Loading...
H4. Res. 6290, Ord. 1943, Ord. 1944, Ashley Creek Annexation and Zoning Development Services Department 201 1st Avenue East Kalispell, MT 59901 Phone: (406) 758-7940 Fax: (406) 758-7739 www.kalispell.com/planning REPORT TO: Jarod Nygren, Interim City Manager FROM: Donnie McBath, Planner II, Development Services SUBJECT: Resolution 6290 and Ordinance 1943 – Ashley Creek Park Annexation, Initial Zoning of P-1 (Public), and Ordinance 1944 - Zone Change from City B-1 to City P-1 – Staff Reports #KA-25-07 and #KZC-25-01 MEETING DATE: September 2, 2025 BACKGROUND Bibler Resources Company and the City of Kalispell have jointly submitted petitions for annexation and zoning related to the property commonly referred to as Ashley Creek Park, located at 301 Fen Way. Bibler Resources Company is a long-standing Montana corporation with property holdings in the Kalispell area. Historically, portions of the land along Ashley Creek were used in lumber and resource-based operations, which have since ceased. The property has remained vacant for several years, transitioning from its industrial past toward restoration and open space use. Bibler Resources has partnered with the City on this application to bring the land under municipal jurisdiction, enabling coordinated planning for a public park, trail connections, and environmental stewardship. The request involves two actions: File #KA-25-07 – Annexation of approximately 25.7 acres into the City of Kalispell with an initial zoning designation of P-1 (Public). The land includes tracts owned by both Bibler Resources and the City. File #KZC-25-01 – Rezoning of approximately 10.55 acres at 301 Fen Way from City B-1 (Neighborhood Business) to P-1 (Public). Together, these actions will create an approximately 36-acre contiguous park corridor along Ashley Creek. This collaborative effort reflects the City’s Growth Policy goals for expansion of public parks, preservation of natural areas, improved neighborhood connectivity, and restoration of riparian habitat. The Kalispell Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on August 12, 2025, to review the applications. After staff presentation and public comment, the Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval to the City Council, adopting Staff Reports #KA-25-07 and #KZC-25-01 as findings of fact. RECOMMENDATIONS: ANNEXATION: It is recommended that the Kalispell City Council approve Resolution 6290, a Resolution to provide for the alteration of boundaries of the City of Kalispell by including therein as an annexation property which can be described as (1) Assessors Tracts 2, 8, 10, 11A, 17 and 18 located in NE1/4 and NE1/4SE1/4 of Section 13, Township 28 North, Range 22 West, P.M.M., Flathead County, Montana, and more particularly described as shown on Exhibit A, attached hereto and hereby incorporated by reference; (2) Tract 2 of Certificate of Survey No. 19545 situated, lying and being in the northeast quarter of Section 13, Township 28 North, Range 22 West, P.M.M., Flathead County, Montana; and (3) Tract 2 of Certificate of Survey No. 19582 situated, lying and being in the northeast quarter and the southeast quarter of Section 13, Township 28 North, Range 22 West, P.M.M., Flathead County, Montana; containing approximately 25.5 acres. INITIAL ZONING: It is recommended that the Kalispell City Council approve the first reading of Ordinance 1943, an Ordinance to amend Section 27.02.010, official zoning map, City of Kalispell zoning ordinance 1677, by zoning certain real property which can be described as (1) Assessors Tracts 2, 8, 10, 11A, 17 and 18 located in NE1/4 and NE1/4SE1/4 of Section 13, Township 28 North, Range 22 West, P.M.M., Flathead County, Montana, and more particularly described as shown on Exhibit A, attached hereto and hereby incorporated by reference; (2) Tract 2 of Certificate of Survey No. 19545 situated, lying and being in the northeast quarter of Section 13, Township 28 North, Range 22 West, P.M.M., Flathead County, Montana; and (3) Tract 2 of Certificate of Survey No. 19582 situated, lying and being in the northeast quarter and the southeast quarter of Section 13, Township 28 North, Range 22 West, P.M.M., Flathead County, Montana; containing approximately 25.5 acres; with an initial zoning classification of City P-1 (Public). ZONING MAP AMMENDMENT: It is recommended that the Kalispell City Council approve the first reading of Ordinance 1944, an Ordinance to amend Section 27.02.010, official zoning map, City of Kalispell zoning ordinance 1677, by rezoning certain real property which can be described as Tract 3 of Certificate of Survey No. 19233 and Tract 1 of Certificate of Survey No. 19582, both situated, lying and being in the north half of the northeast quarter of Section 13, Township 28 North, Range 22 West, P.M.M., Flathead County, Montana; containing approximately 10.55 acres, subject to any easements, covenants, conditions, restrictions, or agreements of record, from City B-1 (Neighborhood Business) to City P-1 (Public), in accordance with the Kalispell Growth Policy Plan-It 2035, and to provide an effective date. FISCAL EFFECTS: There are minimal fiscal impacts at this time. As the property will be dedicated to open space and park use, ongoing costs will be associated with maintenance and future park improvements, which can be coordinated through capital planning and partnerships. ALTERNATIVES: Deny the request. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 6290 Ordinance 1943 Ordinance 1944 Staff Report #KA-25-07 – Ashley Creek Park Annexation and Initial Zoning Staff Report #KZC-25-01 – Ashley Creek Park Zone Change August 12, 2025, Kalispell Planning Commission Minutes Application Materials Maps c: Aimee Brunckhorst, Kalispell City Clerk EXHIBIT A A PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINING FIVE PARCELS OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 200, PAGE 198; PARCEL 2 OF COS No. 18486; BOOK 35, PAGE 560; BOOK 35, PAGE 561; BOOK 35, PAGE 562 AND BOOK 35, PAGE 559 LOCATED IN NE1/4 AND NE1/4SE1/4 OF SECTION 13, T. 28 N., R. 22 W. P.M. MONTANA, FLATHEAD COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING FROM THE NE CORNER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE S01°01'39"W, 46.95 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 13 TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF BNSF RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE S76°03'07"W, 31.05 FEET ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF BNSF RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF SOUTH MERIDIAN ROAD BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE S01°01'39"W, 103.52 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE SAID SOUTH MERIDIAN ROAD TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF BNSF RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE S76°03'07"W, 358.82 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF BNSF RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE; THENCE ALONG A TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 713.95 FEET, ARC LENGTH OF 1077.54 FEET, DELTA ANGLE OF 86°28'28", CHORD BEARING OF S32°48'53"W AND CHORD DISTANCE OF 978.14 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF BNSF RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE S10°25'21"E, 2366.04 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE BNSF RIGHT-OF-WAY TO THE NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF FOYS LAKE ROAD; THENCE S32°51'23"W, 145.87 FEET ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID FOYS LAKE ROAD TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF BNSF RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE N10°25'21"W, 2472.24 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF BNSF RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE ALONG A TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 813.95 FEET, ARC LENGTH OF 180.90 FEET; DELTA ANGLE OF 12°44'02", CHORD BEARING OF N04°03'20"W AND CHORD DISTANCE OF 180.53 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY BNSF RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE; THENCE ALONG A NON-TANGENT COMPOUND CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 548.69 FEET; ARC LENGTH OF 662.93 FEET, DELTA ANGLE OF 69°13'33", CHORD BEARING OF N52°42'34"W AND CHORD DISTANCE OF 623.34 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF BNSF RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE S76°03'07"W, 319.97 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF BNSF RIGHT-OF-WAY TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 2; THENCE N13°56'53"W, 100.00 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL 2 TO THE NW CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 2; THENCE N76°03'07"E, 1877.19 FEET ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF BNSF RIGHT-OF-WAY TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF SAID PARCEL CONTAINING 14.69 ACRES. Return to: Kalispell City Clerk PO Box 1997 Kalispell, MT 59903 RESOLUTION NO. 6290 A RESOLUTION TO PROVIDE FOR THE ALTERATION OF THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY OF KALISPELL BY INCLUDING THEREIN AS AN ANNEXATION CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS ASSESSORS TRACTS 2, 8, 10, 11A, 17 AND 18 LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER AND THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 28 NORTH, RANGE 22 WEST, P.M.M., FLATHEAD COUNTY, MONTANA, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED ON EXHIBIT “A”; TRACT 2 OF CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY NO. 19545 SITUATED, LYING AND BEING IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 28 NORTH, RANGE 22 WEST, P.M.M., FLATHEAD COUNTY, MONTANA; AND TRACT 2 OF CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY NO. 19582 SITUATED, LYING AND BEING IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER AND THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 28 NORTH, RANGE 22 WEST, P.M.M., FLATHEAD COUNTY, MONTANA, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED ON EXHIBIT “B” TO BE KNOWN AS ASHLEY CREEK PARK ADDITION NO. 483, TO ZONE SAID PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE KALISPELL ZONING ORDINANCE, AND TO DECLARE AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Bibler Resources Company and the City of Kalispell, the applicants for the above- referenced property, has submitted a request that the property be annexed into the City; and WHEREAS, the Kalispell Planning Department has made a report on the petitioners’ Annexation Request, #KA-25-07, dated August 12, 2025; and WHEREAS, the Kalispell Planning Commission recommended the territory be zoned City P-1 (Public) upon annexation into the City of Kalispell; and WHEREAS, pursuant to §7-2-4211(1)(b), MCA, the City shall include the full width of any public streets or roads, including the rights-of-way, that are adjacent to the property being annexed; and WHEREAS, the City of Kalispell desires to annex said property in accordance with Title 7, Chapter 2, Part 46, Montana Code Annotated. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KALISPELL AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That all of the real property described on Exhibit A and Exhibit B be annexed to the City of Kalispell and the boundary of the City is altered to so provide. SECTION 2. Upon the effective date of this Resolution, the City Clerk is directed to make and certify under the seal of the City, a copy of the record of these proceedings as are entered on the minutes of the City Council and file said documents with the Flathead County Clerk and Recorder. From and after the date of filing of said documents as prepared by the City Clerk, or on the effective date hereof, whichever shall occur later, said annexed territory is part of the City of Kalispell and its citizens and property shall be subject to all debts, laws and ordinances and regulations in force in the City of Kalispell and shall be entitled to the same privileges and benefits as are other parts of the City. SECTION 3. The territory annexed by this Resolution shall be zoned in accordance with the Kalispell Zoning Ordinance. SECTION 4. This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon passage by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND SIGNED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF KALISPELL, THIS 2ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025. ___________________________________ Mark Johnson Mayor ATTEST: _________________________________ Aimee Brunckhorst, CMC City Clerk EXHIBIT A A PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINING FIVE PARCELS OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 200, PAGE 198; PARCEL 2 OF COS No. 18486; BOOK 35, PAGE 560; BOOK 35, PAGE 561; BOOK 35, PAGE 562 AND BOOK 35, PAGE 559 LOCATED IN NE1/4 AND NE1/4SE1/4 OF SECTION 13, T. 28 N., R. 22 W. P.M. MONTANA, FLATHEAD COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING FROM THE NE CORNER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE S01°01'39"W, 46.95 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 13 TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF BNSF RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE S76°03'07"W, 31.05 FEET ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF BNSF RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF SOUTH MERIDIAN ROAD BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE S01°01'39"W, 103.52 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE SAID SOUTH MERIDIAN ROAD TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF BNSF RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE S76°03'07"W, 358.82 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF BNSF RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE; THENCE ALONG A TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 713.95 FEET, ARC LENGTH OF 1077.54 FEET, DELTA ANGLE OF 86°28'28", CHORD BEARING OF S32°48'53"W AND CHORD DISTANCE OF 978.14 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF BNSF RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE S10°25'21"E, 2366.04 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE BNSF RIGHT-OF-WAY TO THE NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF FOYS LAKE ROAD; THENCE S32°51'23"W, 145.87 FEET ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE OF SAID FOYS LAKE ROAD TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF BNSF RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE N10°25'21"W, 2472.24 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF BNSF RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE ALONG A TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 813.95 FEET, ARC LENGTH OF 180.90 FEET; DELTA ANGLE OF 12°44'02", CHORD BEARING OF N04°03'20"W AND CHORD DISTANCE OF 180.53 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY BNSF RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE; THENCE ALONG A NON-TANGENT COMPOUND CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 548.69 FEET; ARC LENGTH OF 662.93 FEET, DELTA ANGLE OF 69°13'33", CHORD BEARING OF N52°42'34"W AND CHORD DISTANCE OF 623.34 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF BNSF RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE S76°03'07"W, 319.97 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF BNSF RIGHT-OF- WAY TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 2; THENCE N13°56'53"W, 100.00 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL 2 TO THE NW CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 2; THENCE N76°03'07"E, 1877.19 FEET ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF BNSF RIGHT-OF-WAY TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF SAID PARCEL CONTAINING 14.69 ACRES. EXHIBIT B TRACT 2 OF CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY NO. 19545 SITUATED, LYING AND BEING IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 28 NORTH, RANGE 22 WEST, P.M.M., FLATHEAD COUNTY, MONTANA; AND TRACT 2 OF CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY NO. 19582 SITUATED, LYING AND BEING IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER AND THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 28 NORTH, RANGE 22 WEST, P.M.M., FLATHEAD COUNTY, MONTANA ALL CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 25.5 ACRES ORDINANCE NO. 1943 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SECTION 27.02.010, OFFICIAL ZONING MAP, CITY OF KALISPELL ZONING ORDINANCE (ORDINANCE NO. 1677), BY ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, DESCRIBED AS ASSESSORS TRACTS 2, 8, 10, 11A, 17 AND 18 LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER AND THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 28 NORTH, RANGE 22 WEST, P.M.M., FLATHEAD COUNTY, MONTANA, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED ON EXHIBIT “A”; TRACT 2 OF CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY NO. 19545 SITUATED, LYING AND BEING IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 28 NORTH, RANGE 22 WEST, P.M.M., FLATHEAD COUNTY, MONTANA; AND TRACT 2 OF CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY NO. 19582 SITUATED, LYING AND BEING IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER AND THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 28 NORTH, RANGE 22 WEST, P.M.M., FLATHEAD COUNTY, MONTANA, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED ON EXHIBIT “B” (PREVIOUSLY ZONED COUNTY R-1 (SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL) AND I-2 (HEAVY INDUSTRIAL)) TO CITY P-1 (PUBLIC), IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE KALISPELL GROWTH POLICY PLAN – IT 2035, AND TO PROVIDE AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Bibler Resources Company and the City of Kalispell, the applicants for the property described above, petitioned that the zoning classification attached to the above- described tract of land be zoned P-1 on approximately 25.7 acres of land; and WHEREAS, the property is located along Ashley Creek; and WHEREAS, the petition was the subject of a report compiled by the Kalispell Planning Department, Staff Report #KA-25-07, dated August 12, 2025, in which the Kalispell Planning Department evaluated the petition and recommended that the property as described above be zoned P-1, Public, as requested by the petition; and WHEREAS, after considering all the evidence submitted on the proposal to zone the property as described P-1, Public, the City Council finds such initial zoning to be consistent with the Kalispell Growth Policy Plan-It 2035 and adopts, based upon the criterion set forth in Section 76-3-608, M.C.A., and State, Etc. v. Board of County Commissioners, Etc. 590 P2d 602, the findings of fact of KPD as set forth in Staff Report No. KA-25-07. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KALISPELL AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Section 27.02.010, of the Official Zoning Map of the Kalispell Zoning Ordinance (Ordinance No. 1677) is hereby amended by designating the property described above as P-1, Public, on approximately 25.7 acres of land. SECTION 2. The balance of Section 27.02.010, Official Zoning Map, City of Kalispell Zoning Ordinance not amended hereby shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 3. This Ordinance shall be effective thirty (30) days from and after the date of its final passage and approval by the Mayor. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND SIGNED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF KALISPELL THIS 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025. ______________________________________ Mark Johnson Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________________ Aimee Brunckhorst, CMC City Clerk EXHIBIT A A PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINING FIVE PARCELS OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 200, PAGE 198; PARCEL 2 OF COS No. 18486; BOOK 35, PAGE 560; BOOK 35, PAGE 561; BOOK 35, PAGE 562 AND BOOK 35, PAGE 559 LOCATED IN NE1/4 AND NE1/4SE1/4 OF SECTION 13, T. 28 N., R. 22 W. P.M. MONTANA, FLATHEAD COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING FROM THE NE CORNER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE S01°01'39"W, 46.95 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 13 TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF BNSF RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE S76°03'07"W, 31.05 FEET ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF BNSF RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF SOUTH MERIDIAN ROAD BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE S01°01'39"W, 103.52 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE SAID SOUTH MERIDIAN ROAD TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF BNSF RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE S76°03'07"W, 358.82 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF BNSF RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE; THENCE ALONG A TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 713.95 FEET, ARC LENGTH OF 1077.54 FEET, DELTA ANGLE OF 86°28'28", CHORD BEARING OF S32°48'53"W AND CHORD DISTANCE OF 978.14 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF BNSF RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE S10°25'21"E, 2366.04 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE BNSF RIGHT-OF-WAY TO THE NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF FOYS LAKE ROAD; THENCE S32°51'23"W, 145.87 FEET ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE OF SAID FOYS LAKE ROAD TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF BNSF RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE N10°25'21"W, 2472.24 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF BNSF RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE ALONG A TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 813.95 FEET, ARC LENGTH OF 180.90 FEET; DELTA ANGLE OF 12°44'02", CHORD BEARING OF N04°03'20"W AND CHORD DISTANCE OF 180.53 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY BNSF RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE; THENCE ALONG A NON-TANGENT COMPOUND CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 548.69 FEET; ARC LENGTH OF 662.93 FEET, DELTA ANGLE OF 69°13'33", CHORD BEARING OF N52°42'34"W AND CHORD DISTANCE OF 623.34 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF BNSF RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE S76°03'07"W, 319.97 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF BNSF RIGHT-OF- WAY TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 2; THENCE N13°56'53"W, 100.00 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL 2 TO THE NW CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 2; THENCE N76°03'07"E, 1877.19 FEET ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF BNSF RIGHT-OF-WAY TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF SAID PARCEL CONTAINING 14.69 ACRES. EXHIBIT B TRACT 2 OF CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY NO. 19545 SITUATED, LYING AND BEING IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 28 NORTH, RANGE 22 WEST, P.M.M., FLATHEAD COUNTY, MONTANA; AND TRACT 2 OF CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY NO. 19582 SITUATED, LYING AND BEING IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER AND THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 28 NORTH, RANGE 22 WEST, P.M.M., FLATHEAD COUNTY, MONTANA ALL CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 25.5 ACRES ORDINANCE NO. 1944 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SECTION 27.02.010, OFFICIAL ZONING MAP, CITY OF KALISPELL ZONING ORDINANCE (ORDINANCE NO. 1677), BY ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, DESCRIBED AS TRACT 3 OF CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY NO. 19233 AND TRACT 1 OF CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY NO. 19582, BOTH SITUATED, LYING AND BEING IN THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 28 NORTH, RANGE 22 WEST, P.M.M., FLATHEAD COUNTY, MONTANA; CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 10.55 ACRES, SUBJECT TO ANY EASEMENTS, COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS, OR AGREEMENTS OF RECORD (PREVIOUSLY ZONED CITY B-1 (NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS)) TO CITY P-1 (PUBLIC)), IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE KALISPELL GROWTH POLICY PLAN – IT 2035, AND TO PROVIDE AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Bibler Resources Company and the City of Kalispell, the applicants for the property described above, petitioned that the zoning classification attached to the above- described tract of land be zoned P-1 on approximately 10.55 acres of land; and WHEREAS, the property is located at 301 Fen Way; and WHEREAS, the petition was the subject of a report compiled by the Kalispell Planning Department, Staff Report #KZC-25-01, dated August 12, 2025, in which the Kalispell Planning Department evaluated the petition and recommended that the property as described above be zoned P-1, Public, as requested by the petition; and WHEREAS, after considering all the evidence submitted on the proposal to zone the property as described P-1, Public, the City Council finds such initial zoning to be consistent with the Kalispell Growth Policy Plan-It 2035 and adopts, based upon the criterion set forth in Section 76-3-608, M.C.A., and State, Etc. v. Board of County Commissioners, Etc. 590 P2d 602, the findings of fact of KPD as set forth in Staff Report No. KZD-25-01. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KALISPELL AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Section 27.02.010, of the Official Zoning Map of the Kalispell Zoning Ordinance (Ordinance No. 1677) is hereby amended by designating the property described above as P-1, Public, on approximately 10.55 acres of land. SECTION 2. The balance of Section 27.02.010, Official Zoning Map, City of Kalispell Zoning Ordinance not amended hereby shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 3. This Ordinance shall be effective thirty (30) days from and after the date of its final passage and approval by the Mayor. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND SIGNED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF KALISPELL THIS 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025. ______________________________________ Mark Johnson Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________________ Aimee Brunckhorst, CMC City Clerk 1 ASHLEY CREEK PARK ANNEXATION ANNEXATION/INITIAL ZONING AND ZONE CHANGE TO P‑1 (PUBLIC) STAFF REPORT #KA‑25‑07- #KZC-25-01 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT AUGUST 12, 2025 A report to the Kalispell City Planning Commission regarding a request from Bibler Resources Company and the City of Kalispell for annexation/initial zoning of P‑1 (Public) and rezone of property currently zoned City B-1 to City P-1 for property commonly referred to as Ashley Creek Park, located at 301 Fen Way. A public hearing has been scheduled before the Planning Commission for August 12, 2025, at 6:00 PM in the Kalispell City Council Chambers. The Planning Commission will forward a recommendation to the Kalispell City Council for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Bibler Resources Company and the City of Kalispell have jointly submitted petitions for annexation and zoning of multiple tracts of land generally referred to as Ashley Creek Park. The area to be annexed with an initial zoning of City P-1 includes approximately 11 acres of Bibler Resources property currently zoned County I-2 and County R-1 and approximately 15 acres (WYE Tract) of City of Kalispell property also currently zoned County I-2 and County R-1. Bibler Resources is also requesting to rezone approximately 10.5 acres currently zoned City B-1 to City P-1. In total, the proposed applications will result in an approximate 36-acre contiguous area for future development of a public park. The request includes two formal actions: • File #KA-25-07 – A petition for annexation of approximately 26 acres into the City of Kalispell. This includes parcels owned by Bibler Resources Company and parcels currently owned by the City of Kalispell, which are being brought into city limits for development of a park. • File #KZC-25-01 – A zoning map amendment for the approximately 10-acre parcel at 301 Fen Way, owned by Bibler Resources Company, to change the zoning from City B-1 (Neighborhood Business) to P-1 (Public). The annexation and zoning requests are part of a larger collaborative effort to preserve, restore, and activate Ashley Creek. By bringing these parcels under municipal jurisdiction, the City will be able to coordinate future park improvements, pursue funding opportunities, manage stormwater impacts, and provide public access through park facilities and trails. This project supports multiple policy objectives outlined in the Kalispell Growth Policy, including the expansion of public parkland, preservation of natural areas, and improved connectivity between neighborhoods. It also reflects the City’s broader goals for smart urban growth, environmental stewardship, and healthy community design as Kalispell continues to grow. This report evaluates the application in accordance with state and local regulations. The annexation request and initial city zoning classification will be reviewed in accordance with 2 Section 27.03.010(4) of the Kalispell Zoning Ordinance. This property will be annexed under the provisions of Sections 7-2-4601 through 7-2-4610, M.C.A., Annexation by Petition. The statutory basis for reviewing a change in zoning is set forth by Section 27.29.020 of the Kalispell Zoning Ordinance and 76-2-303 M.C.A. Findings of Fact for the zone change request are discussed relative to the itemized criteria described by 76-2-304, M.C.A. A: Applicants/Petitioners: Bibler Resources Company, a Montana corporation 625 Sunset Blvd. Kalispell, MT 59901 City of Kalispell 201 First Avenue East Kalispell, MT 59901 B: Location 301 Fen Way, Kalispell, Montana. The properties encompass approximately 36 acres of open space and creek corridor located between South Meridian Road and the U.S. Highway 93 Bypass, and between Appleway Drive and Foys Lake Road. The properties being annexed are more particularly described as follows: 3 • The annexation would place approximately 25.7 acres of land in the city. The property owned by the City includes Assessors Tracts 2, 8, 10, 11A, 17 and 18 located in NE1/4 and NE1/4SE1/4 of Section 13, T. 28 N., R. 22 W., P.M., Flathead County, Montana. The property owned by Bibler Resources can be described as Tract 2 of Certificate of Survey No. 19545 situated, lying and being in the northeast quarter of Section 13, Township 28 North, Range 22 West, P.M.M., Flathead County, Montana, and Tract 2 of Certificate of Survey No. 19582 situated, lying and being in the northeast quarter and the southeast quarter of Section 13, Township 28 North, Range 22 West, P.M.M., Flathead County, Montana. Properties being rezoned from City B-1 to City P-1 are more particularly described as follows: • Request for zoning map amendment to rezone 10.55 acres of land located at 301 Fenn Way from City B-1 (Neighborhood Business) to City P-1 (Public). The property can be described as Tract 3 of Certificate of Survey No. 19233 and Tract 1 of Certificate of Survey No. 19582, both situated, lying and being in the north half of the northeast quarter of Section 13, Township 28 North, Range 22 West, P.M.M., Flathead County, Montana. C: Existing Land Use and Zoning: The property is vacant. The zoning of the area to be annexed is County I-2 (Heavy Industrial) and R-1 (Suburban Residential). The Flathead County Zoning Ordinance describes the intent of the I-2 district as: “A district to provide for industrial uses to accommodate heavy manufacturing, processing, fabrication, and assembly of parts or materials. It is also intended that the encroachment of non-industrial or unspecified commercial uses within the district be prevented.” Permitted uses in this district include a variety of heavy industrial uses, including a railroad yard. The county’s zoning code conditionally permits additional heavy industrial uses that tend to deal with handling or manufacture of dangerous or toxic materials, or produce excessive noise, such as an airport or motor vehicle race track.” The Flathead County Zoning Ordinance describes the intent of the R-1 district as: “A district to provide estate-type development. These areas would normally be located in rural areas away from concentrated urban development, typically not served by water or sewer services, or in areas where it is desirable to permit only low-density development (e.g., extreme topography, areas adjacent to floodplains, airport runway alignment extensions).” The area to be rezoned is currently City B-1 (Neighborhood Business). Neighborhood Business. The Kalispell Zoning Ordinance describes the intent of this district: “A business district intended to provide certain commercial and professional office uses where such uses are compatible with adjacent residential areas. The district would typically serve as a buffer between residential areas and other commercial districts. Development 4 scale and pedestrian orientation are important elements of this district. This district is also intended to provide goods and services at a neighborhood level. The district is not intended for those businesses that require the outdoor display, sale, and/or storage of merchandise, outdoor services or operations to accommodate large-scale commercial operations. This zoning district would typically be found in areas designated as neighborhood commercial or urban mixed use on the Kalispell Growth Policy Future Land Use Map.” D: Proposed Zoning: The proposed Zoning District is P-1 (Public) for the entire approximately 36-acre property. A P-1 Zoning District is intended “to provide and reserve areas for public uses in order to preserve and provide adequate land for a variety of community facilities which serve the public health, safety and general welfare. Such public uses would include schools, public buildings, parks, airports, jails, utilities, etc. This zoning district would typically be found in the public land use designation as shown on the Kalispell Growth Policy Future Land Use Map but can be applied to any land use designation.” D. Size: The total area of the subject property is approximately 36 acres. 25.5 acres is requested to be annexed with an initial zoning of City P-1, currently zoned County I-2 and County R-1. 10.5 acres is requested to be rezoned from City B-1 to City P-1. 5 E: Adjacent Zoning: North: City B-2 and County I-1 East: City B-1 City R-4 and City R-1 South: County R‑1 West: City R‑3/PUD, County I-2 F: Adjacent Land Uses: North: Business/Light Industrial East: Commercial, multi-family and single-family residential South: Residential neighborhoods and Ashley Creek, West: Bypass and residential G: General Land Use Character: Much of the area was originally developed in the county as a lumber mill; however, that use has lapsed for a number of years and the associated buildings that had been left as remnants have now been removed. Since that time the properties have remained vacant. At this time the area could be classified as an in transition. In the past the subject properties were at the western boundary of the city and used rail- service. Since that time the city has grown around the subject properties. The property functions as a natural buffer providing ecological, hydrological, and recreational benefits. H: Relation to the Growth Policy: The Kalispell Growth Policy Future Land Use Map designates the property as Public/Quasi Public, Suburban Residential, Urban Mixed Use and Industrial. The proposed P‑1 zoning is consistent with these designations as the zone can be applied to any land use designation. I: Availability of Public Services and Extension of Services: The property is adjacent to the city limits and is located within the city annexation boundary. All services are available to the property. Sewer: City of Kalispell upon annexation Water: City of Kalispell upon annexation Refuse: City of Kalispell upon annexation Electricity: Flathead Electric Cooperative Gas: NorthWestern Energy Schools: School District #5 (Peterson Elementary/Flathead High School) Fire: Smith Valley Fire/ City of Kalispell upon annexation Police: Flathead County Sheriff/ City of Kalispell upon annexation I. ANNEXATION EVALUATION 6 A. Compliance with the growth policy: Two primary mechanisms for managing growth in the City of Kalispell exist which are to rely on redevelopment and infill within the current city limits or annexation of outlying areas. A goal of the growth policy is to provide a comprehensive, effective growth management plan that provides for all the needs of the community, is adaptable to changing trends and is attuned to the overall public welfare. The project site is in a prime infill/redevelopment area. Infill development is encouraged to lessen impacts on sensitive lands and provides additional recreational opportunities where services are available. In addition, the city council adopted an annexation policy in 2011, with a corresponding map, as an addendum to the city’s growth policy document. The purpose of the annexation policy is to give the Planning Commission, the Council, and the development community direction when property owners outside of the city limits are requesting annexation. The property proposed for annexation falls inside the city’s direct annexation boundary and is adjacent to the current city limits. There are several aspects of the growth policy which support the annexation of the property: Land Use: The Kalispell Growth Policy promotes orderly development within the city’s growth area, emphasizing the need for compatible land uses and efficient use of existing infrastructure. The Ashley Creek Park property lies within the City’s annexation policy boundary and is directly adjacent to existing neighborhoods within the Kalispell city limits. The Kalispell Growth Policy Future Land Use Map designates the property as Public/Quasi Public, Suburban Residential, Urban Mixed Use and Industrial The proposed P‑1 zoning is consistent with these designations as the zone can be applied to any land use designation. Natural Environment: The property is defined by the Ashley Creek corridor, which contains riparian vegetation, wetlands, and associated habitat. By annexing and zoning the property P‑1, the City of Kalispell will ensure long‑term stewardship of this environmentally sensitive area. B. Municipal Services: Public infrastructure and services are readily available to the subject property due to its location within the City’s annexation boundary and adjacency to established neighborhoods. As an open space parcel, the property requires minimal utility service. C. Distance from current city limits: The subject property directly adjoins existing city limits to the east, south, and west. It is effectively surrounded by urban residential zoning within Kalispell, with Ashley Creek forming the northern edge. This proximity makes the annexation a logical extension of the city boundary and eliminates a small jurisdictional gap within an otherwise fully urbanized area. D. Cost of services: Because the property will remain open space, there are minimal costs associated with extending public infrastructure or municipal services. No significant road, 7 sewer, or water improvements are required at this time. Should public access amenities such as trails or park facilities be developed in the future, those improvements would be coordinated with City Parks and funded as part of capital planning or through partnerships. II. INITIAL ZONING EVALUATION BASED ON STATUTORY CRITERIA The statutory basis for reviewing a change in zoning is set forth by 76-2-303, M.C.A. Findings of fact for the zone change request are discussed relative to the itemized criteria described by 76-2- 304, M.C.A. and Section 27.29.020, Kalispell Zoning Ordinance. The approximately 26-acre site being annexed is zoned County I-2 and County R-1. The applicant is requesting City P-1 Zoning. The Kalispell Zoning Regulations state that the P-1 Zoning District is intended “to provide and reserve areas for public uses in order to preserve and provide adequate land for a variety of community facilities which serve the public health, safety and general welfare. Such public uses would include schools, public buildings, parks, airports, jails, utilities, etc. This zoning district would typically be found in the public land use designation as shown on the Kalispell Growth Policy Future Land Use Map but can be applied to any land use designation.” 1. Does the requested zone comply with the growth policy? Yes. The Kalispell Growth Policy Future Land Use Map designates the property as Public/Quasi Public, Suburban Residential, Urban Mixed Use and Industrial. The proposed P‑1 Zoning is consistent with these designations as the zone can be applied to any land use designation. Additionally, the requested P‑1 Zoning supports the City’s goals of preserving riparian corridors, maintaining open space, and providing recreational opportunities. 2. Will the requested zone have an effect on motorized and non-motorized transportation systems? The requested zone will have a small effect on motorized and non-motorized transportation systems when the property is developed into a City park. Although a small increase in traffic may be anticipated, it is not anticipated the development of the site will negatively impact the transportation system. Any development of the property that creates 300 or more vehicle trip per day will require a traffic impact study. The traffic study evaluates the impacts the development has on the traffic system and indicates mitigation necessary to maintain acceptable levels of service. 3. Will the requested zone secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers? Yes. The property will be managed under City zoning standards and will be served by the Kalispell Fire Department and Police Department upon annexation. Open space uses carry low risk, and the designation ensures continued access for emergency response. 4. Will the requested zone promote the public health, safety and general welfare? 8 Adequate access and public facilities are available to the site in the case of an emergency. There are no features related to the property which would compromise the safety of the public. All municipal services including police and fire protection, water, and sewer service are available to the area. 5. Will the requested zone provide for adequate light and air? Yes. Open space zoning protects the property from dense development and ensures that the area continues to provide light, air, and visual relief within the surrounding urban environment. 6. Will the requested zone facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks, and other public requirements? Yes. As open space, the property places minimal demands on utilities or services. Future integration into the park and trail system would enhance public amenities without overburdening infrastructure. Being located within the City, any improvements will have to meet city standards including but not limited to, stormwater, transportation, land use, sewer water, Police, Fire, etc. 7. Will the requested zone promote compatible urban growth? Yes. This proposal is surrounded by City subdivisions and is a logical extension of urban development. Annexation and P‑1 zoning create a seamless boundary, avoiding county “islands” and ensuring consistent land management. 8. Does the requested zone give consideration to the character of the district and its particular suitability for particular uses? Yes. The P-1 Zone is particularly suitable given the presence of Ashley Creek, Parkline Trail, Rails to Trails, residential neighborhoods, and City Services. 9. Will the proposed zone conserve the value of buildings? Yes. Parks and open space are in integral component to quality of life for city residents. The zoning of the property to P-1 will allow development of a park that will enhance the value of nearby residential properties by preserving viewsheds, protecting environmental quality and allowing for recreation. Lastly, annexation into the city will allow for redevelopment of the property that has been a blight to the community for a number of years since the lumber mill operations ceased. 10. Will the requested zone encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout the municipality? 9 Yes. Annexation and P‑1 Zoning encourage the most appropriate use by conserving a sensitive riparian corridor, aligning with Growth Policy goals, and providing long‑term community benefits through open space preservation and recreational use. III. EVALUATION OF THE ZONE CHANGE REQUEST Bibler Resources is requesting to rezone approximately 10.5 acres currently zoned City B-1 to City P-1. This request will allow for the property to be contiguously zoned in accordance with the annexation and initial zoning applications outlined above. The Kalispell Zoning Regulations state that the P-1 Zoning District is intended “to provide and reserve areas for public uses in order to preserve and provide adequate land for a variety of community facilities which serve the public health, safety and general welfare. Such public uses would include schools, public buildings, parks, airports, jails, utilities, etc. This zoning district would typically be found in the public land use designation as shown on the Kalispell Growth Policy Future Land Use Map but can be applied to any land use designation.” The statutory basis for reviewing a change in zoning is set forth by 76-2-303, M.C.A. Findings of fact for the zone change request are discussed relative to the itemized criteria described by 76-2-304, M.C.A. and Section 27.29.020, Kalispell Zoning Ordinance. 1. Does the requested zone comply with the growth policy? Yes. The Kalispell Growth Policy Future Land Use Map designates the property as Public/Quasi Public, Suburban Residential, Urban Mixed Use and Industrial. The proposed P‑1 Zoning is consistent with these designations as the zone can be applied to any land use designation. Additionally, the requested P‑1 Zoning supports the City’s goals of preserving riparian corridors, maintaining open space, and providing recreational opportunities. 2. Will the requested zone have an effect on motorized and non-motorized transportation systems? The requested zone will have a small effect on motorized and non-motorized transportation systems when the property is developed into a City park. Although a small increase in traffic may be anticipated, it is not anticipated the development of the site will negatively impact the transportation system. Any development of the property that creates 300 or more vehicle trip per day will require a traffic impact study. The traffic study evaluates the impacts the development has on the traffic system and indicates mitigation necessary to maintain acceptable levels of service. 3. Will the requested zone secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers? Yes. The property will be managed under City zoning standards and will be served by the Kalispell Fire Department and Police Department upon annexation. Open space uses carry low risk, and the designation ensures continued access for emergency response. 10 4. Will the requested zone promote the public health, safety and general welfare? Adequate access and public facilities are available to the site in the case of an emergency. There are no features related to the property which would compromise the safety of the public. All municipal services including police and fire protection, water, and sewer service are available to the area. 5. Will the requested zone provide for adequate light and air? Yes. Open space zoning protects the property from dense development and ensures that the area continues to provide light, air, and visual relief within the surrounding urban environment. 6. Will the requested zone facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks, and other public requirements? Yes. As open space, the property places minimal demands on utilities or services. Future integration into the park and trail system would enhance public amenities without overburdening infrastructure. Bineg located within the City any improvements will have to meet city standards including but not limited to, stormwater, transportation, land use, sewer water, Police, Fire, etc. 7. Will the requested zone promote compatible urban growth? Yes. This proposal is surrounded by City subdivisions and is a logical extension of urban development. Annexation and P‑1 zoning create a seamless boundary, avoiding county “islands” and ensuring consistent land management. 8. Does the requested zone give consideration to the character of the district and its particular suitability for particular uses? Yes. The P-1 Zone is particularly suitable given the presence of Ashley Creek, Parkline Trail, Rails to Trails, residential neighborhoods, and City Services. 9. Will the proposed zone conserve the value of buildings? Yes. Parks and open space are in integral component to quality of life for city residents. The zoning of the property to P-1 will allow development of a park that will enhance the value of nearby residential properties by preserving viewsheds, protecting environmental quality and allowing for recreation. Lastly, annexation into the city will allow for redevelopment of the property that has been a blight to the community for a number of years since the lumber mill operations ceased. 10. Will the requested zone encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout the municipality? 11 Yes. Annexation and P‑1 Zoning encourage the most appropriate use by conserving a sensitive riparian corridor, aligning with Growth Policy goals, and providing long‑term community benefits through open space preservation and recreational use. RECOMMENDATION 1. Staff recommends that the Kalispell City Planning Commission adopt Staff Report #KA‑25‑07 as findings of fact and recommend to the Kalispell City Council that 25.7 acres of land be annexed into the City of Kalispell with an initial zoning of P -1 (Public).The properties can be more particularly described as Assessors Tracts 2, 8, 10, 11A, 17 and 18 located in NE1/4 and NE1/4SE1/4 of Section 13, T. 28 N., R. 22 W., P.M., Flathead County, Montana and as Tract 2 of Certificate of Survey No. 19545 situated, lying and being in the northeast quarter of Section 13, Township 28 North, Range 22 West, P.M.M., Flathead County, Montana, and Tract 2 of Certificate of Survey No. 19582 situated, lying and being in the northeast quarter and the southeast quarter of Section 13, Township 28 North, Range 22 West, P.M.M., Flathead County, Montana. 2. Staff recommends that the Kalispell City Planning Commission adopt Staff Report #KZC‑25‑01 as findings of fact and recommend to the Kalispell City Council that the Kalispell Official Zoning Map be amended by rezoning 10.55 acres of land from City B- 1 (Neighborhood Business) to City P-1 (Public). The property can be described as Tract 3 of Certificate of Survey No. 19233 and Tract 1 of Certificate of Survey No. 19582, both situated, lying and being in the north half of the northeast quarter of Section 13, Township 28 North, Range 22 West, P.M.M., Flathead County, Montana. Kalispell City Planning Commission Minutes of the meeting of August 12, 2025 Page | 1 KALISPELL CITY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING August 12, 2025 CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL The regular meeting of the Kalispell City Planning Board and Zoning Commission was called to order at 6:00 p.m. Commission members present were Chad Graham, Doug Kauffman, Shelby Leckron, Joshua Borgardt, Pip Burke, Cate Walker and Rory Young (Zoom). Jarod Nygren, PJ Sorensen, Kari Barnhart, Kirstin Robinson, and Donnie McBath represented the Kalispell Planning Department. Keith Haskins represented the Kalispell Public Works Department. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Kauffman moved and Walker seconded a motion to approve the minutes of the July 8, 2025 meeting of the Kalispell City Planning Board and Zoning Commission. VOTE BY ACCLAMATION The motion passed unanimously on a vote of acclamation. HEAR THE PUBLIC Teresa Karst – 1855 N Belmar Dr – Opposes the North Meadows conditional use permit and has concerns for wildlife, traffic, safety, and flooding impacts. KPUD-25-03 – SILVERBROOK VILLAGE Montarise Developments, LLC, has submitted applications for Silverbrook Village, an amendment to the Silverbrook Planned Unit Development (“PUD”). The property, which contains 11.7 acres, is currently zoned B-1 (Neighborhood Business) with the PUD overlay. This proposal would maintain the underlying zoning designation. The proposal calls for 198 residential units intended to be developed as condominiums with a variety of housing types ranging from two-unit buildings to larger multi-unit buildings. The proposal also has 20,400 square feet of neighborhood business uses that are included within mixed-use buildings. The property is located at 441 and 465 Diamond Peak Drive. STAFF REPORT PJ Sorensen representing the Kalispell Planning Department reviewed Staff report #KPUD-25-03. Staff recommends that the Kalispell Planning Commission adopt Staff Report #KPUD-25-03 as findings of fact and recommend to the Kalispell City Council that Silverbrook Village as an Amendment of the Silverbrook PUD be approved subject to the conditions on the staff report. BOARD DISCUSSION Walker confirmed with Sorensen that the school district for the subdivision cannot be changed by the city and that the parking requirement is met without the angled parking spaces. PUBLIC COMMENT Mike Brodie – 431 1st Ave W – Representative for the applicant – Is happy to answer any questions from the commission and requested that condition #6 be removed from the CUP. Kalispell City Planning Commission Minutes of the meeting of August 12, 2025 Page | 2 MOTION – KPUD-25-03 Kauffman moved and Borgardt seconded that the Kalispell City Planning Commission adopt Staff Report #KPUD-25-03 as findings of fact and recommend to the Kalispell City Council that Silverbrook Village as an Amendment of the Silverbrook PUD be approved subject to the conditions on the staff report. BOARD DISCUSSION Sorensen advised the commission that condition #6 is attached to all PUDs to ensure that any facilities present well aesthetically. He also clarified to Borgardt and Kauffman that if the existing retention pond may be sufficient that a new one/expansion may not be required pending engineering review. ROLL CALL Motion passed unanimously on a roll call vote. BOARD MEMBER SEATED Kauffman recused himself from KA-25-07 and KZC-25-01; he is a representative for the applicant. KA-25-07 & KZC-25-01 – ASHLEY CREEK PARK A request by the Kalispell Development Services Department and Bibler Resources Company to annex property located between South Meridian Road and the Highway 93 Bypass, and between Appleway Drive and Foys Lake Road, commonly known as the “WYE Track,” along with adjacent property, with an initial zoning designation of P-1 (Public). The property is intended to be developed as a park. The annexation would place approximately 25.7 acres of land in the city. The property owned by the City includes Assessors Tracts 2, 8, 10, 11A, 17 and 18 located in NE1/4 and NE1/4SE1/4 of Section 13, T. 28 N., R. 22 W., P.M., Flathead County, Montana. A specific metes and bounds description for the city-owned property is available upon request. The property owned by Bibler Resources can be described as Tract 2 of Certificate of Survey No. 19545. In addition, File # KZC-25-01 - A request by Bibler Resources Company for a zoning map amendment to rezone 10.55 acres of land located at 301 Fenn Way from city B-1 (Neighborhood Business) to city P-1 (Public). The property is intended to be developed as a park. The property can be described as Tract 3 of Certificate of Survey No. 19233 and Tract 1 of Certificate of Survey No. 19582. STAFF REPORT Donnie McBath representing the Kalispell Planning Department reviewed Staff report #KA-25-07 & KZC-25-01. Staff recommends that the Kalispell City Planning Commission adopt Staff Report #KA‑25‑07 as findings of fact and recommend to the Kalispell City Council that 25.7 acres of land be annexed into the City of Kalispell with an initial zoning of P-1 (Public).The properties can be more particularly described as Assessors Tracts 2, 8, 10, 11A, 17 and 18 located in NE1/4 and NE1/4SE1/4 of Section 13, T. 28 N., R. 22 W., P.M., Flathead County, Montana and as Tract 2 of Certificate of Survey No. 19545, and Tract 2 of Certificate of Survey No. 19582. Kalispell City Planning Commission Minutes of the meeting of August 12, 2025 Page | 3 Staff recommends that the Kalispell City Planning Commission adopt Staff Report #KZC‑25‑01 as findings of fact and recommend to the Kalispell City Council that the Kalispell Official Zoning Map be amended by rezoning 10.55 acres of land from City B-1 (Neighborhood Business) to City P-1 (Public). The property can be described as Tract 3 of Certificate of Survey No. 19233 and Tract 1 of Certificate of Survey No. 19582. BOARD DISCUSSION None. PUBLIC COMMENT Doug Andrews – 644 8th Ave W – Stated that the project would be a great benefit but has concerns about traffic, safety, and speeding. MOTION – KA-25-07 Burke moved and Leckron seconded that the Kalispell City Planning Commission adopt Staff Report #KA‑25‑07 as findings of fact and recommend to the Kalispell City Council that 25.7 acres of land be annexed into the City of Kalispell with an initial zoning of P-1 (Public).The properties can be more particularly described as Assessors Tracts 2, 8, 10, 11A, 17 and 18 located in NE1/4 and NE1/4SE1/4 of Section 13, T. 28 N., R. 22 W., P.M., Flathead County, Montana and as Tract 2 of Certificate of Survey No. 19545, and Tract 2 of Certificate of Survey No. 19582. BOARD DISCUSSION Haskins advised the traffic count process to Graham. ROLL CALL Motion passed unanimously on a roll call vote. MOTION – KZC-25-01 Burke moved and Leckron seconded that the Kalispell City Planning Commission adopt Staff Report #KZC‑25‑01 as findings of fact and recommend to the Kalispell City Council that the Kalispell Official Zoning Map be amended by rezoning 10.55 acres of land from City B-1 (Neighborhood Business) to City P-1 (Public). The property can be described as Tract 3 of Certificate of Survey No. 19233 and Tract 1 of Certificate of Survey No. 19582. BOARD DISCUSSION None. ROLL CALL Motion passed unanimously on a roll call vote. BOARD MEMBER RE-SEATED Kauffman re-seated. OLD BUSINESS Nygren provided procedural instructions on taking KCU-25-04 from the table and updated the commission on city council action on items from the July Planning Commission meeting. MOTION – TAKE KCU-25-04 FROM THE TABLE Borgardt moved and Kauffman seconded to take KCU-25-04 from the table from the July 8, 2025 Planning Commission meeting. VOTE BY ACCLAMATION The motion passed unanimously on a vote of acclamation. Kalispell City Planning Commission Minutes of the meeting of August 12, 2025 Page | 4 BOARD MEMBER SEATED Young recused himself from KA-25-05 and KCU-25-04; he is a representative for the applicant. STAFF REPORT Donnie McBath representing the Kalispell Planning Department reviewed supplemental information provided by the applicant for Staff Report KCU-25-04. Staff recommends that the Kalispell City Planning Commission adopt the Conditional Use Permit for a 99‑unit multi‑family residential development on the subject property, subject to the conditions of approval outlined in Staff Report #KCU-25-04. BOARD DISCUSSION Kauffman confirmed with McBath that the buffers were increased on the plans. Nygren advised Walker that there are no set standards or laws for buffers since there is no subdivision involved but that the plans were intended to find the middle ground between city and state requirements. Toby McInstosh from Jackola advised that a geo-tech summary report is in line with what should be expected for a commercial project. Nygren clarified to Graham that the proposed trail system and park would not be gated and would be open to nearby residents. PUBLIC COMMENT Astaris Drolcar – 700 Sunnyside Dr – Opposes the project and has concerns about increased traffic, wildlife and Ashley Creek. Diana Marshall – 1923 Bluestone Dr – Opposes the project and stated that the traffic impact study should have included the dog park and ballpark traffic. Judy Dawson – 1942 Bluestone Dr – Opposes the project and has concerns about increased traffic on Bluestone Drive. Amy Barton – 1978 Bluestone Dr – Opposes the project and has concerns about increased traffic. Denise Chambers – 1974 Bluestone Dr – Opposes the project and has concerns about traffic, safety, and speeding. Nicole Marshall – 1923 Bluestone Dr – Opposes the project and has concerns about egress, safety, and traffic and stated that the traffic impact study should have included the dog park and ballpark traffic. Ms. Marshall also had concerns about the accuracy of the TIS. Cal Marshall – 1923 Bluestone Dr – Opposes the project and has concerns about increased traffic and speeding on Bluestone Dr, loss of view due to building height, and wildlife impacts. Mr. Marshall also stated that the project is not appropriate for the neighborhood. Ricki Moffat on behalf of Susan and Karl Kratt of135 Rimrock Ct – The Kratts oppose the project and have concerns about Kalispell City Planning Commission Minutes of the meeting of August 12, 2025 Page | 5 traffic, school and wildlife impacts, and feels that there is ample housing available in the city. Ricki Moffat – 147 Rimrock Ct – Opposes the project and has concerns about creek bed degradation, density, and egress and would like the geo-tech studies to be conducted in all 4 seasons. Ms. Moffit provided photographs of previous erosion damage to homes on Rimrock Ct and stated that the application and supplemental information had deficiencies and inaccuracies. Mark Topp – 107 Denver Ave – Opposes the project and has concerns about speeding, street width of Bluestone Drive, erosion, construction traffic, egress, erosion, safety, and feels that more apartments are not needed. Clyde Stemberg – 1810 N Belmar Dr – Opposes the project and has concerns about first responder response times. Perry Dilorio – 143 Rimrock Ct – Opposes the project and has concerns about density and the soil conditions of the lot. Jessica Chance – 1934 Bluestone – Opposes the project and has concerns about decreased property values, soil stabilization, construction traffic, flooding, egress, safety, snow storage, and the increased traffic on Bluestone Drive. Ms. Chance also feels that more housing is not needed, that the project does not include affordable housing, and that Bluestone Drive is not wide enough. Sue Prewitt – 1910 Bluestone Dr – Opposes the project and has concerns about speeding, traffic, soil stability, safety, and the condition of Bluestone Drive. Sam Dennison – 1969 Bluestone Dr – Opposes the project and has concerns about the quality of Bluestone Drive, soil erosion, safety, and speeding. Mr. Dennison stated that the traffic count markers were not at the ball or dog parks. Lisa Najera – 119 Rimrock Ct – Opposes the project and has concerns about construction traffic and the developer’s experience with multifamily building projects. Jacqueline Pipolo – 139 Rimrock Ct – Opposes the project and has concerns about safety, speeding, and the width of Bluestone Drive. Ms. Pipolo stated that the project does not fit with the neighborhood. Toby McIntosh – 2250 Hwy 93 S – Representative for the application and is happy to answer any questions the commission may have. Mr. McIntosh also clarified the traffic count and TIS process, egress and fire suppression requirements, how utilities are deemed as available, and the impact fee process. He stated that the geo-tech engineer’s involvement with the Rimrock Ct landslides was to provide their opinion for legal purposes only, Kalispell City Planning Commission Minutes of the meeting of August 12, 2025 Page | 6 that the setbacks of 75-85 feet were to give space, that the buildings will be slab-on-grade (no basements or crawlspaces), that no buildings will be built on unbuildable land, that the land was tied up in a trust for several years, that the developer has a lot of experience with multi-family projects, that infill projects may help prevent sprawl, and that most of the conditions of the CUP are standard conditions that help hold both the developer and the city accountable. Kim Smith – 1827 Bluestone Dr – Opposes the project and has concerns about egress. Ms. Smith also stated that there is a neighborhood petition with over 300 signatures in opposition to the project. Julie Lubick – 44 Rimrock Ct – Opposes the project and agrees with previous comments in opposition. James Williamson – 25 4th St E – Works with the owners and Jackola Engineering – Provided a history of the property and is available after the meeting to answer any questions from the public. Mr. Williamson stated that there was a lot of consideration for what could be developed on the site and that the owner wants to be a good neighbor. Julius Macker – 127 Rimrock Ct – Opposes the project and has concerns about wildlife and riparian habitat. John Pipilo – 139 Rimrock Ct – Opposes the project and has concerns for traffic impacts and safety. Mr. Pipilo stated that there are no sidewalks that access the ball and dog parks. Melinda Huskey – 1955 Bluestone Dr – Opposes the project and has concerns about losing her view of the mountains. Ms. Huskey also stated that the there is no sidewalk to the mailbox and that Bluestone Drive is always parked up. MOTION KCU-25-04 Kauffman moved and Graham seconded that the Kalispell City Planning Commission adopt staff report #KCU-25-04 as findings of fact and recommend to the Kalispell City Council that the conditional use permit be approved subject to the conditions on the staff report. BOARD DISCUSSION Leckron stated that the TIS should have been conducted when school was in session. Haskins clarified the TIS process to Graham and Walker. Haskins stated that MDT considers school traffic to be at the same level as summer traffic and that there were city tube counters recently placed at Begg Park and Bluestone for a project unrelated to the Meadows North TIS. Walker stated that the TIS isn’t as comprehensive as it should be. Nygren advised that developers are not legally required to fix existing problems but that there is a process for community- based input that would solve them. Graham stated that there were no sidewalk requirements when Bluestone Drive was built Kalispell City Planning Commission Minutes of the meeting of August 12, 2025 Page | 7 and confirmed with Nygren that the single entrance meets fire code. He also added that a second entrance would be required if single family homes were built on the lot. Nygren advised Borgardt that traffic studies do not address pedestrian traffic and Haskins advised Borgardt that if Bluestone Drive was reviewed today, it would be signed as no parking. Graham confirmed with Nygren that there are no state codes for viewshed and that the minimum setbacks for single family homes are 10ft and the maximum height is 45ft. Graham stated that views are never guaranteed and that SB382 will change the public feedback process in the future. Nygren advised Graham and Borgardt of the process for a special improvement district that allows residents to fund sidewalks. ROLL CALL Motion passed 5-1 on a roll call vote. Kaufman, Burke, Borgardt, Walker, and Graham voted in favor; Leckron voted against the motion. BOARD DISCUSSION Graham stated that he supports the motion since the supplemental information answered his questions. BOARD MEMBER RE-SEATED Young re-seated. NEW BUSINESS Nygren updated the board on the upcoming September 9, 2025 Planning Commission Meeting and Work Sessions ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at approximately 9:38 PM. WORK SESSION Transitioned into work session on the Montana Land Use Planning Act. _____________________ ___________________ Chad Graham Kirstin Robinson President Recording Secretary APPROVED as submitted/amended: ___________ FennWay Applew ay DrUSHighway2 W Ashle y C re ek 93 U S H i g h w a y 9 3 A l t 4 B ur l in g t o n Norther n S a n t a F e App lewa y D r Conoco B u r l i n g t o n N o r t h e r n S a n t a F e 93 4th S t W S M e r i d i a n R d 2nd S t W 3rd S t W Peterson E l ementary RA-1 Residential Apartment R-4 Residential B-2 General Business B-1 Neighborhood Business R-3 Residential R-3/PUD Residential With Pud I-1 Light Industrial B-3 Core Area Business Subject Parcels Data Sources: Montana Cadastral, Flathead County GIS City of Kalispell GIS, Austin Bachurski - 0 300 600 900150 Feet¯ Subject Parcels B-1 Neighborhood Business B-2 General Business B-3 Core Area Business I-1 Light Industrial R-3 Residential R-3 Residential w/PUD R-4 Residential RA-1 Residential Apartment Basemap: Esri Community Maps, ArcGIS.com Kalispell Zoning WYE Track July 23, 2025 FennWay Applew ay DrUSHighway2 W Ashle y C re ek 93 U S H i g h w a y 9 3 A l t 4 B ur l in g t o n No r thern Santa Fe W C ent er S t 1st St W 8 t h A v e W App lewa y D r Conoco B u r l i n g t o n N o r t h e r n S a n t a F e 93 6 th St W 4th S t W 5 th S t W 7 t h S t W 8 th St W S M e r i d i a n R d 2nd S t W 9 t h A v e W 3rd S t W 3 r d St W Peterson E lementar y Industrial Suburban Residential Floodway Floodway Urban Residential Urban Mixed Use Commercial Industrial Public Or Openspace High Density Residential Urban Mixed Use Public Or Openspace High Density Residential Subject Parcels 0 300 600 900150 Feet Kalispell Growth Policy WYE Track Data Sources: Montana Cadastral, Flathead County GIS City of Kalispell GIS, Austin Bachurski -¯ Subject Parcels Commercial Industrial Urban Mixed Use High Density Residential Urban Residential Suburban Residential Public/Quasi Public, Openspace Floodway Basemap: Esri Community Maps, ArcGIS.comJuly 23, 2025 FennWay Applew a y D rUSHighway 2 W Ashle y C reek U S H i g h w a y 9 3 A l t 4 F oys Lak e R d W C en ter S t 1st St W Conoco B u r l i n g t o n N o r t h e r n S a n t a F e 93 6 th S t W 4th S t W 5t h S t W 7 t h S t W 8th S t W S M e r i d i a n R d 2nd S t W 9 t h A v e W 3rd St W 3rd St W Peterson Elementary U S H i g h w a y 9 3 A l t 0 380 760 1140190 Feet Kalispell Mailing List ¯ Subject Parcel Mailing List Parcels Other Parcels Basemap: Esri Community Maps, ArcGIS.com WYE Track July 23, 2025 Data Sources: Montana Cadastral, Flathead County GIS City of Kalispell GIS, Austin Bachurski -