Chapter 1Kalispell City Airport Feasibility/Master Plan Study August 1999
CHAPTER ONE - INVENTORY
EXISTING FACILITIES
Kalispell City Airport presently has one runway, designated 13-31 with one full parallel
taxiway (on the east side of the runway) and one partial parallel (2,300 feet long, on the west side).
Pavement strengths are unknown, but presumed light duty (less than 12,500 single wheel loading
(SWL)). Runway dimensions are 3,600 feet in length x 60 feet wide.
The Runway Protection Zones (RPZ) are the trapezoidal areas located 200 feet from the
thresholds of each runway. FAA AC 15015300-13 Airport Design specifically prohibits residences
inside the RPZ, it also encourages the airport sponsor to own the RPZ entirely. The RPZ for
Runway 13 is 250 feet x 450 feet x 1,000 feet, and has serious land -use compatibility problems.
Some of the RPZ for Runway 13 is owned by private homeowners who live in residences inside the
RPZ. The RPZ for Runway 31 is also 250 feet x 450 feet x 1,000 feet and is also not owned by the
airport sponsor. There are, however, no residences in this RPZ.
The Runway Object Free Area (OFA) is 250 feet wide centered on the runway centerline and
extends 240 feet beyond the runway threshold.
The runway has stake mounted low intensity runway lights (LIRLs). These lights are
mounted on apparently non -frangible, concrete encased stakes. The taxiways have stake mounted
retro-reflective markers. There are no airport location signs on the airport.
There are two fueling aprons, one on each side of the runway. Red Eagle Aviation located
on the east side of the runway has a fueling apron that is approximately 10,000 square feet.
Diamond Aire has an approximately 45,000 square foot apron on the west side of the airport. There
are two fueling islands (Diamond Aire and Red Eagle Aviation) and three fuel trucks available to
service local and itinerant traffic (Diamond Aire, Red Eagle Aviation, and Eagle Aviation.)
Presently, aircraft use home-made tie -downs to park in the grass along the edges of the
fueling aprons. Overall, there are 68 tie -downs available.
There are two nested Tee hangars and eight commercial hangars (including one helicopter
hangar) located at the airport. The two nested Tee hangars have a storage capacity of six aircraft
each. Of the commercial hangars, Diamond Aire owns one, Red Eagle Aviation owns one (plus one
of the storage hangars), one is owned by Sky Corral Air Service, Mountain West Helicopters leases
one, Eagle Aviation leases one, and three more are owned by unknown parties.
See the airport layout plan in Appendix D.
W
Kalispell City Airport Feasibility/Master Plan Study August 1999
RUNWAY LENGTH
Factors considered when determining runway length is family of aircraft regularly using the
airport, the mean maximum temperature of the hottest month of the year, and altitude of the airport.
Airports are usually developed in phases and in the first phase the runway is designed so that 75%
of all aircraft in the design fleet may depart on during the hottest month of the year. Later, the
runwayis extended to its intermediate length where 95% of the aircraft in the design fleet may depart
during the hottest month of the year as more demanding aircraft use the field. Finally, when the
most demanding aircraft in the design family use the airport regularly, the runway is extended to its
ultimate length so that 100% of the aircraft in the design family may depart during the hottest month
of the year. Runway lengths for Kalispell City Airport are shown below:
Initial Development 75% of the fleet
3,600 feet
Intermediate Development 95% of the fleet
4,300 feet
Ultimate Development 100% of the fleet
4,700 feet
At Kalispell City Airport the ultimate development is shown as 4,700 feet (100% of the
fleet). Generally the larger the aircraft, the more demanding it is, and the noisier it is. The product
of the FAA Runway Length software is included in Appendix G.
DESIGN STANDARDS
The following table illustrates a comparison of design standards of the B-I Airport Reference
Code and the B-II Airport Reference Code.
6
Kalispell City Airport Feasibility/Master Plan Study August 1999
TABLE 1 -DESIGN STANDARDS FOR BI AND BII AIRCRAFT
AIRPLANE DESIGN GROUP
ITEM
I
II
Runway Width
60 ft
75 ft
18m
23)m
Runway Shoulder Width
10 ft
loft
3m
3m
Runway Blast Pad Width
80 ft
95 ft
24m
29m
Runway Blast Pad Length
100 ft
150 ft
30m
45m
Runway Safety Area Width
120 ft
150 ft
36m
45m
Runway Safety Area Length
240 ft
300 ft
Beyond RW End
72 in
90 m
Runway Object Free Area Width
400 ft
500 ft
120 in
150 in
Runway Object Free Area Length
240 ft
300 ft
Beyond RW End
72 in
90 m
Taxiway Separation Width
225 ft
240 ft
67 in
72 in
AC 15015300-13 CH4, Table 3.1, Runway design standards for aircraft approach category A & B visual runways and runways with not lower than
3/4-statute mile (1 200 m) approach visibility minimums.
Kalispell City Airport Feasibility/Master Plan Study August 1999
Figure 1 Aerial Photo of Kalispell City Airport
N.
LAND USE AND ZONING
Zoning and Land Use is discussed
in more detail in Chapter Three. The
current zoning resolution in force
establishes airport perimeter boundaries.
Height restrictions have been in place since
1980. The current zoning resolutions
protect the PAR Part 77 imaginary surfaces
of a B-1 small aircraft airport, and may
require further amendment if a B-11
facility is developed.
GROUND ACCESS, CIRCULATION
AND PARKING
The airport presently can be
accessed from U.S. Highway 93 on the
east, from Airport Road on the west, 18`h
Street West on the north, and a private road
on the south.
There is a partial perimeter fence
on the east side which was erected as the
outfield fence for the four Little League®
fields. A similar fence separates the
landing field from the soccer fields located
immediately west of the landing field. No
other fences exist.
Parking is unrestricted on the
airport; however, parking is generally
confined to close proximity of the fixed
base operators (FBO).
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA
This subject will be discussed in
detail in Chapter Three of this study.
Kalispell City Airport Feasibility/Master Plan Study August 1999
AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT
There are two classes of airways in the United States, "Victor" and "Jet". Victor airways
extend from minimum en route altitude or minimum safe altitude up to 18,000 feet above mean sea
level (MSL). Jet routes extend upward from 18,000 feet MSL. Victor airways are also known as
the very high frequency omnirange, (VOR) system or low altitude federal airways.
There are apparently no published military training routes located near Kalispell. This is
subject to change. Generally, military training routes are shown on sectional aeronautical charts.
Figure 2 shows the current location of Victor airways and military training routes in the
vicinity of Kalispell. Figure 3 is copied from the Great Falls Sectional Aeronautical Chart (541h
Edition, January 29, 1998) which became obsolete on the publication of the next edition on July 16,
1998.
The airspace in the greater Kalispell area is Class E airspace with floor elevation 700 feet
above the surface and is controlled by the Air Traffic -Control Center in Salt Lake City, Utah.
METEOROLOGICAL DATA
According to the Glacier Park International Airport Master Plan Update conducted by
CH2M Hill in 1995, visual flight rules (VFR) weather occurs in the Flathead Valley 92% of the
time.
During 12 mile per hour winds, Runway 12-30 provides 93.01 % coverage. It is assumed that
the Kalispell City Airport Runway 13-31 provides similar coverage. Federal Aviation
Administration design guidance emphasizes the desirability of airport runways providing wind
coverage 95% of the time. In fact, in some cases the FAA will fund construction of a crosswind
runway where 95% wind coverage is not possible with one runway; however, given the proximity
of Glacier Park International Airport, development of a crosswind runway at Kalispell City Airport
is not expected.
FINANCIAL DATA
Cost estimates for development of Kalispell City Airport to B-II Non -Precision Instrument
(NPI) standards at its present location, and for similar development at a "generic" location in the
vicinity ofKalispell, are included in Appendix C. The following notes and assumptions are in effect.
Land acquisition expenses account 45% of the development costs at the existing
location, and are based on recent land sales in the vicinity of the airport.
• Development costs at both locations include $622,000 for Tee hangar and pilot
lounge development, which is neither required nor eligible for Federal funds.
0
t x
..wr
� r $
j III
-..
y
Loren
t:
s
N
Area Airspace
and Airports
Other than hard -surfaced runway
VOR-nMF
OHard
-surfaced runway 1500 ft. to 8069 ft. in length
Non -Directional Radiobeacon
®Private
"(Pvt)" - Non-public use having emergency or
—
Class E Airspace
d
landmark value.
Obstruction with high -intensity lights. May operate
Q
Unverified
part-time
j�
Airport with services during normal working hours
M
Group Obstruction
�T
depicted by ticks around basic airport symbol
Glider Operations
�r
Rotating airport beacon in operation sunset to sunrise
I T-r"r Compass
.
Kalispell City Airport Feasibility/Master Plan Study August 1999
• Land acquisition at a new location is expected to be eligible for Federal participation,
even though there has been no such commitment from the Federal Aviation
Administration.
• Land acquisition and obstruction removal, although generally considered an eligible
expense, is not eligible at present location (see Helena Airports District Office letter
to Clarence Krepps, dated February 21, 1997, Appendix F).
• Earthwork, drainage, and pavement assumes 1.88 feet deep ditches on both sides of
the runway, subsurface drains, 1 foot deep excavation, a layer of geotextile fabric,
9 inches of crushed aggregate base course, and 3 inches aggregate -bituminous
surface course (pavement).
• The total acreage required for acquisition at the present location is 64.20 acres, which
is the minimum required to protect the Runway Object Free Area (OFA) and the 7:1
transitional surface; however, the FAA has agreed that this amount may be reduced
so that only the OFA is protected. This would require 53.96 acres.
AVIATION ACTIVITY, SOCIO-ECONOMIC, AND DEMOGRAPHIC DATA
One of the most difficult tasks of conducting an inventory of existing facilities is accurately
determining the current level of aviation activity. The importance of this data cannot be overstated,
since they are the basis of forecasts of future aviation demand, and these forecasts are used to
determine facility requirements.
There are many possible sources for this information, for this study FAA Form 5010 Airport
Master Record, first-hand observation, and a survey of local area pilots.
The FAA Form 5010 Airport Master Record for Kalispell City Airport dated August 13,
1998, is included in Appendix E. Form 5010 indicates that there are 56 single -engine aircraft, three
multi -engine aircraft, one helicopter, one sailplane, and three ultralights. It further indicates that
there are 6,400 air taxi,13,600 general aviation (GA) local,14,000 GA itinerant, and 1,000 military
air operations.
In May 1998, Morrison-Maierle personnel observed 38 single -engine aircraft, six multi -
engine aircraft, and three sailplanes tied down at Kalispell City Airport. Additionally, there are 18
hangar spaces which are assumed to be occupied, although occupancy was not confirmed. No
helicopters nor ultralight aircraft were observed. Although a number of air operations were
observed, these observations were insufficient to confirm or deny the operations estimates from
FAA Form 5010. All aircraft observed were small airplanes with wingspans less than 49 feet.
7Air operations are defined as one takeoff, one landing, or one touch-and-go.
11
Kalispell City Airport Feasibility/Master Plan Study August 1999
In July 1998, Morrison-Maierle surveyed 223 local area pilots, and received 96 responses.
The objectives of the survey were to:
1. Determine the most demanding aircraft that regularly uses the Kalispell City Airport
(defined as at least 500 take -offs, landings, or touch-and-gos).
2. Determine the total number of air operations per year.
3. Determine the total number of based aircraft.
4. Determine the average stage length for aircraft departures.
5. Determine primary reason for use of Kalispell City Airport.
6. Determine how many passengers are carried from Kalispell City Airport.
7. Determine level of interest for hangar development at Kalispell City Airport.
8. Determine average maximum acceptable hanger lease rate.
Survey respondents indicated a wide variety of small aircraft, all with gross weights less than
12,500 and wingspans less than 49 feet. Twenty respondents indicated that they base their aircraft
at Kalispell City Airport. The total air operations, based on the survey response, is 16,271.
Respondents indicated they carry on passengers every other time they fly, on average. Thirty nine
respondents indicated that they would be interested in leasing hangar space on the airport, and the
average maximum acceptable rate would be $115 per month. A summary of survey response is
included in Appendix H.
A monthly distribution of annual air operations may be computed using fuel sales at the
airport. City Service, Inc supplies bulk fuel for all three fuel retailers on the airport. The table below
shows the total fuel shipped to retailers on the airport over a three year period on a monthly basis.
12
Kalispell City Airport Feasibility/Master Plan Study August 1999
TABLE 2 FUEL SALES TO KALISPELL CITY AIRPORT (Gallons)
1995
1996
1997
Monthly
Average
Monthly
Average as a
Percent of
Annual Total
January
1,749
175
2,791
1,572
2.95
February
1,071
886
592
850
1.59
March
2,767
3,473
2,546
2,929
5.49
April
2,295
2,081
1,332
1,903
3.57
May
2,790
2,450
0
1,747
3.28
June
14,928
5,518
7,889
9,445
17.71
July
9,536
16,060
9,454
11,683
21.91
August
6,999
14,081
4,983
8,688
16.29
September
6,715
5,992
12,841
8,516
15.97
October
1,772
2,619
2,424
2,272
4.26
November
958
704
0
554
1.04
December
1,089
528
7,888
3,168
5.94
Total
52,669 54,567
52,740
53,325 l:0::0:-:E011
Source: City Service, Inc., Kalispell, MT
13