Greer to Wood/Response to Issues-04/24/1995 13:54 4067561236 MT PLANNING CONSULT PAGE 01
facsimile
TRANSMITTAL
to: Brian Wood
fax #: ?Sty-; ; `i9
re: Buffalo Commons PUD--Response to Issues
date: April '''24, 1995
pages: 2. i ci c l ud ing cover sheet.
Brian:
Thank you for dw opportunity to meet with you and Ross this morning. You addressed
several topics C-MCr.rr1ing the PUD application. My response to each topic is as follows:
Signage- Thc, d sign of the entrance signage and locations are as described in the
dpt-1liC:ation (page 32 plus exhibits).
Th c common Kiosk signs are generally described on page 21 and the
;a:;st wi:4ted elevational drawing. The actual square footage allowances and
heighi, for the two proposed Kjosk signs shall be regulated by the Kalispell
Si9r, n..,vulations as applicable to common signage [27,24,070 (1)(c) and
272,4080 (l)(d) and 27.24.080 (3)(b)] as opposed to the restrictions set
fc rt I i in 2 7.24.100 for freestanding signs. Individual wall signs as
cl,�;c ed on page 21. of the application shall not exceed 36 sq. ft. per face.
Uses: You indicated concern with the allowance of: Title companies, investment
f i rn)s i elecorm unication companies, and community residential facilities.
W, f�clieve all these uses to be neighborhood compatible. The other listed
tj w. provide examples of acceptable uses in the retail POD and the "other
retail < 3,000 sq ft" is intended to ensure a neighborhood scale of
d 7�.-(•i, -,-)talent for those uses not specifically listed. As you know, the mixed
u sc• I' UI D would allow considerably
r>! w re in t e nsive uses than those being
prof)oscd by this application. To
add rt-ys Your concerns for a public
hearifig requirement for community
"-,Wontial facilities, we propose to
41�r,: it'i� ally prohibit by covenant this
test° froin the single family and midti-
fainilN, hods.
From the desk of...
David M. Greer
Principal Planner
Monwe Planning Consultants
P.O. Boot 7607
Kalispell. Mt 59904
(406)756-1236
Fax: (406)756- l 236
'04/24/1995 13:54 4067561236 MT PLANNING CONSULT PAGE 02
HospHotel.- We do not. agree with your proposal to use the word "hotel" as opposed to
f fw�t-sf lotel, The application request was for the latter and cannot be
c:m,6dered as being an equivalent use for zoning purposes.
Please call me i f v()i i have any questions.
Sincerely,
David M. Greey