I6. Reso 6250 - Transport Alts GrantNW*0*46
-Wf
CITY OF
KALISPELL
Report To: Doug Russell, City Manager
Development Services
201 Ist Avenue East -
Kalispell, Montana 5991
Phone (406) 758-7940
From: Jarod Nygren, Development Services Director
Subject: Resolution of Support of City submission of "MDT Transportation Alternatives
Grant Application for South Portion of Sunset Boulevard Shared Use Path
Connection"
Meeting Date: Apni 17, 2025
BACKGROUND: The Montana Department of Transportation's (MDT) Transportation Alternatives
grant program provides for design -build projects to local governments for "Construction, planning, and
design of on -road and off -road trail facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists, and other non -motorized forms of
transportation, including sidewalks, bicycle infrastructure, pedestrian and bicycle signals, traffic calming
techniques, lighting and other safety -related infrastructure, and transportation projects to achieve
compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990." The City has successfully applied to this
program in the past for trail segments along Highway 93 and Four Mile Drive.
The City's current grant proposal is to build the south portion of the shared use path connection on the
east side of U.S. 93 connecting downtown Kalispell and Logan Health in accordance with the engineering
and design plan prepared by KLJ engineering that analyzed the appropriate path alignment. This section
lacks any connectivity (other than a dirt path), offers poor site distances, has numerous access
intersections and access points with limited control and has traffic speeds of 35 MPH and higher. When
combined, these conditions make walking or biking this heavily traveled route unsafe and impractical,
limiting connectivity between two major employment centers in the community. The shared use path
connection is a "project priority" within the MOVE 2040 Kalispell Area Transportation Plan.
The total project cost for the entirety of the shared use path connection is approximately 2.68 million
dollars. The Transportation Alternatives grant program provides for a maximum grant award of 1.5
million dollars. Therefore, in order to build the entire project, the City would have to obligate a minimum
of $1.18 million dollars to build the entire shared use path segment. Accordingly, staff is recommending a
grant request for the construction of the south half of the segment building a shared use path from
Wyoming Street to the North side of Mission trail which has a construction cost of approximately
$648,000.00. If the City were to move forward with the south half of the segment no City funds would be
obligated. The north portion of the shared use path segment has a construction cost of approximately 2.08
million dollars, which would require the City to obligate approximately $583,000.00 to the project. If the
City were awarded the grant request for the southern portion of the shared use path, it could apply for the
northern portion of the project during the next Transportation Alternatives grant cycle.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve Resolution 6250, recommending the
City of Kalispell submit the "MDT Transportation Alternatives Grant Application for South Portion of
Sunset Boulevard Shared Use Path Connection"
ALTERNATIVES: Council can elect to not pass the Resolution
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 6250
Shared Use Path Exhibit
KLJ Engineering and Design Plan
RESOLUTION NO. 6250
A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE AN APPLICATION BY THE CITY OF KALISPELL TO
THE MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR A GRANT TO FUND
THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF A SHARED USE PATH CONNECTION ON THE EAST
SIDE OF SUNSET BOULEVARD (US 93) CONNECTING DOWNTOWN KALISPELL
AND LOGAN HEALTH.
WHEREAS, the Montana Department of Transportation's (MDT) Transportation Alternatives
grant program provides funding to local governments to support transportation
projects for pedestrians, bicyclists, and other non-motori zed forms of transportation
in order to achieve compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990;
and
WHEREAS, the City of Kalispell proposes to construct the south portion of the shared use path
connection on the east side of U.S. 93 connecting downtown Kalispell and Logan
Health; and
WHEREAS, this section lacks any connectivity (other than a dirt path), offers poor site distances,
has numerous access intersections and access points with limited control and has
traffic speeds of 35 MPH and higher, making walking or biking unsafe and
impractical; and
WHEREAS, the proposed improvements are identified as a priority project within the adopted
MOVE 2040 Transportation Plan; and
WHEREAS, since the project meets all criteria of the MDT Transportation Alternatives grant
application for such funding it should have the support of the City of Kalispell.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
KALISPELL AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Kalispell City Council approves and fully supports the application of
the City of Kalispell for an MDT Transportation Alternatives funding grant
to construct a shared path connection along the southern portion of Sunset
Boulevard (US 93).
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND SIGNED BY THE MAYOR OF
THE CITY OF KALISPELL, THIS 7TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025.
ATTEST:
Aimee Brunckhorst, CMC
City Clerk
Mark Johnson
Mayor
"ell
OID
4- 0 LL
0
Ql)
0
/ij
U) 4 Lo
�7v
A6
0
o
LO
0
LO
4-J
N
ro
Lo
00\ N
lv
0
4-J �v ��i,
u
4
e4 000�
to
ro
ro
11 �'k
ro
>
moo
Lo
2:0
14
4P
'Ar
iffy o!
(3)
0)
e0o
ot,
rj
0 <
fu
0 ca
Aw AW
-- KLI
4&
ENGINEERING, REIMAGINED
a
ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS REPORT
Sunset Boulevard Path
Kalispell, Montana
February 2024
Sunset Boulevard Path
Alternatives Analysis Report
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
3.5 Costs .................................................................................................................................................................... 6
4 Analysis of Alternatives .............................................................................................................................................. 6
ScreeningScoring ......................................................................................................................................................... 7
5 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................................................................... 9
Recommendation........................................................................................................................................................... 9
APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY DESIGN -LEVEL ALTERNATIVE LAYOUTS ......... 10
APPENDIX B COST ESTIMATES .............................................................................. 11
February 2024
Sunset Boulevard Path
Alternatives Analysis Report
1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Background
The City of Kalispell Park & Recreation Department (City) has initiated a path project along
Sunset Boulevard from Wyoming Street to Bountiful Drive. This project was originally part of a
Montana Department of Transportation (MDT) Transportation Analysis (TA) project developed in
2010 and was pulled from their TA program when alignment questions arose. The purpose of
this project is to explore those questions and develop reasonable alternatives for the City to
consider in order to provide a safe, non -motorized connection between existing pathways. The
City's intentions are to conduct and document the Alternative Analysis in a manner such that it
can determine a preferred alternative.
Sunset Boulevard Path Alternatives Analysis. Key pieces of the analysis documented in this
report include the following items:
• Rationale and history behind the development of alternatives,
• Preliminary design -level evaluation of alternatives under consideration, and
0 Recommendations and findings of the analysis.
Needs and Objectives
The Alternatives Analysis was initiated to explore two path alignments and determine a
preferred alternative that meets the safety needs and objectives of this project while balancing
impacts to the corridor. The primary objective in this analysis is to compare the two identified
alignments.
Alternatives Considered in this Analysis
Two alternatives were identified by the City for consideration in this study. They are briefly
described below.
0 Alternative No. 1
This alternative would maintain the same horizontal alignment and vertical profile as
Sunset Boulevard (US Hwy 93) while adding a 30-inch curb and gutter, 6-foot boulevard
and 1 0-foot paved path along the northeasterly side of the existing road. The path would
tie into the existing pathway on the north side of Bountiful Drive.
0 Alternative No. 2
This alternative would deviate from Alternative No. 1 from Mission Street to Bountiful
Drive pulling the 10' path away from Sunset Boulevard and running it up the hill along
the west side of Highland Park Subdivision through an existing easement. The path
would come back down the hill and tie into the existing pathway on the north side of
Bountiful Drive.
February 2024
Sunset Boulevard Path
Alternatives Analysis Report
Alternatives Screening Criteria
A multi -factor screening process was established to assess defined criteria for each of the two
alternatives, briefly summarized as follows:
Hydraulics
Utility Impacts
Costs
Constructability
Conclusions
Table 1 presents the results of the screening process with respect to each of the two
alternatives. The preferred alternative received the highest score. Each alternative was
assessed under each screen to provide a more thorough and objective assessment.
Table 1: Altematives Screening Criteria Summary
Criteria
Alternative No. 1
Alternative No. 2
Hydraulics
5
5
Utility Impacts
5
1
Costs
5
1
___r
Constructability
5
3
Recommendations
Based on the results of the screening process, this study has identified Alternative No. 1 as the
preferred, reasonable, and practicable alternative that would the most practical option.
Accordingly, this study recommends eliminating Alternative No. 2 from further consideration.
2 INTRODUCTION
A portion of Sunset Boulevard, 2500-feet, is in need of a pathway to provide connectivity with
existing pathways at the north and south ends of the analysis area (Wyoming Street to Bountiful
Drive) in Kalispell, Montana.
Two alignment possibilities were identified by MDT in 2010 through their TA program. As a
result, this portion of the project was pulled from their TA project leave the above -mentioned
gap in pedestrian connectivity along Sunset Boulevard (US Hwy 93). Kalispell City has initiated
this analysis project to gain recommendations as to best overall alignment for the path to be
constructed.
February 2024
Sunset Boulevard Path Alternatives Analysis Report
Project Area Description
As shown in Figure 2.1, the project is just north of the heart of Kalispell, Montana. The project is
between reference post (RP) 113 and reference post (RP) 114, more specifically, Wyoming Street
to Bountiful Drive) on the northeasterly side of US Hwy 93.
Figure 2. 1: Project Area Map
. M16 dffi&�� , V . " �lllll
3 DEVELOPMENT OF ALTERNATIVES
This section describes the two alternatives considered in this study.
Alternative No. 1
This alternative, known as the lower alignment, would following the existing horizontal and vertical
alignments of Sunset Boulevard, adding 30-inch curb and gutter, 6-foot boulevard and a 10-foot
paved path to the northeasterly side of the roadway. Placing the path in a typical location inside
the right-of-way, minimizing impacts along the corridor, was the intent of this alternative. Under
this alternative, the shoulder of the existing roadway would be improved. The total width would be
1 8.50-feet with cut/fill slopes at 3:1 or flatter to the furthest extent practicable. The goal is to stay
within the right-of-way, however flatter slopes could be utilized in some areas provided
construction easements could be attained. This alternative will require sawcutting of the existing
edge of asphalt to provide a clean, straight edge for the construction of the curb and gutter but
will not affect the existing surfacing or drive lanes. Between Mission Street and Bountiful Drive, a
February 2024
Sunset Boulevard Path Alternatives Analysis Report
retaining wall will be required on the uphill side of the new path due to the topography between
Sunset Boulevard and Mission Street / Highland Park Subdivision. The retaining will vary in height
and include a swale on the backside of the wall to catch the water that comes down the hillside.
Under the swale will be a 4-inch perforated pipe which will convey the water that infiltrated the
surface into the existing storm sewer system. The water that doesn't infiltrate will run along the
swale into the existing storm sewer system. The primary concern with this alternative is the
potential impact to property outside the right-of-way.
Alternative No. 2
This alternative, known as the upper alignment, is the same as Alternative No. 1 from Wyoming
Street to Mission Street. At Mission Street horizontal and vertical alignments of the path stop
following the existing Sunset Boulevard, however, will remain the same for the 30-inch curb and
gutter to Bountiful Drive. A 24-inch curb and gutter will following the same horizontal and vertical
alignment of the existing Mission Street and tie into existing curb and gutter and Crestine Avenue.
The purpose of this alternative is to utilize and existing easement on the southwesterly edge of
Highland Park Subdivision. The existing grade of Mission Street vary from 9.6% to 11.9%, making
the vertical profile of Mission Street non-ADA compliant. Therefore, retaining walls are required
on the uphill and downhill side of the path as it climbs the hill at 4.9%, follows the existing
easement and descends the hill until such a time when grades meet and 6" curb can be utilized
for pedestrian safety. The uphill retaining will vary in height and include a swale on the backside
of the wall to catch the water that comes down the hillside. Under the swale will be a 4-inch
perforated pipe which will convey the water that infiltrated the surface into the existing storm sewer
system. The water that doesn't infiltrate will run along the swale into the existing storm sewer
system. The primary concern with this alternative is the potential impact to property outside the
right-of-way. The downhill wall will have 2-inch sleeves through the wall to allow storm water to
pass through, continue down the hill and into the existing storm sewer system. The primary
concerns with this alternative are the potential impacts to the existing parking lot in Highland Park
Subdivision, cost of two retaining walls and the impact to existing utilities.
3.1 Hydraulics
An inlet box will be placed on the existing storm sewer pipe at the intersection of Mission Street
and Crestline Avenue to minimize the quantity of storm water running through the project area. 4"
perforated pipe will be placed in the swale at the top of the uphill retaining walls to minimized
impact on the walls as well as sheeting onto the new path. 2-inch sleeves will be placed in the
bottom of the downhill wall to minimize sheeting on the new path. The intent is to utilize the
existing drainage system with no increase in water volume.
3.2 Right -of -Way
Many transportation projects require acquisition of land and or easements, known as right-of-way.
Right-of-way acquisition can often take a significant amount of time during project development;
therefore, it is imperative to identify ways that will expedite or streamline this process. Maintaining
and reconstructing approach access to adjacent properties is required with any transportation
project.
February 2024
Sunset Boulevard Path Alternatives Analysis Report
3.2.1 Approach Impacts
Three access approaches exist throughout the project corridor. It is critical for any project to
maintain access to these approaches during construction and adequate reconnection of
approaches post -construction. Adjacent landowners often consider the treatment of their access
to determine the ultimate success or failure of a transportation project. All access approaches will
be paved to right -of-way or end of impacted area with both alternatives.
3.3 Utility Impacts
Utilities are found in many highway corridors and require consideration and coordination with
affected owners during projects. Based on preliminary investigations, the Sunset Boulevard
corridor contains power and storm sewer utilities. Utility impacts and relocation may be associated
with added time and costs incurred by the City, MDT or at the utility owners expense. Therefore,
the cumulative total amount of utilities affected by each alternative has been considered in the
following criteria:
Utility Impacts. Impacts to power poles and electrical boxes are cumulatively added to
gauge the overall impact to these facilities under each alternative.
3.4 Constructability
Constructability (or buildability) is a concept that denotes ease of construction. Constructability
assessment is employed to identify challenges before a project is built to reduce or prevent errors,
delays, and cost overruns. The construction traffic control will be similar for any alternative, due
to the shoulder improvement on one side of the road.
3.5 Costs
Transportation project costs can include both capital (up -front, initial costs) and maintenance
(long-term) costs. Criteria refers primarily to initial, estimated construction costs. These costs also
include right-of-way permitting and acquisition, utility relocation, construction engineering, and
indirect costs. High-level cost breakdowns for each alternative can be found in Appendix C.
4 ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES
This section discusses the evaluation of alternatives according to the defined screening
process. The analysis and comparison of alternatives is based on a combination of known
corridor constraints from initial site investigations and preliminary design -level evaluation.
Assumptions and estimates are shown in each respective criterion below.
February 2024
Sunset Boulevard Path
Alternatives Analysis Report
Screening Scoring
To evaluate the comprehensive ranking for each alternative, a scoring metric has been applied
to each of the criteria and sub -criteria in this section. The cumulative scores are then used to
determine a preferred alternative. It is possible for the preferred alternative to score poorly in
one or more criteria.
Generally, the scores given to each sub -criteria are awarded as follows:
0 5 (Most Benefit, Least Impact): A 5 score is considered the best or most preferred
scoring value. This score indicates the sub -criteria for a specific alternative has the most
beneficial effects and/or the least impacts.
0 3 (Moderate Benefit, Moderate Impact): A 3 score is considered a moderate or mid -level
score. This score indicates the sub -criteria for a specific alternative has moderate
beneficial effects while having moderate impacts.
0 1 (Least Benefit, Most Impact): A 1 score is considered the worst or least preferred
scoring value. This score indicates the sub -criteria for a specific alternative has the least
beneficial effects and/or the most impacts.
0 +1 (Added Value): A +1 score is applied to an alternative if it includes a higher benefit or
lower impact for a specific feature, area, or corridor consideration.
0 -1 (Reduced Value): A -1 score applied to an alternative if it includes a lower benefit or
higher impact for a specific feature, area, or corridor consideration.
Based on these scoring values, the alternative with the highest score will be considered the most
desirable or preferred alternative.
CRITERIA: HYDRAULICS
SUB -CRITERIA: SCORING:
Alignment Alterations 5 — Low drainage impacts
3 — Moderate drainage impacts
1 — High drainage impacts
Alternative No. 1 Alternative No. 2
Estimates:
Estimates:
- Length of pipes required = 1120 ft
- Length of pipes required = 1268 ft
- Number of sleeves required = 0. ea
- Number of sleeves required = 50. ea
- Number of inlet boxes required = 1 ea
- Number of inlet boxes required = 1 ea
- Length of curb and gutter = 3587 If
- Length of curb and gutter = 4000 If
Discussion:
Discussion:
This alternative requires fewer drainage elements
This alternative requires more drainage elements to
to ensure adequate drainage.
ensure adequate drainage.
5/5
2/5
February 2024
Sunset Boulevard Path
Alternatives Analysis Report
CRITERIA: UTILITY IMPACTS
Will V III I =11 4
C7
Alternative No. 1
Alternative No. 2
Estimates:
Estimates:
- Number of electrical boxes Impacted 2 ea
- Number of electrical boxes Impacted 2 ea
- Number of power poles impacted = 4 ea
- Number of power poles impacted = 10 ea
Discussion:
Discussion:
The standard alignment allows for little impact to
The alternative alignment has a greater impact to
utilities.
utilities.
5/5
3/5
CRITERIA: CONSTRUCTABILITY
SUB -CRITERIA:
SCORING:
Irrigation
5 — Low constructability concerns
3 — Moderate irrigation impacts
1 — High irrigation impacts
Alternative No. 1
Alternative No. 2
Estimates:
Estimates:
- Potential impact outside right-of-way
- Potential impacts to existing parking lot in Highland
Park Subdivision
- Cost of two retaining walls
Discussion:
Discussion:
Impacts outside the right-of-way will be minimal
Potential impacts to parking lot in Highland Park
but depending on the desired cut/fill slope it is
Subdivision as a result of constructing 2 retaining
possible temporary construction easement will be
walls and a path in the existing hillside holding up
necessary in some locations.
the parking lot.
5/5
3/5
February 2024
Sunset Boulevard Path
Alternatives Analysis Report
5 CONCLUSION
The two alternatives were analyzed and compared across multiple screening criteria to
determine the preferred option.
Both proposed alternatives appeared feasible across multiple screening criteria. A detailed
preliminary design -level evaluation was required to analyze specific comparison criteria,
determining minor differences or deficiencies across the alternatives. Comparison between the
alternatives was oftentimes minimal, as the overall impacts could be generically summed up
between a lower alignment along the road and an upper alignment above the road. Engineering
judgement was applied to some comparison criteria when a distinguishable difference was hard
to achieve between alternatives.
Alternative No. 1 scored overall very well in all categories. Some of the most critical screening
criteria were considered under constructability for this project with potential impacts meaning
temporary construction easements for cut/fill grading.
Alternative No. 2 scored most consistently across all comparison criteria. A significant impact
associated with this alternative considers the utility impacts, drainage elements needed, cost of
the added retaining walls and the potential impacts to Highland Park Subdivision. This
alternative will cost more and impact significantly more but will utilize the existing easement on
the westerly side of Highland Park Subdivision.
Recommendation
For the reasons mentioned above, and based on the comparison screening criteria, Alternative
No. 1 is a reasonable and practicable alternative that provide the pathway connectivity. This
alternative will have minimal impact on the area and cost less.
February 2024
Sunset Boulevard Path
Alternatives Analysis Report
APPENDIX A
PRELIMINARY DESIGN -LEVEL ALTERNATIVE
LAYOUTS
February 2024
sit
soft
low
'14
w
u
c
x
0
.0
>
%
u
U
j7,
0
u
w
u
�z
cz
tj
-E
-E
2EO-T
0
u
u
2,---Uuc>F'w�
—,
t
w
w
qw
u
(MD
>
v
0
u
=W
fs
2
co
ID
0
U
c
.2
x
0
o
5
cc
%
>
w
0--d'
U
U
1,
t:
3
D
0
ro
o
w
o6
o6
t:
u
o
u
-0
E
-2
>
o
u
Z
�2
Go,
LU
U)
0
a_
0
of
0
0
a
A
0
z
<
LLI
z
�:!
;;T
04
Z
0
z
04
of
z
<
LLI
0
LLI
af
z
LLI
af
z
0
z
Lu
LLJ
<
af
z
<
0
2
<
LLJ
D
0
LLI
LLI
0
af
T_
af
0
3:
z
>
0
3:
o
�::,
0
Lu
W
>
W
0
W
�
af
T
W
0
-J
z
0
z
<
0
af
LLI
w
z
Z
LLJ
>
of
LLI
0
LLI
_j
z
(5
0
0
z
LL,
w
af
0
0
o
w
LL,
co
(n
LLI
(n
co
0
Lu
>
of
LL,
Lu
z
Ljj
LLI
0
Z
_j
LLI
o
o
Z
D
m
<
c)
>
LL,
af
Lu
LLI
_j
LL,
af
LLJ
Z=�
Lu
LL,
9
0
z
of
<
T_
z
D
Z
<
<
z
D
0
Z
LLI
>
<
LLJ
z
o
LLI
LU
LU
EL
<
LLI
0
1
10
E
<
(.)
Lu
Z
LLI
0
z
LLI
LL
Z
't
D
af
(D
)_
W
in
)_
'o
'o
)_
ui
CO
LL,
a-
z
o
LLI
LLI
co
Z
o
af
Z
Lu
LLI
LL
z
LLI
LLI
U_
LLJ
Co
<
of
w
<
2
LLI
T_
<
-i
LL
U_
E:
<
2
af
o
0
w
w
-j
ui
ui
<
<
Z
ui
I
I
lj�
D
uj
D
m
o D
0.- (0) 1 20�
A �-OOWF (zo)wq-�j
woo
z �- LL 0 U_ � wo U0 W* >W< ow w< 0
w w LL 0 w
0-"Oww-,O�-z�ww-LZ:2ww>-t�m,000Ew
Z =) Z IL Z 0 < 0 w 0- 0
00-0 -
11 ILI 0 w 11 0 0 Cl 'o
L 11 LL 11
U) 11 U)
Z
00
b 0 a_
w
z
z
z
C, z p
0 0 D
0 >
UJ wz 3: w a
uzj 0 C, I L-Lj LU w
U) 0 Z 0
< LLI
o
U) w2P--jQww How Hz �_x
Z LLJ
z Z<2WW2��02"EWZ20
0 .6 -
LLI =) Z Z LLI Z w 00 2, (M
!� 0 -) <
3ujo-wjww!Sw LJ)�<H�MW3:�w
< (-) ii
u j < c) , 57< LL EL- Z W 0
L> _j 11 02
w 11 11 LL LLJ
LL LLJ 11 1, -1 11
co 0- 11 11 LLJ
co 0- c) LL- Lu U) Lu CO 0 > W <
< � c) co, 'w W. 'w LLLL, L,L LL L,L (D = � -1 2 o
0
LU
U)
0
a_
0
of
a_
gas
I
MO
0000800000
T
(DO
G
0
x
LLI
_J
0
LLJ
>
LLI
x
0
ED
z
0
Lu
Z
o
0
co
LLI
T_
z
<
_<j
>
LLI
D
x
0
LLJ
0
LLJ
0
_j
_j
af
0
z
Z
<
LLI
0
z
<
af
af
z
LU
0
T_
<
Lu
Tf
Ir
ED
(n
'o
LLI
0
0
T_
z
Z
3:
LLI
z
<
LL,
z
LL,
_J
LLJ
LLI
_j
LLI
LLj
P�
z
o
co
w
I
z
<
x
z
<
LLI
0
(n
w
LLI
0
w
LLI
o
LLI
LLI
LL,
LLI
co
D
Z
0
of
o-
x
z
ED
<
>
)o
-
LLI
w
0
w
0
w
-01
<
z
<
w
(n
LLI
<
<
2
<
2
LLI
T
-
0
LLI
_j
Z
<
co
0
af
0
LLI
0 -
_j
<
0
<
_j
_j
LLJ
LLI
(L
LLJ
0
LLI
LLI
LLI
z
<
z
LLI
af
<
Z
0
z
0
_j
<
<
0
co
LLI
co
T_
LLI
co
o
LLI
D
0
2
W
w
z
<
w
3:
LLI
co
af
(.5
LLI
3:
D
_j
<
0
0
of
z
af
0
<
z
0
z
0
o-
LL,
>
af
LLI
0
Ir
LLJ
o -
_j
;�
LLI
a-
LU
LLI
<
D
(.5
<
w
LL,
z
0
LL
<
o
0
0
C)
w
<
0
of
T_
T
LLI
_j
<
0
<
LU
F
(n
<
LL
2
(n
D
co
lZ--
0
LZU
co
EL
o
af
LL
>
0
UJ
z
<
w
W
W
_j
co
of
w
0
p
0
<
<
!=
UJ
<
Z
<
w
0
w
Ln
z
El
cl
0
x
z
D
a
U_
0
z
0
LO
r-
C9
LLI
LLI
U)
D
4k
All,
�Ww
m
0
m
C)
1.0
r-4
-1
U)
m
(D
m
m
�D
0
r-
r14
m
00
0
�D
r14
m
r-
-i
w
Ln
r-�
�t
Z
0�
-1
-1
C-4
C)
m
V)
<4
LLJ
m
00
M
m
Ln
I-D
0
0)
m
r-
M
(D
r,
Ln
(n
�T
r-
C)
�d
Ln
m
-j
(D
-�zf
M
(n
r-�
m
m
m
r-
r-
�D
rl-
-1
(7)
Ln
(D
z
1.0
Cj)
r�
m
Lr)
lz�
00
m
O�
U)
r14
ry�
3
I
Ln
r�
Ilp
m
r,
C�
U)
0)
C�
N
0
O�
Lr)
r-
Lf)
C)
1.0
Lr)
C)
r,
N
0
�.o
r-
00
r,
rr)
m
00
r-
C)
C)
(n
r-
00
Lr)
Ol
r,
r44
r14
C)
00
ri)
ro
C)
00
C14
00
Ul
00
(N
Lr)
C)
00
z
lzt
IZT
IZT
ItT
lZt
IZT
-1
-1
-1
cl:
coo-
UCL
u
U
CL
0-
LL
z
o
C:)
0
+
Lri
-
QD
rn
-4
.4
r,
w
0
r-�
Ln
C)
0-1
cyi
m
Ln
00
d
�D
<
0
<
J,
LU
n-
co
.0
a_
D ;t
co tr
Ir w
D I--
I--
w
U-.)
co a:
< o co
z D
>
Lu co
60
U)
U)
<
c)
C)
I
<
0
LU +
20
U)
o
< I
Ir 0
W 0
+
0
<
I
U) C,
w F--
Z
<
K
0 �
<
0
W
0 U)
<
U) 0
w w
U)
U)
< w
>
LWD �2
T WE
ow
Ir <
U)
Ir
<
U) tr LU
>
w �
0 C)
w >-
F--
a:
0- C)
(D
LU
w a:
Ir
w
<
>
Lu
U) 0-
0-
z
U)
U) Ir
< y
C)
C) a:
C) F--
co
<
Luw
cl g
Z
Z<
LU
<
<
UW)
F--
U)
Ir
0
<
<
F--
>
0,
Lu
0-
0-
a:
Wo
W—
FN
T
Ir
<
co
?: <
<
I--
U) tr W
0 >
w
Z
w >-
a_ 0
�-,
S
L w
Ir a:
C,
01,
01
U�) (OD
co tr
U) C)
U) a:
Ir w
< F--
F--
F--
C) b
D
0 (D
U)
z
C)
co
D
co 1:
<
Lu <
co
z
C,
co >
C-0
co tr
Ir w
D F--
F-- j
D LU)
0 (D
cz, U) 1:
Lu <
z (D U)
z
F-- C,
U)
co
Uji I
w
x
0
co
co
<
+ + ;t
Lu < <
F-- F--
U) U) U)
0 0 0
< F-- F-- F--
fr 0 N
0 0
Lu
0- 0 M
0- + + +
F 0
F--
co co 'CO
I
D
0
W I
U)
<
C)
C)
co
x
<
< Z
U)
x
co
<
w w
w
0 �
60
co
Ir
<
>
w
C) 0
<
Z
U)
co
Lu Ir
<
U)
D
0
U)
a_
Ir
>
< w
>
C)
C)
U)
U)
< y
�
co
[0
U)
U) y
0
0
Z F-- D
0
Co
<
C) c)
c)
C)
0
+
W
w a:
C,
F--
co
z
w �!
Ir
<
<
<
0
F--
U)
F--
Z
w +
0
< F--
20
z [<
Ir
0 U)
� < 0
00
�J;t
co Ir
ir 0
W
co tr
<
Ir w
F--
w
0
+
0
ol
Ir w
D F--
w
co tr
Ir w
D
0 (D
m C)
m
U)
<
U)
m C)
m
U)
w m
U)
z
<
co a:
0 co
z D
z
<
co a:
0 co
z
Z co a:
< 0
>
z
X
w co
w co
x
w co
>
o
T U)
01 -Z< (11 WE < w
w a:
Ir <
U) <
U) tr LU >
w F--
0 c) a:
w >- (D
C) LU
Fo w 1:
Ir
0
U)
U)
<
� C)
C)
C)
co
<
C)o
a: U)
F-- 00
U)
U) 0
< y
c)
C)
c) +
m L-u
<
:Z:J [UO)
N Ir 0
0
0+
�0!
11 a�
R� w
C) Lu
U)
0
CDO a:
W < co
z
x >
Lu co
L-0 I
_0 z u
OF
LU 0 w C)
C) c)
0 0
w w
Ir Ir
U)
� w
Lu 0
� 0-
I Ir
0 w
w 0
Ir 0-
U)
UJ
UJ �
w 0
<
c) Lu
0
w 0
-4�
00-
U)
F-- <
Ir (D
ol
0-
LU F--
5 U)
0 X
7�; W
W �
Ir 0
-158+1
0
z it"
UD u)
F-- <
Ir (D
ol
0-
LU F--
5 U)
0 X
2 W
W �
Ir 0
W gz+g:ld
(Y)
Df
§ t
LU
0
C/)
CZO
I
0
LU
0
ED
U)
z
D
U)
0
U)
<
ol
0-
00-
U)
F-- <
Ir (D
0,
0-
LU F--
5 U)
0 x
2w
W
F
0')
LU
0
ED
LU
Ul
z
D
U)
00-
U)
fr
0
0-
LU F--
5 U)
0 X
7�; W
W �
Ir 0
�2 LU F
5 U)
0 X
2 W
W
Ir 0
qZ-)_j7+j4:Od
U)
I
LU
0
m
LU
C/)
z
D
C/)
U)
00-
U)
F-- <
Ir (D
01
0-
LU F--
5 U)
0 X
2 W
w I
Ir 0
Df
§
LU
IM
LU
z
cu/))
I
w
U)
F
0')
V9 96+ZZ:Ood
LU
U)
z
<
7
D
U)
00-
U)
�__
fr <
oo
0- Z
LU F--
> U)
0 x
2 LU
W �
Ir o
Flu
Ir
w
05
co
Ir
D
C)
ZD
w
o5 >
co <
Ir 0-
D
C) <
a:
0-
U)
<
0
w
0
co
0
U)
w
0
C,
W
C)
<
C) Ir
< F--
w
w
w
73
0
C)
C)
z
< D
C) Ir
< F--
U)
Ir
w
U)
73
Ir
U)
U)
n
ry
0
C/)
z
D
C/)
w
.1�
C)
0
tlZ tl%Z:�31Z tl%Z:�3
C9661� C966+�:177d
F-
0—
c6
+ LU
5 LU LU
0- >
ir
D
C)
LU
Ir
LU
a:
U)
z
0
x
w
�2
w
05
0- (1w
,73 : C)
< 5;
Ir W
<
0
w
F--
F--
D
0
J
w
U)
cr
w
I--
D
o5
co
0-
D
w
D
0
co
w
U)
0
F--
U)
x
w
F
0')
LU
0
ED
U)
z
D
LUL),
o
C6
+
> LU LU
0- >
ir
D
0
w
w
U)
0
U)
�2
0
m
�2
0
m
0
0
�o
0
0
�IUNOO �JOzl N i33HS 33S 3NI�HOiVA 00+9 ViS
U)
.00 z
Ir
w
0
o5
co
Ir
D
01
w
U)
F
0')
ui
0
ED
LU
U)
z
0
x
w
w
w
a:
U)
+ LU
> W LU
0- >
ir
D
C)
09 vooc:�3)9 Vooc:�3
00 LC+6 00 LC+6:177d
/I
/I
0
m
0
m
0
m
0
N
0
m
w
z( (D
tr Z
< Z
<
>
0
'CUD
0
ry
LU
0
m
C/)
z
D
U)�
Ir
w
05
co
Ir
D U)
C)
-
o tr
x
w
CL Lzoc:�3—CL
�q �O+t7� �9 �c
w
w
a:
U)
ob
0
x
w
I/
9C 111+111 Od
0)
0
o
o—
�o
+mzFN
m w
Lu � v
�, L>u
U)
U)
w
z w
U)
w
LU w
Ir
w
w
U)
73
Ir
0
F--
U)
U)
G)
0
'00
,0—
0
m z
LU
-�j W
Lu � v
w
>
0
D-
D
C)
LU
U)
z
D
U)
C,
w
D
0
co
w
o5
co
0
U)
w
w
a:
U)
U)
U)
w
0
co
w
I--
I--
D
0
05
co
r�>:Oo 2�
t7
w
90-6tOCI
w
0 6VOC
a:
u)
t,9-6tOC 'o
0 6VOCI o'
G
9
3
D
0
oz-k9oc
z �Soc
x
U
w
Df
0
LU
00
0
0
+ m
99-t.90C 00
0
w
9 �Soc;�
Lu
LU
> w
>
C/)
z
U)i
ovZ90c,
� z9od
t7
L
zz
t7
0
0
NoiivnNIiNOO �JOzl V � i33HS 33S 3NI�HOiVA 00+CZ ViS
w
F-- w
W a:
Ir U)
w
w
U)
w
c)
W,
<
x
w
U)
c�
w
0
co
b
0- Z+ce..-Ld
F
0')
LU
0
ED
LU
U)
z
0
0
0
m
0 0
kc-tsoc 00
t7goel M+
N
w
w
a:
U)
I
0
0 0
0
+
w
Lu � y
w
>
Ir
D
C)
0
Ir
U)
60 990C :�3 dH
OL Z9+t7Z:dH
60 990C :�3 60 990C :�3
06C6+t7Z O6E6+17C:lAd
z
z
9
5 - ts LE] 00
L t7goel- N
6
6
0
0
111011 ON
9
9 9901;
0
0
0
m
0 0
m m
_0 z u
0 w C)
0
0
w
w
U)
� w
Lu 0
0-
Ir
0 w
w 0
Ir 0-
U)
AI
Lu
W �
w 0
F-- 0-
< I
c) Lu
0
w 0
Ir 0-
0
U)
<
ol
0-
LU F--
5 U)
0 X
7�; W
W �
Ir 0
I
r')
ry
0
C/)
z
D
C/)
�26
?U.<:
z it"
UD u)
F-- <
Ir (D
ol
0-
LU F--
5 U)
0 X
2 W
W �
Ir 0
0 gz+g:ld
0')
LU
0
ED
U)
z
U)
,U)
F-- "
0
U)
<
0,
0-
LU F--
5 U)
0 x
2w
0
U)
<
ol
0-
48�
Lu
UD GO-)
F-- <
Ir (D
ol
0-
LU F--
5 U)
0 X
7�; W
W
Ir 0
F
0')
0
LU
U)
z
H
U)
I
(D w
0
LU w
Lu ?:
F-- 0
< 0-
C)
q
w
Ir
00-
U)
fr
0
0-
LU F--
5 U)
0 x
2 W
W �
Ir 0
--o ,
F--
UZ)
w
0
<,r
0 w
w 0
qZ-)_17+14 :Od
U)
LU
0
m
LU
C/)
z
D
C/)
U)
L�u
w 0
0-
Ir
0 w
w 0
Ir 0-
<
Lu C)
Z
..........
<
U)
0
Ir
w
0
0
w
Ir
Df
UD GO)
c I
0-
W F-- LU
U) C/)
0 X
2 W
W
Ir 0 C/)
w
0
w
w ?:
0
C)
0
w
-Z -- ,
0�
0 U)
0- <1
W
>
ol
2 U)
W R
Ir Lu
0
(Y)
0)
LU
o
ED
LU
U)
z
Flu
Ir
w
05
co
Ir
D
C)
ZD
U)
w
70
W
<
C)
<
C)
<
w
-W
a: 0
C)
z
< D
C) Ir
<
U)
w
w
U)
0
U)
U)
w
5<;
LU
0
C/)
z
D
C/)
tlZ tl%Z:�31Z tl%Z:�3
C966+I, C966+I,:I77d
c6
LU
5 LU W y
0- >
ir
D
0
w
u
w
u
U)
0
x
w
0- (D w
73 z C)
< —Z 5
tr W
<
<
w
0
co
Ir
w
U)
01
w
o5
co
C)
Ir
w
U)
U)
x
w
F
0')
LU
0
ED
U)
z
maz m
+
> W LU
0- 5; >
I Ir
D
C)
w
w
a:
U)
U)
�UNOO �JOzl OZ i33HS 33S 3NI�HOiVA 00+9 ViS
�2
0
m
�2
0
m
0
0
�o
0
0
w
0
co
. /.I
U)
.00 z
Ir
w
0
o5
co
Ir
D
01
w
w
co
U)
F
0')
ui
0
ED
LU
U)
z
0
x
w
w
w
a:
U)
+ LU
> W LU
0- >
ir
D
C)
09 vooc:�3)9 Vooc:�3
00 LC+6 00 LC+6:177d
/I
/I
0
m
0
m
0
N
0
m
iNOO �JOzl �Z i33HS 33S 3NI�HOiVA 09+ ViS
< (ZD
>
U) <
<
OE
ca
Ir
u 0
Ir
w
19
o5
co
w
w
a: a: w
co 0
< Lu
w>
<
tr Z
< Z
<
c,
----------
w
o5
co
LU
C/)
z
C/)
w
co
Ir
U)
Lzoc:�3 -CL
2
1 �q �O+n �9 �c
0 Ir
0
U)
w
oo
.00
0
0
ge Ltl+t7
+ 0
Lu
W Lu
>
w
w
a:
U)
0
x
w
U)
w
w
U)
05
(D w
z w
a:
u)
w
Lu w
u)
I %
Ir
w
U)
73
Ir
U)
U)
01
w
o5
co
C)
F
0')
LU
0
ED
LIJ
U)
z
U)
0 oo
'600
,0-,
�o 0
M z
Lu
w Lu
> >
Ir
D
C)
w
0
<
w
a:
U)
0
Ir
i
0
0
U)
I
U)
U)
w
o5
co
Ir
D
C)
c�
00 2�!
Df
0
z
D
cu/))
0 06
00
0-,
0 0
+ m
m
-�j W
Lu y
> w
>
Ir
D
C)
w
w
U)
FA
0
NoiivnNIiNOO �JOzl t7Z i33HS 33S 3NI�HOiVA 00+CZ ViS
-, , " " ,-Ld
05
(D w
z w
a:
u)
w
Lu w
eo
w
a: C)
F-- >
w
< z
'Ir z
< Ir
F
0')
LU
0
ED
w
co
z
D
col
0
0
0
m
0
0
0
m
0 0
.90-tsoc 00
t7goe
OZ't,90E
Z t7goe
w
0
w
a:
I
tz,tlgoc
u)
Z t7goe
9 t7goe
o'
o
o—
o
+ z o
Lu
00
w
69-tl.90C
Lu
> >
L t7goe
WtSOC
6 t7SOC
0
88,P90C
6 t7SOC
u)
LO ssoc :�3 dH
6t7 t79+t7Z:dH
ko,99oc
0 ssoc
go ssoc :�3 90 ssoc :�3
99 06+t7Z 99 06+t7Z :lAd
8 c -.9.9 o c oo
t7 990C o
N
99,990C
9 ssoc
6.9.9.90C
9 ssoc
Ice-.9.90C
c ssoc
o m
o o
o o
m m
7007fl7Z
217'6CO� v 0 p
Q
0
0
—0
0
I?
Q L0 Q
L0 I- 1-
L0 Q
(1) (1)
0 0 0
(1) (1) (1)
0 0
(1) (1)
Him
HOW
1111101
11111 MUGU
0 L0 0 L0 0
,1- (1) (1) N N
0 0 0 0 0
(1) (1) (1) (1) (1)
illiq
CD
----
961170EZZ 17Z
iiiiiiiii
ec H7
ID
0
CD
0
0
0
C?
L0 0 L0 0 L0 0
(D (D L0 L0 IT IT
L0
(Y)
0 0 0 0 0 0
(Y) (Y) (Y) (Y) CY) CY)
0
CY)
L0 0
L0 L0
0 0
(Y) (Y)
L0 0 L0 0 L0 L0
IT IT (1) (1) N L0
0 0 0 0 0 0
(Y) (Y) (1) (1) (1) (Y)
0
0
0
LO
I-
kil, L
--------- 81)
Z 0'6COC'Z6'17Z \
CD
w
I iiiiiiiii
L0 0 L0
L0 L0 IT
0 0 0
(Y) (Y) (Y)
D
IT-1 0
0
C:)
CD
CD
1111�1114
69'6170C'Z0'9Z
0
9 VC17
hill 0
111) 0
(3 CJ70C'j7(
0
LO CD LO CD LO CD LO
(D (D LO LO �T I- m LO CD LO CD LO CD
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (D (D L0 L0 I- I-
0 0 0 0 0 0
m m m m m m
0 L0 0 L0 0 L0 0 L0 0 L0 0 L0
L0 IT IT (Y) (Y) N (D L0 L0 IT IT (Y)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
C0 C0 C0 C0 C0 C0 C0 C0 C0 C0 C0 C0
CD
(0
CD
LO
11111111111111111111111111 0 Hill
CD
M
CD
0
no
HIM
�11
0 LU �
LJ' -- — ----
<Z
-0
U)
0 frw---
00
mo
0 L0 0 L0 0 L0 0 L0 0 L0 0 L0
L0 IT IT C0 C0 N (D L0 L0 IT IT C0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
C0 C0 C0 C0 C0 C0 C0 C0 C0 C0 C0 C0
0 L0 0 L0 L0
IT (1) (1) N L0
0 0 0 0 0
(Y) (1) (1) (1) (Y)
L0 Q L0 Q
,I- 1- (1) (1)
L0
N
Q L0
N
0 0 0 0
0
0
CD
CD
CD
LO
-----------
0 1-
CD
t79, �COC'172'cz
efszo
IV) C:)
ON
no
HIM
d 11
J�
� W
CD
<
Z��
I
CD LO CD LO CD
LO I- I- m m
0 0 0 0 0
m m m m m
U6 VtUt kSL VC ;4�
/-Z,ezo V�l 0 P\ -
917,1790079,
01 CD
744
917,1790079Z
CD
CD
Q
L0 Q L0
(D (D L0
0 0 0
Q L0
L0 I-
0 0
(1) (1) (1)
m m
IIIIIIII 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I(D
I , �9910� , \ 11
06 Im cz \
176179007S'9��
D
'40
04
00
no
HIM
d 11 1761790079Z
U� CD
�Lu
.z( 11
1z
—0 <
0 U5 ( C,
0- Lu- IL--
00
0
C�
0
I?
LO 0 LO 0 LO 0 LO
I- I- (D (D LO LO I-
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1)
LO
(D
0 LO
(D LO
0
LO
LO
IT
0 LO
IT I-
0
(Y)
0 0
(Y) (Y)
0
(Y)
0
(Y)
0 0
m co
CD
CD
(.0
CD
LO
—0 1-
-
CD
LS
C'9C'
------------
--------
Q
0
IV)
0
17c, �SOC'17 Z
ri
0
0
LO
(D
0 LO
CD LO
0
LO
LO
IT
0 LO
IT I-
0
(Y)
0 0
(Y) (Y)
0
(Y)
0
(Y)
0 0
(Y) (Y)
0 LO 0 LO 0
I- (D (D LO LO
0 0 0 0 0
(Y) (Y) (Y) (Y) (Y)
0 LO 0 LO 0
I- (D (D LO LO
0 0 0 0 0
m m m m m
LO
IT
0
(Y)
I-
0
(D
0
LO
0
IT
0
(Y)
0
N
I?
LO
IT
0
(Y)
Q
(1)
0
N
Q
Q
0
0
0
LO 0 LO 0 LO 0 LO
r— r— (D (D LO LO I-
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(1) (1) (1) m m m m
LO 0 LO 0 LO 0 LO
I- I- (D (D LO LO IT
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(Y) (Y) (Y) (Y) CY) CY) CY)
0
0
(D
0
LO
Q
,I-
0
(1)
0
N
�2
0
Q
Q
Q
I?
LO 0 LO 0 LO 0 LO
I- I- (D (D LO LO IT
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(Y) (Y) (Y) (Y) (Y) m (Y)
eveson's-Z C14
I I
Jill
JIM
JIM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIII
JIM
=
=
Mil
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII11im
LO 0 LO 0 LO c
I- I- (D (D LO Lf
0 0 0 0 0 c
m m m m m cy
LO 0 LO 0 LO
I- I- (D (D LO
0 0 0 0 0
(Y) (Y) (Y) (Y) (Y)
E: V6SOC',L17' 9�1
0 n
00
no
-14
OW
E
0
I-
0 0 0 0
I- (D (D 0
0
co
0 0 0 0
co co co co
0 LO 0 LO 0 LO 0 0 LO 0 LO 0 LO 0 LO 0 LO 0 LO 0
r— (D (D LO LO I- I- r- (D (D LO LO I- I- r— r— (D (D LO LO
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m
0 1 1 0 -
JIM
IIIII
JIM
r—
I I -
I
I I
I I
I I
I
---
I
I I
I
I I
I I
I I
I
0
I I
LO
0
NT.T1
1.
1111
CD
,I-
111�
0
ID
co
0
N
20'6170
NO
ZZ OSUE
V= C��
0
0
LO 0
O�
mm
000
�c6
O�
no
HIM
�11
LU 20'6170079Z
�Lu
no
HIM
Lu, ZZ,090079Z
CD
LU
bo
0
00
—
-------
cm)
cm)
w
cm)
Ew
00
CD
cm)
CD
-------------------
0
0
CD
0�
on
LU 11
CD
LU
<Z
Zo
o,
CD
00
cm)
I'll I'll I ----- ) I I I I I -- I I I I I I
CD
I? I?
CD CD
LO 0 LO 0 LO 0 LO 0 LO 0 LO 0 X) 0 X) 0 X) 0 X) 0 LO 0 LO 0 LO c
(o (o LO LO IT IT I- I- (o (o LO X) �T �T r- I- co co 0 0 IT r— (D (D LO u
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c
co co co co co co co co co co co m m m m m m m m m co m m m m (I
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LO 0 LO
IT �T m m N co 0 0 IT IT co co co co 0 0 �T �T m r- (D (D LO LO I-
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
co co co co co co co co co co m m m m m m m m co co co m m m m
m C, m
I-
0
co
0
0
co
0
N
0
.......... 0
Hills,
Hills
HIM
Him
11
11
liiiiiiiiiiiiii
11
Ills
RUN
9-4
�Mlg
I s,
RUN
HIM=
ul
Ills
0
0
(D
0
LO
cm)
,I-
0
(1)
0
N
0
0
cm)
cm)
cm)
I?
liiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiilli
Hills
Is
I
NUNN
RUN
RUN
0
0
(D
0
LO
cm)
0
(1)
0
N
0
0
cm)
cm)
cm)
I?
LO 0 LO 0 LO 0 LO 0 LO 0 LO 0 LO 0 LO 0 LO 0 LO 0 LO 0 LO 0 LO
IT IT (Y) (Y) N co LO LO IT IT (Y) (Y) (D (D LO LO IT IT (Y) I- co (D LO LO I-
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CY) CY) CY) CY) CY) CY) CY) CY) CY) CY) CY) Cl) m m m m m m m m (Y) (1) (1) (1) (1)
sm
Ills
MINIMUM
Him
smoini
Miss
NUNN
liiiiiiiiiiiii
Hills
liiiiiiiiiiii
Miss
NUNN
liiiiiiiiiiiiii
liiiiiiiiiiiii
liiiiiiiiiiii
Miss
RUN
liiiiiiiiiiii
liiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillill
liiiiiiiiiiii
Miss
HIM
liiiiiiiiiiii
liiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillill
liiiiiiiiiiii
Miss
RUN
I
liiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillill
MOSEll
Miss
RUN
HIM
liiiiiiiiiiii
liiiiiiiiiiiii
Miss
lllillillrAillillilli
liiiiiiimiiiiiiiiiiiiilli
liiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
111MMENIIIIII
Miss
liiiiiii5ligillilill
llilillifillillillillill
HIM
ll1l1llllllll
MINN.
liiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiill
liiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillill
liiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
Miss
liiiii�illill
Ill
liiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillill
liiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
IRMO
.
11
liiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiimiw
liiiiiiiiiiiiiii
MINE
111011111111
lliqw,
.
liiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiim
NOW
.
MINIMUM
liiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiin
liiiiiiiiiiiiII5
111111WA
1111111111111111111M
.
M11111111111111
IIIIIIIIII
milli
Us
1111111101
IIIIIIIIIIN
CD LO
CD
LO
CD
LO
r- (D
(D
LO
LO
I-
0 0
0
0
0
0
M M
M
M
M
M
0 0 0 0 0 0
I- co co 0 0 IT
0 0 0 0 0 0
co co co co co co
IIIIIIIIIII
HIM
stgIIIIIIIIII
Immm
I
0
0
(D
C)
LO
0
,I-
C)
(1)
0
N
C)
C)
0
0
I?
0 LO 0 LO 0 LO
I- co co LO LO IT
0 0 0 0 0 0
(Y) (Y) (Y) (Y) (Y) (Y)
0 LO
0
LO
0
LO
I- co
co
LO
LO
IT
0 0
(Y) (Y)
0
(Y)
0
(Y)
0
(Y)
0
(Y)
C)
Us
IIIIS
0
I?
0 LO
0
LO
0
LO
I- co
co
LO
LO
IT
0 0
(Y) (Y)
0
(Y)
0
(Y)
0
(Y)
0
(Y)
0 0 0 0 0 0 LO
I- I- (o (o 0 0 1-
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
co M M M M M M
CD
111111111,11111111111ITTT
IIIIIIIIIIIIHNIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIHIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII0111111111-FR
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII0111111M
111111111111111111111111140
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII0
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIING4
LO 0
LO
0
LO
0
LO
I- I-
co
co
LO
LO
IT
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
(Y) (Y)
(Y)
(Y)
(Y)
M
(Y)
INS
IIIII
Ills
LO 0
LO
0
LO
0
LO
I- I-
co
co
LO
LO
IT
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
(Y) (Y)
(Y)
(Y)
CY)
M
M
Sunset Boulevard Path
Alternatives Analysis Report
APPENDIX B
COST ESTIMATES
February 2024
Opinion of Probable Costs
Kalispell, Montana
KILI Project #2304-01547 KLI
Sunset Boulevard Path - Preliminary
Lower Alignment
Schedule 1 - Base Bid
Item No.
Description
Estimated Quantity
Unit
Unit Price
Tota I
1
Relocate Power Pole
4
EA
$ 2,000.00
$ 8,000.00
2
Remove Asphalt Paving
1110
SY
$ 12.00
$ 13,320.00
3
Relocate Electrical Box
2
EA
$ 1,500.00
$ 3,000.00
4
Unclassified Excavation
CY
$ 6.50
$ -
5
Sawcut Asphalt
2721
LF
$ 12.00
$ 32,652.00
6
Aggregate Base Course Class 6
757
SY
$ 24.00
$ 18,177.26
7
Concrete Sidewalk (6 Inch)
424
SY
$ 110.00
$ 46,603.52
8
Asphalt Concrete Surface Course Grade Type A
147
TON
$ 120.00
$ 17,646.21
9
Asphalt Cement PG 64-28
9
TON
$ 500.00
$ 4,411.55
10
Tack Coat
882
SY
$ 8.00
$ 7,058.48
11
30" Curb & Gutter
3528
LF
$ 30.00
$ 105,840.00
12
24" Curb & Gutter (Type 2)
59
LF
$ 25.00
$ 1,475.00
13
Valley Gutter (5 foot)
42
SY
$ 150.00
$ 6,344.18
14
Detectable Warning Device
112
SF
$ 400.00
$ 44,800.00
15
Curb Inlet Box
1
EA
$ 2,000.00
$ 2,000.00
16
Retaining Wall
511
CY
$ 1,650.00
$ 843,837.87
17
Perforated Drain Pipe (4-Inch)
1120
LF
$ 60.00
$ 67,200.00
18
Native Seed Mix
1463
SY
$ 4.00
$ 5,852.79
Base Bid - Tota I Estimated Cost
$ 1,222,366.06
Schedule 2 - Allocation Items
17
Mobilization
1
I -SUM
8%
$ 97,800.00
18
Erosion Control and Turf Establishment
1
I -SUM
2%
$ 24,500.00
19
Construction Surveying
1
I -SUM
$ 80,000.00
$ 80,000.00
20
Traffic Control
1
I -SUM
2%
$ 24,500.00
Allocation Items - Total Estimated Cost
$ 226,800.00
Summary of Estimated Construction Costs
Schedule 1 - Base Bid $1,222,366.06
Schedule 1 - Allocation Items 226,800.00
Estimated Construction Costs $1,449,166.06
Construction Contingency 20% $289,833.21
Total Estimated Construction Cost $1,675,966.06
Opinion of Probable Costs
Kalispell, Montana
KILI Project #2304-01547 KLI
Sunset Boulevard Path - Preliminary
Upper Alignment
Schedule 1 - Base Bid
Item No.
Description
Estimated Quantity
Unit
Unit Price
Tota I
1
Relocate Power Pole
10
EA
$ 2,000.00
$ 20,000.00
2
Remove Asphalt Paving
424
SY
$ 12.00
$ 5,083.78
3
Relocate Electrical Box
2
EA
$ 1,500.00
$ 3,000.00
4
Unclassified Excavation
CY
$ 6.50
$ -
5
Sawcut Asphalt
3124
LF
$ 12.00
$ 37,488.00
6
Aggregate Base Course Class 6
1240
SY
$ 24.00
$ 29,759.21
7
Concrete Sidewalk (6 Inch)
836
SY
$ 110.00
$ 91,997.12
8
Asphalt Concrete Surface Course Grade Type A
162
TON
$ 120.00
$ 19,497.51
9
Asphalt Cement PG 64-28
10
TON
$ 500.00
$ 4,874.38
10
Tack Coat
975
SY
$ 8.00
$ 7,799.01
11
30" Curb & Gutter
3528
LF
$ 30.00
$ 105,840.00
12
24" Curb & Gutter (Type 2)
472
LF
$ 25.00
$ 11,800.00
13
Valley Gutter (5 foot)
42
SY
$ 150.00
$ 6,300.00
14
Detectable Warning Device
112
SF
$ 400.00
$ 44,800.00
15
Curb Inlet Box
1
EA
$ 2,000.00
$ 2,000.00
16
Retaining Wall
2230
CY
$ 1,650.00
$ 3,679,044.78
17
Perforated Drain Pipe (4-inch)
1268
LF
$ 60.00
$ 76,080.00
18
Drain Sleeves (2-inch)
50
LF
$ 40.00
$ 2,000.00
19
Native Mix Seed
4515
SY
$ 4.00
$ 18,060.00
Base Bid - Tota I Estimated Cost
$ 4,165,423.79
Schedule 2 - Allocation Items
17
Mobilization
1
LSUM
8%
$ 333,300.00
18
Erosion Control and Turf Establishment
1
LSUM
2%
$ 83,400.00
19
Construction Surveying
1
LSUM
$ 80,000.00
$ 80,000.00
20
Traffic Control
1
LSUM
2%
$ 83,400.00
Allocation Items - Total Estimated Cost
$ 580,100.00
Summary of Estimated Construction Costs
Schedule 1 - Base Bid $4,165,423.79
Schedule 1 - Allocation Items 580,100.00
Estimated Construction Costs $4,745,523.79
Construction Contingency 20% $94L9104.761
Total Estimated Construction Cost $5,325,623.79