The URL can be used to link to this page

03-19-26 Urban Renewal Agency Board Agenda with Materials (2) City of Kalispell Post Office Box 1997 - Kalispell, Montana 59903 Telephone: (406) 758-7701 Fax: (406) 758-7758 AGENDA URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY BOARD THURSDAY, MARCH 19, 2026 – 3 P.M. AT CITY HALL, FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM 1. Welcome 2. Public Comment 3. Approval of Meeting Summary a. January 2026 Meeting 4. TIF & TEDD a. West Side TIF a. 40 Apple Way TIF Assistance Application b. Kalispell Center Mall Work Session 5. Public Projects a. Updates i. BUILD Grant Update ii. SS4A Implementation Grant Update 6. Next Regularly Scheduled Meeting – Thursday, April 16, 2026 7. Adjourn STAFF REPORT KRD 26-01 APPLE WAY AFFORDABLE HOUSING REQUEST FOR WEST SIDE-CORE AREA TIF ASSITANCE KALISPELL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MARCH 19, 2026 This is a report to the Urban Renewal Agency and Kalispell City Council regarding a request for Tax Increment Finance (TIF) assistance for the Site Demolition, Cleanup, and Preparation Program, and shared utilities in the West Side-Core Area Tax Increment Finance District. The Urban Renewal Agency will forward a recommendation to the Kalispell City Council for final action. TIF Assistance Program Overview: MACH 1 Outpost LLC is requesting funding for Site Demolition, Cleanup, and Preparation Improvement and sidewalk improvement under the Shared Utilities programs, which is located within the West Side-Core Area TIF Districts. This report will analyze the proposal in accordance with state law and adopted city policies. On December 17, 2012, Kalispell City Council adopted the Core Area Plan as an amendment to the City of Kalispell Growth Policy 2020 by Resolution No. 5601A. The Core Area Plan addresses needs and priorities affecting redevelopment of the Core Area. Additionally, the Council adopted the West Side Urban Renewal-Core Area plan by Ordinance 1717 (Original Ordinance 1259) and the Downtown Urban Renewal Plan by Ordinance 1816. The City of Kalispell utilizes a Tax Increment Finance District (TIFD) within the urban renewal plan boundary as part of the overall strategy to meet its needs of eliminating blight, promoting economic development, improving area employment opportunities, improving area housing opportunities, and expanding the community’s tax base in addition to other needs identified in the Montana Code Annotated. The Kalispell City Council Amended the West Side-Core Area TIF Assistance Program in 2019, by Resolution 5955. The TIF Assistance Program was developed to support redevelopment activity and advance the goals of the West Side-Core Area Urban Renewal Plan. The West Side-Core Area TIF is managed by the City of Kalispell Urban Renewal Agency advisory to Kalispell City Council. In 2010, pursuant to City of Kalispell Resolution 5435, an Urban Renewal Agency (hereafter referred to as “URA”) was established for the purpose of assisting the Kalispell City Council in evaluating and proposing TIF district plans and projects. Applicant: MACH 1 Outpost LLC 300 Prairie Center Dr. Eden Prairie MN 55344 Location and Legal Description of Property: The subject property is located at 40 Appleway Drive, Kalispell MT 59901. The property is within the West Side Urban Renewal Core Area Boundary. The property can be legally described as: Tract 1 of Certificate of Survey No. 8206, located and being in the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter (SE ¼ SE ¼ ) of Section 12, Township 28 North, Range 22 West, P.M.,M., Flathead County, Montana. Figure 1 Subject Property Figure 2 The Property Currently Lacks Sidewalk Proposed Project: MACH 1 Outpost LLC is requesting West Side/ Core Area TIF assistance through the Shared Utility and Site Demolition, Cleanup, and Preparation program s. The request for TIF assistance through the Site Preparation and Demolition program totals $65,900 in loans for the demolition of the existing building and tree removal. The Shared Utility request for sidewalk and boulevard construction is for $47,800 per the provided contractor bid. The shared utility request would also be administered as a loan. The total TIF request is $113,700. The Outpost Kalispell project is a 24-unit, affordable housing development planned for construction at 40 Apple Way. Outpost Kalispell will include 12 one-bedroom units, and 12 two -bedroom units. The project has obtained tax exempt status from the state and will not pay property tax. The apartments will be rented to renters earning between 50% and 60% Area Median Income. The applicant is requesting a loan for the total project ask of $113,700. The Site Demolition, Cleanup, and Preparation Program amount is $65,900 and the sidewalk/street improvements total $47,800. Site demolition and preparation projects “may be eligible for loan funds, and/or a 50% matching grant up to $250,000.” The requested $65,900 is eligible for loan or 50% matching grant, but the applicant has requested a loan, given the tax- exempt nature of the property. The Shared Utilities Program allows for a grant up to 100% of public infrastructure costs such as sidewalks. The project is not going to be paying property taxes, and so the applicant has requested a loan covering the costs of improvements instead of a grant. There is not currently sidewalk on the property, and creating sidewalk will connect to the neighboring property to the east that does have sidewalk, benefiting the pedestrian network. The sidewalk and boulevard improvements benefit the sidewalk network and the general public, making the project eligible for the funds. The TIF request is for a loan to cover both the construction of the sidewalk hardscape and the boulevard. The RLF committee will review the applicant and help formulate loan terms. POLICIES 1. TIF assistance will be prioritized to projects that do not have the financial feasibility to proceed without the benefits of the TIF fund assistance. The pro forma submitted in the application was given to the Revolving Loan Fund Committee for review. The benefits of the TIF loan requested offer needed assistance to the applicant based on the pro forma. The pro forma and financing include will be reviewed by the Revolving Loan Fund Committee as well. The project has funding from Glacier Bank and has received tax exempt status, so the project is feasible. TIF assistance is requested to close a narrow gap in financing and the project feasibility. 2. The applicant shall provide market and feasibility studies, appraisals, etc., provided to private lenders of the project, as well as any other information the URA, or Kalispell City Council may require in order to review the need for TIF assistance. The applicant has provided market feasibility studies, professional appraisal, pro forma, and other information as requested in order to review the need for TIF assistance. The applicant provided all requested material in order to review the need for TIF assistance. 3. A third party analysis shall be provided for applications requesting more than $200,000 in TIF assistance. The third party analysis will be contracted by the city from a list of qualified consultants at the applicant’s expense. The third party analysis is required to ensure that project assumptions provided by the developer align with current market conditions and industry standards. This policy is not applicable as the TIF assistance requested is under $200,000. 4. The applicant shall be able to demonstrate their ability to construct, operate and maintain the proposed project based on past experience, general reputation, and credit history. The applicant has history of developing multifamily affordable housing. The developer (Mach and TE Miller) has developed more than $500,000,000 in total multifamily development. The applicant has been approved for a loan with Glacier Bank and has shown that they are able to operate and maintain the property. 5. TIF assistance will not be used for projects that place an extraordinary demand on the district infrastructure. The project will not place an extraordinary demand on the district infrastructure as there is adequate infrastructure for multifamily in the district and the B-2 is zoned for multifamily housing. The surrounding land uses are commercial and multifamily. The project will have to meet all City of Kalispell requirements. 6. The relationship of private investment to public investment of a project shall be significant enough to ensure prudent investment of public funds within the TIF District. A prudent expenditure would equate to $1 of public money for every $9 of private money invested in a project. The project costs are projected to be $8,746,540. The applicant is requesting a total of $113,700 in public TIF loan funding. This is a request for 1.29% of the total project cost, or a ratio of $1 public dollar for every $76.92 spent by the applicant. 7. The applicant shall retain ownership of the project long enough to complete it, occupy it, establish property management, and initiate payment of taxes based on the increased project value. This policy will be met through the developer’s agreement to ensure completion, occupation, and property management. The applicant will hire a part time property manager. Property taxes are not applicable to this property as they have been exempted. CRITERIA FOR REVIEWING FUNDING APPLICATIONS In reviewing the TIF assistance application the URA will evaluate each new development project utilizing the following criteria, in addition to the policies outlined above. When an application is submitted, documentation demonstrating adherence to the following criteria must be submitted. 1. Each project must achieve each of the following criteria: • Tax Generation— In order for the West Side TIF District to stay economically healthy for the maximum benefit to the district and community, a project is expected to generate new taxes. The increase in taxable value due to new construction & rehabilitation is estimated by the County Assessor’s office or State Department of Revenue to determine tax increase generation. The project will not be generating new taxes as the applicant has acquired tax exempt status as part of the affordable housing component of the project. The applicant has requested a loan for the total amount and is not requesting a grant given the tax exempt nature of the project. • Elimination of Blight— The project’s direct and indirect impact on the physical deterioration within the TIF The sidewalk will increase connectivity up to city standards and will improve the physical deterioration within the West Side TIF district. The existing building will be demolished to construct the housing. The project will add sidewalk and standard city boulevard landscaping to improve the area. • Project Feasibility— A determination of feasibility is made based on the strength of the applicant's demonstration of market demand for the project as contained primarily on the pro forma and financing commitments. The applicant has received financing commitments from Glacier Bank. The pro forma and other necessary documentation will be additionally analyzed by the Revolving Loan Fund Committee to determine eligibility for a loan from the City of Kalispell and the terms of a loan if they are eligible. • Applicant’s ability to perform— An assessment of the applicant’s capability to undertake the relative complexities of the project based on past performance and the project design and management team on similar projects based on the complexity of the project The applicant has experience developing other affordable housing projects has obtained tax exempt status. The developers have developed over $500,000,000 in multifamily housing. The application has a plan in place to hire property management and maintenance. The applicant has a bid, and a loan from Glacier bank, showing the project has viability. • Timely Completion— The feasibility of completing the project according to the applicant's proposed project schedule. The proposed project schedule aims to start construction in 2026 and be completed in spring of 2027. This timeline is not unrealistic and shows the applicants are wanting to start construction as soon as possible. • Plan Goals— The project’s ability to significantly further specific goals found in the West Side Urban Renewal Plan, Core Area Plan, and Kalispell Growth Policy Plan-It 2035 goals and policies. The proposed project will further specific goals set out in the Core Area Plan, Urban Renewal Plan, and Kalispell Growth Policy Plan-It 2035. The Core Area Plan strategies and policies furthered by the project are as follows: Housing Reinvestment Strategy 1. A housing stock that is safe, affordable and an asset to the neighborhood. Housing Strategy 1. An array of housing options in the Core Area (multi-family apartment buildings, townhouse and row housing, loft and studio apartments, senior housing, second floor residential, smaller scale multi-family apartments, etc.) to provide housing for a variety of age and income levels. Housing Policy 1. Increase the presence of higher density housing in the plan area. Housing Policy 2. Upgrade/replace aged and/or inadequate infrastructure (water, sewer, fire flows, sidewalks, streets and street connections) to accommodate higher density housing. The Kalispell Growth Policy Plan-It 2035 Land Use Housing Goals and Policies that this project furthers include: Housing Goal 1. Provide an adequate supply and mix of housing that meets the needs of present and future residents in terms of cost, type, design and location. Housing Policy 2. City regulations should maintain incentives to provide for varied affordable housing types. Housing Policy 3. Encourage the development of urban residential neighborhoods as the primary residential land use pattern in the Growth Policy area. These developments should incorporate design features that are either consistent with or anticipate the changing character of the area. Historic Downtown And Core Area Goal 2. Encourage development and redevelopment in the downtown and implementation of the core area neighborhood plan. Historic Downtown And Core Area Goal 3. New development should contribute to the community quality of life and its attractiveness as a retirement and tourism destination. Historic Downtown And Core Area Policy 9. Redevelopment is encouraged to integrate a variety of residential housing types to accommodate people of different age groups and income levels. 2. Each Project must achieve at least 2 of the 5 criteria: • Investment— The project’s potential for subsequent investment within the TIF district. The project has potential for subsequent investment within the Westside TIF District. The creation of housing helps to demonstrate market need for similar projects. • Unique Opportunities— The project’s potential to present a unique opportunity, meet a special need, or address specific TIF district or community goals such as filling a market niche or providing an un-met community need. The project would help with the community goal for affordable housing which is a known need in the community. The project also will help fill a market niche as they are also going to set aside ten percent of units for veterans, victims of domestic violence, or youth aging out of foster care. • Environmental Impacts — The project’s ability to positively impact the environment in terms of brownfields cleanup, noise, dust, and traffic reduction; pollution reduction, etc The Phase I environmental assessment is being performed currently. There are no known cleanup needs. • Building— The quality of development and overall aesthetics are beyond that which is minimally required by the UBC. The quality of development will meet all building code standards and the overall aesthetics will go beyond building code construction standards. The project will need to meet architectural review standards, providing for overall aesthetics that would be minimally required. • Job Creation — Projects that create opportunities for new employment contribute to the economic vitality of the district and community in a variety of ways. Projects creating five or more full-time equivalent jobs would be considered to have a significant positive impact on the economic well-being of the district, and will be given greater priority. Additionally, new jobs that pay at or above the median county income level will be given priority. Two part-time positions are being created with this project. One part-time Property Management position as well as one Maintenance position. The Property Manager will be part time and is anticipated to be paid $29,952 and the part time Maintenance wage is estimated to be $9,000. 3. Each Project Must achieve at least 3 out of the 6 criteria • Housing – Increases housing units, including integrating a variety of residential housing types to accommodate people of different age groups and income levels. This project meets these criteria by providing 24 units of affordable housing, which will accommodate renters of different ages groups and income levels from between 60%-50% Area Median Income (AMI). There are 12 of both 1- and 2-bedroom units, providing a variety of housing options. • Urban Development — Redevelopment that considers the Core Area vision by promoting a mix of uses emphasizing retail uses on the main floor and offices or residential uses on upper floors. • The proposed project does not include retail or office plans. The project is urban housing development, providing 24 rental units on 0.88 acres. • Parking — Recognize that there are special parking considerations, which differ from other areas. A project should use innovative parking management and shared parking provisions, including for general public use. Parking is planned for the project and will meet city standards under new state requirements. 30 spaces in total are being provided, while no parking would be required under new standards. Compliance with city standards will be reviewed at time of building permit. • Recreation — Incorporates amenities into the development such as pocket parks, activity nodes and gathering spaces. The plans provided include an indoor gathering space/kitchenette, outdoor playground, and grilling area. The planned project will meet city standards for recreational areas. • Facilities Public Health and Mobility — Project will construct or improve sidewalks, including ADA access to buildings. The sidewalk improvements along Apple Way will be ADA accessible and built to city standards. There is not currently sidewalk along the entirety of the property street frontage, which will be improved as part of the project. The new building will be subject to ADA standards. • Alternative Transportation — Project promotes the use of bicycling, transit, ride sharing, car sharing, etc. The project helps to promote bicycling. The project location is in close proximity to the Parkline Trail and the Great Northern Historical Trail. Workforce Housing Policy: Pursuant to Ordinance No. 1928, the Core Area/West Side Urban Renewal District includes the creation of workforce housing for individuals and families with household income of 60% to 140% of area median income. The application seeks to create affordable housing at the 60%-50% AMI, which is both within and outside the bounds of the West Side TIF Policy’s definition of workforce housing. The average rent will be at 52.92% AMI. Seven of the units will be at 60% AMI, and 17 will be at 50% AMI. The project is an eligible project expense under these guidelines. EVALUATION BASED ON STATUATORY CRITERIA This report evaluates the request in accordance with local and state regulations. The statutory basis for reviewing Urban Renewal Projects is set forth by 7-15-4217 M.C.A., which states that following a hearing the local governing body may approve an urban renewal project if it finds that: 1) A workable and feasible plan exists for making available adequate housing for those persons being displaced by the project; No persons are being displaced by the proposed project. 2) The urban renewal plan conforms to the comprehensive plan or parts thereof for municipality as a whole; The Westside Core Area Urban Renewal Plan adopted by the Kalispell City Council made findings that included the inclusion of funding assistance in order to assist in housing and business development. 3) The urban renewal plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the municipality as a whole, for rehabilitation or redevelopment of the urban renewal area by private enterprise; and The project includes a request for tax increment financing assistance that makes the proposed redevelopment project feasible to be undertaken by private enterprise. 4) A sound and adequate financial program exists for the financing of said project. The Westside Core Kalispell Urban Renewal District currently has adequate revenue to support the tax increment finance assistance for the project. ANALYSIS: The proposed sidewalk improvement and site demolition, cleanup and preparation is eligible for TIF financing under state Urban Renewal Law, is permitted under both the West Side-Core TIF Review Criteria, and site and sidewalk improvements further goals of both the Kalispell Plan it 2035 and the Core Area Plan. The requested loan amount is within the Site Demolition, Cleanup, and Preparation Program limit. The loan terms will be reviewed by the City of Kalispell Revolving Loan Fund Committee. The City of Kalispell TIF Criteria 1 is Tax generation. Projects are expected to generate new taxes. The property is unable to generate new property taxes as they have become exempt for affordable housing. Workforce housing under City TIF policy is an eligible expense, and 7 of the units of the project fall withing the 60-140% AMI threshold. The project meets the remaining review criteria, adheres to City TIF policy, and furthers goals set forth in the Core Area Plan and Kalispell Plan it 2035 Plan. CONCLUSION: The proposed project does comply with the expressed intent and the goals, policies, and recommendations of the Westside Core Area Urban Renewal Plan and the TIF Program Policies as outlined above. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City of Kalispell Urban Renewal Agency adopt staff report KRD- 26-01 as findings of fact and recommended to the Kalispell City Council that MACH 1 Outpost LLC’s TIF REQUEST be approved as provided. ATTACHMENTS: Westside/Core Area TIF POLICY Core Area Plan/Original West Side TIF Plan Project Application 1 City of Kalispell Downtown Urban Renewal District and WestSide/Core Area Urban Renewal District Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Application (Application must be completed in full with all required documents attached) APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of Applicant:________________________________________________________________ Mailing Address:__________________________________________________________________ Phone number:___________________ E-Mail:__________________________________________ PROJECT INFORMATION Business Name: __________________________________________________________________ Business/Project Physical Address:___________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ Business Insurance Co: ____________________________________________________________ Tax ID #_____________ ___________________________________________________________ Business Type (Corp, LLC, Partnership, etc.): _________________________________________ Date business was formed:__________________________________________________________ Date of property acquisition:_________________________________________________________ Shareholders Name Address % Owned *A current financial statement for each shareholder involved in the project may be required as well as documentation of financial capacity. (This information will be kept confidential, subject to challenge in a court of law.) Description of business (product or service provided, etc.): Annual amount of property taxes: $_________________________________________________ Current on all property taxes: ____Yes ___No If no, explain circumstances:_________________________________________________________ Employment: Number of retained positions: _______ ; Full Time:_____ Part Time:_______ Number of new positions to be created: _______; Full Time:_____ Part Time:_______ Average wage per hour $______ 2 Attachment: Attach an Excel spreadsheet briefly listing and describing the job classifications with the average wage noted by each job classification. Provide a schedule of when the positions are anticipated to be created and filled. Provide a summary of the fringe benefits provided to employees:____________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ Project Architectural Firm: ________________________________________________________ Contact:_________________________________________________________________________ Address:_________________________________________________________________________ Phone:____________________________ E-mail:________________________________________ Project Contractor:_______________________________________________________________ Address:_________________________________________________________________________ Phone:____________________________ E-mail:________________________________________ Has such contractor or architect ever failed to qualify as a responsible bidder, refused to enter into a contract after an award has been made, or failed to complete a construction or development contract within the last 10 years? No ____ Yes ____ If yes, explain:________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATION AND FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY Has the applicant or any individual or entity affiliated with the development of this project been adjudged bankrupt, either voluntarily or involuntarily, within the past ten years? No ____ Yes ____ if yes, list date, place, and under what name: ____________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ Has the applicant or any individual or entity affiliated with the development of this project been indicted for or convicted of any felony within the past 10 years? No ____ Yes ____ if yes, list the date, charge, place, court and action taken for each case: ________________________________________________________________________________ 3 PROJECT EXPENSE WORKSHEET Proposed project description:________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ Proposed Construction/Rehabilitation Costs: (If additional room is needed, provide an Excel sheet of expenses) Explanation:______________________________________________ Cost: $_________________ Explanation:______________________________________________ Cost: $_________________ Explanation:______________________________________________ Cost: $_________________ Explanation:______________________________________________ Cost: $_________________ Explanation:______________________________________________ Cost: $_________________ Explanation:______________________________________________ Cost: $_________________ Explanation:______________________________________________ Cost: $_________________ Explanation:______________________________________________ Cost: $_________________ Architectural Design/Supervision: Cost: $_________________ Permitting Fees: Cost: $_________________ Additional Fees:___________________________________________ Cost: $________________ Additional Fees:___________________________________________ Cost: $________________ Total Project Expense: $_________________ Attachment: Attach bids for each proposed project expense Proposed project schedule with start date and completion date:______________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ 4 PROJECT FINANCING WORKSHEET Project Financial Lending Institution: _______________________________________________ Contact:_________________________________________________________________________ Address:_________________________________________________________________________ Phone:____________________________ E-mail:________________________________________ Total Project Cost: Land and Building if recently purchased (5 years): $_________________ Cash invested in recent improvements (5 years): Explanation:____________________________________________ $_________________ Explanation:____________________________________________ $_________________ Explanation:____________________________________________ $_________________ Explanation:____________________________________________ $_________________ Subtotal: $_________________ Total ‘Project Expense’ from page 3: $_________________ Total Project Cost: $________________ Lender Commitments (Include letters of credit or other documentation.) Lender Loan Amount Interest Term Payment/Period ________________ $____________ ______% _____yrs $___________/Month ________________ $____________ ______% _____yrs $___________/Month 5 TIF FUNDING REQUESTED (Refer to appropriate Urban Renewal Plan– TIF District Policies for more information) Public Impact Categories ______ Shared Utilities Extension ______ Sidewalk Improvement ______ Tree Placement/Replacement Private Investment Categories Loan Programs: _____ Façade Improvement _____ Rehabilitation/Code Compliance Grant Programs: ______ Historic Façade Improvement _____ Site Preparation and Demolition (Additional grant or loan dollars may be available through the Kalispell Brownfields Program) ______ Technical Assistance 6 CERTIFICATION I (we), _____________________________________________________________ (please print), certify that the statements and estimates within this application as well as any and all documentation submitted as attachments to this application under separate cover are true and correct to the best of my (our) knowledge and belief. Name: _______________________________ Name: ______________________________ Signature: ____________________________ Signature: ___________________________ Title: ________________________________ Title: _______________________________ Date: ________________________________ Date: _______________________________ Return to: City of Kalispell Community & Economic Development Department 201 1st Avenue East, Kalispell, MT 59901 406-758-7713 nloring@kalispell.com Required attachments: •Excel spreadsheet briefly listing and describing the job classifications with the average wage noted by each job classification. Provide a schedule of when the positions are anticipated to be created and filled. •Bids for each proposed project expense listed on page 3. •Letters of commitment or documentation from any project lender commitment listed on page 4. Outpost Job Creation Annual Wage if Full Time Wage based on need for Project Property Manager Part Time 74,880.00$ 29,952.00$ Maintenance Part Time 54,000.00$ 9,000.00$ Project - Schedule Of Values 11/26/2025 Site Budget 1 Base Site Package: $521,300 2 Survey & SWPPP Included 3 Demo - Trees, Building, & Import Structural Fill $65,900 4 Excavation/Backfill/Compaction/Grading Included 5 Utilities Included 6 Foundation/Slab Gravels Included 7 Hardscapes Included 8 Storm Water Included 9 Parking Lot- Curb & Gutter, Paving, Striping, Signage Included 10 Trash Enclosure Included 11 Public ROW - Mob/Grading/Earthwork $27,700 12 Public ROW - Hardscapes $20,100 13 Landscaping & Irrigation $150,000 14 Site Work Total $785,000 Building Budget 15 Concrete Foundations & Slabs $265,950 16 Gypcrete $61,875 17 Steel Stairs and Handrailings $47,500 18 Rough Carpentry $840,000 19 Finish Carpentry $175,500 20 Building Insulation $75,000 21 Hardie Siding & Trim $197,500 22 Asphalt Shingle Roofing $59,225 23 Interior Doors & Hardware $132,500 24 Drywall (Hang/Tape/Texture) $244,000 25 Interior & Exterior Painting $180,000 26 Flooring $118,500 27 Restroom Accessories $12,000 28 Fire Ext & Cabinets $4,325 29 Appliances $84,000 30 Fire Sprinkler $75,900 31 Plumbing $325,000 32 HVAC $375,000 33 Electrical $345,000 34 Fire Alarm & Low Voltage $52,500 35 Building Budget $3,671,275 36 37 General Conditions @ 6%$220,277 38 39 Site Work $785,000 40 41 Summary of Above $4,676,552 42 6% Swank Fee $280,593 43 44 Total Swank Budget $4,957,145 $220.32 $/sf $206,548 per unit (24 units) Appleway Apartments - 24 Units (Pre-Lim Budget) ABV ACC AFF ARCH ALUM APPROX BPL BM BLKG BOT BOW CIP CB CLG CT CLR CONC CMU CONST CONT CRS CJ DTL DIA DIM DR DS DWG DF ELECT EL EQ EXH EXIST EJ ABOVE ACCESSIBLE ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR ARCHITECT ALUMINUM APPROXIMATE BEARING PLATE BENCH MARK BLOCKING BOTTOM BOTTOM OF WALL CAST-IN-PLACE CATCH BASIN CEILING CERAMIC TILE CLEAR (ANCE) CONCRETE CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT CONSTRUCTION CONTINUE (OUS) COURSE CONTROL JOINT DETAIL DIAMETER DIMENSION DOOR DOWNSPOUT DRAWING DRINKING FOUNTAIN ELECTRIC (AL) ELEVATION EQUAL EXHAUST EXISTING EXPANSION JOINT EXPANSION EXHAUST FAN ELECTRICAL PANEL ELECTRIC WATER COOLER EXTERIOR FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION FIREPLACE FLOOR DRAIN FOOTING FOUNDATION FIRE HYDRANT GAGE, GAUGE GALVANIZED GENERAL CONTRACTOR GRAB BAR HARDWARE HEAT / VENTILATION /AIR COND. HEIGHT HANDICAP HOLLOW METAL HORIZONTAL HOSE BIBB INCLUDE INSIDE DIAMETER INSULATION INTERIOR INVERT JOIST LAMINATE LAVATORY LEFT HAND LIGHT MATERIAL MANHOLE MANUFACTURE EXP EF ELEC PNL EWC EXT FFE FPL FD FTG FND FH GA GALV GC GB HDW HVAC HT HC HM HOR HB INCL ID INSUL INT INV JST LAM LAV LH LT MAT MH MFR MAS MO MTL MISC NIC NTS NO OC OPNG OPP OPH OD OH OHD PAR PART PVMT P LAM PL PT PVC PSF PSI PC PL PP QT R RA RD REF RF RH ROW RM MASONRY MASONRY OPENING METAL MISCELLANEOUS NOT IN CONTRACT NOT TO SCALE NUMBER ON CENTER OPENING OPPOSITE OPPOSITE HAND OUTSIDE DIAMETER OVERHEAD OVERHEAD DOOR PARALLEL PARTITION PAVEMENT PLASTIC LAMINATE PLATE PRESSURE TREATED POLYVINYL CHLORIDE POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH PRECAST PROPERTY LINE POWER POLE QUARRY TILE RADIUS RETURN AIR ROOF DRAIN REFERENCE ROCK FACE RIGHT HAND RIGHT OF WAY ROOM RO R&S SHTG SHR SIM SC SPEC SQ S STL SD STRUCT SYM THK TOC TOS TOW T TYP TOF UNF UR UNO VERT VTR WD WC WH WP WR WWF W YH YD YI ROUGH OPENING ROD AND SHELF SHEATHING SHOWER SIMILAR SOLID CORE SPECIFICATIONS SQUARE STAINLESS STEEL STORM DRAIN STRUCTURAL SYMMETRY (ICAL) THICKNESS TOP OF CONCRETE TOP OF SLAB TOP OF WALL TREAD TYPICAL TOP OF FOOTING UNFINISHED URINAL UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE VERTICAL VENT THRU ROOF WOOD WATER CLOSET WATER HEATER WATERPROOFING WATER RESISTANT WELDED WIRE FABRIC WIDTH, WIDE YARD HYDRANT YARD DRAIN YARD INLET MONTANA AFFORDABLE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE SUBMITTAL ABBREVIATIONS PROJECT TEAM DEVELOPER TE MILLER DEVELOPMENT, LLC 300 Prairie Center Dr. Suite 245 Eden Prairie, MN 55345 Rob Miller rmiller@temiller.com 612.868.7501 Alex Timm atimm@temiller.com 612.655.7761 ARCHITECT TUSHIE MONTGOMERY ARCHITECTS 7645 Lyndale Avenue South Suite 100 Richfield, MN 55423 Evan Jacobsen, Architect evanj@tmiarchitects.com 612.861.9636 CIVIL & LANDSCAPE INTERIOR DESIGNER TUSHIE MONTGOMERY ARCHITECTS 7645 Lyndale Avenue South Suite 100 Richfield, MN 55423 Sophia Levin, Interior Designer sophial@tmiarchitects.com 612.861.9636 PROJECT INFO SITE LOCATION SITE PARKING AUTOMOBILE PARKING STANDARD COMPACT ADA ACCESSIBLE TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED BICYCLE PARKING EXTERIOR PARKING INTERIOR PARKING TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED 40 APPLEWAY LANE KALISPELL, MT 59901 PERVIOUS/IMPERVIOUS AREA TOTAL SITE AREA TOTAL BLDG FOOTPRINT TOTAL NON-BUILDING SITE AREA TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA TOTAL IMPERIOUS NON-BLDG AREA TOTAL PERVIOUS TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA 29 STALLS 00 STALLS 01 STALLS 30 STALLS XX SPACES XX SPACES XX SPACES BUILDING AREA 7,441 SF 7,207 SF 7,207 SF 21,855 SF 1ST FLOOR 2ND FLOOR 3RD FLOOR TOTAL GROSS BUILDING AREA UNIT MIX 1 BED A 2 BED A TOTAL 50 % 50 % 100 % 12 12 24 *TA = TYPE A UNITS WU = WALK UP UNITS **MN CODE REQUIRES 2% OF TOTAL UNITS ARE TYPE A. TYPE A UNITS XX BED TYPE A XX BED TYPE A ROOM #XXX ROOM #XXX X,XXX SF X,XXX SF X,XXX SF X,XXX SF X,XXX SF X,XXX SF X,XXX SF ALL NECESSARY AND/OR REQUIRED TESTS, INSPECTIONS SHOP DRAWING REVIEWS AND DRAWING INTERPRETATIONS, REQUIRED BY THE GENERAL CONDITIONS, SHALL BE EXECUTED BY A REGISTERED ARCHITECT AND/OR BY A REGISTERED ENGINEER; IF NOT, THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD AND/ OR THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL BE HELD HARMLESS FOR THAT PORTION OF THE WORK IMPROPERLY EXECUTED. THE INSPECTION ARCHITECT AND/OR ENGINEER SHALL BECOME RESPONSIBLE FOR THOSE INSPECTIONS, DECISIONS AND/OR DOCUMENT INTERPRETATIONS MADE AS THEY RELATE TO THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THEIR INTENT. DIMENSIONS GIVEN FOR MASONRY ON ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS, ARE NOMINAL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SCALED MEASUREMENTS OF DRAWINGS SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED. DIMENSION FOR STUD WALLS ARE TO FACE OF STUD AND DIMENSIONS FOR MASONRY WALLS ARE TO FACE OF BLOCK UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL MEET ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND MOST STRINGENT SHALL APPLY. GENERAL NOTES TD&H ENGINEERING 450 Corporate Drive, Suite 101 Kalispell, MT 59901 Douglas Peppmeier, PE doug.peppmeier@tdhengineering.com 406.751.5246 DRAWING INDEX X SHEET TITLE XX SHEET TITLE CIVIL ARCHITECTURAL LANDSCAPE X.X SHEET TITLE X.XX SHEET TITLE AMENITY SPACE PER FLOOR 0 SF 0 SF 0 SF 0 SF 1ST FLOOR 2ND FLOOR 3RD FLOOR TOTAL AMENITY AREA UNITS PER FLOOR 1ST FLOOR 2ND FLOOR 3RD FLOOR 8 UNITS 8 UNITS 8 UNITS ACCESSIBLE UNITS Prepared For Issuance Architectural Review Committee ... ... ...NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONxx.xx.2025 ... ... ... Tushie Montgomery Architects 7645 Lyndale Ave S Suite 100 Richfield, MN 55423 Phase Revisions Project 2023 Tushie Montgomery & Associates, P.C.© T AM Mo n t a n a A f f o r d a b l e 40 A p p l e w a y L a n e Ka l i s p e l l , M T 5 9 9 0 1 Schematic Design -CS COVER SHEET 225094A UNIT AREA 1 BED A 2 BED A GROSS 736 SF 993 SF NET 704 SF 955 SF -CS COVER SHEET AR01 SITE PLAN AR02 1ST & 2ND FLOOR PLANS AR03 3RD FLOOR & ROOF PLAN AR04 UNIT PLANS AR05 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AR06 3D VIEWS AR07 SIGNAGE AR08 CONTEXT PHOTOS AR9 SECTIONS QUALITY INN BIG SKY | 2 STORY PLAYGROUND GRILL PATIO 2 STORY MULTI-FAMILY 30 Surface Parking Stalls TRASH BUILDING SETBACK BU I L D I N G S E T B A C K BUILDING SETBACK APPL EWAY DR 2 STORY MULTI-FAMILY 2 STORY MULTI-FAMILY 2 STORY MULTI-FAMILY 2 STORY MULTI-FAMILY 2 STORY MULTI-FAMILY BU I L D I N G S E T B A C K PROPERTY LINE 5' - 0" 10 ' - 0 " 5' - 0" 15' - 0" 3 STORY MULTI-FAMILY 24 UNITS | 30 PARKING 21,855 SF APPLEWAY STORAGE AP P L E W A Y S T O R A G E 1614 PR O P E R T Y L I N E EX I S T I N G P R O P E R T Y S E P A R A T I O N PR O P E R T Y L I N E PROPERTY LINE 20' - 0"26' - 0"20' - 0" SINGLE FAMILY DR A I N A G E S W A L E ADA ACCESS/ TURN AROUND EXISTING TREES 46' - 6"25' - 9 77/128" 30 ' - 0 " 67' - 4" 48 ' - 3 8 1 / 2 5 6 " 23 ' - 1 1 1 9 / 3 2 " DI S T A N C E F R O M E N D O F P A R K I N G L O T T O P R O P E R T Y L I N E 15 0 ' DI S T N A C E F R O M E N D O F P A R K I N G L O T T O E D G E O F R O A D W A Y 16 5 ' 12' - 0" 12 ' - 0 " TRANSFORMER SCALE 1/16" = 1'-0"1 SITE PLAN Prepared For Issuance Architectural Review Committee ... ... ...NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONxx.xx.2025 ... ... ... Tushie Montgomery Architects 7645 Lyndale Ave S Suite 100 Richfield, MN 55423 Phase Revisions Project 2023 Tushie Montgomery & Associates, P.C.© T AM Mo n t a n a A f f o r d a b l e 40 A p p l e w a y L a n e Ka l i s p e l l , M T 5 9 9 0 1 Schematic Design AR01 SITE PLAN 225094A 1 REVISION 1 xx/xx/xxxx PEDESTAL MOUNTED MAILBOXES - BLACK . .. .. .. ... .. .. .. 955 SF 2 BED A 955 SF 2 BED A 955 SF 2 BED A 955 SF 2 BED A 3 AR9 1 AR9 108 SF Office 108 SF MAINT. 704 SF 1 BED A 704 SF 1 BED A 704 SF 1 BED A 704 SF 1 BED A 704 SF 1 BED A 955 SF 2 BED A 704 SF 1 BED A 704 SF 1 BED A 955 SF 2 BED A 3 AR9 1 AR9 11 ' - 6 " 26 ' - 1 1 " 3' - 0" 2' - 0" 704 SF 1 BED A 955 SF 2 BED A 955 SF 2 BED A OFFICE BELOW MAINTENANCE BELOW GENERAL PLAN NOTES 1. REFER TO MEP DRAWINGS AND SPEC FOR MEP INFO 2. REFER TO INTERIOR DESIGN PACKAGE FOR COMMON SPACE FFE, DESIGN ELEMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 3. INTERIOR WALLS NOT TAGGED SHALL BE TYPE S1. 4. INTERIOR WALLS NOT TAGGED SHALL BE TYPE W1. 5. UNIT DEMISING WALLS NOT TAGGED SHALL BE TYPE S11 1HR W/ ACOUSTICAL INSULATION. 6. UNIT DEMISING WALL DIMENSIONING IS TO CENTER OF S11 WALLS. ALL OTHER DIMENSIONS TO FACE OF STUD OR TO NEAREST GRID. 7. CORRIDOR WALLS NOT TAGGED SHALL BE TYPE S6 1HR W/ ACOUSTICAL INSULATION. 8. SEE A9 SERIES FOR SLAB EDGE DIMENSIONS, RAMP SLOPES AND ELEVATION CHANGES 9. REFER TO INTERIOR DESIGN PACKAGE FOR COMMON SPACE FFE, DESIGN ELEMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 10. GRID SUPPORTED SUSPENDED GYPSUM BOARD CEILING AT COMMON AREAS -TYPICAL. FOR FINAL CEILING DESIGN , REFER TO INTERIORS PACKAGE. 11. BULKHEAD AND RAISED CEILING IS TYPICAL AT ELEVATOR LOBBY AT CORRIDOR CONNECTIONS. FOR FINAL DESIGN, REFER TO INTERIORS PACKAGE. 12. PROVIDE GYPSUM BOARD SOFFITS AT MECHANICAL DUCT LOCATIONS. COORDINATE LOCATIONS WITH MECHANICAL. 13. PROVIDE VAPOR BARRIER BELOW SLAB ON GRADE CONDITIONS AT ALL LOCATIONS, EXCEPT PARKING AREAS. 14. COORDINATE STANDPIPE LOCATIONS WITH FIRE PROTECTION DESIGN / BUILD DRAWINGS. 15. DOORS THAT SWING AGAINST A WALL OR OTHER OBJECTS AND ARE NOT DIMENSIONED ARE TO HAVE A R.O. THAT STARTS 4" FROM THE WALL OR OBJECT. 16. SLOPE ROOF 1/4 PER FT. MINIMUM. 17. PROVIDE WALL MOUNTED BIKE RACKS LOCATED BETWEEN EACH PARKING SPACE. 18. ALL PIPING THAT EXTENDS TO THE FLOOR AT THE BACK OF PARKING STALL OR EXPOSED TO THE DRIVE LANE SHALL BE PROTECTED BY A STEEL SAFETY GUARD. 19. PARKING STRIPES SHALL BE 4" WIDE PAVEMENT PAINT. 20. PAINT 6" HIGH PARKING STALL NUMBERS AT EACH STALL. THREE DIGITS PER PARKING SPACE. **THIS LIST USES BULLET POINTS AND AUTOMATICALLY ADJUSTS THE NUMBERING. DELETE THE ONES THAT DON'T APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT, THEN DELETE THIS NOTE** Prepared For Issuance Architectural Review Committee ... ... ...NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONxx.xx.2025 ... ... ... Tushie Montgomery Architects 7645 Lyndale Ave S Suite 100 Richfield, MN 55423 Phase Revisions Project 2023 Tushie Montgomery & Associates, P.C.© T AM Mo n t a n a A f f o r d a b l e 40 A p p l e w a y L a n e Ka l i s p e l l , M T 5 9 9 0 1 Schematic Design AR02 1ST & 2ND FLOOR PLANS 225094A SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0"1 LEVEL 1 SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0"2 LEVEL 2 .. .. .. .. 3 AR9 1 AR9 52' - 2" 13 ' - 0 " 12 5 ' - 9 3 3 / 1 2 8 " 13 ' - 0 " 15 1 ' - 9 3 3 / 1 2 8 " 6" / 12"6" / 12" 6" / 12"6" / 12" 3" / 1 2 " 3" / 1 2 " 3" / 1 2 " 3" / 1 2 " CO N T I N U O U S R I D G E V E N T 955 SF 2 BED A 3 AR9 1 AR9 704 SF 1 BED A 704 SF 1 BED A 704 SF 1 BED A 955 SF 2 BED A 955 SF 2 BED A 704 SF 1 BED A 955 SF 2 BED A 955 SF 2 BED A 38 ' - 5 " 7' - 1 1 3 3 / 2 5 6 " 28 ' - 0 1 / 2 " 28 ' - 0 1 / 2 " 7' - 1 1 3 3 / 2 5 6 " 38 ' - 4 7 / 1 6 " 26' - 0 7/8"25' - 11 15/16" 14 8 ' - 8 9 7 / 1 2 8 " GENERAL PLAN NOTES 1. REFER TO MEP DRAWINGS AND SPEC FOR MEP INFO 2. REFER TO INTERIOR DESIGN PACKAGE FOR COMMON SPACE FFE, DESIGN ELEMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 3. INTERIOR WALLS NOT TAGGED SHALL BE TYPE S1. 4. INTERIOR WALLS NOT TAGGED SHALL BE TYPE W1. 5. UNIT DEMISING WALLS NOT TAGGED SHALL BE TYPE S11 1HR W/ ACOUSTICAL INSULATION. 6. UNIT DEMISING WALL DIMENSIONING IS TO CENTER OF S11 WALLS. ALL OTHER DIMENSIONS TO FACE OF STUD OR TO NEAREST GRID. 7. CORRIDOR WALLS NOT TAGGED SHALL BE TYPE S6 1HR W/ ACOUSTICAL INSULATION. 8. SEE A9 SERIES FOR SLAB EDGE DIMENSIONS, RAMP SLOPES AND ELEVATION CHANGES 9. REFER TO INTERIOR DESIGN PACKAGE FOR COMMON SPACE FFE, DESIGN ELEMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 10. GRID SUPPORTED SUSPENDED GYPSUM BOARD CEILING AT COMMON AREAS -TYPICAL. FOR FINAL CEILING DESIGN , REFER TO INTERIORS PACKAGE. 11. BULKHEAD AND RAISED CEILING IS TYPICAL AT ELEVATOR LOBBY AT CORRIDOR CONNECTIONS. FOR FINAL DESIGN, REFER TO INTERIORS PACKAGE. 12. PROVIDE GYPSUM BOARD SOFFITS AT MECHANICAL DUCT LOCATIONS. COORDINATE LOCATIONS WITH MECHANICAL. 13. PROVIDE VAPOR BARRIER BELOW SLAB ON GRADE CONDITIONS AT ALL LOCATIONS, EXCEPT PARKING AREAS. 14. COORDINATE STANDPIPE LOCATIONS WITH FIRE PROTECTION DESIGN / BUILD DRAWINGS. 15. DOORS THAT SWING AGAINST A WALL OR OTHER OBJECTS AND ARE NOT DIMENSIONED ARE TO HAVE A R.O. THAT STARTS 4" FROM THE WALL OR OBJECT. 16. SLOPE ROOF 1/4 PER FT. MINIMUM. 17. PROVIDE WALL MOUNTED BIKE RACKS LOCATED BETWEEN EACH PARKING SPACE. 18. ALL PIPING THAT EXTENDS TO THE FLOOR AT THE BACK OF PARKING STALL OR EXPOSED TO THE DRIVE LANE SHALL BE PROTECTED BY A STEEL SAFETY GUARD. 19. PARKING STRIPES SHALL BE 4" WIDE PAVEMENT PAINT. 20. PAINT 6" HIGH PARKING STALL NUMBERS AT EACH STALL. THREE DIGITS PER PARKING SPACE. **THIS LIST USES BULLET POINTS AND AUTOMATICALLY ADJUSTS THE NUMBERING. DELETE THE ONES THAT DON'T APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT, THEN DELETE THIS NOTE** Prepared For Issuance Architectural Review Committee ... ... ...NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONxx.xx.2025 ... ... ... Tushie Montgomery Architects 7645 Lyndale Ave S Suite 100 Richfield, MN 55423 Phase Revisions Project 2023 Tushie Montgomery & Associates, P.C.© T AM Mo n t a n a A f f o r d a b l e 40 A p p l e w a y L a n e Ka l i s p e l l , M T 5 9 9 0 1 Schematic Design AR03 3RD FLOOR & ROOF PLAN 225094A SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0"1 LEVEL 3 SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0"2 ROOF PLAN . . 1. DIMENSIONS ARE FACE OF STUD 2. ALL UNIT WALLS ARE WALL TYPE W1 OR S1 (UNO) 3. DIMENSIONS NOTED AS "CLEAR" SHALL INDICATE THE FINISHED DIMENSION REQUIRED FROM FACE TO FACE OF G.W.B. 4. UNIT RCP'S: DIMENSIONS NOTED ARE TO FACE OF GYP. 5. SEE A2 SERIES OF DRAWINGS FOR WALL TYPES AND FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLIES 6. REFER TO OVERALL FLOOR PLANS AND ENLARGED PLANS FOR CORRIDOR, DEMISING AND SHAFT WALL TAGS AND DIMENSIONS 7. ALL UNITS ARE TYPE B, (UNO) 8. ALL TYPE A UNITS TO COMPLY WITH 2020 MNSBC 1341.1003, A117.1 SECTION 1003 TYPE A UNITS 9. ALL TYPE B UNITS TO COMPLY WITH 2020 MNSBC 1341.1004, A117.1 SECTION 1004 TYPE B UNITS 10. INSTALL CENTER OF OUTLETS @ 18" A.F.F, CENTER OF LIGHT SWITCHES @46" A.F.F, TOP OF THERMOSTAT CONTROLS @ 48" A.F.F MAX., AND TOP OF ELECTRICAL PANELS @48" A.F.F. MAX. 11. INSTALL CENTER OF ABOVE COUNTER OUTLETS & SWITCHES @44"A.F.F. 12. PROVIDE BLOCKING AT ALL GRAB BAR LOCATIONS; INCLUDING TOILETS, TUBS AND SHOWERS. SEE ___ 13. INSTALL TOWEL BAR ABOVE TOILETS @ 5'-0" A.F.F. (UNO) 14. INSTALL ROBE HOOKS @ 5'-0" AFF (UNO) 15. INSTALL ACOUSTICAL PUTTY PADS AT ALL ELECTRICAL BOXES IN PARTY AND CORRIDOR WALLS ; ELECTRICAL BOXES TO BE SEALED TO G.W.B. WITH ACOUSTICAL SEALANT 16. INSTALL FULL DEPTH ACOUSTICAL INSULATION IN WALLS ENCLOSING BATHROOMS, MAGIC PAKS, AND WASHER/DRYER CLOSETS 17. IF DRYER DUCT VENT LENGTH EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED LENGTH "A" POWER BOOSTER FAN WILL BE REQUIRED 18. USE PAPERLESS GYP. AT INTERIOR OF MAGIC PACK CLOSETS 19. FIRE RATED PLUMBING ENCLOSURE (BARRI-BOX) TO BE PROVIDED BY PLUMBING CONTRACTOR AT ALL TUB/SHOWER CONTROLS LOCATED IN FIRE RATED WALLS. SEE PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR FURTHER CLARIFICATION. 20. SEE PROJECT SPECIFICATION FOR INFORMATION ON WASHERS AND DRYERS (W/D) 21. SEE A0.01 'THROUGH PENETRATIONS'IN THE CODE REQUIREMENTS CHART FOR INFORMATION ON VENTING THROUGH TRUSS SPACE. 22. CAULK WINDOW SILLS THROUGHOUT. 23. CAULK TUB SURROUNDS. 24. ALL PENETRATIONS IN PARTY AND CORRIDOR WALLS AND FLOOR/ CEILING SHALL BE FIRE CAULKED. UNIT GENERAL NOTES -BUTLER'S PANTRY -ISLAND -KITCHEN -TOWEL BAR -LINEN -VANITY -ROBE HOOK -TOILET PAPER HOLDER -COUNTERTOP -ROD & SHELF(S) -SHELVING -BROOM CLOSET BP I# K# TB L# V# RH TP CT-" #R&SH-" #SH-" BC SEE A8.0 FOR ALL TYPICAL UNIT CASEWORK DETAILS APPLIANCE PACKAGE #1 -REFRIG.: CWE23SP2MS1(CAFE) -RANGE: CGS700P2MS1 (CAFE) -MW: CEB515P2NSS + TRIM (CAFE) -DW: CDT845P2NS1(CAFE) -HOOD: WVW73UC0LS (WHIRLPOOL) -BEV. FRIDGE: GVS04BQNSS (GE) APPLIANCE PACKAGE #1A -REFRIG.: CWE23SP2MS1(CAFE) -RANGE: CGS700P2MS1 (CAFE) -MW: CEB515P2NSS + TRIM (CAFE) -DW: CDT845P2NS1(CAFE) -HOOD: WVW73UC0LS (WHIRLPOOL) APPLIANCE PACKAGE #2 -REFRIG.: ZIC360+ZKFN (GE MONOGRAM) -RANGE: GR366 (WOLF) -MW: CEB515P2NSS + TRIM (CAFE) -DW: CDT845P2NS1(CAFE) -HOOD: AK9134BS (ZEPHYR) -BEV. FRIDGE: GVS04BQNSS (GE) -GRILL: TBD, PROVIDE GAS CONNECT. AP-1 AP-1A AP-2 UNIT TAG LEGEND LIGHTING LEGEND L-1: FLUSH LED PUCK LIGHT -AFX LIGHTING, EDGE ROUND LED, 6" ROUND, EGRF06LAJD1WH, WHITE, 3000K L-2: WALL MOUNTED BATH BAR; CENTER OVER CASEWORK -SATCO, BEND LED MEDIUM VANITY, 62-1322, BRUSHED SATIN NICKEL, 25" W, 3000K L-3: CEILING MOUNT SEMI-FLUSH -KUZCO LIGHTING, BRISBANE FM556016, AGED GOLD/FROSTED GLASS, 16" DIAMETER X 4-1/8" H, 3000K L-4: WALL MOUNTED SCONCE -SATCO, BEND LED LARGE VANITY, 62-1323, BRUSHED SATIN NICKEL, 36" L, 3000K L-5: KITCHEN ISLAND PENDANT -KUZCO LIGHTING, HARPER PD507216, AGED GOLD/OPAL MATTE GLASS, 3000K L-6: WALL MOUNTED SCONCE -DAINOLITE, DAY 232W-MB, MATTE BLACK/OPAL MATTE GLASS, 3000K L-7: CEILING MOUNTED FAN/LIGHT -MODERN FORMS, AXIS FR- W1803-52L-MW-MW, MATTE WHITE 52" 3 BLADE SMART LED CEILING FAN WITH WALL CONTROL CONCEALED COVE UPLIGHTING L1 L7 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 **SEE A7.0 FOR LIGHTING FIXTURE SPECIFICATIONS K# KITCHEN - SEE A8.00 - A8.03 V# VANITY - SEE A8.04 (#)SH WIRE SHELVING - SEE A8.05 *SEE A8.05 FOR TYPICAL UNIT DETAILS UNIT LEGEND 955 SF 2 BED A 955 SF 2 BED A 704 SF 1 BED A GENERAL PLAN NOTES 1. REFER TO MEP DRAWINGS AND SPEC FOR MEP INFO 2. REFER TO INTERIOR DESIGN PACKAGE FOR COMMON SPACE FFE, DESIGN ELEMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 3. INTERIOR WALLS NOT TAGGED SHALL BE TYPE S1. 4. INTERIOR WALLS NOT TAGGED SHALL BE TYPE W1. 5. UNIT DEMISING WALLS NOT TAGGED SHALL BE TYPE S11 1HR W/ ACOUSTICAL INSULATION. 6. UNIT DEMISING WALL DIMENSIONING IS TO CENTER OF S11 WALLS. ALL OTHER DIMENSIONS TO FACE OF STUD OR TO NEAREST GRID. 7. CORRIDOR WALLS NOT TAGGED SHALL BE TYPE S6 1HR W/ ACOUSTICAL INSULATION. 8. SEE A9 SERIES FOR SLAB EDGE DIMENSIONS, RAMP SLOPES AND ELEVATION CHANGES 9. REFER TO INTERIOR DESIGN PACKAGE FOR COMMON SPACE FFE, DESIGN ELEMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 10. GRID SUPPORTED SUSPENDED GYPSUM BOARD CEILING AT COMMON AREAS -TYPICAL. FOR FINAL CEILING DESIGN , REFER TO INTERIORS PACKAGE. 11. BULKHEAD AND RAISED CEILING IS TYPICAL AT ELEVATOR LOBBY AT CORRIDOR CONNECTIONS. FOR FINAL DESIGN, REFER TO INTERIORS PACKAGE. 12. PROVIDE GYPSUM BOARD SOFFITS AT MECHANICAL DUCT LOCATIONS. COORDINATE LOCATIONS WITH MECHANICAL. 13. PROVIDE VAPOR BARRIER BELOW SLAB ON GRADE CONDITIONS AT ALL LOCATIONS, EXCEPT PARKING AREAS. 14. COORDINATE STANDPIPE LOCATIONS WITH FIRE PROTECTION DESIGN / BUILD DRAWINGS. 15. DOORS THAT SWING AGAINST A WALL OR OTHER OBJECTS AND ARE NOT DIMENSIONED ARE TO HAVE A R.O. THAT STARTS 4" FROM THE WALL OR OBJECT. 16. SLOPE ROOF 1/4 PER FT. MINIMUM. 17. PROVIDE WALL MOUNTED BIKE RACKS LOCATED BETWEEN EACH PARKING SPACE. 18. ALL PIPING THAT EXTENDS TO THE FLOOR AT THE BACK OF PARKING STALL OR EXPOSED TO THE DRIVE LANE SHALL BE PROTECTED BY A STEEL SAFETY GUARD. 19. PARKING STRIPES SHALL BE 4" WIDE PAVEMENT PAINT. 20. PAINT 6" HIGH PARKING STALL NUMBERS AT EACH STALL. THREE DIGITS PER PARKING SPACE. **THIS LIST USES BULLET POINTS AND AUTOMATICALLY ADJUSTS THE NUMBERING. DELETE THE ONES THAT DON'T APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT, THEN DELETE THIS NOTE** Prepared For Issuance Architectural Review Committee ... ... ...NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONxx.xx.2025 ... ... ... Tushie Montgomery Architects 7645 Lyndale Ave S Suite 100 Richfield, MN 55423 Phase Revisions Project 2023 Tushie Montgomery & Associates, P.C.© T AM Mo n t a n a A f f o r d a b l e 40 A p p l e w a y L a n e Ka l i s p e l l , M T 5 9 9 0 1 Schematic Design AR04 UNIT PLANS 225094A SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0"2 2 Bed A SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0"1 1 Bed A GALVANIZED STAIR AND RAILING: MANUFACTURER: TBD FINISH: GALVANIZED ASPHALT SHINGLES: MANUFACTURER: TBD TYPE: TBD COLOR: TBD NICKEL GAP SIDING 2: MANUFACTURER: LP SMARTSIDE TYPE: NICKEL GAP SIDING -CEDAR TEXTURE COLOR: TERRA BROWN PANEL SIDING: MANUFACTURER: LP SMARTSIDE TYPE: CEDAR TEXTURE NO-GROOVE PANEL SIDING COLOR: ABYSS BLACK NICKEL GAP SIDING 1: MANUFACTURER: LP SMARTSIDE TYPE: NICKEL GAP SIDING -CEDAR TEXTURE COLOR: ABYSS BLACK EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE COMPOSITE WINDOWS: MANUFACTURER: ANDERSEN OR SIMILAR TYPE: 100 SERIES OR SIMILAR FINISH: WHITE GLASS TYPE: TBD ARCHITECTURAL PTAC LOUVER: MANUFACTURER: TBD FINISH: PAINT TO MATCH SURROUNDING ALUMINUM BALCONY: MANUFACTURER: SUPERIOR OR SIMILAR FINISH: DARK BRONZE GLIDING PATIO DOORS: MANUFACTURER: ANDERSEN OR SIMILAR TYPE: 100 SERIES OR SIMILAR FINISH: WHITE GLASS TYPE: TBD 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 CAST IN PLACE FOUNDATION WALL MANUFACTURER: TBD FINISH: TBD LEVEL 1 100' -0" ROOF 130' -4" LEVEL 2 110' -8" LEVEL 3 121' -4" 01 03090203 LEVEL 1 100' -0" ROOF 130' -4" LEVEL 2 110' -8" LEVEL 3 121' -4" 020908080102010405071006 LEVEL 1 100' -0" ROOF 130' -4" LEVEL 2 110' -8" LEVEL 3 121' -4" 02 09 0204 01 0809 02 06 04 05 01 0209 03 LEVEL 1 100' -0" ROOF 130' -4" LEVEL 2 110' -8" LEVEL 3 121' -4" 010303 02 0407 Prepared For Issuance Architectural Review Committee ... ... ...NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONxx.xx.2025 ... ... ... Tushie Montgomery Architects 7645 Lyndale Ave S Suite 100 Richfield, MN 55423 Phase Revisions Project 2023 Tushie Montgomery & Associates, P.C.© T AM Mo n t a n a A f f o r d a b l e 40 A p p l e w a y L a n e Ka l i s p e l l , M T 5 9 9 0 1 Schematic Design AR05 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 225094A SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0"3 SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0"1 EAST ELEVATION SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0"2 WEST ELEVATION SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0"4 NORTH ELEVATION SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0"5 TRASH ENCLOSURE EAST ELEVATION SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0"6 TRASH ENCLOSURE NORTH ELEVATION SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0"7 TRASH ENCLOSURE WEST ELEVATION SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0"8 TRASH ENCLOSURE SOUTH ELEVATION Prepared For Issuance Architectural Review Committee ... ... ...NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONxx.xx.2025 ... ... ... Tushie Montgomery Architects 7645 Lyndale Ave S Suite 100 Richfield, MN 55423 Phase Revisions Project 2023 Tushie Montgomery & Associates, P.C.© T AM Mo n t a n a A f f o r d a b l e 40 A p p l e w a y L a n e Ka l i s p e l l , M T 5 9 9 0 1 Schematic Design AR06 3D VIEWS 225094A 1 REVISION 1 xx/xx/xxxx SCALE33D View - SW SCALE43D View - NW SCALE13D VIEW SE SCALE23D VIEW NE 1' - 0 " 2' - 6" 2' - 6" 1' - 0 " 4' - 4 " 8" 2' - 0"2' - 0" 3' - 1 0 " 8" TMA GC TEXT CONCRETE FOOTING SEE CIVIL FOR GRADING 1' - 6" 1' - 6 " 1' - 4 3/4" 4' - 4 " SEE CIVIL FOR GRADING CONCRETE FOOTING 2' - 0 " 4' - 4" Prepared For Issuance Architectural Review Committee ... ... ...NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONxx.xx.2025 ... ... ... Tushie Montgomery Architects 7645 Lyndale Ave S Suite 100 Richfield, MN 55423 Phase Revisions Project 2023 Tushie Montgomery & Associates, P.C.© T AM Mo n t a n a A f f o r d a b l e 40 A p p l e w a y L a n e Ka l i s p e l l , M T 5 9 9 0 1 Schematic Design AR07 SIGNAGE 225094A 1 REVISION 1 xx/xx/xxxx SCALE 1 1/2" = 1'-0"5 ENTRY SIGNAGE B SCALE 1 1/2" = 1'-0"4 ENTRY SIGNAGE A SCALE 1 1/2" = 1'-0"2 MONUMENT SIGN ELEVATION A SCALE 1 1/2" = 1'-0"3 MONUMENT SIGN ELEVATION B SCALE 1 1/2" = 1'-0"1 MONUMENT SIGN PLAN SIGNAGE AREAS MONUMENT SIGN ELEVATION A MONUMENT SIGN ELEVATION B TOTAL ELEVATION SIGN A ELEVATION SIGN B 6 SQ FT 6 SQ FT 3 SQ FT 3 SQ FT 18 SQ FT Prepared For Issuance Architectural Review Committee ... ... ...NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONxx.xx.2025 ... ... ... Tushie Montgomery Architects 7645 Lyndale Ave S Suite 100 Richfield, MN 55423 Phase Revisions Project 2023 Tushie Montgomery & Associates, P.C.© T AM Mo n t a n a A f f o r d a b l e 40 A p p l e w a y L a n e Ka l i s p e l l , M T 5 9 9 0 1 Schematic Design AR08 CONTEXT PHOTOS 225094A 1 REVISION 1 xx/xx/xxxx NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXTUAL PHOTOS WEST LOT ADJACENT FROM SITE 2 STORY MULTIFAMILY ADJACENT OF SITE ON THE EAST OUTPOST AT KALISPELL Presentation to Montana Board of Housing May 2025 ABOUT THE DEVELOPMENT TEAM •DEVELOPER: Mach and TE Miller •NONPROFIT PARTNER: Community Action Partnership Of NW MT •FINANCE CONSULTANT: Praxis Consulting Group •Mach and TE Miller have developed over $500 million in multifamily development •Praxis Consulting Group has assisted in the development and financing of over 14,000 units, totaling over $3 billion •Mach and TE Miller have an established presence in the Kalispell community, with active developments already underway, and are committed to further contributing to the area's growth and vitality WHY KALISPELL •Affordable housing in the County has an average occupancy rate of 99.8%. (Outpost at Kalispell Market Study) •Outpost at Kalispell capture rate is 5.3%. (Outpost at Kalispell Market Study) •There is a 31.5% rent differential for Outpost 1-bedroom units vs. average market rate rents. (Outpost at Kalispell Market Study) •There is a 22% rent differential for Outpost 2-bedroom units vs. average market rate rents. (Outpost at Kalispell Market Study) •Flathead County has a 3,000-unit housing shortage, which could rise to nearly 14,000 units by 2032 if construction doesn’t keep pace. (Bureau of Business and Economic Research The University of Montana) ABOUT THE PROJECT •Outpost, located at 40 Apple Way is a proposed 24 -unit project located in the downtown revitalization TIF district of Kalispell •The project rents will average 52.92% AMI •Outpost at Kalispell will set aside 10% of units for veterans, victims of domestic violence, or youth aging out of foster care •Within 0.5 miles of a grocery store, restaurants, fitness center, approximately 1 mile from medical facilities, Kalispell Mall and Main Street downtown •Conveniently located adjacent to the Parkline biking/walking trail for future residents (highlighted in green) PROJECT SPECIFICS •Outpost will include many in unit amenities such as electric kitchen appliances, in-unit washer dryers, and balconies/patios •The project will also include common area amenities for the residents such as an outdoor playground, grilling stations, and an indoor gathering space with a kitchenette Unit Type AMI %Unit Count Unit SF 1 BR 50%9 714 2 BR 50%8 954 1 BR 60%3 714 2 BR 60%4 954 TOTAL 52.92%24 20,016 DEVELOPMENT BUDGET Uses Project Costs Land $1,087,000 Site Work $700,000 Construction $4,189,433 Soft Costs $1,810,669 Developer Fee $874,259 Reserves $76,944 Total Costs $8,738,304 INITIAL CONCEPT PLAN The initial concept plan has taken shape and will continue to evolve to meet the needs of the city and more importantly to maximize the experience for the future residents. PROJECT TIMELINE •May : Present to the State Housing Board •June – July : Receive Site Entitlements from City •August : Submit full application to state Housing Board •November : Awarded Tax Credits by the State •Dec - Jan : Complete Construction Drawings and execute GMP •February : Submit for Permit and Close on the land •April : Receive permits and start construction •March 2027 : Construction Completion NON-PROFIT AND COMMUNITY SUPPORT •“This letter is sent in support of the 24 -unit affordable housing project located at 40 Appleway. Our community is experiencing a significant shortage of housing that is attainable for working families, and local businesses are increasingly challenged in recruiting and retaining employees due to the lack of affordable options.” – Jared Nygren, City of Kalispell Director of Development •“As one of the fastest growing areas with one of the largest increases in average housing costs in the nation, Flathead County is in dire need of new, affordable housing.” – Sean Patrick O’Neill, Executive Committee of the Collaborative Housing Solutions of NW Montana •“There is a desperate community need for this type of housing opportunity in Flathead.” – Cassidy Kipp, Director of Project Development for Community Action Partnership THANK YOU Grant Schnell 406-314-9936 Grant@machcpt.com www.machcpt.com or www.temiller.com Development Services 201 1st Avenue East Kalispell, Montana 59901 Phone (406) 758-7940 Report To: Urban Renewal Agency From: Nelson Loring, Community Development Manager Subject: Kalispell Center Mall Work Session Meeting Date: March 19, 2026 BACKGROUND: The Kalispell Center Mall work session will be held at the March 19th URA meeting at 3pm in the first-floor conference room. The Kalispell Center Mall will present to the URA. They are seeking feedback prior to submitting a complete application for staff and URA review. The preliminary application has been submitted as an exhibit for discussion but is not under consideration and no action will be taken on the application during the work session. The work session goals are to receive feedback on the scope of the project, discuss the overall project, and for the applicant to answer URA questions about the proposed project. ATTACHMENTS: Parkline District Provided Materials Average wage per hour $ 1 City of Kalispell Downtown Urban Renewal District and WestSide/Core Area Urban Renewal District Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Application (Application must be completed in full with all required documents attached) APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of Applicant: Parkline Partners LP Mailing Address: 4809 Cole Ave., Suite 330, Dallas, TX 75205 Phone number: (214) 960-4597 E-Mail: Daniel@shopcompanies.com PROJECT INFORMATION Business Name: Parkline Partners, LP Business/Project Physical Address: 10, 20 & 30 N Main Street, Kalispell, MT 59901 Business Insurance Co: Dexter & Company Tax ID # 99-3038498 Business Type (Corp, LLC, Partnership, etc.): Limited Partnership Date business was formed: 4/30/2024 Date of property acquisition: 6/21/2024 Shareholders Name Address % Owned *A current financial statement for each shareholder involved in the project may be required as well as documentation of financial capacity. (This information will be kept confidential, subject to challenge in a court of law.) Description of business (product or service provided, etc.): Annual amount of property taxes: $304,683.37 (Mall Improvements & Land: $276,926.71 | US Bank Improvements: $18,084.64 | Starbucks Improvements: $9,672.02) Current on all property taxes: X Yes No Employment: Please see attached Schedule A. Number of retained positions: ; Full Time: Part Time: Number of new positions to be created: ; Full Time: Part Time: 2 Attachment: Attach an Excel spreadsheet briefly listing and describing the job classifications with the average wage noted by each job classification. Provide a schedule of when the positions are anticipated to be created and filled. Provide a summary of the fringe benefits provided to employees: TBD Project Architectural Firm: Olson Kundig Contact: Tom Kundig (Principal / Owner & Founder) / John Riordan (Principal) Address: 159 South Jackson Street, Suite 600, Seattle, WA 98104 Phone: (206) 624-3730 E-mail: johnr@olsunkundig.com Project Contractor: TBD (relationship with Martel Construction) Address: Phone: E-mail: Has such contractor or architect ever failed to qualify as a responsible bidder, refused to enter into a contract after an award has been made, or failed to complete a construction or development contract within the last 10 years? No Yes If yes, explain: STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATION AND FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY Has the applicant or any individual or entity affiliated with the development of this project been adjudged bankrupt, either voluntarily or involuntarily, within the past ten years? No X Yes if yes, list date, place, and under what name: Has the applicant or any individual or entity affiliated with the development of this project been indicted for or convicted of any felony within the past 10 years? No X Yes if yes, list the date, charge, place, court and action taken for each case: 3 PROJECT EXPENSE WORKSHEET Proposed project description: Please see attached Schedule B. Proposed Construction/Rehabilitation Costs: (If additional room is needed, provide an Excel sheet of expenses) Explanation: Cost: $ Explanation: Cost: $ Explanation: Cost: $ Explanation: Cost: $ Explanation: Cost: $ Explanation: Cost: $ Explanation: Cost: $ Explanation: Cost: $ Architectural Design/Supervision: Cost: $ Permitting Fees: Cost: $ Additional Fees: Cost: $ Additional Fees: Cost: $ Total Project Expense: $ Attachment: Attach bids for each proposed project expense Proposed project schedule with start date and completion date: TBD 4 PROJECT FINANCING WORKSHEET Project Financial Lending Institution: TBD (relationship with Glacier Bank, Peter Akey) Contact: Address: Phone: E-mail: Total Project Cost: Land and Building if recently purchased (5 years): $ Cash invested in recent improvements (5 years): Explanation: $ Explanation: $ Explanation: $ Explanation: $ Subtotal: $ Total ‘Project Expense’ from page 3: $ Total Project Cost: $ Lender Commitments (Include letters of credit or other documentation.) Lender Loan Amount Interest Term Payment/Period $ % yrs $ /Month $ % yrs $ /Month 5 TIF FUNDING REQUESTED (Refer to appropriate Urban Renewal Plan– TIF District Policies for more information) Public Impact Categories X Shared Utilities Extension Sidewalk Improvement X Tree Placement/Replacement Private Investment Categories Loan Programs: X Façade Improvement Rehabilitation/Code Compliance Grant Programs: Historic Façade Improvement X Site Preparation and Demolition (Additional grant or loan dollars may be available through the Kalispell Brownfields Program) X Technical Assistance 6 CERTIFICATION I (we), Daniel A. Fuller, Jr. as Manager of Parkline Partners LP (please print), certify that the statements and estimates within this application as well as any and all documentation submitted as attachments to this application under separate cover are true and correct to the best of my (our) knowledge and belief. Name: Signature: Title: Name: Parkline Partners LP Signature: Title: Manager Date: 03/17/2026 Date: Return to: City of Kalispell Community & Economic Development Department 201 1st Avenue East, Kalispell, MT 59901 406-758-7713 kking@kalispell.com Required attachments: x Excel spreadsheet briefly listing and describing the job classifications with the average wage noted by each job classification. Provide a schedule of when the positions are anticipated to be created and filled. x Bids for each proposed project expense listed on page 3. x Letters of commitment or documentation from any project lender commitment listed on page 4. LABOR ANALYSIS Occupied Vacant Total Occupied Vacant Total Existing Retail 90,868 124,212 215,080 120,080 0 120,080 Existing Hotel1 106,312 0 106,312 106,312 0 106,312 Existing Bank (Pad) 3,000 0 3,000 3,000 0 3,000 Existing Starbucks (Pad) 2,150 0 2,150 2,150 0 2,150 New Retail 0 0 0 28,500 0 28,500 Event Venue 0 0 0 30,000 0 30,000 New Hotel 0 0 0 115,000 0 115,000 Library 0 0 0 40,000 0 40,000 Total 202,330 124,212 326,542 445,042 0 445,042 Category Use Type Basis / Assumption Staffing / Multiplier Estimated Jobs (Low) Estimated Jobs (High) Avg Hourly Wage Avg Salary Wage Annual Wage (Computed) Estimated Payroll (USD) Estimated Start Date Operational Existing Retail 90,868 sf Occ improvements 1 per 600 sf 151 151 $14.42 $30,000 $29,994 $4,542,431 Existing Operational Existing Hotel1 170 rooms 0.5–1 per room 85 170 $15.38 $32,000 $31,990 $5,438,368 Existing Operational Existing Bank (Pad) 3,000 sf Occ improvements 1 per 333-500 sf 6 9 $26.44 $55,000 $55,000 $495,000 Existing Operational Existing Starbucks (Pad) 2,150 sf Occ improvements 1 per 120-180 sf 12 18 $16.83 $35,000 $35,000 $630,000 Existing Total - Current Operational 254 348 $18.27 $38,000 $151,984 $11,105,799 Category Use Type Basis / Assumption Staffing / Multiplier Estimated Jobs (Low) Estimated Jobs (High) Avg Hourly Wage Avg Salary Wage Annual Wage (Computed) Estimated Payroll (USD) Estimated Start Date Construction Existing Retail 120,080 sf Occ improvements 2 per 1,000 sf 240 240 $26.44 $55,000 $54,995 $13,207,647 Q2 2026 Construction Existing Hotel1 106,312 sf improvements 2.5 per 1,000 sf 0 0 - - - - Construction New Retail 28,500 sf Occ improvements 2 per 1,000 sf 57 57 $26.44 $55,000 $54,995 $3,134,726 Q2 2026 Construction Event Venue 30,000 sf improvements 2 per 1,000 sf 60 60 $26.44 $55,000 $54,995 $3,299,712 Q2 2026 Construction Hotel 115,000 sf improvements 2.5 per 1,000 sf 288 288 $28.85 $60,000 $60,008 $17,282,304 Q2 2026 Construction Library 40,000 sf improvements 2 per 1,000 sf 80 80 $28.85 $60,000 $60,008 $4,800,640 Q2 2026 Sub-total - PR Construction 725 725 $27.40 $57,000 $285,002 $41,725,030 Operational Existing Retail 120,080 sf Occ improvements 1 per 600 sf 200 200 $14.42 $30,000 $29,994 $6,002,719 Existing Operational Existing Hotel1 170 rooms 0.5–1 per room 85 170 $15.38 $32,000 $31,990 $5,438,368 Existing Operational Existing Bank (Pad) 3,000 sf Occ improvements 1 per 333-500 sf 6 9 $26.44 $55,000 $55,000 $495,000 Existing Operational Existing Starbucks (Pad) 2,150 sf Occ improvements 1 per 120-180 sf 12 18 $16.83 $35,000 $35,000 $630,000 Existing Operational New Retail 28,500 sf Occ improvements 1 per 600 sf 48 48 $14.42 $30,000 $29,994 $1,439,693 Q1 2027 Operational Event Venue 30,000 sf improvements 1 per 600 sf 50 50 $16.83 $35,000 $35,006 $1,750,320 Q1 2028 Operational Hotel 140 rooms 0.5–1 per room 70 140 $15.38 $32,000 $31,990 $4,478,656 Q1 2028 Operational Library 40,000 sf improvements Small-community staffing 3 5 $19.23 $40,000 $39,998 $199,992 Q1 2028 Sub-total - PR Operational 474 640 $17.37 $36,125 $288,973 $20,434,748 Total - Post-Redevelopment 1199 1365 $21.23 $44,154 $573,974 $62,159,778 TOTAL ESTIMATED NET NEW JOBS 945 1017 Notes: (1) Analysis assumes existing Red Lion Hotel remains static, with no additional construction jobs; Red Lion is prepared to invest funding into a significant renovation once redevelopment plans are approved PARKLINE DISTRICT Draft Labor Analysis Kalispell, MT PARKLINE DISTRICT - REDEVELOPMENT PLAN Estimated Labor and Average Wage Analysis Current Estimate Business Type Current Post-Redevelopment SF - Improvements Post-Redevelopment Estimate N. M a i n S t W Center St 5t h A v e n u e W 3r d A v e W 4t h A v e W 2n d A v e W 1s t A v e W 3r d A v e W 4t h A v e W 2n d A v e W 1s t A v e W 27 PARKLINE DISTRICT | 352-(&7('1(71(:-2%6&5($7,21(;+,%,7 N0 60’ 120’ 240’ SCALE: 1”= 120’ Proposed Hotel 115,000 SF Estimated Positions: Construction: 288 Operational: 70-140 Proposed Event Venue 30,000 SF Estimated Positions: Construction: 60 Operational: 50 Proposed Retail 28,500 SF Estimated Positions: Construction: 57 Operational: 48 Proposed Library 40,000 SF Estimated Positions: Construction: 80 Operational 3-5 Phase 3 (Future) 106,312 SF Estimated Positions: Operational: 85-170 LEGEND: = Phase 1 (Immediate Term) = Phase 2 (Short Term) = Phase 3 (Medium Term) Existing Retail 120,080 SF Estimated Positions: Construction: 240 Operational: 200 Existing Starbucks (Pad) 2,150 SF Estimated Positions: Operational: 12-18 Existing Bank (Pad) 3,000 SF Estimated Positions: Operational: 6-9 PROJECT COST LAND COSTS HARD COSTS SOFT COSTS TOTAL Public Thoroughfare Connection (3rd Avenue) $700,000 $10,492,748 $1,679,000 $12,871,748 Public & Shared Utilities (Water, Sewer, Storm) $0 $2,074,360 $374,000 $2,448,360 Public Streetscape & Sidewalk $0 $1,410,310 $212,000 $1,622,310 Park / Green Space (Phase 1 Scope Only) $0 $865,000 $87,000 $952,000 Exterior Southern Façade Renovations* $0 $4,756,506 $476,000 $5,232,506 Interior Common Area Renovations $0 $2,798,400 $280,000 $3,078,400 Signage (District ID, Project ID, & Wayfinding) $0 $825,000 $66,000 $891,000 Total Estimated Costs: $700,000 $23,222,324 $3,174,000 $27,096,324 PARKLINE DISTRICT Kalispell, MT Summary of Estimated Cost of Proposed Improvements as of March 2026 Page 1 of 1 Demolition of Existing Improvements:Unit Qty. $/Unit TOTAL Remarks Herberger's: Contractor General Conditions LS $122,028 Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing, Gas, Fire Demo LS 1 $33,096 $33,096 Remove AC units from the Building roof EA 8 $3,150 $25,200 Demolition of Building Pad SF 86,699 $9.01 $781,158 Includes disposal/haul-off of Debris Demolition of CMU walls 944cy SF 38,293 $9.03 $345,786 Includes disposal/haul-off of Debris Contingency % 10%$130,727 Subtotal:$1,437,994 Mall (Selective): Contractor General Conditions LS $88,656 Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing, Gas, Fire Demo LS 1 $238,896 $238,896 Includes re-piping of Gas Lines feeding other tenants to remain Remove AC units from the Building roof SF 5 $3,439 $17,194 Demo of columns and relocate, secure to girder SF 8 $6,771 $54,172 Demolition of old mall area Building slab SF 38,624 $9.03 $348,770 Includes disposal/haul-off of Debris Disposal of demolition debris for cmu walls 944cy SF 8,784 $9.03 $79,320 Cut roof deck at termination point LF 351 $53.75 $18,866 Contingency % 10%$84,587 Subtotal:$930,461 Total Demolition of Existing Improvements: $2,368,455 Public Road & Streetscape (3rd Avenue Connection):Unit Qty. $/Unit TOTAL Remarks Asphalt Section SF 1,000 $7.48 $7,480 Fabric, 4" Asphalt, 3" - 3/4" Crush, 9" - 3" Material Paver section SF 27,500 $35.00 $962,500 Road base, concrete sub base and pavers Concrete Curb LF 1,750 $20.92 $36,610 Per Civil Utility Relocations - Northwest Energy ALLOW 1 $75,000 $75,000 per Chris Beccari with Northwestern Energy Utility Relocations - FEC ALLOW 1 $50,000 $50,000 Plug Decorative Concrete SF 14,700 $20.00 $294,000 Integral colored concrete with decorative finish. Tree Grate EA 20 $2,535 $50,697 Steel 4'x6' grate or sim. Street Tree EA 32 $2,000 $64,000 4" Cal. min. 14' ht min. Ornamental Tree EA 12 $1,200 $14,400 3" Cal. Min. 12' HT min. Planting Area SF 7,335 $24.00 $176,040 Mix of planting sizes, bed prep, mulch Irrigation SF 7,335 $6.00 $44,010 Assume drip irrigation Water Features ALLOW 1 $350,000 $350,000 Raised water feature near West Entry. Boulders ALLOW 1 $20,000 $20,000 Specimen boulders local to the flathead valley Site Furniture ALLOW 1 $100,000 $100,000 Benches, bollards, tables & chairs, litter bins, bike racks, etc. Lighting ALLOW 1 $85,000 $85,000 Street Lighting and Landscape accent lighting Trailhead at Parkline Trail / 3rd Ave ALLOW 1 $100,000 $100,000 Signage, seating, bike racks, low wall, bike repair station, drink fountain, etc. Contingency % 10%$242,974 Total 3rd Avenue Connection: $2,672,710 New Building Façade along 3rd Avenue (“Scar”):Unit Qty. $/Unit TOTAL Remarks Temporary Façade: Contractor General Conditions LS $40,316 Frame new scar wall (351 l' x 26'-6") Labor SF 9,300 $12.50 $116,250 Frame new scar wall (351 l' x 26'-6") Materials SF 10,800 $11.50 $124,200 Assumed Metal Studs w/ Plywood Sheeting Install roofing over scar wall LF 351 $19.00 $6,669 Install roofing flashing over scar wall LF 375 $12.50 $4,688 Insulate Scar Wall SF 7,184 $1.90 $13,650 2 layers 5/8 drywall, interior wall (351 l' x 23'-4") SF 7,184 $4.50 $32,328 For Fire-Rating Tape and texture interior wall (351 l' x 23'-4") SF 7,184 $1.50 $10,776 Paint interior scar wall (351 l' x 23'-4") SF 7,184 $1.95 $14,009 Assumed 1-Color Finish Exterior doors M&L on scar wall EA 6 $2,100 $12,600 Assumed Insulated Hollow-Metal Doors (Double 30/70) Exterior facade M&L on scar wall (351 l' x 26'-6") SF 9,300 $17.50 $162,750 Assumed Hardy EIFS Panels w/ Metal Wainscot Construction cleanup and waste disposal LS 1 $5,250 $5,250 Contingency % 10%$54,348 Subtotal:$597,833 New Façade at "Scar": Per Olson Kundig's Drawings LF 325 $12,500 $4,062,500 Contingency % 10%$406,250 Subtotal:$4,468,750 PARKLINE DISTRICT Kalispell, MT Detail of Estimated Cost of Proposed Improvements as of March 2026 Public Thoroughfare Connection (3rd Avenue) Page 1 of 3 PARKLINE DISTRICT Kalispell, MT Detail of Estimated Cost of Proposed Improvements as of March 2026 Total New Building Façade along 3rd Avenue: $5,066,583 Traffic Signal :Unit Qty. $/Unit TOTAL Remarks Traffic Signal LS 1 $350,000 $350,000 Contingency % 10%$35,000 Total Traffic Signal:$385,000 Unit Qty. $/Unit TOTAL Remarks General - Mobilization LS 1 $90,961 $90,961 General - Construction Surveying LS 1 $22,978 $22,978 General - Quality Control Materials Testing LS 1 $20,116 $20,116 Trasnformer(s) LS 1 $218,500 $218,500 Gas LS 1 $187,000 $187,000 Water Main Removal LF 1,700 $78.55 $133,535 Sewer Main Removal LF 700 $87.07 $60,949 Storm drain Main Removal LF 3,000 $56.15 $168,450 8" Water Main Extension LF 1,500 $98.17 $147,255 8" Sewer Main Extension LF 1,000 $117.79 $117,790 Storm drain Manholes EA 20 $4,637 $92,740 12" Storm drain Main LF 2,600 $82.39 $214,214 Dry Utility LS 1 $185,000 $185,000 Site lighting, power re-routing Contingency % 25%$414,872 Total Public Utilities:$2,074,360 Unit Qty. $/Unit TOTAL Remarks Concrete Sidewalk SF 7,500 $9.00 $67,500 Standard, Assume 4" thick concrete sidewalk Decorative Paving SF 21,600 $35.00 $756,000 Decorative concrete and/or pavers with sub-slab Street Tree EA 27 $2,000 $54,000 4" Cal. min. 14' ht min. Canopy Tree EA 8 $1,200 $9,600 3" Cal min. 12' ht min. Planting Area SF 8,000 $24.00 $192,000 Mix of planting sizes, bed prep, mulch Irrigation SF 8,000 $6.00 $48,000 Assume drip irrigation Site Furniture ALLOW 1 $60,000 $60,000 Benches, bollards, tables & chairs, litter bins Lighting ALLOW 1 $95,000 $95,000 Street Lighting and Landscape accent lighting Contingency % 10%$128,210 Total Streetscape Improvements: $1,410,310 Unit Qty. $/Unit TOTAL Remarks Decorative Paving SF 0 $50.00 $0 Assumes decorative concrete and/or concrete pavers with sub-slab Planted Area SF 8,200 $20.00 $164,000 Mix of planting sizes, bed prep, mulch Lawn SF 10,500 $3.00 $31,500 Sod Canopy Trees EA 32 $2,000 $64,000 4" Cal. Min. 14' HT min. Ornamental Trees EA 14 $1,200 $16,800 3" Cal. Min. 12' HT min. Irrigation SF 18,700 $6.00 $112,200 Assumes spray irrig. at lawn and drip irrig. at planted areas w/ auto controller Lighting ALLOW 1 $250,000 $250,000 Pole lights, event lawn lights, bollard lights, and accent lights Boulders ALLOW 0 $50,000 $0 Specimen boulders local to the flathead valley Bench Seating ALLOW 1 $150,000 $150,000 Radiused Wood / Metal bench seating within park Site Furniture ALLOW 0 $250,000 $0 Benches, bollards, game tables, dining tables/chairs, litter/recycle recept., etc. Water Features ALLOW 0 $1,700,000 $0 Assumes (3) water features total at central park. (2) raised features Sculpture EA 0 $250,000 $0 Assumes sculptures similar to character images provided. Contingency % 10%$78,850 Total Park:$867,350 Public Streetscape & Sidewalk Improvements (Center St. & 5th Ave.) Park / Green Space Public & Shared Utilities Page 2 of 3 PARKLINE DISTRICT Kalispell, MT Detail of Estimated Cost of Proposed Improvements as of March 2026 Façade:Unit Qty. $/Unit TOTAL Remarks Per Olson Kundig's Drawings LF 450 $5,650 $2,542,500 Enhanced Mall Entrance (Southern) LS 1 $1,350,000 $1,350,000 Contingency % 10%$389,250 Total Renovation of Exterior Mall Façade: $4,281,750 Enhanced Pedestrian Sidewalk:Unit Qty. $/Unit TOTAL Remarks Concrete Sidewalk / Flatwork SF 3,500 $9.00 $31,500 Standard 6' width, Assume 4" thick concrete sidewalk Pavers at South Entry SF 1,250 $24.00 $30,000 Road base, concrete sub base and pavers Planted Area SF 4,600 $22.00 $101,200 Mix of planting sizes, bed prep, mulch Irrigation SF 4,600 $5.00 $23,000 Assumes spray irrig. at lawn and drip irrig. at planted areas w/ auto controller Lighting EA 12 $5,750 $69,000 pole mounted lights and landscape accent lighting Boulders ALLOW 1 $15,000.00 $15,000 Specimen boulders local to the flathead valley Site Furniture ALLOW 1 $50,000.00 $50,000 Benches, bollards, litter / recycling receptacles, bike racks, etc Concrete Curb / Sidewalk Removal LS 1 $111,896 $111,896 Contingency % 10%$43,160 Total Enhanced Pedestrian Sidewalk: $474,756 Unit Qty. $/Unit TOTAL Remarks Storefronts LS 24 $38,500 $924,000 Flooring SF 25,000 $8.00 $200,000 Site Furnishings LS 12 $22,500 $270,000 Bathrooms LS 2 $100,000 $200,000 Ceilings ALLOW 1 $625,000 $625,000 Lighting ALLOW 1 $325,000 $325,000 Contingency % 10%$254,400 Total Renovation of Interior Mall Common Areas: $2,798,400 Unit Qty. $/Unit TOTAL Remarks Project ID ALLOW 1 $100,000 $100,000 Multi-Tenant ALLOW 2 $150,000 $300,000 Wayfinding ALLOW 1 $350,000 $350,000 Contingency % 10%$75,000 Total Signage:$825,000 Exterior Southern Façade Renovations Interior Common Area Renovations Signage Page 3 of 3