Loading...
Mountain View - Minor PUD Amendment Ordinance 1862wgm@wgmgroup.com 406.728.4611 www.wgmgroup.com MINOR PUD AMENDMENT REQUEST DATE: October 31, 2025 TO: PJ Sorensen, Assistant Director of Development Services FROM: WGM Group on behalf of Bison Hill, LLC CC: Patrick Jentz, PE; Gary Schnell; Site Review Committee RE: Mountain View Planned Unit Development, Phase 2 – Minor Amendment Request On October 24, 2025, we met with PJ Sorensen and Patrick Jentz to review some minor modifications to the approved Mountain View PUD layout. The request was to make a minor change to the internal lot access to accommodate the topography of the site; namely removing a section of local street in the lot layout. See Figure 1 below. Figure 1: Locations of Road Sections to Be Removed Based on Topography SECTION VIEW SHOWN IN FIGURE 3 BELOW City of Kalispell October 31, 2025 Page 2 of 4 Justification for Access Adjustments: After reviewing topography in detail on the second phase of the Mountain View Subdivision preliminary plat, it was noted that in order to accommodate these short sections of City Streets it would require significant deviation from standard intersection and approach requirements to accommodate intersection grading. Specifically, section 9.1.3.F: Figure 2: Section 9.1.3.F of City of Kalispell Design and Construction Standards Given the distance between the two east-west roads in these locations, a total of 222 feet with 60 feet of 2% intersections at either end, and a 20-foot alley, there is very little distance to make up for the underlying grades. This results in substantial fill moving north on the site to accommodate the intersection grading for both the roads and the future lots. Proposed Modification: To work with the grades and capture the desired intent of the PUD layout, it is proposed to drop the southern local street access to the alley on the two sections noted in Figure 1 above. This would keep the northern access point to the alley to break up the access through a long alley, but to allow more appropriate intersection grades at the east west local streets to the alley. The PUD approval (Ordinance 1862), included a block length deviation, to exceed the 600 ft block length, and in these locations proposed to have vehicle access removed, an open space gap is proposed to mimic other areas on the site with a minimum of 20 ft and in this case 30 ft minimum to perpetuate view corridors and break the block up. This helps to accomplish the desired “Stadium Seating” concept for the homes to work with the site’s topography rather than against it. The southern alley accessed lots would be graded steeper, closer to 15% and the northern lots would be flatter to provide a more gentle grade between the Road F and the Southern Alley and Road H and the Middle Alley (see Figure 1). A conceptual cross section is included below in Figure 3 to help illustrate how the homes would fit in with this modification and the elevation difference between the roads and alleys, full size exhibits are included as supplements to this memorandum. It also shows the existing grade vs. the proposed grades. City of Kalispell October 31, 2025 Page 3 of 4 Figure 3: A Conceptual Cross-Section Located at Original Alley Access City of Kalispell October 31, 2025 Page 4 of 4 Summary and Conclusion: In regard to the approved deviations, the proposed modifications remain in compliance with the deviations allowed or are not utilizing them. 1. Minimum Lot size reduction to 3500 sf. a. This minor amendment is not applicable to this portion of the development, and no changes are proposed that affect this deviation with this minor amendment. 2. Minimum Lot Width reduction to 35 ft for detached cottages and 30 ft for attached units a. This deviation is not applicable to this portion of the development; all single family lots utilizing the proposed modification remain wider than the minimum 50 ft. 3. Block widths allowed in excess of 600 ft. a. This section continues to have block widths in excess of 600 ft and still maintains a break in the lots with the proposed open space gap between lots even though the southern half of the alley access road is proposed to be removed. 4. Driveway access to collector Roads allowed where alleys are not feasible. a. The lots along the collector road will continue to utilize this deviation with the “no parking” signs. No changes are proposed with this minor amendment request. 5. Cottage alleys as an alternative street section a. This minor amendment is not applicable to this portion of the development, and no changes are proposed that affect this deviation with this minor amendment. 6. Alleys with townhouse development. a. This minor amendment is not applicable to this portion of the development and no changes are proposed that affect this deviation with this minor amendment. No detriment to public welfare would be created by allowing the layout update. The blocks of houses continue to be broken up by the open space as allowed by the deviation, and the one side of street access provided in the center of the alleys makes the concept work better with the existing topography. This allows for improved intersection grades to the central alley access points. The number of lots will remain the same and this request does not intend to modify the approved number of lots or change the site traffic generated. This proposed layout modification should be considered a minor change to the approved Mountain View PUD Ordinance 1862.