Russell Sias Abortion Public Comment, 5-18-26Chemical Abortion Pills Leave Something Behind in Your Water
A mother in Ohio turns on her tap, fills a glass, and has no idea what the abortion
industry has been dumping into that water for decades.
The EPA has never been required to check — and three Democrat presidents made sure it
stayed that way.
Students for Life of America finally looked, and what they found should make every
American furious.
Here is how it works.
Mifepristone — the first pill in the Chemical Abortion Pill regimen — works by blocking
progesterone, the hormone that sustains pregnancy.
When a woman takes mifepristone at home and the process is complete, the metabolites
from that drug do not simply disappear.
They leave her body and enter the water supply — still active, still blocking progesterone.
Water treatment plants are not designed or required to filter them out.
According to Students for Life of America, more than 50 tons of abortion pollution —
including chemically tainted blood, placental tissue, and human remains — are flushed
into America's waterways every year.
That is not a fringe claim.
That figure is derived from the abortion industry's own data, using calculations from the
Planned Parenthood -founded Guttmacher Institute.
SFLA's water testing found those pharmaceutical metabolites present in natural
waterways both upstream and downstream from water treatment plants — and in tap
water.
When SFLA filed its formal comment with the EPA in April 2026, it cited findings that
mifepristone's active metabolites exceeded the EPA's own Maximum Contaminant Level
— the threshold at which water contaminants are considered harmful to public health.
The FDA has never conducted a Clean Water Act review of mifepristone — not when it
changed the drug's protocols in 2016, 2019, 2021, or 2023, and not when it approved a
new generic in 2025.
Every single expansion of Chemical Abortion Pill distribution happened without anyone
in the federal government asking what those pills do to the water the rest of us drink.
Your State's Endangered Species Are at Risk Too
VIABILITY - A DISINGENUOUS TERM
"Viability" as used by some folks is intentionally deceptive. It is a very misleading term,
often used to create an excuse for terminating an unwanted baby after conception. It's
misleading because it hides several facts.
What does viability really mean? Viability has recently come to be the answer for some,
including the pro -abortion folks, to the question: When can a baby survive?
We often allow using a baby's birth as a marker in its stage of development. It is nothing
more than a single point, in its life; a "stage of development" in the baby's life. We allow
some to declare 20-24 weeks as viable; meaning they argue that a baby cannot survive prior
to this point in its life. It is somehow okay to destroy it before then. Many won't even call
it a baby at that point. If one establishes a percentage of viability, certainly, a baby is 1000/0
dependent on the parent, often, even for many years after birth. From conception, till....
After birth, we allow manipulation of the term again. Using viability as the term is often
used, the baby is still 100% non -viable, it still cannot survive on its own. However, we
manipulate the phrase again, for once the stage of development includes the baby's birth, we
call termination of the baby, neglect — or worse. Murder or child neglect comes to mind.
Even a four -year -old absolutely requires external support to survive. A child of this age
very likely still cannot survive without support from an external source. I submit that it still
does not fit the definition some use for viability. This is because they are misusing the term,
viability.
For full term babies, using the definition used by many pro -abortion folks, a baby may still
not be considered viable. Once born though, most of us would call termination of its life,
murder.
Viability is not the right term, "Stage of Development" should be closer to a factual truth.
This however, blows up the abortionist argument, for "Stage of Development" implies that
the baby is, at the time of conception, a real, live, baby at some stage of development. A
human being, deserving of all the rights, privileges, and protections, given the rest of us.
Russell Sias
985 Walsh Rd
Columbia Falls, MT 59912
Saby @ -12 weeks in the Womb!
Pro -Creation is an endowment given to each of us by God.
To abuse or misuse this sacred gift and privilege granted us is to deny that the act of
coupling with another person should be done with honor, respect, and the understanding of
the obligation to care and love one another, as well as what might come of the actual act.
We must always keep first in our minds that this sacred honor should always be done with
the utmost respect for what God has granted us.
Russell Sias
985 Walsh Rd
Columbia Falls, MT 59912