The URL can be used to link to this page

Staff Report/West View Ph 6 & 7 Preliminary PlatCITY OF KALISPELL Development Services Department 201 Ist Avenue East Kalispell, MT 59901 Phone: (406) 758-7940 Fax: (406) 758-7739 www.kalispell.com/plannin2 REPORT TO: Doug Russell, City Manager FROM: PJ Sorensen, Senior Planner SUBJECT: KPP-21-03— West View Estates Phases 6 & 7 Preliminary Plat MEETING DATE: June 21, 2021 BACKGROUND: This matter is a request from Owl Corporation for major preliminary plat approval for West View Estates Phases 6 and 7. The property is located within an R-3 (Residential) zoning district. It consists of a total of 34 single-family lots on approximately 15.98 acres of land including the lots, streets, a park area, and other common area. The property is located to the east of Stillwater Road and to the north of West View Estates Phase 2. It can be described as a portion of Assessor's Tract 5, a tract of land, situated, lying and being in the NW 1/4of the SW 1/4and the SW 1/4of the NW 1/4of Section 25, Township 29 North, Range 22 West, P.M.M., Flathead County, Montana. The Kalispell Planning Board held a duly noticed public hearing on June 8, 2021, to consider the preliminary plat request. Staff presented staff report KPP-21-03 providing details of the proposal and evaluation. Staff recommended that the Planning Board adopt the staff report as findings of fact, and recommend to the Council that the request be granted subject to 26 listed conditions. There was one written comment submitted prior to the meeting and three public comments received at the hearing in addition to a statement from the applicant. The comments related to setbacks, utility easements, the emergency access connection to Stillwater Estates, and traffic. The public hearing was closed and a motion was presented to adopt staff report KPP-21-03 as findings of fact and recommend to the Kalispell City Council that the preliminary plat be approved subject to the 26 conditions. Board discussion concluded that the request was appropriate, and the motion was approved on a unanimous vote. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Kalispell City Council approve Resolution 6030, a resolution conditionally approving the preliminary plat of West View Estates Phases 6 and 7 described as a portion of Assessor's Tract 5, a tract of land, situated, lying and being in the northwest quarter of the southwest quarter and the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 25, Township 29 North, Range 22 West, P.M.M., Flathead County, Montana. FISCAL EFFECTS: There are no anticipated fiscal impacts at this time. ALTERNATIVES: Deny the request. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 6030 June 8, 2021, Kalispell Planning Board Minutes Staff Report Application Materials & Maps Public Comment Aimee Brunckhorst, Kalispell City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 6030 A RESOLUTION CONDITIONALLY APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF WEST VIEW ESTATES PHASES 6-7, DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF ASSESSOR'S TRACT 5, A TRACT OF LAND, SITUATED, LYING AND BEING IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 29 NORTH, RANGE 22 WEST, P.M.M., FLATHEAD COUNTY, MONTANA. WHEREAS, Owl Corporation, the owner of the certain real property described above, has petitioned for approval of the Subdivision Plat of said property; and WHEREAS, the Kalispell City Planning Board and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on June 8, 202 1, on the proposal and reviewed Subdivision Report #KPP-21-03 issued by the Kalispell Planning Department; and WHEREAS, the Kalispell City Planning Board and Zoning Commission has recommended approval of the Preliminary Plat of West View Estates, Phases 6-7, subject to certain conditions and recommendations; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Kalispell at its regular Council Meeting of June 21, 202 1, reviewed the Kalispell Planning Department Report #KPP-21-03, reviewed the recommendations of the Kalispell City Planning Board and Zoning Commission, and found from the Preliminary Plat, and evidence, that the subdivision is in the public interest. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KALISPELL, MONTANA AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the Findings of Fact contained in Kalispell Planning Department Report #KPP-21-03 are hereby adopted as the Findings of Fact of the City Council. SECTION 2. That the application of Owl Corporation for approval of the Preliminary Plat of West View Estates, Phases 6-7, Kalispell, Flathead County, Montana is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The development of the site shall be in substantial compliance with the application submitted, the site plan, materials and other specifications as well as any additional conditions associated with the preliminary plat as approved by the city council. 2. The preliminary plat approval shall be valid for a period of three years from the date of approval. New infrastructure required to serve the subdivision shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the City of Kalispell's Standards for Design and Construction. All design work shall be reviewed and approved in writing by the Kalispell Public Works Department prior to construction. This infrastructure shall include but not be limited to streets, street lighting, street signage, curb, gutter, boulevard and sidewalks. 4. Water and sewer main extensions shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the City of Kalispell's Standards for Design and Construction and in compliance with the city's facilities update and extensions of services plans. The water and sewer main extension plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Kalispell Public Works Department. Prior to final plat, a certification shall be submitted to the Public Works Department stating that the water and sewer mains have been built and tested as designed and approved. 5. The developer shall submit water and sanitary sewer plans, applicable specifications, and design reports to the Kalispell Public Works Department and the Montana Department of Environmental Quality for concurrent review, with approval of both required prior to construction. 6. Water and sewer mains within Sperry Way shall extend to the eastern property line of the subdivision adjacent to Stillwater Estates. 7. Any water rights associated with the property shall be transferred to the City of Kalispell prior to final plat. 8. The developer shall submit to the Kalispell Public Works Department for review and approval a storm water report and an engineered drainage plan that meets the requirements of the current city standards for design and construction. Prior to final plat, a certification shall be submitted to the public works department stating that the drainage plan for the subdivision has been installed as designed and approved. 9. The developer shall submit to the Kalispell Public Works Department prior to construction an erosion/sediment control plan for review and approval and a copy of all documents submitted to Montana Department of Environmental Quality for the General Permit for Storm Water Discharge Associated with Construction Activities. 10. A letterfrom the Kalispell Public Works Department shall be submitted stating that all new infrastructure has been accepted by the City of Kalispell, any private infrastructure has been constructed per city standards, and a proper bond has been accepted for unfinished work. 11. All easements and/or rights -of -way shall be indicated on the face of the final plat. Utility easements for City water and sewer shall be provided to allow for the logical extension of utilities from this subdivision to adjoining properties. A letter from the Kalispell Public Works Department shall be obtained stating that the required easements are being shown on the final plat. 12. All streets within the subdivision will be constructed to the appropriate city standards for local streets detailed in the subdivision regulations and the City of Kalispell Standards for Design and Construction for local streets. 13. The construction of Sperry Way shall include frontage improvements for the full length of lots I and 34. Improvements would include, but not necessarily be limited to, curb, gutter, landscape boulevard, trees, street lights, sidewalks, and the paved driving surface. The north side of the street needs to include at least curb and gutter, with the additional improvements to be completed with the following phase. 14. The full frontage of Stillwater Road along Phase 7 shall be improved to collector standards per the subdivision regulations, transportation plan and the Standards for Design and Construction in conjunction with the development of Phase 7. The developer will be responsible for installing improvements on the east side of the road including, but not necessarily be limited to, curb, gutter, landscape boulevard, trees, street lights, and sidewalks. The developer is also responsible for widening both driving lanes to the applicable standard. Any additional right-of-way necessary for improvements shall be dedicated to the City. 15. A letter from the Kalispell Fire Department approving the access, placement of the fire hydrants and fire flows within the subdivision shall be submitted prior to final plat and shall comply with the fire code. 16. The following statement shall appear on the final plat: "The undersigned hereby grants unto each and every person, firm or corporation, whether public or private, providing or offering to provide telephone, telegraph, electric power, gas, cable television, water or sewer service to the public, the right to the joint use of an easement for the construction, maintenance repair, and removal of their lines and other facilities, in, over, under, and across each area designated on this plat as "Utility Easement" to have and to hold forever." Developer's Signature 17. Prior to filing the final plat, a letter from the US Postal Service shall be included stating the Service has reviewed and approved of the design and location of the mail delivery site. The mail delivery site shall be installed or bonded for prior to final plat. In addition, the mail delivery site and improvements shall also be included in the preliminary and final engineering plans to be reviewed by the Public Works Department. The mail delivery site shall not impact a sidewalk or proposed boulevard area. 18. A letter shall be obtained from the Kalispell Parks and Recreation Director approving a landscape plan for the placement of trees and landscaping materials within the landscape boulevards of the streets serving the subdivision. The approved landscape plan shall be implemented or a cash in lieu payment for installation of the street trees and groundcover be provided to the Kalispell Parks and Recreation Department. 19. A parks plan for the area designated as a park shall be approved by the Parks and Recreation Director. A minimum of 1.02 acres for both phases is required. The park shall meet the standards under Section 28.3.22 and the plan shall show that the parkland dedication requirement is met for each phase. The park and stormwater area will need to be redesigned in order to provide at least 1.02 acres of useable park land as provided in the regulations. A cash -in -lieu payment may be made pursuant to the subdivision regulations. 20. A note shall be placed on the final plat indicating a waiver of the right to protest creation of a park maintenance district. This district shall only be activated in the event that the property owners' association defaults on their park and open space amenity conditions. The taxes levied within the maintenance district shall be determined by the Parks and Recreation Department with approvals by the Kalispell City Council. 21. A note shall be placed on the final plat indicating a waiver of the right to protest creation of a stormwater maintenance district. This district shall only be activated in the event that the property owner(s) default on the maintenance of the approved stormwater facilities. The taxes levied within the maintenance district shall be determined by the Public Works Department with approvals by the Kalispell City Council. 22. A note shall be placed on the final plat indicating a waiver of the right to protest creation of a Special Improvement District for roadway improvements in adjacent areas stating "The owners hereby waive the right to protest the creation of an SID for the purpose of financing improvements to area roads which will specifically benefit this subdivision." 23. A homeowner's association (HOA) shall be formed and established to provide for the maintenance of all common areas and facilities. 24. A minimum of two-thirds of the necessary infrastructure for the subdivision shall be completed prior to final plat submittal. 25. All utilities shall be placed underground and in locations that are approved by the Kalispell Public Works Department in accordance with the Kalispell Standards for Design and Construction. 26. All areas disturbed during development shall be re -vegetated with a weed -free mix immediately after development. SECTION 3. Upon proper review and filing of the Final Plat of said subdivision in the office of the Flathead County Clerk and Recorder, said premises shall be a subdivision of the City of Kalispell. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND SIGNED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF KALISPELL, THIS 21ST DAY OF JUNE, 2021. Mark Johnson Mayor ATTEST: Aimee Brunckhorst, CMC City Clerk KALISPELL CITY PLANNING BOARD & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING JUNE 8,2021 CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL The regular meeting of the Kalispell City Planning Board and Zoning CALL Commission was called to order at 6:00 p.m. Board members present were Doug Kauffman (acting President), Rory Young, Joshua Borgardt, George Glavasis, Kurt Vomfell and Ronalce Skees. Chad Graham was absent. PJ Sorensen, Jarod Nygren and Rachel Ezell represented the Kalispell Planning Department. Keith Haskins represented the Kalispell Public Works Department. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Glavasis moved and Skees seconded a motion to approve the minutes of the April 13, 2021, meeting of the Kalispell City Planning Board and Zoning Commission. VOTE BY ACCLAMATION The motion passed unanimously on a vote of acclamation. HEAR THE PUBLIC None. KA-21-02 — PONDEROSA VET A request from Katherine Gates (Mission Impawsible, LLQ for ANNEXATION annexation and initial zoning of B-1 (Neighborhood Business) for property located at 100 Ponderosa Lane (Ponderosa Veterinary Hospital), containing approximately 1.48 acres. The request is based on a desire to connect to city sanitary sewer service. STAFF REPORT PJ Sorensen representing the Kalispell Planning Department reviewed Staff Report #KA-21-02. Staff recommends that the Kalispell Planning Board adopt staff report #KA-21-02 as findings of fact and recommend to the Kalispell City Council that the property be annexed and the zoning for the entire property be city B- I (Neighborhood Business). BOARD DISCUSSION None PUBLIC HEARING None MOTION Vomfell moved and Skees seconded a motion that the Kalispell City Planning Board and Zoning Commission adopt staff report AKA-21-02 as findings of fact and recommend to the Kalispell City Council that the property be annexed and the zoning for the entire property be city B-1 (Neighborhood Business). BOARD DISCUSSION None ROLL CALL Motion passed unanimously on a roll call vote. KCU-21-03 — THE RITZ BAR & File #KCU-21-03 — A request from Tristelle Vu (The Ritz Bar & Salon) SALON CUP for a conditional use permit to allow an accessory casino within the B-4 (Central Business) zone. The property contains an existing bar and will be adding a nail salon in addition to the proposed accessory casino space. The property is located at I 10 & -116 Main Street. Kalispell City Planning Board Minutes of the meeting of June 8, 2021 Page I I STAFF REPORT PJ Sorensen representing the Kalispell Planning Department reviewed Staff Report A KCU-21-03. Staff recommends that the Kalispell City Planning Board and Zoning Commission adopt Staff Report #KCU-21-03 as findings of fact and recommend to the Kalispell City Council that the conditional use permit be approved subject to the conditions listed in the staff report. BOARD DISCUSSION Glavasis asked if the CUP would be tied to the property or just the business. Sorenson explained that any kind of zoning entitlements run with the land as long as what they are doing is consistent with what was approved. Vomfell and Young asked about faqade improvements and signage requirements. Sorenson advised both will be required to go through the architectural review process. PUBLIC HEARING Michael Lawlor — PO Box 728, Missoula — attorney for applicant, offered to answer questions about how the liquor license ties in with the accessory casino. Tim Guenzler — 300 Lee Rd. — Owner of Progressive Gaming, is working with the applicants to set up gaming machines. Offered to answer questions. Melissa Quast — 1520 Us Hwy 2 West — concerned with layout of the business and the machines being in the front of the building and operating hours. Dia Sullivan — PO Box 233, Whitefish — architect for the applicant, explained that the layout they designed works best with the existing layout. Darcy Lard — 500 Main St — downtown business owner — is in favor of the bar and salon. Derek Price — 459 Mountain Vista Way — patron of applicants existing business, Nailtopla, and is in favor of the bar and salon. MOTION Voinfell moved and Young seconded a motion that the Kalispell City Planning Board and Zoning Commission adopt Staff Report #KCU-21- 03 as findings of fact and recommend to the Kalispell City Council that the conditional use permit be approved subject to the conditions listed in the staff report. BOARD DISCUSSION Givasis is opposed to the CUP being tied to the property and has concerns with the 20% square footage requirement. Vomfell does not feel we need another casino in the city, and it is unfortunate that a liquor license must be tied to gaming to afford it. Young and Borgardt feel it is an appropriate use. Nygren noted that it's a good thing that the liquor license will be staying in the downtown area. ROLL CALL Motion passed 4-2 on a roll call vote. Vomfell and Glavasis are opposed to the conditional use permit. BOARD MEMBER SEATED Kauffman recused himself and asked Young to chair because he is a representative for Layne Massie (Edge, LLC). KCU-21-04 — EDGE A request from Layne Massie (Edge, LLQ for a conditional use permit APARTMENTSCUP to allow a multi -family residential development for property located at Kalispell City Planning Board Minutes of the meeting of June 8, 2021 Page 12 2015 & 2105 Third Avenue East, containing approximately 2.04 acres. The development (Third Avenue East Apartments) would include 48 residential units, parking, and recreational amenities. STAFF REPORT PJ Sorensen representing the Kalispell Planning Department reviewed Staff Report 9 KCU-21-04. Staff recommends that the Kalispell City Planning Board and Zoning Commission adopt Staff Report #KCU-21-04 and recommend to the Kalispell City Council that the conditional use permit be approved subject to the conditions listed in the staff report. BOARD DISCUSSION Vomfell asked about Condition 9 16 and the why the number of units may need to be reduced. Sorenson advised that since the B-2 zone does not have density limits changes may need to be made based on design requirements like parking, trash enclosures, storm drainage, etc. PUBLIC HEARING Carol Thill — 2141 3,d Ave E — Owner of Lucky Dog Day Camp to the south of the subject property. She has concerns with how close the apartments will be to her business and that it may cause problems, barking, smell, etc. with tenants in the future if there is not enough buffer. MOTION Vomfell moved and Glavasis seconded a motion that the Kalispell City Planning Board and Zoning Commission adopt Staff Report #KCU-21- 04 and recommend to the Kalispell City Council that the conditional use permit be approved subject to the conditions listed in the staff report. BOARD DISCUSSION Board discussed concerns with south property line regarding dog day camp and agreed that the property owner will be responsible and do what they need to do to mitigate future issues. ROLL CALL Motion passed unanimously on a roll call vote. BOARD MEMBER RE -SEATED Kauffman re -seated and took over as chair. KCU-21-05 — J&S AUTOMOTIV L A request from Jason Sharp for a conditional use permit to allow an auto REPAIR CUP repair business within the B-3 (Core Area Business) zone. The property contains an existing building that was previously used for fleet vehicle maintenance and equipment storage for an internet service company. The property is located at 710 West Montana Street. STAFF REPORT PJ Sorensen representing the Kalispell Planning Department reviewed Staff Report 9 KCU-21-05. Staff recommends that the Kalispell City Planning Board and Zoning Commission adopt Staff Report #KCU-21-05 and recommend to the Kalispell City Council that the conditional use permit be approved subject to the conditions listed in the staff report. BOARD DISCUSSION Board discussed proposed screening, how the required sidewalk would fit and asked for clanification from staff as to why they are requiring the sidewalk if the use prior to this requested use was the same. Staff advised because of the zone change from B-5 to B-3 there are design guidelines now whereas the previous tenant was grandfathered in. Kalispell City Planning Board Minutes of the meeting of June 8, 2021 Page 13 PUBLIC HEARING Butch Clark — 500 Siblerud Lane — owner of property — is concerned with the required sidewalk because of cost and losing some existing tree s. Jason Sharp — 480 Tronstad Rd — applicant requesting CUP — spoke to type of repair business he runs and that it's a small slower paced type of repair shop. MOTION Vomfell moved and Skees seconded a motion that the Kalispell City Planning Board and Zoning Commission adopt Staff Report #KCU-21- 05 and recommend to the Kalispell City Council that the conditional use permit be approved subject to the conditions listed in the staff report. BOARD DISCUSSION Board discussed good use for structure but expressed concerns with disproportionate costs of the sidewalk and requiring the applicant to have power poles moved. ROLL CALL Motion passed unanimously on a roll call vote. KPP-21-03 — WESTVIEW File #KPP-21-03 — A request from Owl Corporation for major ESTATES PHASES 6 & 7 preliminary plat approval for Westview Estates Phases 6 and 7. The PRELIMINARY PLAT property is located within an R-3 (Residential) zoning district, with a total of 34 single-family lots on approximately 15.98 acres of land including the lots, streets, a park area, and other common area. The property is located to the east of Stillwater Road and to the north of Westview Estates Phase 2. STAFF REPORT PJ Sorensen representing the Kalispell Planning Department reviewed Staff Report # KPP-21-03. Staff recommends that the Kalispell City Planning Board and Zoning Commission adopt Staff Report #KPP-21-03 and recommend to the Kalispell City Council that the preliminary plat for Westview Estates Phases 6 & 7 be approved subject to the condition listed in the staff report. BOARD DISCUSSION Board discussed number of accesses from new phases and approval from fire department as well as how the block length is calculated in relation to cul-de-sac. PUBLIC HEARING Eric Mulcahy — 2 Village Loop — representative for applicant — noted they are happy with the conditions of the staff report and offered to answer any questions. Kit Clark — 147 Taclor Rd — concerned with additional traffic, was hoping for an additional access on Stillwater Rd. Valerie Mitchell — 187 Taclor Rd — concerned with additional traffic. Mark Ency — 191 Taclor Rd — concerned with additional traffic. MOTION Vomfell moved and Glavasis seconded a motion that the Kalispell City Planning Board and Zoning Commission adopt Staff Report #KPP-21-03 and recommend to the Kalispell City Council that the preliminary plat for Westview Estates Phases 6 & 7 be approved subject to the condition listed in the staff report. Kalispell City Planning Board Minutes of the meeting of June 8, 2021 Page 14 BOARD DISCUSSION Glavasis noted he is not a fan of the cul-de-sac and Borgardt asked about doing future phase road improvements now to alleviate traffic concerns. Staff noted that the traffic impact study did not indicate there would be too much additional traffic with the design as is. ROLL CALL Motion passed unanimously on a roll call vote. KPUD-21-01 & KPP-21-02 — Files #KPUD-21-01 and KPP-21-02 — A request from Bison Hill, LLC MOUNTAIN VIEW PUD AND for the Mountain View Planned Unit Development ("PUD"), which is a PRELIMINARY PLAT Residential PUD overlay on approximately 139 acres of land abutting the north side of Foys Lake Road to the west of the Highway 93 Bypass, along with major preliminary plat approval for Phase I of the development. The property was previously annexed with a PUD overlay called Willow Creek, which has since expired. This proposal is for a new PUD by a different applicant. The PUD calls for a total of 407 dwelling units (225 single family lots, 16 cottage lots and 166 townhome lots) along with approximately 49.1 acres of open space and park area. The Phase I preliminary plat consists of approximately 21.2 acres with 94 lots (5 single family lots and 89 townhome lots), streets and open space. STAFF REPORT PJ Sorensen representing the Kalispell Planning Department reviewed Staff Reports #KPUD-2 1 -01 & #KPP-21-02. Sorenson noted that the applicant has some concerns with some of the conditions and would like to further discuss these conditions with staff and Public Works and therefore would like to have this tabled to a future meeting. He advised the board that we should proceed with discussion and public comment. Staff recommends that the Kalispell City Planning Board and Zoning Commission adopt Staff Reports #KPUD-21-01 & #KPP-21-02 and recommend to the Kalispell City Council that the PUD and the preliminary plat be approved subject to the conditions listed in the staff report. BOARD DISCUSSION Board discussed west access, the traffic impact study and if it will trigger access to Hwy 2 and the water pressure issues that need to be addressed with Public Works. PUBLIC HEARING Mike Brodie — 431 I't Ave W — representative for applicant — confinned that the applicant does wish to table for further discussion with staff and Public Works. Francis Flanigan — 849 Foys Lake Rd — agrees with the subdivision and likes the existing layout. Melissa Quast — 1520 US Hwy 2 West — concerned that only 2 accesses for 400 homes are not sufficient and how those accesses will be mitigated. She is also concerned with the number of deviations. MOTION — PUD & Vomfell moved and Borgardt seconded a motion that the Kalispell City PRELIMINARY PLAT Planning Board and Zoning Commission adopt Staff Reports #KPUD- (ORGINAL) 21-01 and #KPP-21-02 and recommend to the Kalispell City Council that the PUD and preliminary plat for Mountain View be approved Kalispell City Planning Board Minutes of the meeting of June 8, 2021 Page 15 subject to the conditions listed in the staff report. BOARD DISCUSSION Board discussed the fact that both applicant and staff have asked for a table to further discuss the project. They like the project but are concerned with there only being 2 accesses. MOTION — PRELIMINARY PLAT & PUD (TABLE) Vomfell moved to table and Skees seconded a motion that the Kalispell City Planning Board and Zoning Commission table Staff Reports #KPUD-2 1 -01 & KPP-21-02 to the July 13, 2021 meeting. ROLL CALL Motion tabled unanimously on a roll call vote. OLD BUSINESS Nygren updated the board on the Kalispell Parkline. NEW BUSINESS Nygren updated the board on the July 13, 2021 planning board meeting. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at approximately 9:05pm. Chad Graham President APPROVED as submitted/amended: Kari Barnhart Recording Secretary Kalispell City Planning Board Minutes of the meeting of June 8, 2021 Page 16 WEST VIEW ESTATES PHASES 6&7 REQUEST FOR MAJOR SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT #KPP-21-03 KALISPELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT JUNE 2,2021 A report to the Kalispell City Planning Board and the Kalispell City Council regarding a request from Owl Corporation for major preliminary plat approval of West View Estates Phases 6 and 7 on a total of 15.98 acres. A public hearing has been scheduled before the Planning Board for June 8, 2021, beginning at 6:00 PM in the Kalispell City Council Chambers. The Planning Board will forward a recommendation to the Kalispell City Council for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Owl Corporation has submitted a request for major preliminary plat approval for West View Estates Phases 6 and 7. The property is located within an R-3 (Residential) zoning district, with a total of 34 single-family lots on 15.98 acres of land including the lots, streets, a park area, and other common area. Phases 6 and 7 encompass only a part of the existing tract and do not extend to the northern portion of the parcel. It is anticipated that future plats will be submitted as the overall development plan proceeds. A: Applicant: Owl Corporation 115 Taelor Rd Kalispell, MT 59901 B: Location: The property is located to the east of Stillwater Road and to the north of West View Estates Phase 2. It can be described as a portion of Assessor's Tract 5, a tract of land, situated, lying and being in the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 and the SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4of Section 25, Township 29 North, Range 22 West, P.M.M., Flathead County, Montana. I C: Existing Land Use and Zoning: The subject property is currently vacant. The zoning of the property is R-3 (Residential), which is a single-family zoning district "intended to provide lot areas for urban residential development. This district should have good thoroughfare access, and be in proximity to community and neighborhood facilities, i.e., schools, parks, shopping areas, etc. Development within this district must be served by all public utilities. This zoning district would typically be found in areas designated as suburban residential or urban residential on the Kalispell Growth Policy Future Land Use Map. AL Kalispell Zoning Exhibit- May 13th, 2021 NORTH West View Phase 6 & 7 County CAN WAY -*a FW-ty -3 County R N,4ghbrhd B-in.. Rmid�tml .,__.__.....VPru1IDnaJ Offim �S C_t4 B-6- 4�1��_ OWL LCOP R-id-6.1 AF—t—A R-id-6.1 AprtmentfUffim C,-r.J B C—Ar- B N ,qA� 1 G , )� R-id-IW 2021 Kal m� I I P11 �nnirig Dept. �D513 KALISPEU 7K I'CEFI]MI D. Size: The subj ect property approximately 15.98 acres. E: Adjacent Zoning: North: County SAG-10 East: County R-2 South: City R-3 West: County SAG-5; AG-80 F: Adjacent Land Uses: is North: Gravel pit (current proposed phases do not extend to the north property line) East: Single-family residential South: Single-family residential West: Gravel pit; agricultural G: General Land Use Character: The area is primarily a residential area with established single-familv residential development in the county to the east (Stillwater Estates) and to the south (prior phases of West View Estates). Property to the west includes some large lot county residential property with significant areas of undeveloped farmland which is likely to 2 see city residential development in the future. The LHC gravel pit is a major use in the area, with active operations to the north and to the west of the proposed development. These phases do not extend to the gravel pit at the north property line and future phases of this development will likely be proposed, continuing the residential uses further to the north- H: Availability of Public Services and Extension of Services: The property is currently located within the City of Kalispell and all services are available to the property. The subdivision will require an extension of existing water and sewer services to serve Phases 6 and 7. Sewer: Water: Refuse: Electricity: Gas: Telephone: Schools: Fire: Police: City of Kalispell City of Kalispell City of Kalispell Flathead Electric Cooperative NorthWestern Energy CentufyTel School District 91 (West Valley)/Glacier High School City of Kalispell City of Kalispell Op SUBJECT PROPERTY .6 5-'� , 'd � i 3 REVIEW AND FINDINGS OF FACT FOR THE MAJOR PRELINHNARY PLAT pl.t Of WEST VIEW ESTATES, PHASES 6 & 7 .4 SubdIvIsIon Located h3 SWI14NW114 SEC. Z5, TZVN,. E.ZZE, F.XX, C-rry OF IaZISPALE, FL4THK4D COUNTY, MONTAIVA vu!- i z ra r 9 A a too, A. Effects on Health and Safety: Fire: The property is considered to be at low risk of fire. Buildings within the subdivision would be constructed in accordance with the International Fire Code and have access which meets city standards. The area to be built upon does not have steep slopes or woody fuels. Hydrants will be required to be placed in compliance with the requirements of the Uniform Fire Code and approved by the Fire Chief. Flooding: The subject property is located entirely outside of the 100-year floodplain per the Flood Insurance Rate Map (panel number 30029C1805J, effective date November 4, 2015). Access: The primary access to the subdivision will be provided from the existing streets within the earlier phases of West View Estates. Gucci Way will be extended from the south to connect with the new phases. Gucci Way connects with Taelor Road, providing access to Stillwater Road and Old Reserve Drive, which are minor arterials bordering the west and south boundaries of the overall subdivision. There is an emergency access from Stillwater Estates which serves that subdivision. The emergency access is not required for these phases, as there is adequate access for fire from the existing road network to the south via Gucci Way. Although there is adequate access, a temporary turnaround meeting city design standards needs to be provided in the interim. The existing emergency access road will be constructed to city standards with future phases of West View Estates. B. Effects on Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat: There are no water features which would provide aquatic or riparian habitat. There also does not appear to be any significant wildlife impacts. The Resources and Analysis Section of the Kalispell Growth Policy includes information from the Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks relating to deer, elk and moose habitat. As with the majority of the Kalispell area outside of the core downtown, the maps show a whitetail deer density of 5 to 30 per square mile, but no significant elk or moose habitat. C. Effects on the Natural Environment: Topogrgphy, Geology and Soils: The overall site is generally flat with slopes averaging one to two percent. There are not any topographic or slopes that would impact this development. A Geotech report was prepared to address the proposed stonnwater area and the environmental assessment included information as well. No significant issues impacting development were noted. The recommendations in the report should be followed as the site is developed. Surface and Groundwater: This subdivision will be served by public water and sewer thereby minimizing any potential impacts to the groundwater. No surface water creates concerns regarding this development. There is no floodplain in the area or on the property - The environmental assessment indicates that the water table for the site is greater than 50 feet below the surface. Therefore, the Planning Department is not recommending any conditions which may limit basements or crawl spaces within the project site. Drainage: Curbs and gutters will be installed and a storm management plan will have to be developed to address the runoff from the site. There is no city storm drain system in the area, so the storm water will need to be managed on -site. Stormwater infiltration rates were not measured as part of the Geotech currently completed in the proposed pond/recreation facility and will be required as part of the engineering design for the project. City Standards require infiltration facilities to completely drain within 120 hours after a I 00-yr storm event. A homeowner's association has been created for the maintenance of the open space and storm water management. At the time of final plat, provisions for maintenance of common facilities is to be provided under the subdivision regulations. A waiver of right to protest the creation of a Special Improvement District ("SID") for stormwater maintenance shall be included on the final plat as part of those maintenance provisions. The SID would only be implemented in the event that stormwater facilities are not maintained in a manner consistent with the approved drainage plan. 5 Also, the developer is required to submit for to the Kalispell Public Works Department an erosion/sediment control plan for review and approval per requirements of the city's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System permit with the State of Montana. These plans provide for managing storm water on the site and include stabilizing the construction site through an approved revegetation plan after site grading is completed. D. Effects on Local Services: Water: Water service to the subdivision would be provided by the City of Kalispell from an existing water main that the developer would extend throughout the subdivision. The water system for the subdivision will be reviewed and approved by the Kalispell Public Works Department and Kalispell Fire Department as part of the development of the subdivision for compliance with the City of Kalispell Standards for Design and Construction and the Fire Code. Under the city's Design and Construction Standards as well as the Extension of Services Plan, the water main in Sperry Way needs to be extended to the eastern property line bordering Stillwater Estates. There is adequate capacity within the city's water system to accommodate this development. Per the subdivision regulations, any water rights associated with the property shall be transferred to the City of Kalispell prior to final plat, although the environmental assessment indicates that there are no water or irrigation rights associated with the property. Sewer: Sewer service will be provided by the City of Kalispell with an extension of existing sanitary sewer mains that the developer would extend into the subdivision within the new streets being created. The sewer system for the subdivision will be reviewed and approved by the Kalispell Public Works Department as part of the development of the subdivision for compliance with the City of Kalispell Standards for Design and Construction. Under the city's Design and Construction Standards as well as the Extension of Services Plan, the sewer main in Sperry Way needs to be extended to the eastern property line bordering Stillwater Estates. There is adequate capacity within the city's sewer system to accommodate this development. Access and Roads: These phases include an extension of Gucci Way from the south through Phase 6, along with two cul-de-sacs and ending in the northeast of Phase 6. All streets will be constructed to the appropriate city standards detailed in the subdivision regulations and the City of Kalispell Standards for Design and Construction. The construction of Sperry Way needs to include frontage improvements for the full length of lots I and 34 given that the street improvements are included within Phase 6. Improvements would include, but not necessarily be limited to, curb, gutter, landscape boulevard, trees, street lights, sidewalks, and the paved driving surface. The north side of the street needs to include at least curb and gutter, with the additional improvements to be completed with the following phase. All improvements would have to extend to the eastern property line pursuant to the subdivision regulations, extension of services plan, and standards for design and construction. 10 The full frontage of Stillwater Road along Phase 7 shall be improved to collector design standard per the subdivision regulations, transportation plan and the Standards for Design and Construction. The developer will be responsible for installing improvements on the east side of the road including, but not necessarily be limited to, curb, gutter, landscape boulevard, trees, street lights, and sidewalks. He is also responsible for widening both driving lanes to the applicable standard. Any additional right-of-way necessary for improvements shall be dedicated to the City. At some point in the development of the overall subdivision, improvements to Stillwater Road along the frontage from Old Reserve Drive to the turn in Stillwater Road will need to be addressed in order to accommodate the overall development. The improvements provided for with these phases address a portion of that need, but development of Phase 8 and its connection to Stillwater Road will likely require the improvements from that point south to the roundabout at Old Reserve. Additionally, Section 28.3.25 of the subdivision regulations requires a waiver of the right to protest a Special Improvement District ("SID") for roadway improvements in adjacent areas. On the face of the final plat, there shall be a note stating "The owners hereby waive the right to protest the creation of an SID for the purpose of financing improvements to area roads which will specifically benefit this subdivision." Schools: The property is within the boundaries of School District 91 (West Valley and Glacier High School). On average, it would be anticipated that there would be about 17 students at full build -out. Section 76-3-608(l) of the Montana Code Annotated states that the governing body may not deny approval of a proposed subdivision based solely on the subdivision's impacts on educational services. Police: Police services will be provided by the Kalispell Police Department. The department can adequately provide service to this subdivision. Fire Protection: Fire protection services will be provided by the Kalispell Fire Department. The department can adequately provide service to this development. Additionally, the road network to the subdivision provides adequate access for fire protection. As part of the review of the engineering plans for the subdivision, fire protection, including access, fire flow and hydrant location, will be reviewed. Fire station 62 is located approximately 1. 1 miles away providing good response time. Parks and Recreation: Under the subdivision regulations, 0.03 acres of parkland is required for each dwelling unit, which would equate to 1.02 acres. The preliminary plat shows a 3.193 acre homeowners park with amenities. It is intended that the park would also provide park area for future phases of the subdivision. The amount of area, if deemed acceptable parkland, would satisfy the requirement. However, Section 28.3.22(c)(3) lists types of land that is not considered appropriate for park purposes, including inappropriate access and areas where (a) 10% or more of the park site is wet, swampy, or marshy; (b) the average cross slope of the park is greater than 10%; and (c) areas where more than five percent of the park site has an average cross slope greater than 25%. The park is located within a stormwater detention/infiltration area. The 8:1 slopes on the four to five foot berms along the perimeter as shown do not meet handicap accessibility requirements and provisions will need to be made to allow access. With the information provided, it is unclear to what extent the stormwater area will be wet, its frequency, and duration. Historically, the city has accepted areas that have infrequent, short time frames of stormwater impacting a park. Furthermore, with a depth of four feet or greater, a security fence is required per city standards as a safety issue and access would thus be restricted. The park and stormwater area will need to be redesigned in order to provide at least 1.02 acres of useable park land under Section 28.3.22. The redesign can be accomplished during the engineering review of the subdivision. Alternatively the regulations also allow for a cash -in -lieu payment, which the City Council, Planning Board, and Parks Department can consider. Additionally, as a homeowners park with common maintenance responsibilities, provisions for maintenance shall be submitted and reviewed at the time of final plat pursuant to the subdivision regulations. As part of those provisions, a waiver of protest of the creation of a parks maintenance district shall be included on the face of the final plat, which would only be created if necessary if those maintenance obligations are not fulfilled. Solid Waste: Solid waste will be handled by the City of Kalispell. There is sufficient capacity within the landfill to accommodate this additional solid waste generated from this subdivision. Medical Services: Ambulance service is available from the fire department and ALERT helicopter service. Kalispell Regional Medical Center is approximately 2.5 miles from the site. E. Effects on Agriculture and agricultural water user facilities: This property is in active production, primarily producing grass hay. The NRCS classification from 2007 shows the property as prime farmland if irrigated. Current policies in the Kalispell Growth Policy Plan -It 2035, Chapter 5, Land Use: Natural Environment, state the following: Policy — Encourage urban growth only on agriculture lands entirely within the city's annexation policy boundary. By providing a growth area boundary, the city can encourage the extension of city water and sewer service, as well as other city services, which enables more growth to come into the City of Kalispell with higher density. By allowing higher density development within the city's growth policy area, it could reasonably be expected that more farmland could be conserved because the availability of residential and commercial lots within the Kalispell Growth Policy boundary, limiting sprawl/leapfrog development. In this particular case, the land is already located within the city limits and partially developed. KjhIi*p@13 (,rgw%Ib PQIkY ExhIt*- M" IM. N21 A WC51 ViCW PhO $C 6,% 7 J A ftl� mdko ua-hww sububm RestdentW Suburban llb�*tt prc�p Realdenlial ')Man M LO Lei M%M%*4 KO'W'fl 1%. DPFL KAI.Islkut — F: Relation to the Growth Policy: The Kalispell Growth Policy Future Land Use Map designates the subject property as Urban Residential. Areas designated as Urban Residential are served by urban infrastructure and services, and are generally developed at densities between four and twelve dwelling units per acre, typically with single-family construction. The proposed density does not exceed the density limits of the land use designation. The proposed subdivision can be found to be in compliance with the Kalispell Growth Policy and its goals and policies. G. Compliance with Zoning: The request complies with the R-3 zoning regulations, including minimum lot size (6000 square feet) and width (50 foot) requirements. H. Compliance with the Kalispell Subdivision Regulations: This request complies with provisions of the Kalispell Subdivision Regulations. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Kalispell City Planning Board and Zoning Commission adopt staff report #KPP-21-03 as findings of fact and recommend to the Kalispell City Council that the preliminary plat for West View Phases 6 and 7 be approved subject to the conditions listed below: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The development of the site shall be in substantial compliance with the application submitted, the site plan, materials and other specifications as well as any additional conditions associated with the preliminary plat as approved by the city council. 9 2. The preliminary plat approval shall be valid for a period of three years from the date of approval. 3. New infrastructure required to serve the subdivision shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the City of Kalispell's Standards for Design and Construction. All design work shall be reviewed and approved in writing by the Kalispell Public Works Department prior to construction. This infrastructure shall include but not be limited to streets, street lighting, street signage, curb, gutter, boulevard and sidewalks. 4. Water and sewer main extensions shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the City of Kalispell's Standards for Design and Construction and in compliance with the city's facilities update and extensions of services plans. The water and sewer main extension plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Kalispell Public Works Department. Prior to final plat, a certification shall be submitted to the Public Works Department stating that the water and sewer mains have been built and tested as designed and approved. 5. The developer shall submit water and sanitary sewer plans, applicable specifications, and design reports to the Kalispell Public Works Department and the Montana Department of Environmental Quality for concurrent review, with approval of both required prior to construction. 6. Water and sewer mains within Sperry Way shall extend to the eastern property line of the subdivision adjacent to Stillwater Estates. 7. Any water rights associated with the property shall be transferred to the City of Kalispell prior to final plat. 8. The developer shall submit to the Kalispell Public Works Department for review and approval a storm water report and an engineered drainage plan that meets the requirements of the current city standards for design and construction. Prior to final plat, a certification shall be submitted to the public works department stating that the drainage plan for the subdivision has been installed as designed and approved. 9. The developer shall submit to the Kalispell Public Works Department prior to construction an erosion/sediment control plan for review and approval and a copy of all documents submitted to Montana Department of Environmental Quality for the General Permit for Storm Water Discharge Associated with Construction Activities. 10. A letter from the Kalispell Public Works Department shall be submitted stating that all new infrastructure has been accepted by the City of Kalispell, any private infrastructure has been constructed per city standards, and a proper bond has been accepted for unfinished work. 11. All easements and/or rights -of -way shall be indicated on the face of the final plat. Utility easements for City water and sewer shall be provided to allow for the logical extension of 10 utilities from this subdivision to adjoining properties. A letter from the Kalispell Public Works Department shall be obtained stating that the required easements are being shown on the final plat. 12. All streets within the subdivision will be constructed to the appropriate city standards for local streets detailed in the subdivision regulations and the City of Kalispell Standards for Design and Construction for local streets. 13. The construction of Sperry Way shall include frontage improvements for the full length of lots I and 34. Improvements would include, but not necessarily be limited to, curb, gutter, landscape boulevard, trees, street lights, sidewalks, and the paved driving surface. The north side of the street needs to include at least curb and gutter, with the additional improvements to be completed with the following phase. 14. The full frontage of Stillwater Road along Phase 7 shall be improved to collector standards per the subdivision regulations, transportation plan and the Standards for Design and Construction in conjunction with the development of Phase 7. The developer will be responsible for installing improvements on the east side of the road including, but not necessarily be limited to, curb, gutter, landscape boulevard, trees, street lights, and sidewalks. The developer is also responsible for widening both driving lanes to the applicable standard. Any additional right-of-way necessary for improvements shall be dedicated to the City. 15. A letter from the Kalispell Fire Department approving the access, placement of the fire hydrants and fire flows within the subdivision shall be submitted prior to final plat and shall comply with the fire code. 16. The following statement shall appear on the final plat: "The undersigned hereby grants unto each and every person, firm or corporation, whether public or private, providing or offering to provide telephone, telegraph, electric power, gas, cable television, water or sewer service to the public, the right to the joint use of an easement for the construction, maintenance, repair, and removal of their lines and other facilities, in, over, under, and across each area designated on this plat as "Utility Easement" to have and to hold forever." Developer's Signature 17. Prior to filing the final plat, a letter from the US Postal Service shall be included stating the Service has reviewed and approved of the design and location of the mail delivery site. The mail delivery site shall be installed or bonded for prior to final plat. In addition, the mail delivery site and improvements shall also be included in the preliminary and final engineering plans to be reviewed by the Public Works Department. The mail delivery site shall not impact a sidewalk or proposed boulevard area. 11 18. A letter shall be obtained from the Kalispell Parks and Recreation Director approving a landscape plan for the placement of trees and landscaping materials within the landscape boulevards of the streets serving the subdivision. The approved landscape plan shall be implemented or a cash in lieu payment for installation of the street trees and groundcover be provided to the Kalispell Parks and Recreation Department. 19. A parks plan for the area designated as a park shall be approved by the Parks and Recreation Director. A minimum of 1.02 acres for both phases is required. The park shall meet the standards under Section 28.3.22 and the plan shall show that the parkland dedication requirement is met for each phase. The park and stormwater area will need to be redesigned in order to provide at least 1.02 acres of useable park land as provided in the regulations. A cash -in -lieu payment may be made pursuant to the subdivision regulations. 20. A note shall be placed on the final plat indicating a waiver of the right to protest creation of a park maintenance district. This district shall only be activated in the event that the property owners' association defaults on their park and open space amenity conditions. The taxes levied within the maintenance district shall be determined by the Parks and Recreation Department with approvals by the Kalispell City Council. 21. A note shall be placed on the final plat indicating a waiver of the right to protest creation of a stormwater maintenance district. This district shall only be activated in the event that the property owner(s) default on the maintenance of the approved stormwater facilities. The taxes levied within the maintenance district shall be determined by the Public Works Department with approvals by the Kalispell City Council. 22. A note shall be placed on the final plat indicating a waiver of the right to protest creation of a Special Improvement District for roadway improvements in adjacent areas stating "The owners hereby waive the right to protest the creation of an SID for the purpose of financing improvements to area roads which will specifically benefit this subdivision." 23. A homeowner's association (HOA) shall be formed and established to provide for the maintenance of all common areas and facilities. 24. A minimum of two-thirds of the necessary infrastructure for the subdivision shall be completed prior to final plat submittal. 25. All utilities shall be placed underground and in locations that are approved by the Kalispell Public Works Department in accordance with the Kalispell Standards for Design and Construction. 26. All areas disturbed during development shall be re -vegetated with a weed -free mix immediately after development. 12 Development Services CAI y Department 201 1st Aven u e East Kalispell, MT 59901 KAILISPE11.1L Phone (406) 758-7940 MAJOR SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT Email: l)IanninqCcDkaIisPeII.corn Website: www.kalispell.com Project Name Property Address West View, Phases 6 & 7 Non given yet NAME OF APPLICANT Owl Corp, Attn: Mark Ownens I Applicant Phon'e (406) 752-5666 Applicant Address 115 Taelor Rd F"l-State, Zip Kalispell, MT 59901 Applicant Email Address mark@owlcorpmt.com and gaylon@owlcorpmt.com If not current owner, please attach a letter from the current owner authorizing the applicant to proceed with the application. ------T OWNER OF RECORD Same Owner Phone Owner Address —Tc—ity—Istate, Zip Owner Email Address CONSULTANT (ARCHITECTIENGINEER) Carver Engineering, Inc Attn: Tom Cowan I Phone 257-6202 State, Zip Kalispell, MT 59901 Address 1995 3rd Ave East Email Address chappie@cavereng.com POINT OF CONTACT FOR REVIEW COMMENTS Phone Sands Surveying, Inc attn: Eric Mulcahy 1 755-6481 Address 2 Village Loop Email Address eric@sandssurveing.com City, State, Zip Kalispell, MT 59901 List ALL owners (any individual or other entity with an ownership interest in the property): Legal Description (please provide a full legal description for the property and attach a copy of the most recent deed): — Please initial here indicating that you have verified the description with the Flathead County Clerk and Recorder and that the description provided is in a form acceptable to record at their office. < ; 1"1' Nk- KAILI[SPEILIL Development Services Department 201 1$t Avenue East Kalispell, IVIT 59901 Phone (406) 758-7940 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBDIVISION: Number of lots or rental spaces 34 Total Acreage in subdivision 15.98 Total Acreage in lots 9.47 ac Minimum size of lots or spaces 85303f Total Acreage in streets or roads 2.79 ac Maximum size of lots or spaces 16,867 sf Total acreage in parks, open spaces and/or common spaces 3.46 ac PROPOSED USE(S) AND NUMBER OF ASSOCIATED LOTSISPACES: Single Family 34 sfr Townhouse Mobile home/RV Park Commercial/lindustrial Multi -family Other APPLICABLE ZONING DESIGNATION & DISTRICT: R-3 ESTIMATE OF MARKET VALUE BEFORE IMPROVEMENTS: $20,001 PROPOSED EROSIONISEDIMENT CONTROL: As required ARE ANY SUBDIVISION VARIANCES REQUESTED? No (YESINO) If yes please complete a separate subdivision variance application APPLICATION PROCESS (application must be received and accepted by the Kalispell Planning Department 35 days prior to the Planning Board hearing) A pro -application meeting with the planning staff is required. 1. Completed preliminary plat application 2. Copy of pre -application meeting form and any required submittals listed on the form 3. One reproducible set of supplementai information. (See appendix A of the Subdivision Regulations) 4. One reduced size copy of the preliminary plat not to exceed 11 "xl 7" in size 5. Electronic copy of the application matel including the preliminary plat, either copied onto a disk or emalled to plarning@kalispell.com (Please note the maximurn file size to email is 201 6, A bona fide legal description of the subject property and a map showing the location and boundaries of the property *i - verify with the Flathead County Clerk & Recorder that the legal description submitted is accurate and recordable. They can be reached at (406) 758-5526. 7. Fnvironmental Assessment (see appendix B in subdivision regulations) if applicable. 8. Application fee based on the schedule below made payable to the City of i Major Subdivision $1,000 + $125 per lot Major Subdivision Resubm ittal $1,000 for each original lot unchanged add add $10 per lot for each lot re-designedladded add add $125 per lot Mobile Home Parks & Campgrounds 6 more more spaces $1,000 + $250 per space 5 or fewer spaces $400 + $125 per space Amended Preliminary Plat amendment to conditions only $400 base fee re-ccni proposed lots base fee + $40 per lot add additional lots or sublots base fee + $125 per lot I hereby certify under penalty of perjury and the laws of the State of Montana that the information submitted herein, on all other submitted forms, documents, plans or any other information submitted as a part of this application, to be true, complete, and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Should any information or representation submitted in connection with this application be incorrect or untrue, I understand that any approval based thereon may be rescinded, and other appropriate action taken. The signing of this application signifies approval for the Kalispell City staff to be present on the property for routine monitoring and inspection during the approval and development process. Legal Description for West View Estates, Phases 6 & 7 DESCRIPTION: A TRACT OF LAND, SITUATED, LYING AND BEING IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER, and THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 29 NORTH, RANGE 22 WEST, P.M.,M., FLATHEAD COUNTY, MONTANA, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS TO WIT: Commencing at the northwest comer of the Southwest Quarter of Section 25, Township 29 North, Range 22 West, P.M.,M., Flathead County, Montana, which is a found brass cap on the centerline of a 60 foot county road known as Stillwater Road; Thence along said centerline SOO'06'15"E 280.83 feet to THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE TRACT OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED: Thence leaving said centerline N89'59'1 I "E 331.25 feet to a found iron pin; Thence EAST 204. 10 feet; Thence NORTH 250.39 feet; Thence N89'59'11"E 176.06 feet; Thence SOUTH 121.68 feet; Thence EAST 75.00 feet; Thence S74'29'58"E 220.65 feet; Thence N22'10'14"E 51.15 feet; Thence NORTH 140.05 feet; Thence EAST 310.37 feet to a found iron pin; Thence SOO'00'23"W 632.88 feet to a found iron pin; Thence S89059'11"W 1327.95 feet to the centerline of said Stillwater Road; Thence along said centerline N00006'15"W 375.91 feet to the point of beginning and containing 15.053 ACRES; Subject to and together with all appurtenant casements of record. West View Estates Phases 6 & 7 Phasing Plan a. Phasing As the name implies, West View Estates Phases 6 & 7 are proposed as two phases. Phase 6 will be developed first with construction beginning in the Fall of 2021 or Spring of 2022. Phase 6 will contain 19 residential lots and the Park area. The City Street (yet to be named) will proceed to the north ending in a temporary hammer head. This hammer head also connection to and existing emergency egress road that currently serves Stillwater Estates on the east. The emergency egress is reciprocal and allows emergency vehicles to travel east or west. Phase 7 will go to construction in the fall of 2022. Phase 7 consists of 15 residential lots. The City street will be extended west to the cul-de-sac of the Phase 7. All associated utilities and stormwater facilities will be constructed with each phase. The preliminary Plat of West View Estates Phase 6 & 7 clearly defines each phase. West View Estates Phasing Plan West View Estates Ph 6 & 7 Environmental Assessment Supplement This document is intended to supplement the original EA of West View Estates. Specifically, an expanded Geotechnical report to include the new phases is attached to this EA supplement. There is an updated Traffic Impact Study that includes all of the West View Estates, all phases of Owl View Landing, and future phases to the north. The sources of information for each section of the Assessment shall be identified. All Environmental Assessments shall contain the signature, date of signature and mailing address of the owner of the property and the person, or persons, preparing the report and citation and a copy of all supporting information. . (Note: Any response to any section not specifically sourced in this report is attributed to the Author of the report.) West View Estates Phases 6 & 7 — Environmental Assessment Section I — Resource Assessment and Impact Criteria Report 2. Groundwater Using available data, provide the following information: A. The minimum depth to the water table or the historic water table and identify dates when depths were determined. What is the location and depth of all aquifers which may be affected by the proposed subdivision? Describe location of known aquifer recharge areas which may be affected. The depth to the water table is estimated to be about 60 ft. This was determined by the elevation of the ground surface in West View Estates, Phases 6 & 7 and a groundwater pond in LHC's gravel pi about 1/2 mile north. There are no local aquifers that ingy adversely affect the proposed subdivision, as the depth to groundwater is about 60' and water and sewer service will be provided by the CijY o Kalispell's public water and sewer systems. The local shallow aquifer's recharge area is primarily from surrounding mountains that drain to the Flathead River basin and, to a lesser extent, the Stillwater River. B. Describe any steps necessary to avoid depletion or degradation of groundwater recharge areas. The Subdivision will connect to the Cily of Kalispell Public Water System as opposed to constructing a new water system. The development will connect to the Cily wastewater system which greatly reduces the chance of groundwater degradation. 3. Topography, geology and soils A. Provide a map of topography of the area to be subdivided, and an evaluation of the suitability for the proposed land uses. On the map identify any areas with highly erodible soils or slopes in excess of 15% grade. Identify the lots or areas affected. Address conditions such as: i. Shallow Bedrock ii. Unstable slopes iii. Unstable or expansive soils iv. Excessive slope. The soils in this area are described as being Kalispell loam, 0 to 3% slopes, by the Web Soil Survey. There is no bedrock within 100' of the groun surface and the steepest grade on the propejjy is only about 8%, and that is West View Estates Phases 6 & 7 — Environmental Assessment M only a small area in the northeast comer of Phase 6. The soils are fine grained (silt to sandy silt loam) and could be erodible if slopes were steeper leading to higher runoff water velocities. However, average slopes across the propelly are gpproximately I to 2%. The soils are silt to sandy silt loam, they have vely low clqy content, and are not expansive. B . Locate on an overlay or sketch map Any known hazards affecting the development which could result in propeM damage or personal injM due to: a. Falls, slides or slumps b. Rock outcroppings c. Seismic activi1y d. High water table The subject propelly is virtually flat with slopes generally averaging I to 2%. There is no evidence of falls, slides or slumps, there are no rock outcroppings, and groundwater is greater than 50' deep. All of the Flathead ValIg is in a similar seismic zone and the building code, enforced by the Kalispell Building Department, requires mitigation of any seismic activily in building design. C. Describe measures proposed to reduce these hazards. There are no hazards that need to be reduced, see answer above (3.B.i) D. Describe the location and amount of any cut or fill more than three feet in depth. There should be no cuts of three feet or greater. Regardless all disturbed areas will be revegetated to prevent erosion. 4. Vegetation A. On a plat overlay or sketch map: i. Indicate the distribution of the major vegetation types, such as marsh, grassland, shrub, conifer forest, deciduous forest, mixed forest. West View Estates Phases 6 & 7 — Environmental Assessment M Source -Flathead County GIS As indicated in the photo of Figure 1. The propegy is in agricultural production and primarily grass hU. Identify the location of critical plant communities There are no critical plant communities on the subject parcel. The propeM has been under intensive agricultural production for decades and all native Dlant communities have been eliminated from the propegi-y. 5. Wildlife A. Identify species of fish and wildlife use of the area affected by the proposed subdivision. There are no water resources on or near the propeM so there will be no direct impacts to any fish species. The area is used by waterfowl, birds o prey, whitetail deer, and associated mammals. There are no eagle nests or habitat that would be used by endangered species. West View Estates Phases 6 & 7 — Environmental Assessment M B. On a copy of the preliminary plat, identify known critical wildlife areas. There are no critical wildlife areas on the subject propem. There are no riparian areas, no nesting areas, and no winter range. C. Describe proposed measures to protect or enhance wildlife habitat. The West View project is being designed to urban standards and densities so there will not be natural areas as part of the project. There are no critical wildlife areas to protect on the subject propegy. There will be a number of parks within the project but these will be developed and maintained park areas. Section 11 — Summary of Probable Impacts Effects on Agricultural Water User Facilities A. Describe conflicts the subdivision would create with agricultural user facilities, eg residential development creating problems for operating or maintaining irrigation systems, etc. There are no water rights or irrigation rights associated with the subiec propeM. Part III — Community Impact Report According to the US Census Bureau — Quick Facts, there are 2.44 persons pe household in Kalispell. With potential of 34 lots in phases 6 & 7 of West View Estates, there would be gpproximately 83 persons living in this subdivision at full buildout. I . Education and Busing A. Describe the available educational facilities that would serve this subdivision The subject propelly is within the West Valley School District for grades K- 8 and the Glacier High School District for grades 9-12. According to the 2020 Flathead Counly SMerintendent of School Statistical Report o Schools, West Valley school had 711 students in 2020. There is an increase of I% over the 2019 school year and a 47% increase over a ten year period. Flathead and Glacier High Schools are combined in this report but there was a 3% increase in students over 2019 and an 18% increase over the ten -ye period. West View Estates Phases 6 & 7 — Environmental Assessment M B. Estimate the number of school aged children that will be added to the school system by the proposed subdivision. Using Counly wide average of 0.31 school aged children per residence. (There were 14,753 students recorded with the Flathead CogM Soerintendent of Schools Office including public, private and home schooled children at the beginning of the 2011 school year. The US Census Bureau 2010 counted 46,963 housing units in Flathead Counly — 14,753 students / 46,963 housing units = 0.31 students per unij), the 34 residential lots would generate gpproximately 10 students in the school system. This influx of students will occur over the k-12 arades so school districts should be able to plan ahead for projected population growth. 2. Parks and Recreation Facilities A. Describe park and recreation facilities to be provided within the proposed subdivision and other recreational facilities that will serve the subdivision. Prepared By Applicant: We are proposing two jypes of parks and open space. We are creating 3.193 acre park area that will have some amenities and also serve as a shallow area for stormwater detention. We are proposing a small common area along Stillwater Road that contains the existing landscgpe and sound wall buffer. The Subdivision regulations requires 0.03 acres of parkland per dwelling unit. In this case the 34 lot subdivision would only require 1.02 acres of park. The proposed park will also accommodate future phases of development. Eric H. Mulcahy AICP Sands Surveying, Inc. 2 Village Loop Kalispell, MT 59901 (406) 755-6481 Mark Owens Owl Corporation 155 Taelor Road Kalispell, NIT 59901 Date: Date: West View Estates Phases 6 & 7 — Environmental Assessment EA APPENDICIES A. Geotechnical Study B. Traffic Impact Study — Abelin Traffic Services C. Draft CC&R's West View Estates Phases 6 & 7 — Environmental Assessment M West View Estates North & abefin Owl View Landing traffic services Residential Subdivision Prepared For: Carver Engineering 1995 3rd Ave East Kalispell, MT 59901 January, 2019 Traffic Impact Study Kalispell, Montana 130 South Howie Street Helena, Montana 59601 406-459-1443 West View Estates North & Owl View Landing Traffic Impact Study Kalispell, Montana Table of Contents A. Executive Summary ...................................................................................... I B. Project Description ........................................................................................ I C. Existing Conditions ........................................................................................ I Adjacent Roadways .............................................................................. 2 TrafficData ............................................................................................ 3 HistoricTraffic Data ............................................................................... 4 Planned Road Improvements ................................................................ 4 Additional Developments ....................................................................... 4 Levelof Service ..................................................................................... 4 D. Proposed Development .............................................................................. 5 E. Trip Generation and Assignment ................................................................ 7 F. Trip Distribution .......................................................................................... 7 G. Traffic Impacts Outside of the Development ............................................... 8 H. Impact Summary & Recommendations ...................................................... 9 List of Figures Figure I - Proposed Development Site ................................................................... 2 Figure 2 - Proposed Development .......................................................................... 6 Figure5- Trip Distribution ....................................................................................... 8 List of Tables Table I - Historic Traffic Data ................................................................................. 4 Table 2 - 2018 Level of Service Summary .............................................................. 5 Table 3 - Trip Generation Rates ............................................................................. 7 Table 4 - Projected LOS Summary with Development ........................................... 9 West View Estates North & Owl View Landing Traffic Impact Study Kalispell, Montana West View Estates North & Owl View Landing- DRAFT Traffic Impact Study Kalispell, Montana A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The West View Estates North and Owl View Landing projects are combined 318-unit developments located north of Old Reserve Drive in Kalispell, Montana. At full build -out, the projects would produce up to 2,480 new daily vehicle trips. With the additional phases of the West View Estates currently planned in this area (86 unbuilt units) and phase I of the Owl View Landing condominiums (40 units), the traffic volumes on the surrounding road network could increase by 3,585 VPD from current conditions. As proposed, the West View Estates and Owl View Landing residential developments would not create any new roadway capacity problems in this area. The roads adjacent to the project will remain well within the functional capacity without any additional roadway improvements. The developers should consider providing additional ROW on the northeast comer of the intersection of Stillwater Road and the development's northern entrance to provide room for future intersection improvements. B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION This document studies the possible effects on the surrounding road system from a proposed residential development north of Old Reserve Drive in Kalispell, Montana. The document provides information regarding possible traffic impacts in the area and identifies mitigation efforts that the developments may require. The developments would include up to 318 new residential units. C. EXISTING CONDITIONS The proposed development property currently consists of a 117-acre parcel of land located north of Old Reserve Drive just east of Stillwater Road. The property currently consists of an open farm field directly north of the previous five phases of West View Estates. To date, Owl View Landing, Ph. 1 (40 units) and West View Estates, Phases I - 3 (86 lots) have been platted and are currently being developed. West View Estates, Phases 4 & 5 (40 lots) have received preliminary plat approval. Currently 40 lots in West View Estates Phases I — 3 are constructed is single-family residential homes. West View Estates North (198 lots) and the remainder of Owl View Landing (120 units) are future planned developments. Ultimately there will be a total of 484 residential units within the I I 7-acre traffic study area. One existing home is located towards the middle of the West View Estates North property on the east side adjacent to Stillwater Road. An existing farm road connects Stillwater Road with Bowman Drive to the east. This route is currently not a public route and is rarely used. The Abelin Traffic Services I January, 2019 West View Estates North & Owl View Landing Traffic Impact Study Kalispell, Montana surrounding area is comprised of a mix of residential developments and undeveloped properties on the northwest side of the City of Kalispell. The LHC construction company/gravel pit is located to the north and west of the site. The Kalispell Bypass is located 1/2mile to the southeast. See Figure 1 for a location map of the proposed development. Adjacent Roadways Old Reserve Drive (S-548) is a minor arterial roadway which has been developed as part of the Highway 93 Bypass improvements. The road extends northwest from Highway 93, and connects with Stillwater Road at a modem roundabout. Old Reserve Drive connects with the Highway 93 Bypass at a grade -separated intersection with off -ramps for northbound and southbound traffic. The intersections of Old Reserve Drive with Wolfpack Way and both ramps of the 93 Bypass are currently signalized. Glacier High School is Abelin Traffic Services 2 January, 2019 West View Estates North & Owl View Landing Traffic Impact Study Kalispell, Montana located along Old Reserve Drive west of the Highway 93 Bypass. The road currently has a four -lane urban cross-section with left -turn bays at all intersections, corridor lighting, and sidewalks on both sides to the east of Stillwater Road. A pedestrian crosswalk is currently installed just west of Taelor Road to access Glacier High School. The posted speed limit is 35 MPH. According to traffic counts conducted by MDT is 2017, Old Reserve Drive carried 8,000 Vehicles per Day (VPD) west of the Highway 93 bypass. Traffic data collected by ATS in October 2018 indicated that the roadway carries 4,500 VPD east of Stillwater Road. Stillwater Road is a north/south, two-lane collector roadway which extends north from Three Mile Drive past Reserve Drive to the north. The road provides access to the LHC construction operations site to the north. North of Old Reserve Drive the road has a paved width of 24 feet and a posted speed limit of 35 MPH. Traffic data collected by ATS indicates that the roadway currently carries 1,300 VPD north of Reserve Drive. The intersection of Stillwater Road and Old Reserve Drive is controlled by a modem roundabout. Stillwater Road is maintained by the City of Kalispell north of Old Reserve Drive for a distance of 1/2mile. The road then curves to the west where it falls under the jurisdiction of Flathead County. A review of traffic data collected by ATS in 2015 and 2018 indicates that the Kalispell Bypass has decreased traffic volumes on Stillwater Road to the south by providing an alternative north/south route through the western portion of Kalispell. Taelor Road is a loop road that provides access to the existing portions of the West View Estates subdivision. The road intersects with West Reserve Drive 1,100 feet east of Stillwater Road and then loops to the northwest to reconnect with Stillwater Road 1,800 feet north of Old Reserve Drive. Taelor Road has a paved width of 32 feet with adjacent sidewalks. The intersection with Old Reserve Drive currently has left -turn lanes installed for eastbound traffic. Traffic Data In October of 2018 Abelin Traffic Services (ATS) collected traffic data at area intersections to evaluate current operations characteristics. These counts included peak -hour turning movement counts and daily traffic volume counts. The peak -hour turning movement counts were performed at the intersections of Old Reserve Drive with Stillwater Road and Taelor Road. Additional 24-hour traffic counts were taken on Stillwater Road and Old Reserve Drive. The raw traffic data is included in Appendix A of this report. The raw data collected for this project was adjusted for seasonal variation in accordance with the data collected from MDT's annual count station located on US Highway 2 west of Kalispell (Station A-24). This count station data indicated that data collected in October is approximately 110% of the AADT (Average Annual Daily Traffic) volume in this area. Abelin Traffic Services 3 January, 2019 West View Estates North & Owl View Landing Traffic linpact Study Kalispell, Montana Historic Traffic Data Abelin Traffic Services obtained historic traffic data for Old Reserve Drive from the Montana DOT. This data is presented in Table 1. The traffic data history for this area indicates that traffic volumes increased sharply when the Kalispell Bypass was completed in 2016. Due to the relatively short existence of the bypass, the current growth trends for the area are not defined. Table I - Historic Traffic Data Old Re erve Drive 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 East of HVVY 93 Bypass 3,240 3,100 3,070 2,900 3,100 5,550 5,409 5,366 West of HVVY 93 Bypass 7,670 8,179 8,040 Planned Road Improvements The Montana Department of Transportation is currently in the planning phases of a reconstruction plan for West Reserve Drive from Stillwater Road to Springcreek Road that will improve the route to accommodate future growth in this area. The reconstruction will include road widening, intersection turning lanes, and an adjacent shared use paths. This project was identified in the 2006 Kalispell Area Transportation Plan as MSN-I. This project is planned to begin construction in 2021. Additional Developments A variety of development projects are currently planned and underway for the areas just south of the proposed development project. This includes the unconstructed units in phases 1-5 of the West View Estates (126 units total, 35% complete) and the Owl View Landing apartments which are currently under construction. The first phase of Owl View Landing condominiums will include 40 residential units and is planned to be completed in the spring of 2019. The projected traffic from the unbuilt portions of the West View Estates Phases 1-5 (86 units) and the first phase of the Owl View Landing condominiums (40 units) are included in this traffic analysis. Level of Service Using the data collected for this project, ATS conducted a Level of Service (LOS) analysis at area intersections. This evaluation was conducted in accordance with the procedures outlined in the Transportation Research Board's Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) - Special Report 209 and the Highway Capacity Software (HCS) version 7.5. Intersections are graded from A to F representing the average delay that a vehicle entering an intersection can expect. Typically, a LOS of C or better is considered acceptable for peak -hour conditions. Table 2 shows the existing 2018 LOS for the AM and PM peak hours without the traffic from Abelin Traffic Services 4 January, 2019 West View Estates North & Owl View Landing Traffic Impact Study Kalispell, Montana the proposed developments in this area. The LOS calculations are included in Appendix C. The table shows that all of the existing intersections in this area are currently operating within acceptable limits. Table 2 — 2018 Level of Service Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection Delay (Sec.) LOS Delay (Sec.) LOS Reserve Drive & Stillwater Road 4.7 A 4.3 A Reserve Drive & Taelor Road* 11.8 B 10.6 B Stillwater Road & Taelor Road* 9.0 I A 8.9 A I *Minor Street Approach LOS & Delay. D. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The development to be constructed on the 198 unit West View Estates North subdivision and 120 new residential condominium units for the second phase of the Owl View Landing development. The overall development property currently consists of a 117-acre parcel of land located east of Stillwater Road. The property currently consists of an open farm field directly north of the previous five phases of West View Estates. To date, Owl View Landing, Ph. 1 (40 units) and West View Estates, Phases I - 3 (86 lots) have been platted and are currently being developed. Access to the West View Estates North development would be provided through a connection to Taelor Road to the south and a new approach onto Stillwater Road at the existing entrance to LHC. The project would also include an emergency access approach to the east to Bowman Drive. This approach is proposed as a gated emergency access only. The visibility from the proposed approach locations is unrestricted. The development will have 32-foot interior roadways with sidewalks on both sides to match the adjacent residential areas. The West View Estates North development plan is shownin Figure 2. The project is expected to be completed around 2030. The second phase of Owl View Landing would be accessed from Taelor Road to the east and a new approach onto Stillwater Road located 500 feet north of West Reserve Drive. It is not known when the new Owl View Landing condominiums may begin construction. Abelin Traffic Services 5 January, 2019 West View Estates North & Owl View Landing Traffic Impact Study Kalispell, Montana Figure 2 — Proposed West View Estates Developments =:777:71 I Abelin Traffic Services 6 January, 2019 West View Estates North & Owl View Landing Traffic Impact Study Kalispell, Montana E. TRIP GENERATION AND ASSIGNMENT ATS performed a trip generation analysis to determine the anticipated future traffic volumes from the proposed developments using the trip generation rates contained in Trip Generation (Institute of Transportation Engineers, Tenth Edition). These rates are the national standard and are based on the most current information available to planners. A vehicle "trip" is defined as any trip that either begins or ends at the development site. ATS determined that the critical traffic impacts on the intersections and roadways would occur during the weekday morning and evening peak hours. The undeveloped units from the previous phases of the West View Estates and the Owl View Landing condominiums are also included with this analysis. According to the ITE trip generation rates, at full build -out the developments would produce 248 AM peak hour trips, 316 PM peak hour trips, and 3,585 daily trips. See Table 3 for detailed trip generation information. Table 3 - Trip Generation Rates AM Peak Total AM PM Peak Total PM Hour Trip Peak Hour Trip Peak Weekday Total Ends per Hour Trip Ends per Hour Trip Trip Ends Weekday Land Use Units Unit Ends Unit Ends per Unit Trip Ends West View Phases 1-5 Unbuilt (ITE #210) 86 0.74 64 0.99 85 9.44 812 Owl View Conds. Phase 1 (ITE #220) 40 0.46 18 0.56 22 1 7.32 293 NEW- Owl View Condominiums Future (ITE #220) 120 0.46 55 0.56 67 7.32 878 NEW -Townhouse West View (ITE #220) 126 0.46 58 0.56 71 1 7.32 922 NEW -Single Fa m i ly West Vi ew (ITE #210) 72 0.74 53 0.99 71 9.44 680 Total 1 1 248 316 1 3,585 F. TRIP DISTRIBUTION The traffic distribution and assignment for the proposed subdivision was based upon the existing ADT volumes along the adjacent roadways and peak -hour volumes. It is expected that traffic will distribute onto both Stillwater Road and Taelor Road to approach Old Reserve Drive. Once at Reserve Drive the majority of traffic will proceed towards Kalispell, utilizing the bypass and distributing into Kalispell as shown on Figure 3. Abelin Traffic Services 7 January, 2019 West View Estates North & Owl View Landing Traffic linpact Study Kalispell, Montana Figure 3 — Peak -Hour Trip Distribution G. TRAFFIC IMPACTS OUTSIDE OF THE DEVELOPMENT Using the trip generation and trip distribution numbers, ATS determined the future Level of Service for the area intersections. The anticipated intersection LOS with the proposed development is shown in Table 4. This analysis includes the projected traffic from the other planned developments in this area. The LOS calculations are included in Appendix C of this report. The table indicates that the construction of West View Estates Phase North of the Owl View Landing condominiums will not cause any roadway capacity problems in this area. The West View Estate projects alone would increase traffic volumes on West Reserve Drive by 2,500 VPD (35%) east of Stillwater Road to 7,000 VPD, which is well within the capacity of this five - lane roadway. Traffic Volumes on Stillwater Road north of Reserve Drive will increase by 1,500 VPD to 2,800 VPD, which again is well within the capacity of this two-lane roadway. It is likely that traffic growth in this area will continue for the foreseeable future. The roundabout at the intersection of West Reserve Drive and Stillwater Road provides considerable reserve capacity for future growth. A review of the traffic volume projections at this intersection indicate that the roundabout will still function at LOS C with 200%-300% more overall traffic than what is currently projected with the West View Estates projects. Abelin Traffic Services 8 January, 2019 West View Estates North & Owl View Landing Traffic linpact Study Kalispell, Montana Table 4 — Projected Level of Service With Developments = AM Peak Hour —F—PM Peak Hour Intersection Delay (Sec.) LOS Delay (Sec.) LOS Reserve Drive & Stillwater Road 5.5 A 5.0 A Reserve Drive & Taelor Road* 13.9 B 12.1 B Stillwater Road & Owl View Landing Approach* 10.4 B 10.6 B Stillwater Road & Taelor Road* 9.4 A 9.5 A Stillwater Road & North Approach* 9.2 A 9.3 A *Minor Street Approach LOS & Delay. The intersection of Stillwater Road at LHC/West View Estates west approach is located on a 90 degree curve along Stillwater Road. Routes with turn 90 degrees at intersections can create traffic control and safety issues on busy routes. Currently the traffic volumes at this intersection are low and the geometry and traffic controls are adequate for existing use. The West View Estates will significantly increase traffic volumes at this intersection, but overall volumes along the approaches will remain low (less than 200 VPH). If and when development increases in this area it may be necessary to modify this intersection to provide more efficient operations. Due to the topography and property ownership near the intersection, the angled section of Stillwater Road may need to remain. In order to provide future service at this location, it may be appropriate to rebuild the intersection as a roundabout similar to the one at Old Reserve Drive to the south. A roundabout at this location would provide flexibility for a wide variety of potential developments in this area. Although this modification is not currently needed, it may be desirable for the developers to provide additional ROW or easement on the northeast comer of this intersection to help facilitate the installation of a roundabout in the future. H. IMPACT SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS As proposed, the West View Estates and Owl View Landing residential developments would not create any new roadway capacity problems in this area. The roads adjacent to the project will remain well within the functional capacity without any additional roadway improvements. The developers should consider providing additional ROW on the northeast comer of the intersection of Stillwater Road and the development's northern entrance to provide room for future intersection improvements. Abelin Traffic Services 9 January, 2019 APPENDIX A Traffic Data Grand Total For Data From: 19:00 -10/23/2018 To:10:59-10/25/2018 Total Count 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 Total Lane #3 10 7 4 5 25 83 225 476 501 355 305 178 204 201 159 185 203 216 128 121 72 59 31 15 3768 Lane #4 19 8 11 8 15 41 133 317 324 276 251 142 179 209 184 234 226 283 191 256 205 133 34 25 3704 TOTAL 29 15 15 13 40 124 358 793 825 631 556 320 383 410 343 419 429 499 319 377 277 192 65 40 7472 Percents." 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 Lane #3 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 % 2% 6% 13% 13% 9% 8% 5% 5% 5% 4% 5% 5% 6% 3% 3% 2% 2% 1 % 0% Lane #4 1 % 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 % 4% 9% 9% 7% 7% 4% 5% 6% 5% 6% 6% 8% 5% 7% 6% 4% 1 % 1 % TOTAL 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 % 2% 5% 11% 11% 8% 7% 4% 5% 5% 5% 6% 6% 7% 4% 5% 4% 3% 1 % 1 % ADT.' 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 Total Lane #3 5 4 2 3 13 42 113 238 251 178 153 178 204 201 159 185 203 216 128 61 36 30 16 8 2627 Lane #4 10 4 6 4 8 21 67 159 162 138 126 142 179 209 184 234 226 283 191 128 103 67 17 13 2681 TOTAL 15 8 8 7 21 63 180 397 413 316 279 320 383 410 343 419 429 499 319 189 139 97 33 21 5308 LANE#3 LANE#4 ALLLANES Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Total Percent DW Totals: 0 0 480 5277 1715 0 0 Weekday (Mon -Fri): 7472 100% # Days: 0.0 0.0 0.2 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 ADT: 4483 ADT: 0 0 2304 5277 3742 0 0 Weekend (Sat -Sun) : 0 0% Percent : 0% 0% 6% 71% 23% 0% 0% ADT: 0 Centurion Basic Volume Report Printed 11116118 Page 4 Station ID: STILLWATER Info Line 1 ATS Info Line 2 Unicorn #4 GPS Lat/Lon DB File: STILLWATER.DB Last Connected Device Type : Unic-L Version Number: 1.41 Serial Number: 91889 Number of Lanes : 2 Posted Speed Limit: 0.0 mph Lane #1 Configuration # Dir. Information VolumeMode VolumeSensors DivideBy2 Comment 1. NB Normal Veh. No Lane #1 Basic Volume Data From: 15:00 - 04/08/2015 To: 10:59 - 10/25/2018 Date DW 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 Total 040815 W 113 101 120 74 51 35 14 4 1 513 040915 T 2 2 0 2 13 11 84 249 137 63 47 56 61 92 95 121 91 96 90 45 40 14 11 3 1425 041015 F 3 0 2 0 3 18 58 255 77 416 Month Total 5 2 2 2 16 29 142 504 214 63 47 56 61 92 95 234 192 216 164 96 75 28 15 4 2354 Percent 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 6% 21% 9% 3% 2% 2% 3% 4% 4% 10% 8% 9% 7% 4% 3% 1% 1% 0% ADT: 3 1 1 1 8 15 71 252 107 63 47 56 61 92 95 117 96 108 82 48 38 14 8 2 1386 Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Total Percent DW Totals: 0 0 0 513 1425 416 0 Weekday (Mon -Fri): 2354 100% # Days: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 1.0 0.4 0.0 ADT: 1345 ADT: 0 0 0 1368 1425 1109 0 Weekend (Sat -Sun) : 0 0% Percent : 0% 0% 0% 22% 61% 18% 0% ADT: 0 Centurion Basic Volume Report Printed 11116118 Page I tuctwt ��a " sewize6 cs.�. s t"' et Helena, MIT 59601 File Name StillwaterPM Site Code 00000000 Start Date 10/23/2018 Page No 1 (',rntjnq Printprl- I In-qhiftt-rl STILLWATER RD Southbound TAELOR RD Westbound STILLWATER RD Northbound TAELOR RD Eastbound Right � Thru � Left � Peds R, g:ht:Ethm 1: Left � Peds � App Tti JR:ig:hI[Th�Left � Peds � App Tti Right � Thru � Left—Fp—eds � App Tt., 04:45 PM 0 9 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 -q� 15 Total 0 9 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 15 05:00 PM 0 19 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 25 05:15 PM 0 18 0 0 18 0 0 1 0 1 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 23 05:30 PM 0 12 0 0 12 1 0 1 0 2 2 7 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 23 Grand Total 0 58 0 0 58 1 0 2 0 3 5 20 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 86 Apprch % 0 100 0 0 33.3 0 66.7 0 20 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total % 0 67.4 0 0 67.4 1.2 0 2.3 0 3.5 5.8 23.3 0 0 29.1 0 0 0 0 0 tuctwt ��a " sewize6 cs.�. s t"' et Helena, MIT 59601 File Name StillwaterAM Site Code 00000000 Start Date 10/24/2018 Page No 1 (',rntjnq Printprl- I In-qhiftt-rl STILLWATER Southbound TAELOR Westbound STILLWATER Northbound TAELOR Eastbound Right � Thru � Left � Peds R, g:ht:Ethm 1: Left � Peds � App Tw JR:ig:hI[Th�Left � Peds � App Tti Right � Thru � Left—Fp—eds � App Tt., 07:45 AM 0 13 0 0 13 0 0 2 0 2 3 11 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 -q� 29 Total 0 13 0 0 13 0 0 2 0 2 3 11 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 29 08:00 AM 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 23 08:15 AM 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 1 15 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 26 08:30 AM 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 2 15 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 24 Grand Total 0 40 0 0 40 0 0 2 0 2 6 54 0 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 102 Apprch % 0 100 0 0 0 0 100 0 10 90 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total % 0 39.2 0 0 39.2 0 0 2 0 2 5.9 52.9 0 0 58.8 0 0 0 0 0 lfuctwt ��a " Sewize,5 vs.�.s t-e t Helena, IVIT 59601 File Name TaelorAIVI Site Code 00000000 Start Date 10/24/2018 Page No 1 Groups Printed- Unshifted TAELOR OLD RESERWE TAELOR OLD RESERWE Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Right Thru � Left � Peds App TItII R i g:h:t:E� L e ft � Peds App T.t.i Right Thru � Left � Peds App T.t.1 :RR:ig:h:t:ETh�Left � PedS App T.t.1 07:30 AM 2 0 14 0 16 7 72 0 0 79 0 0 0 0 0 0 79 5 0 84 179 07:45 AM 1 0 7 1 9 10 61 0 0 71 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 1 0 60 140 Total 3 0 21 1 25 17 133 0 0 150 0 0 0 0 0 0 138 6 0 144 319 08:00 AM 1 0 7 0 8 5 29 0 0 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 3 0 55 97 08:15 AM 0 0 6 0 6 3 20 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 2 0 45 74 08:30 AM 0 0 4 0 4 3 21 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 0 29 57 Grand Total 4 0 38 1 43 28 203 0 0 231 0 0 0 0 0 0 262 11 0 273 547 Apprch % 9.3 0 88.4 2.3 12.1 87.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 96 4 0 Total % 0.7 0 6.9 0.2 7.9 5.1 37.1 0 0 42.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 47.9 2 0 49.9 lfuctwt ��a " Sewize,5 vs.�.s t-e t Helena, MT 59601 File Name TaelorPM Site Code 00000000 Start Date 10/23/2018 Page No 1 Groups Printed- Unshifted TAELOR OLD RESERVE TAELOR OLD RESERVE Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Right Thru Left Peds App TItII R g:h:t:E� L e ft Peds App T.t.1 Right Thru Left ----F— FPeds App T.t. Right Thru Left F---s Ped App T.t. T— 04:30 PM 2 0 5 0 7 6 46 0 0 52 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 0 0 33 92 04:45 PM 6 0 12 0 18 5 50 0 0 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 0 0 31 104 Total 8 0 17 0 25 11 96 0 0 107 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 0 0 64 196 05:00 PM 3 0 7 1 11 5 62 0 0 67 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 0 0 44 122 05:15 PM 3 0 2 0 5 7 64 0 0 71 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 1 1 41 117 05:30 PM 3 0 6 0 9 7 55 0 0 62 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 0 0 44 115 05:45 PM 0 0 5 1 6 2 51 0 0 53 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 3 0 42 101 Total 9 0 20 2 31 21 232 0 0 253 0 0 0 0 0 0 166 4 1 171 455 Grand Total 17 0 37 2 56 32 328 0 0 360 0 0 0 0 0 0 230 4 235 651 Apprch % 30.4 0 66.1 3.6 8.9 91.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 97.9 1.7 0.1 4 To 2.6 0 5.7 0.3 8.6 4.9 50.4 0 0 55.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.3 0.6 0.2 36.1 APPENDIX B Traffic Model West View Estates Traffic Model LHC AM Peak Hour 0 0 Existing 15 Min x 4 21 0 0 0 0 26 0 18 31 0 9.0 A 52 0 0 1* 4r 8 Taelor t 44 111* 12 0 *L 0 60 4r 0 56 0 4.7 A 16 24 40 172 28 72 Old Reserve 0 12 220 8 44 40 11.8 B 8 4J IL 28 56 16 � - 288 20 Taelor 316 West View Estates Traffic Model LHC PM Peak Hour 0 4j 0 Existing 15 Min x 4 29 4 0 0 0 0 12 0 8 43 0 8.9 A 72 0 0 4 Taelor 20 4 0 0 76 0 1 24 0 4.3 A 4 4J 8 52 t 228 20 16 Old Reserve 4 52 92 12 20 48 Stillwater I Stillwater 10.6 B 12 20 28 248 4 -1 Taelor 176 -0 West View Estates Traffic Model LHC AM Peak Hour J *L Site Generated Traffic 4 4— 5 94 C 43 47 -0 41 3 15 25% t 1 f* 13 IN 59 OUT 189 43 3 1 11* 4r 26 28 Taelor t 13 9 15% 11* 8 68 *- 4r 19 19 t 21 6 10% 50% 11* 6 9 19 95 30 17 15 21 4J IL 24 61 6 74 - 19 Old Reserve 3 41 6 Taelor 4 t 5 61 94 2 IN 59 Stillwater OUT 189 West View Estates Traffic Model LHC PM Peak Hour 41 *— Site Generated Traffic 4 4— 3 14 0' 26 29 41 2 50 25% 5 3 45 IN 200 OUT 116 26 2 3 16 17 Taelor 45 30 15% 27 42 12 12 72 20 10% 50% 20 5 4J 64 58 100 11 9 13 J *— 80 37 4 45 16 - 64 Old Reserve 9 41 20 -1 Taelor 14 18 37 -0 6 IN 200 Stillwater OUT 116 West View Estates Traffic Model LHC 9.2 A AM Peak Hour 0 0 Projected Traffic 21 5 0 43 0 29 1 18 32 13 9.4 A 95 3 1 1* 4r 34 Taelor t 57 111* 20 10.4 B 68 0 60 4r 19 T 77 111* 6 5.5 A 25 43 57 187 89 78 Old Reserve 3 12 224 t 13 44 f* 42 West View Estates Traffic Model LHC 9.3 A PM Peak Hour 0 4J 0 Projected Traffic 29 3 0 26 0 14 5 8 46 45 9.5 A 98 2 3 9* 20 Taelor 65 31 10.6 B 42 0 76 12 96 20 5.0 A 13.9 B 9 4J 72 29 4J IL 52 63 237 130 - 307 57 20 26 Taelor Old Reserve 13 52 377 106 30 20 54 Stillwater I Stillwater 12.1 B 25 100 73 312 24 Taelor 213 APPENDIX C LOS Calculations HCS7 Roundabouts General Information Report Site Information Analyst RL Intersection Reseve & Stillwater Agency or Co. ATS E/W Street Name Reserve Street Date Performed 11/9/2018 N/S Street Name Stillwater Road Analysis Year 2018 Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Time Analyzed AM Peak Hou - Existing Peak Hour Factor 1.00 Project Description West View Ph 6 Jurisdiction City of Kalispell Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Approach EB WB NB SB Movement U L R U L T R U L T R T R Number of Lanes (N) 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 Lane Assignment R I R I R I LTR Volume (V), veh/h 0 1 ;LT 220 44 0 24 0 40 0 28 40 16 Percent Heavy Vehicles, % 3 10 3 3 3 10 3 3 3 10 10 10 Flow Rate (VPCE), pc/h 0 1 227 45 0 26 0 41 0 31 44 18 Right -Turn Bypass None None None Non Conflicting Lanes 1 1 1 1 Pedestrians Crossing, p/h 0 0 0 0 Critical and Follow -Up Headway Adjustment Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Critical Headway (s) 4.9763 4.9763 4.9763 4.9763 Follow -Up Headway (s) 2.6087 2.6087 2.6087 2.6087 Flow Computations, Capacity and v/c Ratios Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Entry Flow (w), pc/h 273 277 62 93 Entry Volume veh/h 265 267 60 85 Circulating Flow (vc), pc/h 149 22 259 263 Exiting Flow (vex), pc/h 299 207 36 163 Capacity (cpce), pc/h 1185 1349 1060 1055 Capacity (c), veh/h 1151 1302 1019 959 v/c Ratio (x) 0.23 0.21 0.06 0.09 Delay and Level of Service Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Lane Control Delay (d), s/veh 5.2 4.5 4.0 4.6 Lane LOS A A A A 95% Queue, veh 0.9 0.8 0.2 0.3 Approach Delay, s/veh 5.2 4.5 4.0 4.6 Approach LOS A A A A Intersection Delay, s/veh I LOS 4.7 A Copyright K) 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSM Rounclabouts Version 7.5 Generated: 12/21/2018 9:07:07 AM RoundAM.xro HCS7 Roundabouts General Information Report Site Information Analyst RL Intersection Reseve & Stillwater Agency or Co. ATS E/W Street Name Reserve Street Date Performed 11/9/2018 N/S Street Name Stillwater Road Analysis Year 2018 Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Time Analyzed PM Peak Hou - Existing Peak Hour Factor 1.00 Project Description West View Ph 6 Jurisdiction City of Kalispell Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Approach EB WB NB SB Movement U L R U L T R U L T R T R Number of Lanes (N) 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 Lane Assignment LTR R R LTR Volume (V), veh/h 0 4 92 20 0 8 0 48 0 20 52 4 Percent Heavy Vehicles, % 3 10 3 3 3 10 3 3 3 10 10 10 Flow Rate (VPCE), pc/h 0 4 95 21 1 0 9 0 49 0 22 57 4 Right -Turn Bypass None None None Non Conflicting Lanes 1 1 1 1 Pedestrians Crossing, p/h 0 0 0 0 Critical and Follow -Up Headway Adjustment Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Critical Headway (s) 4.9763 4.9763 4.9763 4.9763 Follow -Up Headway (s) 2.6087 2.6087 2.6087 2.6087 Flow Computations, Capacity and v/c Ratios Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Entry Flow (w), pc/h 120 260 116 83 Entry Volume veh/h 116 252 112 75 Circulating Flow (vc), pc/h 95 71 121 305 Exiting Flow (vex), pc/h 166 293 26 94 Capacity (cpce), pc/h 1253 1284 1220 1011 Capacity (c), veh/h 1213 1243 1176 919 v/c Ratio (x) 0.10 0.20 0.10 0.08 Delay and Level of Service Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Lane Control Delay (d), s/veh 3.8 4.6 3.9 4.7 Lane LOS A A A A 95% Queue, veh 0.3 0.8 0.3 0.3 Approach Delay, s/veh 3.8 4.6 3.9 4.7 Approach LOS A A A A Intersection Delay, s/veh I LOS 4.3 A Copyright K) 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSM Rounclabouts Version 7.5 Generated: 12/21/2018 9:07:40 AM RoundPM.xro HCS7 Two -Way Stop -Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst RLA Intersection Stillwater & Taelor Agency/Co. ATS Jurisdiction City of Kalispell Date Performed 11/9/2018 East/West Street Taelor Road Analysis Year 2018 North/South Street Stillwater Road Time Analyzed AM Peak Hour - Existing Peak Hour Factor 1.00 Intersection Orientation North -South Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description West View Phase 6 Lanes 4 1 .1.4- 1- U A 11 1 t Y t Major Street: North -South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 10 11 12 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LR 13 TR LT Volume (veh/h) 8 1 44 12 1 52 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type I Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) 7.1 6.2 4.1 Critical Headway (sec) 6.43 6.23 4.13 Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.5 3.3 2.2 Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.53 3.33 2.23 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 9 1 Capacity, c (veh/h) 903 1542 v/c Ratio 0.01 0.00 95% Queue Length, Q95 (veh) 0.0 0.0 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.0 7.3 Level of Service (LOS) A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 9.0 0.1 Approach LOS A Copyright K) 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSM TWSC Version 7.5 Generated: 12/21/2018 9:04:08 AM StillwaterAM.xtw HCS7 Two -Way Stop -Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst RLA Intersection Stillwater & Taelor Agency/Co. ATS Jurisdiction City of Kalispell Date Performed 11/9/2018 East/West Street Taelor Road Analysis Year 2018 North/South Street Stillwater Road Time Analyzed PM Peak Hour - Existing Peak Hour Factor 1.00 Intersection Orientation North -South Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description West View Phase 6 Lanes 4 1 .1.4- 1- U A 11 1 t Y t Major Street: North -South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 10 11 12 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LR 13 TR LT Volume (veh/h) 4 1 20 4 1 72 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type I Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) 7.1 6.2 4.1 Critical Headway (sec) 6.43 6.23 4.13 Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.5 3.3 2.2 Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.53 3.33 2.23 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 5 1 Capacity, c (veh/h) 927 1584 v/c Ratio 0.01 0.00 95% Queue Length, Q95 (veh) 0.0 0.0 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.9 7.3 Level of Service (LOS) A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 8.9 0.1 Approach LOS A Copyright K) 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSM TWSC Version 7.5 Generated: 12/21/2018 9:03:30 AM StiIIwaterPM.xtw HCS7 General Information Two -Way Stop -Control Report Site Information Analyst RLA Intersection Taelor Rd. & Old Reserve Agency/Co. ATS Jurisdiction City of Kalispell Date Performed 11/9/2018 East/West Street Old Reserve Drive Analysis Year 2018 North/South Street Taelor Road Time Analyzed AM Peak Hour - Existing Peak Hour Factor 1.00 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description West View Phase 6 Lanes I + Y t t, r Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration L T T 128 R LR Volume (veh/h) 20 316 56 8 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 1 0 Right Turn Channelized No I Median Type I Storage Left Only 1 Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) 4.1 7.5 6.9 Critical Headway (sec) 4.16 6.86 16.96 Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 2.2 3.5 3.3 Follow -Up Headway (sec) 2.23 3.53 , 3.33 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 20 64 Capacity, c (veh/h) 1234 590 v/c Ratio 0.02 0.11 95% Queue Length, Q95 (veh) 0.0 0.4 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.0 11.8 Level of Service (LOS) A B Approach Delay (s/veh) 0.5 11.8 Approach LOS B Copyright K) 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSM TWSC Version 7.5 Generated: 12/21/2018 9:05:54 AM TaelorAM.xtw HCS7 General Information Two -Way Stop -Control Report Site Information Analyst RLA Intersection Taelor Rd. & Old Reserve Agency/Co. ATS Jurisdiction City of Kalispell Date Performed 11/9/2018 East/West Street Old Reserve Drive Analysis Year 2018 North/South Street Taelor Road Time Analyzed PM Peak Hour - Existing Peak Hour Factor 1.00 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description West View Phase 6 Lanes I + Y t t, r Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration L T T 12 R LR Volume (veh/h) 4 176 0 28 12 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 1 0 Right Turn Channelized No I Median Type I Storage Left Only 1 Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) 4.1 7.5 6.9 Critical Headway (sec) 4.16 6.86 16.96 Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 2.2 3.5 3.3 Follow -Up Headway (sec) 2.23 3.53 , 3.33 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 4 40 Capacity, c (veh/h) 1285 682 v/c Ratio 0.00 0.06 95% Queue Length, Q95 (veh) 0.0 0.2 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.8 10.6 Level of Service (LOS) A B Approach Delay (s/veh) 0.2 10.6 Approach LOS B Copyright K) 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSM TWSC Version 7.5 Generated: 12/21/2018 9:05:22 AM TaelorPM.xtw HCS7 Roundabouts General Information Report Site Information Analyst RL Intersection Reseve & Stillwater Agency or Co. ATS E/W Street Name Reserve Street Date Performed 11/9/2018 N/S Street Name Stillwater Road Analysis Year 2018 Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Time Analyzed AM Peak Hou - With Dev. Peak Hour Factor 1.00 Project Description West View Ph 6 Jurisdiction City of Kalispell Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Approach EB WB NB SB Movement U L R U L T R U L T R T R Number of Lanes (N) 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 Lane Assignment LIT R I R I R I LTR Volume (V), veh/h 0 2 223 44 0 39 0 41 0 76 54 23 Percent Heavy Vehicles, % 3 10 3 3 3 10 3 3 3 10 10 10 Flow Rate (VPCE), pc/h 0 2 230 45 0 43 0 42 0 84 59 25 Right -Turn Bypass None None None Non Conflicting Lanes 1 1 1 1 Pedestrians Crossing, p/h 0 0 0 0 Critical and Follow -Up Headway Adjustment Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Critical Headway (s) 4.9763 4.9763 4.9763 4.9763 Follow -Up Headway (s) 2.6087 2.6087 2.6087 2.6087 Flow Computations, Capacity and v/c Ratios Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Entry Flow (w), pc/h 277 310 67 168 Entry Volume veh/h 269 298 64 153 Circulating Flow (vc), pc/h 222 27 316 279 Exiting Flow (vex), pc/h 356 225 58 183 Capacity (cpce), pc/h 1100 1343 1000 1038 Capacity (c), veh/h 1068 1292 959 944 v/c Ratio (x) 0.25 0.23 0.07 0.16 Delay and Level of Service Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Lane Control Delay (d), s/veh 5.8 4.8 4.4 5.4 Lane LOS A A A A 95% Queue, veh 1.0 0.9 0.2 0.6 Approach Delay, s/veh 5.8 4.8 4.4 5.4 Approach LOS A A A A Intersection Delay, s/veh I LOS 5.2 A Copyright K) 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSM Rounclabouts Version 7.5 Generated: 12/21/2018 9:20:52 AM RoundAMwith.xro HCS7 Roundabouts General Information Report Site Information Analyst RL Intersection Reseve & Stillwater Agency or Co. ATS E/W Street Name Reserve Street Date Performed 11/9/2018 N/S Street Name Stillwater Road Analysis Year 2018 Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Time Analyzed PM Peak Hou - With Dev. Peak Hour Factor 1.00 Project Description West View Ph 6 Jurisdiction City of Kalispell Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Approach EB WB NB SB Movement U L R U L T R U L T R T R Number of Lanes (N) 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 Lane Assignment LTR R R LTR Volume (V), veh/h 0 11 103 20 0 59 0 53 0 50 61 8 Percent Heavy Vehicles, % 3 10 3 3 3 10 3 3 3 10 10 10 Flow Rate (VPCE), pc/h 0 12 106 21 1 0 65 0 55 0 55 67 9 Right -Turn Bypass None None None Non Conflicting Lanes 1 1 1 1 Pedestrians Crossing, p/h 0 0 0 0 Critical and Follow -Up Headway Adjustment Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Critical Headway (s) 4.9763 4.9763 4.9763 4.9763 Follow -Up Headway (s) 2.6087 2.6087 2.6087 2.6087 Flow Computations, Capacity and v/c Ratios Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Entry Flow (w), pc/h 139 327 138 131 Entry Volume veh/h 134 313 132 119 Circulating Flow (vc), pc/h 142 95 173 316 Exiting Flow (vex), pc/h 216 305 106 108 Capacity (cpce), pc/h 1194 1253 1157 1000 Capacity (c), veh/h 1153 1201 1108 909 v/c Ratio (x) 0.12 0.26 0.12 0.13 Delay and Level of Service Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Lane Control Delay (d), s/veh 4.1 5.4 4.3 5.2 Lane LOS A A A A 95% Queue, veh 0.4 1.0 0.4 0.5 Approach Delay, s/veh 4.1 5.4 4.3 5.2 Approach LOS A A A A Intersection Delay, s/veh I LOS 4.9 A Copyright K) 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSM Rounclabouts Version 7.5 Generated: 12/21/2018 9:21:20 AM RoundPMwith.xro HCS7 Two -Way Stop -Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst RLA Intersection Stillwater & North App. Agency/Co. ATS Jurisdiction City of Kalispell Date Performed 11/9/2018 East/West Street North Approach Analysis Year 2018 North/South Street Stillwater Road Time Analyzed AM Peak Hour - Future Peak Hour Factor 1.00 Intersection Orientation North -South Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description West View Phase 6 Lanes 4 1 .1.4- 1- U A 11 1 t Y t Major Street: North -South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R R U L T R U L T R Priority 10 11 12 7 8 9 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LR 14 TR LT Volume (veh/h) 55 29 29 1 32 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type I Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) 7.1 6.2 4.1 Critical Headway (sec) 6.43 6.23 4.13 Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.5 3.3 2.2 Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.53 3.33 2.23 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 59 1 Capacity, c (veh/h) 929 1540 v/c Ratio 0.06 0.00 95% Queue Length, Q95 (veh) 0.2 0.0 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.1 7.3 Level of Service (LOS) A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 9.1 0.2 Approach LOS A Copyright K) 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSM TWSC Version 7.5 Generated: 12/21/2018 9:24:40 AM StillwaterNorthAMwith.>ctw HCS7 Two -Way Stop -Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst RLA Intersection Stillwater & North App. Agency/Co. ATS Jurisdiction City of Kalispell Date Performed 11/9/2018 East/West Street North Approach Analysis Year 2018 North/South Street Stillwater Road Time Analyzed PM Peak Hour - Future Peak Hour Factor 1.00 Intersection Orientation North -South Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description West View Phase 6 Lanes 4 1 .1.4- 1- U A 11 1 t Y t Major Street: North -South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 10 11 12 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LR 12 TR LT Volume (veh/h) 50 13 42 4 46 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type I Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) 7.1 6.2 4.1 Critical Headway (sec) 6.43 6.23 4.13 Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.5 3.3 2.2 Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.53 3.33 2.23 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 52 4 Capacity, c (veh/h) 912 1544 v/c Ratio 0.06 0.00 95% Queue Length, Q95 (veh) 0.2 0.0 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.2 7.3 Level of Service (LOS) A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 9.2 0.6 Approach LOS A Copyright K) 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSM TWSC Version 7.5 Generated: 12/21/2018 9:25:09 AM StillwaterNorthPMwith.xtw HCS7 Two -Way Stop -Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst RLA Intersection Stillwater & Taelor Agency/Co. ATS Jurisdiction City of Kalispell Date Performed 11/9/2018 East/West Street Taelor Road Analysis Year 2018 North/South Street Stillwater Road Time Analyzed AM Peak Hour - Future Peak Hour Factor 1.00 Intersection Orientation North -South Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description West View Phase 6 Lanes 4 1 .1.4- 1- U A 11 1 t Y t Major Street: North -South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 10 11 12 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LR 12 TR LT Volume (veh/h) 28 55 18 1 86 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type I Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) 7.1 6.2 4.1 Critical Headway (sec) 6.43 6.23 4.13 Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.5 3.3 2.2 Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.53 3.33 2.23 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 30 1 Capacity, c (veh/h) 846 1520 v/c Ratio 0.04 0.00 95% Queue Length, Q95 (veh) 0.1 0.0 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.4 7.4 Level of Service (LOS) A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 9.4 0.1 Approach LOS A Copyright K) 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSM TWSC Version 7.5 Generated: 12/21/2018 9:23:45 AM StillwaterAMwith.xtw HCS7 Two -Way Stop -Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst RLA Intersection Stillwater & Taelor Agency/Co. ATS Jurisdiction City of Kalispell Date Performed 11/9/2018 East/West Street Taelor Road Analysis Year 2018 North/South Street Stillwater Road Time Analyzed PM Peak Hour - Future Peak Hour Factor 1.00 Intersection Orientation North -South Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description West View Phase 6 Lanes 4 1 .1.4- 1- U A 11 1 t Y t Major Street: North -South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 10 11 12 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LR 13 TR LT Volume (veh/h) 17 1 55 25 2 93 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type I Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) 7.1 6.2 4.1 Critical Headway (sec) 6.43 6.23 4.13 Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.5 3.3 2.2 Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.53 3.33 2.23 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 18 2 Capacity, c (veh/h) 831 1512 v/c Ratio 0.02 0.00 95% Queue Length, Q95 (veh) 0.1 0.0 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.4 7.4 Level of Service (LOS) A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 9.4 0.2 Approach LOS A Copyright K) 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSM TWSC Version 7.5 Generated: 12/21/2018 9:24:17 AM StillwaterPMwith.>ctw HCS7 General Information Two -Way Stop -Control Report Site Information Analyst RLA Intersection Taelor Rd. & Old Reserve Agency/Co. ATS Jurisdiction City of Kalispell Date Performed 11/9/2018 East/West Street Old Reserve Drive Analysis Year 2018 North/South Street Taelor Road Time Analyzed AM Peak Hour - With Dev. Peak Hour Factor 1.00 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description West View Phase 6 Lanes I + Y t t, r Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration L T T 147 R LR Volume (veh/h) 25 364 114 24 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 1 0 Right Turn Channelized No I Median Type I Storage Left Only 1 Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) 4.1 7.5 6.9 Critical Headway (sec) 4.16 6.86 16.96 Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 2.2 3.5 3.3 Follow -Up Headway (sec) 2.23 3.53 , 3.33 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 25 138 Capacity, c (veh/h) 1198 570 v/c Ratio 0.02 0.24 95% Queue Length, Q95 (veh) 0.1 0.9 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.1 13.3 Level of Service (LOS) A B Approach Delay (s/veh) 0.5 13.3 Approach LOS B Copyright K) 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSM TWSC Version 7.5 Generated: 12/21/2018 9:23:10 AM TaeIorAMwithxtw HCS7 General Information Two -Way Stop -Control Report Site Information Analyst RLA Intersection Taelor Rd. & Old Reserve Agency/Co. ATS Jurisdiction City of Kalispell Date Performed 11/9/2018 East/West Street Old Reserve Drive Analysis Year 2018 North/South Street Taelor Road Time Analyzed PM Peak Hour - With Dev. Peak Hour Factor 1.00 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description West View Phase 6 Lanes I + Y t t, r Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration L T T 183 R LR Volume (veh/h) 20 206 64 22 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 1 0 Right Turn Channelized No I Median Type I Storage Left Only 1 Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) 4.1 7.5 6.9 Critical Headway (sec) 4.16 6.86 16.96 Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 2.2 3.5 3.3 Follow -Up Headway (sec) 2.23 3.53 , 3.33 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 20 86 Capacity, c (veh/h) 1166 618 v/c Ratio 0.02 0.14 95% Queue Length, Q95 (veh) 0.1 0.5 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.1 11.8 Level of Service (LOS) A B Approach Delay (s/veh) 0.7 11.8 Approach LOS B Copyright K) 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSM TWSC Version 7.5 Generated: 12/21/2018 9:22:34 AM TaelorPMwith.xtw o I H 1010 'yo— 2" GAS CO LU z CO 0 LU < Lu z 5; co < Lu < m Zo< CO CO < LU = 10, 0 0 100 200_ H 2"GAS CO LU z CO LU Lu Iz -w co <w LU <m< C') Zo, CO < LU = wow 0 0 0 100 200_ H 2"GAS CO LU z CO LU Lu Iz -w co <w LU <m< C') Zo, CO < LU = wow 0 0 RP txl 5b t C CC C [ H 'UMMMUp \j Q 130 conditions of approval issued by ffie Flathead County, C;ommissioners on June 22, 2000, a 60-foot wide easement Said easement shall be located 60-feet south of the.mid-section line of Secdon 25, Township 29 North, Range 22 West, Flathead County, Montana and more P"cularly de. 6cnIxd as follows: An easement 60-feet south of the following described line; Bcgm'nm'g at the Northwest corner of the NW 1A of die SW- I/. ofSection 25, T29N, R22W, P.M.M. Flathead County, Montina, thence easterly to the northeast. comer Of the NW'/, Of the SW 1/4 of Section 25, T29 N, R22W, P.M.M.,:Flathead County, Montana. Further said casement is granted with the condition it may be relocated at the grantors, grantors heirs, and assignm ro*wst, as long as said relocated easement cnrnplies with the conditions of subdivision approval issued by the Flathead County Conunissions on June 22, 2000 IN W17NESS VREREOF., thii cmement is made this 1,9— day of April, 2001. By: Vramon &L. Jo on By: 1 nrufm M. Johnson CERT—MCATE OF NOTARY State of County of ss. On tws day of ied N 20�2L. before rm the undersim a otary Public for the State 05"�4 persmally apKarad 3 1)6 hh&,qknowa . e- -rson(s) whose name(s)40oubscribeiltoft to me that Wame0executed the same. JT T 00 A* NomPub He folp die sote of A --)7 Res ;4, ssion Expfies on &I �12 loom , Is STATE OF MONTANA, Com.ty of FWjW ss -5�(4& 2-(a r-11 Recorded at the requ %.� A. —I this —IZ day of :4��f - �&e �— at O'cloc M and recorded in the r0ODrdS 0 FUthead County. State of Montana. Fee S Pd. RECEPMON NO� '200110 (Flathead C ry am Ae� RETURN TO i7l I'& Kalispell Growth Policy Exhibit- May 13th, 2021 NORTH West View Phase 6 & 7 1 F7ASubject Property Commercial Neighborhood Commercial Industrial Urban Mixed Use High Density Residential Urban Residential Suburban Residential City Airport -Gov. Public/Quasi Public, Openspace Floodway Suburban Residential Industrial Urban a TAELOR RD Residential LU P: a. 0 0 High Density ?esider#ial Suburban Residential tllllll� '11111111111111k Kalispell Planning Dept. Date: May 13th, 2021 CII101 FilePath: J\2021\0513 0 500 1,000 I KALISPELL ====� Feet A Kalispell Zoning Exhibit- May 13th, 2021 NORTH West View Phase 6 & 7 County M! M! IonsResidential Subject Property Neighborhood Business Residential Residential/Professional Office Central Business Residential Apartment ApartmentlOffice General Business Core Area Business Residential Public Kalispell Planning Dept. Date: May 13th, 2021 cily"I 1111101110 0 500 1,000 FilePath: J\2021\0513 KALISPELL Feet Kari Barnhart From: Lynn Rued <1rued@bresnan.net> Sent: Monday, May 24, 2021 10:34 AM To: Kari Barnhart Subject: EXTERNAL File#kpp-21-03 I live in Stillwater estates and my lot abuts the Owl co. property. It would have been a bit more clear if your vicinity map would also have included the boundaries of the preliminary plat under consideration. The parcel of land on the west side of Sperry way is dedicated for emergency purposes only and not for general traffic. There is a 20 foot utility easement on the west side of Stillwater Estates. Ten feet on the Stillwater side and 10 feet on the Owl side. I have three questions. What is the zoning on the owl property. What are the rear yard setbacks, and; will the setback be measured from the utility easement or from the common property line between the Owl properties and Stillwater Estates? Is it possible that the preliminary plat drawing can be emailed? Thanks Lynn Rued