Loading...
25-0815 Addendum No. 3201 1st Avenue E PO BOX 1997 Kalispell, MT 59903 Public Works Department Phone (406)758-7720 Fax (406)758-7831 www.kalispell.com August 15, 2025 ADDENDUM NO. 3 Lift Station #36 Upgrade Project EQ# 25-1781 QuestCDN # 9797748 City of Kalispell, MT The provisions of this Addendum Number 3 shall apply to and be part of the Bidding and Contract Documents for the Lift Station #36 Upgrade Project. Bidders shall acknowledge the receipt of this addendum through the QuestCDN VBid electronic bidding portal in order to submit bid. The Bid Opening Date has been moved to September 4th, 2025, at 8:30 AM. This was requested by bidders at the Prebid Meeting. Subsequent dates in the tentative schedule will be delayed correspondingly except for the completion date. Preamble & Discussion: During the prebid, I mentioned that groundwater dewatering was not anticipated as an issue for the project as groundwater was not encountered in the geotechnical bore holes. That statement was incorrect. Groundwater WAS encountered at 16 ft. This elevation is within the excavation required for the wet well. Further, bidders should review section 5.3 of the Geotechnical Report in detail for the construction of the wet well. Additionally, bidders should review the Measurement and Payment Section for Lift Station – Structural which requires an “engineered shoring and bracing plan” to be provided as part of the work. Bidders are also referred to the following text from the Geotechnical Report: “Considering the subsurface conditions encountered and the nature of the proposed construction, the wet well portion of the structure can be supported on a mat foundation bearing on undisturbed native soils. However, depending on ground water levels and site dewatering, the sands at the anticipated bearing elevation may be unstable and saturated beyond moisture levels which are conducive to compaction; thus, disturbance of this layer must be avoided using smooth-edged excavation equipment. We would advise a representative of the geotechnical engineer be present during construction to further assess subsurface conditions and determine if compaction (when possible) or other subgrade stabilization measures are warranted.” Page 2 of 5 “Mat slab foundations should bear on properly compacted native soils, when possible. If compaction is deemed not possible by a representative of our firm during construction, at a minimum the surface should be statically rolled smooth. Mat foundations should be designed for a maximum allowable soil bearing pressure not to exceed 1,000 psf. Mat slabs supported as described may realize total settlements of up to one inch with differential settlements on the order of one-half this magnitude. If subgrade conditions are unstable or not suitable for use of equipment or work in the excavation without excessive disturbance to the native soils, subgrade improvements are warranted. Subgrade improvements options are discussed in Item 15 below. When subgrade improvements are necessary, a minimum 12-thickness of structural fill or 6-inch cementitious mud mat are appropriate to stabilize the surface and facilitate ongoing construction. When the subgrade is saturated and cannot be dewatered, we would advise the use of a mud mat in lieu of conventional gravel as the necessary vibratory compaction of the gravel could further destabilize the subgrade soils. The mud mat should consist of a low strength concrete with a compressive strength of at least 100 psi per ASTM D4832. Page 3 of 5 A question was raised as to whether railing should be provided around the “dock” area shown in the plans. Railing is required with a chain gate. Additional details will be forthcoming in a later Addendum. Please also reference the Project Q&A inside QuestCDN for additional information pertaining to the project. Additional questions will be answered as they are received and reviewed. A summary of the Q&A to date is provided below. Bidders should consider the answers to questions in the Q&A in the preparation of their bids, even though the responses do not necessarily require changes to the contract. Some of the responses are informational only. However, many of the responses are meant to clarify the requirements of the project plans and specifications. QuestCDN Q&A Summary 1. Will the geotechnical report be provided? a. The geotechnical report is a required download for bidding but will also be made available here (Quest Q&A) as an attachment. 2. What project value should be used for bid bonding purposes and what is the Engineer's Estimate for the project? a. A project value of $3 million should be used for preliminary discussions with bonding sureties. The engineer's estimate for construction is $3.265 million. 3. Several specifications seem to be missing for valves, piping and lift station components. Will there be an addendum to address this? a. Thank you for bringing this to our attention. It appears there was an error when binding the pdf files together for the project manual. Many of the specification sections were duplicated and others are completely missing. To avoid unnecessary confusion, a new full project manual will be provided to all plan holders as part of Addendum No. 1 which will eliminate the repeated specifications and include missing sections. Addendum No. 1 is expected to be uploaded to QuestCDN by 7/31/25. I apologize for the confusion and inconvenience. 4. Will a winter shutdown be allowed? a. Yes, a winter shutdown is anticipated as likely due to turnaround times on required components such as pumps, valves, and electrical items. 5. Are AIS or BABA requirements a part of this project? a. No, this project is locally funded, so AIS and BABA are not applicable. 6. What is the intended schedule for the job? a. A Preliminary Project Schedule is included in the project manual Section 00004. Notice of Award is anticipated on September 3, 2025 and Construction Completion is anticipated by August 31, 2026. 7. According to the rough carpentry spec, it looks like all the framing material is to be fire treated. Is that correct? a. No, the framing structure doesn't need to be fire-treated. Page 4 of 5 8. C10/C11 shows the south side of the existing slab over the existing wet well, valve vault, and south manhole to be demoed. S100 shows the entire slab, including the northern part of the L slab over the northern sanitary manhole to be demoed. The northern part of the slab will need to be partially demoed for the installation of the proposed 18" CLDI pipe and shoring. Can you confirm whether or not the north side of that existing slab should be replaced? a. Sheet S100 is correct. The full existing slab should be removed and does not require replacement. However, a City Standard manhole collar should be installed on the existing manhole in accordance with the attached detail. 9. Please confirm that the gray-colored pumps shown on the loading dock on C15, C16, and C17 (square box) are for visual representation only and the Contractor should be providing only the 3 pumps on the pump room floor (colored black). a. Yes, the grey-colored pump shown on the loading dock is for visual representation during design to verify adequate clearances when maintenance, removal, or replacement is required. 10. Please provide head pressure of the current force main system to allow for proper sizing of the bypass system. a. We don't anticipate bypass pumping as being necessary since the existing lift station can remain active throughout construction of the new lift station. However, the existing system is designed to pump at 520 gpm. According to the pump curve, there is a system head of 120 feet at that flow rate. Current static head is 87 feet. 11. What permits are required for the work? a. City Construction Stormwater Permit & SWPPP if applicable b. City Public Right-of-Way Permit c. State Building Permit (City has applied for and paid) d. State Electrical Permit v. State Plumbing Permit (if applicable) e. State HVAC Permit (if applicable) f. MDT Utility Occupancy Permit g. MDEQ Construction Dewatering General Permit (if necessary) 12. Can I attend the prebid remotely? a. We have some of the engineers on the project attending remotely and we weren't going to make it available for other participants, but had a request from someone out of town that is running late. Here is the Teams link: Meeting Link 13. Is there a specific call out for J bolts and how often they are to be spaced in the top of the foundation wall for the sill plate and wall framing? Sheet S001 wood general note 10 discusses embedment’s, but its not clear if these are to be wet set or drilled and epoxied? a. Note 10 gives the option for either cast-in anchors (j-bolts) or post-installed screw anchors and calls for them to be at 48” o/c 14. Are there any HDU’s required for hold downs of the walls to the sill plate? a. No HDU’s required 15. Is 3/8” plywood acceptable for interior sheet, instead of 3/8” OSB? a. Yes, plywood would be acceptable in lieu of the OSB 16. Pre-bid mentioned a gantry crane, I’m not seeing anything on the plans for this. Can you clarify? a. The City has its own gantry crane that will be located to the site as necessary for maintenance. The referenced gantry crane is not a requirement of the project. Page 5 of 5 17. What is the intended fill material for the interior elevated platform/loading dock? Sheet S314 just calls out for Rigid foam insulation. a. Geofoam blocks. This could also be a void space 18. Is the inside ceiling also to be 3/8” OSB sheeting? a. Yes, the interior ceiling is to have 3/8” OSB sheathing. See details on S103. General Information: Modifications will be bolded and highlighted in yellow in this addendum for clarification of required changes. A general description of the required changes is provided below, with the specific changes for the individual sections following the general description: Section 40 61 13 – Process Control System General Requirements • Section 1.1.A.5 was discussed at the Prebid Meeting. This section was a spill over from our Master Spec. The section should be deleted. The Valve Vault Diameter is not provided on the plans. Bidders should assume an 8’ Diameter Valve Vault Manhole in the preparation of their bids. Concrete was assumed as the material for the Valve Vault Manhole, but HDPE can also be used if H20 Rated. Entry Hatches are shown in the Civil Plans for the Valve Vault and the Structural Plans for the Wet Well, but are not specified as to sizing or type. Hatches need to be H20 Rated. The hatch shown in the plans for the wet well is a single leaf, but to get an appropriate size, a double leaf hatch will be necessary. Bidders should use the following for the hatches on the project: • Wet Well – Halliday Products – H2R7260. Hatch shall also include Retro-Grate. • Valve Vault – Halliday Products – H2R6060. Include concrete slab for the hatch. Section Specific Changes: Section 40 61 13 – Modify Section 1.1.A by deleting item 5 in full. Prepared by the City of Kalispell Public Works Department Keith Haskins, PE Deputy Public Works Director / City Engineer Enclosure(s): • None