The URL can be used to link to this page

Timberwolf Ridge Application MaterialsWGMG1 i FmmoWlli"' uuuuuu uuuuuu uuuum uuuuuuuuuu uuuuuuuum i iiii uuuuum pu� uuuuuuuuuu uuuuuuu� uuuuumi uuuuuum uuuuuuuuuu �. �� uuummn� uumm uuuuuuuuuu uuuuuuuWl°" omuvl i uuuiu i loouuu"uu uuuuuuuu uuuuuuw The following is a narrative for the Timberwolf Ridge Planned Unit Development application. Also included is the site plan, utility layout, and development applications for the PUD and preliminary plat. L1 /_1 N NIA 91T/ a. An overall description of the goals and objectives for the development of the project. The proposed Timberwolf Ridge PUD is a planned multifamily development located on the east side of Stillwater Road, surrounded on all sides by property that has been annexed into the City of Kalispell. The site is a part of the former Grossweiler Dairy Farm and is currently vacant land with some remnants of old buildings and agricultural activities from the previous owners. Based on the growth policy map and surrounding developments, the site is well suited for RA-2 zoning. This property is well positioned for residential development that can be well integrated into the surrounding neighborhoods and emphasize the existing ridge line with open space and connectivity throughout the site and surrounding recreational amenities. The goals of the development are the following: 1. Allow for residential density vertically to preserve open spaces and prevent sprawl. 2. Offer residential units in a desirable location for a variety of income levels, lifestyles, age groups, and needs. 3. Include site amenities including recreational corridors and a trail system along the ridgeline that connects to the larger area multiuse path system. 4. Create a holistic development with an emphasis on community that incorporates the ability to live, work, and play in one area. The location is in close proximity to a schools, shopping, parks, entertainment, and restaurants. Kalispell and the greater Flathead Valley are currently facing a housing crisis with one of the primary issues being supply. This development is intended to create additional housing in the Kalispell community in a location suitable for such land use. b. In cases where the development will be executed in increments, a schedule showing the time within phase will be completed. It is expected that the project will be phased from northwest to southeast with the project being broken into two phases of three buildings. The first phase will be accessed via Stillwater Road on the west and Timberwolf Parkway on the North. The first phase would begin construction in fall of 2023 and be completed in the fall of 2024. Phase 2 would begin in 2025 and likely be 431 1st Avenue West, Kalispell, MT 59901 1 OFFICE 406.756.4848 1 EMAIL wgm@wgmgroup.com Timberwolf Ridge December 5, 2022 Page 2 of 11 built out by mid to late 2026. These dates would all be subject to market conditions and are projections that may change. All phases will be constructed with the intent to be stand alone as if the future phases will not be constructed. Figure 1: Preliminary phasing diagram C. The extent to which the plan departs from zoning and subdivision regulations including but not limited to density, setbacks and use, and the reasons why such departures are or are not deemed to be in the public interest; The annexation and initial zoning request of RA-2 correspond with the growth policy and would also limit the need to request substantial departures from zoning and subdivision regulations. The Timberwolf Ridge PUD application requests only one variance from the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinance: a. Maximum building height to 60 feet. The height variance is being requested for architectural creativity to allow more compact building footprints allowing more open space on the site. This is further emphasized with the parking being proposed under the buildings; without this more of the site would be surface parking. The buildings have an actual height of 54 ft, but the additional height provides room for any appurtenances or supporting infrastructure that would be located on the roofs. Architectural renderings have been included with this application in Part L. Timberwolf Ridge December 5, 2022 Page 3 of 11 «MUMMMMEMIM - The large buildings also serve to "provide an adequate supply and mix of housing that meets the needs of present and future residents in terms of cost, type, design and location" in accordance with the growth policy housing goals. The intent of a PUD is to "provide flexibility of architectural design and density as well as providing the option to mix land uses and densities while preserving and enhancing the integrity and environmental values of an area." A Housing and Land Use policy within the Growth Policy includes encouragement that "High - density residential neighborhoods should be developed at densities up to 20 units per acre, with some as high as 40 units per acre. "A density of 19.81 Dwelling units per acre is proposed which is well in line with the high -density residential neighborhood standards. The request for a height variance may seem imposing on the public, but it is in the public's interest. Given the limited supply and the exponential need for housing, creating high quality residential communities is in the public's interest. d. The nature and extent of the common open space in the project and the provisions for maintenance and conservation of the common open space; and the adequacy of the amount and function of the open space in terms of the land use, densities and dwelling types proposed in the plan; Timberwolf Ridge December 5, 2022 Page 4 of 11 The site plan has been developed in a configuration that mimics a river corridor, reminiscent of canyons that contract and expand along the middle fork of the Flathead River. While it is located at the ridge of hill, the river concept is also a nod to the history of the site where a now abandoned irrigation ditch used to provide water to the Grossweiler Dairy Farm. The density proposed on this site was done specifically to leave more open space by keeping building footprints small and leaving generous amounts of the site either undeveloped or developed as parkland. The main openspace and park amenities are located at the center of the site with the buildings' residents in mind. Exterior to these buildings, a path along Stillwater Road is being provided which will abut a linear park buffer. Paths and sidewalks will link the open space network and provide a mile plus loop for recreation and access to the City's multi use path systems. The open space will be maintained by the property management. e. The manner in which services will be provided such as water, sewer, storm water management, schools, roads, traffic management, pedestrian access, recreational facilities and other applicable services and utilities. The project will utilize the city of Kalispell sewer and water systems which are currently located along the northern and western boundaries. SEWER The sewer main from the current phase of the Starling PUD (under construction summer/fall 2022) includes a manhole to be located at its eastern access on Stillwater Road. Access points to this site will be lined up with this access and the sewer mains will be extended into this development to gravity flow to this manhole. There is more than adequate capacity as this main connects to the Westside Interceptor Sewer trunkline. WATER There is an existing 18" main located on the west side of Stillwater Road that can be tapped and extended into the site. A loop would be proposed from this connection in Stillwater road to an existing 8" main located within Timberwolf Parkway. Pressures based on Kalispell infrastructure map is shown at an average of 72 PSI which further support the capabilities of the site for taller buildings. The upper floor is proposed at a height of approximately 46 ft which can expect a head loss of about 20 PSI due to gravity. This remains within City of Kalispell Public Works Design Guidelines of 50-80 PSI. STORM Stormwater will be collected in the development streets and conveyed to one of several ponds proposed on the site. Soils onsite are anticipated to be amenable to infiltration with much of the area type A and B soils, however, there are opportunities for detention discharges to the south or east of the site along existing site flow paths. Ponds shown on map have been sized conservatively assuming low infiltration rates yielding the largest pond footprints. ACCFSS Timberwolf Ridge December 5, 2022 Page 5 of 11 The site is accessed via Stillwater Road and Timberwolf Ridge and is bordered by the US-93 bypass which will provide connection to the greater Kalispell area. The site does not directly access the bypass, but the Four Mile Drive On/Off Ramp is located approximately 0.5 miles to the south of the property. The two accesses to Stillwater Road and access to Timberwolf will be controlled via stop signs. The intersection of Timberwolf Parkway and Stillwater Road is planned to be upgraded to a roundabout should Timberwolf ever be connected through and appropriate ROW has been set aside for the footprint. A traffic impact study has been included with this application outlining the impacts of the development to the greater Kalispell transportation system. SCHOOLS The nearest elementary school is West Valley School which is located west of the site along Farm to Market Road (approximately 3.35 miles from the site). Glacier Highschool is located about 0.5 mile from the site. Flathead Community College can be quickly reached via Four Mile Drive and is located approximately 1.5 miles from the property. The development includes a multi -use path along Stillwater Road which connects to the existing path which currently terminates at the north side of Timberwolf Parkway. Initial discussions with the DNRC regarding the extension of a path have taken place, but no definitive answer has been provided. Theoretically, this development could provide a path along the future ROW of Timberwolf Parkway from Stillwater to Reserve. This would further aid students attending Glacier High School by providing another walking route. The development will be served by School District 7 and is located 1.5 miles west of Kalispell Fire Station No. 62 at 255 Old Reserve Drive. f. The relationship, beneficial or adverse, of the planned development project upon the neighborhood in which it is proposed to be established. The proposed PUD complements the surrounding neighborhoods further creating congruent but unique communities. The adjacent neighborhoods are apartments and dense single family to the west and southwest. To the north, there are government offices and the highschool. To the south is a large vacant DNRC property that will likely be developed in the future; it is currently zoned R-4 which is considered a high density single family development. To the east of the development is the US-93 bypass which is lined with apartments and high density residential. The planned development is in alignment with the growth policy and adjacent land uses. The nearest development to the west is the Starling PUD (a multifamily/single family development) and to the southwest the Stillwater Crossing PUD partially built out as 192 apartments and planned for 83 additional single family homes and a commercial node. It should be noted that high density residential developments exist all along the US-93 Bypass corridor. There is a substantial amount of precedence for a development of this type in this location. This proposal is being made at an optimal time where several other properties are in progress. This project will further improve the adjacent streets and multiuse path system. Timberwolf Ridge December 5, 2022 Page 6 of 11 g. How the plan provides reasonable consideration to the character of the neighborhood and the peculiar suitability of the property for the proposed use. High density residential is a remarkably well -suited use in this location given its location to city services, businesses, regional parks, schools, and transportation networks. The plan provides consideration to the character of the neighborhood which is currently being constructed around the property. The uses on adjacent developments are not identical to what is being proposed but are being constructed as high density residential. The development corresponds with the intent of the Growth Policy and Future Land Use Map, providing a residential interface. The site is located within half a mile of the US-93 Bypass and 1.5 miles from US-93 giving it excellent transportation connectivity and access to services. h. Where there are more intensive uses or incompatible uses planned within the project or on the project boundaries, how will the impacts of those uses be mitigated. The site is currently surrounded by vacant/agricultural land ( Section 36 DNRC PUD to the south and east), Office buildings (DEQ/DNRC to the north) or residential (Starling PUD to the West). The eastern side of the property abuts the US 93 bypass, with undeveloped agricultural land on the opposite side of the highway and high density residential of the western downtown neighborhood. The Future Land Use Map generally corresponds with this and shows the following land use adjacencies: • North: Urban Residential/Industrial • South: Suburban Residential • East: High Density Residential The proposed land uses of the subject property of single- and multi -family residential are directly compatible with the 2035 Growth Policy PLAN -IT (2017 Growth policy) and similar to adjacent developments while maintaining a unique character and product. The height of the proposed buildings and ground floor parking under the buildings makes a drastic reduction in foot print that would be required for this number of units. The buildings will be constructed into the existing ridge line to reduce the visual impacts of the height. Additionally, the buildings are set back from the road with a parklike buffer to reduce visual impacts from drivers and pedestrians using the path system. i. How the development plan will further the goals, policies and objectives of the Kalispell Growth Policy. Timberwolf Ridge December 5, 2022 Page 7 of 11 The development plan will meet the Land Use/Housing goal of the 2017 Kalispell Growth Policy which is to "provide an adequate supply and mix of housing that meets the needs of present and future residents in terms of cost, type, design, and location." Additionally, the following policies are met through the development: "Land Use/Housing Policies: 1. On larger tracts of land, creative design and a mix of housing types is encouraged within the overall density requirements to create more dynamic neighborhoods, to provide more open space, and to protect sensitive resource areas. 2. High -density residential neighborhoods should be developed at densities up to 20 units per acre, with some as high as 40 units per acre. An integrated development plan within a high -density neighborhood could include: a. Zero lot line and patio homes, with open spaces and common areas, b. Triplexes and Four-plexes, c. Multi -family, and d. Mixed uses. 3. A variety of housing types and compatible land uses are encouraged in residential areas and should be designed to fit scale and character of the neighborhood. Where necessary, developers should utilize the Planned Unit Development (PUD) process to craft development proposals that are both innovative and creative, while maintaining the integrity and values of the community." Additionally, the policy that notes, "city regulations should maintain incentives to provide for varied affordable housing types" is also met through this development, the proposed development is unique to the area and Flathead Valley but corresponds well with other unit types in various stages of construction in the area and with the larger region as it ties to the northern commercial center of Kalispell. Timberwolf Ridge December 5, 2022 Page 8 of 11 UMMM Zoning (Outline & Labe& sj b Growth FiAcy - Future Land Use P,b Roblic F oc d City UM its 1XISTIMITUrl, Figure 4: Surrounding Zoning Map Timberwolf Ridge December 5, 2022 Page 9 of 11 Include site plans, drawings and schematics with supporting narratives where needed that includes the following information: 1. Total acreage and present zoning classifications; zoning20.09 Acres currently unzoned being requested for annexation into City of Kalispell with initial '• 2. Zoning classification of all adjoining properties; North:p •. 4: R D 3. Density in dwelling units per gross acre; 4. Location, size, height, and number of stories for buildings and uses proposed for buildings; The building sizes and locations are shown on the layouts included in Part L. The buildings are proposed as three to five story buildings with under building parking on the first level and varying heights building the roof line up to the center or end of the buildings. The maximum height proposed is 53 feet and a variance is being requested as a part of this PUD application. 5. Layout and dimensions of streets, parking areas, pedestrian walkways and surfacing; The proposed PUD layout is attached and included with this application. This layout utilizes the City of Kalispell Standard for collector streets along the Stillwater Road Frontage with an 8-foot sidewalk on the development side. Internally, access roads will be private and utilize 26 ft street widths through parking lots. Pedestrian walkways internally will be primarily concrete. A layout of the proposed trail/path network within the PUD is included with the PUD Layout. 6. Vehicle, emergency and pedestrian access, traffic circulation and control; Timberwolf Ridge December 5, 2022 Page 10 of 11 Two accesses are provided off Stillwater Road (along the west) and one-off Timberwolf Parkway (on the north). All of the main roads have a minimum of 50 foot centerline radii aside from intersections which have 20 ft radii at the back of curb. 7. Location, size, height, color and materials of signs; Subdivision identification sign locations are shown on the plans. Colors and materials are yet to be defined. The site signage will meet the City's requirements as follows: "One sign not to exceed 24 square feet in area or two signs not to exceed 12 square feet each per exclusive entrance to a subdivision or tract. Such signs shall be restricted to the subdivision or development name and shall not exceed six feet in height. " 8. Location and height of fencing and/or screening; No fencing is proposed as a part of the development. Earthen landscape berms will be placed along perimeters to reduce roadway noise and create separation/screening for the buildings from the adjacent to Stillwater Road. No fencing is proposed. 9. Location and type of landscaping; A conceptual landscape plan has been included with the PUD. A final landscape plan will be produced during design development and submitted to parks and recreation for approval. 10. Location and type of open space and common areas; The site plan shows parks and trails along an open space network. The open space network is intended to provide amenities to residents within the development. Adjacent to the roadway, a larger openspace buffer has been left to aid in building scale and provide some buffer and a linear park feel between the roadway and the buildings. This will also directly connect to the existing multi use path system which extends north to Glacier Highschool and to the larger network throughout Kalispell along the US-93 Bypass. 11. Proposed maintenance of common areas and open space; The Apartment management will maintain and manage the common areas and open space. The apartment management will be responsible boulevard maintenance per City of Kalispell ordinance. 12. Property boundary locations and setback lines; Property boundaries are shown on the site plan. Timberwolf Ridge December 5, 2022 Page 11 of 11 13. Special design standards, materials and / or colors; Example renderings of proposed multi family buildings have been included with the application in part L. The intent is to provide high density residential units to reduce building footprints and preserve open space/view corridors. Draft CCRs have been included with this application with regulations that pertain to the architectural aesthetics for the property. 14. Proposed schedule of completions and phasing of the development, if applicable; It is expected that the project will be phased from Northwest to southeast with the areas adjacent to Stillwater Road to be the first phase of the project. This first phase would likely begin construction in fall of 2023 and be completed in the fall of 2024. The next phases would be anticipated to be done each following year, e.g. phase 2 would begin in 2025 but be dependent on demand and market conditions. A Phasing diagram has been included with the submittal in the PUD exhibits. 15. Covenants, conditions and restrictions; CC&Rs are in development and will be provided by the owner. A Draft is available in the application, Part "H". 16. Any other information that may be deemed relevant and appropriate to allow for adequate review. An annexation request has been included with this application along with a preliminary plat. The initial zoning being requested is RA-2 which corresponds with the growth policy map and intent. Development Services Department 201 1st Avenue East Kalispell, MT 59901 JA4,A]LISPEILIL Phone (406) 758-7940 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Email: planning(a)kalispell.com Website: www•kalispell.com Project Name Timberwolf Ridge Property Address 605 Stillwater Road NAME OF APPLICANT Timberwolf Ridge, LLC Applicant Phone (406) 249-5783 Applicant Address 3821 Lower Valley Road City, State, Zip Kalispell, MT 59901 Applicant Email Address jamesbarnett360@gmail.com IfTrot current owner, please attach a letter from the current owner authorizing the applicant to proceed with the application. OWNER OF RECORD Barnett, James Owner Phone Owner Address 3821 Lower Valley Rd City, State, Zip Columbia Falls, MT 59912 Owner Email Address CONSULTANT (ARCHITECT/ENGINEER) WGM Group Phone 406-756-4848 Address 431 1st Ave. West City, State, Zip Kalispell, MT, 59901 Email Address POINT OF CONTACT FOR REVIEW COMMENTS Mike Brodie (WGM) Phone 406-756-4848 Address 431 1 st Ave. West City, State, Zip Kalispell, MT, 59901 Email Address mbrodie@wgmgroup.com List ALL owners (any individual or other entity with an ownership interest in the property): Barnett, James Legal Description (please provide a full legal description for the property and attach a copy of the most recent deed): Parcel A of Certificate of Survey No. 16743, situated in the SW1A SW1A NW1A and NW1A NW1A SW1/4 of Section 36, Township 29 North, Range 22 West, P.M.M., Flathead County, MT M 6 Please initial here indicating that you have verified the description with the Flathead County Clerk and Recorder and that the description provided is in a form acceptable to record at their office. CFIIY7170r""Waw"%�44. KaLisnELL Check One: Present zoning of above property: Initial PUD proposal Amendment to an existing PUD Total gross acres of property: Development Services Department 201 1st Avenue East Kalispell, MT 59901 Phone (406) 758-7940 20.1 Acres Please provide the following information in a narrative format with supporting drawings or other format as needed (reference 27.19.020(3)): a. An overall description of the goals and objectives for the development of the project. b. In cases where the development will be executed in increments, a schedule showing the time within phase will be completed. c. The extent to which the plan departs from zoning and subdivision regulations including but not limited to density, setbacks and use, and the reasons why such departures are or are not deemed to be in the public interest; d. The nature and extent of the common open space in the project and the provisions for maintenance and conservation of the common open space; and the adequacy of the amount and function of the open space in terms of the land use, densities and dwelling types proposed in the plan; e. The manner in which services will be provided such as water, sewer, storm water management, schools, roads, traffic management, pedestrian access, recreational facilities and other applicable services and utilities. f. The relationship, beneficial or adverse, of the planned development project upon the neighborhood in which it is proposed to be established g. How the plan provides reasonable consideration to the character of the neighborhood and the peculiar suitability of the property for the proposed use. h. Where there are more intensive uses or incompatible uses planned within the project or on the project boundaries, how with the impacts of those uses be mitigated. i. How the development plan will further the goals, policies and objectives of the Kalispell Growth Policy. j. Include site plans, drawings and schematics with supporting narratives where needed that includes the following information: M. Total acreage and present zoning classifications; (2). Zoning classification of all adjoining properties; (3). Density in dwelling units per gross acre; (4). Location, size height and number of stories for buildings and uses proposed for buildings; (5). Layout and dimensions of streets, parking areas, pedestrian walkways and surfacing; (6). Vehicle, emergency and pedestrian access, traffic circulation and control; (7). Location, size, height, color and materials of signs; (8). Location and height of fencing and/or screening; (9). Location and type of landscaping; (10). Location and type of open space and common areas; (11). Proposed maintenance of common areas and open space; (12). Property boundary locations and setback lines (13). Special design standards, materials and / or colors; (14). Proposed schedule of completions and phasing of the development, if applicable; (15). Covenants, conditions and restrictions; (16). Any other information that may be deemed relevant and appropriate to allow for adequate review. If the PUD involves the division of land for the purpose of conveyance, a preliminary plat shall be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the subdivision regulations. Please note that the approved final plan, together with the conditions and restrictions imposed, shall constitute the zoning for the district. No building permit shall be issued for any structure within the district unless such structure conforms to the provisions of the approved plan. APPLICATION PROCESS (application must be received and accepted by the Kalispell Planning Department 35 days prior to the Planning Board Hearing) Application Contents: Development Services Department 2011st Avenue East Kalispell, MT 59901 Phone (406) 758-7940 1. Completed application form 2. Electronic copy of the application materials submitted. Either copied onto a disk or emailed to planning@kalispell.com (Please note the maximum file size to email is 20MB) 3. A bona fide legal description of the subject property and a map showing the location and boundaries of the property. *Note - verify with the Flathead County Clerk & Recorder that the legal description submitted is accurate and recordable. They can be reached at (406) 758-5526. 4. If proposal invloves annexation, pre plat orother action please submit appropriate application forms in addition to the PUD application 5. Application fee based on the schedule below, made payable to the City of Kalispell: Residential (no subdivision) $1,000 + $125 per acre Commercial(no subdivision) $1,200 + $100 per acre Residential (with subdivision) $1,000 + $100 per acre Commercial (with subdivision) $1,000 + $100 per acre I hereby certify under penalty of perjury and the laws of the State of Montana that the information submitted herein, on all other submitted forms, documents, plans or any other information submitted as a part of this application, to be true, complete, and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Should any information or representation submitted in connection with this application be incorrect or untrue, I understand that any approval based thereon may be rescinded, and other appropriate action taken. The signing of this application signifies approval for the Kalispell City staff to be present on the property for routine monitoring and inspection during the approval and development process. Applica ignature Date tZ VNViNON 1-13dSIWN and DOGI2l J�OAA081NII cw �3AOO-and 133HS -------------- �MWAWNJIRIM avow b3-Lvm-rlus ozz\�vlliwen5 ondr�si�o �\ova\��a oz,szbozz\�afad/'.x 3 1W `Tl3dSIWN and DOGI2l J�OAA 1081N11 m 3 W 3 3 NV-ld 81lS -and /33Hs Z Ur ,/ /./ / ) r , o r .. ,,,rr,,,, rr„ / riiiii ✓i i i�,,,r rr �, , , , rrrar. r i �� , . / »»1��>/ r � �� (/� r , / / + "�)J)yY , s�/„ , ✓ �/�j r yr/r. /�/%/fii //�d Ol %ir , lr ?1 i y r / , % /�� r /% /, „ ' , )1 P: ,r�// % / � / Ipf�i%ti% 1� �1rN✓ Ir ,, ✓' ,� �if 1'r ,1�)(`Ir� � �� ij r��I/✓:% y /„r�(,, ��p ((rrll�� ,,, „. r �i� / �'; 1 ✓ ,r;.:. „ / fJ�lf l�u(. , i,4+,�,. �il� i S r; �iY I��''%A(rr,,HY %l �il /�� n �' ° , > < ;. , � y /4 Pr,. /p rr // ,G%/ . / / �If✓ r r 1rY I , , , („/ , r ,, ,1 1W �/%' ��,, /�, 1 ��// r, /,,,r., ✓ / s,r,,i/ ri ,, ✓,,, r�f//r,// � ,r Jr' r /r! r,✓ dip; rl � l,p � /f /1 , r � �� , . �p 7 r , , „✓ „ i i , r,. � l/„J �" !r, � / �i r r P iii i r , r r � �/,,, r..,...r �lr r. � ,� .r;/.. r! ,,,,,, lf, � ir,/;.,,, ,,�/!�J .r �. ,✓,. ,,,, !u/p ;�/./f :.../ ,d � a r ra r ,, ail ,tin, r ��iiii/i ,✓ � r/ it ��r rlu 1 f✓< rb � ll/ ,' / //� ,r, , J� rf,.9,ry .'. r ✓:, � / / !ro�//�o" „r.. JIIYr y/i/r, ��I/��/�i�/�/ �,I � 1N. ,/� ��W r,r / I r „m, fe J �r�f�/ p �i�r m� /�,. // , ,r,, ru �r r ,,,, � / ..,,,. %a✓pii,�;: r , i r�,, � //��,/J /r , it rr , / ,-. ::� / ri 1 //// W„r , ,, : ,, ; , %; ,,� ,� ' rr,rJ% �/ C�� ;C, r�i� �! /l f x l „ ,:;✓" r " 1G './ ,r.�idrl� r -r,', �i r, ;,n,q /„ar' �,,, i,%i / 1 r� !,o "'��Jrrr,/>„ I��.i✓�", :,�� f,D„ / , ) r �; �/ , r � �l/, � I � �, . // � � �// �lrr� � l�✓/ d 1. �� / r � / ,.✓ / //f/ rr rr r � ,,, r� , :, � r ,i//d 1 xs ,rl" �... /� ( ) , r 1 r r / , �� r ✓ ✓ � / _ / r rrr:.. , , / �. ( / � . / r l r /, �� ✓ .<,, / rrr ///� r , , f r r. r / r u„ r/, � r / / .� � r,,,. � / �� r,. ,.._.,flu✓ u , r r� �� /r i % / /„ ,� l/. r:� , ,,.. �i ,�� ..p „ ,,,, r,/a �rVildG,.r ,. r./ r,,, ,:.,,, 1 r✓+;l rrr� r ✓� r/ri,lr�. V/i r.,// /%, �% � / ://�/Y,.. //%1 ,..:� /// �i J,d ,.,,,,... a., / ��/i// f %/„tf i,.,;f Ji, r 71 // 1 � J/or„ �,:,„ I ..� ,✓ ../ ,�I ,..,, �,., /pa / ,�/,.. ,/�„ �. /A.. ,..�fr�G..,, r,>l, r/ r/ r ,� r✓ � � _ r ✓, /, / .r�r, r r rr k�rr,1 r1/ / �/ ✓ r /, rrrr�r rrr / r 1 f / / r /✓k r/ r �/ / f � r / e r I i r / r / r / / / I / / r r / r err L 1, r I 1 / / /r r / / ! �r r I f r l p VNViNON 'Tl3dSIWN C'4 C' °°w and DOGI2l J�OAA081NII m ZD 0- SNOlil(INOO!DNIiSIX3-(ind i33HS LLI (IVOb N31VAA11l1S ozz\zviiiwens ond��si�o �\ova\��a oz\szbozz\�afad�'.x 3 'w 1W `Tl3dSIWN and DOGI2l J�OAA 081N11 m o �3 0- 3 W 3 3 NV-ld 81lS -and i33Hs o - - o z z w da m 17 I I � I I � I � I ` J i I - m t i I � ae /7 J — x =max aHOZl2i31VMllIlS � f I I I I I I I I I I ozz\�vlliwen5 ond��si�o �\ova\��a oz�szbozz\�afad�'.x 3 0 1W `Tl3dSIWN and DOGI2l J�OAA 1081N11 m 3 W 3 3 NV-ld JNISVHd -(ind i33Hs 0 0 z zw , w m I � I I � I I � I � I 11J1%1J1,,/ I Q ff r P ICI ��.�� n,, � � , / �r ��✓ � � ��, w� OVOH 2,GlvMlllis ---- I I I I I I I I I I I 1N'Tl3dSIWN and DOGI2l J�OAA081NII NV-ld kinun -and i33HS GVOH aGlvmlllis Development Services ,.� Department 201 1st Avenue East Phone (406) 758-7940 IS4,A]LISPEILIL Kalispell, )MT 75-794 MAJOR SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT Email: planning(a)kalispell.com Website: www•kalispell.com Project Name Timberwolf Ridge Property Address 605 Stillwater Road NAME OF APPLICANT Timberwolf Ridge, LLC Applicant Phone (406) 249-5783 Applicant Address 3821 Lower Valley Road City, State, Zip Kalispell, MT 59901 Applicant Email Address jamesbarnett360@gmail.com If not current owner, please attach a letter from the current owner authorizing the applicant to proceed with the application. OWNER OF RECORD Barnett, James Owner Phone Owner Address 3821 Lower Valley Rd City, State, Zip Columbia Falls, MT 59912 Owner Email Address CONSULTANT (ARCHITECT/ENGINEER) WGM Group Phone 406-756-4848 Address 431 1 st Ave. West City, State, Zip Kalispell, MT, 59901 Email Address POINT OF CONTACT FOR REVIEW COMMENTS Mike Brodie (WGM) Phone 406-756-4848 Address 431 1 st Ave. West City, State, Zip Kalispell, MT, 59901 Email Address mbrodie@wgmgroup.com List ALL owners (any individual or other entity with an ownership interest in the property): Barnett, James Legal Description (please provide a full legal description for the property and attach a copy of the most recent deed): Parcel A of Certificate of Survey No. 16743, situated in the SW1/4 SW1/4 NW1/4 and NW1/4 NW1/4 SW1/4 of Section 36, Township 29 North, Range 22 West, P.M.M., Flathead County, MT M B Please initial here indicating that you have verified the description with the Flathead County Clerk and Recorder and that the description provided is in a form acceptable to record at their office. M-,,qlmmmmmw" ANk MA GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBDIVISION: Number of lots or rental spaces 6 Total Acreage in subdivision 20.1 Total Acreage In lots 18.36 Minimum size of lots or spaces 112 Total Acreage In streets or roads 1.74 Maximum size of lots or spaces 164 Total acreage in parks, open spaces and/or common spaces PROPOSED USE(S) AND NUMBER OF ASSOCIATED LOTS/SPACES: Single Family Townhouse Mobile home/RV Park Commercial/Industrial Multi -family 6 Other APPLICABLE ZONING DESIGNATION & DISTRICT: RA-2/PUD ESTIMATE OF MARKET VALUE BEFORE IMPROVEMENTS: $2.000.000 Development Services Department 201 1st Avenue East Kalispell, MT 59901 Phone (406) 758-7940 PROPOSED EROSION/SEDIMENT CONTROL: SEE ATTCHED EXHIBIT ARE ANY SUBDIVISION VARIANCES REQUESTED? YES (YES/NO) If yes please complete a separate subdivision variance application APPLICATION PROCESS (application must be received and accepted by the Kalispell Planning Department 36 days prior to the Planning Board hearing) A pro -application meeting with the planning staff is required. 1. Completed preliminary plat application 2. Copy of pre -application meeting form and any required submittals listed on the form 3. One reproducible set of supplemental inibmnation, (See appendix A of the Subdivision Regulations) 4. One reduced size copy of the preliminary plat not to exceed 11"x17" in size 5. Electronic copy of the application materials, including the preliminary plat, either copied onto a disk or emailed to planning@kalispell.com (Please note the maximum file size to email is 20MB) 6. A bona fide legal description of the subject property and a map showing the location and boundaries of the property *Note - verify with the Flathead County Clerk & Recorder that the legal description submitted is accurate and recordable. They can be reached at (406) 758-5526. 7. Environmental Assessment (see appendix B in subdivision regulations) if applicable. 8. Application fee based on the schedule below made payable to the City of Kalispell: Major Subdivision $1,000 + $125 per lot Major Subdivision Resubmiftal $1,000 for each original lot unchanged add add $10 per lot for each lot re-designed/added add add $125 per lot Mobile Home Parks & Campgrounds 6 more more spaces $1,000 + $250 per space 5 or fewer spaces $400 + $125 per space Amended Preliminary Plat amendment to conditions only $400 base fee re-confgured proposed lots base fee + $40 per lot add additional lots or sublots base fee + $125 per lot I hereby certify under penalty of perjury and the laws of the State of Montana that the information submitted herein, on all other submitted forms, documents, plans or any other information submitted as a part of this application, to be true, complete, and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Should any information or representation submitted In connection with this application be incorrect or untrue, I understand that any approval based thereon may be rescinded, and other appropriate action taken. The signing of this application signifies approval for the Kalispell City_at�aff to be present on the property for routine monitoring and inspection during the approval and development process. ( VZ_:b11'0 V MNu `dNd1NOW I�IdSIWN o n. C , 3Ja12� ��OM2i38W11 m 3 Lu 3 Lu NVd ld-ld Al JVNIIN M2ld w a o i33Hs CD i 1:14 ael :A d III% d 12.05.2022 Mike Brodie, P.E. Senior Project Engineer WGM Group, Inc. 4W Environmental Assessment Timberwolf Ridge 0 PART I .......... PROPERT� DESCRIPTION Surface Water Locate on a plat overlay or sketch map: A. Any natural water systems such as streams, rivers, intermittent streams, lakes or marshes (also indicate the names and sizes of each). B. Any artificial water systems such as canals, ditches, aqueducts, reservoirs, and irrigation systems (also indicate the names, sizes and present uses of each). C. Time when water is present (seasonally or all year). D. Any areas subject to flood hazard, or in delineated 100-year floodplain. E. Describe any existing or proposed stream bank alteration from any proposed construction or modification of lake beds or stream channels. Provide information on location, extent, type and purpose of alteration, and permits applied for. closestThe , • area is nearlyone - to the southeasttheresmall wetlandfreshwater pond on the eastern edge of the Kidsports Facility. Further east and across the highway is the Stillwater Road (which the 1 00-year floodplain runs along). The Spring Creek freshwater is southwestapproximately one 2. Groundwater Using available data, provide the following information: A. The minimum depth to the water table or to the historic water table and identify dates when depths were determined. What is the location and depth of all aquifers which may be affected by the proposed subdivision? Describe the location of known aquifer recharge areas which may be affected. B. Describe any steps necessary to avoid depletion or degradation of groundwater recharge areas. There is no anticipated eNect on deep water aquifers in the vicinity as all existing site runoff either infiltrates or discharges to the unnamed stream southwest of the property. Typically, in the Flathead Valley water enters the deep -water aquifer in the foothills of the surrounding mountains; not through the valley floor where this project is located. Runoff fromthe project either - in yardsor park areas or be collected into a storm water collection system. Prior to entering any stormwater facilities, the stormwater will be treated in accordance with City of # Design and Construction Standards. After treatment, runoff will be discharged to the roadside ditch which subsequently enters the City's Regional Storm system and discharges into a stream at • -•- ••-• - • - .•- - r • - •- , -• as -a- part of development. All potable water will be supplied by ofKalispell's water system; no wells are proposed. There is an existing irrigation well located just outside the property that remains in use. Source:• • — Groundwater m• • • observations and findings. Source: Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology: https://www.mbmg.mtech.edu (GWIC) • - of •- design , • construction standards. Environmental Assessment 4W Timberwolf Ridge: 605 Stillwater Rd, Kalispell, MT 3. Topography,GeoUmgy and Soils A. Provide a map of the topography of the area to be subdivided, and an evaluation of suitability for the proposed land uses. On the rnop identify any areas with highly erodible soils or slopes in excess of 15% grade. Identify the lots or areas affected. Address conditions such as: iShallow bedrock ii Unstable n|Vpen iiiUnstable orexpansive soils ivExcessive slope The entire area encompassed is located on gentle slopes with no areas in excess of 15% grade. Soils on the site consists of different types of loam. These are typical soils in the Flathead Valley and standard erosion control measures as shown in the plans should suffice. Maps of the Natural Resources & Conservation Services (NRCS) Soils data as well as the United States Geological Survey (USGS) contour data have been included in Appendix A. Source: Natural Resources & Conservation Services Soils data Source: USGS 1/3 arc -second Contours data B. Locate onanoverlay orsketch map: i Any known hazards affecting the development which could result in property damage or personal injury duato: o. Falls, slides nrslumps — soil, rock, mud, snow. There are no areas on the site where any falls or slides would affect any propos structures. I b. Rock outcroppings o. Seismic The nearest known fault is the Mission Fault located relatively down the north/south centerline of Flathead lake. Earthquakes in this region are common below magnitudes of 2.5 but rare above 4.5. No change to the existing seismic activity could result as a part of this project. No major hazards exist on the site that could cause damage or personal injury due to seismic activity. Future building construction will consider precautionary methods required to mitigate seismic activity predicted and typical for the Flathead Valley. d. High water table Environmental W� 2 The well on the property and adjacent properties show the static water level to be greater than 120 feet below the ground water surface. Groundwater is not anticipated to have an effect on the site development, nor will the development impact the groundwater. C. Describe measures proposed to prevent or reduce these hazards. O. Describe the location and amount of any cut or fill more than three feet in depth. Indicate these cuts or fills on a plat overlay or sketch map. Where cuts or fills are necessary, describe plans to prevent erosion and to promote vegetation such as replacement of topsoil and grading. Minimal cuts and fills will be required in the Preliminary Plat area. An erosion and sedimentation control plan will be assembled with construction documents to prevent any sediment from leaving the site during construction and full site stabilization will be required prior to construction closeout. The remainder of the site will be adjusted to balance earthwork to limit import and export of material. 4. Vegetation A. [)naplat overlay ursketch map: i. Indicate the distribution of the major vegetation b/peo' such as marsh, gnomm|and. shrub, coniferous forest, deciduous forest, mixed forest. Environmental � 3 A map of land cover for the section along with a full description of vegetation species of concern for the township is provided in Appendix B. wv§��* line I ii. Identify the location of critical plant communities such as: a. Stream bank or shoreline vegetation I Lill rem, Mes M., Mra b. Vegetation on steep, unstable slopes BOTETIT07M. M#- c. Vegetation on soils highly susceptible to wind or water erosion d. Type and extent of noxious weeds There are no known noxious weeds on sight, however, standard measures prevent noxious weeds will be used. B. Describe measures to: i. Preserve trees and other natural vegetation e.g. locating roads and lot boundaries, planning construction to avoid damaging tree cover. Some trees will fall into open space and park areas, and these will be saved where possible. The majority of the trees line the existing farm area and much of them will cleared to accommodate the development. !,- Environmental Assessment 4W Timberwolf Ridge: 605 Stillwater Rd, Kalispell, MT 4I ii. Protect critical plant oornrnundUes e.g. keeping structural development away from these areas, setting areas aside for open space. The proposed development includes a connected network of open space and trails. critical plant communities are known on site. I Source: WGM Preliminary Plans Source: Montana Natural Heritage Program Species Snapshoi iii Prevent and cnn1nd graee, brush or forest fires e.g. green athpe, water supply, iv. Control and prevent growth of noxious weeds The prevention of noxious weeds is a requirement of the contractors through the construction standards for Montana Public Works. Upon completion of said improvements, it will then become the responsibility of the lot owners through the 5. Wildlife A. Identify species of fish and wildlife use the area affected by the proposed subdivision. Q-1 or -IS] Birds - Bald Eagle, Black Tern, Black -necked Stilt, Bobolink, Brown Creeper, Clark's Grebe Clark's Nutcracker, Evening Grosbeak, Ferruginous Hawk, Franklin's Gull, Golden Eagle, Gray -crowned Rosy -Finch, Great Blue Heron, Lewis's Woodpecker, Loggerhead Shrike, Northern Goshawk, Northern Hawk Owl, Peregrine Falcon, Pileated Woodpecker, Trumpeter Swan Environmental V� � Source: Montana Natural Heritage Program — Species Snapshol Source: WGM Group Field observations and preliminary plans. B. Onacopy of the preliminary plat oroverlay, identify known critical wildlife areas, such as big game winter range, calving areas and migration routes; riparian habitat and waterfowl nesting areas; habitat for rare or endangered species and wetlands. C. Describe proposed measures to protect or enhance wildlife habitat or to minimize degradation (e.g. keeping buildings and roads back from shorelines; setting aside wetlands aaundeveloped open apaca\. 6. Land Use A. Describe the existing historical use of the site. According to Montana Cadastral, the Subject Property is a single parcel, approximately 20.1 acres in size and is currently owned by Dakota Ridge, Inc. The land is taxed as non - qualified agricultural land. Also, the site is a part of the former Grossweiler Dairy Farm and is currently vacant land with some remnants of old buildings and agricultural activities from the previous owners. Source: Owner Source: MT Cadastral (http://svc.mt.gov/msI/mtcadastral) B. Describe any comprehensive plan recommendations and other land use regulations on and adjacent to the site. Is zoning proposed? Is annexation proposed? The property is currently zoned by the county as AG-80. Zoning adjacent to the site is shown in the image below. Annexation is proposed. Environmental W� 8 Source: City of Kalispell Interactive Planning Map (https://cityof kal ispell. maps. arcg is. com/) Source: WGM Preliminary Plans C. Describe the present uses of lands adjacent to or near the proposed development. Describe how the subdivision will affect access to any adjoining land and/or what measures are proposed to provide access. Bordering on the north edge of the project are buildings currently housing the Montana Department of Environmental Quality and Flathead County's E-9-1-1 Center. Except for the buildings to the north of the site, areas to all sides of the project are undeveloped farmland. The City of Kalispell Growth Policy (future land use) designates the following land use adjacencies: * North & East: Urban Mixed Use ki/est: Ur'i Resi4eutti.21 Cii—h Policy F r, Land W, N,91 r, 1, :d U�UWUI , Ji -1 ., ,, ; 11,1,iii `V ,,: U- III H gir D—, ly R,, din,,,[ U,bnii, li,, d-T e1 Si,l—,l—, R—d-1 ,I C,y A p— "A Environmental Assessment 4W 7 Timberwolf Ridge: 605 Stillwater Rd, Kalispell, MT I O. Describe the basis of the need for the subdivision. How much development of similar nature is, or is not, available in the area? The City of Kalispell is rapidly expanding and there is a significant need for affordable and workforce housing throughout the valley. This project is targeted at the current market. The proposed development will be complimentary to the surrounding land E. Describe any health orsafety hazards onornear the subdivision (mining activity,high voltage lines, gas lines, agricultural and farm activities, shooting ranges, septage disposal operations, etc.) Any such conditions should be accurately described and their origin and location identified. F. Describe any on -site uses creating a nuisance (unpleasant odor, unusual noises, dust, smoke, etc.). Any such conditions should be accurately described and their origin and location identified. There are no significant nuisances anticipated by the proposed residential and commercial development of the site. There will be construction -related dust and noise when the the extent possible. ��/ ��~�� ^ ��^� �-�� PROBABLE IMPA C Tocw Summarize the effects of the proposed subdivision on each topic below. Provide responses to the following questions and provide reference materials as required: 1' Effects on Agriculture A. |athe proposed subdivision orassociated improvements located onornear prime farmland orfarmland ofstatewide importance as defined bythe Natural Resource Conservation Service? If so, identify each area on a copy of the preliminary plat. Most Qfthe project 8heksf@mn|8ndOfimpOrt8nCeOrphmefarm|and ifirrigated Qs3howOn the map below. Environmental W� 8 B. Describe whether the subdivision would remove from production any agricultural or timberland. The Subject Property is currently vacant. There are noted historical uses of this site including agriculture, however, the proposed use (multi -family housing) would not remove from production agricultural or timberland. (The site is currently zoned as AG-80 but will be rezoned to RA-2.) C. Describe possible conflicts with nearby agricultural operations, e.0..residential development creating problems for moving livestock, operating farm machinery, operating septage disposal aiUya, maintaining water supplies, controlling vvaada or applying pesticides; agricultural operations suffering from vandalism, uncontrolled pets or damaged fences. O. Describe possible nuisance problems which may arise from locating a subdivision near agricultural or timber lands. E. Describe effects the subdivision would have on the value of nearby agricultural lands. The addition of this subdivision may increase the value of surrounding agricultural land. It is possible that this development could serve as a catalyst for other PUDs located on nearby properties per the City of Kalispell Growth Plan. 2. Effects onAgricultural Water User Facilities A. Describe uunOiutm the subdivision would create with agricultural water user facilities, e.g. residential development creating problems for operating and maintaining irrigation systems, Environmental V� g and whether agricultural water user facilities would be more subject to vandalism or damage because of the subdivision. B. Describe possible nuisance problems which the subdivision would generate with regard to agricultural water user facilities, e.g. safety hazards to residents or water problems from irrigation ditches, head gates, siphons, sprinkler systems, or other agricultural water user facilities. 3. Effects on Local Services A. Indicate the proposed use and number of lots or spaces in each: Residential,• lots Types •i multiple family structures and number of each,e.g. p s • apartments, 69 units in 5 of the buildings, 53 units and a clubhouse in 1 (one) buildin Planned unit development (No. of units): 398 units Commercial or Industrial: B. Describe the additional or expanded public services and facilities that would be required of local government or special districts to serve the subdivision. It is anticipated that no additional s- be required to serve the proposed • and mixed -density development. The City is currently constructing a water transmission main to serve this area, and previously constructed the West Side Interceptor Sewer Transmission main with the purpose of serving developments in this area. Describe additional costs that would result for services such as roads, bridges, law enforcement, parks and recreation, fire protection, water, sewer and solid waste systems, schools or busing, (including additional personnel, construction, and maintenance costs). Who would bear these costs, e.g. all taxpayers within the jurisdiction, people within special taxing districts, or users of a service? Additional services are not anticipated for this development, but all property owners • residents living in the city will pay city taxes. iii. Can the service providers meet the additional costs given legal or other constraints, e.g. statutory ceilings on mill levies or bonded indebtedness? iv. Describe off -site costs or costs to other jurisdictions may be incurred, e.g. development of water sources or construction of a sewage treatment plant; costs borne by the municipality. Environmental Assessment 10 4V Timberwolf Ridge: 605 Stillwater Rd, Kalispell, MT to which is being proposed. C. Describe how the subdivision allows existing services, through expanded use, to operate more efficiently, or makes the installation or improvement of services feasible, e.g. allow installation of a central water system, or upgrading a rural road. • ••- • • • -. • ! !ile V rt. planned extension. A•• • ! water availabilityy!! • Stillwater Road r • Timberwolf Parkway - development. D. What are the present tax revenues received from the unsubdivided land? i. By the County ii. By the municipality if applicable iii. By the school(s) According to 2021 tax records, the present tax revenue for the unsubdivided land includes the following: • County Functions $91.9 • Municipality $0.00 • Education $230.49 E. Provide the approximate revenues received by each above taxing authority if the lots are reclassified, and when the lots are all improved and built upon. Describe any other taxes that would be paid by the subdivision and into what funds. It is unclear what the value of the constructed homes will be, however, for assumption purposes, - multifamily buildings generate $700 per per -means improved property will generate $278,600 in tax revenue annually. This does not include the tax revenue that will be generated by the clubhouse improvements or utility impact • .•'. .' .0 1 r F. Would new taxes generated from the subdivision cover additional public costs? G. How many special improvement districts would be created which would obligate local government fiscally or administratively? Are any bonding plans proposed that would affect the local government's bonded indebtedness? Environmental Assessment4V 11 Timberwolf Ridge: 605 Stillwater Rd, Kalispell, MT No special improvement districts are proposed as a part of this preliminary plat and nit bonding plans are specifically proposed with this property. MEMO 11=4 4^ Effects on the Historic or Natural Environment A. Describe and locate onaplat overlay orsketch map known orpossible histohc, ooeonhu|ogico|, archaeological or cultural aihan, ntnuctunoa, or objects that may be affected by the proposed subdivision. B. How would the subdivision affect surface and groundwater, soils, slopes, vegetation, historical or archaeological features within the subdivision or on adjacent land? Describe plans to protect these sites. Would any stream banks or lake shorelines be altered, streams rechanneled or any surface water contaminated from sewage Ureatmantaystema.run-offoanying sedimentation, orconcentration ofpesticides orfertilizers? No stream banks or channels will be altered as a part of this development. All proposed units will be connected to the City of Kalispell's water and sewer system; no sewage treatment systems are proposed on site. All runoff from the site will be detained and treated according to City of Kalispell and DEQ standards, and discharged at predeveloped rates. Pesticides and fertilizer used for residential the treatment system and storm water detention. Kalispell and Flathead County Public documents. Would groundwater supplies likely be contaminated or depleted as a result of the subdivision? No wells are proposed as a part of this project; the groundwater will not be impacteI by this development. Additionally, there are no subsurface discharges such as drain fields present on the site. The completed development will be connected to City of Kalispell Water and Sewer. iii Would construction of roads or building sites require cuts and fills on steep slopes or cause erosion on unstable, erodible soils? Would soils be contaminated by sewage treatment systems? Environmental V� 13 There are no steep slopes on the existing property. Additionally, there are no existing or proposed onsite sewage treatment systems. iv. Describe the impacts that removal of vegetation would have on soil erosion, bank, or shoreline instability. V. Would the value of significant historical, visual, or open space features be reduced or eliminated? No. The existing site is farmland along the north edge of the property; there is no significant historical value associated with the property. Landscaping will be included as a •rl of the open space developments # will improvesite from . visual perspective. • - 11 1'. - 1*, vi. Describe possible natural hazards the subdivision could be subject to, e.g., natural hazards such as flooding, rock, snow or land slides, high winds, severe wildfires, or difficulties such as shallow bedrock, high water table, unstable or expansive soils, or excessive slopes. No natural hazardsout of the ordinary are expected on this property. development is proposed outside of the flood plain, there are no large hillsides present in the vicinity where rocks or snow could slide from, it is not located in a historically windy area, there are no adjacent forests susceptible to wildfires, and a 5*6 for constructing on • Kalispell and Flathead County Public documents. C. How would the subdivision affect visual features within the subdivision or on adjacent land? Describe anticipated efforts to visually blend the proposed development with the existing environment, e.g. use of appropriate building materials, colors, road design, underground utilities, and revegetation of earthworks. The subdivision will be constructed to provide a similar feel. other residential• • area.in the All roads• utilities will •- constructed to City of Kalispell•.r a • with the open space included and the associated landscaping. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions's will be written to help ensure a uniform and aesthetically pleasing residential setting. 5. Effects on Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat Environmental Assessment 13 4V Timberwolf Ridge: 605 Stillwater Rd, Kalispell, MT A. Describe what impacts the subdivision or associated improvements would have on wildlife areas such as big game wintering range, migration routes, nesting areas, wetlands, or important habitat for rare or endangered species. The vast majority of the site is currently used for agriculture and no endangered species are typically found in these• of properties in this ar- • - • * Onsite visits and informationobtained from the City of • and Flathead County Public documents. B. Describe the effect that pets or human activity would have on wildlife. It is anticipated that all pets within the proposed subdivision will be controlled through the implementation of fencing or kennel areas. Dogs or cats at -large will not be tolerated within the proposed development. Flathead 6. Effects on the Public Health and Safety A. Describe any health or safety hazards on or near the subdivision, such as natural hazards, lack of water, drainage problems, heavy traffic, dilapidated structures, high pressure gas lines, high voltage power lines, or irrigation ditches. These conditions, proposed or existing, should be accurately described with their origin and location identified on a copy of the preliminary plat. There are no health or safety hazards on the subject property aside from Bonneville Pow Administration's (BPA) easement for high voltage lines that pass by the southeast corner the property (not through). Safety concerns have been discussed with BPA and the main concern is that development underneath the lines be limited in nature and limit long term exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF). There are no concerns about EMFs outside th BPA easement depicted on plans. B. Describe how the subdivision would be subject to hazardous conditions due to high voltage lines, airports, highways, railroads, dilapidated structures, high pressure gas lines, irrigation ditches, and adjacent industrial or mining uses. C. Describe land uses adjacent to the subdivision and how the subdivision will affect the adjacent land uses. Identify existing uses such as feed lots, processing plants, airports or industrial firms that could be subject to lawsuits or complaints from residents of the subdivision. INTO MOO Wins Environmental Assessment Timberwolf Ridge: 605 Stillwater Rd, Kalispell, MT 14 O. Describe public health or safety hazards, such as dangerous traffic, fire conditions, or contamination of water supplies that would be created by the subdivision. 0 PART /I/ �r�O TYr IMPA �~�T R ORT Provide a community impact report containing a statement of estimated number of people coming into the area as a result of the subdivision, anticipated needs of the proposed subdivision for public facilities and services, the increased capital and operating cost to each affected unit of local government. Provide responses to each of the following questions and provide reference materials as required. 1' Education and Busing A. Describe the available educational facilities that would serve this subdivision. The project is located in the Glacier High School district and in the West Valley elementary school and middle school districts. B. Estimate the number of school children that will beadded by the proposed subdivision. In Flathead County there is an estimated 2.5 persons per household, with roughly 22% 0 Flathead County residents under the age of 18. This translates to approximately 0.55 children under 18 per household. There are 150 units proposed in Phase 1, and at full occupancy, this would translate to 83 children. MIUMMOTAUFROM Provide o statement from the administrator of the affected school ovmtam indicating whether the increased enrollment can be accommodated by the present personnel and facilities and by the existing school bus system. If not, asUnno&a the increased expenditures that would be necessary to do so. Glacier High School has approximately 1367 students and 77 teachers per current google data. If all 83 students attended glacier high this would raise the student to teacher ratio of 18:1 to 19:1. West Valley School has approximately 412 students and 26 teachers with a student teacher ratio of 16:1. If all 83 children attended West Valley School, this would raise this ratio 19:1. Environmental � 1� Additional information will be provided upon completion of the Preliminary Plat and in the design stages of the project. 2. Roads and Maintenance A. Estimate how much daily traffic the subdivision, when fully occupied, will generate on existing atnaata and arterials. A full Traffic Impact study has been included with this preliminary plat and PUD submittal in Part H: Traffic Impact Study. B. Describe the capability of existing and proposed roads to safely accommodate this increased traffic. A full Traffic Impact study has been included with this preliminary plat and PUD submittal in Part H: Traffic Impact Study. C. Describe increased maintenance problems and increased cost due to this increase in No increased maintenance aside from normal wear and tear to roads is anticipated. A in Part H: Traffic Impact Study. O. Describe proposed new public or private access roads including: i. Measures for disposing of storm run-off from streets and roads. /\storm water collection system will be installed in all the roads to collect and convey storm water runoff from roads to either retention or detention ponds. Full extent Ufstorm water system will be assessed when design takes place. Type ofroad surface and provisions tobmmade for dust. All roads will beasphalt and constructed tOCity OfKalispell Standards. VVGM Preliminary Plans City OfKalispell Standards for Design and Construction iii. Facilities for streams ordrainage crossing (n.g.culverts, bhdges). iv. Seeding of disturbed areas. Source: WGM Preliminary Plans Source: City of Kalispell Standards for Design and Construction Environmental W� 18 E. Describe the closing or modification of any existing roads. F. Explain xvhv rood access was not provided within the subdkvisk)n, if access to any individual lot is directly from arterial streets or roads. G. |ayear-round access bvconventional automobile over legal hgavailable to the subdivision and to all lots and oornrnon facilities within the subdivision? Identify the owners of any private property over which access to the subdivision will be provided. Access will be maintained via the subdivision roads year-round to allow residential and postal service access along with BPA access to their towers and lines. H. Estimate the cost and completion date ofthe system, and indicate who will pay the cost of installation, maintenance and snow removal. This has yet to be determined. If the roads are turned over to the City of Kalispell, the owner will pay for the installation and the city will own and maintain the roads within the 3. Water, Sewage, and Solid Waste Facilities & Briefly describe the water supply and sewage treatment systems to beused inserving the proposed subdivision, a.g. methods, capacities, locations. Water and sewage systems will be provided by the developer and turned over to City Kalispell Public works. The City of Kalispell is currently constructing a sewer system t collect from the west side of the valley (the West Side Interceptor Project). This projec will include its own wastewater conveyance system to be connected as a p art of this treatment plant on the south end of the City. Source: City of Kalispell West Side Interceptor Plans and Four Mile Drive Transmission Main Plans B. Provide information on estimated cost of the nvatem, who will bear the ooats, and how the system will be financed. Environmental V� 17 The costs will be covered by the developer and investors. Upon completion and approval, the City of Kalispell will assume ownership of the water system and sewage conveyance system. Order of Magnitude Costs for main extensions (services not included): Water: $500,000 Sewer: $400,000 C. Where hook-up to an existing system is proposed, describe estimated impacts on the existing system, and show evidence that permission has been granted to hook up to the existing system. NOT, Nil I W 0i 0111.1f., "_ T -1 101 �9110TIIUII_ j•T AU1161U116 U1 LHUIC7776rMMMAZA PIVIK; 11111"aLUI 611.fp�lj`aliu zsunwve coiiecul systems. Until further engineering is completed it is unknown the extent of water line extension that is required to provide proper water pressure for the subdivision. Howev it is ounderstanding that sufficient capacity is available to serve all proposed development. I ur Wastewater from the proposed lots will flow through the new wastewater collection system and tie into the City of Kalispell's West Side Interceptor; a project designed specifically to collect and convey wastewater from this end of the valley and to promote City growth. It is our understanding that there is sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposed development. Permission to extend the City's water and sewer cannot be granted until detailed plans ..nd specifications have been reviewed and approved by the City and the Montana Department of Environmental Quality. Source: WGM Group — Onsite visits and information obtained from the City of Kalispell ind Flathead County Public Documents. D. All water supply and sewage treatment plans and specifications will be reviewed and approved by the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) and should be submitted using the appropriate DEQ application form. Not Applicable, no water supply systems or sewer treatment systems are proposed. Prior to completion, all water and sewer plans will be submitted to the DEQ and the City #f Kalispell for comment and approval of proposed extensions and connections to the City of Kalispell water and wastewater systems. b-01#11,1 K&42 rul orm a I I I m a Iwo] 0 ffi�� E. Describe the proposed method of collecting and disposing of solid waste from the development. "A Environmental Assessment 18 4V Timberwolf Ridge: 605 Stillwater Rd, Kalispell, MT I F. If use of an existing collection system or disposal facility is proposed indicate the name and location of the facility. The City of Kalispell Public works department will provide garbage collection and disposal. This service is included in property taxes that will result as a part of the built - out development. 4. Fire and Police Protection A. Describe the fire and police protection services available hothe residents ofthe proposed subdivision including number of personnel and number of vehicles or type of facilities for: Fire protection -- is the proposed subdivision in an existing fire district? If not, will one bnformed orextended? Describe what fire protection procedures are planned? The proposed project is located within the City of Kalispell Fire Department Response Area. It will be connected to the City of Kalispell's public water system and fire hydrants will be provided throughout the subdivision. Kalispell has a full - service fire department staff available 24 hours a day, seven days a week. As a part of subdivision approval of the water system, Public Works and the Fire Marshall will review the sizing pressure and location to the hydrants needed to serve the development. Multifamily buildings will require fire service lines but will need to be sized based on demand which has yet to be determined. Fire Station 62 is located in North Kalispell on Old Reserve Drive and is less than a two-mile drive away from the subject property. Source: City of Kalispell Fire Department website and City of Kalispell Desicl Standards I Law Enforcement protection —is the proposed subdivision within the jurisdiction of a County Sheriff or municipal policy department? The City of Kalispell Police department will assume jurisdiction of the proposeli development once it is annexed into the city limits. Source: City of Kalispell Police Source: Kalispell Building and Planning Department GIS B. Can the fire and police protection service needs of the proposed subdivision bemet by present personnel and facilities? If not, describe the additional expenses that would be necessary to make these services adequate, and who would pay the costs? Environmental V� 1Q The City of Kalispell should be adequately staffed to accommodate the development. As this project will be incorporated into the city, the additional police service would be covered by City of Kalispell. 5. Parks and Recreation Facilities A. Describe park and recreation facilities to be provided within the proposed subdivision and other recreational facilities that will serve the subdivision. A total of 5.40 acres of open space/park area has been included as a part of the layout. The parks and open spaces are included in the Multifamily lots, without a separate lot designation. Those parks are broken out as follows: Central Park 1.94 Acr Western Linear Park 0.85 Acre Eastern Linear Park 1. 17 Acre - Northern Linear Park 0.84 Acre. Southern Linear Park 0.60 Acrell Open space and park space has been designated throughout the development. The central piece of the development is served by a 1.94-acre central park. On the east side of the site, the development includes a 1. 1 7-acre linear park. An additional 0.60-acre pocket park is at the southwest corner of the site and on the north side of the multi -family residential site there is another 0.84 acre linear park. A 0.85 linear park connect the southern and northern parks around the outside of the multifamily buildings. The specific types of amenities included with these open space areas have yet to be determined, but will include picnic tables, playgrounds, benches, and landscaping. The development also includes a walking path linking the open space areas and access to the Bonneville Power Easement where it is anticipated a future trail system will be constructed. B. List other parks and recreation facilities or sites in the area and their approximate distance from the site. miles, also to the southeast. C. |fcash-in-lieuof parkland isproposed, state the purchase price per acre or current market value (values stated must be no more than 12 months old). The property was roughly valued at $218,000/28.2 acres or $7,730/acre. The intention is to provide adequate amenities to account for any deficiencies in park area. The developer plans to install a clubhouse ($150,000) to serve the residences, playground equipment ($15,000+), benches ($500), Picnic Tables ($600). Specifics will be determined during design and landscape planning. Environmental V� 2O 6. Payment for Extension of Capital Facilities A. Indicate how the subdivider will pay for the cost ofextending capital facilities resulting from expected impacts directly attributable to the subdivision. The developer will use a combination of investors and (or) construction loans from lending institutions to raise the capital to build the infrastructure required for the planrvee. unit development. Environmental W� 21 Timberwolf Ridge Environmental Assessment ,3080 r,P60 ax, 0 0.04 0.07 0.15 0.22 3066 0.3 ■ Miles lali¢.d o<c�°�e^rerc,n a"1r Od l a,„ TIMBERWOLF RIDGE,,,), Gla`CONTOUR MAP Glacier (High School Bluebell P y IIII � IIIL'';: www.wgmgroup.com LOC: Flathead PROJ MGR: Brodie TR: 29N 22W DRAWN BY: Cochran BASE: ESRITopo PROJ: 220425 FILE: Timberwolf_Ridge DATE: 7/27/2022 This is not a legally recorded map or survey. WGM does not guarantee the accuracy, current status, or completeness of the material contained herein and is not responsible for any misuse/misrepresentation of this information or its derivatives. This graphic representation is for general planning purposes only. V reelll Timberwolf Ridge Environmental Assessment FNi 0 1 TAN A Natural Heritage - 11L Program W/ A program of the Montana State Library's Natural Resource Information System Land Cover Summarized by: 029NO22WO36 (Township/ Section) Latitude L a ngit ude �,3.22531 -124.3335S �3. 24 133 - 124. 3 5 2136 WGir,assdaii,"W Ak)iintaiinie, Girwifmlaincl fli . � Rocky Mountain Lower Montane, Foothill, and ValleyGrassland 300lo(194 This grassland system of the northern Rocky Mountains is found at lower montane to foothill elevations in mountains and valleys throughout Acres) Montana. These grasslands are floristically similar to Big Sagebrush Steppe but are defined by shorter summers, colder winters, and young soils derived from recent glacial and alluvial material. They are found at elevations from 548 - 1,650 meters (1,800-5,413 feet). In the lower montane zone, they range from small meadows to large open parks surrounded by conifers; below the lower treeline, they occur as extensive foothill and valley grasslands. Soils are relatively deep, fine -textured, often with coarse fragments, and non -saline. Microphytic crust may be present in high -quality occurrences. This system is typified by cool -season perennial bunch grasses and forbs (>25%) cover, with a sparse shrub cover (<10%). Rough fescue (Festuca campestris) is dominant in the northwestern portion of the state and Idaho fescue (Festuca idahoensis) is dominant or co -dominant throughout the range of the system. Bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata) occurs as a co -dominant throughout the range as well, especially on xeric sites. Western wheatgrass (Pascopyrum smithii) is consistently present, often with appreciable coverage (>10%) in lower elevation occurrences in western Montana and virtually always present, with relatively high coverages (>250/o), on the edge of the Northwestern Great Plains region. Species diversity ranges from a high of more than 50 per 400 square meter plot on mesic sites to 15 (or fewer) on xeric and disturbed sites. Most occurrences have at least 25 vascular species present. Farmland conversion, noxious species invasion, fire suppression, heavy grazing and oil and gas development are major threats to this system. mu o" 111,11h"Jill"nall"i II.aainI I se a Acr ospa ii,u IV tit ar', Pasture/Ha 2411/o(153 These agriculture lands typically have perennial herbaceous cover (e.g. regularly -shaped plantings) used for livestock grazing or the production Acres) of hay. There are obvious signs of management such as irrigation and haying that distinguish it from natural grasslands. Identified CRP lands are included in this land cover type. 11111tir,non iiru ILar rui 11,]Jevelo,11:redl commercial I Industrial 22% (144 Businesses, industrial parks, hospitals, airports; utilities in commercial/industrial areas. Acres) 111"IL111111allI ILa iivl IJse Deelollaedl IN Developed, Open _ pac 11%(71 Vegetation (primarily grasses) planted in developed settings for recreation, erosion control, or aesthetic purposes. Impervious surfaces account Acres) for less than 20% of total cover. This category often includes highway and railway rights of way and graveled rural roads. h I1 l.0 u n I r i ii Lairicl Ilse �feve 11loIp:�e��.� - Other Roads 6% (40 County, city and or rural roads generally open to motor vehicles. Acres) I6h"iiuumuu ILaiiuueil 9iDse Ds„ vs. IVojji!�e d . Mayor Roads 6% (35 U.S. and State Highways that are not part of the National Highway System (NHS) Interstate network. This category includes entrance and exit Acres) ramps to NHS Interstate highways. Additional Limited Land Cover 1% (6 Acres) Low Intensity Residential <1% (0 Acres) f Alpine -Montane wet Meadow <1% (0 Acres) Rocky Mountain -Montane -Foothill Deciduous Shrubland Page 2 of 3 Introduction to Land Cover Land Use/Land Cover is one of 15 Montana Spatial Data Infrastructure framework layers considered vital for making statewide maps of Montana and understanding its geography. The layer records all Montana natural vegetation, land cover and land use, classified from satellite and aerial imagery, mapped at a scale of 1:100,000, and interpreted with supporting ground -level data. The baseline map is adapted from the Northwest ReGAP (NWGAP) project land cover classification, which used 30m resolution multi -spectral Landsat imagery acquired between 1999 and 2001. Vegetation classes were drawn from the Ecological System Classification developed by NatureServe (Comer et al. 2003). The land cover classes were developed by Anderson et al. (1976). The NWGAP effort encompasses 12 map zones. Montana overlaps seven of these zones. The two NWGAP teams responsible for the initial land cover mapping effort in Montana were Sanborn and NWGAP at the University of Idaho. Both Sanborn and NWGAP employed a similar modeling approach in which Classification and Regression Tree (CART) models were applied to Landsat ETM+ scenes. The Spatial Analysis Lab within the Montana Natural Heritage Program was responsible for developing a seamless Montana land cover map with a consistent statewide legend from these two separate products. Additionally, the Montana land cover layer incorporates several other land cover and land use products (e.g., MSDI Structures and Transportation themes and the Montana Department of Revenue Final Land Unit classification) and reclassifications based on plot -level data and the latest NAIP imagery to improve accuracy and enhance the usability of the theme. Updates are done as partner support and funding allow, or when other MSDI datasets can be incorporated. Recent updates include fire perimeters and agricultural land use (annually), energy developments such as wind, oil and gas installations (2014), roads, structures and other impervious surfaces (various years): and local updates/improvements to specific ecological systems (e.g., central Montana grassland and sagebrush ecosystems). Current and previous versions of the Land Use/Land Cover layer with full metadata are available for download at the Montana State Library's Geographic Information Clearinghouse Within the report area you have requested, land cover is summarized by acres of Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3 Ecological Systems. Literature Cited Anderson, J.R. E.E. Hardy, J.T. Roach, and R.E. Witmer. 1976. A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 964. Comer, P., D. Faber-Langendoen, R. Evans, S. Gawler, C. Josse, G. Kittel, S. Menard, M. Pyne, M. Reid, K. Schulz, K. Snow, and J. Teague. 2003. Ecological systems of the United States: A working classification of U.S. terrestrial systems. NatureServe, Arlington, VA. Page 3 of 3 Timberwolf Ridge Environmental Assessment M 0 N T A N A NaturalHefiotaW Prram 1515 East 6th Avenue Helena, MT 59620 (406) 444-5363 SpeciesAll Montana us found in Township: 027N020W ILS that are MT Status Species of Concern or Special Status Species Suggested Citation Format: Custom Field Guide from /SpeciesSnapshot for (insert the title text above to indicate the filters you selected). Retrieved on 7/1812022. KI—ft J Offline Field Guide Note: This PDF version of the Montana Field Guide is intended to assist in offline identification and field work. It is not intended to replace the online Field Guide, as that version contains more information and is updated daily. For the most up-to-date information on Montana species, please visit FieldGuide.mt.gov The Montana Natural Heritage Program is part of the Montana State Library's Natural Resource Information System. Since 1985, it has served as a neutral and non -regulatory provider of easily accessible information on Montana's species and biological communities to inform all stakeholders in environmental review, permitting, and planning processes. The program is part of NatureServe, a network of over 80 similar programs in states, provinces, and nations throughout the Western Hemisphere, working to provide current and comprehensive distribution and status information on species and biological communities. Natural Heritage ��a�e p NW Prog—Library IAii�iiF:v cern 4 s3 XN JED ;CN2-3 General Description Grizzly Bears have a massive head with a prominent nose, rounded inconspicuous ears, small eyes, short tail and a large, powerful body (Pasitschnaik-Arts 1993). The facial profile is concave and there is a noticeable hump above the shoulders. The claws on the front feet of adults are about 4 inches long and slightly curved. Grizzly Bears range widely in color and size. The most prevalent coloration of Grizzly Bears in Montana is medium to dark brown underfur, brown legs, hump and underparts, with light to medium grizzling on the head and back and a light patch behind the front legs. Other forms, lighter or darker with varying levels of grizzled hair patches, occur in lesser numbers. Although extremely variable depending on the season, adults are around 185 centimeters long (Foresman 2012) and weigh around 200 kilograms in males and 130 kilograms in females (Kasworm and Manley 1988). Range �->/aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaiiaaaaaaaaiiiai # Observations: 2419 9,J1,)ii)itted C)L�s IDy kloiitfi 40 S+at 200 au ----- -- l 9. Dia nostic Characteristics ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Adult Grizzly Bears differ from American Black Bears (Ursus americanus) in being larger and by having a hump above the shoulders, a concave (rather than straight or convex) facial profile, shorter and more rounded ears, a rump lower than the shoulder hump, and longer, less curved claws usually evident in the tracks. Identification can be difficult at times and Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks has developed an Online Bear ID Test to help people better distinguish between American Black Bears and Grizzly Bears. Habitat In Montana, Grizzly Bears primarily use meadows, seeps, riparian zones, mixed shrub fields, closed timber, open timber, sidehill parks, snow chutes, and alpine slabrock habitats. Habitat use is highly variable between areas, seasons, local populations, and individuals (Servheen 1983, Craighead and Mitchell 1982, Aune et al. 1984). Historically, the Grizzly Bear was primarily a plains species occurring in higher densities throughout most of eastern Montana. M1 ;CN3 General Description The Hoary Bat is a large lasurine (20 to 35 g) with long pointed wings and heavily -furred interfemoral membrane. Pelage overall is frosted or hoary (mixed brownish and grayish with white -tipped hairs, wrist and shoulder patches whitish), yellowish on the throat, forearm length about 46 to 55 mm. Ears are short and rounded, rimmed in dark brown or black, tragus short and broad. It has large teeth; dental formula I 1/3, C 1/1, P 2/2, M 3/3 (Shump and Shump 1982, Adams 2003). Diagnostic Characteristics Range Summer Migratory �- aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaiiaaaaaaaaiiiai # Observations: 1530 i,,J_)mitted ¢_)t, IDy Plaith c;0 �J 900 1 i"PEE Hoary Bat is the largest bat species found in Montana, and only one of two with an interfemoral membrane completely furred on the dorsal surface, the other being the Eastern Red Bat. The Hoary Bat has a distinctive appearance along with its large size (35 g in weight, to about 140 mm in total length): dorsal pelage in is a mixture of browns and grays, tinges with white, giving the bat a frosted or hoary appearance (Shump and Shump 1982), unlike the reddish dorsal pelage of the smaller Eastern Red Bat. Definitive Hoary Bat calls are also of lower characteristic frequency and appearance: < 23 kHz lasting up to 20 milliseconds for Hoary versus 38-50 kHz lasting > 10 milliseconds for Eastern Red. Habitat During the summer, Hoary Bats occupy forested areas. A female with two naked pups was found in mid -July using a wooden bridge in Stillwater County as a temporary day roost (Hendricks et al. 2005) but no other Montana roosts have been reported. Often captured foraging over water sources embedded within forested terrain, both conifer and hardwood, as well as along riparian corridors. Reported in Montana over a broad elevation range (579 to 2774 m; 1900 to 9100 ft) during August, the highest record from treeline along the Gravelly Range road (Madison County), the lowest from the Yellowstone River near Sidney (Richland County); probably most common throughout summer in Montana at lower elevations. MI General Description The most common bat species in Montana (Foresman 2012). Cinnamon - buff to dark brown above, buffy to pale gray below; hairs on back have long glossy tips; ears, when laid forward, reach approximately to the nostril; tragus about half as high as ear; calcar without keel; length of head and body 41 to 54 mm, ear 11.0 to 15.5 mm, forearm 33 to 41 mm; braincase rises gradually from rostrum; greatest length of skull 14 to 16 mm; length of upper toothrow 5.0 to 6.6 mm (Hall 1981). Diacinostic Characteristics Can be distinguished from all but one of the seven Myotis species in Montana by the absence of a fringe of hair around the uropatagium and the absence of a keeled calcar. Can be distinguished from Yuma myotis by the glossy appearance of the dorsal hair and dark brown ear color. (Foresman 2012) Habitat Range �- aaaaaaaaaaaaaa777077iaaaaaiiiia # Observations: 1818 i,d")iWtted CLa c7 I)y f faith 800 0 a.iu Found in a variety of habitats across a large elevation gradient. Commonly forages over water. Summer day roosts include attics, barns, bridges, snags, loose bark, and bat houses. Known maternity roosts in Montana are primarily buildings. Hibernacula include caves and mines. MW General Description Similar in appearance to the Little Brown Myotis, but is slightly larger, fur extends from the ventral surface to the elbow on the wing undersurface, and the calcar is keeled. Wingspan is 10-12 inches (25-30 centimeters) and weight ranges from 0.2-0.3 ounces (6-9 grams) (Adams 2003). Habitat Occurs mostly in forested mountain regions and river bottoms, also at high elevations. Summer day roosts include trees, rock crevices, fissures in stream banks, abandoned buildings. Hibernacula include caves and mines. Range �- aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaiiaaaaaaaaiiiai # Observations: 340 i,,J_)mitted C)L�s IDy P faith 20 8 40 ;CNN General Description The Wolverine is a bear -like mustelid with massive limbs and long, dense, dark brown pelage, paler on the head, with two broad yellowish stripes extending from the shoulders and joining on the rump. Variable white or yellowish markings are often present on the throat and chest. The tail is bushy. The feet are relatively large (6.5 to 11.3 centimeters total length) with robust claws. Wolverines weigh between 7 and 32 kilograms and range from 0.9 to 1.1 meters in length. Females average about 10% less than males in linear measurements and 30% less in mass (Ingles 1965, Hall 1981, Nowak 1991). Diagnostic Characteristics Range �- aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa iIEMEaaiiiai # Observations: 1951 i,d")iWtted CLa c7 Y)'y ktolh 400 �, ,a c : I11FlifflVD. �n�rium��f��IPr Wolverines are most similar to Fishers (Mantes pennanti) but are nearly twice as large. Fishers also lack the light colored lateral markings of the Wolverine and the tail is less bushy. Badgers have shorter legs and are much lighter colored with a distinctive black and white pattern on the face. Habitat Wolverines are limited to alpine tundra, and boreal and mountain forests (primarily coniferous) in the western mountains, especially large wilderness areas. However, dispersing individuals have been found far outside of usual habitats. They are usually in areas with snow on the ground in winter. Riparian areas may be important winter habitat. When inactive, Wolverines occupy dens in caves, rock crevices, under fallen trees, in thickets, or similar sites. Wolverines are primarily terrestrial but may climb trees. In Montana, Hornocker and Hash (1981) found most Wolverine use in medium to scattered timber, while areas of dense, young timber were used least. Wolverines avoided clearcuts and burns, crossing them rapidly and directly when they were entered at all. Hash (1987) reported Wolverines in the Northern Rocky Mountain region were associated with fir, pine, and larch. Aspen stands were also used, as were cottonwoods in riparian areas. Ecotonal areas appeared to be important habitat components (Hash 1987). Hatter (1989) believed Wolverines are not dependant on any particular vegetative habitat type. Banci (1986) reported "habitat requirements appear to be large, isolated tracts of wilderness supporting a diverse prey base, rather than specific plant associations or topography." South of the boreal forest, most habitat descriptions in the literature agree with Grove's (1988) characterization of "large, mountainous, and essentially roadless areas." 0,v1- Alder Flycatcher Empidonax alnorum View in Field Guide General Description Although large in the Empidonax genus, the Alder Flycatcher is a small species within the flycatcher family. Thirteen to seventeen centimeters in length, with a wingspan of approximately 21 cm, the Alder Flycatcher has dull greenish -olive upperparts with a similarly colored, but darker, crown. The eye -ring is narrow, whitish, and sometimes indistinct but rarely lacking, while the throat is clearly white and contrasts with a gray breast band. The bill is black on the upper mandible and dull yellow - orange or pinkish on the lower. The wings are darker than the back, have white -edged tertials (innermost secondaries) and wing -bars that are whitish and boldly marked (Lowther 1999). The vocalization of the Alder Flycatcher is a harsh and burry, three syllable "rreeBEEa" or "fee-BEE-o" (Lowther 1999, Sibley 2000). For a more complete description, see below on distinguishing between the vocalizations of the Alder and Willow (E. trailii) flycatchers. Range Summer Migratory �- aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaiiaaaaaaaaiiiai # Observations: 292 i,,J_)mitted t_)t, IDy llaith 20 8 40) For a comprehensive review of the conservation status, habitat use, and ecology of this and other Montana bird species, please see Marks et al. 2016, Birds of Montana. Diagnostic Characteristics ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Other flycatchers found in Montana with which the Alder may be confused are the Least (E. minimus) and Willow Flycatchers. In comparison, the Least Flycatcher has a shorter, narrower bill, a bold, complete eye -ring, thinner tail, and different song (Lowther 1999, Sibley 2000). The general appearance of the Alder Flycatcher is so similar to that of the Willow Flycatcher that separating these two species visually can be extremely difficult (Lowther 1999). The Alder Flycatcher is best separated from the Willow Flycatcher by voice. The song of the Alder Flycatcher (a 3-syllable "fee-BEE-o") is described as being harsh and burry in nature with a strongly accented second syllable, making it sound like a 2 syllable "rrree- BEEP" (Lowther 1999). The song of the Willow Flycatcher is accented on the first syllable, more of a "FITZ-bew," but may occasionally sound as though it has a subtle third syllable, "FRITZ-be-yew" (Lowther 1999). The call of the Alder is described more as an emphatic "pip" or "pit" (reminiscent of an Olive -sided Flycatcher) in contrast to the liquid "whit" of the Willow (Gorski 1969a, 1971, Lowther 1999, Sibley 2000). Lowther (1999) indicates that, generally, the Alder has a darker overall appearance, "slightly greener crown, more pointed wings, slightly shorter bill, and slightly longer tail." Habitat Habitat use is similar to that of the Willow Flycatcher and includes willow (Salix) thickets, red osier dogwood (Corpus sericea), or birch (Betula sp.) along the edges of wetlands, streams, lakes, and forests (Johnsgard 1992). 0,v1- American White Pelican Pelecanus erythrorhynchos View in Field Guide) mm General Description The American White Pelican is a large, white bird (length: 127 to 165 cm; weight: most birds 5.0 to 9.0 kg; wingspan: 2.4 to 2.9 m) with black primaries and outer secondaries, an enormous bill with distensible gular pouch, and totipalmate webbed feet. It is often seen in flocks, and when in flight it flies with the head withdrawn. In the early breeding season the bill and legs are bright orange, the head has white plumes, and there is a laterally flattened horn on the upper mandible. Later the leg color fades, the head darkens, and the plumes and horn are lost (Evans and Knopf 1993). For a comprehensive review of the conservation status, habitat use, and ecology of this and other Montana bird species, please see Marks et al. 2016, Birds of Montana. Diaanostic Characteristics Range Summer Migratory �- aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaiiaaaaaaaaiiiai # Observations: 12959 Sr„iL'mr�itted Cfl)S fD'y 1%lorith C sari The American White Pelican is unlike other North American birds, except the Brown Pelican (Pelecanus occidentalis), which does not occur inland, and is smaller with generally darker body plumage, and often forages by plunge -diving, whereas the American White Pelican does not (Evans and Knopf 1993). The Snow Goose (Chen caerulescens) and Whooping Crane (Grus americana) display contrasting black primaries and a white body when in flight, similar to the American White Pelican, but are quite different otherwise in appearance and behavior. Snow Geese are much smaller and fly with their neck extended. Whooping Cranes are often confused with American White Pelicans but are easily distinguished because they fly with their legs and neck extended. Habitat Habitat use in Montana appears similar to other areas within the breeding range. American White Pelicans occur on a variety of aquatic and wetland habitats, including rivers, lakes, reservoirs (both large and small), estuaries, bays, marshes, and sometimes in inshore marine habitats. These habitats are used variously for nesting, loafing, and feeding. They rest on islands and peninsulas, as well as exposed rocks in rivers. Nesting colonies usually are situated on islands or peninsulas in brackish or freshwater lakes, where they are isolated from mammalian predators. Nests are built on the ground in slight depressions or on mounds of earth and debris, usually on low, flat, or gently sloping terrain. They may use dredge spoil or natural islands. Usually nests are built in an open area, but often near vegetation, driftwood, or large rocks (Spendelow and Patton 1988). There is increasing concentration and feeding at catfish aquaculture operations during the non -breeding season (King and Grewe 2001). Montana breeding colonies are located in the eastern prairie regions on islands or peninsulas of low topographic relief at lakes and reservoirs. Cover at some colonies is minimal, with nests mostly or completely exposed, but nests are often under extensive stands of chokecherry (Prunus virginiana) in the main sub -colony at Medicine Lake (Hendricks and Johnson 2002). Feeding occurs near the colony as well as at remote locations (> 100 km) away from the colony in reservoirs, lakes, and along rivers. �,v°"� Bald Eagle Nat AIII 9 Haliaeetus leucocephalus View in Field Guide) Special Status Species Native Species Global Rank: GS State Rank: S4 Agency Status USFWS: BGEPA; META USFS: SENSITIVE BLM: SENSITIVE PIF: 2 General Descri Range # Observations: 50313 With a white head and tail contrasting with a dark brown body and wings, the adult plumage of the Bald Eagle, attained at approximately 5 9,11.r111itted Cfl)s IDy 1%lorithi years of age, is unmistakable. In addition to the obvious white head and tail, other distinguishing features include the yellow bill, cere, iris, legs ,i, and feet. Second in size of North American birds of prey only to the California Condor (Gymnogyps californianus), the Bald Eagle ranges in total length from 71 to 96 cm, with an average wingspan of 168 to 244 Tf cm and a body mass ranging from 3.0 to 6.3 kg (Buehler 2000). In general appearance the sexes are similar with females approximately 25 percent larger than males. The plumage of the juvenile birds is much less distinct, being dark brown overall. The head, body, wings, and tail are dark brown with limited mottling on the underside of the wings and on the belly. While the legs and feet of the young bird are yellow like those of adults, the bill and cere are dark gray and the iris is dark brown. The voice of the Bald Eagle is a weak series of chirps. The vocalization is described as flat chirping, stuttering whistles, given in a halting fashion, with the immature calls generally harsher and more shrill than those of the adults (Buehler 2000, Sibley 2000). For a comprehensive review of the conservation status, habitat use, and ecology of this and other Montana bird species, please see Marks et al. 2016, Birds of Montana. Diagnostic Characteristics ............................................................................................... In adult plumage, the Bald Eagle is unlikely to be confused with any other species. Juvenile Bald Eagles may be confused with Golden Eagles (Aquila chrysaetos), especially with adult Goldens. A few characteristics differentiate these two species. The Bald Eagle has unfeathered legs, while those of the Golden Eagle are feathered. During flight, the head and neck of the Bald Eagle extend to about half the length of the tail, while the Golden Eagle is considerably less. This distinction is true for all age classes of both species. The terminal tail band on the Golden Eagle is dark and well defined, especially on the juveniles. In addition, the underwing and belly of the Bald Eagle show a greater amount of white compared to the Golden Eagle, whose white feathering is restricted to the base of the flight feathers (Buehler 2000). Habitat In Montana, as elsewhere, the Bald Eagle is primarily a species of riparian and lacustrine habitats (forested areas along rivers and lakes), especially during the breeding season. Important year-round habitat includes wetlands, major water bodies, spring spawning streams, ungulate winter ranges and open water areas (Bureau of Land Management 1986). Wintering habitat may include upland sites. Nesting sites are generally located within larger forested areas near large lakes and rivers where nests are usually built in the tallest, oldest, large diameter trees. Nesting site selection is dependent upon maximum local food availability and minimum disturbance from human activity (Montana Bald Eagle Working Group 1994). See the Montana Bald Eagle Management Plan (1994) for further details including home range sizes and habitat requirements of fledgling birds. �,v°"� Black -backed Woodpecker Nat A H P 1�""'' 1 Picoides arcticus View in Field Guide) rE ;CN3 General Description Black -backed Woodpeckers are at the large end of the medium-sized woodpeckers. At 9.5 inches in length, only the flickers and Pileated Woodpeckers (Dryocopus pileatus) are larger. Adults are similar in size and in appearance except for the yellow crown present only on the males. The back of the head, neck, back, and wings (upperparts) are all black and the chin, throat, breast and belly (underparts) are white. The sides and flanks are also white with heavy black barring. A strong white line runs below the eye from the bill to the nape (Dixon and Saab 2000). The wing primaries are barred black and white and only the outer tail feathers (rectrices) are white; otherwise the tail is black. Juvenile birds are similar in appearance but much duller overall. They have a plain black crown, with no, or nearly no, crown patch, and a washed out or buffy look to the underparts. Black -backed Woodpeckers, like Three -toed Woodpeckers (Picoides tridactylus), have only 3 toes on each foot rather than the normal 4 toes (Dixon and Saab 2000). Range �- aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaiiaaaaaaaaiiiai # Observations: 1127 i,d")iWtted CLa c7 I)'y I%Iolli 400 1100 The call note, a single metallic "kyik" or "chet" (similar to Hairy Woodpecker, Picoides villosus) helps to detect the Black -backed Woodpecker. They also use a unique agonistic "wet-et-ddd-eee-yaaa," or "scream -rattle -snarl" call in association with a hunched wing -spreading display (Short 1974). Drumming is variable (fast or slow) in long, even rolls (Farrand 1983, Goggans 1989). Drumming is described as coming in 2-second bursts tapering off at the end, at intervals of 30 to 40 seconds, suggestive of Pileated Woodpeckers. They also give single raps when nervous or about to roost (Kilham 1966). For a comprehensive review of the conservation status, habitat use, and ecology of this and other Montana bird species, please see Marks et al. 2016, Birds of Montana. Diagnostic Characteristics ............................................................................................... Having only three toes on each foot and, in males, having a yellow crown patch instead of red, distinguishes Black -backed Woodpeckers from all other woodpeckers except Three -toed Woodpeckers (Dixon and Saab 2000). The all -black head and back are diagnostic of Black -backed Woodpeckers. Three -toed Woodpeckers have at least some white on the back. Also, the white line under the eye is broader in Black -backed Woodpeckers; Three -toed Woodpeckers have a slimmer white line below the eye as well as another white line behind the eye. The yellow crown patch is smaller and solidly yellow in Black -backed Woodpeckers rather than larger and rather streaked in Three -toed Woodpeckers. Female Black -backed Woodpeckers have a solid black forehead and crown, which is unlike the streaked and white speckled forehead and crown of Three -toed Woodpeckers (Dixon and Saab 2000). Habitat The habitat of Black -backed Woodpeckers in Montana is early successional, burned forest of mixed conifer, lodgepole pine, Douglas -fir, and spruce -fir (Hutto 1995a, 1995b), although they are more numerous in lower elevation Douglas -fir and pine forest habitats than in higher elevation subalpine spruce forest habitats (Bock and Bock 1974). This is supported by Harris (1982) who found Black -backed Woodpeckers in two recently burned forests comprised of 73% and 77% Douglas -fir, respectively. They appear to concentrate in recently burned forests and remain for several years (3 to 5) before leaving due to prey source decline (Harris 1982). In northwestern Montana, Black -backed Woodpeckers nested in areas of western larch (Larix occidentalis)/Douglas- fir forest with a major component of old -growth (McClelland et al. 1979). Harris (1982) found Black -backed Woodpeckers nesting within western larch even though the stand was predominately Douglas -fir. McClelland et al. (1979) determined the decay of heartwood while maintaining a hard outer shell of western larch creates an ideal nesting site for Black -backed Woodpeckers to excavate. I, W101-1— Black-necked Stilt Himantopus mexicanus View in Field Guide mm General Description The Black -necked Stilt is a tall, slender wader with a long, straight, and slender bill, the upperparts glossy black (male) or duller black tinged with brown (female) with a white spot above the eye, underparts white, the legs and feet very long and red or pink. The iris is red. Immatures have buffy edges on the dark brown feathers of the upperparts. For a comprehensive review of the conservation status, habitat use, and ecology of this and other Montana bird species, please see Marks et al. 2016, Birds of Montana. Diaanostic Characteristics Range Summer Migratory �- aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaiiaaaaaaaaiiiai # Observations: 2496 i,d")iWtted CLa c7 I)'y ktolh 800 The black and white plumage and very long red legs of this species are unique and diagnostic. Habitat Black -necked Stilts breed on the edges of shallow marshes, often on islands, building a scrape that is lined with vegetation, pebbles, and feathers. Nests may be out in the open or among low vegetation and are usually within 50 m of water (Robinson et al. 1999). Taking full advantage of their long legs, almost all feeding occurs in the water. In Montana, Black -necked Stilts nest in medium to large wetland complexes of open marshes and meadows, often in alkali wetlands. Habitats used during migration similar to those used in other seasons, but they also occur on coastal mud flats. Bobolink Dolichonyx oryzivorus view in Field GuLde Species of Concern Native Species Global Rank: GS State Rank: S313 Agency Status USFWS: MBTAi BCCIO; BCC11; BCC17 USFS: BLM: FWP SWAP: SGCN3 PIF: 3 General Descri The Bobolink is approximately 18 centimeters long with a stout, relatively short, pointed bill and sharply pointed tail feathers. The breeding male is black below, with a buff to whitish hind -neck, white scapulars, and white rump; early in spring the male has pale feather edgings. The breeding female is buffy with dark streaks on the back, rump, sides, and head. The juvenile resembles the breeding female but lacks streaks below. Fall adults and immatures resemble breeding female but are darker above and richer buff below. (Renfrew et al. 2015) Range Summer Migratory # Observations: 3812 P)y f��3r7ti�i "oar For a comprehensive review of the conservation status, habitat use, and ecology of this and other Montana bird species, please see Marks et al. 2016, Birds of Montana. Diagnostic Characteristics Breeding males are unique among North American passerines in being entirely black underneath and lighter above (Renfrew et al. 2015). Habitat Nests built in tall grass and mixed -grass prairies. Prefers "old" hay fields with high grass -to -legume ratios. �,v°- Brewer's Sparrow iN" III p Spizella breweri view in Field Guide) Species of Concern Native Species Global Rank: GS State Rank: S36 Agency Status USFWS: MBTA USFS: BLM: SENSITIVE FWP SWAP: SGCN3 PIF: 2 General Descri The Brewer's Sparrow is a nondescript sparrow of sagebrush habitats. In suitable habitat, the Brewer's Sparrow can be the most abundant species present. Its song, a series of distinctive long and short buzzy trills, can be heard throughout the breeding season (Rotenberry et al. 1999). For a comprehensive review of the conservation status, habitat use, and ecology of this and other Montana bird species, please see Marks et al. 2016, Birds of Montana. Range Summer Migratory # Observations: 10089 9r„ihmr�itted Cfl)5 IDY 1%lorith ,, C'oar7 4,i:X,r, xrr:, Phenolo Arrives on breeding grounds by late April. Nests with eggs observed as early as late May. Nestlings observed as early as early June and fledglings by early July (Montana Natural Heritage Program Point Observation Database 2014). Diagnostic Characteristics Sexes are similar in appearance. The crown is finely streaked brown; pale gray eyebrow, complete white eye - ring, and a grayish mustache. Underparts dull white, with grayish flanks; breast unstreaked in adult, although sometimes flanks are streaked. Back and rump brown, the latter streaked with black (Rotenberry et al. 1999). Habitat The Brewer's Sparrow typically breeds in shrubsteppe habitats dominated by sagebrush. Densities of Brewer's Sparrow correlated with some aspect of total shrub cover (Rotenberry et al. 1999). In sagebrush areas in central Montana, Brewer's Sparrows nested in sagebrush averaging 16 inches high (Best 1970). 0,v1- Brown Creeper Certhia americana View in Field Guide) Species of concern Native Species Global Rank: GS State Rank: S3 Agency Status USFWS: MBTA USFS: BLM: FWP SWAP: SGCN3 PIF: 1 General Descri The Brown Creeper is the only tree creeper in North America. It is very small: males 12.0 to 13.5 cm (4.7 to 5.3 inches) total length; females 11.7 to 13.2 cm (4.6 to 5.2 inches) total length. Average body mass for both is 7.2 to 9.9 g. Adult plumage is dark -brown on the upperparts, extensively streaked with dull whitish on head, back, scapulars, and wings; it has a distinctive brownish -white supercilium. Underparts whitish washed with cinnamon distally. The bill is slightly decurved, the tail long and stiff (Hejl et al. 2002). Range # Observations: 7180 �r,il:�i��itecl a=atl7, P)ir f��3r7ti�i 1 �o:1f3 For a comprehensive review of the conservation status, habitat use, and ecology of this and other Montana bird species, please see Marks et al. 2016, Birds of Montana. Diacinostic Characteristics The combination of brown and white coloration, very small size, and tree -creeping behavior distinguish this species from all other North American birds. Habitat Creepers breed in coniferous and mixed coniferous -deciduous forests, preferring mature and old -growth stands with high canopy cover in the western U.S. (Hejl et al. 2002). Hutto and Young (1999) found that they were more common in mature western redcedar-western hemlock, spruce -fir, and mixed -conifer forests than in pine or younger forests in western Montana and Idaho. They winter in the same habitats used for breeding but also use a wider diversity of forest types, including uplands dominated by deciduous trees, urban and suburban parks and residential areas that contain large trees, and riparian cottonwoods. The consistent factor appears to be the need for large trees and snags (dead trees) for foraging and nesting microsites. Brown Creepers are the only North American birds that build their nests behind loose pieces of bark on tree trunks. They prefer to nest in large dead or dying trees within dense forest stands, placing their nests from <1 m to >20 m above the ground (Hejl et al. 2002). For 19 nests in mixed conifer forests of western Montana and east -central Idaho, 5 were in subalpine fir, 5 in Douglas -fir, 4 in Engelmann spruce, 3 in lodgepole pine, and 2 in western larch; all nest trees were dead and all but one in unlogged forest stands (Hejl et al. 2002). 0,v1- Cas ian Tern Hyl/!oprogne caspia View in Field Guide General Description Gull -like in appearance, the Caspian Tern is the largest tern in North America. It has pale gray upperparts, and a white throat, breast, flanks, rump and tail. The all -black cap on the mature adults extends forward to below the eye. Males and females are of like plumage, though the males average slightly larger (Sibley 2000). This species is generally 47 to 54 cm long, with a wingspan of approximately 127 cm. The Caspian Tern has a dark red, stout, rather massive bill, with a dark gray colored tip. The bill on juvenile birds is more orange -red and their upperparts are paler than on the adults. Range Summer Migratory �- aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaiiaaaaaaaaiiiai # Observations: 1782 400 The vocalization of this species is described as a deep, harsh, heron -like w) scream "aaayayaum" (Sibley 2000). Several other vocalizations are described as the contact, alarm, gakkering, fish (advertising), and 1100 female begging calls (Cuthbert and Wires 1999). For a comprehensive review of the conservation status, habitat use, and i,,J_)mitted DLL s IDy kloiitli ecology of this and other Montana bird species, please see Marks et al. 2016, Birds of Montana. Dia9.nostic Characteristics ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... The Caspian Tern is most similar to the Royal Tern, but the latter species, restricted primarily to the coasts, is rarely observed inland. The Caspian is also a larger bird, by approximately 20 percent, and has broader, blunter wings, and a larger head (Cuthbert and Wires 1999). The Caspian's bill is also much darker and thicker. The legs of a Caspian Tern are also slightly longer and thicker and the tail is not notched as deeply as that of the Royal Tern (Cuthbert and Wires 1999). Caspian Terns are distinguishable from other species of terns by their larger size and the blackish undersurface and whitish uppersurface of the outer primaries (Cuthbert and Wires 1999). Habitat In Montana, the Caspian Tern prefers islands within large lakes or reservoirs, where sandy or stony beaches are used for nesting (Johnsgard 1992). The species has also been noted to utilize rivers, though nesting in this habitat is not documented (Johnsgard 1992, Casey 2000). 0,v1- Cassin's Finch Haemorhous cassinii View in Field Guide mm General Description m Cassin's Finch is the largest of the North American Carpodacus finches (includes Purple Finch and House Finch); length is 14.5-15.5 cm (5.7- 6.1 inches). Adults are sexually dimorphic in plumate traits. Adult males have rose -red coloration on the head throat and upper breast, the crown is bright pinkish -red contrasting with the paler nape and back; rump and upper tail coverts are dull rose -pink and streaked with brown. The lower breast and belly appear generally whitish, the undertail coverts with fine brown streaks. Females have an overall brownsih plumage; the head has supercillium and submoustacial regions with fine brown streaks, back and rump dusky and streaked with brown, the throat, breast and flanks whitish with crisp brown streaks. Juneniles and immatures resemble females. Range �- aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaiiaaaaaaaaiiiai # Observations: 11648 P)ir f��3r7ti�i For a comprehensive review of the conservation status, habitat use, and ecology of this and other Montana bird species, please see Marks et al. 2016, Birds of Montana. Diagnostic Characteristics ............................................................................................... Male Cassin's Finch has fine streaking on the undertail coverts and flanks, in contrast to pure white of the Purple Finch. In females and immature males, breast and flanks more cleanly white and more finely streaked in Cassin's Finch than in Purple Finch. Larger and more chunky than the House Finch. Red on male House Finch is usually brighter and oranger, not rose -red. Male Cassin's Finch is much less streaked on the lower breast and belly than male House Finch; female Cassin's Finch with a noticable supercilliary stripe lacking in female House Finches, and the breast streaking more distinct and less diffuse. Cassin's Finch the only of the three Carpodacus finches routinely encountered higher in the mountains. Habitat Cassin's Finches occur in every major forest type and timber -harvest regime in Montana, including riparian cottonwood, but are especially common in ponderosa pine and postfire forests; they occur less often in lodgepole pine, sagebrush, and grassland (Manuwal 1983, Hutto and Young 1999). They often visit bird feeders and occasionally venture into alpine terrain (Johnson 1966, Pattie and Verbeek 1966). &,v°- Clark's Nutcracker Nuc%fraga co/Umbiana View in Field Guide mm General Description Clark's Nutcracker is a jay -sized corvid that is crowlike in build and flight, with moderate sexual size dimorphism. Total length of adults 27.0 to 30.1 cm. Mass 106 to 161 g. Males slightly larger than females. Sexes similar in appearance. Light to medium gray, with varying amounts of white around eyes, on forehead, and on chin; white around vent and at base of tail; wings and tail glossy black; secondaries broadly tipped with white forming a white patch; outer rectrices white. Folded wings nearly reach tip of tail. Long, pointed, black bill with short nasal bristles. Distinctive grating call audible at great distance (Tomback 1998). Range �- aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaiiaaaaaaaaiiiai # Observations: 19180 9,11,'mr�itted Cfl)5 IDY 1%lorith 4,I.,ail ter For a comprehensive review of the conservation status, habitat use, and ecology of this and other Montana bird species, please see Marks et al. 2016, Birds of Montana. Diagnostic Characteristics ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Clark's Nutcracker is distinctive in appearance and behavior, and unlike any other corvid in Montana. Plumage is similar to that of the Northern Shrike and Northern Mockingbird, but the longer, straighter bill and larger body distinguish nutcrackers from these species. White and black markings in the wings and tail, in combination with the other body characters and the sharp grating "craaaww" call, help distinguish a nutcracker. Other similar - appearing species don't travel in conspecific flocks, as nutcrackers often do. Habitat Nutcrackers in Montana typically occupy conifer forests dominated by whitebark pine at higher elevations and ponderosa pine and limber pine along with Douglas firs at lower elevations, relying largely on seeds of these species for food (Saunders 1921, Mewaldt 1956, Giuntoli and Mewaldt 1978). They often are seen above treeline in alpine meadows or flying among drainages (Johnson 1966, Pattie and Verbeek 1966). 0,v1- Common Loon Gavia i/7mmer View in Field Guide tern s B re ;CN3 Range Summer Migratory General Description The Common Loon is a large and mainly aquatic bird. Males are generally larger than females. Adult body length ranges from 71 to 92 cm (28 to 36 inches) with wingspans to 147 cm (58 inches). Weight varies ranging from 1.6 to 8 kg (3.5 to 17.6 lb.) with an average of about 3 to 4 kg (6.6 to 8.8 lb.) (McIntyre 1988, McIntyre and Barr 1997). The feet are located far back on the body and are large, webbed, and sweep to the side rather than forward under the belly. This trait makes it difficult for Common Loons to walk on land but allows more efficient swimming underwater. �- aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaiiaaaaaaaaiiiai # Observations: 8726 �r,il i��at cl a=atl��, b'y 1%,10 7t11i 20 Sexes are indistinguishable based on plumage. The head and neck of breeding adults are black with a green gloss. The back, wings and sides '°''�(� are also black. Scapulars and wing -coverts have large white markings, .. which is a distinctive field mark. The eye is red. Common Loons have a broad patch of vertical white stripes on the side of the neck and a smaller patch on the upper foreneck. The breast and belly are white and the bill is straight, heavy and black (McIntyre and Barr 1997). In the non -breeding plumage, the head, neck and upper parts are dark gray to dark brown. The cheeks, throat, and underparts are white. The bill is brownish -gray to pale bluish -gray or horn colored. The iris is brown. The tail is dark brown, tipped with white (Bent 1919, Johnsgard 1987, McIntyre 1986, 1988). Juvenile plumage is similar to the adult non -breeding plumage, although the upperparts have the most pale and more conspicuous feather margins than those of adults, and the throat and sides of the neck are more finely streaked with brown. This plumage is worn until the following summer when the birds molt into more adult -like basic plumage (Palmer 1962, McIntyre 1988). Common Loons are known for their distinctive calls, three of which are heard on summer breeding lakes. The wail, a long almost mournful cry, the tremolo, a high pitched, rapid, five -beat call, and probably the best known is the yodel which is given only by males during territorial confrontations. Common Loons generally lay 2 subelliptical to ovoid shaped eggs which vary from deep olive to light brown in color, with irregular dark brown or black spots. For a comprehensive review of the conservation status, habitat use, and ecology of this and other Montana bird species, please see Marks et al. 2016, Birds of Montana. Diaanostic Characteristics The Common Loon is a large loon with a heavy, black bill and an easily recognizable breeding plumage. The large size of the Common Loon distinguishes it from the Pacific Loon (G. pacifica) and the Red -throated Loon (G. steiiata), as well as the Arctic Loon (G. arctica), which has never occurred in Montana. Only the Yellow -billed Loon (G. adamsii) is comparable in size. It, however, has a distinctive yellow bill as well as subtle differences in plumage (McIntyre and Barr 1997). Habitat In Montana, Common Loons will not generally nest on lakes less than about 13 acres in size or over 5000 feet in elevation (Skaar 1990). Successful nesting requires both nesting sites and nursery areas. Small islands are preferred for nesting, but herbaceous shoreline areas, especially promontories, are also selected. Nursery areas are very often sheltered, shallow coves with abundant small fish and insects (Skaar 1990). Most Montana lakes inhabited by Common Loons are relatively oligotrophic and have not experienced significant siltation or other hydrological changes. The quantity and quality of nesting habitat limits the Common Loon population of northwest Montana. Skaar (1990) estimated the state's "carrying capacity" at 185 potential nesting territories, based on the size and number of lakes within the species' breeding distribution. He assumed 100 ha of surface area per pair. Kelly (1992) documented a density of 72.2 surface ha of water per adult Common Loon for the Tobacco, Stillwater, Clearwater, and Swan River drainages. 0,v1- Common Tern 11111 Sterna hirundo View in Field Guide) tern 5 B General Description In breeding plumage, the Common Tern has an orange -red bill tipped in black and orange -red legs. The back, body, and wings are a silvery -gray with blackish primaries on the wingtips, evident during flight. The nape and cap are black and extend low enough on the head to contain the black eye before abruptly stopping at the white of the cheek and neck. The outer tail feathers on the forked tail are dusky. In non -breeding plumage the bill and legs lose their red coloration and are black. The cap no longer covers the forehead, leaving a white patch nearly to the top of the head (Sibley 2000). The vocalization is described as numerous, varied, and of sharp, distinctive, and somewhat irritable timbre (Nisbet 2002). The most common call, the advertising call, is described as a down -slurring "keeyuur" or an up -slurred "keeuri" in addition to the "kip" or "tyik" call that is expressed during flock feeding, or during take -off and landing (Sibley 2000, Nisbet 2002). �- aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaiiaaaaaaaaiiiai # Observations: 1587 >ti,il_)iWtted Ct7, I)y ktolh A0 10 �+lti 0 For a comprehensive review of the conservation status, habitat use, and ecology of this and other Montana bird species, please see Marks et al. 2016, Birds of Montana. Diagnostic Characteristics ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Distinguishable from Forster's Tern (S. forsteri) by the Forster's Tern's whiter underparts, lighter primaries, lighter back coloration (and, hence, less difference in color between back and tail), and greater amount of black on a bill that is more orange than red -orange (Sibley 2000, Nisbet 2002). Habitat Nesting in Montana generally occurs on sparsely vegetated islands in large bodies of water, such as Medicine Lake and Bowdoin National Wildlife Refuge. Nest substrate at these locations includes sparsely sandy, pebbly, or stony substrate, surrounded by matted or sparsely scattered vegetation (Casey 2000, Nisbet 2002). A study in the Lewistown District of the Bureau of Land Management documented that the Common Tern selected sites larger than 30 acres, with emergent vegetation covering more than 25% of the shoreline on all but one of the eight sites studied (Feigley 1997). All nesting occurred on islands (Feigley 1997). 0,v1- Evenin Grosbeak Coccothraustes vespertinus View in Field Guide) mm General Description m The Evening Grosbeak is a large, robust finch with a massive, conical bill. This species forms large, irruptive feeding flocks in winter, announcing its arrival with a loud "clee-ip" or "peeer" call. Although gregarious in winter, this species is secretive during the breeding season and little is known about its breeding biology (Gillihan and Byers 2001). For a comprehensive review of the conservation status, habitat use, and ecology of this and other Montana bird species, please see Marks et al. 2016, Birds of Montana. Phenol Range Migratory �- aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaiiaaaaaaaaiiiai # Observations: 15777 Adults observed feeding young from late -May through August. Feeding flocks are irruptive and have been observed September -early May, with the largest flock size occurring during the winter months of December -February (Montana Program Point Observation Database 2014). S1,11.'m1�itted Cfl)5 iDw 1%lonthl Natural Heritage Diagnostic Characteristics ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... A large, stocky finch with a heavy, greenish -yellow bill. Adult male has a brownish -black head with a black crown, and a yellow forehead and eyebrow. The neck and back are brown contrasting with yellow shoulders and rump. Tail and wings are black with large white patches. Throat is brown and underparts are brownish -yellow. Adult female is mostly grayish brown with a thin moustache and yellowish wash on the sides of the neck. Wings and tail are black with white spotting. Throat and underparts are pale grayish -brown. Juvenile resembles adult female (Gillihan and Byers 2001). Habitat In Montana, the Evening Grosbeak breeds in mixed coniferous and spruce -fir forests of western Montana. Winter habitat is much more varied, including coniferous forest as well as urban and suburban areas statewide (Gillihan and Byers 2001, Montana Natural Heritage Program Point Observation Database 2014). �,v°"� Ferruginous Hawk i�� 11� 9 Buteo regalis View in Field Guide) Species of Concern Native Species Global Rank: G4 State Rank: S36 Agency Status USFWS: MBTAi BCC17 USFS: BLM: SENSITIVE FWP SWAP: SGCN3 PIF: 2 General Descri Ferruginous Hawks have rusty backs and shoulders, pale heads, and white tails washed with pale rust. They have a white patch at the base of the flight feathers on the upper wing surface. Their wings are brown above and white below. The rusty legs of the adult form a dark V contrasted with whitish underparts. Ferruginous Hawks usually appear very light-colored when viewed from a distance. The uncommon dark phase lacks dark tail bands and are dark brown on the body, but still have the whitish tail. The species averages 58 cm long with a 135 cm wingspan. Immature birds are brown instead of rust, and have brown streaking on the undersides. Range Summer Migratory # Observations: 6392 �r,il:�i�I�itecl a=atl7, by f��3r7ti�i (9!If 'V. 0) For a comprehensive review of the conservation status, habitat use, and ecology of this and other Montana bird species, please see Marks et al. 2016, Birds of Montana. Diaanostic Characteristics Krider's Red-tailed Hawk (B. jamaicensis) is brown, not rust, has white feathers on the legs, dark shoulder patches, and a dark band across the belly. The dark phase Ferruginous Hawk differs from the dark phase Rough - legged Hawk (B. lagopus) by the absence of dark tail bands in the former. Immature Ferruginous Hawks resemble the Great Plains form of the Red-tailed Hawk, but have larger white wing patches and lack the dark bar on the leading edge of the underwing. Habitat The habitat of Ferruginous Hawks in Montana has been studied extensively (Ensign 1983, Restani 1989, 1991, De Velice 1990, Wittenhagen 1992, Black 1992, Atkinson 1992, 1993) and described as mixed -grass prairie, shrub -grasslands, grasslands, grass -sagebrush complex, and sagebrush steppe. In southeastern Montana, Ensign (1983) reported mixed -grass prairie with black greasewood (Sarcobatus vermiculatus) and big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata) in uplands and drainages. Other shrub and tree species present in the habitat were junipers (Juniperus ssp.), cottonwoods (Populus ssp), willows (Salix spp.), and ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa). Also in southeastern Montana, Wittenhagen (1992) reported Ferruginous Hawk habitat to consist of shrub -grasslands with big sagebrush present as well as wheatgrasses. The Kevin Rim area of north -central Montana has been categorized as grasslands dominated by bluebunch and western wheatgrass, blue gramma, and other grasses (De Velice 1990). Habitat also exists for Ferruginous Hawks in the Centennial Valley in the southwestern portion of the state. Restani (1989, 1991) reported grass -sagebrush complexes on mid -elevation slopes to be where most hawks nested. These complexes included sagebrush species and rabbitbrush as overstory to wheatgrasses, needle -and -thread grass, and junegrass. Also in southwestern Montana, Atkinson (1992, 1993) described the preferred habitat as sagebrush steppe over foothill prairie or mountain mahogany. Black (1992) surveyed Ferruginous Hawk habitat in Phillips County and reported the habitat to be 69% grassland, 25% shrubland and 13% bare area. Nest location studies have also described the habitat Ferruginous Hawks use during the breeding season. In southwestern Montana, sagebrush (Artemisia) and grasslands predominated within 100 meters of nests (Atkinson 1992). Ground nests in northern Montana were located in grass -dominated, rolling (more than 10 percent slope) rangeland. In cultivated areas (20 percent) in north -central Montana, nests closer to cultivated fields and roads were more successful, presumably because of higher prey densities associated with edge habitats (Zelenak et al. 1997). Nests in southwestern Montana were significantly oriented toward the south (Atkinson 1992). Nests on rock outcrops in Montana were built on slopes averaging 62.8 percent and were found on the upper 35 percent of the slope (Atkinson 1992). Ground nests in northern Montana were located either on the top of a small rise or on slopes ranging from 10 to 50 percent (Black 1992). The average height of ground nests below the highest surrounding topographic feature was 10 meters, whereas the average height of ground nest sites above the valley floor was 10.4 meters, indicating that nests were placed at mid -elevation sites within the immediate topography (Black 1992). Ferruginous Hawks do not appear to nest in areas converted to agriculture (Schmutz 1984, Jasikoff 1982). A study done in Petroleum and Fergus counties seems to support this statement. Rogers and Rogers (1995) reported direct observations of Ferruginous Hawks avoiding crested wheatgrass (Agropyron cristatum) fields as nesting locations. They concluded few prey resources in such monotypic croplands as the reason for not nesting in these habitats. 0,v1- Forster's Tern 1�"1=1 Sterna forsteri View in Field Guide) tern s B General Description The Forster's Tern is a medium-sized, primarily white tern with a black cap and dark eyes. The back and wings are a pale silvery -gray, contrasting with the white of the neck and belly. The primaries and the deeply forked tail on the breeding adult bird are also a pale gray, with the primaries appearing as white as they become worn. During the breeding season, the large bill is orange and tipped in black, and the legs are bright orange or orange -red. In non -breeding plumage the bill is black and the legs are a duller red -brown (McNicholl et al. 2001). During non -breeding season, the primaries are dark silvery -gray and the crown is white with an evident large black patch encompassing and extending behind the eye (Sibley 2000). The bird is approximately 13 inches (33 cm) in length with a 31 inch (79 cm) wingspan. �- aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaiiaaaaaaaaiiiai # Observations: 1793 >,,J)ii)itted t_)t, IDy kloiitli c;0 The common call of this bird is a simple descending "kerrrr", described as lower and more raspy and wooden -sounding than the Common Tern (Sibley 2000). Sibley (2000) notes the species also has a "kit" or "kuit" common call; a begging "kerr kerr kerr" during courtship; and a very low "zaaaar" during defensive attack. For a comprehensive review of the conservation status, habitat use, and ecology of this and other Montana bird species, please see Marks et al. 2016, Birds of Montana. Diagnostic Characteristics White wings and underparts give the Forster's Tern a lighter and brighter overall appearance than the Common Tern. The Forster's Tern is also distinguishable from the Common Tern by its longer and stouter bill, longer tail, and more orange, rather than red, colored bill (McNicholl et al. 2001). Habitat Large marshes with extensive reed beds or Muskrat houses that provide nesting structures are the preferred breeding habitat for the Forester's Tern. It is also occasionally found along marshy borders of lakes and reservoirs in Montana. The species generally nests colonially, with as many as five nests recorded on one Muskrat house (Johnsgard 1992). Preferred nesting locations include both nesting and foraging sites within close proximity. Saltmarsh bulrush (Scirpus maritimus) was used as nesting substrate at Benton Lake National Wildlife Refuge (Montana Bird Distribution Committee 2012). A study in the Lewistown District of the Bureau of Land Management documented that five of the six sites selected by the Forster's Tern were larger than 100 acres, with emergent vegetation covering more than 25% of the shoreline (Feigley 1997). Four of the nesting sites were on permanent bodies of water, with the remaining two on temporarily flooded sites (Feigley 1997). �,v°�th Franklin's Gull Leucophaeus pipixcan view in Field Guide) cern 5 B Beci®; BCC17 CN3 General Description The Franklin's Gull is a small gull of wetlands in the interior of North America. In breeding plumage, this species has a black hood and a dark red bill with a black mark near the tip. The dark gray of the back extends to the upperpart of the wings. The underparts of the bird, including the wings, are white. The hindneck, the area between the black hood and the gray back, is also white. The underparts are sometimes tinged with pink, a coloration that earned the species the early name of Rosy or Prairie Dove (Burger and Gochfeld 1994). The legs are brownish -black or dusky (Burger and Gochfeld 1994). Broad white arcs directly above and below the black eye are apparent during the breeding season. The gray wings are tipped with a white band, then a black margin, and ultimately with large white primary ends. In non -breeding plumage, the species loses the redness in the bill, and it becomes black. The black hood is reduced to an area from the eye to the back of the head, revealing a white forehead, throat, and splotchy crown. The bird averages 37 cm (14.5 inches) long with a wingspan of 91 cm (36 inches); the male tends to be slightly larger than the female Range Summer Migratory �- aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaiiaaaaaaaaiiiai # Observations: 5511 �r,il:�i��it ecl a=atl7, Y)'y 1%,10 111 w,�ro:rra 9 1f ,V.0 r; ..... (Sibley 2000). The vocalization of the Franklin's Gull is described as a nasal, laughing, hollow sound. A "kowii" or "queei" are used to define the common call (Sibley 2000). For a comprehensive review of the conservation status, habitat use, and ecology of this and other Montana bird species, please see Marks et al. 2016, Birds of Montana. Diaqnostic Characteristics The most likely species with which the Franklin's Gull could be confused is the Laughing Gull, a rare species in Montana. The Franklin's Gull is slightly smaller, with proportionately smaller legs and bill. The bill is thinner and does not droop at the tip as it does on the Laughing Gull (Burger and Gochfeld 1994). The arcs of white around the Franklin's Gull's eye are more apparent as are the large white primary tips of the wings; the wingtips on the Laughing Gull have white on them, but the white is small and is not always evident (Sibley 2000). Differentiating the Franklin's Gull from the Bonaparte's Gull can be made by several distinguishing features. The Franklin's Gull is larger; the bill color is red in the Franklin's Gull compared to black in the Bonaparte's Gull; anc unlike the indistinct white around the Bonaparte's Gull's eye, the white eye -arcs of the Franklin's Gull are obvious (Sibley 2000). Habitat Preferring large, relatively permanent prairie marsh complexes, the Franklin's Gull builds its nests over water on a supporting structure of emergent vegetation. Nesting is noted to occur in cattails (Typha spp.) and bulrushes (Scirpus spp.) (Berger and Gochfeld 1994). Typical water depth is 30 to 60 cm. Nesting over water differs from the nesting habits of Montana's other, generally ground nesting, gulls (Johnsgard 1992). Franklin's Gulls prefer to nest at sites with intermediate vegetation density, interspersed with open water of various sizes (Burger and Gochfeld 1994). Preferred nesting sites within a wetland can change from year to year because of changes in water level and associated changes in vegetation (Burger and Gochfeld 1994). One key feature of selected nesting sites is that the water levels remain high enough throughout the nesting period, or at least until the young can fledge, in order to provide protection from predators (Casey 2000). During migration, including the Bozeman area, the Franklin's Gull can be found feeding on dry land, especially in cultivated fields prior to planting (Skaar 1969, Johnsgard 1992). 0,v1- Golden Eagle Nat A 1111 1 Aquila chrysaetos View in Field Guide) ;CN3 General Description Range �- aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaiiaaaaaaaaiiiai Adults are brown overall, gold on head and neck feathers, with light brown bands in the tail. Immature birds have white patches on the #Observations: 20143 wings and white at the base of the tail feathers. Golden Eagles often soar with their wings held nearly flat, but slightly upturned. The legs,iLrn itke�l c_i7 Icy h�r�tl7 are heavily feathered down to the tops of the toes. Golden Eagles range in length from 33 to 38 inches, and have a wingspan of 6-1/2 to 7-1/2 feet. A very large raptor with mostly brown plumage, a golden wash on the back of the head and neck, and a mostly horn -colored bill; tail is P� faintly banded; immatures have white at the base of the primaries and ��;�x'^y,y' and white tail with a dark terminal band; total length 76 to 102 cm, wingspan 203 to 224 cm. For a comprehensive review of the conservation status, habitat use, and ecology of this and other Montana bird species, please see Marks et al. 2016, Birds of Montana. Diagnostic Characteristics ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Bald Eagles have feathers only part way down the leg, and usually soar with wings held completely flat. Immature Bald Eagles usually have a strip of white along the underside of the wing, rather than in a round patch on the flight feathers like the immature Golden Eagle. Older immature Bald Eagles have irregular patches of white on their bodies, instead of the sharply defined patterns on Golden Eagles. Turkey Vultures soar with wings held in a more pronounced "V". Habitat Golden Eagles nest on cliffs and in large trees (occasionally on power poles), and hunt over prairie and open woodlands; some nest sites in the Fallon area include scoroacious badland pillars (Cameron 1905), another near Knowlton was in a ponderosa pine (Cameron 1907). In the Livingston area 62% of 92 nests were on cliffs, 29% in Douglas -fir, and 2-3% each in ponderosa pine, cottonwood, snags, and on the ground (McGahan 1968). About 70% of cliff nests were oriented to the south or east, most nests were found between 4000-6000 ft elevation, and sites were associated with sagebrush/grassland hunting areas (McGahan 1968). In the Bozeman area, Golden Eagles move from mountains to valleys in the winter (Skaar 1969). �,v°"� Gray -crowned crowned Rosy -Finch Finch iNat A 1,1 Y- Y- ""�"'"" Leucosticte tephrocotis View in Field Guide) General Description The Gray -crowned Rosy -Finch is a medium-sized, dark brown finch of about 14 to 16 cm in length and 22 to 26 grams in weight; the Pribilof and Aleutian island forms are larger (17 to 21 cm in length and 42 to 60 grams in weight). Adults are rather stout with long wings and a notched tail. Adult male plumage includes pink on the wings, belly, and rump, a black forecrown and gray band around the hindcrown (in some races gray is also present on the cheeks, and the head appears mostly gray). The breast and flanks are brown, nasal tufts are white, and the bill is yellow in winter and black in the breeding season. The sexes are similar in size and appearance, although in females the black in the crown and the pink in the plumage are less distinct. Juveniles are similar in appearance to adult females but with overall duller coloration and lacking the gray crown, black forehead, and pink on the underparts (MacDougall-Shackleton et al. 2000). Range Migratory �- aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa iIEMEaaiiiai # Observations: 2125 i,d")iWtted CLa c7 I)'y I%Iolli 400 3$XJ gin, i I Oil, -,\,I 4-111 For a comprehensive review of the conservation status, habitat use, and ecology of this and other Montana bird species, please see Marks et al. 2016, Birds of Montana. Diagnostic Characteristics ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... The Gray -crowned Rosy -Finch is most likely to be confused with other rosy -finch species. The Black Rosy -Finch is much darker bodied (blackish or blackish -brown) with less extensive pink on the underparts, and lacks the mostly gray head present in one race of Gray -crowned Rosy -Finch that winters in Montana. The Brown -capped Rosy -Finch lacks gray on the head, and the body plumage is a richer brown with darker and more extensive pink on the belly. Ranges of the three species rarely overlap during the breeding season (MacDougall-Shackleton et al. 2000). Habitat Breeding, nesting, and winter roosting habitat in Montana is similar to other regions in the species' range (Johnson 1965, Hendricks 1981). Gray -crowned Rosy -Finches nest in crevices in cliffs and talus among glaciers and snowfields above timberline (also in abandoned buildings above treeline) and forage in barren, rocky or grassy areas adjacent to the nesting sites; in migration and winter they also occur in open situations, fields, cultivated lands, brushy areas, and around human habitation. They may roost in mine shafts or similar protected sites. During some winters individuals move out onto the shortgrass and midgrass prairies to feed (Hendricks and Swenson 1983, Swenson et al. 1988). �,v°- Great Blue Heron iN" z � "1�""''�1 Ardea herodias View in Field Guide mm General Description Largest heron in North America, 60 cm tall, 97 to 135 cm long, 2.1 to 2.5 kg mass. Wings long and rounded, bill long and tapered, tail short. Upper parts are gray, fore -neck is streaked with white, black, and rust - brown. Bill yellowish. Legs brownish or greenish. In flight, folds neck in an "S" shape and extends legs along the body axis; wing beats are deep slow wing. Adults have long occipital plumes (Butler 1992). For a comprehensive review of the conservation status, habitat use, and ecology of this and other Montana bird species, please see Marks et al. 2016, Birds of Montana. Range Summer Migratory �- aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaiiaaaaaaaaiiiai # Observations: 23975 Sr„ilri1r�itted Cfl)5 IDY 1%lorIthl 4. A) Z "lIl", Diagnostic Characteristics ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... No other heron in Montana is the size or color of the Great Blue Heron, nor are other herons likely to be encountered in Montana during winter. Habitat Great Blue Herons are equally at home in urban wetlands and wilderness settings. Most Montana nesting colonies are in cottonwoods along major rivers and lakes; a smaller number occur in riparian ponderosa pines and on islands in prairie wetlands. Nesting trees are the largest available. Active colonies are farther from rivers than inactive colonies. The number of nests in the colony corresponds to the distance from roads (Parker 1980). Great Blue Herons build bulky stick nests high in the trees when nesting near the shores of rivers and lakes and on the ground or in low shrubs when nesting on treeless islands. Nv°"- I"IIGreat Gray Owl " Strix nebulosa View in Field Guide Species of concern Native Species Global Rank: GS State Rank: S3 Agency Status USFWS: MBTA USFS: BLM: SENSITIVE FWP SWAP: SGCN3, SGIN PIF: 3 Range General Descri # Observations: 1060 Great Gray Owls are the largest owl species in North America. They have a wingspan over 4 feet with a body length of up to 27 inches. They Si„ii_)iWtted CL7, I)y I%Ioltli can weigh over 2 pounds. Females are usually larger than males, but 200 they are otherwise identical in appearance. Great Gray Owls have a 160 00 large, rounded, half -domed head with a flat face and no ear tufts (Bull 0 and Duncan 1993, Sibley 2000). Their eyes are yellow, but look rather 40� small due to the ringed facial disks. The bill is mostly yellow with a black patch below separating white lores that give Great Gray Owls their classic bow -tied appearance. The plumage is mostly gray with patches of whites and browns. The tail is fairly long and is also brown and gray (Bull and Duncan 1993). The vocalization of Great Gray Owls is a series of deep resonating "whoos" that falls in pitch and accelerates (Cramp 1985). For a comprehensive review of the conservation status, habitat use, and ecology of this and other Montana bird species, please see Marks et al. 2016, Birds of Montana. Diagnostic Characteristics ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Great Gray Owls are distinguished from Barred Owls (Strix varia) by their much larger size, yellow eyes, bow -tie under the face, the lack of barring on the breast, and the better defined concentric rings on the face (Bull and Duncan 1993). Great Gray Owls are distinguished from their other closest relative, the Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis), by many of the same physical characteristics, much larger size, yellow eyes, and bow -tie. Also, the ranges of Great Gray Owl and Spotted Owl do not usually overlap, unless extreme southern movements occur by Great Gray Owls in winter. Habitat Little specific habitat information for Montana is currently available, as systematic surveys for Great Gray Owls have not been done. Great Gray Owls are known to use lodgepole pine/Douglas-fir in Montana. Habitat information from other Great Gray Owl sources state that their habitat is dense coniferous and hardwood forest, especially pine, spruce, paper birch, poplar, and second -growth, and especially near water. They forage in wet meadows, boreal forests and spruce -tamarack bogs in the far north, and coniferous forest and meadows in mountainous areas. Great Gray Owls nest in the tops of large broken -off tree trunks (especially in the south), in old nests of other large birds (e.g., hawk nest) (especially in the north), or in debris platforms from dwarf mistletoe, frequently near bogs or clearings. Nests are frequently reused (Franklin 1988) and the same pair often nests in the same area in successive years. 0,v1- Harle uin Duck Histrionicus histrionicus view in Field Guide) N mm General Description The Harlequin Duck is unique among North American waterfowl for breeding and foraging in clear, fast -flowing rivers and streams. The breeding plumage of adult males is unmistakable, with slate blue, white, black, and chestnut markings. This species is also unusual in its vocalizations; males and females give a mouselike squeak. The Harlequin Duck overwinters along coastal rocky shorelines (Robertson and Goudie 1999). For a comprehensive review of the conservation status, habitat use, and ecology of this and other Montana bird species, please see Marks et al. 2016, Birds of Montana. Phenol Range Summer Migratory �- aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaiiaaaaaaaaiiiai # Observations: 4026 Sr„ihmr�itted Cfl)5 fDy 1%lorith 600 tss�r 400 In Montana, adults arrive from late April to early May (Kuchel 1977, Reichel and Genter 1996). Males depart breeding grounds in June while females and young depart from late July to early September (Kuchel 1977, Reichel and Genter 1994). Egg -laying occurs between April 30 and July 4 (Kuchel 1977, Reichel and Genter 1996). Kuchel (1977) estimated hatching dates for broods on McDonald Creek, Glacier National Park: 13 of 15 occurred between June 27 and July 7 with extremes on June 11 and August 2. Young fledge in Montana between July 15 and September 10, with most fledging between July 25 and August 15 (Kuchel 1977, Reichel and Genter 1996). Transients and winter observations recorded from October -March. Pairs observed beginning in April and May (Montana Natural Heritage Program Point Observation Database 2014). Diaqnostic Characteristics The Harlequin Duck is a small diving duck. Male is larger than female. Breeding plumage of male is unmistakable: the body is slate blue with white bands and collars, bordered with black lines on chest and neck; large white crescent in front of eye with small white circular patch near ear; white vertical stripe on side of neck; black streak bordered by white and amber lines on top of head; iridescent blue secondaries; dark -slate -blue belly and chestnut -brown flanks. Adult female has brown body plumage, a white belly, with brown checks or spots, a round white spot behind ear, faded variable white patches in front of eye, and occasionally white streaks on back of head. Juveniles and immatures are similar to female, but feet are typically yellow, not gray (Robertson and Goudie 1999). Habitat In Montana, Harlequin Ducks inhabit fast moving, low gradient, clear mountain streams. In Glacier National Park, birds used primarily old -growth or mature forest (90%); and 2) most birds in streams on the Rocky Mountain Front were observed in pole -sized timber (Diamond and Finnegan 1993). Banks are most often covered with a mosaic of trees and shrubs, but the only significant positive correlation is with overhanging vegetation (Diamond and Finnegan 1993, Ashley 1994). The strongest stream section factor in Montana appears to be for stream reaches with at least two loafing sites per 10 meters (Kuchel 1977, Diamond and Finnegan 1993, Ashley 1994). Broods may preferentially use backwater areas, especially shortly after hatching (Kuchel 1977), though this is not apparent in data from other studies (Ashley 1994). Stream width ranges from 3 m to 35 m in Montana. Harlequin Ducks in Glacier National Park used straight, curved, meandering, and braided stream reaches in proportion to their availability (Ashley 1994). �,v°"� Horned Grebe iNat AH Podiceps auritus View in Field Guide) tern 5 s ;CN3 General Description Nonbreeding plumage (September -March) is black and white. The head is topped with a gray crown bordering on white cheeks; this border extending in a rather straight line from behind the eyes. The front of the neck, flanks and belly are dingy white. In breeding plumage, the neck and flanks are ruddy in color, the crown and cheeks are black and a stripe of white to gold feathers extends back from the eye. For a comprehensive review of the conservation status, habitat use, and ecology of this and other Montana bird species, please see Marks et al. 2016, Birds of Montana. Diagnostic Characteristics Range Summer Migratory �- aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaiiaaaaaaaaiiiai # Observations: 3541 >,,J_]ii)itted C)L�s IDy kloiitli fssa(l P,rol( "blU u Wi�omu�p- Sul& ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Most easily confused with the Eared Grebe, but differs from this species by having the forehead rise to a peak at the rear of the crown rather than in the middle (as with the Eared), a thicker neck and thicker bill with the lower mandible lacking an up- turned tip (all features of Eared Grebes), and a less rounded back without the fluffier rear -end. Eared Grebe also lacks the whitish patch at the base of the forewing that are visible in flight. Habitat Horned Grebes use shallow freshwater ponds and marshes with beds of emergent vegetation (especially sedges, rushes and cattails), including in Montana (Dubois 1919, Weydemeyer 1932). In spring and fall the Horned Grebe is found mainly on large sized bodies of water, including rivers and small lakes. The winter range consists of large sized bodies of fresh and more commonly salt water; usually inshore (Stedman 2000). 0,v1- Lewis's Woodpecker 1�"1=1 Melanerpes lewis View in Field Guide) tern 4 B Bcci®; General Description The Lewis's Woodpecker is a medium sized woodpecker, approximately 10 to 11 inches in length. They weigh about 115 grams. Their wings and tail are relatively long (Sibley 2000). The head, back, wings and tail are greenish -black. They have a silver -pale collar and upper breast. The face is dark red and the belly and lower breast is pinkish or salmon -red. The sexes are similar in appearance, but males are usually larger than females (Tobalske 1997). Juvenile birds are distinct from adults, having an overall dark appearance with more brownish -black on the back. They usually lack the silver color of the neck, the pinkish belly color, as well as the red on the face (Tobalske 1997). �- aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaiiaaaaaaaaiiiai # Observations: 3380 �r,ili��itecl a=atl��, Y)'y f��3r7tf�� tss�r 4e,�, () ............ , Lewis's Woodpeckers are quieter than other woodpeckers. They commonly call during the breeding season only. During breeding male Lewis's Woodpeckers will give a harsh "CHURR" call which is repeated 3 to 8 times. Males will also give a chatter call throughout the year and commonly during the breeding season (Tobalske 1997). For a comprehensive review of the conservation status, habitat use, and ecology of this and other Montana bird species, please see Marks et al. 2016, Birds of Montana. Diagnostic Characteristics The plumage of the Lewis's Woodpecker will easily distinguish it from any other woodpecker species. Also the flight pattern is unique for woodpeckers. Lewis's Woodpecker flight is slow and direct and will often include long glides and aerial maneuvers (Tobalske 1997). From long distances, Lewis's Woodpeckers may be mistaken for a American Crow or jay, but closer observation of the plumage and form will eliminate any confusion. Habitat In the Bozeman area, Lewis's Woodpeckers are known to occur in river bottom woods and forest edge habitats (Skarr 1969). Habitat information from other Lewis's Woodpecker sources state that the breeding habitat is open forest and woodland, often logged or burned, including oak and coniferous forest; primarily ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa), riparian woodland and orchards, and less commonly in pinyon -juniper Pinus spp.-Juniperus spp.) (American Ornithologists' Union 1983). Lewis's Woodpecker distribution is closely associated with open ponderosa pine forest in western North America, and is strongly associated with fire -maintained old -growth ponderosa pine (Diem and Zeveloff 1980, Tobalske 1997, Saab and Dudley 1998). Important habitat features include an open tree canopy, a brushy understory with ground cover, dead trees for nest cavities, dead or downed woody debris, perch sites, and abundant insects. Lewis's Woodpeckers use open ponderosa pine forests, open riparian woodlands dominated by cottonwood (Populus spp.), and logged or burned pine. They also use oak (Quercus spp.) woodlands, orchards, pinyon -juniper woodlands, other open coniferous forests, and agricultural lands. Apparently the species prefers open ponderosa pine at high elevations and open riparian forests at lower elevations (Bock 1970, Tobalske 1997). In the Blue Mountains of Oregon, they showed a preference for open stands near water (Thomas et al. 1979). Because the species catches insects from the air, perches near openings or in open canopy are important for foraging habitat (Bock 1970, Tobalske 1997). Lewis's Woodpeckers often use burned pine forests, although suitability of post -fire habitats varies with the age, size, and intensity of the burn, density of remaining snags, and the geographic region. Birds may move to unburned stands once the young fledge (Block and Brennan 1987, Tobalske 1997, Saab and Dudley 1998). They have been generally considered a species of older burns rather than new ones, moving in several years post -fire once dead trees begin to fall and brush develops, five to thirty years after fire (Bock 1970, Block and Brennan 1987, Caton 1996, Linder and Anderson 1998). However, on a two- to four -year -old burn in Idaho they were the most common cavity -nester, and occurred in the highest nesting densities ever recorded for the species (Saab and Dudley 1998). As habitat suitability declines, however, numbers decline. For example, in Wyoming, the species was more common in a seven -year -old burn than in a twenty -year -old burn (Linder and Anderson 1998). Overall, suitable conditions include an open canopy, availability of nest cavities and perches, abundant arthropod prey, and a shrubby understory (Linder and Anderson 1998, Saab and Dudley 1998). Unlike other woodpeckers, Lewis's Woodpeckers are not morphologically well adapted to excavate cavities in hard wood. They tend to nest in a natural cavity, abandoned Northern Flicker (Co/aptes auratus) hole, or previously used cavity, 1 to 52 meters above ground. Sometimes they will excavate a new cavity in a soft snag (standing dead tree), dead branch of a living tree, or rotting utility pole (Harrison 1979, Tobalske 1997). The mated pair may return to the same nest site in successive years. On partially logged burns with high nesting densities in Idaho, nest sites were characterized by the presence of large, soft snags and an average of 62 snags per hectare that had more than 23-centimeter diameter at breast height (dbh) (Saab and Dudley 1998). In late summer, wandering flocks move from valleys into mountains or from breeding habitat to orchards. In winter, they use oak woodlands and nut and fruit orchards. An important habitat feature in many wintering areas is the availability of storage sites for grains or mast, such as tree bark (e.g. bark of mature cottonwood trees) or power poles with desiccation cracks (Bock 1970, Tobalske 1997). In southwestern Arizona and southeastern California, Lewis's Woodpeckers may use scrub oak, pecan orchards, and cottonwoods, but more study is needed in this area (Bock 1970). In Mexico, they use open and semi -open woodlands, especially those with oaks (Howell and Webb 1995). 0,v1- Lo erhead Shrike Lanius /udoyicianus View in Field Guide) tern 4 B ;CN3 Range Summer Migratory General Description Slightly smaller than the American Robin (Turdus migratorius), the total length of this bird averages 23 cm. Males and females are similar in appearance. This species has a stout, hooked bill that has dark upper and lower mandibles. It has a broad black mask extending above the eye and thinly across top of bill. Its head and back are covered with a bluish -gray cowl, while its underparts and rump are white or grayish - white (underparts are very faintly barred in adults). It has a black tail with white tip and large white patches on black wings. Juveniles are paler and barred overall, with brownish -gray upperparts and buffy wing patches (Miller 1931, Fraser and Luukkonen 1986). Most nests are made of coarse twigs with a lining of plant material and animal hair (Fraser and Luukkonen 1986). For a comprehensive review of the conservation status, habitat use, and ecology of this and other Montana bird species, please see Marks et al. 2016, Birds of Montana. �- aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaiiaaaaaaaaiiiai # Observations: 3484 �r,il:�i��itt�cl a=atl7, P)y f��3r7ti�i p , �ro:rra (9!Jf V. Dia9.nostic Characteristics ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Loggerhead Shrikes differ from Northern Shrikes (Lanius excubitor) by having the base of the lower mandible black instead of pale, unbarred or barely barred underparts (adults), a shorter and less hooked bill, a darker head and back, and a more extensive black mask. They differ from the Northern Mockingbird (Mimus poiygiottos) by having a black mask and a shorter, less curved bill. Habitat Open landscapes with short vegetation, including pastures with fence rows, mowed roadsides, agricultural fields, riparian areas, and open woodlands (Yosef 1996). In Idaho, nests are found in sagebrush (65%), bitterbush, and greasewood, and are equally successful in all three (Woods and Cade 1996). �,v°"� Lon billed Curlew iNat A110,4W Long- billed Numenius americanus View in Field Guide) BCC11 ;CNN General Description Range Summer Migratory ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... The Long -billed Curlew is the largest shorebird in North America. It is # Observations: 10511 considered an endemic to the Great Plains. The Long -billed Curlew's Ion decurved bill is adapted for capturing invertebrates living in.iLi� itt�cl c=atl7s Icy h�r7tl 9, p p 9 9 � S,i,00 mudflats on its wintering grounds (bugger and Dugger 2002). Its 4,1XJ familiar "curlew" call can be heard throughout the mixedgrass prairie of „i:�rr� Montana during the spring and summer. For a comprehensive review of the conservation status, habitat use, and v��''�� ecology of this and other Montana bird species, please see Marks et al. 2016, Birds of Montana. Phenol Migrants arrive in Montana late March to mid -April. Adults observed on nests with eggs in mid- to late -May. Adults with young birds observed in early June to early July. Females leave breeding grounds before males; tagged females left around June 28 and tagged males left July 28 (see Migration, below). Dia9.nostic Characteristics ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... The large size, long decurved bill, and cinnamon color is diagnostic of this species. Sexes are similar in appearance, but females average slightly larger than males. Plumages are similar throughout the year. Body is a rich buff tinged with cinnamon or pink. Upperparts are streaked with dark brown. Juveniles are similar to adults except the bill is much shorter (Dugger and Dugger 2002). Habitat The Long -billed Curlew breeds in mixedgrass prairie habitats and moist meadows throughout Montana. It prefers to nest in open, short-statured grasslands and avoids areas with trees, dense shrubs, or tall, dense grasses (Dugger and Dugger 2002). �,v°"� Northern Goshawk �Nw Az� Accipiter gentilis View in Field Guide) Species of Concern Native Species Global Rank: GS State Rank: S3 Agency Status USFWS: MBTA USFS: BLM: FWP SWAP: SGCN3 PIF: 2 Range Migratory General Descri # Observations: 4743 The Northern Goshawk is a fairly large hawk with a long tail having a broad, dark sub -terminal band and three to four narrower dark bands, Si„il_,iWttrcl c_aL7, I)y hlolh rounded wing tips, and a conspicuous pale eyebrow. The sexes are fssilU similar with adults having a dark crown, blue -gray back, white underparts with fine, dense gray barring and conspicuous white undertail coverts. Thee es of adults are deeprub red and the feet are "' i yellow. Immature Northern Goshawks are brown above, buffy below, 1.15 with dense, blurry streaking. The undertail coverts are dark -streaked �'�` and the tail has wavy dark bands bordered with white and a thin white tip. The eyes of immature Northern Goshawks are yellowish, deepening in color to red as they mature. The total length is 53 to 66 cm, with females averaging larger than males (Squires and Reynolds 1997). For a comprehensive review of the conservation status, habitat use, and ecology of this and other Montana bird species, please see Marks et al. 2016, Birds of Montana. Dia9.nostic Characteristics ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... The Northern Goshawk is the largest and heaviest bodied of the three North American accipiters. Goshawks are clearly larger than Sharp -shinned Hawks (Accipiter striatus). Male Northern Goshawks can be of similar size to female Cooper's Hawks (Accipiter cooperi), but Northern Goshawks have broader wings and a relatively short tail compared to Cooper's Hawks (Squires and Reynolds 1997). Their ventral surface is pale rather than rust -colored as well. They can be distinguished from both Sharp -shinned and Cooper's Hawks by their whiteish underside as well as a boldly patterned head with a strong, white superciliary line above the eye (Sibley 2000). Juvenile Northern Goshawks can be distinguished from juvenile Cooper's Hawks by their conspicuous pale superciliary line (Squires and Reynolds 1997), overall buffy wash appearance on the breast and belly (Sibley 2000), uneven tail - bands creating a zig-zag pattern when the tail is spread (Squires and Reynolds 1997) and overall paler and more patterned upperside (Sibley 2000). Northern Goshawks can be discerned from falcons by their shorter, more rounded wings, and alternating flap -and -glide flight pattern. Habitat Goshawks nest in a variety of forest types in Montana, including Douglas -fir and Western Larch west of the Continental Divide, Lodgepole Pine in Beaverhead County, and Ponderosa Pine in Powder River and Carter counties. They prefer mature and old -growth forests with a preponderance of large trees, a dense canopy, and a relatively open understory (Hayward and Escano 1989, Squires and Reynolds 1997, Clough 2000). An exception to this generality is in Beaverhead County, where nests commonly occur in Lodgepole Pine stands with an average tree diameter of only 13 cm, although the birds usually place their nests in larger trees within these stands (Kirkley 1996). The nest is a bulky platform of sticks placed near the main trunk of a large tree from 6-20 m off the ground, usually in the lower part of the canopy. Forest stands where Northern Goshawks nest in Montana tend to be mature large -tract conifer forests with a high canopy cover (69%), relatively steep slope (21%), and little to sparse undergrowth (Kirkley 1996). Hayward and Escano (1989) examined nest -site characteristics at 17 territories in western Montana and northern Idaho in 1983. The birds nested preferentially in mature and old -growth stands of conifers that had a closed canopy (75-85% canopy cover) and a large forest opening within 1 km of the nest. Nest heights ranged from 7-17 m, and most nests were placed next to the main trunk in the lower one-third of the canopy. All Northern Goshawk nest trees reported by Kirkley (1996) were either Lodgepole Pine or Douglas -fir with an average DBH (diameter at breast height) of 33.6 cm and average height of 21.9 meters. In another study conducted in Montana, Douglas -fir, Ponderosa Pine and Grand Fir were the trees selected most often for nest building (State of Idaho HCA/CS Dev. Team 1995). Nests were constructed an average 10.9 meters above the ground and were usually located near water (232 m) or a clearing (85 m) (Kirkley 1996). Range -wide nest site characteristics are similar. Almost no information is available regarding Northern Goshawk foraging strategies in Montana. It is known they hunt in closed canopy habitats as well as more open landscapes and over 50 species of identified prey indicate they are generalists in terms of prey selection. Little information exists concerning Northern Goshawk non -breeding or wintering habitat in the state. However, in the Bozeman area, birds coming into the valley are found in forested or thickety areas. Multiple observations of wintering Northern Goshawks are documented in the north -central and northeastern areas of Montana (Montana Bird Distribution Committee 2012), possibly indicating movement toward areas of higher prey availability. 0,v1— Pacific Wren Troglodytes pacificus View in Field Guide) mm General Description The Pacific Wren is a small dark wren (8-12 cm long, 8-12 g) with a short stubby tail typically held in an upright and cocked position, and with a short slender bill. The color is fairly uniform dark to medium brown, becoming paler on the supercilium, chin, and throat, and with dark barring on the wings, tail and underparts (belly, flanks, crissum); sexes are alike in appearance. For a comprehensive review of the conservation status, habitat use, and ecology of this and other Montana bird species, please see Marks et al. 2016, Birds of Montana. Diaonostic Characteristics Range �— aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaiiaaaaaaaaiiiai # Observations: 5646 si"I:Jlll�itted a=atl7, Y)'y 1%,10 111 X.) ,':41f2 o0 Pacific Wren was formerly considered a subspecies of Winter Wren (T. troglodytes), then split in 2010 based on voice, DNA, and subtle differences in plumage (more deeply rufescent). Pacific Wrens are distinguished from other sympatric wrens by usually smaller size, much shorter tail, and fairly uniform brown coloration. Their voice is more complex and modulated, and delivered more rapidly than by the Winter Wren, such that individual notes are difficult to follow and appreciate (Hejl et al. 2002). Winter Wren reported infrequently during migration in far eastern Montana. Habitat Pacific Wrens prefer large uncut stands of old -growth and mature coniferous forests and also occur in riparian cottonwoods and aspens. In Montana they are especially common in cedar -hemlock, cedar -grand fir, and spruce - fir forests and are strongly associated with riparian areas within these forest types (Manuwal 1986, Hutto and Young 1999, Casey 2000). Snags, large trees, and downed woody debris are important components of breeding habitat. The nest substrate is highly variable and includes woodpecker cavities in trees, holes in dirt banks, niches in rotting trees, root tangles of fallen trees, clumps of hanging moss, and folds in tree bark (Hejl et al. 2002). Nesting and foraging typically occur within 2 m (6.5 feet) of the ground. In winter, Pacific Wrens use thickets in open forests and lower -elevation riparian areas in addition to large tracts of mature forests. 0,v1- Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus View in Field Guide) Species of concern Native Species Global Rank: G4 State Rank: S3 Agency Status USFWS: META USFS: SENSITIVE BLM: SENSITIVE FWP SWAP: SGCN3 PIF: 2 General Description The Peregrine Falcon has long pointed wings, a dark crown and nape, and a dark wedge extending below the eye. The forehead is pale in immature birds, which are mainly brownish above rather than black or gray as in adults. Arctic birds are relatively pale, and the Peregrine Falcons of the northwest coast of North America are very dark, compared to the intermediate coloration of the subspecies (anatum) that once ranged across North America. They average 41 to 51 cm long and 91 to 112 cm in wingspan. For a comprehensive review of the conservation status, habitat use, and ecology of this and other Montana bird species, please see Marks et al. 2016, Birds of Montana. Range lll� aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaiiaaaaaaiaaiiia # Observations: 4065 >,,J)ii)itted C)Lts IDy l faith 600 9t Diagnostic Characteristics ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Smaller and less stocky in appearance than Gyrfalcons. Juvenile Peregrine Falcons are similar in size to Prairie Falcons, but are darker in color and have a heavy dark wedge on the side of the face. Habitat Nests typically are situated on ledges of vertical cliffs, often with a sheltering overhang. Ideal locations include undisturbed areas with a wide view, near water, and close to plentiful prey. Substitute man-made sites can include tall buildings, bridges, rock quarries, and raised platforms. In fall in the Bozeman area, birds have been seen following flocks of shore birds at the lakes (Skaar 1969). 0,v1- Pileated Woodpecker Dryocopus pileatus View in Field Guide) Species of concern Native Species Global Rank: GS State Rank: S3 Agency Status USFWS: MBTA USFS: BLM: FWP SWAP: SGCN3 PIF: 2 General Descri A crested, black woodpecker with wing span of about 70 cm. More or less uniformly black body with a white line extending down the neck from the bill to underwing area; white throat and line above the eye; black through the eye. Male with a vivid red crest extending from the bill to the nape and a red moustache mark extending from the bill. Female slightly smaller than male and with gray to brown forehead, red crest, and no red moustache mark. In all sex and age groups, a few gray -white bars can be found on the flanks. In flight, wings show black leading and trailing edges and white near the center of the wing close to Range # Observations: 11135 �r,il:�i��itecl a=atl7, P)y f��3r7ti�i "oar 00 0 GIIIIII�� s ,. 1. the body. Juveniles have duller, more loosely textured feathers; primary 10 is longer, broader, and less pointed. Voice a loud, characteristic "kuk-kuk-kuk-kuk" drumming a deep resonant roll that carries a kilometer or more (Bull and Jackson 1995). For a comprehensive review of the conservation status, habitat use, and ecology of this and other Montana bird species, please see Marks et al. 2016, Birds of Montana. Diagnostic Characteristics ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Except for the probably extinct Ivory -billed Woodpecker (Campephilus principalis) of the southeastern United States and Imperial Woodpecker (C. imperialis) of montane western Mexico, the Pileated Woodpecker is the largest woodpecker in North America. Large size and prominent red crest distinguish this woodpecker from all other woodpecker species in Montana. Habitat .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Late successional stages of coniferous or deciduous forest preferred, but also younger forests that have scattered, large dead trees (Bull and Jackson 1995). In forests of northwestern Montana dominated by western larch and Douglas -fir, Pileated Woodpecker nests (113 in 97 trees) were in western larch (52), ponderosa pine (18) black cottonwood (15), trembling aspen (7), western white pine (3), grand fir (1), and Douglas -fir (1). Nest -tree diameter at breast height (DBH) averaged 73 cm (29 in) and height averaged 29 m (95 ft). Roost trees were similar to nest trees; both typically were snags (81% and 78%, respectively) with broken tops (77% in both categories). Old -growth stands containing western larch were common nesting sites; old -growth ponderosa pine, black cottonwood and trembling aspen were locally important but more restricted in distribution (McClelland and McClelland 1999). �,v°"� Short -eared Owl Asio flammeus View in Field Guide) ;-. General Description Range Short -eared Owls are a small to medium-sized owl. Published lengths q of 06s 1-9 10-18 19-28 29-46 47"352 r range from 37 to 39 centimeters (Cramp 1985) to 34 to 42 centimeters (Mikkola 1983), with females slightly larger than males and # Observations: 3399 considerably heavier, averaging 411 grams compared to 350 grams for males (Mikkola 1983). They are excellent flyers with long wings (95 to Si,,i1_)mitted c_)L7, IDy 1%laitli 110 centimeters) (Cramp 1985), and light wing -loading (0.333 gram 80 per centimeter squared) (Clark 1975). There is little difference in wing length between the sexes (Clark and Ward 1974). The back and upper u wing surfaces are tawny -brown to buff -colored with heavy but indistinct streaking. The ventral surfaces are much lighter, with bold, vertical brown streaking on the breast, and a pair of barely visible ear tufts close together at the top of the facial disk. The belly is pale, lightly streaked; the wings are long and have a buffy patch beyond the wrist above and a dark patch at the base of the primaries below; the dark facial disk contrasts with yellow eyes; and the legs and feet are feathered. Mature males are bright white on the underwing, while mature females show somewhat more buff coloration (Bent 1938, Village 1987). It is, nonetheless, difficult to sex or age these birds in the field. Females are generally darker than males but young birds are also darker than older ones (Mikkola 1983), thus a young male may be darker than an old female. Both sexes have a distinct, black carpal bar and dark wingtips. Juveniles possess full adult plumage by October of the first year (Bent 1938, Cramp 1985). The facial disc is circular and whitish with dark areas around the bright, yellow eyes, black bill. Recently fledged and juvenile Short -eared Owls show much darker coloration overall and a much darker facial disc which whitens with age. The Short -eared Owl gets its common name from the small ear tufts over the eyes. These inconspicuous tufts are part of the facial disc and are generally not seen except when female is in camouflage position on nest or erected when the bird is annoyed or alert. They may possibly aid in making birds more cryptic when in vegetation by breaking the line of the circular facial disc. The bird is generally silent but does vocalize in courtship (a low, repeated, hooting "voo, hoo, hoo, hoo", or in conjunction with defensive behavior or annoyance, yaps or barks). The call is given approximately 15 times during courtship flight and is also accompanied by an audible wing -clap and dive between calls. Young give a food -begging call ("pssssip") that apparently aids adults in locating them from the time they leave the nest until after fledging. Adults may squeal while feigning injury during broken -wing acts to distract intruders from nests or young. Both young and adults will clack their bills when annoyed or in defense. Apparently, no data exist on the use of broadcasting tape-recorded vocalizations for detection or monitoring purposes. For a comprehensive review of the conservation status, habitat use, and ecology of this and other Montana bird species, please see Marks et al. 2016, Birds of Montana. Diaanostic Characteristics Short -eared Owls can be distinguished by large "wrist" patches and moth -like flight. Long-eared Owl (Asio otis) has a smaller "wrist" patch, buffy underwings, and a darker belly. Although Long-eared Owls hunt similarly to Short -eared Owls, they are rarely seen hunting during the day. Short -eared Owls are probably the most diurnal of owls (Lockie 1955, Clark 1975) and may often be observed from late afternoon until nightfall, or at dawn. A crow -sized owl seen abroad during daylight in open country will most likely be a Short -eared Owl. However, they also hunt at night. They are easily recognized by their blunt -headed profile and the fact that they glide with their wings held horizontally. This contrasts with the shallow v-shape of the Northern Harrier (Circus cyaneus) with which the Short -eared Owl often shares habitat and may be confused. Northern Harriers may also be distinguished by their white rump patch. Habitat is useful in separating Short -eared Owls from Long-eared Owls, the latter being predominantly a woodland dweller. The Long-eared Owl is also more slender with much longer ear tufts. Burrowing Owl also inhabits open country but is smaller (24 centimeters vs. 38 centimeters), has relatively longer legs, a yellow to whitish bill, and (in adults) has at least some horizontal barring on the breast. The Short -eared Owl's style of flight is unique and has at times been called mechanical, moth -like, or even slovenly (Peterson 1934). Habitat Open grasslands, plains, and agricultural areas with suitable vegetation and food. W&I-1- '14, Trumpeter Swan Cygnus buccinator View in Field Guide) rE ;CN3 General Description Range �— aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaiiaaaaaaaaiiiai Trumpeter Swans are the largest waterfowl in North America. They can # Observations: 7976 be up to 5 feet in length, have a wingspan up to 80 inches (almost 7 feet) and weigh over 20 pounds. Males are larger than females, but otherwise the sexes are similar in appearance. The adult Trumpeter `,iLn ittecl c=atl7s Icy h�r7tl 11 Swan is entirely white, although the head and neck are sometimes stained an orange color due to iron -rich waters and mud where they f9s lrJ forage for food. The webbed feet and legs are black. The bill is straight, ' rarely shows any yellow spot in front of the eyes (lores) and also is „ lillllllli�' " oz black. Sometimes the lower mandible shows a salmon -red line along the upper edge (Mitchell 1994). Juvenile swans are mostly white, but can retain a gray or brown head, neck and body feathers. Their feet may be yellowish, grayish or dull black. Hatchlings (cygnets) are all gray in color and have pinkish feet and a black and pink bicolored bill (Mitchell 1994). The vocalization of Trumpeter Swans is limited to only a call sounding like "oh -OH". They can make this call either with their mouths open (louder) or closed (nasal -like). Other sounds made include peeps, hisses and gurgles (Mitchell 1994). For a comprehensive review of the conservation status, habitat use, and ecology of this and other Montana bird species, please see Marks et al. 2016, Birds of Montana. Diagnostic Characteristics Trumpeter Swans are similar in appearance to, but larger than, Tundra Swans. Trumpeter Swans rarely show any yellow on the lores, while Tundra Swans have very evident yellow lores (Mitchell 1994). The easiest method of separation between these two species is vocalization. Trumpeter Swans are less vocal, much lower pitched and have a more nasal quality than the louder, clearer sounds of Tundra Swans (Sibley 2000). Trumpeter Swans are also similar in size and weight to the introduced Mute Swans. However, the bill of Mute Swans is mostly orange rather than all black. Also, male Mute Swans have a black knob at the base of the bill. Trumpeter Swans do not have this knob (Mitchell 1994). Habitat The breeding habitat for Trumpeter Swans in the Red Rock Lakes/Centennial Valley of Montana includes lakes and ponds and adjacent marshes containing sufficient vegetation and nesting locations. Along the Rocky Mountain Front the breeding habitat is small pothole lakes, generally with sufficient water to maintain emergent vegetation through the breeding season (Montana Natural Heritage Program Point Observation Database). Habitat requirements for breeding include room to take off (-100 m), shallow, unpolluted water with sufficient emergent vegetation and invertebrates, appropriate nest sites (i.e. Muskrat lodges), and areas with little human disturbance (Mitchell 1994). Their nonbreeding habitat in Montana is the many large and small lakes and ponds in extreme southern Montana, including the breeding area of the Red Rock Lakes/Centennial Valley. Trumpeter Swans also winter in the Ennis Lake and Madison River complex, as well as Hebgen Lake and the surrounding area. During winter appropriate habitat is areas where water does not freeze and food is plentiful and accessible. Trumpeter Swans will move out of one lake or pond to another if conditions become too severe. �,v°"� Varied Thrush iNat Az,10 Ixoreus naevius View in Field Guide) General Description The Varied Thrush is unmistakable with its black and orange plumage and ethereal song. Yet, its shy behavior and tendency to nest in dense mature and old -growth forests have made study of this the breeding biology of this species difficult. For a comprehensive review of the conservation status, habitat use, and ecology of this and other Montana bird species, please see Marks et al. 2016, Birds of Montana. Phenol Range Summer Migratory �- aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaiiaaaaaaaaiiiai # Observations: 6059 Sr„ihmr�itted Cfl)5 fD'y 1%lorith C sari xrr:, ........, In Montana, active Varied Thrush nests have been observed beginning mid- to late -April. Nestlings and fledglings have been observed as early as mid -May. Fledglings from likely second broods observed mid- to late -August (Montana Natural Heritage Program Point Observation Database 2014). Diagnostic Characteristics ............................................................................................... The Varied Thrush is a large, brightly colored thrush. Adult male has a burnt -orange breast and throat, gray to gray -blue rump, back, neck, and crown, a black to slate -gray V-shaped breast band, orange-buffy eyebrow and wing bars, and black to slate -gray wing and tail feathers. Female is similar to male but duller overall with brown - olive to brown -gray upperparts, brown wing and tail feathers, and brown to slate -gray breast band. Plumages are similar throughout the year. Immature birds are similar to adults except the head and neck are brown tinged with buff with an indistinct orange eyebrow. Throat and breast feathers are buff instead of orange. The song of this species is distinctive: a long, whistled tone about two seconds in length with a pause of three to 20 seconds between each tone. The song is somewhat ventriloquial. (George 2000). Habitat In Montana, the Varied Thrush breeds in mixed -coniferous forests with most observations occurring in western and northwestern Montana (Montana Natural Heritage Program Point Observation Database 2014). Dominant tree species include Douglas -fir and western larch. This species is more abundant in mature and old -growth forest stands than in younger forests (Tobalske et al. 1991). In winter, the Varied Thrush uses a wider variety of habitats, including suburban areas such as bird feeders and areas where fruits and berries are present (George 2000). &,v°- Veer Catharus fuscescens View in Field Guide) ;CN3 General Description The Veery is an 18-cm-long bird with a reddish brown dorsum, white belly, gray flanks, grayish face, small spots (often indistinct) on the breast, indistinct grayish eyering, and straight slim bill. Western populations have a darker dorsum and more breast spotting than do eastern populations. For a comprehensive review of the conservation status, habitat use, and ecology of this and other Montana bird species, please see Marks et al. 2016, Birds of Montana. Diagnostic Characteristics Veerys differ from other thrushes by having less breast spotting (less distinct and more restricted). They differ from Pacific coast populations of Swainson's Thrush (Catharus ustulatus) in having gray, instead of buffy brown, flanks. Habitat Range Summer Migratory �- aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaiiaaaaaaaaiiiai # Observations: 3065 P)y f��3r7ti�i 00 80 Generally inhabits damp, deciduous forests in the east. Has a strong preference for riparian habitats in several regions, including the Great Plains. Prefers disturbed forest, probably because denser understory is not found in undisturbed forests (Moskoff 1995). In Montana, Veerys are often associated with willow thickets and cottonwood along streams and lakes in valleys and lower mountain canyons (Saunders 1921, Hand 1969, Skaar 1969), icluding the Flathead and Lewistown regions (Silloway 1901, 1903a). It also occupies riparian cottonwood stands along the lower Missouri River (Kroodsma 1973). Along Beaver Creek in the Bears Paw Mountains, Veerys were present in a variety of plant community types (box elder, alder, aspen, cottonwood, and lodgepole pine) so long as willow was a significant component (Walcheck 1969). �,v°"� , � White-faced Ibis � i�� III, Piegadis chihi View in Field Guide) Species of concern Native Species Global Rank: GS State Rank: S36 11-111119Mf IAW USFS: BLM: SENSITIVE FWP SWAP: SGCN3 PIF: 2 General Description Range Summer Migratory # Observations: 1954 The White-faced Ibis is a medium-sized wading bird with dark maroon or brown plumage, a long neck and legs, and a long, decurved bill. Si,, _)matted c_IL7, IDy 1%laith Males are almost always larger than females and adults are larger than juveniles for the first 6 to 9 months (Ryder and Manry 1994). The adult ac�ei body length ranges from 46 to 56 cm (18.1 to 22.0 inches) with wingspans ranging from 94 to 99 cm (37 to 39 inches). Weight varies" " ranging from 450 to 525 grams (1.0 to 1.2 lb.) and the bill length " averages between 15 to 18 cm (6 to 7 inches) (Ryder and Manry 1994). Male and female plumages cannot be distinguished. In the adult breeding plumage, the head, neck, upper back, wing coverts, and undersides are a dark maroon or brown with a metallic green and bronze sheen. The head of the White-faced Ibis has bare facial skin that is reddish or purple. White feathers on the head separate the forehead from the face and also encircle the eye. The eye itself is red (Ryder and Manry 1994). The bill is cream with some shades of red (Pratt 1976) and the legs are bright red. The non -breeding plumage is similar to the breeding plumage without the presence of the white face feathers. Also, the overall plumage is less glossy (Oberholser 1974), and the bill and legs become an olive -gray color (Pratt 1976). The juvenile plumage has a fuscous foreneck and anterior surface. The back, tail and wings are a dull metallic, greenish -olive and often appears oily (Palmer 1962, Oberholser 1974). When observing immature White-faced Ibises, it can be extremely difficult to separate from the closely related Glossy Ibis. White-faced Ibises have a limited vocalization array. Single birds, pairs, and flocks often give an "oink oink" or "ka-onk ka-onk" sound (Oberholser 1974). During nest building, they often give a guttural babbling sound. Vocalizations during interspecific aggression are long "gheeeeeee" sounds and the greeting call by the male to the female is a "geeeeek, geeeeek, geeeeek" sound (Belknap 1957). White-faced Ibis eggs are elliptically -ovate to round shaped and range in color from a pale bluish -green to a deep turquoise, with no markings (Bent 1926, Belknap 1957, Kotter 1970, King et al. 1980). Dimensions average 51.2 to 52.26 mm by 36.0 to 37.0 mm (Kaneko 1972, Belknap 1957), and weights average 28.4 to 43.7 grams (Kotter 1970). White-faced Ibises are a single brood species, but will attempt to renest after an early nest failure. For a comprehensive review of the conservation status, habitat use, and ecology of this and other Montana bird species, please see Marks et al. 2016, Birds of Montana. Dia9.nostic Characteristics ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... The White-faced Ibis is very similar in appearance to the closely related Glossy Ibis and identification can be difficult. Distinguishing characteristics which separate the two species include the red iris versus a more brownish or dark iris, bright red legs versus more grayish ones, the bare facial skin colored red and trim of white feathers which surround the eye versus a darker face with only small white lines connecting the bill to the eye (Ryder and Manry 1994), and the olive -gray bill versus a more brown colored bill (Sibley 2000). Habitat The White-faced Ibis breeding habitat is typically freshwater wetlands, including ponds, swamps and marshes with pockets of emergent vegetation. They also use flooded hay meadows and agricultural fields as feeding locations. Ibises nest in areas where water surrounds emergent vegetation, bushes, shrubs, or low trees. In Montana, White-faced Ibises usually use old stems in cattails (Typha spp.), hardstem bulrush (Scirpus acutus) or alkali bulrush (S. paiudosus) over shallow water as their nesting habitat (DuBois 1989). Water conditions usually determine whether nesting occurs in a particular area. Therefore, White-faced Ibis nesting sites can often move around from year to year. However, they are a fairly adaptable species and the primary breeding requirement is colony and roosting site isolation. During migration, White-faced Ibises use more varied habitats for resting and feeding sites, ranging from wooded streams, mudflats, and grassy fields to small marshes and sewage ponds (Duebbert 1968, Locatelli and Blankenship 1973, Ducey 1988, Baumgartner and Baumgartner 1992). VNViNONl13dSIIVN LU 39ON d-10/V12EONU LU NVdAin0un -and LUI GIs wV OL 0 0 L o Z, A uow um cm C%j Z- z 1, -Z z Z.� p¢w u 2<0 N SOO*05'48"E 6 s ........... W CO > M c cn C2 Lys uj 1121- 74' 14 lklhv S09'04�50"E 132 661.56, z U- W 7t ---- -- A6A 661,39 z N00'04'30"W ."56, UO U 0 z '10 09Z <,w T— nz 5, LLz z I z z u 1 H z u t' z P 1323 37' T.1SQO'09'37"E S00'09'37'E 1323,37' < z S00*11'31"E. _132?�08' 0 2! Do J66L4j .0 3'26"W 1320,1 2641,59 a a 10 0H U Z� Z o< nut 2 m z z 0 Z < u z O Z '0 1 0 0 z Z G wz 6 3 V < z z z z L. 10- 0 Qj 4-J 0 4-J .2 (1) -0 0 ro FCO — CL 4-d m u m GUARANTEE Issued by Insured Titles 44 4th Street West/P, O, Box 188, Kalispell MT 59901 Title Officer: Sheri Smith Phone: (406)755-5028 FAX,- (406)755-3299 File No. 1075335-FT Cover Pa e aft a�n emirs FirstAmerican Title' Form 5010500(7-1-14) Guarantee Number: 501055-1075335-FT Guarantee Face Page Issued By FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 7 MrstAmeno'can e!" First American Title Insurance Company E1��^Mn1s ryl �.iMr��, P��.dre�w�R This jacket was created electronically and constitutes an original document File No. 1075335-FT Page 2 of 8 Guarantee Face Page - Exclusions, Conditions and Stipulations Form 5010500 7-1-14 SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE OF THIS GUARANTEE 1. Except to the extent that specific assurances are provided in (a) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other Schedule A of this Guarantee, the Company assumes no matters affecting the title to any property beyond the liability for loss or damage by reason of the following: lines of the land expressly described in the description set (a) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other forth in Schedule (A), (C) or in Part 2 of this Guarantee, matters against the title, whether or not shown by the or title to streets, roads, avenues, lanes, ways or public records. waterways to which such land abuts, or the right to (b) (1) Taxes or assessments of any taxing authority that maintain therein vaults, tunnels, ramps or any structure levies taxes or assessments on real property; or, (2) or improvements; or any rights or easements therein, Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes unless such property, rights or easements are expressly or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether and specifically set forth in said description. or not the matters excluded under (1) or (2) are shown (b) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other by the records of the taxing authority or by the public matters, whether or not shown by the public records; (1) records. which are created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by (c) (1) Unpatented mining claims; (2) reservations or one or more of the Assureds; (2) which result in no loss exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance to the Assured; or (3) which do not result in the invalidity thereof; (3) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or potential invalidity of any judicial or non -judicial or not the matters excluded under (1), (2) or (3) are proceeding which is within the scope and purpose of the shown by the public records. assurances provided. 2. Notwithstanding any specific assurances which are provided in (c) The identity of any party shown or referred to in Schedule A of this Guarantee, the Company assumes no Schedule A. liability for loss or damage by reason of the following: (d) The validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown or referred to in this Guarantee GUARANTEE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 1. DEFINITION OF TERMS. 3. NO DUTY TO DEFEND OR PROSECUTE. The following terms when used in the Guarantee mean: The Company shall have no duty to defend or prosecute any (a) the "Assured": the party or parties named as the action or proceeding to which the Assured is a party, Assured in this Guarantee, or on a supplemental writing notwithstanding the nature of any allegation in such action or executed by the Company. proceeding. (b) "land": the land described or referred to in Schedule 4. COMPANY'S OPTION TO DEFEND OR PROSECUTE (A)(C) or in Part 2, and improvements affixed thereto ACTIONS; DUTY OF ASSURED CLAIMANT TO which by law constitute real property. The term "land" COOPERATE. does not include any property beyond the lines of the Even though the Company has no duty to defend or prosecute area described or referred to in Schedule (A)(C) or in Part as set forth in Paragraph 3 above: 2, nor any right, title, interest, estate or easement in (a) The Company shall have the right, at its sole option and abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways or cost, to institute and prosecute any action or proceeding, waterways. interpose a defense, as limited in (b), or to do any other (c) "mortgage": mortgage, deed of trust, trust deed, or act which in its opinion may be necessary or desirable to other security instrument. establish the title to the estate or interest as stated (d) "public records": records established under state herein, or to establish the lien rights of the Assured, or to statutes at Date of Guarantee for the purpose of prevent or reduce loss or damage to the Assured. The imparting constructive notice of matters relating to real Company may take any appropriate action under the property to purchasers for value and without knowledge. terms of this Guarantee, whether or not it shall be liable (e) "date": the effective date. hereunder, and shall not thereby concede liability or 2. NOTICE OF CLAIM TO BE GIVEN BY ASSURED waive any provision of this Guarantee. If the Company CLAIMANT. shall exercise its rights under this paragraph, it shall do An Assured shall notify the Company promptly in writing in so diligently. case knowledge shall come to an Assured hereunder of any (b) If the Company elects to exercise its options as stated in claim of title or interest which is adverse to the title to the Paragraph 4(a) the Company shall have the right to estate or interest, as stated herein, and which might cause select counsel of its choice (subject to the right of such loss or damage for which the Company may be liable by virtue Assured to object for reasonable cause) to represent the of this Guarantee. If prompt notice shall not be given to the Assured and shall not be liable for and will not pay the Company, then all liability of the Company shall terminate fees of any other counsel, nor will the Company pay any with regard to the matter or matters for which prompt notice fees, costs or expenses incurred by an Assured in the is required; provided, however, that failure to notify the defense of those causes of action which allege matters Company shall in no case prejudice the rights of any Assured not covered by this Guarantee. unless the Company shall be prejudiced by the failure and (c) Whenever the Company shall have brought an action or then only to the extent of the prejudice interposed a defense as permitted by the provisions of File No. 1075335-FT Page 3 of 8 Guarantee Face Page - Exclusions, Conditions and Stipulations Form 5010500 7-1-14 GUARANTEE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS (Continued) this Guarantee, the Company may pursue any litigation to final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction and expressly reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to appeal from an adverse judgment or order. (d) In all cases where this Guarantee permits the Company to prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding, an Assured shall secure to the Company the right to so prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding, and all appeals therein, and permit the Company to use, at its option, the name of such Assured for this purpose. Whenever requested by the Company, an Assured, at the Company's expense, shall give the Company all reasonable aid in any action or proceeding, securing evidence, obtaining witnesses, prosecuting or defending the action or lawful act which in the opinion of the Company may be necessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate or interest as stated herein, or to establish the lien rights of the Assured. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the Assured to furnish the required cooperation, the Company's obligations to the Assured under the Guarantee shall terminate. 5. PROOF OF LOSS OR DAMAGE. In addition to and after the notices required under Section 2 of these Conditions and Stipulations have been provided to the Company, a proof of loss or damage signed and sworn to by the Assured shall be furnished to the Company within ninety (90) days after the Assured shall ascertain the facts giving rise to the loss or damage. The proof of loss or damage shall describe the matters covered by this Guarantee which constitute the basis of loss or damage and shall state, to the extent possible, the basis of calculating the amount of the loss or damage. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the Assured to provide the required proof of loss or damage, the Company's obligation to such Assured under the Guarantee shall terminate. In addition, the Assured may reasonably be required to submit to examination under oath by any authorized representative of the Company and shall produce for examination, inspection and copying, at such reasonable times and places as may be designated by any authorized representative of the Company, all records, books, ledgers, checks, correspondence and memoranda, whether bearing a date before or after Date of Guarantee, which reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. Further, if requested by any authorized representative of the Company, the Assured shall grant its permission, in writing, for any authorized representative of the Company to examine, inspect and copy all records, books, ledgers, checks, correspondence and memoranda in the custody or control of a third party, which reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. All information designated as confidential by the Assured provided to the Company pursuant to this Section shall not be disclosed to others unless, in the reasonable judgment of the Company, it is necessary in the administration of the claim. Failure of the Assured to submit for examination under oath, produce other reasonably requested information or grant permission to secure reasonably necessary information from third parties as required in the above paragraph, unless prohibited by law or governmental regulation, shall terminate any liability of the Company under this Guarantee to the Assured for that claim. 6. OPTIONS TO PAY OR OTHERWISE SETTLE CLAIMS: TERMINATION OF LIABILITY. In case of a claim under this Guarantee, the Company shall have the following additional options: (a) To Pay or Tender Payment of the Amount of Liability or to Purchase the Indebtedness. The Company shall have the option to pay or settle or compromise for or in the name of the Assured any claim which could result in loss to the Assured within the coverage of this Guarantee, or to pay the full amount of this Guarantee or, if this Guarantee is issued for the benefit of a holder of a mortgage or a lienholder, the Company shall have the option to purchase the indebtedness secured by said mortgage or said lien for the amount owing thereon, together with any costs, reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by the Assured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to the time of purchase. Such purchase, payment or tender of payment of the full amount of the Guarantee shall terminate all liability of the Company hereunder. In the event after notice of claim has been given to the Company by the Assured the Company offers to purchase said indebtedness, the owner of such indebtedness shall transfer and assign said indebtedness, together with any collateral security, to the Company upon payment of the purchase price. Upon the exercise by the Company of the option provided for in Paragraph (a) the Company's obligation to the Assured under this Guarantee for the claimed loss or damage, other than to make the payment required in that paragraph, shall terminate, including any obligation to continue the defense or prosecution of any litigation for which the Company has exercised its options under Paragraph 4, and the Guarantee shall be surrendered to the Company for cancellation. (b) To Pay or Otherwise Settle With Parties Other Than the Assured or With the Assured Claimant. To pay or otherwise settle with other parties for or in the name of an Assured claimant any claim assured against under this Guarantee, together with any costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by the Assured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment and which the Company is obligated to pay. Upon the exercise by the Company of the option provided for in Paragraph (b) the Company's obligation to the Assured under this Guarantee for the claimed loss or damage, other than to make the payment required in that paragraph, shall terminate, including any obligation to continue the defense or prosection of any litigation for which the Company has exercised its options under Paragraph 4. 7. DETERMINATION AND EXTENT OF LIABILITY. This Guarantee is a contract of Indemnity against actual monetary loss or damage sustained or incurred by the Assured claimant who has suffered loss or damage by reason of reliance upon the assurances set forth in this Guarantee and only to the extent herein described, and subject to the File No. 1075335-FT Page 4 of 8 Guarantee Face Page - Exclusions, Conditions and Stipulations Form 5010500 7-1-14 GUARANTEE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS (Continued) Exclusions From Coverage of This Guarantee. The liability of the Company under this Guarantee to the Assured shall not exceed the least of: (a) the amount of liability stated in Schedule A or in Part 2; (b) the amount of the unpaid principal indebtedness secured by the mortgage of an Assured mortgagee, as limited or provided under Section 6 of these Conditions and Stipulations or as reduced under Section 9 of these Conditions and Stipulations, at the time the loss or damage assured against by this Guarantee occurs, together with interest thereon; or (c) the difference between the value of the estate or interest covered hereby as stated herein and the value of the estate or interest subject to any defect, lien or encumbrance assured against by this Guarantee. 8. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY. (a) If the Company establishes the title, or removes the alleged defect, lien or encumbrance, or cures any other matter assured against by this Guarantee in a reasonably diligent manner by any method, including litigation and the completion of any appeals therefrom, it shall have fully performed its obligations with respect to that matter and shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused thereby. (b) In the event of any litigation by the Company or with the Company's consent, the Company shall have no liability for loss or damage until there has been a final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction, and disposition of all appeals therefrom, adverse to the title, as stated herein. (c) The Company shall not be liable for loss or damage to any Assured for liability voluntarily assumed by the Assured in settling any claim or suit without the prior written consent of the Company. 9. REDUCTION OF LIABILITY OR TERMINATION OF LIABILITY. All payments under this Guarantee, except payments made for costs, attorneys' fees and expenses pursuant to Paragraph 4 shall reduce the amount of liability pro tanto. 10. PAYMENT OF LOSS. (a) No payment shall be made without producing this Guarantee for endorsement of the payment unless the Guarantee has been lost or destroyed, in which case proof of loss or destruction shall be furnished to the satisfaction of the Company. (b) When liability and the extent of loss or damage has been definitely fixed in accordance with these Conditions and Stipulations, the loss or damage shall be payable within thirty (30) days thereafter. 11. SUBROGATION UPON PAYMENT OR SETTLEMENT. Whenever the Company shall have settled and paid a claim under this Guarantee, all right of subrogation shall vest in the Company unaffected by any act of the Assured claimant. The Company shall be subrogated to and be entitled to all rights and remedies which the Assured would have had against any person or property in respect to the claim had this Guarantee not been issued. If requested by the Company, the Assured shall transfer to the Company all rights and remedies against any person or property necessary in order to perfect this right of subrogation. The Assured shall permit the Company to sue, compromise or settle in the name of the Assured and to use the name of the Assured in any transaction or litigation involving these rights or remedies. If a payment on account of a claim does not fully cover the loss of the Assured the Company shall be subrogated to all rights and remedies of the Assured after the Assured shall have recovered its principal, interest, and costs of collection. 12. ARBITRATION. Unless prohibited by applicable law, either the Company or the Assured may demand arbitration pursuant to the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association. Arbitrable matters may include, but are not limited to, any controversy or claim between the Company and the Assured arising out of or relating to this Guarantee, any service of the Company in connection with its issuance or the breach of a Guarantee provision or other obligation. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Liability is $1,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Assured. All arbitrable matters when the amount of liability is in excess of $1,000,000 shall be arbitrated only when agreed to by both the Company and the Assured. The Rules in effect at Date of Guarantee shall be binding upon the parties. The award may include attorneys' fees only if the laws of the state in which the land is located permits a court to award attorneys' fees to a prevailing party. Judgment upon the award rendered by the Arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. The law of the situs of the land shall apply to an arbitration under the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules. A copy of the Rules may be obtained from the Company upon request. 13. LIABILITY LIMITED TO THIS GUARANTEE; GUARANTEE ENTIRE CONTRACT. (a) This Guarantee together with all endorsements, if any, attached hereto by the Company is the entire Guarantee and contract between the Assured and the Company. In interpreting any provision of this Guarantee, this Guarantee shall be construed as a whole. (b) Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not based on negligence, or any action asserting such claim, shall be restricted to this Guarantee. (c) No amendment of or endorsement to this Guarantee can be made except by a writing endorsed hereon or attached hereto signed by either the President, a Vice President, the Secretary, an Assistant Secretary, or validating officer or authorized signatory of the Company. 14. NOTICES, WHERE SENT. All notices required to be given the Company and any statement in writing required to be furnished the Company shall include the number of this Guarantee and shall be addressed to the Company at First American Title Insurance Company, Attn: Claims National Intake Center, 1 First American Way, Santa Ana, California 92707. Phone:888-632-1642. File No. 1075335-FT Page 5 of 8 Guarantee Face Page - Exclusions, Conditions and Stipulations Form 5010500 7-1-14 Subdivision Guarantee C5 Guarantee Subdivision or Proposed Subdivision: Order No.: 1075335-FT Reference No.: ISSUED BY First American Title Insurance Company GUARANTEE NUMBER 5010500-1075335-FT Fee: $150.00 SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE LIMITS OF LIABILITY, AND OTHER PROVISIONS OF THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS HERETO ANNEXED AND MADE A PART OF THIS GUARANTEE, FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION HEREIN CALLED THE COMPANY GUARANTEES: WGM Group FOR THE PURPOSES OF AIDING ITS COMPLIANCE WITH FLATHEAD COUNTY SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS, in a sum not exceeding $5,000.00. THAT according to those public records which, under the recording laws of the State of Montana, impart constructive notice of matters affecting the title to the lands described on the attached legal description: PARCEL A OF CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY NO. 16743, LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER AND THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 29 NORTH, RANGE 22 WEST, P.M.M., FLATHEAD COUNTY, MONTANA. (A) Parties having record title interest in said lands whose signatures are necessary under the requirements of Flathead County Subdivision Regulations on the certificates consenting to the recordation of Plats and offering for dedication any streets, roads, avenues, and other easements offered for dedication by said Plat are: James Barnett and Adam Mills, "As part of an IRC 1031 Tax -Deferred Exchange", and Sean Averill and Craig Denman and Matt Fritter (B) Parties holding liens or encumbrances on the title to said lands are: 1. 2022 taxes and special assessments. The first one-half becomes delinquent after November 30th of the current year, the second one-half becomes delinquent after May 31st of the following year. General taxes as set forth below. Any amounts not paid when due will accrue penalties and interest in addition to the amount stated herein: Year First Half / Status Second Half / Status Parcel Number Covers 2022 $168.11 paid $168.09 paid 0309910 Subject Land File No. 1075335-FT Page 6 of 8 Guarantee Face Page - Exclusions, Conditions and Stipulations Form 5010500 7-1-14 2. Deed of Trust dated July 8, 2022, to secure an original indebtedness of $2,850,000.00, and any other amounts and/or obligations secured thereby Recorded: July 8, 2022, as Instrument No. 2022-000-16912 Grantor: Adam Mills, Sean Averill, James Barnett, Matt Fritter and Craig Denman Trustee: Fidelity Title of Flathead Valley, LLC Beneficiary: First Interstate Bank 3. Terms and Conditions and any amounts due as contained in Marital and Property Settlement Agreement by and between Alexandria Averill and Sean D. Averill, filed January 17, 2018, Case No. DR-17-098. 4. Child support judgment. Debtor: Sean D. Averill Creditor: Alexandria N. Averill Cause No: DR-17-098 in the District Court of Flathead County. (C) Easements, claims of easements and restriction agreements of record are: 5. County road rights -of -way not recorded and indexed as a conveyance of record in the office of the Clerk and Recorder pursuant to Title 70, Chapter 21, M.C.A., including, but not limited to any right of the Public and the County of Flathead to use and occupy those certain roads and trails as depicted on County Surveyor's maps on file in the office of the County Surveyor of Flathead County. 6. Easement for a right of way for an electric transmission and distribution line granted to Pacific Power & Light Company, recorded August 15, 1973 in Book 556 of, Page 800, as Doc. No. 9051. B.P.A. Transmission Line Easement as shown on available county assessor maps. 8. Resolution by the Transportation Commission of the State of Montana for Designation of Limited Access Highway, recorded November 14, 1997, as Doc. No. 1997-318-10050. Amended Resolution Designation of Controlled Access Highway and Facility, recorded October 8, 2004, as Doc. No. 2004-282-08180. Amended Resolution Designation of Controlled Access Highway and Facility, recorded February 11, 2010, as Doc. No. 2010-000-03450. 9. All matters, covenants, conditions, restrictions, easements and any rights, interests or claims which may exist by reason thereof, disclosed by Certificate of Survey No. 16743, recorded June 16, 2005, as instrument number Doc. No. 2005-167-08450, but deleting any covenant, condition or restriction indicating a preference, limitation or discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin to the extent such covenants, conditions or restrictions violate 42 USC 3604(c). 10. All matters, covenants, conditions, restrictions, easements and any rights, interests or claims which may exist by reason thereof, disclosed by Certificate of Survey No. 18465, recorded September 17, 2008, as instrument number Doc. No. 2008-000-26044, but deleting any covenant, condition or restriction indicating a preference, limitation or discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin to the extent such covenants, conditions or restrictions violate 42 USC 3604(c). 11. Right of Way Easement Agreement upon the terms, conditions and provisions contained therein: Parties: Grosswiler Dairy, Inc. and the City of Kalispell Recorded: September 17, 2008, Doc. No. 2008-000-26045 File No. 1075335-FT Page 7 of 8 Guarantee Face Page - Exclusions, Conditions and Stipulations Form 5010500 7-1-14 12. Deed Transferring Water Rights, recorded February 6, 2009, as Doc. No. 2009-000-02994 and as Doc. No. 2009-000-02995. 13. Latecomers Agreement upon the terms, conditions and provisions contained therein: Parties: Owl Corporation and the City of Kalispell Recorded: May 5, 2006, Doc. No. 2006-125-09030 Amendment to Latecomers Agreement, recorded May 18, 2011, as Doc. No. 2011-000-10329. Memorandum of Understanding, recorded August 16, 2011, as Doc. No. 2011-000-16731. Date of Guarantee: November 07, 2022 at 7:30 A.M. By: Authorized Countersignature File No. 1075335-FT Page 8 of 8 Guarantee Face Page - Exclusions, Conditions and Stipulations Form 5010500 7-1-14 Yr dP*Tp Z, Z, �E I- lie 4r �Z- C, z < 2z R5 Z, 8 C4 �60 CM z 2 cr. z z z 2 < 2— 0 J. C14 2646.34 - ' SOO-05'11"1 BASIS OF BEARINGS PER C. OF S. NO. 14700 2651.90' W (D CY) 'o I I > C 0 co Z, cn A2 z -, :2 cl) '0 LLz Z, 3 0 uj S 0-05'09"r, 1323,47 SOID'S"W" llll.�T TV37"E S 0 1323.37' M I. TT cc LLhYy\ < > 10, 0 z I rNmiSOO*04'52:E 132J.12' SOO 131"E\ _111� 0 z .56' 661< 661.04' 8 CC �'2 m 661,56' cr- tS, p , as "'o N ob 10 A\ T ..A 4.... 661,4-0' 60.4 f660.40'1 -6 66&4-1320.79'- No��13� NOG'04'30"W ---66139' 2 2645.56' 2641.59' < , 00 6 o 0 U t: wd nz �2z >r. 0 Cgd -ra Nmo 0 ,110 Ora — � S 6 R 2x nut n :E n 2 n < z Cl) z CY < z o o0z 0 U Z OL—o z 0 o Z U 0 o 0 z < Z ZQ z In R w o f V < 2 2 9 C) 0 w ci I u N 9 3•~-N 3`b �_ C o � �' U ... � .1 fia�l �2,Nh- M° M��ga�s gm oG $gn c n � oN as' °$'5�f C&ov _m It mm r �d Yo°S (� 3 �� $H drna c4 c 5I 0 of m " 5 3g8wsa �.'2>$'�£ .y o.� E� o cEiw"gam ¢ $wLL zEBm$m.'o.3c8-��e$P3tewo� UPm Zo, HUDMh,' 4d Gz$ca, 5,��qv aiOi�v�a a�{�� Ed Y{gsa s � u Nana s ¢$' w�g gH9 G r h H m y lit ui L.� d N Q w �ag�$=P3 waoggP U ;a ��` w�Nh o g 8l L z '—uj Ln z Z Z d G[ Q Dales— .asa N N 0 r yL9(Z 3 9 t99305VOa0U>I 3 S(§�3EfcO36ZY0.0��-D bl9a F \ Z Zbi Z 321 ha'4)93. i-E"",b Lo00S) (4 �3i1 R9'OW63..4 L.L4,.tlUR) 7yce 3,VbAL,005 K! Q Z 8 ml O GNU s' QZa.Q�'�, 11i U N �— Z.t- � u— E cn %o x - I� be`r� uj P: a a� u W Ln m N a1 s' ` (L`Y:123.tlf;'4E9 Nx.at4a.tlaN)(b �32I 6E'499 M.El.VOPaaN) \r } o .V4'fN38 ( 3N,04'049 M.9Z.E L.traN)i4 J3N .PEUfl9 M.GO.CLOafJ) M,.50.E4 SOON m .o l !�o QF�02I h1�1�LC10�� Q [21F�'TJHQ �09 a.ba.vo.�iosL2IbpL � T °s �V-✓99 M„GLIb00aN \; 'Mi0 Eta0f1N` f ,r, fj w oN� zzw� g U- `a IggERA 5Q 0 0 � CL x s p a L7 ° I. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES The Open Space Management Plan is intended to guide the management and use of the Timberwolf Ridge PUD open space lands for conservation and recreational purposes. Open space is defined as an area that either remains in its natural state or is developed as usable parkland associated with the development. Lands addressed by this document are either owned in fee by the Timberwolf Ridge PUD property owners. Any information contained within this "Exhibit A" found to conflict with the approved Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions for Timberwolf Ridge will be amended in favor of the CCRs. A formal management plan may be developed to replace this "Exhibit A" prior to occupancy of development and amendments will be made for subsequent phases to ensure site specific items are addressed and incorporated. Goal: To preserve, protect and manage open space properties. Objectives include: • Preserve and protect scenic views, and aesthetic values; • Protect and enhance the areas natural environment; • Develop management plans for specific developed parks associated with the development. Goal: To provide access to and/ or linkage among open space and recreational sites. Objectives include: • Promote walkability throughout the development; • Seek to preserve pedestrian access by connecting internal park systems to external pedestrian networks Goal: To enable use of PUD open space for recreation and amenities for residents. Objectives include: • Mark and maintain existing trails and easements, and create new trails where and as necessary; Diversify recreational opportunities available to residents; Provide opportunities for passive recreational activities that require trails or paths; DEVELOPED'11. MANAGEMENT OF -. IMPROVEMENTS Ownership of the Rental Community will be responsible for developed open space areas immediately adjacent to rental community buildings. This is estimated to be approximately two acres and includes the following: a. Patio area, sidewalks, and concrete appurtenances supporting the building. b. Playground equipment, benches or hard usable landscape features installed as a part of the developed landscape plans. c. Trail system d. Landscaping of these areas. e. Irrigation systems. 2. Maintenance will include the following and will be done in accordance with the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions for the Timberwolf Ridge PUD. Maintenance responsibilities will ensure that items outlined in item 1 are usable year round, with the exclusion of seasonal irrigation. This includes the following: a. Physical maintenance of sidewalks to perpetuate American Disability Act (ADA) requirements/needs. b. Physical maintenance of hard landscape features such as playground equipment to ensure safety and usability. This will not include clearing of equipment during winter. c. Snow plowing/clearing access for residents. d. Any methods required to perpetuate existing landscaping within developed openspace areas. 3. The Ownership may choose to appoint a Land Management Advisory Committee, either composed of residents or owners to set priority, identify issues, or provide improved maintenance. 1. Ownership of the rental community will be responsible for maintaining access to trails and specifically fire access roads year-round for safety and walkability. This includes the following: a. Maintain a walkable drivable surface free of any impedances such as ice, tripping hazards, and areas effected by erosion or frost damage. b. Snow removal with the following order of importance. i. Building access to ensure people can move freely in and out of the building ii. Snow removal on the parking areas and fire access roads, including around fire hydrants to ensure these can be accessed and located if needed by City of Kalispell Fire Department. iii. Adjacent trails within Highway Right of Way. 2. Access trails within property and adjacent to City of Kalispell Right of way, shall be maintained by the property immediately adjacent. This includes the following: a. The asphalt or concrete surface to ensure ADA access is maintained, Asphalt typically has a life span of 10 years and concrete 20+ years. b. Snow removal. 1. Ownership will be responsible for providing, maintaining, and emptying trash receptacles around the developed park area adjacent to the building. 2. Pet waste stations (dog bags) shall be provided in key areas surrounding the building to ensure pet waste is adequately addressed and disposed. 3. Ownership will be responsible to schedule trash removal for all provided receptacles to ensure usability and preventing overflow which could impede locking mechanisms. 1. All property and occupants of the property will be subject to laws and regulations set forth by The City of Kalispell. 2. Pet owners shall keep all pets leashed at all times to protect other residents and to protect wildlife within natural open space surrounding development. I Organized events or group activities should be scheduled with rental community management for groups of more than 10 on rental community property. 4. Organized events or group activities on for sale properties will be subject to future developed Homeowners Association regulations. 5. Commercial activity including display of goods for sale is prohibited without written consent and approval from management and/or ownership on rental community property. 6. Commercial activity including display of goods for sale is prohibited on for sale properties and will be relegated to commercial district. This use will be at the discretion of owners of this property and subject to any developed Home Owners/Business Association guidelines. 7. Posters, leaflets, placards, or advertisements shall not be affixed to any property without written approval of individual property owners, management, and/or ownership on rental community property. The Rental Management or Homeowners Association will enforce the rules and regulations as necessary to preserve property's open space lands for their intended uses within the guidelines set forth in the above plan, CCRs, or subsequent HOA or Rental Agreements. The City of Kalispell Fire, Police, and EMT personnel are responsible for emergency procedures to be in place for response to emergencies at town open space lands. Motorized emergency vehicles are allowed on the open space lands for public safety emergencies without prior written permission of the ownership of the properties. After recording return to: William VanCanagan Datsopoulos, MacDonald & Lind, P.C. 201 W. Main Street, Suite 201 Missoula, MT 59802 Phone: (406) 728-0810 DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND EASEMENTS FOR THE TIMBERWOLF RIDGE PUD This Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, Restrictions and Easements for the Timberwolf Ridge PUD (this "Declaration") is made this by LLC, a/n "Declarant"). day of , 2022 (the "Effective Date"), limited liability company (the RECITALS WHEREAS, Declarant is the owner of the following described real property: (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, Declarant intends to develop the Property as several distinct projects and phases (each, a "Phase"), including, without limitation, a multi -family apartment project containing approximately 398 dwelling units and/or other improvements and uses permitted by applicable law and by the terms and conditions of the PUD applicable to the Property (collectively, the "Project"); and WHEREAS, Declarant desires to establish certain covenants, conditions, restrictions and easements for the common benefit and enjoyment of the Owners from time to time in order to promote, preserve and enhance the value and desirability of the Property and to facilitate the continuing care and maintenance of Common Areas, and in furtherance thereof, intends to submit the Property to the provisions of this Declaration; NOW, THEREFORE, Declarant, as the owner of the Property, hereby declares that the Property is hereby submitted to the following covenants, conditions, restrictions, and easements, which shall run with the land and bind and inure to the benefit of all Owners and any other Persons from time to time having or acquiring any right, title or interest in the Property or any portion thereof: 1. Incorporation. The foregoing recitals and all exhibits attached hereto are hereby incorporated into this Declaration by reference as if fully set forth in this Section 1. 2. Definitions. Capitalized terms used in this Declaration shall have the following meanings: a. "Assessments" has the meaning set forth in Section 5.b below. b. "City" means the City of Kalispell, Montana. C. "Common Areas" means any area, improvement, equipment, or facility situated on the Property and intended or designed for the use and enjoyment of more than one, or all, of the Phases, including, without limitation: (1) streets, roads, and driveways (ii) trails, (iii) water mains, sewer mains, and other utility lines and facilities, (v) retention ponds and associated improvements and facilities providing stormwater management for the Property; (vi) entry monument signage, and (vii) open space and forest buffer areas. If and to the extent an area, improvement, equipment, or facility has been dedicated for public use and the City has assumed the responsibility for maintaining, repairing, and replacing the same, it shall not be considered a Common Area for purposes of this Declaration. d. "Common Expenses" means the actual and estimated expenses incurred, or anticipated to be incurred, by the Owners in operating, maintaining, repairing, and replacing the Common Areas, including reasonable reserves. e. "Declarant" means , LLC and its successors and assigns designated as such by the Declarant in writing. £ "Declaration' means this Declaration, as it may be amended and supplemented from time to time. g. "Effective Date" has the meaning given to it in the preamble of this Declaration. h. "Majority of the Owners" means the Owners holding more than fifty percent (50%) of all Proportionate Shares. i. "Owner" means one or more Persons who hold record title to any Phase or an interest as a purchaser under a contract for deed for any Phase. "Owner" shall not include a Person holding an interest merely as security for the performance of an obligation, or a Person who is a seller under a contract for deed for any Phase. Where this Declaration imposes responsibility for conduct of an Owner and where otherwise appropriate given the 2 context, the term "Owner" shall include such Owner's occupants, tenants, guests, contractors, invitees, and licensees. The term "Owner" does not include owners of individual dwelling units but instead refers to all such owners in a particular Phase collectively. Where a Phase is owned by more than one Person, those Persons shall, in writing, appoint a single representative who shall have the authority to act on behalf of and bind such Persons in respect to all matters arising under this Declaration, and the other Owners shall be entitled to rely, without further inquiry, on the representations and actions of such authorized representative. Accordingly, where a Phase has been submitted to a condominium, townhome, or other common -interest community governed by a homeowners association, the board of directors of such homeowners association shall be the authorized representative for such Phase. j. "Period of Declarant Control" means the time period during which Declarant is an Owner. k. "Person" means a natural person, a corporation, a partnership, a trustee, or any other legal entity. 1. "Phase" has the meaning set forth in the recitals. During the period of Declarant Control, Declarant, in its sole discretion and without the consent of any other Owner, may designate individual Phases with more specificity from time to time by recording amendments or supplements to this Declaration. A Phase may, but is not required to be, a phase identified in the PUD and/or a distinct tract of record established by deed, subdivision, certificate of survey, or otherwise. in. "Project" has the meaning set forth in the recitals. n. "Proportionate Share" has the meaning set forth in Section 5.a below. o. "PUD" means the planned unit development applicable to the Project and the Property, as approved by the City and as the same may be amended from time to time. 3. Basic Responsibilities of the Owners. Without limiting any other obligation or responsibility of the Owners set forth herein, each Owner shall (i) comply in all respects with the terms and conditions of the PUD as they apply to such Owner's Phase; (ii) use the Common Areas exclusively for purposes for which they are designed; (iii) avoid causing damage, other than ordinary wear and tear, to the Common Areas; (iv) cause the Common Areas benefiting such Owner's Phase to be maintained in good working condition and repair, as set forth in more detail in Section 4 below, and (v) contribute to Common Expenses by paying Assessments as set forth in Section 5 below. 4. Maintenance of Common Areas. The Owners shall cause the Common Areas to be operated and maintained in good working condition and repair. Maintenance of the Common Areas includes, without limitation: a. regular snow removal from all Common Area streets, roads, and driveways; 3 b. maintaining, repairing, and replacing, as necessary, all paving, curb, sidewalk, and gravel improvements to Common Area streets, roads, and driveways; C. maintaining, repairing, and replacing, as necessary, the surface of the Common Area trail on the Property; d. maintaining, repairing, and replacing, as necessary, all Common Area water mains, sewer mains, and other Common Area utility lines and facilities; e. maintaining, repairing, and replacing, as necessary, all Common Area stormwater management improvements and facilities; f. maintaining all buffers and open spaces thereon in compliance with the Open Space Management Plan for the Project attached hereto as Exhibit "A"; and g. maintaining, repairing, and replacing, as necessary, all Common Area entry monument signage. The Declarant (during the Period of Declarant Control) or a Majority of the Owners (after the Period of Declarant Control) may, from time to time designate a property manager to undertake, or coordinate the undertaking of, some or all of the Common Area maintenance required by this Declaration, and the fees of such property manager shall constitute Common Expenses. The Declarant (during the Period of Declarant Control) or a Majority of the Owners (after the Period of Declarant Control) may, but are not required to, form an association in the nature of a non-profit, mutual benefit, property owners' association for the purposes of administering the maintenance responsibilities of the Owners, collecting Assessments, and paying Common Expenses as provided in this Declaration. Voting power in such property owners' association shall be in accordance with the Owners' Proportionate Shares. 5. Common Expenses. a. Contribution for Common Expenses. Each Owner hereby agrees to contribute its Proportionate Share of Common Expenses by paying Assessments as hereinafter provided. "Proportionate Share" means each Owner's proportionate share of Common Expenses based on the relative benefit received by such Owner from the Common Areas. The Owners' Proportionate Shares shall be determined initially by Declarant and set forth in a subsequent amendment or a supplement to this Declaration, and thereafter may be adjusted from time to time by the Declarant (during the Period of Declarant Control) or by a Majority of the Owners (after the Period of Declarant Control), acting reasonably and in good faith. In making such determination, the Declarant or the Owners, as the case may be, may take into account, for example and without limitation, the acreage of each Owner's Phase, the number of dwelling units in each Phase, the building square footage in each Phase, the traffic generated by each Phase, the amount of impervious surface in each Phase, material differences in the improvements and uses in each Phase, and the extent to which certain Common Areas primarily or exclusively benefit certain Phases and not others. El b. Assessments; Lien for Common Expenses. Each Owner, by acceptance of a deed to, or other interest in, a Phase, whether or not it shall be so expressed in any such deed or other conveyance for such Phase, hereby covenants and agrees to contribute its Proportionate Share of Common Expenses and to pay other costs and fees levied pursuant to this Declaration (collectively, "Assessments"). Such Assessments, costs, and fees, not paid when due, together with interest thereon at the rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum, late fees in the amount of five percent (5%) of the total amount past due, and costs of collection (including, without limitation, attorneys' fees incurred in respect thereto whether or not suit shall be instituted), shall be a charge and a continuing lien upon the Phase against which such levy is made in favor of all other Owners. C. Annual Assessments. Collection and expenditure of Assessments and the holding of reserves may be done in any reasonable manner determined by a Majority of the Owners (including, without limitation, through a property owners association as provided in Section 4 above. Unless a Majority of the Owners determines otherwise, each year on or before December 1 st, the Owners shall meet and confer on a budget for Common Area maintenance for the ensuing calendar year (which may include a reasonable amount for reserves), which budget may be approved by a Majority of the Owners. The approved budgeted amount shall be apportioned among the Owners in accordance with their Proportionate Shares, and on or before the fifth (5th) day of each calendar month of said year, each Owner shall be liable for and obligated to pay one -twelfth (1/12th) of such Owner's share of its Proportionate Share of the total annual Common Expenses. d. Special Assessments. A Majority of the Owners may at any time or from time -to -time levy special assessments on all Phases and the Owners thereof in accordance with their Proportionate Shares for the purpose of defraying, in whole or in part, the cost incurred or to be incurred for any unbudgeted Common Area maintenance, repair, or replacement. e. Specific Assessments. A Majority of the Owners, acting reasonably and in good faith, shall have the power to levy specific assessments against a particular Phase and the Owner(s) thereof (i) to cover costs incurred in bringing a nonconforming Phase into compliance with this Declaration; and/or (ii) to cover costs or liabilities incurred as a consequence of the conduct of such Owner(s), provided the Owner(s) subject to the specific assessment shall have received notice (or a reasonable effort shall have been made to notify such Owner(s)) and a reasonable opportunity to cure before such specific assessment is levied. f. Nonpayment of Assessments. Any Assessment which is not paid when due shall be deemed delinquent, with no requirement for notice to the delinquent Owner. If an Assessment is not paid within five (5) days after the delinquency date, such Assessment shall be subject to interest and late fees as provided in Section 5.b above from the delinquency date. If an Owner fails to pay when due any Assessment, charge, fee, cost, or other amount authorized to be charged to the Owner hereunder, such amount shall constitute a default hereunder and a lien on the Phase of such Owner. The other Owners shall have all rights and remedies to enforce collection as permitted by law, including bringing an action at law or in equity against such Owner and foreclosing the aforesaid E lien. All expenses incurred by such other Owners in connection with such action or proceedings, whether or not suit shall be instituted, including attorneys' fees and court costs and other fees and expenses, shall be charged to, and assessed against, such Owner (and shall constitute a personal liability of such Owner) and shall be added to and deemed part of that Owner's Assessment. g. Subordination of Lien to Mom4a;e. The lien for Assessments provided for herein shall be subordinate to the lien of any prior, recorded first mortgage or trust deed on a Phase made to any bona fide, arms -length lender, except for the amount of any Assessments which becomes due and payable from and after the date such lender obtains title to or possession of such Phase pursuant to a decree of foreclosure or any other proceeding in lieu of foreclosure. Such transfer of title or possession shall not relieve any Owner from personal liability for any Assessments. h. Failure to Levy or NotifX. Failure of the Owners to fix Assessment amounts or rates or to deliver or mail each Owner an Assessment notice shall not be deemed a waiver, modification, or a release of any Owner from the obligation to pay Assessments. i. No Withholding of Payment. No Owner shall be entitled to withhold, offset, or abate Assessments for any reason. Specifically, but without limitation, no Owner shall withhold Assessments due to interruption to services or due to an Owner's failure or refusal to benefit from Common Areas or the maintenance thereof. j. HOA Assessments. Any homeowners association established in any Phase shall account for Assessments required hereunder and shall assess its homeowners for the same in the manner provided for in the applicable homeowners, condominium, or townhome declaration. 6. Easements and Use of Common Areas. Declarant hereby declares, grants, and establishes the following non-exclusive, perpetual easements: a. Use of Common Areas. Subject to the provisions of this Declaration and any reasonable rules and regulations that may be adopted by a Majority of the Owners from time to time (which rules may include, without limitation, reasonable restrictions on the nature and extent of permitted uses of the Common Areas), each Owner shall have the non- exclusive right to use the Common Areas for their intended purposes in common with all other Owners. b. Easement for Maintenance and Enforcement. A blanket easement over the Property (but not under or within any building situated on the Property from time to time) is hereby granted in favor of all Owners for the purpose of exercising their respective rights and performing their respective duties under this Declaration. 7. Reserved Rights of Declarant. Without limiting any other rights of Declarant provided by this Declaration or by law, Declarant hereby expressly reserves the following rights. a. Notwithstanding any provision of this Declaration to the contrary, during the Period of Declarant Control, Declarant reserves the right and power to prepare, execute 0 and record amendments to this Declaration (i) to correct clerical or typographical or similar errors in this Declaration or any exhibit hereto; or (ii) to make any other changes to this Declaration which do not materially and adversely affect the rights or responsibilities of any other Owner. In furtherance of the foregoing, a power coupled with an interest is hereby reserved and granted to Declarant to vote in favor of, make or consent to such an amendment on behalf of each Owner as proxy or attorney in fact, as the case may be. Each deed, mortgage, trust deed, other evidence of obligation, or other instrument affecting a Phase, and the acceptance thereof, shall be deemed to be a grant and acknowledgment of, and a consent to the reservation of, the power to the Declarant to vote in favor of, make, execute, and record such amendments. b. Nothing in this Declaration shall be construed to prohibit Declarant (including its contractors, employees, and agents) from undertaking any activity upon, or use of, the Property or any portion thereof in furtherance of development and disposition of the Project including, without limitation, activities related to advertising, construction, demolition, excavation, grading, maintenance, marketing, planning, surveying, sales, and leasing. To the extent any provision of this Declaration could be construed to limit any such activity by Declarant upon the Property or any portion thereof, Declarant shall be deemed to be exempt from such limitation. 8. General Provisions. a. Manner of Giving Notices. Notices provided for in this Declaration to any Owner shall be in writing and addressed to the address at which such Owner receives tax bills according to the Flathead County property tax department or assessor's office, except that any Owner may from time to time designate a different address or addresses for notices by recording an instrument to that effect in the public records of Flathead County (which instrument shall reference this Declaration by book, page, and document number) and giving written notice thereof to all other Owners. Notices addressed as above shall be deemed delivered two (2) business days after deposit with the United States Postal Service, certified mail, return receipt requested, or on the day of delivery if delivered in person or by e-mail. b. Partial Invalidity. The invalidity of any covenant, restriction, condition, limitation or any other provision of this Declaration, or any part of the same, shall not impair or affect in any manner the validity, enforceability, or effect of the rest of this Declaration. C. Term; Perpetuities and Other Invalidity. This Declaration shall continue in effect in perpetuity. If any of the options, privileges, covenants, or rights created by this Declaration would otherwise be unlawful or void for violation of the rule against perpetuities, the rule restricting restraints on alienation, or any other statutory or common law rules imposing time limits, then such provision shall continue for so long as permitted by law. 7 d. Amendments. Subject to all of Declarant's rights as set forth above, this Declaration may only be amended by a written instrument that is approved in writing by all Owners. e. No Waivers. No covenants, restrictions, conditions, obligations, or provisions contained in this Declaration shall be deemed to have been abrogated or waived by reason of any failure to enforce the same, irrespective of the number of violations or breaches which may occur. f. Enforcement. Any Owner, or the Declarant shall have the option and right to enforce by any proceeding at law or in equity all restrictions, conditions, covenants, reservations, and charges imposed by the provisions of this Declaration. The method of enforcement may include legal action seeking an injunction to prohibit any violation, to recover damages, or both. Should any lawsuit or other legal proceeding be instituted against an Owner who is alleged to have violated one or more of the provisions of this Declaration, the prevailing party in such proceeding shall be entitled to reimbursement for the costs of such proceeding, including reasonable attorneys' fees. [The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.] IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Declarant has executed this Declaration on the Effective Date. STATE OF ) ) SS COUNTY OF ) a/n ,LLC limited liability company By: Its: Authorized Signatory Acknowledged before me this day of , 2021 by , authorized signatory of , LLC. Notary Public for the State of Printed Name: Residing At: My Commission Expires: 0 EXHIBIT A OPEN SPACE MANAGEMENT PLAN [attached] uum uuuumo mmu mmimu 4 "A WG M G (' ii i i'r"iv..iiiiT, v li7tsl ii (e(. F':iif iti a +a. Parcel A of Certificate of Survey No. 16743, situated in the SW1/4 SW1/4 NW1/4 and the NW1/4 NW1/4 SW1/4 of Section 36, Township 29 North, Range 22 West, P.M.M., Flathead County, Montana. "A WG M uuuuuopil rum uumil mmm I ,i� r'rr r`rri rant; r,r V,�.Irir`>^t>. li`r `�I"rir."i=x rl I`Jl; i+i ray DATE: December 5, 2022 : City of Kalispell WGM Group Timberwolf Ridge Traffic Impact Study (TIS) Status Update q t II V ,I A ei iiul %Ne t WWW wgirgnqp C0II7,11 The purpose of this memorandum is to document the status of the TIS required for the PUD application for the proposed Timberwolf Ridge development. Existing traffic counts, traffic forecasting, trip generation, and preliminary capacity analysis are completed. The remaining effort consists of summarizing the findings and providing recommendations regarding site -generated traffic impacts on the adjacent transportation network. The finalized TIS report is forthcoming and expected to be provided to the City of Kalispell by December 16th, 2022. \\wgm-fs01-azure\Projects\Projects\220425\50 Planning & Landscape Architecture\Planning\PUD Application Submittal\PART J-TIS\2022-12-05 Timberwolf Ridge PUD Application TIS Status Memo.docx WGMGROuuuuu tmmi rraffic Impact Study Kalispell, Montana Timberwolf Ridge, LLC 12/20/2022 Timberwolf Ridge, LLC Mark Bancale, PE, PTOE Senior Traffic Engineer WGM Group, Inc. 12.20.2022 raf Timberwolf Ridge 4v Traffic Impact Study CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 1 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUME .............................................................................................................. 2027 NO -BUILD I.................................................................................................. SITE -GENERATED I............................................................................................................. 1 SITE-GENERATEDASSIGNMENT OF I...................................................................................1 2027 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES ......................................................................................................1 CAPACITY ANALYSIS ....................................................................................................................... 21 NON -MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION 30 ............................................................................................ SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, & RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................... 31 APPENDICES t ►12IT—AWA raf Timberwolf Ridge 4v Traffic Impact Study 0 INTRODUCTION Timberwolf Ridge, LLC proposes to construct Timberwolf Ridge, a residential development to be located southeast of the intersection of Stillwater Road and Timberwolf Parkway in Kalispell, Montana (see Figure 1). The proposed development will consist of 400 residential apartments in buildings with three stories of residential over one story of parking. Buildout and occupancy of this development is expected to require approximately five years; accordingly, the study year for this traffic analysis is 2027. The subject property is within Kalispell's urban annexation boundary and is currently undeveloped. Existing land use to the north is commercial (professional office) and all other surrounding land is either undeveloped or residential development currently under construction. Vehicular access to the proposed development will be via two approaches on the west side of the development from Stillwater Road and one approach on the north side from Wolfpack Way. See the Site Plan in Figure 2. This traffic impact study (TIS) was prepared using standard traffic engineering techniques to forecast traffic volumes and operations at the study intersections listed below. These intersections were identified for study through discussions with the Kalispell City Engineer. Capacity analysis is presented both with and without the traffic generated by the proposed Timberwolf Ridge development to determine what impact this development will have on traffic operations. A detailed traffic analysis was completed of the following intersections: • Stillwater Road and Old Reserve Drive • Stillwater Road and Timberwolf Parkway • Stillwater Road and Four Mile Drive • Each of the proposed site access intersections In brief, the analysis conducted for this report leads to the conclusion that the subject development will not negatively impact traffic operations to the degree that would require mitigation at most of the study intersections. Traffic at the proposed development access points will operate at a good level of service. A traffic signal may be necessary in the future to accommodate traffic from all sources at the intersection of Stillwater Road and Four Mile Drive. A signal warrant study is recommended for this intersection as explained further in the Capacity Analysis portion of this report. Timberwolf Ridge4W 1 Traffic Impact Study Also, the Kalispell Area Transportation Plan (Move 2040) calls for Stillwater Road between Four Mile Drive and Old Reserve Drive to be upgraded to a 3-lane arterial. The proposed Timberwolf Ridge development will construct improvements on its side of Stillwater Road, along its site frontage, consistent with this recommendation. Timberwolf Ridge4W 2 Traffic Impact Study 4w Timberwolf Ridge Traffic Impact Study Y W�(RWOH VARI(W- �r =r 0 - (D CL 0 Cr W p r- M C) z- x M o w m m --4 6) < w o C6 -4 z a R - NORTH 1, N, FIGURE 2: PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN "A Timberwolf Ridge 4w Traffic Impact Study 4 0 f1p0' pips°' G TRAFFIC VOLUME WGM Group, Inc. (WGM) conducted mid -week AM and PM peak -period manual intersection turning - movement counts between Tuesday, September 13, 2022, and Thursday, September 22, 2022, to identify existing traffic volumes at each of the study intersections. AM peak -period counts were conducted between 7:00 and 9:00 AM. PM peak -period counts were conducted between 4:00 and 6:00 PM. The count data (included in Appendix A) was analyzed to determine the existing AM and PM peak -hour traffic volumes at each study intersection. The 2022 existing peak -hour volumes are illustrated in Figure 3. The most current Montana Department of Transportation (MDT) seasonal adjustment factor for urban roadways counted mid -week in September ranges between 0.87 to 0.89. However, applying this factor would result in lowering the counted traffic volumes. Therefore, to provide a more conservative traffic analysis, a seasonal adjustment factor was not applied to the traffic counts. Timberwolf Ridge4W 5 Traffic Impact Study "A Timberwolf Ridge 4w Traffic Impact Study 0 2027 TRAFFIC VOLUMES , W The year 2022 existing peak -hour traffic volumes were projected to the study year 2027 using an annually compounded growth rate of 2.5 percent. This growth rate was chosen based on growth rates recently calculated and used in planning documents published by the City of Kalispell. ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES The Kalispell City Engineer was consulted to understand which planned adjacent developments should be incorporated into the traffic volumes for this analysis. Four adjacent developments were identified: Starling Subdivision, Stillwater Crossing, West View Estates North, and Owl View Landing. Starling Subdivision is a residential development consisting of 354 single family homes and 35 multi- family residential units. The Starling Subdivision is located on the east side of Stillwater Drive, opposite the proposed Timberwolf Ridge development. A site approach to Starling Subdivision from Stillwater Road will be constructed opposite Timberwolf Ridge Site Approach "A", forming the fourth leg to this intersection. A second access to Starling Subdivision is planned opposite Timberwolf Parkway. The TIS prepared for the Starling Subdivision (Abelin Traffic Services, "Starling Subdivision Traffic Impact Study Update" August, 2021) was reviewed to determine the amount of adjacent development traffic expected to be generated during the AM and PM peak hours at each of the study intersections. This Starling Subdivision peak hour traffic is illustrated in Figure 4. Stillwater Crossing is a mixed -use development in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Stillwater Road and Four Mile Drive. The proposed development will include 97 single family homes, 192 residential apartments, and an estimated 20,386 square feet of retail development. The TIS prepared for Stillwater Crossing (WGM Group, Inc, "430 Stillwater Road", March 23, 2020) was reviewed to determine the amount of adjacent development traffic expected to be generated during the AM and PM peak hours at each of the study intersections. The estimated Stillwater Crossing peak hour traffic is illustrated in Figure 5. A combined TIS prepared for the West View Estates North and Owl View Landing developments (Abelin Traffic Services, "West View Estates North & Owl View Landing Residential Subdivision Traffic Impact Study", January, 2019) was reviewed to determine the amount of adjacent development traffic expected to be generated during the AM and PM peak hours at each of the study intersections. Several Timberwolf Ridge4W 7 Traffic Impact Study assumptions were made prior to including these developments in the analysis. It is assumed that West View Phases 1-5 and Owl View Phase 1 were constructed and occupied when traffic counts were completed for this study in September 2022. Furthermore, it is assumed that the remaining development will be built and occupied by this study's analysis year of 2027 as a conservative estimate of adjacent development traffic. The remaining future phases of West View North development will include 126 townhomes and 72 single family homes. The estimated West View North peak hour traffic is illustrated in Figure 6. The remaining future phases of Owl View Landing will include 120 residential apartments. The estimated Owl View peak hour traffic is illustrated in Figure 7. After reviewing the TIS prepared for the Bloomstone Development (A2Z Engineering, "Bloomstone Development Traffic Analysis Update", May 2021), it was determined that the peak hour traffic associated with this development will likely not travel through the study intersections of this analysis because the trip distribution map provided in the TIS shows site -generated traffic utilizing either the Kalispell Bypass or Highway 93, not Stillwater Road. The study intersections in this analysis are located on the west side of the Kalispell Bypass whereas the Bloomstone Development is located on the east side of the Kalispell Bypass. The total 2027 no -build traffic volumes illustrated in Figure 8 are the sum of the existing traffic volume as grown to the study year using the 2.5 percent per year traffic growth rate and the estimated traffic generated by the Starling Subdivision, Stillwater Crossing, West View Estates North, and Owl View Landing adjacent developments. These are the volumes projected to exist in the analysis year 2027 without construction of the Timberwolf Ridge development. Timberwolf Ridge4W 8 Traffic Impact Study "A Timberwolf Ridge 4w Traffic Impact Study "A Timberwolf Ridge 4w Traffic Impact Study 1 10 510 1 1,!, 1 TMIT�� "A Timberwolf Ridge 11 4w Traffic Impact Study "A Timberwolf Ridge 4w Traffic Impact Study 1 12 "A Timberwolf Ridge 4w Traffic Impact Study 1 13 The Timberwolf Ridge development is planned to consist of 400 residential apartments in buildings with three stories of residential over one story of parking. Data from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) publication Trip Generation (11th Edition) was used to estimate the number of vehicle trips that will be generated by the proposed development. Table 1 shows the results of these trip -generation calculations. Timberwolf Ridge4W 14 Traffic Impact Study 0 A SSIGNMEN T OF S1 TE- GENERA TED Roadway network connections were analyzed, the Kalispell area's retail and employment distribution/density was considered, and traffic volumes on the adjoining streets were reviewed to identify potential arrival and departure patterns for the site -generated traffic. The expected site arrival and departure patterns are illustrated in Figures 9 and 10, respectively. The site -generated vehicle trips from Table 1 were distributed through the study intersections in accordance with the estimated arrival and departure patterns, resulting in the AM and PM peak -hour site - generated vehicle trips shown in Figure 11. These are the vehicle trips that are new to the roadway network as a direct result of the Timberwolf Ridge development. Timberwolf Ridge4W 15 Traffic Impact Study FIGURE 9: SITE TRAFFIC ARRIVAL PATTERN "A Timberwolf Ridge 4w Traffic Impact Study 1 16 FIGURE 10: SITE TRAFFIC DEPARTURE PATTERN "A Timberwolf Ridge 4w Traffic Impact Study 1 17 FIGURE 11: SITE -GENERATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC "A Timberwolf Ridge 4w Traffic Impact Study 1 18 0 2027 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES Combining the site -generated trips from Figure 11 with the 2027 no -build traffic volumes from Figure 8 results in the projected study year 2027 build traffic volumes shown in Figure 12. These are the total traffic volumes projected to exist at the study intersections when the Timberwolf Ridge development is fully built -out and occupied. Timberwolf Ridge4W 19 Traffic Impact Study FIGURE 12: 2027 BUILD «,K HOUR TRAFFIC 4w Timberwolf Ridge Traffic Impact Study 1 20 0 o"wWl Capacity analysis was conducted for each of the study intersections using the AM and PM no -build and build traffic volumes forecasted in this report. Intersections were evaluated in accordance with the procedures presented in the Highway Capacity Manual, 711 Edition (2022), published by the Transportation Research Board. The analysis results are discussed below and the analysis worksheets are contained in Appendix B. The capacity analysis procedures result in traffic level of service (LOS) rankings from A to F, with A representing essentially free -flow conditions and F representing congested conditions. See Appendix C for a description of the various LOS categories for unsignalized intersections. Timberwolf Ridge4W 2� Traffic Impact Study Old Reserve Drive is an east/west major collector with one travel lane in each direction; east of the intersection the corridor widens to two travel lanes in each direction. Stillwater Road is a local road with one travel lane in each direction. This intersection is controlled by a single -lane roundabout. The speed limit is 35 miles per hour on both Old Reserve Drive and Stillwater Road. Capacity analysis of this intersection was conducted using the 2027 no -build and build traffic volumes developed earlier in this report and the intersection configuration described above. The results of this analysis are summarized in Table 2. • ... r � : lTl .' ." � : • �Wo-MPUM1 "Al- ' 2027 NO -BUILD 2027 BUILD 2027 NO -BUILD 2027 BUILD Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound 6.1 A 6.2 A 5.5 A 5.7 A Westbound 6.6 A 6.7 A 5.3 A 5.6 A Northbound 7.5 A 7.4 A 6.2 A 6.1 A Southbound 8.2 A 8.3 A 8.9 A 9.2 A Delav is measured in seconds Der vehicle. The analysis summarized in Table 2 shows that the subject intersection operates at a very good LOS and that the site -generated traffic will have no appreciable impact on delay or traffic operations at this intersection. No improvements are required at this location. Timberwolf Ridge4W 22 Traffic Impact Study INTERSECTION OF STILLWATER ROAD TIMBERWOLF PARKWAY l rel #►; 00 KOM KI Timberwolf Parkway is an east/west local road with one travel lane in each direction and a total current length of less than two -tenths of a mile. This intersection is currently configured as a T-intersection. However, a west approach will be added as a vehicular access to the Starling Subdivision. The westbound Timberwolf Parkway approach is stop -controlled and therefore, it is assumed that the eastbound approach will also be stop -controlled. The speed limit on Stillwater Road is 35 miles per hour and the speed limit on the Timberwolf Parkway and Starling subdivision approaches are assumed as 25 miles per hour based on the adjacent land use. All approaches to this intersection are modeled as single - lane approaches in the no -build scenario. The Kalispell Area Transportation Plan (Move 2040) recommends that this portion of Stillwater Road be upgraded to a 3-lane arterial. The proposed Timberwolf Ridge development, as well as the Starling Subdivision on the opposite side of Stillwater Road, will be required to construct improvements to Stillwater Road along their site frontage consistent with the Move 2040 recommendations. This portion of Stillwater Road will then be a three -lane section, resulting in a functional left -turn lane northbound at the Timberwolf Parkway intersection for the build scenario. Capacity analysis of this intersection was conducted using the 2027 no -build and build traffic volumes developed earlier in this report and the intersection configurations described above. The results of this analysis are summarized in Table 3. 2027 NO -BUILD 2027 BUILD 2027 NO -BUILD 2027 BUILD Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Lt/Th/Rt 13.4 B 14.1 B 12.7 B 13.6 B Westbound Lt/Th/Rt 13.8 B 15.3 C 12.5 B 14.4 B Northbound Left 7.7 A 7.7 A 8.0 A 8.1 A Southbound Left 8.1 A 8.2 A 7.5 A 7.6 A Delay is measured in seconds per vehicle. Timberwolf Ridge4V 23 Traffic Impact Study The analysis summarized in Table 3 shows that the subject intersection operates at an acceptable LOS and that the site -generated traffic will have minimal impact on delay or traffic operations at this intersection. Although there is a drop in the Peak AM LOS for the westbound approach, that LOS change is the result of only a 1.5 second increase in approach delay. Given the very small increase in delay and the continued good LOS, mitigation should not be required in this instance. The Move 2040 Kalispell Area Transportation Plan, adopted in 2021, recommends a roundabout at the intersection of Stillwater Road and Timberwolf Parkway. Once again, the analysis summarized in Table 3 shows that an intersection improvement such as a roundabout will not be needed even with the combined added traffic of Timberwolf Ridge and the several adjacent developments. A roundabout here would only be needed if additional future development to the east pushes Timberwolf Ridge through to connect with Old Reserve Drive. Timberwolf Ridge will, however, dedicate the necessary right-of-way in the northwest corner of the development to accommodate future construction of a roundabout at this intersection, should it occur. Timberwolf Ridge4W 24 Traffic Impact Study Stillwater Road is a north/south local roadway with one travel lane in each direction. Four Mile Drive is an east/west roadway, also with one travel lane in each direction, and is classified as a local road on the west side of this intersection, and a major collector on the east side. The southbound and westbound approaches to this intersection each provide a dedicated left -lane and a separate shared through/right- turn lane. The northbound approach is a single lane shared by all movements. The Stillwater Crossing subdivision is reconstructing and widening the eastbound intersection approach to add a separate left - turn lane and a through/right-turn lane as part of its transportation system improvements. The eastbound and westbound approaches of this intersection are stop -controlled and both roadways have a speed limit of 35 miles per hour. Capacity analysis of this intersection was conducted using the 2027 no -build and build traffic volumes developed earlier in this report and the intersection configuration described above. The results of this analysis are summarized in Table 4. TABLE 4: STILLWATER ROAD & FOUR MILEDRIVE . I 1 0 1 2027 NO -BUILD 2027 BUILD 111=MM;1= 2027 NO -BUILD 2027 BUILD Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Left 44.8 E 101.0 F 26.3 D 42.6 E Eastbound Th/Rt 30.0 D 53.5 F 17.4 C 21.1 C Westbound Left 33.8 D 69.2 F 24.6 C 35.5 E Westbound Th/Rt 20.5 C 31.7 D 17.1 C 22.9 C Northbound Left 7.5 A 7.5 A 7.4 A 7.4 A Southbound Left 8.4 A 8.7 A 7.8 A 7.9 A Delay is measured in seconds per vehicle. The analysis summarized in Table 4 shows that, in the peak AM no -build scenario, eastbound and westbound traffic experience delays longer than generally considered acceptable. While traffic generated by the Timberwolf Ridge development will increase vehicular delay and drop the LOS for eastbound and Timberwolf Ridge4W 25 Traffic Impact Study westbound traveling vehicles, this poor no -build LOS shows that intersection improvements will be necessary even without construction of the subject development. In reviewing the traffic impact analyses completed for the adjacent developments it was noted that the Starling Subdivision analysis did not include traffic from the Stillwater Crossing development. The Starling Subdivision is expected to be completed in 2027 while the Stillwater Crossing development is anticipated to be fully built and occupied in 2023; therefore, it is reasonable to assume that the Starling Subdivision analysis should include the Stillwater Crossing site -generated traffic to fully understand the expected traffic operations. To understand the implications of this omission, capacity analysis was completed using volumes derived starting with the build traffic volumes developed in the Starling Subdivision TIS and adding to those the site -generated traffic from the Stillwater Crossing TIS. The results of this analysis are summarized in Table 4A and show that improvements should have been identified for this intersection by the Starling Subdivision to address the poor eastbound and westbound LOS under the combined Stillwater Crossing + Starling traffic volumes. This information is presented to better inform discussions of proportionate share for improvements at this location. .•��M- r -�VA W FOG 2027 BUILD 2027 BUILD Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Left 70.5 F 25.4 D Eastbound Th/Rt 36.6 E 17.6 C Westbound Left 74.9 F 26.0 D Westbound Th/Rt 34.8 D 16.5 C Northbound Left 7.5 A 7.4 A Southbound Left 8.5 A 7.9 A Delav is measured in seconds per vehicle. To determine feasible intersection improvements which would address the forecasted traffic at this intersection, a signalized intersection was modeled with the existing approach lane configurations. The results of this analysis are summarized in Table 4B. Timberwolf Ridge4W 26 Traffic Impact Study ' •'!• 1 •;' ! 1 .. •;i 2027 BUILD 2027 BUILD Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Left 18.1 B 25.3 C Eastbound Th/Rt 11.0 B 14.4 B Westbound Left 11.8 B 16.4 B Westbound Th/Rt 14.3 B 19.0 B Northbound Left 7.4 A 7.8 A Southbound Left 13.0 B 10.4 B Southbound Th/Rt 6.8 A 7.7 A Overall Intersection 11.6 B 14.4 B Delay is measured in seconds per vehicle. The analysis summarized in Table 413 shows the subject intersection can operate an at acceptable LOS if signalized. A signal warrant study is recommended for this intersection during buildout of Timberwolf Ridge and the various other area developments to determine when a traffic signal becomes warranted based on the nationally accepted Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) traffic signal warrant criteria. Furthermore, it is recommended that developers in the close vicinity of this intersection discuss their respective proportionate share of impacts with the City of Kalispell prior to signalizing this intersection. Timberwolf Ridge4W 27 Traffic Impact Study INTERSECTIONS OF SITE ACCESS ROADWAYS The three proposed site approach intersections were also analyzed under the 2027 build traffic volumes as stop -controlled, single -lane approaches. The analysis summarized in Tables 5, 6, and 7 shows that the site accesses will operate at an acceptable LOS or better during both the AM and PM peak hours. Across Stillwater Road from Site Approach "A" is one of the access points to the Starling Subdivision. Therefore, the intersection is modeled as a T-oriented intersection in the no -build scenario. Site Approach "B" will be constructed as part of the Timberwolf Ridge development. Therefore, it is not modeled in the no -build scenario. In the build scenario, it will be a T-oriented intersection with Stillwater Road. Finally, Site Approach "C" will also be constructed as part of the Timberwolf Ridge as a site access point from Timberwolf Parkway. Timberwolf Ridge4V 28 Traffic Impact Study 1 1 2027 NO -BUILD 2027 BUILD Delay LOS Delay LOS 1 2027 NO -BUILD 2027 BUILD Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Lt/Th/Rt 12.0 B 13.3 B 11.6 B 13.1 B Westbound Lt/Th/Rt --- --- 17.4 C --- --- 16.7 C Northbound Left 7.8 A 7.9 A 8.0 A 8.1 A Southbound Left --- --- 8.2 A --- --- 7.9 A Delav is measured in seconds per vehicle. Delay is measured in seconds per vehicle. 2027 BUILD 2027 BUILD Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Lt/Th/Rt 7.3 A 7.2 A Westbound Lt/Th/Rt 7.3 A 7.3 A Northbound Lt/Th/Rt 9.1 A 8.9 A Southbound Lt/Th/Rt 8.3 A 8.4 A Delav is measured in seconds Der vehicle. Timberwolf Ridge4w 29 Traffic Impact Study 0 iiiii - iiiii „".) Z p Sidewalks will be constructed adjacent to all streets within the Timberwolf Ridge development. Furthermore, a separated shared -use path will be constructed along the subject development's frontage on Stillwater Road that will connect to the existing shared -use path north of the development. This will provide excellent opportunities for residents of the proposed development to utilize non -motorized modes of transportation, particularly for trips to and from Glacier High School. Providing safe and convenient non -motorized facilities will aid in reducing vehicular congestion across the transportation network within Kalispell. Timberwolf Ridge4W 30 Traffic Impact Study oii m uw S uu REC NS wu°"' The discussion and analyses contained in this report can be summarized as follows: • Timberwolf Ridge, LLC proposed to construct a residential development east of Stillwater Road and south of Timberwolf Parkway in Kalispell, MT. This development, called Timberwolf Ridge, will consist of 400 residential apartments. • Vehicle access to the proposed development will be via two approaches onto Stillwater Road and one approach onto Timberwolf Parkway. • The following four adjacent development proposals will add traffic to the study intersections: West View Estates North, Owl View Landing, Starling Subdivision, and Stillwater Crossing. This traffic is included in the traffic volumes studied in this report. The Bloomstone development traffic was not included in this study based on the trip distributions assigned to that development. • The proposed Timberwolf Ridge development will generate new traffic through the study intersections. Highway Capacity Manual based analysis shows that this traffic can be accommodated at most of the study intersections without the need for improvements to mitigate the site -generated trips. • A traffic signal will be necessary in the future to accommodate projected traffic volumes at the intersection of Stillwater Road and Four Mile Drive. A signal warrant analysis is recommended for this intersection during the buildout of Timberwolf Ridge and the several adjacent developments to determine when traffic signalization is warranted. Discussions are recommended between the City of Kalispell and developers in the close vicinity of this intersection to determine the proportionate share of impacts and resources necessary to upgrade this intersection. • Right-of-way will be dedicated by the developer in the southeast corner of Stillwater Road and Timberwolf Parkway to accommodate a possible future roundabout at this intersection (by others). • The Kalispell Area Transportation Plan (Move 2040) calls for Stillwater Road between Four Mile Drive and Old Reserve Drive to be upgraded to a 3-lane arterial. The proposed Timberwolf Ridge development will construct improvements to Stillwater Road along its site frontage consistent with this recommendation. 0 The proposed Timberwolf Ridge development will provide internal sidewalks and a critical connection to the existing shared -use path along the east side of Stillwater Road for active transportation trips thereby promoting walkability and non -motorized transportation within and around the proposed development. Timberwolf Ridge4W 31 Traffic Impact Study 0 APPENDIX A Timberwolf Ridge Traffic Impact Study \ j \ / E 04 \ 0 \ � ± _ e E o /0 \C§ %) e- n 5\\ §« Z%a {4 ]ZI *a } \ v 2/ r'TNT=N )/ wm»wo array j/-,t(.0=(D�= ]/m»c22nrr =aaa=or=or © g \ 0 zk=r<mn� e z =$==-oon m j �\o-000000 ± ={moan»»-o = j )-C CONNeeQ 7 P � 7777777) of roromoro =- smfRsmfo r- r- r- aaaaa }> _ « « « « oromomor o7r',I:om 7It �r- r- «a aaa 2 d B Or ) a /7 ƒCL a. ms /q a } \ v «/ n�Torr- )/ 22222 r=a�=r�= ]0 MLO««N a-»%22222 » / �\00000no r E =\owaQo=a J j �\ m=-a� _ z 7\000-0o00 j )/Q=2%\\\Q m P of r00000ro =- smfRsmfR \> rrrrm _ =====III 00000ror RsmfRsm# ��TNTItrrrr 2 d \/;E§§2G2; \/2Gpep%e$ IL 2 } ,,, = G m 2==aSee=w 2a==©r=== \` )` G 22======e r / 2a==,a,=, § 2( )( 7ƒ7ƒ$ƒ7ƒ !M!M!M!ƒ _- y IL CL �2222 2�2 } ] « « « « q !M!M!M!M \ E k\ \2 \2 \\2 ) f) �IL \)} `) �) 0 APPENDIX B MMMMUHMMIM Timberwolf Ridge Traffic Impact Study MOVEMENT SUMMARY Tq'7 Site: 101 [Stillwater Road and Old Reserve Drive (Site Folder: General)] Peak AM Hour No Build Site Category: (None) Roundabout South: Northbound Stillwater Road 1 u U 3 0.0 4 0.0 0.205 14.3 LOS B 1.3 9.4 0.66 0.68 0.66 52.2 1 L2 30 2.0 37 2.0 0.205 12.0 LOS B 1.3 9.4 0.66 0.68 0.66 53.7 2 T1 36 2.0 44 2.0 0.205 6.1 LOS A 1.3 9.4 0.66 0.68 0.66 52.7 3 R2 88 2.0 107 2.0 0.205 6.3 LOS A 1.3 9.4 0.66 0.68 0.66 60.0 Approach 157 2.0 191 2.0 0.205 7.5 LOS A 1.3 9.4 0.66 0.68 0.66 60.0 East: Westbound Old Reserve Drive 4u U 34 0.0 41 0.0 0.261 12.0 LOS B 1.8 13.0 0.34 0.52 0.34 60.0 4 L2 93 2.0 113 2.0 0.261 9.7 LOS A 1.8 13.0 0.34 0.52 0.34 60.0 5 T1 122 2.0 149 2.0 0.261 3.8 LOS A 1.8 13.0 0.34 0.52 0.34 60.0 6 R2 43 2.0 52 2.0 0.261 3.9 LOS A 1.8 13.0 0.34 0.52 0.34 60.0 Approach 292 1.8 356 1.8 0.261 6.6 LOS A 1.8 13.0 0.34 0.52 0.34 60.0 North: Southbound Stillwater Road 7 L2 101 2.0 123 2.0 0.230 11.2 LOS B 1.4 10.2 0.56 0.65 0.56 60.0 8 T1 74 2.0 90 2.0 0.230 5.2 LOS A 1.4 10.2 0.56 0.65 0.56 51.6 9 R2 25 2.0 30 2.0 0.230 5.4 LOS A 1.4 10.2 0.56 0.65 0.56 52.8 Approach 200 2.0 244 2.0 0.230 8.2 LOS A 1.4 10.2 0.56 0.65 0.56 60.0 West: Eastbound Old Reserve Drive 10 L2 14 2.0 17 2.0 0.407 11.8 LOS B 2.9 20.8 0.66 0.63 0.66 55.7 11 T1 250 2.0 305 2.0 0.407 5.8 LOS A 2.9 20.8 0.66 0.63 0.66 60.0 12 R2 82 2.0 100 2.0 0.407 6.0 LOS A 2.9 20.8 0.66 0.63 0.66 51.8 Approach 346 2.0 422 2.0 0.407 6.1 LOS A 2.9 20.8 0.66 0.63 0.66 60.0 All Vehicles 995 1.9 1213 1.9 0.407 6.9 LOS A 2.9 20.8 0.54 0.61 0.54 60.0 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay (SIDRA). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: SIDRA Roundabout LOS. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay per movement. Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all vehicle movements. Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard. Delay Model: SIDRA Standard (Geometric Delay is included). Queue Model: SIDRA Standard. Gap -Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akgelik M3D). HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 1 Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd I sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WGM GROUP, INC. I Licence: NETWORK / 1PC I Processed: Thursday, December 01, 2022 4:15:30 PM Project: W:\Projects\220425\70 Transportation Engineering\TRAFFIC\Capacity Analysis\Roundabout\Stillwater and Old Reserve AM No Build.sip9 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Tq'7 Site: 101 [Stillwater Road and Old Reserve Drive (Site Folder: General)] Peak AM Hour Build Site Category: (None) Roundabout South: Northbound Stillwater Road 1 u U 3 0.0 4 0.0 0.240 14.4 LOS B 1.6 11.2 0.67 0.69 0.67 52.3 1 L2 30 2.0 37 2.0 0.240 12.1 LOS B 1.6 11.2 0.67 0.69 0.67 53.8 2 T1 36 2.0 44 2.0 0.240 6.2 LOS A 1.6 11.2 0.67 0.69 0.67 52.9 3 R2 114 2.0 139 2.0 0.240 6.3 LOS A 1.6 11.2 0.67 0.69 0.67 60.0 Approach 183 2.0 223 2.0 0.240 7.4 LOS A 1.6 11.2 0.67 0.69 0.67 60.0 East: Westbound Old Reserve Drive 4u U 34 0.0 41 0.0 0.267 12.0 LOS B 1.9 13.5 0.34 0.52 0.34 60.0 4 L2 101 2.0 123 2.0 0.267 9.7 LOS A 1.9 13.5 0.34 0.52 0.34 60.0 5 T1 122 2.0 149 2.0 0.267 3.8 LOS A 1.9 13.5 0.34 0.52 0.34 60.0 6 R2 43 2.0 52 2.0 0.267 3.9 LOS A 1.9 13.5 0.34 0.52 0.34 60.0 Approach 300 1.8 366 1.8 0.267 6.7 LOS A 1.9 13.5 0.34 0.52 0.34 60.0 North: Southbound Stillwater Road 7 L2 101 2.0 123 2.0 0.231 11.2 LOS B 1.4 10.3 0.57 0.65 0.57 60.0 8 T1 74 2.0 90 2.0 0.231 5.3 LOS A 1.4 10.3 0.57 0.65 0.57 51.6 9 R2 25 2.0 30 2.0 0.231 5.4 LOS A 1.4 10.3 0.57 0.65 0.57 52.8 Approach 200 2.0 244 2.0 0.231 8.3 LOS A 1.4 10.3 0.57 0.65 0.57 60.0 West: Eastbound Old Reserve Drive 10 L2 14 2.0 17 2.0 0.410 11.8 LOS B 2.9 21.0 0.67 0.64 0.67 55.6 11 T1 250 2.0 305 2.0 0.410 5.9 LOS A 2.9 21.0 0.67 0.64 0.67 60.0 12 R2 82 2.0 100 2.0 0.410 6.1 LOS A 2.9 21.0 0.67 0.64 0.67 51.7 Approach 346 2.0 422 2.0 0.410 6.2 LOS A 2.9 21.0 0.67 0.64 0.67 60.0 All Vehicles 1029 1.9 1255 1.9 0.410 7.0 LOS A 2.9 21.0 0.55 0.62 0.55 60.0 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay (SIDRA). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: SIDRA Roundabout LOS. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay per movement. Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all vehicle movements. Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard. Delay Model: SIDRA Standard (Geometric Delay is included). Queue Model: SIDRA Standard. Gap -Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akgelik M3D). HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 1 Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd I sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WGM GROUP, INC. I Licence: NETWORK / 1PC I Processed: Thursday, December 01, 2022 4:25:57 PM Project: W:\Projects\220425\70 Transportation Engineering\TRAFFIC\Capacity Analysis\Roundabout\Stillwater and Old Reserve AM Build.sip9 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Tq'7 Site: 101 [Stillwater Road and Old Reserve Drive (Site Folder: General)] Peak PM Hour No Build Site Category: (None) Roundabout South: Northbound Stillwater Road 1 u U 1 0.0 1 0.0 0.157 12.8 LOS B 0.9 6.6 0.46 0.56 0.46 53.7 1 L2 42 2.0 45 2.0 0.157 10.5 LOS B 0.9 6.6 0.46 0.56 0.46 54.5 2 T1 40 2.0 43 2.0 0.157 4.6 LOS A 0.9 6.6 0.46 0.56 0.46 53.6 3 R2 83 2.0 89 2.0 0.157 4.7 LOS A 0.9 6.6 0.46 0.56 0.46 60.0 Approach 166 2.0 178 2.0 0.157 6.2 LOS A 0.9 6.6 0.46 0.56 0.46 60.0 East: Westbound Old Reserve Drive 4u U 1 0.0 1 0.0 0.390 12.2 LOS B 3.0 21.3 0.39 0.48 0.39 60.0 4 L2 105 2.0 113 2.0 0.390 9.9 LOS A 3.0 21.3 0.39 0.48 0.39 60.0 5 T1 284 2.0 305 2.0 0.390 3.9 LOS A 3.0 21.3 0.39 0.48 0.39 60.0 6 R2 107 2.0 115 2.0 0.390 4.1 LOS A 3.0 21.3 0.39 0.48 0.39 60.0 Approach 497 2.0 534 2.0 0.390 5.3 LOS A 3.0 21.3 0.39 0.48 0.39 60.0 North: Southbound Stillwater Road 7 L2 83 2.0 89 2.0 0.187 11.9 LOS B 1.2 8.3 0.63 0.69 0.63 60.0 8 T1 62 2.0 67 2.0 0.187 5.9 LOS A 1.2 8.3 0.63 0.69 0.63 51.1 9 R2 22 2.0 24 2.0 0.187 6.1 LOS A 1.2 8.3 0.63 0.69 0.63 52.5 Approach 167 2.0 180 2.0 0.187 8.9 LOS A 1.2 8.3 0.63 0.69 0.63 60.0 West: Eastbound Old Reserve Drive 10 L2 24 2.0 26 2.0 0.173 10.6 LOS B 1.0 7.4 0.49 0.53 0.49 56.1 11 T1 129 2.0 139 2.0 0.173 4.7 LOS A 1.0 7.4 0.49 0.53 0.49 60.0 12 R2 27 2.0 29 2.0 0.173 4.9 LOS A 1.0 7.4 0.49 0.53 0.49 52.3 Approach 180 2.0 194 2.0 0.173 5.5 LOS A 1.0 7.4 0.49 0.53 0.49 60.0 All Vehicles 1010 2.0 1086 2.0 0.390 6.1 LOS A 3.0 21.3 0.46 0.54 0.46 60.0 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay (SIDRA). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: SIDRA Roundabout LOS. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay per movement. Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all vehicle movements. Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard. Delay Model: SIDRA Standard (Geometric Delay is included). Queue Model: SIDRA Standard. Gap -Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akgelik M3D). HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 1 Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd I sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WGM GROUP, INC. I Licence: NETWORK / 1PC I Processed: Thursday, December 01, 2022 4:35:08 PM Project: W:\Projects\220425\70 Transportation Engineering\TRAFFIC\Capacity Analysis\Roundabout\Stillwater and Old Reserve PM No Build.sip9 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Tq'7 Site: 101 [Stillwater Road and Old Reserve Drive (Site Folder: General)] Peak PM Hour Build Site Category: (None) Roundabout South: Northbound Stillwater Road 1 u U 1 0.0 1 0.0 0.176 12.8 LOS B 1.1 7.5 0.47 0.56 0.47 53.9 1 L2 42 2.0 45 2.0 0.176 10.5 LOS B 1.1 7.5 0.47 0.56 0.47 54.7 2 T1 40 2.0 43 2.0 0.176 4.6 LOS A 1.1 7.5 0.47 0.56 0.47 53.8 3 R2 103 2.0 111 2.0 0.176 4.8 LOS A 1.1 7.5 0.47 0.56 0.47 60.0 Approach 186 2.0 200 2.0 0.176 6.1 LOS A 1.1 7.5 0.47 0.56 0.47 60.0 East: Westbound Old Reserve Drive 4u U 1 0.0 1 0.0 0.415 12.2 LOS B 3.3 23.4 0.40 0.49 0.40 60.0 4 L2 139 2.0 149 2.0 0.415 9.9 LOS A 3.3 23.4 0.40 0.49 0.40 60.0 5 T1 284 2.0 305 2.0 0.415 4.0 LOS A 3.3 23.4 0.40 0.49 0.40 60.0 6 R2 107 2.0 115 2.0 0.415 4.1 LOS A 3.3 23.4 0.40 0.49 0.40 60.0 Approach 531 2.0 571 2.0 0.415 5.6 LOS A 3.3 23.4 0.40 0.49 0.40 60.0 North: Southbound Stillwater Road 7 L2 83 2.0 89 2.0 0.194 12.1 LOS B 1.2 8.7 0.65 0.71 0.65 60.0 8 T1 62 2.0 67 2.0 0.194 6.2 LOS A 1.2 8.7 0.65 0.71 0.65 50.9 9 R2 22 2.0 24 2.0 0.194 6.3 LOS A 1.2 8.7 0.65 0.71 0.65 52.3 Approach 167 2.0 180 2.0 0.194 9.2 LOS A 1.2 8.7 0.65 0.71 0.65 60.0 West: Eastbound Old Reserve Drive 10 L2 24 2.0 26 2.0 0.177 10.9 LOS B 1.1 7.6 0.52 0.55 0.52 56.0 11 T1 129 2.0 139 2.0 0.177 4.9 LOS A 1.1 7.6 0.52 0.55 0.52 60.0 12 R2 27 2.0 29 2.0 0.177 5.1 LOS A 1.1 7.6 0.52 0.55 0.52 52.1 Approach 180 2.0 194 2.0 0.177 5.7 LOS A 1.1 7.6 0.52 0.55 0.52 60.0 All Vehicles 1064 2.0 1144 2.0 0.415 6.2 LOS A 3.3 23.4 0.47 0.55 0.47 60.0 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay (SIDRA). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: SIDRA Roundabout LOS. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay per movement. Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all vehicle movements. Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard. Delay Model: SIDRA Standard (Geometric Delay is included). Queue Model: SIDRA Standard. Gap -Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akgelik M3D). HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 1 Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd I sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WGM GROUP, INC. I Licence: NETWORK / 1PC I Processed: Thursday, December 01, 2022 4:39:57 PM Project: W:\Projects\220425\70 Transportation Engineering\TRAFFIC\Capacity Analysis\Roundabout\Stillwater and Old Reserve PM Build.sip9 ME= MESEM4 Em General Information Site Information ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Analyst DBG ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Intersection Stillwater Road & Timberwolf Parkway .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Agency/Co. WGM Group ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Jurisdiction ...........................................................................................................................................I ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Date Performed 12/02/2022 East/West Street Timberwolf Parkway .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Analysis Year 2027 North/South Street Stillwater Road ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Time Analyzed No -Build ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Peak Hour Factor ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 0.83 LAM .................................................................................................................................................................................................... Intersection Orientation th-South Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Project Description berwolf Ridge Lanes ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. fl "I "T + Y' t 11 Major Street: North -South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R .................................................................................................................................................................................I................................,................................ ................................. Priority 10 11 ................................ 12 ................................. ................................. .................................. ................................. ,................................ ................................. 7 8 9 1U ................................ 1 ................................. ................................. 2 3 4U .................................. ................................. ,................................ 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR Volume (veh/h) 51 0 76 2 0 1 25 295 17 10 134 17 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................ ................................ Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 3 3 ................................ 3 ................................ ................................. .................................. ................................ I................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 3 3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...................................I,..................................,.................................. .................................. ,.................................. ,.................................. .................................. ................................. .................................. ,..................................................................... Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Right Turn Channelized ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................... Median Type I Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Base Critical Headway (sec) 7.1 6.5 6.2 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 .................................................................................................... 4.1 Critical Headway (sec) 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 4.13 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................ I................................I Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.5 4.0 ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.53 4.03 3.33 3.53 4.03 3.33 2.23 2.23 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 153 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 30 ................................................................................................ 12 Capacity, c (veh/h) 580 415 1387 1177 .................................................................................................................................................................................I................................,................................ ................................. v/c Ratio 0.26 ................................ ................................. ................................. .................................. ................................. ................................. ................................. 0.01 ................................. 0.02 ................................. .................................. .................................. ,................................................................. 0.01 95% Queue Length, Q95 (veh) 1.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Control Delay (s/veh) 13.4 13.8 7.7 0.2 0.2 ................................................................................................... 8.1 0.1 0.1 Level of Service (LOS) B B A A A A A A ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................I,..................................,....................................................................,..................................,,......................................................................................................................................,..................................................................... Approach Delay (s/veh) 13.4 13.8 0.8 0.6 ......................................................................8...................................................................... Approach LOS ..................................................................,,,..................................................................... B A A Copyright © 2022 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSi l TWSC Version 2022 Generated: 12/2/2022 11:26:23 AM 2 AM No-Build.xtw ME=G =MEE= General Information Site Information ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Analyst DBG ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Intersection Stillwater Road & Timberwolf Parkway ................................................................................................................................................................................. Agency/Co. WGM Group ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ .................................................................................................................................................. Jurisdiction ........................................................................................................................................... ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Date Performed 12/15/2022 East/West Street Timberwolf Parkway ................................................................................................................................................................................. Analysis Year 2027 .................................................................................................................................................. North/South Street Stillwater Road ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Time Analyzed AM Build w/ NB LT TL ........................................................................................................................................... Peak Hour Factor ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 0.83 ................................................................................................................................................................................. Intersection Orientation North -South ......... ,,,,,,,............ i........... ,,,,,,,,,,,,.:................... ................................................................... Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................I.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Project Description Timberwolf Ridge Lanes ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. -1 4r -x �1IItyt ' Major Street: North -South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................... .................................................................................................................................................... Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound ................................................................................................................................................................................. Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Priority 10 11 ............................... 12 ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 7 8 9 1U 1 ..............................,, ............................. 2 3 4U .......................... ................................. 4 5 ............................... 6 ................................................................................................................................................................................. Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Configuration LTR ................................................................................................................................. ............................................................................................................................... LTR L ..............................,, ............................. TR .......................... ................................. LTR ............................... ................................................................................................................................................................................. Volume (veh/h) 51 0 76 21 0 10 25 319 23 13 141 17 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................ ................................ , Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 3 3 ............................... 3 ................................ ................................. .................................. ................................ ,............................................................................................... 3 3 3 3 ..............................,, ............................. .......................... ................................. 3 ............................... ................................................................................................................................................................................. Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 0 ................................................................................................................................................................................. Right Turn Channelized .......... E ...................... : .............. : ................. : ................ : .............. : .............. : .............. : ................ i ................ : ................. : ................ : Median Type I Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ............. ................. ............................... Base Critical Headway (sec) 7.1 6.5 ............................... 6.2 ............................... I ................................ .................................. I ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1 ................................................................................................................................................................................. Critical Headway (sec) 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 4.13 Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 ................................................................................................................................................................................. Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.53 4.03 3.33 3.53 4.03 3.33 2.23 ................................................................ 2.23 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ............................... ............................... Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 153 ............................... ............................... ................................ .................................. ............................... ............................... ............................... 37 ............................... 30 ................................ ................................... .................................. ............................... I 16 ............................... ................................................................................................................................................................................. Capacity, c (veh/h) 549 385 1377 1141 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................ ................................ , v/c Ratio 0.28 ............................... ................................ ................................. .................................. ................................ ,............................................................................................... 0.10 0.02 ..............................,, ............................. .......................... ................................ , 0.01 ............................... ................................................................................................................................................................................. 95% Queue Length, Q95 (veh) 1.1 0.3 0.1 0.0 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................ ................................ , Control Delay (s/veh) 14.1 .................................................................................................................................. ...............................,............................................................................................... 15.3 7.7 ..............................,, ............................. .....................................................,,,,, 8.2 0.1 .............................. 0.1 ................................................................................................................................................................................. Level of Service (LOS) B C A A A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 14.1 15.3 0.5 0.7 Approach LOS B C A A Copyright © 2022 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS�uH TWSC Version 2022 Generated: 12/15/2022 1:26:37 PM 2 AM Build NB LTTL.xtw ME= MESEM4 Em General Information Site Information ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Analyst DBG ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Intersection Stillwater Road & Timberwolf Parkway .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Agency/Co. WGM Group ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Jurisdiction ...........................................................................................................................................I ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Date Performed 12/01/2022 East/West Street Timberwolf Parkway .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Analysis Year 2027 North/South Street Stillwater Road ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Time Analyzed PM No -Build ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Peak Hour Factor 0.83 .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Intersection Orientation North -South Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Project Description Timberwolf Ridge ,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Lanes ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. fl "I "T + Y' t 11 Major Street: North -South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R .................................................................................................................................................................................I................................,................................ ................................. Priority 10 11 ................................ 12 ................................. ................................. .................................. ................................. ,................................ ................................. 7 8 9 1U ................................ 1 ................................. ................................. 2 3 4U .................................. ................................. ,................................ 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR Volume (veh/h) 33 0 50 16 0 12 84 110 3 1 161 56 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................ ................................ Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 3 3 ................................ 3 ................................ ................................. .................................. ................................ I................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 3 3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...................................I,..................................,.................................. .................................. ,.................................. ,.................................. .................................. ................................. .................................. ,..................................................................... Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Right Turn Channelized ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................... Median Type I Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Base Critical Headway (sec) 7.1 6.5 6.2 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 .................................................................................................... 4.1 Critical Headway (sec) 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 4.13 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................ I................................I Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.5 4.0 ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.53 4.03 3.33 3.53 4.03 3.33 2.23 2.23 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 100 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 34 101 ................................................................................................ 1 Capacity, c (veh/h) 567 513 1297 1442 .................................................................................................................................................................................I................................,................................ ................................. v/c Ratio 0.18 ................................ ................................. ................................. .................................. ................................. ................................. ................................. 0.07 ................................. 0.08 ................................. .................................. .................................. ,................................................................. 0.00 95% Queue Length, Q95 (veh) 0.6 0.2 0.3 0.0 .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Control Delay (s/veh) 12.7 12.5 8.0 0.7 0.7 ................................................................................................... 7.5 0.0 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) B B A A A A A A ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................I,..................................,....................................................................,..................................,,......................................................................................................................................,..................................................................... Approach Delay (s/veh) 12.7 12.5 3.8 0.0 ......................................................................8...................................................................... Approach LOS ..................................................................,,,..................................................................... B A A Copyright © 2022 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSi l TWSC Version 2022 Generated: 12/1/2022 5:05:15 PM 2 PM No-Build.xtw ME=G =MEE= General Information Site Information ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Analyst DBG ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Intersection Stillwater Road & Timberwolf Parkway ................................................................................................................................................................................. Agency/Co. WGM Group ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ .................................................................................................................................................. Jurisdiction ........................................................................................................................................... ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Date Performed 12/15/2022 East/West Street Timberwolf Parkway ................................................................................................................................................................................. Analysis Year 2027 .................................................................................................................................................. North/South Street Stillwater Road ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Time Analyzed PM Build W/NB LTTL ........................................................................................................................................... Peak Hour Factor ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 0.83 ................................................................................................................................................................................. Intersection Orientation North -South ......... ,,,,,,,............ i........... ,,,,,,,,,,,,.:................... ................................................................... Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................I.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Project Description Timberwolf Ridge Lanes ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. -1 4r -x �1IItyt ' Major Street: North -South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................... .................................................................................................................................................... Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound ................................................................................................................................................................................. Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Priority 10 11 ............................... 12 ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 7 8 9 1U 1 ..............................,, ............................. 2 3 4U .......................... ................................. 4 5 ............................... 6 ................................................................................................................................................................................. Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Configuration LTR ................................................................................................................................. ............................................................................................................................... LTR L ..............................,, ............................. TR .......................... ................................. LTR ............................... ................................................................................................................................................................................. Volume (veh/h) 33 0 50 28 0 18 84 126 24 11 188 56 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................ ................................ , Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 3 3 ............................... 3 ................................ ................................. .................................. ................................ ,............................................................................................... 3 3 3 3 ..............................,, ............................. .......................... ................................. 3 ............................... ................................................................................................................................................................................. Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 0 ................................................................................................................................................................................. Right Turn Channelized .......... E ...................... : .............. : ................. : ................ : .............. : .............. : .............. : ................ i ................ : ................. : ................ : Median Type I Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ............. ................. ............................... Base Critical Headway (sec) 7.1 6.5 ............................... 6.2 ............................... I ................................ .................................. I ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1 ................................................................................................................................................................................. Critical Headway (sec) 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 4.13 Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 ................................................................................................................................................................................. Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.53 4.03 3.33 3.53 4.03 3.33 2.23 ................................................................ 2.23 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ............................... ............................... Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 100 ............................... ............................... ................................ .................................. ............................... ............................... ............................... 55 ............................... 101 ................................ ................................... .................................. ............................... I 13 ............................... ................................................................................................................................................................................. Capacity, c (veh/h) 516 440 1262 1389 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................ ................................ , v/c Ratio 0.19 ............................... ................................ ................................. .................................. ................................ ,............................................................................................... 0.13 0.08 ..............................,, ............................. .......................... ................................ , 0.01 ............................... ................................................................................................................................................................................. 95% Queue Length, Q95 (veh) 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.0 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................ ................................ , Control Delay (s/veh) 13.6 .................................................................................................................................. ...............................,............................................................................................... 14.4 8.1 ..............................,, ............................. .....................................................,,,,, 7.6 0.1 .............................. 0.1 ................................................................................................................................................................................. Level of Service (LOS) B B A A A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 13.6 14.4 2.9 0.4 Approach LOS B B A A Copyright © 2022 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS�uH TWSC Version 2022 Generated: 12/15/2022 1:31:14 PM 2 PM Build NB LTTL.xtw ME= MESEM4 Em General Information Site Information ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Analyst DBG ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Intersection Stillwater Road & Four Mile Drive .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Agency/Co. WGM Group ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Jurisdiction ...........................................................................................................................................I ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Date Performed 12/01/2022 East/West Street Four Mile Drive .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Analysis Year 2027 North/South Street Stillwater Road ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Time Analyzed No -Build ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Peak Hour Factor ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 0.75 LAM .................................................................................................................................................................................................... Intersection Orientation th-South Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Project Description berwolf Ridge Lanes ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. I fl "I "T + Y' t 11 Major Street: North -South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R .................................................................................................................................................................................I................................,................................ ................................. Priority 10 11 ................................ 12 ................................. ................................. .................................. ................................. ,....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Configuration L TR L TR LTR L TR Volume (veh/h) 26 75 7 11 50 209 4 117 71 189 61 22 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................ ................................ Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 3 3 ................................ 3 ................................ ................................. .................................. ................................ I................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 3 3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...................................I,..................................,.................................. .................................. ,.................................. ,.................................. .................................. ................................. .................................. ,..................................................................... Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Right Turn Channelized ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................... Median Type I Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Base Critical Headway (sec) 7.1 6.5 6.2 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 .................................................................................................... 4.1 Critical Headway (sec) 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 4.13 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................ I................................I Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.5 4.0 ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.53 4.03 3.33 3.53 4.03 3.33 2.23 2.23 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 35 109 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 15 345 5 ................................................................................................ 252 Capacity, c (veh/h) 124 251 139 570 1473 1309 .................................................................................................................................................................................I................................,................................ ................................. v/c Ratio 0.28 ................................ 0.44 ................................. ................................. .................................. ................................. ................................. ................................. 0.11 0.61 ................................. 0.00 ................................. .................................. .................................. ,................................................................. 0.19 95% Queue Length, Q95 (veh) 1.1 2.1 0.3 4.0 0.0 0.7 .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Control Delay (s/veh) 44.8 30.0 33.8 20.5 7.5 0.0 0.0 ................................................................................................... 8.4 Level of Service (LOS) E D D C A A A A ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Approach Delay (s/veh) 33.5 ...................................I,..................................,....................................................................,.................................. 21.1 ,,................................. 0.2 .................................. ................................. ,,,,,,,,,,......,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 5.8 .......................................................................................................................................... Approach LOSD ..................................................................,,,..................................................................... C A A Copyright © 2022 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSi l TWSC Version 2022 Generated: 12/1/2022 4:46:33 PM 5 AM No-Build.xtw ME= MESEM4 Em General Information Site Information ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Analyst DBG ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Intersection Stillwater Road & Four Mile Drive .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Agency/Co. WGM Group ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Jurisdiction ...........................................................................................................................................I ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Date Performed 12/01/2022 East/West Street Four Mile Drive .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Analysis Year 2027 North/South Street Stillwater Road ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Time Analyzed Build ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Peak Hour Factor 0.75 LAM .................................................................................................................................................................................................... Intersection Orientation th-South Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Project Description berwolf Ridge ,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Lanes ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. I fl "I "T + Y' t 11 Major Street: North -South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R .................................................................................................................................................................................I................................,................................ ................................. Priority 10 11 ................................ 12 ................................. ................................. .................................. ................................. ,....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Configuration L TR L TR LTR L TR Volume (veh/h) 27 75 7 11 50 230 4 120 71 256 69 26 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................ ................................ Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 3 3 ................................ 3 ................................ ................................. .................................. ................................ I................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 3 3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...................................I,..................................,.................................. .................................. ,.................................. ,.................................. .................................. ................................. .................................. ,..................................................................... Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Right Turn Channelized ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................... Median Type I Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Base Critical Headway (sec) 7.1 6.5 6.2 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 .................................................................................................... 4.1 Critical Headway (sec) 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 4.13 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................ I................................I Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.5 4.0 ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.53 4.03 3.33 3.53 4.03 3.33 2.23 2.23 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 36 109 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 15 373 5 ................................................................................................ 341 Capacity, c (veh/h) 70 177 70 493 1453 1305 .................................................................................................................................................................................I................................,................................ ................................. v/c Ratio 0.51 ................................ 0.62 ................................. ................................. .................................. ................................. ................................. ................................. 0.21 0.76 ................................. 0.00 ................................. .................................. .................................. ,................................................................. 0.26 95% Queue Length, Q95 (veh) 2.1 3.4 0.7 6.5 0.0 1.1 .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Control Delay (s/veh) 101.0 53.5 69.2 31.7 7.5 0.0 0.0 ................................................................................................... 8.7 Level of Service (LOS) F F F D A A A A ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Approach Delay (s/veh) 65.3 ...................................I,..................................,....................................................................,.................................. 33.1 ,,................................. 0.2 .................................. ................................. ,,,,,,,,,,......,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 6.4 ............................................................................................................................................ Approach LOSF ..................................................................,,,..................................................................... D A A Copyright © 2022 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSi l TWSC Version 2022 Generated: 12/1/2022 5:18:32 PM 5 AM Build.xtw ME= MESEM4 Em General Information Site Information ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Analyst DBG ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Intersection Stillwater Road & Four Mile Drive .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Agency/Co. WGM Group ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Jurisdiction ...........................................................................................................................................I ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Date Performed 12/01/2022 East/West Street Four Mile Drive .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Analysis Year 2027 North/South Street Stillwater Road ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Time Analyzed PM No -Build ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Peak Hour Factor 0.88 .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Intersection Orientation North -South Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Project Description Timberwolf Ridge ,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Lanes ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. I fl "I "T + Y' t 11 Major Street: North -South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R .................................................................................................................................................................................I................................,................................ ................................. Priority 10 11 ................................ 12 ................................. ................................. .................................. ................................. ,....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Configuration L TR L TR LTR L TR Volume (veh/h) 30 82 7 87 100 191 9 64 33 162 52 28 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................ ................................ Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 3 3 ................................ 3 ................................ ................................. .................................. ................................ I................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 3 3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...................................I,..................................,.................................. .................................. ,.................................. ,.................................. .................................. ................................. .................................. ,..................................................................... Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Right Turn Channelized ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................... Median Type I Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Base Critical Headway (sec) 7.1 6.5 6.2 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 .................................................................................................... 4.1 Critical Headway (sec) 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 4.13 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................ I................................I Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.5 4.0 ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.53 4.03 3.33 3.53 4.03 3.33 2.23 2.23 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 34 101 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 99 331 10 ................................................................................................ 184 Capacity, c (veh/h) 203 391 281 624 1498 1474 .................................................................................................................................................................................I................................,................................ ................................. v/c Ratio 0.17 ................................ 0.26 ................................. ................................. .................................. ................................. ................................. ................................. 0.35 0.53 ................................. 0.01 ................................. .................................. .................................. ,................................................................. 0.12 95% Queue Length, Q95 (veh) 0.6 1.0 1.5 3.1 0.0 0.4 .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Control Delay (s/veh) 26.3 17.4 24.6 17.1 7.4 0.1 0.1 ................................................................................................... 7.8 Level of Service (LOS) D C C C A A A A ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Approach Delay (s/veh) 19.7 ...................................I,..................................,....................................................................,.................................. 18.8 ,,................................. 0.7 .................................. ................................. ,,,,,,,,,,......,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 5.2 .......................................................................................................................................... Approach LOS.0 ..................................................................,,,..................................................................... C A A Copyright © 2022 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSi l TWSC Version 2022 Generated: 12/1/2022 5:10:55 PM 5 PM No-Build.xtw ME= MESEM4 Em General Information Site Information ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Analyst DBG ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Intersection Stillwater Road & Four Mile Drive .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Agency/Co. WGM Group ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Jurisdiction ...........................................................................................................................................I ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Date Performed 12/01/2022 East/West Street Four Mile Drive .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Analysis Year 2027 North/South Street Stillwater Road ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Time Analyzed PM Build ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Peak Hour Factor 0.88 .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Intersection Orientation North -South Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Project Description Timberwolf Ridge ,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Lanes ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. I fl "I "T + Y' t 11 Major Street: North -South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R .................................................................................................................................................................................I................................,................................ ................................. Priority 10 11 ................................ 12 ................................. ................................. .................................. ................................. ,....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Configuration L TR L TR LTR L TR Volume (veh/h) 34 82 7 87 100 263 9 73 33 205 57 31 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................ ................................ Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 3 3 ................................ 3 ................................ ................................. .................................. ................................ I................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 3 3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...................................I,..................................,.................................. .................................. ,.................................. ,.................................. .................................. ................................. .................................. ,..................................................................... Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Right Turn Channelized ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................... Median Type I Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Base Critical Headway (sec) 7.1 6.5 6.2 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 .................................................................................................... 4.1 Critical Headway (sec) 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 4.13 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................ I................................I Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.5 4.0 ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.53 4.03 3.33 3.53 4.03 3.33 2.23 2.23 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 39 101 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 99 413 10 ................................................................................................ 233 Capacity, c (veh/h) 134 324 214 603 1486 1461 .................................................................................................................................................................................I................................,................................ ................................. v/c Ratio 0.29 ................................ 0.31 ................................. ................................. .................................. ................................. ................................. ................................. 0.46 0.68 ................................. 0.01 ................................. .................................. .................................. ,................................................................. 0.16 95% Queue Length, Q95 (veh) 1.1 1.3 2.2 5.3 0.0 0.6 .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Control Delay (s/veh) 42.6 21.1 35.5 22.9 7.4 0.1 0.1 ................................................................................................... 7.9 Level of Service (LOS) E C E C A A A A ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Approach Delay (s/veh) 27.0 ...................................I,..................................,....................................................................,.................................. 25.4 ,,................................. 0.6 .................................. ................................. ,,,,,,,,,,......,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 5.5 .......................................................................................................................................... Approach LOSD ..................................................................,,,..................................................................... D A A Copyright © 2022 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSi l TWSC Version 2022 Generated: 12/1/2022 5:12:16 PM 5 PM Build.xtw ME=G =MEE= General Information Site Information ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Analyst DBG ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Intersection Stillwater Road & Four Mile Drive ................................................................................................................................................................................. Agency/Co. WGM Group ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ .................................................................................................................................................. Jurisdiction ........................................................................................................................................... ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Date Performed 12/15/2022 East/West Street Four Mile Drive ................................................................................................................................................................................. Analysis Year 2027 .................................................................................................................................................. North/South Street Stillwater Road ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Time Analyzed AM Starling+Stillwater Cr ........................................................................................................................................... Peak Hour Factor ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 0.75 ................................................................................................................................................................................. Intersection Orientation North South Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Project Description Timberwolf Ridge Lanes ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. J 4 1, 4r �1IItyt ' Major Street: North -South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................... .................................................................................................................................................... Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound ................................................................................................................................................................................. Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Priority 10 11 ............................... 12 ............................... . ................................ .................................. ............................... I ............................................................................................... 7 8 9 1U 1 ..............................,, ............................. 2 3 4U .......................... ................................ 4 5 ............................... , 6 ................................................................................................................................................................................. Number of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Configuration L ................................................................................................................................... TR .............................................................................................................................. L TR ..............................,, ............................. LTR .......................... ................................ L ................................ , TR ................................................................................................................................................................................. Volume (veh/h) 20 78 11 43 70 205 11 143 49 207 59 27 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................ ................................ , Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 3 3 ............................... 3 ................................ ................................. .................................. ................................ ,............................................................................................... 3 3 3 3 ..............................,, ............................. .......................... ................................ 3 ................................ , ................................................................................................................................................................................. Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 0 ................................................................................................................................................................................. Right Turn Channelized .......... E ...................... : .............. : ................. : ................ : .............. : .............. : .............. : ................ i ................ : ................. : ................ : Median Type I Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Base Critical Headway (sec) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1 ................................................................................................................................................................................. Critical Headway (sec) 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 4.13 Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 ................................................................................................................................................................................. Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.53 4.03 3.33 3.53 4.03 3.33 2.23 ................................................................ 2.23 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 27 119 57 367 15 276 ................................................................................................................................................................................. Capacity, c (veh/h) 80 228 105 470 1468 1303 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................ ................................ , v/c Ratio 0.33 ............................... 0.52 ................................ ................................. .................................. ................................ ,............................................................................................... 0.55 0.78 0.01 ..............................,, ............................. .......................... ................................ 0.21 ................................ , ................................................................................................................................................................................. 95% Queue Length, Q95 (veh) 1.3 2.7 2.5 6.9 0.0 0.8 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................ ................................ , Control Delay (s/veh) 70.5 .................................................................................................................................. 36.6 ...............................,............................................................................................... 74.9 34.8 7.5 ..............................,, ............................. 0.1 0.1 .....................................................,,,,, 8.5 .............................. ................................................................................................................................................................................. Level of Service (LOS) F E F D A A A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 42.9 40.2 0.5 6.0 Approach LOS E E A A Copyright © 2022 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS�uH TWSC Version 2022 Generated: 12/15/2022 2:31:06 PM 5-AM-Starling with Stillwater Crossing.xtw ME=G =MEE= General Information Site Information ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Analyst DBG ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Intersection Stillwater Road & Four Mile Drive ................................................................................................................................................................................. Agency/Co. WGM Group ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ .................................................................................................................................................. Jurisdiction ........................................................................................................................................... ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Date Performed 12/15/2022 East/West Street Four Mile Drive ................................................................................................................................................................................. Analysis Year 2027 .................................................................................................................................................. North/South Street Stillwater Road ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Time Analyzed PM Starling+Stillwater Cr ........................................................................................................................................... Peak Hour Factor ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 0.88 ................................................................................................................................................................................. Intersection Orientation North South Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Project Description Timberwolf Ridge Lanes ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. J 4 1, 4r �1IItyt ' Major Street: North -South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................... .................................................................................................................................................... Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound ................................................................................................................................................................................. Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Priority 10 11 ............................... 12 ............................... . ................................ .................................. ............................... I ............................................................................................... 7 8 9 lU 1 ..............................,, ............................. 2 3 4U .......................... ................................ 4 5 ............................... , 6 ................................................................................................................................................................................. Number of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Configuration L ................................................................................................................................... TR .............................................................................................................................. L TR ..............................,, ............................. LTR .......................... ................................ L ................................ , TR ................................................................................................................................................................................. Volume (veh/h) 28 75 8 98 87 216 13 56 67 156 57 25 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................ ................................ , Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 3 3 ............................... 3 ................................ ................................. .................................. ................................ ,............................................................................................... 3 3 3 3 ..............................,, ............................. .......................... ................................ 3 ................................ , ................................................................................................................................................................................. Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 0 ................................................................................................................................................................................. Right Turn Channelized .......... E ...................... : .............. : ................. : ................ : .............. : .............. : .............. : ................ i ................ : ................. : ................ : Median Type I Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Base Critical Headway (sec) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1 ................................................................................................................................................................................. Critical Headway (sec) 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 4.13 Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 ................................................................................................................................................................................. Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.53 4.03 3.33 3.53 4.03 3.33 2.23 ................................................................ 2.23 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 32 94 ill 344 15 177 ................................................................................................................................................................................. Capacity, c (veh/h) 208 380 281 654 1495 1437 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................ ................................ , v/c Ratio 0.15 ............................... 0.25 ................................ ................................. .................................. ................................ ,............................................................................................... 0.40 0.53 0.01 ..............................,, ............................. .......................... ................................ 0.12 ................................ , ................................................................................................................................................................................. 95% Queue Length, Q95 (veh) 0.5 1.0 1.8 3.1 0.0 0.4 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................ ................................ , Control Delay (s/veh) 25.4 .................................................................................................................................. 17.6 ...............................,............................................................................................... 26.0 16.5 7.4 ..............................,, ............................. 0.1 0.1 .....................................................,,,,, 7.9 .............................. ................................................................................................................................................................................. Level of Service (LOS) D C D C A A A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 19.5 18.8 0.8 5.1 Approach LOS C C A A Copyright C 2022 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS�uH TWSC Version 2022 Generated: 12/15/2022 2:36:10 PM 5-PM-Starling with Stillwater Crossing.xtw .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. HCS Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information ' 4.JA- � �° 1 "IllAgency WGM Group Duration, h 0.250 "IllAnalyst DBG Analysis Date 12/6/2022 Area Type Other r° Jurisdiction Time Perod AM Build PHF 0.75 `� l- .� Urban Street Stillwater Road Analysis Year 2027 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 "" .:: Intersection Stillwater Roao &Four.. ,, FIIe Na e 5 A Bulld.xus . Protect Description Timberwolf Ridge Peak AM Build wI 4 t 4"i T, INEEMEEMENNEEMOM Demand Information EB WB NB"Illl SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h 27 75 7 11 50 230 4 120 71 256 69 26 Signal Information 43.2 Reference Phase 2 F w Offset, s �� 0 Referen d ceoint E n Uncoord'nated Yes Simult. v � GapE/W O 1111111"Fixed Yellow H15-� 3 58 6.0 0.0 0.0 0 �OFO 11.1 Force Mode Simult. Gap N/S O n Red 1.5 0.0 0.0 ,0,0 �, �s. v Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT "IllAssigned Phase 2 6 8 4 Case Number 6.0 6.0 8.0 6.0 Phase Duration, s 18.3 18.3 24.8 24.8 Change Period, ( Y+R � ), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Allow Headway (MAH ), s 3.3 3.3 3.4 3.4 Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s 12.3 11.0 6.1 18.3 Green Extension Time ( g e ), s 1.2 1.2 1.8 1.5 Phase Call Probabll°It Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Max Out Probability 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB "IllApproach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R "IllAssigned Movement 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h 36 109 15 373 260 341 127 "IllAdjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In 1001 1827 1325 1617 1738 1116 1768 Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 1.4 1.9 0.4 9.0 0.0 12.1 1.8 Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s 10.3 1.9 2.2 9.0 4.1 16.3 1.8 Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.46 0.46 0.46 Capacity ( c ), veh/h 269 562 518 497 885 572 814 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) 0.134 0.194 0.028 0.751 0.294 0.597 0.156 Back of Queue ( Q ), In 95 th percentile) 13.4 28.2 3.9 121.6 48 105 21.4 Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 95 th percentile) 0.5 1.1 0.2 4.8 1.9 4.1 0.8 Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ ) ( 95 th percentile) 0.13 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 1.61 0.00 Uniform Delay ( d i ), s/veh 18.0 11.0 11.8 13.4 7.4 12.6 6.8 Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.9 0.1 0.4 0.0 Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay d s/veh Y ( ), 1R 1 11 0 11.8 14 3 7.4 1�w 8 LeVe1 of Service LOs ( ) B B B B A A "IllA roach Delay, s/veh / LOS pp Y, 12 8 B 14.2 B 7.4 A 11 3 Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 11.6 B Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score LOS �� B"I'll""I'll",'ll",'ll",'ll""I'll""I'll",'ll""I'll""I'll",'ll""I'll""I'll",'ll",'ll",'ll""I'll""I'll",'ll""I'll""I'll",'ll""I'll""I'll",'ll",'ll",'ll""I'll��l��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��,,,��,,,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��,,,��,,,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��,,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��,��,�,��,�,��,�,��,�,��,�,��,�,��,11,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��,,�,,��,,�,,��,,�,,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��ll,��'ll,��'ll,��'ll,��'ll,��'ll,��,��,11,��,11,��,11,��,11,��,11,��,11,��,11,��,11,��,11,��,11,��,11,��,11,��,11,��,11,��,11,��,11,��,11,��,11,��,11,��,11,��,11,��,11,��,11,��,�� IcycIeLOS Score /LOS .... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ... Copyrmght Z 0 "'. W.,Pnhiers'ity iiif III:::: lorkIli.ii, AH III qghts III'wWraw ii'J. III 11;Swow, Stric,ots'iihi!r »'dor m02 Gc! erat d fl 2/"1$1 2022 2555 II::11M .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. HCS Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information ' 4.JA- � �° 1 "IllAgency WGM Group Duration, h 0.250 "IllAnalyst DBG Analysis Date 12/6/2022 Area Type Other r° Jurisdiction Time Perod PM Build PHF 0.88 `� l- .� Urban Street Stillwater Road Analysis Year 2027 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 "" .:: Intersection Stillwater Roao &Four.. ,, FIIe Na e 5 P Bulld.xus . Protect Description Timberwolf Ridge Peak AM Build wI 4 t 4"i T, INEEMEEMENUMEMOM Demand Information EB WB NB"Illl SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h 34 82 7 87 100 263 9 73 33 205 57 31 Signal Information 59.1 Reference Phase 2 F w Offset, s �� 0 Referen d ceoint E n Uncoord'nated Yes Simult. v � GapE/W O 1111111"Fixed Yellow 3 50 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 Force Mode Simult. Gap N/S O n Red 1.5 1.5 0.0 0.0 00 00 �, 6, v Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT "IllAssigned Phase 2 6 8 4 Case Number 6.0 6.0 8.0 6.0 Phase Duration, s 24.1 24.1 35.0 35.0 Change Period, ( Y+R � ), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Allow Headway (MAH ), s 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s 17.7 15.4 4.3 11.5 Green Extension Time ( g e ), s 1.4 1.4 0.9 0.9 Phase Call Probabll°It Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Max Out Probability 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB "IllApproach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R "IllAssigned Movement 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h "Ill233 39 101 99 413 131 100 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In 966 1830 1335 1641 1739 1261 1745 Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 2.2 2.3 3.4 13.4 0.0 7.1 1.8 Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s 15.7 2.3 5.7 13.4 2.3 9.5 1.8 Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.51 0.51 0.51 Capacity ( c ), veh/h 216 593 501 532 947 711 884 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) 0.179 0.170 0.197 0.775 0.138 0.328 0.113 Back of Queue (Q ), In 95 th percentile) 22.2 39.7 43 205.6 32.7 75.4 24.6 Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 95 th percentile) 0.9 1.6 1.7 8.0 1.3 2.9 1.0 Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ ) ( 95 th percentile) 0.22 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.00 1.16 0.00 Uniform Delay ( d i ), s/veh 25.1 14.3 16.4 18.0 7.8 10.3 7.6 Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.9 0.0 0.1 0.0 Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay d s/veh Y ( ), 25 3 14.4 ............................................. � 4 19.0 7.8 1 w 7.7 LeVe1 of Service LOs ( ) C B B B A S A "IllA roach Delay, s/veh / LOS pp Y, 17 4 I B .......... 5 B 7$ A Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 14.4 B Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score LOS BIcycIeLOS Score /LOS Copyrmght Z 0 "'. W.,Pnhiers'ity iiif III:::: lorkIli.ii, AH III qghts III'wWraw ii'J. III 11;Swow, Stric,ots'iihi!r »'dor m02 Gc! erat d fl 2/"'h$1 2022 25r 5II::iu W ME= MESEM4 Em General Information Site Information ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Analyst DBG ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Intersection Stillwater Road & Site Approach "A" .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Agency/Co. WGM Group ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Jurisdiction ...........................................................................................................................................I ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Date Performed 12/02/2022 East/West Street Site Approach "A" .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Analysis Year 2027 North/South Street Stillwater Road ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Time Analyzed No -Build ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Peak Hour Factor ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 0.83 LAM .................................................................................................................................................................................................... Intersection Orientation th-South Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Project Description berwolf Ridge Lanes ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. fl "I "T + Y' t 11 Major Street: North -South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R .................................................................................................................................................................................I................................,................................ ................................. Priority 10 11 ................................ 12 ................................. ................................. .................................. ................................. ,....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Configuration LR LT TR Volume (veh/h) 25 59 20 312 204 8 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................ ................................ Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 3 ................................ 3 ................................ ................................. .................................. ................................ I................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Proportion Time Blocked ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...................................I Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................... Median Type I Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Base Critical Headway (sec) 7.1 6.2 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 4.1 .................................................................................................... Critical Headway (sec) 6.43 6.23 4.13 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................ I................................I Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.5 ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3.3 2.2 Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.53 3.33 2.23 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 101 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 24 ................................................................................................ Capacity, c (veh/h) 616 1304 .................................................................................................................................................................................I................................,................................ ................................. v/c Ratio 0.16 ................................ ................................. ................................. .................................. ................................. ................................. ................................. ................................. 0.02 ................................. .................................. .................................. ,................................................................. 95% Queue Length, Q95 (veh) 0.6 0.1 .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Control Delay (s/veh) 12.0 7.8 ................................................................................................... 0.2 Level of Service (LOS) B A A ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Approach Delay (s/veh) 12.0 ...................................I,..................................,....................................................................,.................................. ,,................................. 0.6 .................................. ................................. .................................... , ................................................................................................................................................. Approach LOS B ................................................................................................................................................. A Copyright © 2022 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS�N TWSC Version 2022 Generated: 12/2/2022 11:28:58 AM 3 AM No-Build.xtw ME= 4 ECOMMEM General Information Site Information ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Analyst DBG ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Intersection Stillwater Road & Site Approach "A" .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Agency/Co. WGM Group ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Jurisdiction ...........................................................................................................................................I ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Date Performed 12/02/2022 East/West Street Site Approach "A" .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Analysis Year 2027 North/South Street Stillwater Road .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Time Analyzed Build ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Peak Hour Factor 0.83 LAM .................................................................................................................................................................................................... Intersection Orientation th-South Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Project Description berwolf Ridge ,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Lanes ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. I fl11"T+Y't 11 Major Street: North -South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R .................................................................................................................................................................................I................................,................................ ................................. Priority 10 11 ................................ 12 ................................. ................................. .................................. ................................. ,....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 8 9 1 U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Configuration LTR LTR L TR L TR Volume (veh/h) 25 0 59 26 0 11 20 331 8 4 227 8 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................ ................................ Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 3 3 ................................ 3 ................................ ................................. .................................. ................................ I................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 3 3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...................................I,..................................,.................................. .................................. ,.................................. ,.................................. .................................. ................................. .................................. ,..................................................................... Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Right Turn Channelized ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................... Median Type I Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Base Critical Headway (sec) 7.1 6.5 6.2 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 .................................................................................................... 4.1 Critical Headway (sec) 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 4.13 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................ I................................I Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.5 4.0 ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.53 4.03 3.33 3.53 4.03 3.33 2.23 2.23 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 101 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 45 24 ................................................................................................ 5 Capacity, c (veh/h) 534 334 1273 1145 .................................................................................................................................................................................I................................,................................ ................................. v/c Ratio 0.19 ................................ ................................. ................................. .................................. ................................. ................................. ................................. 0.13 ................................. 0.02 ................................. .................................. .................................. ,................................................................. 0.00 95% Queue Length, Q95 (veh) 0.7 0.5 0.1 0.0 .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Control Delay (s/veh) 13.3 17.4 7.9 ................................................................................................... 8.2 Level of Service (LOS) B C A A ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Approach Delay (s/veh) 13.3 ...................................I,..................................,....................................................................,.................................. 17.4 ,,................................. 0.4 .................................. ................................. ,,,,,,,,,,......,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 0.1 ......................................................................8...................................................................... Approach LOS ..................................................................,,,..................................................................... C A A Copyright © 2022 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS'[iN TWSC Version 2023 Generated: 12/19/2022 4:07:37 PM 3 AM Build.xtw ME= MESEM4 Em General Information Site Information ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Analyst DBG ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Intersection Stillwater Road & Site Approach "A" .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Agency/Co. WGM Group ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Jurisdiction ...........................................................................................................................................I ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Date Performed 12/01/2022 East/West Street Site Approach "A" .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Analysis Year 2027 North/South Street Stillwater Road ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Time Analyzed PM No -Build ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Peak Hour Factor 0.83 .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Intersection Orientation North -South Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Project Description Timberwolf Ridge ,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Lanes ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. fl "I "T + Y' t 11 Major Street: North -South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R .................................................................................................................................................................................I................................,................................ ................................. Priority 10 11 ................................ 12 ................................. ................................. .................................. ................................. ,....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Configuration LR LT TR Volume (veh/h) 17 39 66 180 199 28 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................ ................................ Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 3 ................................ 3 ................................ ................................. .................................. ................................ I................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Proportion Time Blocked ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...................................I Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................... Median Type I Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Base Critical Headway (sec) 7.1 6.2 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 4.1 .................................................................................................... Critical Headway (sec) 6.43 6.23 4.13 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................ I................................I Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.5 ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3.3 2.2 Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.53 3.33 2.23 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 67 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 80 ................................................................................................ Capacity, c (veh/h) 613 1284 .................................................................................................................................................................................I................................,................................ ................................. v/c Ratio 0.11 ................................ ................................. ................................. .................................. ................................. ................................. ................................. ................................. 0.06 ................................. .................................. .................................. ,................................................................. 95% Queue Length, Q95 (veh) 0.4 0.2 .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Control Delay (s/veh) 11.6 8.0 ................................................................................................... 0.6 Level of Service (LOS) B A A ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Approach Delay (s/veh) 11.6 ...................................I,..................................,....................................................................,.................................. ,,................................. 2.6 .................................. ................................. .................................... , ................................................................................................................................................. Approach LOS B ................................................................................................................................................. A Copyright © 2022 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS�N TWSC Version 2022 Generated: 12/1/2022 5:06:58 PM 3 PM No-Build.xtw ME= 4 ECOMMEM General Information Site Information ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Analyst DBG ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Intersection Stillwater Road & Site Approach "A" .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Agency/Co. WGM Group ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Jurisdiction ...........................................................................................................................................I ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Date Performed 12/01/2022 East/West Street Site Approach "A" .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Analysis Year 2027 North/South Street Stillwater Road .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Time Analyzed PM Build ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Peak Hour Factor 0.83 .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Intersection Orientation North -South Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Project Description Timberwolf Ridge ,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Lanes ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. I fl11"T+Y't 11 Major Street: North -South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R .................................................................................................................................................................................I................................,................................ ................................. Priority 10 11 ................................ 12 ................................. ................................. .................................. ................................. ,....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 8 9 1 U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Configuration LTR LTR L TR L TR Volume (veh/h) 17 0 39 17 0 7 66 210 28 12 226 28 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................ ................................ Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 3 3 ................................ 3 ................................ ................................. .................................. ................................ I................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 3 3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...................................I,..................................,.................................. .................................. ,.................................. ,.................................. .................................. ................................. .................................. ,..................................................................... Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Right Turn Channelized ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................... Median Type I Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Base Critical Headway (sec) 7.1 6.5 6.2 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 .................................................................................................... 4.1 Critical Headway (sec) 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 4.13 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................ I................................I Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.5 4.0 ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.53 4.03 3.33 3.53 4.03 3.33 2.23 2.23 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 67 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 29 80 ................................................................................................ 14 Capacity, c (veh/h) 513 337 1249 1270 .................................................................................................................................................................................I................................,................................ ................................. v/c Ratio 0.13 ................................ ................................. ................................. .................................. ................................. ................................. ................................. 0.09 ................................. 0.06 ................................. .................................. .................................. ,................................................................. 0.01 95% Queue Length, Q95 (veh) 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.0 .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Control Delay (s/veh) 13.1 16.7 8.1 ................................................................................................... 7.9 Level of Service (LOS) B C A A ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Approach Delay (s/veh) 13.1 ...................................I,..................................,....................................................................,.................................. 16.7 ,,................................. 1.8 .................................. ................................. ,,,,,,,,,,......,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 0.4 ......................................................................8...................................................................... Approach LOS ..................................................................,,,..................................................................... C A A Copyright © 2022 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS'[iN TWSC Version 2023 Generated: 12/19/2022 4:11:56 PM 3 PM Build.xtw ME= MESEM4 Em General Information Site Information ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Analyst DBG ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Intersection Stillwater Road & Site Approach "B" .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Agency/Co. WGM Group ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Jurisdiction ...........................................................................................................................................I ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Date Performed 12/01/2022 East/West Street Site Approach "B" .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Analysis Year 2027 North/South Street Stillwater Road ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Time Analyzed Build ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Peak Hour Factor 0.83 LAM .................................................................................................................................................................................................... Intersection Orientation th-South Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Project Description berwolf Ridge ,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Lanes ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. fl "I "T + Y' t 11 Major Street: North -South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R .................................................................................................................................................................................I................................,................................ ................................. ................................ Priority 10 11 12 ................................. ................................. .................................. ................................. ,....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Configuration LR TR LT Volume (veh/h) 34 13 346 11 4 308 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................ ................................ ................................ Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) ................................ ................................. .................................. ................................ I................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...................................I Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................... Median Type I Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Base Critical Headway (sec) ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 7.1 6.2 .................................................................................................... 4.1 Critical Headway (sec) 6.43 6.23 4.13 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................ I................................I...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.5 3.3 2.2 Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.53 3.33 2.23 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Flow Rate, v (veh/h) ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 57 ................................................................................................ 5 Capacity, c (veh/h) 398 1124 .................................................................................................................................................................................I................................,................................ ................................. ................................ v/c Ratio ................................. ................................. .................................. ................................. ................................. ................................. 0.14 ................................. ................................. .................................. .................................. ,................................................................. 0.00 95% Queue Length, Q95 (veh) 0.5 0.0 .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Control Delay (s/veh) 15.5 ................................................................................................... 8.2 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C A A ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................I,..................................,....................................................................,..................................,,......................................................................................................................................,..................................................................... Approach Delay (s/veh) 15.5 0.1 ................................................................................................................................................. Approach LOS ................................................................................................................................................. C A Copyright © 2022 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS�N TWSC Version 2022 Generated: 12/1/2022 4:44:03 PM 4 AM Build.xtw ME= MESEM4 Em General Information Site Information ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Analyst DBG ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Intersection Stillwater Road & Site Approach "B" .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Agency/Co. WGM Group ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Jurisdiction ...........................................................................................................................................I ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Date Performed 12/01/2022 East/West Street Site Approach "B" .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Analysis Year 2027 North/South Street Stillwater Road ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Time Analyzed PM Build ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Peak Hour Factor 0.83 .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Intersection Orientation North -South Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Project Description Timberwolf Ridge ,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Lanes ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. fl "I "T + Y' t 11 Major Street: North -South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R .................................................................................................................................................................................I................................,................................ ................................. ................................ Priority 10 11 12 ................................. ................................. .................................. ................................. ,....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Configuration LR TR LT Volume (veh/h) 22 9 295 36 15 267 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................ ................................ ................................ Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) ................................ ................................. .................................. ................................ I................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...................................I Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................... Median Type I Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Base Critical Headway (sec) ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 7.1 6.2 .................................................................................................... 4.1 Critical Headway (sec) 6.43 6.23 4.13 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................ I................................I...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.5 3.3 2.2 Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.53 3.33 2.23 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Flow Rate, v (veh/h) ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 37 ................................................................................................ 18 Capacity, c (veh/h) 432 1154 .................................................................................................................................................................................I................................,................................ ................................. ................................ v/c Ratio ................................. ................................. .................................. ................................. ................................. ................................. 0.09 ................................. ................................. .................................. .................................. ,................................................................. 0.02 95% Queue Length, Q95 (veh) 0.3 0.0 .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Control Delay (s/veh) 14.1 ................................................................................................... 8.2 0.2 Level of Service (LOS) B A A ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................I,..................................,....................................................................,..................................,,......................................................................................................................................,..................................................................... Approach Delay (s/veh) 14.1 0.6 ................................................................................................................................................. Approach LOS ................................................................................................................................................. B A Copyright © 2022 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS�N TWSC Version 2022 Generated: 12/1/2022 5:09:41 PM 4 PM Build.xtw ME= MESEM4 Em General Information Site Information ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Analyst DBG ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Intersection Timberwolf Parkway & Site Approach "C" .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Agency/Co. WGM Group ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Jurisdiction ...........................................................................................................................................I ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Date Performed 12/01/2022 East/West Street Timberwolf Parkway .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Analysis Year 2027 North/South Street Site Approach "C" ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Time Analyzed Build ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Peak Hour Factor 0.83 LAM .................................................................................................................................................................................................... Intersection Orientation -West Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Project Description berwolf Ridge ,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Lanes ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 141).41� I. -4 , II+Yt tr Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R .................................................................................................................................................................................I................................,................................ ................................. ................................ Priority 1U 1 2 3 ................................. ................................. .................................. 4U 4 ................................. ,................................ ................................. 5 6 7 ................................ 8 ................................. ................................. 9 .................................. 10 ................................. , 11 ................................ 12 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR Volume (veh/h) 22 6 9 0 1 0 28 0 0 0 0 2 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................ ................................ ................................ Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 3 ................................ ................................. .................................. 3 ................................ I................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 3 3 3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...................................I,.................................. ,.................................. .................................. ,.................................. ................................... .................................. ................................. .................................. ,..................................................................... Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Right Turn Channelized ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................... Median Type I Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Base Critical Headway (sec) 4.1 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 .................................................................................................... 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Headway (sec) 4.13 4.13 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................ I................................I...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 Follow -Up Headway (sec) 2.23 2.23 3.53 4.03 3.33 3.53 4.03 3.33 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 27 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 0 34 ................................................................................................ 2 Capacity, c (veh/h) 1615 1592 906 1080 .................................................................................................................................................................................I................................,................................ ................................. ................................ v/c Ratio 0.02 ................................. ................................. .................................. 0.00 ................................. ................................. ................................. ................................. 0.04 ................................. .................................. .................................. ,................................................................. 0.00 95% Queue Length, Q95 (veh) 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Control Delay (s/veh) 7.3 0.1 0.1 7.3 0.0 0.0 9.1 ................................................................................................... 8.3 Level of Service (LOS) A A A A A A A A ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Approach Delay (s/veh) 4.4 ...................................I,..................................,....................................................................,.................................. 0.0 ,,................................. 9.1 .................................. ................................. .................................... , 8.3 .......................................................................................................................................... Approach LOSA A ..................................................................,,,..................................................................... A A Copyright © 2022 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSi l TWSC Version 2022 Generated: 12/1/2022 5:14:26 PM 6 AM Build.xtw ME= MESEM4 Em General Information Site Information ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Analyst DBG ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Intersection Timberwolf Parkway & Site Approach "C" .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Agency/Co. WGM Group ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Jurisdiction ...........................................................................................................................................I ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Date Performed 12/01/2022 East/West Street Timberwolf Parkway .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Analysis Year 2027 North/South Street Site Approach "C" ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Time Analyzed Build ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Peak Hour Factor 0.83 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Intersection Orientation -West L Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Project Description berwolf Ridge ,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Lanes ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 141).41� I. -4 , II+Yt tr Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R .................................................................................................................................................................................I................................,................................ ................................. ................................ Priority 1U 1 2 3 ................................. ................................. .................................. 4U 4 ................................. ,................................ ................................. 5 6 7 ................................ 8 ................................. ................................. 9 .................................. 10 ................................. , 11 ................................ 12 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR Volume (veh/h) 3 1 30 0 6 0 18 0 0 0 0 23 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................ ................................ ................................ Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 3 ................................ ................................. .................................. 3 ................................ I................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 3 3 3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...................................I,.................................. ,.................................. .................................. ,.................................. ................................... .................................. ................................. .................................. ,..................................................................... Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Right Turn Channelized ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................... Median Type I Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Base Critical Headway (sec) 4.1 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 .................................................................................................... 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Headway (sec) 4.13 4.13 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................ I................................I...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 Follow -Up Headway (sec) 2.23 2.23 3.53 4.03 3.33 3.53 4.03 3.33 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 4 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 0 22 ................................................................................................ 28 Capacity, c (veh/h) 1607 1567 943 1072 .................................................................................................................................................................................I................................,................................ ................................. ................................ v/c Ratio 0.00 ................................. ................................. .................................. 0.00 ................................. ................................. ................................. ................................. 0.02 ................................. .................................. .................................. ,................................................................. 0.03 95% Queue Length, Q95 (veh) 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Control Delay (s/veh) 7.2 0.0 0.0 7.3 0.0 0.0 8.9 ................................................................................................... 8.4 Level of Service (LOS) A A A A A A A A ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................I,..................................,....................................................................,..................................,,......................................................................................................................................,..................................................................... Approach Delay (s/veh) 0.7 0.0 8.9 8.4 .......................................................................................................................................... Approach LOSA A ..................................................................,,,..................................................................... A A Copyright © 2022 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSi l TWSC Version 2022 Generated: 12/1/2022 5:13:41 PM 6 PM Build.xtw W� APPENDIX • Timberwolf Ridge Traffic Impact Study Level of Service (LOS) for unsignalized (two -way -stop -controlled) intersections is determined by the control delay experienced by drivers on each minor approach. Minor movements are those entering from or exiting onto the stop -controlled side street(s). LOS is not defined for the intersection as a whole, but rather for each minor movement individually. The delay value used in determining LOS is known as "control delay." Control delay is defined as the total delay experienced by a driver and includes initial deceleration delay, queue move -up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. The delay a vehicle experiences is a function of the capacity of the approach and the degree of saturation on the uncontrolled (unstopped) roadway (i.e., the number of acceptable gaps in the passing traffic stream). LOS values range from A to F. The delay range for each LOS value is as shown in the following table. LOS CRITERIA A INTERSECTIONS -. 0-10 B >10-15 C > 15-25 D >25-35 E >35-50 F >50 Source: Transportation Research Board. Hiahwav Capacity Manual. 7th Edition Timberwolf Ridge 4V Traffic Impact Study SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LEVEL OF • DEFINED Level of Service (LOS) for signalized intersections is determined by the control delay experienced by drivers and is calculated for each movement, for each approach, and for the intersection as a whole. The delay value used in determining LOS is known as "control delay." Control delay is defined as the total delay experienced by a driver and includes initial deceleration delay, queue move -up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. The delay a vehicle experiences is a function of the capacity of the approach, the volume of traffic, and the signal timing. LOS values range from A to F. The delay range for each LOS value is as shown in the following table. i LOS 1 Fil 4 PA4 Q 10119:4L01 1 AVERAGE CONTROL DELAY (SECONDS/VEHICLE) Source: Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual, 7,n Edition Timberwolf Ridge 4W Traffic Impact Study USDA United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local participants Custom Soil Resource Report for Upper Flathead Valley Area, Montana Timberwolf Ridge November 18, 2022 Preface Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas. They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers. Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand, protect, or enhance the environment. Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions. The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations. Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/ portal/nres/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center (https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nres) or your NRCS State Soil Scientist (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/? cid=nres142p2_053951). Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to basements or underground installations. The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require 2 alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 3 Contents Preface.................................................................................................................... 2 How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5 SoilMap.................................................................................................................. 8 SoilMap................................................................................................................9 Legend................................................................................................................10 MapUnit Legend................................................................................................ 11 MapUnit Descriptions.........................................................................................11 Upper Flathead Valley Area, Montana............................................................13 Ke—Kalispell loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes...................................................13 Kf—Kalispell loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, wind eroded .............................. 14 Pb—Prospect loam, 3 to 7 percent slopes..................................................15 Pc —Prospect loam, 7 to 12 percent slopes ................................................ 16 Ta—Tally, Blanchard, and Flathead soils, 0 to 3 percent slopes ................. 17 References............................................................................................................ 20 4 How Soil Surveys Are Made Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length, and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other biological activity. Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA. The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a specific location on the landscape. Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented by an understanding of the soil -vegetation -landscape relationship, are sufficient to verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries. Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units). Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil 5 Custom Soil Resource Report scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and research. The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map. The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape, and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the soil -landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at specific locations. Once the soil -landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded. These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color, depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil typically vary from one point to another across the landscape. Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other properties. While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field -observed characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management. Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same kinds of soil. Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example, soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date. After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and 1. Custom Soil Resource Report identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings, fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately. 7 Soil Map The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit. 1.1 v v v OO49PES 0009bES 0065bi5 0084785 OOLSVES 00991Em 009stm 0065i4.� OGESbES 00ZSbE5 M „ZZ ,OZ obTT r S m z v v 0009tm 0069tm OOR9V S 002-GVM 0099tm 0099tm OOG9b£S OCESb£9 OOZ9bE9 M „ZZ ,OZ obTT m Ln 8 (n W z g rl QNQ N a x L_ 2 v zO U a w o 8 RR R5 6 cn � P a Z 8 SR M„££,TZ obTT iC z v L O CL N� �/ ry U i O U) (D ry O U) C O U) U 7 N m a a) m i N N m r m @ -° N O 3 o -° w C m U N C)LO N O C a) U O E MD E ON "O N ,� 'E 2 V) N Q) m (a) C > Q '� U O Q M _� N O (0 E Z E U ❑ m O (n w°@ N a U) E ° °q O N Q m Co m w N m OMO m O_ 7 ° () cl��O Q N Q .L-' _ ° ~ 3 w U U ° Q w 3 s oa'r o �Noa�i°@ �N Lola CL -0 Em° m 0 Oo mQ m cmtO °oQu; O LL > 1' > 2CC-)9LWN " O E E 2, m NE Z a) y m -O L a) m 1) O 6 N 7 N c 0 LL N Q N Q U m '. E O N "_' J (n N Cl C° m O- > L N L -° O m E O- Q O a) m Co L Y L m z L 8 Q L) C O- a) N °? O O E 02 '_' -O �C .Z N m O) E C~ N a) T .-- >O M m .7- > L N a) aa)i a0 m (a m m MO E O _� T O 'O 'p .L-- C N C Q> T _m a) (6 m 7 .N -0 ❑ N m ° 70 an d '6 i 7 0 CO C (m0 a) N m E O) O T m 3 (n Q) -6 U @ V O 7 Q m N m -E 7 O (6 N Q m L ❑_ m N E N O) i N m U '� ° 'p C E 2.2 N a) Y N ° m i Q a C) m r L "O O C E a (0 2) N U)'a U N V i@ O- N U) a) E (v 0 a) 0, �ENmE p L > (0 �C0N O N a p Q>>p CL .N O m 0 7 U m N�iE "O N :2 'p 'Cl p N 0'- L r > W E— U N E U) > U a Q m H O U) U) U) r ❑ r H U ._ U) o a w y 6 @ C a) U U- > m L > Q m cu d L d Q Z) _ J N m E a) .0., O ° p of O LL C .Q O T a) a)U m t a y O fn C m y LL' O N O m U ❑ m O R � C 3 Z ff ri LL O C C Oy W R 0 i F m W J N QT 0 y a) .0 0 Q C O C O N a m a O 0 a a a d Q ❑ d T O d W (0 0 OCL 0 1 CL a o m m m a) 3 LL O Cl)Q > = LL 3 T N > Q (n U) U) p m m d c a 0 � y _ ,, * -,e.�u, . I . ., ® w ..., c m O r- Custom Soil Resource Report Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI Ke Kalispell loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes 120.2 70.7% Kf Kalispell loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, wind eroded 5.6 3.3% Pb Prospect loam, 3 to 7 percent slopes 38.8 22.8% Pc Prospect loam, 7 to 12 percent slopes 3.9 2.3% Ta Tally, Blanchard, and Flathead soils, 0 to 3 percent slopes 1.6 0.9% Totals for Area of Interest 170.1 100.0% Map Unit Descriptions The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit. A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils. Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape. 11 Custom Soil Resource Report The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties and qualities. Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement. Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series. Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas. These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups. A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example. An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha -Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example. 12 Custom Soil Resource Report Upper Flathead Valley Area, Montana Ke—Kalispell loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 4vgh Elevation: 2,600 to 3,400 feet Mean annual precipitation: 15 to 18 inches Mean annual air temperature: 39 to 45 degrees F Frost -free period: 105 to 125 days Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated Map Unit Composition Kalispell and similar soils: 90 percent Minor components: 10 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Kalispell Setting Landform: Terraces Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material: Alluvium Typical profile Ap - 0 to 8 inches: loam Bw - 8 to 13 inches: silt loam Bk - 13 to 30 inches: silt loam C - 30 to 60 inches: stratified loamy fine sand to silt loam Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum content: 15 percent Maximum salinity: Very slightly saline (2.0 to 3.0 mmhos/cm) Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 10.3 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 2e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e Hydrologic Soil Group: B Ecological site: R044AP808MT - Upland Grassland Group Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Nonhydric Percent of map unit: 10 percent Hydric soil rating: No 13 Custom Soil Resource Report Kf—Kalispell loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, wind eroded Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 4vgj Elevation: 2,600 to 3,400 feet Mean annual precipitation: 15 to 18 inches Mean annual air temperature: 39 to 45 degrees F Frost -free period: 105 to 125 days Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated Map Unit Composition Kalispell and similar soils: 85 percent Minor components: 15 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Kalispell Setting Landform: Terraces Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material: Alluvium Typical profile Ap - 0 to 5 inches: loam Bw - 5 to 10 inches: silt loam Bk - 10 to 30 inches: silt loam C - 30 to 60 inches: stratified loamy fine sand to silt loam Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum content: 15 percent Maximum salinity: Very slightly saline (2.0 to 3.0 mmhos/cm) Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 10.3 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 2e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e Hydrologic Soil Group: B Ecological site: R044AP808MT -Upland Grassland Group Hydric soil rating: No 14 Custom Soil Resource Report Minor Components Nonhydric Percent of map unit: 15 percent Hydric soil rating: No Pb—Prospect loam, 3 to 7 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 4vrx Elevation: 2,600 to 3,400 feet Mean annual precipitation: 15 to 18 inches Mean annual air temperature: 39 to 45 degrees F Frost -free period: 105 to 125 days Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition Prospect and similar soils: 80 percent Minor components: 20 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Prospect Setting Landform: Moraines Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material: Glacial till Typical profile A - 0 to 6 inches: loam Bw - 6 to 14 inches: Bk - 14 to 24 inches: C - 24 to 60 inches: gravelly silt loam gravelly silt loam gravelly loam Properties and qualities Slope: 3 to 7 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum content: 15 percent Maximum salinity: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 9.5 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 3e 15 Custom Soil Resource Report Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e Hydrologic Soil Group: B Ecological site: R044AP808MT -Upland Grassland Group Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Nonhydric Percent of map unit: 20 percent Hydric soil rating: No Pc —Prospect loam, 7 to 12 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 4vry Elevation: 2,600 to 3,400 feet Mean annual precipitation: 15 to 18 inches Mean annual air temperature: 39 to 45 degrees F Frost -free period: 105 to 125 days Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Prospect and similar soils: 85 percent Minor components: 15 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Prospect Setting Landform: Moraines Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material: Glacial till Typical profile A - 0 to 4 inches: loam Bw - 4 to 12 inches: gravelly silt loam Bk - 12 to 24 inches: gravelly silt loam C - 24 to 60 inches: gravelly loam Properties and qualities Slope: 7 to 12 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum content: 15 percent Maximum salinity: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) 16 Custom Soil Resource Report Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 9.4 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 4e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e Hydrologic Soil Group: B Ecological site: R044AP808MT - Upland Grassland Group Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Nonhydric Percent of map unit: 15 percent Hydric soil rating: No Ta—Tally, Blanchard, and Flathead soils, 0 to 3 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 4vss Elevation: 1,800 to 5,000 feet Mean annual precipitation: 12 to 19 inches Mean annual air temperature: 39 to 45 degrees F Frost -free period: 90 to 135 days Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Tally and similar soils: 40 percent Blanchard and similar soils: 30 percent Flathead and similar soils: 20 percent Minor components: 10 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Tally Setting Landform: Terraces, alluvial fans Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material: Outwash Typical profile Ap - 0 to 8 inches: fine sandy loam Bw - 8 to 15 inches: fine sandy loam Bk1 - 15 to 30 inches: fine sandy loam Bk2 - 30 to 60 inches: loamy fine sand Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Well drained 17 Custom Soil Resource Report Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95 i n/h r) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum content: 15 percent Maximum salinity: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 6.7 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 4e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e Hydrologic Soil Group: A Ecological site: R044AP808MT -Upland Grassland Group Hydric soil rating: No Description of Blanchard Setting Landform: Dunes Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material: Eolian deposits Typical profile A - 0 to 7 inches: very fine sandy loam C - 7 to 60 inches: loamy fine sand Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Somewhat excessively drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95 i n/h r) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum content: 5 percent Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 4.8 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 4e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e Hydrologic Soil Group: A Ecological site: R044AP808MT -Upland Grassland Group Hydric soil rating: No Description of Flathead Setting Landform: Terraces Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material: Alluvium Typical profile A - 0 to 24 inches: fine sandy loam Bw - 24 to 34 inches: fine sandy loam 18 Custom Soil Resource Report BC - 34 to 44 inches: fine sandy loam C - 44 to 60 inches: loamy fine sand Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum content: 10 percent Maximum salinity: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.1 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 4e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e Hydrologic Soil Group: B Ecological site: R044AP808MT - Upland Grassland Group Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Nonhydric Percent of map unit: 10 percent Hydric soil rating: No 19 References American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing. 24th edition. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deep -water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS-79/31. Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States. Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States. Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States. National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries. Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_054262 Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http:// www. nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053577 Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http:// www. nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nresl42p2_053580 Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands Section. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical Report Y-87-1. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National forestry manual. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/ home/?cid=nres142p2_053374 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/ detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084 20 Custom Soil Resource Report United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nres/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nres142p2_054242 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/? cid=nres142p2_053624 United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http:// www.nres.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nresl42p2_052290.pdf 21 } K H Z z W Z W W � 23 a 9L 4Z9 � of ¢ M „90 ,£Z .99 N Q C7 .L— w X } H w X W a v w W � LU 1 Q z "'0 J d of a O F- K LL W N OQ co ti I 03f: � W o F w m� J w m p Z n ' (� O _ V Lu W ui W Q } U a F X W �I z a w r X Q � W Q I M � Z 'M.£b,Z LZ99 N,,l cn LuW M � I I I I II I X W x Z W -� W CD W N I U I � AI Z H I O \� �Y >a 1 _ F-: C�!LU X p W M o w O 00,Z99 \ (n 3 ,SS .9Z o99 S CY LyOpJ pr�J>0 O Hw O LLOIY COJLLY COJLLY -OJLL LLLL `o � OOc OCY OW O O �OO �NN I�N� I—O�OJLL I—OyJ Iy OOJLL IO�O O�OOMO`O_M I�O�Ji N iY-� W S d S III OV]O N H a w W S S M O N W H LLI III III (Y N a � I li � � 1 I I I I I I I o I I I I I I w LL z I LL z W o � N N b ¢ U m I I Lu ¢ O m 1 II o C I i � r' o FTF I S I I LF- I I I I I M I I I n I �I I I 1 1 1 il II s a il fn �_ II I L II I I 1 I I I I I 11 i o I C) U U) CD c/) 11 m 4 o a co aD 1 II I � Lij In N ¢ S W cn J(D Z WQ O oo� Ir LL � J L) 00 LU �� W w m m H 0 � 0 01 OIM O� Oo wN LL_ H HIM VA 3dAl / Z2i Z/L 641 Z 0 w m rr 0 0 LL S N M Kq O- OIL J oo OI O^ J N JL(U^ Z J V lU �C) `O ❑ LL U LLJ W 00 CO w LL Z ~m Q � J H m J U a a E C) -j \ID\\� \f k -Z5{ ) \0 \\ (/ k y\ § ®�� :§ , / \{ \\\D m\ \\ ® {\R\) \® < = a 2 \ {]/)\i/)/522/ ) \ / }) (§ M.0o=0-M=._x_ StiwLO a 'T7P" low /311, 00, I oo- TI' F7TI$ 1'71 �'T dMA/ "p, Acm-YJL'd R—OCIMI -a Lim ww From: Mike Brodie To: James Barnett; PJ Sorensen Subject: EXTERNAL Annexation of Timberwolf Ridge Property (605 Stillwater Road) Date: Friday, December 16, 2022 3:57:12 PM Attachments: 68f60b2a-5af8-46c7-b400-dele2d5ef755.ona WGM banner d922236b-c768-40fl-b664-4ldOc469805a.ona [NOTICE: This message includes an attachment -- DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe.] Pi, Per our discussion, we are fine with changing the initial zone request from RA-2 to RA-1 as long as there is no issue with the submitted application and proposed density, lot size, and layout as it pertains to this change. Thank you. 61 Mike Brodie, PE Senior Project Engineer I1M:a a:o...rs 431 1I�st Aveinue IKdllispeIIII, Montana 59901 V1!VttV(VV4C, �n��rQu,iG c�1�m ......... ___.