07-14-98KALISPELL CITY -COUNTY PLANNING- BOARD .
- AND ZONING COMMISSION
NIINUTES OF MEETING
July 14, 1998
CALL TO ORDER The regularly scheduled meeting of the Kalispell City -County Planning
AND ROLL CALL Board and Zoning Commission was called to order at 6:05 p.m. Board
members present were Jean Johnson, Rob Heinecke, Milt Carlson,
Walter Bahr, Therese Hash, Don Hines, Gregory Stevens, and Don
Garberg. Joe Brenneman was absent (excused). The Flathead Regional
Development Office was represented by Narda Wilson, Senior Planner
and Koen van Waes, FRDO Planning Intern. There were approximately
15 people in the audience.
APPROVAL OF The minutes of the meeting of June 9, 1998, were corrected on pages 6,
MINUTES 7, 9 and 11 to reflect correct name spellings. The minutes were
approved as corrected on a motion by Bahr, second by Carlson.
PRESENTATION Koen van Waes FRDO Planning Intern, gave a presentation regarding the
Kalispell Bike and Pedestrian Plan and submitted a final report to each of
C� the Board members on the plan. van Waes worked in a combined
internship for both FRDO and Citizens For a Better Flathead.
Clarification was made regarding that there would be a public hearing on
the bike and pedestrian plan as part of the Master Plan. Mayre Flowers
of Citizens For a Better Flathead made a brief presentation of small gifts
of appreciation for van Waes efforts.
CHARLES W. The first scheduled public hearing was introduced on a request by
MASON, DDS / Charles Mason for preliminary plat approval of Buffalo Stage
BUFFALO STAGE Professional Park a 3.025 acre subdivision containing a total of eight
PROFESSIONAL condominium lots. The subdivision is located on the southwest corner of
PARK / Whitefish Stage Road and Bruyer Way in Kalispell and is zoned R-5,
PRELEVIlNARY Residential / Ptofessional Office.
PLAT
Rob Heinecke excused himself from this public hearing due to a conflict
of interest, as he did the drafting on the project and would be speaking in
favor of it.
Staff Report Wilson gave a detailed report of report #KPP-98-1. The application was
evaluated in accordance with the necessary statutory criteria. Wilson
noted that Dr. Mason went before the County Board of Adjustment
Kalispell City -County Planning Board
Minutes of Meeting of July 14, 1998
Page 1 Of 9
about a year ago for a conditional use permit for four (4) duplex units on
this property. The conditional use permit was granted. The property
owner has donated a 10' bike and pedestrian easement along the eastern
boundary of the property which is part of the Edgerton School trail that
is being developed. Wilson explained this proposal requires a variance
from the subdivision regulations due to Lot 3B not having an access to a
public or private street. Justification for recommendation of approval
was the design being acceptable under both a condominium and an
overall development plan. Staff recommends the variance to the
subdivision regulations be granted and that the planning board
recommend approval of the preliminary plat subject to fourteen (14)
conditions.
Wilson answered questions regarding the adequate roadway and fire
suppression
Public Hearing The public hearing was opened to those in favor. of the application.
In Favor Rob Heinecke, 307 Ponderosa Street, spoke in favor of the project. He
asked that condition #11 be removed. The trees next to the access are
too close to the road, and would be blocking the vision for cars. The
trees will be moved back to the island which will be landscaped. If is
Opart of the requirement for the subdivision, then someone else could take
care of that, but Dr. Mason wouldn't have to. Condition #7, the Uniform
Fire Code is spelled out, but why should he be required to do more that
what is in the regulations? This turnaround may be required, and that
kills the plan. As I see it, if there is a fire, they would park in front, and
when the fire is taken care of, they can put the truck in reverse and back
down the road.
Charlie Mason, the applicant, addressed the conditions he would like
changed. Condition #11, regarding the trees. This condition was in the
conditional use permit, as well, but it was prior to Buffalo Stage Phase
III being annexed. At that time, that property belonged to the
developers, and I thought that was a condition being placed on the
developers of Phase III, and is owned by them. The 5-foot boulevard is
not a requirement for Buffalo Hill Stage III, and I would request that it
not be a requirement for this subdivision, as well. I don't think it would
be aesthetic to have trees for just 300 feet on that road. We will have
plenty of trees, but would prefer to put them inside the lot as part of our
landscaping scheme. It is only a 5-foot boulevard, and there is a
possibility that as they grow and mature, it would cause problems with
Kalispell City -County Planning Board
Minutes of Meeting of July 14, 1998
Page 2 of 9
(7) the sidewalks. I would ask that you delete that condition.
No one else spoke either in favor or in opposition. The public hearing
was closed and opened to Board discussion.
Board Discussion The applicant's concerns about the conditions were discussed. The fire
requirements were clarified and it was agreed that condition #7 be left in.
There was considerable discussion on the landscaping requirement, and
how the county regulations compare to the city's requirements. There
was a majority of the Board in favor of deleting condition #11.
Motion Bahr moved to adopt the findings of fact in report #KPP-98-1 and grant
preliminary plat approval for Buffalo Stage Professional Park subject to
the conditions set forth, deleting condition #11. Stevens seconded. On a
roll call vote Bahr, Garberg, Hines, Stevens and Johnson voted aye.
Carlson and Hash voted no. The motion carried 5-2.
Heinecke returned to the Board.
O'NE1L ZONE The next agenda item was introduced on a request by Ivan and Marian
CHANGE / FROM O'Neil for a zone change from RA-1, Low Density Residential
RA-1 TO B-2 Apartment, to B-2, General Business for property located on the east
side of Third Avenue East, north of Western Ace Home Center and east
of the Outlaw Inn.
Staff Report Wilson gave a presentation of report #KZC-98-2. The application was
evaluated in accordance with the necessary criteria and was
recommended for approval.
Public Hearing The public hearing was opened to those in favor.
In Favor Ivan O'Neil, owner / applicant, purchased this property with the idea of
expanding Western Building Center, as well as apartment buildings,
which I think is a nice addition to the area. I think the best use for this
undeveloped piece is for business.
No one else spoke in favor. The public hearing was opened to those
opposed.
Opposition Ardele Gendreau, 1437 4t' Ave East, addressed the roads. We strongly
object to opening up 4`h Avenue East, which is a dead-end street. This
�) Kalispell City -County Planning Board
Minutes of Meeting of July 14, 1998
Page 3 of 9
was zoned for apartments and it is a good area for apartments. We
strongly object to commercial zoning. This would cause one person's
property to increase in value, and ours would decrease. It would bring
more vandalism, noise and traffic. This is a very swampy area, ,and Mr.
O'Neil would bring in fill and cause us water problems.
Etta Hill, 1428 4 h Ave East; feels this would impact me. I am concerned
about the same things that Mrs. Genfreau is. We have enough businesses
in this area. Apartments make a good buffer. I am also concerned about
our property values and the water table. We have had problems with
others who have put in fill and it pushes the water closer to us. We have
a nice quiet neighborhood on a dead end street, and do not want a lot of
traffic. We do not want to extend 0' Ave East. We feel the zoning
should be left as it is.
William Miller, 1444 4a' Ave East, had concerns about the water.
Development of that property will require bringing in fill, and I already
have lots of water on my property. It would cause my septic system to
fail. It is a quiet area down there, I like it and I plan to stay in my house.
Putting in a business changes the property values all down the road. I am
a general contractor and buy my lumber from this guy, but that doesn't
mean I want to cut my own throat. I strongly oppose the zone change.
No one else spoke in opposition. The public hearing was closed and
opened to Board discussion.
Board Discussion There was considerable discussion on the road system in the area, and
the concerns of the neighbors about the extension of e Avenue East, as
well as on the anticipated amount of traffic generated from the
development of this property.
Garberg wanted it noted on the record that he disagreed with the findings
of fact, criteria 92, and felt that the road system in the area may not
adequately accommodate additional traffic which might be generated
from development of the property. He had no problem with changing the
property to commercial zoning, but felt there were inadequate roads in
the area.
Motion Carlson made the motion to amend the last sentence under the second
criteria in the findings of fact in report 9KZC-98-2 to read: "Additional
traffic which might be generated from the development of this property
could currently be margin allX deguately accommodated by the road
Kalispell City -County Planning Board
Minutes of Meeting of July 14, 1998
Page 4 of 9
system in the area." Garberg seconded. On a roll call vote the motion
carried on an unanimous vote of 8-0 in favor.
Discussion Discussion resumed on the storm water drainage problems in the area,
and how it would be addressed.
Stevens addressed the neighbors' concerns about noise, traffic,
vandalism, dogs, etc. that based on his personal experience, an apartment
complex would increase those nuisances much more than a commercial
use; which has set hours of operation during the week. There isn't the
noise and traffic at night or on weekends like with a residential use. He
understands the fears, but thinks they may be unfounded.
Motion Bahr moved to adopt the findings of fact as amended in staff report
#KZC-98-2; and recommend the requested zone change from RA-1 to
B-2 be granted. Stevens seconded. On a roll call vote Stevens, Garberg,
Heinecke; Bahr, and Johnson voted aye. Hash, Carlson and Hines voted
no. The motion carried on a vote of 5-3 in favor.
MONTESSORI On the next agenda item President Hash declared a conflict and stepped
SCHOOL / down from the Board.
CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT Vice -Chair Carlson introduced the public hearing on a request by
Kalispell Montessori Center, Inc., for a conditional use permit to allow a
house to be converted as part of the existing Montessori school to the
east. The property is zoned RA-1, Low Density Apartment and is
located at the west end of Park Hill.
Staff Report Wilson presented an overview of report #KCU-98-6. Evaluation of the
application resulted in approval of the conditional use permit subject to
five (5) conditions to help mitigate impacts to the neighborhood.
Public Hearing The public hearing was opened to those in favor.
In Favor Charles Harball, school board member and officer of the corporation,
addressed the parking situation. There is currently adequate parking and
we have engaged an architect to develop an overall plan. We are
experiencing a similar situation that all the private schools are
experiencing in that more parents are choosing to keep their children in
private schools longer rather than put them in public schools. So, we
have an immediate need for more space in the 1" through 6t` grades. The
Welders designed their home with the future possibility of expanding the
Kalispell City -County Planning Board
Minutes of Meeting of July 14, 1998
Page 5 of 9
school. He explained their plans for expansion. The actual impacts to
the neighborhood would be negligible with an increase of 10-12 students.
We will comply with any requirements of the city.
Tere Hash, 490 Kookinsint Trail, her children attend Montessori school
and her daughter would start her classes in the Welder residence. I am in
favor of the proposal and when it is no longer a residence, the site
provides ample space for any additional staff parking. The turn around
drop off system works well. My children started in pre-school and will
continue on through the 6 h grade, so am in favor of the addition.
No one else spoke in favor. The public hearing was opened to those
opposed.
Opposition Beverly Hubbard, 334 College Ave, just across the road from the
Montessori School, does not agree that the neighborhood has not been
impacted, and that it will continue in a negative way. I feel the parking is
very inadequate and the amount of traffic on our street is too much.
When I bought my condominium 20 years ago, Terry and Sally had one -
building, lived- upstairs in their apartment and had a day care below.
There was not -a lot of traffic. It kept growing and expanding and -the
traffic kept increasing. The parking has stayed the same and the road has
not changed. We have seen cars stacked 3 deep and have had difficulty
getting out of our carport, or they park in our carports. People park or
drive across -our lawns. I've given up -on keeping the edge of my lawn
nice. I thought I could live with the school being as big as it is, but they
are going to expand even more, and it will be difficult for me to sell. I
am wondering why the Welders are selling their- home, which was a
private residence when they bought it, and are not looking at the vacant
lot to the north. Every Wednesday they block off the street so the
children can ride their bicycles. It is not fair to the other residents on our
side of Park Hill- Road. They have a large playground. I wish they
would keep the children in the fenced area.
Laura Gerard; 332 College Ave, added that the parking is extremely
inadequate. I am in the first condominium on the corner, directly on their
parking lot. From 11:30 to 5:30 p.m. it is quite dangerous for me to -
back out -of my carport. The cars park on lawns and in front of
mailboxes: I watch toddlers walk between cars while their mothers are
talking. I have witnessed an accident, and 30-40 cars parked there when
something is going on at the school. It is impossible to get out of our
driveway. Do something about the parking before allowing more
Kalispell City -County Planning Board
Minutes of Meeting of July 14, 1998
Page 6 of 9
(� children in the school.
No one else spoke in opposition. The public hearing was closed and
opened to Board discussion.
Board Discussion Stevens asked if this school has an existing conditional use permit? The
application is not for an expansion, it is for a conditional use permit.
What were the conditions and requirements for parking on that permit?
It was clarified that a conditional use permit was granted for the school,
which is allowed as a conditional use in the RA-1 zone. It is not an
expansion of a non -conforming use.
There was considerable discussion on the parking, traffic, pick-up and
delivery problem there, now. Additional growth will further that impact
in a limited access area. There is concern about the safety of the children
as well as the neighbors being able to enjoy their property without their
lawns being driven on and driveways blocked. Bahr could not support
the expansion without a better solution to the parking problem.
Garberg said he lived on College Avenue for three years and did not see
the school as a problem, although agreed with the parking and
congestion issues. The problem already exists, so did not see that an
extra 20 :students would increase that.
Wilson suggested tabling the matter until further research can be done on
the conditional use permit for the entire project and look at the
cumulative effects of the school.
Charles Harball addressed the questions the Board had about parking,
and alternative solutions which they have explored. They did not have
time to wait another month.
Motion Bahr moved to adopt staff report #KCU-98-6 as findings as fact, and
forward a recommendation to the City Council to grant the conditional
use permit subject to conditions in the report. Stevens seconded. On a
roll call vote Garberg, Heinecke, Johnson, Hines, Bahr, Carlson, and
Stevens voted aye.
Hash returned to the Board.
(J Kalispell City -County Planning Board
Minutes of Meeting of July 14, 1998
Page 7 of 9
WESTERN The next public hearing was introduced on a• request by Western
CATERING dba Catering, Inc. d.b.a. Magic Diamond Casino for a conditional use permit
MAGIC DIAMOND to allow the expansion of an existing casino in the Cavanaugh's lobby by
CASINO / approximately 1,000 square feet. The property is zoned B-4, Central
CONDITIONAL Business District and is at the east end of the Kalispell Center Mall.
USE PERMIT
Staff Report Wilson gave a presentation of report #KCU-98-5. The application was
evaluated in accordance with the necessary criteria and staff
recommended three conditions of approval when granting the conditional
use permit.
Public Hearing The public hearing was opened to those in favor.
In Favor John Webster, representing the applicant, explained their application.
They wish to add a restroom facility and kitchen area to their existing
business operation. He was available to answer questions.
No one else spoke either in favor or in opposition. The public hearing
was closed and opened to Board discussion.
Motion Bahr moved to adopt staff report #KCU-98-5 as findings of fact and
forward a favorable recommendation to the city council granting the
conditional use permit subject to the conditions set forth. Johnson
seconded. On a roll call vote the motion carried 8-0 in favor.
COMMISSIONER The next public hearing was introduced on a request initiated by the
INITIATED ZONE Board of County Commissioners for a zone change from AG-40 to
CHANGE / AG-40 SAG-5 on approximately 120 acres in the Foys Lake area generally west
TO SAG-5 of the intersection of North Foys Lake road and Daley Lane.
Staff Report Wilson gave a presentation on the background and an overview of report
#FZC-98-5. The statutory criteria for a change in zoning was evaluated,
and the zone change recommended for approval.
An adjacent property owner called FRDO and expressed concern
regarding the roads and access.
Public Hearing The public hearing was opened to those in favor of the zone change.
In Favor Daniel Pearce, 225 Newsom Lane, acknowledged that this has been a
time consuming endeavor. At the onset of this request, one property
Kalispell City -County Planning Board
Minutes of Meeting of July 14, 1998
Page 8 of 9
owner Jerry Fitzwater, sent a letter in opposition. I have explained the
proposal to him and addressed his concerns. He is no longer in
opposition. Pearce submitted seven letters in support out of the eleven
property owners in the area, in addition to support from the local fire
chief. I am in support of the zone change.
No one else spoke either in favor or in opposition. The public hearing
was closed and it was opened to Board deliberation.
Board Discussion Carlson commented that when this request came in for a single property,
Mr. Pearce did an exemplary job of clearing the property in compliance
with the state wildfire regulations. The area to the west is still a high risk
fire area, as is the property adjoining Mr. Pearce's property.
There were no further comments.
Motion Stevens made the motion to adopt staff report 9FZC-98-5 as findings of
fact and recommend to the Board of County Commissioners that the
requested zone change from AG-40 to SAG-5 be approved. Hines
seconded. On a roll call vote Garberg, Heinecke, .Hash, Carlson, Bahr,
Stevens, Hines, and Johnson voted aye. The motion carried
unanimously.
UNEW BUSINESS There was no new business.
OLD BUSINESS The letter from Russ Crowder was scheduled under old business. Given
the late hour, it was moved to next month.
ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to discuss, the meeting was adjourned at
9:41 p.m.
Therese Fox Hash, President 1sa Simmer, Recording Secretary
APPROVED: 0,4 �/l
Kalispell City -County Planning Board
Minutes of Meeting of July 14, 1998
Page 9 of 9