Loading...
01-19-11 Urban Renewal Agency MinutesKALISP L FOR BUSINESS. FOR LIFE. MONTAIVA City of Kalispell • www.kalispell.com AGENDA FOR 01/19/11 URA MEETING 4:00 AT CITY HALL CONFERENCE ROOM 1.) CALL TO ORDER: 2.) AGENDA: 3.) APPROVAL OF PRIOR MEETING SUMMARY OF ACTIVITIES: 4.) PUBLIC COMMENT: 5.) UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 201 1st Avenue East Kalispell, MT 59901 Phone: 406.758.7738 Fax: 406.758.7758 • City Attorney Memorandum regarding "Historical Outline of Old School Station". 0 Old School Station Budget. 6.) NEW BUSINESS: 7.) ADJOURN MEETING: I 201 1st Avenue East 1�,IFVNV,M118,00 L Kalispell, MT .7738 Phone: 406.758.7738 FOIL BUSINESS. Fort LIFE. MONM.5A `,4 Fax: 406.758.7758 City of Kalispell • www.kalispell.com SUMMARY OF ACTIVITIES OF 12/08/10 URA MEETING MEMBERS IN ATTENDANCE: Marc Rold — Chairman Tom Lund — Vice Chairman Richard Kuhl Shannon Nalty Suzanne Faubert OTHERS IN ATTENDANCE: City of Kalispell City Manager, Jane Howington City of Kalispell Community Development Manager, Katharine Thompson City of Kalispell RLF Manager; Wade Elder MEMBERS ABSENT: None Members had been E-Mailed an agenda for this meeting and a Summary of Activities of the 11/17/10 meeting prior to the meeting. The URA met on December 8, 2010 at 4pm at the City Hall upstairs conference room. Chairman Rold called the meeting to order. Reviewed the prior meetings "Summary of Activities" that was E-Mailed to members, the "Summary of Activities" was accepted as written. Public Comment: There was no public comment. Unfinished Business: Chairman Rold opened the discussion on the West Side TIF expansion possibility. Members had been sent an E-Mail from Jane Howington and a Memo from Wade Elder in their packets prior to the meeting that discussed the proposed boundaries of the expanded area, why this area is being proposed and potential projects and what revenues are expected in the upcoming year in the TIF. The URA committee reconfirmed it is generally in agreement of the proposed expanded area (subject to changes or modifications to the boundaries if determined later) and are willing to consider projects including the proposed concept of the Civic Center/Convention Center project. There are many more details before any final decisions are to be made. There was discussion regarding the upcoming Mayor's Summit in February in which there will be discussion about potential projects, including this proposed expanded area, to see if there are any partners or interest of others in the community. There was discussion about bonding for a feasibility study of the proposed expanded area as an option the committee would consider. New Business: Chairman Rold opened the discussion on Old School Station. Vice Chairman Lund would like to see the budget completed for the Old School Station financial worksheet that was provided at a previous meeting. Mr. Elder reported that he had a conversation with the bank that is financing this project and as far as they are concerned the developer is in good standings with them other than of course the real estate taxes and SID's they are behind on. Mr. Kuhl asked what happened with Glacier Investment Properties (GIP) request for funding from the West Side TIF. Ms. Howington commented that we have not heard a response from GIP regarding the special computer wiring improvements that were done to the interior of the building of $21,376 as we requested. GIP did have a meeting with the City Attorney and we will get a written response from the City Attorney to the URA. Next meeting: A tentative date was scheduled for 12/22/10, however if there were no items to discuss presented by 12/20/10 the meeting would be called off and the committee would meet in January 2011. End of Summary of Activities of 12/08/10. City of Kalispell Charles A. Harball Office of City Attorney City Attorney 201 First Avenue East P.O. Box 1997 Kalispell, MT 59903-1997 MEMORANDUM Date: January 3, 2011 To: Kalispell Urban Redevelopment Agency cc: Wade Elder, Jane Howington From: Charles A. Harball, Kalispell City Attorney Subject: Historical Outline of Old School Station re: TIF Tel 406.758.7709 Fax 406.758.7979 charball@kalispell.com At the time when the previous city manager, Jim Patrick, was searching for ways to bring business investment into the city, he discovered that an investor had purchased property south of the city with plans to construct a business park. He made contact with them and discussed the possibilities that the property may be annexed into the city so that the city might benefit from the increased tax base. The basic framework of the exchange was that the investor would pay the cost of running the utility infrastructure to the property and deed the utilities to the city when it was completed according to city specifications. The city would enter into a latecomer agreement with the investor such that properties hooking into the utility services would pay a fee to reimburse the investor for his outlay. Further, the city would cooperate with the financing of needed infrastructure within the business park by creating a special improvement district. Such a district is eligible for relatively attractive financing through the issuance of bonds for which the individual parcels within the park would be primarily responsible. Finally, the city would create an industrial tax increment district and a technology tax increment district within the park as an overlay to the SID. The intent was that the tax increment created by investment within the districts would create revenue that would be used to pay on the SID bond obligations. Memorandum Re: Old School Station — Historical Context January 3, 2011 Page - 2 Based upon these discussions the following occurred. The property known as Old School Station was annexed into the city and subdivided into 17 parcels. The owner of Old School Station constructed sewer and water conveyance from Four Corners on Highway 93 South and Cemetery Road to the Old School Station property according the city specifications and dedicated these utilities to the city. A latecomer agreement was executed. At the same time, the city created a special improvement district and issued bonds for the construction of public infrastructure within the subdivision. This included a water well with water and sewer conveyance, layout of other utilities, streetlights, roadways and right-of-way appurtenances. This construction was completed according to city specifications. Contemporaneous to this the industrial and technology tax increment districts were created such that the tax base was considered agricultural property and all improvement thereafter created tax increment. Particular to the plan and its execution are the following relevant incidents: Fun Beverage began construction of its facility within OSS prior to the completion of the utilities running to OSS or within the subdivision, and for that matter prior to the creation of the TIF districts. It was determined, at that time, after consultation with the Department of Revenue that Fun Beverage would not be an eligible activity for tax increment financing as it met neither criteria of industrial nor technology districts. Therefore neither tax increment district included the Fun Beverage parcel. Because the parcel did benefit from the infrastructure constructed for the subdivision it was included within the special improvement district. It is therefore obligated on the SID bonds. Because of long delays in the completion of the sewer and water facilities to OSS and reconciliation of those costs, the latecomer agreement was finally implemented long after it was expected. Fun Beverage therefore paid its latecomer connection fees pursuant to the agreement some time after actual hook up to the facilities. Glacier Investments constructed its facility sometime after the interior infrastructure of the SID was completed but prior to execution of the latecomer agreement. Once the latecomer fee was established, Glacier Investments paid that obligation. Inquiry was made to the city prior to its purchase and construction as to the statutory eligibility for tax increment financing. Consultation with Department of Revenue determined that its activities would be deemed legally eligible. In the meantime the city was attempting, with the assistance of bond counsel, to negotiate a master agreement with the owner of OSS regarding the utilization of TIF. Such an agreement would set out terms that investors would be able to rely upon to determine the value of investing in a parcel. The agreement would determine the criteria that businesses would need to meet in order to be eligible for TIF benefits. For a variety of reasons, this agreement has never been reached. Office of City Attorney City of Kalispell Memorandum Re: Old School Station — Historical Context January 3, 2011 Page - 3 Due to the downturn in the economy, when the investor seeking to construct a facility for FedEx in OSS came forward, it was determined to enter into a developer's agreement with him even though a master agreement had not been established with the OSS owners. This agreement essentially directed that increment created by the investment on that parcel would be dedicated to the SID obligation on that parcel. In order to complete the transaction the owners of OSS agreed to substantially buy down the SID obligation for that parcel as well. In the meantime Glacier Investments continues to seek an agreement which would allow it to share some of the benefits of its TIF district, at least to the extent that the FedEx parcel has been allowed. Glacier Investments chose to forge ahead with its purchase and construction without an agreement in place regarding the use of tax increment financing. As a result of this the city and other owners of parcels within OSS are benefitting from the increment that it has created. Looking through the lens that Glacier Investments views this situation there is no difference between it and the FedEx project other than an accident of time and change in economy. Office of City Attorney City of Kalispell