Loading...
Growth Policy Amendment Meeting - Public Comment from Judy MartinsonAimee Brunckhorst From: Judy Martinson <judy@nprmt.com> Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2024 4:51 PM To: Kalispell Meetings Public Comment Subject: EXTERNAL Growth Policy Amendment Meeting - Public Comment Kalispell City Council 201 First Avenue East Kalispell, MT 59901 Subject: Opposition to Amendment #KGPA-24-01: Tronstad Meadows and Whitetail Crossing Dear Kalispell City Council Members, I am writing to voice my strong opposition to the proposed amendment concerning the Tronstad Meadows and Whitetail Crossing development (#KGPA-24-01). As a dedicated resident of Kalispell, I believe this amendment threatens the sustainable and thoughtful growth our community deserves. Misalignment with Existing Growth Policies The proposed annexation of Tronstad Meadows and Whitetail Crossing contradicts the carefully crafted objectives of the Kalispell Growth Policy Plan -It 2035 and the city's Annexation Policy. These policies were designed to ensure orderly, sustainable development that reflects our community's values and existing land use. Fast -tracking an amendment to favor a single development in rural and agricultural areas seems like an abrupt departure from our established growth plans. Such a move appears to benefit a single developer's interests rather than the broader community. Shortsighted Planning Concerns Unlike the strategic growth along the Highway 93 corridor, this proposed patchwork annexation is shortsighted. It undermines the comprehensive planning efforts that are vital for the sustainable future of Kalispell. We must maintain a consistent and thoughtful approach to growth that aligns with our long-term vision. Community Opposition and Call for Thorough Review The community's opposition to this amendment is evident, with over 500 signatures on a petition, packed meetings, and numerous public comments against it. We urge the council to reconsider this amendment and stick to the established growth policies that reflect the collective interests and long- term vision for Kalispell. Please vote no until a comprehensive review and community consultation are conducted to ensure any changes align with the principles of sustainable and orderly growth outlined in Plan -It 2035. 1 Economic and Environmental Implications Approving this amendment would overextend the city's resources and set a troubling precedent for unaffordable developments. The proposed housing prices are not accessible to many residents, countering the policy's goal of providing affordable housing for all income levels. Additionally, increased development would lead to more traffic, compromising road safety for pedestrians and cyclists and conflicting with our goals for walkable and bikeable neighborhoods. Converting agricultural lands to residential use poses significant environmental risks, threatening local wildlife, water quality, and the rural landscape's integrity. Conclusion In light of these concerns, I urge the Kalispell City Council to reject application #KGPA-24-01. Let's uphold our commitment to strategic, inclusive growth that respects the needs and values of all Kalispell residents, preserving the unique character and natural beauty of our community. Thank you for considering the long-term interests of our community in your decision -making process. Sincerely, N Forbes National Parks Realty A-zo I, k IN m 111(a ludy I'lairthisoin Brokor/11F�('a[Wir ',\alioinal IParks F�oalfy (SO1 Spokane Avoini io \A/hilohsh, 1111 59937 www.NationaLParl<sReafty.com Olficoc 406.862.8400 Aol�i[(,� 40(S250(S(S44 11 iconsed in Uho Sl@('cal lloinaina 11 IIC�8420