10-29-20 Technical Advisory Committee Agenda
Development Services
201 1st Avenue East
Kalispell, MT 59901
Phone: (406) 758-7940
Fax: (406) 758-7739
www.kalispell.com/planning
KALISPELL TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE
The Kalispell Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) will meet on Thursday, October 29, 2020 starting at
1:30 p.m. in the MDT 2nd Floor Conference Room at 85 5th Ave EN in Kalispell. A final agenda is
provided below.
The agenda for the meeting will be:
A. Call to order and roll call
B. Approval of minutes of June 17, 2020 meeting
C. Comments from the Public
D. Old Business
- Use of urban funding for the section of Whitefish Stage north of Reserve that is designated as
urban.
- Consideration of new committee member Tom Schneider
Tom Schneider is the Transportation Manager for Eagle Transit. Eagle Transit has served as Flathead
County’s public transportation provider since the early 1980’s. Tom has been with Flathead County since 2017 and
began as the Glacier Park Lead of operations for the Glacier Shuttle system. In 2018 he moved into the position of
transportation manager. Tom Schneider began working in Public Transportation 6 years ago as a driver for Community
Transit in Everett Washington. Before that he worked as a Traffic Control Supervisor for the HOV expansions throughout
the Seattle area in the 1990’s.
- 2006 Transportation Plan update (see materials attached)
- Kalispell Bypass
- Dern/West Springcreek intersection with Hwy 2
- West Reserve Drive
E. New Business
F. Set next meeting date
G. Adjournment
1
201 1st Avenue East, P.O. Box 1997,
Kalispell, MT 59903-Phone (406)758-7720 www.kalispell.com
To: Kalispell Area Technical Advisory Committee
From: Susie Turner, P.E., Public Works Director
Re: Kalispell Area Transportation Plan Update
Meeting Date: October 29,2020
BACKGROUND: The City of Kalispell (City) and the Montana Department of Transportation (MDT) with assistance from the Kalispell Transportation Coordinating Committee (TCC) are working towards updating the Greater Kalispell Area Transportation Plan (PLAN). The PLAN provides an update to the current 2007 Kalispell Urban Area Transportation Plan. The planning process has been ongoing since mid-September of 2019 and is anticipated to be completed towards the 2nd quarter of 2021. To date, KLJ has completed several draft sections and continues to progressively work on the remaining
sections to complete the PLAN. The objective of this meeting is to inform TCC of the progress, provide preliminary information generated as part of updating the PLAN, and review the next steps in the planning process. Wade Kline, KLJ Project Manager, will present on the PLAN’s progress, as outlined
below, and provided in the enclosed summary power point presentation.
• Public Engagement to Date
o In the spring of 2020, the project team held a series of Listening Sessions to gather input and
guidance from the public and key stakeholders on the existing transportation systems.
o Deployment of an online issues and needs survey which elicited nearly 150 responses from
the public.
o Deployment of project website awww.kalispellmove2040.com
o Over the summer of 2020, outreach was made to several community groups and
organizations to keep them apprised of the plan development process.
• Existing Conditions
o A detailed Existing Conditions report was prepared and is currently undergoing final
technical edits based on comments from the City and MDT. This report outlines existing
conditions for a broad range of transportation assets within the study.
• Projected Conditions
o Move 2040 PLAN has a planning horizon looking out to the year 2040.
o The first step in the growth projecting process was to establish geographic growth
assumptions within the study area. Three geographic growth areas were used and account for
all current jurisdictions in the planning area, including Kalispell, Evergreen, and the
remainder of Flathead County within the study area.
o Household Growth: Overall household growth within the Study Area was projected to grow
by 2.4%, or nearly 9,300 households.
2
201 1st Avenue East, P.O. Box 1997,
Kalispell, MT 59903-Phone (406)758-7720 www.kalispell.com
o Employment Growth: Employment
growth was projected for Move 2040 for each of the geographic segments. Overall
employment growth for the study area was projected at 1.9%. Total employment growth is
estimated to be nearly 11,700 over the life of the planning horizon.
o Travel Model Development: MDT provided a calibrated travel demand model for the year
2017 to replicate existing traffic conditions in the study area. Previously discussed
employment and household projections were added to the travel demand model and modeled
to the year 2040. This resulted in the 2040 Existing plus Committed (E+C) model for the
study area. The 2040 E+C model output generated volumes, capacity, and the resulting
volume to capacity ratios (VC) and levels of service (LOS). The 2040 E+C model
demonstrates future transportation conditions in the study with projected growth, without the
addition of any new improvement beyond those committed by the MDT State Transportation
Improvement Program (STIP), the Kalispell Capital Improvement Program (CIP), or
improvement planned by Flathead County.
• Alternatives Analysis
o As part of Move 2040, an alternative analysis was completed to evaluate a range of 9
different alternatives, some of which consider sub alternatives which combined various base
alternatives. In total, 13 alternative models were ran. Alternatives were designed to replicate
the potential improvement to a corridor or set of corridors for the purposes of evaluating the
relative benefit of those improvements. Each alternative considered the addition of one or
more changes to the transportation system in the Move 2040 PLAN study area.
o The results of each alternative will be evaluated against area wide travel indicators such as
vehicle miles traveled (VMT), vehicle hours traveled (VHT) and miles of congested
roadways. Congested roadways were defined as segments of roadway with a level of service
(LOS) of D, E or F. Alternatives were also evaluated against corridor level travel indicators
such as change in annual daily traffic (ADT) and volume to capacity (V/C) or LOS.
o Preliminary results are currently being evaluated by the project committee; however, an
initial areawide summary will be provided as part of this work session to the Council.
• Project Identification
o A range of needed transportation improvements will be highlighted as part of the
development of the Transportation System Management (TSM) and Major Street Network
(MSN) elements for the PLAN.
o Transportation System Management (TSM) Projects: The TSM project list reflects
intersection level improvements which responds to both safety and traffic operation related
issues at an isolated location, typically an intersection. TSM projects are developed based on
a review of more localized existing and projected conditions.
o Major Street Network (MSN) Projects: The MSN project list reflects larger corridor level
improvements aimed at both improving existing corridors or upgrading corridors which are
projected to require a higher standard related to safety and operations.
3
201 1st Avenue East, P.O. Box 1997,
Kalispell, MT 59903-Phone (406)758-7720 www.kalispell.com
• Bike & Pedestrian Plan
o The PLAN integrates the generalized set of system needs identified in the current bike and
pedestrian plan developed by the City of Kalispell. An additional layer of screening was
applied to prioritize and stratify existing and projected bicycle and pedestrian needs. This
process used growth factors and system needs identified by the Move 2040 PLAN. The bike
and pedestrian element of Move 2040 prioritizes projects at a corridor level and established
individual priorities for a range of facility types.
• Policy Plan and Goals Development
o A final element of the PLAN will include the development of a Policy Plan inclusive of a
series of goals and objectives to guide future transportation planning decisions. The document
will be based on projected needs in the study area and constructed from a series of existing
growth policy plans, community development, land use and transportation related
infrastructure plans. This element of the plan has not yet been developed for committee
review.
• Pending Public Engagement
o Two additional public input opportunities are anticipated prior to completion of the PLAN’s
planning process.
o The next round of meetings will provide the public an opportunity to comment on and
prioritize the initial list of projects identified by the planning process, including a review of
the more detailed alternatives analysis. Originally scheduled for the fall of 2020, the timing of
these meetings are currently being reviewed.
o The final round of public input would entail the full Draft PLAN and required public
comment process. These meetings are anticipated in late spring 2021.
October 29, 2020
Kalispell Urban Area TAC
Project Overview
Existing System Data
Transportation Model
Projected Conditions
Alternatives Analysis
Project Identification
Project Schedule
Study Area
Covers the Kalispell Urban Area
Projected growth areas over the next 20
years to 2040
Considers Growth in:
City of Kalispell (and annexation areas)
Evergreen Census Designated Place (CDP);
Flathead County (portions of)
Crash Data
MDT 2014-2018 database
Flathead County – Clipped to Study Area
266 251 232 215 204
738 704
828 797
697
1014 983 1080 1033
918
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Crashes‐per‐Year
Injury Non‐Injury Total
Crash Rate/Severity Rate
Bike/Ped Systems & School Zones
Evaluating
existing systems
Bicycle
Pedestrian
School Zones
StreetLight Data
2018 average annual estimates
Daily Trips – Estimated 367,500 based on
33,000 devices scaled on pass-through
AADTs
Off peak season- 26% decline to 272,000
daily trips (Nov)
Peak season 9% increase in daily trips to
~400,000 (June-Aug)
3,800 Daily Pass-through trips
Pass through trips see a 25%
increase (+1,000 trips) in traffic
during the summer (June-August)
All Regional Routes see a summer
increase of 25% (+10,000 daily trips)
Regional Trips
10-20 miles
5-10 miles
US 93 South
US 2 North
US 93 North
MT 35
US 2 West
West Reserve
MT 424
Whitefish
Stage
5-10 miles
10-20 miles
17% (~1,500 trips/day) of northbound
US 93 and 8% (~800 trips/day) of
southbound US 93 traffic is pass
through.
2/3rds of this traffic uses the Bypass
versus US 93 through downtown
Kalispell.
Traffic using US 93 instead of US 93A
showed 87% of trips were less than 10
miles
Highway 93A (Kalispell Bypass)
62% of traffic has a trip length over 10
miles.
44% have between 10-20 mile trip lengths.
30% of eastbound traffic using West
Reserve is from the Bypass
West Reserve
Congestion/Travel Speeds
0 -10 MPH 10-20 MPH 20-30 MPH
20-30 MPH10-20 MPH
40 - 50 MPH 50 - 60 MPH
40 - 50 MPH 50 - 60 MPH
US 93 N
US 2
US 93 S
US 93A
Meridian
30% of Ped trips are downtown zones
27 and 28
Zone 10 & 11 includes Flathead Community College and Medical
Center (20%)
Multimodal Opportunity Areas
(Trips <1 mile)
27 28
11
Do
w
n
t
o
w
n
Do
w
n
t
o
w
n
Fl
a
t
h
e
a
d
C
C
Me
d
i
c
a
l
Ce
n
t
e
r
10
Travel Demand
Model
Replicates existing (2017) Conditions
Key inputs include:
Housing
Employment
Current roadway capacity
Supports identification of System
Deficiencies
Households
(2017)
Current housing distribution
MDT Travel Model
Total HH’s = 17,579
Households
2017
Kalispell 12,831
Evergreen 3,356
Balance of Study Area 1,392
Total 17,579
Employment
(2017)
Current allocation of employment
Total Employment = 27,432
Employment split between retail and non-
retail (23% - 77%)
Employment 2017
Kalispell 22,072
Evergreen 3,999
Balance of Study Area 1,361
Total 27,432
Base (2017) Model
Level of Service (LOS)
Measured as volume to
capacity (V/C)
Generally simulates
existing peak
congestion
Split Study Area into Three (3) Distinct Geographies
Boundaries “smoothed” to match MDT Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs)
Kalispell
2015 Annexation Boundary
Evergreen
Census Defined Place (CDP)
Balance of Study Area
Growth Allocation
Households
Kalispell 2.5%
Evergreen - 2.3%
Balance of the Study Area 1.9%
Total Study Area – 2.4%
Growth Projections - Methods & Assumptions
Household Growth 2018-2040
Growth Allocation
Households
2017 2040 Change Annual %
Kalispell 12,831 19,836 7,005 2.5%
Evergreen 3,356 5,028 1,672 2.3%
Balance of Study Area 1,392 1,970 578 1.9%
Total 17,579 26,834 9,255 2.4%
Households
2017 2040 Change Annual %
Kalispell 12,831 19,836 7,005 2.5%
Evergreen 3,356 5,028 1,672 2.3%
Balance of Study Area 1,392 1,970 578 1.9%
Total 17,579 26,834 9,255 2.4%
Growth Allocation
Household Growth 2018-2040
Employment
Kalispell 2.1%
Evergreen 1.2%
Balance of Study Area 2.3%
Total Study Area – 1.9%
Growth Projections - Methods & Assumptions
Employment Growth 2018-2040
Growth Allocation
Employment
Employment 2017 2040 Change Annual %
Kalispell 22,072 32,031 9,959 2.1%
Evergreen 3,999 5,022 1,023 1.2%
Balance of
Study Area 1,361 2,057 696 2.3%
Total 27,432 39,110 11,678 1.9%
Employment Growth 2018-2040
Growth Allocation
Employment
Employment 2017 2040 Change Annual %
Kalispell 22,072 32,031 9,959 2.1%
Evergreen 3,999 5,022 1,023 1.2%
Balance of
Study Area 1,361 2,057 696 2.3%
Total 27,432 39,110 11,678 1.9%
KBP/Foys Lake Road
US 2/Dern Road
Rose Crossing - US 93 to Whitefish Stage
Three Mile Dr/West Spring Creek
Note: Several other projects are pending/programmed locally, but are not integrated into the travel modeling process.
Existing + Committed
Projects
2017 vs. 2040EC – Areawide
2017 vs. 2040EC – Inset
Projected Conditions
Detailed Evaluation between 2017 and 2040EC
Compare change in VMT & VHT
ID “hot spots”
Grow existing intersection operations to year 2040
Grow intersections based on delta between 2017 and 2040 models for each intersection
Outline the full impact of No Build
Set stage for Project Development (MSN + TSM)
2017 2040 % Change
VMT 733,000 1,325,942 80.9%
VHT 24,500 34,912 42.5%
Projected Conditions
Model Year 2017 % Total 2040 E+C % Total Difference
(Miles)
Total
System*
Miles LOS A‐C 401.11 96.2 378.38 90.5 ‐22.73
Miles LOS D‐F 15.83 3.8 39.9 9.5 24.07
LOS By
System†
NHS
Miles LOS A‐C 31.56 72.8 21.41 50.1 ‐10.15
Miles LOS D‐F 11.8 27.2 21.37 50.1 9.57
Total 43.36 100 42.78 100 ‐0.58
Primary
Miles LOS A‐C 0.27 15.6 0.27 15.6 0
Miles LOS D‐F 1.46 84.4 1.46 84.4 0
Total 1.73 100 1.73 100 0
Secondary
Miles LOS A‐C 10.59 100.0 9.4 88.3 ‐1.19
Miles LOS D‐F 0 0.0 1.25 11.7 1.25
Total 10.59 100 10.62 100 ‐0.06
Urban
Miles LOS A‐C 43.19 96.1 37.67 84.2 ‐5.52
Miles LOS D‐F 1.76 3.9 7.09 15.8 5.33
Total 44.95 100 44.76 100 0.19
NHS: Congested corridors are concentrated along Highway 2,
Highway 93, and Highway 93A in both 2017 and 2040.
75% of congested roadways (2017) are on the NHS; drops to 54%
(2040)
25% congested (2017); 50% congested (2040).
Primary: MT 35 is the only portion on the Primary System in
the study area. This area is congested in 2017 and remains
congested in 2040.
Secondary: In 2017 there is no congestion on the secondary
system, but that grows to roughly 10% congested (2040).
Lower congestion levels on the secondary system would make
sense given its more rural setting.
Urban: Very little current (2017) congestion, congestion
increase by 2040
11% of congested roadways in 2017 are on the Urban systems,
but by 2040 this increases to 18%.
Only 5% congestion (2017); almost 20% of the Urban system is
congested (2040)
Alternative Analysis
Summary
Highway 93A
Projected capacity meets demand, generally, with some capacity issues from Airport Road through Highway 2
Reduces congestion on Highway 93
Influences Meridian Road (more traffic)
Highway 93
Full build bypass dampens demandThree-lane diverts traffic; diversion even further with full bypass
Model not accounting for micro level improvements (right turn lanes, etc.), only accounting for center left
Not generally impacted by east side improvements
North – South Improvements (Willow Glen/7
th Street/LaSalle)
Attracts trafficImpacts localizedPositive and negative impacts on Highway 2 /Idaho
Don’t appear to have negative impacts on Woodland or Willow Glenn
East-West Improvements (Rose Crossing/Four Mile/Grandview)
Attract traffic from Whitefish Stage, Highway 93, etc
Position Helena Flats as a possible perimeter roadway
Pronounces the need for better east-west mobility
Draw more traffic to Highway 93ADon’t appear to greatly impact trouble spots on West Reserve (LaSalle to Highway 93)
Influence on Major street Network
Recommended improvements supported by alternatives analysis
Alternatives Analysis- Alternative 2A
Full Build 93A + Three Lane Main Street
Highway 93 (Main Street)
Traffic Reduction
Congestion remains, lessthan Alts 1 and 2
Meridian Road
Increase
Bypass influence
1st Ave E & W
Increase (both)
2nd/Conrad
Increase
Alternatives Analysis- Alternative 2A
Full Build 93A + Three Lane Main Street
Corridor Segments (Termini)
2040 E+C Alternative 2A
2040 E+C
ADT V/C LOS 2040 ADT 2040 V/C LOS ADT Change LOS Change
Hwy 93A
Hwy 93 Airport Road 15,100 0.99 E 18,300 0.60 A-C 21.2%-0.39
Airport Road Foys Lake 19,300 0.63 A-C 25,000 0.82 D 29.5% 0.19
Foys Lake Hwy 2 20,400 1.33 F 22,500 1.47 F 10.3% 0.14
Old Reserve Hwy 93 20,300 1.13 F 22,300 1.24 F 9.9%0.11
Hwy 93S
Hwy 93A Cemetery Road 24,000 0.75 A-C 19,100 0.59 A-C -20.4% -0.15
Cemetery Road 13th Street 20,400 0.72 A-C 15,500 0.55 A-C -24.0% -0.17
12th Street 10th Street 21,658 1.60 F 15,738 1.17 F -27.3% -0.44
Main Street (Hwy
93)
8th Street 9th Street 19,478 1.44 F 14,154 1.05 F -27.3% -0.39
6th Street 4th Street 20,131 1.36 F 14,547 0.98 E -27.7% -0.38
4th Street 2nd Street 21,058 1.42 F 15,856 1.07 F -24.7% -0.35
Montana Idaho (Hwy 2) 22,969 0.85 D 20,406 0.76 A-C -11.2%-0.09
Meridian Road 7th Street Center Street W 10,300 0.86 D 12,100 1.01 F 17.5% 0.15
Center Street W Idaho (Hwy 2) 11,200 0.85 D 12,400 0.94 E 10.7%0.09
Shady Lane MT 35 Conrad Drive 5,100 0.38 A-C 5,800 0.43 A-C 13.7%0.05
Conrad Drive Woodland Ave Willow Glen 4,500 0.44 A-C 6,300 0.62 A-C 40.0% 0.18
Willow Glen Shady Lane 8,300 0.61 A-C 10,200 0.75 A-C 22.9% 0.14
2nd Street East Woodland Dr.Main Street
(Hwy 93)5,300 0.44 A-C 6,300 0.53 A-C 18.9%0.08
Meridian Road Idaho (Hwy 2) Three Mile Road 11,700 0.65 A-C 12,700 0.71 A-C 8.5% 0.06
Three Mile Road Hwy 93 12,100 1.01 F 12,800 1.07 F 5.8% 0.06
1st Avenue E 12th Street 9th Street 3,500 0.39 A-C 3,600 0.40 A-C 2.9% 0.01
5th Street 3rd Street 3,900 0.43 A-C 4,200 0.47 A-C 7.7% 0.03
1st Avenue W 12th Street 9th Street 7,500 0.83 D 7,600 0.84 D 1.3% 0.01
5th Street 3rd Street 7,400 0.82 D 7,500 0.83 D 1.4% 0.01
Alternatives Analysis- Alternative 9
Combines Rose Crossing & Evergreen/Grand View
Whitefish Stage
Decrease
Hwy 93N
Decrease
Hwy 93A
Increase (north of two mile)
Hwy 2/Idaho
Decrease
MT 35
Decrease
Alternatives Analysis- Alternative 9
Combined Rose Crossing & Evergreen/Grandview/Four Mile
Corridor Segments (Termini)
2040 E+C Alternative 9
2040 E+C ADT V/C LOS 2040 ADT 2040 V/C LOS ADT Change LOS Change
Hwy 93A Three Mile Drive Four Mile Drive 24,000 0.67 A-C 26,900 0.75 A-C 12.1%0.08Hwy 93N Idaho (Hwy 2) Wyoming Street 29,800 1.10 F 26,700 0.99 E -10.4% -0.11
Four Mile
Drive/Evergreen
Helena Flats LaSalle/Hwy 2 3,700 0.36 A-C 5,500 0.54 A-C 48.6% 0.18Hwy 2/LaSalle Whitefish Stage 6,400 0.47 A-C 10,600 0.78 A-C 65.6% 0.31Hwy 93 Hwy 93A 2,300 0.23 A-C 6,800 0.52 A-C 195.7% 0.28
Hwy 93A Farm to Market Road 3,500 0.93 E 10,100 1.02 F 188.6%0.09
Three Mile Drive Farm to Market Road Hwy 93 10,000 0.74 A-C 8,200 0.60 A-C -18.0% -0.13
Stillwater Road Four Mile Drive West Reserve 1,500 0.40 A-C 1,000 0.27 A-C -33.3% -0.13
Springcreek Road Four Mile Drive West Reserve Drive 4,400 1.17 F 6,100 1.63 F 38.6% 0.45
Farm to Market (MT
424)Three Mile Drive Four Mile Drive 4,100 0.40 A-C 1,500 0.15 A-C -63.4% -0.25
Reserve Drive Spring Creek Drive Stillwater Road 9,500 1.06 F 6,800 0.76 A-C -28.4% -0.30
Hwy 93 Whitefish Stage 20,700 1.00 E 18,300 0.88 D -11.6% -0.12
Whitefish Stage Idaho (Highway 2) Evergreen 8,100 0.60 A-C 7,100 0.52 A-C -12.3%-0.07
Evergreen Reserve Drive 9,200 0.77 A-C 6,100 0.51 A-C -33.7% -0.26
Reserve Drive Rose Crossing 6,100 0.60 A-C 5,000 0.49 A-C -18.0% -0.11
Helena Flats MT 35 Evergreen Drive 9,100 0.89 D 11,200 1.10 F 23.1% 0.21
Rose Crossing
Helena Flats LaSalle (Hwy 2) 5,300 1.25 F 4,600 0.61 A-C -13.2% -0.63
Lasalle (Hwy 2) Whitefish Stage 2,500 0.48 A-C 5,600 0.30 A-C 124.0% -0.17Whitefish Stage Hwy 93 5,300 1.01 F 9,300 0.50 A-C 75.5%-0.51
Hwy 93N Meridian Road Four Mile Drive 38,000 1.41 F 36,300 1.34 F -4.5% -0.06Four Mile Drive West Reserve 26,400 0.98 E 24,600 0.91 E -6.8% -0.07
Hwy 2 (Idaho)
Main Street (Hwy 93) 3rd Avenue EN 24,400 0.90 E 22,100 0.82 D -9.4% -0.09
3rd Avenue EN 7th Avenue
EN/Whitefish Stage 25,600 0.95 E 23,500 0.87 D -8.2% -0.08
7th Avenue
EN/Whitefish Stage Woodland Park 23,300 0.86 D 21,800 0.81 D -6.4% -0.06
Woodland Park LaSalle/MT 35 27,100 0.89 D 25,800 0.84 D -4.8% -0.04LaSalle (Hwy 2)Idaho/MT 35 Evergreen 23,300 0.73 A-C 25,300 0.79 A-C 8.6% 0.06MT 35 Shady Lane Helena Flats 12,000 0.88 D 10,800 0.79 A-C -10.0% -0.09Three Mile Drive Hwy 93 Meridian Road 4,500 0.33 A-C 4,100 0.30 A-C -8.9% -0.03Stillwater Road Three Mile Drive Four Mile Drive 1,300 0.31 A-C 1,400 0.33 A-C 7.7% 0.02
Project
Identification
Review 2010 Major Street Network (MSN)& Transportation System Network Projects
Remove completed
Reevaluate existing
Development of New Projects
Analysis Overlay
Projected HH and Employment
High Crash Locations
Severe Crashes
Projected Level of Service
Project
Identification
Major Street Network
Larger corridor level improvements
Improving existing corridors
Upgrading corridors which are projected to
require a higher standard related to safety and
operations
Project
Identification
Transportation System Management (TSM)
Intersection level improvements
Responds to safety and traffic operations
Based on a review of more localized existing
and projected conditions.
Bike/Ped
Analysis
Methodology
Types of connection
School connectivity
Non-vehicular crashed
Multi-modal equity
Developing a range of facility types
Sidewalks
Shared Use Path
Shared Road
Bike Lane
Next Steps & Progress Report
Major Task Status Completion Data
Existing Conditions 100% 15-Oct
Projected Conditions SRC review 30-Oct
Alternative Analysis
75% complete; memo
development following
SRC#7
30-Oct
Project Identification 70%; missing project cost
estimates 15-Nov
Bike & Pedetrian Element 80% 15-Nov
Financial Summary 90% 30-Oct
Policy Plan 50% 30-Nov
Public Meeting #2 pending pending
Draft Plan Public Meeting pending pending
Draft Plan NA 30-Mar
Final Plan NA 30-Jun