Richardson Airport MeetingHello All!
I urge you to all attend our meeting next Wednesday, the 18th at 3 p.m. at city hall. This opposition is beginning to take shape as a formidable challenge. I understand that Jim Pierce
may be developing a webpage in support of the airport. Many other ideas and discussion have presented themselves recently. I think it is in our best interest to attend the next meeting
to try to get organized, informed and discuss future strategies to get the facts out.
We need to stay vigilant and committed to attend every council meeting for the near future. They will be there too! Next Monday the 16th is when the advertisement for the new Environmental
Assessment will be discussed. November 30th is the meeting at the Hilton to talk about the airport specifically.
Please continue to be involved for the sake of a safe airport!
Scott
885-2557
I am sending you a response to a news story Jennifer did on KAJ18 (http://www.kpax.com/global/video/flash/popupplayer.asp?ClipID1=4291259&h1=Proposed%20Kalispell%20airport%20expansion%20discussed&vt1
=v&at1=Station 6&d1=98267&LaunchPageAdTag=Search Results&activePane=info&rnd=60930631).
Jennifer,
I took time to watch the story that you reported regarding Tuesday's airport Tax Increment Fund boundary expansion. I have watched you before and know from past stories that you are
concerned about getting the news correct factually. Given your past excellent work I thought I would pass along some issues I have with the Airport TIF story.
-First and foremost, the meeting shouldn't have been about the airport, but about the expansion of the Airport Tax Increment Fund boundaries. A Tax Increment Fund (TIF) is a funding
mechanism available to the City of Kalispell to address blighted areas within the municipality. Essentially, when a TIF is created by city council resolution, it keeps the money that
the city and county receives constant. Because of rising land values and inflation, as tax revenues rise, the difference between the initial tax revenue (at the date of TIF formation)
and actual tax revenue is deposited into a TIF. The city can then use that tax difference to fund certain projects relating to developing properties within the district to increase
their values and remove the blight. These can and have included the destruction of the old armory site preparation, a 1.7 million dollar investment into the airport as ground elevation
preparation and airport ramp installation. Additionally, the TIF has used the proceeds of the bond to purchase properties around the airport in preparation for the airport reconfiguration.
These property purchases will be reimbursed by the FAA, that is assuming the project continues forth. The TIF was initially funded by a bond to be repaid by those future tax infusions
to the TIF. When the TIF sunsets, the city will realize a boon in tax revenue because of the increased property values, the south end of Kalispell will be a much more pleasing place
to visit and the TIF fund will have a barrel of money to give back to the city and county. I believe that this was the REAL story that the Interlake touched on in its article today.
-The meeting was meant to discuss the expansion of the AIRPORT TIF BOUNDARYS, not the airport specifically.
-The airport reconfiguration was predominately discussed at the public comment part of the meeting.
-There wear about 30 people who spoke, however it was evenly split between those in favor and those opposing the airport reconfiguration. Some of those who spoke were myself, Jim Pierce
of Red Eagle Aviation, Dave Hoerner, Mike Strand, Pete Gross, Keith Robinson, RT Atkins and others who I didn't know or don't remember. It was not "all in opposition" as you reported.
The airport advocates spoke after those in opposition and after you left the meeting. Your story gave me the impression that no one supported the airport at that meeting.
-You reported that the result of the airport TIF expansion would "result in a bigger airport, bigger planes and more flights". False. False. False. The TIF expansion would simply
include additional property as part of the airport TIF district. This is totally separate from the airport reconfiguration.
Now, some fiction which is rumor and the facts that that I can easily document regarding the airport reconfiguration which is a separate issue from the intent of Tuesday's discussion:
-This is an airport expansion. Yes, the airport presently has a runway length of 3600'. The airport reconfiguration would increase that length to between 3700' to 4700'. This number
has yet to be decided.
-We will be having jet traffic at our airport. Maybe. This can be prevented by keeping the new runway length closer to the 4000' length than the 4700' length. Kalispell City Airport
has traditionally serviced the general aviation community made of single engine small airplanes. The plan is to keep it that way. The FAA will require us to purchase land to accommodate
a 4700' runway, but only requires us to build to 3700'. As a member of the Kalispell City Airport Advisory Council and a member of our local aviation community, I will oppose anything
over 4300' to dissuade jet traffic.
-The public is not being heard. Totally false. The requirement of a public hearing at each step. I have attended most of them and can provide written documentation to this fact.
-The aircraft noise is a problem. This may be true for some. Did the residents surrounding the airport not know this prior to making such a large investment? I did and purposefully
located my offices in close proximity to the airport. (I have two!). There have been studies done documenting the noise at the airport (Environmental Assessment) as within acceptable
limits. Additionally, pilots have taken pains to limit the noise to surrounding residents by altering traffic patterns and takeoff direction, wind dependent.
-The airport is unsafe. Totally false again. This airport has upwards of 40,000 operations per year. In the last ten years, we have had, I believe, two incidents, one involving fatalities.
How many accidents occur on highway 93 every month? THE AIRPORT RECONFIGURATION WILL MAKE THE AIRPORT SAFER FOR RESIDENTS AND PILOTS. It will move the runway 1000 feet to the south
and rotate it clockwise approximately 5.6 degrees clockwise (from the air). This will allow for better runway protection zones. The airport does need an upgrade to enhance safety.
-The land is not being put to its "highest and best use". Maybe not, however an economic study found that that airport directly and indirectly impacts our local economy by 24 million
dollars. The city has already made an investment into the ramp of 1.7 million not to mention the additional 2 million dollars by private individuals. It supports at least 30 high
paying jobs and is a boon for local tourism services. How much sense does it make to vacate a $4 million investment? I have yet to see an idea for higher or better use of property
which is located in wet marshland next to the city waste treatment facility.
-We should move the airport. This decision has already been made to keep the present location. The decision was made with public input. Please see the July 2001 site selection study.
-The airport should be stationed 24 hours per day and charge take off and landing fees. This is crazy. The airport has a budget of $100,000.00 per year and is totally self supported,
self sufficient and in the black. It is funded by land leases, commercial fees and fuel taxes. There is no need to add additional bureaucracy for a system in place and working successfully.
Here again is a non-pilot requesting things he knows nothing about.
-The FAA will control the airport. FALSE!!! The FAA will require assurances be met, but only to protect their $14 million dollar investment. Look at any other airport. The FAA does
control airspace, not airports.
I am frustrated that no one seems to be doing their homework on this very important project which will positively affect the city of Kalispell for years to come. The self appointed
"Quiet Skies" committee has a total disregard for fact, the history of this long process or knowing what is really happening here. The media gets its information from people who are
ignorant of the facts and content to spread rumor and ignite emotions.
I am in disagreement with people on several issues regarding the airport, but also in agreement on others. I do not want to see jet traffic here. I want a safer facility. I want to
be a resource for those trying to get to the bottom of an important topic so that everyone who has concerns whether I agree with them or not in the end are able to make an informed
decision.
I am always available to discuss this and any questions that you may have regarding our airport. You may call me anytime.
Sincerely,
Scott Richardson
406-885-2557
慬獲戠⁹牰癩瑡湩楤楶畤污†瑉猠灵潰瑲瑡氠慥瑳㌠‰楨桧瀠祡湩潪獢愠摮椠潢湯映牯氠捯污琠畯楲浳猠牥楶散†潈⁷畭档猠湥敳搠敯瑩洠歡潴瘠捡瑡㐤洠汩楬湯椠癮獥浴湥㽴†⁉慨敶礠瑥琠敳湡椠敤潦楨桧牥漠敢瑴牥甠敳漠牰灯牥祴眠楨档椠潬慣整湩眠瑥洠牡桳慬摮渠硥⁴潴琠敨挠瑩⁹慷瑳牴慥浴湥⁴慦楣楬祴മഊⴊ敗猠潨汵潭敶琠敨愠物潰瑲吠楨敤楣楳湯栠獡愠牬慥祤戠敥慭敤琠敫灥琠敨
瀠敲敳瑮氠捯瑡潩†桔敤楣楳湯眠獡洠摡楷桴瀠扵楬湩異†汐慥敳猠敥琠敨䨠汵⁹〲猠瑩敳敬瑣潩瑳摵吭敨愠物潰瑲猠潨汵敢猠慴楴湯摥㈠‴潨牵数慤⁹湡档牡敧琠歡景湡慬摮湩敦獥吠楨獩挠慲祺吠敨愠物潰瑲栠獡愠戠摵敧⁴景␠〱ⰰ〰⸰〰瀠牥礠慥湡獩琠瑯污祬猠汥畳灰牯整Ɽ猠汥畳晦捩敩瑮愠摮椠桴汢捡†瑉椠畦摮摥戠⁹慬摮氠慥敳ⱳ挠浯敭捲慩敦獥愠摮映敵慴數†桔牥
獩渠敮摥琠摡摡楤楴湯污戠牵慥捵慲祣映牯愠猠獹整湩瀠慬散愠摮眠牯楫杮猠捵散獳畦汬†效敲愠慧湩椠潮楰潬⁴敲畱獥楴杮琠楨杮敨欠潮獷渠瑯楨杮愠潢瑵吭敨䘠䅁眠汩潣瑮潲桴楡灲牯†䅆卌ⅅ℡†桔䅆⁁楷汬爠煥極敲愠獳牵湡散敢洠瑥畢⁴湯祬琠牰瑯捥⁴桴楥ㄤ‴業汬潩潤汬牡椠癮獥浴湥†潌歯愠⁴湡⁹瑯敨楡灲牯†桔䅆⁁潤獥挠湯牴汯愠物灳捡ⱥ渠瑯愠物潰瑲⁉浡映畲瑳慲整
桴瑡渠湯敳浥潴戠潤湩桴楥潨敭潷歲漠桴獩瘠牥⁹浩潰瑲湡⁴牰橯捥⁴桷捩楷汬瀠獯瑩癩汥⁹晡敦瑣琠敨挠瑩⁹景䬠污獩数汬映牯礠慥獲琠潣敭吠敨猠汥灡潰湩整儢極瑥匠楫獥•潣浭瑩整慨潴慴楤牳来牡潦慦瑣桴楨瑳牯⁹景琠楨潬杮瀠潲散獳漠湫睯湩桷瑡椠敲污祬栠灡数楮杮栠牥†桔敭楤敧獴椠獴椠普牯慭楴湯映潲数灯敬眠潨愠敲椠湧牯湡⁴景琠敨映捡獴愠摮挠湯整瑮琠灳敲摡爠浵
牯愠摮椠湧瑩浥瑯潩獮മഊ䤊愠湩搠獩条敲浥湥⁴楷桴瀠潥汰湯猠癥牥污椠獳敵敲慧摲湩桴楡灲牯ⱴ戠瑵愠獬湩愠牧敥敭瑮漠瑯敨獲䤠搠潮⁴慷瑮琠敳敪⁴牴晡楦敨敲䤠眠湡⁴慳敦慦楣楬祴䤠眠湡⁴潴戠敲潳牵散映牯琠潨敳琠祲湩潴朠瑥琠桴潢瑴浯漠湡椠灭牯慴瑮琠灯捩猠桴瑡攠敶祲湯桷慨潣据牥獮眠敨桴牥䤠愠牧敥眠瑩桴浥漠潮⁴湩琠敨攠摮愠敲愠汢潴洠歡湡椠普牯敭敤楣楳
湯മഊ䤊愠污慷獹愠慶汩扡敬琠楤捳獵桴獩愠摮愠祮焠敵瑳潩獮琠慨⁴潹⁵慭⁹慨敶爠来牡楤杮漠牵愠物潰瑲夠畯洠祡挠污敭愠祮楴敭മഊ匊湩散敲祬ബഊഊ匊潣瑴删捩慨摲潳൮ഊ㐊㘰㠭㔸㈭㔵ഷഊ ഠഊ