 40-49 points Silver- 50-59 points Gold 60-79 points Platinum 90-106 points Lf-FT) r Ic,NcitJttl of Ili,.) l Dovelct;)trwkif I'll thiicj ysCt;t7t February 2007 5 V) (D 0) 7C) Lij >1 � � D E E 0 u / \ _ 2 \ a y (Do g/ e 2% m r=« \ z _ e o >% m= u o « 3mx7EE3D //±\\\/ . 2 y o r . 2 z-0 g g p g> a o G ®m . a m° » E)° ®® C o m%« o u 3± 9> m p� o« : o r c» o« o o/ m s- 9 s e \ \ o ® 0 (D\ 3 / « 9 n \ 2 D (D ID 2 Q 2\ y 3 3©\ « u a « = m �• « ^ z 6 2 z » ® / \ ®� « y y \ c \ \ (D/ c (D% ® R 3 « o 0 , 2 e s 9 2\/ 6\ C\\ m \\ ±©n«�(1o®«- ©« o» c© 92 3 ®« f a ®9 o a « u/ o g»\ \{\\°4 a\/m»o2C)c c«u.c« (Dz-u5/\ee«x®® ®\\ 9w«%o»-`-c\a%/2- 3 6 R \\© 4 /) a j\ y ? O 'F (D a \ E & o g (D_ c } g y / >. / y 0 c o c m y e \\�- �(� u. «Imy 2 % \ )< ? ©± G 3\ a z s m m»« ^ o § mx5s2®(D \ / \ D q) .0 yQ \%G«xo ///uay\e o g m 5 0 2 a ® \ ) I ©g © E » 9 ~ y / ° m o / } \ \/ 2\/\\\\_\\c Q Q G c®®k 9»®ƒ © o)C- © x \ j 2 - \ \ 2 E /°« \2(\0% 0 w z 2&\& g g l / o. o&.L o 0 g o I 0 7- ƒ\-o�/\-0-022\§°°® e e o E \ o (D 0 c / E / % e I/gocR®0Es�$sc/5 e° 2 >- \± m®«« e (De F/2\///%£\/»%\ 0»»%/�//»\so\$aa E±wc »�o°®o'°° Eoƒg33/ ° °/o3§rE§/ 0) z / -0 / / § » E _0ua) @ ?y2f° oE9§ƒCL-0 \g//�D u.— \/c)E /\��}\\��_(1)0r - g®c*\�E-0 :;= a)0 » \ \ ° / ® E 9 9 U-j a u - /D (D E [,§ % \a"c2a)(D \(- E2\o%2gaEu3E«2E G u 0 m� 0 0u k/ < o ¥U G 0 # � § 0 m O •U N O j 0 7 0 U T 0 -O 0 O C U E 0 O "E O o '} 0 0 Q O C C O (D o n� 0) !1 L C5 T]Q) V C: 11 U V O= 0 - CLL O a C Q O •U U o 0 n 0-N O) (D U C U 0 O c 0 o T Q , o n}� C U O Q U Q) _ N -O O U n > -0 -0 C } Z) N C 0 �-0 C) O O C 0- O n N 0 O 0 0 p Q (D O 0 U (1) 'U 0 (D _N 0 (3 U O O a)" O O N O 0 U N N> C C Q- O O 0 N C 3 -O C 0)00 0� U _ U N O O E} U N O ° O p (D} C U O O U-c O +- C C T� N U Q O 0 Q O) O *- C N �O)0 U.> C U 3 0 0 0 C C O C — N n (DT - C L D + m3 >�-0°�_>'E N C a .0 O U _O C -O n 0 OL •U E ID m L (D c C o 0 O)•> O (D0 C U C o o 0 c -O E 0) N Not30-CL-S � in E -O > ,_ = O O O a) C O O O O> U (D0 U O O O > Q 0- 0 -0 } --a Q O O 0 U ) QQ) 0 O_ C. '� Q) Q L 0 N U C 0 O 0 O) OU .0 - -p > a T O (DO N - •� Ua %)0 N O 0 Q O O O Q C O) 70 N� CO n _ _ O = U •— in C C E '= L O O ` _N (DN E (D•N O C? 0 T N L1 N O E 0 •` � O _ U F-- O C O p •C C • °U IDE> D U D C N N N � C OU D 0 �> •� , C O N 0 N O 0 °) c 3 N 0 j •� O C in OL to C U C O C N E C '� o in E U to C N L - -Q :�-- ° Q N+ 0 O` 0 += t Y C O N— 0 7 E « N- N C c 7 O N _N N O v p Q)? N �O '� O Q O' C L O N •° D E�- C c C U Q C .c L 0 3 O Q O •= N O N F N> N 0 O U O -0 0O Q N 2} , O Q - U L N O O L' > N C N N O O- C O _ T w c O m u -� Q � O C a} O U E- C O U O Q 0 Q w v .- ° O O N O 0 D 3^ 3 '� U) E .- O O-0 N z� N N Q� 0) c0 .0 o N = 0 0 O u C N U O 0 0 'O 0 0 0 a O U C a -O E O O Q O a C - N C '+- C O) 0-C _� O Q O j o O Q o Q Q� c Q O c -O N C o ) 0 c m a� - - ° EQ = C: 0) 3 0 °' 0 n a O N C Z C 0) C O C O U O 70 O C N O i- O T O U- �n C C O O v C O O c O C U O_ a O C O O in O C O �_- ._ �[ O t L 0 C X O0 0} O >O O O T• U¢ _� ~ O N c a O O N O C C C C 0 Q C7 N n O.0 41 C' = 0 0 U Q 0- d > O, N5-0 > .7'2 O 0 > N D ° a 0 .c ^ 3 0 0 0 0 E> O LO -� N i Q U N O 0 C Q w v) C N a E- O U c> c O • N •� N N c N .� O c T• 0 U >- -c- O 0) -0 U-00-�=0 U0 03 oE--.--00 GY" Framework 1.0 - Copyright Periding YELLOWSTONE BUSINESS PARTNERSHIP GREATER YELLOWSTONE FRAMEWORK FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT Prereq 1 Asset Inventory and Spirit of Place Credit 1 Sensitive Resources Credit 2 Slopes Credit 3.1 Views: Visual Quality Credit 3.2 Views: Night Sky Credit Defensible Space Credit 5 Density Credit 6 Brownfield Restoration Credit 7 Land Conservation No Required 2 1 1 1 1 3 to 7 3 2 Yes ? Prereq 1 Credit 1 Credit 2 Credit 3 Credit 4 Credit 5 Credit 6 Credit 7 Credit e ? No Wildlife -Human Conflicts Wildlife Habitat and Corridors Native Vegetation and Habitat Conservation Habitat Restoration and Enhancement Preservation of Aquatic Resources Surface and Ground Water Conservation Invasive Species Management Fence Siting and Materials Domestic Animal Management Required 2 to 4 3 3 .5 to 4 1 1 1 1 Yes -.. - - - t 9 - FM Credit 1 Cultural Resource Conservation and Management 1 to 2 Credit 2 Conservation of Cultural/Historic Structures (2) to 3 Credit 3 Historically Appropriate New Construction 1 to 4 Credit Cultural/Historic Interpretation and Documentation 1 to 2 Credit 5 Qualified Professional 1 Yes ? No Prereq 1 All LEED-NC Prerequisites Required Credit 1 Optimize Energy Performance 1 to 3 Credit 2.1 Green Building Programs: Participation and Compliance 1 Credit 2.2 Green Building Programs: LEED Certification 1 to s Credit 3.1 Waste Management - Reduce and Recycle 2 Credit 3.2 Construction Waste: Materials Efficiency 1 Credit 3.3 Construction Waste: Reuse of Organics 1 Credit 4 Outdoor Space 1 Credit 5 Size of Residential Dwellings 1 Yes ? No Format based on U.S. Green Building Council's LEED Rating System. Used with permission 2006 hftp ,'//.vv WN � fllowsbne,busi*0-esS. orI/ GY Frarework 1.0 - Copyright Pending Prereq 1 Code Compliance Required 7-2 Prereq 2 Water Metering Required Credit 1.1 Shared Services: Energy Efficiencies 1 Credit 1.2 Renewable Energy: Expanded Use 1 to 5 Credit 2 Electrical Load/Demand Efficiency 1 to 2 Credit 3 Water Use Efficiency 1 to 3 Credit 4 Water Quality 1 to 3 Credit 5 Snow Plan 1 Credit 6 Utility Construction and Resource Management 3 Yes ? No a } a Prereq 1 Transportation Plan Required Credit 1 Alternative Transportation Amenities 2 to 5 Credit 2.1 Efficient Vehicles: Fleets 1 to 2 Credit 2.2 Efficient Vehicles: Alternative Fuels 1 to 2 Credit 3 Trails, Pathways and Scenic Byways 3 to 5 Yes 7 No Prereq 1 Community Engagement Required Credit 1 Housing Diversity 3 to 5 Credit 2 Mixed Use 1 to 3 Credit 3 Employment Opportunities 1 Credit Local/Regional Business Support 1 to Credit 5 Public Spaces: Availability and Access 1 to 3 Yes ? No Credit 1 Carrying Capacity 2 to 4 Credit 2 Recreation Opportunity and User Conflict 1 to 2 Credit 3 Outdoor Ethics and Education 1 to 3 Credit 4 Public and Private Land and River Access 1 to 3 Credit 5 Rewarding Sustainable Operations 1 to 2 Yes No Credit 1 Sustainability Investments 1 Credit 2 Sustainable Agriculture 4 Credit 3 Site Development for Extraction Projects 4 Credit 4 Carbon Emission Reduction 1 Credit 5 Continuous Improvement (Ongoing Credit Compliance) 1 Credit 6 GY Framework - Accredited Professional 1 Credit 7 Other Innovations/Exceptional Performance Yos 7 No 56 - Certified points 70- Sliver points 84- Gold points 112 -Platinum points Format based on U.S. Green Building Council's LEED Rating System. Used with permission 2006