06-23-21 Final Agenda
Development Services
201 1st Avenue East
Kalispell, MT 59901
Phone: (406) 758-7940
Fax: (406) 758-7739
www.kalispell.com
KALISPELL TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE
The Kalispell Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) will meet on Wednesday, June 23, 2021 starting at
2:00 p.m. in the MDT 2nd Floor Conference Room at 85 5th Ave EN in Kalispell. A final agenda is
provided below.
If you would like to join the meeting via Zoom, please follow this link
https://mt-gov.zoom.us/j/4067512030?pwd=ajVtRGk1MGZsVXZyOVVuL1dUTmt3UT09.
The agenda for the meeting will be:
A. Call to order and roll call
B. Approval of minutes of November 5, 2020 meeting
C. Comments from the Public
D. Old Business
- Move 2040 Transportation Plan Adoption (memo attached & link provided)
https://kalispellmove2040.com/resources/
- West Reserve Corridor Update
- Kalispell Bypass Update from KLJ
E. New Business
F. Set next meeting date
G. Adjournment
1
1830 3rd Ave E #303
Kalispell, MT 59901
406 755 2763
KLJENG.COM
Memorandum
To: Kalispell Urban Area Transportation Advisory Committee (TAC)
From: Wade Kline; Zach Chappell
RE: Kalispell Area Transportation Plan Update
Date: June 16th, 2021
Background
The City of Kalispell (City) and the Montana Department of Transportation (MDT) with assistance from
the Kalispell Transportation Coordinating Committee (TCC) – a public panel composed of private
individuals, local government officials and staff, state and federal transportation agency personnel – are
working towards updating the Greater Kalispell Area Transportation Plan (PLAN).
The City is the local authority facilitating the update of the Kalispell Area Transportation Plan and
continues to collaborate with MDT and stakeholder groups through the development of the PLAN. The
intent of the PLAN is to guide and facilitate planned improvements for the Kalispell Urban Area that
incorporate current and future transportation network deficiencies for the community.
To date, KLJ (the City’s PLAN consultant) has completed a full draft PLAN document. The draft PLAN
document was made available for public comment in mid‐May, and a final round of public engagement
open houses was held at City Hall on May 26th. The objective of this memorandum is to inform the
Urban Transportation Advisory Committee regarding progress and provide information generated as
part of updating the PLAN. The draft PLAN is available at the following link:
https://kalispellmove2040.com/resources/
Wade Kline, KLJ Project Manager, will present on the PLAN’s progress including additional information
on the following:
Public Engagement to Date
Phase I
In the spring of 2020, the project team hosted a series of Listening Sessions to gather input on the
existing transportation system. The Listening Sessions were held as public meetings which informed
community members about the background data supporting the PLAN, collected their input on issues
and needs, and guided them through exercises to prioritize goals and identify “big ideas”.
Phase I of public engagement also included an online issues and needs survey which elicited nearly 150
responses from the public. The Listening Sessions were announced through both traditional and social
media outlets.
2
Phase II
Over the summer of 2020, the project team provided a progress report on the Move 2040 planning
process to the Kalispell community. The team initiated a social media campaign through Instagram and
Facebook to provide recent materials and information on the planning process. Project updates included
results from Phase I of the public input process, as well as updated documentation on the existing and
projected conditions driving the planning process.
Phase III
The final round of public engagement included a series of open houses, which were held at City Hall on
May 26th. The open houses included a presentation of the full draft PLAN by project manager Wade
Kline, as well as a series of posters detailing the PLAN elements. The open house presentations were
streamed live online for those unable to attend in person, and presentation slides and posters were
made available for viewing and download on the project website. Over 45 individuals participated online
and in person on May 26th. Phase III presented the public with an overview of the PLAN content and
provided an opportunity for the community to comment on the PLAN in its final form.
A full description of the public engagement process can be found in Chapter 2 (p.9) of the PLAN
document.
Existing Conditions
A detailed existing conditions report was prepared for the PLAN. The report provides a baseline for
identification of needs and development of recommendations. Key current and historical trends
highlighted in the existing conditions report include:
Population: Flathead County’s population increased by over 20 percent from 2000 to 2010. This
is due in large part to Kalispell’s growth, with the City’s population increasing by over 40 percent
during this period. In contrast, the unincorporated areas of Flathead County increased by
approximately 9 percent.
Travel to Work: The predominant means of commuting to the workplace is the single‐
occupancy vehicle — nearly 83 percent of people drove alone in a personal automobile for
commuting to work in 2017. The use of single‐occupancy vehicles increased between 2010 and
2017 by five and a half percent.
Safety: Between 2014 and 2018, there were 5,001 crashes reported in the study area. Nine of
these crashes resulted in a fatality, with 123 crashes resulting in serious injury. During this five‐
year period, injury and non‐injury crashed peaked in 2016 (1,077), and gradually decreased
through 2018.
Full existing conditions documentation can be found in Chapter 3 (p.13) of the PLAN document.
Growth Forecasts and Projected Conditions
Move 2040 has a planning horizon extending through 2040. The first step in the growth forecasting
process was to establish growth assumptions for all current political jurisdictions within the planning
area. The Move 2040 study area was divided into three (3) geographic subareas for development of
2040 growth projections to support Move 2040:
3
Kalispell – Reflects the current annexation boundary for the City of Kalispell, smoothed to match MDT
TAZ boundaries which otherwise exceed the current annexation boundary.
Evergreen – Reflects the current census defined place (CDP) of Evergreen. This area extends beyond the
current boundary of the Evergreen Water & Sewer District to include the current Evergreen Wastewater
Service Area Boundary developed between the City of Kalispell and the Evergreen Water & Sewer
District.
Balance of the Study Area – The remainder of the study area outside of the subareas defined as Kalispell
or Evergreen, and within Flathead County.
Household Growth
Total households within the study area are projected to grow by 2.4%, or nearly 9,300 households.
Household growth was projected specifically for each of the geographic subareas.
Employment Growth
Employment growth was projected for each of the geographic subareas. Overall employment growth for
the study area is projected at 1.9%. Total employment growth is estimated to be nearly 11,700 over the
planning horizon. Final growth rates were adjusted to reflect the evaluation of potential projected
conditions related to each component of the study area.
Travel Model Development
MDT provided a calibrated travel demand model for the year 2017 to replicate existing traffic conditions
in the study area. Previously discussed employment and household projections were added to the travel
demand model and modeled to the year 2040. This resulted in the 2040 Existing plus Committed (E+C)
model for the study area. The 2040 E+C model output generated volumes, capacity, and the resulting
volume to capacity ratios (V/C) and levels of service (LOS). The 2040 E+C model demonstrates future
transportation conditions in the study area within the context of projected growth, excluding any new
improvement beyond those committed through the MDT State Transportation Improvement Program
(STIP), the Kalispell Capital Improvement Program (CIP), or improvement planned by Flathead County.
Documentation of the growth forecasting and projected conditions processes can be found in Chapter 4
(p.79) and Chapter 5 (p.95) of the PLAN document, respectively.
Alternatives Analysis
As part of Move 2040, 10 alternative scenarios (four with sub‐alternatives) were evaluated to analyze
the effects of one or more changes to the Kalispell transportation network. In total, 14 alternative
models were run. The analysis was designed to assess the relative local and systemwide benefits of a
range of potential improvements to corridors throughout the network. A brief description of each
alternative is provided below:
Alternative 1: Complete Highway 93A
Alternative 2: Evaluates a three‐lane section on Hwy 93/Main St from 7th St to West Center St.
Alternative 2A: Combines the assumptions of Alternatives 1 and 2.
Alternative 3: Evaluates connecting both 8th Ave WN and 3rd Ave WN between HWY 2/Idaho St
and West Center St.
4
Alternative 3A: Combines the assumptions of Alternatives 2 and 3.
Alternative 4: Evaluates development of a three‐lane roadway along the Willow Glen corridor
from Highway 93 South to Conrad Road, then continuing along Conrad Road to Shady Lane,
where it would continue until MT 35.
Alternative 5: Evaluates a connection between LaSalle Rd/Hwy 2 and Conrad Rd.
Alternative 5A: Combines the assumptions of Alternatives 4 and 5.
Alternative 6: Assumes an extension of Whitefish Stage from Hwy 2/Idaho St to East Center St/
Woodland Ave.
Alternative 6A: Combines the assumptions of Alternatives 4 and 6.
Alternative 7: Evaluates an improved three‐lane corridor along Evergreen/Four Mile Dr from
Whitefish Stage to Farm‐to‐Market Rd.
Alternative 8: Evaluates an improved three‐lane facility along the Rose Crossing corridor from
Helena Flats to HWY 93.
Alternative 9: Combines the assumptions of Alternatives 7 and 8.
Alternative 10: Includes the corridor‐level improvements determined to constitute a preferred
build condition (6 separate improvements).
Each alternative was evaluated against the original outputs from the 2040 E+C model network, which
forecast traffic conditions assuming only committed projects will be added beyond existing facilities. The
benefits of each alternative were described using areawide metrics including vehicle miles traveled
(VMT), vehicle hours traveled (VHT), and percent of congested roadway segments. Alternatives were
also evaluated against corridor‐level travel indicators such as change in annual daily traffic (ADT) and
volume to capacity ratio (V/C).
Full documentation of the alternatives analysis process can be found in Chapter 6 (p.107) of the PLAN
document.
Project Development and Identification
The project development and identification process established recommendations in two categories:
Transportation System Management (TSM) and Major Street Network (MSN).
The TSM recommendations reflect intersection‐level improvements which respond to both safety and
traffic operations‐related issues at an isolated location, typically an intersection. TSM recommendations
are developed based on a review of more localized existing and projected conditions.
The MSN recommendations reflect larger corridor‐level improvements aimed at both improving existing
corridors or upgrading corridors which are projected to require a higher standard related to safety and
operations.
The recommendations development process involved the review and incorporation of project
recommendations from previous plans, as well as an inventory of projects that have been completed.
Project recommendations were evaluated against new safety data, 2040 travel demand model results,
and other existing and future conditions data. A total of 41 TSM and 48 MSN recommendations were
established.
5
Full details on the recommendation’s identification process can be found in Chapter 7 (p.157) of the
PLAN document.
Project Prioritization
The Move 2040 goals were used as a foundation to develop an objective methodology for prioritizing
the MSN and TSM recommendations. The methodology also reflects key priorities identified through the
public engagement process and emphasized by the City.
Full details on the prioritization process and results are provided in Chapter 8 (p.171) of the PLAN
document.
Bike & Pedestrian Plan
Move 2040 provides a detailed analysis of existing and proposed bicycle and pedestrian facilities based
on a core set of conditions, applying a weighted score to those facilities and connections that are most
beneficial to public safety and the growing community. The analysis produced a list of ranked projects
for each of four bicycle and pedestrian route categories: Shared‐Use Paths, Sidewalks and Paths, On‐
Street Designated Bike Lanes, and On‐Street Shared Bike Lanes.
Full details on the bicycle and pedestrian project prioritization methodology and results are provided in
Chapter 9 (p.181) of the PLAN document.
Policy Plan
The Policy Plan element of Move 2040 provides the City of Kalispell policy guidance to support
development of the transportation system. The Policy Plan encompasses the priorities and policy
direction established within other local plans, and leverages collaboration with stakeholders and agency
partners to set forth a vision for mobility, accessibility, and connectivity. Key elements of the Policy Plan
include:
Downtown‐Highway 93 Main Street: Discusses the redevelopment of Kalispell’s downtown with
a focus on the U.S. Highway 93/Main Street corridor.
Proposed Functional Class Map: Presents and discusses Kalispell’s proposed functional class
map.
Typical Street Cross Sections: Presents street cross section concepts for principal and minor
arterials, major and minor collectors, and local roads.
Access Management: Provides an overview of access management and discusses best practices
to operate an effective access management program.
Traffic Impact Study (TIS) Guidelines: Discusses standards for the requirement, format, and
content of a TIS.
Traffic Calming: Presents a sample toolbox of traffic calming techniques, and discusses their
appropriateness for different road types.
Overview of Roundabouts: Presents an overview of best practices for roundabouts, including
types of roundabouts, their warrants, and a comparison with other traffic control devices.
6
ITS: Provides an overview of ITS and presents several solutions for consideration within the
Kalispell area.
The full Policy Plan can be found in Chapter 11 (p.225) of the PLAN document.
Pending Revisions
Comments from MDT:
Reduce technical jargon related to travel demand modeling (Chapter 3) and growth projections
(Chapter 4).
Further clarify language regarding the prioritization process for bicycle and pedestrian facilities
(Chapter 9).
Update statutory references related to funding programs (Chapter 10).
Update references to “Future Functional Classification” to read “Proposed Functional
Classification”. Provide language to reinforce that Proposed Functional Classification maps are
for local planning purposes only (do not reflect the federally approved functional classification)
(Chapter 11).
Input from Phase III Open Houses:
Consider bike lanes on 1st Avenue East and West – 11th Street to 4th Street.
There are significant parking needs downtown; the LRTP should support a more detailed parking
analysis study.
The Grandview connection is critical for emergency management.
Evaluate prioritization/ranking of remaining bypass elements to ensure they are near the top.
Consider Sunnyview Lane and Grandview Drive (north‐south segment) as Major Collector, versus
Minor Arterial (especially considering Grandview connection); east‐west segment of Grandview
should remain Minor Arterial.
Comments from the City:
Final comments from the City are forthcoming.
A full final draft will be developed prior to the formal adoption and hearing process planed by the City
which starts on August 2, 2021.